LT. COL. PRASAD SHRIKANT PUROHITversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2017 INSC 78421 August 2017Appeal(s) allowed
Lt. Col. Prasad Shrikant Purohit, a serving Army officer, was accused of conspiring with others to plant a bomb in Malegaon in 2008, resulting in six deaths. The case was investigated first by the Anti‑Terrorist Squad (ATS) and later by the National Investigation Agency (NIA), leading to divergent charge‑sheets, with t…
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusRATHIN DANDAPAT AND OTHERS
2015 INSC 59921 August 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The case arose from the killing of nine persons and injuries to many villagers in Netai, West Bengal, where the CBI investigated and filed a charge sheet against 21 accused, some of whom were absconders. After the charge sheet, several proclaimed offenders were arrested and the CBI sought police remand under Section 16…
PROF. K.V. RAJENDRANversusSUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CBCID SOUTH ZONE, CHENNAI & ORS.
2013 INSC 54521 August 2013Dismissed
Prof. K.V. Rajendran, an associate professor, alleged that a Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO) and other officials tortured him in 1998 and that the State police investigation was inadequate. He repeatedly approached the High Court seeking transfer of the investigation to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), but t…
STATE OF U.P.versusSANJAY KUMAR
2012 INSC 34521 August 2012Dismissed
The respondent, Sanjay Kumar, was convicted of raping and murdering an 18‑year‑old girl, Divya Rani, and was sentenced to death by the Sessions Court. The High Court of Allahabad commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment, holding that the case did not fall within the "rarest of rare" category. The State of Uttar…
KHURSHEED AHMAD CHOHANversusUNION OF TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND ORS. ETC.
2025 INSC 87621 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a police constable, was summoned to the Senior Superintendent's office and allegedly detained illegally for six days during which he suffered severe genital mutilation and other injuries, as confirmed by medical reports. His wife complained to the police seeking registration of an FIR against the officia…
VICTIM ‘X’versusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.
2025 INSC 87721 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned allegations that the Superintendent of a women’s protection home in Patna administered intoxicating substances to inmates and facilitated their sexual exploitation. The accused, respondent No.2, was granted bail by the Patna High Court despite the victim not being notified, contrary to Section 15A(3)…
STATE REPRESENTED BY DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICEversusK. N. NEHRU ETC.
2017 INSC 65921 July 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The State filed a criminal appeal against the discharge of K.N. Nehru, a former minister, and his wife under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The FIR alleged that they had amassed assets disproportionate to their known income, with the investigation also focusing on the income and assets of their son, Arun. Whil…
MS. EERA THROUGH DR. MANJULA KRIPPENDORFversusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.
2017 INSC 65821 July 2017Disposed off
The appeal concerned the interpretation of Section 2(d) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012, where the appellant, a mentally retarded adult, argued that "age" should include mental age so that she could be treated as a child. The Court examined the POCSO Act's objects and reasons, its d…
MR. ROBERT JOHN D'SOUZA AND OTHERSversusMR. STEPHEN V. GOMESANDANOTHER
2015 INSC 50621 July 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, directors of Mukka Welfare Society, were summoned in a criminal complaint alleging breach of trust and cheating in respect of a 1996 sale of society land. The complainant, not a member of the society, filed the complaint more than a decade after the deeds were executed, despite an earlier police investi…
A. SUBASH BABUversusSTATE OF A.P.& ANR.
2011 INSC 51421 July 2011Disposed off
The appellant, a Sub‑Inspector, married a woman (the second wife) by concealing that he was already married, collected money from her family and threatened them. The second wife filed a complaint alleging offences under Sections 494, 495, 417, 420 and 498A IPC. The High Court quashed the complaint under Section 498A, h…
MOHD. AYUB DARversusSTATE OF J & K
2010 INSC 41521 July 2010Dismissed
Mohd. Ayub Dar was convicted by a designated TADA court for conspiracy under Section 3(3) of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 and for murder under Section 302 of the Ranbir Penal Code, Samvat 1989. The conviction rested primarily on a confession recorded under Section 15 of the TADA Act, w…
STATE OF PUNJABversusKEWAL KRISHAN
2023 INSC 58321 June 2023Dismissed
The State of Punjab appealed the High Court's acquittal of Kewal Krishan, who had been convicted for murder under Section 302 IPC. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence: the deceased was last seen with the accused on 10‑12‑1998, the body was discovered on 12‑12‑1998, an alleged extra‑judicial confession to …
PADMAN BIBHARversusSTATE OF ODISHA
2025 INSC 75121 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant was accused of murdering his nephew after the two were last seen together at a river and later at a cashew field. The prosecution relied on the "last seen together" theory, a recovered stone alleged to be the weapon, and a motive based on alleged marital suspicions, but no direct evidence linked the appel…
MD. JAMILUDIN NASIRversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL
2015 INSC 31621 May 2014Disposed off
The case concerns a pre‑planned terrorist attack on the police guarding the American Centre in Calcutta on 22 January 2002, which resulted in five police deaths and multiple injuries. The accused, including Md. Jamiludin Nasir and Aftab Ahmed Ansari, were convicted under the waging‑war provisions of the IPC and various…
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusDAL SINGH & ORS.
2013 INSC 35221 May 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned the alleged murder of Kusum Rani, who was burnt alive by her parents‑in‑law. The prosecution relied primarily on the victim’s dying declaration recorded by an executive magistrate and a thumb impression on the FIR, along with medical evidence of 100 % burns. The High Court acquitted the accused, hold…
STATE OF RAJASTHANversusDARSHAN SINGH @ DARSHAN LAL
2012 INSC 24121 May 2012Dismissed
The State of Rajasthan convicted Darshan Singh for murder under Section 302 IPC based on the testimony of Geeta, a deaf‑and‑dumb eyewitness, whose statement was recorded in sign language through her father who acted as interpreter. The High Court set aside the conviction, holding that the witness and the interpreter we…
SACHINversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2025 INSC 51821 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant was convicted under the POCSO Act and sentenced by the Special Court to seven years of rigorous imprisonment. On appeal, the High Court and the Special Court altered the sentence to life imprisonment with a fine, leading the appellant to serve eleven years and eight months, exceeding the original term. Th…
SACHINversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2025 INSC 71621 April 2025Disposed off
The appellant was convicted under the POCSO Act and IPC for penetrative sexual assault on a four‑year‑old girl and sentenced to seven years' rigorous imprisonment. In his appeal against conviction, the High Court affirmed the conviction but, finding that the trial court had overlooked aggravated provisions, issued a sh…
SANJAY COLAROversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2025 INSC 68621 April 2025Disposed off
The appellant, Sanjay Colaro, was convicted under Sections 279 and 304A of the IPC for causing a fatal road accident by rash driving. He was sentenced to six months' simple imprisonment and a fine, which he appealed through the criminal appellate hierarchy up to the Supreme Court. The appellant argued that, given the l…
ANOOP BARTARIA & ETCversusDY. DIRECTOR ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE & ANR.
2023 INSC 41321 April 2023Dismissed
The petitioners, Anoop Bartaria and World Trade Park Ltd., challenged an Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) and a prosecution complaint filed under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA), arguing that they lacked knowledge that the funds they received were proceeds of crime and that such knowledge …
VIKAS CHAUDHARYversusTHE STATE OF DELHI
2023 INSC 41221 April 2023Case Partly allowed
The appellants were convicted for kidnapping, ransom, and murder of an 18‑year‑old victim, and were sentenced by the trial court to life imprisonment without remission for 30 years, a sentence affirmed by the Delhi High Court. The Supreme Court examined whether a trial court can impose a "special" or fixed‑term sentenc…
DAKKATA BALARAM REDDY & ANRversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR.
2023 INSC 41121 April 2023
The appellants, Dakkata Balaram Reddy and Chinapana Gopi, were convicted for the murder of Vetcha Kesava Rao's son and wife and for robbery of gold ornaments and cash, based largely on circumstantial evidence and the recovery of stolen property from their possession. The prosecution presented testimony of three indepen…
KANAKARAJAN @ KANAKANversusSTATE OF KERALA
2017 INSC 37721 April 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The case arose from a night-time religious procession at a temple where nine accused allegedly attacked the deceased Rajesh and the complainant Vinod (PW2), leading to Rajesh's death. One of the accused, A-2, was found dead hanging from a tree the next day, and the remaining eight were charged under IPC sections 143, 1…
FAZAR ALI & ORS.versusSTATE OF ASSAM
2017 INSC 37521 April 2017Dismissed
The appellants were convicted for murder under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the IPC for attacking the complainant's family with weapons, injuring them and preventing medical treatment, which led to the death of the complainant's brother. The FIR listed only five names but expressly mentioned that seven other pe…
SANTOSH S/O SHANKAR PAWARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2015 INSC 99021 April 2015Dismissed
The appellant, Santosh Pawar, was convicted of murdering his wife by pouring kerosene on her and setting her ablaze after suspecting infidelity. The prosecution relied on the victim's dying declaration, corroborating testimony of relatives and neighbours, and a post‑mortem report showing death from 60% burns. The appel…
MAKHAN SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2015 INSC 34121 April 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant was intercepted while driving a vehicle and, after refusing a search by a gazetted officer or magistrate, consented to a police search during which three bags containing 120 kg of poppy husk were seized. The prosecution’s case rested mainly on the testimony of official police witnesses, while two independ…
INDIAN BANK ASSOCIATION AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
2014 INSC 96321 April 2014Disposed off
The Indian Bank Association and other banking entities filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking uniform guidelines for the trial of cheque‑dishonour cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, alleging that despite the 2002 amendment (Sections 143‑147) courts were not following a uniform summ…
THIMMAREDDY & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2014 INSC 29821 April 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Karnataka charged eight persons with robbery and dacoity under Section 397 read with Section 120‑B IPC, alleging they conspired and used deadly weapons on a KSRTC bus. The trial court acquitted all accused, finding the prosecution failed to prove conspiracy and the identification of the accused was unrelia…
FAHIM KHANversusSTATE OF BIHAR NOW JHARKHAND
2011 INSC 32521 April 2011Dismissed
The appellant Fahim Khan and two others were accused of murdering Sagir Hasan Siddique. The trial court acquitted them, but the High Court set aside the acquittal, finding the trial court's judgment perverse and convicting the appellant. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined whether the High Court could interfere with …
SUDAM PRABHAKAR ACHATversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2025 INSC 37821 March 2025Case Partly allowed
The appellant Sudam Prabhakar Achat was convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for the death of his cousin Motiram Deoram Achat, based on testimony of relatives who witnessed a quarrel in which the appellant, armed with a stick, and a co‑accused, armed with the blunt side of an axe, assaulted the deceased…
SUNDAR @ SUNDARRAJANversusSTATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
2023 INSC 26421 March 2023Disposed off
The petitioner, Sundar, was convicted of kidnapping and murdering a seven‑year‑old child and sentenced to death by the trial court, a decision affirmed by the High Court and the Supreme Court. He filed a review petition alleging errors in the evidence, especially the admissibility of call‑detail records (CDRs) without …
GANGADHAR NARAYAN NAYAK @ GANGADHAR HIREGUTTIversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.
2022 INSC 31821 March 2022Matter referred to larger bench
The appellant, an editor, published a news report disclosing the name of a 16‑year‑old girl who was a victim of sexual harassment, leading to a complaint under Section 23 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO). The police investigated, filed a charge‑sheet and the Special Court took cognizance, …
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHversusOM PAL & ORS.
2018 INSC 25221 March 2018Dismissed
The State of Uttar Pradesh charged Om Pal and two others with murder under Sections 302 and 34 IPC for the death of Mahipal on 25‑03‑1993. The trial court convicted them based primarily on the testimony of the complainant (PW‑1) and two eyewitnesses (PW‑2 and PW‑3). On appeal, the Allahabad High Court acquitted the acc…
RAM KISHAN FAUJIversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
2017 INSC 23821 March 2017Appeal(s) allowed
Ram Kishan Fauji challenged the Haryana Lokayukta's recommendation to register an FIR and investigate alleged corruption. The Punjab & Haryana High Court, sitting as a Single Judge, quashed the recommendation and the FIR under a writ petition filed under Article 226. The State appealed the judgment via a Letters Patent…
NEERAJ KUMAR SAINY AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.
2017 INSC 23921 March 2017Dismissed
The appellants, who cleared the Uttar Pradesh Post Graduate Medical Entrance Examination but were not allotted seats in the first round of counselling, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to conduct second, third and mop‑up rounds of counselling as prescribed in the information brochure. The Hi…
YAKUB ABDUL RAZAK MEMONversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH CBI, BOMBAY
2013 INSC 17921 March 2013Disposed off
On March 12, 1993, a series of 12 bomb explosions occurred in Bombay, killing 257 people and injuring 713, with property damage worth Rs. 27 crores. The conspiracy was hatched by Tiger Memon and Dawood Ibrahim, with Yakub Abdul Razak Memon (A-1) playing a key role. The Designated Court convicted 100 accused, sentencing…
SANJAY DUTT (A-117)versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH CBI (STF), BOMBAY
2013 INSC 18221 March 2013Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined a series of appeals arising from the Designated Court's judgments in the 1993 Bombay bomb blast case under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA). The Court held that confessional statements recorded under Section 15 of TADA are substantive evidence admissible a…
M. VIJAYAKUMARversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU
2024 INSC 17721 February 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, M. Vijayakumar, was convicted under IPC sections 306, 342 and 365 for allegedly kidnapping and wrongfully confining the deceased, leading to the latter's suicide. The prosecution argued that the appellant’s abduction and confinement forced the victim to commit suicide, thereby satisfying the elements of …
RAM NATHversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.
2024 INSC 13821 February 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The petitioners, Ram Nath and others, challenged prosecutions under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for alleged adulteration and sale of noxious food, arguing that the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (FSSA) had an overriding effect. The State of Uttar Pradesh contended that simultaneous prosecut…
YOGESH UPADHYAY AND ANR.versusATLANTA LIMITED
2023 INSC 15021 February 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The petitioners Yogesh Upadhyay and Shakti Buildcon faced six complaint cases under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, filed by Atlanta Limited for dishonoured cheques relating to a single purchase transaction. Two of the cases were instituted in Nagpur because the cheques were presented through a …
JUHRU & ORSversusKARIM & ANR.
2023 INSC 14821 February 2023Case Partly allowed
The deceased Rukseena died by suicide after alleged dowry harassment, leading her brother to file an FIR against her husband, his mother, and the husband’s father‑in‑law, sister‑in‑law and brother‑in‑law. The investigating agency found no incriminating material against the three relatives and only charged the husband a…
SUNIL KUMAR RAI & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
2022 INSC 21221 February 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The petitioners, members of the Lohar community in Bihar, challenged a 2016 Bihar Government notification that authorised the issuance of Scheduled Tribe certificates to the Lohar (also referred to as Lohara) community, alleging it was illegal and violated their fundamental rights. They sought quashing of the notificat…
DATTATRAYA @ DATTA AMBO ROKADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2019 INSC 24721 February 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant was convicted of raping and murdering a five‑year‑old girl, with DNA evidence and an extra‑judicial confession establishing his guilt. The trial court sentenced him to death for murder and life imprisonment for rape, a sentence confirmed by the High Court. The Supreme Court examined whether the death pena…
TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL INDIA & ANR.versusSTATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR
2017 INSC 16721 February 2017Disposed off
Transparency International India and Centre for Media Studies filed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging contempt proceedings initiated by a Judicial Magistrate, Class I, Kangan, Jammu & Kashmir, against them for a study that alleged 92% of the lower judiciary in the State was corrupt. The magistrate issued a s…
THE STATE OF A.P. & ORS.versusM/S. STAR BONE MILL & FERTILISER CO.
2013 INSC 11621 February 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Andhra Pradesh (appellant) challenged a civil suit filed by Mis. Star Bone Mill & Fertiliser Co. (respondent) seeking declaration of title over a 3.525‑acre land. The respondent relied on a registered sale deed dated 11‑Nov‑1959 executed by M/s A. Allauddin & Sons, who were merely lessees of the State sinc…
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENTversusSUBHASH SHARMA
2025 INSC 14121 January 2025Dismissed
The Enforcement Directorate detained Subhash Sharma under a Look Out Circular at IGI Airport on 4 March 2022 and later took him into physical custody on 5 March 2022, but failed to produce him before the nearest magistrate within the statutory 24‑hour period. The High Court held that this breach of Article 22(2) of the…
STATE OF JHARKHANDversusDR. NISHKANT DUBEY & ORS.
2025 INSC 9421 January 2025Dismissed
The State of Jharkhand filed an FIR alleging that Dr. Nishkant Dubey and others forcibly entered the Air Traffic Control (ATC) room at Deoghar Airport, exerted pressure on officials, and caused an unsafe take‑off, invoking Sections 336, 447 and 448 of the IPC and Sections 10 and 11A of the Aircraft Act. The High Court …
LAXMI DASversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.
2025 INSC 8621 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Smt. Laxmi Das, mother of Babu Das, was charged under Section 306 read with Section 34 of the IPC for abetment of suicide of Souma Pal. The High Court upheld the charge against her, finding prima facie material that she had allegedly told the deceased she need not be alive. On appeal, the Supreme Court e…
MUSSTT REHANA BEGUMversusSTATE OF ASSAM & ANR.
2022 INSC 8021 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed
Mushtt Rehana Begum (appellant) sought to quash a criminal complaint filed by her husband (second respondent) under Sections 494 and 495 of the IPC, alleging that she married him while a prior marriage subsisted. The dispute over her matrimonial status had already been adjudicated by the Principal Judge of the Family C…
RAGINI DWIVEDI @ GINI @ RAGSversusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA
2021 INSC 3821 January 2021
Actress Ragini Dwivedi was arrested after a police search of her residence, which yielded only electronic devices and cigarettes, no narcotics. The prosecution relied on a statement by B.K. Ravishankar and alleged that she consumed drugs at parties, invoking Section 37 of the NDPS Act to deny bail, citing a total seizu…
REKHA SENGARversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2021 INSC 3721 January 2021Dismissed
The Supreme Court considered a Special Leave Petition filed by Rekha Sengar seeking bail under Section 439 of the CrPC after being charged in a non‑bailable offence under the PC&PNDT Act for alleged prenatal sex determination and sex‑selective abortion. A sting operation led to the seizure of an unregistered ultrasound…
PAULversusSTATE OF KERALA
2020 INSC 6921 January 2020Dismissed
Paul was married to Jessy and was accused of cruelty and of causing her death. The trial court initially acquitted him, but the Kerala High Court set aside the acquittal, remanded the case for further examination under Section 313 Cr.PC, and the trial court subsequently convicted him under Section 302 IPC, sentencing h…
DR NALLAPAREDDY SRIDHAR REDDYversusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS
2020 INSC 6821 January 2020Dismissed
The appellant, Dr Nallapareddy Sridhar Reddy, was originally charged under Section 498A IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. After the trial had proceeded, the public prosecutor filed an application under Section 216 of the CrPC to add charges of cheating (IPC ss. 406 and 420) based on an additional charge‑sheet filed in…
RAMESAN (DEAD) THROUGH LR. GIRIJA AversusTHE STATE OF KERALA
2020 INSC 6621 January 2020Appeal(s) allowed
Ramesan was convicted under Sections 55(a) and 55(g) of the Kerala Abkari Act and sentenced to two years' imprisonment and a fine of Rs.1 lakh for each charge. He appealed the conviction, but died while the appeal was pending. The Kerala High Court held that the imprisonment portion of the sentence became unworkable du…
DULESHWAR & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF M.P. (NOW CHHATTISGARH)
2020 INSC 6121 January 2020Disposed off
The case involved two violent incidents on 15 October 1998 in Kodebod, where a large group of armed men assaulted Dhanwaram, causing grievous injuries, and later beat Govind Singh to death. The trial court convicted ten of the eighteen accused under Sections 147, 148, 302/149 IPC, while acquitting eight, and the High C…
VINOD KUMARversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2015 INSC 95621 January 2015Dismissed
Vinod Kumar, an octroi inspector, was convicted under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs.500. The prosecution relied on the recovery of the tainted notes, the testimony of an independent clerk (PW‑6), a shadow witness (PW‑7) who was later declared ho…
SHATRUGHAN CHAUHAN & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2014 INSC 4621 January 2014Case Allowed
The Supreme Court entertained a batch of writ petitions filed under Article 32 by death‑row convicts and their families alleging that the executive had unreasonably delayed the disposal of their mercy petitions under Articles 72 and 161, and that other supervening circumstances such as mental illness, solitary confinem…
DEEPAK AGGARWALversusKESHAV KAUSHIK AND OTHERS
2013 INSC 4421 January 2013Appeal(s) allowed
Five candidates who were serving as Assistant District Attorneys, Public Prosecutors or Deputy Advocate General were selected for the post of Additional District and Sessions Judge in Haryana through direct recruitment. The Punjab and Haryana High Court quashed their appointments, holding that they did not satisfy the …
RABINDRA KUMAR PAL @ DARA SINGHversusREPUBLIC OF INDIA
2011 INSC 6321 January 2011Dismissed
The case concerns the 1999 arson and murder of Australian missionary Graham Staines and his two sons by a mob in Orissa. The trial court convicted fourteen accused, sentencing Dara Singh (A‑1) to death and the others to life imprisonment; the High Court modified Dara Singh's sentence to life imprisonment and acquitted …
M.R. AJAYANversusSTATE OF KERALA & ORS.
2024 INSC 88120 November 2024
The case arose from allegations that a piece of evidence (an underwear) seized in a 1990 NDPS case was tampered with after being released from judicial custody, leading to the conviction of an Australian national being set aside and a subsequent FIR being lodged against court staff and a junior lawyer for conspiracy an…
PRASHANTversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI
2024 INSC 87920 November 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant was charged under Sections 376(2)(n) and 506 of the IPC for an alleged forceful sexual relationship and intimidation, based on an FIR filed in 2019. The complainant claimed the appellant had threatened her and refused to marry her after a consensual relationship that began in 2017. The High Court rejected…
TARUN KUMARversusASSISTANT DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
2023 INSC 100620 November 2023Dismissed
The appellant, a Vice President of Purchases at Shakti Bhog Foods Ltd., was arrested under the fourth supplementary complaint filed under Sections 44 and 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) for alleged money‑laundering offences linked to a bank fraud investigated under the Prevention of Corruption…
PRIYA INDORIAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. ETC.
2023 INSC 100820 November 2023Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined applications for anticipatory bail filed by the husband and his family in a matrimonial cruelty case where the FIR was lodged in Rajasthan but the bail applications were made in Karnataka. The Court considered whether a High Court or Court of Session can grant anticipatory bail for an FIR out…
VENKATESAN BALASUBRAMANIYANversusTHE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, D.R.I. BANGALORE
2020 INSC 65220 November 2020Dismissed
Two offences under the NDPS Act were investigated – one for contraband recovered from a car in Hyderabad and another for contraband seized from a factory in Maharashtra. A combined complaint covering both offences was filed in the Special Court at Omerga on 6 July 2018, well within the 180‑day period prescribed for fil…
REKHA MURARKAversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR.
2019 INSC 126920 November 2019Disposed off
The appellant, a widow, sought to have her private counsel assist the prosecution in a murder trial by making oral arguments, examining and cross‑examining witnesses, invoking Section 301 read with the proviso to Section 24(8) of the CrPC. The trial court and the Calcutta High Court rejected the application, holding th…
STATE OF RAJASTHANversusRAMESH
2015 INSC 84520 November 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Rajasthan prosecuted Ramesh for the death of his daughter Sheela, alleging that he slapped her, took her inside the house and caused her death by strangulation and throttling. The defence claimed the death was a suicide by hanging. The trial court convicted Ramesh under Sections 302 and 201 IPC, but the Hi…
KRISHNA BHATACHARJEEversusSARATHI CHOUDHURY AND ANR.
2015 INSC 84820 November 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a wife, filed an application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 seeking seizure of her stridhan held by her husband after they were judicially separated. The trial court, Sessions Court and High Court dismissed the application on the grounds that she was no longe…
TAMIL NADU MERCANTILE BANK LTD.versusSTATE THROUH DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE AND ANR.
2013 INSC 76420 November 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined an appeal by Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank Ltd. against the Madras High Court's order quashing criminal proceedings under Section 482 of the CrPC against five non‑bank accused in a fraud case involving Rs 2.51 crore. The FIR and charge‑sheet alleged that the accused, in collusion with bank offic…
SANGEET & ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA
2012 INSC 52220 November 2012Case Partly allowed
Six persons, including appellants Sandeep and Narender, were convicted of murder, attempt to murder, rioting and other offences for the killings of Ranbir, Simla, Seema and a child, Rahul. The trial court sentenced the appellants to death and the others to life imprisonment; the High Court affirmed the death sentences.…
MUNILAKSHMIversusNARENDRA BABU & ANR.
2023 INSC 94320 October 2023Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined an appeal against the grant of regular bail to the accused (Respondent No.1) in a murder case involving sections 109, 120B, 201, 302, 450 and 454 IPC. After the bail was granted, key witnesses – the mother, sister and father of the deceased – turned hostile within twenty days, raising concern…
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.versusNARAYAN @ NARAYAN SAI @ MOTA BHAGWAN ASARAM @ ASUMAL HARPALANI
2021 INSC 65320 October 2021Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, convicted of multiple serious offences including rape and assault, applied for furlough under the Bombay Furlough and Parole Rules. The Director General of Police (DGP) rejected the application, citing the respondent's criminal conduct, threats to witnesses, illegal activities in jail, and the risk to p…
NASER BIN ABU BAKR YAFAIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.
2021 INSC 64920 October 2021Dismissed
An FIR was lodged on 14 July 2016 alleging that the accused had links with ISIS and were planning bombings under the UAPA. The Anti‑Terrorism Squad (ATS) of Nanded began investigation, arrested four persons and, on 8 September 2016, the Central Government directed the National Investigation Agency (NIA) Mumbai to take …
JASWANT SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.
2021 INSC 65020 October 2021Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Jaswant Singh was named in an FIR for alleged cheating and breach of trust under Sections 406 and 420 IPC, arising from a dispute over a promised job placement in Italy. The complainant later settled the matter with the main accused Gurmeet Singh, and the offence against him was compounded, but the procee…
YOGESH SINGHversusMAHABEER SINGH & ORS.
2016 INSC 97820 October 2016Appeal(s) allowed
Mohan Singh was murdered on 26 June 1982; his head was severed and the crime was witnessed by his daughter (a child) and his father. The trial court convicted six accused under Sections 302 and 149 of the IPC, but the Allahabad High Court later acquitted them, citing alleged delays in FIR dispatch, defects in the inque…
HARBEER SINGHversusSHEESHPAL & ORS.
2016 INSC 97720 October 2016Dismissed
The case arose from the murder of Balbir Singh on 21‑12‑1993, alleged to have been committed by Sheeshpal and his associates in a pre‑planned conspiracy. The trial court convicted the accused under Sections 302, 149 and 120B IPC, sentencing them to life imprisonment. On appeal, the High Court acquitted all accused, hol…
PANCHOversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2011 INSC 77320 October 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined the convictions of three accused (A1‑Pratham, A2‑Pancho and A3‑Gajraj) for murder and robbery of a tractor owner. The prosecution’s case hinged on an extra‑judicial confession made by A1, five months after the incident, to a villager with no close relationship, and on the belated recovery of …
SANSAR CHANDversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN
2010 INSC 71220 October 2010Dismissed
Sansar Chand, a long‑time organiser of illegal wildlife trade, was convicted under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 for receiving leopard skins. The prosecution’s case rested on an extra‑judicial confession by a co‑accused, Balwan, which was corroborated by oral and documentary evidence, including recovered hunting …
IRIDIUM INDIA TELECOM LTD.versusMOTOROLA INCORPORATED & ORS.
2010 INSC 71320 October 2010Appeal(s) allowed
Iridium India Telecom Ltd. filed a criminal complaint alleging cheating by Motorola Inc. (respondent No.1) for misleading investors about the Iridium satellite system. The Bombay High Court, invoking Article 227 and Section 482 of the CrPC, quashed the magistrate's process, holding that a corporation cannot possess the…
BHAGWAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.
2024 INSC 70820 September 2024Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined criminal appeals filed in the name of Bhagwan Singh, who alleged that his son‑in‑law and daughter had fabricated vakalatnamas, affidavits and other documents to lodge a Special Leave Petition and related proceedings without his knowledge, thereby attempting to falsely implicate Ajay Katara, a…
SHOOR SINGH & ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND
2024 INSC 71320 September 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased, Neelam, died from extensive burn injuries within seven years of her marriage to the son of the appellants, who were her father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law. The prosecution alleged that the accused demanded a motorcycle and Rs 50,000 as dowry and threatened her, invoking the presumption of dowry death under S…
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERSversusBHUPENDRA YADAV
2023 INSC 83720 September 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, Bhupendra Yadav, applied for a constable post in the Madhya Pradesh police and truthfully disclosed in his verification form that he had been tried for offences under IPC and the POCSO Act, but was acquitted by the trial court. The Superintendent of Police deemed him unfit on the ground of moral turpitu…
BHAGWAN NARAYAN GAIKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
2021 INSC 50320 September 2021Dismissed
The appellant, Bhagwan Narayan Gaikwad, was convicted under IPC s.326 read with s.149 for violently amputating the victim's right arm and leg in 1993. The High Court upheld the conviction and sentenced him to five years' rigorous imprisonment and a monetary compensation under CrPC s.357. After serving five months, the …
GHEWARCHAND & ORS.versusM/S MAHENDRA SINGH & ORS.
2018 INSC 84020 September 2018Case Allowed
The plaintiffs filed a civil suit in 1978 seeking declaration of title, a permanent injunction and possession of a property that had been attached by a City Magistrate on 23‑12‑1966. The trial court held the suit was within the limitation period and decreed in favour of the plaintiffs. The High Court reversed this, hol…
KISHOREBHAI GANDUBHAI PETHANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
2013 INSC 64220 September 2013Dismissed
The appellant was accused of tampering with a medical report and a complaint under Sections 463, 465, 468, 471 and 114 IPC was filed. The appellant sought to quash the complaint under Section 482 CrPC, arguing that the complaint was not maintainable unless filed by the court under Section 195 CrPC. The High Court rejec…
VYAS RAM @ VYAS KAHAR & ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR
2013 INSC 64320 September 2013Case Partly allowed
The Supreme Court examined the conviction of three accused—Vyas Ram, Naresh Paswan and Sugai Mochi—under TADA and several IPC provisions for a 1992 massacre that killed 35 people. The Court found serious investigative flaws, including non‑examination of the informant, absence of a test identification parade and delayed…
BALDEV SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2013 INSC 64420 September 2013Case Partly allowed
The appellants, a Deputy Superintendent of Police and a constable, were convicted for abducting seven members of a family and for their alleged murder. The prosecution alleged that the victims were taken on 29 October 1991, later seen in various police stations, and never returned, leading to convictions under IPC sect…
ASH MOHAMMADversusSHIV RAJ SINGH @ LALLA BABU AND ANR.
2012 INSC 41420 September 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant lodged an FIR alleging that the accused, Shiv Raj Singh (alias Lalla Babu), a known history‑sheeter, orchestrated the kidnapping, confinement for eight days and assault of Bihari Lal under threat, offences punishable under Sections 364 and 506 IPC. The trial court denied bail, but the High Court granted b…
HARESH MOHANDAS RAJPUTversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2011 INSC 70020 September 2011Disposed off
The appellant, Haresh Mohandas Rajput, was accused of raping and murdering 10‑year‑old Pooja, whose body was discovered under a cot in his house with blood‑stained sheets and forensic evidence of sexual assault and strangulation. The prosecution relied solely on circumstantial evidence, including the location of the bo…
SAJJAN KUMARversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
2010 INSC 62420 September 2010Disposed off
The case concerned the framing of charges against former MP Sajjan Kumar for alleged involvement in the 1984 anti‑Sikh riots. After the Delhi Police’s closure report, the CBI was tasked with re‑investigation and filed a charge‑sheet in 2010, relying on statements recorded many years after the incident. The appellant so…
DEVENDRA KUMARversusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.
2025 INSC 100920 August 2025Disposed off
The petitioner, a police SHO, was alleged to have misbehaved with a process server who was serving court summons, leading the process server to lodge a private complaint under s.195 CrPC. The Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (CMM) ordered registration of an FIR under s.186 and s.341 IPC and directed police investigation u…
VIKRAM BAKSHI AND OTHERSversusR.P. KHOSLA AND ANOTHER
2025 INSC 102020 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The dispute arose between the Khosla and Bakshi groups over a resort development project, leading to allegations of perjury and a criminal proceeding under Section 340 of the CrPC. The High Court initially dismissed the criminal application but later recalled its own order after a review petition was filed under Order …
NEELAM KUMARIversusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
2025 INSC 101320 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Neelam Kumari, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of her infant son based primarily on alleged extra‑judicial confessions to her husband and other villagers. The prosecution also relied on a green dupatta found with blood stains and circumstantial evidence, but failed to establish a clear…
UNION OF INDIAversusSALEEM KHAN
2025 INSC 100820 August 2025Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined two bail appeals arising from a 2020 FIR under the IPC, Arms Act and UAPA, involving accused no.11 (Saleem Khan) and accused no.20 (Mohd. Zaid). Both had been denied bail by the trial court, but the Karnataka High Court granted bail to Khan while refusing it to Zaid. The Court held that Khan'…
IN RE: RIGHT TO PRIVACY OF ADOLESCENTS versus
2024 INSC 61420 August 2024Directions issued
The Supreme Court examined a criminal appeal filed by the State of West Bengal against a High Court order that set aside the conviction of a 25‑year‑old accused under Section 6 of the POCSO Act and Sections 376(2)(n) and 376(3) of the IPC for raping a 14‑year‑old girl who later gave birth to his child. The Court held t…
MUSTAFAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.
2019 INSC 92420 August 2019Disposed off
An FIR was lodged under the United Provinces Excise Act, 1910 and the IPC for the seizure of illicit liquor and a firearm, leading to the confiscation of a truck owned by the appellant. The District Magistrate, who also acted as the Collector, issued a show‑cause notice and subsequently ordered the vehicle's confiscati…
CBI GUJARATversusDILIP MULANI & ANR.
2019 INSC 92520 August 2019Disposed off
The respondent, Dilip Mulani, was charged under IPC section 120‑B and several provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The trial court rejected his discharge application, relying on documentary evidence, telephonic transcripts and witness statements that suggested his participation in a bribery conspiracy.…
STATE OF HARYANAversusRAJESH AGGARWAL & ANR.
2018 INSC 72220 August 2018Dismissed
A blast in the factory of M/s Kee Pharma Private Limited in Gurgaon on 27 June 1996 caused a stampede that killed seven workers. An FIR was lodged against the company’s shareholders/directors under Section 302 of the IPC, and the accused sought to quash the FIR by invoking Section 482 of the CrPC. The High Court partia…
SATVIR SINGHversusSTATE OF DELHI THROUGH CBI
2014 INSC 54820 August 2014Appeal(s) allowed
Satvir Singh, an Inspector Customs, was accused of demanding and accepting a bribe from complainant Ramesh Suri in 1989. The trial court acquitted him, finding that the prosecution had not proved the demand, acceptance, or recovery of illegal gratification and that the presumption under Section 20 of the Prevention of …
SANJAY KUMAR KEDIA @ SANJAY KEDIAversusINTELLIGENCE OFFICER, NARCOTIC CONTROL BUREAU AND ANR.
2009 INSC 106120 August 2009Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Sanjay Kumar Kedia was arrested under the NDPS Act and his custody was extended twice under Section 36A(4) of the Act. The extensions were granted on applications that did not contain a report from the public prosecutor indicating investigation progress or compelling reasons, nor were notices given to the…
SHATRUGHANversusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
2023 INSC 63020 July 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The case involved an appeal by Shatrughan against his conviction for murder under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the death of his nephew Jagat Ram. The prosecution's case relied mainly on the testimony of the deceased's uncle, who claimed to have heard the victim shout that Shatrughan was assaulting him with …
MOHAMMED ZUBAIRversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
2022 INSC 73620 July 2022Case Partly allowed
The Supreme Court examined a writ petition filed by Mohammed Zubair, co‑founder of ALT News, who faced five FIRs in Uttar Pradesh and one in Delhi arising from the same set of tweets. The petitioner sought quashing of the FIRs and, alternatively, their consolidation with the Delhi FIR, along with interim bail in all ca…
BRIJESH SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS
2021 INSC 34120 July 2021Appeal(s) allowed
The trial court acquitted five accused persons of offences under Sections 302 read with 149, 304B and 498A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The informant filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking leave to appeal the acquittal. The…
KUMER SINGHversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR
2021 INSC 34320 July 2021Appeal(s) allowed
The complainant, brother of the deceased Sumer Singh, challenged the High Court's grant of bail to three accused (Kamlesh, Arif and Bhojraj Singh) who were alleged to have participated in an unlawful assembly that brutally murdered Sumer Singh and injured his brother Vikram Singh, causing 26 and 11 injuries respectivel…
P MAHESH COOPERATIVE URBAN BANK SHAREHOLDERS WELFARE ASSOCIATIONversusRAMESH KUMAR BUNG AND ORS.
2021 INSC 34620 July 2021Dismissed
The A.P. Mahesh Cooperative Urban Bank Shareholders Welfare Association (petitioner) challenged the election of the bank's board, alleging voter fraud and later loan fraud, and filed criminal complaints under various IPC sections. The accused respondents filed petitions under CrPC Section 482 seeking quash of the compl…
SATWANT SINGHversusMALKEET SINGH
2017 INSC 65320 July 2017Appeal(s) allowed
Satwant Singh, an investigating officer, arrested Malkeet Singh on a charge of murder (Section 307 IPC) after the latter had been granted anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC. The High Court had ordered that the bail protection applied only to offences listed in its order, leading to a conviction of Satwant …
STATE OF U.P.versusRAM KUMAR & ORS.
2017 INSC 64920 July 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Uttar Pradesh prosecuted Ram Kumar and others for the murder of informant Mohan Lal, his wife, and three children by firearms and arson, alleging a common intention to kill. The trial court convicted all accused and imposed the death penalty. The Allahabad High Court acquitted them, holding that the lanter…
BABLU KUMARAND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAIR AND ANR.
2015 INSC 100320 July 2015Dismissed
The appellants were charged with murder and related offences under the IPC. The trial court issued summons and warrants but failed to verify whether they were served, recorded that witnesses were absent and acquitted the accused under Section 232 CrPC. The informant filed a criminal revision under Section 401 CrPC; the…
JAYRAJSINH DIGVIJAYSINH RANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR.
2012 INSC 29420 July 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The dispute involved alleged illegal disposal of association plots through forged documents, leading Respondent No.2 to lodge an FIR against three accused, including the appellant. The appellant sought quash of the FIR under Section 482 of the CrPC, but the High Court dismissed the application. Subsequently, the appell…
RAMESH CHILWAL @ BOMBAYYAversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND
2012 INSC 29520 July 2012Disposed off
Ramesh Chilwal was convicted of murder under IPC s.302, offences under the Gangsters Act s.213 and the Arms Act s.27, and sentenced to life imprisonment, ten years rigorous imprisonment, and seven years rigorous imprisonment respectively, along with fines and compensation. The High Court affirmed these convictions and …
JAGROOP SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2012 INSC 29620 July 2012Dismissed
The appellant Jagroop Singh was convicted of murder under IPC sections 302, 34 and 201 based on circumstantial evidence that the victim was last seen with the accused, voluntary extra‑judicial confessions, and the recovery of a blood‑stained spade. The appellant challenged the conviction, arguing that the time gap betw…
SATYAJIT BALLULBHAI DESAI & ORS.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT
2012 INSC 29120 July 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were charged in a criminal complaint alleging forgery and fraudulent sale of land, which was later withdrawn after a compromise in a related civil suit. A third party, unrelated to the dispute, succeeded in reviving the complaint before the High Court, which also granted the appellants regular bail. Six …
MOHD.HAMID & ANR ETC.ETCversusBADI MASJID TRUST & ORS.ETC.ETC.
2011 INSC 50520 July 2011Dismissed
The Supreme Court considered appeals against a Nagpur High Court order directing the exhumation of a saint's body that had been buried without permission on school premises. The appellants argued that Islamic law (fatwas) prohibited exhumation and that the High Court lacked jurisdiction, contending the matter should be…
DISHAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
2011 INSC 50620 July 2011Dismissed
The petitioner, Disha, and her husband were involved in a share‑broking business that allegedly duped investors of about Rs 60 crore, leading to an FIR and a charge‑sheet against thirteen persons including the petitioner. The husband later died by jumping from a hotel, an incident investigated by the Maharashtra police…
HAMZAversusMUHAMMADKUTTY @ MANI & ORS.
2013 INSC 37220 June 2013Dismissed
The deceased woman was stabbed to death in her matrimonial home, leading to an initial prosecution of four in‑law family members under Sections 498A and 306 IPC, which resulted in acquittal. Two years later, the deceased's brother filed a complaint alleging that six family members, including A‑1 and A‑2, murdered her, …
SRIversusSTATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, Q BRANCH, RAMANATHAPURAM, TAMIL NADU
2026 INSC 51620 May 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a Sri Lankan national named Ranjan, was arrested in 2021 and charged under multiple statutes for allegedly being the absconding accused "Sri" (A‑5) involved in a conspiracy to revive the banned LTTE. The prosecution’s case rested solely on the belated testimonies of two witnesses who identified the appel…
M/S KNIT PRO INTERNATIONALversusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
2022 INSC 62120 May 2022Appeal(s) allowed
M/S Knit Pro International filed a criminal application under Section 156(3) of the CrPC to register an FIR against respondent No.2 for alleged violations of Sections 51, 63 and 64 of the Copyright Act and Section 420 of the IPC. The FIR was registered, but the respondent obtained a writ order from the Delhi High Court…
ABHISHEKversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS
2022 INSC 61820 May 2022Dismissed
The appellant Abhishek Singh was charged under several IPC offences, the Arms Act and MCOCA after a proclamation declared him an absconder. The Additional Director General of Police and Commissioner of Police granted sanction for prosecution under MCOCA, which the appellant challenged before the High Court and then the…
DEEPAK YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. & ANR
2022 INSC 61020 May 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Deepak Yadav filed an FIR alleging that the accused Harjeet Yadav (Respondent No.2) shot his father, leading to his death. The accused was arrested, and his bail application was rejected by the Sessions Court but later granted by the Allahabad High Court on the ground of parity with a co‑accused. The Supr…
SABITRI SAMANTARAYversusSTATE OF ODISHA
2022 INSC 60820 May 2022Dismissed
The appellants, a husband and wife, were accused of strangling a man to death in their rented house and attempting to conceal the body by pouring acid over it. The trial court convicted them and their daughter under Sections 302, 201 and 34 IPC, sentencing the parents to life imprisonment; the High Court later acquitte…
MANOJ & ORSversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2022 INSC 60620 May 2022Case Partly allowed
The appellants Manoj, Rahul (Govind) and Neha Verma were convicted for the triple murder of three women during a robbery on 19 June 2011 and sentenced to death, which the High Court affirmed. The Supreme Court held that the trial and appellate courts failed to provide an effective sentencing hearing under s.235(2) CrPC…
DEEPAK GULATIversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2013 INSC 34920 May 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Deepak Gulati was convicted under Sections 365 and 376 of the IPC for allegedly enticing a 19‑year‑old woman with a false promise of marriage, confining her and having sexual intercourse. The woman voluntarily left home to marry the appellant, accompanied him to several locations, and did not raise any ob…
SANJAY RAGHUNATH AGARWALversusTHE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
2023 INSC 40820 April 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a chartered accountant, was arrested in September 2022 after the Enforcement Directorate (ED) filed an information report and a prosecution complaint under the Prevention of Money‑Laundering Act (PMLA) alleging his involvement in a fraudulent Global Depository Receipt (GDR) scheme that misappropriated fu…
AMOD KUMAR KANTHversusASSOCIATION OF VICTIM OF UPHAAR TRAGEDY AND ANR.
2023 INSC 39720 April 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a former Deputy Commissioner of Police and licensing officer, ordered the removal of extra seats in the Uphaar cinema in 1979‑80 following a revocation of a prior notification. After the 1997 fire that killed 59 people, the CBI filed a closure report finding no criminal act by the appellant, which the ma…
RAMVEER UPADHYAY & ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ANR.
2022 INSC 45520 April 2022Dismissed
Ramveer Upadhyay and others filed a Special Leave Petition challenging the Allahabad High Court’s order dismissing their application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to quash criminal proceedings (Complaint No.19/2018) filed under IPC sections 365/511 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. …
IN RE: TO ISSUE CERTAIN GUIDELINES REGARDING INADEQUACIES AND DEFICIENCIES IN CRIMINAL TRIALSversusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS.
2021 INSC 26020 April 2021Disposed off
The Supreme Court, exercising suo motu jurisdiction under Article 32, examined widespread inadequacies and inconsistencies in criminal trials across India, such as poor documentation of witnesses, exhibits, and material objects, and procedural delays. After issuing notices to all High Courts, State Governments and Unio…
RAMESH BHAVAN RATHODversusVISHANBHAI HIRABHAI MAKWANA MAKWANA (KOLI) & ANR.
2021 INSC 26520 April 2021Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined six bail orders granted by the Gujarat High Court to accused involved in a violent incident that resulted in five homicides. The Court held that the High Court failed to consider the seriousness and gravity of the offences, the role of each accused, and the material evidence contained in the …
MAHENDRA SINGH DHONIversusYERRAGUNTLA SHYAMSUNDAR AND ANR.
2017 INSC 128220 April 2017Disposed off
The complainant, dissatisfied with a magazine cover that featured the petitioner with the caption "God of Big Deals," filed a complaint under Section 295A read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code before a magistrate in Andhra Pradesh. The petitioner sought transfer of the proceedings to Karnataka and simultaneousl…
THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR.versusAMIT KUMAR @ BACHCHA RAL
2017 INSC 37420 April 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Bihar appealed against the Patna High Court's order granting conditional bail to Amit Kumar, the principal of Vishnu Rai College, who was alleged to be the king‑pin of the "Bihar Toppers Scam" involving tampering of answer sheets, illegal firearms, and large sums of cash and property. The High Court had re…
MD. MANNAN @ ABDUL MANNANversusSTATE OF BIHAR
2011 INSC 31920 April 2011Dismissed
The appellant, Md. Mannan, a mason employed in the victim's grandfather's house, sent a seven‑year‑old girl to a betel shop and subsequently abducted her on his bicycle, raping and murdering her. He later confessed, leading police to the body. He was convicted under IPC sections 366, 376, 302 and 201 and sentenced to d…
INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TAMIL NADUversusJOHN DAVID
2011 INSC 31620 April 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Inspector of Police, Tamil Nadu, appealed the High Court's acquittal of John David, who was charged with the gruesome murder of a medical student whose body was dismembered and disposed of in various locations. The trial court had convicted David under IPC sections 302, 201, 364 and 342 based on strong c…
A.M. MOHANversusTHE STATE REPRESENTED BY SHO AND ANOTHER
2024 INSC 23320 March 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, A.M. Mohan, was charged under Section 420 read with Section 34 of the IPC along with co‑accused for alleged cheating. He filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quashment of the FIR, arguing that the FIR and charge‑sheet did not disclose the essential ingredient of dishonest inducement req…
DR. SUBHASH KASHINATH MAHAJANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
2018 INSC 24820 March 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Dr. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan, a senior government official, was charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for refusing sanction to prosecute two senior officers who had made adverse entries in his service record. He sought anticipatory bail and the quashing o…
SHIVDEV KAUR (D) BY LRS. & ORS.versusR.S. GREWAL
2013 INSC 17720 March 2013Dismissed
Dr. Hira Singh's 1944 will granted his daughter Shivdev Kaur a life interest in a property. After the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 came into force, Shivdev Kaur claimed that the life interest had crystallised into an absolute title under Section 14 of the Act. The lower courts held that the life interest remained restric…
JITENDER @ KALLAversusSTATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS.
2025 INSC 24920 February 2025Disposed off
The appellant, convicted of murder and sentenced to thirty years without remission, filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) in the Supreme Court but suppressed the fixed‑term nature of his sentence, leading the Court to initially treat the case as a simple life sentence. The SLP was drafted by senior advocate Rishi Malhot…
SURINDER DOGRAversusSTATE THROUGH DIRECTOR CBI
2025 INSC 25820 February 2025Dismissed
The appellant, a Traffic Superintendent of Indian Airlines at Jammu, was convicted of cheating the airline by preparing an infant ticket under a fictitious name and then forging the flight coupon to convert it into an adult ticket, thereby obtaining a lower fare and causing loss to the airline. The trial court and the …
MOHD ABAAD ALI & ANR.versusDIRECTORATE OF REVENUE PROSECUTION INTELLIGENCE
2024 INSC 12520 February 2024Dismissed
The appellants were acquitted under Section 135(1)(b) of the Customs Act, 1962, and the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence filed an appeal against the acquittal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, after a 72‑day delay, seeking condonation under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The Delhi Hi…
KULDEEP KUMARversusU.T. CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS
2024 INSC 12920 February 2024Directions issued
Kuldeep Kumar contested the mayoral election of the Chandigarh Municipal Corporation held on 30 January 2024. The presiding officer, Anil Masih, declared the BJP candidate Manoj Kumar Sonkar elected, treating eight ballots cast for the appellant as invalid after marking them with an ink line. Video evidence and physica…
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusSURESH
2019 INSC 24020 February 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Madhya Pradesh prosecuted Suresh for the fatal assault on his father, resulting in death and a charge of culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC, along with a false information charge under Section 201 IPC. The Trial Court convicted Suresh under Section 304 Part II and sente…
RAVI PRAKASH SINGH @ARVIND SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR
2015 INSC 14520 February 2015Dismissed
The appellant surrendered before the Chief Judicial Magistrate on 5 July 2013 and was remanded to judicial custody. He applied for bail on 3 October 2013 under Section 167(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, claiming that the charge sheet had not been filed within the statutory 90‑day period. The magistrate, noting an e…
ANIL @ ANTHONY ARIKSWAMY JOSEPHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2014 INSC 11920 February 2014Disposed off
The appellant, Anil @ Anthony Arikswamy Joseph, was convicted of murdering a 10‑year‑old boy after subjecting him to pederasty, under Sections 302, 377 and 201 of the IPC and sentenced to death. The Supreme Court examined the reliability of the prosecution's circumstantial and DNA evidence, finding it trustworthy and s…
SUNIL MEHTA & ANR.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
2013 INSC 11520 February 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether depositions taken by a magistrate under Chapter XV of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) before taking cognizance could be used as evidence for framing charges under Part B of Chapter XIX, and whether the accused is entitled to cross‑examine those witnesses before charges are framed. …
SAURAV DASversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2023 INSC 7620 January 2023Dismissed
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a direction that all State governments upload copies of chargesheets filed under Section 173 of the Criminal Procedure Code on their websites, invoking the transparency principle established in Youth Bar Association of India v. Union of India. The petition r…
MS. XversusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.
2021 INSC 3120 January 2021Disposed off
Ms. X, a confirmed rape victim, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking rehabilitation, including free education for her minor children, housing accommodation, police protection, and legal aid. The Court noted that she had been convicted of rape in 2002 and had already received compensation under the Jharkhand V…
MANIK TANEJA & ANR.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR.
2015 INSC 5520 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, Manik Taneja and his wife, posted comments on the Bangalore Traffic Police Facebook page alleging harassment by a police inspector after a road accident. The inspector filed an FIR under Sections 353 and 506 of the IPC. The appellants sought quashing of the FIR under Section 482 of the CrPC, but the Kar…
TOMASO BRUNO & ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P.
2015 INSC 5220 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed
Three Italian tourists were accused of murdering their fellow tourist in a hotel room in Varanasi. The trial and appellate courts convicted them under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC based on circumstantial evidence, including alleged motive, post‑mortem findings of strangulation, and the claim that they remained in the…
PERUMALversusJANAKI
2014 INSC 3820 January 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Perumal, was acquitted of offences under Sections 417 and 506(i) IPC after a charge‑sheet filed by Sub‑Inspector Janaki alleged his involvement in a pregnancy that a medical report had disproved. Perumal then lodged a private complaint under Section 190 CrPC seeking to try Janaki for an offence under Sec…
RAJEEV KUMAR UPADHYAYversusSRIKANT UPADHYAY & ORS.
[2024] 12 S.C.R. 112219 December 2024Disposed off
The case arose from an FIR registered under multiple IPC sections and the Witch (Daain) Act after a woman was accused of witchcraft, physically assaulted, verbally abused and publicly disrobed along with another woman. Thirteen persons were named; initially only one was sent to trial, but the Additional Chief Judicial …
PRAKASH AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
2024 INSC 102019 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were charged under Sections 306 and 34 IPC for allegedly abetting the suicide of their daughter-in-law, who had committed suicide on 20 March 2015 after a family dispute and a court‑ordered mahalokadalat. The prosecution’s case hinged on the claim that the appellants' words at the mahalokadalat on 17 Feb…
NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAUversusKASHIF
2025 INSC 104519 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) seized large quantities of Tramadol and Zolpidem tablets in multiple operations and arrested Kashif and co‑accused. Kashif applied for bail, which the Delhi High Court granted solely on the ground that the NCB had not complied with Section 52A of the NDPS Act within a reasonable time,…
ANIL BHAVARLAL JAIN & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
2024 INSC 103919 December 2024Dismissed
The appellants, directors of a construction company and employees of a bank, were charged under IPC sections 409, 420 and 120B and the Prevention of Corruption Act for cheating, criminal breach of trust and diversion of funds. The bank had declared the loan a non‑performing asset, recovered part of the amount through a…
DIGAMBAR AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
2024 INSC 101919 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The complainant filed an FIR alleging that her husband and his parents-in-law subjected her to cruelty, forced her to consume poisonous food, and caused a miscarriage, invoking sections 498-A, 312, 313 and 34 of the IPC. The appellants filed a criminal application under section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of the FIR,…
BIJOY KUMAR MONIversusPARESH MANNA & ANR.
2024 INSC 102419 December 2024
The complainant lent Rs 7,00,000 to the accused and later received a cheque of Rs 8,45,000, signed by the accused in his capacity as Director of Shilabati Hospital Pvt. Ltd., drawn on the company's bank account. The cheque bounced for insufficient funds and the complainant issued a statutory notice under Section 138 of…
SIDDIQUEversusSTATE OF KERALA & ANR.
2024 INSC 87719 November 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Siddique, was charged under Sections 376 and 506 of the IPC for alleged sexual abuse, with the FIR filed in August 2024. He sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC, which the Kerala High Court rejected. On appeal, the Supreme Court noted that the complainant filed the complaint nearly eigh…
JAYANTILAL VERMAversusSTATE OF M.P. (NOW CHHATTISGARH)
2020 INSC 64919 November 2020Dismissed
The appellant, Jayantilal Verma, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the strangulation death of his wife, Sahodara Bai, whose body was found in their matrimonial home. The prosecution's case rested primarily on the testimony of the step‑brother (PW‑1) and the post‑mortem report indicating homicidal asphyxia. Althou…
PROF. N. K. GANGULYversusCBI NEW DELHI
2015 INSC 84419 November 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned an alleged illegal transfer of a government plot by senior officials of ICMR and ICPO, who were accused of criminal conspiracy and obtaining undue pecuniary advantage under Section 120B IPC and Sections 13(1)(d) & 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The CBI filed a charge‑sheet and the S…
K. SRINIVASversusK. SUNITA
2014 INSC 79119 November 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The husband and wife were married in 1989; the wife later filed a criminal complaint against the husband and his family under several IPC provisions and the Dowry Prohibition Act, which led to their arrest. The husband filed for divorce on the grounds of cruelty and alleged irretrievable breakdown, and the wife was lat…
JAIMINIBEN HIRENBHAI VYAS &ANR.versusHIRENBHAI RAMESHCHANDRA VYAS &ANR.
2014 INSC 79319 November 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The wife and her minor daughter sought maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) and Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The Family Court initially granted interim maintenance but later awarded maintenance only to the daughter, denying the wife on the ground that she could earn a liveliho…
GANESHAversusSHARANAPPA & ANR.
2013 INSC 76219 November 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Ganesha was acquitted by a trial court of offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 324 and 504 read with 34. On the informant's petition, the Karnataka High Court, in revision, set aside the acquittal and convicted Ganesha under s.324 IPC, imposing six months' simple imprisonment and a fine. Ganesha appealed…
SUNIL MAHADEO JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2013 INSC 76319 November 2013Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the custodial death of a kidnapping suspect who was arrested by three police officers and found dead in the lock‑up. The trial court had acquitted all accused, but the High Court convicted them under sections 302, 342, 218 and 193 IPC. The Court held that the arrest panchnama and register wer…
SAYGO BAIversusCHUEERU BAJRANGI
2010 INSC 79119 November 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Saygo Bai, filed a Section 125 CrPC application for maintenance for herself and her two minor children after her husband, Chueeru Bajrangi, took a second wife and threw her out of the matrimonial home. The trial court, revision court, and High Court dismissed her claim, relying on her alleged abandonment…
NAHAR SINGH YADAV & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2010 INSC 79019 November 2010Dismissed
The Supreme Court considered an application by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to transfer the trial of the Ghaziabad Provident Fund scam from the Special Judge, CBI, Ghaziabad to a court in Delhi. The case involved alleged fraudulent withdrawals of government funds by former court officials and judges. The C…
INDRAKUNWARversusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
2023 INSC 93419 October 2023Appeal(s) allowed
Indrakunwar was convicted under Section 302 IPC for allegedly killing a newborn child she was said to have delivered and then thrown into a pond. The prosecution’s case rested on circumstantial evidence and the accused's statement under Section 313 CrPC, but failed to establish any relationship between the accused and …
NAVEEN @ AJAYversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2023 INSC 93619 October 2023Disposed off
The appellant, Naveen (alias Ajay), was convicted and sentenced to death for the rape and murder of a three‑month‑old girl under multiple provisions of the IPC and the POCSO Act. The trial was completed in fifteen days, during which a legal‑aid counsel was appointed only hours before the case began and was not given su…
PARANAGOUDA AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANOTHER
2023 INSC 93319 October 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The case involved the suicide by self‑immolation of Akkamahadevi, married to the accused, who was alleged to have subjected her to mental and physical cruelty for dowry. The trial court convicted the accused under IPC sections 498A, 304B (read with s.34), and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, based largely…
NAZMAversusJAVED @ ANJUM
2012 INSC 49119 October 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant filed an FIR under dowry and related offences against the respondent. The respondent's family filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash the FIR; the High Court stayed the arrest of the respondent and ordered a monthly deposit of Rs 2,000. After the investigation closed and the magistra…
SAYED MOHD. AHMED KAZMIversusSTATE, GNCTD & ORS.
2012 INSC 48719 October 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Sayed Mohd. Ahmed Kazmi, was arrested in connection with an alleged bomb attack and was placed in police and then judicial custody. After the initial 90‑day period expired, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate extended his custody for another 90 days with retrospective effect, despite the appellant's pendin…
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusVISHWANATH MARANNA SHETTY
2012 INSC 49419 October 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The State prosecuted Vishwanath Maranna Shetty, accused No.9 in a Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act (MCOCA) case, alleging that he managed funds for an organised crime syndicate and abetted the murder of Farid Tanasha. The Special Court denied his bail application, but the Bombay High Court later granted bail.…
VITHAL LAXMAN CHALAWADI & ETC.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY P. PROSECUTOR
2010 INSC 70719 October 2010Disposed off
The deceased Ramesh was killed during an altercation with members of the Chalawadi family over a disputed marriage. The trial court convicted two of the six accused for assault, while the High Court later convicted four under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for murder. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined the eye…
IN RE: FRAMING GUIDELINES REGARDING POTENTIAL MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES TO BE CONSIDERED WHILE IMPOSING DEATH SENTENCESversusIN RE: FRAMING GUIDELINES REGARDING POTENTIAL MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES TO BE CONSIDERED WHILE IMPOSING DEATH SENTENCES
2022 INSC 98719 September 2022Matter referred to larger bench
The Supreme Court, hearing Suo Motu Writ Petition (Crl.) No.1 of 2022, examined whether a separate, meaningful hearing on sentencing is required after conviction for a capital offence under Section 235(2) of the CrPC. It noted divergent judicial opinions on same‑day sentencing and the lack of a uniform framework for co…
RAJU @ RAJENDRA PRASADversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN
2022 INSC 98319 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased was found hanging from a tree after a dispute with his wife Suman Devi, who allegedly had an illicit relationship with Raju. The FIR alleged that Suman Devi, Raju and other family members conspired to murder the deceased. The trial court and the Rajasthan High Court convicted the accused under Section 302 …
SMT. GARGIversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2019 INSC 105619 September 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Smt. Gargi, was convicted of murdering her husband by strangulation and subsequently hanging his body to simulate suicide, based largely on the testimony of the deceased's brother and sister. The prosecution alleged strained marital relations, illicit affairs, and a property dispute as motive, while the …
GANPAT SINGHversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2017 INSC 95619 September 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Ganpat Singh, was convicted for the murder of Shantabai, whose body was discovered in a dry well and identified as the mother of a minor. The trial court relied on circumstantial evidence: the deceased was last seen with the appellant, silver ornaments allegedly lent to her were recovered from the appell…
SAMPELLY SATYANARAYANA RAOversusINDIAN RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY LIMITED
2016 INSC 88719 September 2016Dismissed
The appellant, a director of Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency Ltd, had taken a loan of Rs 11.5 crore which was disbursed on 28 February 2002. The loan agreement required repayment of installments by post‑dated cheques, which were described as "security". Several of these cheques were dishonoured and a crimina…
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH CBIversusVIKRAM ANANTRAI DOSHI AND OTHERS
2014 INSC 65519 September 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The CBI prosecuted Vikram Doshi and others for fraud involving bank loans, forged letters of credit, and diversion of funds to fictitious companies, alleging offences under IPC sections 420, 406 and others. The bank later settled the civil dispute, paid a sum and issued a "no due certificate", after which the Bombay Hi…
YOGENDRA PRATAP SINGHversusSAVITRI PANDEY & ANR.
2014 INSC 65019 September 2014Hearing Adjourned
The appellant filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against the respondent for dishonoured cheques, after serving a notice on 23 September 2008 but before the statutory 15‑day period expired (complaint filed on 7 October 2008). The trial magistrate took cognizance, which the Allahabad Hi…
NAGOOR PICHAI @ BADUSHAversusSTATE TR. SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE
2013 INSC 64019 September 2013Dismissed
Nagoor Pichai @ Badusha was convicted under IPC s.302 for murdering his paternal uncle and sentenced to life imprisonment. He was 19 years 8 months old at the time of the offence and 22 years 9 months old at conviction. He applied for bail, contending that the Tamil Nadu Borstal Schools Act, 1925 should have been appli…
DEEPAK RAIversusSTATE OF BIHAR
2013 INSC 63819 September 2013Disposed off
The appellants Jagat Rai, Deepak Rai and Bachcha Babu Rai were convicted for the pre‑meditated murder of an informant, his wife and five children by locking them in a house and setting it ablaze, motivated by the informant's refusal to withdraw an FIR. The trial court sentenced all three to death, a decision affirmed b…
BALAJI GUNTHU DHULEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2012 INSC 40919 September 2012Appeal(s) allowed
Balaji Gunthu Dhule was convicted under IPC sections 302 and 34 for the death of Ranga Rao during a quarrel, based primarily on the testimony of several eye‑witnesses. The High Court upheld the conviction relying chiefly on PW‑10’s testimony and the appellant’s own statement under CrPC section 313, inferring that PW‑10…
PUDHU RAJA & ANR.versusSTATE, REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
2012 INSC 41119 September 2012Dismissed
The case involved the murder of Jayalakshmi, who was set on fire in a house she shared with her husband Pudhu Raja (A-1) and his mother (A-2). The prosecution alleged that the accused killed her to extort dowry, invoking Sections 302 r/w 34, 304(b) and 201 of the IPC, while the trial court acquitted them citing contrad…
MAHESH CHANDRA VERMA & ORS.versusSTATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.
2012 INSC 41019 September 2012Disposed off
The Jharkhand High Court had appointed 17 Additional District Judges (ADJs) to the regular cadre under a 2001 advertisement, but later appointed another 25 ADJs as Fast Track Court (FTC) judges using the same merit list. The petitioners, sub‑judges, challenged these later appointments as illegal, arguing that FTC posts…
SHIVLAL & ANR.versusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
2011 INSC 69419 September 2011Appeal(s) allowed
Fifteen persons were charged with the murder of Shankar Satnami. The sole eye‑witness, the victim's wife (PW‑9), was illiterate and her testimony was found to contain contradictions and improvements. The police recorded only a "Dehati Nalish" instead of a formal FIR, failed to send a copy of the FIR to the magistrate a…
K. PRABHAKAR HEGDEversusBANK OF BARODA
2025 INSC 99719 August 2025Disposed off
K. Prabhakar Hegde, a former officer of Vijaya Bank (later merged with Bank of Baroda), was dismissed after disciplinary proceedings for alleged irregularities in approving temporary overdrafts. He challenged the denial of the preliminary inquiry report, the failure of the Inquiry Officer to generally question him as r…
MOHD. ANWARversusTHE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI)
2020 INSC 49619 August 2020Dismissed
The appellant, Mohd. Anwar, was accused of robbing a motorist with two accomplices, using a knife and a revolver, and extorting Rs.30,000. The trial court convicted him of robbery with hurt and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment, which the High Court reduced to two years under Section 394 IPC and added a conviction…
SALEEM AHMEDversusSTATE & ANR.
2019 INSC 91919 August 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a house owner, was charged with electricity theft after BSES issued a bill of Rs.97,786 and filed a criminal case. The parties settled the dispute in a Permanent Lok Adalat, agreeing that the appellant would pay Rs.83,120 as full and final settlement, which he duly paid. Despite the settlement, BSES late…
TARUN JIT TEJPALversusTHE STATE OF GOA & ANR.
2019 INSC 91819 August 2019Dismissed
Tarun Jit Tejpal was charged under IPC sections 354, 354A, 354B, 341, 342, 376(2)(f) and 376(2)(k) for alleged sexual offences. After the charge‑sheet was filed, the trial court framed charges under CrPC ss.227/228. The appellant sought discharge on the ground that the informant and the investigating officer were the s…
HARSARUP PANWARversusSTATE OF DELHI THROUGH CBI
2015 INSC 58419 August 2015Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the sentencing of A‑15 Harsarup Panwar, the cinema owner held responsible for the 1997 Uphaar fire that killed 59 people. The Court affirmed his conviction under IPC sections 304A, 337, 338 and 36. It imposed one year of rigorous imprisonment but, considering his advanced age and ill health, …
VENKATESANversusRANI &ANR.
2013 INSC 54319 August 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Venkatesan, was tried for offences under Sections 498A, 304B and 302 IPC, alleged to have harassed his wife for dowry and burnt her to death. The trial court acquitted him, but the Madras High Court, on revision filed by the deceased's mother, set aside the acquittal and ordered a fresh trial, finding fl…
KESHAV DUTTversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2010 INSC 53019 August 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a meter reader, was convicted under Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demanding a bribe, based primarily on a handwriting expert’s report linking him to a paper (Ex.PR) used in the alleged offence. The Supreme Court examined whether such expert opinion could be admitted witho…
RAJESHWAR TIWARI AND ORS.versusNANDA KISHORE ROY
2010 INSC 53219 August 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The employee, Nanda Kishore Roy, complained that his employer had wrongfully deducted Rs.1,640 per month as income tax and failed to deposit it, leading a magistrate to issue summons under sections 406/1208 IPC. The employer argued that the deductions were mandated by the Income Tax Act and that the complaint was essen…
TEESTA ATUL SETALVADversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
2023 INSC 63719 July 2023Appeal(s) allowed
Teesta Atul Setalvad was arrested in June 2022 for alleged offences under Sections 468, 469, 471, 194, 211, 218 and 120B of the IPC, relating to alleged influence over false affidavits concerning documents from 2002‑2012. After being denied bail by the trial court and the High Court, the Supreme Court granted her inter…
NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAUversusMOHIT AGGARWAL
2022 INSC 73019 July 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) sought to overturn a Delhi High Court order that granted post‑arrest bail to Mohit Aggarwal, who was charged under Sections 8, 22 and 29 of the NDPS Act. Aggarwal had made a statement under Section 67 of the NDPS Act, implicating himself and co‑accused in a large drug seizure, but the…
MUTHURAMALINGAM & ORS.versusSTATE REP. BY INSP. OF POLICE
2016 INSC 111819 July 2016Reference answered
The appellants were convicted of several murders in a single trial and were sentenced to multiple life imprisonments, each directed to run consecutively, along with term sentences. They challenged the validity of consecutive life sentences under Section 31 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC). The Supreme Court examin…
ANITA KUSHWAHAversusPUSHAP SUDAN
2016 INSC 118619 July 2016Directions issued
The Supreme Court was asked to decide whether it can transfer civil or criminal proceedings pending in any court of Jammu and Kashmir to a court outside the State and vice‑versa, despite the fact that Sections 25 of the CPC and 406 of the CrPC do not apply to Jammu and Kashmir and the State codes contain no such provis…
MAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.
2011 INSC 50019 July 2011Appeal(s) allowed
Man Singh was arrested in 1979 with half a bottle of illicit liquor and equipment for liquor manufacture. He was convicted under Section 60(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Excise Act, 1910 and sentenced to one year of rigorous imprisonment and a fine, a conviction affirmed by the trial, appellate and revisional courts. On appe…
ANIL SACHAR & ANR.versusM/S SHREE NATH SPINNERS P. LTD. & ORS. ETC.
2011 INSC 50319 July 2011Disposed off
The complainants, partners of Rati Woolen Mills, alleged that cheques issued by Munish Jain in his capacity as director of A.T. Overseas Ltd., a sister concern of Shree Nath Spinners Pvt. Ltd., were given for payment of goods supplied to Shree Nath Spinners. The cheques were dishonoured and the accused were charged und…
S. KASIversusSTATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SAMAYNALLUR POLICE STATION MADURAI DISTRICT
2020 INSC 43919 June 2020Appeal(s) allowed
S. Kasi was arrested on multiple IPC charges and remained in judicial custody for over 73 days without a charge sheet being filed. He applied for default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, arguing that the Supreme Court’s order dated 23 March 2020, which extended limitation periods for civil p…
RAMBALAKversusSTATE OF U.P.
2026 INSC 51119 May 2026Appeal(s) allowed
Rambalak was charged under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471. The Allahabad High Court rejected his second bail application and, while exercising its bail jurisdiction, directed the trial court to issue summons under CrPC ss.62 and 69 and to take coercive measures against persons delaying the proceedings. The Sup…
PARVINDER SINGHversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
2026 INSC 51919 May 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Parvinder Singh, was subject to an ECIR and arrested, after which the Enforcement Directorate filed a prosecution complaint under the PMLA on 24 June 2024. The Special Court took cognizance of the offence on 2 July 2024, after the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) had come into force, without giv…
RAVINDER SINGH SIDHUversusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.
2025 INSC 72719 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The petitioner, Ravinder Singh Sidhu, faced 64 FIRs across ten states arising from alleged financial fraud. He filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking the clubbing and transfer of all FIRs to a single jurisdiction, later modifying the prayer to consolidation within each state. The Supreme Court examined whether …
RAMJI PRASAD JAISWAL @ RAMJEE PRASAD JAISWAL AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR
2025 INSC 73819 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, Ramji Prasad Jaiswal, Ashok Kumar Jaiswal and Bal Mukund Jaiswal, were convicted for a 1982 fraud against the State Bank of India under IPC sections 420, 468, 471, 120B and the Prevention of Corruption Act. During the trial, their statements under Section 313 of the CrPC were recorded by asking only fou…