Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

Judgments of 2024

782 judgments, newest first — showing 401–600.

MAHESHKUMAR CHANDULAL PATEL & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

2024 INSC 60814 August 2024Dismissed

The petitioners, senior Assistant Professors appointed directly in 2001, claimed that their junior colleagues—former ad‑hoc lecturers regularised later—were drawing higher pay because of senior‑scale and selection‑grade benefits counted from their ad‑hoc service. They invoked Rule 21 of the Gujarat Civil Services (Pay)

MINERAL AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.versusM/S STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ANR. ETC.

2024 INSC 60714 August 2024Directions issued

The Supreme Court considered whether the nine‑judge bench decision in Mineral Area Development Authority v. Steel Authority of India (2024 INSC 554) should be given prospective effect. The judgment had overruled India Cement Ltd. v. State of Tamil Nadu and clarified the legislative competence of States under Entries 49

ANISH M RAWTHER @ ANEES MOHAMMED RAWTHERversusHAFEEZ UR RAHMAN & ORS.

2024 INSC 46014 June 2024Dismissed

The respondents filed a summary suit under Order XXXVII of the CPC seeking recovery of Rs. 1,04,16,576 and later submitted a memo under Rule 3(6)(b) asking the trial court to decree the suit. The trial court rejected the memo, but the Karnataka High Court set aside that order and directed the trial court to accept the

IN RE-INHUMAN CONDITIONS IN 1382 PRISONS versus

2024 INSC 46114 May 2024Directions issued

The Supreme Court examined the status reports filed by several states on the implementation of its earlier prison‑reform directives, focusing on overcrowding, inadequate infrastructure, and the welfare of women prisoners and children. The Court noted persistent delays, lack of approvals, and insufficient action by the

SAMAJ PARIVARTANA SAMUDAYA & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

2024 INSC 26714 March 2024Directions issued

The Supreme Court heard applications arising from the long‑standing illegal mining controversy in Bellary, Chitradurga and Tumkur districts of Karnataka. The petitioners sought directions for demarcating seven mining leases that straddle the Karnataka‑Andhra Pradesh boundary, for the implementation of Reclamation and R

SRIKANT UPADHYAY & ORSversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ANR.

2024 INSC 20214 March 2024Dismissed

The appellants were charged under several IPC offences and the Daain Act, failed to appear after summons and bailable warrants, and subsequently faced non‑bailable warrants and a proclamation under Section 82 CrPC. They filed an anticipatory bail application in November 2022, which was adjourned without interim protect

BABAN BALAJI MORE (DEAD) BY LRS. & OTHERSversusBABAJI HARI SHELAR (DEAD) BY LRS. & OTHERS

2024 INSC 20314 March 2024Dismissed

The case concerned agricultural Watan lands in Maharashtra held by the heirs of the original Watandar after his death in 1958. The appellants sought possession of the lands under sections 5, 11 and 11A of the Maharashtra Hereditary Offices Act, 1874, arguing that the tenancy created by the tenants had terminated. The r

INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusDR. HEMANT MANDOVRA

[2024] 12 S.C.R. 103813 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The Indore Development Authority (IDA) allotted a plot to Dr. Hemant Mandovra in 1995 under a tender, requiring 50% payment upfront and the balance in installments. The respondent failed to pay the balance, leading to cancellation of the allotment in 2000. After a High Court order in 2006 directing the IDA to hand over

BHARTI ARORAversusTHE STATE OF HARYANA

[2024] 12 S.C.R. 104413 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a former Superintendent of Police, was implicated by a Special Judge for allegedly fabricating a false story that led to the recovery of opium and was issued a show‑cause notice under Section 58 of the NDPS Act. The Special Judge recorded adverse findings against her and other officers without giving the

CELIR LLPversusMR. SUMATI PRASAD BAFNA & ORS.

2024 INSC 97813 December 2024Directions issued

The Supreme Court considered contempt petitions filed by the successful auction purchaser (Celir LLP) against the original borrower, a subsequent transferee, and the bank, alleging wilful disobedience of the Court’s 21 September 2023 judgment that confirmed the 9th auction of a secured asset and directed issuance of a

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusROHIT NANDAN

2024 INSC 98413 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Rohit Nandan, was appointed as a Postal Assistant in 1997 under the OBC category based on a Tanti caste certificate. In 2015, the Bihar Government deleted the Tanti caste from the OBC list and merged it with the Pan/Swasi caste in the Scheduled Castes list, after which the respondent obtained a Schedule

PARTHA CHATTERJEEversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

[2024] 12 S.C.R. 62713 December 2024Disposed off

The former West Bengal Education Minister, Partha Chatterjee, was arrested by the Enforcement Directorate in connection with a large‑scale teachers recruitment scam and alleged money‑laundering offences under the PMLA. After raids recovered substantial cash and gold from his associates and companies, he was denied bail

GEORGEversusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND OTHERS

[2024] 12 S.C.R. 76913 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, George, was convicted under Sections 294(b), 341 and 302 IPC for the murder of the informant's son, based solely on the testimony of the father (PW‑1), an interested witness. The High Court, however, acquitted two co‑accused on the same testimony, finding it unreliable for them, yet upheld the appellant'

OM PRAKASH YADAVversusNIRANJAN KUMAR UPADHYAY & ORS.

[2024] 12 S.C.R. 77713 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant lodged an FIR alleging that his brother was murdered in Firozabad and that a separate FIR was falsely registered in Gwalior to provide an alibi for the main accused. The High Court quashed the criminal proceedings against several police officials, holding that sanction under Section 197 of the CrPC was re

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND OTHERSversusVIVEK V. GAWDE ETC. ETC.

[2024] 12 S.C.R. 84313 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned eviction proceedings initiated by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai against occupants who held premises on a licence basis. The respondents challenged the Inquiry Officer's authority and the High Court's order that framed nine specific points for the Officer to determine, alleging violation

URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUSTversusSMT. VIDHYA DEVI AND ORS.

[2024] 12 S.C.R. 99313 December 2024Dismissed

The Urban Improvement Trust (the appellant) sought to acquire land in Nangli Kota and Moongaska villages under the Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959. The respondents challenged the acquisition, alleging procedural defects: failure to serve individual notices under s.52(2), premature possession before compensation w

GANAPATI BHIKARAO NAIKversusNUCLEAR POWER CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED

2024 INSC 87113 November 2024Appeal(s) allowed

Ganapati Bhikarao Naik, the son‑in‑law of a land‑loser whose land was acquired for the Kaiga Atomic Power Project, was appointed as a helper under a rehabilitation scheme. After marital discord and a divorce proceeding, his father‑in‑law alleged that Naik was not a legitimate family member and the employer terminated h

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS.versusOM PARKASH

2024 INSC 87013 November 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant LIC terminated Om Parkash's employment on the ground of abandonment after he was absent without leave for more than 90 days and failed to respond to multiple notices sent to his permanent address. The employee later secured a job with the Food Corporation of India but concealed this fact in his writ petit

TINKUversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

2024 INSC 86713 November 2024Disposed off

The appellant, Tinku, son of a constable who died on duty in 1997, sought a compassionate appointment after attaining majority in 2008, relying on earlier communications that his name was entered in a Minor's Register. The State rejected his claim, invoking a 1999 government instruction that a dependent must attain maj

IN RE: DIRECTIONS IN THE MATTER OF DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURES versus

2024 INSC 86613 November 2024Directions issued

The Supreme Court heard a batch of writ petitions challenging the demolition of residential and commercial structures belonging to persons accused or convicted of crimes, where the demolitions were carried out without following any due‑process requirements. The Court examined whether the executive could impose such a p

KIMNEO HAOKIP HANGSHINGversusKENN RAIKHAN & ORS.

2024 INSC 68913 September 2024Dismissed

The appellant, a Member of the Manipur Legislative Assembly, was elected from the Saikul constituency in 2022. The respondent filed an election petition alleging that the appellant concealed assets worth about Rs. 2 crore and falsified her income, thereby committing corrupt practices. The appellant moved an application

ARVIND KEJRIWALversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

2024 INSC 68713 September 2024Disposed off

The appellant, a three‑time Chief Minister of Delhi, was arrested by the CBI in June 2024 in connection with an FIR registered in August 2022 under sections 120B, 477A IPC and section 7 PC Act. He challenged the legality of the arrest under Sections 41A and 41(1)(b)(ii) of the CrPC and also sought regular bail. The Hig

KUKREJA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY & OTHERSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS

2024 INSC 69213 September 2024

The appellants, owners of land reserved for Development Plan Roads under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, constructed the roads at their own cost, surrendered the land to the Mumbai Municipal Corporation and were granted 25% transferable development rights (TDR). They later claimed the balance 75% (or 10

SRI SUJIES BENEFIT FUNDS LIMITEDversusM. JAGANATHUAN

2024 INSC 60213 August 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a chit‑fund company, advanced loans totalling Rs 21,09,000 to the respondent over several years. To partly discharge the debt, the respondent issued a cheque for Rs 19,00,000 which was returned marked ‘Account Closed’, leading to a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial

JAMES KUNJWALversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ANR.

2024 INSC 60113 August 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, James Kunjwal, was accused of offences under Sections 376 and 504 IPC and was granted bail by the High Court. The complainant sought cancellation of bail, alleging that Kunjwal had filed a false affidavit contradicting her statements. The High Court, finding the affidavit intentionally false, directed th

IN RE: PATANJALI AYURVED LIMITED THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, ACHARYA BALKRISHNA AND BABA RAMDEV IN THE MATTER OF:INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION AND ANRversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2024 INSC 60513 August 2024Disposed off

The Indian Medical Association filed a writ petition alleging that Patanjali Ayurved Ltd., its managing director Acharya Balkrishna and proponent Baba Ramdev, violated an undertaking given to the Supreme Court on 21 November 2023 by holding a press conference on 22 November 2023 and publishing advertisements that claim

JALALUDDIN KHANversusUNION OF INDIA

2024 INSC 60413 August 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a retired police constable, was charged under the UAPA and IPC for alleged involvement in activities of the Popular Front of India (PFI) at a building owned by his wife. He sought bail before the Special Court and the High Court, both of which denied it while granting bail to a co‑accused. The Supreme Co

SHENTO VARGHESEversusJULFIKAR HUSEN & ORS.

2024 INSC 40713 May 2024Case Partly allowed

The appellant, a deliveryman, complained that gold bars received in exchange for gold chains were counterfeit, leading the police to freeze the accused's bank accounts. The police reported the seizure to the jurisdictional magistrate only after a delay, and the Madras High Court ordered de‑freezing on the ground that t

DHARNIDHAR MISHRA (D) AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS

2024 INSC 41513 May 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant's land was acquired in 1976‑77 under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, but no compensation was ever paid. After repeatedly seeking payment, the appellant filed a writ petition which was dismissed by a single High Court judge on the ground of a 42‑year delay. The Division Bench of the High Court then directe

SRI PUBI LOMBIversusTHE STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH & ORS.

2024 INSC 20013 March 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a modified transfer order dated 20 April 2023 of a Deputy Director of School Education, issued on the basis of a UO note from a local MLA. The employee (respondent No.5) challenged the modification, alleging arbitrariness, but the Single Judge of the Gauhati High Court dismissed the petition, finding

SATENDER KUMAR ANTILversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND ANR.

2024 INSC 13413 February 2024Directions issued

The Supreme Court reviewed the compliance report filed by an amicus curiae regarding the implementation of its earlier directions in Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI. It examined whether States, Union Territories, the CBI, and High Courts had adhered to specific directives concerning Sections 41, 41A, 438, 440, 88, 170, 204

DR KAVITA KAMBOJversusHIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA & ORS

2024 INSC 19213 February 2024Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined a dispute arising from the High Court of Punjab and Haryana's recommendation to promote thirteen in‑service judicial officers to Additional District and Sessions Judges under the 65% promotion quota of the Haryana Superior Judicial Service Rules, 2007. The State of Haryana refused to accept t

DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENTversusNIRAJ TYAGI & ORS

2024 INSC 10613 February 2024

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) investigated money‑laundering offences arising from three FIRs and an ECIR filed against India Bulls Housing Finance Ltd (IHFL) and its officers after the financial institution recovered dues from defaulting borrowers under the SARFAESI Act. The borrowers challenged the FIRs and the ECI

VASANTHA (DEAD) THR. LR.versusRAJALAKSHMI @ RAJAM (DEAD) THR.LRS.

2024 INSC 10913 February 2024Appeal(s) allowed

In 1947 a mother, Thayammal, executed a First Settlement Deed granting interests in her property to her two sons and her daughter. Subsequent deeds in 1952 and later altered those interests, ultimately leaving the daughter’s husband, Gopalakrishnan, claiming a vested right as heir of the daughter under the First Settle

AMAR SARDARversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

2024 INSC 104012 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed

Amar Sardar was convicted by a Fast Track Court for offences under Sections 376, 511 and 354 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment. He appealed to the Calcutta High Court, which upheld the conviction and sentence. The appellant contended that the High Court had merely reiterated the trial cour

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusN.M. RAUT & ORS.

2024 INSC 104212 December 2024Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the interpretation of the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACPS), 2008, particularly how financial upgradations granted under the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008 should be counted for MACPS eligibility. Respondents, employed as Pharmacists and Superintendents, had

NAVRATAN LAL SHARMAversusRADHA MOHAN SHARMA & ORS.

2024 INSC 97012 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Navratan Lal Sharma, filed a suit for declaration and injunction which was dismissed, leading him to file a first appeal. During the pendency of the appeal, the parties executed a compromise deed that provided for the restoration of the appeal if the respondents failed to honor payment obligations. The H

PROPOSED VAIBHAV COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITEDversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

[2024] 12 S.C.R. 73212 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Proposed Vaibhav Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., challenged the allocation of a land plot to Medinova Regal Co-operative Housing Society (MRCHS) by the State of Maharashtra. MRCHS had originally applied for a plot to house doctors of Tata Memorial Hospital, but the plot eventually allotted was differen

SHYAM KUMAR INANIversusVINOD AGRAWAL & ORS.

2024 INSC 86512 November 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants purchased 23.98 acres of agricultural land from Sushila Devi under an Agreement to Sell dated 30‑08‑1990, paid full consideration and took possession, but the legal heirs refused to execute a sale deed. The trial court decreed specific performance, but the High Court reversed, holding the agreement void

RABBU @ SARVESHversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2024 INSC 72012 September 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Rabbu @ Sarvesh, was convicted of rape, murder and related offences under Sections 450, 376(2)(i), 376D, 376A, 302 IPC and Section 5(g)/6 POCSO, receiving the death penalty for Sections 376A and 302. The defence argued that the three dying declarations were inconsistent and that DNA evidence suggested a

JASEELA SHAJIversusTHE UNION OF INDIA & ORS

2024 INSC 68312 September 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Jaseela Shaji, challenged the preventive detention of her husband under COFEPOSA, arguing that the detaining authority failed to provide the statement of Ms. Preetha Pradeep, a material document relied upon for the detention, thereby violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution. She also contended that th

PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONversusSUS ROAD BANER VIKAS MANCH AND OTHERS

2024 INSC 68212 September 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) and its concessionaire Noble Exchange set up a Garbage Processing Plant (GPP) at Baner, Pune under a 2005 development plan that reserved the land for such a facility. The plant was authorized under the Municipal Solid Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 2000 and received environm

RAVINDER KUMARversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2024 INSC 68412 September 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a radiologist, was raided on 27 April 2017 after a decoy patient alleged that his clinic performed illegal sex‑determination ultrasounds. The raid was conducted by a team authorized only by the Civil Surgeon, who was the Chairman of the district Appropriate Authority, without the consent of the other mem

ROHAN BUILDERS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITEDversusBERGER PAINTS INDIA LIMITED

2024 INSC 68612 September 2024Directions issued

Rohan Builders sought an extension of time under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after the statutory twelve‑month period (or the six‑month consent‑based extension) for making an arbitral award had expired. The Calcutta High Court had held that such an application was not maintainable, a view e

MAHENDRA KUMAR SONKERversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2024 INSC 60012 August 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a Patwari, was accused of demanding a bribe of Rs.500 and was caught in a trap operation organized by the Lokayukta. He was convicted under Section 353 of the Indian Penal Code for assaulting public servants during the trap, and sentenced to six months' imprisonment and a fine. On appeal, the Supreme Cou

ARVIND KEJRIWALversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

2024 INSC 51212 July 2024Matter referred to larger bench

The Supreme Court examined the arrest of Arvind Kejriwal under Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, in connection with the Delhi excise policy case alleging kickbacks and money‑laundering. Kejriwal challenged the arrest as illegal, arguing that the "reasons to believe" did not disclose all materi

HARESH SHANTILAL AVLANI & ANRversusTHE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.

2024 INSC 25112 March 2024Disposed off

The Supreme Court considered two appeals challenging the reduction of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) on the ground that, for an unmarried deceased, the multiplier should be based on the age of the parents rather than the age of the deceased. The appellants, parents of the deceased, ar

THE STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.versusPARESH NATHALAL CHAUHAN

2024 INSC 27712 March 2024Disposed off

The respondent, Paresh Nathalal Chauhan, filed a writ petition seeking protection from arrest under the GST Act, prompting the Gujarat High Court to issue an interim order that criticised the prolonged presence of a search party at his residence as unauthorized. The High Court also observed that the good‑faith protecti

DABLU KUJURversusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND

2024 INSC 19712 March 2024Disposed off

The appellant, Dablu Kujur, challenged the High Court's dismissal of his bail application in a case involving offences under the IPC and Arms Act. The Supreme Court examined whether the police report (charge sheet) filed under Section 173(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 complied with the statutory requiremen

MAHANADI COALFIELDS LTD.versusBRAJRAJNAGAR COAL MINES WORKERS’ UNION

2024 INSC 19912 March 2024

Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. (the appellant) had engaged a contractor to transport crushed coal, employing 32 workmen from 1984 to 1994. The workers' union sought regularisation of all 32 workers under clauses of the National Coal Wage Agreement IV, leading to a settlement on 5 April 1997 that regularised only 19 of them,

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KNNLversusSUBHASHCHANDRA & ORS.

2024 INSC 20812 March 2024Disposed off

The Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Limited (Corporation) sought compensation for about 13,000 acres of land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for several water and irrigation projects. The Karnataka High Court had enhanced compensation amounts in a series of judgments, but the Supreme Court found that the High C

NARESH KUMAR & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR.

2024 INSC 19612 March 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, senior officials of a bicycle manufacturing company, were charged under Sections 406, 420 and 506 IPC for alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust arising from a payment dispute with a contractor. The contractor claimed underpayment for assembling 83,267 bicycles, leading to an FIR and subsequent c

GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusPRABHJIT SINGH SONI & ANR.

2024 INSC 10212 February 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (GNIDA) claimed that it had submitted a claim of Rs 43.40 crore as a financial creditor against JNC Construction Ltd., but the resolution professional treated it as an operational creditor and the resolution plan approved by the NCLT omitted its claim and undervalued i

MALLAPPA & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2024 INSC 10412 February 2024Disposed off

The trial court acquitted three accused of murder after finding the eyewitnesses' testimonies implausible and noting contradictions in medical evidence. The High Court reversed the acquittal, relying on the same eyewitness accounts and post‑mortem report to convict the accused under section 302 IPC. On appeal, the Supr

STATE BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICEversusB. RAMU

2024 INSC 11412 February 2024

The case concerned the grant of anticipatory bail to B. Ramu, accused of procuring and supplying 232.5 kg of ganja, a quantity far exceeding the commercial quantity of 20 kg under the NDPS Act. The Madras High Court had allowed the bail application under Section 438 of the CrPC despite opposition from the public prosec

STATE OF HARYANAversusMOHD. YUNUS & ORS.

2024 INSC 3412 January 2024Dismissed

Four persons were tried for the killing of Akbar on 9 January 1999. The trial court convicted A1, A2 and A3 under sections 302 and 323 read with section 34 of the IPC, while acquitting them of section 325, and later the High Court altered the convictions, acquitting A1 of 302/34 and A2 of 302/34 but upholding A2's conv

SANJAY KUNDUversusREGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & ORS

2024 INSC 4312 January 2024Disposed off

The petitioner, the Director General of Police (DGP) of Himachal Pradesh, challenged an ex parte order of the Himachal High Court that transferred him and a Superintendent of Police to other posts to ensure a fair investigation into allegations of intimidation and misuse of power. The High Court had acted suo motu on a

ASMA LATEEF & ANRversusSHABBIR AHMAD & ORS

2024 INSC 3612 January 2024Dismissed

The appellants filed a suit for permanent injunction over a property, alleging an oral gift, while the defendants contested the suit's maintainability under the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act. The trial court, ignoring the written statement of one defendant and the pending jurisdictional objecti

DALIBEN VALJIBHAI & ORS.versusPRAJAPATI KODARBHAI KACHRABHAI & ANR.

2024 INSC 104911 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants filed a suit in 2017 seeking cancellation of a sale deed dated 04‑12‑2004, alleging fraud and claiming they only became aware of the deed on 31‑03‑2017 when a revenue notice was issued. The defendants moved to dismiss the suit under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC, arguing that the suit was barred by the thre

DUSHYANT JANBANDHUversusM/S HYUNDAI AUTOEVER INDIA PVT. LTD.

2024 INSC 96611 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an assistant manager, was terminated by the respondent employer alleging absenteeism, after a show‑cause notice and disciplinary inquiry. The appellant filed a petition under Section 15(2) of the Payment of Wages Act for unpaid wages and later approached the Industrial Tribunal under Section 2(A) of the

ARJUN S/O RATAN GAIKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

[2024] 12 S.C.R. 63711 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Arjun was detained for twelve months under section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act on the ground that his bootlegging activities threatened public peace. The detaining authority relied on six excise cases involving illicit liquor and on vague statements of two unnamed witnes

SMT. NARESH KUMARI & ORS.versusSMT. CHAMELI & ORS.

[2024] 12 S.C.R. 69311 December 2024Dismissed

The appellants, heirs of Rai Bahadur Randhir Singh, claimed that a 1953 oral gift of 38 Bighas of land to the respondents was conditional on the donees rendering lifelong services to the donor and his heirs, and that the cessation of such services entitled the donors to resume possession. The trial court and first appe

BABY SAKSHI GREOLAversusMANZOOR AHMAD SIMON AND ANOTHER

[2024] 12 S.C.R. 95811 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a child of seven years, suffered grievous injuries and moderate mental retardation in a motor vehicle accident, resulting in 75% disability which the Court treated as 100% for compensation purposes. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.5,90,750, which the Delhi High Court enhanced by Rs.5,60,000

SUKHMANDER SINGH AND ORS ETC.versusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS ETC.

2024 INSC 73611 September 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The Punjab School Education Board advertised 31 vacancies for Laboratory Attendants in 2011, receiving 4,752 applications. After a written test, 1,952 candidates were shortlisted for interviews, a number vastly exceeding the vacancies, and a final list was published in April 2012. Unsuccessful candidates challenged the

M/S NEW WIN EXPORT & ANR.versusA. SUBRAMANIAM

2024 INSC 53511 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque that bounced due to insufficient funds. After a series of appeals, the High Court reinstated the conviction, but the parties subsequently entered into a settlement agreement where the appellants paid the complainant R

MD. RAHIM ALI @ ABDUR RAHIMversusTHE STATE OF ASSAM & ORS.

2024 INSC 51111 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Md. Rahim Ali, was declared a foreigner by the Foreigners Tribunal, Nalbari, on the basis that he failed to prove his Indian citizenship under Section 9 of the Foreigners Act, 1946. He challenged the Tribunal's order, arguing that the authorities had no material basis for the allegation of illegal migrat

DEVU G NAIRversusTHE STATE OF KERALA & ORS.

2024 INSC 22811 March 2024Disposed off

The appellant, a woman, filed a habeas corpus petition alleging that her intimate partner, also a woman (referred to as X), was being held against her will by X's parents. The Kerala High Court ordered the District Legal Services Authority to interview X and subsequently directed that X undergo counselling with a psych

SHAHID ALIversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2024 INSC 19111 March 2024Case Partly allowed

The appellant, Shahid Ali, fired a country-made pistol during a celebratory firing at a marriage ceremony on 17 March 2016, striking the deceased Ishfaq Ali in the neck and causing his immediate death. The trial court and the High Court convicted him under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for murder, along wi

THE STATE OF HARYANAversusASHOK KHEMKA & ANR.

2024 INSC 19011 March 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Haryana appealed against a High Court order that set aside a CAT decision which had upheld the Chief Minister’s downgrade of an IAS officer’s performance appraisal score. The officer’s self‑appraisal was initially graded 8.22 by the Reporting Authority, raised to 9.92 by the Reviewing Authority, and then r

STATE BANK OF INDIAversusASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND OTHERS

2024 INSC 19511 March 2024

The Supreme Court had earlier declared the Electoral Bond Scheme unconstitutional and directed the State Bank of India (SBI), as the authorized bank, to furnish the Election Commission of India (ECI) with details of each bond purchased and redeemed between 12 April 2019 and 15 February 2024. SBI filed a Miscellaneous A

DINESH GUPTAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.

2024 INSC 3211 January 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The complainant, Karan Gambhir, filed a police complaint in Gautam Budh Nagar alleging that the promoters of three Delhi‑based companies had induced his firm to give short‑term loans which were later converted into equity. The FIR, registered on 29 July 2018, listed the accused companies and promoters with incomplete a

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusHELLO HOME EDUCATION SOCIETY

2024 INSC 3311 January 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The Hello Home Education Society sought to establish a junior high school in Vasant Kunj and obtained an essentiality certificate and sponsorship letter only for Jasola. Despite an in‑principle approval by the Lieutenant Governor in 2003, the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) changed its policy in December 2003 to allo

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERSversusYOGENDERA MOHAN SENGUPTA AND ANOTHER

2024 INSC 3011 January 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Himachal Pradesh prepared a draft development plan for the Shimla Planning Area under the Himachal Pradesh Town & Country Planning Act, 1977, which was stayed by the National Green Tribunal (NGT) in 2014 and again in 2022. The State challenged the NGT orders before the Himachal Pradesh High Court, while th

JYOTI LIMITEDversusBSE LIMITED & ANR

[2024] 12 S.C.R. 111710 December 2024Dismissed

Jyoti Limited sought to list equity shares on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) that were allotted to an Asset Reconstruction Company (RARE) after converting part of its debt into equity. The BSE rejected the application, stating that Jyoti had not obtained in‑principle approval from the exchange and had not secured a sh

CHADURANGA KANTHRAJ URS AND ANR.versusP. RAVI KUMAR AND ORS.

2024 INSC 95710 December 2024

The Supreme Court examined whether the State of Karnataka and its agencies wilfully disobeyed its earlier orders dated 21‑11‑2014, 17‑05‑2022 and 19‑03‑2024 directing the issuance of Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) for land acquired for road widening. The petitioners alleged that the respondents delayed and altere

JAYEDEEPSINH PRAVINSINH CHAVDA & ORS.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2024 INSC 96010 December 2024Case Partly allowed

The appellants, husband and in‑laws, were charged under Sections 306, 498A and 114 of the IPC for the alleged suicide of the wife after twelve years of marriage, based on a FIR filed by her father. They sought discharge under Section 227 of the CrPC, arguing that no prima facie case existed, particularly for abetment o

PARVIN KUMAR JAINversusANJU JAIN

2024 INSC 96110 December 2024Disposed off

Parvin Kumar Jain and Anju Jain were married in 1998 and have lived apart since 2004. The husband, a senior banker, was ordered to pay interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, which was later enhanced, while the wife sought further increase and permanent alimony. The Supreme Court examined whethe

DARA LAKSHMI NARAYANA & OTHERSversusSTATE OF TELANGANA & ANOTHER

2024 INSC 95310 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The marriage between appellant No.1 and respondent No.2 deteriorated, leading the wife to file an FIR under Section 498A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Act alleging cruelty and dowry demands, while also implicating the husband’s parents and sisters-in-law. The appellants contended that the FIR was a retaliatory

JAICHAND (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.versusSAHNULAL & ANR.

[2024] 12 S.C.R. 71910 December 2024Disposed off

The case involved a suit for specific performance of a 1996 sale agreement concerning a half‑acre land in Bilaspur. The trial court granted specific performance, but the first appellate court set aside that part of the decree, ordering only a refund of earnest money, citing alleged hardship under Section 20(2)(b) of th

CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATOR & ORS. & ETC. ETC.versusMANJIT KUMAR GULATI & ORS. & ETC. ETC.

[2024] 12 S.C.R. 94710 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The Chandigarh Administrator sold a 99‑year leasehold booth site to Manjit Kumar Gulati and others in 1989, requiring 25% premium upfront and the balance in three installments. The allottees failed to pay the remaining 75%, were served a show‑cause notice, given multiple opportunities to clear dues, and their lease was

S. VIJIKUMARIversusMOWNESHWARACHARI C

2024 INSC 73210 September 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a wife, obtained a maintenance order of Rs.12,000 per month and Rs.1,00,000 compensation under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 in 2015. The respondent husband later filed an application under Section 25 seeking to set aside that order and to recover all maintenance

MANILALversusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.

2024 INSC 67510 September 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a reserved‑category candidate, applied for the post of Teacher Grade‑III (Level II) in a Scheduled Area of Rajasthan but was rejected because his graduation percentage (44.58%) fell short of the 45% threshold. He had secured admission to a B.Ed. programme on 23 October 2009, after the NCTE notification d

RAGHUVEER SHARANversusDISTRICT SAHAKARI KRISHI GRAMIN VIKAS BANK & ANR.

2024 INSC 68110 September 2024

The appellant, a bank cashier, was examined as a witness in 2016 and admitted altering the tenure of a fixed deposit, a statement recorded at the pre‑summoning stage. During the trial, another witness (PW‑1) testified in 2022 that the appellant had made the interpolations, leading the bank to move an application under

R.P. GARGversusTHE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, TELECOM DEPARTMENT & ORS.

2024 INSC 74310 September 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a contractor, entered into a 1997 contract with the Telecom Department of Haryana for laying underground cables. Disputes over unpaid bills were referred to arbitration, and the arbitrator awarded the claim but denied interest, citing a contractual clause that prohibited it. The appellant later sought po

KHURSHEED & ANR.versusSHAQOOR

2024 INSC 76410 September 2024Dismissed

The dispute concerned agricultural land in Haridwar where the mother of Petitioner No.1 allegedly fraudulently claimed inheritance and executed a sale deed on 09‑08‑2016 by impersonation, a deed the Respondent sought to cancel. The Respondent filed a civil suit for cancellation, but the defendant filed an application i

NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusDARSHAN LAL BOHRA & ORS.

2024 INSC 50810 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) sought to acquire 83.761 hectares of land for industrial development, issuing a Section 4 notification in 2013. Several landowners filed objections under Section 5A, claiming their lands were "abadi" and should be exempt, but the Collector dismissed the objections

ROHINI SUDARSHAN GANGURDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

2024 INSC 51910 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Rohini Sudarshan Gangurde, was charged under Section 306 of the IPC for allegedly abetting her husband’s suicide by harassing him over money and property. The husband was found hanged in their jointly owned house, and the mother filed an FIR alleging physical and mental abuse by the wife. The trial court

UNIWORLD LOGISTICS PVT. LTD.versusINDEV LOGISTICS PVT. LTD.

2024 INSC 51510 July 2024Dismissed

The appellant and respondent entered into a leave‑and‑license agreement for a warehouse, which the respondent later terminated for non‑payment of storage charges. The respondent filed a suit for permanent injunction and vacant possession, expressly reserving the right to claim arrears of rent and damages, and was grant

DUNI CHANDversusVIKRAM SINGH AND OTHERS

2024 INSC 51610 July 2024Case Allowed

The plaintiff, Tota Ram, claimed ownership of a land based on a registered Will dated 12‑12‑1988 executed by the deceased Beli Ram, while the defendants relied on a later Will dated 16‑05‑1994 to transfer the land to themselves and subsequent purchasers. The trial court dismissed the suit, but the first appellate court

MOHD. ABDUL SAMADversusTHE STATE OF TELANGANA & ANR.

2024 INSC 50610 July 2024Dismissed

The appellant, a Muslim husband, obtained a triple talaq and was ordered by the Family Court to pay interim maintenance of Rs.20,000 per month to his divorced wife, which the High Court reduced to Rs.10,000. He appealed, arguing that Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) does not apply to Muslim women af

KAZI AKILODDINversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2024 INSC 50510 July 2024

The appellant, owner of a 1.25‑lac‑sq‑ft land in Akola, challenged the award of compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for a flood‑protection wall, contending that the land was not wholly within the statutory ‘Blue Zone’ and that the market value should be based on arm‑length transactions.

CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST & ORS.versusVIRENDRA KUMAR & ORS.

2024 INSC 51410 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The Forest Department conducted a public auction of forest produce in 1998, where the respondents emerged as the highest bidders and executed an agreement. Despite being given deadlines to deposit the bid amount and complete the work, the respondents failed to comply despite multiple notices, leading to the forfeiture

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSIONversusD.D.A. & ANR.

2024 INSC 51310 July 2024Case Allowed

The Central Information Commission (CIC) issued Management Regulations in 2007, including provisions to constitute benches and form committees for case management. The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) challenged these actions, and the Delhi High Court quashed the regulations, holding that the RTI Act did not expressly

MIR MUSTAFA ALI HASMIversusTHE STATE OF A.P.

2024 INSC 50310 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a Forest Section Officer, was convicted under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly demanding and accepting a bribe from a saw‑mill operator. The prosecution relied on the complainant’s testimony, a friend who acted as a shadow witness, and the recovery

YOGESH GOYANKAversusGOVIND & ORS.

2024 INSC 51010 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant purchased farming land from a seller during the pendency of a suit challenging earlier release deeds, and obtained a registered sale deed while fully aware of the litigation. He applied to be impleaded as a defendant under Order 1 Rule 10 of the CPC, but the Additional District Judge dismissed the applica

THE STATE OF WEST BENGALversusUNION OF INDIA

2024 INSC 50210 July 2024Directions issued

The State of West Bengal filed an original suit under Article 131 of the Constitution seeking a declaration that the Union of India’s registration of cases by the CBI after the State withdrew its consent under Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment (DSPE) Act is unconstitutional, and asked for an injunctio

VIKAS KANAUJIAversusSARITA

2024 INSC 51710 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed

Dr. Vikas Kanaujia filed a petition for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act alleging cruelty, after his wife Dr. Sarita left the marital home within a month of their 2002 marriage and the couple lived together for only about 43 days over a 22‑year separation. The Family Court granted a decree of divorce

ARVIND KEJRIWALversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

2024 INSC 40010 May 2024

Arvind Kejriwal, the Chief Minister of Delhi, was arrested on 21 March 2024 by the Directorate of Enforcement in connection with alleged offences under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act and related statutes. He challenged the arrest before the Supreme Court, arguing that the legality of his detention was sub judic

MRUGENDRA INDRAVADAN MEHTA AND OTHERSversusAHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

2024 INSC 40110 May 2024Dismissed

The plaintiffs sued the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation seeking either compensation for the loss of 974 square metres of land or, alternatively, an allotment of land of that size in any town planning scheme. The trial court granted the alternative relief of land allotment but rejected the compensation claim, prompting

BHUPATBHAI BACHUBHAI CHAVDA & ANR.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2024 INSC 29510 April 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The father and son appellants were acquitted by the Sessions Court of murder under IPC s.302 read with s.34. The State appealed, and the Gujarat High Court reversed the acquittal, convicting them of murder and assault under s.323. The Supreme Court examined whether an appellate court can overturn an acquittal and held

SUBHASH @ SUBANNA & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS

2024 INSC 29410 April 2024Dismissed

The appellants were convicted for the murder of Mahadevappa after he went to their house to inquire about a blocked pathway and was brutally assaulted with a stick, chopper and stones, leading to his death. The appellants argued that they acted in private defence, claiming the victim had provoked them, and contended th

MANISHA MAHENDRA GALA & ORS.versusSHALINI BHAGWAN AVATRAMANI & ORS.

2024 INSC 29310 April 2024Dismissed

The appellants (the Gala family) claimed a right of way over a 20‑ft road (the disputed rasta) situated on the respondents' land, asserting that the easement was acquired by prescription, necessity, or a 1994 sale deed. The trial court initially decreed in their favour, but the appellate courts set aside that decree, h

DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD.versusDELHI AIRPORT METRO EXPRESS PVT. LTD.

2024 INSC 29210 April 2024Case Allowed

The Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) and Delhi Airport Metro Express Private Ltd (DAMEPL) entered into a 2008 concession agreement for the Delhi Airport Metro project. DAMEPL alleged safety defects, issued a cure notice, and later terminated the agreement; an arbitral tribunal awarded substantial sums to DAMEPL. The

PHR INVENT EDUCATIONAL SOCIETYversusUCO BANK AND OTHERS

2024 INSC 29710 April 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The borrower defaulted on a loan from UCO Bank, which led to an auction of four mortgaged properties; PHR Invent Educational Society (the appellant) was the highest bidder and paid the full consideration, after which the sale was confirmed and registered. The borrower filed a securitization application under the SARFAE

RAVISHANKAR TANDONversusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2024 INSC 29910 April 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were convicted for murder under Sections 302, 34, 120B and 201 of the IPC based largely on their statements recorded under Section 27 of the Evidence Act and the subsequent recovery of the victim's body from a pond. The Supreme Court examined whether the prosecution had proved beyond reasonable doubt tha

ALAGAMMAL AND ORS.versusGANESAN AND ANR.

2024 INSC 2810 January 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The sellers (Alagammal and others) entered into a registered agreement of sale on 22‑Nov‑1990 with the buyers (Ganesan and others) for Rs.21,000, stipulating that the balance be paid within six months. The buyers paid only a fraction of the amount and failed to complete the purchase before the deadline, while the selle

LT. COL. SUPRITA CHANDELversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2024 INSC 9429 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed

Lt. Col. Suprita Chandel, a Short Service Commissioned officer in the Army Dental Corps, was denied a third chance for permanent commission after a 2013 amendment to the age‑relaxation rules. A batch of similarly situated officers successfully obtained a one‑time age relaxation and permanent commission from the Armed F

AJAY KUMAR JAINversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.

2024 INSC 9589 December 2024Rejected

Dr. Ajay Kumar Jain filed a miscellaneous application in a writ petition (W.P. (C) No.429/2020) that had been finally disposed of on 6‑8‑2021, seeking protection from alleged threats by a contemnor. The Supreme Court examined whether such a post‑disposal application could be entertained to revive proceedings or address

TEJ BHAN (D) THROUGH LR. & ORS.versusRAM KISHAN (D) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.

2024 INSC 9459 December 2024

The appeal concerned the interpretation of Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, specifically the interplay between sub‑sections (1) and (2) regarding whether a Hindu female's possession of property, whether by will, gift, or maintenance, confers absolute ownership or a restricted estate. The appellant, a purch

NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIAversusG ATHIPATHI AND OTHERS

2024 INSC 9439 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the promotion of G. Athipathi, who had served on deputation with NHAI from 2008 to 2014, was repatriated to his parent department, and later rejoined NHAI on a direct recruitment as Manager (Technical) in 2015. NHAI issued a circular in 2017 treating deputation service as regular service for promotio

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.versusPRADEEP YASHWANT KOKADE & ANR.

2024 INSC 9479 December 2024Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the case of two convicts sentenced to death for the rape and murder of a woman, focusing on the inordinate and unexplained delay in executing the death sentence. The convicts filed mercy petitions with the Governor of Maharashtra and the President of India, which were rejected after prolonged

JAMI VENKATA SURYAPRABHA & ANR.versusTARINI PRASAD NAYAK & ORS.

[2024] 12 S.C.R. 6469 December 2024Disposed off

The plaintiffs filed a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement dated 1 September 2019. The defendants, while admitting the existence of the agreement, denied its validity, calling it a sham, and denied other material facts. The plaintiffs sought an order under Order XVIII Rule 1 of the CPC that the defendants

ABHISHEK BANERJEE & ANR.versusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

2024 INSC 6689 September 2024Dismissed

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) issued multiple summons under Section 50 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) requiring the appellants, Abhishek Banerjee and Rujira Banerjee, to appear in Delhi and produce documents related to a coal theft and money‑laundering investigation. The appellants challenged the s

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusLT. COL. RAHUL ARORA

2024 INSC 6729 September 2024Dismissed

Lt. Col. Rahul Arora, an Army Medical Corps officer, was convicted by a General Court Martial of two offences—accepting extraneous consideration to declare a recruit fit and unauthorised absence—and dismissed from service. The Armed Forces Tribunal upheld the conviction, but the High Court set aside the tribunal’s orde

ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA & ORSversusUNION OF INDIA

2024 INSC 6749 September 2024Dismissed

Former civil servants, scholars and activists filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a court order directing the Union Government to cancel existing licences and stop granting new licences for the export of arms and military equipment to Israel amid the Gaza conflict. The petitioners alleged violations of inter

COX & KINGS LTD.versusSAP INDIA PVT. LTD. & ANR.

2024 INSC 6709 September 2024Case Allowed

Cox & Kings Ltd. sought appointment of an arbitrator under Clause 15.7 of its Services General Terms and Conditions Agreement with SAP India Pvt. Ltd., alleging breach of a software implementation project. The petition raised questions on whether a prima facie arbitration agreement existed under Section 11 of the Arbit

CHALASANI UDAYA SHANKAR AND OTHERSversusM/S. LEXUS TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS

2024 INSC 6719 September 2024Case Allowed

The appellants, who claimed to have purchased 94.8% of the equity shares of M/s. Lexus Technologies Pvt. Ltd., filed a company petition before the NCLT seeking rectification of the Register of Members under Sections 59 and 88 of the Companies Act, 2013 and relief for oppression, mismanagement and fraud. The NCLT, and s

DHANRAJ ASWANIversusAMAR S. MULCHANDANI & ANR.

2024 INSC 6699 September 2024Dismissed

The respondent, already in judicial custody for ECIR No.10 of 2021, feared arrest in a separate case (CR No.806 of 2019) and applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC. The complainant objected, arguing that a person already in custody cannot seek anticipatory bail for another offence. The Bombay High

SAHIL BHARGAVA & ORS.versusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.

2024 INSC 6999 September 2024

The petitioners, a group of students who completed an undergraduate medical degree in Uttarakhand in 2023, challenged the fee fixation imposed by the Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee, which raised fees retroactively for the 2018‑19 academic year. They sought issuance of their degrees without paying the additional

M/S SITARAM ENTERPRISESversusPRITHVIRAJ VARDICHAND JAIN

2024 INSC 6859 September 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed the respondent's Special Leave Petitions and granted the landlord nine months to obtain vacant possession of the premises, subject to an undertaking. The respondent failed to file the undertaking on time, filed multiple review and extension applications, and deliberately avoided personal app

MANISH SISODIAversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

2024 INSC 5959 August 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, former Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia, was arrested in 2023 in connection with CBI and ED investigations into alleged irregularities in Delhi’s excise policy. He remained in custody for about 17 months without trial, and his multiple bail applications were rejected by the trial court and the Delhi

RAHULversusNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ANOTHER

2024 INSC 5989 August 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a pillion rider, was injured in a motor accident on 27 January 2013, sustaining fractures of both forearms and undergoing surgery with plates and screws. A medical disability certificate issued by Dr. N.Y. Joshi recorded a 50% permanent disablement. The Tribunal awarded compensation based on a 25% disabi

DOLI RANI SAHAversusUNION OF INDIA

2024 INSC 6039 August 2024Disposed off

The appellant, Doli Rani Saha, claimed compensation for the death of her brother who allegedly fell from a moving train in 2003. The Railway Claims Tribunal and the Gauhati High Court dismissed the claim, holding that there was insufficient proof the deceased was a bona‑fide passenger, particularly noting the absence o

ELFIT ARABIA & ANR.versusCONCEPT HOTEL BARONS LIMITED & ORS.

2024 INSC 5369 July 2024Dismissed

The petitioners, a UAE entity, claimed that the respondents defaulted on payments under a 2004 MoU and invoked arbitration in 2022, eleven years after the alleged breach in 2011. The petition sought appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, while criminal proceeding

ARMY WELFARE EDUCATION SOCIETY NEW DELHIversusSUNIL KUMAR SHARMA & ORS. ETC.

2024 INSC 5019 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a service dispute between teachers and non‑teaching staff of a school that had been taken over by the Army Welfare Education Society (AWES) and the employees who claimed that their service conditions should not be altered. The employees filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution, argu

G.M. SHAHUL HAMEEDversusJAYANTHI R. HEGDE

2024 INSC 4939 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant filed a civil suit challenging a sale deed, while the respondent filed a counter suit. During the respondent's suit, a General Power of Attorney (GPA) that was insufficiently stamped was tendered as evidence; the trial court admitted it and marked it as an exhibit without any objection or judicial determi

GAURAV MAINIversusTHE STATE OF HARYANA

2024 INSC 4889 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were convicted for kidnapping a minor for ransom, robbery and criminal conspiracy under IPC sections 364A, 392 and 120B. The prosecution's case relied on the statements of the victim and his father, but the victim's family never reported the incident to police and the key witness, the grandfather, was ne

VINOD JASWANTRAY VYAS (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.versusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

2024 INSC 4909 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined an appeal against the conviction of two police officers for the death of Jeeva, who allegedly died from custodial torture at Amraiwadi police station. The trial and High Court had upheld the conviction, later reducing the charge from murder (Sec. 302 IPC) to culpable homicide not amounting to

MAHARAJ SINGH & ORS.versusKARAN SINGH (DEAD) THR. LRS. & ORS.

2024 INSC 4919 July 2024Case Partly allowed

The case concerned a registered agreement for sale of 2.90 acres of land executed in 1981, which the plaintiffs sought to enforce by specific performance. The defendants argued that the agreement was a sham, forged, and that they were bona‑fide purchasers without notice of the agreement. The Supreme Court held that Sec

M/S DAIMLER CHRYSLER INDIA PVT. LTD.versusM/S CONTROLS & SWITCHGEAR COMPANY LTD. & ANR.

2024 INSC 4969 July 2024

The Supreme Court examined whether a company’s purchase of luxury cars for the personal use of its directors fell within the definition of a "commercial purpose" under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, and whether defects in the cars entitled the buyer to compensation. It held that such purchases are for personal use

RATNU YADAVversusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2024 INSC 4879 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Ratnu Yadav, was convicted by the Sessions Court and upheld by the High Court for murder of his step‑mother under Section 302 IPC, based primarily on an alleged extra‑judicial confession before a village officer (PW‑1) and the testimony of the deceased’s brother (PW‑5) that the appellant dragged the vict

M/S AL-CAN EXPORT PVT. LTD.versusPRESTIGE H.M. POLYCONTAINERS LTD. & ORS.

2024 INSC 5009 July 2024Case Partly allowed

The case concerned an auction of land owned by Prestige H.M. Polycontainers Ltd., which was mortgaged to a bank and later assigned to ARCIL. The Tahsildar conducted the auction without observing the mandatory 30‑day notice period and issued the sale certificate and possession to the appellant, Al‑Can Export Pvt. Ltd.,

SUBODH KUMAR SINGH RATHOURversusTHE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER & ORS.

2024 INSC 4869 July 2024Case Allowed

The appellant was awarded a PPP tender by the Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority (KMDA) to maintain two underpasses, but KMDA later cancelled the tender citing alleged technical faults and a policy change. The appellant challenged the cancellation via a writ petition, which the High Court upheld, holding the ca

UJAGAR SINGH (DEAD) THR. LRS. & ANR.versusPUNJAB STATE & ORS.

2024 INSC 4979 July 2024Case Allowed

The appellants, followers of the Dam Dama religious shrine, filed a suit seeking a declaration that certain land belonged to the shrine and an injunction against its transfer as surplus. The trial court noted that the respondents had not raised any jurisdictional objection and decided in favor of the plaintiffs, but la

MUTHYALA SUNIL KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2024 INSC 4999 July 2024Disposed off

Transporters and tour operators filed a batch of 117 writ petitions under Article 32 challenging the levy of Border Tax/Authorization Fee by several State Governments, alleging that the All India Tourist Vehicles (Permit) Rules, 2023 had abolished such levies. The petitioners claimed double taxation and argued that the

ALI HOSSAIN MANDAL & ORS.versusWEST BENGAL BOARD OF PRIMARY EDUCATION & ORS.

2024 INSC 4539 May 2024

The West Bengal Board of Primary Education issued a notification on 23 December 2020 to fill 16,500 primary teacher vacancies, publishing a merit list on 15 February 2021. After many positions remained unfilled, a single judge ordered that 252 writ petitioners be appointed to the remaining 3,929 vacancies, a decision l

RAJENDRA BHAGWANJI UMRANIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2024 INSC 4139 May 2024Disposed off

The Sessions Court convicted two accused under Section 325 IPC, sentencing them to five years' rigorous imprisonment and fines. The Gujarat High Court reduced the term to four years and, invoking Section 357 of the CrPC, ordered each accused to deposit Rs 2.5 lakh as compensation to the victim, on the condition that pa

M/S RAJCO STEEL ENTERPRISESversusKAVITA SARAFF AND ANOTHER

2024 INSC 2889 April 2024Dismissed

M/S Rajco Steel Enterprises, a partnership firm, filed complaints alleging that four cheques issued by respondent No.1 were dishonoured for insufficient funds and were purportedly issued in discharge of a debt owed to the firm. The trial court convicted the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act

AABID KHANversusDINESH AND OTHERS

2024 INSC 2919 April 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a self‑employed mechanic with 30 years of experience, suffered a road accident on 23‑04‑2013 resulting in a 17% whole‑body disability as certified by Dr. Alok Mehta. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.87,700 as loss of future income, which the High Court enhanced to Rs.1,27,700, both based on

KIZHAKKE VATTAKANDIYIL MADHAVAN (DEAD) THR. LRS.versusTHIYYURKUNNATH MEETHAL JANAKI AND ORS

2024 INSC 2879 April 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a suit for partition of a property claimed by a son born of a widow’s second marriage, who sought his share through his mother, the widow. The widow had remarried after the death of her first husband, and the plaintiff relied on a series of lease and assignment deeds executed in 1910 and 1925 to esta

KARIKHO KRIversusNUNEY TAYANG AND ANOTHER

2024 INSC 2899 April 2024Disposed off

In the 2019 Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly election, independent candidate Karikho Kri was elected from Tezu (ST) constituency. Nuney Tayang challenged the election, alleging that Kri failed to disclose three vehicles, a no‑dues certificate for government accommodation, and municipal/property tax liabilities, t

SMT. NAJMUNISHAversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

2024 INSC 2909 April 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The prosecution alleged that secret information received by an intelligence officer indicated that Accused No.4 would transport narcotics in an auto‑rickshaw, leading to a raid in which 1.45 kg of charas was seized from the vehicle and, subsequently, 2.098 kg was recovered from the house of Accused No.4 where Accused N

THE VVF LTD. EMPLOYEES UNIONversusM/S. VVF INDIA LIMITED & ANR.

2024 INSC 2939 April 2024Disposed off

The VVF Ltd. Employees Union filed a charter of demand in 2008 seeking wage revisions and various allowances for 146 workmen employed at VVF India Ltd.'s Sewree and Sion units. The Industrial Tribunal awarded relief on several demands but rejected the union's claims for pay‑scale revision, adjustments, and dearness all

NO.2809759H EX-RECRUIT BABANNA MACHCHEDversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2024 INSC 959 February 2024Appeal(s) allowed

Four ex‑recruits of the Maratha Light Infantry were dismissed in 2013 on the ground that they had secured enrollment under the Unit Headquarters Quota by producing forged relationship certificates. The appellants contended that they had applied as general‑category candidates and never submitted any such certificates. T

M/S. K.P. MOZIKAversusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD. AND ORS

2024 INSC 279 January 2024

The assessees entered into contracts to provide motor vehicles, cranes and related equipment to ONGC and tank trucks to IOCL, and the tax authorities treated these arrangements as sales under Clause 29A(d) of Article 366, imposing sales tax and VAT. The assessees contended that the contracts were for services, not for

ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITYversusNARESH AGARWAL & ORS.

[2024] 11 S.C.R. 16478 November 2024Reference answered

The Supreme Court considered a reference to determine the criteria for an educational institution to be considered a minority institution under Article 30 of the Constitution, and whether the decision in Azeez Basha (which held that Aligarh Muslim University was not a minority institution because it was established by

M/S SIDDAMSETTY INFRA PROJECTS PVT. LTD.versusKATTA SUJATHA REDDY & ORS.

2024 INSC 8618 November 2024

The petitioner, Siddamsetty Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd., entered into two agreements to sell agricultural land with the respondents in 1997, paid a substantial portion of the consideration, and sought specific performance after the respondents refused to execute the sale deed. The trial court dismissed the suit, the High

RAJIVE RATURIversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2024 INSC 8588 November 2024Directions issued

The petition was filed by Rajive Raturi, a visually‑challenged activist, seeking directions to ensure meaningful access to public spaces for persons with disabilities under the RPWD Act. The Supreme Court had earlier issued eleven action points in 2017, but States and Union Territories showed slow compliance, leading t

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.versusBHUPENDRA SINGH

2024 INSC 5928 August 2024Disposed off

The case concerned Bhupendra Singh, a former Inspector and Assistant Registrar of the Rajasthan civil services, who was suspended in 1979 and later removed from service after a departmental enquiry that found him guilty of multiple irregularities, including unauthorized appointments, embezzlement and failure to hand ov

ALLARAKHA HABIB MEMON ETC.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2024 INSC 5908 August 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were convicted for murder under Sections 302 and 120B of the IPC based on the testimony of two alleged eyewitnesses – a police constable (PW‑12) and the first informant (PW‑11). The Supreme Court found that PW‑12, who had actually brought the weapons to the police station, never lodged a formal complaint

JAGDISH PRASAD SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS

2024 INSC 5918 August 2024Appeal(s) allowed

Jagdish Prasad Singh, a retired government employee, was promoted to Senior Selection Grade (ADSO) on 10 March 1991 and received the revised pay scale of Rs.6500-10500 under the 5th Pay Commission. The State of Bihar later claimed that a 1999 Government Resolution (paragraph 11) automatically terminated his promotion a

K. ARUMUGAMversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS ETC.

2024 INSC 6308 August 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, who were registered lottery dealers in Kerala, bought state lottery tickets in bulk at a discount and resold them to retailers on an outright basis, earning a profit. The Central Excise authorities directed them to obtain service‑tax registration and pay tax under the heading ‘business auxiliary service

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, JAIPUR -IIversusM/S MIRAJ PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.

2024 INSC 4708 July 2024Dismissed

The Commissioner of Central Excise issued show‑cause notices alleging that Miraj Products packaged chewing tobacco in poly packs that were group packages intended for retail sale, thereby attracting Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Miraj contended that the poly packs were placed inside HDPE bags, which were

SARDAR RAVI INDER SINGH & ANR.versusSTATE OF JHARKHAND & ANR.

2024 INSC 4728 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, trustees of a trust, entered into sale agreements with the second respondent and his brother, which later led to a suit for specific performance. The suit was withdrawn after an out‑of‑court settlement, but the second respondent filed a criminal complaint alleging fraud and other offences. The appellant

BOMBAY SLUM REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITEDversusSAMIR NARAIN BHOJWANI

2024 INSC 4788 July 2024Case Partly allowed

The dispute arose from a slum redevelopment project where the respondent, Samir Narain Bhojwani, alleged default by the appellant, Bombay Slum Redevelopment Corporation Private Limited, leading to arbitration and an award in favour of the respondent. The appellant challenged the award under Section 34 of the Arbitratio

NARESH KUMARversusSTATE OF DELHI

2024 INSC 4648 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Naresh Kumar was convicted under Section 302 IPC, read with Section 34 IPC, for the murder of Arun Kumar, based on two incriminating circumstances – his exhortation to kill and his act of holding the victim to enable the brother’s stabbing. The conviction was affirmed by the High Court, but the appellant

MAHESH CHAND BARETH & ANR.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.

2024 INSC 4668 July 2024Dismissed

The appellants challenged the recruitment of Prabodhak teachers in Rajasthan, arguing that Rule 13(v) of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Prabodhak Service Rules, 2008, which gave age relaxation to persons who had served in certain educational projects, violated Article 14 of the Constitution, and that the award of bonus m

DHARMENDRA KUMAR @ DHAMMAversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2024 INSC 4808 July 2024Dismissed

The appellant, Dharmendra Kumar, was convicted for murder under s.302 read with s.34 IPC for stabbing Tillu during a dispute over a wall construction, with additional convictions under s.147, 148 and 149 later set aside. The Supreme Court examined whether alleged contradictions in witness testimonies, the inconclusive

R. RADHAKRISHNA PRASADversusSWAMINATHAN & ANR.

2024 INSC 4638 July 2024Dismissed

The plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of a 1998 agreement to purchase a property for Rs 30 lakhs, having paid an initial advance of Rs 3 lakhs and claiming to have paid an additional Rs 15 lakhs thereafter. The trial court denied specific performance but ordered the defendant to refund the total advance o

NIPUN MALHOTRAversusSONY PICTURES FILMS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.

2024 INSC 4658 July 2024Disposed off

The appellant, a person with arthrogryposis, challenged the portrayal of persons with disabilities in the film ‘Aankh Micholi’, alleging violations of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (RPwD Act) and the Cinematograph Act, 1952. He sought the inclusion of disability experts on the Central Board of Film

THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER KARNATAKA & ANR.versusMYSORE SALES INTERNATIONAL LTD. & ORS.

2024 INSC 4848 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed

Mysore Sales International Ltd., a Karnataka government undertaking that manufactures and bottles arrack, was directed by the Income Tax Deputy Commissioner to collect TDS from liquor vendors (excise contractors) under Section 206C of the Income Tax Act, treating the vendors as "buyers". The vendors obtained retail ven

HAR NARAYAN TEWARI (D) THR. LRS.versusCANTONMENT BOARD, RAMGARH CANTONMENT & ORS.

2024 INSC 4678 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed

Har Narayan Tewari filed a title suit seeking declaration of his ownership and possession over 0.30 acres of land in Ramgarh village. The Cantonment Board, Ramgarh, contested the claim, while an earlier suit (Title Suit No. 8/64) filed by Maharani sought title over the entire 5.38 acres, including the disputed 0.30 acr

LAL MOHAMMAD MANJUR ANSARIversusTHE STATE OF GUJRAT

2024 INSC 4758 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC based on eyewitness testimony, an alleged extra‑judicial confession to his employer (PW‑19), and a dying declaration by the victim (PW‑24). The Supreme Court examined the credibility of the extra‑judicial confession, noting that the appellant had worked for th

VISHWANATHAversusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT

2024 INSC 4828 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Vishwanatha was convicted by the Karnataka High Court for murder and robbery based on the testimony of two eyewitnesses, PW‑1 and PW‑2, who claimed to have seen him and a co‑accused strangling the victim. The trial court had acquitted them, citing contradictions between the eyewitness accounts and the pos

THE STATE OF PUNJABversusPARTAP SINGH VERKA

2024 INSC 4838 July 2024Dismissed

The State of Punjab appealed against the High Court's order setting aside a trial court's summons of Dr. Partap Singh Verka under Section 319 of the CrPC for alleged offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The FIR alleged that Verka, a doctor employed in a government hospital, dem

THE STATE OF WEST BENGALversusDR. SANAT KUMAR GHOSH AND ORS.

2024 INSC 4698 July 2024Directions issued

The State of West Bengal appointed 24 Vice‑Chancellors in 2022, but the High Court held the State‑constituted Search Committee invalid for lacking a UGC‑nominated member, rendering those appointments unlawful. Subsequent attempts by the State to extend tenures and appoint interim Vice‑Chancellors were also challenged,

SHIV PRATAP SINGH RANAversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR.

2024 INSC 4818 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Shiv Pratap Singh Rana, was charged under Sections 376(2)(n) and 506 of the IPC for allegedly raping and threatening the prosecutrix by promising marriage and blackmailing her with photographs. The prosecution’s case relied on the prosecutrix’s statements recorded under Sections 161 and 164 of the Cr.P.C

P. SASIKUMARversusTHE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2024 INSC 4748 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was convicted for the murder of a 14‑year‑old girl under sections 302/34, 449, 404 and 201 of the IPC, based largely on circumstantial evidence and the dock identification of two witnesses who had never seen him before the incident and who identified him while he wore a monkey cap that obscured his face.

FRANK VITUSversusNARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU & ORS.

2024 INSC 4798 July 2024

Frank Vitus, a Nigerian national, was charged under Sections 8, 22, 23 and 29 of the NDPS Act. The Special Judge granted him bail but imposed two conditions: a certificate of assurance from the High Commission of Nigeria that he would not leave India and a requirement to drop a PIN on Google Maps to disclose his locati

COL. RAMNEESH PAL SINGHversusSUGANDHI AGGARWAL

2024 INSC 3978 May 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the guardianship of two minor children of Colonel Ramneesh Pal Singh and Sugandhi Aggarwal. The Family Court had awarded permanent custody to the father with visitation rights to the mother, but the Delhi High Court set aside that order and ordered shared custody. The Supreme Court examined the welfa

MAHENDRA KAUR ARORAversusHDFC BANK LTD

2024 INSC 4328 May 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a landlady, leased part of her commercial premises to HDFC Bank for nine years. The bank gave three months' notice to terminate the lease but failed to hand over vacant possession and did not pay use‑and‑occupation charges, while also not refunding the security deposit. The Rent Tribunal decreed eviction

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusSANTOSH KUMAR TIWARI

2024 INSC 3928 May 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a Head Constable in the CRPF, was found guilty of assaulting a colleague and was compulsorily retired under Rule 27 of the CRPF Rules, 1955. He challenged the retirement, arguing that Rule 27's provision of compulsory retirement was ultra vires Section 11 of the CRPF Act, 1949, and that the punishment w

MRS. BHUMIKABEN N. MODI & ORS.versusLIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA

2024 INSC 3958 May 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased submitted a life insurance proposal on 6 July 1996 and paid the first premium by cheque on 9 July 1996; he died accidentally on 14 July 1996. The insurer issued an Acceptance‑cum‑First Premium Receipt on 9 July, which the appellants (widow and children) relied on to claim policy benefits. The insurer argue

SHEIKH NOORUL HASSANversusNAHAKPAM INDRAJIT SINGH & ORS.

2024 INSC 3918 May 2024Dismissed

The election petitioner challenged the election of the returned candidate on grounds of non‑disclosure of bank accounts, a vehicle, spouse's occupation and other material facts. The returned candidate’s written statement introduced explanations for these allegations, prompting the petitioner to seek leave to file a rep

SELVAMANIversusTHE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2024 INSC 3938 May 2024Dismissed

The appellant, one of five accused, was convicted for gang rape and criminal intimidation under Sections 376(g) and 506(1) of the IPC and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act. The victim, her mother and aunt turned hostile during cross‑examination, three and a half months after their exami

PATHAPATI SUBBA REDDY (DIED) BY L.RS. & ORS.versusTHE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LA)

2024 INSC 2868 April 2024Dismissed

Sixteen claimants filed a reference under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for compensation on land acquired in 1989. Three claimants, including Pathapati Subba Reddy, died during the pendency of the reference and their heirs were not impleaded. After the reference was dismissed in 1999, the heirs of the deceased claiman

VIPIN SAHNI AND ANOTHERversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

2024 INSC 2848 April 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, who founded a society that obtained AICTE approvals for several business schools, were charged under Sections 420 and 120B IPC for allegedly cheating the AICTE by concealing that the leased land was mortgaged. After a Special Judicial Magistrate discharged them, the CBI approached the Allahabad High Cou

KARIM UDDIN BARBHUIYAversusAMINUL HAQUE LASKAR & ORS.

2024 INSC 2828 April 2024Case Allowed

The appellant, Karim Uddin Barbhuiya, contested the dismissal of his application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC seeking rejection of an election petition filed by Aminul Haque Laskar alleging false statements in the appellant's nomination affidavit and improper acceptance of his nomination. The Supreme Court examined whet

YASH TUTEJA & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2024 INSC 3018 April 2024

The petitioners challenged a complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement under Section 44(1)(b) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA), arguing that the offences alleged, except for IPC Section 120B, were not "scheduled offences" as required by clause (y) of Section 2(1) of the PMLA. The Supreme C

KHENGARBHAI LAKHABHAI DAMBHALAversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

2024 INSC 2858 April 2024Dismissed

The appellant's vehicle was seized under the Gujarat Prohibition Act after the driver was found carrying liquor well beyond the permissible limit. The appellant filed a Special Criminal Application under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution with the High Court seeking the vehicle's release, without first invoking Secti

K.B. LAL (KRISHNA BAHADUR LAL)versusGYANENDRA PRATAP & ORS.

2024 INSC 2818 April 2024Dismissed

The appellant, K.B. Lal, sought to set aside a 2006 ex-parte order of the Civil Judge (Jr. Division) Barabanki by filing applications under Order IX, Rule 7 of the CPC, first in 2017 and again in 2020, after a delay of about 14 years. The delay was explained by the appellant as due to non-receipt of summons and neglige

RAJ REDDY KALLEMversusTHE STATE OF HARYANA & ANR.

2024 INSC 3478 April 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing dishonoured cheques and also faced an FIR under Sections 406, 420 and 120B of the IPC for allegedly cheating a complainant after taking an advance for a laser cutting machine. Both parties initially agreed to settle the dispute

BALVEER BATRAversusTHE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY & ANR.

2024 INSC 3618 February 2024Disposed off

The appellant, father of a deceased motor‑vehicle accident victim, filed an application under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) at Nainital. The Tribunal, after hearing witnesses, held that it lacked territorial jurisdiction and, on that basis alone, dismissed the cl

NARESH CHANDRA AGRAWALversusE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2024 INSC 948 February 2024Dismissed

The Bank of Rajasthan complained that the audit firm Ramesh C. Agrawal & Co. failed to flag suspicious transactions, leading the Director (Discipline) to give a prima facie opinion that the appellant was not guilty of professional misconduct. The Board of Discipline disagreed and, relying on Rule 9(3)(b) of the 2007 Ru

BILKIS YAKUB RASOOLversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

2024 INSC 248 January 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court quashed the remission orders granted by the State of Gujarat to 11 convicts in the Bilkis Bano case, who were convicted for gangrape, murder, and rioting during the 2002 Gujarat riots. The Court held that the State of Gujarat was not the 'appropriate government' under Section 432(7) of the CrPC to gra

JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS.versusMB POWER (MADHYA PRADESH) LIMITED & ORS.

2024 INSC 238 January 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission (State Commission) was asked to approve the procurement of 1,000 MW of power through a competitive bidding process. After negotiations, the Commission approved only 500 MW and adopted the tariffs of the lowest bidders, while the higher‑priced bids of L‑4 and L‑5 were reje

M/S ARIF AZIM CO. LTD.versusM/S MICROMAX INFORMATICS FZE

2024 INSC 8507 November 2024Dismissed

M/s Arif Azim Co. Ltd., an Afghan distributor, entered into a 2010 distributorship agreement with M/s Micromax Informatics FZE (UAE) that contained an arbitration clause designating Dubai as the venue and subjecting the arbitration to UAE Arbitration and Conciliation rules. After a credit dispute, the petitioner sought

GOQII TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITEDversusSOKRATI TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED

2024 INSC 8537 November 2024Appeal(s) allowed

Goqii Technologies (appellant) entered a Master Services Agreement with Sokrati Technologies (respondent) containing an arbitration clause (Clause 18.12). After paying over Rs 5.5 crore, Goqii raised concerns based on an independent audit reporting alleged overcharges and fraudulent practices, and invoked arbitration u

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search