ASAR MOHAMMAD AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF U.P.
2018 INSC 98524 October 2018Disposed off
The case involved the murder of Zahida Begum and her son Ishlam, whose bodies were recovered from a septic tank after appellant No.1, Asar Mohammad, confessed and led police to the site. The trial court convicted all three accused under Sections 302 and 201 IPC, sentencing them to death (later commuted to life). On app…
MUKESH SINGHversusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
2023 INSC 76524 August 2023Dismissed
The appellant Mukesh Singh was convicted of murder, robbery and related offences based primarily on the identification of the injured eyewitness Sushil Kumar, who identified him in court after the accused had refused to attend a test identification parade (TIP). The accused argued that his refusal to participate in the…
ZAKIR ABDUL MIRAJKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
2022 INSC 85524 August 2022Dismissed
The State of Maharashtra alleged that the appellants were members of an organized crime syndicate operating the illegal "Mumbai Matka" gambling network. Police raided a gambling den, recorded confessions of several accused, including the appellants, by an Additional Superintendent of Police (Addl. SP) under Section 18 …
MANJEET SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
2021 INSC 41924 August 2021Appeal(s) allowed
An FIR (No.477) recorded the death of Amarjit Singh and injuries to his nephew Manjeet Singh, naming five persons as perpetrators. Only one accused, Sartaj Singh, was charge‑sheeted; the other four private respondents were placed in column‑2. During trial, the victim (PW1) reiterated the allegations against the private…
STATE OF HARYANAversusRAM MEHAR & OTHERS ETC. ETC.
2016 INSC 61624 August 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Haryana prosecuted 148 workers for offences including murder arising from a factory fire. After the prosecution examined 102 witnesses and the accused gave statements under Section 313 CrPC, the defence sought recall of several prosecution witnesses under Section 311 CrPC, alleging that the lead counsel ha…
SASAN POWER LIMITEDversusNORTH AMERICAN COAL CORPORATION INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
2016 INSC 119624 August 2016Dismissed
Sasan Power Ltd entered into Agreement‑I with the American company NAC, which contained an arbitration clause governed by English law and seated in London. Two years later the parties executed Agreement‑II, a tripartite deed involving Sasan Power, NACC India (a subsidiary of NAC) and NAC, which transferred NAC's rights…
DILIP K. BASUversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.
2015 INSC 52424 July 2015Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined petitions seeking directions to set up State Human Rights Commissions (SHRCs) in several states that had failed to do so under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993. The Court held that the word "may" in Section 21 of the Act does not make the power to constitute SHRCs discretionary; it is…
ANUJ KUMAR GUPTA @ SETHI GUPTAversusSTATE OF BIHAR
2013 INSC 49124 July 2013Dismissed
The appellant, Anuj Kumar Gupta, was convicted for the murder of Chhotu Kumar Das based largely on a confessional statement he gave to the investigating officer (PW‑9) that led police to the victim’s body in a river. The trial court sentenced him to death, which the High Court later commuted to life imprisonment. The a…
M. SARVANA @ K.D. SARAVANAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2012 INSC 30324 July 2012Dismissed
The appellant was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for stabbing and further assaulting the deceased, who later died. The prosecution relied on a dying declaration recorded by a police officer after medical certification of fitness, corroborated by an eye‑witness, forensic blood‑group evidence, the recovered kn…
SHUDHAKARversusSTATE OF M.P.
2012 INSC 30124 July 2012Dismissed
The appellant Shudhakar was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for allegedly setting his wife on fire. The deceased gave three dying declarations: the first, recorded by a Naib Tehsildar, exonerated the husband and claimed the fire originated from a stove; the second and third, recorded later by a Tehsildar and …
MANOJ PRATAP SINGHversusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
2022 INSC 65224 June 2022Dismissed
Manoj Pratap Singh was convicted of kidnapping, raping and murdering a seven-and-a-half-year-old mentally and physically disabled girl. The prosecution proved its case through a complete chain of circumstantial evidence, including DNA matches, blood‑stained clothing, the victim’s body recovered at the appellant’s direc…
RUMI BORA DUTTAversusSTATE OF ASSAM
2013 INSC 35424 May 2013Dismissed
The appellant aunt and nephew were convicted for murdering the deceased husband, an Upper Division Clerk, based on circumstantial evidence. The prosecution proved that the death occurred at 1.30 a.m., the victims were found dead in bed, the accused were present, and the nephew’s statement under Section 27 led to the re…
RAJPUT JABBARSINGH MALAJIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
2011 INSC 40924 May 2011Dismissed
The appellant, Rajput Jabbarsingh Malaji, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for murdering his brother Jethusing by striking him on the face with an axe. The prosecution relied on the dying victim's wife (PW‑3) who identified the appellant, corroborated by two brothers (PW‑5, PW‑6) whose statements were recorded under…
DASHRATHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2025 INSC 65424 April 2025Case Partly allowed
Dashrath was convicted under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demanding and accepting a bribe. He challenged the conviction on four grounds: the sanction to prosecute was mechanically granted, the investigation was conducted by an Inspector of Police contrary to Sect…
MAGHAVENDRA PRATAP SINGH @ PANKAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
2023 INSC 41524 April 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Maghavendra Pratap Singh (Pankaj Singh), was convicted for the murder of businessman Goverdhan Aggarwal and related offences under Sections 302, 201, 120B of the IPC and the Arms Act, based largely on circumstantial evidence. The prosecution’s case lacked any eyewitnesses, direct forensic linkage, or rel…
SHIVAKUMAR & ORS.versusSHARANABASAPPA & ORS.
2020 INSC 34924 April 2020Dismissed
The plaintiffs filed a suit claiming ownership of several properties on the basis of a Will dated 20‑05‑1991 executed by the deceased Sri Sangappa and sought to declare a trust created by the defendants void. The defendants challenged the genuineness of the Will, pointing to numerous irregularities such as the use of d…
DIPAKBHAI JAGDISHCHANDRA PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHER
2019 INSC 56824 April 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Dipakbhai Jagdishchandra Patel, was implicated in a counterfeit currency case after co‑accused 1‑3 claimed the fake notes originated from his residence. No counterfeit notes were actually recovered from his home and the only incriminating material was the co‑accused statements recorded by police under Se…
DELHI ADMINISTRATIONversusVIDYA GUPTA
2018 INSC 40424 April 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The Delhi Administration appealed the acquittal of Vidya Gupta, a sweet shop vendor, who was charged under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 for storing adulterated ghee used to make jalebis. The Supreme Court held that Section 7, read with its explanation, deems any person who stores adulterated food for t…
HEERA LAL AND ANR.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN
2017 INSC 39024 April 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The wife, Lalita, committed suicide within five years of her marriage, alleging daily quarrels and dowry demands by her mother‑in‑law and father‑in‑law. A dying declaration recorded by a Sub‑Divisional Magistrate detailed the harassment and the in‑laws’ presence at the time of the act. The trial court acquitted the acc…
VUTUKURU LAKSHMAIAHversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
2015 INSC 35224 April 2015Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined the murder of Patrangi Ramanaiah, who was stabbed by a group of accused during an unlawful assembly. The trial court and High Court had convicted most of the accused under Sections 302, 148 and 324 IPC, relying on eyewitness testimony, a dying declaration, and forensic evidence, while acquitt…
MIS. BHUWALKA STEEL INDUSTRIES LTD. & ANO!HERversusUNION OF IND!A & OTHERS
2017 INSC 26524 March 2017Matter referred to larger bench
The Supreme Court examined whether Rule 5 of the Hot‑Re‑rolling Steel Mills Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997, which allows the annual capacity of production (ACP) to be deemed equal to actual production for the 1996‑97 year, creates a legal fiction and is ultra vires Section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944.…
MANMEET SINGH ALIAS GOLDIEversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2015 INSC 25324 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Manmeet Singh (alias Goldie) was convicted under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code for dacoity with murder, based on an alleged robbery of a large sum of money and the killing of Mohinder Singh. The prosecution alleged that five or more persons participated in the dacoity, but only the appellant was id…
MD. BANI ALAM MAZID @ DHANversusSTATE OF ASSAM
2025 INSC 26024 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant was accused, along with a co‑accused, of kidnapping and murdering a 16‑year‑old girl in Assam. The prosecution relied on three circumstantial links: the victim was last seen with the appellant, the appellant’s extra‑judicial confessions to several villagers, and the recovery of the dead body after those c…
HIRALAL BABULAL SONIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
2025 INSC 26624 February 2025Disposed off
The case involved a fraud scheme where fake telegraphic transfers were used to withdraw Rs. 6.7 crore from a bank, the proceeds of which were allegedly used to purchase 205 gold bars that were later seized from accused Nandkumar Babulal Soni. The trial court convicted Soni under Sections 120B and 411 of the IPC, direct…
NANJAPPANversusRAMASAMY &ANR
2015 INSC 15224 February 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Nanjappan, entered into a 1987 sale agreement to sell his sole property for Rs 45,000, receiving an advance of Rs 25,000, with the balance to be paid within 2½ years. The time for execution was extended repeatedly, ultimately spanning eight years, and the respondents paid a total advance of Rs 42,500. Th…
MUNNA LALversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
2023 INSC 7824 January 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned the murder of Narayan in 1985, for which Munna Lal, Sheo Lal and Babu Ram were convicted under section 302 IPC based largely on the oral testimony of two eye‑witnesses, PW‑2 (Ram Vilas) and PW‑3 (Hemraj), and medical evidence. The Supreme Court examined the credibility of these witnesses, noting PW‑2…
UNION OF INDIAversusVIJAY KRISHNA UNIYAL (D) THROUGH LRS.
[2017] 14 S.C.R. 6823 December 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The Union of India, as the owner of land covered by an Old Grant, issued a notice to resume a 3.398‑acre property in Landour Cantonment occupied by Vijay Krishna Uniyal, who sued for a permanent injunction claiming ownership based on a 1980 sale deed and long possession. The trial court, the first appellate court and t…
HAMID ALI KHAN (D) THROUGH LRS. & ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.
2021 INSC 77423 November 2021Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants challenged the acquisition of their land for a residential‑commercial scheme, arguing that the State had improperly invoked the urgency clause under Section 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to dispense with the hearing mandated by Section 5A. The High Court had dismissed the writ petition, but on …
SMT. BAYANABAI KAWAREversusRAJENDRA S/O BABURAO DHOTE
2017 INSC 113623 November 2017Dismissed
The plaintiff purchased a plot from a housing cooperative society by a registered sale deed dated 29‑12‑1981 and was placed in possession. The defendant later encroached on the land and erected a hut, prompting the plaintiff to sue for possession and mesne profits. The trial court and first appellate court dismissed th…
PARVEEN KUMARversusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
2024 INSC 71723 September 2024Dismissed
Parveen Kumar was married to Raksha Devi, who filed multiple complaints alleging cruelty, including an FIR under Section 498-A and a maintenance petition under Section 125 CrPC. Within two years of marriage, she died by ingesting aluminum phosphide tablets, and her brother lodged an FIR accusing the husband of cruelty …
GOVINDBHAI CHHOTABHAI PATEL & ORS.versusPATEL RAMANBHAI MATHURBHAI
2019 INSC 107023 September 2019Dismissed
The appellants, sons of the deceased donor, claimed that a property gifted by their father to the respondent was ancestral and that the donor lacked authority to execute the gift deed, alleging the deed was forged. The trial court held the property ancestral, a view affirmed by the first appellate court, but the Gujara…
S.P.S. RATHOREversusC.B.I. & ANR.
2016 INSC 90723 September 2016Disposed off
S.P.S. Rathore, a senior police officer, was convicted under Section 354 IPC for molesting a minor girl, Ruchika, after she was forced into his office and embraced against her will. The prosecution relied primarily on the testimony of a single eye‑witness, PW‑13 (Aradhana), whose account was corroborated by other witne…
DHAL SINGH DEWANGANversusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
2016 INSC 90523 September 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Dhal Singh Dewangan was accused of murdering his wife and five daughters. The prosecution relied on statements of village witnesses (PWs 1,2,3,5) that they heard the appellant’s mother (PW‑6) accuse him, and on circumstantial evidence such as the presence of a blood‑stained knife and the appellant’s uncon…
PREM KUMAR GULATIversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
2014 INSC 66823 September 2014Disposed off
The deceased Rajni died from severe burns after kerosene oil was poured on her and she was set alight. Her dying declaration named her husband Mahender Singh, her brother‑in‑law Prem Kumar Gulati and his wife Simla as participants, but did not specify who actually poured the oil or lit the fire. The trial court and Hig…
DELTA DISTILLERIES LIMITEDversusUNITED SPIRITS LIMITED & ANR.
2013 INSC 64923 September 2013Dismissed
Delta Distilleries supplied Indian Made Foreign Liquor to United Spirits under a contract that made the buyer responsible for sales tax. A dispute arose over a set‑off/refund claimed by Delta from the Sales Tax Department, which United Spirits argued reduced its tax burden. The arbitral tribunal allowed United Spirits …
KULDEEP SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2010 INSC 64023 September 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The police, acting on secret information, seized four sealed bags containing 150 kg of poppy husk from the appellant's residence. No samples were taken at the time of seizure; instead, the Station House Officer later broke the seals, mixed the contents, and collected samples before resealing the bags. The appellant was…
M/S KARNATAKA EMTA COAL MINES LIMITED AND ANOTHERversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
2024 INSC 62323 August 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appeals challenge the Special Judge’s order on charge (24‑12‑2021) and charge‑framing order (03‑03‑2022) against Karnataka Emta Coal Mines Ltd (KECML) and its former MD for alleged conspiracy to illegally sell coal washery rejects. The Court examined whether the CBI’s investigation was predicated solely on the 2013…
IRFAN @ NAKAversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
2023 INSC 75823 August 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Irfan, was convicted and sentenced to death for allegedly setting fire to a room that killed his son and two brothers, based primarily on two dying declarations. The prosecution argued that the appellant had motive and that eye‑witnesses saw him pour inflammable substance and lock the door. The defence c…
G H GIRISH SINGHversusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
2019 INSC 79623 July 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Uttarakhand appealed the acquittal of Girish Singh and Jodh Singh, who were charged under Sections 304B r/w 34 and 306 r/w 34 of the IPC for the alleged dowry death of Ishwari Devi, who committed suicide by burning within seven years of marriage. The High Court convicted them, relying on unproduced letters…
DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMYversusARUN SHOURIE
2014 INSC 50623 July 2014Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined an editorial published by Arun Shourie that criticised a report of a Commission of Inquiry headed by a sitting Supreme Court Judge, Justice Kuldip Singh. Dr. Subramanian Swamy filed contempt petitions alleging that the editorial scandalised the Court. The Court was asked to decide (i) whether…
GIAN CHAND & ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA
2013 INSC 48823 July 2013Dismissed
The appellants were seized at night while travelling in a jeep that contained ten bags of poppy husk (total 410 kg). They were convicted under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and sentenced to ten years of rigorous imprisonment. On appeal they argued that the prosecution failed to …
KALIYAversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2013 INSC 48923 July 2013Dismissed
The appellant, Kaliya, mother‑in‑law, was convicted of murdering her daughter‑in‑law, Guddi, who was burnt alive in the appellant's house. Guddi’s dying declaration, stating that Kaliya poured kerosene on her, was recorded by a doctor and a nurse, but the original document was lost and only a carbon copy was produced. …
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MADURAIversusAYYAPPAN TEXTILES LTD.
2013 INSC 49023 July 2013Dismissed
Ayyappan Textiles Ltd., a manufacturer of cotton yarn under heading 52.03, was inspected on 30 August 1993 and two registers and a file of weekly test reports were seized. The Central Excise Department issued a show‑cause notice alleging that the company had been producing yarn of higher counts (40s, 43s, 60s, 82s) tha…
AGNIRAJ & ORS. ETC.versusSTATE THROUGH DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CB-CID
2025 INSC 77423 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The case arose from a violent incident on 14 November 2012 in which members of a political rival family were attacked, resulting in three deaths. The prosecution relied on three key witnesses – PW‑1, PW‑2 and a 10‑year‑old child PW‑9 – as well as fingerprint and weapon‑recovery evidence to secure convictions of accused…
MAHARANA PRATAP SINGHversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS
2025 INSC 55423 April 2025Disposed off
Maharana Pratap Singh, a constable in the CID dog squad, was dismissed from service in 1996 following departmental proceedings that found him guilty of four charges, while he was later acquitted of the related criminal charges. The appellant challenged the dismissal, alleging denial of due process, vague charges, and t…
PURAN CHANDversusSTATE OF H.P.
2014 INSC 31523 April 2014Dismissed
The appellant, Puran Chand, was convicted under Section 376 IPC for raping a 17‑year‑old girl who later attempted suicide. He appealed, claiming false implication due to enmity, a 20‑day delay in filing the FIR, and that the medical report showing an intact hymen created reasonable doubt. The Supreme Court held that th…
NETAJI ACHYUT SHINDE (PATIL) & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2021 INSC 20023 March 2021Dismissed
The case concerns the murder of Suhas on 5 July 2011, for which three accused—Netaji Achyut Shinde (A‑1), Samadhan Shinde (A‑2) and Balasaheb Shinde (A‑3)—were charged under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC. A telephonic intimation at 17:45 was treated by the trial court as the FIR, leading to the conviction of A‑2…
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusBALVEER SINGH
2025 INSC 26123 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Madhya Pradesh prosecuted Balveer Singh for the murder, concealment and conspiracy to murder his wife, relying heavily on the testimony of the 7‑year‑old daughter, Rani, as the sole eye‑witness. The High Court acquitted the accused, holding that the child’s delayed statement and residence with an inimical …
AMITversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
2012 INSC 10023 February 2012Case Partly allowed
The appellant, a neighbour, abducted a three‑year‑old girl from her home under the pretext of giving her biscuits, subsequently raping and murdering her. The trial court convicted him under IPC sections 364, 376, 377, 302 and 201 and imposed death for the murder, which the High Court affirmed. On appeal, the Supreme Co…
SAHDEO @ SAHDEO SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.
2010 INSC 11523 February 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined contempt proceedings initiated suo motu by the Allahabad High Court against police personnel accused of illegally detaining a man whose whereabouts were unknown. The High Court had presumed the detainee dead under Section 108 of the Evidence Act, despite only 4½ years having elapsed, and conv…
RANDEEP SINGH @ RANA & ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
2024 INSC 88722 November 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were convicted under Sections 364, 302, 120-B and 201 of the IPC for the abduction and murder of Gurpal Singh, based largely on the testimony of an alleged eyewitness, CCTV footage, and confessional statements made to police. The Supreme Court examined the credibility of the eyewitness, noting material o…
ARVIND KUMAR @ NEMICHAND & ORS.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN
2021 INSC 76422 November 2021Appeal(s) allowed
The case arose from a land‑dispute over a pathway between the prime accused Surjaram and the deceased Ladduram, which escalated into a violent clash on 18‑07‑1989 resulting in two deaths and several injuries. The trial courts and the High Court delivered mixed judgments, convicting some accused under Section 302 r.w. S…
K.V. PRAKASH BABUversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2016 INSC 105122 November 2016
The appellant, K.V. Prakash Babu, was convicted under Sections 498‑A and 306 of the IPC for the suicide of his wife, who allegedly suspected him of an extra‑marital affair. The prosecution alleged that the husband's alleged relationship and the resulting suspicion constituted mental cruelty that drove the wife to kill …
RAMESH AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2016 INSC 104922 November 2016Dismissed
The case involves the death of Roshni, who suffered 100% burns and gave a dying declaration to a Judicial Magistrate in hospital after a doctor certified her fitness to speak. The trial court acquitted the four accused, rejecting the dying declaration and relying on the victim's brother's testimony that the accused wer…
C.B.I.versusASHOK KUMAR AGGARWAL & ANR.
2013 INSC 77722 November 2013Dismissed
The CBI appealed against the Delhi High Court’s order quashing a Special Judge’s grant of pardon to respondent No.2 (Abhishek Verma) under Section 306 of the CrPC, who had confessed to forging a fax message on the instructions of respondent No.1 (Ashok Kumar Aggarwal). The Supreme Court examined the scope of the court’…
C.B.I.versusASHOK KUMAR AGGARWAL
2013 INSC 77822 November 2013Dismissed
The CBI filed a case against Ashok Kumar Aggarwal for possessing disproportionate assets and obtained sanction for prosecution under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The respondent challenged the validity of the sanction, alleging that material was not placed before the Finance Minister and that th…
GOVIND SINGHversusHARCHAND KAUR
2010 INSC 79822 November 2010Appeal(s) allowed
Govind Singh, a former Social Security Minister, resigned on 12 January 2002 and filed his nomination as an independent candidate on 23 January 2002. He was elected MLA from the Sherpur (SC) constituency on 13 February 2002. The defeated candidate, Harchand Kaur, filed an election petition alleging that Singh had indul…
UMA & ANR.versusTHE STATE REP. BY THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
2024 INSC 80922 October 2024Dismissed
The trial court acquitted Ms. Uma and co‑accused of murder, holding that the prosecution had not proved its case beyond reasonable doubt, particularly discounting medical evidence in the absence of an eyewitness. The State appealed, and the Madras High Court reversed the acquittal, convicting the appellants on charges …
NAGAMMA @ NAGARATHNA & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA
2025 INSC 113522 September 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Karnataka alleged that a police constable (A1) borrowed money from a fellow police officer who later demanded repayment, leading A1's wife (A2) to invite the victim to their home and murder him with two choppers. The trial court convicted A2, A3 and A4 under Section 302 read with Section 34, while acquitti…
BALWINDER SINGH (BINDA)versusTHE NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU
2023 INSC 85222 September 2023Disposed off
The case arose from a 2005 drug seizure in Chandigarh where the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) recovered heroin from a car driven by Satnam Singh and later arrested Balwinder Singh based on a confession recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act. The High Court had upheld both convictions, relying on the confessional st…
GOPI @ GOVERDHANNATH (D) BY LRS. & ORS.versusSRI BALLABH VYAS
2022 INSC 100022 September 2022Dismissed
The respondent, Ballabh Vyas, claimed ownership of a small shop (Mulgi) based on a registered sale deed dated 27 June 1985 and sought eviction of the appellants, who were tenants succeeding the original lessee Balraj. The appellants denied the respondent’s title, asserting that Balraj had purchased the property for Rs.…
IQBAL AHMED (DEAD) BY LRS. & ANR.versusABDUL SHUKOOR
2025 INSC 102722 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The trial court decreed specific performance of a sale agreement between the plaintiffs and the defendant. The defendant appealed and, during the pendency of the appeal, filed an application under Order XLI Rule 27(1) of the CPC to lead additional documentary evidence. The High Court admitted this evidence without firs…
S. TIRUPATHI RAOversusM. LINGAMAIAH & ORS.
2024 INSC 54422 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The dispute arose from a civil suit concerning the partition of ancestral land, which led to a decree directing the Tahsildar to mutate the name of the first respondent in revenue records. The Tahsildar failed to comply, prompting a contempt petition that was initially allowed by a Single Judge but later set aside by a…
SANJAY RAJAKversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR
2019 INSC 78722 July 2019Dismissed
The appellant, Sanjay Rajak, was convicted under IPC s.364(A) for kidnapping a 5‑6‑year‑old child and sentenced to life imprisonment. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence: a classmate’s testimony that a man with a covered face, addressed as "uncle" by the child, abducted him; parents’ identification of the…
MD. ALAUDDIN KHANversusKARAM THAMARJIT SINGH
2010 INSC 41822 July 2010Matter referred to larger bench
The election for the 9th Manipur Legislative Assembly was won by MD Alauddin Khan by a margin of two votes over Karam Thamarjit Singh, who filed an election petition under Section 100(1)(d)(iii) alleging impersonation of dead voters in certain polling stations and seeking a recount and declaration of the election as vo…
DHAN SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2010 INSC 41922 July 2010Case Partly allowed
The appellant Ohan Singh was convicted for the death of his brother Shiv Ram, who died after being struck on the head with an iron rod during a family property dispute. The prosecution relied on Shiv Ram's dying declaration, recorded by a Head Constable after a doctor certified that he was fit to speak, which identifie…
DAVINDER SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2023 INSC 58522 June 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Davinder Singh, was convicted by the trial court and the Punjab & Haryana High Court for offences under Sections 376, 452 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, based on the allegation that he threatened the prosecutrix with a knife at her residence. On appeal before the Supreme Court, the appellant contended…
PAPAN SARKAR @ PRANABversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL
2026 INSC 52822 May 2026Case Allowed
The appellant accused were convicted of pre‑meditated murder based on the "last seen together" theory, alleged extra‑judicial confessions, recoveries of alleged weapons and a motorcycle, and serological evidence. The Supreme Court examined whether the time gap between the accused being last seen with the deceased and t…
AEJAZ AHMAD SHEIKHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
2025 INSC 52922 April 2025Dismissed
The case concerned the alleged murder of Amina and her three daughters by setting them on fire, for which the accused, Aejaz Ahmad Sheikh's brother, was initially convicted and sentenced to death. The High Court later acquitted him, prompting appeals by the State and the complainant. The Supreme Court examined the reli…
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYATI RAJ, LUCKNOWversusRAM PRAKASH SINGH
2025 INSC 55522 April 2025Dismissed
The State of Uttar Pradesh initiated disciplinary proceedings against Ram Prakash Singh, an Assistant Engineer, alleging embezzlement of Panchayat funds. The enquiry officer prepared a report without examining any witnesses, without furnishing the report or supporting documents to the respondent, and the disciplinary a…
JAFARUDHEEN & ORS.versusSTATE OF KERALA
2022 INSC 46422 April 2022Disposed off
The case involved a violent clash between members of two political parties in Kerala, resulting in the murder of a CPI(M) member. Sixteen accused were charged, but the trial court acquitted A-10 to A-16 while convicting five others. The High Court upheld the convictions but reversed the acquittals of A-10 to A-13, rely…
THAKORE UMEDSING NATHUSINGversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
2024 INSC 19822 February 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The accused were tried for murder, dacoity and robbery after the victim's jeep was allegedly hijacked; the trial court acquitted them of murder and dacoity but convicted them of robbery. The State appealed, and the Gujarat High Court reversed the acquittal, convicting the accused of murder and related offences. The Sup…
NARESH KUMARversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2024 INSC 14922 February 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Naresh Kumar was convicted under Section 306 of the IPC for allegedly abetting his wife Rani's suicide in 1993, based largely on the fact that she died within seven years of marriage and that he repeatedly demanded money for a business. The prosecution relied on the testimony of the deceased's brother and…
VAHITHAversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU
2023 INSC 15122 February 2023Dismissed
The appellant Vahitha was convicted under Section 302 IPC for allegedly strangling her five‑year‑old daughter in the house of her mother‑in‑law. The prosecution relied on the testimony of the mother‑in‑law, two other family members, and two independent neighbours who saw the appellant near the child's body, as well as …
RAMESHversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN
2011 INSC 14822 February 2011Dismissed
The case involved the murder of money‑lender RL and his wife during a robbery of their house‑cum‑shop, where the accused A‑1 (Gordhan Lal), A‑2 (Bharat Kumar) and A‑3 (Ramesh) were convicted of murder, robbery and related offences. The prosecution relied on a chain of circumstantial evidence, including blood‑stained cl…
THAMMARAYA AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA
2025 INSC 10822 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants Thammaraya and Basappa were convicted for murder and concealment of dead body under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the IPC based largely on circumstantial evidence and alleged disclosure statements that led to the recovery of certain articles. The prosecution's case hinged on the recovery of a gold chain, d…
STATE OF KERALA AND ANR.versusMOHAMMED BASHEER
2019 INSC 6522 January 2019Dismissed
The respondent Mohammed Basheer claimed ownership of about two acres of jenmam land, asserting that it was not a private forest under the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 and that a certificate of purchase issued by the Land Tribunal under s.72K of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 vested title…
MOHAMMED SALIM (D) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.versusSHAMSUDEEN (D) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.
2019 INSC 7122 January 2019Dismissed
The plaintiff, Shamsudeen, claimed inheritance rights in two properties originally owned by his grandmother Zainam Beevi, alleging that he was the son of Mohammed Ilias (a Muslim) and Valliamma (a Hindu) born before Ilias's death. The defendants contested his paternity, arguing that the marriage between Ilias and Valli…
POOJA PALversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2016 INSC 8622 January 2016Appeal(s) allowed
Pooja Pal, the widow of slain MLA Raju Pal, alleged that the state police and administration were complicit or indifferent in the murder of her husband and sought a fresh investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The High Court dismissed her writ petition, but the Supreme Court held that when an inves…
HARPAL SINGH @ CHHOTAversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2016 INSC 104521 November 2016Dismissed
The Supreme Court upheld the convictions of Harpal Singh @ Chhota and co‑accused for kidnapping, abduction for ransom and conspiracy under IPC §§ 364A, 395, 412, 471, 1208 and Arms Act § 25. The Court found the victim’s testimony – recorded under §§ 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. and reiterated at trial – to be truthful and suffi…
SURINDER KUMARversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2012 INSC 52421 November 2012Dismissed
The appellant Surinder Kumar was convicted under Sections 304B and 498A of the IPC for the death of his wife, Kiran Bala, who suffered 90% burn injuries and gave a dying declaration blaming him for dowry demands. The appellant challenged the admissibility of the declaration, arguing that his wife was too injured to mak…
KUNJUMON @ UNNIversusSTATE OF KERALA
2012 INSC 52521 November 2012Case Partly allowed
The appellant, Kunjumon, entered a house with a common intention to commit robbery, threatened an 11‑year‑old girl and subsequently dragged a 90‑year‑old woman from her cot, beating her on the head with a wall clock, leading to her death. He was convicted by the trial court and the High Court under IPC sections 302 (mu…
SURINDER KUMARversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2011 INSC 77721 October 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Surinder Kumar, was accused of setting fire to his lover Kamlesh Rani, who later died from severe burns. The sole evidence against him was a dying declaration recorded by an executive magistrate at a hospital, which alleged that Kumar had poured kerosene on her and set her ablaze. The trial court rejecte…
JASWANT SINGHversusGURDEV SINGH & ORS.
2011 INSC 77821 October 2011Dismissed
Jaswant Singh filed several suits concerning ownership of land in Simbli, Hoshiarpur, and the parties entered into a compromise on 27 November 1972 which led to a decree on 8 December 1972. The dispute later centered on the interpretation of that compromise—whether Singh owned 12.5 acres or only 8 acres—and on the admi…
RAJESH & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2023 INSC 83921 September 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned the kidnapping and murder of 15‑year‑old Ajit Pal, for which three relatives – Rajesh Yadav, Raja Yadav and Om Prakash Yadav – were convicted and sentenced to death (two of them) and life imprisonment based largely on circumstantial evidence and confessions recorded before they were formally accused.…
RITESH TEWARI & ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.
2010 INSC 62921 September 2010Dismissed
The original landholders, whose holdings exceeded the ceiling under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, were assessed as surplus and transferred a major portion of the land to Mayur Sahkari Awas Samiti in 1982. The Act deemed such surplus land vested in the State, but the authorities never took physical …
SYED BASHEER AHMEDversusM/S TINNI LABORATORIES PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.
2025 INSC 103021 August 2025Rejected
Syed Basheer Ahmed filed a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement concerning two parcels of land. The trial court found the plaintiff ready to pay the balance consideration and decreed specific performance. The High Court reversed this decision, holding that the agreement showed a material alteration—differe…
PRABHAKAR GONES PRABHU NAVELKAR (DEAD) THROUGH LRS & ORS.versusSARADCHANDRA SURIA PRABHU NAVELKAR (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.
2019 INSC 93321 August 2019Dismissed
The dispute concerned two ancestral lands in Goa, "M" and "B", originally owned by the grandfather of brothers Suriaji and Gones. A 1915 sale deed conveyed portions of the lands to Suriaji, with an accompanying 1919 settlement deed stating that Suriaji had paid half the price on behalf of Gones and would transfer Gones…
NIRMAL SINGH PEHLWAN @ NIMMAversusINSPECTOR, CUSTOMS, CUSTOMS HOUSE, PUNJAB
2011 INSC 51321 July 2011
During a joint operation in January 1999, Nirmal Singh was apprehended and offered a choice to be searched before a magistrate or a gazetted officer under Section 50 of the ND PS Act. He chose a gazetted officer, and a search uncovered two kilograms of heroin; he also made a confession to a customs officer under Sectio…
STATE OF PUNJABversusKEWAL KRISHAN
2023 INSC 58321 June 2023Dismissed
The State of Punjab appealed the High Court's acquittal of Kewal Krishan, who had been convicted for murder under Section 302 IPC. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence: the deceased was last seen with the accused on 10‑12‑1998, the body was discovered on 12‑12‑1998, an alleged extra‑judicial confession to …
PARVATHI NAIRTHI (DEAD) AND ORS.versusLAXMI NAIRTHY (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS.
2026 INSC 52121 May 2026Dismissed
The testator B. Sheena Nairi executed a Will on 15 May 1983 bequeathing all his immovable properties to his sister Laxmi Nairthy, cancelling an earlier Power of Attorney in favour of his brother‑in‑law. After his death, his wife applied for mutation of the properties in her name, but the sister filed a suit seeking dec…
MD. JAMILUDIN NASIRversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL
2015 INSC 31621 May 2014Disposed off
The case concerns a pre‑planned terrorist attack on the police guarding the American Centre in Calcutta on 22 January 2002, which resulted in five police deaths and multiple injuries. The accused, including Md. Jamiludin Nasir and Aftab Ahmed Ansari, were convicted under the waging‑war provisions of the IPC and various…
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusDAL SINGH & ORS.
2013 INSC 35221 May 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned the alleged murder of Kusum Rani, who was burnt alive by her parents‑in‑law. The prosecution relied primarily on the victim’s dying declaration recorded by an executive magistrate and a thumb impression on the FIR, along with medical evidence of 100 % burns. The High Court acquitted the accused, hold…
STATE OF RAJASTHANversusDARSHAN SINGH @ DARSHAN LAL
2012 INSC 24121 May 2012Dismissed
The State of Rajasthan convicted Darshan Singh for murder under Section 302 IPC based on the testimony of Geeta, a deaf‑and‑dumb eyewitness, whose statement was recorded in sign language through her father who acted as interpreter. The High Court set aside the conviction, holding that the witness and the interpreter we…
DAKKATA BALARAM REDDY & ANRversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR.
2023 INSC 41121 April 2023
The appellants, Dakkata Balaram Reddy and Chinapana Gopi, were convicted for the murder of Vetcha Kesava Rao's son and wife and for robbery of gold ornaments and cash, based largely on circumstantial evidence and the recovery of stolen property from their possession. The prosecution presented testimony of three indepen…
DEVENDER SINGH & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
2022 INSC 45721 April 2022Case Partly allowed
The deceased Sushila, married to Devender Singh, went missing six months after her marriage and her body was later recovered from a river. The prosecution alleged that she was subjected to dowry harassment, including a demand for Rs.2 lakh or a house, and that she died from injuries before falling into the river, const…
SUNDAR @ SUNDARRAJANversusSTATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
2023 INSC 26421 March 2023Disposed off
The petitioner, Sundar, was convicted of kidnapping and murdering a seven‑year‑old child and sentenced to death by the trial court, a decision affirmed by the High Court and the Supreme Court. He filed a review petition alleging errors in the evidence, especially the admissibility of call‑detail records (CDRs) without …
OM PRAKASH & ANR.versusMISHRI LAL (DEAD) REPRESENTED BY HIS LR. SAVITRI DEVI
2017 INSC 24521 March 2017Appeal(s) allowed
Om Prakash and another, joint owners of a property, filed an eviction suit under the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 against Mishri Lal (deceased) represented by his legal heirs. The tenants admitted tenancy under the appellants' grandmother but denied the appellants as landlor…
IBRAHIM MUSA CHAUHAN @ BABA CHAUHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2013 INSC 18021 March 2013Dismissed
The Supreme Court reviewed a series of criminal appeals arising from the 1993 Bombay serial blasts, all tried under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA). The appeals concerned convictions for offences such as unauthorised possession of arms and explosives (s.3(3), s.5, s.6 TADA), conspi…
SANJAY DUTT (A-117)versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH CBI (STF), BOMBAY
2013 INSC 18221 March 2013Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined a series of appeals arising from the Designated Court's judgments in the 1993 Bombay bomb blast case under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA). The Court held that confessional statements recorded under Section 15 of TADA are substantive evidence admissible a…
M. VIJAYAKUMARversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU
2024 INSC 17721 February 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, M. Vijayakumar, was convicted under IPC sections 306, 342 and 365 for allegedly kidnapping and wrongfully confining the deceased, leading to the latter's suicide. The prosecution argued that the appellant’s abduction and confinement forced the victim to commit suicide, thereby satisfying the elements of …
MAHENDRANversusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU
2019 INSC 24821 February 2019Dismissed
In March 1994 a group of caste Hindus attacked the hut of Murugaiyan, the father‑in‑law of PW1, setting it alight and assaulting him with sickles, resulting in his death. The prosecution relied on the testimony of PW1, PW2, PW3 and PW5, along with medical evidence, to identify twenty‑four accused; the trial court convi…
THE STATE OF A.P. & ORS.versusM/S. STAR BONE MILL & FERTILISER CO.
2013 INSC 11621 February 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Andhra Pradesh (appellant) challenged a civil suit filed by Mis. Star Bone Mill & Fertiliser Co. (respondent) seeking declaration of title over a 3.525‑acre land. The respondent relied on a registered sale deed dated 11‑Nov‑1959 executed by M/s A. Allauddin & Sons, who were merely lessees of the State sinc…
REKHA SENGARversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2021 INSC 3721 January 2021Dismissed
The Supreme Court considered a Special Leave Petition filed by Rekha Sengar seeking bail under Section 439 of the CrPC after being charged in a non‑bailable offence under the PC&PNDT Act for alleged prenatal sex determination and sex‑selective abortion. A sting operation led to the seizure of an unregistered ultrasound…
PAULversusSTATE OF KERALA
2020 INSC 6921 January 2020Dismissed
Paul was married to Jessy and was accused of cruelty and of causing her death. The trial court initially acquitted him, but the Kerala High Court set aside the acquittal, remanded the case for further examination under Section 313 Cr.PC, and the trial court subsequently convicted him under Section 302 IPC, sentencing h…
VINOD KUMARversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2015 INSC 95621 January 2015Dismissed
Vinod Kumar, an octroi inspector, was convicted under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs.500. The prosecution relied on the recovery of the tainted notes, the testimony of an independent clerk (PW‑6), a shadow witness (PW‑7) who was later declared ho…
RABINDRA KUMAR PAL @ DARA SINGHversusREPUBLIC OF INDIA
2011 INSC 6321 January 2011Dismissed
The case concerns the 1999 arson and murder of Australian missionary Graham Staines and his two sons by a mob in Orissa. The trial court convicted fourteen accused, sentencing Dara Singh (A‑1) to death and the others to life imprisonment; the High Court modified Dara Singh's sentence to life imprisonment and acquitted …
SAMITTRI DEVI AND ANR.versusSAMPURAN SINGH AND ANR.
2011 INSC 6121 January 2011Appeal(s) allowed
Samitiri Devi (appellant) purchased a house in 1985 with her own funds, but the sale deed was executed in the names of her son and brother‑in‑law. They later sold half of the property to Sampuran Singh (respondent No.1) on 13‑April‑1987 without her consent, despite a notice she had posted on 8‑April‑1987 informing him …
MOTURU NALINI KANTHversusGAINEDI KALIPRASAD (DEAD, THROUGH LRS.)
2023 INSC 100420 November 2023Dismissed
The appellant, Moturu Nalini Kanth, filed a suit as a minor claiming absolute title to the properties of the deceased Venkubayamma based on a registered will dated 03.05.1982 and a registered adoption deed dated 20.04.1982. The trial court upheld the suit, but the Andhra Pradesh High Court reversed the decision, holdin…
REKHA MURARKAversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR.
2019 INSC 126920 November 2019Disposed off
The appellant, a widow, sought to have her private counsel assist the prosecution in a murder trial by making oral arguments, examining and cross‑examining witnesses, invoking Section 301 read with the proviso to Section 24(8) of the CrPC. The trial court and the Calcutta High Court rejected the application, holding th…
PANCHOversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2011 INSC 77320 October 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined the convictions of three accused (A1‑Pratham, A2‑Pancho and A3‑Gajraj) for murder and robbery of a tractor owner. The prosecution’s case hinged on an extra‑judicial confession made by A1, five months after the incident, to a villager with no close relationship, and on the belated recovery of …
SANSAR CHANDversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN
2010 INSC 71220 October 2010Dismissed
Sansar Chand, a long‑time organiser of illegal wildlife trade, was convicted under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 for receiving leopard skins. The prosecution’s case rested on an extra‑judicial confession by a co‑accused, Balwan, which was corroborated by oral and documentary evidence, including recovered hunting …
SHOOR SINGH & ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND
2024 INSC 71320 September 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased, Neelam, died from extensive burn injuries within seven years of her marriage to the son of the appellants, who were her father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law. The prosecution alleged that the accused demanded a motorcycle and Rs 50,000 as dowry and threatened her, invoking the presumption of dowry death under S…
APPAIYAversusANDIMUTHU @ THANGAPANDI & ORS.
2023 INSC 83520 September 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant purchased a two‑acre property in 1963 from Puliyankaladi, who had earlier acquired it through a registered sale deed (Exhibit A1) dated 27‑08‑1928. The trial court and the first appellate court held that the certified copy of Exhibit A1, a public document, was admissible as secondary evidence to prove the…
BALDEV SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2013 INSC 64420 September 2013Case Partly allowed
The appellants, a Deputy Superintendent of Police and a constable, were convicted for abducting seven members of a family and for their alleged murder. The prosecution alleged that the victims were taken on 29 October 1991, later seen in various police stations, and never returned, leading to convictions under IPC sect…
M/S PAYAL VISION LTD.versusRADHIKA CHOUDHARY
2012 INSC 41320 September 2012Appeal(s) allowed
M/S Payal Vision Ltd., the landlord, filed a suit for possession and mesne profits against Radhika Choudhary, the tenant, alleging a lease of Rs.50,000 per month and a notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act terminating the tenancy due to unauthorized structural changes. The tenant contested the nature…
HARESH MOHANDAS RAJPUTversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2011 INSC 70020 September 2011Disposed off
The appellant, Haresh Mohandas Rajput, was accused of raping and murdering 10‑year‑old Pooja, whose body was discovered under a cot in his house with blood‑stained sheets and forensic evidence of sexual assault and strangulation. The prosecution relied solely on circumstantial evidence, including the location of the bo…
ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL ADJUDICATION, DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCEversusSURESH KUMAR AND CO. IMPEX PVT. LTD. & ORS.
2025 INSC 105020 August 2025
The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence alleged that Suresh Kumar & Co. Impex Pvt. Ltd. and its directors under‑declared the retail selling price of imported branded food items, thereby evading customs duty. A show‑cause notice was issued, and the Adjudicating Authority confirmed the demand, interest and penalty. The C…
TILAK RAJ BAKSHIversusAVINASH CHAND SHARMA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & OTHERS
2019 INSC 92320 August 2019Dismissed
The plaintiff, Tilak Raj Bakshi, claimed that his brother (the first defendant) violated a family settlement by selling his one‑third share of a Chandigarh house to a stranger (the second defendant) without obtaining the written concurrence of the other brothers and without offering the share to the plaintiff as requir…
SATVIR SINGHversusSTATE OF DELHI THROUGH CBI
2014 INSC 54820 August 2014Appeal(s) allowed
Satvir Singh, an Inspector Customs, was accused of demanding and accepting a bribe from complainant Ramesh Suri in 1989. The trial court acquitted him, finding that the prosecution had not proved the demand, acceptance, or recovery of illegal gratification and that the presumption under Section 20 of the Prevention of …
JAGROOP SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2012 INSC 29620 July 2012Dismissed
The appellant Jagroop Singh was convicted of murder under IPC sections 302, 34 and 201 based on circumstantial evidence that the victim was last seen with the accused, voluntary extra‑judicial confessions, and the recovery of a blood‑stained spade. The appellant challenged the conviction, arguing that the time gap betw…
DANDU JAGGARAJUversusSTATE OF A.P.
2011 INSC 50420 July 2011Appeal(s) allowed
Varalakshmi, an upper‑caste woman, married a Scheduled‑Caste man against her family's wishes. Six years later she disappeared after being lured by her paternal uncle, the appellant, who claimed her grandmother was ill. Her body was later found, showing death by smothering, and jewellery allegedly taken from her was rec…
HAMZAversusMUHAMMADKUTTY @ MANI & ORS.
2013 INSC 37220 June 2013Dismissed
The deceased woman was stabbed to death in her matrimonial home, leading to an initial prosecution of four in‑law family members under Sections 498A and 306 IPC, which resulted in acquittal. Two years later, the deceased's brother filed a complaint alleging that six family members, including A‑1 and A‑2, murdered her, …
ABHISHEKversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS
2022 INSC 61820 May 2022Dismissed
The appellant Abhishek Singh was charged under several IPC offences, the Arms Act and MCOCA after a proclamation declared him an absconder. The Additional Director General of Police and Commissioner of Police granted sanction for prosecution under MCOCA, which the appellant challenged before the High Court and then the…
SABITRI SAMANTARAYversusSTATE OF ODISHA
2022 INSC 60820 May 2022Dismissed
The appellants, a husband and wife, were accused of strangling a man to death in their rented house and attempting to conceal the body by pouring acid over it. The trial court convicted them and their daughter under Sections 302, 201 and 34 IPC, sentencing the parents to life imprisonment; the High Court later acquitte…
DEEPAK GULATIversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2013 INSC 34920 May 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Deepak Gulati was convicted under Sections 365 and 376 of the IPC for allegedly enticing a 19‑year‑old woman with a false promise of marriage, confining her and having sexual intercourse. The woman voluntarily left home to marry the appellant, accompanied him to several locations, and did not raise any ob…
CHARAN SINGH @ CHARANJIT SINGHversusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
2023 INSC 40420 April 2023Appeal(s) allowed
Charan Singh, the husband of the deceased Chhilo Kaur, was convicted under Sections 304B, 498A and 201 of the IPC for allegedly killing his wife over dowry demands. The trial court sentenced him to ten years' rigorous imprisonment under 304B, two years each under 498A and 201, which the High Court later reduced the 304…
IN RE: TO ISSUE CERTAIN GUIDELINES REGARDING INADEQUACIES AND DEFICIENCIES IN CRIMINAL TRIALSversusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS.
2021 INSC 26020 April 2021Disposed off
The Supreme Court, exercising suo motu jurisdiction under Article 32, examined widespread inadequacies and inconsistencies in criminal trials across India, such as poor documentation of witnesses, exhibits, and material objects, and procedural delays. After issuing notices to all High Courts, State Governments and Unio…
APOLLO ZIPPER INDIA LIMITEDversusW. NEWMAN AND CO. LTD.
2018 INSC 38420 April 2018Appeal(s) allowed
Apollo Zipper India Ltd., which became the absolute owner of a commercial premises after a series of statutory transfers, served a quit notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act to its tenant, W. Newman & Co. Ltd., demanding arrears and vacant possession. The tenant sought leave to defend the summary evi…
MD. MANNAN @ ABDUL MANNANversusSTATE OF BIHAR
2011 INSC 31920 April 2011Dismissed
The appellant, Md. Mannan, a mason employed in the victim's grandfather's house, sent a seven‑year‑old girl to a betel shop and subsequently abducted her on his bicycle, raping and murdering her. He later confessed, leading police to the body. He was convicted under IPC sections 366, 376, 302 and 201 and sentenced to d…
THE TEHSILDAR, URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST AND ANR.versusGANGA BAI MENARIYA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND OTHERS
2024 INSC 12120 February 2024Disposed off
The respondents claimed that a lease (patta) of a government grazing land was granted to them by the Gram Panchayat in 1959 and filed a suit for permanent injunction without seeking a declaration of title. The appellants argued that the Panchayat lacked authority to lease the land, the lease deed was unproved, and the …
APARNA AJINKYA FIRODIAversusAJINKYA ARUN FIRODIA
2023 INSC 14620 February 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The husband filed for divorce on the ground of adultery and sought a DNA test of their son, born during the marriage, to establish paternity. The Family Court and the High Court ordered the DNA test, but the Supreme Court set aside those orders, holding that the conclusive presumption of legitimacy under Section 112 of…
PARTAP SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.versusSHIV RAM (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.
2020 INSC 21920 February 2020Appeal(s) allowed
The plaintiffs, heirs of Shri Partap Singh, sued Shiv Ram alleging ownership of certain lands and seeking possession and injunctions, while the defendant claimed to be a tenant and that the suit should be tried in the revenue court. The trial court, relying on oral testimony, held that the presumption of truth in the J…
BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD.versusMAHENDRA PRASAD JAKHMOLA & ORS.
2019 INSC 24420 February 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. (BHEL) was subject to the 24‑April‑1990 notification issued under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970, and whether the workmen who were engaged through contractors were direct employees of BHEL. The Court held that BHEL’s Haridwar ope…
SUNIL MEHTA & ANR.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
2013 INSC 11520 February 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether depositions taken by a magistrate under Chapter XV of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) before taking cognizance could be used as evidence for framing charges under Part B of Chapter XIX, and whether the accused is entitled to cross‑examine those witnesses before charges are framed. …
SAURAV DASversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2023 INSC 7620 January 2023Dismissed
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a direction that all State governments upload copies of chargesheets filed under Section 173 of the Criminal Procedure Code on their websites, invoking the transparency principle established in Youth Bar Association of India v. Union of India. The petition r…
RAJ KUMAR@ RAJUversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI)
2017 INSC 5620 January 2017Case Partly allowed
The deceased woman was found dead with her jewellery missing; the appellant had been present in her house the night before the incident and was later arrested with the missing ornaments recovered from his possession. The prosecution relied solely on circumstantial evidence – the appellant’s presence, a "last seen" test…
TOMASO BRUNO & ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P.
2015 INSC 5220 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed
Three Italian tourists were accused of murdering their fellow tourist in a hotel room in Varanasi. The trial and appellate courts convicted them under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC based on circumstantial evidence, including alleged motive, post‑mortem findings of strangulation, and the claim that they remained in the…
JOSHINDER YADAVversusSTATE OF BIHAR
2014 INSC 3720 January 2014Dismissed
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of six accused, including the appellant Joshinder Yadav, for the dowry death of Bindula Devi under IPC sections 302 r/w 149, 498A and 201. The Court found that the father and brother of the deceased gave reliable testimony of continuous cruelty and harassment for dowry, and that …
NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAUversusKASHIF
2025 INSC 104519 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) seized large quantities of Tramadol and Zolpidem tablets in multiple operations and arrested Kashif and co‑accused. Kashif applied for bail, which the Delhi High Court granted solely on the ground that the NCB had not complied with Section 52A of the NDPS Act within a reasonable time,…
ASHOK VERMAversusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
[2024] 12 S.C.R. 74319 December 2024Dismissed
The appellant, Ashok Verma, was convicted under Sections 302, 201 and 498A of the IPC for the death of his wife, Pushpa, which occurred in their matrimonial home. He claimed the death was a suicide, pleaded an alibi that he was in a nearby garden, and argued that the non‑rupture of the hyoid bone indicated strangulatio…
THE STATE OF HARYANA & ANR.versusAMIN LAL (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS & ORS.
2024 INSC 87519 November 2024Dismissed
The plaintiffs, heirs of Amin Lal, sued the State of Haryana and the Public Works Department for possession of land on the basis of revenue records, sale deeds and mutation entries. The trial court ruled in favour of the plaintiffs, holding that the State had not proved adverse possession. The State appealed and the fi…
JAYANTILAL VERMAversusSTATE OF M.P. (NOW CHHATTISGARH)
2020 INSC 64919 November 2020Dismissed
The appellant, Jayantilal Verma, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the strangulation death of his wife, Sahodara Bai, whose body was found in their matrimonial home. The prosecution's case rested primarily on the testimony of the step‑brother (PW‑1) and the post‑mortem report indicating homicidal asphyxia. Althou…
BALJINDER KAURversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2014 INSC 79219 November 2014Case Partly allowed
Baljinder Kaur, the sister‑in‑law of the deceased Sharanjit Kaur, was convicted under Section 304B IPC for dowry death based on a demand for a gold karra made two months after the marriage. The deceased died of poisoning, and the prosecution relied on a dying declaration that she was beaten and poisoned by the accused.…
SUNIL MAHADEO JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2013 INSC 76319 November 2013Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the custodial death of a kidnapping suspect who was arrested by three police officers and found dead in the lock‑up. The trial court had acquitted all accused, but the High Court convicted them under sections 302, 342, 218 and 193 IPC. The Court held that the arrest panchnama and register wer…
INDRAKUNWARversusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
2023 INSC 93419 October 2023Appeal(s) allowed
Indrakunwar was convicted under Section 302 IPC for allegedly killing a newborn child she was said to have delivered and then thrown into a pond. The prosecution’s case rested on circumstantial evidence and the accused's statement under Section 313 CrPC, but failed to establish any relationship between the accused and …
NAVEEN @ AJAYversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2023 INSC 93619 October 2023Disposed off
The appellant, Naveen (alias Ajay), was convicted and sentenced to death for the rape and murder of a three‑month‑old girl under multiple provisions of the IPC and the POCSO Act. The trial was completed in fifteen days, during which a legal‑aid counsel was appointed only hours before the case began and was not given su…
PARANAGOUDA AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANOTHER
2023 INSC 93319 October 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The case involved the suicide by self‑immolation of Akkamahadevi, married to the accused, who was alleged to have subjected her to mental and physical cruelty for dowry. The trial court convicted the accused under IPC sections 498A, 304B (read with s.34), and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, based largely…
S. RAMACHANDRA RAOversusS. NAGABHUSHANA RAO & ORS.
2022 INSC 111419 October 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, S. Ramachandra Rao, sought to have his wife—who held a General Power of Attorney (GPA) for him and was also an enrolled advocate—appear in several civil suits as his GPA holder. The Trial Court allowed her to act in that capacity, but the High Court later set aside those orders and permitted her to appea…
SANTOSH @ RAJESH @ GOPALversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2024 INSC 72319 September 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Santosh @ Rajesh @ Gopal, was convicted for the murder of Narayan Singh based on the recovery of a pistol from his possession and a ballistic report linking the weapon to the fatal bullet. The prosecution’s case relied on a disclosure statement made by a co-accused, which led to the discovery of the pist…
SMT. GARGIversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2019 INSC 105619 September 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Smt. Gargi, was convicted of murdering her husband by strangulation and subsequently hanging his body to simulate suicide, based largely on the testimony of the deceased's brother and sister. The prosecution alleged strained marital relations, illicit affairs, and a property dispute as motive, while the …
SD. SHABUDDINversusTHE STATE OF TELANGANA
2025 INSC 99919 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Sd. Shabuddin, was convicted under Section 411 of the IPC for dishonestly receiving stolen property after being found in possession of cash amounts of Rs.25,000 and Rs.2,60,000, which he could not account for. Both he and co-accused Moulana were acquitted of theft (Section 379 IPC) by the Trial Court and…
K. PRABHAKAR HEGDEversusBANK OF BARODA
2025 INSC 99719 August 2025Disposed off
K. Prabhakar Hegde, a former officer of Vijaya Bank (later merged with Bank of Baroda), was dismissed after disciplinary proceedings for alleged irregularities in approving temporary overdrafts. He challenged the denial of the preliminary inquiry report, the failure of the Inquiry Officer to generally question him as r…
NILIMA DAS GUPTA (DECEASED) THROUGH ITS LRS.versusON THE DEATH OF ABDUR ROUF HIS LEGAL HEIRS & ORS.
2025 INSC 103719 August 2025Disposed off
In a title suit, the original defendant (Defendant No.1) failed to appear in court and her son (DW‑5) testified on her behalf. The High Court, relying on Section 120 of the Indian Evidence Act, held that the son was an incompetent witness and discarded his testimony, thereby allowing the second appeal and dismissing th…
GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.versusMANJU JAIN. & ORS.
2010 INSC 52919 August 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The Greater Mohali Area Development Authority allotted a flat to Manju Jain under a hire‑purchase scheme, sending her an allotment letter by registered post and requiring acceptance and a 25% deposit within 60 days. Jain never responded, deposited no money, and after four years the Authority cancelled the allotment. Ja…
KESHAV DUTTversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2010 INSC 53019 August 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a meter reader, was convicted under Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demanding a bribe, based primarily on a handwriting expert’s report linking him to a paper (Ex.PR) used in the alleged offence. The Supreme Court examined whether such expert opinion could be admitted witho…
KAUSHIK PREMKUMAR MISHRA & ANR.versusKANJI RAVARIA @ KANJI & ANR.
2024 INSC 54019 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants purchased half of a 3.40‑hectare land from respondent No.2 in 1985, and a sale deed was executed on 02‑12‑1985 but remained unregistered due to stamp‑duty deficiency until 14‑06‑2011. Respondent No.2 later executed a second conveyance in 2010 in favour of respondent No.1 for the same land, leading the ap…
PRAHALAD SINGH & ORSversusSTATE OF M.P.
2011 INSC 49919 July 2011Disposed off
On 30 September 1996, five accused ambushed Ganeshram and his companions at a river crossing. Rammilan Lodhi and Babula Lodhi, armed with shotguns, fired, killing Ganeshram and injuring Annilal, while Prahlad, Dullam and Hukum, armed with lathis, only exhorted the shooters. The trial court convicted all under IPC secti…
CANARA BANKversusG S JAYARAMA
2022 INSC 59719 May 2022Disposed off
The appeal concerned an award of a Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA) that had granted Canara Bank repayment of a loan from G S Jayarama without any recorded conciliation. The High Court had set aside the award, holding that the PLA lacked adjudicatory power and had bypassed mandatory conciliation steps. The Supreme Court exam…
KAVITA KANWARversusMRS. PAMELA MEHTA & ORS.
2020 INSC 39719 May 2020Dismissed
The appellant, the younger daughter of Smt. Amarjeet Mamik, sought probate of a 2003 Will that left the entire immovable property to her, while excluding her brother and elder sister. The Trial Court and the Delhi High Court rejected the probate petition, finding numerous unexplained suspicious circumstances, including…
BABU SAHEBAGOUDA RUDRAGOUDAR AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2024 INSC 32019 April 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The trial court acquitted six accused, including A‑1, A‑2 and A‑3, for the alleged murder of Malagounda under sections 302 r/w s.34 IPC, finding the prosecution evidence unreliable and the complainant's testimony contradictory. The State appealed under s.378 CrPC, and the Karnataka High Court reversed the acquittal, co…
MOHD. FIROZversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2022 INSC 42919 April 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Mohd. Firoz, was convicted for the rape, sexual assault and murder of a four‑year‑old girl, under Sections 302, 376(2)(i), 376(2)(m), 363, 366 IPC and Sections 5(i), 5(m), 6 POCSO. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence, the "last seen together" theory, DNA evidence and the appellant's own adm…
VENKATESH @ CHANDRA & ANR. ETCversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2022 INSC 130219 April 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court considered appeals by four members of the Dandupalya gang convicted of murder and robbery. The trial court had relied on the accused’s voluntary statements recorded by police, shown on DVD, and a chart of gang activities to uphold death sentences under Section 396 IPC. The Court examined the admissibi…
BALAKRAMversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.
2017 INSC 36519 April 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Balakram, was charged with murder and attempted murder and, after the prosecution's witness (the investigating officer) was examined, sought to produce copies of pages from the police diary obtained under the Right to Information Act to confront the officer. The trial court rejected the application, the …
SIDHARTHA VASHISHT @ MANU SHARMAversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI)
2010 INSC 21919 April 2010Dismissed After
The case concerns the murder of Jessica Lal on 30 April 1999, for which Sidhartha Vashisht (Manu Sharma) and two co‑accused were initially acquitted by the trial court. The State appealed, alleging that the prosecution had proved the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt through ocular testimony, telephone call …
RAM BABUversusSTATE OF U.P.
2010 INSC 22019 April 2010Dismissed
The appellants were convicted of dacoity under Section 395 IPC based on eyewitness identification in court and a test identification parade conducted under a magistrate's supervision. They challenged the admissibility of the parade evidence, arguing that the delay in conducting it rendered the identification unreliable…
STATE (CBI)versusMOHD. SALIM ZARGAR @ FAYAZ & ORS.
2025 INSC 37619 March 2025Dismissed
The case arose from a 1990 kidnapping and murder of the Vice Chancellor of Kashmir University and his personal secretary, allegedly carried out by members of the JKSLF. The CBI charged several accused, including Mohd. Salim Zargar, under the Ranbir Penal Code and the now‑repealed TADA Act. The Special Court acquitted a…
PUNEET SABHARWALversusCBI
2024 INSC 22119 March 2024Dismissed
The CBI filed a case alleging that R.C. Sabharwal, a former public servant, owned assets disproportionate to his known sources of income and that his son, Puneet Sabharwal, abetted him. The trial court framed charges under Section 13(1)(e) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 10…
GURCHARAN SINGH & ORS.versusANGREZ KAUR & ANR.
2020 INSC 31419 March 2020Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, Gurcharan Singh and others, obtained a decree on 9 January 1995 confirming their ownership of a suit land based on a registered will (dated 2 September 1986) and a family settlement (dated 15 June 1994) executed by the sole defendant, Bhajan Singh. Bhajan Singh had admitted these facts in his statement …
NAND RAM (D) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.versusJAGDISH PRASAD (D) THROUGH LRS.
2020 INSC 31519 March 2020Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, owners of land leased for 20 years to the respondent, sought possession after the lease was deemed terminated for non‑payment of rent and after part of the land was de‑notified following acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act. The respondent claimed a share of compensation for the unexpired lease te…
RAM CHANDRA PRASAD SINGHversusSHARAD YADAV
2020 INSC 32219 March 2020Dismissed
The appellant, a Rajya Sabha MP and JD(U) leader, petitioned the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha to disqualify respondent Sharad Yadav under paragraph 2(1)(a) of the Tenth Schedule, alleging that Yadav had voluntarily given up JD(U) membership by aligning with the RJD. The Chairman, after due process, disqualified Yadav on…
DHANPATversusSHEO RAM (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.
2020 INSC 31619 March 2020Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Dhanpat sought a declaration that he, his mother and sisters were entitled to equal shares in a suit land, challenging a Will dated 30‑April‑1980 that favored his brother’s sons. The trial court and first appellate court dismissed the suit, holding that the Will was duly executed and the property had been…
BALVIR SINGHversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2019 INSC 22619 February 2019Disposed off
The incident occurred on 11 March 1998 when the victim, Mohan Mehtar, was stopped by four accused; Bharat Singh beat him with a lathi, Balvir Singh and Bhav Singh held him, and Harnam Singh shot him at close range, causing instant death. The trial court convicted all four under sections 341, 302 and, for Harnam Singh, …
RAJA GOUNDER AND OTHERSversusM. SENGODAN AND OTHERS
2024 INSC 4719 January 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined a partition suit concerning agricultural lands of the late Muthusamy Gounder, where the trial and high courts had rejected the claim of certain parties as coparceners on the ground that the marriage of their mother to the propositus was not proved. The appellants argued that, despite the alle…
INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK & ORS.versusOM PRAKASH LAL SRIVASTAVA
2022 INSC 6919 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, a clerk‑cum‑cashier of Indian Overseas Bank, was dismissed after a departmental inquiry found him guilty of multiple charges including forging his sister‑in‑law's signature to open a joint account and withdraw a demand draft. The Industrial Tribunal upheld the dismissal, but the Allahabad High Court set…
SUDEVANANDversusSTATE THROUGH CBI
2012 INSC 4119 January 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned the conviction of Sudevanand and co‑accused for an attempted murder of the Chief Justice of India, based largely on the testimony of an approver, Vikram, who later retracted his earlier statements while in jail. The appellants filed three criminal miscellaneous applications after a delay of more than…
RAMDAS BANSAL (D)versusKHARAG SINGH BAID & ORS.
2012 INSC 4419 January 2012Dismissed
The appellant, Ramdas Bansal, held a 21‑year lease of a building (Grace Cinema Hall) on premises in Kolkata and, after the lease expired, the respondents filed a suit for vacant possession and rectification of the lease description. Bansal sought to introduce documents alleging that the respondents were "Thika" tenants…
P. MANIKANDANversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND ORS.
2024 INSC 100718 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, P. Manikandan, was originally convicted of kidnapping and murdering a four‑year‑old girl and sentenced to death, but the Madras High Court acquitted him on the ground of reasonable doubt. The High Court, however, ordered the transfer of the case file to the CBI and directed a de‑novo reinvestigation and …
BANARSI DASS AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2014 INSC 89118 December 2014Case Partly allowed
The deceased, Chander Kalan, suffered 40-45% burns after an alleged kerosene incident on 18 June 1998 and died on 4 August 1998 from septicemia. The trial court acquitted the accused of Section 3048 IPC (death caused by burns) but convicted them under Section 498A IPC (dowry harassment). The High Court reversed the acq…
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR INDIAversusSATISH AND ANOTHER
2021 INSC 76218 November 2021Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined two convictions under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act – one involving a 12‑year‑old girl (Satish) and another involving a 5‑year‑old girl (Libnus). The central issue was the interpretation of Section 7, specifically whether "touch" or "physical contact" required "s…
RISHIPAL SINGH SOLANKIversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.
2021 INSC 75218 November 2021Dismissed
The appellant alleged that respondent No.2, Nishant Solanki, who was charged with serious offences including murder, was not a juvenile and challenged the Juvenile Justice Board's (JJ Board) declaration that he was a juvenile delinquent based on his matriculation certificate. The appellant argued that the admission for…
BAIJNATH & OTHERSversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2016 INSC 104018 November 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased Saroj Bai was found hanging in her matrimonial home within seven years of marriage. The State alleged that her husband’s family demanded a motorcycle as dowry, subjecting her to cruelty and harassment, thereby invoking Sections 304B and 498A of the IPC and the statutory presumption under Section 113B of th…
ATLURI BRAHMANANDAM (D) THROUGH LRS.versusANNE SAI BAPUJI
2010 INSC 78718 November 2010Dismissed
The respondent claimed to be the adopted son of Late Anne Seetharamaiah, seeking possession of land purchased at auction by the adoptive father. The appellant contested the adoption, arguing that the respondent was over 15 years old at the time of adoption, which under Section 10(iv) of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenan…
ABHISHEK SHARMAversusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)
2023 INSC 92418 October 2023Appeal(s) allowed
Abhishek Sharma was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for allegedly setting his colleague Mandeep Kaur on fire after a quarrel. The prosecution's case rested on four dying declarations made by the victim to various police officers, a doctor, and her mother. The Supreme Court examined the admissibility and relia…
PUTCHALAPALLI NARESH REDDYversusSTATE OF A.P. AND ETC.
2013 INSC 70618 October 2013Disposed off
The case involved twenty accused charged with offences including murder, rioting and attempt to murder arising from a politically‑motivated land dispute that culminated in the killing of Mudi Parandhami Reddy. The trial court acquitted all accused, but the High Court convicted accused Nos. 1‑12 under Sections 147, 148,…
DEVINDER @ KALA RAM & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF HARYANA
2012 INSC 48418 October 2012Case Partly allowed
The appellants Devinder @ Kala Ram, his mother and his brother's wife were convicted under Sections 498-A and 304-B of the IPC for dowry harassment and the death of Devinder's wife by burns. The Supreme Court examined the evidence, finding that witnesses PW‑2 to PW‑5 reliably proved continuous dowry harassment, thereby…
SHREE SHYAM AGENCYversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
2012 INSC 48518 October 2012Dismissed
Shree Shyam Agency, a sugar manufacturer, booked a consignment under a "Self" basis and retained the railway receipt, but the buyer failed to pay and the goods were delivered to a third party without authority. The agency filed a claim petition before the Railway Claims Tribunal seeking compensation for non‑delivery, a…
RAM NIRANJAN KAJARIAversusSHEO PRAKASH KAJARIA AND OTHERS
2015 INSC 67318 September 2015Case Partly allowed
The case arose from a partition suit filed in 1978 where defendants No.5 and No.12, in their 1979 written statements, admitted that they had no right, title or interest in the family property, having renounced any claim. After about 25 years they sought to amend their written statements to withdraw those admissions, an…
ANVAR P.V.versusP.K. BASHEER AND ORS.
2014 INSC 64518 September 2014Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined an election petition challenging the election of P.K. Basheer on the ground that a leaflet (Exhibit‑P1) and various audio‑visual recordings were published to malign the petitioner, Anvar P.V., constituting a corrupt practice under the Representation of the People Act, 1951. The Court held tha…
ABHINAV MOHAN DELKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
2025 INSC 99018 August 2025Dismissed
Seven‑time MP Abhinav Mohan Delkar died by suicide on 22 February 2021, leaving a note that accused several officials of defamation, harassment and extortion. An FIR was filed under Section 306 IPC (now Section 108 BNS) read with Section 107 (now Section 45 BNS) alleging abetment of suicide, and the accused sought quas…
SMT. SHIRAMABAI W/O PUNDALIK BHAVE AND OTHERSversusTHE CAPTAIN, RECORD OFFICER FOR O.I.C. RECORDS, SENA CORPS ABHILEKH, GAYA, BIHAR STATE AND ANR.
2023 INSC 74418 August 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether Shrimabai, who cohabited with late Subedar Pundalik Bhave and bore two children, was entitled to his family pension after his death. Bhave had married Shrimabai while still married to his first wife Anusuya, but later obtained a divorce from Anusuya in 1990 and had the service record …
HARENDRA RAIversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
2023 INSC 73818 August 2023
The case involves a double murder in which accused Prabhunath Singh, a sitting MP, was originally acquitted along with other co‑accused. The Supreme Court, on appeal, took judicial notice of the Patna High Court's Habeas Corpus judgment, treating it as a public document, and considered the accused's subsequent conduct …
BACHPAN BACHAO ANDOLANversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2023 INSC 74518 August 2023Directions issued
The petition arose from the hardships faced by a child victim of sexual offence who, despite the provisions of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 and its 2020 Rules, was not provided with an effective support person. The Court examined the statutory definition, duties and entitlements of …
RAMESH KUMAR & ANR.versusFURU RAM & ANR. ETC.
2011 INSC 59318 August 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, brothers who co‑owned land, sued the respondents seeking a declaration that the arbitration awards and the subsequent court decrees granting title to the respondents were null and void because they were obtained through fraud and stamp‑duty evasion. The lower courts dismissed the suits on the ground tha…
SONU@AMARversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2017 INSC 63418 July 2017Dismissed
The case concerned the abduction and murder of Ramesh Jain, for which six accused were convicted under sections 120B, 364A, 302, 328A and 201 of the IPC. The prosecution relied on disclosure statements, recovered items, and Call Detail Records (CDRs) of the accused’s mobile phones. The principal issue was whether the C…
RANA NAHID @ RESHMA @ SANA & ANR.versusSAHIDUL HAQ CHISTI
2020 INSC 43218 June 2020Disposed off
A Muslim couple divorced; the wife filed a petition under Section 125 of the CrPC for maintenance, which the Family Court converted into an application under Section 3 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 and ordered maintenance. The High Court set aside the conversion, holding the Family Cou…
SISTERS OF ST. JOSEPH OF CLUNYversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.
2018 INSC 36318 April 2018Disposed off
The Sisters of St. Joseph of Cluny, a society that had established Cluny Women’s College as a secular institution, later applied to the National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions (NCMEI) for a minority status certificate, which was granted in 2007. The society and the college’s governing body subsequentl…
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusCDR. RAVINDRA V. DESAI
2018 INSC 36118 April 2018Dismissed
Commander Ravindra V. Desai was convicted by a court‑martial of making obscene telephone calls to the wives of three naval officers, resulting in dismissal from service and forfeiture of 24 months' seniority. The Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) upheld the conviction on seven charges but substituted the dismissal with loss …
MARIAPPANversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU
2013 INSC 27318 April 2013Dismissed
The appellant, Mariappan, was convicted of murder and criminal intimidation for repeatedly assaulting his paternal aunt with an aruval, resulting in her death, amid a land dispute. He appealed, claiming he suffered from paranoid schizophrenia at the time of the offence and sought protection under Section 84 of the Indi…
WAIKHOM YAIMA SINGHversusSTATE OF MANIPUR
2011 INSC 31018 April 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased was found unconscious on the road and taken to a hospital where he allegedly regained consciousness and made an oral dying declaration accusing Waikhom Yaima Singh of assault before dying the next morning. The trial court acquitted the accused, finding the dying declaration unreliable due to lack of medica…