Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA

92 judgments delivered by benches including this judge.

GOVERNMENT OF GOA THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARYversusMARIA JULIETA D’SOUZA (D) & ORS.

2024 INSC 8831 January 2024Dismissed

The Government of Goa filed a suit for declaration of title and injunction against Maria Julieta D’Souza, which the trial court dismissed for lack of a clear title document and alleged limitation. The High Court reversed the decision, holding that the plaintiff's predecessor’s title was established through deeds and co

IN RE: T. N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPADversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2024 INSC 7831 January 2024Directions issued

The petition sought the institutionalisation and reconstitution of the Central Empowered Committee (CEC), which had functioned as an ad‑hoc body since its Supreme Court‑ordered creation in 2002. The Court examined the need for a permanent statutory authority to monitor compliance with its environmental orders and consi

SUBHA PRASAD NANDI MAJUMDARversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL SERVICE & ORS

2025 INSC 91030 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed

Subha Prasad Nandi Majumdar, a teaching staff member who served 16 years in Assam and subsequently joined Burdwan University in West Bengal, sought to benefit from a 2021 Government Notification that extended the retirement age of teachers from 60 to 65 years, provided they had at least ten years of continuous teaching

YASH DEVELOPERSversusHARIHAR KRUPA CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED & ORS.

2024 INSC 55930 July 2024Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the termination of a development agreement between Yash Developers (appellant) and Harihar Krupa Co‑Operative Housing Society (respondent) under Section 13 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971, which had been upheld by the Bombay High Court. The C

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIAversusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

2024 INSC 35830 April 2024Dismissed

Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) issued several insurance policies in Rajasthan between 1993-94 and 2001-02 and, due to the unavailability of India Insurance stamps in the state, purchased the stamps from Maharashtra. The Rajasthan government issued show‑cause notices demanding payment of stamp duty on those p

RUTU MIHIR PANCHAL & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2025 INSC 59329 April 2025Disposed off

The petitioners challenged the constitutionality of sections 34(1), 47(1)(a)(i) and 58(1)(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, which base the pecuniary jurisdiction of district, state and national consumer commissions on the value of consideration paid rather than the compensation claimed. The challenge arose fr

RENUKAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.

2025 INSC 59629 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant-wife alleged that her husband and his relatives assaulted her and her family on 27 October 2020 by throwing chilli powder in her eyes and attacking them with slippers and stones, while also demanding dowry. A criminal case was filed under IPC sections 498-A, 324, 355, 504, 506 read with 149, and the polic

K. VALARMATHI & ORS.versusKUMARESAN

2025 INSC 60629 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, legal heirs of the deceased Kathiresan, filed suits seeking declaration of title and injunction over a suit land purchased by Kathiresan. The respondent, a relative, invoked Article 227 of the Constitution before the Madras High Court, seeking rejection of the plaints on the ground that they were barred

FILOMENA SALDANHA THROUGH POWER OF ATTORNEY MR. FRAZIER SALDANHAversusSUNIL KOHLI REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY, MR. NAVAL BOWRY, & ORS.

2022 INSC 59529 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute arose from a construction licence granted to the respondent, which the appellant claimed would obstruct a pathway adjoining his land. After a series of appeals under the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, the parties reached a settlement wherein the respondent agreed to provide a 3‑metre access path, and the High Court

S.D. JAYAPRAKASH AND ORS. ETC.versusTHE UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2025 INSC 59429 April 2025Case Partly allowed

The appellants were appointed as Data Entry Operators on a contractual basis between 1996 and 1999 and were regularised in 2015. They sought to have their contractual service counted for pension benefits under the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972. The Central Administrative Tribunal and the Karnataka High C

LAKHA SINGHversusBALWINDER SINGH & ANR.

2024 INSC 74427 September 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Lakha Singh, contested a civil suit filed by the respondent, Balwinder Singh, for specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural land and for the recovery of Rs.16,00,000 earnest money. The trial court held the transaction to be a loan rather than a sale and ordered the appellant to refund the

NEERAJ SUD AND ANR.versusJASWINDER SINGH (MINOR) AND ANR.

2024 INSC 82525 October 2024

The father and son complained that a minor eye surgery (ptosis correction) performed by Dr. Neeraj Sud at PGI in 1996 resulted in deterioration of the child's vision, and they alleged medical negligence, seeking compensation. The State Consumer Commission dismissed the complaint, finding no negligence, but the National

KAILASHBEN MAHENDRABHAI PATEL & ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

2024 INSC 73725 September 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The complainant, a wife, filed a criminal complaint in 2013 alleging dowry demand, threats, and cruelty by her step‑mother‑in‑law, step‑brother‑in‑law, father‑in‑law and a munim, leading to an FIR under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 read with 34 IPC and a subsequent chargesheet. The appellants sought quashing of the FIR

THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE & ANR.versusK.C. DEVAKI

2025 INSC 38925 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned K.C. Devaki, a staff nurse appointed in 1979, who sought a cadre change to First Division Assistant on medical grounds and consented to be placed below the last incumbent in the new post. The Government accepted her request, issued orders in 1989 effecting the change, and later issued a seniority lis

LIFECARE INNOVATIONS PVT. LTD. & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2025 INSC 26924 February 2025Disposed off

Lifecare Innovations Pvt. Ltd., a micro‑enterprise manufacturing a specialised liposomal drug, was repeatedly disqualified from government tenders because the Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) imposed mandatory minimum turnover requirements that it could not meet. The petitioners argued that such clauses violated Articles 1

RAJU NARYANA SWAMYversusSTATE OF KERALA & ORS.

2025 INSC 56323 April 2025Dismissed

The appellant, an IAS officer of the 1991 Kerala batch, sought promotion to Chief Secretary but was denied by the Screening Committee because less than 90% of his ACRs/PARs were available and his performance was deemed unsatisfactory. He appealed the decision, first to the Review Committee, which upheld the denial citi

DURGA PRASADversusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

2025 INSC 54823 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a former Inspector of Police, was charged with dereliction of duty for allegedly failing to control the 1984 anti‑Sikh riots. An inquiry officer exonerated him, but the disciplinary authority disagreed and issued a punishment of reduction in rank, which the High Court set aside and directed a fresh disag

M/S AJAY PROTECH PVT. LTD.versusGENERAL MANAGER & ANR.

2024 INSC 88922 November 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a construction contractor, entered into a works contract with the respondent and later referred their dispute to arbitration, resulting in the appointment of a sole arbitrator. The arbitral tribunal was required to render its award within 12 months of the completion of pleadings, extendable by six months

VIDYASAGAR PRASADversusUCO BANK & ANR.

2024 INSC 81022 October 2024Dismissed

The appellant, a suspended director of the corporate debtor, challenged the admission of a Section 7 application initiating a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) by UCO Bank, arguing that the debtor's balance‑sheet entries did not constitute a clear, specific acknowledgment of debt required under Section 18

SHAH SAMIR BHARATBHAI & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

2025 INSC 102622 August 2025Disposed off

The petitioners, contractually appointed Assistant Professors in Gujarat's government engineering and polytechnic colleges, sought parity in pay with regularly appointed Assistant Professors, arguing that they performed identical duties. The State of Gujarat contended that contractual appointments were governed by the

IQBAL AHMED (DEAD) BY LRS. & ANR.versusABDUL SHUKOOR

2025 INSC 102722 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The trial court decreed specific performance of a sale agreement between the plaintiffs and the defendant. The defendant appealed and, during the pendency of the appeal, filed an application under Order XLI Rule 27(1) of the CPC to lead additional documentary evidence. The High Court admitted this evidence without firs

YASH RAJ FILMS PRIVATE LIMITEDversusAFREEN FATIMA ZAIDI & ANR.

2024 INSC 32822 April 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Yash Raj Films, released a promotional trailer for its 2016 film "Fan" that featured a song which was not included in the final movie. The complainant, after viewing the trailer, purchased tickets expecting to see the song and alleged deficiency of service and unfair trade practice under the Consumer Pro

SMT. VIDYA K. & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

2024 INSC 13722 February 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The Karnataka Public Service Commission issued a notification on 24 December 2007 to recruit 18 Home Science lecturers in government first‑grade colleges. Two successful candidates and the State of Karnataka challenged the notification, arguing that it failed to specify the subject‑wise specialisations within Home Scie

S.P. PANDEYversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2024 INSC 80421 October 2024Disposed off

The appellant, an Air Force airman, was admonished in May 2010 for allegedly overtaking vehicles at a railway crossing and using insubordinate language toward a Squadron Leader. Although the commanding officer initially expunged the punishment, the matter was reopened, leading to a second admonition in January 2011. Th

DHIRUBHAI BHAILALBHAI CHAUHAN & ANR.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

2025 INSC 38121 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a large-scale riot in Vadod village where over a thousand people clashed, resulting in police firing and a stampede. Seven persons, including the appellants, were arrested on the spot and named in the FIR, while a total of nineteen were tried. The trial court acquitted all accused due to lack of spe

RACING PROMOTIONS PRIVATE LIMITEDversusDR. HARISH & ORS.

2025 INSC 25220 February 2025Case Partly allowed

Racing Promotions Private Limited (RPPL) entered into a three‑year Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Sports Development Authority of Tamil Nadu (SDAT) to organise Formula 4 motor‑racing events. Several public‑interest litigations were filed challenging the event on grounds of safety, noise, and the use of publ

ALL INDIA FOOTBALL FEDERATIONversusRAHUL MEHRA & ORS.

2025 INSC 113119 September 2025Directions issued

The Supreme Court examined a series of challenges to the draft Constitution of the All India Football Federation (AIFF) raised by Rahul Mehra and other stakeholders, focusing on issues such as the inclusion and eligibility of eminent players, the definition of office‑bearers, the number of vice‑presidents, disqualifica

SUSHMAversusNITIN GANAPATI RANGOLE & ORS.

2024 INSC 70619 September 2024Disposed off

In 2013 a car collided with a 14‑wheeler that had been abandoned in the middle of a highway without any warning lights or markers, killing the car's driver and three passengers while one passenger, Smt. Sushma, survived with injuries. The claimants filed compensation claims under the Motor Vehicles Act against the owne

SAJID KHANversusL RAHMATHULLAH & ORS.

2025 INSC 25119 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The Lakshadweep Electricity Department advertised a Junior Engineer (Electrical) post requiring either a degree in Electrical Engineering or a Diploma in Electrical Engineering with two years' experience. The appellants, holding Diplomas in Electrical and Electronics Engineering, were selected, but the respondents, hol

BANK OF BARODAversusFAROOQ ALI KHAN & ORS.

2025 INSC 25319 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether the Karnataka High Court was justified in using its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 to halt personal insolvency proceedings against Farooq Ali Khan under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The bank had filed an application for personal insolvency after the gua

UNION OF INDIA & ANRversusM/S GANPATI DEALCOM PVT. LTD.

2024 INSC 79918 October 2024

The Supreme Court, in a review petition filed by the Union of India, examined its earlier 2022 judgment that declared certain provisions of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 and its 2016 amendment unconstitutional. The Court observed that the original appeal did not contain any challenge to the

SURESH CHANDRA (DECEASED) THR. LRS. & ORS.versusPARASRAM & ORS.

2025 INSC 87318 July 2025Dismissed

The plaintiff sued the defendants for title and possession of a house, alleging they were tenants; the trial court dismissed the suit, but the first appellate court declared the plaintiff the owner and the defendants tenants. The defendants filed a second appeal, but one co-defendant (Ram Babu) died during its pendency

BGM AND M-RPL-JMCT (JV)versusEASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED

2025 INSC 87418 July 2025Dismissed

The appellant and Eastern Coalfields Limited entered into a contract for transportation of goods that contained Clause 13, which the appellant claimed was an arbitration agreement. The appellant filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for the appointment of an arbitrator,

RAJESH KUMARversusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

[2024] 12 S.C.R. 110817 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Rajesh Kumar, suffered a motor vehicle accident in which his car overturned and later caught fire due to short‑circuiting while he was attending to an injured co‑passenger. He claimed the full insured sum under his policy, but the insurer denied part of the claim, citing delay in intimation and the vehic

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & ANR.versusJSW HYDRO ENERGY LIMITED & ORS.

2025 INSC 85716 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The Himachal Pradesh government entered into an Implementation Agreement with JSW Hydro Energy Ltd (formerly JIL) to supply 12% free power for the first 12 years and 18% thereafter from a 1045 MW hydro project. When the free‑power obligation rose above the 13% cap prescribed in CERC (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Reg

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusM/S HYUNDAI ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. & ORS.

2024 INSC 43116 May 2024Appeal(s) allowed

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. issued a Contractor's All Risk policy for a bridge project that collapsed during construction, killing 48 workers. The insurer repudiated the claim, invoking an exclusion clause covering loss due to faulty design, workmanship and construction defects, and relied on a surveyor's report an

KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR.versusBIMAL KUMAR SHAH & ORS

2024 INSC 435416 May 2024Dismissed

The Kolkata Municipal Corporation claimed it had acquired the land of Bimal Kumar Shah under Section 352 of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980, which it argued gave it power to acquire land for streets and parks. The High Court held that Section 352 does not confer a power of compulsory acquisition and set asi

ADAVYA PROJECTS PVT. LTD.versusM/S VISHAL STRUCTURALS PVT. LTD. & ORS

2025 INSC 50716 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant and respondent No.1 formed an LLP governed by an agreement containing an arbitration clause (Clause 40). Disputes arose over the ITF project, and the appellant issued a Section 21 notice of arbitration only to respondent No.1 and filed a Section 11 application appointing an arbitrator, also only naming re

IRWAN KOURversusPUNJAB PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS.

2025 INSC 49416 April 2025Dismissed

The Punjab Public Service Commission advertised vacancies for the Punjab Civil Service with a reservation for "ex‑servicemen". The appellant, a former Indian Army captain, was appointed under this reservation, while respondent No. 4, a former officer of the Indian Military Nursing Service (IMNS), was denied appointment

VIJAY KUMARversusCENTRAL BANK OF INDIA & ORS.

2025 INSC 84815 July 2025Case Allowed

Vijay Kumar, a former Chief Manager of Central Bank of India, was compulsorily retired after an inquiry found him guilty of sanctioning loans without proper appraisal. The disciplinary authority imposed retirement and the Field General Manager, acting as appellate authority, reduced his pension to two‑thirds without co

PNB HOUSING FINANCE LIMITEDversusSH. MANOJ SAHA & ANR

2025 INSC 84715 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, PNB Housing Finance Ltd., took symbolic and later physical possession of a premises that had been offered as security for a loan to the borrower (2nd Respondent) after the borrower defaulted. The 1st Respondent claimed to be a tenant of the premises since 1987 under an unregistered lease and sought resto

ARUN KUMAR SHARMA & ORS.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.

2025 INSC 82614 July 2025Dismissed

The appellants filed an application before the National Green Tribunal (NGT) seeking to quash a No‑Objection Certificate (NOC) and consent for a petrol pump at Khasra No. 109/1/2, alleging violations of environmental and municipal regulations. While the NGT dismissed the application, the appellants appealed to the Supr

PANDURANGANversusT. JAYARAMA CHETTIAR & ANR.

2025 INSC 82514 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Pandurangan, purchased a property from Hussain Babu, who had earlier bought it from Jayam Ammal. He later discovered that Defendant No. 1, claiming co‑ownership, had obtained an ex‑parte decree in a 1996 partition suit that the appellant alleged was collusive and fraudulently obtained. The appellant file

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusROHIT NANDAN

2024 INSC 98413 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Rohit Nandan, was appointed as a Postal Assistant in 1997 under the OBC category based on a Tanti caste certificate. In 2015, the Bihar Government deleted the Tanti caste from the OBC list and merged it with the Pan/Swasi caste in the Scheduled Castes list, after which the respondent obtained a Schedule

KAMAL GUPTA & ANR.versusM/S L.R BUILDERS PVT. LTD. & ANR. ETC.

2025 INSC 97513 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from an oral family settlement reduced to a Memorandum of Understanding/Family Settlement Deed (MoU/FSD) signed by Pawan Gupta (PG) and Kamal Gupta (KG) but not by KG's son Rahul Gupta (RG). PG and others filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointme

VIJAYA BANK & ANR.versusPRASHANT B NARNAWARE

2025 INSC 69113 May 2025

Vijaya Bank required its senior middle‑manager, Prashant B. Narnaware, to serve a minimum of three years and to pay Rs 2 lakhs as liquidated damages if he resigned earlier, as stipulated in clause 11(k) of his appointment letter. The employee resigned after less than two years and paid the amount under protest, subsequ

M/S HARCHARAN DASS GUPTAversusUNION OF INDIA

2025 INSC 68913 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a MSME supplier based in Delhi, entered into a contract with ISRO for construction of staff quarters, which contained a clause fixing Bengaluru as the seat of arbitration. Disputes arose and the supplier invoked the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (Development) Act, 2006, prompting the Delhi Facilita

SHENTO VARGHESEversusJULFIKAR HUSEN & ORS.

2024 INSC 40713 May 2024Case Partly allowed

The appellant, a deliveryman, complained that gold bars received in exchange for gold chains were counterfeit, leading the police to freeze the accused's bank accounts. The police reported the seizure to the jurisdictional magistrate only after a delay, and the Madras High Court ordered de‑freezing on the ground that t

CMJ FOUNDATION AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF MEGHALAYA AND OTHERS

2025 INSC 21113 February 2025Disposed off

The Chandra Mohan Jha (CMJ) University was established in 2009, but its sponsor appointed a Chancellor without the required approval of the Visitor (the Governor of Meghalaya). The Supreme Court examined whether this appointment violated Section 14(1) of the CMJ University Act, 2009, and whether the State Government’s

VINOD @ NASMULLAversusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2025 INSC 22013 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Vinod @ Nasmulla was convicted under IPC sections 395 and 397 and Arms Act section 25 for a dacoity involving a bus robbery on 28 September 1993. The prosecution's case rested on a dock identification by a police constable (PW‑9) and the alleged recovery of a country‑made pistol at the time of his arrest,

P. RAMMOHAN RAOversusK. SRINIVAS AND ORS. ETC.

2025 INSC 21213 February 2025Disposed off

The petitioners, originally appointed as Work Inspectors in 1990 and later as temporary Assistant Executive Engineers (AEEs) between 1990‑1992, sought seniority over the 1997 batch of AEEs recruited through the APPSC. The State Government regularised the temporary AEEs in 2005 but placed them below the 1997 regular rec

NAVRATAN LAL SHARMAversusRADHA MOHAN SHARMA & ORS.

2024 INSC 97012 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Navratan Lal Sharma, filed a suit for declaration and injunction which was dismissed, leading him to file a first appeal. During the pendency of the appeal, the parties executed a compromise deed that provided for the restoration of the appeal if the respondents failed to honor payment obligations. The H

RAJUL MANOJ SHAH ALIAS RAJESHWARI RASIKLAL SHETHversusKIRANBHAI SHAKRABHAI PATEL & ANR.

2025 INSC 110912 September 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant filed a suit in 2012 seeking a declaration that her sister‑in‑law could not sell a jointly owned bungalow and that an agreement to sell dated 21‑10‑2011 was void. After the sister‑in‑law died, the court substituted a Nazir as defendant No.1. In 2021 the respondent (defendant No.2) applied to amend his wri

OFFICE FOR ALTERNATIVE ARCHITECTUREversusIRCON INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICES LTD.

2025 INSC 66512 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Office for Alternative Architecture, challenged a Delhi High Court order that, while appointing an arbitral tribunal under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, excluded certain claims as non‑arbitrable. The appellant argued that the court should only examine whether a prima facie arb

MAHANADI COALFIELDS LTD.versusBRAJRAJNAGAR COAL MINES WORKERS’ UNION

2024 INSC 19912 March 2024

Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. (the appellant) had engaged a contractor to transport crushed coal, employing 32 workmen from 1984 to 1994. The workers' union sought regularisation of all 32 workers under clauses of the National Coal Wage Agreement IV, leading to a settlement on 5 April 1997 that regularised only 19 of them,

THE STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.versusPARESH NATHALAL CHAUHAN

2024 INSC 27712 March 2024Disposed off

The respondent, Paresh Nathalal Chauhan, filed a writ petition seeking protection from arrest under the GST Act, prompting the Gujarat High Court to issue an interim order that criticised the prolonged presence of a search party at his residence as unauthorized. The High Court also observed that the good‑faith protecti

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.versusPRISM CEMENT LIMITED & ANR

2025 INSC 19912 February 2025Dismissed

Prism Cement Ltd., a unit that had been granted an absolute tax exemption under the Package Scheme of Incentives 1993 (PSI 1993) through an Eligibility Certificate (20‑02‑1998) and an Entitlement Certificate (24‑03‑1998), challenged the Maharashtra State's attempt to withdraw that benefit after the Finance Act, 2002 am

DUSHYANT JANBANDHUversusM/S HYUNDAI AUTOEVER INDIA PVT. LTD.

2024 INSC 96611 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an assistant manager, was terminated by the respondent employer alleging absenteeism, after a show‑cause notice and disciplinary inquiry. The appellant filed a petition under Section 15(2) of the Payment of Wages Act for unpaid wages and later approached the Industrial Tribunal under Section 2(A) of the

GURDEEP SINGHversusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB

2025 INSC 95711 August 2025Dismissed

The appellant, an Assistant Superintendent of Jail, was alleged to have facilitated a private vehicle ride for two police constables escorting an undertrial prisoner, during which two unidentified youths attacked the constables with red chilli powder, a knife and a kirpan, attempting to free the prisoner. The prosecuti

AC CHOKSHI SHARE BROKER PRIVATE LIMITEDversusJATIN PRATAP DESAI & ANR.

2025 INSC 17410 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The stock broker AC Chokshi Share Broker invoked arbitration under BSE Bye‑law 248(a) to recover a large debit balance that accrued in the wife’s trading account after the 2001 market crash, alleging that the husband had orally agreed to be jointly and severally liable. The arbitral tribunal held both spouses jointly l

TEJ BHAN (D) THROUGH LR. & ORS.versusRAM KISHAN (D) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.

2024 INSC 9459 December 2024

The appeal concerned the interpretation of Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, specifically the interplay between sub‑sections (1) and (2) regarding whether a Hindu female's possession of property, whether by will, gift, or maintenance, confers absolute ownership or a restricted estate. The appellant, a purch

NBCC (INDIA) LTD.versusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS

2025 INSC 549 January 2025Matter referred to larger bench

NBCC (India) Ltd., a micro‑small enterprise, entered into several construction contracts with the State of West Bengal and later filed a memorandum under Section 8 of the MSMED Act, 2006 after the contracts were executed. The enterprise then referred a payment dispute to the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Cou

UMASHANKAR YADAV & ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH, THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY & ANR.

2025 INSC 6538 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, members of a child‑rights NGO, accompanied labour officials during a raid on a brick kiln to rescue alleged bonded child labourers. A dispute arose over whether the children should be taken to the police station for interrogation or statements recorded on site, leading the officials to lodge an FIR alle

SAMIULLAHversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

2025 INSC 12927 November 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants challenged the Bihar Registration Rules, 2008 amendments that introduced sub‑rules (xvii) and (xviii) to Rule 19, which made the production of jamabandi or holding‑allotment proof a condition precedent for registering sale or gift documents. The High Court of Patna dismissed the writ petitions, holding t

VIKRAM BHALCHANDRA GHONGADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2025 INSC 12836 November 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a legal heir of the original plaintiffs, sought execution of a 2006 decree that declared an agricultural land allotment to the defendants illegal. The defendants (Nos. 4 and 5) had appealed the decree, but both died before the appeal was heard, and their legal heirs were never brought on record. The firs

POONAMversusDULE SINGH & ORS.

2025 INSC 12846 November 2025Dismissed

The petitioner, Poonam, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and failed to disclose this conviction in the affidavit required by Rule 24‑A of the Madhya Pradesh Nagar Palika Nirvachan Niyam, 1994 when filing her nomination for councillor. The trial court declared her election void und

BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. & ANRversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS

2025 INSC 9376 August 2025Directions issued

The three Delhi distribution companies (BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd., BSES Yamuna Power Ltd., and Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd.) challenged the Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission’s (DERC) tariff orders that created and perpetuated a large regulatory asset to bridge revenue gaps, which had ballooned to over Rs 27,

THE STATE OF JHARKHANDversusTHE INDIAN BUILDERS JAMSHEDPUR

2025 INSC 13085 December 2025Directions issued

The State of Jharkhand appealed a High Court order that restored an arbitral award allowing claims that the civil court had struck down as prohibited by specific contractual clauses. The High Court had relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Bharat Drilling & Foundation Treatment Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Jharkhand, hold

ADARSH SAHKARI GRIH NIRMAN SWAWLAMBI SOCIETY LTD.versusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.

2025 INSC 13895 December 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a cooperative society registered under the Jharkhand Self‑Supporting Cooperative Societies Act, sought exemption from stamp duty on a land transfer to its members under Section 9A of the Stamp (Bihar Amendment) Act, 1988. The State, through a memorandum issued by the Principal Secretary, Department of Re

SOUMEN PAUL & ORS.versusSHRABANI NAYEK & ORS.

2025 INSC 4514 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the recruitment of assistant teachers in West Bengal primary schools, where the eligibility rule required a Diploma in Elementary Education (D.El.Ed.) as prescribed by the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE). Because the COVID‑19 pandemic delayed the 2020‑22 D.El.Ed. batch, several candidat

DELHI POLLUTION CONTROL COMMITTEEversusLODHI PROPERTY CO. LTD. ETC.

2025 INSC 9233 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) appealed against a Delhi High Court decision that held it could not levy restitutionary or compensatory damages under s.33A of the Water Act and s.31A of the Air Act, on the ground that such powers amounted to penalties. The Supreme Court examined the statutory scheme, the p

JOGESWAR SAHOO & ORS.versusTHE DISTRICT JUDGE, CUTTACK & ORS.

2025 INSC 4493 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, who were Stenographer Grade‑I and Personal Assistant in the District Judiciary, Cuttack, were granted a retrospective promotion and a financial benefit in 2017 based on the Shetty Commission recommendations. After their superannuation in 2020, the State ordered them to repay the amounts, alleging the pr

WAHIDversusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

2025 INSC 1453 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Wahid and Anshu, were convicted for robbery under IPC sections 392/397 and for possession of arms under the Arms Act, based on an FIR that named no specific perpetrators. The prosecution’s case relied on the complainant’s identification of the accused at a bus depot two days after the incident and the r

OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD.versusM/S G & T BECKFIELD DRILLING SERVICES PVT. LTD.

2025 INSC 10662 September 2025Dismissed

The dispute arose from an arbitral award dated 21 November 2004 in favour of G & T Beckfield Drilling Services, directing ONGC (the respondent) to pay a sum of US$6,56,272.34 together with interest at 12% per annum from 12 December 1998, the date the claim was affirmed. ONGC challenged the award under Section 34 of the

SHANKARversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.

2024 INSC 3662 May 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Shankar and Vishal, were named in an FIR for the murder of Vijay Singh based solely on the mother’s (PW‑1) suspicion arising from a long‑standing family enmity. PW‑1 later clarified in her Section 161 statement and during trial that the names were included falsely and that she was not an eyewitness. No

CHAITRA NAGAMMANAVARversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

2024 INSC 3672 May 2024Dismissed

The Bangalore University advertised a vacancy for an Assistant Professor (English) reserved for Scheduled Tribe candidates, stating that the selection would be made in accordance with the Karnataka State Civil Services (Special Recruitment) Rules, 2001. The appellant, Chaitra Nagammanavar, was appointed on the basis of

M/S R. K. TRANSPORT COMPANYversusM/S BHARAT ALUMINUM COMPANY LTD. (BALCO)

2025 INSC 4382 April 2025Dismissed

The parties entered into a contract for bauxite mining, and an arbitral award dated 9 April 2022 was issued in favour of the appellant. The respondent filed an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 on 11 July 2022 to set aside the award. The issue before the Supreme Court was whethe

MOHAMMED ENTERPRISES (TANZANIA) LTD.versusFAROOQ ALI KHAN & ORS.

2025 INSC 252 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined appeals against a Karnataka High Court order that had stayed the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) for Associate Decor Ltd, where Mohammed Enterprises (Tanzania) Ltd's resolution plan had been approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) on 11 February 2020. The petitioners argue

SEROSOFT SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD.versusDEXTER CAPITAL ADVISORS PVT. LTD.

2025 INSC 262 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed

Serosoft Solutions and Dexter Capital Advisors were in arbitration over unpaid fees. During the arbitration, the respondent sought additional time to cross‑examine the appellant's witness RW‑1, which the arbitral tribunal rejected, holding that sufficient opportunity had already been given. The respondent appealed to t

COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXESversusFEMC PRATIBHA JOINT VENTURE

2024 INSC 3641 May 2024Dismissed

The respondent, FEMC Pratibha Joint Venture, claimed refunds of excess VAT credits for the 4th quarter of 2015‑16 and the 1st quarter of 2017‑18, filing revised returns in 2017 and 2019. The Commissioner of Trade and Taxes failed to refund the amounts and, in 2022, issued an adjustment order that set off the pending re

M/S FERRO CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION (INDIA) PVT. LTD.versusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

2025 INSC 4291 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed

M/s Ferro Concrete Construction (India) Pvt. Ltd. entered into a works contract with the State of Rajasthan that contained Clause 22 prohibiting the contractor from claiming any interest on payments, arrears or balances. Disputes led to arbitration under the Arbitration Act, 1940, where the arbitrator awarded the contr

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search