SHRI S.K. MAINIversusM/S. CARONA SAHU COMPANY LTD. AND ORS.
1994 INSC 1078 March 1994Dismissed
Shri S.K. Maini, employed as Shop Manager/In‑charge of M/s Carona Sahu Co. Ltd., was terminated after a domestic enquiry. The Labour Court held he was a workman under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and ordered his reinstatement with back wages. The Punjab & Haryana High Court reversed, finding that h…
VED PRAKASH GUPTAversusDELTON CABLE INDIA (P) LTD.
1984 INSC 568 March 1984Disposed off
Ved Prakash Gupta, employed as a security inspector at Delton Cable India, was dismissed after a domestic enquiry found him guilty of abusing a worker. The Labour Court initially held he was not a "workman" under s.2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, rendering the reference invalid, but the Supreme Court directe…
SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER TELEGRAPH, BIJNORversusTHE PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM-LABOUR COURT, KANPUR AND ANR.
2006 INSC 758 February 2006Appeal(s) allowed
In an industrial dispute, the Central Government Industrial Tribunal‑cum‑Labour Court awarded reinstatement, back wages and benefits to six casual workers in 1992. The Department filed an Original Application before the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in 1993, which was later dismissed on the ground that, pursuan…
APSRTC & ORS.versusG. KONDAL RAO
2018 INSC 11737 December 2018Leave granted
G. Kondal Rao, a contract conductor with APSRTC, was terminated after a departmental enquiry proved misconduct. He unsuccessfully challenged the termination through departmental and review mechanisms and then filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The Single Judge of the High Court, relying mechan…
WORKMEN OF WILLIAMSON MAGOR & CO. LTD.versusWILLIAMSON MAGOR & CO. LTD. & ANR.
1981 INSC 1977 December 1981Appeal(s) allowed
The workmen of Williamson Magor & Co. alleged that the management arbitrarily promoted junior clerks to the Special Grade, superseding the legitimate claims of senior employees, thereby victimising them. The Industrial Tribunal found the promotions unjustified but declined to grant relief because no promotion norms exi…
DEPOT MANAGER, A.P.S.R.T.C.versusREGHUDA SIVA SANKAR PRASAD
2006 INSC 7997 November 2006Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, a long‑serving employee of the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (APSRTC), was charged with four instances of theft in 1986 and admitted to the misconduct. A departmental enquiry found him guilty and the Labour Court (Industrial Tribunal) ordered his removal from service. The High Court Si…
BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD.versusANIL AND ORS.
2006 INSC 8027 November 2006Disposed off
Fourteen garden workers employed by a contractor for Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. (BHEL) had their services terminated by the contractor on 1 December 1988 without complying with Section 6‑N of the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. They filed an individual dispute under Section 2‑A, which was referred to th…
R.M. YELLATTIversusTHE ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
2005 INSC 5457 November 2005Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a daily‑wage worker appointed on 26‑Nov‑1988, was terminated on 20‑Jun‑1994 and claimed that he had worked continuously for more than 240 days in the preceding year, invoking section 25‑F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The labour court held him to be a workman, found that he had satisfied the 240‑…
STATE OF HARYANAversusDHARAMPAL, WATER PUMP OPERATOR AND ORS.
1996 INSC 13067 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Haryana appealed against orders of the Punjab and Haryana High Court that had granted regularisation and equal‑pay relief to a group of casual water‑pump operators led by Dharampal. The workers claimed that, on the principle of equal pay for equal work, they were entitled to be regularised and to receive p…
BATALA COOPERATIVE SUGAR MILLS LTD.versusSOWARAN SINGH
2005 INSC 5047 October 2005Appeal(s) allowed
The workman, Sowaran Singh, claimed he was a regular employee of Batalá Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd. from April 1986 and that his termination on 12 February 1994 was illegal, seeking reinstatement and back wages. The employer contended that Singh was engaged on a casual, seasonal basis for a specific period and purpose…
PRABHAKARversusJOINT DIRECTOR, SERICULTURE DEPARTMENT &ANR.
2015 INSC 10147 September 2015Dismissed
The petitioner, a former clerk of the Karnataka Sericulture Department, was terminated in 1985 but only raised an industrial dispute in 1999, fourteen years later, alleging illegal termination under the Industrial Disputes Act. The Labour Court awarded reinstatement without back wages, which the management challenged; …
HUSSAN MITHU MHASVADKARversusBOMBAY IRON AND STEEL LABOUR BOARD AND ANR.
2001 INSC 4327 September 2001Dismissed
Hussan Mithu Mhasvadkar, employed as an Inspector in the Bombay Iron & Steel Labour Board, was placed on probation and terminated after 21 months. He claimed that he was a "workman" under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and that the Board constituted an "industry", making him entitled to the Act's protections. The La…
PALGHAT BPL AND PSP THOZHILALI UNIONversusBPL INDIA LTD. AND ANR.
1995 INSC 5447 September 1995Appeal(s) allowed
During a strike at BPL India Ltd., three workmen affiliated with the Palghat BPL and PSP Thozhilali Union assaulted company officers at a bus‑stop outside the factory, throwing stones and causing injuries. The employer dismissed the workmen under Clause 39(h) of its certified Standing Orders, alleging misconduct, and t…
METROPOLITAN TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusV. VENKATESAN
2009 INSC 10327 August 2009Case Partly allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether V. Venkatesan, a former employee of Metropolitan Transport Corporation who was terminated in 1996 and later reinstated in 2004, was entitled to full back wages under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act despite having been enrolled and practicing as an advocate from December …
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR HARYANA SEEDS DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD.versusTHE PRESIDING OFFICER AND ANR. ETC.
1997 INSC 5267 July 1997Appeal(s) allowed
The Haryana Seeds Development Corporation Ltd. closed several of its seed sales units after heavy floods, resulting in the termination of several employees, including the respondents. The employees sought a reference under Section 10(1)(c) of the Industrial Disputes Act, claiming that their termination amounted to retr…
PUNJAB DAIRY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED AND ANR. ETC.versusKALA SINGH ETC
1997 INSC 4897 May 1997Case Partly allowed
The respondent, a dairy helper, was dismissed for inflating milk supply and fat content. The domestic enquiry was held defective by the Labour Court, which then allowed both parties to present fresh evidence; the Court found the misconduct proved and the dismissal justified. The High Court altered the Labour Court's aw…
ANIL BAPURAO KANASEversusKRISHNA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD. AND ANR.
1997 INSC 4947 May 1997Dismissed
Anil Bapurao Kanase, a seasonal worker in the chemistry section of Krishna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., was terminated after the sugar crushing season ended. He claimed that the termination amounted to retrenchment under Section 25‑F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and sought a reference before the Industrial T…
D.K. YADAVversusJ.M.A. INDUSTRIES LTD.
1993 INSC 1857 May 1993Appeal(s) allowed
D.K. Yadav, a workman of J.M.A. Industries Ltd., was deemed to have abandoned his post after being absent for more than eight days and was terminated under clause 13(2)(iv) of the company's certified standing orders. The employer did not conduct a domestic enquiry nor gave Yadav an opportunity to be heard, and the Labo…
BIRA KISHORE NAIKversusCOAL INDIA LTD. & ORS.
1986 INSC 1117 May 1986Dismissed
The petition filed by B.K. Naik and 700 workmen sought a writ of mandamus directing the Central Government to declare that Natundihi Pahariabera Colliery had vested in it and to treat the petitioners as its employees with back wages under Section 14 of the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973. The Court examined whet…
MINISTRY OF TEXTILEversusMURARI LAL GUPTA & ANR.
2008 INSC 4627 April 2008Case Partly allowed
Murari Lal Gupta, appointed as a chowkidar in 1982, sought regularisation but was denied on age grounds and later stopped working. He filed claims for salary differences and overtime, and after failed conciliation, a writ petition led to a reference to the Industrial Tribunal, which awarded reinstatement with back wage…
BHUPENDRA KUMAR CHIMANBHAI KACHIYA PATELversusDIVISIONAL CONTROLLER GSRTC NADIAD
2018 INSC 2187 March 2018Dismissed
The Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation (GSRTC) and the Union of its workers entered into a settlement on 21‑12‑1989, wherein Clause 20 prescribed that Badali Kamdars would be regularised and absorbed into the permanent conductor cadre after completing 180 days of continuous service in that cadre. Several Badali K…
OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONversusKRISHAN GOPAL & ORS.
2020 INSC 1477 February 2020Directions issued
The Supreme Court examined a batch of appeals filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) challenging High Court orders that regularised workmen based on the PCLU judgment. The Court questioned whether the PCLU decision correctly interpreted clause 2(ii) of ONGC’s Certified Standing Orders and whether it had consid…
ABP PVT. LTD. & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2014 INSC 827 February 2014Dismissed
The petitioners, a consortium of newspaper management firms, challenged the constitutionality of the Working Journalists and Other Newspaper Employees (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 and its 1974 amendment, alleging violations of Articles 14, 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution, as …
SHARMIK UTTARSH SABHAversusRAYMOND WOOLLEN MILLS LTD. AND ORS.
1995 INSC 1037 February 1995Dismissed
The appellant, Sharimk Uttarsah Sabha, a trade union, sought to be impleaded in an Industrial Court proceeding where Raymond Woolen Mills Ltd. had complained of unfair labour practices under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971. The Industrial Court had restrai…
DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEERversusKUBERBHAI KANJIBHAI
2019 INSC 197 January 2019Case Partly allowed
The respondent, a daily‑wage worker in the R&B Department of the State, was terminated in 1981 after working intermittently for about two years. After a lapse of fifteen years he filed a claim before the Labour Court, which ordered his reinstatement but awarded no back wages. The State appealed; the High Court upheld t…
MANAGEMENT OF DANDAKARANYA PROJECT, KOREPUTversusWORKMEN THROUGH REHABILITATION EMPLOYEES UNION AND ANR.
1997 INSC 77 January 1997Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether the Dandakaranya Project, undertaken by the Central Government for refugee rehabilitation, qualified as an "industry" under Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and whether the Industrial Tribunal could lawfully direct the regularisation of 425 non‑ministerial regular (N…
AIR INDIA STATUTORY CORPORATIONversusUNITED LABOUR UNION AND ORS.
1996 INSC 14426 December 1996
The Air India Statutory Corporation, originally a statutory authority and later a company, employed union members as contract labour for cleaning and related services. The Central Government, as the appropriate Government under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970, issued a 1976 notification abolish…
CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTSversusJAGANNATH MARUTI KONDHARE
1995 INSC 8476 December 1995Dismissed
The workmen employed by the Maharashtra Forest Department under the Panchgaon Parwati Scheme and social‑forestry projects alleged that they had been kept as casual labourers for five to six years, constituting an unfair labour practice under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Pr…
ASHOK KUMAR SHARMAversusOBEROI FLIGHT SERVICES
2009 INSC 12166 November 2009Case Partly allowed
Ashok Kumar Sharma, a loader employed by Oberoi Flight Services since 1980, was dismissed in 1986 after being caught with 30 soup spoons in his shoe and allegedly admitting guilt. The dismissal was effected without any enquiry, charge‑sheet or show‑cause notice. The Labour Court held the dismissal contrary to law but a…
WORKMEN OF THE BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. (REFINING DIVISION) BOMBAYversusBHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. AND ANOTHER
1983 INSC 1426 October 1983Appeal(s) allowed
The workmen of Bharat Petroleum's refinery division sought to raise the retirement age for clerical staff from 55 to 60 years, relying on a perceived trend in the Bombay region. The Industrial Tribunal raised it only to 58 years, noting wage scales, the existence of a pension scheme for the marketing division, and the …
MUKESH K. TRIPATHIversusSR. DIVISIONAL MANAGER, LIC AND ORS.
2004 INSC 4996 September 2004Dismissed
The appellant, Mukesh K. Tripathi, was appointed as an Apprentice Development Officer in LIC and was terminated during his apprenticeship without notice. He claimed that his dismissal violated Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, arguing that he was a "workman" within the meaning of Section 2(s). The Supre…
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, FARIDABADversusSIRI NIWAS
2004 INSC 5006 September 2004Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, Siri Niwas, claimed that he had worked for more than 240 days in the twelve months preceding his termination by the Municipal Corporation, Faridabad, and therefore his retrenchment was illegal under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Industrial Tribunal found that he had worked only 1…
BANK EMPLOYEES UNIONversusRAJARSHI SHAHU GOVT. SERVANTS CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., KOLHAPUR
2021 INSC 3226 July 2021Appeal(s) allowed
The original standing order of a co‑operative bank fixed the retirement age at 55 years. Two settlements, dated 11‑01‑2004 and 21‑02‑2010 and sanctioned by an award of the Industrial Court, raised the retirement age to 58 years. The Bank Employees Union, a registered trade union, filed an application under Section 38(2…
VIJAYA BANKversusSHYAMAL KUMAR LODH
2010 INSC 3536 July 2010Dismissed
Shyamal Kumar Lodh, an employee of Vijaya Bank, filed an application before the Labour Court at Dibrugarh for suspension/subsistence allowance under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The bank contended that the Court, constituted by the State Government, lacked jurisdiction because it had not been sp…
A. MANJULA BHASHINI & OTHERSversusTHE MANAGING DIRECTOR, AP. WOMENS COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION LTD. AND ANOTHER,
2009 INSC 8656 July 2009Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether employees hired on daily‑wage, nominal muster‑roll, consolidated‑pay or as contingent workers in Andhra Pradesh could be regularised after five years of service and whether the 1998 amendments to the Andhra Pradesh (Regulation of Appointments to Public Services and Rationalisation of …
THE TELEPHONE DISTRICT MANAGER & ORS.versusKESHAB DEB
2008 INSC 5926 May 2008Disposed off
Keshab Deb was appointed as a casual daily‑wage driver in the Directorate of Telecommunications, Dimapur, and was terminated allegedly for misconduct after a brief imprisonment. He filed a writ petition alleging violation of Section 25‑F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and seeking regularisation under a casual‑lab…
M/S. B.P.L. LTD. AND ORS.versusR. SUDHAKAR AND ORS.
2004 INSC 3656 May 2004Leave Granted & Allowed
The Karnataka High Court stayed the operation of an order of reference that had sent certain work‑men’s disputes to the Industrial Tribunal. While the stay was in force, the employer dismissed the work‑men for serious misconduct and the work‑men filed a complaint under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, …
ARKAL GOVIND RAJ RAOversusCIBA GEIGY OF INDIA LTD., BOMBAY
1985 INSC 1236 May 1985Appeal(s) allowed
Arkal Govind Raj Rao was employed by Ciba Geigy of India Ltd. as a stenographer‑cum‑accountant, later promoted to Assistant and designated Group Leader. After his termination, the employer argued that he was not a "workman" under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, claiming he performed supervisory and a…
CENTRAL INLAND WATER TRANSPORT CORPORATION LTD. & ANR. ETC.versusBROJO NATH GANGULY & ANR.
1986 INSC 666 April 1986Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined whether the Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Ltd., a government‑owned company under section 617 of the Companies Act, qualifies as "the State" under Article 12 of the Constitution and whether clause (i) of Rule 9 in its service rules – which allows termination of a permanent employe…
BINOY KUMAR CHATTERJEEversusM/S JUGANTAR LTD. AND OTHERS
1983 INSC 336 April 1983Dismissed
Binoy Kumar Chatterjee retired from Jugantar Ltd. upon reaching the superannuation age of 60 on 1 December 1976, received his gratuity and provident fund, and was subsequently offered a fresh twelve‑month contract as Assistant Editor. After the contract ended on 1 December 1977 he claimed that his services had been wro…
THE UNITED PLANTERS ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN INDIAversusKG. SANGAMESWARAN AND ANR.
1997 INSC 2356 March 1997Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, K.G. Sangameswaran, an accountant employed by United Planters Association, was dismissed for alleged misappropriation. He appealed the dismissal under Section 41(2) of the Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947, claiming that no domestic enquiry had been held. The Appellate Authority set aside th…
CHAIRMAN, CANARA BANK, BANGALOREversusM. S. JASRA AND ORS.
1992 INSC 656 March 1992Appeal(s) allowed
M.S. Jasra, a former RBI officer, joined Lakshmi Commercial Bank as Assistant General Manager in 1983. After Lakshmi was amalgamated with Canara Bank under Section 45 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, he was placed as Divisional Manager in Canara Bank. He claimed entitlement to a higher post and to retire at age 60,…
CHANDRAKANT TUKARAM NIKAM AND ORS.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF AHMEDABAD AND ANR.
2002 INSC 656 February 2002Dismissed
Workmen of the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation were dismissed and filed a civil suit in the City Civil Court challenging the termination. The civil court dismissed the suit for lack of jurisdiction, and the Gujarat High Court affirmed that the dispute falls within the ambit of the Industrial Disputes Act, making civil …
UPTRON INDIA LTD.versusSHAMMI BHAN AND ANR.
1998 INSC 746 February 1998Dismissed
Uptron India Ltd., a manufacturing concern, terminated the services of Ms. Shammi Bhan, a confirmed permanent employee, invoking clause 17(g) of its certified standing orders which provided for automatic termination if a workman overstayed leave for more than seven days. The employee challenged the termination before t…
M/S. PEARLITE LINERS PVT. LTD.versusMANORAMA SIRSI
2004 INSC 216 January 2004Appeal(s) allowed
Pearlite Liners Pvt Ltd. transferred the respondent, a trainee accountant later promoted, from its head office to a sales office. The employee refused to comply, was absent, and a chargesheet was issued. She filed a suit seeking a declaration that the transfer order was void, that she remained in service, and an injunc…
MADAN PAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.
2000 INSC 76 January 2000Appeal(s) allowed
Madan Pal Singh, a daily‑wage work agent employed by the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) from July 1982 to August 1986, filed a dispute after his services were terminated. In his conciliation application he mistakenly wrote his name as Madan Lal, and the State of U.P. issued a reference to the Labour…
WORKMEN OF KETTLEWELL BULLEN AND COMPANY LTD.versusKETTLEWELL BULLEN AND COMPANY LTD.
1994 INSC 46 January 1994
The workmen of Kettlewell Bullen & Co. claimed a customary bonus for the years 1974‑1977, arguing that the company had been paying a bonus since 1959, at a uniform rate of 10.5% of salary from 1965‑1973, before the Puja festival and irrespective of profits. The Industrial Tribunal held that this long‑standing, uniform,…
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.versusVISAN KUMAR SHIV CHARAN LAL
2008 INSC 14035 December 2008Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Madhya Pradesh filed a Letters Patent Appeal against a Division Bench order that had dismissed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking to quash a Labour Court order passed under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The High Court held the appeal non‑maintainable, relying on the petition’s nom…
UNITED BANK OF INDIAversusTAMIL NADU BANKS DEPOSIT COLLECTORS UNION AND ANR.
2007 INSC 12305 December 2007Appeal(s) allowed
United Bank of India terminated two commission agents (tiny deposit collectors) in 1984. The Union raised the terminations as industrial disputes, which were referred to the Tamil Nadu Industrial Tribunal. The Tribunal allowed the bank to lead evidence to justify the dismissals and ruled in its favour. The Madras High …
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, JABALPURversusOM PRAKASH DUBEY
2006 INSC 9595 December 2006Appeal(s) allowed
The Municipal Corporation of Jabalpur appointed a large number of daily‑wage workers without following the recruitment rules prescribed under the Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act. Several labour disputes arose and the High Court, exercising contempt jurisdiction, directed the corporation to prepare a gradation …
GAMON INDIA LIMITEDversusNIRANJAN DASS
1983 INSC 1885 December 1983Dismissed
Niranjan Dass, a senior clerk of Gammon India Ltd., was served notice of termination on the ground of a recession in business, effective 14 October 1967. The dispute was referred to an Industrial Tribunal, which held that the termination was an illegal retrenchment and declared Dass to remain in service with entitlemen…
RAJ KUMAR GUPTAversusLT. GOVERNOR, DELHI AND ORS.
1996 INSC 12875 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Lt. Governor of Delhi authorized Raj Kumar Gupta, Patron of a workers' union, to file a complaint under Section 34 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the employer for alleged unfair labour practices punishable under Section 25‑U. The employer challenged the order, and the Delhi High Court set it aside, ho…
V. RAMANAversusA.P.S.R.T.C. AND ORS.
2005 INSC 3995 September 2005Dismissed
V. Ramana, a conductor with the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, was removed from service for failing to issue tickets, collect fares and maintain records. He challenged the removal by filing a writ petition, which was upheld by the Andhra Pradesh High Court. On appeal, he argued that the quantum of pun…
THE DIRECTOR STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD.V. ISPAT KHADAN JANTA MAZDOOR UNIONversusISPAT KHADAN JANTA MAZDOOR UNION
2019 INSC 7285 July 2019Disposed off
The case concerned contract labour employed in SAIL's captive limestone mines under a tripartite agreement with contractors. After a prohibition notification under Section 10(1) of the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970 was issued in 1993, the contract labour continued to work until their services were …
STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. & ANR.versusJAGGU & ORS. ETC.
2019 INSC 7275 July 2019Disposed off
The case concerned 2,040 contract labourers employed in SAIL's captive limestone mine who, after a 1993 prohibition on contract labour under the CLRA Act, continued to work and claimed parity of wages with regular SAIL employees under the NJCS memorandum. The respondents sought relief under Section 20(1) of the Minimum…
ASSISTANT ENGINEER, C.A.D. KOTAversusDHAN KUNWAR
2006 INSC 3985 July 2006Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, a temporary work‑charged employee, was terminated in the early 1980s and, after an eight‑year gap, filed a claim for reinstatement and back wages under Section 10(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Labour Court awarded 30% back wages and ordered reinstatement, but the High Court dismissed the …
M/S. INDIAN DRUGS AND PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.versusDEVKI DEVI AND ORS.
2006 INSC 3995 July 2006Appeal(s) allowed
Mis Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd., a public sector undertaking, gave contract work to the widows and dependents of employees who died in harness after a union demand, without any compassionate appointment scheme. The contracts were later terminated in 1998 due to the company's severe financial distress, prompting…
STATE OF KERA LAversusB.RENJITH KUMAR & ORS.
2008 INSC 7435 June 2008Dismissed
The respondents, who were Presiding Officers of Kerala's Industrial Tribunals, had historically received pay scales equal to District Judges. After the 1998 Shetty Commission revised the pay of District Judges, the state granted the revised scales only to District Judges and not to the Tribunal officers, prompting the …
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, SUJANPURversusSURINDER KUMAR KUMAR
2006 INSC 2965 May 2006Appeal(s) allowed
The Municipal Council, Sujanpur terminated Surinder Kumar, a daily‑waged worker appointed in violation of its recruitment rules and allegedly as a supervisor. The Labour Court held that Kumar was a workman who had completed the requisite 240 days of work and ordered his reinstatement with full back wages. The High Cour…
STATE OF U.P.versusJAI BIR SINGH
2005 INSC 2585 May 2005Matter referred to larger bench
The Supreme Court was asked to resolve a conflict between two earlier decisions on whether the 'social forestry' department and similar welfare activities fall within the definition of "industry" under Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The conflict arose from differing interpretations of the expansive …
LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA & ANOTHER ETC.versusS.S. SRIVASTAVA & OTHERS
1987 INSC 1495 May 1987Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned the constitutional validity of Regulation 19(2) of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (Staff) Regulations, 1960, as amended in 1977, which required employees appointed on or after 1 September 1956 and belonging to Class I or II to retire at age 58, with a provision for retirement at 50 in the co…
MADHYA PRADESH ADMINISTRATIONversusTRIBHUBAN
2007 INSC 3825 April 2007Case Partly allowed
The Madhya Pradesh Administration terminated the services of Tribhuban, who had been employed on a temporary basis with intermittent breaks, prompting an industrial dispute that was adjudicated by an Industrial Tribunal. The Tribunal awarded retrenchment compensation, notice pay and interest, finding the employer had n…
M/S WRITERS AND PUBLISHERS PVT. LTD.versusDR. AK MISHRA, OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR
2020 INSC 2835 March 2020Dismissed
The Supreme Court dealt with contempt petitions filed by M/s Writers and Publishers Pvt. Ltd. (WPL) seeking the disbursement of proceeds from the sale of Super Bazar assets after the Court had earlier ordered a full refund of WPL's investment with interest, subject to deduction of profits. The Court examined the Comptr…
H.P: STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ANR.versusRANJEET SINGH AND ORS.
2008 INSC 3095 March 2008Case Allowed
The appellant, H.P. State Electricity Board, appealed against the Labour Court and Himachal Pradesh High Court decisions that had granted daily‑wage workers (respondents) a minimum bonus under the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965. The respondents had filed applications under Section 33‑C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 19…
G.M. HARYANA ROADWAYSversusJAI BHAGWAN AND ANR.
2008 INSC 3125 March 2008Dismissed
The State, G.M. Haryana Roadways, terminated a casual driver, Jai Bhagwan, whose reinstatement was ordered by the Labour Court. The State reinstated him on 10 May 2002 and later regularized his service on 21 June 2004, but failed to disclose these material facts in a writ petition before the High Court and again in a S…
SITA RAM & ORSversusMOTI LAL NEHRU FARMERS TRAINING INSTITUTE
2008 INSC 3165 March 2008Case Partly allowed
The Motilal Nehru Farmers Training Institute employed daily wagers for various project works such as bee‑farming. Their services were terminated on 28‑December‑1996 and they claimed they had worked for more than 240 days, invoking Section 6N of the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Labour Court, after dr…
WORKMEN OF NILGIRI COOP. MKT. SOCIETY LTD.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS.
2004 INSC 895 February 2004Dismissed
The case concerned 407 porters and graders employed at the marketing yards of Nilgiri Cooperative Marketing Society Ltd., who claimed permanency and other benefits, alleging they were workmen of the Society. The State referred the dispute to the Industrial Tribunal to decide whether their non‑employment was justified. …
COLOUR-CHEM LTD.versusA.L. ALASPURKAR AND ORS.
1998 INSC 675 February 1998Dismissed
The case concerned two plant operators (respondents 3 and 4) who were dismissed for sleeping on duty while the machine was left running. The Labour Court held that the dismissal was shockingly disproportionate and ordered reinstatement with back wages. The appellant appealed, arguing that Clause (g) of Item 1 of Schedu…
ALL INDIA RADIOversusSHRI SANTOSH KUMAR AND ANR. ETC.
1998 INSC 705 February 1998Dismissed
All India Radio and Doordarshan challenged the termination and non‑regularisation of several clerical, linemen and casual workmen, contending that they are not "industries" under Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 because they perform sovereign functions. The Supreme Court examined whether the broadcasti…
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. AND ANR.versusASHOK KUMAR ARORA
1997 INSC 1065 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, a senior stenographer in Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., was identified by a vigilance enquiry as the organiser of a scheme in which employees submitted forged medical certificates and bills to obtain reimbursements, causing monetary loss to the corporation. He was charge‑sheeted, suspended and, after a de…
NATIONAL KAMGAR UNIONversusKRAN RADER PVT. LTD. & ORS.
2018 INSC 35 January 2018Disposed off
The National Kamgar Union (appellant) challenged the closure of Kran Rader Pvt. Ltd.'s manufacturing unit, alleging that more than 100 workers were employed and that the employer failed to comply with Section 25-K of Chapter VB of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Industrial Court had held that 115 workers were em…
HARJINDER SINGHversusPUNJAB STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION
2010 INSC 95 January 2010Appeal(s) allowed
Harjinder Singh, a workman employed by Punjab State Warehousing Corporation, was retrenched despite seniority over junior employees. The Labour Court awarded him reinstatement with 50% back wages under Section 25G of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Punjab & Haryana High Court, exercising writ jurisdiction under …
ANDHRA BANKversusW.T. SESHACHALAM
2004 INSC 145 January 2004Dismissed
The respondent, a clerk of Andhra Bank, was suspended pending departmental action and later faced criminal charges under Sections 409 and 436 of the Indian Penal Code. He was convicted by a trial court but acquitted on appeal; however, a departmental enquiry continued for several years, culminating in his dismissal. Th…
WORKMEN OF M/S HINDUSTAN LEVER LTD. & ORS.versusMANAGEMENT OF M/S HINDUSTAN LEVER LTD.
1984 INSC 55 January 1984Appeal(s) allowed
The case arose when two salesmen, who were also union office‑bearers, were disciplined and terminated by Hindustan Lever Ltd. The union claimed the dismissals were illegal and that the employer was retaliating for trade‑union activity. The employer argued that the salesmen were not "workmen" under the Industrial Disput…
SRI MAHABIR PROSAD CHOUDHARYversusM/S. OCTAVIUS TEA AND INDUSTRIES LTD. AND ANR.
2018 INSC 11454 December 2018Dismissed
The appellant, an accountant, was dismissed by the respondent company and the dispute was referred to the Fifth Industrial Tribunal under the West Bengal Industrial Disputes Rules, 1958. The workman appeared before the Tribunal while the company did not; the workman filed a written statement but the Tribunal failed to …
LAL MOHAMMAD AND ORS.versusINDIAN RAILWAY CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. AND ORS.
1998 INSC 4624 December 1998Appeal(s) allowed
The case involved 25 workmen employed by Indian Railway Construction Co. Ltd. (IRCON) on the Rihand Nagar railway line project who were served retrenchment notices in 1993 stating that most work was completed. The workmen challenged the notices, arguing that the project constituted a "factory" under the Factories Act, …
NEETA KAPLISHversusPRESIDING OFFICER LABOUR COURT AND ANR.
1998 INSC 4634 December 1998Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a clerk at Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, was dismissed after a domestic enquiry that she alleged was biased and violated natural justice. The Labour Court found the enquiry to be unfair and ordered the management to lead fresh evidence on the merits, but the management relied only on the enquiry…
M/S MITRA S.P. (P) LTD. & ANR.versusDHIREN KUMAR
2022 INSC 7954 August 2022Disposed off
The workman, originally a Junior Supervisor, was transferred from Visakhapatnam to Jharsuguda but refused to report, leading to his suspension and dismissal. He challenged the dismissal before the Labour Court, which modified the order, reinstated him, and directed him to join at Jharsuguda, while also directing the ma…
STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.versusSURJIT SINGH & ORS.
2009 INSC 10104 August 2009Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether daily‑wage employees appointed without following recruitment rules were entitled to "equal pay for equal work" with regular staff. It held that the doctrine, rooted in Article 39(d) and Article 14 of the Constitution, can be invoked only when the claimants perform equal work of equal …
INDIAN PETROCHEMICALS CORPORATION LTD. AND ANR.versusSHRAMIK SENA AND ORS.
1999 INSC 3024 August 1999Dismissed
The workmen employed in the statutory canteen of Indian Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd. filed a writ petition seeking declaration that they were regular employees of the corporation and were entitled to regularisation, pay scales and arrears. The Bombay High Court held that, relying on Parimal Chandra Raha v. LIC, the …
AELTEMESH REIN, ADVOCATE, SUPREME COURT OF INDIAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
1988 INSC 2034 August 1988Disposed off
The petitioner, a practising advocate, filed a writ petition alleging that he was handcuffed while being taken to court and that the Union Government had failed to issue guidelines on handcuffing as required by the Prem Kumar Shukla judgment. The petition also sought a mandamus directing the Central Government to bring…
A.P. FOODSversusS. SAMUEL AND ORS.
2006 INSC 3914 July 2006Case Partly allowed
A.P. Foods, a non‑profit public‑sector establishment run by the Andhra Pradesh Nutrition Council, was challenged by its employees who demanded bonus under the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965. The Labour Commissioner held the Act inapplicable, but the employer later paid ex‑gratia and subsequently stopped it, prompting a wri…
U.P STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusBABU RAM
2006 INSC 3924 July 2006Disposed off
The respondent, Babu Ram, was employed on a temporary basis by the U.P. State Road Transport Corporation and was terminated in 1983. After a fifteen‑year gap, the dispute was referred to the Labour Court in 1998, which held the termination illegal and ordered reinstatement with back wages. The corporation challenged th…
HARINAGAR SUGAR MILLS LTD. (BISCUIT DIVISION) & ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
2025 INSC 8014 June 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd. (Biscuit Division) (HSML) applied to close its biscuit unit after Britannia Industries terminated a 32‑year job‑work agreement. The State Government, through a Deputy Secretary, sent a letter on 25 September 2019 asking HSML to resubmit its application, claiming the original lacked cogent re…
M.D. TAMIL NADU STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusNEETHIVILANGAN, KUMBAKONAM
2001 INSC 2564 May 2001Dismissed
The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation dismissed a junior superintendent after a departmental inquiry and sought approval of the dismissal under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Labour Tribunal rejected the application on merit, finding no prima facie case for dismissal. Despite the reject…
PUNJAB LAND DEVELOPMENT AND RECLAMATION CORPORATION LTD., CHANDIGARH ETC.versusPRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, CHANDIGARH ETC.
1990 INSC 1864 May 1990Disposed off
The Supreme Court considered a batch of eighteen appeals concerning the meaning of "retrenchment" under Section 2(oo) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The petitioners (workmen) argued that the term should be given its wider literal meaning – termination of service for any reason other than disciplinary punishment,…
BANK OF INDIAversusT.S. KELAWALA AND ORS.
1990 INSC 1924 May 1990Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court considered two appeals involving Bank of India and a private company concerning wage deductions during industrial actions. In the first appeal, employees participated in a four‑hour strike covering crucial banking hours; the Bank had issued a circular stating that participants would forfeit the full d…
MANAGEMENT, ESSORPE MILLS LTD.versusPRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT AND ORS.
2008 INSC 4534 April 2008Appeal(s) allowed
The Tamil Nadu Panchalai Workers' Union served a strike notice on 14 March 1991 stating that a strike would commence on or after 24 March 1991, giving only ten days' notice. The Supreme Court held that the notice did not satisfy the six‑week advance notice required under Section 22(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 19…
KARNATAKA POWER CORPORATION LIMITED AND ANR.versusK. THANGAPPAN AND ANR.
2006 INSC 2014 April 2006Appeal(s) allowed
The dispute arose from a 1979 settlement under Section 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, whereby a workman who had been on the nominal muster roll was to be appointed to a vacancy when one arose. The workman failed to report for duty in 1979 and his name was removed; after nearly two decades he made representations…
BHARAT SINGHversusMANAGEMENT OF NEW DELHI TUBERCULOSIS CENTRE, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU MARG, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS
1986 INSC 624 April 1986Appeal(s) allowed
Bharat Singh, a workman dismissed in 1975, obtained a Labour Court award on 28 September 1983 directing his reinstatement and back wages. The management challenged the award by filing a writ petition in the Delhi High Court on 31 January 1984. While the writ was pending, Singh invoked Section 17‑B of the Industrial Dis…
MADHYA PRADESH ELECTRICITY BOARDversusJAGDISH CHANDRA SHARMA
2005 INSC 1204 March 2005Case Partly allowed
The employee, a muster‑roll labourer, assaulted his superior officer with a tension screw, causing a broken nose, and then remained absent without permission for three weeks. A domestic enquiry proved the misconduct and the employer dismissed him. The Labour Court set aside the dismissal as punitive, ordering reinstate…
COIR BOARD, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN AND ANR.versusINDIRA DEVI P.S. AND ORS.
1998 INSC 1314 March 1998Dismissed
The Coir Board, a statutory body established under the Coir Industry Act, 1953, dismissed several temporary clerks and typists who claimed that their termination was governed by Chapter V‑A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Kerala High Court held that the Board qualified as an "industry" under the Act, making t…
M/S BOMBAY CHEMICAL INDUSTRIESversusDEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER & ANR.
2022 INSC 1524 February 2022Appeal(s) allowed
Bombay Chemical Industries (appellant) contested an application filed by a former employee (respondent No.2) before the Labour Court under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act seeking difference of wages for the period 2006‑2012, claiming he was employed as a salesman. The appellant denied any employment relat…
OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD.versusTHE PRESIDENT, OIL FIELD EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION & ORS.
2022 INSC 1454 February 2022Dismissed
The Supreme Court dismissed ONGC's appeal against the Bombay High Court's order upholding the Central Government Industrial Tribunal's findings. The dispute concerned whether contract workmen engaged through contractors were employees of ONGC and thus entitled to pay parity, and whether a settlement dated 19 September …
VAZIR GLASS WORKS LTD.versusMAHARASHTRA GENERAL KAMGAR UNION AND ANR.
1996 INSC 154 January 1996Disposed off
The appellant, VAZIR GLASS WORKS Ltd., sought closure of its loss‑making factory under s.25‑0(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, but the Maharashtra Government rejected the application on 12‑Oct‑1992. The company filed a review application under s.25‑0(5) within the one‑year period, which remained pending when th…
SHRI H.D. SHARMAversusNORTHERN INDIA TEXTILE RESEARCH ASSOCIATION
2018 INSC 11293 December 2018Dismissed
The appellant, a workman, was dismissed for misconduct and the employer sought approval of the dismissal under Section 6E(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, which requires that the workman be paid wages for one month before dismissal. The appellant claimed that his monthly wages of Rs.1,214.40 were …
MANJU SAXENAversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2018 INSC 11413 December 2018Dismissed
Manju Saxena, a senior confidential secretary of HSBC Bank, was terminated after her post became redundant and she refused four alternate positions offered at the same pay scale, as well as a severance package. She raised an industrial dispute seeking an enhanced severance package, but the Central Government Industrial…
BHAVNAGAR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ETC.versusJADEJA GOVUBHA CHHANUBHA & ANR.
2014 INSC 8323 December 2014Case Partly allowed
The respondent, a daily‑wage conductor, was employed by Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation from 3 October 1987 to 31 March 1989 and was terminated without payment of retrenchment compensation. The Labour Court held the termination illegal, ordering reinstatement with 65% back wages; the Gujarat High Court set aside the ba…
PRAVIN GADA AND ANOTHERversusCENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS
2012 INSC 5573 December 2012Disposed off
The Supreme Court dealt with the sale of immovable property of Jay Electric Wire Corporation Ltd., a company under liquidation, which had been sold to the appellants for Rs. 2.50 crore in 2006. Secured creditors and the workmen's union challenged the sale, alleging procedural irregularities, unfair price, and the limit…
KULDEEP SINGHversusG.M., INSTRUMENT DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND FACILITIES CENTRE & ANR.
2010 INSC 8493 December 2010Appeal(s) allowed
Kuldeep Singh, a data entry operator, was terminated by the Instrument Design Development and Facilities Centre without complying with the notice and compensation requirements of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. He made numerous representations to various government officials, after which the Haryana G…
M/S. REETU MARBLESversusPRABHAKANT SHUKLA
2009 INSC 12793 December 2009Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, an accountant employed by M/s Reetu Marbles, was terminated on 11 June 1987. The Labour Court held the termination illegal, ordered reinstatement but denied any back wages, noting the respondent failed to prove he was unemployed during the 15‑year gap before the award. The Allahabad High Court modified …
M/S. L&T KOMATSU LID.versusN. UDAYAKUMAR
2007 INSC 12173 December 2007Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, a workman employed by L&T Komatsu Ltd., was dismissed after being found guilty of unauthorized absence for 105 days, with a history of 15 prior instances of absenteeism. The Labour Court set aside the dismissal, ordering reinstatement with continuity of service and a penalty of four stopped increments, …
MANAGEMENT OF MIS. INDIAN IRON AND STEEL CO. LTD.versusPRAHLAD SINGH
2000 INSC 5033 November 2000Appeal(s) allowed
The workman Prahlad Singh was granted leave from 1 July to 20 September 1974 and failed to resume duty. The company terminated his employment on 8 October 1974 under its standing orders, which stipulated loss of lien for over‑stay of leave. Singh raised an industrial dispute before the Central Government Industrial Tri…
WELLMAN (INDIA) PVT. LTD.versusTHE EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION
1993 INSC 3603 November 1993
Wellman (India) Pvt. Ltd. entered into a settlement with its workers' union in 1966 that created an attendance bonus scheme, which became an express term of the employment contract. The company sought a declaration from the Employees' Insurance Court that the Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) could not dema…
WORKMEN RASTRIYA COLLIERY MAZDOOR SANGHversusBHARAT COKING COAL LTD. & ANR.
2016 INSC 9373 October 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Sangh, representing 14 workmen of BCCL's Balihari Colliery, obtained a 1996 Industrial Tribunal award directing their regularisation without back wages. The Jharkhand High Court in 2004 modified the award, stipulating that the employer must give preference to these workmen when hiring reg…
M.R. PRABHAKAR AND OTHERSversusCANARA BANK AND OTHERS
2012 INSC 4433 October 2012Dismissed
The appellants were officers of Canara Bank who resigned between 1986 and June 1993, i.e., before the statutory settlement dated 29‑Oct‑1993 and the Canara Bank Employees' Pension Regulations, 1995 came into force. They claimed entitlement to a pension in lieu of the Contributory Providable Fund, relying on the pension…
DIV. MANAGER, NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusA. SANKARALINGAM
2008 INSC 11223 October 2008Dismissed
The respondent was appointed as a sweeper‑cum‑water carrier on a monthly wage in 1986 and worked daily until about 5 p.m., effectively on a full‑time basis despite being described as part‑time. His services were terminated in March 1989 and he sought regularisation and protection under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947…
RAGHUBIR SINGHversusGENERAL MANAGER, HARYANA ROADWAYS, HISSAR
2014 INSC 5923 September 2014Appeal(s) allowed
Raghuvir Singh, a conductor with Haryana Roadways, was arrested in 1994 on a criminal charge of ticket‑money misappropriation and was terminated from service without a proper enquiry or show‑cause notice. After being acquitted in 2002, he sought reinstatement; the dispute was referred by the State Government to the Lab…
RASHTRIYA MILL MAZDOOR SANGHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 9883 September 1996Dismissed
The appellant, a workers' union, challenged the constitutional validity of Sections 9(2), 10(2), 12(1) and 26 of the Central India Spinning, Weaving and Manufacturing Company Limited, the Empress Mills, Nagpur (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act, 1986, alleging violations of Articles 14, 19(1)(c) and 21 of th…
KRISHNA DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY LIMITED, VIJAYAWADAversusN.V. PURNACHANDRA RAO & ORS.
1987 INSC 1933 August 1987Dismissed
The Krishna District Co‑operative Marketing Society (the petitioner) retrenched nine clerks, invoking the Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, 1966. The employees (respondents) challenged the terminations, arguing that the retrenchment provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (particularly s.25F) applied…
THEIR WORKMEN THROUGH THE JOINT SECRETARY (WELFARE), FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA EXECUTIVE STAFF UNION.versusEMPLOYER IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF THE FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ANR.
2023 INSC 5883 July 2023Disposed off
The Central Government Industrial Tribunal awarded reinstatement, regularisation and 75% back wages to 21 casual workers of the Food Corporation of India (FCI) whose retrenchment was held void. The management of FCI filed a writ petition challenging the award, obtained a conditional stay, but nevertheless reinstated an…
CHIEF ENGINEER, RANJIT SAGAR DAM AND ANR.versusSHAM LAL
2006 INSC 3803 July 2006Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined an appeal by the Chief Engineer, Ranjit Sagar Dam (appellants) against a Labour Court order that reinstated workman Sham Lal and awarded back wages. The central questions were whether the burden of proof to show that a workman had worked at least 240 days in the year preceding termination res…
SURENDRANAGAR DISTT. PANCHAYAT AND ANR.versusGANGABEN LALJIBHAI AND ORS.
2006 INSC 3813 July 2006Appeal(s) allowed
The employer, Surendranagar District Panchayat, terminated several daily‑wage workers and claimed that none had worked continuously for 240 days in the preceding year, a condition required under Section 25‑F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for retrenchment. The workers contended they had met the 240‑day requiremen…
VIVEKA NAND SETHIversusCHAIRMAN, J. AND K., BANK LTD. AND ORS.
2005 INSC 2503 May 2005Case Partly allowed
Viveka Nand Sethi, a cashier‑clerk of Jammu & Kashmir Bank, failed to resume duties after his leave expired and did not submit a proper medical‑leave application with a valid certificate despite repeated notices and memoranda. The Bank invoked clause 2 of the bipartite settlement (voluntary cessation of employment) and…
STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORSversusHARBANS LAL
2000 INSC 2823 May 2000Appeal(s) allowed
Harbans Lal, a clerk-cum-cashier of State Bank of India, was suspended on 29 November 1990 pending a departmental enquiry into alleged misconduct. He filed writ petitions under Article 226 seeking payment of full salary during the suspension, invoking the Sastry Award as adopted by the bank. The Punjab and Haryana High…
RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ANR. ETC.versusKRISHNA KANT ETC. ETC.
1995 INSC 3353 May 1995Appeal(s) allowed
The employees of Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation were dismissed after disciplinary inquiries conducted under certified Standing Orders. They filed civil suits seeking declaration that the dismissals were illegal and that they be reinstated with benefits. The corporation contended that the Civil Court lacked …
GENERAL MANAGER, KARNATAKA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATIONversusGENERAL SECRETARY, MYSORE DIVISION INDUSTRIAL WORKERS GENERAL UNION AND ORS.
2013 INSC 2113 April 2013
The Karnataka State Financial Corporation (KSFC) sold the lease‑hold rights of the closed industrial concern Mysore Panel and Boards Pvt Ltd, whose 83 workmen had earlier been awarded statutory dues of Rs 29,17,062 by courts under Section 33‑C of the Industrial Disputes Act and the Payment of Gratuity Act. The workmen’…
MANAGEMENT OF AUROFOOD PVT. LTD.versusS. RAJULU
2008 INSC 4513 April 2008Dismissed
The respondent, S. Rajulu, was employed as a packer by Aurofood Pvt. Ltd. and was suspended in 1981 for alleged misconduct, including insolent and filthy language towards superiors and a lady supervisor. A domestic enquiry found him guilty on two charges and the employer dismissed him after an unsatisfactory show‑cause…
THE DEPOT MANAGER, APSRTCversusB. SWAMY
2007 INSC 3693 April 2007Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, a bus conductor for APSRTC, was caught on 23 May 2000 issuing tickets of 0.50 paise instead of the correct fare of Rs 4 to sixteen illiterate female passengers, thereby pocketing an extra Rs 52. The management dismissed him, and the Labour Court upheld the dismissal as justified misconduct. The responde…
STATE BANK OF INDIA STAFF ASSOCIATIONversusSTATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 4793 April 1996Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined whether a retired employee of the State Bank of India, who had been elected General Secretary of the SBI Staff Association before his retirement, could continue to represent the union and negotiate with management. The appellants argued that Sections 6(e) and 22 of the Trade Unions Act, 1926 …
S.G. CHEMICAL AND DYES TRADING EMPLOYEES' UNIONversusS.G. CHEMICALS AND DYES TRADING LIMITED AND ANOTHER
1986 INSC 593 April 1986Appeal(s) allowed
The S.G. Chemicals and Dyes Trading Employees' Union challenged the closure of the company’s Churchgate marketing and sales division, arguing that the closure violated section 25‑0 of the Industrial Disputes Act and amounted to an unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trad…
STATE BANK OF PATIALA AND ANOTHERversusRAM NIWAS BANSAL (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.
2014 INSC 1593 March 2014Disposed off
Ram Niwas Bansal, a bank officer, was charged with financial irregularities and dismissed on 23 April 1985. The High Court set aside the dismissal, directing reinstatement only to enable a fresh enquiry because the enquiry report had not been furnished, and ordered back‑wages until the earlier of superannuation or fina…
K.L.E. SOCEITY AND ORS.versusSIDDALINGESH
2008 INSC 2873 March 2008Case Allowed
The respondent, a former peon of K.L.E. Society, filed a private complaint alleging offences under IPC ss.403, 405 and 415 r/w s.34, claiming that salary deductions were made without justification. The Judicial Magistrate took cognizance and issued process, prompting the society to move the Karnataka High Court under s…
PRAMOD JHA AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS
2003 INSC 1343 March 2003Dismissed
The appellants, daily‑wage project employees, challenged their retrenchment by the State of Bihar, arguing that the notices issued under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 did not accompany the required compensation and that the compensation was not paid directly to them. The State contended that a one‑mo…
SRI BHIMSEN GUPTAversusSRI BISHWANATH PRASAD GUPTA
2004 INSC 763 February 2004Dismissed
The landlord filed an eviction suit on 5 September 1994 under Section 11(1)(d) of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1982, alleging the tenant’s default in rent for months that fell more than three years before the suit. The tenant contended that the suit was barred because the limitation perio…
RANBIR SINGHversusTHE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
2011 INSC 43 January 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a daily‑wage workman, was terminated in 1999 after being implicated in a criminal case, later acquitted, and filed an industrial dispute alleging violation of Section 25(f) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Labour Court ordered his reinstatement with 50% back wages. The State of Haryana filed a w…
STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.versusKGSD CANTEEN EMPLOYEES WELFARE ASSOCIATION AND ORS.
2006 INSC 73 January 2006Disposed off
The Karnataka Government ran a Secretariat canteen through a committee and appointed workers on an ad‑hoc basis. The workers claimed they were state employees entitled to regularisation and pay parity with government staff. The Karnataka High Court, treating the canteen as a Government Hospitality Organisation, ordered…
NOVARTIS INDIA LTDversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS
2008 INSC 13832 December 2008Dismissed
Novartis India Ltd. transferred three senior sales representatives to distant locations; they refused to report, filed representations and civil suits, and were terminated without a domestic inquiry. The workmen raised an industrial dispute; the Industrial Tribunal held the termination illegal, denied reinstatement bec…
RAM KUMAR & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
1987 INSC 3572 December 1987Disposed off
The petitioners, casual labourers employed for 10-16 years in the Northern Railway's construction department, filed writ petitions alleging they were denied temporary status, equal pay, and regularisation despite continuous service. The respondents contended that some petitioners had already been empanelled or given te…
MADURA COATS LIMITEDversusINSPECTOR OF FACTORIES, FIRST CIRCLE, MADURAI & ANR.
1980 INSC 2292 December 1980Appeal(s) allowed
Madura Coats Ltd., an industrial establishment in Tamil Nadu, faced a strike by its workmen from 21 January to 5 February 1976 over a bonus dispute. The strike included 26 January, a national holiday, for which the employer withheld wages. The Inspector of Factories ordered payment of wages for that day under the Tamil…
P.G.I. OF M.E. AND RESEARCH, CHANDIGARHversusRAJ KUMAR ETC.
2000 INSC 5022 November 2000Appeal(s) allowed
The employer, Post‑Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, terminated Raj Kumar after he had completed 240 days of service. The Labour Court held the termination illegal, ordered reinstatement with continuity of service and awarded only 60% of back wages, exercising its discretion under Sections 25‑B and …
RANBIR SINGHversusEXECUTIVE ENG. P.W.D
2021 INSC 4392 September 2021Case Partly allowed
Ranbir Singh, a daily‑wage worker employed by the Executive Engineering Public Works Department, was terminated in 1991 without the notice and retrenchment compensation mandated by Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Labour Court held the termination illegal and ordered his reinstatement with back wag…
PREM SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.
2019 INSC 9832 September 2019Disposed off
Prem Singh, a welder, worked for about 37 years in a work‑charged establishment of the Uttar Pradesh government and was later regularised before superannuation. He claimed that the period spent in the work‑charged establishment should be counted as qualifying service for pension under the Uttar Pradesh Retirement Benef…
THE MANAGEMENT OF TNSTC (COIMBATORE) LTD.versusM.CHANDRASEKARAN
2016 INSC 8482 September 2016Appeal(s) allowed
S. K. VERMAversusMAHESH CHANDRA AND ANOTHER
1983 INSC 1092 September 1983Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, S.K. Verma, a Development Officer in the Life Insurance Corporation of India, was dismissed and the dispute was referred to an Industrial Tribunal. The Tribunal held that Development Officers were not "workmen" under s.2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, rendering the reference non‑maintainable. V…
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA & OTHERSversusDRAGENDRA SINGH JADON
2022 INSC 7822 August 2022Dismissed
The respondent, a former agricultural assistant of the Central Bank of India, was dismissed in 1982 on charges of impersonating his brother in a recruitment test. An industrial tribunal in 2008 held the dismissal unjustified and ordered reinstatement without back wages. The respondent filed a 2009 writ petition challen…
POST MASTER GENERAL, KOLKA TA AND ORS.versusTUTU DAS (DUTTA)
2007 INSC 5092 May 2007Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, a daily‑wage substitute to a regular EDA, claimed she had completed 240 days of service before 7 May 1985 and sought regularisation under a 13 Nov 1987 circular that allowed such substitutes to be appointed as EDAs in vacant posts. The Central Administrative Tribunal directed that if she had indeed comp…
HARYANA STATE ELECTRONICS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.versusMAMNI
2006 INSC 2752 May 2006Modified
The respondent was engaged on an ad‑hoc basis as a Junior Technician for successive 89‑day periods from 1990 to 1992, each appointment ending with a one‑ or two‑day gap before the next. She was terminated on 7 August 1992 and later raised an industrial dispute. The Labour Court ordered her reinstatement with back wages…
SRI GANGANAGAR URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.versusPRESCRIBED AUTHORITY AND ORS.
1997 INSC 4682 May 1997Disposed off
Ten workmen were employed by Sri Ganganagar Urban Co‑operative Bank in 1992 and were dismissed on 5 June 1992 without any prior notice or payment in lieu of notice. They filed an application before the Industrial Tribunal under Section 33(c‑2) of the Industrial Disputes Act seeking reinstatement with full back wages. T…
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEERversusK. SOMASETTY AND ORS.
1997 INSC 4692 May 1997Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent was engaged on daily wages for a state‑run project that was closed, leading to his discharge. He filed a claim under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act seeking continuity of service and back wages. The Labour Court and the Karnataka High Court held that he was entitled to reinstatement with back w…
GENERAL MANAGER, E.L.D. PARRY (INDIA} LTDversusPRESIDING OFFICER, 2ND ADDL. LABOUR COURT, MADRAS AND ORS.
1991 INSC 1262 May 1991Dismissed
ELD Parry (India) Ltd. retired several employees who claimed a pension (retiring allowance) under General Office Order No. 26, 1943. The 1956 settlement between the company and the employees' union allowed workers to choose either gratuity or, in lieu of gratuity, a retiring allowance, but did not expressly abolish the…
UCO BANK & ANR.versusVIJAY KUMAR HANDA
2025 INSC 4422 April 2025Dismissed
Vijay Kumar Handa, a clerk of UCO Bank, was charged with gross misconduct and dismissed from service in 1999. The appellate authority modified the penalty to removal from service with entitlement to terminal benefits, stating that removal would not disqualify future employment. The bank later challenged the award of th…
M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITEDversusA.S. RAGHAVENDRA
2024 INSC 2652 April 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, A.S. Raghavendra, was appointed by Bharti Airtel Limited as Regional Business Head (South) in the grade of Senior Manager (B2)‑Sales with a salary of Rs.22 lakh per annum and supervised four Account Managers. After resigning in 2011, he claimed his resignation was forced and filed a petition before the …
THE GENERAL MANAGER, M/S BARSUA IRON ORE MINESversusTHE VICE PRESIDENT UNITED MINES MAZDOOR UNION AND ORS.
2024 INSC 2642 April 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, a piece‑rated mazdoor, initially declared his date of birth as 27‑12‑1948 when he joined Barsua Iron Ore Mines in 1972, enabling him to meet the statutory minimum age of 18. In 1982 he altered his recorded birth date to 12‑03‑1955 without documentary proof, and only in 1998 submitted a school transfer c…
MAVJI C LAKUMversusCENTRAL BANK OF INDIA
2008 INSC 4422 April 2008Appeal(s) allowed
Mavji C. Lakum, a long‑serving peon of Central Bank of India, was repeatedly disciplined and eventually discharged for alleged misconduct. The Industrial Tribunal, exercising its power under Section 11‑A of the Industrial Disputes Act, held that the departmental inquiry was fair but the punishment of discharge was disp…
M/S. AWAZ PRAKASHAN PRIVATE LIMITEDversusPRAMOD KUMAR PUJARI
2003 INSC 2102 April 2003Dismissed
Awaz Prakashan Private Ltd closed its newspaper and retrenched reporter P.K. Pujari on 1 July 1989. The reporter claimed the retrenchment violated the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and obtained a Labour Court award for reinstatement with back wages. The employer later challenged the award, arguing that the Working Jour…
M/S P.V.K. DISTILLERY LTD.versusMAHENDRA RAM
2009 INSC 2892 March 2009Case Partly allowed
Mahendra Ram was hired by P.V.K. Distillery Ltd. in 1981, became a permanent workman in 1982, and was terminated orally in 1985. He approached the Labour Court, which held that his termination was illegal, ordered his reinstatement with full back wages, and the High Court affirmed that award. The factory, however, rema…
OSHIAR PRASAD AND OTHERSversusTHE EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO MANAGEMENT OF SUDAMDIH COAL WASHERY OF M/S BCCL, DHANBAD, JHARKHAND
2015 INSC 822 February 2015Disposed off
The appellants, former contract workers of the Sudamdih Coal Washery project, sought to be absorbed as regular employees of Bharat Coking Coal Ltd (BCCL) and to receive retrenchment compensation. The Central Government referred their grievance to an Industrial Tribunal under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1…
SUB-DIVISIONAL INSPECTOR OF POST, VAIKAM AND ORS. ETC.versusTHEYYAM JOSEPH ETC.
1996 INSC 1772 February 1996Dismissed
The case concerned several Extra‑Departmental Agents (EDAs) of the Postal Department who were terminated without notice. The appellants argued that EDAs are appointed under specific service rules and are not permanent employees, therefore the Postal Department is not an "industry" and the agents are not "workmen" under…
MANAGEMENT OF THE BARARA COOPERATIVE MARKETING-CUM-PROCESSING SOCIETY LTD.versusWORKMAN PRATAP SINGH
2019 INSC 12 January 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, Pratap Singh, worked as a peon for the Barara Cooperative Marketing‑cum‑Processing Society Ltd from 1973 until his termination in 1985. The Labour Court held the termination illegal and awarded him a lump‑sum compensation of Rs.12,500 in lieu of reinstatement, which he accepted. In 1993 he sought re‑emp…
MUIR MILLS UNIT OF N.T.C. (U.P) LTD.versusSWAYAM PRAKASH SRIVASTAVA AND ANR.
2006 INSC 9381 December 2006Appeal(s) allowed
Muir Mills Unit of N.T.C. (U.P.) Ltd. appointed Swayam Prakash Srivastava as a Legal Assistant on a one‑year probation. After the probation period the mill terminated his services for unsatisfactory performance. Srivastava raised an industrial dispute; the Labour Court held he was a workman and ordered reinstatement wi…
NATIONAL ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES LTD.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.
1999 INSC 5381 December 1999Appeal(s) allowed
National Engineering Industries Ltd. (employer) had three unions: a recognised majority Labour Union, a Staff Union and a minority Workers' Union. A tripartite settlement was reached in conciliation proceedings with the Labour and Staff unions covering most demands, and the Workers' Union also received the benefits. Th…
REGIONAL MANAGER, SBI.versusMAHATMA MISHRA
2006 INSC 7731 November 2006Appeal(s) allowed
Mahatma Mishra was appointed by the State Bank of India as a temporary messenger for a fixed period of 88 days in 1982 and was terminated thereafter. He claimed that the termination violated Section 25‑H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and sought reinstatement with full back wages. The Labour Court held the termin…
B.C. CHATURVEDIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1995 INSC 6611 November 1995Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, an Income Tax Officer, was investigated by the CBI and found to hold assets disproportionate to his known income. Although the evidence was insufficient for criminal prosecution under Section 5(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, a departmental inquiry proved the misconduct and dismissed him…
MANGANESE ORE (INDIA) LTD.versusCHAND LAL SAHA AND ORS.
1990 INSC 3361 November 1990Dismissed
Manganese Ore (India) Ltd. paid its mine workers a cash wage, an attendance bonus and supplied grain at concessional rates. The workers claimed that the cash value of the grain concession and the attendance bonus were being deducted from their statutory minimum wages fixed by a government notification, and filed applic…
MANAGEMENT OF KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, BANGALORE & ORSversusM. BORAIAH & ORS.
1983 INSC 1701 November 1983Dismissed
The Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation terminated several probationary employees for unsatisfactory service, both during the initial and extended probation periods. The employees challenged the dismissals, arguing that the terminations did not constitute retrenchment and therefore were not subject to the proced…
TALWARA COOP. CREDIT & SERVICE S0CIETY LTD.versusSUSHIL KUMAR
2008 INSC 11161 October 2008Appeal(s) allowed
Talwara Cooperative Credit & Service Society Ltd terminated clerk Sushil Kumar after two short spells of employment (1987-1990 and 1995-1997) citing financial losses. The Labour Court awarded reinstatement with full back wages, which the High Court upheld. The Society appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing that reinsta…
U.P. STATE ELECTRICITY BOARDversusSHRI SHIV MOHAN SINGH AND ANR.
2004 INSC 5681 October 2004Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether apprentices appointed under the Apprentices Act, 1961 become "workmen" under the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and whether the requirement in Section 4(4) of the Apprentices Act to send the contract to the Apprenticeship Adviser for registra…
REGIONAL MANAGER, BANK OF BARODAversusANITA NANDRAJOG
2009 INSC 10961 September 2009Appeal(s) allowed
Anita Nandrajog, an accounts clerk of Bank of Baroda, was absent without leave for more than 150 consecutive days on multiple occasions. The bank invoked Clause 17(b) of the Fifth Bipartite Settlement (dated 10‑April‑1989) and issued a notice on 26‑June‑1989 requiring her to report within 30 days, failing which she wou…
JITENDRA NATH BISWASversusEMPIRE OF INDIA & CEYLONE TEA CO. & ANR.
1989 INSC 2211 August 1989Dismissed
Jitendra Nath Biswas, an employee of Empire of India & Ceylon Tea Co., was dismissed after a domestic enquiry for alleged misconduct. He filed a civil suit in the Munsiff Court seeking reinstatement, back wages and an injunction against the dismissal. The respondents contended that such relief was exclusively available…
PRAKASH COTION MILLS PVT. LTD.versusRASHTRIYA MILLS MAZDOOR SANGH
1986 INSC 1551 August 1986Case Partly allowed
The mill of Prakash Cotton Mills was forced to shut from 24 March to 10 June 1964 because essential raw materials were detained by excise authorities. The Rashtriya Mazdoor Sangh sought closure compensation for regular employees and Badli (casual) workers. The Labour Court ordered compensation at 50% of wages; the Indu…
AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION &ANR. ETC.versusRAJUBHAI SOMABHAI BHARWAD AND ANR. ETC.
2015 INSC 4611 July 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned a workman who was dismissed by the Nava Naroda Gram Panchayat and later entered into a compromise with the Sarpanch for reinstatement and back wages. The Labour Court upheld the compromise, but the Gram Panchayat and Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation challenged its validity, arguing that the Sarpanch l…
KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPN.versusSMT. LAKSHMIDEVAMMA AND ANR.
2001 INSC 2341 May 2001Dismissed
The employee was dismissed after a domestic enquiry which the Labour Court held to be invalid. The employer then sought permission to adduce fresh evidence to justify the dismissal, but did so only after the preliminary issue on the enquiry's validity had been decided. The High Court dismissed the employer's writ petit…
HAL EMPLOYEES UNIONversusTHE PRESIDING OFFICER AND ANR.
1996 INSC 6071 May 1996
The HAL Employees Union appealed against a lock-out imposed by the employer from 4/5 June 1978 to 18 June 1978, during which wages were deducted. The Industrial Tribunal had held the lock-out to be both legal and justified, and therefore no wage claim arose. The appellant argued that the strike preceding the lock-out w…
THE MANAGEMENT OF WORTH TRUSTversusTHE SECRETARY, WORTH TRUST WORKERS UNION
2025 INSC 4321 April 2025Dismissed
The Worth Trust, a charitable organization that also runs commercial factories, was challenged by its workers' union for payment of bonus and ex-gratia for the year 1996-97. The union argued that the workers, employed in the Trust's factories, fall within the definition of "workmen" under the Factories Act and are ther…
FED. OF BANK OF INDIA STAFF UNIONS & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR
2019 INSC 3001 March 2019Dismissed
The Federation of Bank of India Staff Unions and an employee sought to have three workmen nominated as directors of the Bank of India under the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970. The Central Government rejected the panel because the candidates had less than three years of service…
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA WORKERS' UNIONversusFOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
1985 INSC 461 March 1985Case Allowed
The Food Corporation of India (FCI) employs contract labour through contractors. Contract labourers, organized by the Food Corporation of India Workers' Union, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking departmentalisation or, alternatively, the extension of benefits under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolit…
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF WEST BOKARO COLLIERY OF M/S. TISCO LTD.versusTHE CONCERNED WORKMAN, RAM PRAVESH SINGH
2008 INSC 1281 February 2008Case Allowed
The workman, a senior dumper operator at West Bokaro Colliery of M/s TISCO Ltd., was charged with leaving work without permission and exhibiting indecent, riotous and disorderly behaviour after assaulting a security officer. A domestic inquiry found the charges proved beyond reasonable doubt and recommended dismissal, …
A.P.S.R.T.C. AND ANR.versusB.S. DAVID PAUL
2006 INSC 561 February 2006Appeal(s) allowed
The Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (AP SRTC) terminated certain employees who claimed they were its workers. The Labour Court held the termination illegal and ordered reinstatement, after which the employees sought back wages under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Labour Court,…
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, A.P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusTHE PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, RAMKOTE, HYDERABAD AND ORS. ETC.
2001 INSC 611 February 2001Case Partly allowed
The transport wing of Tirupati Tirumala Devasthanam (TTD) was transferred to the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (APSRTC) in 1975. Some of the 850 transferred workmen opted to be governed by APSRTC’s rules, while others did not. The workers’ union claimed that, under Clause 13 of the transfer agreement,…
INLAND STEAM NAVIGATION WORKS' UNIONversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2001 INSC 631 February 2001Case Partly allowed
The River Steam Navigation Co. Ltd., operating a river service with about 8,000 employees, suffered heavy losses during the 1965 armed conflict with Pakistan and entered into a scheme of arrangement with the Central Inland Water Transport Corporation (CIWTC) that transferred assets but not the undertaking, and provided…