URMILA DEVI & OTHERSversusBALRAM & ANOTHER
2025 INSC 91531 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, daughters‑in‑law of a deceased landowner, obtained a mutation order based on an unregistered will and later secured an ex‑parte injunction against the complainant who had purchased a share of the land from the testator's third son. The complainant subsequently filed a criminal complaint alleging conspir…
MANCHU MOHAN BABUversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANOTHER
2025 INSC 91631 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, Manchu Mohan Babu and his son, organized a rally and dharna on 22 March 2019 to protest the state government's refusal to reimburse student fees, despite a Model Code of Conduct prohibiting such gatherings without permission. The police registered FIR No.102 of 2019 alleging offences under IPC sections …
PADI KAUSHIK REDDY ETC.versusTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AND OTHERS ETC.
2025 INSC 91231 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Three BRS MLAs who were elected to the Telangana Legislative Assembly joined the INC, prompting two other BRS MLAs to file disqualification petitions under the Tenth Schedule. The Speaker delayed issuing notices for over seven months, leading the petitioners to approach the High Court, which only directed the Speaker t…
CH. JOSEPHversusTHE TELANGANA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION & OTHER
2025 INSC 92031 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a driver employed by the Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, was found colour‑blind during a routine medical check and was retired on medical grounds without being offered an alternative post. He claimed entitlement to redeployment under Clause 14 of a 1979 Memorandum of Settlement (MOS) executed…
S.N. VIJAYLAKSHMI & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR.
2025 INSC 91731 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, owners of a Bangalore property, entered into an Agreement to Sell (ATS) with the complainant, who later alleged they cheated him and filed a private complaint that led to an FIR charging them under multiple IPC sections. The High Court dismissed the appellants' petition to quash the FIR, but the Supreme…
SURESHversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. R1: STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH R2: DEVI SINGH
2025 INSC 91831 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Suresh alleged that his paternal uncle and the uncle's son, Respondent No.2, forcibly entered his house and the son shot his brother Rajesh, resulting in death. Respondent No.2 claimed juvenility, asserting he was 16 years old at the time, based on a school transfer certificate from the first school he at…
KHEM SINGH (D) THROUGH LRSversusSTATE OF UTTARANCHAL (NOW STATE OF UTTARAKHAND) & ANOTHER ETC.
2025 INSC 102431 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The original appellant, Khem Singh, had filed special leave petitions challenging the acquittal of three accused in a 1992 murder case. While the petitions were pending, Khem Singh died and his son, Raj Kumar, applied to set aside the abatement of the appeals and to be substituted as appellant. The Supreme Court examin…
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESHversusN. SANJAY
2025 INSC 97331 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Andhra Pradesh appealed against a High Court order that granted anticipatory bail to N. Sanjay, an IPS officer who was Additional Director General of Police, CID, and Director General of the State Disaster Response and Fire Services, alleging misappropriation of public funds through irregular tenders and c…
SATBIR SINGHversusRAJESH KUMAR AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 41631 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Satbir Singh, an army serviceman, was stabbed and assaulted by Mukesh and several others during a volleyball match dispute. He filed an application under Section 319 of the CrPC to summon Rajesh Kumar, Neeraj, Sagar @ Bittoo and Ankit as additional accused. The Sessions Judge allowed the application, but the High Court…
ZULFIQUAR HAIDER & ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.
2025 INSC 48031 March 2025Disposed off
The appellants' residential buildings in Prayagraj were demolished by the Prayagraj Development Authority (PDA) under Section 27 of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973. The PDA issued a show‑cause notice on 18 December 2020 but merely affixed it without making genuine attempts at personal service…
M/S FAIME MAKERS PVT. LTD.versusDISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES(3), MUMBAI & ORS.
2025 INSC 42331 March 2025Case Allowed
The appellant, Faime Makers Pvt. Ltd., owned a parcel of land in Mumbai after acquiring it from Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Private Limited. The respondent society applied for a Unilateral Certificate of Deemed Conveyance under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963, which was dismissed on 22 February 2021 …
RAKESH BHANOTversusM/S. GURDAS AGRO PVT. LTD
2025 INSC 44531 March 2025Dismissed
The appellants, who were directors and guarantors of a company, were charged under sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing cheques that bounced due to insufficient funds. While the criminal proceedings were pending, they filed personal insolvency applications under section 94 of the Insolvenc…
RAMAYANA ISPAT PVT. LTD. AND ANR.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.
2025 INSC 42431 March 2025Dismissed
The appellants, large industrial consumers and captive power generators, challenged the Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission's (RERC) 2016 Open Access Regulations, alleging that they exceeded RERC's jurisdiction over inter‑state open access, imposed unreasonable penalties for drawal variations, required a 24‑hou…
AMRESH SHRIVASTAVAversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.
2025 INSC 41731 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a Tehsildar, passed a land settlement order in 1997 which was later alleged to be illegal, leading to a show‑cause notice in 2009 and a chargesheet in 2011 after a 13‑year delay. The appellant challenged the chargesheet under the Judges Protection Act, 1985, arguing that the order was a quasi‑judicial ac…
KISHORE CHHABRAversusTHE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
2025 INSC 41931 March 2025Disposed off
The appellant, Kishore Chhabra, owned land in Sultanpur, Sonipat, which was included in a 1992 notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for development. He challenged the acquisition, arguing that his land should be released because a factory had been operating there since 1970 and that other simi…
THE SECRETARY, ALL INDIA SHRI SHIVAJI MEMORIAL SOCIETY (AISSMS) AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
2025 INSC 42231 March 2025Disposed off
The All India Shri Shivaji Memorial Society (AISSMS) appealed against Bombay High Court orders that granted certain private engineering teachers a higher pay band and redesignation as Associate Professors. The teachers, appointed between 1995 and 2009, held only Master's degrees and, except for one, failed to obtain a …
PIRAMAL CAPITAL AND HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS DEWAN HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED)versus63 MOONS TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED & OTHERS
2025 INSC 42131 March 2025Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the corporate insolvency resolution of Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd (DHFL), where Piramal Capital submitted a resolution plan (RP) that allocated recoveries from Section 66 applications to itself. The plan was approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and the National Company Law …
KARUPPUDAYARversusSTATE REP. BY THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, LALGUDI TRICHY & ORS.
2025 INSC 13231 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Karuppudayar was charged under Sections 294(b) and 353 IPC read with Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the SC‑ST Act for allegedly insulting a revenue inspector in his office. The High Court dismissed the appellant's petitions under Section 482 CrPC seeking quash of the proceedings, holding that the trial w…
SAU. JIYAversusKULDEEP
2025 INSC 13531 January 2025Case Partly allowed
The marriage between Sau. Jiya and Kuldeep was dissolved by a family court on the ground of cruelty, a decree later affirmed by the High Court. After the husband remarried in 2019, the parties disputed a permanent alimony settlement, with the wife seeking a lump‑sum amount and the husband contesting his income and asse…
KARAN SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2025 INSC 13331 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Karan Singh, was convicted under Sections 304-B and 498-A of the IPC for the alleged dowry death of his wife, Asha Rani, who committed suicide within two years of marriage. The prosecution's case relied on the testimonies of three witnesses, whose statements about dowry demands were found to contain sign…
KULDEEP SINGHversusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.
2025 INSC 13731 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Kuldeep Singh, was charged under Sections 366, 376 and 506 IPC for alleged abduction and rape of his wife, Respondent No.3, after she filed a statement alleging forced marriage. The appellant contended that the marriage was solemnised voluntarily under Sikh rites and that, under Exception 2 to Section 37…
M/S C & C CONSTRUCTIONS LTD.versusIRCON INTERNATIONAL LTD.
2025 INSC 13831 January 2025Dismissed
The appellant, C & C Constructions Ltd., contracted with IRCON International Ltd. to construct five road over bridges, but delays attributable to the respondent led the appellant to seek extensions of time under clause 49 of the General Conditions of Contract (GCC). The appellant gave a solemn undertaking not to claim …
SHRIPAL & ANR.versusNAGAR NIGAM, GHAZIABAD
2025 INSC 14431 January 2025Disposed off
The workmen, employed as gardeners in the Ghaziabad Nagar Nigam's horticulture department since the late 1990s, alleged that they were dismissed orally in July 2005 while a conciliation proceeding was pending, without notice or retrenchment compensation. They claimed the termination violated Sections 6E and 6N of the U…
SUBHA PRASAD NANDI MAJUMDARversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL SERVICE & ORS
2025 INSC 91030 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Subha Prasad Nandi Majumdar, a teaching staff member who served 16 years in Assam and subsequently joined Burdwan University in West Bengal, sought to benefit from a 2021 Government Notification that extended the retirement age of teachers from 60 to 65 years, provided they had at least ten years of continuous teaching…
MADDURI GANGARAJU @ BABU RAOversusMADDURI SUNANDA & OTHERS
2025 INSC 99130 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The marriage between Madduri Venkateswara Rao and Madduri Sunanda was dissolved by a California divorce decree in 2007. After returning to India, Sunanda filed a matrimonial suit, a domestic violence case, and an FIR under sections 494 and 498A IPC against her husband and his relatives. The parties later resolved all d…
MUKUND K. PAI & ORS.versusPUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ORS
2025 INSC 103330 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, retired Indian Navy officers, were re‑employed by Punjab National Bank and initially received a basic pay higher than the ceiling prescribed in the Indian Banks Association (IBA) Clarification of 2018. The bank later re‑fixed their pay at a lower amount, citing the IBA Clarification and an HRMD Circular…
UMRI POOPH PRATAPPUR (UPP) TOLLWAYS PVT. LTD.versusM.P. ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND ANOTHER
2025 INSC 90730 July 2025Disposed off
Umri Pooph Pratappur (UPP) Tollways Pvt. Ltd. entered into a 2012 concession agreement with Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation (MPRDC) for a state highway project. Disputes over cost overruns and delays led the appellant to first file a reference before the Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Tribunal under the 1983 Ac…
STATE OF PUNJABversusGURNAM @ GAMA ETC.
2025 INSC 96030 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The respondents were convicted under the NDPS Act for transporting 750 kg of poppy husk after a seizure in 2009. They appealed their convictions, and the High Court acquitted them, relying solely on the principle from Mohan Lal v. State of Punjab that an informant cannot also be the investigator. The State of Punjab ch…
IL & FS FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITEDversusADHUNIK MEGHALAYA STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED
2025 INSC 91130 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, IL & FS Financial Services Ltd., entered into a term loan agreement with the respondent, Adhunik Meghalaya Steels Pvt. Ltd., in 2015, which became a non‑performing asset on 1 March 2018. The appellant filed a Section 7 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code on 15 January 2024, relying on th…
CHETANversusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA
2025 INSC 79330 May 2025Dismissed
The appellant was convicted of murder (IPC s.302), misappropriation of property (IPC s.404), and unlawful possession and use of a firearm (Arms Act s.3, s.5) based largely on circumstantial evidence, including the last‑seen theory, forensic ballistics, and his subsequent abscondence. The Supreme Court examined whether …
KAMLA NEHRU MEMORIAL TRUST & ANR.versusU.P. STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS.
2025 INSC 79130 May 2025Dismissed
The Kamla Nehru Memorial Trust (KNMT) was allotted 125 acres of industrial land by the Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation (UPSIDC) in 2003 on condition of scheduled payments and execution of a lease deed. KNMT repeatedly delayed payments, sought waivers, and failed to furnish required documents, whi…
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI & ORS.versusPANKAJ BABULAL KOTECHA & ORS.
2025 INSC 79230 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned a theme park developed by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) on land alleged to be the site of a 100‑year‑old lake, Khajuria Lake. A public‑interest writ petition before the Bombay High Court ordered demolition of the park and restoration of the lake, a decision later appealed to the …
PRAGYA PRASUN & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2025 INSC 59930 April 2025Disposed off
The petitioners, including acid‑attack survivors with facial disfigurements and a blind individual, challenged the mandatory digital KYC/e‑KYC/video‑KYC procedures for being inaccessible and discriminatory. They argued that requirements such as capturing a live photograph and performing a liveness check (e.g., eye‑blin…
GAYATRI BALASAMYversusM/S ISG NOVASOFT TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
2025 INSC 60530 April 2025Disposed off
The Supreme Court was asked to resolve a long‑standing controversy over whether courts exercising jurisdiction under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 can modify an arbitral award. The issue arose from the earlier decision in Project Director, NHAI v. M. Hakeem, where the Court held that …
SHENBAGAVALLI AND ORS.versusTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KANCHEEPURAM DISTRICT AND ANR.
2025 INSC 60730 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, including the deceased's wife, were charged under Section 306 IPC for abetment of suicide after the husband Dinesh died by suicide on 09‑12‑2013. The prosecution relied on a torn diary page alleged to be a suicide note claiming continuous harassment by the accused from 10‑11‑2013 onward. The Supreme Cou…
KANIZ AHMEDversusSABUDDIN & ORS.
2025 INSC 61030 April 2025Dismissed
The petitioners challenged the High Court's directions ordering police to evict occupants of an unauthorised two‑storey construction and to have the Kolkata Municipal Corporation (KMC) demolish the building, along with inspecting neighbouring properties. The Supreme Court examined whether the High Court had acted withi…
RAJU @ UMAKANTversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2025 INSC 61530 April 2025Case Partly allowed
The appellant Raju was convicted of kidnapping, gang rape and wrongful confinement under IPC sections 366, 376(2)(g) and 342, and of an offence under the SC/ST Act 3(2)(v). The prosecution relied primarily on the uncorroborated but consistent testimony of the prosecutrix, who described being abducted, gagged, and sexua…
PAVUL YESU DHASANversusTHE REGISTRAR, STATE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.
2025 INSC 67730 April 2025Dismissed
The appellant, an Inspector of Police, refused to register a First Information Report (FIR) lodged by the complainant and used objectionable language while speaking to the complainant's mother. The State Human Rights Commission of Tamil Nadu held that this conduct violated the complainant's human rights and directed th…
RAKESH KUMAR CHARMAKAR & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.
2025 INSC 13630 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were appointed as temporary part‑time sweepers under a Special Recruitment Drive to fill vacant, sanctioned posts in the Madhya Pradesh Veterinary Department. They sought regular pay‑scale benefits under a 1984 circular that granted revised pay‑scale to temporary employees after three years of service, a…
PARIMAL KUMAR & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.
2025 INSC 13430 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, who had passed the Jharkhand Teacher Eligibility Test (JTET) under the 2022 Recruitment Rules, challenged a High Court order that allowed candidates who cleared the Central Teacher Eligibility Test (CTET) or neighbouring states' Teacher Eligibility Tests (STET) to participate in the ongoing recruitment …
ASHOK SAXENAversusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND ETC.
2025 INSC 14830 January 2025Disposed off
The appellant, Ashok Saxena, entered the complainant's house armed with a knife during an altercation and stabbed the complainant's wife, who later died. The trial court acquitted him, but the High Court convicted him under Section 302 IPC for murder. The appellant challenged the conviction, arguing lack of intent to k…
M/S JM LABORATORIES AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
2025 INSC 12730 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, M/s JM Laboratories and its partners, were summoned by a Judicial Magistrate in Kurnool to appear in a case filed under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act alleging manufacture of sub‑standard drugs. They filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings, which the High Co…
SMT. N. USHA RANI AND ANR.versusMOODUDULA SRINIVAS
2025 INSC 12930 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Smt. N. Usha Rani, married her first husband in 1999, separated and executed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) in 2005, and subsequently married the respondent twice, the second marriage being registered. The respondent obtained a decree declaring the first marriage void and later filed a criminal revi…
VELLORE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENT MONITORING COMMITTEE REP. BY ITS SECRETARY MR. R. RAJEBDRANversusTHE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VELLORE DISTRICT & OTHERS
2025 INSC 13130 January 2025Disposed off
The case concerns the continued pollution of the Palar River in Vellore District by tannery effluents and the adequacy of compensation awarded by the Loss of Ecology Authority (LoEA). The appellants, the Vellore District Environment Monitoring Committee, challenged the Madras High Court's dismissal of writ petitions th…
INOX AIR PRODUCTS LIMITED NOW KNOWN AS INOX AIR PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
2025 INSC 12830 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Andhra Pradesh alleged that INOX Air Products Ltd. (now INOX Air Products Private Ltd.) sold Nitrous Oxide I.P. to a third‑party firm that allegedly lacked a Form 20B licence, thereby violating s.18(a)(vi) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and attracting punishment under s.27(d). The High Court dismisse…
LALITAversusVISHWANATH & ORS.
2025 INSC 17330 January 2025Dismissed
The mother of a deceased woman appealed against the High Court's order acquitting four accused of abetment of suicide under Sections 306, 498A and 34 of the IPC. The trial court had convicted them based on evidence of harassment, but the High Court set aside the conviction, finding no reliable proof of abetment. The Su…
JASMINBHAI BHARATBHAI KOTHARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
2025 INSC 17230 January 2025Dismissed
Jasminbhai Bharatbhai Kothari, convicted under IPC Section 302 read with Section 34 and the Arms Act, sought an extension of temporary bail, which the Gujarat High Court refused. While filing a Special Leave Petition (SLP) before the Supreme Court, he also filed an interlocutory application seeking exemption from surre…
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERSversusEX. C. SATPAL SINGH
2025 INSC 105629 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, a constable in the Punjab Armed Forces who was later transferred to the Commando Force, was absent without leave on several occasions, the last being a 37‑day unauthorized absence in 1994. A departmental enquiry was held, during which the respondent neither cross‑examined witnesses nor produced any defe…
SMT. BHAGWATI DEVIversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND
2025 INSC 105129 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Bhagwati Devi, a mother‑in‑law, was convicted under Section 498‑A IPC for allegedly subjecting her daughter‑in‑law to dowry‑related cruelty that led to the latter's suicide by hanging. The trial court and the Uttarakhand High Court upheld the conviction based primarily on the testimony of the deceased's …
M/S KKK HYDRO POWER LIMITEDversusHIMACHAL PRADESH STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LIMITED AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 105729 August 2025Dismissed
The appellant, KKK Hydro Power Ltd, entered into a 3 MW power purchase agreement (PPA) with HPSEB in 2000 fixing a tariff of ₹2.50/kWh, later augmenting the project to 4.90 MW and attempting to raise the tariff to ₹2.95/kWh through a supplementary PPA in 2010 without the Himachal Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commissi…
M/S TARACHAND LOGISTIC SOLUTIONS LIMITEDversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS.
2025 INSC 105229 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a logistics company, was awarded a contract to handle and store iron and steel at the central dispatch yard of Visakhapatnam Steel Plant (RINL) and deployed 36 motor vehicles exclusively within the enclosed premises. It sought exemption from motor vehicle tax under Section 3 of the Andhra Pradesh Motor V…
AJWARversusWASEEM AND ANOTHER R1: WASEEM R2: STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
2025 INSC 96829 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Ajwar filed a criminal appeal challenging a bail order granted by the Allahabad High Court to respondent No.1, Waseem, who had been repeatedly granted and then cancelled bail by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court had earlier cancelled the bail on two occasions, directing that any future bail could be so…
S. MOHAMMED HAKKIMversusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS.
2025 INSC 90529 July 2025Disposed off
The appellant, a 20‑year‑old engineering student, was riding a motorcycle when the car ahead suddenly braked, causing him to collide with the car and subsequently be run over by a bus, resulting in amputation of his left leg and 100% functional disability. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs 9…
SUKHDEV YADAV @ PEHALWANversusSTATE OF (NCT OF DELHI) & OTHERS
2025 INSC 96929 July 2025Disposed off
The appellant Sukhdev Yadav was convicted of murder, kidnapping and related offences and sentenced to life imprisonment fixed at twenty years without remission, along with fines. After serving the full twenty‑year term on 9 March 2025, he sought release but the Delhi High Court had earlier denied his furlough applicati…
RAKHI SADHUKHANversusRAJA SADHUKHAN
2025 INSC 78929 May 2025Disposed off
Rakhi Sadhukhan filed for divorce from Raja Sadhukhan and was awarded permanent alimony of Rs.20,000 per month with a 5% increase every three years by the Calcutta High Court. She later contended that the amount was insufficient given the husband’s higher income and the standard of living she enjoyed during the marriag…
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusSEKH JAMIR HOSSAIN AND ORS.
2025 INSC 78829 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The CBI investigated a violent attack on the house of Sekh Jamir Hossain that occurred on the day election results were announced in West Bengal, where a mob assaulted the complainant, looted his property and molested his wife. The accused, including politically influential respondents, were arrested and a charge‑sheet…
ARATHY RAMACHANDRANversusBIJAY RAJ MENON
2025 INSC 58729 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The mother, a working professional, filed a petition seeking permanent custody of her two minor children, alleging the father might forcibly remove them. The Family Court restrained the father and granted limited visitation, which the father appealed. The High Court then ordered a 15‑day monthly interim custody for eac…
KAMAL DEV PRASADversusMAHESH FORGE
2025 INSC 59129 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a forging machine operator, lost multiple phalanges of four fingers of his right hand in an accident at work. The Commissioner under the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 initially assessed a 100% disability and awarded compensation based on a factor of 213.57. On appeal, the High Court reduced the disab…
P. KUMARAKURUBARANversusP. NARAYANAN & ORS.
2025 INSC 59829 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, P. Kumarakurubaran, was assigned a vacant site in 1974 and executed a power of attorney in 1978 for construction. His father later sold the property in 1988 to the defendant without authority, which the appellant discovered in 2011 and filed a land‑grabbing complaint. In 2014 he instituted a suit seeking…
K. VALARMATHI & ORS.versusKUMARESAN
2025 INSC 60629 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, legal heirs of the deceased Kathiresan, filed suits seeking declaration of title and injunction over a suit land purchased by Kathiresan. The respondent, a relative, invoked Article 227 of the Constitution before the Madras High Court, seeking rejection of the plaints on the ground that they were barred…
FILOMENA SALDANHA THROUGH POWER OF ATTORNEY MR. FRAZIER SALDANHAversusSUNIL KOHLI REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY, MR. NAVAL BOWRY, & ORS.
2022 INSC 59529 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The dispute arose from a construction licence granted to the respondent, which the appellant claimed would obstruct a pathway adjoining his land. After a series of appeals under the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, the parties reached a settlement wherein the respondent agreed to provide a 3‑metre access path, and the High Court…
SHYAM NANDAN MEHTAversusSANTOSH KUMAR & ORS.
2025 INSC 58629 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant was appointed as an Intermediate Trained Assistant Teacher in Palamau district after securing higher marks than the writ petitioner. Two years later, the petitioner filed a writ alleging that the appellant had manipulated his caste declaration by showing "Most Backward Class" (MBC) in his TET certificate …
SRI MALAKAPPA & ORS.versusTHE IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ANR.
2025 INSC 59029 April 2025Disposed off
The appellants, husband and children of a woman who died as a pillion rider in a motorcycle accident on 22 February 2015, claimed compensation from the insurer of IFFCO Tokio. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.18,81,966, applying a 1/3 deduction for personal expenses and a 50% addition for future prospects,…
STATE OF U.P. & ANOTHERversusMISS BHAVNA TIWARI & ORS.
2025 INSC 74729 April 2025Disposed off
The petitioners, the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Director General of Medical Education, challenged a High Court order that awarded Rs.10,00,000 each to two NEET‑PG aspirants alleging seat‑blocking during counselling. The aspirants claimed that the mop‑up round denied them the opportunity to secure their preferred MD…
JAIPUR VIDYUT VITARAN NIGAM LIMITED AND ORS.versusRAJASTHAN TEXTILE MILLS ASSOCIATION & ANR. ETC.
2025 INSC 59229 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court considered appeals by Jaipur Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Ltd. and other distribution licensees challenging an Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) order that set aside the Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission's (State Commission) determination of Cross‑Subsidy Surcharges (CSS) effective 1 Decemb…
SHARDHAMMA & ANR.versusTHE DY. COMMISSIONER & ORS.
2025 INSC 58329 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants purchased four acres of land that had been granted to Shri Ranga in 1946-47 and was subject to a Saguvalli Chit confirming a non‑alienation clause. Shri Ranga sold the land in 1969, but in 1992 a third party, Dodda Hanumaiah, filed an application under Section 5 of the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Sche…
S.D. JAYAPRAKASH AND ORS. ETC.versusTHE UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2025 INSC 59429 April 2025Case Partly allowed
The appellants were appointed as Data Entry Operators on a contractual basis between 1996 and 1999 and were regularised in 2015. They sought to have their contractual service counted for pension benefits under the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972. The Central Administrative Tribunal and the Karnataka High C…
RENUKAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.
2025 INSC 59629 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant-wife alleged that her husband and his relatives assaulted her and her family on 27 October 2020 by throwing chilli powder in her eyes and attacking them with slippers and stones, while also demanding dowry. A criminal case was filed under IPC sections 498-A, 324, 355, 504, 506 read with 149, and the polic…
RUTU MIHIR PANCHAL & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2025 INSC 59329 April 2025Disposed off
The petitioners challenged the constitutionality of sections 34(1), 47(1)(a)(i) and 58(1)(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, which base the pecuniary jurisdiction of district, state and national consumer commissions on the value of consideration paid rather than the compensation claimed. The challenge arose fr…
PUNIT BERIWALAversusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.
2025 INSC 58229 April 2025Disposed off
The appellant, Punit Beriwala, alleged that a receipt‑cum‑agreement to sell dated 12 April 2004 was a fraudulent transaction in which the accused, Vikramjit Singh and Maheep Singh, misrepresented their authority as Karta of the HUF and induced the appellant to pay a large sum. The appellant filed a criminal complaint i…
VISA COKE LIMITEDversusM/S MESCO KALINGA STEEL LIMITED
2025 INSC 59729 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Visa Coke Ltd., an operational creditor, claimed that it had validly served a statutory demand notice under Section 8 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, by sending Form 3 to the Key Managerial Personnel (KMP) of Mesco Kalinga Steel Ltd. at its registered office. The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and th…
SHANKAR LAL SHARMAversusRAJESH KOOLWAL & ORS.
2025 INSC 20029 January 2025Disposed off
Shankar Lal Sharma, a 73‑year‑old man of limited means, filed a Special Leave Petition against Rajesh Koolwal & Ors. The Court appointed Sanchar Anand as amicus curiae, who represented the petitioner pro bono on fourteen occasions. The Court examined the duty of advocates to assist indigent litigants and the broader co…
AJAY MALIKversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ANR.
2025 INSC 11829 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The case arose from FIR No. 60/2017 alleging wrongful confinement, trafficking and conspiracy against Ajay Malik for employing a tribal domestic worker. Malik sought quashing of the criminal proceedings and compounding of the offences, supported by a no‑objection affidavit from the complainant, while the State opposed …
H. ANJANAPPA & ORS.versusA. PRABHAKAR & ORS.
2025 INSC 12129 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The plaintiffs filed a suit for specific performance of a sale deed, while the defendants sold portions of the disputed land to Respondents No.1 and No.2 during the pendency of the suit, violating a temporary injunction and Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act. The respondents sought to be impleaded under Order I…
INDEPENDENT SUGAR CORPORATION LTD.versusGIRISH SRIRAM JUNEJA & ORS.
2025 INSC 12429 January 2025Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the corporate insolvency resolution of Hindustan National Glass and Industries Ltd., where AGI Greenpac's resolution plan was approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) without prior approval from the Competition Commission of India (CCI) as required by the proviso to Section 31(4) of the I…
S. VISHNU GANGA & ORS.versusM/S ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED REP. BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER & ORS.
2025 INSC 12329 January 2025Disposed off
The appellants' parents, who were partners in a mill, died in a road accident when a bus collided with their vehicle. The appellants filed separate claim petitions under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking Rs 1 crore each, and the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 58.24 lakh and Rs 93.61 lakh respectively, ba…
M.S. SANJAYversusINDIAN BANK & ORS.
2025 INSC 17729 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant purchased a mortgaged property at an auction conducted on 31 July 2007 and received a sale certificate on 30 November 2007, thereafter developing the property. The guarantor of the original borrower challenged the auction before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, which set aside the sale; the decision was later …
NARCOTIC CONTROL BUREAUversusLAKHWINDER SINGH
2025 INSC 19029 January 2025Dismissed
The Narcotic Control Bureau appealed against a High Court order that suspended the ten‑year rigorous imprisonment sentence of Lakhwinder Singh, convicted under the NDPS Act, and granted him bail pending appeal after he had served 4½ years. The issue was whether the appellate court could grant such relief when the convi…
KRISHNADATT AWASTHYversusSTATE OF M.P. & ORS.
2025 INSC 12629 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned the 1998 appointment of ten individuals as Shiksha Karmi Grade III teachers in Janpad Panchayat, Gaurihar, where the selection was challenged on grounds of alleged bias because some selection committee members were relatives of the appointees and for the lack of a hearing. The Collector set aside the…
DR. TANVI BEHLversusSHREY GOEL & ORS.
2025 INSC 12529 January 2025Disposed off
The case concerned the Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, which reserved 64 postgraduate (PG) medical seats under its State quota – 32 for candidates who had studied at the college (institutional preference) and 32 for candidates deemed "residents" of Chandigarh based on broad residence criteria. The …
MAHABIR & ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA
2025 INSC 12029 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were acquitted of murder by the Sessions Court in 2005, but a criminal revision filed by the victim's father in 2006 was allowed by the High Court, which reversed the acquittal and sentenced the appellants to life imprisonment. The Supreme Court examined whether the High Court could convert an acquittal …
M/S MOTILAL AGARWALAversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR.
2025 INSC 106228 August 2025Dismissed
The dispute concerned an arbitral award dated 12 November 2013 in favour of M/s Motilal Agarwala against the State of West Bengal. The State sought to set aside the award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filing the application on 20 March 2014, arguing that it had only become aware of the…
ANIL KHANDELWAL ETC.versusPHOENIX INDIA AND ANR.
2025 INSC 106928 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The Bank of Baroda issued a possession notice under the SARFAESI Act to recover defaulted loans, but a clerical error inflated the outstanding amount, leading the borrower Phoenix India to allege defamation and file a criminal complaint under Sections 499, 500 and 501 IPC against the Bank's senior officers. The magistr…
IN RE: MEPUNG TADAR BAGE, MEMBER, ARUNACHAL PRADESH PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION versus
2025 INSC 104728 August 2025Reference answered
The President of India referred a matter under Article 317(1) of the Constitution seeking the removal of Ms. Mepung Tadar Bage, a member of the Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission (APPSC), alleging misbehaviour in connection with the leakage of the Assistant Engineer (Civil) Mains Examination question paper in …
VIJAY KRISHNASWAMI @ KRISHNASWAMI VIJAYAKUMARversusTHE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INVESTIGATION)
2025 INSC 104828 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Vijay Krishnaswami, was searched in 2016 and Rs.4.93 crore of unaccounted cash was seized, leading the Revenue to initiate prosecution under s.276C(1) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2017-18. The appellant filed a quashing petition and later applied to the Settlement Commission under s.245C…
MANOJ TEJRAJ JAINversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
2025 INSC 109028 August 2025Disposed off
The case arose from a raid on a godown in Ahmedabad where 55 boxes containing 1,364 kg of ephedrine, a controlled substance under the NDPS (Regulation of Controlled Substances) Order 2013, were seized. Four appellants were convicted under Sections 25A and 29 of the NDPS Act based largely on the confessional statement o…
MANOHAR AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS
2025 INSC 90028 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, a group of farmers, had their land acquired in the 1990s under the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 for the Jintur Industrial Area and were awarded Rs 10,800 per acre by the Land Acquisition Officer. They filed a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 seeking enhancemen…
CHIRAG SEN AND ANOTHER ETC.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANOTHER
2025 INSC 90328 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, prominent badminton players and their coach, were accused in a private complaint of falsifying birth records to gain entry into age‑restricted tournaments, leading to the registration of an FIR under Sections 420, 468, 471 and 34 IPC. The complaint relied mainly on an unauthenticated 1996 GPF nomination…
SHRI SHRI SWAMI SAMARTH CONSTRUCTION & FINANCE SOLUTION & ANRversusTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF NKGSB CO-OP. BANK LTD. & ORS.
2025 INSC 90828 July 2025Dismissed
The petitioner, an MSME, defaulted on a loan from NKGSB Co‑operative Bank and its account was classified as a non‑performing asset (NPA) with a demand notice issued under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act. The petitioner contended that, under the 2015 Notification containing the ‘Framework for Revival and Rehabilitatio…
GAJANAN DATTATRAY GOREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.
2025 INSC 91328 July 2025Dismissed
Gajanan Dattatray Gore was arrested for offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including cheating and criminal breach of trust. He applied for regular bail before the High Court, which granted bail on the condition that he would deposit Rs 25,00,000 within five months, based on an affidavit‑undertaki…
DAIVSHALA & ORS.versusORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ANR
2025 INSC 90428 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Shahu Sampatrao Jadhavar, a night watchman, died in a road accident on 22 April 2003 while commuting 5 km to his sugar factory workplace. His family claimed compensation under the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923, but the employer and insurer argued the accident did not arise out of or in the course of employment beca…
BATLANKI KESHAV (KESAVA) KUMAR ANURAGversusSTATE OF TELANGANA & ANR.
2025 INSC 79028 May 2025
The appellant, Batlanki Keshav (Kesava) Kumar Anurag, sought to quash FIR No. 103 of 2022 alleging offences under Section 376(2)(n) IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, claiming the allegations of sexual relations under a false promise of marriage were fabricated. The de‑facto complainan…
N.S. GNANESHWARAN ETC.versusTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE & ANR.
2025 INSC 78728 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were charged under sections 120B, 420, 468 and 471 of the IPC and section 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly diverting bank funds. Parallel civil recovery proceedings before the Debt Recovery Tribunal were settled through a One Time Settlement (OTS) in which the ba…
ARIF MD. YEASIN JWADDERversusSTATE OF ASSAM AND ORS.
2025 INSC 78528 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a lawyer, filed a public interest litigation alleging that up to 171 police encounters in Assam between 2021 and 2022 were fake and that the State had violated the procedural safeguards laid down in the People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) guidelines. The Gauhati High Court dismissed the petition as…
CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATIONversusREGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 78628 May 2025Disposed off
The Chandigarh Administration appealed against several orders of the Punjab and Haryana High Court that directed the construction of a verandah in front of Court Room No.1 of the High Court and the laying of green paver blocks in a kutcha parking area. The Administration argued that the verandah could jeopardise the UN…
BINDU KAPUREAversusSUBHASHISH PANDA & ORS.
2025 INSC 78428 May 2025
The Supreme Court examined the Delhi Development Authority's (DDA) unauthorised felling of over a thousand trees in the Delhi Ridge and its failure to disclose this during a hearing, despite pending applications for permission. The Court held that these actions amounted to wilful disobedience of its 1996 order in M.C. …
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusKAMLESH AND OTHERS.
2025 INSC 72428 April 2025Disposed off
The claimants, legal heirs of a government employee who died in a motor accident, were awarded Rs.37,85,800 compensation by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The insurer, New India Assurance Co., appealed seeking deduction of the financial assistance payable under the Haryana Compensation Assistance Rules, 2006, whil…
CHUNNI BAIversusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
2025 INSC 57728 April 2025Case Partly allowed
Chunni Bai was convicted of murdering her two young daughters after the trial court and High Court upheld a Section 302 IPC conviction. She claimed she acted under the influence of an invisible power, asserting unsoundness of mind under Section 84 IPC. The Supreme Court examined the eyewitness testimony, medical autops…
K.P. TAMILMARANversusTHE STATE BY DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
2025 INSC 57628 April 2025Dismissed
The case concerns the honour killing of a Dalit boy, Murugesan, and his Vanniyar bride, Kannagi, in 2003. Police officers Sub‑Inspector K.P. Tamilmaran (A‑14) and Inspector M. Sellamuthu (A‑15) failed to register an FIR despite being informed of the murders and later fabricated evidence to implicate Dalit relatives whi…
CONSOLIDATED CONSTRUCTION CONSORTIUM LIMITEDversusSOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY PARKS OF INDIA
2025 INSC 57428 April 2025Dismissed
The appellant, Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd., was contracted by the respondent, Software Technology Parks of India, to construct a building. The contract stipulated liquidated damages for delay, but the respondent granted several extensions of time before finally deducting Rs. 82,43,499 as liquidated damage…