STATE OF M.P.versusRAKESH KOHLI & ANR.
2012 INSC 23411 May 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Madhya Pradesh challenged the constitutional validity of clause (d) of Article 45 in Schedule 1‑A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, as amended by the Madhya Pradesh Stamp Amendment Act, 2002, which imposes a 2% stamp duty on power‑of‑attorney instruments given without consideration to persons who are not bloo…
N.C. DASversusGAUHATI HIGH COURT THR. REGISTRAR & ORS.
2012 INSC 1411 January 2012Dismissed
N.C. Das, a Grade‑II civil judge of the Tripura Judicial Service, filed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging (i) the denial of his promotion to Grade‑I despite his seniority and (ii) the refusal to extend his service up to the age of 60 years as provided in the amended Rule 20 of the Tripura Judicial Service Ru…
MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIAversusJSS MEDICAL COLLEGE & ANR.
2012 INSC 1511 January 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The Medical Council of India (MCI) appealed against a Karnataka High Court interim order that allowed JSS Medical College to admit 200 MBBS students for 2011‑12, despite the Board of Governors of the MCI having rejected the college’s application for increase of seats. The college had originally applied for an increase …
MOHD. HUSSAIN @ JULFIKAR ALIversusTHE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI
2012 INSC 1611 January 2012Matter referred to larger bench
An explosion on a Delhi bus in 1997 killed four people and injured twenty‑four. Mohd. Hussain @ Julfikar Ali, a Pakistani national, was charged under Sections 302, 307 IPC and Section 3 of the Explosives Substances Act and was convicted and sentenced to death. The trial proceeded for years with the accused largely unre…
COLLECTOR, DISTT. GWALIOR AND ANOTHERversusCINE EXHIBITORS P. LTD. AND ANOTHER
2012 INSC 1711 January 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The Gwalior Development Authority (GOA) auctioned a plot of nazul land and granted a 30‑year lease to Cine Exhibitors for a cinema hall. After the cinema licence was surrendered, the GOA terminated the lease and ordered possession, which the lessee challenged before the High Court. The Division Bench held the lessee co…
NARAIN PANDEYversusPANNALAL PANDEY
2012 INSC 57210 December 2012Case Partly allowed
The appellant filed a complaint under the Advocates Act alleging that the respondent advocate had filed vakalatnamas without authority and forged fictitious compromise deeds, thereby defrauding parties in consolidation courts. The State Bar Council's Disciplinary Committee examined oral and documentary evidence, includ…
AVTAR SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2012 INSC 46210 October 2012Dismissed
The case arose from a violent clash on 9 April 2003 between two groups over a disputed piece of land in Marori, Punjab. The accused, armed with gandasis, kirpans and swords, attacked members of the complainant’s family, killing Amarjit Singh (father of PW‑10) and injuring several others. The appellants pleaded self‑def…
ABUZAR HOSSAIN @ GULAM HOSSAINversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL
2012 INSC 46110 October 2012Reference answered
The appellant, Abuzar Hossain @ Gulam Hossain, claimed that he was a juvenile at the time of the alleged offence and therefore could not be tried in a regular criminal court. The claim was not raised in the trial or earlier appeals, and the question before the Supreme Court was whether a claim of juvenility under s.7A …
VILAS PANDURANG PAWAR & ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
2012 INSC 38610 September 2012Dismissed
The complainant, Savita Madhav Akhade, alleged that she and her family were insulted and assaulted on caste grounds by Vilas Pandurang Pawar and others, leading to an FIR under the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The accused applied for anticipatory …
M/S. REAL ESTATE AGENCIESversusGOVT. OF GOA & ORS.
2012 INSC 38710 September 2012Disposed off
The petitioners, a real‑estate partnership, claimed ownership of a 19,250 sq m open space in Miramar, Goa, based on a 1977 deed and sought a writ to restrain the Government of Goa and the Panaji Municipal Corporation from undertaking developmental works on the land. The High Court dismissed the writ, directing the peti…
ANAND MOHANversusSTATE OF BIHAR
2012 INSC 27710 July 2012Dismissed
The case concerned the murder of a District Magistrate during a funeral procession of a political leader, where 36 persons were charged. The trial court convicted A‑1 (Anand Mohan) and six others under sections 147, 302/149, 307/149 and 302/109, sentencing A‑1, A‑3 and A‑4 to death. The High Court acquitted A‑2 to A‑7 …
NITIN GUNWANT SHAHversusINDIAN BANK & ORS.
2012 INSC 27510 July 2012Dismissed
The petitioner, Nitin Gunwant Shah, claimed to be a monthly tenant of a flat in Mumbai based on a 1989 "Leave and Licence" agreement and sought a declaration to that effect. The Indian Bank, holding a mortgage over the same property, obtained a decree for recovery of dues and sought to sell the flat, also asking the co…
BABLE @ GURDEEP SINGHversusSTATE OF CHATTISGARH TR.P.S.O.P. KURSIPUR
2012 INSC 27810 July 2012Dismissed
The appellant Bable @ Gurdeep Singh was convicted under IPC s.302 r.w. s.34 for the murder of Ishwari Verma. He challenged the conviction on the grounds that the FIR lost its relevance because the informant turned hostile, the oral dying declaration was not corroborated, his injuries were unexplained, and the acquittal…
ASHAversusPT. B.D. SHARMA UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES & ORS.
2012 INSC 27910 July 2012Disposed off
The appellant, a high‑scoring candidate in the MBBS entrance exam, was denied admission to the MBBS course despite being present at the second counseling, while lower‑scoring candidates were admitted. The High Court initially granted her relief, but the Division Bench set aside that order. The Supreme Court held that t…
M/S PURBANCHAL CABLES & CONDUCTORS PVT. LTDversusASSAM STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ANOTHER
2012 INSC 28010 July 2012Dismissed
The Supreme Court considered two appeals by suppliers of aluminium conductors against the Assam State Electricity Board concerning claims for interest on delayed payments under the Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993. The Court held that a suit seeking only intere…
SUBHASH POPATLAL DAVEversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
2012 INSC 27610 July 2012Hearing Adjourned
The bench examined several writ petitions challenging preventive detention orders at the pre‑execution stage. The petitioners argued that, under the Right to Information Act, 2005, a detenu should be furnished with the grounds of detention before arrest, and that the five exceptions laid down in Alka Subhash Gadia's ca…
COMMON CAUSEversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2012 INSC 22110 May 2012Disposed off
Common Cause filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a mandamus directing the President of India to refer allegations against the Chairman of the National Human Rights Commission to the Supreme Court under Section 5(2) of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993. The allegations, communicated on 4 April 2011 by …
ATMARAM & ORS.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2012 INSC 22210 May 2012Dismissed
The five accused, Atmaram and four others, attacked two brothers and their sister with farsi, dharia and lathis, resulting in the death of one brother. The prosecution relied on the testimony of two injured eye‑witnesses (PW‑1 and PW‑2) and medical evidence showing ten injuries, including fatal head wounds. The appella…
ARUNA RODRIGUES AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2012 INSC 22010 May 2012Hearing Adjourned
The petitioners filed a public‑interest litigation under Article 32 seeking a complete ban on the release of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and a biosafety protocol. Earlier Supreme Court orders had required GEAC approval for field trials and later lifted the moratorium with specific conditions. Persistent contr…
ABDUL NAWAZversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL
2012 INSC 22310 May 2012Case Partly allowed
M/S. NARNE CONSTRUCTION P. LTD. ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC.
2012 INSC 22410 May 2012Dismissed
Narane Construction Ltd marketed plots for sale, promising development of infrastructure, layout approvals and other amenities, and required purchasers to become members by paying fees. The purchasers alleged deficiencies in the promised services and contended that the company was a service provider under the Consumer …
RAJESH BHATNAGARversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND
2012 INSC 22510 May 2012Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined the murder of Ms. Renu, who was burnt to death after her husband, brother‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law allegedly poured kerosene on her for refusing to meet dowry demands for a refrigerator, television and cooler. The trial and High Courts had convicted all three accused under Section 304B of the…
MRUDUL M. DAMLE & ANR.versusC.B.I. NEW DELHI
2012 INSC 22610 May 2012Case Allowed
The petitioners, a husband and wife accused under the Prevention of Corruption Act, sought transfer of their criminal trial from the Special Judge, CBI Cases, Rohini Court, New Delhi to the Special Judge, CBI Cases, Court of Sessions at Thane, Maharashtra, arguing that most of the 92 witnesses (88) were located in Maha…
SALIM GULAB PATHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SHO
2012 INSC 22710 May 2012Dismissed
The appellant, Salim Gulab Pathan, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for allegedly setting his wife on fire. The prosecution's case rested on the victim's dying declaration, recorded by a police constable after being certified by a doctor as conscious and fit, and corroborated by eyewitnesses who heard the victim imp…
PARA SEENAIAH & ANR.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR.
2012 INSC 22810 May 2012Dismissed
The accused were charged with offences including assault (ss.324, 326 IPC) and murder (s.302 IPC) arising from a village feud. Four eyewitnesses saw the attack and the deceased gave a statement to the police implicating the accused. The trial court acquitted them of murder but convicted three of them under s.326, later…
RAM DHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR.
2012 INSC 16810 April 2012Dismissed
Petitioner Ram Dhan filed a complaint alleging his son had been kidnapped, leading to the conviction of Balraj and others under IPC 364 r/w 149. The son later testified that he had left voluntarily, prompting Balraj to file an FIR against the petitioner for false information under IPC sections 177, 181, 182, 195 and 42…
LOKESH SHIVAKUMARversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2012 INSC 8610 February 2012Dismissed
The deceased, a money lender, was lured out by accused No.1 who owed him money. He was later found surrounded by four accused, including the appellant (accused No.2). The appellant picked up a piece of gobbaly tree wood and struck the victim on the head, causing fatal injuries; accused No.1 also threw a stone. All four…
DIPAK SHUBHASHCHANDRA MEHTAversusC.B.I. AND ANR.
2012 INSC 8510 February 2012Disposed off
The appellant, a joint managing director of a large export company, was arrested in 2010 on several economic offences alleged by multiple banks and the CBI. After a prolonged period of custody, intermittent interim bail on medical grounds, and the filing of charge sheets without framing of charges, the High Court rejec…
STATE OF M.P. & ANR.versusRAM PRAKASH SINGH & ANR.
2012 INSC 1210 January 2012Disposed off
Four accused escaped from police custody in Gwalior in 2001, allegedly with police collusion, and subsequently murdered 14 villagers. A public interest writ petition was filed alleging police torture of a particular community, prompting the High Court to direct the CBI to investigate the escape and the role of police o…
MOHAN SONIversusRAM AVTAR TOMAR AND ORS.
2012 INSC 1310 January 2012Appeal(s) allowed
Mohan Soni, a cart puller, lost his left leg below the knee in a motor vehicle accident and claimed compensation under section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.2,03,400, fixing his disability at 50% based on Schedule 1 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, and the Hi…
SHEORAJ SINGH AHLAWAT & ORS.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
2012 INSC 5159 November 2012Dismissed
The appellants, the husband and his parents‑in‑law, were charged under Section 498A IPC for alleged dowry harassment and a specific incident of abandonment. They sought discharge under Section 239 of the CrPC, claiming the allegations were false. The Supreme Court examined the scope of Section 239 and the standard for …
RAM CHANDRA BHAGATversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND
2012 INSC 5139 November 2012Dismissed
The appellant, Ram Chandra Bhaghat, was convicted under Section 493 of the Indian Penal Code for deceiving the complainant into believing she was his lawful wife, cohabiting with him for nine years and bearing two children. The prosecution proved that the appellant obtained a signed marriage registration form, induced …
M/S. NAGARJUNA CONSTN. CO. LTD.versusGOVERNMENT OF INDIA & ANR.
2012 INSC 5169 November 2012Dismissed
M/s Nagarjuna Construction Co. Ltd. entered into composite construction contracts and paid service tax before 1 June 2007 under the then‑applicable clauses (zzd), (zzq) and (zzzh) of Section 65(105) of the Finance Act, 1994. After the amendment introducing clause (zzzza) and the Works Contracts (Composition Scheme for …
C.K. JAFFER SHARIEFversusSTATE (THROUGH CBI)
2012 INSC 5179 November 2012Appeal(s) allowed
C.K. Jaffer Sharief, then Union Railway Minister, was accused of having the Managing Directors of RITES and IRCON approve the travel of four persons to London for his medical treatment, allegedly causing pecuniary loss to the PSUs. The FIR alleged that the journeys were arranged without any public interest and that the…
SHANTIBHAI J. VAGHELA AND ANR.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS.
2012 INSC 5189 November 2012Dismissed
Two minor children residing in a Gurukul (ashram) went missing and were later found dead in the Sabarmati river. An FIR was lodged against seven ashram inmates under Section 304 IPC (culpable homicide not amounting to murder), Section 23 of the Juvenile Justice Act and other offences. The High Court quashed the FIR in…
SPECIAL OFFICER, COMMERCE, NORTH EASTERN ELECTRICITY COMPANY OF ORISSA (NESCO) & ANR.versusM/S RAGHUNATH PAPER MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.
2012 INSC 5199 November 2012Dismissed
The appellant, North Eastern Electricity Supply Company of Orissa (NESCO), refused to supply electricity to a unit purchased at auction by the respondent, M/s Raghunath Paper Mills Pvt. Ltd., unless the arrears of electricity dues incurred by the previous owner were paid. The respondent filed a writ petition seeking a …
EX-HAV. SATBIR SINGHversusTHE CHIEF OF THE ARMY STAFF, NEW DELHI & ANR.
2012 INSC 5149 November 2012Case Partly allowed
The appellant, a Havildar in the Indian Army, was discharged on 1 April 1995 after a show‑cause notice alleging four "Red Ink Entries" in his service record. He challenged the discharge in the Delhi High Court, which set aside the termination but ordered his reinstatement without salary or other allowances for the peri…
RAJ PAUL SINGH & ANR.versusSTATE THROUGH P.S. MUSHEERABAD, HYDERABAD
2012 INSC 4599 October 2012Dismissed
The appellants were convicted of murder for stabbing the husband of the complainant after the husband warned them to stop abusive behavior. The trial and high courts upheld the conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC based on the testimony of two eye‑witnesses. On appeal, the accused argued that th…
TAMIL NADU WAKF BOARDversusSYED ABDUL QUADER & ORS.
2012 INSC 4609 October 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board filed a suit seeking a declaration that certain land and a superstructure were Wakf property and to obtain vacant possession. The tenant-defendants relied on the Madras City Tenants' Protection Act, 1921, asserting a right to purchase the land under Section 9 of that Act and argued that the su…
BHOPAL GAS PEEDITH MAHILA UDYOG SANGATHAN & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2012 INSC 3269 August 2012Transferred to High Court
The Supreme Court heard a public‑interest writ filed by Bhopal Gas Peedith Mahila Udyog Sangathan on behalf of the victims of the 1984 Bhopal gas disaster, seeking free medical care, implementation of research studies, and proper administration of the Bhopal Memorial Hospital Trust (BMHT). The Court examined whether it…
RAJOO @ RAMAKANTversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2012 INSC 3279 August 2012Remitted to Lower Court
Rajoo was convicted of gang‑rape and appealed to the High Court, which upheld his conviction but did not provide him with legal representation at the appellate stage. The Supreme Court examined whether, under Article 39‑A of the Constitution and the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, an accused in custody is entitle…
CANTONMENT BOARD, JAMMU & ORS.versusJAGAT PAL SINGH CHEEMA
2012 INSC 3289 August 2012Appeal(s) allowed
Jagat Pal Singh Cheema, a Section Officer of the Cantonment Board, Jammu, was removed from service following a departmental inquiry. The Board later reconsidered the decision, and its President referred the matter to the Officer Commanding‑in‑Chief (OCIC) under Section 51 of the Cantonments Act, 1924. The OCIC issued a…
SAEED ZAKIR HUSSAIN MALIKversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
2012 INSC 3299 August 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Saeed Zakir Hussain Malik, challenged a preventive detention order issued under COFEPOSA against his brother, alleging that the order was passed 15 months after the alleged offence and was served 14.5 months later, violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution. The Supreme Court examined whether such delay…
KAVITA SOLUNKEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
2012 INSC 3309 August 2012Appeal(s) allowed
Kavita Solunke was appointed as a teacher in an aided school in Maharashtra to a post reserved for Scheduled Tribe candidates, claiming to belong to the Halba tribe. Ten years later, a caste‑verification committee found that her father was a Koshti, a caste not listed as a Scheduled Tribe, and cancelled her caste certi…
PHOOL KUMARIversusOFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL JAIL, TIHAR, NEW DELHI AND ANR.
2012 INSC 3319 August 2012Disposed off
Phool Kumari was convicted under IPC sections 323, 342, 307 and 34 and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment, later reduced to five years. While incarcerated in Tihar Central Jail she was assigned work as a Sewadar in the Medical Inspection room. She claimed wages for the work done, but the prison superintendent and a vis…
SINNAMANI & ANR.versusG. VETTIVEL AND ORS.
2012 INSC 2199 May 2012Disposed off
PREMJI NATHUversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHER
2012 INSC 1669 April 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Premji Nathu, challenged the compensation awarded for his land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. After the Collector issued a notice under s.12(2) on 22‑Feb‑1985 without attaching a copy of the award, the appellant obtained the award later and filed an application on 8‑Apr‑1985 under s.18(1)…
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAIversusTHOMAS MATHEW & ORS.
2012 INSC 1679 April 2012Dismissed
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai issued notices under Section 314 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, directing occupants to remove patra structures on footpaths; after non‑compliance it demolished the structures and later issued another notice to demolish a reconstructed building. The occupants c…
UNION OF INDIA THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER NORTHERN RAILWAYSversusCHAIRMAN, UP STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.
2012 INSC 849 February 2012Disposed off
The Union of India (Northern Railways) sought to construct its own transmission lines to draw power directly from NTPC’s thermal power plants, alleging that the tariff charged by UP State Electricity Board (UPSEB) was excessive. UPSEB issued a notice demanding cessation of the construction, prompting the Railways to ch…
DENEL (PROPRIETARY LIMITED)versusGOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE
2012 INSC 119 January 2012Case Allowed
Denel (Proprietary) Ltd. entered into a contract with the Ministry of Defence for supply of Base Bleed Units. Disputes arose over rejected goods and the parties could not resolve them, leading to the appointment of a sole arbitrator, A.K. Jain, by the Director General of Ordnance Factory (DGOF) as per the contract clau…
V.K. NASWAversusHOME SECRETARY, U.O.I. AND ORS.
2012 INSC 109 January 2012Dismissed
V.K. Naswa filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking Rs 10 crore each from Baba Ramdev, Anna Hazare and others for alleged misuse and insult of the National Flag, and also asked the Court to direct amendment of the Flag Code of India, 2002. The petitioner had already lodged criminal complaints against the responde…
AYAAUBKHAN NOORKHAN PATHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
2012 INSC 5128 November 2012Disposed off
The appellant, Aymubkhan Noorkhan Pathan, was appointed as a senior clerk in the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation under a Scheduled Tribe reservation based on a caste certificate that declared him a member of the Bhil Tadvi tribe. Respondent No.5, a general‑category citizen, alleged that the appellant, being a Muslim, …
VOLTAS LIMITEDversusTEHSILDAR, THANE & ORS.
2012 INSC 5118 November 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The Maharashtra government acquired land for Voltas Ltd. and issued an allotment order in 1969 restricting alienation without prior permission and mandating use for workers' housing. Voltas later obtained an exemption under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, to develop surplus land for a weaker‑section …
DIPAK KUMAR MUKHERJEEversusKOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND OTHERS
2012 INSC 4588 October 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Dipak Kumar Mukherjee, challenged the illegal construction of a multi‑storeyed building by respondent No.7 (a construction company) that exceeded the two‑storey plan sanctioned under the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980. Despite a stop‑work notice and a demolition order passed by the Mayor‑in‑Coun…
STATE OF A.P. & ORS.versusD. RAGHUKUL PERSHAD (D} BY LRS & ORS.
2012 INSC 3248 August 2012Case Partly allowed
The State of Andhra Pradesh filed a suit for eviction against D. Raghukul Pershad and others, alleging that the appellants had failed to pay rent since 1986 and that the lease had not been renewed. The appellants contended that the lease deed and rent payments were made by mistake of fact and that they were the true ow…
R.C. CHANDELversusHIGH COURT OF M.P. & ANR.
2012 INSC 3258 August 2012Dismissed
The appellant, a District and Sessions Judge in Madhya Pradesh, was compulsorily retired in 2004 on the recommendation of the High Court Full Court, which cited adverse entries in his service record. He challenged the retirement before the High Court, obtaining a temporary reinstatement order from a Single Judge, which…
RATTAN LAL (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVESversusS.N. BHALLA & ORS.
2012 INSC 3238 August 2012Disposed off
The appellant purchased a plot in 1978 and paid Rs.50,000 as earnest money. The vendors were contractually obliged to obtain sale permission and an Income Tax clearance, but failed to do so within six months, invoking Clause 9 to terminate the agreement and refunding the earnest money. The appellant protested the refun…
CHHANGA SINGH AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
2012 INSC 2068 May 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants' land was acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and they were awarded compensation and a solatium by the Reference Court in 2001, but no interest was granted on the solatium. During execution proceedings they claimed interest on the solatium, which the execution court and the High Court rejected.…
M/S. A.B.N.A. AND ORS.versusTHE MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S. U.P.S.I.D.C. LIMITED, KANPUR & ANR.
2012 INSC 2078 May 2012Dismissed
The petitioners applied for an industrial land plot, paid a part of the price but were denied possession on the ground of pending dues. They filed a complaint before the MRTP Commission, which on 13 September 2007 ordered the respondents to hand over possession and to furnish a fresh SSI certificate. The respondents fi…
ALAGUPANDI @ ALAGUPANDIANversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU
2012 INSC 2088 May 2012Dismissed
Alagupandi was convicted for murdering his step‑mother Tamilarasi. The prosecution relied on the testimony of the deceased's brother (PW‑1), corroborative statements of other witnesses, forensic evidence linking the accused's blood to the crime scene, and a confession that led to the recovery of the knife. The appellan…
SAHADEVAN & ANR.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU
2012 INSC 2098 May 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined the murder conviction of three accused, two of whom appealed while the third did not. The prosecution's case relied heavily on an extra‑judicial confession and the theory that the accused were last seen with the deceased, but the confession was found unreliable, contradictory, and uncorrobora…
AL JAZEERA STEEL PRODUCTS COMPANY SAOGversusMID INDIA POWER & STEEL LTD.
2012 INSC 2178 May 2012Case Allowed
Al Jazeera Steel Products Company SAOG (the applicant) entered into a sale‑purchase contract with Mid India Power & Steel Ltd. (the respondent) for 2,000 metric tonnes of prime alloy steel billets. The billets delivered were found to be defective, leading the applicant to notify the respondent and request a joint inspe…
JITENDER KUMARversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2012 INSC 2108 May 2012Dismissed
The case concerned the murder of Indra, who was strangulated to death by her father‑in‑law, brother‑in‑law and others. Five accused were tried; four were convicted under s.120‑B, s.302 and s.34 IPC and one (Jitender Kumar) under s.120‑8 IPC. The appellants challenged the convictions on several grounds, including that J…
STATE OF KERALA & ORS.versusM/S. MAR APPRAEM KURI CO. LTD. & ANR.
2012 INSC 2058 May 2012Reference answered
The State of Kerala amended its Chitties Act, 1975 to bring chitties registered outside the state but with substantial Kerala subscribers within its regulatory ambit. Private chit firms challenged the amendment as repugnant to the Central Chit Funds Act, 1982 under Article 254(1). The Supreme Court was asked whether re…
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusRAFIQUE SHAIKH BHIKAN & ANR.
2012 INSC 2128 May 2012Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the Union of India's 2012 Hajj Policy, focusing on the eligibility conditions for Private Tour Operators (PTOs) such as a minimum 250 sq ft office, Rs 1 crore turnover, and a Rs 25 lakh security deposit, as well as the family‑restriction clause, the constitutionality of the Hajj subsidy, and …
BIPROMASZ BIPRON TRADING SAversusBHARAT ELECTRONICS LIMITED (BEL)
2012 INSC 2188 May 2012Disposed off
BIPROMASZ BIPRON Trading SA entered into a purchase order with Bharat Electronics Ltd (BEL) for gyro units, but BEL halted supplies, rejected goods and alleged contractual breaches. The contract’s arbitration clause required disputes to be referred to BEL’s Chairman‑cum‑Managing Director (CMD) or his nominee. The petit…
PRIYA GUPTAversusSTATE OF CHHATISHGARH & ORS
2012 INSC 2138 May 2012Disposed off
The appellants, Priya Gupta and Akanksha Adile, were admitted to the MBBS programme at Government Medical College, Jagdalpur on 30 September 2006 through a hurried process that ignored higher‑ranking candidates, allegedly due to favouritism (the father of the second appellant was the Director of Medical Education). The…
M/S BEST SELLERS RETAIL (INDIA) PVT. LTD.versusM/S ADITYA BIRLA NUVO LTD. & ORS.
2012 INSC 2148 May 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Best Sellers Retail (India) Pvt. Ltd. (and A.C. Thirumalaraj), challenged a temporary injunction granted to respondent Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd. that restrained the defendants from leasing or encumbering a suit property pending a suit for specific performance. The trial court and High Court had held a prima…
KATHI BHARAT VAJSUR & ANR.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT
2012 INSC 2158 May 2012Dismissed
The case involved an armed altercation in which three accused (A1, A2, A3) fired pistols and used an axe, resulting in the death of Mulu Dada and serious injury to Jagu Dada. The trial court acquitted all three, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, but the Gujarat High Court reversed t…
NAGESHversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2012 INSC 2168 May 2012Dismissed
The victim, a college student, was staying with accused No.1 in Belgaum when accused No.2 (the appellant) allegedly attempted to outrage her modesty, assaulted her and administered poison, leading to her death. Multiple eyewitnesses saw the deceased being taken in a car by the accused, with police present, and later ob…
MUNNA KUMAR UPADHYAYA @ MUNNA UPADHYAYAversusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HYDERABAD, ANDHRA PRADESH
2012 INSC 2118 May 2012Dismissed
The appellant, Munna Kumar Upadhyaya, was convicted for the murder of a railway official and his family, based on a complex web of circumstantial evidence, forensic findings, fingerprint matches, and extra‑judicial confessions. The prosecution proved the chain of events through 49 witnesses, forensic reports, recovered…
M/S ACG ASSOCIATED CAPSULES PVT. LTD.versusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-IV, MUMBAI
2012 INSC 828 February 2012Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether the deduction under Explanation (baa) to Section 80HHC of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961 should be computed on the basis of gross receipts or the net amount of receipts such as interest and rent that are actually included in the profit‑and‑gain calculation. The Court held that only ninety p…
VIKAS KALRAversusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VIII, NEW DELHI
2012 INSC 818 February 2012Disposed off
The appellant, an exporter, claimed deductions under Section 80HHC for profits retained for export business, arguing that the face value of the Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB) is "cash assistance" and should be excluded from profit under Section 28(iiib). The Assessing Officer treated the entire sale value of the DEP…
M/S TOPMAN EXPORTSversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI
2012 INSC 838 February 2012Disposed off
Mis Topman Exports sold its Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB) and claimed a deduction under section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2002-03. The Assessing Officer treated the entire sale proceeds as profit on transfer under section 28(iiid), denying the deduction. The Tribunal held that DEPB is cash…
GURMINDER SINGH KANGversusSHIV PRASAD SINGH & ORS.
2012 INSC 5697 December 2012Disposed off
Shiv Prasad Singh, a government employee, was reappointed in 1980 with a condition that he would not receive any future promotions. He later sought time‑bound promotions under a state scheme, and the Patna High Court held that despite the reappointment condition, he was entitled to such promotions and directed the Comm…
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.versusVIVEKANANDA M. HALLUR & ORS.
2012 INSC 5707 December 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The Karnataka government allotted residential sites to members of a charitable society (the Sangha) through lease‑cum‑sale agreements, which were stamped and later, after ten years, converted into absolute sale deeds. The stamp duty on the sale deeds was collected on the market value at the time of execution, with a cr…
RITESH SINHAversusTHE STATE OF UTIAR PRADESH & ANR.
2012 INSC 5717 December 2012Matter referred to larger bench
The appellant was summoned by a Chief Judicial Magistrate to give a voice sample to aid the investigation of an alleged recruitment scam. He challenged the summons on the ground that it violated Article 20(3) of the Constitution and that no statutory provision empowered a magistrate to order a voice sample. The Supreme…
M/S VIRGO INDUSTRIES (ENG.) P.LTD.versusM/S.VENTURETECH SOLUTIONS P.LTD.
2012 INSC 3837 September 2012Appeal(s) allowed
Virgo Industries (Eng.) Ltd filed two suits in 2005 seeking a permanent injunction against VentureTech Solutions Ltd to prevent alienation of two parcels of land. In 2007, while those suits were still pending, Virgo filed two additional suits for specific performance of the same sale agreements. The High Court held the…
M/S SALORA INTERNATIGNAL LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI
2012 INSC 3847 September 2012Dismissed
MIS Salora International Ltd., a manufacturer of television components, assembled the parts into complete TV sets for testing, numbered and matched them, then disassembled the sets and shipped the parts to satellite units for final assembly. The Revenue classified the goods as "Television Receivers" under Tariff Entry …
MARUTI NIVRUTTI NAVALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.
2012 INSC 3857 September 2012Dismissed
The appellant, founder and managing trustee of a technical education society, was accused by a charity trust of forging lease deeds and submitting false information to obtain permission for running a school. The trust alleged that the appellant altered documents, forged a lease for 87 years, and misrepresented facts to…
SHYAM BABUversusSTATE OF U.P.
2012 INSC 3827 September 2012Dismissed
The case concerns a 1978 incident in which seven accused, including Shyam Babu, were alleged to have fired on a group of villagers, resulting in five deaths and one injury. The trial court acquitted all seven, but the High Court set aside the acquittal and convicted three of the accused; four had died during the penden…
RAI SANDEEP @ DEEPUversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI
2012 INSC 3227 August 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were convicted of gang rape under s.376(2)(g) IPC based solely on the prosecutrix's testimony. The Supreme Court examined contradictions between the FIR, the prosecutrix's statements, and the accounts of her niece and nephew, who denied any intrusion. Forensic evidence showed no semen on the alleged clea…
NUPUR TALWARversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ANR.
2012 INSC 2547 June 2012Dismissed
The case arose from the double murder of Aarushi Talwar and her domestic servant Hemraj in Noida in May 2008, for which a First Information Report was filed by the victim's father, Dr. Rajesh Talwar. The investigation was taken over by the CBI, which later submitted a closure report citing insufficient evidence. Dr. Ra…
SUPREME COURT BAR ASSOCIATION & ORSversusB.D. KAUSHIK
2012 INSC 2037 May 2012Disposed off
The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) had been directed by the Supreme Court in 2011 to identify regular practitioners for voting rights under the "One Bar One Vote" principle. While the Implementation Committee was carrying out this task, the SCBA held a General Body Meeting on 16 January 2012 that passed resolutio…
NEEL KUMAR @ ANIL KUMARversusTHE STATE OF HARYANA
2012 INSC 2047 May 2012Disposed off
The appellant, Neel Kumar (also known as Anil Kumar), was convicted of raping and murdering his four‑year‑old daughter. The trial court and High Court relied on the victim’s custody, the appellant’s silence, blood‑stained clothing recovered from his disclosure statement, and the absence of any explanation for these inc…
V.D. BHANOTversusSAVITA BHANOT
2012 INSC 797 February 2012Disposed off
The petition arose from a dispute between V.D. Bhanot and his wife Savita Bhanot concerning relief under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The wife filed a petition under Section 12 seeking residence and maintenance after being evicted from the matrimonial home, and the magistrate granted interi…
MANINDERJIT SINGH BITTAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2012 INSC 787 February 2012Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the persistent failure of several State Governments and Union Territories to implement the High Security Registration Plates (HSRP) scheme mandated under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The petitioners sought enforcement of the statutory provisions and earlier Supreme Court directions, while th…
ABSAR ALAM @ AFSAR ALAMversusSTATE OF BIHAR
2012 INSC 807 February 2012Case Partly allowed
Absar Alam was convicted of murdering his mother by beheading her after accusing her of causing his wife to leave home. The trial court and the Patna High Court sentenced him to death under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. The appellant appealed to the Supreme Court, raising only the question of whether t…
RAHEJA UNVIERSAL LIMITEDversusNRC LIMITED & ORS.
2012 INSC 777 February 2012Dismissed
NRC Ltd, a sick industrial company, entered into a memorandum of understanding and subsequent agreements with K. Raheja Universal Ltd for the sale of 344 acres of land to raise funds for restructuring. The sale was only partially paid and the company later sought a corporate debt restructuring (CDR) scheme, which was a…
SRI BHAGWANversusSTATE OF U.P.
2012 INSC 5686 December 2012Dismissed
The appellant, Sri Bhagwan, was convicted for murdering Yogender Nath Bhargava by pouring acid on him, an offence initially registered under Section 326 IPC and later altered to Section 302 IPC. The prosecution relied on the testimony of two eyewitnesses (PW‑1 and PW‑3) who claimed to have seen the assault, and on the …
AKIL@ JAVEDversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI
2012 INSC 5676 December 2012Dismissed
The appellant Akil @ Javed was convicted for murder (IPC s.302) and robbery (IPC s.392) along with a co‑accused. The prosecution relied on the testimony of several eye‑witnesses, especially PW‑20 who identified the appellant, and on the recovery of a Rado watch and gold chain from the appellant that were identified by …
TARA CHAND & ORS.versusGRAM PANCHAYAT JHUPA KHURD & ORS.
2012 INSC 5106 November 2012Dismissed
The appellants, Tara Chand and others, claimed occupancy rights over a 78-kanal land in Jhupa Khurd, asserting they were tenants under Sections 5 and 8 of the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887. Their ancestors had been recorded as joint‑owners (hisedars) of the shamilat deh since before 1935‑36 and paid nominal rent to the Gram…
ROHITASH KUMAR & ORS.versusOM PRAKASH SHARMA & ORS.
2012 INSC 5096 November 2012
The case concerned the seniority of Assistant Commandants in the Border Security Force who were selected in a single recruitment process but trained in two separate batches (Batch 16 starting 1‑Feb‑1993 and Batch 17 starting 2‑July‑1993). A promoted officer (respondent No.1) who joined on 15‑Mar‑1993 was placed below a…
VIPUL SHITAL PRASAD AGARWALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
2012 INSC 5086 November 2012Dismissed
Dr. Vipul Shital Prasad Agarwal, a Superintendent of Police, was arrested in connection with FIR No.115 of 2006 concerning a alleged fake encounter. The Supreme Court had directed the CBI to take over the investigation and the CBI registered a fresh FIR, but the original charge‑sheet filed under the first FIR was submi…
BHARAT ALUMINIUM CO.versusKAISER ALUMINIUM TECHNICAL SERVICE, INC.
2012 INSC 3796 September 2012Reference answered
The dispute arose from a contract between Bharat Aluminium Co. and Kaiser Aluminium Technical Service, Inc. that provided for arbitration in London under English law, but governed the contract by Indian law. After two awards were rendered in England, the appellant sought to set aside the awards under Section 34 of the …
FAIZA CHOUDHARYversusSTATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND ANR.
2012 INSC 3816 September 2012Dismissed
In 2010, the Jammu & Kashmir Board of Professional Entrance Examination had to fill 15 MBBS seats reserved for the Scheduled Tribe Gujjar Bakerwal (STGB) category, with a 15th odd seat earmarked for a female candidate. The seat remained vacant after a male candidate's writ petition was dismissed, and the appellant, a l…
M/S. MICRO HOTEL P. LTD.versusM/S. HOTEL TORRENTO LIMITED & ORS.
2012 INSC 3806 September 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The State Financial Corporation (OSFC) and IPICOL financed a hotel project of MIS. MICRO HOTEL P. Ltd. (the borrower) which defaulted on loan repayments. The corporations offered One‑Time Settlement (OTS) schemes in 2006 and 2007, which the borrower failed to meet, leading to withdrawal of the offers and a demand for f…
CICILY KALLARACKALversusVEHICLE FACTORY
2012 INSC 3216 August 2012Dismissed
Cicily Kallarackal filed Special Leave Petitions challenging Kerala High Court judgments that entertained writ petitions against orders of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC). The Supreme Court examined two issues: (1) whether a High Court can entertain writ petitions under Article 226 against N…
RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND NATURAL RESOURCE POLICYversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2012 INSC 2736 July 2012Disposed off
The Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Natural Resource Policy challenged the Ministry of Environment's permission to import hazardous wastes, seeking a total ban, amendment of the Hazardous Wastes (Management & Handling) Rules, 1989 to conform with the Basel Convention, and a declaration that the Rules vi…
PONNALA LAKSHMALAHversusKOMMURI PRATAP REDDY & ORS.
2012 INSC 2746 July 2012Dismissed
The appellant, a returned candidate, appealed a High Court order that refused to dismiss an election petition filed by the respondent alleging irregularities in vote counting. The Supreme Court examined whether the petition disclosed a cause of action and could be struck out at the threshold, and whether the lack of an…
MS. MAYAWATIversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2012 INSC 2726 July 2012Case Allowed
Mayawati, then Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh, filed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging FIR No. RC 0062003A0019 dated 05.10.2003, which the CBI had lodged under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act alleging disproportionate assets. The FIR was said to be based on a Sup…
RAJENDRA PRASAD BAGARIAversusPHARMACY COUNCIL OF STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.
2012 INSC 756 February 2012Dismissed
Rajendra Prasad Bagaria obtained registration as a pharmacist in Rajasthan on the basis of a registration he had earlier obtained in Sikkim, where he had worked only for two months. The Rajasthan Pharmacy Council, after receiving complaints about ineligible pharmacists, examined his registration and found it irregular,…
RATTAN BAI & ANR.versusRAM DASS & ORS.
2012 INSC 766 February 2012Appeal(s) allowed
Respondents 1‑3 instituted a suit for specific performance of a sale of immovable property. They later filed an application (P‑2) and a joint statement (P‑4) claiming a compromise and seeking dismissal of the suit, but subsequently respondent 1 filed an affidavit (P‑5) alleging that he had never filed the suit and that…
DR. MRS. NUPUR TALWARversusC.B.I., DELHI & ANR.
2012 INSC 86 January 2012Disposed off
The case arose from the murder of a young girl, Arushi, and a domestic help, Hemraj, where the CBI filed a closure report. The father of the deceased filed a protest petition, leading the Special Judicial Magistrate to take cognizance of offences under Sections 302/34 and 201/34 IPC against Dr. Rajesh Talwar and Dr. Nu…
STATE OF PUNJABversusBALWINDER SINGH AND ORS.
2012 INSC 96 January 2012Appeal(s) allowed
In 1992 a bus and a truck, both traveling at high speed, collided on a highway in Punjab, resulting in the deaths of five passengers. The drivers of the bus (Balwinder Singh) and the truck were convicted under IPC sections 304A, 337 and 279 and sentenced to two years rigorous imprisonment for the 304A charge and six mo…
ADARSH SHIKSHA MAHAVIDYALAYA AND OTHERSversusSUBHASH RAHANGDALE AND OTHERS
2012 INSC 76 January 2012Dismissed
The Supreme Court considered a civil appeal challenging the Madhya Pradesh High Court's order that arose from a public‑interest writ petition highlighting irregularities in the grant of recognition to private teacher‑training institutions by the Western Regional Committee of the National Council for Teacher Education (…
BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD.versusR.S. AVTAR SINGH & CO.
2012 INSC 4565 October 2012Dismissed
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. (appellant) challenged an execution petition filed by R.S. Avtar Singh & Co. (respondent) on the ground that the arbitral award, made a rule of court on 31‑05‑1985, had been fully satisfied by part payments made in 1985 and 2000, and that no further interest could be claimed. The Supreme C…
PARAS NATH RAI AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.
2012 INSC 4575 October 2012Appeal(s) allowed
A partition suit filed by the father of the appellants was dismissed by the trial court for procedural defects. The appellants filed title appeals, but while the appeals were pending the State issued a notification under Section 3 of the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 bringing…
GAYTRI BAJAJversusJITEN BHALLA
2012 INSC 4505 October 2012Dismissed
The parties were married in 1992 and had two daughters. They obtained a decree of divorce by mutual consent in 2003, expressly agreeing that the husband would have sole custody of the children and the wife would forego visitation rights. The wife later challenged the decree on grounds of fraud and also sought custody/v…
BALIYA@ BAL KISHANversusSTATE OF M.P.
2012 INSC 4515 October 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants Baliya and Gopal were convicted under Sections 120B and 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Pradeep, based on alleged conspiracy to kill him after a pamphlet scandal. The prosecution relied on two alleged eye‑witnesses, one of whom was declared hostile, and on circumstantial evidence such as t…
SUDHAKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2012 INSC 4525 October 2012Case Partly allowed
The appellant was convicted of murdering his son under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. Evidence showed that only the appellant, his wife (the mother), and the deceased were present, and the appellant's blood‑stained clothes matched the victim's blood group. The trial and high courts affirmed the con…
SHAHEJADKHAN MAHEBUBKHAN PATHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
2012 INSC 4535 October 2012Disposed off
The appellants were arrested for transporting 500 grams of brown sugar, a commercial quantity under the NDPS Act, and were convicted under Sections 8(c), 21 and 29, receiving 15 years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.1.5 lakh with a default imprisonment of three years for non‑payment. They appealed, seeking redu…
MD. SAHABUDDIN & ANR.versusSTATE OF ASSAM
2012 INSC 4545 October 2012Dismissed
The appellants, MD Sahabuddin and others, were arrested for transporting 347 cartons of Phensedyl and 102 cartons of Recodex cough syrups, each containing codeine phosphate in quantities exceeding the limits prescribed under the Central Government notifications. They possessed no valid transport documents and could not…
SHANTI DEVIversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN
2012 INSC 4555 October 2012Dismissed
Shanti Devi was convicted for murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and for causing the disappearance of a body (Sec. 201 IPC) after the father of PW2 allegedly visited her house on 22‑08‑1997 and never returned. The prosecution relied on a series of circumstantial facts: the victim’s disappearance, the appellant’s misleading statemen…
BHAWNA GARG & ANR.versusUNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS.
2012 INSC 3785 September 2012Disposed off
The Delhi University Bulletin for 2011‑12 reserved 30 of 150 MBBS seats in Lady Harding Medical College for Nominees of Government of India (NGOI), exempting them from the Delhi University Medical and Dental Entrance Test (DUMET). Female general‑category candidates who cleared DUMET but were not admitted challenged the…
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusGOPALI & ORS.
2012 INSC 2715 July 2012Dismissed
The case involved a claim for compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act after the death of Nanag Ram, a 36‑year‑old machine operator, in a road accident. The claimants sought Rs.24 lakh, while the insurer challenged the award on several grounds. The Supreme Court examined whether the High Court should ha…
COX & KINGS LTD.versusINDIAN RLY. CATERING & TOURISM CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.
2012 INSC 2705 July 2012Dismissed
Cox & Kings Ltd. entered into a joint‑venture with IRCTC to operate a luxury tourist train under a lease of the train to the joint‑venture company. IRCTC later terminated the lease, prompting Cox & Kings to invoke Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking a stay of termination and the appointment …
MOHD. AYUB & ANR.versusMUKESH CHAND
2012 INSC 55 January 2012Disposed off
The landlords, Mohd. Ayub & Anr., sought eviction of tenant Mukesh Chand under Section 21 of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, claiming a bona‑fide need for the premises for their unemployed sons. The lower authorities dismissed the application, relying on the landlords' …
MUNAGALA YADAMMAversusSTATE OF A.P. & ORS.
2012 INSC 65 January 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined a detention order issued under the Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1986 against Munagala Anjaiah, who was alleged to be a bootlegger violating the Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act, 1995. The appellant's wife challenged the order, and the High Court upheld it, reasoning th…
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANOTHERversusMANOHARSINHJI PRADYUMANSINHJI JADEJA
2012 INSC 5644 December 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Gujarat and the Mamlatdar sought to enforce the Gujarat Agricultural Lands Ceiling Act, 1960 against Manoharsinhji Pradyumansinhji Jadeja, whose 587 acres of land were declared surplus. Jadeja contended that the lands were "urban land" under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and therefore o…
JAYESH DHANESH GORAGANDHIversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI & ORS.
2012 INSC 5664 December 2012Dismissed
The appellants, heirs of a plot of land in Borivali, challenged the reservation of their land for a municipal office under a Town Planning Scheme prepared under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP Act). After the scheme was finalized, an arbitrator determined compensation, which was paid, and the…
JEETU @ JITENDERA & ORS.versusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
2012 INSC 5634 December 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were convicted under Sections 147 and 327/149 of the IPC and sentenced to three months and three years rigorous imprisonment respectively. In the High Court appeal they did not contest the conviction but sought a reduced sentence, which the High Court partially granted by lowering the term for the Sectio…
SURAJIT SARKARversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL
2012 INSC 5654 December 2012Disposed off
The case involved the murder of Gour Chandra Sarkar, for which six persons, including Surajit Sarkar, were charged. The trial court convicted Surajit under Section 302 IPC, while acquitting the other accused, and the High Court upheld this conviction. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined whether a cryptic telephonic c…
SASIKUMAR & ANR.versusSTATE OF KERALA
2012 INSC 5614 December 2012Case Partly allowed
The appellants and a third accused were caught with two cans containing 40 litres of arrack in an auto‑rickshaw and were convicted under Section 8(1) read with 8(2) of the Kerala Abkari Act. The trial court sentenced them to three years' rigorous imprisonment, a fine of Rs 1,00,000 and a default year of imprisonment fo…
GUDU RAMversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
2012 INSC 5624 December 2012Disposed off
Gudu Ram was accused of assaulting his cousin Dalip Singh and another resident, Jai Pal Singh, with a wooden stick (thapi), resulting in Dalip Singh's death. The sole eyewitness, Jai Pal Singh, turned hostile during trial, yet the trial court and High Court convicted the appellant for murder under IPC s.302. On appeal,…
WINSTON TAN & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2012 INSC 4464 October 2012Dismissed
The appellants purchased a flat from a detenu and his wife after notices under Section 6 of the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976 (SAFEMA) had been served, and later the Competent Authority forfeited the property under Section 7, declaring it vested in the Central Government…
PRAVEEN PRADHANversusSTATE OF UTTRANCHAL & ANR.
2012 INSC 4474 October 2012Dismissed
MUNISH MUBARversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2012 INSC 4484 October 2012Dismissed
The appellant Munish Mubar was convicted for the murder of Ashok Jain based on a series of circumstantial evidences, including a love triangle, the appellant's car parked at Delhi airport at the time of the murder, phone call records placing him near the crime scene, hotel stays, and recovery of blood‑stained items and…
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MARTYRS MEMORIAL TRUST AND ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
2012 INSC 4494 October 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The Board of Trustees of Martyrs Memorial Trust, a public charitable trust, was allotted government accommodation in Ballia, Uttar Pradesh, which was later cancelled by the District Collector who also acted as the Trust's Secretary. The Trust challenged the cancellation, alleging the Collector acted without a Trust mee…
BABLA @ DINESHversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND
2012 INSC 3734 September 2012Case Partly allowed
The appellant, Babla @ Dinesh, was convicted by a trial court and sentenced to life imprisonment under Sections 302 and 149 of the IPC for a murder committed on 1‑12‑1991. He contended that he was a juvenile at the time of the offence, but the High Court rejected the plea on the ground that it was not raised before the…
DEEPAK @ WIRELESSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2012 INSC 3744 September 2012Dismissed
The appellant Deepak, along with four others, was convicted of offences under Sections 395, 396 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code for a dacoity that resulted in the death of one victim and grievous injuries to another. The appellant challenged the conviction on the grounds that the essential ingredient of five participa…
STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERSversusTHE TRIBAL MISSION
2012 INSC 3754 September 2012Disposed off
The Tribal Mission established an unaided English‑medium school in Kerala in 2001 and applied for state recognition in 2003. The Government, relying on its 2007 policy and the Kerala Education Rules (KER) 1959, rejected the application, noting that three recognized schools existed nearby and that granting recognition c…
RAKHAL DEBNATHversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL
2012 INSC 3764 September 2012Dismissed
The appellant, Rakhal Debnath, was charged with abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC and cruelty under Section 498A IPC after his wife died from severe burns within 35 days of their marriage. The prosecution alleged that the husband demanded money from his father‑in‑law, pledged his wife's jewellery, and maintaine…
BHIMANNAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2012 INSC 3774 September 2012Disposed off
The appellants, three agricultural workers, trespassed onto the deceased's land, leading to a heated verbal altercation and an assault with axes and a wooden plough part, after which the victim fell and later died from grievous injuries. The trial court convicted the principal assailant under Section 302 IPC read with …
GURGAON GRAMIN BANKversusSMT. KHAZANI & ANR.
2012 INSC 3724 September 2012Dismissed
Smt. Khazani obtained a loan from Gurgaon Gramin Bank to purchase a buffalo and insured the animal for Rs.15,000 with New India Assurance. After the buffalo died, the bank failed to process her insurance claim, prompting her to file a complaint before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, which ordered the in…
MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIAversusRAMA MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CENTRE, KANPUR & ANR.
2012 INSC 2684 July 2012Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether a medical college can increase its MBBS seats without prior permission of the Central Government under the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956. The Court held that Section 10A requires prior Central Government permission, based on the Council’s recommendation, for any increase in admissi…
VISHWANATH S/O SITARAM AGRAWALversusSAU. SARLA VISHWANATH AGRAWAL
2012 INSC 2694 July 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The husband filed a divorce petition under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 alleging mental cruelty by his wife, who had publicly defamed him, hidden his clothes and keys, and made false criminal allegations. The trial court and appellate courts dismissed the petition, deeming the evidence unreliable a…
TEJAS CONSTRUCTIONS & INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.versusMUNICIPAL COUNCIL, SENDHWA & ANR.
2012 INSC 2014 May 2012Dismissed
The Municipal Council of Sendhwa invited tenders for an integrated water supply scheme and accepted the bid of M/s P.C. Snehal Construction Company (respondent No.2). Tejas Constructions & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (appellant) challenged the award on two grounds: the successful bidder had not filed audited balance‑sheet…
SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES LTD.versusMUSIC BROADCAST PVT. LTD.
2012 INSC 2004 May 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether the Copyright Board, under Section 31(1)(b) of the Copyright Act, 1957, could grant an interim compulsory licence while a complaint was pending. The Board had earlier held it lacked such power, but the Delhi High Court reversed that view and directed the Board to grant an interim lice…
RASHMI REKHA THATOI & ANR.versusSTATE OF ORISSA & ORS.
2012 INSC 2024 May 2012Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether a High Court could, while refusing anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, direct that the accused would be released on bail by a magistrate upon surrender. The Court held that such a blanket direction is beyond the statutory mandate of Section 438, viol…
BHUSHAN KUMAR & ANR.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.
2012 INSC 1644 April 2012Dismissed
The appellants were summoned by a Metropolitan Magistrate under Section 204 of the CrPC after a FIR under Section 420 IPC was lodged by Respondent No.2 in a property dispute concerning the assets of the late Gulshan Kumar. The appellants challenged the summoning order, arguing that the magistrate had not provided reaso…
MAHESHWARI PRASAD & ORS.versusSTATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.
2012 INSC 1654 April 2012Dismissed
The State of Jharkhand advertised 350 vacancies for police drivers, requiring candidates to hold a licence for heavy motor vehicles or a combined licence for light and heavy vehicles. The original merit list published on 29 May 2005 included the appellants, but a revised list on 23 August 2005 excluded them because the…
CHAUGULEversusBHAGWAT
2012 INSC 1624 April 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant was elected to the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly. An independent candidate, Y, filed an election petition challenging the rejection of his nomination paper, but later withdrew the petition. Within fourteen days, Bhagwat, who had not contested the election, applied under Section 110(3)(c) of the Represe…
AMRIT BHANU SHALI & ORS.versusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS.
2012 INSC 1634 April 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased, a 26‑year‑old unmarried man, was killed in a road accident. His parents and unmarried sister filed a claim under s.166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for compensation. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 8,66,000, applying a 50% deduction for personal and living expenses and a multiplier of 17 …
YUMMAN ONGBI LEMBI LEIMAversusSTATE OF MANIPUR & ORS.
2012 INSC 24 January 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant's husband, Yumman Somendro, was arrested in January 2011 for murder and, while in police custody, was served with a detention order under the National Security Act (NSA) dated 31 January 2011, which was later confirmed by the Governor for twelve months. The order was based solely on the subjective satisfa…
RUSHIKESH TANAJI BHOITEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
2012 INSC 44 January 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant challenged the detention of his father under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981. The detenu had been arrested for an offence on 14 August 2010 and was released on bail on 15 August 2010, with a bail condition later r…
COAL MINES P.F. COMMR. THR. BOARD OF TRUSTEEversusRAMESH CHANDRA JHA
2012 INSC 34 January 2012Dismissed
The Coal Mines Provident Fund Commissioner (appellant) challenged a Jharkhand High Court order that upheld a suit filed by a former lower‑division clerk (respondent) who had been removed from service. The central issue was whether the Commissioner, as a public officer under Section 2(17) of the Code of Civil Procedure …
KRISHAN LALversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.
2012 INSC 5543 December 2012Disposed off
Krishan Lal was convicted of murder and originally sentenced to death, which was later commuted to life imprisonment. The Supreme Court, in Subash Chander v. Krishan Lal (2001), held that his life sentence meant imprisonment for the rest of his life, precluding any commutation or premature release under Section 401 of …
NATIONAL BANK OF OMANversusBARAKARA ABDUL AZIZ & ANR.
2012 INSC 5563 December 2012Disposed off
The National Bank of Oman filed a private complaint in the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM), Ahmednagar, alleging that Barakara Abdul Aziz cheated the bank of AED 43,15,000. The CJM issued process under IPC sections 418 and 420 without first conducting an enquiry or ordering an investigation as required by …
STATE BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusPALAK MODI AND ANOTHER
2012 INSC 5583 December 2012Dismissed
The case concerned two probationary officers of State Bank of India who were terminated after being alleged to have used unfair means in a confirmation test. The bank, relying on a report from the Institute of Banking Personnel Selection (IBPS) and seating‑arrangement evidence, extended their probation and then dismiss…
RAM KARAN GUPTAversusJ.S. EXIM LTD. AND ORS.
2012 INSC 5593 December 2012Dismissed
In a partition suit, the suit property was ordered to be sold by public auction. J.S. Exim Ltd., the highest bidder, paid 25% of the bid amount by demand drafts on the auction day and the remaining 75% within the statutory period. The judgment debtor, Ram Karan Gupta, challenged the sale alleging non‑compliance with Or…
N.V. SUBBA RAOversusSTATE, THROUGH INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CBI/SPE,VISAKHAPATNAM, A.P.
2012 INSC 5603 December 2012Dismissed
The case involved a bank manager (A‑1) and a private firm proprietor (A‑2) who were accused of conspiring to defraud the Central Bank of India by sanctioning loans without obtaining mandatory undertaking letters, bypassing pre‑inspection requirements, and crediting the proceeds to A‑2’s account. The prosecution present…
PRAVIN GADA AND ANOTHERversusCENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS
2012 INSC 5573 December 2012Disposed off
The Supreme Court dealt with the sale of immovable property of Jay Electric Wire Corporation Ltd., a company under liquidation, which had been sold to the appellants for Rs. 2.50 crore in 2006. Secured creditors and the workmen's union challenged the sale, alleging procedural irregularities, unfair price, and the limit…
ENVIRONMENT & CONSUMER PROTECTION FOUNDATIONversusDELHI ADMINISTRATION & ORS.
2012 INSC 4423 October 2012Disposed off
The Environment & Consumer Protection Foundation filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking directions to improve basic infrastructure in government, aided and locally‑run schools so that the right to free and compulsory education under Article 21A could be realised. While the petition was pending, Parliament enact…
M.R. PRABHAKAR AND OTHERSversusCANARA BANK AND OTHERS
2012 INSC 4433 October 2012Dismissed
The appellants were officers of Canara Bank who resigned between 1986 and June 1993, i.e., before the statutory settlement dated 29‑Oct‑1993 and the Canara Bank Employees' Pension Regulations, 1995 came into force. They claimed entitlement to a pension in lieu of the Contributory Providable Fund, relying on the pension…
VINOD KAPOORversusSTATE OF GOA & ORS.
2012 INSC 4443 October 2012Dismissed
Vinod Kapoor challenged the construction of a bungalow on C‑land in Goa, alleging violations of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 and the Coastal Regulation Zone notification under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. The Bombay High Court dismissed his writ petition on the basis of a technical report and late…
GIRISH RAMCHANDRA DESHPANDEversusCEN. INFORMATION COMMR. & ORS.
2012 INSC 4453 October 2012Dismissed
The petitioner filed an RTI application seeking the third respondent's service records, disciplinary memos, and details of his assets and gifts, most of which were contained in his income‑tax returns. The Central Information Commissioner (CIC) held that the requested information fell within the definition of "personal …
JODHBIR SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2012 INSC 3713 September 2012Appeal(s) allowed
Jodhbir Singh was arrested for possession of 2 kg of heroin under the NDPS Act. He claimed to be a juvenile at the time of the offence, producing a school leaving certificate and a State Council certificate showing his date of birth as 20‑07‑1996. The Sessions Court and the High Court rejected his claim, relying on his…
SEVA LALversusSRI KANT & ORS.
2012 INSC 3703 September 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Seva Lal, obtained a mutation order from the Naib Tehsildar, which the respondents challenged under Section 210 of the Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901. The Sub‑Divisional Officer remanded the matter, leading the appellant to file a revision under Section 218 before the Additional Commissioner, which…
DAYAL SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF UTTARANCHAL
2012 INSC 3173 August 2012Dismissed
The appellants were convicted for the murder of Pyara Singh, who died after being assaulted with lathis by four accused. The trial hinged on the testimony of three eye‑witnesses, including the victim's son and wife, while the post‑mortem report prepared by the government medical officer (PW3) claimed no injuries and fa…
SATYAPRATA SAHOO & ORS.versusSTATE OF ORISSA & ORS.
2012 INSC 3183 August 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, who qualified for postgraduate medical courses in Odisha as direct (open) candidates, challenged Clause 11.2 of the prospectus and the third proviso to Clause 9(2)(d) of the MCI regulations that gave additional weightage to in‑service candidates applying through the open category. They argued that the w…
STATE TR. P.S. LODHI COLONY, NEW DELHIversusSANJEEV NANDA
2012 INSC 3203 August 2012Case Partly allowed
The appellant State prosecuted Sanjeev Nanda for a 1999 hit‑and‑run accident in which six persons died and one was injured after he, allegedly under the influence of alcohol, drove a BMW at high speed and fled the scene. The trial court convicted him under Section 304(II) IPC (culpable homicide not amounting to murder)…
BAR COUNCIL OF INDIAversusUNION OF INDIA
2012 INSC 3143 August 2012Dismissed
The Bar Council of India challenged the constitutional validity of Sections 22‑A to 22‑E of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (as inserted by the 2002 Amendment), arguing that they were arbitrary, violated Articles 14 and 21, denied a right of appeal and encroached on the jurisdiction of special statutes. The Su…
AVISHEK GOENKAversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2012 INSC 3153 August 2012Dismissed
The Supreme Court, in response to numerous applications seeking clarification or modification of its 27 April 2012 judgment, reaffirmed that Rule 100 of the Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 bars the use of any black film or other material on safety glasses, windscreens or side glasses of vehicles, regardless of the visual li…
SADHUPATI NAGESWARA RAOversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
2012 INSC 3163 August 2012Dismissed
The appellant, a Fair Price Shop dealer, was entrusted with distributing rice free of cost under the Food for Work Scheme. An inspection revealed that he disposed of 67.65 quintals of rice in the black market without the required coupons, indicating dishonest misappropriation of government property. He was convicted un…
DR. MEHMOOD NAYYAR AZAMversusSTATE OF CHATTISGARH AND ORS.
2012 INSC 3193 August 2012Appeal(s) allowed
Dr. Mehmoood Nayar Azam, an Ayurvedic doctor and social activist, was arrested and taken into police custody where he was forced to hold a placard with self‑condemning words and photographed; the photograph was later circulated, causing humiliation and mental trauma. The High Court found that he had been subjected to c…
SHAMBHU PRASAD SHARMAversusSHRI CHARANDAS MAHANT & ORS.
2012 INSC 2623 July 2012Dismissed
The appellant, an independent candidate, filed an election petition challenging the acceptance of nomination papers of the other candidates on the ground that their affidavits were not in the prescribed format required under the Representation of People Act and Election Commission directions. The High Court dismissed t…
A. NAWAB JOHN & ORS.versusV.N. SUBRAMANIYAM
2012 INSC 2633 July 2012Dismissed
The appellants filed a suit for specific performance but initially paid only a deficient court fee. After multiple representations and condonation of delay, the trial court allowed the deficit fee to be paid well beyond the limitation period. The second defendant, a pendente‑lite purchaser, was impleaded and challenged…
THE CHURCH OF CHRIST CHARITABLE TRUST & EDUCATIONAL CHARITABLE SOCIETY, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMANversusM/S PONNIAMMAN EDUCATIONAL TRUST REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRPERSON/ MANAGING TRUSTEE
2012 INSC 2643 July 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The Church of Christ Charitable Trust & Educational Charitable Society (appellant) challenged the Madras High Court Division Bench’s reversal of a single judge’s order rejecting the plaint against it in a suit for specific performance filed by M/s Ponniamman Educational Trust (respondent). The Supreme Court examined wh…
SHREEJITH L.versusDEPUTY DIRECTOR (EDUCATION) KERALA & ORS.
2012 INSC 2653 July 2012Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined several petitions for compassionate appointments of dependents of government employees who died in service, filed under the Kerala Education Rules and a 1999 Government Order. It held that applications must be made within two years of death, or within three years after a minor attains majorit…
BRIJESH MAVIversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI
2012 INSC 2663 July 2012Case Partly allowed
The appellant, Brijesh Mavi, was charged with murder (IPC s.302) and possession of a counterfeit stamp (IPC s.460) read with s.34, as well as illegal possession of a firearm (Arms Act s.25). The sole eye‑witness identified only a different accused, and the appellant was later linked to the case through his own confessi…
UNION OF INDIAversusMOHANLAL & ANR.
2012 INSC 2673 July 2012
The Union of India appealed the acquittal of Mohanlal and another by the Madhya Pradesh High Court, which had held that the prosecution failed to prove the destruction of 3.36 kg of opium seized under Sections 8/18(b) read with 29 of the NDPS Act. The Supreme Court examined whether the lack of proof of destruction inva…
R. MOHANversusA.K. VIJAYA KUMAR
2012 INSC 2613 July 2012Disposed off
The accused R. Mohan was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque without sufficient funds and was sentenced to three months' simple imprisonment and ordered to pay Rs.5 lakh compensation to the complainant A.K. Vijaya Kumar under Section 357(3) of the CrPC, with an additional …
ISHWARDAS ROHANIversusALOK MISHRA & ORS.
2012 INSC 1983 May 2012Matter referred to larger bench
The appellant, a returned candidate, challenged an election petition filed by the respondent alleging corrupt practices under Sections 123 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. The High Court, despite noting deficiencies in the petition, directed the respondent to amend the pleadings and verify them, rather th…
ARJUNversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2012 INSC 1993 May 2012Disposed off
The appellant, Arjun, was convicted of murder (s.302 IPC) and causing grievous hurt (s.326 IPC) after he attacked Jagannath and his family during a property dispute, using a large knife to inflict fatal head injuries on the deceased and injuries on the deceased's wife. The appellant claimed he acted in private defence,…
MODERN DENTAL COLLEGE AND RESEARCH CENTRE AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.
2012 INSC 1593 April 2012Disposed off
The petitioners, private unaided medical and dental colleges in Madhya Pradesh, challenged the manner in which unfilled NRI seats were to be allocated. The State argued that such seats should merge into the general pool and be filled through the state‑conducted common entrance test, following the view expressed in R.D.…
KESRI COMMISSARIAT & OTHERSversusMINISTRY OF FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES, GOVT. OF MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI & ANR.
2012 INSC 1603 April 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The Parsee Girls' School Association, a public trust, leased two floors of its school building to New India Assurance Company Ltd. (NIAC) in 1954. NIAC sub‑let the premises to the Ministry of Food and Civil Supplies, Government of Maharashtra in 1959 without the trust's consent. The trust sought recovery of possession …
YOGENDRA PRATAP SINGHversusSAVITRI PANDEY & ANR.
2012 INSC 1613 April 2012Matter referred to larger bench
The appellant filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against the respondent for dishonoured cheques, after serving a statutory notice on 23‑09‑2008. The complaint was lodged on 07‑10‑2008, i.e., before the expiry of the 15‑day period prescribed in the proviso to Section 138(c). The magist…
M/S HOTEL ASHOKA (INDIAN TOUR.DEV.COR.LTD.)versusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES &ANR.
2012 INSC 723 February 2012Appeal(s) allowed
M/s Hotel Ashoka, a dealer under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, sold goods at its duty‑free shop in Bengaluru International Airport before the goods crossed the customs frontiers of India. The Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes assessed Rs. 4,20,70,900 as sales tax,…
BAVO @ MANUBHAI AMBALAL THAKOREversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
2012 INSC 733 February 2012Disposed off
SUSANTA GHOSHversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL
2012 INSC 743 February 2012Disposed off
Susanta Ghosh, a sitting MLA, was named in a fourth FIR lodged nine years after a 2002 incident in which seven persons were killed. The earlier three FIRs and charge‑sheets did not mention him. He had earlier been granted anticipatory bail, but the trial court denied regular bail, prompting an appeal to the Calcutta Hi…
ZELIA M. XAVIER FERNANDES E. GONSALVESversusJOANA RODRIGUES AND ORS.
2012 INSC 713 February 2012Dismissed
The appellant, a member of Raia Village Panchayat in Goa, was disqualified by the State Election Commission under Section 10(f) of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 because her husband secured a contract with the same Panchayat for collection of market fees. The appellant challenged the disqualification, arguing that mer…
DARSHAN LAL NAGPAL (DEAD) BY L.RS.versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS
2012 INSC 13 January 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The Delhi government sought to acquire 80 bighas 15 biswas of land, including 21 bighas 3 biswas belonging to the appellants, for a 400/220 KV electric sub‑station. It invoked Sections 17(1) and 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, dispensing with the hearing provisions of Section 5A(2) on the ground of urgency lin…
SATHYA NARAYANANversusSTATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
2012 INSC 5052 November 2012Dismissed
The case involved twelve accused members of an ashram who were charged with murdering a woman, Leelavathi, who was a trustee of the ashram. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence, including the fact that the accused were last seen with the deceased, distress cries heard by a neighbor, commotion in the ashram…
GURCHARAN SINGHversusSURJIT SINGH AND ANR.
2012 INSC 5072 November 2012Disposed off
The petitioner filed Special Leave Petition (SLP) No.7735 of 2010 against respondent Surjit Singh, who had actually died on 09‑06‑2009, a fact discovered only later. The petitioner then moved Interlocutory Application (I.A.) No.2 seeking substitution of the deceased respondent’s legal representatives and I.A. No.3 seek…
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. ETC.ETC.versusSAEED SOHAIL SHEIKH ETC. ETC.
2012 INSC 5042 November 2012Case Partly allowed
The State of Maharashtra transferred a group of under‑trial prisoners from Arthur Road Jail in Bombay to other jails, citing overcrowding and security concerns, and the jail authorities later used force to quell a disturbance involving some of those prisoners. The prisoners filed writ petitions alleging that the transf…
TUKARAM KANA JOSHI & ORS. THR. POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDERversusM.I.D.C. & ORS.
2012 INSC 5032 November 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants' ancestral land was notified for acquisition in 1964, but the acquisition proceedings lapsed while the State took possession and handed it over to the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation without paying compensation. The appellants filed a writ petition seeking compensation, which the High Cour…
GWALIOR SUGAR CO. LTD. & ANR.versusANIL GUPTA AND ORS.
2012 INSC 5062 November 2012Appeal(s) allowed
Gwalior Sugar Co. Ltd., a private limited company, was granted 215 bighas of land in 1941-42 for setting up a sugar factory, with pattas prohibiting agricultural use. Facing financial difficulties, the company sold about 9 bighas of surplus land, leading to a public interest litigation alleging violation of the patta c…
BISHNUPADA SARKAR & ANR.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL
2012 INSC 2562 July 2012Case Partly allowed
The appellants, Bishnu Sarkar and his brother Madhab Sarkar, were convicted under Section 304 Part I read with Section 34 of the IPC for the death of Shyamalendu, an Income Tax Inspector, after a verbal altercation escalated into a physical assault. The trial and High Courts upheld a ten‑year rigorous imprisonment for …
HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.versusMAWASI & ORS. ETC.ETC.
2012 INSC 2572 July 2012Dismissed
The Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation (HSIDC) sought review of a Supreme Court judgment that fixed compensation for land acquired for an industrial township, alleging that the market value was based on a fraudulent sale deed (Exhibit P1) between two companies allegedly under common management and that th…
VILLAGE PANCHAYAT, CALANGUTEversusTHE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT-II AND ORS.
2012 INSC 2582 July 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The Village Panchayat of Calangute revoked an occupancy certificate and permission for a construction by Kay Jay Constructions after complaints that the building blocked a water well and chapel. The Sarpanch issued a notice under Section 64 of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act to stop further construction. The Additional Direc…
DROPTI DEVI & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2012 INSC 2592 July 2012Dismissed
The petitioners challenged the constitutional validity of Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA), which authorises preventive detention of persons whose activities are prejudicial to the conservation or augmentation of foreign exchange. They argu…
P. SANJEEVA RAOversusTHE STATE OF A.P.
2012 INSC 2602 July 2012Appeal(s) allowed
P. Sanjeeva Rao was tried under the Prevention of Corruption Act for demanding and receiving a bribe. During the trial, prosecution witnesses PW1 (the complainant) and PW2 (an independent witness) were examined, but their cross‑examination was deferred pending the examination of the trap‑laying officer PW11. The appell…
M.T. ENRICA LEXIE & ANR.versusDORAMMA & ORS.
2012 INSC 1972 May 2012Disposed off
Two Indian fishermen were killed when an Italian-flagged vessel, M.T. Enrica Lexie, allegedly opened fire while its Naval Military Protection Squad (NMP) was on board. The Kerala Police detained the vessel and a Circle Inspector issued a notice prohibiting it from sailing without permission. The vessel challenged the d…
STATE OF KERALA & ANR.versusP.V. MATHEW (DEAD) BY L.RS.
2012 INSC 1582 April 2012Dismissed
The State of Kerala sought to confiscate a vehicle used by the accused to transport ivory obtained from the illegal killing of wild elephants, invoking Section 61A of the Kerala Forest Act, 1961. The vehicle was seized in 1996 and the District Judge, upheld by the High Court, set aside the confiscation, holding that iv…
JEGANNATHANversusRAJU SIGAMANI & ANR.
2012 INSC 1572 April 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The plaintiffs obtained a decree for permanent injunction, which was set aside by a first appellate court that remanded the suit for fresh trial under Order 41 Rule 23A of the Code of Civil Procedure. The plaintiffs filed a civil miscellaneous appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(u) challenging the remand order, but the Madras…
JITU PATNAIKversusSANATAN MOHAKUD & ORS.
2012 INSC 1232 March 2012Appeal(s) allowed
In the 25‑Champua Assembly constituency, an independent candidate died after the withdrawal deadline but before polling, yet his name remained on the Electronic Voting Machine (EVM) and he received 550 votes. The election petitioner alleged that, had the deceased candidate’s name been masked, those votes would have gon…
SAMPATH KUMARversusINSPECTOR OF POLICE, KRISHNAGIRI
2012 INSC 1242 March 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were convicted of murder under Sections 302 and 34 IPC based primarily on the testimony of a single witness (PW7) and the alleged motive that one accused disapproved of the victim's relationship with his sister. The Supreme Court examined the reliability of PW7, noting a material contradiction between hi…
VISMAY DIGAMBAR THAKAREversusRAMCHANDRA SAMAJ SEWA SAMITI AND ORS.
2012 INSC 1252 March 2012Case Partly allowed
Vismay Digambar Thakare, a former employee, appealed against Ramchandra Samaj Seva Samiti and an institution for back wages. The High Court had set aside a tribunal award of back wages. During the Supreme Court hearing, the parties negotiated a settlement where the respondents agreed to pay Rs 1 lakh as full and final …
RAVI YASHWANTversusDISTRICT COLLECTOR, RAIGAD AND ORS.
2012 INSC 1262 March 2012Appeal(s) allowed
Ravi Yashwant Bhoir, elected President of Uran Municipal Council, was disqualified for the remainder of his term and barred for six years under Section 558 of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act on allegations of misconduct, including failure to call a General Body meeting and awarding tenders at higher rates. The S…