THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.versusT. VENKATARAMANAPPA
1996 INSC 108620 September 1996Disposed off
The respondent, a police constable, was prosecuted for bigamy after his wife alleged he had contracted a second marriage. He was discharged in the criminal trial for lack of evidence, but was suspended and a departmental enquiry was initiated under Rule 28 of the Karnataka Civil Service Rules, which prohibits a governm…
RAMESH KUMAR CHOUDHA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF M.P. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 108820 September 1996Disposed off
The appellants and respondents were employees of the Madhya Pradesh Irrigation Engineering Service governed by the 1968 Recruitment Rules. The Rules stipulated that eligibility for promotion to Assistant Engineer be determined as of 1 January each year, requiring either 8 years of service for graduate engineers or 12 y…
U.P STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPN. THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR AND ANR.versusGOBARDHAN AND ANR.
1996 INSC 108920 September 1996Disposed off
The Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation prepared a waiting list of 414 candidates for conductor posts to be filled during peak seasons or vacancies. The corporation cancelled the waiting‑list procedure in July 1980, yet later appointed several junior candidates from the list, some of whom were regularised. G…
ALL ORISSA ELECTRICAL WORKERS UNIONversusSTATE OF ORISSA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 109120 September 1996Dismissed
The All Orissa Electrical Workers Union filed a Special Leave Petition challenging the State of Orissa's service rules that required Class III and higher employees, even if skilled or highly skilled, to retire at 58 instead of 60. The petition argued that various categories of workers such as electricians, plumbers, an…
C.K. LOKESHversusP.E. PANDURANGA NAIDU
1996 INSC 109220 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent filed a suit for declaration of title and injunction against the appellant, but personal service was not effected and substitute service by newspaper failed to reach the appellant. An ex‑parte decree was passed on March 30, 1985. Upon learning of the decree in 1990, the appellant filed an application und…
STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.versusBRIDGE AND ROOF CO. (INDIA) LTD.
1996 INSC 90620 August 1996Dismissed
The State of Uttar Pradesh entered into a works contract with Bridge & Roof Co. (India) Ltd., which required the State to deduct 4% tax at source under the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948. The Commissioner of Sales Tax, under a composition scheme, directed a reduced deduction of 1% and the State complied, prompting the contra…
TAPAN KUMAR SADHUKHANversusFOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA
1996 INSC 90420 August 1996Disposed off
The Food Corporation of India (FCI) had a stock of sub‑standard rice and issued a tender inviting licensed dealers to purchase it on the condition that they would upgrade the rice before it entered the market for human consumption. Two licensed dealers challenged the tender, alleging it violated the West Bengal Rice an…
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX GUJARATversusSHRI UDAYAN CHINUBHAI AND ORS.
1996 INSC 90720 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The respondents, former members of a Joint Hindu Family, received specific assets and certain family debts after a partition ordered by an arbitrator's award. They claimed that interest paid on these debts, especially to unsecured creditors, should be deductible as a diversion of income by an overriding title under the…
ABDUL FAZAL SIDDIQUIversusFATEHCHAND HIRAWAT AND ANR.
1996 INSC 90820 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant was charged with cheating for allegedly making false representations that a business, Calcutta Cafe, was free of encumbrances, leading the complainant to advance a loan of Rs.30,000. The trial court convicted him under Section 420 read with Section 34 of the IPC, a decision upheld by the High Court. On ap…
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESHversusNAGOTIVENKATARAMANA
1996 INSC 90920 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Andhra Pradesh prosecuted N. Venkatramana, a video shop owner, for possessing 90 video cassettes that lacked the statutory particulars required under Section 52-A of the Copyright Act, 1957. The trial court convicted him under Section 63, imposing six months' imprisonment and a fine of Rs.3,000, a sentence…
M/S. FAIR AIR ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. AND ANR.versusN.K. MODI
1996 INSC 91020 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed
M/s. Fair Air Engineers Pvt. Ltd. entered into a contract with N.K. Modi to install a centrally air‑conditioned plant in his house. After alleged breach, the respondent filed a complaint before the State Consumer Commission, which stayed the proceedings and ordered the parties to arbitrate under clause 12 of the agreem…
THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER AND ORS.versusM/S. BISWANATH JHUNJHUNWALA AND ANR.
1996 INSC 90520 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Commercial Tax Officer sought to reopen sales‑tax assessments of Biswanath Jhunjhunwala for the assessment years Chaitra Sudi 2023‑24, which had been finalized in early 1969. Under the original Rule 80(5)(ii) of the Bengal Sales Tax Rules, such assessments could be reopened only within four years. A 1974 amendment,…
M/S. RAJASTHAN PREM KRISHAN GOODS TRANSPORT CO.versusREGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, NEW DELHI AND ORS.
1996 INSC 68920 May 1996Dismissed
M/s. Rajasthan Prem Krishan Goods Transport Co. (the appellant) and M/s. Rajasthan Prem Krishan Transport Co. (the third respondent) were two partnership firms that shared the same address, telephone numbers, management, and ten out of thirteen partners. The Inspectorate under the Employees' Provident Fund and Miscella…
B.V. NAGARAJUversusM/S. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., DIVISIONAL OFFICE, HASSAN
1996 INSC 69020 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, owner of a Tata truck insured by Oriental Insurance, suffered vehicle damage in a collision while nine persons were aboard, exceeding the policy’s limit of six workmen (excluding the driver). The insurer denied the claim, citing the policy’s exclusion for carrying passengers beyond the permitted number. …
UTTAM DAS CHELA SUNDER DASversusSHIROMANI GURDWARA PRABANDHAK COMMITTEE, AMRITSAR
1996 INSC 69120 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed
A charitable institution in Kanganpur, claimed to be a Sikh Gurdwara, was the subject of a petition under Section 7 of the Sikh Gurdwaras Act, 1925. Uttam Das, asserting himself as the hereditary office‑holder of the institution, filed a petition under Section 8 claiming the place was an Udasi dera and not a Sikh Gurdw…
RAKESH KUMAR SINGHversusTHE COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT, RAIBARALI
1996 INSC 41620 March 1996Dismissed
The appellant, a lecturer appointed on probation, was terminated after a performance report and a management resolution, with prior approval from the District Inspector under the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921. The Deputy Director held the termination invalid because Regulation 25, framed under Section 16‑C, req…
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR.versusM/S. HINDUSTAN SAFETY GLASS WORKS (P) LTD.
1996 INSC 41720 March 1996Dismissed
The Uttar Pradesh Government issued a Gazette notification under Section 4‑A of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948, granting a three‑year sales‑tax exemption to certain newly set‑up industrial units for specified goods. Hindustan Safety Glass Works (P) Ltd claimed that, under the pre‑amendment provision of Section 8(2A) of t…
BODDULA KRISHNAIAH AND ANR.versusSTATE ELECTION COMMISSIONER, A.P. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 41420 March 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The dispute arose from the Gram Panchayat elections in Nalgonda district, Andhra Pradesh, where the names of about 94 persons were deleted from the draft electoral roll. The affected persons filed a writ petition seeking to be allowed to vote. The High Court initially ordered that they could participate, but the electi…
WELFARE ASSOCIATION, SECTOR 7, URBAN ESTATE, FARIDABADversusRAJIV KAPOOR AND ORS.
1996 INSC 41520 March 1996Disposed off
The Welfare Association filed a civil suit seeking a perpetual injunction to prevent the conversion of a designated green belt in Sector 7, Faridabad, into a petrol pump operated by Rajiv Kapoor and others. The trial court initially granted an ad‑interim injunction, later vacated it, but on revision the District Judge …
MOHD. ASLAM KHANversusNARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU AND ANOTHER
1996 INSC 28420 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Mohammad Aslam Khan was convicted under Section 22 read with Section 8(c) of the NDPS Act for possession of 50,000 Mandrex tablets seized from flat No.102 in Andheri. The prosecution relied on an agreement allegedly signed by the appellant, seized from the premises, and on statements made by the appellant under Section…
M/S PRAKASH TRADING CO.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUJARAT
1996 INSC 28620 February 1996Dismissed
Prakash Trading Co., a groundnut oil manufacturer, claimed an additional tax deduction for deoiled cakes exported or sold to exporters under the export incentive provisions of the Finance Acts of 1966 and 1967, which were linked to the First Schedule of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951. The Income …
DIRECTOR, A.I.I.M.S. ETC.versusDR. NIKHIL TANDON AND ORS.
1996 INSC 28720 February 1996Dismissed
The All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) advertised for an Assistant Professor in Endocrinology. Dr. Nikhil Tandon was appointed, while Dr. Ajay Sood challenged the appointment, alleging that Tandon did not possess the required D.M. qualification or an equivalent recognised qualification. The High Court set …
COSTAO FERNANDESversusSTATE AT THE INSTANCE OF D.S.P, CBI, BOMBAY
1996 INSC 28820 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Costao Fernandes, a customs preventive officer, chased a vehicle suspected of smuggling gold and, during a scuffle, the driver died. He was prosecuted under Section 302 IPC, while claiming immunity under Section 155 of the Customs Act, 1962. The trial court and High Court denied the protection, alleging lack of prior i…
ACHUTRAO HARIBHAU KHODWA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 28920 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The wife of the appellant was admitted to a government civil hospital for delivery and a sterilisation operation. During the sterilisation a mop was left inside her peritoneal cavity, leading to peritonitis and her death. The appellants sued the State of Maharashtra and the doctors for damages. The trial court awarded …
R.M. TEWARI, ADVOCATE ETC. ETC.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) ORS ETC. ETC.
1996 INSC 29020 February 1996Disposed off
The Delhi Government, after constituting a high‑power Review Committee as directed in Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab, sought the withdrawal of TADA charges in several cases. The Special Public Prosecutor filed applications before the Designated Court relying solely on the Committee’s recommendations. The Designated Co…
MANSUversusSHADI RAM
1996 INSC 29220 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Mansu, a tenant, claimed pre-emption rights over a suit property sold by co‑sharers (male and female) under the Punjab Pre‑emption Act as applicable to Haryana. Shadiram, the vendee, argued that the female vendors' share was not pre‑emptable under Section 15(2) and that, as a successor‑in‑interest, he became a co‑share…
NET RAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF M.P.
1996 INSC 151519 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Netraj was arrested after a silver todal, allegedly stolen during a dacoity that also involved the murder of a woman, was recovered from him two days after the incident. He was convicted under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code for dacoity with murder and sentenced to death, later reduced to life impris…
M.C.MEHTAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 151619 December 1996Disposed off
The Supreme Court, hearing a public‑interest writ filed by environmental activist M.C. Mehta, examined the pollution caused by about 550 tanneries in the eastern fringe of Calcutta that were discharging untreated effluent into the River Ganga. The Court found that the tanneries were operating without consent under the …
ICHCHAPUR INDUSTRIAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.versusTHE COMPETENT AUTHORITY, OIL AND NATURAL GAS COMMISSION AND ANR.
1996 INSC 151719 December 1996Dismissed
The appellant, Ichchapur Industrial Co‑operative Society Ltd., owned land over which the Oil and Natural Gas Commission (ONGC) had been vested with the right of user under the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 for laying a gas pipeline. When water became necessary for the…
LILY KURIANversusTHE UNIVERSITY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND OTHERS
1996 INSC 151819 December 1996Disposed off
Lily Kurian, the founding principal of St. Joseph's Training College for Women, was dismissed after an ex‑parte disciplinary enquiry and later reinstated by the Vice‑Chancellor, but the reinstatement was set aside by the Kerala High Court. The Kerala University Act, 1974 introduced Sections 60(7) and 61, allowing an ex…
SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT AND OTHERSversusA.CJ. BRITTO
1996 INSC 151919 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, a Sub‑Inspector of Police, was reinstated after a prior dismissal was set aside, but subsequently remained on extended medical leave and failed to appear before a Medical Board despite orders from his Superintendent. The State initiated disciplinary proceedings for his non‑compliance, found him guilty a…
GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU AND OTHERSversusS. VEL RAJ
1996 INSC 152019 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, a Head Constable in the Tamil Nadu Police, was charged with being drunk and in 'mufti' while on duty on 7 July 1984, and a charge memo was issued by a Deputy Superintendent of Police. A departmental enquiry found him guilty and he was initially demoted to Constable Grade‑I; the appellate authority later…
GANGABAI GOPALDAS MOHATAversusFULCHAND AND OTHERS
1996 INSC 152119 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Gangabai Gopaldas Mohata (appellant) owned Nazul land that was leased to several lessees. After a compromise decree required the lessees to vacate, the Municipal Council attached the property for alleged tax arrears and auctioned it. The court ordered that the sale would be cancelled if the appellant paid the arrears; …
MIS. ASHOK LEYLAND LTD. MADRASversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS
1996 INSC 152219 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Ashok Leyland Ltd., a manufacturer of trucks and spare parts, imported certain spare parts and sold them to its truck buyers. The company claimed deductions under sections 80‑E and 80‑I of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for profits earned from these imports, arguing that the income was attributable to its "priority industry"…
BAKHATAWARversusSHRI SATNARAIN ATID ORS.
1996 INSC 152319 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Shri Neki, a tenant of demised agricultural land for over 50 years, paid one‑third of the crop produce as rent to the landlord's agent. In 1978 the rabi crop failed and he could not pay the share, but later paid the amount. The landlord's General Power of Attorney (GPA) filed an eviction application under Section 9 of …
JAGANNATHversusSHRI YUGAL NARAIN PUROHIT, ADV. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 152419 December 1996Dismissed
The appellant Jagannath challenged a sale of property made by the insolvent Bhadarmal to the respondent Yugal Narain Purohit on May 17, 1958, seeking a declaration under Section 53 of the Provincial Insolvency Act that the transfer was fraudulent. The trial court, a single judge and a division bench of the Rajasthan Hi…
SAVALIRAM GOTIRAM TELI (DECEASED) BY HEIRS AND LRS.versusMADHUKAR YESHWANT PATANKAR AND OTHERS
1996 INSC 133519 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Savaliram Gotiram Teli was a tenant of agricultural land on the appointed day of 15 June 1955. He was dispossessed by the landlords before 1 April 1957 without a Section 29 order and died in 1959. The Mamlatdar initiated suo motu proceedings under Section 32(1‑B) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, leadin…
COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE), AHEMDABADversusM/S ESSAR GUJARAT LTD. SURAT
1996 INSC 133419 November 1996Disposed off
Essar Gujarat Ltd. purchased a Direct Reduction Iron Plant from Teviot Investments Ltd. and, as a pre‑condition, obtained a process licence and technical know‑how from Midrex and Yoest Alpine (V.A.). The Collector of Customs added the licence fee (DM 2,000,000) and a portion of the engineering and consultancy fees to t…
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS.versusVINAY KUMAR JAIN
1996 INSC 133619 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, a cinema owner, applied to the District Magistrate for a reduction in seating capacity from 540 to 450 seats and to opt for the composite (compounded) payment of entertainment tax for FY 1995‑96. Both applications were rejected, leading to a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court, which held that the…
RAMNIKLAL N. BHUTTA AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 133719 November 1996Dismissed
The State of Maharashtra issued a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to acquire two plots (CTS No. 211 and CTS No. 218) for a bus stand. The Land Acquisition Officer passed an award only for CTS No. 211, excluding CTS No. 218 on the basis of a private settlement between BEST and other partie…
M/S. MITTAL ENGINEERING WORKS (P) LTD.versusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MEERUT
1996 INSC 133819 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Mittal Engineering Works (P) Ltd. manufactured mono vertical crystallisers used in sugar factories, which were shipped in knocked‑down condition and assembled on site. The Central Excise Collector held that the crystallisers were "goods" and liable to excise duty, a view affirmed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Contro…
SHESHANK SEA FOODS PVT. LTD. KARNATAKA ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 133919 November 1996Dismissed
Sheshank Sea Foods Pvt. Ltd. imported raw materials under an advance licence that incorporated Exemption Notification No. 116 (30‑April‑1988) issued under Section 25(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, with a condition that the materials not be sold, loaned, transferred or otherwise disposed. The Customs authorities alleged t…
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESHversusGANGULA SATYA MURTHY
1996 INSC 134019 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Andhra Pradesh prosecuted Gangula Satya Murthy for raping and throttling to death a 16‑year‑old girl, Satya Vani, whose body was found on a cot in his house. The trial court convicted him under IPC sections 302 and 376, relying on medical evidence of ante‑mortem neck injuries, a fresh vaginal tear, and an …
THE STATE OF PUNJABversusSARWAN SINGH
1996 INSC 134219 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The case arose from a land dispute that escalated into a fight between two groups on 25 October 1985, during which the victim Santokh Singh sustained eight injuries, five on the head, inflicted by the respondent Sarwan Singh with a heavy weapon (gandasa). The trial court and the Punjab & Haryana High Court convicted th…
S.K. SINGHversusCENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 120119 October 1996Dismissed
S.K. Singh, a Branch Manager of Central Bank of India, was removed from service after an enquiry found a cash shortfall of Rs. 20,000. He challenged the removal, arguing that the disciplinary authority had not supplied him with a copy of the enquiry report, which he claimed rendered the action illegal. The High Court, …
DELHI CLOTH AND GENERAL MILLS CO. LTD. AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
1996 INSC 108219 September 1996Dismissed
Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. Ltd. imported tyre‑cord grade wood pulp from the United States and were required to pay additional duty under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act. The company contended that because wood pulp is not produced in India, the additional duty should be calculated on the excise duty applicab…
RAMJI SHARMA @ RAMJI BABU (DEAD) BY LRS.versusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.
1996 INSC 108319 September 1996Dismissed
The appellants, co‑sharers of a parcel of land in the town of Hajipur, sought a re‑transfer of the land that had been sold to a third party under a registered deed. They invoked Section 16(3) of the Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act, 1961, which allows a co‑sharer or adjo…
KUMUD LATA DASversusINDU PRASAD
1996 INSC 107619 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a daughter-in-law, was in possession of a property when her mother‑in‑law filed a suit for possession. The appellant was set ex parte and sought restoration of the decree. The Delhi High Court ordered that the appellant deposit mesne profits of Rs 2,000 per month from the date of the ex‑parte decree as a…
P.A.THOMAS AND ANR.versusM. MOHAMMED TAJUDDIN AND ANR.
1996 INSC 107719 September 1996Dismissed
The appellant, P.A. Thomas, was let an open land under a lease and later converted his sole proprietorship into a partnership named 'P.A. Thomas and Co.' with his son and another partner. The Supreme Court examined whether, under Section 2(4)(ii)(a) of the Tamil Nadu City Protection Act, 1922, the appellant remained a …
DR. CHIITARANJAN SHARMA AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND ANR.
1996 INSC 107819 September 1996Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined the absorption of staff from the H.I.M. Ayurvedic Degree College, which had been taken over by the Himachal Pradesh government. The college employees were to be regularised only if they satisfied qualifications, age, and were appointed before the takeover, as per the agreement and a screening…
MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ETC.versusSATBIR SINGH AND ORS. ETC.
1996 INSC 107919 September 1996Dismissed
The Meerut Development Authority sought to acquire land for a housing scheme and had issued a notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on 11 June 1985 and a declaration under Section 6 on 13 June 1985, i.e., simultaneously. The respondents challenged the validity of the simultaneous publication…
THE SCHEDULE CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES OFFICERS WELFARE COUNCILversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR.
1996 INSC 108019 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The SC/ST Officers Welfare Council filed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging a July 28, 1986 memorandum that raised the minimum length of service required for promotion in the Provincial Medical Health Services of Uttar Pradesh, allegedly to deny promotion to three SC/ST officers. The petition sought quashing …
DHARAMBIR SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 108119 September 1996Dismissed
Dharmabir Singh applied for a prospecting licence and mining lease for limestone deposits in Haryana, claiming a preferential right under Section 11 of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation & Development) Act, 1957. The State Government notified the area under Rule 59 of the Mineral Concession Rules, 1960, and the Central…
NIRMAL SINGH ETCversusSTATE OF HARYANA
1996 INSC 89819 August 1996Disposed off
The murder case arising from FIR No. 89 dated 16 July 1994 was investigated by the CBI, which charged fourteen persons including Nirmal Singh. After being denied bail repeatedly, the Sessions Judge, Ambala, granted interim bail on 11 May 1996 without the prosecution present. The High Court stayed that bail and, on 28 M…
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusSHRI PARMANAND
1996 INSC 90019 August 1996Dismissed
The respondent, originally appointed as a Junior Engineer in the Central Public Works Department (CPWD) in 1977, was later selected as an Assistant Engineer by the U.P.S.C. in 1982 and appointed in 1987. The dispute concerned whether, after 18 years of service in CPWD, he should be absorbed in that department or alloca…
SOHAN SINGHversusSARWAN SINGH AND ORS.
1996 INSC 90119 August 1996Dismissed
The petitioner and respondent entered into a sale agreement for land on June 14, 1986, with a total price of Rs.85,000 per killa, Rs.6,000 paid as earnest money and the balance of Rs.64,000 to be paid in cash at registration by July 15, 1987. At registration, the respondent presented a bank draft for the balance, but t…
HIRABAIversusHANUMANTH KRISHNAJI BHIDE AND ORS.
1996 INSC 90219 August 1996Dismissed
The petitioner, Hirabai, challenged the sale of her 8 acres of agricultural land that had been attached and sold under execution of a money decree. She argued that the proclamation of sale under Order 21 Rule 66 of the CPC was invalid because it did not contain a valuation of the property and alleged material irregular…
KRISHNA DASS AGARWALversusKANHAIYALAL
1996 INSC 75419 July 1996Dismissed
Krishna Dass Agarwal sued Kanhaiyalal to enforce a pre-emption right over a house Kanhaiyalal had purchased, relying on an alleged agreement, the Gwalior Pre-emption Act (Samvat 1992) and a customary right. The trial court decreed in favour of the plaintiff, but the defendant appealed. While the appeal was pending, the…
DR. D.C. SAXENAversusHONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA
1996 INSC 75319 July 1996Disposed off
Dr. D.C. Saxena filed a public‑interest writ petition seeking recovery of funds from the Prime Minister, which was dismissed by a bench headed by the Chief Justice of India. He then filed a second writ petition directly against the Chief Justice, alleging bias, procedural improprieties, misuse of official facilities an…
J.N. GANATRAversusMORVI MUNICIPALITY, MORVI
1996 INSC 75519 July 1996Appeal(s) allowed
J.N. Ganatra, an overseer with Morvi Municipality, was dismissed by a resolution dated 1 December 1970 without the procedure prescribed in Rule 35 of the Morvi City Municipal Officers and Servants Conduct, Discipline, Dismissal, Penalty and Appeal Rules, 1960. He filed a civil suit challenging the dismissal; the trial …
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. ETC.versusMONLRUJJAMAN MULLICK AND ORS. ETC.
1996 INSC 75619 July 1996Dismissed
Instructors employed on a part‑time basis in non‑formal education centres in West Bengal were paid a modest monthly honorarium and taught for two hours a day. They filed a writ petition seeking the same pay scales and allowances as regular primary school teachers, invoking the constitutional principle of "equal pay for…
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS.versusM/S. BINDAL AGRO CHEMICAL LTD. AND ANR.
1996 INSC 75719 July 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against a High Court order that had allowed M/s. Bindal Agro Chemical Ltd. to claim subsidies under a 1986 state notification. The company had purchased a vanaspati factory originally licensed for Dewas and obtained Central Government permission to shift the licence to Mandideep. Th…
STATE OF PUNJABversusLABH SINGH ETC
1996 INSC 75819 July 1996Dismissed
The State of Punjab appealed the acquittal of Labh Singh and others under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, arguing that the trial court erred by not considering the violation of Section 50, which mandates that an accused be informed of his right to be searched in the presence of a gazetted offi…
S.R. BHANRALEversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 75919 July 1996Disposed off
S.R. Bhanrale, an employee of the Department of Telecommunications, retired in July 1984 and claimed his pension, death-cum-retirement gratuity, G.P.F., encashment of earned leave, increment arrears, special pay and other retirement benefits. The Union of India failed to pay these dues within the statutory deadline, pr…
STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.versusV.B. HIREGOWDAR
1996 INSC 76019 July 1996Appeal(s) allowed
V.B. Hegowdar, a government employee in Karnataka's Department of Child Development, was found guilty of irregularities in fund release and was reduced in rank on 10 April 1990. He challenged the punishment before the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal, which initially upheld the order but later, on review, set it aside…
SHISH RAM AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND ORS.
1996 INSC 76119 July 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned promotion eligibility in the Himachal Pradesh service where Head Clerks (appellants) and Accountants (respondents) had differing pay scales and seniority. Initially, Accountants drew a higher pay scale, but subsequent statutory rules under the proviso to Article 309 raised the Head Clerks' pay and cr…
PANCHAYAT VARGA SHARMAJIVI SAMUDAIK SAHAKARI KHEDUT COOP. SOCIETY LTD. AND ORS.versusHARIBHAI MEVABHAI AND ORS.
1996 INSC 76219 July 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Panchayat Varga Sharmajivi Samudaik Sahakari Khedut Co‑op Society Ltd. (appellants) sought assignment of 300 acres of waste land vested in the Gram Panchayat for the economic empowerment of its labourer and Scheduled Caste members. The Gram Panchayat passed a unanimous resolution requesting the District Collector t…
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENF AUTHORITY & ANR.versusER. HARSH JAIN & ORS .
1996 INSC 76319 July 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) allotted an industrial plot to the respondent through a Provisional Letter of Allotment (PLA) dated 29 October 1991 at Rs. 60.50 per sq. yard. The respondent failed to complete the required formalities within the stipulated period and sought an extension, for which HUDA gr…
STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIRversusSH. BAL RAJ SHARMA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 55119 April 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Melo Devi, a teacher, retired and filed a writ petition for her dues; she died before the petition was decided. Her son, Bal Raj Sharma, was substituted as legal representative and produced a will bequeathing future pension benefits to his son, the grandson of Melo Devi. The question before the Supreme Court was whethe…
SMT. RAJESHWARI DEVI ETC.versusSTATE OF U.P.
1996 INSC 55219 April 1996Case Partly allowed
The deceased Sudha was shot dead in her husband Santosh Singh's house in 1982. The husband was seen with a gun and, together with eyewitness testimony, was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC. The father‑in‑law Onkar Singh and mother‑in‑law Rajeshwari were also convicted of murder under Section 302 read with Sect…
MST. KARTAR KAURversusAJMER SINGH
1996 INSC 55319 April 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Kartar Kaur, the widow of the deceased Ranjit Singh, sued his son Ajmer Singh for declaration and possession of a suit property situated in the former PEPSU area. The son claimed sole inheritance under local custom, while the widow asserted a special custom allowing a widow to inherit alongside the son and relied on th…
ALL MANIPUR GOVERNMENT COLLEGES TEACHERS ASSOCIATIONversusALL MANIPUR COLLEGE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION AND ORS.
1996 INSC 55419 April 1996Disposed off
The All Manipur Government Colleges Teachers Association challenged a Government order that counted service in taken‑over private colleges towards promotion to Director, alleging discrimination against government lecturers and principals. The petitioners argued that principals of private colleges were promoted without …
JAI RAM SHARMAversusJAMMU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
1996 INSC 55719 April 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Jai Ram Sharma, a regular Office Superintendent in the Jammu Development Authority, claimed that he was entitled to be considered for promotion to Public Relations Officer before a deputationist senior stenographer, P.N. Jalla, was promoted. The vacancy arose while Jalla was on deputation, and the Authority promoted Ja…
R.S. RAWATversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
1996 INSC 55819 April 1996Disposed off
The appellant, a Havildar of the Indo‑Tibetan Border Police, was deputed to the Intelligence Bureau and on 26 February 1982 was absorbed as a Junior Intelligence Officer (JIO) Grade II. He claimed that his substantive rank in the parent department, JIO Grade I, entitled him to be absorbed as JIO Grade I and alleged a d…
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR.versusSHAKRI KHAN
1996 INSC 55919 April 1996Disposed off
The respondent, a Lower Division Clerk appointed before 1973, claimed two advance increments after passing the Hindi type‑writing test in December 1979, relying on various government instructions. The State had introduced a scheme granting such increments only to clerks who passed the test before a cut‑off date of 30 J…
LAXMIKANT AND ORS.versusSATYAWAN AND ORS.
1996 INSC 40919 March 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, who had acquired a lease of a plot from the Nagpur Improvement Trust, failed to commence and complete construction within the time limits stipulated in the lease, leading to cancellation of the allotment. The Trust put the plot up for auction; the respondent was the highest bidder up to the second round…
BAIJ NATH AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.
1996 INSC 41019 March 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, teachers in Punjab high schools, obtained post‑graduate degrees and claimed entitlement to the higher pay scale designated for lecturers, relying on Government letters dated 23 July 1957 and 20 September 1979. The Punjab & Haryana High Court rejected their claim, holding that the lecturer post was not p…
SH. A.S. NARAYANA DEEKSHJTULU ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.
1996 INSC 41119 March 1996Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of Sections 34, 35, 36, 37, 39 and 144 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987, which abolished hereditary rights of archakas, mirasidars, gamekars and other temple office‑holders. The petitioners, hereditary priests, co…
IMPERIAL CHIT FUNDS (P) LTD.versusINCOME TAX OFFICER, ERNAKULAM
1996 INSC 41219 March 1996Dismissed
Imperial Chit Funds Ltd., a company in liquidation, was served with a tax demand of Rs.1,027 by the Income Tax Officer after winding‑up proceedings had begun. The Official Liquidator argued that the tax claim could not be enforced until the claim was proved in the winding‑up process, invoking the Companies Act’s scheme…
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC.versusM/S. BANGALORE WIRE RED MILLS ETC.
1996 INSC 41319 March 1996Dismissed
M/s Bangalore Wire Red Mills imported a high reversible mill in 1982 and warehoused it without paying duty, executing a bond under Section 59(1) of the Customs Act, 1962. A notice dated 7 March 1985 required clearance within fifteen days, but the goods were only cleared on 9 September 1988, at which time duty was paid …
STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.versusRANCHI ZILA SAMTA PARTY AND ANR.
1996 INSC 40719 March 1996Disposed off
A massive fraud involving approximately Rs. 500 crore was uncovered in Bihar's Animal Husbandry, Education, Cooperation and Fisheries Departments, prompting the Patna High Court to order a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe under Article 226 of the Constitution, without the State government's consent. The Stat…
DELHI SCIENCE FORUM AND ORS. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
1996 INSC 27519 February 1996Dismissed
The petitioners challenged the Central Government’s exercise of power under Section 4(1) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 to grant licences to private companies for establishing and operating telecommunication services, arguing that the privilege was exclusive to the Government and that the procedure, including a capp…
LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIAversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
1996 INSC 27719 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) received a large income‑tax refund for the life‑insurance business in the assessment year 1963‑64, which it claimed should be treated as a profit and deducted under Rule 2(1)(b) of the Income‑Tax Act. The tax authorities argued that only the portion of the refund that had b…
FERTILIZER CORPORATION OF INDIAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 27619 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, D.K. Jain, a member of the Indian Audit and Accounts Service, was appointed Director (Finance) of Fertilizer Corporation of India (FCI) for a term of five years under Article 69 of the corporation's Articles of Association. He later accepted a two‑year appointment as Director (Finance) of Cement Corpora…
PADMINI CHANDRASEKHARAN (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS.versusR. RAJAGOPAL REDDY (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 28019 February 1996Dismissed
Padmini Chandrasekharan filed a suit claiming sole ownership of a house in Gandhi Nagar, Madras, and sought an injunction against R. Rajagopal Reddy. The dispute centered on whether the second defendant, Venugopal Reddy, was a benamidar for Rajagopal Reddy under the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, and whet…
DEV RAJ (DEAD) THROUGH L.RS.versusHARBANS SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH L.RS.
1996 INSC 28219 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, the original owner of a parcel of land, sold the property to the respondent on the condition that the respondent would discharge an existing mortgage of Rs.5,000. The appellant himself paid all installments and ultimately discharged the mortgage, while the respondent never did so nor obtained mutation of…
BANK OF BARODAversusRAJENDER PAL SONI
1996 INSC 28319 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, an employee of Traders Bank, tendered his resignation on the same day the bank sought to terminate his service by offering three months' pay in lieu of notice and returned the cheque. Traders Bank was later amalgamated with Bank of Baroda under Section 45 of the Banking Companies Regulation Act, 1949, w…
DIRECTOR OF ENFORCEMENTversusM/S M.C.T.M. CORPORATION PVT. LTD. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 10019 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Directorate of Enforcement prosecuted M.C.T.M. Corp. Ltd. and its directors for failing to repatriate foreign exchange held in Malaysia for over fifteen years, alleging contravention of Section 10(1)(a) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 (FERA) and imposing penalties under Section 23(1)(a). The Appellate …
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS.versusPEERLESS GENERAL FINANCE AND INVESTMENT COMPANY LTD. AND ANR.
1996 INSC 10119 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) could, under Section 45K(3) of the Reserve Bank of India Act, issue Paragraph 4A of the 1987 Directions prohibiting residuary non‑banking companies from levying processing or maintenance charges on depositors. Peerless General Finance & Investment Co. L…
THE MADHYA PRADESH CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. JABALPUR ETC.versusTHE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX. ETC.
1996 INSC 10219 January 1996Dismissed
The Madhya Pradesh Co-operative Bank Ltd., an apex co-operative bank, claimed that all its income, including interest earned on government securities placed with the State Bank of India/Reserve Bank of India and interest on Provident Fund deposits, arose from its banking business and was therefore exempt under Section …
CHERAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION LTD. COIMBATOREversusREGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY COIMBATORE AND ORS.
1996 INSC 10319 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Regional Transport Authority (RTA) of Coimbatore, using a marking system, awarded 11 marks to the State Transport Undertaking (Cheran Transport Corporation Ltd.) and 6 marks to a private operator (N.T. Arasu) for the Coimbatore‑Kottur stage‑carriage route, rejecting the private operator's renewal application. The S…
MULAK RAJ AND ORS .versusSTATE OF HARYANA
1996 INSC 10419 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Krishna Kumari, a well‑educated teacher, was found burnt in the kitchen of her matrimonial home about two months after her marriage. The prosecution alleged that her father‑in‑law, husband, sister of the husband and sister‑in‑law killed her over dowry demands, relying on motive, alleged extra‑judicial confessions, thei…
SMT. JAYA DEVIversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.
1996 INSC 10519 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Smt. Jaya Devi, an assistant teacher, was terminated by the Bihar Directorate of Education in 1990 and successfully obtained reinstatement through a writ petition before the Patna High Court. In a later, unrelated writ petition filed by another teacher, the same High Court judge, believing his earlier order to be erron…
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.versusD.L. UPPAL
1996 INSC 10619 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, D.L. Uppal, retired on 31 January 1994 and claimed his pension, which had not been paid. The Punjab & Haryana High Court ordered payment of gratuity with 12% interest and directed that the pension be computed on the basis of his last drawn emoluments, subject to a pending determination of the correct sc…
AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPN. ETC. ETC.versusSHARDABEN AND ORS. ETC. ETC.
1996 INSC 10719 January 1996Dismissed
The Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation acquired strips of land for a Ring Road under a notification issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Land Acquisition Officer fixed compensation at Rs 50‑80 per square metre, which the claimants challenged under Section 18, leading the City Civil Court to enh…
GURUVAYOOR DEVASWOM MANAGING COMMITIEEversusCHAIRMAN, GURUVAYOOR D.EVASWOM MANAGING COMMITIEE AND ORS.
1996 INSC 10819 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court heard an appeal against a Kerala High Court order that replaced a member of the selection committee for clerks in Guruvayoor Devaswom with the Director of Training, a judicial officer, and made the Director an observer in the interview process. The appellant argued that the High Court's direction impr…
D.K. BASUversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL
1996 INSC 150818 December 1996Disposed off
The Supreme Court entertained a public‑interest writ petition filed after media reports of deaths and torture in police lock‑ups, seeking guidelines for preventing custodial violence and for awarding compensation to victims or their families. The Court held that torture, rape and death in police custody violate Article…
PEOPLE'S UNION FOR CIVIL LIBERTIES {PUCL)versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
1996 INSC 150918 December 1996Disposed off
The People's Union for Civil Liberties filed a public‑interest writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of Section 5(2) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, which permits telephone interception in cases of public emergency or public safety. The petition argued that telephone tapping infringes the right to pr…
AMBALAL SARABHAI ENTERPRISES LTD. AND ORS.versusPRAKASH CHANDRA ARYA
1996 INSC 151018 December 1996Disposed off
Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. and others appealed against a decree appointing a Receiver over premises occupied by the respondent, Prakash Chandra Arya. The Calcutta High Court Division Bench had declined to interfere with the single judge’s order appointing the Receiver. The Supreme Court, exercising its special l…
JASP AL SINGH AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
1996 INSC 151118 December 1996Dismissed
The Supreme Court heard an appeal by Jaspal Singh and another against the Union of India concerning compensation awarded under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for land acquired for a cantonment extension in Amritsar. The appellants claimed loss of earnings from their poultry business under clause fourthly of Section 23(…
PRIMA REALTYversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 131718 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Prima Realty, a partnership firm, entered into a compulsory purchase agreement with the Union of India for a property in Chembur. The Central Government was required to tender the consideration within one month of the purchase order, but the cheque issued to Prima Realty was incorrectly made out to "Prime Realty Ltd" a…
M.M.T.C. LIMITEDversusSTERLITE INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LTD.
1996 INSC 131818 November 1996Disposed off
M.M.T.C. Ltd. appealed against a High Court order directing it to appoint an arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The dispute arose after the 1996 Act came into force, so the Court examined whether the arbitration clause in a 1993 agreement, which provided for each party to nominate one arbitrat…
LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusTHE CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR AND ORS.
1996 INSC 131918 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined an order of removal of a workman by the employer, which had been challenged before the Central Industrial Tribunal. The workman died while the tribunal proceedings were pending, and the tribunal had directed payment of wages from the date of dismissal to the date of death. Relying on its earl…
R. THIRUVIRKOLAMversusPRESIDING OFFICER AND ANR.
1996 INSC 132018 November 1996Dismissed
The appellant, a technician employed by Madras Fertilizers Ltd., was dismissed on 18 November 1981 after a domestic inquiry that was later held defective by the Labour Court. The Labour Court, however, allowed the employer to prove misconduct and, on its own appraisal of the evidence, upheld the dismissal, issuing its …
M/S BENGAL WATERPROOF LIMITEDversusMIS BOMBAY WATERPROOF MANUFACTURING CO. AND ANR.
1996 INSC 132118 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Bengal Waterproof Ltd., holder of the registered trademark ‘Duck Back’, sued Bombay Waterproof Manufacturing Co. for infringement and passing off. The first suit (1980) was dismissed, and a second suit (1982) was filed alleging continuous infringement after the first suit. The trial court and High Court held the second…
DUTTA ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD.versusINDO MERCHANTILES PVT. LTD. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 132218 November 1996Dismissed
The Commissioner of Excise, Assam invited tenders for supplying rectified spirit and received seventeen bids. After excluding two ineligible bids, the lowest eligible offer was from Dutta Associates, but the Government introduced a "viability range" (Rs. 14.72‑Rs. 15.71) not mentioned in the tender notice and asked onl…
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.versusLAL SINGH AND ORS.
1996 INSC 132318 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, who were JBT Teachers appointed temporarily as Head Teachers, claimed an advance increment for the period of their temporary promotion. The dispute centered on which pay‑scale the advance increment should be drawn from – the scale of the temporary post (Head Teacher) or that of their substantive post (J…
NIVARTI GOVIND INGALE AND ORS.versusRAVANAGOUDA BHIMANGOUDA PATIL
1996 INSC 132418 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Radhabai, the mother of the appellants, owned a parcel of land and obtained a loan from the respondent's father on the condition that she execute a sale deed in the name of his minor son, accompanied by an agreement of reconveyance. After receiving the loan, the father failed to execute the reconveyance deed, prompting…
PARSHOTAM SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.versusHARBANS KAUR AND ANR.
1996 INSC 132718 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Bakhtawar Singh died leaving his son Harsukhjit Singh and widow Pritam Kaur. Harsukhjit succeeded to property inherited from his grandfather and to a portion of his mother's self‑acquired property, which he later blended. After Harsukhjit’s death, his sons Parshotam Singh (appellants) and Lakhmir Singh (respondents) di…
BRIG. SAWAI BHAWANI SINGHversusM/S. INDIAN HOTELS COMPANY LTD.
1996 INSC 132818 November 1996Dismissed
The respondents, Indian Hotels Co. Ltd., claimed they were in possession of a hotel property under an agreement and sought a perpetual injunction to prevent the appellant, Brig. Sawai Bhabwan Singh, from interfering with their possession. The appellant, asserting exclusive ownership, applied for the appointment of a re…
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusMAHENDER SINGH AND ORS.
1996 INSC 132918 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The respondents, who served as temporary drivers (Security Assistants Motor Transport) in the Intelligence Bureau from April 24, 1986 to October 5, 1988, filed an application for regularisation of their services. The Central Administrative Tribunal directed that they be regularised with relaxation of age and educationa…
GOVERNMENT OE INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARYversusK.V. SWAMINATHAN
1996 INSC 133018 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
K.V. Swaminathan applied for a freedom‑fighter pension, which was pending for a long period. The government, after giving him the benefit of doubt, granted the pension on 18 November 1989. Swaminathan filed a writ petition seeking the pension to be backdated to the date of his application. The Madras High Court ordered…
RAMARAVALUGAVADEversusSATABA GAVADU GAVADE (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ANR.
1996 INSC 133118 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, an illiterate farmer, sought to bring his legal representatives on record after his uncle, a party to a civil suit, died pending appeal, causing the original appeal to abate. The High Court dismissed the application to condone the delay, citing lack of proper explanation, and upheld the abatement. The ap…
BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARDversusAKHIL KRISHNA MITRA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 133218 November 1996Disposed off
The employee was appointed as a Bihar Government servant in June 1950 and was sent on deputation to the Bihar State Electricity Board (BSEB) in August 1959, later being absorbed by the Board in 1970 and retiring in 1984. The dispute concerned whether the BSEB was liable to pay the employee's pension for the deputation …
STATE OF KERALA ETC.versusGURUVAYUR DEVASWOM MANAGING COMMITTEE AND ORS. ETC.
1996 INSC 133318 November 1996Dismissed
The State of Kerala challenged a Kerala High Court order that sanctioned Rs 7,10,212 spent by Shri Raghavan, the Administrator of the Guruvayur Devaswom, on a clerk recruitment examination whose question paper had leaked, and also directed payment of Rs 35,000 as monetary consideration for his exemplary work. The petit…
GHANTESHER GHOSHversusMADAN MOHAN GHOSH AND ORS.
1996 INSC 107118 September 1996Disposed off
The case concerned a residential dwelling house owned by an undivided family. After a partition suit, the widow of a deceased co‑owner obtained a final decree for her one‑third share and later gifted that share to her brother, a stranger to the family, who filed an execution petition. During execution, the legal heir o…
SAROJINI AMMALversusTHE CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY, MADRAS
1996 INSC 107218 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed
UNITED BANK OF INDIAversusSH. NARESH KUMAR AND ORS.
1996 INSC 107318 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed
United Bank of India filed a suit to recover a loan advanced to the respondents. The trial court dismissed the suit on the ground that the plaint was not signed and verified by a competent person. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined whether a company may authorize an officer or ratify the signing of pleadings under O…
UNION OF INDIAversusMHATHUNG KITHAN AND ORS.
1996 INSC 107418 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Respondent No.1, an IAS officer from Nagaland, was allocated to the Haryana cadre under the 30‑point roster that earmarked the two available Nagaland vacancies for outsiders. He challenged the allocation before the Central Administrative Tribunal, which ordered his transfer to the Nagaland cadre. The Union appealed, ar…
JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusMAHAVIR HOUSING CO-OP., SOCIETY, JAIPUR ETC.
1996 INSC 106918 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Jaipur Development Authority acquired land for an urban development scheme under the Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953. The Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded compensation of Rs 5,000 per bigha to Jai Ambe Co‑op Housing Society and Rs 7,500 per bigha to Mahavir Co‑op Housing Society. The civil court enha…
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusMADHAV S/0. GAJANAN CHAUBAL AND ANR.
1996 INSC 107018 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Government created a single post of Secretary in the National Savings Scheme Service and applied a 40‑point roster and rule of rotation to reserve vacancies for Scheduled Tribes. When a vacancy at point No. 4 arose, a Scheduled Tribe candidate was to be promoted from the Superintendents, but the Central Administrat…
ALIL MOLLAH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL
1996 INSC 75218 July 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were convicted for the murder of Elem Bux Molla under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC, based solely on the testimony of a single eye‑witness, PW‑3, who was an employee of the deceased. The Supreme Court examined the witness's conduct, noting that he delayed reporting the incident, gave no prior account to…
INDIAN COUNCIL FOR ENVIRO-LEGAL ACTIONversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 54318 April 1996
The Indian Council for Enviro‑Legal Action filed a public‑interest writ under Article 32 seeking enforcement of the 19 February 1991 Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) Notification and challenging the validity of the 18 August 1994 amendment Notification. The petition alleged widespread non‑implementation of the 1991 Notifi…
BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC.
1996 INSC 54418 April 1996Disposed off
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd (BHEL), a public sector undertaking, manufactured boiler components in its Hyderabad unit and dispatched some to its Tiruchi unit and others directly to the work‑site at Angul, Orissa, for a NALCO power‑plant project. The Andhra Pradesh State began levying Central Sales Tax (CST) on these c…
KASHI NATH ROYversusSTATE OF BIHAR
1996 INSC 54518 April 1996Appeal(s) allowed
K.N. Roy, a charge sessions judge in Munger, granted bail to accused in a dacoity case on 17 August 1991, relying on doubts about the identification parade evidence. The Patna High Court cancelled the bail and, in its order, harshly criticized Roy, suggesting he had exceeded his jurisdiction and recommending administra…
THE STATE OF PUNJABversusDES RAJ
1996 INSC 54618 April 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Punjab appealed a compensation award granted to Des Raj for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The original award of Rs. 4,500 per acre was enhanced by the Additional District Judge in 1982 to Rs. 25,000 per acre, and further enhanced by a Single Judge in 1988 to Rs. 43,000 per acre, apply…
DHANNA RAMversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 54718 April 1996Dismissed
The appellant, a Scheduled Caste candidate, was selected for the post of Goods Clerk/Coaching Clerk under the reserved quota with relaxed standards, but the initial communication erroneously stated he was selected on general standards. The error was later corrected, placing him in the reserved‑quota list; however, no v…
STATE OF M.P. AND ORS.versusSADASHIV ZAMINDAR
1996 INSC 54818 April 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, an Upper Division Teacher, claimed the status and salary of a Lecturer based on a 1962 recognition, but was denied higher pay on the "no work, no pay" principle. After retiring in 1983, he filed a writ petition for arrears from 1962 to the notional promotion date, which was transferred to the Madhya Pra…
M.P. ELECTRICITY BOARD, JABALPUR AND ORS.versusHARSH WOOD PRODUCTS AND ANR.
1996 INSC 55018 April 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board inspected the meters of Harsh Wood Products and found tampered seals indicating theft of electricity. The Board issued a notice demanding payment of Rs 6,51,256.61 and threatened disconnection of supply. The High Court set aside the demand, holding that the consumer was entitled to …
NAGAR MAHAPALIKA, MEERUTversusM/S. PREM NATH MONGA BOTTLERS PVT. LTD. AND ANR.
1996 INSC 40118 March 1996Dismissed
The Meerut Municipal Corporation attempted to levy octroi on empty glass bottles of the aerated drink "Double Seven" that were brought into the municipal area for refilling. The bottling company contended that the bottles were exempt under Entry 13 of the 1975 Notification, which exempts "mineral water bottles" importe…
SUBHASHGIR KHUSHALGIR GOSAVI AND ORS.versusSPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND ORS.
1996 INSC 40218 March 1996Dismissed
The petitioners challenged a notification issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for acquiring land in Pandharpur to extend an existing state transport bus stand and depot. They argued that the land, reserved for residential use under the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966, could not be u…
DR. G.N. KHAJURIA AND ORS.versusD.D.A. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 40318 March 1996IA disposed
The petitioners, Dr. G.N. Khajuria and others, challenged the continued occupation of a school built on land originally earmarked for a park by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA). The Supreme Court had directed the dismantling and vacation of the school, but the DDA sought to delay compliance. The Delhi High Court, …
TELECOM DISTRICT MANAGER, GOA AND ORS.versusV.S. DEMPO & CO. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 40418 March 1996Dismissed
The case concerned two telephone billing disputes (Rs. 99,196 and Rs. 71,280) between the telecom authority and V.S. Dempo & Co. The Union of India argued that, under its administrative instructions, a subscriber must first obtain a court direction before the dispute can be referred to an arbitrator under Section 7B of…
STATE OF ORISSAversusDIVISIONAL MANAGER, LIC AND ANR.
1996 INSC 40518 March 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Haribandhu Setha, a government servant, filed a consumer complaint under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 seeking damages from the State of Orissa. The State Commission and later the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission awarded Rs.1,00,000 against the State. The State appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing …
DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE AND ORS.versusMRITYUNJOY SARKAR AND ORS.
1996 INSC 40618 March 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The respondents were appointed as constables in the State Armed Police in April 1985 based on a list supplied by the Katwa Employment Exchange. The Labour Commissioner later declared that the list was fabricated and directed the authorities to take action, leading to the respondents' discharge effective 1 January 1986 …
HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.versusINDERJEET SAWHNEY
1996 INSC 9218 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. (HSIDC) offered Inderjeet Sawhney a provisional allotment of one acre of industrial land in 1984, subject to fulfillment of pre‑requisites and a final allotment letter. Sawhney failed to meet those conditions, and the parties later agreed that he would accept tw…
M/S. ALANKAR GRANITES INDUSTRIES AND ORS.versusP.G.R. SCINDIA, MLA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 9118 January 1996Dismissed
The Karnataka Government, after amending Rule 3A of the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1969 to relax a prohibition on quarry leases for certain granites, issued an order on 18 June 1991 granting 203 quarry leases under Rule 3. The petitioners challenged these grants, arguing they violated the prohibition in …
PURAN SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.
1996 INSC 9318 January 1996
The appellants filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging an order of the Additional Director, Consolidation of Holdings, Punjab, relating to land allocation under the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948. During the pendency of the petitio…
VASAVADATTA CEMENTS ETC.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANOTHER
1996 INSC 9518 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Vasavadatta Cements, a cement manufacturer, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 5(3‑D) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, which made packing material (gunny/plastic bags) taxable. The Karnataka High Court dismissed the challenge, relying on Ranganatha Associates and the Supreme Court’s decision in Rajs…
LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIAversusSHIVA PRASAD TRIPATHI AND ORS.
1996 INSC 9618 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Shiva Prasad Tripathi, a former employee of Life Insurance Corporation of India, was allotted corporation premises which he was required to vacate after his service ended. He refused to leave, prompting the Estate Officer to issue a notice and subsequently an eviction order under Section 7 of the Public Premises (Evict…
M/S. MURLIDHAR SHYAMLAL AND ANR .versusSTATE OF ASSAM
1996 INSC 9718 January 1996Dismissed
Murlidhar Shyamlal, a vendor, was charged under Section 7 read with Section 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 for selling adulterated mustard oil. The trial court acquitted him, but the Assam High Court convicted him, relying on the absence of a proper warranty. The vendor argued that Section 19(2) of…
RADHIKA DEVIversusBAJRANGI SINGH AND ORS.
1996 INSC 9818 January 1996Dismissed
The appellant filed a partition suit in 1988, after which the respondents claimed ownership of the property by virtue of a gift deed executed and registered in 1978. In 1992 the appellant sought to amend the plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 of the CPC to obtain a declaration that the gift deed was fraudulent and therefore …
SH. S.V. BHIMA BHATIA AND ANR. ETC.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 9918 January 1996Disposed off
The appellants, government servants who continued in service beyond the normal superannuation age due to a fluctuation in the retirement age, claimed that their pension should be calculated on the basis of the age of 60, including the residue period they served. The State argued that pension should be computed as of th…
BALIRAM PRASADversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 149517 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Baliram Prasad appealed against the appointment of respondent No. 7 as Extra Department Branch Post Master, alleging that he was more meritorious. The Central Administrative Tribunal dismissed his petition on two grounds: the application was filed after the one‑year limitation period and the appellant was disqualified …
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHversusRUP LAL SHARMA AND OTHERS
1996 INSC 149617 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Rup Lal Sharma, a retired government servant, continued to occupy a government‑allotted quarter after retirement. The State of Uttar Pradesh sought eviction under the U.P. Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1972, but the prescribed authority dismissed the first application on the ground that the …
ASIA FOUNDATION AND CONSTRUCTION LTD.versusTRAFALGAR HOUSE CONSTRUCTION (I) LTD. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 149717 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Paradip Port Trust awarded a contract for constructing a coal‑handling wharf to AFCONS (the appellant) after the Asian Development Bank (ADB) indicated that only AFCONS could secure the loan. Respondent No. 1 (Trafalgar House) challenged the award, arguing that it was the lowest evaluated bidder and that the award …
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusP. JAGDISH AND ORS.
1996 INSC 149817 December 1996Dismissed
The respondents, senior clerks promoted to head clerks, claimed that their pay should be fixed on a notional basis as if they had received a special allowance of Rs.35 per month that was granted only to senior clerks posted in identified arduous posts. The Central Administrative Tribunal, on equitable grounds, directed…
MEDIWELL HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CARE PVT. LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 149917 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a privately run Modern Heart Institute and Research Centre, applied for a certificate under Notification No. 64/88‑Customs (issued under Section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962) to import sophisticated hospital equipment without paying customs duty. The Director General of Health Services refused the certifi…
HARYANA URBAN DEVLOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR.versusRANJAN DHAMINA AND ANR.
1996 INSC 150017 December 1996Dismissed
The Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) had provisionally allotted an industrial plot to the respondents and later issued a final allotment letter fixing the price at Rs.3,78,250. After the respondents paid the balance, HUDA issued a further notice demanding an additional Rs.4,66,847, invoking Clause 9 of the al…
RAM GANESH TRIPATHI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 150117 December 1996Disposed off
The appellants, who were directly recruited Sahayak Nagar Adhikaris, challenged the Government’s order granting selection grade to ad‑hoc appointees whose services were regularised only on 17 May 1985, despite those appointees being junior to the appellants. The High Court dismissed the petition on the ground that the …
STATE OF RAJASTHANversusKUNJI RAMAN
1996 INSC 150217 December 1996Case Partly allowed
Kunji Raman and 36 other work‑charged employees of the Mahi Sagar Project filed a writ petition alleging that the Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951 and the Rajasthan Service (Concessions on Project) Rules, 1962/1975 were inapplicable to them, depriving them of house‑rent allowance, project allowance and leave encashment. T…
MIS. PSI DATA SYSTEMS LTD.versusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE
1996 INSC 150317 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether the value of tangible software (discs, floppies, CD‑ROMs) sold together with a computer should be included in the assessable value of the computer for excise duty. The Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal had held that the computer system and its software formed a singl…
STATE OF U.P.versusSHER SINGH AND ORS.
1996 INSC 150417 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Uttar Pradesh filed a suit under Section 6 of the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 seeking a declaration that the respondent, Ram Het, held vacant urban land in excess of the prescribed ceiling. The competent authority found an excess of 1,146.0430 sq m and the matter was appealed before the Dis…
SANWAT SINGHversusZAIL SINGLF AND ORS.
1996 INSC 150517 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Dalip Kaur sold her land to Jeet Kanwar in 1967. Zail Singh obtained a decree of pre-emption and attempted to take possession of the property, which was then occupied by the appellant who claimed to be a tenant of the vendor since before 1957. The trial court granted a perpetual injunction in favor of the appellant, bu…
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.versusMOHINDER SINGH CHAWLA ETC.
1996 INSC 150617 December 1996Disposed off
A government servant suffering from a heart ailment was permitted to obtain specialized treatment at AIIMS/Escorts Heart Institute because such facilities were unavailable in Punjab state hospitals. He submitted his medical bills for reimbursement, including the actual room rent paid during his inpatient stay, but the …
RAJASTHAN CO-OPERATIVE DIARY FEDERATION LTD.versusSH. MAHA LAXMI MINGRATE MARKETING SERVICE PVT. LTD. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 105917 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Rajasthan Co‑operative Dairy Federation Ltd. issued a Letter of Intent to Sh. Maha Laxmi Mingrate Marketing Service Pvt. Ltd. (respondent No.1) appointing it as a selling agent, subject to conditions including submission of a Rs.15 lakh irrevocable bank guarantee, execution of an agreement, and submission of financ…
STATE OF PUNJABversusM/S. YOGINDER SHARMA ONKAR RAI & CO. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 106017 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Punjab government auctioned liquor vends in March 1996. M/s Yoginder Sharma Onkar Rai & Co. claimed it had made higher bids than the successful bidders and challenged the auction in a writ petition. The High Court Division Bench quashed the auction and ordered a re‑auction, criticizing the Financial Commissioner’s …
IN RE : HARIJAI SINGH AND ANR.versusIN RE : VIJAY KUMAR
1996 INSC 106217 September 1996Disposed off
The Supreme Court entertained contempt petitions filed against the editors and publishers of The Sunday Tribune and Punjab Kesari for publishing a news item that falsely alleged that the sons of a senior Supreme Court judge and the Chief Justice of India had been allotted petrol pumps from a discretionary quota. The Co…
M/S. SHAPERS CONSTRUCTION (P) LTD. AND ANR.versusAIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANR.
1996 INSC 106317 September 1996Dismissed
The petitioners, Shapers Construction (P) Ltd. and another, applied for tender forms from the Airport Authority of India, invoking a tender condition that required having satisfactorily completed at least two runway or national highway works of specified value within the last five years. They claimed that they had exec…
D.K. CHHANGANI AND ORS.versusNITYA RANJAN MUKHERJEE AND ORS.
1996 INSC 106617 September 1996Disposed off
The appeal arose from a Calcutta High Court order concerning the recognition of a rival union of Geological Survey of India employees. The dispute centered on whether the High Court had jurisdiction to review an Industrial Tribunal's decision in Maharashtra regarding the membership and recognition of that union. The Su…
M/S. ESTER INDUSTRIES LTD.versusU.P. STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ORS.
1996 INSC 106817 September 1996Dismissed
The Government of Uttar Pradesh issued a policy on 16 July 1986 granting a 10% developmental rebate on electricity to newly set‑up industries, valid until 1990. Ester Industries Ltd., having established a plant, claimed the rebate, but the Uttar Pradesh State Electricity Board issued a tariff without it, prompting a wr…
DR. SURINDER SINGH JAMWAL AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND ORS.
1996 INSC 75117 July 1996Disposed off
Dr. Surinder Singh Jamwal and another doctor were appointed on an ad hoc basis in the Jammu & Kashmir health service and had served for more than thirteen years. They filed a petition seeking regularisation of their posts, arguing that their long service created a right to be appointed regularly. The High Court dismiss…
M/S. RAJAKAMAL TRANSPORT AND ANR.versusTHE EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION, HYDERABAD
1996 INSC 53817 April 1996Dismissed
M/s. Raikamal Transport engaged hamalis to load and unload goods it transported as a carrier. The Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) issued notices requiring the company to pay contributions for the hamalis under the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948. The company contested liability, arguing there was no …
NARASHIMAHA MURTHYversusSMT. SUSHEELABAI & ORS.
1996 INSC 53717 April 1996Dismissed
Narasoji Rao died intestate leaving a sole son (the appellant) and five daughters (including the plaintiff). The daughter filed a suit for partition of the family house (Schedule A) and other property, alleging a one‑seventh share, later increased to one‑sixth after the mother’s death. The trial court granted a prelimi…
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusSHREE GANESH STEEL ROLLING MILLS LTD. AND ANR.
1996 INSC 53917 April 1996Dismissed
The Union appealed against a Delhi High Court order staying a clause of a circular that reinterpreted the term “date of transfer” in the duty‑free licence rules. The issue arose when Shree Ganesh Steel imported goods under a licence transferred multiple times, and customs objected that the import occurred beyond six mo…
STATE OF HARYANAversusCHANDVIR AND ORS.
1996 INSC 54117 April 1996Dismissed
The case arose from a violent altercation on 21 September 1984 in which the deceased Rajpal was attacked and later died from injuries. The prosecution charged Chandvir and Rohtash (A1 and A2) with murder under Section 302 read with Section 32 of the IPC and also under Section 149 for rioting. The trial court convicted …
SH. RAGHUBIR SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 54217 April 1996Dismissed
The third respondent, a tenure‑holder of agricultural land in Uttar Pradesh, transferred 64 bighas each to the appellants in 1974. The prescribed authority declared those transfers void under Section 5(8) of the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960, and ordered the surplus land to be surrendered. The a…
AFZAL AND ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 8417 January 1996Disposed off
Two minor boys were illegally detained by police to coerce a criminal suspect. The Supreme Court ordered the police to file counter‑affidavits denying the detention, but the affidavits were later found to be false and the signature of Superintendent M.S. Ahlawat was forged by a head constable on instructions from senio…
PANNALAL BANSILAL PITTI AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
1996 INSC 8517 January 1996Disposed off
The petitioners, hereditary trustees of several Hindu charitable and religious institutions in Andhra Pradesh, challenged Sections 15, 16, 17, 29(5) and 144 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987, alleging violations of Articles 14, 15, 25 and 26 of the Constitution. …
PADANATHIL RUGMINI AMMAversusP.K. ABDULLA
1996 INSC 8717 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The dispute arose from a leasehold property originally owned by a Tarwad, which was taken by an ex parte decree in 1942 and sold at a court auction to the decree‑holder Mohammed Haji. The decree‑holder subsequently leased the land to Raghavan Nair, whose rights were later assigned to P.K. Abdulla, the respondent. The e…
HARYANA WAREHOUSING CORPORATIONversusRAM AVTAR AND ANR.
1996 INSC 8817 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Ram Avtar, a Mali‑cum‑Chowkidar employed by Haryana Warehousing Corporation, was stopped at the efficiency bar for the years 1988 and 1989 and faced adverse remarks in his 1986‑87 confidential report. He challenged the orders through writ petitions; the High Court dismissed the first petition but allowed the second, di…
KESAVENCHARI GOPALKRISHNAN ACHARIversusVELU ACHARI PAPPUKUTTY ACHARI AND ORS.
1996 INSC 8917 January 1996Dismissed
The case concerned a partition suit over land originally owned by Ummini, whose five sisters inherited his interest and executed an Ottikuzhikanam deed in favour of the first defendant. The first defendant later released his interest to the second defendant, who also obtained a sale deed from a man claiming to be Ummin…
THE U.P. JAL NIGAM, LUCKNOW THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN AND ANR.versusM/S KALRA PROPERTIES (P) LTD., LUCKNOW AND ORS.
1996 INSC 9017 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Uttar Pradesh Jal Nigam acquired 0.23 acres of land for a pumping station by publishing a Section 4(1) notification on 8 March 1973, taking possession on 5 July 1973 and issuing a Section 6 declaration on 9 October 1973. The respondent, Kalra Properties, purchased the land in 1989 after the acquisition and sought c…
KARNATAKA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONversusP.S. RAMAKRISHNA
1996 INSC 8017 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appeal arose from an order of the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal rejecting a service matter involving P.S. Ramakrishna. The appellant argued that a notice sent on 28 September 1993, which was returned marked “Not present”, should be deemed served on the respondent. The Tribunal had not treated the notice as serv…
THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAX ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD AND ANR.versusG. SETHUMADHAVA RAO AND ORS.
1996 INSC 8117 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Commissioner of Commercial Tax appealed against an Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal order that held Rule 22 of the State and Subordinate Service Rules did not apply to appointments by promotion for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The Supreme Court examined Rule 5 of the A.P. Commercial Tax Subordinate …
N. NARASIMHAIAH AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 8217 January 1996Dismissed
The State of Karnataka and the Union of India issued a notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to acquire 114 acres for the Defence Research & Development Organisation, dispensing with the enquiry under Section 5A by invoking Section 17(4) and publishing a declaration under Section 6 on June 2…
STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS.versusL. KRISHNAN AND ORS.
1996 INSC 8317 January 1996Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined an appeal by the State of Tamil Nadu against a Madras High Court order that had quashed a notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, on the ground that it was vague because the development scheme was not fully formulated. The Court held that a scheme need not be comple…
UMRAH KHATOONversusMD. ZAFIR KHAN AND ORS.
1996 INSC 148816 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Umrah Khatoon filed a suit claiming an easement right to discharge drain water over the land of Md. Zafir Khan. The trial court decreed in her favour and the first appellate court affirmed the decree. The High Court reversed, holding the suit non‑maintainable because the plaint also asserted title to the land, deeming …
BALBIR CHANDversusTHE FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 148916 December 1996Dismissed
The petitioner, a manager of the Food Corporation of India, was removed from service after a joint disciplinary enquiry found him guilty of dereliction of duty for failing to verify a fraudulent transport contract obtained by a notorious contractor impersonating another person. The petitioner challenged the validity of…
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusN.R. BANERJEE AND ORS.
1996 INSC 149116 December 1996Dismissed
The case concerned promotion to the post of Senior General Manager in the Indian Ordinance Factories under the Indian Ordinance Factories Service Rules. The Union of India argued that the Central Administrative Tribunal erred by directing the government to ignore the Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) of 1994 and to co…
THE VICE CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF ALLAHABAD AND ORS.versusDR. ANAND PRAKASH MISHRA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 149216 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Allahabad University had begun recruitment for two Reader posts before the U.P. Public Services (Reservation of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes) Act, 1994 came into force. After the Act became effective (retrospectively from 11 December 1993), the Chancellor directed the Vice‑Chancellor to a…
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.versusDHARAM SINGH
1996 INSC 149316 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Punjab initiated disciplinary action against Dharm Singh for failing to report for duty during his suspension from 21 November 1991 to 31 October 1992. An inquiry concluded that his absence was wilful, leading to his removal from service. The Punjab & Haryana High Court set aside the removal on the ground …
KULDIP SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
1996 INSC 105716 September 1996Dismissed
Head Constable Kuldip Singh was dismissed from the Punjab Police without a departmental enquiry under proviso (b) of Article 311(2) of the Constitution, on the ground that it was not reasonably practicable to hold an enquiry because witnesses feared for their lives. The dismissal was based primarily on a confession he …
THE PATIALA CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD.versusTHE PATIALA CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK EMPLOYEES UNION AND ANR. ETC.
1996 INSC 105616 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Patiala Central Cooperative Bank and its employees' union entered into a comprehensive settlement on 28 May 1973, valid for four years, covering pay scales and dearness allowance. After the settlement expired on 31 March 1977, the bank issued a notice on 25 February 1978 under Section 19(2) of the Industrial Disput…
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusKANWAR KUMAR MEHTA AND ORS. ETC.
1996 INSC 105816 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) allotted 5,000 plots in Rohini, Delhi, but a stay ordered by the High Court on land acquisition delayed issuance of allotment letters. After the stay was vacated, the DDA recalculated plot costs using a cost‑of‑living index escalation of 16.62% per annum, whereas the High Court had…
PFIZER LTD.versusMAZDOOR CONGRESS AND ORS.
1996 INSC 89216 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Pfizer Ltd., a pharmaceutical manufacturer, terminated two security staff members (respondents) after they were arrested for alleged theft, invoking its standing order for loss of confidence. The respondents filed complaints under Section 28 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour …
SRI M.A. RAJASEKHARversusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA.AND ANR.
1996 INSC 89316 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a Tehsildar, challenged an adverse remark in his 1988‑89 Annual Confidential Report that he "does not act dispassionately when faced with dilemma." The Supreme Court held that adverse remarks must be based on specific instances and the officer must be given an opportunity to respond. Since the remark was…
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BOMBAYversusT.P. KUMARAN
1996 INSC 89416 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, an Income‑Tax Officer, was dismissed from service and filed a suit challenging his dismissal. The suit was decreed, resulting in his reinstatement, but the arrears of salary were not paid, prompting a writ petition in the High Court which ordered payment of all arrears. After the arrears were paid, the …
THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF WORKS AND HOUSING, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA AND ORS.versusSH. MOHINDER SINGH JAGDEV AND ORS.
1996 INSC 89616 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Sh. Mohinder Singh Jagdev was appointed as a Section Officer in the Central Public Works Department in 1956 but was found to have obtained the appointment using false certificates. He was suspended and later terminated on 10 September 1957 under Rule 5 of the Central Government (Temporary) Service Rules, 1949, while cr…
STATE OF KARNATAKAversusG.M. HAYATH
1996 INSC 89716 August 1996Dismissed
The State of Karnataka initiated disciplinary proceedings against G.M. Hayath under Rule 6(1) of the Karnataka State Police Disciplinary Proceedings Rules, 1965, alleging that he had submitted a false income certificate at recruitment, claiming his father's income exceeded the Rs 1,000 per annum ceiling. The Tribunal h…
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA WORKERS UNIONversusFOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ANR.
1996 INSC 74616 July 1996Disposed off
The Food Corporation of India (FCI) had employed 464 handling mazdoors at its Siliguri depot, first through a contractor, then via a direct‑payment system, and later reverted to the contractor method. The workers, represented by their union, claimed that the re‑introduction of the contractor system was illegal and that…
M/S. KALPETTA ESTATES LTD. ETC. ETC.versusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, COCHIN
1996 INSC 74716 July 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, owners of rubber estates, sold old, unyielding rubber trees during the assessment years 1968-69 to 1978-79. The Income Tax Officer treated the difference between the sale price and the notional price fixed under Section 55(2) of the Income Tax Act as capital gains and also taxed the replantation subsidy…
SRI KRISHNA PVT. LTD. ETC.versusITO CALCUTTA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 74816 July 1996Dismissed
Sri Krishna Pvt. Ltd. claimed large unsecured hundi loans in its return for AY 1959‑60. In the assessment of the subsequent year (AY 1960‑61) the Income Tax Officer discovered that many of those loans were bogus and that the alleged lenders were near relatives of the company’s directors. Relying on this, the Officer is…
STATE BANK OF BIKANER AND JAIPURversusAJAY KUMAR GULATI
1996 INSC 74916 July 1996Dismissed
The State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur ordered a fresh disciplinary inquiry against employee Ajay Kumar Gulati, appointing a new inquiry officer despite an earlier report finding the charges established. Gulati challenged the order in a writ petition before the Delhi High Court, contending that the de novo enquiry should…
COMORIN MATCH INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU
1996 INSC 53016 April 1996Dismissed
Comorin Match Industries (Pvt.) Ltd. challenged Central Sales Tax assessments for the years 1957-58 to 1965-66 on the ground that the tax was levied on turnover that included excise duty, which the Madras High Court had held to be illegal. The High Court quashed the assessments, but the State of Tamil Nadu did not appe…
SMITH KLINE AND FRENCH (INDIA) LTD. ETC.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
1996 INSC 53216 April 1996
The assessees, Smith Kline and French (India) Ltd., claimed a deduction for a surtax liability of Rs. 76,777 under the Companies Profits (Surtax) Act, 1964 while computing their total income for AY 1976-77. The Income Tax Officer disallowed the deduction based on Section 40(a)(ii) of the Income‑Tax Act, which bars any …
MOTILAL DAULATRAM BORA AND ORS.versusMURLIDHAR RAMCHANDRA BHUTABE (SINCE DECEASED) BY HIS LRS. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 53316 April 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The dispute concerned the width of a common road on property jointly purchased by the parties in Nasik. The trial court and the appellate court, after extensive consideration of oral and documentary evidence, found that a 30‑foot wide road existed and enjoined the defendants to remove encroachments. The Bombay High Cou…
SRI SAMIR SOBHAN SANYALversusTRACKS TRADE PRIVATE LTD. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 53416 April 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, S. S. Sanyal, was occupying premises as a tenant of India Foils Ltd. when the landlady sold the property to Habitat Developers, who obtained a decree for specific performance and possession. Although the decree was against the landlady, the appellant was not impleaded nor was any eviction order passed ag…
IMPROVEMENT TRUST, MOGA ETC.versusMANCHANDA SOAP WORKS AND ORS.
1996 INSC 53516 April 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Improvement Trust, Moga initiated a truck diversion scheme under Section 36 of the Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922, acquiring 15.5 acres for a new market. Notices of the scheme and objections were published in newspapers and the Gazette as required by the Act, and the scheme was approved under Section 40. The res…
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusNANDLAL RAIGAR
1996 INSC 53616 April 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Nandlal Raigar, an accountant in the Rajasthan Telephones Department, was dismissed on May 9, 1973 for alleged fabrication of records. After exhausting departmental appeals, he filed a suit in 1980 seeking a declaration that his dismissal was illegal. The trial court dismissed the suit on limitation grounds but noted p…