Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

Judgments of 1996

1,256 judgments, newest first — showing 1,001–1,200.

LOKNARAYAN PANDE AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 11507 October 1996Dismissed

The petitioners, Head Constables in the Maharashtra Subordinate Police Service, sought regularisation for promotion to Sub‑Inspector based on a High Court order that required them to file their willingness within two months. They failed to do so, later filed a special leave petition, and claimed that a subsequent gover

SRI HANUMANTHAPPAversusSRI MUNINARAYANAPPA

1996 INSC 11517 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Sri Hanumanthappa, filed a partition suit in 1966 and obtained a compromise decree in 1990 granting him a share of 39 guntas of land, for which he was put in possession by the Tehsildar in 1993. The respondent, Sri Muninarayanappa, had purchased the same land from a co‑sharer in 1986, before the decree.

JOGINDER TULIversusS.L. BHATIA AND ANR.

1996 INSC 11527 October 1996Dismissed

The appellant, Joginder Tuli, occupied a premises under a lease dated 21 December 1990 at a rent of Rs.6,000 per month. The respondent, S.L. Bhatia, terminated the tenancy on 15 March 1993 and instituted suit No.133/1993 for possession, valuing the suit at Rs.72,000. The respondent later amended the plaint to claim dam

DR. SHIVDEV SINGH GREWAL THROUGH DR. AMRIK SINGH SANDHUversusHARGURBACHAN SINGH GREWAL

1996 INSC 11537 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, residing in Malaysia, was served summons for a suit seeking declaration of title and possession of property. The suit was decreed ex‑parte on 22 July 1986. Upon learning of the decree on 13 November 1986, the appellant filed an application under Order IX, Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure on 24 Dece

UNION OF INDIAversusSHRI UJAGAR LAL

1996 INSC 11547 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned Shri Ujagar Lal, a retired railway employee who remained in unauthorized possession of railway accommodation for over two years, resulting in the Railway Board’s circular directing that his death‑cum‑retirement gratuity not be paid until he surrendered the quarters. The Central Administrative Tribuna

OM PRAKASH GARGIversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

1996 INSC 11557 October 1996Dismissed

The petitioner, a government servant, sought reimbursement of medical expenses incurred for heart disease treatment in a private hospital. Although the amount was eventually disbursed on August 28, 1991, there was a delay, and the petitioner claimed interest at 12% on the delayed payment. The Punjab & Haryana High Cour

DR. KISHOREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 11567 October 1996Dismissed

Dr. Kishore was appointed on an ad hoc basis as Medical Officer (Class III) in Maharashtra on 28 February 1990, with successive extensions. Fearing termination, he filed a writ petition, which was transferred to the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. The Tribunal allowed him to continue only until a candidate selecte

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.versusNILMANI SAHU AND ANR.

1996 INSC 11587 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Bihar acquired 43.14 acres of land with trees under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and the Land Acquisition Officer valued the trees at Rs 2,466, a valuation upheld by the reference court and embodied in a decree dated 27 March 1980. The State paid compensation and the respondents appealed under Section 5

DAYANANDLAL AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 8347 August 1996Disposed off

The case concerned promotions of constables to head constables in the Kerala Police Subordinate Service. Senior constables who had failed a 1978 promotion test were later qualified in a 1981 test, but juniors who qualified in 1978 were promoted first under Rule 10(ii) of a 1963 order. The senior constables challenged t

TULSI SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

1996 INSC 8357 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed

Tulsi Singh was convicted by a Special Court for the murder of his wife based solely on a confession he gave before a Judicial Magistrate. The appellant contended that the confession was not recorded in accordance with Section 164(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, which requires the magistrate to caution the accused a

M/S SIRDANWAL INDUSTRIESversusCOMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX

1996 INSC 8367 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed

Mis Sirdanwal Industries appealed against the Commissioner of Sales Tax challenging the classification of its brass wire under the Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948. The issue was whether the brass wire, an alloy of copper and zinc, fell within the entry "copper, tin, nickel, or zinc, or any other alloy containing any

V. L. PATILversusARJUN HALAPPA NAIKAWAD! AND ORS.

1996 INSC 8377 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether the Karnataka High Court was justified in criticizing the appellant, V.L. Patil, for allegedly using his ministerial position to influence a land tribunal's decision. The High Court had linked Patil's role as a minister to the tribunal's order, despite finding no direct or circumstant

THE STATE OF M.P. ETC.versusHARISHANKAR GOEL AND ANR. ETC.

1996 INSC 8387 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Madhya Pradesh acquired 33 bighas 15 biswas of agricultural land in 1964 for industrial purposes. The Collector initially awarded Rs 3,150 per bigha, which was later enhanced by the Additional District Judge to Rs 1 per square foot with statutory benefits. The High Court judges varied the compensation, ran

UPENDRA NARAIN SINGH (DEAD) BY LRS.versusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

1996 INSC 8397 August 1996Dismissed

The appellant claimed a patta (title deed) for land in Muzaffarpur that he said was granted by the Zamindar on 11 August 1950. The Collector, exercising powers under Section 4(h) of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950, investigated and concluded that the patta was a fraudulent transfer intended to evade the Act, and there

BALDEV SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB THROUGH COLLECTOR

1996 INSC 8417 August 1996Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined an appeal by Baldev Singh and others challenging the Punjab & Haryana High Court’s reduction of compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Collector had fixed Rs 16,000 per acre, the Additional District Judge raised it to Rs 30,000 per acre, and the High Court re

STATE OF KERALA AND ORS.versusM.N. SANKARA NARAYANAN AND ORS.

1996 INSC 8427 August 1996Disposed off

The State of Kerala challenged a notification issued under the Kerala Preservation of Trees Act, 1986 that prohibited felling of all trees on a 60‑acre parcel which the Supreme Court had earlier declared not to be a private forest under the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971. The respondents, who

CHINTAMAN AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

1996 INSC 8437 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants challenged the award of compensation for land acquired by the State of Maharashtra for a spinning mill near Nagpur. The Land Acquisition Officer had fixed compensation at Rs 5,000, Rs 3,000 and Rs 2,000 per acre for three categories of land. The reference court enhanced the compensation to Rs 0.40 per sq

DURGA DASversusTHE COLLECTOR AND ORS.

1996 INSC 8447 August 1996Dismissed

Durga Das purchased a share of land from Kewal Krishan, a member of a family that owned 14 cannals 18 marlas of land. The government acquired part of this land under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and the appellant claimed compensation as a tenant in occupation, relying on a mutation entry that listed him as a qualify

KARAN SINGH AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA

1996 INSC 8467 August 1996Dismissed

The appellant's land, acquired under a notification issued pursuant to Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, was awarded compensation of Rs.10 per square yard by the Reference Court, relying on a Delhi High Court decision in A.N. Bialdari v. Union of India. The High Court had based its award on a market value

JHANDOO (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA

1996 INSC 8477 August 1996Dismissed

The appellant’s land, measuring one bigha and 14 biswas, was acquired under a 1957 notification of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The reference court awarded compensation at Rs 10 per square yard, relying on the decision in A.N. Bhandari v. Union of India, which the High Court affirmed. The appellant argued that the m

THE NEW DATAR TRANSPORT CO. (PVT.) LTD.versusSMT. RADHABAI AND ORS.

1996 INSC 8487 August 1996Dismissed

The case concerned a collision between a jeep driven by Shantaram Patki and a passenger bus, resulting in the death of R.J. Kulkarni. The trial court dismissed the claim for damages, deeming the accident inevitable, but the Bombay High Court reversed this, finding the bus driver negligent and upholding a compensation a

DHANNA ETC.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

1996 INSC 6957 July 1996Dismissed

The case involved the murder of Nanji, for which five persons were charged. The Sessions Court convicted two accused (K and M) under Section 302 IPC and acquitted the remaining three, including Dhanna, due to insufficient evidence linking Dhanna to the crime. The Madhya Pradesh High Court reversed Dhanna's acquittal, i

PAWAN KUMARversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.

1996 INSC 6327 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed

Pawan Kumar was appointed on an ad‑hoc basis as a Class IV field worker in Haryana. While in service he was convicted in a summary trial under Section 294 of the Indian Penal Code for an obscene act, pleading guilty and paying a fine of Rs 20. When his regularisation was considered, the authorities, relying on the conv

PREM SINGH AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusHARYANA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1996 INSC 6337 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Haryana State Electricity Board advertised 62 junior engineer posts, stating that candidates with higher qualifications would receive preference. After screening, 212 candidates were shortlisted and 147 were appointed, far exceeding the advertised vacancies. The petitioners challenged the appointments, alleging vio

THE ASSTT. COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISEversusBATA INDIA LTD.

1996 INSC 6257 May 1996Dismissed

The Assistant Collector of Central Excise appealed against Bata India Ltd. alleging that the manufacturer could not claim exemption under a notification that exempted footwear valued up to Rs.60 per pair when its wholesale price exceeded that limit. Bata argued that by deducting the 10% excise duty from the wholesale p

U.P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ORS.versusTRILOK CHANDRA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 6267 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, U.P. State Road Transport Corporation, was sued for compensation after its omnibus caused the death of Prem Chandra, aged 26. The claimants calculated loss of dependency based on a monthly surplus of Rs.200 and applied a multiplier of 24 years, which the Tribunal used; the High Court corrected the multip

HIMACHAL ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusSH. DINESH KUMAR

1996 INSC 6357 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The children of deceased employees of the Himachal Road Transport Corporation applied for regular clerk appointments under the corporation's "kith and kin" policy, but no vacancies existed. The Administrative Tribunal directed the corporation to appoint the applicants immediately, and in one case even ordered the creat

THE III INCOME TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE - I, SALEM AND ANR.versusARUNAGIRI CHETTIAR

1996 INSC 6367 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Arunagiri Chettriar, retired from a partnership firm in 1963 and later the firm was dissolved. The Income Tax Officer issued a notice that the respondent was jointly and severally liable for tax arrears of the firm for assessment years 1962-63 and 1963-64, arguing that liability attaches to any partner

SRI KRISHAN GOPAL SHARMA AND ANRversusGOVERNMENT OF N.C.T. O F DELHI

1996 INSC 6377 May 1996Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined criminal prosecutions under Sections 7 and 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 against manufacturers of pan masala and mouth freshener whose products contained saccharin at 2000 ppm and 2450 ppm, exceeding the limits prescribed by Rule 47 of the 1955 Food Adulteration Rules. T

MULTIPURPOSE HEALTH WORKERS ASSOCIATION & ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 6387 May 1996Dismissed

The Multipurpose Health Workers Association, whose members are multipurpose health workers in Haryana, sought to have the higher pay scale of Rs 1200‑2040 applied to them from 1 May 1990, as stipulated in a State Government notification dated 26 July 1991. The State Government had instead granted the scale from 1 Janua

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusPURSHOTTAM

1996 INSC 6407 May 1996Dismissed

The respondents, originally appointed as Junior Engineers on a work‑charged establishment, were later absorbed into the regular establishment but were omitted from the state‑wide seniority list. They contended that the Government of Maharashtra’s resolutions, which granted a "deemed date" of absorption for seniority pu

SH. JAG MOHAN CHAWLA AND ANR.versusDERA RADHA SWAMI SATSANG AND ORS.

1996 INSC 6417 May 1996Dismissed

The plaintiffs filed a suit for perpetual injunction to prevent the respondents from interfering with their possession of a specific plot of land. The respondents, in their written statement, claimed to have purchased a different plot and sought a counter‑claim for a permanent injunction to restrain the plaintiffs from

PUSHPAGIRI MATHversusKOPPARAJU VEERABHADRA RAO

1996 INSC 6277 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, Pushpagiri Math, claimed ownership of a parcel of land that had been granted as a Bhatavarthi inam to the great‑grandfather of the respondent, Kopparaju Veerabhadra Rao, for services rendered. The respondent asserted title by prescription after the Inam Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari Act, 1956 ca

BRITISH INDIAN CORPORATION LTD.versusMIS RASHTRACO FREIGHT CARRIERS

1996 INSC 6287 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed

British Indian Corporation Ltd entrusted 147 bales of raw wool to Rashtaco Freight Carriers for transport. The carrier detained the goods and sued the owner for an injunction, claiming arrears of Rs 13,48,817.13 in transport charges. The owner filed a separate suit for recovery of the detained goods. The carrier applie

MADHU KISHWAR AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.

1996 INSC 4897 April 1996Disposed off

The petitioners, tribal women from Bihar, challenged Sections 7, 8 and 76 of the Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act, 1908 as discriminatory against women and violative of Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution. The Court examined whether the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 and the Indian Succession Act, 1925 applied to Scheduled

SHRI M.B. GOPALA KRISHNA AND ORS.versusTHE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND ACQUISITION

1996 INSC 1987 February 1996Dismissed

The State issued a notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to acquire 105 acres for defence purposes. The Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded compensation of Rs.30 per square yard, which the civil court later enhanced to Rs.108 per square yard. The respondent appealed, and the High Cour

BOMBAY ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION GROUP AND ANR.versusTHE MUNICIPAL CORPN. OF PUNE AND ORS.

1996 INSC 2007 February 1996Disposed off

The Bombay Environmental Action Group appealed to the Supreme Court against the Bombay High Court’s order closing contempt proceedings against builders who were constructing a building on plot No. 57. The High Court had held that the construction did not violate its earlier interim injunction dated 23‑03‑1992, which wa

OSMAN UMARversusMALAL ALIBHAI NATHU AND ORS

1996 INSC 2017 February 1996Dismissed

The appellant, representing the Patni Jamat, sought an occupancy certificate from the Mamlatdar in 1951 for land to be used as a Kabristan. A later suit (Suit No. 151/66) declared that all four jamats were jointly entitled to the land, and an injunction was placed against the appellant; this decree was reversed on appe

P.S. SAWHNEYversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 2027 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a government employee, sought annual increments of Rs.100 on his pay scale as directed by a previous Supreme Court order, arguing that after reaching the maximum of the scale the increments should continue as special pay. He also claimed entitlement to local allowances on par with the Punjab pattern afte

S. NOORDEENversusV.S. THIRU VENKITA REDDIAR AND ORS.

1996 INSC 2037 February 1996Dismissed

The appellant S. Noordeen challenged the validity of a sale of properties that had been attached before judgment in a suit (O.S. No. 95/53) to recover a debt from D.J. Gonzaga. The properties, including items 1‑7 attached under Order 38 Rule 6 of the CPC, were incorporated in a compromise decree dated 3 April 1954 and

AIR INDIA STATUTORY CORPORATIONversusUNITED LABOUR UNION AND ORS.

1996 INSC 14426 December 1996

The Air India Statutory Corporation, originally a statutory authority and later a company, employed union members as contract labour for cleaning and related services. The Central Government, as the appropriate Government under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970, issued a 1976 notification abolish

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.versusGURSHARAN SINGH AND ORS.

1996 INSC 14436 December 1996Disposed off

The Government Engineering College in Bhatinda was transferred to an autonomous society in 1992. The college’s staff, who were government employees, filed writ petitions seeking absorption into regular government service rather than being transferred to the society. The Punjab & Haryana High Court ordered that all of t

RELIANCE SILICON (I) PVT. LTD.versusCOLLECTOR, CENTRAL EXCISE, THANE

1996 INSC 12946 November 1996

The Supreme Court examined three groups of appeals concerning the classification of silicone products for Central Excise and Customs duties. It held that silicone oil that has undergone condensation, polycondensation or polyaddition falls under Central Excise Tariff Item 15A(1) and the corresponding Customs heading 39.

SMT. GULAB DEVIversusTHE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION AND ORS.

1996 INSC 12956 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Gulab Devi, succeeded to her father's tenancy under Section 35 of the Uttar Pradesh Tenancy Act, 1939, along with her sister Ram Kumari. After the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 came into force, Ram Kumari died unmarried while Gulab Devi was already married. The Deputy Direc

K.P.A. VELLAYAPPA NADAR (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.versusBHAGIRATHI AMMAL AND OTHERS

1996 INSC 12966 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, K.P.A. Vellayappa Nadar, was a partner in a firm formed in 1954. In February 1970, due to his old age, the partners mutually dissolved that firm and settled accounts, and a new partnership was created on 15 February 1970 without the appellant. After the death of one partner in 1972, the respondents filed

SHRI TULSIversusSMT. PARO (DEAD)

1996 INSC 12976 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Paro, sued Tulsi for possession of agricultural land, alleging Tulsi was merely a licensee who cultivated the land on her behalf. Tulsi contended he was a tenant at will, a status reflected in revenue records from 1951‑52 to 1971‑72 where he was listed as "Gar Marusi" and he had enjoyed uninterrupted po

JAI DAYAL AND ORS.versusKRISHAN LAL GARG AND ANR.

1996 INSC 12986 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed

Jai Dayal sued Krishan Lal Garg for a perpetual and mandatory injunction to keep a 5‑ft passage between their houses free from obstruction. The trial court granted the injunction in 1964, which was confirmed on appeal. After the obstruction was initially removed, Garg later built a shop that completely blocked the pass

M. POORNACHANDRAN AND ANR.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS.

1996 INSC 12926 November 1996Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered a review petition (No. 2070 of 1996) filed by Shri Prabir Chowdhury on behalf of M. Poornachandran and others against a judgment of the Madras High Court. The petitioner was not the advocate‑on‑record (AOR) who argued the original appeal, nor was he present during the proceedings. The Court

VIJAY KUMAR NIGAM (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.versusSTATE OF M.P. AND ORS.

1996 INSC 12996 November 1996Dismissed

V.K. Nigam, a Sub‑Inspector, was found to have received illegal gratification from a gambling organiser and was dismissed from service after a departmental inquiry. He challenged the dismissal, contending that he was not furnished with the preliminary inquiry report, violating natural justice, and that the statement of

INDIAN DRUGS AND PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. ETC.versusEMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION ETC.

1996 INSC 13006 November 1996Dismissed

The appellants, employers, had their regular employees perform overtime work and paid them overtime wages as per an agreement. The question before the Supreme Court was whether such overtime remuneration falls within the definition of "wages" under Section 2(22) of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948, especially wh

NAVANEETHAMMALversusARJUNA CHETTY

1998 INSC 3496 September 1998Appeal(s) allowed

Navaneethammal, the plaintiff, purchased land and sued Arjuna Chetty, the tenant, for declaration of title and recovery of possession. The tenant claimed he had surrendered the lease, re‑entered the land and acquired title by adverse possession, contending that the suit was barred by Article 139 of the Limitation Act.

CHOUDHARY GOUTAM KUMAR SARANversusDIRECTOR OF SPORTS AND YOUTH SERVICES ORISSA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 10046 September 1996Dismissed

The petitioner, an ad‑hoc employee, applied for the post of Senior Auditor under the Orissa Auditors Service Rules, 1987. Three candidates were shortlisted, and the Selection Board awarded extra marks for post‑graduation and honours qualifications, resulting in S. Sahu being selected. The petitioner challenged the awar

HANUMAN PRASADversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1996 INSC 10056 September 1996Dismissed

The case concerned the cancellation of a select list of 106 candidates for Ticket Collector posts after a CBI preliminary report indicated that examination papers had been leaked and mass copying occurred. The candidates challenged the cancellation, contending that the Divisional Manager lacked authority, that the orde

MOHAMMADversusMOHAMMED BEKE

1996 INSC 10066 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant transferred one acre and 65 cents of land with a building to his father for his lifetime enjoyment, stipulating that after the father's death the property would be used as a Muslim Jamat mosque. While the father was still alive, the appellant executed a second deed cancelling the earlier provision. The ce

GUMAN SINGHversusSTATE OF RATASTHAN AND ORS.

1996 INSC 10076 September 1996Dismissed

The petitioner, a lessee of sand stone in Rajasthan, failed to file the required returns under the Rajasthan Mineral Concession Rules, 1986, prompting the Assessing Authority to make a best‑judgment assessment under Rule 38(3) based on a government circular of 17 October 1987. A random weighment of a truck revealed 12

THE BRITISH MACHINERY SUPPLIES CO.versusTHE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 8266 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed

British Machinery Supplies Co., a manufacturer of sewing machines, imported rotating hooks with bobbin cases intended for industrial sewing machines. The Assistant Collector of Customs levied a higher duty under heading 84.2 (domestic sewing machines) instead of the 40% duty under item 84.41(1) (not elsewhere specified

LIPTON INDIA LTD. ETC.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

1996 INSC 8286 August 1996Disposed off

Lipton India Ltd. and Brook Bond India Ltd., tea companies, maintained godowns in 1968 where a single salesman opened and closed the premises, loading tea onto a manually‑operated push‑cart for door‑to‑door sales. They sought clarification on whether such premises required registration under Section 7 of the Bombay Sho

LAXMAPPA AND ORS.versusSMT. BALAWA KOM TIRKAPPA CHAVDI

1996 INSC 8296 August 1996Dismissed

The widow, a destitute and widowed daughter, adopted her brother as her son with her father's consent. The father and the adopted son jointly gifted her agricultural land in 1950, stipulating that the land would revert to them (or their heirs) upon her death. After the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 came into force, the wi

SHRI KANWAR PAL AND ORS.versusGAON SABHA KIRARI AND ORS.

1996 INSC 8306 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Gaon Sabha of Kirari Suleman Nagar complained that a co‑sharer, Narender Singh, had converted agricultural land to non‑agricultural use, violating Section 81 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954. A notice was served on Singh to restore the land to agricultural use within three months or face ejectment and vesting of

SRI RAM NIWAS TOD! AND ANR.versusBIBI JABRUNNISSA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 8316 August 1996Dismissed

The appellants challenged the validity of a gift of a house and its appurtenant land made by the father‑in‑law to the respondent, who was already in possession of the property. The gift was evidenced by an oral declaration and a written deed that had not been registered. The trial court and the High Court held that the

THE NAIHATI MUNICIPALITY AND ORS.versusCHINMOYEE MUKHERJEE AND ORS.

1996 INSC 8326 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Naihati Municipality resolved to rehabilitate hawkers by acquiring land, but lacked funds, so the hawkers' union contributed Rs 3,90,000 which was deposited with the municipal commissioner and became part of the municipality’s funds. The Government issued a notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Ac

AJAY KRISHAN SHINGHAL ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 8336 August 1996Dismissed

The petitioners challenged the acquisition of 3,470 acres in Naraina village for the "planned development of Delhi" on the grounds that the land was not required for a public purpose and that the substance of the notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 had not been properly published in the lo

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusSKIPPER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (P) LTD.

1996 INSC 6196 May 1996

The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) auctioned a plot of land in 1980, which was won by Skipper Construction Company (Skipper). Skipper paid only 25% of the price, repeatedly defaulted on the balance, and despite court orders continued to sell space in the proposed building, collecting about Rs. 25 crore from purchase

PASCHIM BANGA KHET MAZDOOR SAMIT!versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

1996 INSC 6216 May 1996Disposed off

The petitioners, members of Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samiti, filed a writ petition under Article 32 on behalf of Hakim Seikh, who suffered serious head injuries after falling from a train and was repeatedly denied admission in several government hospitals due to lack of beds and facilities, eventually receiving treat

HARI SHANKER ETCversusSTATE OF U.P. ETC.

1996 INSC 6226 May 1996Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the murder of Parshadi Lal, in which Hari Shanker fired a licensed 12‑bore gun belonging to Shiam Behari, killing the victim while the motorcycle was being pushed. The Court held that the medical evidence of blackening and a cork wad indicated a firing distance of roughly three feet to two ya

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusM. BHASKAR AND ORS.

1996 INSC 6186 May 1996Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the Railway Board's 15 May 1987 memorandum that altered recruitment and pay scales for Traffic/Commercial Apprentices. It held that the memorandum did not revise pay for all apprentices but only for higher‑grade Traffic/Commercial Inspectors, and that the Board acted within its authority unde

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.versusSRI KARTICK CHANDRA DAS AND ORS.

1996 INSC 6246 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The State of West Bengal and others directed the appellant to grant registration and subsidy under the West Bengal Cinemas Development Scheme, a direction issued by a single High Court judge under Article 226. While the appeal against that direction was pending, contempt proceedings were initiated against the appellant

SH. DHARMVIRversusAMAR SINGH

1996 INSC 1936 February 1996Dismissed

The appellant, Dharmvir, was elected to the Haryana Legislative Assembly from the Toshan constituency in June 1987. Petitioners alleged that during the counting of votes, Dharmvir's agents double‑marked, defaced and mutilated ballot papers cast for the rival candidate, Bansi Lal, and intimidated the Returning Officer t

STATE OF BIHARversusBIHAR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

1996 INSC 1946 February 1996Dismissed

The Bihar Legislature enacted the Bihar Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas for Consumption, Use or Sale Therein Act, 1993, imposing a tax of up to 5% on scheduled goods entering any local area in the State. The Patna High Court struck down the Act on grounds that it violated Article 301 of the Constitution, was not

M/S. MARIKAR MOTORS LTD.versusSALES TAX OFFICER AND ANR.

1996 INSC 1956 February 1996Disposed off

Marikar Motors Ltd., a dealer in motor trucks, sold vehicles on a hire‑purchase basis where the agreement stipulated a two‑year period and an option to purchase at the end. The dispute before the Supreme Court concerned when, for purposes of the Kerala Sales Tax Act, a sale is deemed to occur – whether automatically at

INDERMANI KIRTIPALversusTHE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1896 February 1996Dismissed

The petitioner, a former semi‑skilled workman who later became an Assistant Store Keeper, claimed that he was unfairly excluded from promotion to the OEP Section, alleging a violation of his right to consideration. The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dismissed his application through a single‑member bench. He cha

SMT. FIRDOSH FATIMA (SINCE DEAD) ETC.versusSMT. FIRDOSH BEGUM (DEAD) AND ORS. ETC.

1996 INSC 1906 February 1996Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of Section 4 of the Uttar Pradesh Amendment Act 33 of 1972, which abolished letters‑patent appeals from judgments of a single High Court judge in writ jurisdiction concerning revenue and tenancy matters. The petitioners challenged the amendment on the ground that i

K.P.O. MOIDEENKUTTY HAJEEversusPAPPU MANJOORAN AND ANR.

1996 INSC 1916 February 1996Dismissed

The appellant‑defendant challenged the trial and Kerala High Court judgments that upheld a suit for recovery of Rs 1.5 lakhs on a promissory note (Ex A) executed for the transfer of 3 acres 44 cents of land and a building. The appellant contended that the note was purportedly for cash consideration, that the underlying

STATE OF U.P.versusO.P. SHARMA

1996 INSC 1926 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The State of U.P. filed an FIR against O.P. Sharma, manager of Modi Paints and Varnish Works, for storing large quantities of edible oils without a licence under the U.P. Oil‑seeds and Oil‑seeds Products Control Order, 1966 and the Edible Oil‑seeds and Edible Oils (Storage Control) Order, 1977. The High Court quashed t

DR. R.K. GOYALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

1996 INSC 14375 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed

Dr. R.K. Goyal was appointed on an ad‑hoc basis as a lecturer in orthopaedics in a Uttar Pradesh medical college in 1983 without the three‑years teaching experience that the Public Service Commission later stipulated in its advertisement. The appointment was subsequently regularised under the Uttar Pradesh Regularisati

SMT. PRITAM KAURversusDY. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS AND ORS.

1996 INSC 14405 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents, sons of a West‑Pakistani resident who migrated to India in 1947, filed an application on 19 December 1955 under Section 4 of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954 seeking rehabilitation compensation for land in Pakistan. The authorities verified the claim and allotted land b

P. RAMA RAOversusP. NIRMALA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 14415 December 1996Dismissed

The petitioner, a contractor for Indian Oil, hired the respondent truck owner to transport 12,000 litres of oil. An accident caused a leak and only 1,755 litres were delivered, leading the petitioner to sue the truck owner and the insurer, Oriental Fire & General Insurance Co., for the shortfall. The trial court decree

UNION OF LNDIA AND ORS.versusSUSHIL KUMAR MODI AND ORS.

1996 INSC 12805 November 1996Disposed off

The Supreme Court heard appeals against a Patna High Court order that, in an application for extension of time, directed all CBI investigation reports in the Bihar "Fodder Scam" to be submitted directly to the High Court and barred the Director of the CBI from intervening in the investigation. The Court held that the D

TMT. NOORJAHANversusTMT. SULTAN RAJIA @THAJU AND ORS.

1996 INSC 12825 November 1996Dismissed

Syed Abu Thakir was injured while alighting from a bus owned by the appellant and died en route to the hospital. His family claimed Rs 92,000 compensation from the bus owner, the insurer, and the driver. The Motor Vehicles Tribunal awarded the full amount but limited the insurer's liability to Rs 10,000, invoking Secti

IN RE: AJAY KUMAR PANDEY...CONTEMNERversus.

1996 INSC 12835 November 1996Disposed off

Advocate Ajay Kumar Pandey filed petitions and letters containing intemperate, insulting language against two Supreme Court judges, demanded apologies and compensation, and threatened to prosecute them, also filing a criminal complaint in a magistrate's court. The Supreme Court, after giving him opportunities to delete

ORISSA MINING CORPORATION AND ANR.versusANANDA CHANDRA PRUSTY

1996 INSC 12845 November 1996Dismissed

The appellant, Orissa Mining Corporation, dismissed its Assistant Accounts Officer, the respondent, after a disciplinary inquiry found him guilty of making false notings that led to loans being sanctioned to ineligible persons and of failing to maintain proper registers. The respondent challenged the dismissal before t

S.K. NAIRversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

1996 INSC 12855 November 1996Dismissed

The appellant, an army personnel, was convicted of murder and causing injuries with a khukri in a barracks. He appealed, asserting that he was a diagnosed paranoid and therefore incapable of understanding his acts, seeking protection under Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code. The Supreme Court examined whether the ment

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusDHIRENDRA KUMAR

1996 INSC 12865 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Madhya Pradesh prosecuted Dhirendra Kumar for the murder of Munibai, alleging motive stemming from an 'evil eye' and supported by eye‑witness testimony, a dying declaration, and the recovery of the murder weapon, a revolver stolen from the police malkhana. The trial court convicted Kumar under s.302 IPC an

RAJ KUMAR GUPTAversusLT. GOVERNOR, DELHI AND ORS.

1996 INSC 12875 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Lt. Governor of Delhi authorized Raj Kumar Gupta, Patron of a workers' union, to file a complaint under Section 34 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 against the employer for alleged unfair labour practices punishable under Section 25‑U. The employer challenged the order, and the Delhi High Court set it aside, ho

COMMANDER HEAD QUARTER CALCUTTA AND ORS.versusCAPT. BIPLA BENDRA CHANDA

1996 INSC 12885 November 1996Dismissed

The respondent, a commissioned officer who retired in May 1982, was denied a pension because, under the rules then in force, only two‑thirds of his pre‑commissioned service counted toward the qualifying service required for pension eligibility. In 1986 the government issued revised pension rules that allowed the entire

MOHD. ABDUL KHADER MOHD KASTIM AND ANR.versusPAREETHIJ KUNJU SAYED AHAMMED AND ORS.

1996 INSC 12895 November 1996Dismissed

The appellant, a mortgagor of a property under a usufructuary mortgage, filed a redemption suit seeking to pay the mortgage amount of Rs.18,000. The trial court passed a preliminary decree on 22 November 1960 directing redemption on deposit of the mortgage money, payment of mesne profits, and a provision for claiming i

SHANTINATH RAMU DANOLE AND ANR.versusJAMBU RAMU DANOLE AND ORS.

1996 INSC 12905 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed

Shantinath Ramu Danole and his mother Housabai (deceased) sued Jambu Ramu Danole for partition of ancestral land, claiming a two‑thirds share as the legitimate son and widow of Ramubabu Danole. The defendant denied that Housabai was ever married to Ramubabu and claimed sole ownership. The trial court accepted the testi

THE STATE OF GUJARATversusRAJESH KUMAR CHIMANLAL BAROT AND ANR.

1996 INSC 8205 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Gujarat appealed against an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission which had upheld a Gram Panchayat's claim to a subsidised electricity rate. The appellant argued that the question of pricing did not fall within the jurisdiction of the consumer redressal forums. The Supreme Court hel

MOHAMMAD KHA,LILversusKAMARUDDIN

1996 INSC 8215 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, one of four defendants in a suit for specific performance, challenged a decree of the appellate court before the Allahabad High Court. While three appellants were represented by counsel who appeared, the appellant had changed his advocate, and the new counsel failed to appear on the scheduled hearing dat

INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusSHRI BALAKRISHNA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 8225 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Indore Development Authority sought to acquire 4.85 acres of land under Town Improvement Scheme No. 54 framed under the Madhya Pradesh Town Improvement Trust Act, 1960. The Government sanctioned the scheme and a notification under Section 71(2) of the Act was published on 22 August 1973, which, according to the Sup

SRI CHOWDEGOWDA @ DORJI (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.versusC. NEGARAJU AND ORS.

1996 INSC 8235 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Sri Chowdegowda, claimed to be the legitimate son of the deceased, Machine Chowdegowda, and sought his share in a partition of ten acres of wet land, five point three acres of dry land and thirty gunthas of house site. The dispute centered on whether a customary Kuduvali marriage that allegedly took plac

BHARAT COKING COAL LTD. AND ORS.versusBABULAL AND ANR. ETC.

1996 INSC 8245 August 1996Disposed off

The case arose from a fatal roof collapse in the South Govindpur Colliery on 30 June 1989, which killed five miners and injured two. The senior mining engineer, Babular, and the manager, Maheshwari Sharma, were alleged to have been absent and to have failed to take safety precautions, leading a fact‑finding committee t

RAMESHWAR DUBEY AND ORS.versusMASOMAT ASHA KAUR AND ORS.

1996 INSC 8255 August 1996Dismissed

Rameshwar Dubey and others filed a suit on 15 February 1973 under Section 31 of the Specific Relief Act seeking declaration that two sale deeds (dated 12 July 1966 and 14 December 1970) were void because fraud had been perpetrated on the plaintiff. The trial court and the Patna High Court held that the fraud rendered t

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, TAMIL NADUversusCITY MILLS DISTRIBUTORS (P) LTD .

1996 INSC 1785 February 1996Disposed off

City Mills Distributors Pvt. Ltd. was incorporated on 30 October 1972. Its promoters had earned Rs. 24,862 from business carried out between 1 and 20 October 1972, before the company existed, and the Income‑Tax Officer included this amount as pre‑incorporation profit in the company's assessment for AY 1974‑75. The Trib

ST. MARY'S SCHOOL AND ORS. ETC.versusCANTONMENT BOARD, MEERUT AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1815 February 1996Disposed off

The petitioners, owners of buildings claimed to be exempt from property tax under Section 99 of the Cantonment Act, appealed an assessment order without depositing the tax as required by Section 87. The appellate authority allowed the appeal, invoking the exemption, which led the Cantonment Board to file a writ petitio

M.C. DHINGRAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1835 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed

M.C. Dhingra, who had rendered temporary service in a State Government before joining the Central Government and retired on 1 February 1973, sought a proportionate pension for that earlier service. The Government of India issued a circular on 31 March 1982 allowing such pensionary benefits but limited them to employees

L. RAJAIAHversusINSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND STAMPS, HYDERABAD AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1845 February 1996Disposed off

The appellant, L. Rajaiah, a Junior Assistant in the Andhra Pradesh Registration and Stamps Department, was temporarily promoted to Senior Assistant in 1989 but later had to relinquish the post when senior officers were reinstated. In 1991, two Senior Assistant posts were created, yet the appellant was passed over in f

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.versusCHHANGUR PRASAD SETH

1996 INSC 1855 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed

Shyama Devi, a teacher employed by the State of Bihar, died on 17 August 1988 and had nominated certain persons to receive her General Provident Fund (GPF) benefits. The nominated claimants were paid the GPF amount. The deceased's brother's son, Chhangur Prasad Seth, later produced a succession certificate and claimed

STATE OF ORISSAversusRAJAKISHORE DAS

1996 INSC 1865 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Orissa acquired about 120 decimals of land in Bhubaneswar for a road extension under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The landowner, Rajakishore Das, constructed a building on the land without obtaining municipal permission, despite knowing that the land was subject to acquisition. After the acquisition awa

RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ANR.versusLADULAL MALI

1996 INSC 1875 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation terminated Ladulal Mali's service in 1983, a termination later confirmed by an appellate authority. Mali filed a suit seeking a declaration that the termination was illegal; the District Munsif declared the termination void and against natural justice. Mali then filed an e

THE AJMER CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. AJMER, THROUGH THE MANAGING DIRECTORversusTHE PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY UNDER THE RAJASTHAN SHOPS AND CO. ESTABLISHMENT ACT, AIMER AND ORS.

1996 INSC 215 January 1996Dismissed

The manager of a village cooperative Samiti (the second respondent) was dismissed on charges of embezzlement. Claiming that the dismissal order was never served, he filed a civil suit for injunction, which was later withdrawn, and also lodged a complaint under Section 28‑A of the Rajasthan Shops and Establishment Act.

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXversusMANOHARLAL GUPTA AND CO.

1996 INSC 235 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant‑Commissioner of Income Tax appealed against the Calcutta High Court’s decision that the assessment of Manoharlal Gupta & Co. as an unregistered firm for AY 1961‑62 was improper. The firm had been assessed by one Income‑Tax Officer (ITO‑C) while a partner, Manoharlal Gupta, had earlier been assessed by ano

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusNAZIR AHMED SHEIKH

1996 INSC 245 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed

Inspector Dharamveer of the Border Security Force was murdered on 26 October 1990 by the accused, Nazir Ahmed Sheikh. The accused was arrested on 8 March 1991 and a charge‑sheet was filed on 6 March 1992. The issue before the Court was whether the charge‑sheet was filed within the one‑year limitation prescribed under S

U.P. STATE SUGAR CORPORATIONversusM/S SUMAC INTERNATIONAL LTD.

1996 INSC 14334 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The U.P. State Sugar Corporation entered into a contract with M/s Sumac International Ltd. for the supply and installation of a sugar plant, requiring the seller to furnish several irrevocable bank guarantees payable on demand. The contract was not completed within the stipulated or extended time, leading the appellant

M/S HINDUSTAN FERODO LTD.versusTHE COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BOMBAY

1996 INSC 14344 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed

Mis Hindustan Ferodo Ltd. appealed against the finding of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal that its asbestos rings and fabrics fell under Item 22‑F of the Central Excise Tariff. The appellant submitted affidavits from a senior manager and an experienced asbestos dealer stating that the rings we

JIVAN LAL AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

1996 INSC 14364 December 1996Dismissed

Thirteen persons were tried for the murder of Mohan Lal on 11 June 1984. The trial court convicted eleven, acquitting two; the High Court later acquitted eight of the convicted and upheld the conviction of three appellants under sections 148 and 302/149 IPC. The appellants challenged the reliance on the sole eye‑witnes

SASADHAR CHAKRAVARTY AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 12724 November 1996Dismissed

The petitioners, a retired employee of Indian Oxygen Ltd. and a pensioners’ society, challenged the scheme of the company’s non‑contributory approved superannuation fund. They argued that improvements made to the fund in 1985 should have been extended to existing pensioners and that the denial of such benefits violated

INDIRA SAWHNEYversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 12734 November 1996Disposed off

The Supreme Court revisited the implementation of its earlier Mandal judgment, which required the exclusion of socially advanced persons (the "creamy layer") from reservations for Other Backward Classes (OBCs). The State of Kerala had repeatedly failed to comply with the Court's directions despite multiple extensions,

COMMON CAUSE A REGD. SOCIETYversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 12744 November 1996

The Supreme Court examined the arbitrary allotment of fifteen petrol pumps by the then Minister of Petroleum, Capt. Satish Sharma, finding that the allocations were made without any official application, advertisement, or criteria, and favoured relatives and associates, thereby violating Article 14 of the Constitution.

RAJ KUMAR KARANWALversusTHE COMMISSIONER AND ANR.

1996 INSC 12754 November 1996Dismissed

The petitioner had placed a bid in a 1993‑94 toll‑lease auction but could not take over the lease because the earlier contractor obtained a stay that later lapsed. For the years 1995‑97, instead of conducting a fresh auction, the Executive Engineer recommended that the petitioner be granted a lease for the same amount,

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusMAJOR R.N. MATHUR

1996 INSC 12764 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed

Major R.N. Mathur was granted a permanent NCC commission in 1980 with an appointment letter stating that, if fit, he could serve until the age of 55. The Central Administrative Tribunal directed that he be retained in service until the age of 57. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined whether the appointment letter and

UNION OF INDIAversusK.R. THAMPI

1996 INSC 12774 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Union of India appealed against a decision of the Central Administrative Tribunal which had granted the respondent, K.R. Thampi, a higher pay scale of Rs. 2200‑4000 (Assistant Director) after he was re‑allocated from a temporary veterinary post to the Geological Department as an Administrative Officer. Th

SOWRASHTRA VIPRA SABHAversusTHE NAMAKKAL MUNICIPALITY AND ANR.

1996 INSC 12794 November 1996Dismissed

The Sowrashtara Vipra Sabha filed a suit seeking a declaration of title and a perpetual injunction over land it claimed as an estate. The respondents, Namakkal Municipality and others, argued that the land was Pavadi land which, after the abolition of the estate, vested in the State free of encumbrances. Lower courts h

KUMBHAR DHIRAJLAL MOHANLALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

1996 INSC 11424 October 1996Dismissed

The appellant, Kumbhar Dhirajlal Mohanlal, was charged with murdering his wife, Hansaben, by pouring kerosene on her and setting her on fire. The deceased gave three dying declarations—before a doctor, a head constable, and an executive magistrate—stating that her husband had set her ablaze. The trial court acquitted t

STATE OF TAMIL NADUversusSRI SRINIVASA SALES CIRCULATION

1996 INSC 11434 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a coupon scheme operated by Sri Srinivasa Sales Circulation where a customer paid Rs.5 for a coupon, received three coupons for Rs.16 each, sold them to three persons for Rs.5 each, and ultimately obtained an article of his choice after the downstream purchasers cleared their payments. The As

TAMIL NADU HOUSING BOARD AND ANR.versusP. PARTHASARATHI

1996 INSC 11444 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent applied for allotment of a plot from the Tamil Nadu Housing Board in 1987, paid the required amount, but the plot was later converted into a public road and thus unavailable. After years of inactivity, the Board offered another plot on the condition that the respondent certify he owned no flat or plot, w

THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICEversusK.S. SWAMINATHAN

1996 INSC 11454 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, then an Inspector of Police, was named in a charge memo alleging misconduct after a raid uncovered material linking him to illegal payments. He challenged the memo before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, which set it aside on the ground that the charges were vague. The Supreme Court examined whet

DELHI ADMINISTRATION THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND ORS.versusSUSHIL KUMAR

1996 INSC 11464 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Sushil Kumar, applied for recruitment as a constable in the Delhi Police in 1989‑90 and was provisionally selected pending verification of his character and antecedents. The verification revealed antecedent records that the appointing authority deemed unsuitable, and his provisional selection was cancel

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusPRAVEEN GUPTA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 11474 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India sought to acquire two bighas of land in Siraspur and Libaspur for shifting the timber market under the Delhi Master Plan 2001. The acquisition was effected by a notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, with the enquiry under Section 5A dispensed with by invoking the urgency

JANAKI S. MENON AND ORS.versusDR. V.R.S. KRISHANAN AND ORS.

1996 INSC 11484 October 1996Dismissed

The deceased V. Madhava Raja left unpaid income tax, wealth tax and agricultural income tax. A partition suit was filed, and the State sought to recover the tax dues by attaching the estate, eventually ordering the sale of the property Devi Vilas Palace by public auction. The auction purchaser sought extensions and wit

HIMACHAL PRADESH MARKETING BOARD AND OTHERSversusSHANKAR TRADING COMPANY PVT. LTD. AND ORS.

1996 INSC 9954 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents, Shankar Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. and others, bought khairwood (a forest agricultural produce) and processed it through a series of physical and chemical steps to produce katha, a catechu product listed in the schedule of the Himachal Pradesh Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. The Himachal Pradesh Marketi

REVAPPA GURUSIDDAPPAversusTHAKUBAI MADHAVARAO PATIL AND ORS.

1996 INSC 9964 September 1996Dismissed

The first respondent entered into an agreement on 11 March 1983 to purchase 3 acres 28 gunthas of land for Rs.12,000, paying Rs.2,000 as earnest money. The petitioner‑second defendant subsequently bought the same land on 8 July 1983 for Rs.6,000 and registered the sale deed. The first respondent sued for specific perfo

SHROMANI GURDWARA PRABHANDAK COMMITTEEversusJASWANT SINGH

1996 INSC 9994 September 1996Dismissed

The respondent, Jaswant Singh, filed a suit seeking declaration of title and possession of a parcel of land. The petitioner, Shromani Gurudwara Prabandhak Committee, initially denied any title of the alleged owner, Isher Singh, in its first written statement. After trial, the petitioner sought to amend its written stat

MUNICIPAL BOARD, HAPUR ETC.versusJASSA SINGH AND ORS. ETC.

1996 INSC 10014 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Municipal Board of Hapur had set up a bus stand and, by resolution, increased the daily fee for its use from Rs 0.50 to Rs 0.75. Transport operators (the respondents) challenged the fee, arguing that the municipality lacked authority to levy it and that the increase was ultra vires. The Allahabad High Court struck

COMMON CAUSE-A REGISTERED SOCIETYversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1996 INSC 4874 April 1996Case Allowed

The Supreme Court entertained a public‑interest writ filed by Common Cause seeking enforcement of statutory provisions that require political parties to disclose their sources of funding and maintain audited accounts. The Court examined the obligations under Section 293A of the Companies Act, 1956, Sections 13A, 139(48

MAHE BEACH TRADING COMPANY AND ETC.versusUNION TERRITORY OF PONDICHERRY AND ORS.

1996 INSC 4854 April 1996Dismissed

The appellants, dealers in petrol and diesel in Mahe, challenged the levy of a municipal tax on fuel and the subsequent Pondicherry Municipal Decree (Levy and Validation of Taxes, Duties, Cesses and Fees) Act, 1973. The High Court had struck down the original levy and later upheld the Validation Act as intra vires. On

VAZIR GLASS WORKS LTD.versusMAHARASHTRA GENERAL KAMGAR UNION AND ANR.

1996 INSC 154 January 1996Disposed off

The appellant, VAZIR GLASS WORKS Ltd., sought closure of its loss‑making factory under s.25‑0(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, but the Maharashtra Government rejected the application on 12‑Oct‑1992. The company filed a review application under s.25‑0(5) within the one‑year period, which remained pending when th

MRS. VALSAMMA PAUL ETC.versusCOCHIN UNIVERSITY AND ORS. ETC.

1996 INSC 164 January 1996Dismissed

The appellant, a Syrian Catholic (a forward caste) married a Latin Catholic fisherman (a backward class) and was appointed as a lecturer to a post reserved for Latin Catholics under Articles 15(4) and 16(4) of the Constitution. The appointment was challenged on the ground that she was not entitled to reservation benefi

RAJBIR SINGH, HFS-IIversusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.

1996 INSC 184 January 1996Dismissed

The appellant, Rajbir Singh, challenged the inter-se seniority between himself and M.P. Sharma, who had been appointed to an additional post as a general candidate. The High Court had dismissed the writ petition without addressing the seniority issue because Sharma was not made a party to the proceedings. On appeal, th

OMKAR NAMDEO JADHAO AND ORS.versusSECOND ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE BULDANA AND ANR.

1996 INSC 194 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were served a notice under Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code for prosecution under Sections 194 and 195 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that they had fabricated a false case against two elderly women. The Sessions Judge relied on statements recorded under Section 161 CrPC and on the physical

MUNISHWAR DUTT PANDEYversusRAMJEET TIWARI AND ORS.

1996 INSC 14293 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed

Munishwar Dutt Pandey, the senior-most lecturer, was appointed ad hoc Principal of Brijendra Mani Inter College on 1 July 1988 after the previous principal retired. The college’s managing committee later ratified this appointment on 29 October 1988. When the Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Services Selection Boards (

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORSversusBIHAR DISTILLERY LTD. ETC.

1996 INSC 14303 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Bihar enacted the Bihar Excise (Amendment and Validating) Act, 1995 to give statutory basis to the price fixation of country liquor and the deduction of a 0.70‑paise warehouse‑maintenance charge that had been ordered by the Excise Commissioner. Distilleries challenged the Act, arguing it was beyond the Sta

UNION OF INDIAversusU.D. DWIVEDI ETC.

1996 INSC 14313 December 1996Dismissed

U.D. Dwivedi, a scientist in the Defence Research and Development Organisation, challenged his promotion assessment on the ground that the Recruitment and Assessment Centre (RAC) was chaired by Prof. S. Sampath, a former member of the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC). The Central Administrative Tribunal held the

MOHMEDRAFIZ HUSENMIYA THAKOR AND ORS.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

1996 INSC 14323 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved the murder of Girishbhai, a VHP secretary, for which 63 persons were charged under Section 302 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the TADA Act. Nine appellants were convicted by the designated court based largely on eye‑witness identification. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined the reliability of the iden

VIJAY SINGH DEORA ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR. ETC. ETC.

1996 INSC 11403 October 1996Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the method for fixing inter se seniority among three categories of officers (Group A, B and C) in the Rajasthan Engineering Subordinate Service (Irrigation Branch) for promotion to Assistant Engineer. Group A officers were temporarily appointed before 30 June 1978, while Group B and C officer

HINDUSTAN STEELWORKS CONSTRUCTION LTD.versusTHE COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR AND ORS.

1996 INSC 9873 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed

Hindustan Steelworks Construction Ltd., a government company registered as a principal employer under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970, engaged M/s Investigation and Security Services India Pvt. Ltd. as a licensed contractor to supply security staff. The contractor paid the workers lower wages t

RASHTRIYA MILL MAZDOOR SANGHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 9883 September 1996Dismissed

The appellant, a workers' union, challenged the constitutional validity of Sections 9(2), 10(2), 12(1) and 26 of the Central India Spinning, Weaving and Manufacturing Company Limited, the Empress Mills, Nagpur (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act, 1986, alleging violations of Articles 14, 19(1)(c) and 21 of th

HIRAversusKASTURIBAI AND ORS.

1996 INSC 9903 September 1996Dismissed

The respondents, children of a deceased pakka tenant, sued to declare a 1960 sale deed executed by their mother invalid, alleging that her remarriage in 1958 forfeited her tenancy rights under the Madhya Bharat Land Revenue and Tenancy Act. The trial court, appellate court and High Court held that the mother lost her r

SH BENOY MAZUMDAR (DEAD) BY LRS.versusTHE COLLECTOR OF CACHAR

1996 INSC 9923 September 1996Dismissed

The appellant's 60 bighas of land, requisitioned in 1959 under the Assam Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948 for settlement of Bangladesh refugees, was compensated at Rs. 300 per bigha under Section 7(1A). The appellant argued that the land, originally granted in 1872 for "special cultivation," should attract

STATE BANK OF INDIA STAFF ASSOCIATIONversusSTATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 4793 April 1996Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether a retired employee of the State Bank of India, who had been elected General Secretary of the SBI Staff Association before his retirement, could continue to represent the union and negotiate with management. The appellants argued that Sections 6(e) and 22 of the Trade Unions Act, 1926

GHULAM DIN BUCH ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

1996 INSC 4803 April 1996Disposed off

The case concerned the alleged conspiracy by senior officials of the Jammu & Kashmir Power Department to award transport contracts for bamboo poles at inflated per‑kilometre‑per‑pole rates, causing wrongful loss to the State. The prosecution proved that the officials deliberately selected non‑transport firms, fixed unr

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, LUCKNOWversusRAJA VISHWANATH PRATAP SINGH

1996 INSC 4813 April 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Commissioner of Wealth Tax, challenged the High Court's order that allowed a deduction of a Rs 30 lakh decree amount as a debt owed by the assessee, Raja Vishwanath Pratap Singh, under the Wealth Tax Act. The decree arose from his father's debts under the U.P. Encumbered Estates Act; the father's estate

DR. SMT. SHIPRAversusSHANTI LAL KHOIWAL

1996 INSC 4773 April 1996Dismissed

Dr. SMT. Shipra filed an election petition challenging the election of S.L. Khotwal on grounds of corrupt practices. The petition and its supporting affidavit were served on the returned candidate, but the copy of the affidavit omitted the notarized verification required by Form 25 under Rule 94‑A of the Conduct of Ele

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALOREversusSMT. R. SHARADAMMA

1996 INSC 4843 April 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned penalty proceedings for the assessment year 1972-73 that had been referred to the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner (IAC) under Section 271(1)(c) and Section 274(2) of the Income Tax Act. The Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975 deleted sub‑section (2) of Section 274 with effect from 1 April 1976. The

STATE OF U.P.versusAMEER ALI

1996 INSC 4783 April 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased wife was attacked by her husband, who beat her, poured kerosine on her and set her on fire. She gave two dying declarations, one to an Executive Magistrate on the day of the incident and another to a Sub‑Inspector the following day, both describing the accused's actions. At trial, the Sessions Court convic

B. G. KUMARVELU AND ANR.versusK.R. KANAKARATHNAM CHETTY AND ORS.

1996 INSC 123 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute arose over the lease of the Opera House, a cinema building in Bangalore, which included fittings, furniture and some machinery but excluded projectors, amplifiers, screen and speakers. After a series of lease deeds spanning from 1944 to the 1970s, the respondents sought eviction of the appellants, arguing t

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, THROUGH THE SECRETARY RURAL DEVELOPMENT TO THE GOVT. OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLAversusASHWANI KUMAR AND ORS.

1996 INSC 143 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents were daily‑wage workers engaged on a muster‑roll under a Central Government scheme in Himachal Pradesh. After the project was completed and closed due to lack of funds, they were dismissed. They filed a writ petition in the Himachal Pradesh High Court, which issued an interim direction ordering their re

M/S BIHAR STATE FOOD AND SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD.versusM/S GODREJ SOAPS PVT. LTD. AND ORS.

1996 INSC 14212 December 1996Disposed off

The petitioners, Bihar State Food and Supplies Corporation Ltd., sought to have suit No. 398/89, which had been transferred to the Subordinate Judge, Patna, re‑transferred back to that court for trial, arguing that the earlier order for a joint trial with suit No. 1028/78 had outlived its purpose. The respondents oppos

BABY AMMALversusRAJAN ASARI

1996 INSC 14222 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Baby Ammal, owned a property in Trivandrum and filed a suit for possession and a declaration that the respondent, Rajan Asari, was merely a licensee. The trial court decreed in favour of the appellant, but the Kerala High Court reversed the decision, holding that a deed executed in 1966 was a valid gift

MASJID FARKUNDA MOSQUEversusHAMED BASHA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 14232 December 1996Dismissed

The appellant, Masjid Farikunda Mosque, filed a suit for ejectment and possession of a house, claiming it had purchased the super‑structure in 1975 from Mohd. Hussain. The third respondent had earlier bought the same land and super‑structure by a registered sale deed in 1969, making him the true owner. The Madras High

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, GHAZIABADversusSMT. JAIMALA

1996 INSC 14242 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The trial court passed a decree in favour of the respondent, which the appellant sought to execute. While the decree was being executed, the respondent filed a revision and the High Court stayed the execution. Counsel for the appellant, unaware of the stay, claimed no revision was filed, leading the executing court to

MANOJ BEHARI LAL MATHUR AND ANR.versusDR. SHANTI MATHUR AND ORS.

1996 INSC 14252 December 1996Dismissed

The appellants' mother filed a suit for perpetual injunction against Dr. Shanti Mathur to prevent alienation of a family property, later filing suits for partition and for a declaration that Dr. Mathur was a benamidar and the property belonged to the joint family. An application was made to amend the plaint to allege t

BASHIR MUSA PATELversusSATYAWAN GANPAT .JAWKAR AND ORS.

1996 INSC 14262 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents filed an election petition alleging corrupt practices by the appellant, Bashir Musa Patel, under the Representation of the People Act, 1951. The petition was found to lack the specific particulars required by Section 86(5) of the Act. The Bombay High Court, while acknowledging the deficiency, directed t

THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER TELECOM KERALA CIRCLE TRIVENDRUM AND ANR.versusG. RENUKA AND ANR.

1996 INSC 14282 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the promotion of Junior Telecom Officers where 15% of the posts were reserved for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST). In the competitive examination, several SC/ST candidates failed to meet the general qualifying marks, prompting the government to constitute a Review Committee as per Cir

KRISHNAN AND ANR.versusSTATE OF KERALA

1996 INSC 9772 September 1996Dismissed

The deceased Madavan was killed in a night-time attack allegedly orchestrated by his brother Krishnan and nephew Vijay Kumar, who waited under a tree and assaulted him with knives. The trial court acquitted the accused, but the Kerala High Court convicted them under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal

UNION OF INDIAversusMOHAN SINGH RATHORE AND ANR.

1996 INSC 9782 September 1996Disposed off

Mohan Singh Rathore, a Rajasthan State Police Service officer, was placed on the select list for promotion to the Indian Police Service (IPS) and his name was approved by the UPSC. The State Government failed to issue the mandatory "no deterioration certificate" before his retirement on 31 May 1988, and consequently hi

SHARAFAT HUSSAIN (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.versusMOHD. SHAFIQ AND ORS.

1996 INSC 9792 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The sole appellant died while his appeal was pending before the High Court. The death was notified late, and the appellant's counsel could not locate the legal heirs to file a substitution application within the prescribed time, leading the High Court to declare the appeal abated and dismiss it. An application filed la

STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.versusS.M. KOTRAYYA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 9802 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The teachers (respondents) misused Leave Travel Concession benefits in 1981‑82, leading to recovery actions in 1984‑86. They filed applications before the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal challenging the government's right to recover the amounts. In August 1989 the Tribunal, in similar cases, held that the government

D. RADHAKRISHNANversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 9812 September 1996Dismissed

D. Radhakrishnan, appointed to the Tamil Nadu State Police Service in 1979, was transferred to a cadre post in July 1980 and continuously officiated there. He was first placed on the UPSC‑approved select list in 1979 (continued for 1980), omitted in 1981 due to lack of vacancies, and re‑included in 1982. The Central Ad

ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusNASIRUZZAMAN AND ORS.

1996 INSC 9822 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Allahabad Development Authority had acquired 23 bighas 19 biswas of land for a Transport Nagar Scheme by issuing a notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and taking possession on 2 November 1977 under Section 17(4). The acquisition was later declared to have lapsed under Section 11-A of t

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusTHE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER & ORS.

1996 INSC 9842 September 1996Dismissed

The Union of India and another party, as tenants of a plot in Worli Estate, challenged a compensation award made by the Special Land Acquisition Officer under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. They argued that the award of Rs. 8300 per square foot was excessive and that, as tenants, they were entitled to pro‑rata compens

ARULMIGHU LAKSHMINARASIMHASWAMY TEMPLE SINGIRIGUDIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 9852 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a piece of land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for a public purpose. After the acquisition, a dispute arose over who was entitled to receive the compensation. The single judge had declared the title in favour of the petitioner and the division bench directed a civil court to determine

SHRI CHANDRAGAUDA RAMGONDA PATIL AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ETC.

1996 INSC 9862 September 1996Dismissed

The petitioners challenged the acquisition of land by the State of Maharashtra under the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act and the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, arguing that surplus land should be returned to them based on a government resolution. The land had been taken in 1974, an award was made in 1977, and after

SARVINDER SINGHversusDALIP SINGH AND ORS.

1996 INSC 8172 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed

Sarvinder Singh filed a suit for declaration of ownership of land based on a registered will of his mother dated 26 May 1952, also relying on an earlier decree granting him possession. He obtained an interim injunction against the defendants, which was later vacated. The defendants, heirs of Rajender Kaur, alienated th

CENTRAL WELFARE BOARD AND ORS.versusMS. ANJALI BEPARI AND ORS.

1996 INSC 8182 August 1996Case Partly allowed

Ms. Anjali Bepari was appointed as a Gram Sevika under the Central Social Welfare Board Scheme against a casual vacancy on 11 February 1992 and sought regularisation of her services. The Single Judge of the Calcutta High Court rejected her claim, holding the appointment was not in accordance with the rules, but a Divis

M/S. ELPRO INTERNATIONAL LTD.versusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE

1996 INSC 6102 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed

ELPRO International Ltd., a manufacturer of X‑ray components, obtained a final order from a three‑member bench of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT) which was later rectified by another three‑member bench. Subsequent applications for further rectification were heard by a two‑member bench

M/S. SUNDARAM CLAYTON LTD. ETC.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1996 INSC 6112 May 1996Dismissed

Sundaram Clayton Ltd. issued 20,40,000 worth of bonus shares by capitalising its general reserves in the assessment year 1971-72 and claimed that the bonus issue should be proportionately added to its share capital for the purpose of computing capital under Rule 3 of Schedule II of the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1

RAMESH BABULAL DOSHIversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

1996 INSC 6122 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Ramesh Babulal Doshi, was charged with the murder of Khodibhai Patel and related offences. The prosecution relied solely on circumstantial evidence, including sightings of the appellant with the deceased, a trunk containing the body, and blood‑stained articles recovered from the appellant's flat. The tri

KIRAN BALAversusSURINDER KUMAR

1996 INSC 6132 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed

Kiran Bala sold her residential house to relatives to pay debts, but the sale was declared null and void as a fraudulent transfer under the Transfer of Property Act. The decree-holder sought to attach and sell the house in execution of a money decree, while the appellant claimed exemption under Section 60(1)(ccc) of th

SMT. SANTOSH YADAVversusSTATE OF,HARYANA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 6142 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a Hindi teacher, was appointed on a six‑monthly contract in 1980 and regularised in 1984. In 1990 the Education Department ordered her removal, claiming her teacher‑training certificate from Uttar Pradesh was not recognised by Haryana. The Department relied on a 7 July 1981 circular that barred recruitme

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.versusSURESH CHANDRA MUKHERJEE

1996 INSC 6152 May 1996Disposed off

The State of Bihar appointed retired Patna High Court Judge Suresh Chandra Mukherjee as Presiding Officer of an Industrial Tribunal, but failed to honor the re‑employment conditions stipulated in the notification. Mukherjee filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court seeking enforcement of those benefits, and the Hig

SUKHDEOversusTHE.COMMISSIONER AMRAVATI DIVISION, AMRAVATI AND ANR.

1996 INSC 6162 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed

Sukhdeo, a Class III government employee with 30 years of service but under 55 years of age, was compulsorily retired on 23 March 1990 under Rule 65(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, based on adverse remarks in his confidential reports for 1987‑88 and 1988‑89. The remarks were contradictory

STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.versusN. MADAPPA AND ORS. ETC.

1996 INSC 6172 May 1996Dismissed

The State of Karnataka, by the Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation (Amendment) Act 1989, inserted sub‑section (4) in Section 3 of the Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1957, imposing a special additional tax on each occasion a motor vehicle carries passengers in excess of its permitted capacity. The respondents chal

NARASINGH PATNAIKversusSTATE OF ORISSA

1996 INSC 4672 April 1996Appeal(s) allowed

N. Patnaik, a senior engineer in the Orissa Irrigation Department, was compulsorily retired in 1986 under Rule 71(a) of the Orissa Service Code on the recommendation of a Review Committee that cited adverse entries in his confidential reports and several pending investigations. Patnaik challenged the retirement before

MILLS DOUGLAS MICHAEL AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

1996 INSC 4692 April 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined two appeals concerning the recruitment of Inspectors of Central Excise and Income‑Tax. The advertisement required a university degree by 1 August 1992, but allowed ex‑servicemen who were not graduates to be deemed graduates upon completing 15 years of service in the Armed Forces. The question

HUKAM CHAND AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC.

1996 INSC 4712 April 1996Dismissed

The petitioners sought additional compensation for land acquired under a 1971 notification after a High Court enhanced the award for other claimants to Rs.135 per square yard. The petitioners had earlier obtained a reference under Section 18 and an enhancement under Section 26, but they did not appeal to the High Court

ZILA DASTAVEJ LEKHAK ASSOCIATION BANDA AND ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

1996 INSC 4752 April 1996Dismissed

The Zila Dastavej Lekhak Association, representing persons licensed under the Uttar Pradesh Document Writers' Licence Rules, 1977, challenged the validity of Rule 6(2) which excludes advocates (and parties) from the requirement of obtaining a licence to draft and present documents for registration. The Association argu

NAMBURI BASAVA SUBRAHMANYAMversusALAPATI HYMAVATHI AND ORS.

1996 INSC 4762 April 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a dispute over two settlement deeds executed by Seshamma in 1958 in favour of her daughters, and a later will revoking one deed and bequeathing the property to the other daughter. After Seshamma’s death, the daughter Hymavathy filed suit claiming ownership, while the husband of the other daughter Vim

GURSHARAN SINGH AND ORS.versusNEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1662 February 1996Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the allotment of shops in a new marketing complex by the New Delhi Municipal Committee (NDMC) to long‑standing roadside stall‑holders on a concessional licence fee and with relaxed trade‑zoning restrictions, while other traders obtained shops at higher fees and with strict zoning. The appella

SABITRI DEI AND ORS.versusSARAT CHANDRA ROUT AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1672 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The decree-holder, a deceased intermediary, obtained a decree for possession of an estate in 1965, but the estate had been vested in the State of Orissa by a notification under Section 3(1) of the Orissa Estate Abolition Act in 1963. The judgment debtor filed a Section 47 CPC objection, and the executing court dismisse

NITYANAND SHARMA AND ANR.versusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ORS .

1996 INSC 1652 February 1996Dismissed

The appellants, two assistant teachers belonging to the Lohar caste, claimed that they were a Scheduled Tribe under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Order, 1950 (as amended in 1976) and sought promotion under the ST quota. They relied on the Hindi version of the Schedule, which listed "Lobar," and on earlier H

V.P. SHRIVASTAVA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF M.P. AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1702 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, direct recruits appointed as Assistant Directors of Industries on 29‑09‑1980 under the Madhya Pradesh State Industries (Gazetted) Service Recruitment Rules, 1965, challenged a seniority list that placed ad‑hoc promotee respondents, appointed on 27‑09‑1980 without Public Service Commission approval, abov

HARYANA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARDversusNARESH TANWAR AND ANR. ETC. ETC.

1996 INSC 1712 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined two appeals challenging High Court orders that directed the Haryana State Electricity Board to appoint the heirs of deceased employees on compassionate grounds. The petitioners argued that compassionate appointments are meant to provide immediate financial relief to dependents of a deceased e

SMT. PUTTAHONNAMMAversusC. GANGADHARA MURTHY AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1722 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute arose from a family partition and subsequent land demarcation ordered by the Assistant Director of Land Records, which was challenged by the respondents. The respondents appealed the demarcation order under Section 49 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1956, and the appeal was allowed, setting aside the ori

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusSEVA RAM AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1732 February 1996Disposed off

The Supreme Court entertained a petition under Article 136 of the Constitution, noting that the controversy was already covered by its earlier order in C.A. 3204/95 where delay was condoned and the matter was remitted to the High Court. Accordingly, the Court set aside the Rajasthan High Court’s order dated 12 January 

MUNICIPAL COMMITIEE, ABOHARversusREGIONAL COMMISSIONER, E.S.I. CORPN. AND ANR.

1996 INSC 1742 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Municipal Committee of Abohar operates the Patel Water Works and sought to exclude its water‑department employees from the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948. The Committee objected when a notice under Section 45‑A of the Act was issued, leading to an appeal under Section 75 after the Insurance Court affirmed the

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search