Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Indian Penal Code, 1860

3,190 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act — showing 601–800.

KANAKA REKHA NAIKversusMANOJ KUMAR PRADHAN & ANR.

2011 INSC 7225 January 2011Appeal(s) allowed

Manoj Kumar Pradhan, a sitting MLA, was convicted under IPC sections 147, 326 read with 149 and sentenced to seven years' rigorous imprisonment. He and another convict appealed, and the Orissa High Court granted him bail on the same day, citing his status as an MLA. The appellant, Kanaka Rekha Naik, the wife of the dec

MANJIT SINGH @ MANGEversusCBI, THROUGH ITS S.P.

2011 INSC 7325 January 2011Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined appeals against a Designated Court (TADA) judgment that convicted three men for the murder of Additional Collector L.D. Arora under the IPC and acquitted them of TADA charges. The key issues were the admissibility of confessional statements made by co‑accused under TADA s.15 against an accuse

AMAR BAHADUR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

2011 INSC 6925 January 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was accused of raping his daughter-in-law in the family home on 2 April 1989, an incident allegedly witnessed by several family members and resulting in the victim's bleeding. The trial court convicted him under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to seven years' rigorous imprisonment.

VIKRAM SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2010 INSC 5825 January 2010Disposed off

The appellants Vikram Singh, Jasvir Singh and Sonia were convicted for kidnapping a 16‑year‑old boy, Abhi Verma, for ransom, administering chloroform and pentazocine which caused his death, and for conspiracy under Sections 302, 364A, 201 and 120‑8 IPC. The Supreme Court examined the sufficiency of circumstantial and e

SURESH CHANDRA TIWARI & ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND

2024 INSC 90724 November 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were convicted of murder based on circumstantial evidence that they had last seen the deceased alive, were seen walking near the crime scene, purchased meat, and allegedly pointed out the spot where a blood‑stained stone was recovered. The Supreme Court examined whether each circumstance was proved beyon

MARIAPPANversusSTATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2023 INSC 103424 November 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, accused No.1, was convicted of murder (s.302 IPC) for stabbing the deceased during a heated verbal quarrel, while co‑accused No.2 and No.3 were acquitted. The issue before the Supreme Court was whether the appellant's act fell under Exception 4 to s.300 IPC, thereby constituting culpable homicide not amo

V. P. SINGH ETCversusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.

2022 INSC 132624 November 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined an appeal by three college officials charged under Section 306 of the IPC for alleged abetment of suicide after a student, Gaurav Wahi, was suspended and asked to deposit a security amount as part of disciplinary action. The student subsequently committed suicide, sending an SMS to his brothe

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusBABLU @ OM PRAKASH

2021 INSC 78224 November 2021Case Partly allowed

The case involved a violent assault on the house of an informant during Holi, resulting in the death of Dhanpal. Thirteen persons were charged under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 450, 452, 302 and 307. The trial court convicted all of them, but the High Court upheld convictions only of two accused and acquitted the remai

STATE OF BIHARversusRAJBALLAV PRASAD@ RAJBALLAV PP. YADAV@ RAJBALLABH YADAV

2016 INSC 106124 November 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Bihar appealed against the High Court’s order granting bail to Rajballav Prasad, an under‑trial accused charged with multiple serious offences under the IPC, POCSO Act and Immoral Traffic Act. The accused had initially evaded arrest, later surrendered, and his bail application was rejected by the trial cou

SHAMSHER SINGH VERMAversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2015 INSC 86024 November 2015Appeal(s) allowed

Shamsher Singh Verma was charged under IPC 354 and the POCSO Act for allegedly molesting his nine‑year‑old niece. The accused filed an application under Section 294 of the CrPC to have a compact disc containing a recorded conversation between the victim's father, the accused's son and his wife played in court and sent

RAM CHANDRA BHAGATversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND

2010 INSC 81024 November 2010Hearing Adjourned

The appellant, Ram Chandra Bhaghat, was convicted under Section 493 of the Indian Penal Code for deceitfully inducing a belief of lawful marriage and cohabiting with the complainant for nine years, during which they had two children. The appellant argued that no belief of a lawful marriage was induced, contending that

DATTAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2010 INSC 81424 November 2010Dismissed

The appellant was charged under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code for raping a girl aged 10‑12 years. The trial court acquitted him due to lack of medical proof, but the High Court set aside the acquittal, finding the victim’s and her mother’s statements credible and interpreting the medical report as indicating par

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusASHOK SIRPAL

2024 INSC 81924 October 2024Disposed off

Ashok Sirpal was convicted under the IPC and the Prevention of Corruption Act for embezzling Rs 46 lakhs and was sentenced to seven years rigorous imprisonment (concurrent) and a fine of Rs 95 lakhs, with a default term of simple imprisonment for non‑payment of the fine. He appealed to the Delhi High Court, which suspe

IMRAT SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2019 INSC 119024 October 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants Imrat Singh and others were convicted by the trial court and the High Court for offences under Sections 148, 149 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code based primarily on the testimony of two eye‑witnesses, PW‑10 and PW‑11. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined the statements of these witnesses and found numer

ASAR MOHAMMAD AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF U.P.

2018 INSC 98524 October 2018Disposed off

The case involved the murder of Zahida Begum and her son Ishlam, whose bodies were recovered from a septic tank after appellant No.1, Asar Mohammad, confessed and led police to the site. The trial court convicted all three accused under Sections 302 and 201 IPC, sentencing them to death (later commuted to life). On app

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusRAJARAM @ RAJA

2018 INSC 98624 October 2018Dismissed

The trial court convicted Rajaram for raping a minor who later died by suicide, invoking Sections 376(1) and 306 of the IPC. The High Court set aside the conviction, relying primarily on the testimony of the deceased's 12‑year‑old sister and her father, and acquitted the accused. The State appealed, arguing that the ch

L. KRISHNA REDDYversusSTATE BY STATION HOUSE OFFICER & ORS.

2013 INSC 72024 October 2013Dismissed

The husband, Ramachandra Reddy, murdered his wife Sujatha in a hotel in Pondicherry and subsequently committed suicide. Charges under IPC sections 302, 498A read with 34 were framed against him and his parents, Vidyasagar and Narasamma Reddy. After the husband's death, the charge against him abated, and the parents sou

JOGINDER SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2013 INSC 71824 October 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Joginder Singh was tried along with two others for murder, attempted murder and offences under the Arms Act arising from a land dispute that escalated into a shooting. The trial court acquitted all three accused, finding contradictions between eyewitness testimony, the ballistic report and the fact that t

SITA RAMversusBALBIR@ BALI & ANR.

2013 INSC 71524 October 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Sita Ram, filed an FIR alleging that Balbir (respondent No.1), an ex‑MLA, led a mob of 30‑35 armed men to his shop over a donation dispute, resulting in the death of his brother‑in‑law and injuries to several others. The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Balbir’s bail application, but the High Court lat

DR. BALRAM PRASADversusDR. KUNAL SAHA & ORS.

2013 INSC 71724 October 2013Disposed off

Dr. Kunal Saha filed a consumer complaint after his wife died while being treated for toxic epidermal necrolysis at AMRI Hospital. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission held the hospital and four doctors negligent but reduced the claim, deducted 10% for alleged contributory negligence and awarded only Rs.

ANUKUL SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR.

2025 INSC 115324 September 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Anukul Singh, challenged a FIR and charge sheet filed under Sections 420, 467 and 468 IPC alleging cheating and forgery arising from a dispute over a loan and property ownership. He contended that the FIR was a retaliatory measure linked to a civil dispute over land possession and that the complainant ha

SUNIL @ SONU ETC.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI

2024 INSC 72724 September 2024Case Partly allowed

The appellants Sunil (Accused No.1) and Nitin (Accused No.4) were convicted by the trial court and the Delhi High Court for murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC, based on a FIR lodged after a violent altercation that resulted in the death of Sachin. The prosecution proved that the injuries causing d

NEVADA PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS DIRECTORversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

2019 INSC 107724 September 2019Reference answered

The Supreme Court examined whether the phrase “any property” in Section 102 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 includes immovable property. It held that the provision confers power only to seize movable property, as the word “seize” implies taking physical custody, which is impossible for immovable assets. The Cou

GEORGE BHAKTANversusRABINDRA LELE & ORS.

2014 INSC 67524 September 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant filed a private complaint under Section 200 CrPC alleging forgery and fraud in connection with a machinery supply contract, leading the magistrate to take cognizance of offences under Sections 425, 468 and 471 IPC. The respondents obtained a stay of the cognizance by invoking Section 195(1)(b)(ii) CrPC, a

SUSHILA DEVIversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

2013 INSC 65124 September 2013Disposed off

The petitioners sought Supreme Court monitoring of a CBI investigation into the alleged police encounter killing of Dara Singh, claiming the investigation was incomplete. The CBI had completed its inquiry, filed a charge‑sheet against 16 accused, and the trial had commenced in the Sessions Court. The respondents argued

GIAN SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ANOTHER

2012 INSC 41924 September 2012Reference answered

The petitioner, convicted under Sections 420 and 120‑B IPC, sought quashing of the FIR under Section 482 of the CrPC on the ground that the dispute with the victim had been settled, although the offences were non‑compoundable under Section 320. The larger Bench examined the scope of the High Court's inherent power unde

V.P. SHRIVASTAVAversusINDIAN EXPLOSIVES LTD. & ORS.

2010 INSC 64624 September 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a tripartite agreement between the Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd (FCIL), Indian Explosives Ltd (IEL) and Bharat Coking Coal Ltd (BCCL) for the supply of ammonium nitrate. IEL later filed a criminal complaint alleging that senior FCIL officials (the appellants) and a third party suppressed the

MUKESH SINGHversusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

2023 INSC 76524 August 2023Dismissed

The appellant Mukesh Singh was convicted of murder, robbery and related offences based primarily on the identification of the injured eyewitness Sushil Kumar, who identified him in court after the accused had refused to attend a test identification parade (TIP). The accused argued that his refusal to participate in the

PUSHPENDRA KUMAR SINHAversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND

2022 INSC 86024 August 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an Executive Engineer of the Jharkhand State Electricity Board (JSEB), was accused of financial irregularities and fraud in connection with the implementation of an arbitration award favoring Ramjee Power Construction Limited (RPCL). The prosecution alleged that he prepared an agenda for appointing an ar

RAJBIR SINGHversusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB

2022 INSC 85824 August 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Rajbir Singh, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for allegedly poisoning his neighbour's wife by mixing organophosphorus into milk he supplied. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence, including a loan motive, alleged pronote, and chemical reports indicating poison in milk and viscera. The Sup

ZAKIR ABDUL MIRAJKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2022 INSC 85524 August 2022Dismissed

The State of Maharashtra alleged that the appellants were members of an organized crime syndicate operating the illegal "Mumbai Matka" gambling network. Police raided a gambling den, recorded confessions of several accused, including the appellants, by an Additional Superintendent of Police (Addl. SP) under Section 18

MANJEET SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

2021 INSC 41924 August 2021Appeal(s) allowed

An FIR (No.477) recorded the death of Amarjit Singh and injuries to his nephew Manjeet Singh, naming five persons as perpetrators. Only one accused, Sartaj Singh, was charge‑sheeted; the other four private respondents were placed in column‑2. During trial, the victim (PW1) reiterated the allegations against the private

HARJIT SINGHversusINDERPREET SINGH @ INDER AND ANOTHER

2021 INSC 41824 August 2021Leave Granted & Allowed

Harjit Singh filed an FIR alleging that his father was murdered by a group of accused, including Inderpreet Singh (respondent No.1), who was alleged to have orchestrated the conspiracy from jail using a mobile phone. The High Court granted bail to Inderpreet Singh, reasoning that he was not physically present at the cr

LALA @ANURAG PRAKASH AASREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2021 INSC 41524 August 2021Dismissed

The appellant, Lala @ Anurag Prakash Aasre, was convicted for murder, unlawful assembly and related offences after a group assault with sharp weapons that resulted in the death of Balu Mandpe and injuries to several witnesses. The key dispute was that the appellant’s name was absent from the FIR, though he was identifi

SARANYAversusBHARATHI AND ANOTHER

2021 INSC 41624 August 2021Appeal(s) allowed

Saranya appealed the Madras High Court's order that quashed the chargesheet against Bharathi (respondent No.1) for offences under Sections 420, 302 r/w 109 IPC. The High Court had examined the evidence and concluded that the accused was likely to be convicted, thereby exercising its power under Section 482 CrPC to dism

SUBRAMANIAN SWAMYversusA. RAJA

2012 INSC 35224 August 2012Rejected

Dr. Subramanian Swamy filed a criminal complaint alleging that former Finance Minister P. Chidambaram conspired with Telecom Minister A. Raja in the 2G spectrum scam, seeking to make Chidambaram an accused under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The Special Judge, after examining the material, found no evidence of Chid

ROHIT BISHNOIversusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR

2023 INSC 64224 July 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The case involves an alleged honour killing where the victim, Vikash Panwar, was shot dead by three accused who were related to his live-in partner. The accused were charged under Sections 302 and 120B of the IPC and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. The High Court of Rajasthan granted bail to all three accused in

POSTMAN VENGAISAMY & ORS.versusSTATE REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE & ORS.

2019 INSC 80224 July 2019Dismissed

The case involved fifteen accused who, on 26 April 2003, surrounded and brutally attacked the deceased Chinnaperiaiyah and two witnesses, Irulandi (PW‑1) and Ramar (PW‑2), using swords, resulting in the victim's death. The prosecution proved a prior attack on the victim on 8 April 2003, establishing a motive and a patt

ESHWARAPPAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2015 INSC 52224 July 2015Case Partly allowed

The appellant, Eshwarappa, was married to Latha, who complained about his illicit relationship with another woman and his demand for additional dowry. On 6 November 2005, Latha went to a field to collect money from her husband for her child's medical treatment and was later found dead with ligature marks around her nec

KAILASHversusSTATE OF M.P.

2013 INSC 49224 July 2013Dismissed

The appellant was accused of raping a 15‑year‑old girl who later died by suicide. An eye‑witness, a cousin aged about 13‑14, testified that he saw the appellant committing the assault, and his testimony was supported by another witness and by medical and forensic reports that showed evidence of sexual intercourse. The

ANUJ KUMAR GUPTA @ SETHI GUPTAversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2013 INSC 49124 July 2013Dismissed

The appellant, Anuj Kumar Gupta, was convicted for the murder of Chhotu Kumar Das based largely on a confessional statement he gave to the investigating officer (PW‑9) that led police to the victim’s body in a river. The trial court sentenced him to death, which the High Court later commuted to life imprisonment. The a

ARUMUGAMversusSTATE REP. BY INSP. OF POLICE

2012 INSC 30024 July 2012Dismissed

The appellant Arumugam was convicted under Sections 147, 148, 341 and 302 IPC for the murder of his brother, the deceased, based primarily on the testimony of a single eye‑witness who was also the victim's brother. The appellant challenged the conviction on grounds of delay in filing the complaint and registering the F

M. SARVANA @ K.D. SARAVANAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2012 INSC 30324 July 2012Dismissed

The appellant was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for stabbing and further assaulting the deceased, who later died. The prosecution relied on a dying declaration recorded by a police officer after medical certification of fitness, corroborated by an eye‑witness, forensic blood‑group evidence, the recovered kn

SHUDHAKARversusSTATE OF M.P.

2012 INSC 30124 July 2012Dismissed

The appellant Shudhakar was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for allegedly setting his wife on fire. The deceased gave three dying declarations: the first, recorded by a Naib Tehsildar, exonerated the husband and claimed the fire originated from a stove; the second and third, recorded later by a Tehsildar and

RAMPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF UP

2012 INSC 30224 July 2012Disposed off

Rampal Singh, an Indian Army soldier, broke a fence (ladauri) constructed by his relative RKS and threw garbage on his land, leading to a heated altercation during which they grappled. After being separated, Rampal retrieved a rifle, warned his brother to stay away, and, provoked by RKS's challenge to shoot, fired a si

MANOJ PRATAP SINGHversusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

2022 INSC 65224 June 2022Dismissed

Manoj Pratap Singh was convicted of kidnapping, raping and murdering a seven-and-a-half-year-old mentally and physically disabled girl. The prosecution proved its case through a complete chain of circumstantial evidence, including DNA matches, blood‑stained clothing, the victim’s body recovered at the appellant’s direc

ZAKIA AHSAN JAFRIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

2022 INSC 65324 June 2022Dismissed

The case arises from the 2002 Gujarat riots following the Godhra train burning incident, in which the appellant's husband was killed in the Gulberg Society massacre. The appellant filed a complaint alleging a larger criminal conspiracy at the highest level of the state government, including the then Chief Minister, to

MAMTA & ANRversusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR

2022 INSC 62624 May 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The second respondent was charged with kidnapping and murdering a 13‑year‑old child for ransom, with the trial ongoing since 2014. The Delhi High Court granted him bail, a decision challenged by the parents of the deceased and the State. The Supreme Court examined whether bail under Section 439 of the CrPC was appropri

V. SHANTHAversusSTATE OF TELANGANA AND ORS.

2017 INSC 46824 May 2017Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, V. Shanth, was the owner of a seed distribution company accused of selling spurious chilli seeds that caused loss to farmers, leading to three FIRs under the IPC and the Seeds Act, 1966. The State invoked preventive detention under the Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Dacoits,

RUMI BORA DUTTAversusSTATE OF ASSAM

2013 INSC 35424 May 2013Dismissed

The appellant aunt and nephew were convicted for murdering the deceased husband, an Upper Division Clerk, based on circumstantial evidence. The prosecution proved that the death occurred at 1.30 a.m., the victims were found dead in bed, the accused were present, and the nephew’s statement under Section 27 led to the re

RAJPUT JABBARSINGH MALAJIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2011 INSC 40924 May 2011Dismissed

The appellant, Rajput Jabbarsingh Malaji, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for murdering his brother Jethusing by striking him on the face with an axe. The prosecution relied on the dying victim's wife (PW‑3) who identified the appellant, corroborated by two brothers (PW‑5, PW‑6) whose statements were recorded under

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusISLAM

2011 INSC 41024 May 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Rajasthan appealed against the Rajasthan High Court’s order converting the murder conviction of respondent No.1 Islam under IPC Section 302 to a lesser offence under Section 304 Part‑II, on the ground that the High Court had erred in its appreciation of the evidence and its application of the fourth except

SUNEETHA NARREDDYversusY S AVINASH REDDY & ANR

2023 INSC 42224 April 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased Y.S. Vivekananda Reddy was murdered in March 2019 and the case was transferred to the CBI, which filed charge sheets naming several accused including the first respondent Y.S. Avinash Reddy. The first respondent sought anticipatory bail and filed a writ petition, prompting the Telangana High Court to grant

MAGHAVENDRA PRATAP SINGH @ PANKAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2023 INSC 41524 April 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Maghavendra Pratap Singh (Pankaj Singh), was convicted for the murder of businessman Goverdhan Aggarwal and related offences under Sections 302, 201, 120B of the IPC and the Arms Act, based largely on circumstantial evidence. The prosecution’s case lacked any eyewitnesses, direct forensic linkage, or rel

DIPAKBHAI JAGDISHCHANDRA PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHER

2019 INSC 56824 April 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Dipakbhai Jagdishchandra Patel, was implicated in a counterfeit currency case after co‑accused 1‑3 claimed the fake notes originated from his residence. No counterfeit notes were actually recovered from his home and the only incriminating material was the co‑accused statements recorded by police under Se

KAVITA CHANDRAKANT LAKHANIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

2018 INSC 40224 April 2018Dismissed

The appellant, Kavita Chandrakant Lakhani, filed an FIR alleging that her former boyfriend, Respondent No.2, forcibly took her to his house, beat her and later molested her. The charge sheet included offences under Sections 363, 342, 324, 354, 323, 506(ii) and 366 of the Indian Penal Code. Respondent No.2 was discharge

HEERA LAL AND ANR.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2017 INSC 39024 April 2017Appeal(s) allowed

The wife, Lalita, committed suicide within five years of her marriage, alleging daily quarrels and dowry demands by her mother‑in‑law and father‑in‑law. A dying declaration recorded by a Sub‑Divisional Magistrate detailed the harassment and the in‑laws’ presence at the time of the act. The trial court acquitted the acc

RAJ TALREJAversusKAVITA TALREJA

2017 INSC 38524 April 2017Appeal(s) allowed

The husband filed a petition for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, alleging that his wife had made false and defamatory complaints against him, his family and colleagues, which amounted to cruelty. The wife had lodged multiple complaints with various authorities and the media, all of which were later

NANDA GOPALANversusSTATE OF KERALA

2015 INSC 35724 April 2015Disposed off

The appellant was convicted under Sections 324 and 326 of the IPC for assaulting his cousin with a bat made of coconut leaf stem and a stone, causing grievous injuries. The High Court reduced his sentence, but the parties later reached a settlement and sought to compound the offences. The Supreme Court held that the qu

VUTUKURU LAKSHMAIAHversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2015 INSC 35224 April 2015Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the murder of Patrangi Ramanaiah, who was stabbed by a group of accused during an unlawful assembly. The trial court and High Court had convicted most of the accused under Sections 302, 148 and 324 IPC, relying on eyewitness testimony, a dying declaration, and forensic evidence, while acquitt

RAJAT PRASADversusC.B.I

2014 INSC 31824 April 2014Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined a criminal appeal filed by Rajat Prasad and Arvind Vijay Mohan, who were charged under Section 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 read with Section 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly conspiring to conduct a sting operation that exposed a Union Minister taking a bribe. The

FIROZ KHAN AKBARKHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2025 INSC 38724 March 2025Dismissed

The appellant, Firoz Khan Akbarkhan, was convicted along with a co‑accused for murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC, based on eyewitness testimony that he stabbed the deceased with a knife. He challenged the conviction, arguing that the delay of two to three days in recording witness statements unde

JOTHIRAGAWANversusSTATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE & ANR.

2025 INSC 38624 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was accused of raping the complainant three times, allegedly after promising to marry her. The complainant claimed she was coerced into sexual intercourse under threat and that the promise of marriage was a false inducement. The High Court rejected the appellant's application to quash the proceedings unde

ANIL KUMARversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

2023 INSC 29624 March 2023Dismissed

Anil Kumar, convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment, was released on emergency parole during the COVID‑19 pandemic by a High‑Powered Committee constituted under a Supreme Court order. He filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking to quash the Committee's decision that the parole period should not be

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.versusLOVE KUSH MEENA

2021 INSC 20824 March 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Rajasthan sought to appoint Love Kush Meena as a constable, but the recruitment advertisement disqualified candidates who were not honourably acquitted of offences involving moral turpitude or violence. Meena had been acquitted in a case under IPC sections 302, 323, 341 and 34 on the basis of benefit of do

MANJU DEVIversusONKARJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA @ OMKARJEET SINGH & OTHERS

2017 INSC 127624 March 2017Appeal(s) allowed

Manju Devi, a Scheduled Caste woman, complained that the respondents assaulted her, outraged her modesty and insulted her caste, invoking Sections 323, 354, 452 of the IPC and Section 3(1)(xi) of the SC/ST Act. The High Court granted anticipatory bail to the respondents under Section 438 of the CrPC. The appellant chal

MANMEET SINGH ALIAS GOLDIEversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2015 INSC 25324 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Manmeet Singh (alias Goldie) was convicted under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code for dacoity with murder, based on an alleged robbery of a large sum of money and the killing of Mohinder Singh. The prosecution alleged that five or more persons participated in the dacoity, but only the appellant was id

SHREYA SINGHALversusUNION OF INDIA

2015 INSC 25724 March 2015Disposed off

The petitioners challenged the constitutional validity of Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, alleging that it infringes the right to freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) and is not saved by the reasonable restrictions of Article 19(2). They also contested the validity of Section 69A

MD. BANI ALAM MAZID @ DHANversusSTATE OF ASSAM

2025 INSC 26024 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was accused, along with a co‑accused, of kidnapping and murdering a 16‑year‑old girl in Assam. The prosecution relied on three circumstantial links: the victim was last seen with the appellant, the appellant’s extra‑judicial confessions to several villagers, and the recovery of the dead body after those c

HIRALAL BABULAL SONIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2025 INSC 26624 February 2025Disposed off

The case involved a fraud scheme where fake telegraphic transfers were used to withdraw Rs. 6.7 crore from a bank, the proceeds of which were allegedly used to purchase 205 gold bars that were later seized from accused Nandkumar Babulal Soni. The trial court convicted Soni under Sections 120B and 411 of the IPC, direct

SUNEETI TOTEJAversusSTATE OF U.P. & ANOTHER

2025 INSC 26724 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a senior BIS officer deputed as Director of FSSAI, acted as Presiding Officer of the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) investigating a sexual harassment complaint. She filed a counter‑affidavit on behalf of the complainant without the complainant’s consent, and later amended it when the complainant wis

ANANT THANUR KARMUSEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS

2023 INSC 16824 February 2023Case Partly allowed

The appellant, a civil engineer, posted a viral picture of a sitting cabinet minister on Facebook and alleged that police, at the minister’s behest, forcibly took him to the minister’s residence, beat him and threatened him. He filed FIRs (Nos. 119 and 120 of 2020) but the minister was not named in the initial chargesh

THE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENTversusM. GOPAL REDDY & ANR

2023 INSC 16324 February 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The Directorate of Enforcement (ED) appealed against a Telangana High Court order that granted anticipatory bail to M. Gopal Reddy (respondent No.1) under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with a money‑laundering case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA). The Supreme Court examined whether the

RAMCHANDERversusANANTA

2015 INSC 14824 February 2015Dismissed

The husband, an engineer, filed a suit for divorce under Sections 13(1)(i‑a) and 13(1)(i‑b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, alleging mental cruelty and desertion by his wife, a draftsman. The wife counter‑claimed that she faced dowry harassment, alleged an extra‑marital affair by the husband, and had withdrawn a criminal co

SHYAMAL SAHA & ANR.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2014 INSC 12324 February 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The State alleged that Shyamal Saha and Prosanta (Kalu Kabiraj) abducted and murdered Paritosh Saha after taking him across the Ganges River. The trial court acquitted them, finding the prosecution's witnesses inconsistent and the basic fact of the victim boarding the boat doubtful, thereby granting the benefit of doub

SWAPAN KUMAR SENAPATIversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2011 INSC 15724 February 2011Disposed off

The appellant, Swapan Kumar Senapati, assaulted his uncle Satkari Senapati by sitting on his chest and allegedly striking his head with a stone. The victim died three days later from intracranial hemorrhage, with no external injuries found at autopsy. The FIR was lodged three days after the incident, citing Sections 34

TUKARAM & ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2011 INSC 16024 February 2011Disposed off

The deceased Prakash was assaulted after a marriage ceremony by members of two rival groups of the Dalit Mukti Sena. He sustained a buttock wound and later developed internal injuries, leading to his death after eighteen days of hospitalization. The trial court convicted the accused of murder (s.302/149 IPC) and other

NARAYAN DUTT AND ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.

2011 INSC 16124 February 2011Disposed off

The Additional Sessions Judge convicted Narayan Dutt, Manjit Singh and Prem Kumar for murder under the IPC and sentenced them to life imprisonment. While their appeals were pending before the High Court, they filed petitions under Article 161 of the Constitution seeking pardon from the Governor of Punjab, who granted i

MARIPPAN & ANR.versusSTATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE & ANR.

2025 INSC 16324 January 2025Case Allowed

The appellants, parents of a man who had a relationship with a woman, sought to quash the chargesheet filed against them under Section 482 of the CrPC, alleging that the High Court erred in rejecting their petition. The complainant claimed the parents had assured her of marriage to their son, leading to an intimate rel

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusKAPIL WADHAWAN & ANR.

2024 INSC 5824 January 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed a chargesheet on 15 October 2022 against 75 persons, including Kapil Wadhawan and Dheeraj Wadhawan, for alleged conspiracy, fraud and corruption involving DHFL. The respondents applied for default bail under the proviso to Section 167(2) of the CrPC, arguing that the char

PRASAD PRADHAN & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2023 INSC 7924 January 2023Dismissed

The appellants Prasad Pradhan and another, cousins of the deceased Vrindawan, attacked him with axes while he was levelling his land, causing severe head injuries that led to his death after 20 days. The trial court convicted them of murder under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 and sentenced them to life imprisonm

MUNNA LALversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2023 INSC 7824 January 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the murder of Narayan in 1985, for which Munna Lal, Sheo Lal and Babu Ram were convicted under section 302 IPC based largely on the oral testimony of two eye‑witnesses, PW‑2 (Ram Vilas) and PW‑3 (Hemraj), and medical evidence. The Supreme Court examined the credibility of these witnesses, noting PW‑2

MUNISHAMAPPA & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2019 INSC 8824 January 2019Disposed off

A long‑standing property dispute between two families escalated when Survey Department officials arrived to survey the land. After an initial verbal altercation, the accused returned armed with knives, clubs, a baku and explosives, stabbing and killing two members of the complainant’s family and injuring several others

RAJU AMBADAS GANGEKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2019 INSC 8424 January 2019Dismissed

The appellant, Raju Ambadas Gankekar, was convicted under Section 304 Part II of the IPC for assaulting Captain Vinod Rawat, who later died from his injuries. The incident occurred on 10 July 1988 at a hotel in Ahmednagar, where the victim was chased and attacked with a gupti. Evidence included a dying declaration desc

GURDIAL SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2011 INSC 6424 January 2011Dismissed

The appellants Gurdial Singh, Bakshish Singh and Darshan Singh attempted to divert a village drain towards the house of Buta Singh despite a court injunction. When Buta Singh objected, the appellants, armed with a gandasi and dangs, assaulted him and several witnesses; Buta Singh later died from his injuries. The trial

RAMESHBHAI CHANDUBHAI RATHODversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

2011 INSC 6524 January 2011Disposed off

Rameshbhai Chandubhai Rathod, a 27‑year‑old watchman, was convicted of raping and murdering a ten‑year‑old girl residing in the building where he worked. The trial court sentenced him to death under Section 302 IPC, a decision affirmed by the Gujarat High Court as a "rarest of rare" case. On appeal before a two‑judge S

NIKESH TARACHAND SHAHversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2017 INSC 113723 November 2017Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of Section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, which imposes two additional conditions for granting bail when the offence involves a scheduled offence punishable with imprisonment of more than three years under Part A of the Schedule. The Court h

SANJAY CHANDRAversusCBI

2011 INSC 81923 November 2011Disposed off

The Supreme Court considered appeals by Sanjay Chandra and 16 co‑accused who were denied bail by the Special CBI Judge and the Delhi High Court in a telecom‑licence fraud case involving alleged loss of billions to the State. The appellants argued that the investigation was complete, the charge‑sheet filed, and there wa

GIAN SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ANR

2010 INSC 80323 November 2010Matter referred to larger bench

Gian Singh was convicted under IPC Sections 420 (cheating) and 120B (criminal conspiracy). While his appeal was pending, he sought to compound the offences and filed a petition under CrPC Section 482 to quash the FIR, which the High Court dismissed. The Supreme Court examined whether a non‑compoundable offence such as

BHAGIRATHversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2018 INSC 97523 October 2018Appeal(s) allowed

On 19 August 2005, the deceased Bherulal was surrounded by the appellant Bhagirath, who was armed with a farsi, and several others. During a heated quarrel, Bhagirath struck the victim on the right side of the head near the ear, causing fatal injuries; an injured eye‑witness (PW‑6) corroborated this account. The trial

URMILA DEVIversusYUDHVIR SINGH

2013 INSC 71423 October 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether a magistrate's order to issue summons is an interlocutory or intermediate order and whether it can be challenged under Section 397 of the CrPC. It held that such an order is intermediate/quasi‑final and therefore revisable under Section 397 (and also under the inherent jurisdiction of

JUST RIGHTS FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE & ANR.versusS. HARISH & ORS.

2024 INSC 71623 September 2024Disposed off

The case arose from an FIR filed in 2020 alleging that the accused, S. Harish, had downloaded and stored child pornographic videos on his mobile phone. The investigation recovered two such videos and a chargesheet was filed under Section 15(1) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) and Section 6

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusRAMJI LAL SHARMA & ANOTHER

2024 INSC 74723 September 2024Case Allowed

The respondents were convicted for murder and related offences arising from an incident on 17 January 2002. After being acquitted by the High Court, the Supreme Court restored the conviction in 2022, and the accused served more than four years of imprisonment. The accused then filed a miscellaneous application claiming

PARVEEN KUMARversusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

2024 INSC 71723 September 2024Dismissed

Parveen Kumar was married to Raksha Devi, who filed multiple complaints alleging cruelty, including an FIR under Section 498-A and a maintenance petition under Section 125 CrPC. Within two years of marriage, she died by ingesting aluminum phosphide tablets, and her brother lodged an FIR accusing the husband of cruelty

YOGARANIversusSTATE BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2024 INSC 72123 September 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant (accused No.2) was convicted under IPC s.420 and the Passports Act for allegedly facilitating the illegal issuance of a second passport to accused No.1, who already possessed a passport. The prosecution relied on the testimony of three witnesses, including a hostile employee and a handwriting expert, but

AMINUDDINversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.

2022 INSC 102023 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant filed an FIR alleging that his son was brutally murdered in broad daylight by a group of seven assailants, resulting in eight grievous injuries. One of the accused, respondent No.2, was granted bail by the Allahabad High Court on the ground of parity with other co‑accused who had also been released on bai

S.P.S. RATHOREversusC.B.I. & ANR.

2016 INSC 90723 September 2016Disposed off

S.P.S. Rathore, a senior police officer, was convicted under Section 354 IPC for molesting a minor girl, Ruchika, after she was forced into his office and embraced against her will. The prosecution relied primarily on the testimony of a single eye‑witness, PW‑13 (Aradhana), whose account was corroborated by other witne

DHAL SINGH DEWANGANversusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2016 INSC 90523 September 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Dhal Singh Dewangan was accused of murdering his wife and five daughters. The prosecution relied on statements of village witnesses (PWs 1,2,3,5) that they heard the appellant’s mother (PW‑6) accuse him, and on circumstantial evidence such as the presence of a blood‑stained knife and the appellant’s uncon

RANJIT SARKARversusSTATE OF TRIPURA

2015 INSC 102623 September 2015Disposed off

The appellant, Ranjit Sarkar, was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for delivering a single blow with a wooden file to the head of the deceased, Anil Das, who later died from head injuries. The prosecution alleged multiple injuries, while the defence argued that only one blow caused the death, making it culpabl

S. MAHABOOB BASHAversusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA

2014 INSC 67223 September 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, S. Mahaboob Basha, was convicted under Section 498A IPC for subjecting his wife, PW‑1, to cruelty and dowry harassment, along with other offences. The prosecution presented testimony of the wife, her brother, and mother, and documentary evidence establishing repeated ill‑treatment and unlawful dowry dema

PREM KUMAR GULATIversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

2014 INSC 66823 September 2014Disposed off

The deceased Rajni died from severe burns after kerosene oil was poured on her and she was set alight. Her dying declaration named her husband Mahender Singh, her brother‑in‑law Prem Kumar Gulati and his wife Simla as participants, but did not specify who actually poured the oil or lit the fire. The trial court and Hig

BHEEMRAYAversusSUNEETHA

2013 INSC 64523 September 2013Appeal(s) allowed

Both parties were minors when they allegedly married. The wife filed two suits—one to restrain the husband from remarrying and another seeking a perpetual injunction against alienation of property, claiming a one‑third share for herself and her daughter. She also filed a petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage A

VINOD RAGHUVANSHIversusAJAY ARORA AND ORS.

2013 INSC 64723 September 2013Dismissed

The appellant, a District Excise Officer, was charged with cheating for allegedly facilitating the replacement of a partnership deed dated 5‑Mar‑2002 with a forged deed dated 6‑Mar‑2003, thereby depriving the complainant of his share in an excise liquor contract. The complainant filed a criminal complaint under IPC sec

DINBANDHUversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ANR.

2011 INSC 70523 September 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant and the complainant, who are brothers, were involved in a pending partition suit where the appellant produced a deed that the complainant alleged was altered and forged. The complainant filed a criminal complaint under several sections of the Indian Penal Code alleging forgery and related offences. The Hi

SHAJAN SKARIAversusTHE STATE OF KERALA & ANR.

2024 INSC 62523 August 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Shajan Skaria, an online news editor, published a YouTube video alleging misconduct by the complainant, an MLA belonging to a Scheduled Caste. The complainant filed a complaint under Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(u) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, and the Sp

M/S KARNATAKA EMTA COAL MINES LIMITED AND ANOTHERversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

2024 INSC 62323 August 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appeals challenge the Special Judge’s order on charge (24‑12‑2021) and charge‑framing order (03‑03‑2022) against Karnataka Emta Coal Mines Ltd (KECML) and its former MD for alleged conspiracy to illegally sell coal washery rejects. The Court examined whether the CBI’s investigation was predicated solely on the 2013

DELHI RACE CLUB (1940) LTD. & ORS.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.

2024 INSC 62623 August 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The complainant, a supplier of horse feed, alleged that Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd. and its officers failed to pay Rs 9,11,434 for goods supplied and filed a private complaint invoking sections 406, 420 and 120B of the IPC. The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, after a magisterial inquiry under Section 202 CrPC, is

BHAGWAN SINGHversusDILIP KUMAR @ DEEPU @ DEPAK AND ANOTHER

2023 INSC 76123 August 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined an appeal against a Rajasthan High Court order that granted bail to three accused in a gang‑rape case involving a 15‑year‑old girl. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 376D, 384, 506 IPC, Sections 3‑6 POCSO Act, Section 3(2)(v) SC/ST Act and Section 66 IT Act, with the complainant asserti

IRFAN @ NAKAversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2023 INSC 75823 August 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Irfan, was convicted and sentenced to death for allegedly setting fire to a room that killed his son and two brothers, based primarily on two dying declarations. The prosecution argued that the appellant had motive and that eye‑witnesses saw him pour inflammable substance and lock the door. The defence c

G H SHIV KUMAR JATIAversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI

2019 INSC 94923 August 2019Disposed off

The case arose from a fall of a guest from the terrace of the Hyatt Regency hotel in Delhi, leading to charges under Sections 336, 338 IPC read with Section 32 and Section 4 of the COTPA 2003 against the hotel company, its Managing Director (Shiv Kumar Jatia) and its General Manager (Aseem Kapoor). The High Court refus

GIRISH SHARMA & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ORS.

2017 INSC 79723 August 2017Disposed off

An FIR was lodged for corruption and a charge‑sheet was filed against 16 persons, while three individuals—Girish Sharma, Arvind Singh Dhruv and Jeet Ram Yadav—were recorded as witnesses under Sections 161 and 164 of the CrPC and not named as accused. Some of the accused applied under Sections 193/319 to have these thre

MANOJ KUMAR SHARMA & ORS.versusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ANR.

2016 INSC 119323 August 2016Appeal(s) allowed

Manoj Kumar Sharma, a serving Flying Officer, was accused of dowry‑related offences after his wife’s death was initially investigated as a suicide under Section 174 of the CrPC and closed with no foul play. Five years later, the deceased’s brother filed an FIR alleging murder, dowry cruelty and IPC sections 304B, 498A

STATE OF ORISSAversusKHAGA @ KHAGESWAR NAIK & ORS.

2013 INSC 55823 August 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Orissa appealed against the Orissa High Court's alteration of the conviction of three accused from murder (s.302 IPC) to culpable homicide not amounting to murder (s.304 Part II IPC). The facts revealed that the accused entered a house at night, molested a woman, and, after the victim's father verbally abu

INDERJIT SINGH GREWALversusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.

2011 INSC 60123 August 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The husband and wife obtained a decree of divorce by mutual consent in 2008. The wife later filed a criminal complaint under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 alleging the divorce decree was a sham and that they continued to live together. The husband moved the trial magistrate under Section 482

M.C. RAVIKUMARversusD.S. VELMURUGAN & ORS.

2025 INSC 88823 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The complainant filed Criminal Complaint No. 1828 of 2019 alleging offences under several sections of the IPC against the accused. The accused first filed a quashing petition under s.482 CrPC, which the High Court dismissed. Six months later they filed a second quashing petition on the same grounds, and the High Court

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusSHISHU PAL @ SHIV PAL

2024 INSC 55023 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a Constable (GD) in the CRPF, filled a verification roll in November 2011 denying any pending criminal cases, despite having been arrested, bailed, and having two FIRs registered against him earlier that year. The employer discovered the omission, issued a show‑cause notice, and after a departmental inq

PARVINDER SINGH KHURANAversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

2024 INSC 54623 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was granted regular bail by a Special Court on 17 June 2023 in a PMLA case, after which the Enforcement Directorate sought cancellation of bail under Section 439(2) of the CrPC. The Delhi High Court, without hearing the appellant’s counsel, issued an ex‑parte interim stay of the bail order on 23 June 2023

LAKSHMAN SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR (NOW JHARKHAND)

2021 INSC 35223 July 2021Dismissed

The case arose from a violent incident at a polling booth where the accused, belonging to another village, attacked a voter slip issuer and his brother, using lathis and pistols, causing injuries to several witnesses. The trial court convicted the accused of voluntarily causing hurt under Section 323 IPC and rioting un

INDRA DEVIversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.

2021 INSC 35623 July 2021Dismissed

Indra Devi alleged that a fraudulent land transaction involving a forged lease was carried out in collusion with municipal officials, including a clerk (Respondent No.2) who was not named in the FIR. Respondent No.2 sought protection under Section 197 of the CrPC, claiming his actions were performed in the discharge of

SHIV PRAKASH MISHRAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER

2019 INSC 79823 July 2019Dismissed

The complainant Shiv Prakash Mishra alleged that five persons, including Subhash Chandra Shukla (respondent No.2), formed an unlawful assembly and attacked his brothers, resulting in the death of Sangam Lal Mishra. While the FIR named all five, the investigating officer, after examining witnesses, concluded that Subhas

G H GIRISH SINGHversusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

2019 INSC 79623 July 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttarakhand appealed the acquittal of Girish Singh and Jodh Singh, who were charged under Sections 304B r/w 34 and 306 r/w 34 of the IPC for the alleged dowry death of Ishwari Devi, who committed suicide by burning within seven years of marriage. The High Court convicted them, relying on unproduced letters

DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMYversusARUN SHOURIE

2014 INSC 50623 July 2014Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined an editorial published by Arun Shourie that criticised a report of a Commission of Inquiry headed by a sitting Supreme Court Judge, Justice Kuldip Singh. Dr. Subramanian Swamy filed contempt petitions alleging that the editorial scandalised the Court. The Court was asked to decide (i) whether

MAHADEO S/O KERBA MASKEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

2013 INSC 48723 July 2013Reference answered

Mahadeo, a musician, lured a 15‑year‑old girl with promises of recording her bhajans, persuaded her to bring gold ornaments, and confined her for over a month during which he repeatedly forced sexual intercourse. The trial court convicted him under IPC sections 363 (kidnapping) and 376 (rape); the High Court affirmed t

KALIYAversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2013 INSC 48923 July 2013Dismissed

The appellant, Kaliya, mother‑in‑law, was convicted of murdering her daughter‑in‑law, Guddi, who was burnt alive in the appellant's house. Guddi’s dying declaration, stating that Kaliya poured kerosene on her, was recorded by a doctor and a nurse, but the original document was lost and only a carbon copy was produced.

POLAMURI CHANDRA SEKHARARAO @ CHINNA@ BABJIversusSTATE OF A.P.

2012 INSC 29923 July 2012Dismissed

The appellant, Polamuri Chandra Sekhararao, was convicted under s.302 IPC for murdering his elder sister's son, Ravi Kishore, on 6 April 2004. The prosecution alleged that the deceased visited the appellant's house, proposed to marry the appellant's daughters, and was subsequently stabbed repeatedly with a knife (M.O.-

STATE OF BIHAR & ANR.versusARVIND KUMAR & ANR.

2012 INSC 29823 July 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Bihar seized 5,923 bags of wheat from the flour mill of Arvind Kumar & Anr. after a raid based on secret information indicating diversion of subsidised food grains for black marketing. The respondents filed a writ petition seeking quashing of the FIR under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and release of

NATIONAL COMMISSION OF WOMENversusSTATE OF DELHI & ANR.

2010 INSC 42323 July 2010Dismissed

The case arose from the suicide of a 21‑year‑old woman, Sunita, who alleged that the accused, Amit, had exploited her sexually after promising marriage and threatening to expose her. The trial court convicted Amit under IPC s.306 (abetment of suicide) and s.376 (rape), sentencing him to life imprisonment for the latter

PODYAMI SUKADAversusSTATE OF M.P. (NOW CHHATISGARH)

2010 INSC 42523 July 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was accused of killing his mother with a burnt wooden stick. The prosecution relied on an alleged extra‑judicial confession made by the appellant before a village Panchayat, witnessed by four persons, and on the recovery of the alleged weapon at the appellant's request. The trial court and the High Court

THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDversusKALU RAM AND OTHERS

2026 INSC 65323 June 2026

The deceased, a 20‑year‑old CA final student, was killed when his roommate's car struck a truck that had been left stationary on a dark road without any warning lights or signs. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal held that the negligence lay with the truck driver for leaving the vehicle unattended, and awarded Rs 81,21

AGNIRAJ & ORS. ETC.versusSTATE THROUGH DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CB-CID

2025 INSC 77423 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a violent incident on 14 November 2012 in which members of a political rival family were attacked, resulting in three deaths. The prosecution relied on three key witnesses – PW‑1, PW‑2 and a 10‑year‑old child PW‑9 – as well as fingerprint and weapon‑recovery evidence to secure convictions of accused

ANJAN KUMAR SARMA & ORS.versusSTATE OF ASSAM

2017 INSC 46723 May 2017Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Anjan Kumar Sarma and others, were convicted by the High Court for murder (Sec. 302) and related offences on the basis that they were last seen with the victim, Rekha Dutta, and offered no explanation. The Supreme Court examined whether the "last seen together" circumstance, without any other corroborat

MAHAVIR SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2014 INSC 40523 May 2014Dismissed

Mahavir Singh and co‑accused Jagbir Singh were convicted under IPC §§302, 1208 and 201 for murdering Suraj Mal at the behest of the deceased's wife, Sudesh Rani. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence, including the "last seen" theory, medical testimony that the death occurred about a week before the post‑mo

PAULMELI AND ANR.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU TR. INSP. OF POLICE

2014 INSC 40723 May 2014Dismissed

The case involves the murder of Ramasamy, for which 17 persons, including the appellants Paulmeli and Chockaiah, were alleged to have assembled with a common object (aruval) and inflicted multiple incised wounds, causing death. The victim's wife (PW‑1) positively identified the appellants despite claims of darkness, an

SUDARSHAN AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2014 INSC 41123 May 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants Sudarshan and others were convicted for the murder of two persons at a holiday resort, based on an FIR that was lodged at a police station outside the incident’s jurisdiction after the complainant first consulted an advocate 15 km away. The Supreme Court examined the abnormal conduct of the complainant,

RAMACHANDRAIAH & ANR.versusM. MANJULA & ORS.

2025 INSC 55623 April 2025Dismissed

The deceased K. Raghunath, a successful realtor and close confidant of MP D.K. Adikeshavalu, was found hanging in 2019 under mysterious circumstances, leading his wife and son to allege murder by certain relatives who were also claimants to his property. Two wills – one dated 2016 favoring the wife and another posthumo

SRI SHRIKANTH NS & ORS.versusK. MUNIVENKATAPPA & ANR.

2025 INSC 55723 April 2025Disposed off

The appellants and respondents were embroiled in a series of suits and appeals concerning a sale deed of land and the validity of a mutation register entry. The trial court dismissed the plaint on the ground of rejection under Order VII Rule 11, and subsequently, the respondents sought production of the mutation regist

DURGA PRASADversusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

2025 INSC 54823 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a former Inspector of Police, was charged with dereliction of duty for allegedly failing to control the 1984 anti‑Sikh riots. An inquiry officer exonerated him, but the disciplinary authority disagreed and issued a punishment of reduction in rank, which the High Court set aside and directed a fresh disag

RAMYASH @ LAL BAHADURversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER ETC. ETC

2025 INSC 54423 April 2025Disposed off

The complainant Ramyash lodged a FIR alleging that the accused Bhupendra Singh, Moti Lal and Prahlad assaulted his family, resulting in the death of his father. The trial court convicted the accused under Sections 302, 323, 324 (with 34) and other offences, sentencing them to life imprisonment. The Allahabad High Court

MAHARANA PRATAP SINGHversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS

2025 INSC 55423 April 2025Disposed off

Maharana Pratap Singh, a constable in the CID dog squad, was dismissed from service in 1996 following departmental proceedings that found him guilty of four charges, while he was later acquitted of the related criminal charges. The appellant challenged the dismissal, alleging denial of due process, vague charges, and t

SIVAKUMARversusTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE & ANR.

2025 INSC 55823 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a Manager at the Head Office of HDFC Ltd., was charged in an FIR for allegedly suppressing the fact that a mortgaged property had been acquired by the Tamil Nadu Housing Board and for cheating the purchaser at a public auction conducted in 2012. He filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking t

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHversusSANJAY KUMAR

2025 INSC 56123 April 2025Dismissed

The State of Himachal Pradesh prosecuted Sanjay Kumar (A1) and Chaman Shukla (A2) for kidnapping, rape and related offences arising from the alleged abduction of a 14‑year‑old girl in March 2012. The trial court convicted both accused, but the Himachal Pradesh High Court set aside the convictions, acquitting them on th

MUPPIDI LAKSHMI NARAYANA REDDY & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR.

2025 INSC 56223 April 2025Case Allowed

The appellants, relatives of the husband in a matrimonial dispute, were charged in an FIR alleging they instigated dowry demands, although they lived in Hyderabad while the complainant resided in Guntur. The complainant had earlier withdrawn a restitution of conjugal rights case and later filed a police complaint after

X ETC.versusRAJESH KUMAR & ORS.

2025 INSC 57923 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether the Kerala High Court erred in quashing five FIRs filed under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act against a computer teacher accused of inappropriate conduct with female students. The allegations included holding students' hands while using a mouse, asking inva

SUDHA SINGHversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.

2021 INSC 27123 April 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The accused, alleged to be a contract killer and member of an organized crime gang, was arrested under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 for the murder of Rajnarain Singh. The Allahabad High Court granted him bail on liberal terms despite his prior involvement in fiftee

NAGJI ODHAVJI KUMBHAR & ANR.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2019 INSC 55723 April 2019Dismissed

The appellants, Nagji Odhavji Kumbhar and another, were convicted under Sections 302 and 324 IPC for the murder of Bhura Govind and Lakha Arjan on 1 July 1987. They claimed they acted in private defence and that the incident occurred in the spur of the moment, seeking a reduction of the charge to Section 304 IPC. The S

RAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA ETC.

2015 INSC 34523 April 2015Disposed off

The appellant Raj Singh was convicted of murder (later reduced to culpable homicide not amounting to murder) for shooting and killing Girdhari Lal during a violent altercation at the complainant's house. He claimed the act was in private defence, invoking Exception 2 to Section 300 IPC, asserting that the complainants

PURAN CHANDversusSTATE OF H.P.

2014 INSC 31523 April 2014Dismissed

The appellant, Puran Chand, was convicted under Section 376 IPC for raping a 17‑year‑old girl who later attempted suicide. He appealed, claiming false implication due to enmity, a 20‑day delay in filing the FIR, and that the medical report showing an intact hymen created reasonable doubt. The Supreme Court held that th

ANJANI KUMAR CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANOTHER

2014 INSC 96723 April 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Advocate Anjani Kumar Chaudhary was assaulted by a group demanding money for a Holi celebration; the assailants used lathis, rods, and sharp weapons, threatened to kill him, and inflicted multiple injuries. An FIR was lodged charging several offences including Section 307 IPC (attempt to murder). The Sessions Court, an

ALBER ORAONversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND

2014 INSC 96623 April 2014Disposed off

Alber Oraon, a mason and civil‑works contractor, was engaged by Pushpa Devi to construct a house. During the work they became intimate and Oraon lived with her, posing as her husband. Pushpa and her two minor children later disappeared; their bodies were recovered from a soak‑pit that Oraon had dug and sealed with bric

SANGEETABEN MAHENDRABHAI PATELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR.

2012 INSC 18023 April 2012Dismissed

The appellant was first prosecuted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonoured cheque and was convicted, later acquitted on appeal, with the appeal still pending. Subsequently, the same complainant filed an FIR under Sections 406, 420 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code alleging criminal

DHARAMBIRversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR.

2010 INSC 23823 April 2010Case Partly allowed

The appellant, Dharmabir, was convicted of murder and attempted murder committed in August 1991 when he was 16 years, 9 months old. At the time of the offences the Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 did not deem him a juvenile, but the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, which defines a juvenile as a

NETAJI ACHYUT SHINDE (PATIL) & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2021 INSC 20023 March 2021Dismissed

The case concerns the murder of Suhas on 5 July 2011, for which three accused—Netaji Achyut Shinde (A‑1), Samadhan Shinde (A‑2) and Balasaheb Shinde (A‑3)—were charged under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC. A telephonic intimation at 17:45 was treated by the trial court as the FIR, leading to the conviction of A‑2

GORUSU NAGARAJU S/O APPARAOversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2018 INSC 25723 March 2018Dismissed

Gorusu Nagaraju was convicted of murder under IPC s.302 and of concealing the offence under s.201, based primarily on circumstantial evidence linking him to the victim's death. The trial court and the Andhra Pradesh High Court both upheld the conviction, relying on seven material circumstances, including the appellant'

SOYEBBHAI YUSUFBHAI BHARANIA & ORS.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2017 INSC 127523 March 2017Dismissed

The appellants were convicted for the murder of Rameshbhai Prajapati, who was attacked with a large knife while sleeping, after the accused objected to his brother's marriage. The trial court convicted four of the five accused under Sections 302, 147, 148 and 149 IPC, acquitting one; the High Court later set aside the

STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS ETC.versusANIL KUMAR AND OTHERS ETC.

2017 INSC 25923 March 2017Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether the Central Government's Rule 7 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules, 1995 – which mandates that investigations under the SCST Act be conducted by a police officer not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police – is valid, and whether th

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusRAKESH MISHRA

2015 INSC 24423 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against the High Court’s order that set aside the trial court’s decision to frame charges against three municipal officials accused of corruptly granting building and completion certificates for Sayaji Hotel. The officials were alleged to have conspired to issue a revised building p

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusMOHAN LAL & ORS.

2012 INSC 14523 March 2012Dismissed

In January 2000, a group of six accused attacked three brothers in Rajasthan, resulting in the death of one brother, Lalu, and injuries to the others. The accused were charged under IPC sections 148, 302/149, 323, 324/149 and 325. The trial court convicted them of all offences, including murder, and sentenced them to l

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusBALVEER SINGH

2025 INSC 26123 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Madhya Pradesh prosecuted Balveer Singh for the murder, concealment and conspiracy to murder his wife, relying heavily on the testimony of the 7‑year‑old daughter, Rani, as the sole eye‑witness. The High Court acquitted the accused, holding that the child’s delayed statement and residence with an inimical

RAJENDRA RAJORIYAversusJAGAT NARAIN THAPAK AND ANOTHER

2018 INSC 19123 February 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant filed a criminal complaint alleging cheating, forgery and offences under the SC/ST Act, which the Judicial Magistrate dismissed for lack of evidence. The appellant sought revision before the Sessions Court, which held that the appellant belonged to a Scheduled Caste, found a prima facie case and remanded

PANKAJ JAINversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2018 INSC 19823 February 2018Disposed off

Pankaj Jain, accused in a CBI case involving serious offences under the IPC and the Prevention of Corruption Act, was issued a non‑bailable warrant and proceedings under sections 82 and 83 of the CrPC. He voluntarily appeared before the Special Judge, CBI, and sought release on a bond under section 88 of the Code of Cr

SHEIKH JUMAN & ANR. ETC.versusSTATE OF BLHAR

2017 INSC 17323 February 2017Dismissed

The appellants, armed with bombs and guns, attacked the informant's nephews, hurling bombs that caused two deaths and injuries to others. The trial court convicted several accused under Sections 302 and 149 of the IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act, sentencing two to de

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusSADHU RAM SINGLA & ORS.

2017 INSC 17523 February 2017Dismissed

The Central Bureau of Investigation filed an appeal against the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s order quashing FIR No. SIA‑2001‑E‑0006, which alleged cheating, forgery and conspiracy (IPC sections 420, 471, 120B) against Sadhu Ram Singla and others. The FIR arose from alleged fraudulent stock statements that enabled a

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, BANK SECURITIES & FRAUD CELLversusRAMESH GELLI AND OTHERS

2016 INSC 13423 February 2016Case Partly allowed

The Central Bureau of Investigation appealed against orders that held the Chairman‑cum‑Managing Director and Executive Director of Global Trust Bank (a private bank before its 2004 amalgamation with Oriental Bank of Commerce) were not public servants for purposes of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PC Act). The

AMITversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2012 INSC 10023 February 2012Case Partly allowed

The appellant, a neighbour, abducted a three‑year‑old girl from her home under the pretext of giving her biscuits, subsequently raping and murdering her. The trial court convicted him under IPC sections 364, 376, 377, 302 and 201 and imposed death for the murder, which the High Court affirmed. On appeal, the Supreme Co

SONU SARDARversusSTATE OF CHHATISGARH

2012 INSC 10123 February 2012Dismissed

The appellant, Sonu Sardar, along with four others, entered the house of a scrap dealer, demanded money, and committed dacoity followed by the murder of five persons, including two children, using a knife, axe and iron rod. The prosecution proved the appellant's participation through the testimony of the victim's daugh

IN RE: RAMLILA MAIDAN INCIDENT DT.4/5.06.2011versusHOME SECRETARY, UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2012 INSC 10323 February 2012Disposed off

The Supreme Court, hearing a suo motu writ petition, examined the midnight police raid on a sleeping crowd at Ramlila Maidan on 4-5 June 2011, where police used teargas, lathi charge and brick‑batting after revoking permission for a yoga camp and a fast led by Baba Ramdev. The Court found that the order under Section 1

AMERIKA RAI & ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

2011 INSC 15323 February 2011Disposed off

The case arose from a violent incident that followed a marriage ceremony in Vaishali district, where six accused formed an unlawful assembly and opened fire, killing Shankar Rai and injuring his brother Dineshwar Rai. The prosecution proved that the accused slapped and fisted the bride's brother-in-law, after which the

STATE OF U.P.versusGURU CHARAN & OTHERS

2010 INSC 11623 February 2010Dismissed

The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed to the Supreme Court under Article 136 against the Allahabad High Court’s acquittal of Guru Charan, Sunil, Pramod and Brahma Pal for the alleged murder of Ramesh Narain and Jitendra (Guddu) and the murderous assault on Nathu Singh. The trial court had convicted the accused under IPC

KIRPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

2010 INSC 11723 February 2010Dismissed

The appellant, Kirpal Singh, was convicted for murdering Ram Kumar Singh after allegedly firing a gunshot during a family dispute. The trial court and High Court relied on the medical testimony confirming a homicidal death and on eyewitness accounts of the appellant's wife and son, which were corroborated by the FIR fi

NIMAI GHOSH & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF BIHAR (NOW JHARKHAND)

2025 INSC 81623 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the murder of Manmohan Ghosh in 1989, for which six relatives were charged, including Nimai Ghosh, Sonachand Ghosh and Sambal Ghosh. The trial court acquitted all accused, finding the eyewitness testimonies unreliable and noting the absence of the weapon and forensic evidence. The High Court reversed

MADHUSHREE DATTAversusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR.

2025 INSC 10523 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, senior employees of Juniper Networks India, were accused by a former employee of forcibly terminating her employment, confiscating her laptop, and using "filthy language" while evicting her from the premises. The complainant filed a non‑cognizable report, followed by an FIR alleging offences under secti

M. VENKATESWARANversusTHE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2025 INSC 10623 January 2025Case Partly allowed

M. Venkateswaran was convicted under Section 498A of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for demanding gold sovereigns and harassing his wife‑de‑facto complainant. The trial court sentenced him to three years imprisonment and a fine, which the Madras High Court modified to two years imprisonment under Se

ISSAC @ KISHORversusRONALD CHERIYAN AND ORS.

2018 INSC 4823 January 2018Dismissed

The case involved the murder of a widow, Brijitha, during a robbery. Accused No.1 (the appellant) was living with the deceased and was arrested after giving a disclosure statement that led to the arrest of Accused No.2, who was later convicted of murder and robbery. The trial court acquitted Accused No.1, holding that

LACHHMAN DASSversusRESHAM CHAND KALER AND ANR.

2018 INSC 5023 January 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from FIR 205/2015 alleging murder, attempted murder and offences under the Arms Act in a land‑dispute incident, with Resham Chand Kaler, a British national, alleged to be the kingpin. The trial court rejected his bail application, but the Punjab & Haryana High Court later granted regular bail. The compla

DASHRATH @ JOLO & ANR. ETC.versusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2018 INSC 5123 January 2018Dismissed

On 3 August 2008, PW‑19 Birichram went to a neighbour's house for a child's birth celebration when the appellants, armed with battleaxes and sticks, threatened and assaulted him. The assault escalated, resulting in the deaths of three persons (Chedilal, Bablu, Bhuru) and injuries to two others, with weapons and blood‑s

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusNANDE @ NANDKISHORE SINGH

2018 INSC 4723 January 2018Dismissed

The State of Madhya Pradesh charged Nande (also known as Nandkishore Singh) with murder and attempted murder after he allegedly hurled a burning cow‑dung cake at women attending a marriage ceremony, causing severe burns that later led to the deaths of two victims. The trial court convicted him under Section 304 Part I

PRASHANT BHARTIversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI

2013 INSC 5123 January 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The complainant Priya lodged an FIR alleging that the accused Prashant Bharti had assaulted, molested, and later raped her under sections 328, 354 and 376 IPC, claiming these acts were committed on the promise of marriage. Investigation revealed mobile‑phone records disproving the presence of both parties at the allege

C.P. SUBHASHversusINSPECTOR OF POLICE CHENNAI & ORS.

2013 INSC 5423 January 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, C.P. Subhash, the General Manager of SNP Ventures, filed a criminal complaint alleging that senior managers of Gorden Woodroff Ltd. forged two 1922 sale deeds to fraudulently claim title over land he possessed. An FIR was registered under IPC sections 468 and 471, but the respondents obtained a quashing

RAJIV THAPAR & ORS.versusMADAN LAL KAPOOR

2013 INSC 5223 January 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The father of the deceased, Madan Lal Kapoor, filed a criminal complaint alleging his daughter Dr. Monica Thapar was poisoned, later also claiming strangulation. The trial court discharged the accused, Rajiv Thapar and others, on the basis of post‑mortem, forensic and inquest reports showing natural death due to a card

RANDEEP SINGH @ RANA & ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

2024 INSC 88722 November 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were convicted under Sections 364, 302, 120-B and 201 of the IPC for the abduction and murder of Gurpal Singh, based largely on the testimony of an alleged eyewitness, CCTV footage, and confessional statements made to police. The Supreme Court examined the credibility of the eyewitness, noting material o

K.S. MURALIDHARversusR. SUBBULAKSHMI & ANR.

2024 INSC 88622 November 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, K.S. Muralidhar, suffered a severe spinal injury resulting in 100% functional disability after his company vehicle collided with a negligently driven lorry. The Tribunal awarded Rs.58,09,930 plus interest and future medical expenses, while the Karnataka High Court enhanced the award to Rs.78,16,390, calc

SONU AGNIHOTRIversusCHANDRA SHEKHAR & ORS.

2024 INSC 88822 November 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an Additional District and Sessions Judge, appealed to the Supreme Court seeking expungement of adverse remarks recorded by the Delhi High Court in its order dated 2 March 2023. The remarks criticized the appellant’s conduct in rejecting an anticipatory bail application and directing inquiries against po

ARVIND KUMAR @ NEMICHAND & ORS.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2021 INSC 76422 November 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a land‑dispute over a pathway between the prime accused Surjaram and the deceased Ladduram, which escalated into a violent clash on 18‑07‑1989 resulting in two deaths and several injuries. The trial courts and the High Court delivered mixed judgments, convicting some accused under Section 302 r.w. S

DR. DHRUVARAM MURLIDHAR SONARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2018 INSC 109222 November 2018Leave Granted & Allowed

The appellant, a government medical officer, was charged under Section 376(2)(b) IPC, Section 420 IPC read with Section 34, and Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act after a widow nurse alleged that he had a consensual relationship and failed to marry her. The appellant sought quashing of the FIR and charge sheet under Sect

K.V. PRAKASH BABUversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2016 INSC 105122 November 2016

The appellant, K.V. Prakash Babu, was convicted under Sections 498‑A and 306 of the IPC for the suicide of his wife, who allegedly suspected him of an extra‑marital affair. The prosecution alleged that the husband's alleged relationship and the resulting suspicion constituted mental cruelty that drove the wife to kill

RAMESH AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2016 INSC 104922 November 2016Dismissed

The case involves the death of Roshni, who suffered 100% burns and gave a dying declaration to a Judicial Magistrate in hospital after a doctor certified her fitness to speak. The trial court acquitted the four accused, rejecting the dying declaration and relying on the victim's brother's testimony that the accused wer

VADLAKONDA LENINversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2012 INSC 53122 November 2012Dismissed

The appellant, Vadlakonda Lenin, was accused of murdering his wife while she slept and fleeing the scene. The prosecution's case relied entirely on circumstantial evidence, including the appellant's history of dowry demands, a quarrel with the victim, the victim being found injured in her home, the appellant seen runni

SATISH MEHRAversusSTATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ANR.

2012 INSC 52922 November 2012Disposed off

Satish Mehra filed a criminal complaint alleging cheating and forgery in the renewal and encashment of five foreign currency non‑resident fixed deposits (FCNRFD). The trial court framed charges against two bank officials (Chief Manager and Senior Manager of Canara Bank) and against the complainant's wife and father‑in‑

BHARAT SONI ETC.versusSTATE OF CHHATISGARH

2012 INSC 53722 November 2012Case Partly allowed

The case involved seven accused charged with murder (s.302 IPC) and rioting (s.147, s.148 IPC) arising from an altercation that escalated into a violent assault. The prosecution alleged that the accused formed an unlawful assembly with a common object to kill the deceased, invoking constructive liability under s.149 IP

BUSI KOTESWARA RAO & ORS.versusSTATE OF A.P.

2012 INSC 53022 November 2012Dismissed

The case arose from a violent clash between two rival groups in Pedagarlapadu village, Andhra Pradesh, where the appellants formed an unlawful assembly, armed with deadly weapons, and set fire to about 50 houses belonging to a Harijan colony. The trial court convicted the appellants under IPC sections 148 and 436 (read

SHIV SHANKAR SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ANR.

2011 INSC 81222 November 2011Appeal(s) allowed

Shiv Shankar Singh filed two protest petitions against the State of Bihar after two FIRs were lodged for the same incident, one alleging a dacoity and the other alleging murder for property disputes. The first petition, filed before the police final report, was deemed incompetent, while the second petition was entertai

RAJBIR @ RAJU AND ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

2010 INSC 80022 November 2010Hearing Adjourned

The Supreme Court examined a special leave petition filed by Rajbir (the husband) and his mother, who were convicted for the murder of Rajbir's pregnant wife Sunita under Section 304B of the IPC. The trial court had sentenced Rajbir to life imprisonment, but the Punjab & Haryana High Court reduced his term to ten years

THATHAMSETTY SURESHversusSTATE OF A.P.

2010 INSC 80122 November 2010Hearing Adjourned

Thathamsetty Suresh was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his wife and sentenced to life imprisonment. He filed a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court seeking relief from the conviction and sentence. The Court examined the post‑mortem report, which showed multiple ante‑mortem head injuries ca

UMA & ANR.versusTHE STATE REP. BY THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

2024 INSC 80922 October 2024Dismissed

The trial court acquitted Ms. Uma and co‑accused of murder, holding that the prosecution had not proved its case beyond reasonable doubt, particularly discounting medical evidence in the absence of an eyewitness. The State appealed, and the Madras High Court reversed the acquittal, convicting the appellants on charges

HDFC BANK LTD.versusTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

2024 INSC 80722 October 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The Income Tax Department ordered HDFC Bank to stop operation of certain lockers and accounts, but later revoked the order only for the accounts, leading bank officials to mistakenly allow a locker to be operated. The department filed a complaint and an FIR was registered against the bank and its officials for multiple

V.D. RAVEESHAversusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA

2024 INSC 106022 October 2024Dismissed

The petitioner obtained a loan of Rs.3,00,000 from Shriram Transport Finance Company to purchase a vehicle, defaulted on repayments and allegedly forged documents to clear the hypothecation and sell the vehicle to a third party. The trial court convicted him under sections 406, 420, 468, 465 and 471 of the Indian Penal

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search