ARVIND KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.
2016 INSC 5798 August 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, legal heirs of a tenure‑holder, challenged an order dated 13‑Jan‑1975 that declared 51.29 acres of their land surplus under the Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960. An appeal against that order was filed and later dismissed, but the appellants argued that the appeal had abated…
JODHANversusSTATE OF M.P.
2015 INSC 9878 April 2015Dismissed
On 7 January 1984 a group of accused, including Jodhan, entered the house of the deceased and attacked the victims with lathis, farsa and handmade bombs, causing the death of the deceased. The trial court acquitted all accused, holding that the incident was a "free fight" and finding the prosecution evidence unreliable…
USMANGANJADAMBHAIVAHORAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
2016 INSC 308 January 2016
The accused filed an application under Section 408 of the CrPC seeking transfer of a criminal trial from one Additional Sessions Judge to another after the trial had already commenced. The Principal Sessions Judge rejected the petition, holding that he lacked jurisdiction to transfer a case once trial began. The High C…
VINOD KUMARversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2015 INSC 158 January 2015Dismissed
Vinod Kumar, a domestic servant, was accused of kidnapping his employer's 3‑year‑old son for ransom. The trial court acquitted him and co‑accused Joginder, but the High Court reversed the acquittal, convicting Vinod Kumar under IPC sections 363, 364A and 109. The Supreme Court examined whether the High Court was entitl…
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION RAJASTHANversusSANJEEV SACHDEVA AND OTHERS
2013 INSC 178 January 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The respondents purchased a plot and applied to the Rajasthan Municipal Corporation for conversion of land use from residential to commercial under the Rajasthan Municipalities (Change of Land Use) Rules, 2000. The corporation approved the conversion and issued a demand notice for conversion charges of Rs.5,70,300. The…
CENSUS COMMISSIONER & OTHERSversusR. KRISHNAMURTHY
2014 INSC 7627 November 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined a challenge to two orders of the Madras High Court that had directed the Census Department to conduct a caste‑wise census, including Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, in order to achieve social justice. The appellant, the Census Commissioner, was not a party to the earlier writ petition …
YUSUFBHAI NOOR MOHAMMED JODHPURWALAversusMOHMMED SABIR IBRAHIM BYAVARWALA
2014 INSC 7637 November 2014Disposed off
The landlord filed a Special Leave Petition challenging a Gujarat High Court order that had set aside an appellate decree allowing eviction of the tenant under Section 12(3)(b) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947. The tenant had been in arrears of rent before the suit and on the date of…
STATE OF U P THR. ITS SECRETARY & ORSversusMERAJ AHMAD
2017 INSC 8697 September 2017Disposed off
Meraj Ahmad was appointed temporarily as a Livestock Development Assistant in 1983 and was terminated in April 1984 after an FIR under Section 302 IPC was lodged against him. He was acquitted of the murder charge in October 1985 and, in February 1989, voluntarily sought a fresh appointment, expressly undertaking to for…
SHAILESHBHAI @ PAPPU BALUBHAI CHUNARA & ANR.versusSTATE OF GUJRAT
2014 INSC 5307 August 2014Dismissed
The appellants were convicted of murder, attempt to murder and criminal conspiracy under IPC sections 302, 34, 323 and 114 based solely on the dying declaration of the victim, Champaben, who identified the accused as having set her ablaze with kerosene. The defence argued that three separate dying declarations were inc…
VIKRAM SINGH @ VICKY WALIA AND ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.
2017 INSC 5947 July 2017Dismissed
The petitioners Vikram Singh, Jasvir Singh and a third accused were convicted under Sections 302, 364A, 201 and 120B of the IPC and sentenced to death, with the death sentence of the female co‑accused later commuted to life imprisonment. They filed review petitions challenging the Supreme Court’s 2010 judgment on groun…
CHANDRA BABU @ MOSESversusSTATE THROUGH INSPECTOR OF POLICE & ORS.
2015 INSC 4887 July 2015Disposed off
The appellant filed an FIR alleging assault and the police investigation concluded with a final report exonerating the accused. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, after a protest petition, directed "reinvestigation" of the case by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBCID). The Madras High Court set aside that order, hold…
M/S. BHS INDUSTRIESversusEXPORT CREDIT GUARANTEE CORP. &ANR.
2015 INSC 4867 July 2015Dismissed
The appellant, a small‑scale exporter, obtained a Shipment Comprehensive Risk Policy from Export Credit Guarantee Corporation (ECGC) and made several shipments to a US buyer. Two of the shipments were sent after the approved credit limit was exhausted and the buyer later refused to accept the documents. The appellant c…
DURGA PRASADversusNARAYAN RAMCHANDAANI (D) THR. LRS.
2017 INSC 1167 February 2017Dismissed
The suit premises were originally let to the plaintiff's father‑in‑law in 1940; after his death the tenancy passed to his son Baldev, and subsequently to Baldev's wife Lalita. Upon Lalita's death, her brother Durga Prasad claimed to inherit the tenancy and resisted eviction by the landlord. The landlord filed an evicti…
NIDHIversusRAM KRIPAL SHARMA (D) THROUGH LRS.
2017 INSC 1137 February 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Nidhi, the owner of a non‑residential building, sought possession of the premises under Section 21(1)(a) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, claiming a bona‑fide requirement to house her ailing grandparents and her younger sister. The Prescribed Auth…
MIS. ALKALI MANUFACTURERS ASSN. OF INDIAversusDESIGNATED AUTHORITY, D.A.D.A.S. & ORS.
2016 INSC 11627 January 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The Mis. Alkali Manufacturers Association of India filed a petition under the Anti‑Dumping Rules alleging that caustic soda imported from China and Korea was being dumped, leading to injury to the domestic industry. The Designated Authority (DA) investigated, found dumping, and imposed provisional anti‑dumping duties, …
PRATEEK GUPTAversusSHILPY GUPTA & ORS.
2017 INSC 11956 December 2017Appeal(s) allowed
Prateek Gupta (father) appealed a Delhi High Court order that directed him to hand over his five‑year‑old son Aadvik, a U.S. citizen, to his wife Shilpi Gupta (mother) after she filed a writ of habeas corpus. The father had taken the child to India in 2015 without the mother’s consent, and the mother obtained custody o…
M/S COCHIN SHIPYARD LTD.versusM/S APEEJAY SHIPPING LTD.
2015 INSC 8376 November 2015Case Partly allowed
The parties entered into a contract for the construction of a cargo ship, which later gave rise to arbitration before a former Supreme Court judge who awarded in 2009. The respondent sought to set aside the award under Sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, alleging the arbitrator’s legal misconduct, and appl…
RAMESH CHAND (DEAD) THROUGH L.RS.versusASRUDDIN (DEAD) THROUGH LRSANDANOTHER
2015 INSC 7356 October 2015Disposed off
The plaintiff claimed that a sale agreement dated 21‑06‑2004 with the defendant for a 12‑kanal land, mortgaged to a bank, was breached when the defendant failed to execute the sale deed after receiving Rs 4 lakhs as earnest money. The defendant contended that he had already sold the same land to a third party on 07‑05‑…
STATE THROUGH INTELLIGENCE OFFICER NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAUversusMUSHTAQ AHMAD ETC.
2015 INSC 7196 October 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The State, through an Intelligence Officer of the Narcotics Control Bureau, charged Mushtaq Ahmad and Guizar Ahmad with possession of large amounts of charas (6.2 kg and 4.0 kg respectively) seized on 5 April 2004. The trial court held that the seized charas constituted a "commercial quantity" under the NDPS Act and co…
NAVTEJ SINGH JOHAR & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA THR. SECRETARY MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE
2018 INSC 7906 September 2018Disposed off
The Supreme Court of India considered the constitutional validity of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, which criminalized 'carnal intercourse against the order of nature' with any man, woman, or animal. The petitioners challenged the provision insofar as it criminalized consensual sexual acts between adults o…
COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAX, U.P.versusM/S. A.R. THERMOSETS (PVT.) LTD.
2016 INSC 8546 September 2016Dismissed
The appellant, Commissioner of Commercial Tax, Uttar Pradesh, challenged the High Court's decision that bitumen emulsion manufactured by the respondent falls under Entry 22 of Schedule II of the VAT Act, which taxes "bitumen" at 4%. The respondent had earlier sought clarification on the tax rate and was taxed at 12.5% …
DHARIWAL INDUSTRIES LTD.versusKISHORE WADHWANI & ORS.
2016 INSC 8536 September 2016Disposed off
Dhariwal Industries Ltd filed a complaint under Sec. 200 CrPC alleging several IPC offences. After the police investigation and filing of a charge‑sheet, the accused applied for discharge under Sec. 239 CrPC. The appellant sought, orally, permission to be heard alongside the Assistant Public Prosecutor at the charge‑fr…
LUDOVICO SAGRADO GOVEIAversusCIRILA ROSA MARIA PINTO AND ORS.
2016 INSC 8556 September 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a successful purchaser at a sealed‑tender sale, sought to enforce a sale certificate issued after the execution of an award under the Multi‑State Co‑operative Societies Act, 1984. The respondents, borrowers, had defaulted on a loan and the property was sold after multiple failed public auctions. The High…
M/S. TATA CHEMICALS LTD.versusTHE COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, AHMEDABAD
2015 INSC 5476 August 2015Matter referred to larger bench
Tata Chemicals sold soda ash in gunny bags and claimed that the cost of these durable, returnable bags should be excluded from the assessable value of the soda ash under Section 4(4)(d)(i) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The revenue argued that no valid arrangement obligating buyers to return the bags to the seller ex…
SH JOGENDRASINHJI VIJAYSINGHJIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
2015 INSC 4856 July 2015Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether a letters patent appeal could be filed against an order of a Single Judge that arose from civil court proceedings or other tribunals. It held that orders of civil courts are only reviewable under Article 227 of the Constitution and therefore are not amenable to writ jurisdiction under…
PRABHAKAR VITHAL GHOLVEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2016 INSC 3896 May 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Prabhakar Vithal Golve, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the fatal assault of a deceased man, allegedly triggered by a minor grievance over a telephonic message. The prosecution failed to establish any motive for the killing, and the evidence showed that the assault was a spontaneous reaction to t…
SATYENDRA KUMAR & ORS.versusRAJ NATH DUBEY & ORS.
2016 INSC 3886 May 2016Dismissed
The appeal concerned a land‑inheritance dispute where the petitioners sought to set aside an order of the Consolidation Officer that rejected their claim to a share of land. The petitioners argued that earlier judgments in a separate proceeding involving the same parties, but concerning a different parcel of land, shou…
BHARTIBEN NAYABHA KER AND ORSversusSIDABHA PETHABHA MANKE AND ORS
2018 INSC 3056 April 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased, Nayabha Mapbha Ker, died in a motor‑vehicle collision in 1993. His heirs filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 7.78 million with interest at 12% per annum; the Gujarat High Court added Rs 33,000 for loss of life, expenses and consort…
MANGLA RAMversusTHE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS.
2018 INSC 3116 April 2018Appeal(s) allowed
Mangla Ram, a motorcyclist, was hit by a jeep (No. RST‑4701) driven by respondent No.2, resulting in amputation of his right leg. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation but reduced it on the ground that the claimant contributed to the accident by riding on the wrong side of the road. The High Court set…
AJITSLNH ARJUNSLNH GOHLLversusBAR COUNCIL OF GUJARAT AND ANR.
2017 INSC 3186 April 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, an advocate enrolled with the Bar Council of Gujarat, was subjected to disciplinary proceedings initiated by the State Bar Council after a complaint was filed. The State Bar Council failed to dispose of the complaint within the one‑year period prescribed under the Advocates Act, 1961, and consequently th…
STANDARD CHARTERED BANKversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ETC.
2016 INSC 2986 April 2016Appeal(s) allowed
Standard Chartered Bank filed three complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against ABG Shipyard Ltd. and several of its directors for the dishonour of cheques issued to repay a Rs.200 crore loan. The Metropolitan Magistrate issued summons to the company and the directors, but the Bombay High Cou…
SHAMIMA FAROOQUIversusSHAHID KHAN
2015 INSC 2836 April 2015Appeal(s) allowed
Shamima Farooqui, a Muslim woman, filed an application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking maintenance after being harassed and deserted by her husband Shahid Khan, who later divorced her. The Family Court ordered Rs 2,500 per month from the date of application and Rs 4,000 per month from the da…
JASBIR SINGH @ JAVRI @ JABBAR SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2015 INSC 2846 April 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Jasbir Singh was convicted under Sections 399 and 402 of the IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act for allegedly planning and attempting a dacoity with firearms. The Supreme Court examined the evidence, noting the absence of independent witnesses, the fact that the investigating officer himself conducted the…
STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.versusM/S DURGA PROJECTS INC
2018 INSC 2056 March 2018Dismissed
M/s Durga Projects Inc, a civil works contractor registered under the Karnataka Value Added Tax (KVAT) Act, 2003 and the Central Sales Tax Act, sought clarification from the Authority for Advance Clarification and Ruling on the tax rate applicable to works contracts before 1 April 2006. The AAR held that the rate shoul…
S. THANGARAJversusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. REP. BY THE BRANCH MANAGER
2018 INSC 2086 March 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, S. Thangaraj, a 26‑year‑old loadman, suffered multiple fractures and complete loss of sensation below the abdomen in a motor accident on 1 August 2004. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded him Rs 11,27,359 as compensation, assessing his disability at 70% and granting interest at 12% per annum. The …
BHARATI REDDYversusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.
2018 INSC 2136 March 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Bharati Reddy, was elected Adhyaksha of a Zilla Panchayat after obtaining an Income and Caste Certificate from the Tahsildar. Unsuccessful candidates alleged that the certificate was fraudulently obtained, that the appellant’s affidavits contained contradictory income disclosures, and that the certificat…
JAGDISH KUMAR SOODversusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ORS
2018 INSC 2096 March 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The husband of the third respondent died in a motor accident caused by a collision with a truck. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation but absolved United India Insurance Co. Ltd., the insurer, on the ground that the vehicle was a Light Goods Vehicle and the driver lacked a specific endorsement to dri…
ANDANUR KALAMMA AND ORS.versusGANGAMMA (DEAD) BY L.RS.
2018 INSC 2046 March 2018Dismissed
The appellants sought a declaration of ownership and possession of a 23‑acre land that had been auctioned in 1966 to satisfy income‑tax arrears. The auction sale was confirmed by the Deputy Commissioner, but the appellant’s predecessor challenged the confirmation under Section 177 of the Karnataka (Mysore) Land Revenue…
JAGDISHversusMOHAN & ORS.
2018 INSC 2116 March 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a self‑employed skilled carpenter, suffered a motor‑vehicle accident resulting in loss of use of both hands and a 90% permanent disability. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 12,81,228 based on a monthly income of Rs 4,050, while the High Court added Rs 2,19,000; the appellant sought further e…
DWARIKA PRASADversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS.
2018 INSC 2106 March 2018Disposed off
The appellant, a guarantor, created an equitable mortgage over his property to secure a loan that later defaulted. The bank invoked the SARFAESI Act and initiated auction proceedings, which the appellant attempted to halt by offering partial payment and filing writ petitions. The High Court stayed the sale until the ap…
SINGH RAMversusNIRMALA AND ORS.
2018 INSC 2066 March 2018Dismissed
The accident occurred on 22 March 2010 when a motor‑cycle, owned and driven by the appellant, collided, killing Sunil Kumar. The appellant did not possess a valid driving licence at the time; the licence he produced was found to be fake and the other licence he attempted to produce had expired and was renewed after a t…
ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusAJAY KUMAR MOHANTY & ANR.
2018 INSC 2076 March 2018Disposed off
The claimant, Ajay Kumar Mohanty, suffered a 55% temporary disability in a motor accident. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 22,85,322 compensation, assuming permanent disability and using inconsistent income figures. The insurer appealed; the High Court reduced the award to Rs 12,00,000 without providing r…
SITARAMversusRADHEY SHYAM VISHNAV & ORS.
2018 INSC 2126 March 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Sitaram was elected Chairperson of a municipal corporation, but the defeated candidate Radhey Shyam Vishnav filed an election petition under the Rajasthan Municipalities Election Petition Rules, 2009. The petition was filed without the mandatory treasury challan of Rs 1,000 required by Rule 3(5)(d). The a…
DR. AKSHYA BISOI AND ANOTHERversusALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES & OTHERS
2018 INSC 1026 February 2018Dismissed
Two cardiac surgeons (Dr. Akshya Bisoi and Dr. Ujjwal Chowdhury) employed at AIIMS filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a mandamus directing AIIMS to determine that they were senior to Dr. Shiv Kumar Choudhary, the fourth respondent, based on the 1997 selection policy which they argued gave them higher grades…
MAYA APPLIANCES (P) LTD NOW KNOWN AS PREETHI KITCHEN APPLIANCES PVT. LTD.versusADDL.COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES & ORS
2018 INSC 996 February 2018Appeal(s) allowed
Maya Appliances (now Preethi Kitchen Appliances) manufactures home appliances and offers quantity discounts to its distributors based on their quarterly performance. The discounts are applied to the net sale price and VAT is collected on that net amount. The assessing authority disallowed the discounts as deductions fr…
NAVEEN KUMAR V. VIJAY KUMAR AND ORS.versusVIJAY KUMAR AND ORS.
2018 INSC 1006 February 2018Appeal(s) allowed
A motor vehicle registered in the name of Vijay Kumar (the first respondent) struck two pedestrians, killing one and injuring another. The vehicle had allegedly been sold through a chain of transfers before the accident, but the registration certificate remained in Vijay Kumar's name. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal…
IQ CITY FOUNDATION & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2018 INSC 1016 February 2018Disposed off
IQ City Foundation, a medical college, applied for renewal of its permission under Section 10‑A of the Medical Council Act, 1956 to admit 150 MBBS students for the 2017‑18 academic year. The Medical Council of India (MCI) inspection and the subsequent Hearing Committee found a faculty deficiency of 15.9% and a resident…
STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERSversusPRESIDENT, PARENT TEACHER ASSN. SNVUP AND OTHERS
2013 INSC 786 February 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Kerala challenged a Kerala High Court order that directed the Secretary of the General Education Department to verify the actual strength of students in all aided schools through police assistance, after a school was found to have obtained staff fixation orders through bogus admissions. The High Court had …
THE STATE OF TELANGANAversusHABIB ABDULLAH JEELANI & ORS.
2017 INSC 326 January 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Telangana filed a criminal appeal against a Hyderabad High Court order that, while refusing to quash FIR No. 205/2014 (offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149 and 307), directed the police not to arrest the three accused. The Supreme Court held that such a direction amounts to an order under Section 438 …
AJAY SINGH AND ANR. AND ETC.versusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND ANR.
2017 INSC 356 January 2017Dismissed
The trial judge in two dowry‑death cases recorded the acquittal of the accused in the order sheet but did not pronounce a judgment in open court, nor was any typed judgment signed or dated. A complaint led the High Court to investigate and find that no judgment existed on record, resulting in the judge's suspension and…
DARSHAN SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2016 INSC 176 January 2016Dismissed
The dispute arose between two families over irrigation rights and escalated into a violent clash in a court premises on 17 February 1995, resulting in two deaths and several injuries. Darshan Singh, the appellant, was charged with murder (IPC s.302) of Santa Singh and voluntarily causing hurt (IPC s.324) to others, but…
STATE OF A.P.versusPATCHIMALA VIGNESWARUDU@ VIGGANNA @ GANAPATHI
2016 INSC 156 January 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Andhra Pradesh prosecuted Patchimala Vigneswarudu for the murder of his wife, alleging he strangled her after a night out, motivated by strained marital relations and suspicion of venereal disease transmission. The trial court convicted him under Section 302 IPC, but the High Court acquitted him, holding t…
UNION OF INDIA & ANR.versusS.N. MAITY & ANR.
2015 INSC 56 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, a scientist, was appointed on deputation to the post of Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks for a tenure of five years or until further orders. After serving one year, he was repatriated to his parent department without any stated reason. The Central Administrative Tribunal upheld the…
R.S. SEHRAWATversusRAJEEV MALHOTRA & ORS.
2018 INSC 7795 September 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, R.S. Sehrawat, a junior engineer of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi, was convicted by the Delhi High Court for contempt of court for allegedly filing a false affidavit concerning the demolition of unauthorised structures in Sainik Farms. He appealed to the Supreme Court under Section 19(1)(b) of the C…
SHIVRAJversusRAJENDRA & ANR.
2018 INSC 7815 September 2018Disposed off
The appellant, a 25‑year‑old coolie, was injured when the tractor he was riding in collided with a mud stone due to the driver’s rash driving. He filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking Rs.9,02,324 as compensation, which the tribunal awarded jointly against the tractor owner and the ins…
SMT. KAVITAversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH SECRETARY & ORS.
2018 INSC 7825 September 2018Dismissed
The appellant, Smt. Kavita, then Block Pramukh of a Kshettra Panchayat, challenged a no‑confidence motion notice issued by the Collector under Section 15 of the Uttar Pradesh Kshettra Panchayats and Zila Panchayats Adhiniyam, 1961. She contended that the Collector failed to investigate alleged fraud in the signatures o…
S. K. RAJU @ ABDUL HAQUE @ JAGGAversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL
2018 INSC 7805 September 2018Dismissed
The appellant was intercepted on a public road near a club and, after being informed of his right to be searched before a gazetted officer or magistrate, consented to a search by a gazetted officer. A bag containing 1.5 kg of charas and cash was recovered from him. The appellant challenged the conviction on the grounds…
N. RADHAKRISHNAN @ RADHAKRISHNAN VARENICKALversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
2018 INSC 7845 September 2018Dismissed
The petitioner sought a court order to ban the novel "Meesha", alleging that it insulted temple‑going women and could disturb public order, decency and morality. The Court examined whether the work fell within the narrow, reasonable restrictions permissible under Article 19(2) of the Constitution. Relying on principles…
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.versusTASNEEM RIZWAN SIDDIQUEE
2018 INSC 7835 September 2018Leave Granted & Allowed
The police, investigating a case involving illegal sale of call detail records, arrested Rizwan Alam Siddique and obtained a magistrate's order remanding him to police custody until 23 March 2018. His wife, Tasneem Rizwan Siddiquee, filed a writ of habeas corpus in the High Court alleging unlawful detention; the High C…
THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ANOTHERversus. DHARAM PAL
2017 INSC 8505 September 2017Dismissed
The respondent, a government employee, was appointed on an officiating basis to Superintendent Grade II in 2004 and later to Superintendent Grade I in 2007, with orders stipulating that he would continue on his own pay scale pending departmental promotion committee approval. He retired in 2008 and filed a writ petition…
WORLD COLLEGE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES & RESEARCH AND HOSPITAL & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
2017 INSC 8515 September 2017Hearing Adjourned
The World College of Medical Sciences & Research and Hospital sought a writ of mandamus to quash the order that barred it from admitting MBBS students for the 2017‑18 and 2018‑19 sessions and to obtain renewal of its Letter of Permission (LOP). The Medical Council of India (MCI) inspection in October 2016 identified si…
MUKESH & ANR.versusSTATE FOR NCT OF DELHI & ORS.
2017 INSC 4485 May 2017Dismissed
On 16 December 2012, a 23-year-old paramedical student and her male friend boarded a bus in Delhi. Six men, including the appellants, gang-raped her, inserted an iron rod into her private parts causing severe internal injuries, and threw both victims out of the moving bus. The woman died from her injuries. The appellan…
KULWINDER SINGH &ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2015 INSC 9945 May 2015Dismissed
In 1988 police stopped a truck near Raidhriana village and seized 110 bags of poppy husk. The appellants Kulwinder Singh and Amrik Singh, who were on the truck, fled the scene and were later arrested. They were convicted under Section 15 of the NDPS Act, sentenced to ten years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine, and app…
SEEMA UPADHYAYversusUNION OF INDIA THR. THE SECRETARY, MIN. OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS AND ORS.
2018 INSC 3045 April 2018Disposed off
The petitioner alleged that the second respondent, Devender Agrawal, owned numerous diesel and petrol dealerships under the names of relatives, constituting benami arrangements, and also raised concerns of adulteration of petroleum products and the need for direct transfer of kerosene subsidies. The Supreme Court allow…
KALPANA MEHTA AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
2017 INSC 3145 April 2017Matter referred to larger bench
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus challenging the approval and administration of the HPV vaccine, relying heavily on a report of the Parliamentary Standing Committee. The Union of India contended that such a report could not be used as evidence to establish facts, invoking parliamentary privilege and the doctri…
COMMISSIONER, DELHI VALUE ADDED TAXversusM/S. ABB LTD.
2016 INSC 2975 April 2016Dismissed
The Commissioner of Delhi Value Added Tax appealed against the Delhi High Court's order that exempted M/s ABB Ltd. from VAT on sales made to the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) under Sections 7(a) and (c) of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004. The issue was whether the import of goods and their inter‑state movemen…
M/S. V. L. S. FINANCE LTD.versusS. P. GUPTA AND ANR.
2016 INSC 1435 February 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, V.L.S. Finance Ltd., challenged a series of orders that allowed the withdrawal of prosecution under Section 321 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) and permitted the accused to contest that withdrawal by filing applications under Section 91 Cr.P.C. The Court examined whether the Assistant Public …
KRISHNAMOORTHYversusSIVAKUMAR & ORS.
2015 INSC 9605 February 2015Dismissed
The appeal concerned the election of Krishnamoorthy as President of Thekampatti Panchayat, where he had filed a nomination affidavit disclosing only one pending criminal case while suppressing eight other embezzlement cases. The High Court had declared his election void on the ground of corrupt practice, holding that t…
COMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISE, BANGALOREversusM/S. UNITED SPIRITS LTD. & ANR.
2017 INSC 265 January 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The Commissioner of Central Excise appealed against United Spirits Ltd., which manufactures Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL) and also produces food flavours used in IMFL. The revenue department issued show‑cause notices alleging that royalty received from franchisees for the use of its trademark should be added to the…
PARBATBHAI AAHIR @ PARBATBHAI BHIMSINHBHAI KARMUR AND ORS.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR.
2017 INSC 10034 October 2017Dismissed
The appellants were charged under Sections 384, 467, 468, 471, 120‑B and 506(2) of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly conspiring to forge documents and extort land from the complainant. They filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the FIR on the ground that the dispute had…
MOHAMMED FAIZAL K.A.versusD. SALI AND ORS.
2017 INSC 10004 October 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a police officer, challenged the promotion and seniority of respondent No.1, who was granted notional promotion to Deputy Superintendent of Police for 2001 despite a 1997 punishment of a two‑year increment bar. The High Court had directed inclusion of respondent No.1 in the 2001 select list, ignoring the…
RAVI NORA KUMAR SHRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF M.P. & ORS.
2015 INSC 6424 September 2015Dismissed
Ravi N. Shrivastava, originally a daily wage worker, was regularized as a Lower Division Clerk and later made in charge of Office Steno. He was formally absorbed as a Steno‑typist on 12‑04‑2002, had passed the required shorthand‑typing exam in 2000, and was promoted to Stenographer on 22‑01‑2003. The promotion was canc…
NIZAM & ANR.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN
2015 INSC 6404 September 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants Nizam and Shafique were convicted for the murder of Manoj under Sections 302 and 201 IPC based primarily on the "last seen theory" that Manoj was last seen alive with them. The Supreme Court examined the circumstantial evidence and held that the prosecution failed to establish a complete, unbroken chain …
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERSversusR.K.B.K. LTD. & ANR.
2015 INSC 6434 September 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The State of West Bengal appealed against an order of the Director of Consumer Goods that imposed a penalty on R.K.B.K. Ltd., a licensed kerosene oil agent, for alleged excess distribution. The dispute centered on whether the Director or the District Magistrate had authority under Paragraph 9 of the West Bengal Kerosen…
HINDUSTAN COCA COLA BEYERAGE (P) LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2014 INSC 6014 September 2014Case Partly allowed
The appellant Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage Ltd. had claimed CENVAT credit and refunds under notifications issued in 1999‑2002. After the Finance Act, 2003 amended those notifications retrospectively under Section 153, the Assistant Commissioner ordered recovery of Rs 2,20,18,124, demanding payment within 30 days. The a…
U. MANJUNATH RAOversusU. CHANDRASHEKAR & ANR.
2017 INSC 7084 August 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant challenged a Karnataka High Court judgment that dismissed a first appeal against a trial court order directing rectification of a partition deed. The High Court had merely reproduced portions of the trial court judgment and quoted documents without analysing the evidence or addressing the legal issues rai…
AMEER MINHAJversusDIERDRE ELIZABETH (WRIGHT) ISSAR AND ORS.
2018 INSC 5784 July 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant filed a suit for specific performance of a 2003 agreement to sell land, relying on an unregistered sale deed, a registered power of attorney, and an earlier unregistered 1995 agreement. The respondents challenged the admissibility of these documents, arguing that the 2003 deed required registration under …
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHIversusUNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER
2019 INSC 1944 July 2018Directions issued
The Supreme Court of India interpreted Article 239AA of the Constitution, which provides special provisions for the National Capital Territory of Delhi. The case arose from a dispute between the Government of NCT of Delhi and the Union of India regarding the powers of the Lieutenant Governor and the elected Council of …
ROGER SHASHOUA & OTHERSversusMUKESH SHARMA & OTHERS
2017 INSC 5894 July 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The parties entered into a shareholders' agreement that stipulated arbitration under ICC Rules with the venue in London and the agreement governed by Indian law. The appellants argued that, based on the English court's interpretation and the Supreme Court's endorsement in BALCO and Enercon, the seat of arbitration was …
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERSversusCALCUTTA CLUB LIMITED
2019 INSC 11114 May 2016Matter referred to larger bench
The State of West Bengal appealed against Calcutta Club Limited, which had been held not liable for sales tax on food and drink supplied to its permanent members. The club argued that the doctrine of mutuality made such supplies a non‑sale, while the State contended that the 46th Constitution Amendment (Article 366(29A…
ANANT PRAKASH SINHA @ ANANT SINHAversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR.
2016 INSC 2484 March 2016
The wife (informant) filed an FIR under Sections 498A, 323 and 34 IPC against her husband and mother‑in‑law. The charge‑sheet, however, named only the husband for offences under 498A and 323. While the trial was pending, she filed an application under Section 216 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) seeking to add …
VIJENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
2017 INSC 194 January 2017Disposed off
The case concerned the murder of Badan Pal, a student, at a tube‑well shed where the deceased was shot. The prosecution proved that four accused, including Mahendra Singh and Vijendra Singh, were present in the shed; two were armed with pistols while Mahendra carried a lathi and Vijendra a ballam. The trial court convi…
CINE EXHIBITION PVT. LTD.versusCOLLECTOR, DISTRICT GWALIOR AND OTHERS
2013 INSC 64 January 2013Dismissed
Cine Exhibition Pvt. Ltd. filed Interlocutory Applications No.5 and 6 under Order XVIII Rule 5 seeking clarification or modification of a Supreme Court judgment dated 11 January 2012. The applications aimed to alter specific paragraphs, obtain official records, and modify operative directions concerning the Gwalior Dev…
NATIONAL BANK OF OMANversusBARAKARA ABDUL AZIZ & ANR.
2012 INSC 5563 December 2012Disposed off
The National Bank of Oman filed a private complaint in the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM), Ahmednagar, alleging that Barakara Abdul Aziz cheated the bank of AED 43,15,000. The CJM issued process under IPC sections 418 and 420 without first conducting an enquiry or ordering an investigation as required by …
BENSONversusSTATE OF KERALA
2016 INSC 9443 October 2016Case Partly allowed
The appellant, Benson, was convicted in twelve separate theft cases under Sections 379 and 414 of the IPC, each tried and sentenced individually. He petitioned for the subsequent sentences to run concurrently with the sentence already being served (Crime No.8). The Supreme Court examined Section 427(1) of the Criminal …
VIKAS YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. ETC. ETC.
2016 INSC 9433 October 2016Disposed off
The appellants Vikas Yadav, Vishal Yadav and Sukhdev Yadav were convicted of murder, kidnapping and related offences (IPC ss.302, 364, 34, 201) and sentenced to life imprisonment with additional fixed‑term sentences. The State appealed for enhancement of the life sentence to death; the High Court instead imposed a fixe…
GIRISH RAMCHANDRA DESHPANDEversusCEN. INFORMATION COMMR. & ORS.
2012 INSC 4453 October 2012Dismissed
The petitioner filed an RTI application seeking the third respondent's service records, disciplinary memos, and details of his assets and gifts, most of which were contained in his income‑tax returns. The Central Information Commissioner (CIC) held that the requested information fell within the definition of "personal …
PARHLAD AND ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA
2015 INSC 5403 August 2015Dismissed
The appellant, Parhlad, and his uncle were convicted for kidnapping and raping a girl who was about 14 years old. The trial court, and subsequently the High Court, relied on the victim's testimony, her father's statements, and a school leaving certificate to establish that she was below sixteen, rejecting the ossificat…
STATE ELECTION COMMISSIONER, BIHAR PATNA & OTHERSversusJANAKDHARI PRASAD AND OTHERS
2018 INSC 5693 July 2018Dismissed
The State Election Commissioner of Bihar disqualified Janakdhari Prasad, an elected member of a Panchayat Samiti, on the ground that his appointment as an Assistant Government Advocate placed him in the service of the State Government under Section 139(1)(c) of the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The High Court and the …
KALIM KHAN & OTHERSversusFIMIDABEE & OTHERS
2018 INSC 5733 July 2018Case Partly allowed
The deceased's family filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation for death caused by a stone that fell during a blasting operation used to dig a well. The tribunal held the accident to be a vehicular accident because the tractor’s battery, still installed on the vehicl…
INDOFIL INDUSTRIES LTD. AND ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2017 INSC 5853 July 2017Dismissed
Indofil Industries Ltd. and others were prosecuted under the Insecticides Act for a misbranded insecticide and sought to quash the criminal complaint, contending that the spare sample had been sent to the Central Insecticides Laboratory (CIL) before any proceedings, violating Section 22(6)(ii) and depriving them of the…
HIRA SINGH & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2017 INSC 5833 July 2017Matter referred to larger bench
The Supreme Court examined a challenge to the Central Government's 2009 notification (S.0.2941(E)) amending the NDPS Act's quantification parameters by inserting Note 4. The petitioners argued that the Act does not empower the Government to alter the definition of "small" and "commercial" quantities or to base punishme…
NITHYA ANAND RAGHAVANversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
2017 INSC 12953 July 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The mother, Nithya Anand Raghavan, removed her seven‑year‑old daughter Nethra from the United Kingdom to India and the father filed a writ of habeas corpus in Delhi seeking the child's production and compliance with a UK court order directing her return. The Delhi High Court ordered the mother to produce the child and …
TRF LTD.versusENERGO ENGINEERING PROJECTS LTD.
2017 INSC 5773 July 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The dispute arose from a purchase order between TRF Ltd (appellant) and Energo Engineering Projects Ltd (respondent) where the contract stipulated that any dispute be referred to the Managing Director of the buyer or his nominee as sole arbitrator. After the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 introduced…
SATTI PARADESI SAMADHI & PHILLIAR TEMPLEversusM. SANKUNTALA (D) TR. LRS. & ORS.
2014 INSC 4673 July 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The plaintiff, Satti Paradesi Samadhi & Pillayar Temple, filed a suit in 1997 seeking a declaration that three settlement deeds dated 27 March 1978, executed by a former trustee in favour of his daughters and granddaughter, were void, and also sought possession of the trust land. The defendant contended that the suit w…
SATISH SHETTYversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2016 INSC 4363 June 2016Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined the appeal of Satish Shetty, convicted under IPC sections 498A (cruelty) and 306 (abetment of suicide) for the death of his wife, who had left a ten‑month‑old son and was twenty weeks pregnant. The High Court had set aside the trial court’s acquittal, invoking the presumption under Evidence A…
BIJENDER @PAPU AND ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA
2016 INSC 4393 June 2016Disposed off
Five accused were convicted under IPC sections 325 read with 149, 148A, 308/149 and 323/149 for causing grievous hurt and related offences. The trial court sentenced them to three years rigorous imprisonment for the major offence and imposed fines; the High Court enhanced the sentence for the two appellants to five yea…
BHAGWAN SAHAI AND ANR.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN
2016 INSC 4383 June 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, two brothers and their female relatives, were charged with offences arising from an alleged unlawful assembly in which they allegedly injured several persons and their father later died. The trial court held the incident to be a free fight and convicted them individually; the High Court set aside some c…
INDIRA DEVI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
2016 INSC 4403 June 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The case arose from a land dispute between the victim, Shriram, and his brothers. The victim alleged that three women (the appellants) and two men assaulted him, resulting in gunshot, axe, and other injuries, leading to an FIR under IPC sections 147, 148, 307, 149 and Section 25 of the Arms Act. The trial court convict…
DR. RINI JOHAR & ANR.versusSTATE OF M.P. & ORS.
2016 INSC 4413 June 2016Case Allowed
Dr. Rini Johar, a doctor, and a senior advocate were arrested in November 2012 on a FIR alleging fraud under IPC sections 420 and 34 and the Information Technology Act. The arrest was carried out without complying with Sections 41 and 41‑A of the CrPC, nor the D.K. Basu guidelines, and the petitioners were taken to Bho…
SARLA PERFORMANCE FIBERS LIMITED ETC.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, SURAT-II
2016 INSC 4373 June 2016Appeal(s) allowed
Sarla Performance Fibers Ltd., a 100% export‑oriented unit (EOU), was assessed excise duty and penalty for removing partially oriented yarn to the domestic tariff area (DTA) without permission of the Development Commissioner. The Central Excise Commissioner ordered duty under the proviso to Section 3(1) of the Central …
VASANTA SAMPAT DUPAREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2017 INSC 4363 May 2017Dismissed
The petitioners, Vasanta Sampat Dupare, were convicted of raping and murdering a four‑year‑old girl and sentenced to death. They sought review, arguing that the trial court violated Section 235(2) of the CrPC by not granting a separate hearing on sentencing, that the State failed to discharge its burden under Bachan Si…
M/S RAVI PRAKASH REFINERIES (P) LTD.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2016 INSC 3633 May 2016Case Partly allowed
M/s Ravi Prakash Refineries (P) Ltd. sold Sunflower De‑oiled Cake (SF DOC) in inter‑State trade and claimed a reduced central sales tax rate of 2% by producing Form C under Notification No. FD 119 CSL 2002(2). The assessing officer initially accepted the claim, but a later officer reopened the assessment, asserting tha…
ORISSA OLYMPIC ASSOCIATION TH. GENERAL SECRETARYversusSTATE OF ORISSA & ANR.
2017 INSC 3103 April 2017Directions issued
The Orissa Olympic Association (OOA) was granted a lease of 20.808 acres for a stadium but later constructed 23 shops and a Kalyan Mandap (Barabati Palace) on land the State claims lies outside the lease. The Supreme Court, after a committee measured the leasehold area, found that the shops and part of the Mandap are o…
SASI (D) THROUGH LRS. ·versusARAVINDAKSHAN NARI AND OTHERS
2017 INSC 2013 March 2017Dismissed
The Supreme Court dismissed a Special Leave Petition filed by SASI (D) through LRS against orders of the Kerala High Court that dismissed a second appeal (9 March 2012) and a review petition (26 October 2016). The review petition, filed on 20 September 2012, was barred by limitation and remained pending for nearly four…
RAM LAXMANversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN
2016 INSC 11723 March 2016
The Supreme Court examined the convictions of Ram Laxman and Sanju under IPC sections 302, 149 and 148, which had been upheld by the High Court while other co‑accused were acquitted. The trial and appellate courts relied almost entirely on the testimony of a single eye‑witness, the informant Ganesh (PW‑10), whose credi…
SARDAR NIRMAL SINGH (DEAD) THR. LRS.versusBHATIA SAFE WORKS & ANR.
2016 INSC 11713 March 2016Disposed off
The appellant sought to enforce an auction sale of a plot in Kanpur that had been conducted to recover land revenue under the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948. The auction was held a day after notice, the successful bidder deposited the required 25% by cheque and later by bank draft, both of which were rejected, and…
GURPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2016 INSC 10902 December 2016Case Partly allowed
The appellant and his son were involved in a family land dispute with their brother (the informant). After a verbal altercation, the appellant fetched a 12‑bore DBBL gun and fired at the informant, killing him, and subsequently shot at the informant's wife and two friends, killing one and injuring another. The trial co…
GURCHARAN SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2016 INSC 10922 December 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The case involved the suicide of Surjit Kaur and her two daughters, who died after ingesting aluminium phosphide. A suicide note blamed the appellant Gurcharan Singh, his wife Ajit Kaur and a co‑accused for depriving the victims of their share in family property and subjecting them to harassment. The trial court and th…
ALL INDIA JUDGES ASSOCIATION & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2018 INSC 6712 August 2018Directions issued
The Supreme Court entertained an interlocutory application filed by the All India Judges Association seeking improvement of judicial infrastructure, particularly in subordinate courts. The Court noted that inadequate infrastructure hampers the delivery of justice and violates constitutional guarantees under Articles 21…
ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDversusM/S. NARBHERAM POWER AND STEEL PVT. LTD.
2018 INSC 4382 May 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Oriental Insurance Company Ltd issued a fire industrial all‑risk policy to the respondent M/s Narbheram Power and Steel Pvt. Ltd. After a cyclone caused alleged losses, the insurer repudiated the claim, refusing to accept liability and declined to refer the dispute to arbitration. The insured invoked Clau…
CANARA BANKversusM. AMARENDER REDDY & ANR.
2017 INSC 12702 March 2017Appeal(s) allowed
Canara Bank, the secured creditor, sought to enforce its security over an immovable property pledged by the guarantor M. Amaren... after the borrower defaulted. The bank issued a possession notice, valued the property, and then served a notice of intention to sell together with a public e‑auction notice, fixing the sal…
ANNA JUHI JOHN AND ANR.versusENGLISH AND FOREIGN LANGUAGES UNNERSITIES, HYDERABAD AND ANR.
[2017] 3 S.C.R. 8932 March 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, who secured admission to the Lucknow campus of English and Foreign Languages Universities after being placed lower on the Hyderabad campus merit list, sought transfer to Hyderabad when seats became vacant. The High Court single judge allowed the transfer, but the division bench set aside that order, hold…
RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusSHALU SHARMA & ORS.
2018 INSC 942 February 2018Disposed off
A 42‑year‑old self‑employed businessman died in a motor accident caused by the negligence of a driver whose vehicle was insured by Reliance General Insurance. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs 30,26,810, including a 30% addition for loss of future prospects. The insurer appealed, contending …
THE ANIMAL WELFARE BOARD OF INDIA & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2018 INSC 892 February 2018Matter referred to larger bench
The Animal Welfare Board of India and others filed writ petitions seeking to quash a 2016 Union notification and to compel compliance with the Supreme Court's earlier judgment in Animal Welfare Board of India v. A. Nagaraja. While the petitions were pending, the Tamil Nadu Amendment to the Prevention of Cruelty to Anim…
MOHAMMED ANSARIversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2017 INSC 12592 February 2017Dismissed
Mohammed Ansari, a member of the General Reserve Engineering Force (GREF), sought non‑functional financial upgradation after completing the requisite service. He filed an original application before the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), which, despite a preliminary objection by the Government on jurisdiction, ente…
AMRUTBHAI SHAMBHUBHAI .PATELversusSUMANBHAI KANTIBHAI PATEL & ORS.
2017 INSC 1022 February 2017Dismissed
The appellant, Amrutbhai Shambhubhai Patel, filed a petition under Section 173(8) of the CrPC seeking a court‑ordered further investigation by the police after a charge‑sheet had been filed and the trial was underway. The trial court had granted the direction, but the High Court set it aside, holding that a magistrate …
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, MUMBAIversusM/S ABAN LOYD CHILES OFFSHORE LTD. & ORS.
2017 INSC 12582 February 2017Dismissed
The Commissioner of Customs ordered the confiscation of a drilling rig owned by Mis Aban Loyd Chiles Offshore Ltd. on the ground that the rig had been brought into Indian territorial waters for repairs without filing a bill of entry, was not declared under Section 46 and was therefore imported for home consumption. The…
BALU S/O ONKAR PUND & OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2015 INSC 852 February 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, led by Apparao Pund, entered a cattle shed owned by Madhavrao Range to forcibly take possession of the land, resulting in a scuffle during which they set the shed on fire with kerosene. Savitribai, the wife of Madhavrao, was injured in the blaze and later died from her burns. The trial court and High Co…
HDFC BANK LTD.versusKUMARI RESHMAAND ORS.
2014 INSC 8221 December 2014Appeal(s) allowed
HDFC Bank had financed a motor vehicle that was hypothecated to a borrower. The vehicle, uninsured at the time, was involved in a road accident causing injury to a third‑party claimant who obtained a compensation award. The issue was whether the financier, as the registered owner, could be held liable as the "owner" un…
KODUNGALLUR FILM SOCIETY & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2018 INSC 9171 October 2018Disposed off
The Kodungallur Film Society filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking directions to prevent mob violence against cultural establishments, especially following protests over films like Padmaavat. The Court examined whether the State must implement the guidelines from In Re: Destruction of Public and Private Proper…
PUKHREM SHARATCHANDRA SINGHversusMAIREMBAM PRITHVIRAJ@ PRITHIBIRAJ SINGH
2015 INSC 7261 October 2015Disposed off
The appellant, Pukhrem Sharatchandra Singh, filed an election petition challenging the 2012 election of the respondent, Mairembam Prithviraj, on grounds of a forged affidavit and procedural irregularities. The respondent delayed filing his written statement for two years and repeatedly sought adjournments, filing numer…
SUDHIRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
2015 INSC 7251 October 2015Dismissed
The case involved two officials of the Rural Water Supply Department of Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon, accused of misappropriating public funds allocated for rural drinking‑water schemes. FIRs were filed after an enquiry by the Revenue Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner, alleging large sums were siphoned through fictitious…
SHRI VENKATESHWARA UNIVERSITY THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR AND ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
2017 INSC 8401 September 2017Dismissed
Shri Venkateshwara University sought renewal of its Letter of Permission (LOP) to admit MBBS students for 2017‑18 after the Medical Council of India (MCI) inspected the college on 9 December 2016 and recommended debarment for 2017‑18 and 2018‑19. The university argued that the inspection violated clause 8(3)(l)(d) of t…
KRISHNA MOHAN MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER
2017 INSC 8451 September 2017Hearing Adjourned
Krishna‑Mohan Medical College & Hospital challenged a Union of India order that barred it from admitting MBBS students for 2017‑18 and 2018‑19 and authorised the Medical Council of India to encash a Rs 2‑crore bank guarantee, on the ground of alleged faculty and resident‑doctor deficiencies and non‑cooperation with a s…
SARASWATI EDUCATIONAL CHARITABLE TRUST AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
2017 INSC 8411 September 2017Case Allowed
The Saraswati Educational Charitable Trust sought to establish a medical college and was granted conditional permission for the 2016-17 session. The Medical Council of India (MCI) conducted an inspection in November 2016, finding only minor deficiencies (faculty 1.5% and residents 6.52%) within permissible limits. A se…
U.P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORP. &ANR.versusGOPAL SHUKLA & ANR.
2015 INSC 10111 September 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, U.P. State Road Transport Corporation, dismissed conductor Gopal Shukla for allowing 25 passengers to travel without tickets, an act that constituted personal gain and breach of trust. The Labour Court, invoking Section 6(2-A) of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, substituted the dismissal with reinstatem…
ABDUL WAHEEDversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
2015 INSC 10101 September 2015Dismissed
Abdul Waheed, aggrieved by a civil suit and contempt petition, went armed with a pistol and firearms to the chabutra of Abbas Khan, where he and co‑accused fired shots and assaulted the complainants with lathis, resulting in the deaths of Abbas Khan and Israr Khan and injuries to several others. The prosecution relied …
KERALA STATE TODDY SHOP CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATIONversusT.N. PRATHAPAN, MLA & ORS.
2014 INSC 9981 September 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The Kerala State Toddy Shop Contractors Association filed a public interest litigation challenging the Kerala High Court's order that, on the basis of Rule 28A of the Foreign Liquor (Compounding, Blending and Bottling) Rules, 1975, the State could not permit sale of Indian Made Foreign Liquor on the first day of any En…
GLOCAL MEDICAL COLLEGE AND SUPER SPECIALITY HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CENTREversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER
2017 INSC 6921 August 2017Hearing Adjourned
The petitioners, a group of medical colleges, applied for permission to establish new medical colleges for the 2016-17 academic year. After the Medical Council of India (MCI) and the Central Government initially disapproved their schemes, the Supreme Court constituted an Oversight Committee which later granted conditio…
IQ CITY FOUNDATION & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2017 INSC 6931 August 2017Dismissed
IQ City Medical College applied for renewal of its MBBS intake for the 2017‑18 academic year. The Medical Council of India (MCI) inspection identified deficiencies and recommended non‑renewal. A Hearing Committee found the deficiencies insufficient to deny renewal, but the Central Government sent the matter back to MCI…
RAMESHversusSTATE THROUGH INSPECTOR OF POLICE
2014 INSC 5151 August 2014Dismissed
The appellant was accused of raping an eight‑year‑old girl who later died of neurogenic shock. Although the initial FIR did not name him, the investigation recovered the child's shawl and recorded a voluntary confessional statement. The trial court convicted him under IPC sections 376, 302 and 201 and sentenced him to …
PETROLEUM & NATURAL GAS REGULATORY BOARDversusINDRAPRASTHA GAS LIMITED & ORS.
2015 INSC 4591 July 2015Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined whether the Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board (PNGRB) could, under the PNGRB Act, 2008, fix the maximum retail price of gas and determine network tariff and compression charges for a city or local natural gas distribution network owned by Indraprastha Gas Ltd. The Court held that Sec…
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI-IVversusM/S. SANDAN VIKAS (I) LTD.
2015 INSC 4421 July 2015Disposed off
The appeal concerned the classification of car air‑conditioning kits and automotive gas compressors under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 for the period 1 August 1991 to 28 February 1993. The revenue argued that the kits, whether sold with or without compressors, should be taxed under serial No.3 (or serial No.5) o…
STATE OF KERALA & ORS.versusA. P. MAMMIKUTIY
2015 INSC 4601 July 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The Kerala Tahsildar levied a luxury tax on a three‑storey building comprising 13 residential apartments by aggregating the plinth area of all apartments, invoking Section SA of the Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975. The Kerala High Court, on a single‑judge decision, held that tax should be levied only on apartments whose …
RAHUL YADAV &ANR.versusM/S. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD.AND OTHERS
2015 INSC 4621 July 2015Dismissed
The petitioners, Rahul Yadav and others, purchased land and entered into a 30‑year lease with Indian Oil Corporation (IOC) to operate a petrol pump after being awarded a dealership. The dealership was later cancelled by the Court in Mukund Swarup Mishra's case, and IOC sought possession of the premises under the Public…
STATE OF M.P.versusMADAN LAL
2015 INSC 4581 July 2015Case Partly allowed
Madan Lal was convicted by a Sessions Court for raping a seven‑year‑old girl under IPC Section 376(2)(f) read with Section 511 and sentenced to five years’ rigorous imprisonment. The High Court, relying on a compromise between the accused and the victim’s parents, set aside the rape conviction, reduced the charge to Se…
AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION &ANR. ETC.versusRAJUBHAI SOMABHAI BHARWAD AND ANR. ETC.
2015 INSC 4611 July 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned a workman who was dismissed by the Nava Naroda Gram Panchayat and later entered into a compromise with the Sarpanch for reinstatement and back wages. The Labour Court upheld the compromise, but the Gram Panchayat and Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation challenged its validity, arguing that the Sarpanch l…
STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.versusMAHENDRANATH SHARMA
2015 INSC 4651 July 2015Dismissed
The petitioners (State of Rajasthan and officials) appealed against a High Court order that granted revised pensions to a group of retired lecturers, librarians and PTIs who had retired before 1 January 2006. The respondents argued that, under the circular dated 12 September 2008, a pre‑1.9.2006 pensioner’s consolidate…
RAM KUMAR & ORS.versusSTATE OF M.P.
2014 INSC 4411 July 2014Dismissed
The appellant and four others were accused of attacking the father of the complainant with weapons, causing fatal injuries that led to his death. The trial court convicted them under Sections 302, 149 and 148 of the IPC, while the High Court altered the murder conviction to Section 302/34 and acquitted them of the Sect…
UMAKANT & ANR.versusSTATE OF CHHATISGARH
2014 INSC 4471 July 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined the conviction of Umakant and his in‑laws for murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, which was based solely on the victim's dying declaration. The Court held that the dying declaration was unreliable, showing signs of tutoring and contradictions with other evidence, and therefore …
ALAKH ALOK SRIVASTAVAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2018 INSC 4331 May 2018Disposed off
Alakh Alok Srivastava filed a writ petition seeking medical care and compensation for an eight‑month‑old girl who was a victim of an offence under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, and also sought directions for speedy disposal of POCSO cases across the country. The Court ordered that the chi…
SAVITRI PANDEY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.AND OTHERS
2015 INSC 9921 May 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Savitri Pandey and Raju Pandey were named in an FIR filed in 2014 by their sister‑in‑law alleging fraudulent sale deeds executed in 1994 concerning joint family land. The High Court dismissed their writ petition under Article 226 seeking quashing of the FIR. The Supreme Court examined whether such a writ …
LILAWATI AGARWAL ETC.versusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND ETC.
2016 INSC 2941 April 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The appeal concerned the interpretation of Section 30(2) of the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984, which provides for an enhanced solatium of 30% of market value. The award in the present case was passed on 30 September 1985, after the amendment came into force. The High Court had held that the principle laid down…
OIL & NATURAL GAS CORP. LTD.versusGUJARAT ENERGY TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LTD. & ORS.
2017 INSC 12691 March 2017Dismissed
Oil & Natural Gas Corp. Ltd. (ONGC) appealed to the Supreme Court against the order of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity which denied its claim for a refund. The appeal was filed more than 71 days after the 60‑day period prescribed under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003, and beyond the additional 60‑day co…
STATE OF M.P.versusUDAIBHAN
2016 INSC 2271 March 2016Case Partly allowed
The State of Madhya Pradesh prosecuted three accused—Rajaram, Udaibhan and Hakim Singh—for assaulting a complainant and his brother with weapons, resulting in multiple grievous injuries. The trial court convicted them under Section 307 IPC (attempt to murder) and Section 307/34, imposing ten years’ rigorous imprisonmen…