Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

DIPAK MISRA

546 judgments delivered by benches including this judge — showing 201–400.

TEHSEEN POONAWALLAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2018 INSC 36919 April 2018Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined petitions filed under Article 32 seeking an inquiry into the death of Judge Brijgopal Harkishan Loya, who died on 1 December 2014 while presiding over the Sohrabuddin case. The petitioners relied on media reports alleging foul play and questioned the conduct of the judges who accompanied the

BALAKRAMversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.

2017 INSC 36519 April 2017Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Balakram, was charged with murder and attempted murder and, after the prosecution's witness (the investigating officer) was examined, sought to produce copies of pages from the police diary obtained under the Right to Information Act to confront the officer. The trial court rejected the application, the

VIDEOCON INDUSTRIES LTD. & ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2016 INSC 117719 April 2016Appeal(s) allowed

Videocon Industries Ltd. and its directors were penalised by the adjudicating authority under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) for alleged violations of sections 18(2) and 18(3). They appealed before the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange, which held that the transactions (purchase of goods from Korea an

SANJIV KUMAR @ GORAversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2015 INSC 23819 March 2015Dismissed

The appellant, Sanjiv Kumar, a police sub‑inspector, was convicted under IPC sections 395 (dacoity), 450 (robbery) and 342 (wrongful confinement) for a robbery of Indian and foreign currency from a licensed forex firm. The trial court sentenced him to ten years for 395, seven years for 450 and an undisclosed term for 3

HMT WATCHES LTD.versusM.A. ABIDA &ANR.

2015 INSC 24019 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed

HMT Watches Ltd filed a series of criminal complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against M.A. Abida for the dishonour of 57 cheques, which were stopped by a stop‑payment instruction and for which a demand notice had been issued. The High Court of Kerala, invoking its powers under Section 482 of

DHROPADABAI AND OTHERSversusM/S. TECHNOCRAFT TOOLINGS

2015 INSC 97719 March 2015Dismissed

The deceased employee, Ambadas Lahane, died while on duty and his legal heirs claimed compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. The employer contended that the employee was an "insured person" under the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, and therefore barred from any claim under the 1923 Act pursuant

MRS. PRIYANKASRIVASTAVAANDANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.AND OTHERS

2015 INSC 23919 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a series of criminal complaints filed by borrower Prakash Kumar Bajaj against senior officials of Punjab National Bank Housing Finance Ltd. after the bank invoked the SARFAESI Act to recover a defaulted housing loan. The borrower, having settled the loan through a one‑time settlement, repeate

RAMRAO LALA BORSE AND ANRversusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ANR

2018 INSC 4319 January 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The parents of Deepak, a 29‑year‑old assistant teacher who died in a bus‑truck collision, filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs 61.20 million using a multiplier of 17 based on the deceased’s age, plus conventional heads. The Bombay

PAPPU AND ORS.versusVINOD KUMAR LAMBA AND ANR.

2018 INSC 3619 January 2018Disposed off

The widowed wife of Om Prakash, who died in a road accident on 12‑08‑1995 when his truck was struck by Truck No. DIL‑5955, filed a claim for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The offending truck was comprehensively insured by National Insurance Co. Ltd. (respondent No.2). The Motor Accident Claims Tribun

ATUL THAKURversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ETC. ETC.

2018 INSC 3719 January 2018Case Partly allowed

The appellant, Atul Thakur, attacked Hitesh Thakur with a knife during a sudden quarrel at a drink party, inflicting six injuries that later caused Hitesh's death. The trial court convicted him of culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part‑II IPC and sentenced him to five years' rigorous imprisonm

SHRI NAGAR MAL AND ORS.versusTHE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ORS.

2018 INSC 4219 January 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant's 20‑year‑old son died in a road accident and the claim for compensation was filed before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT). The Tribunal rejected the father's income certificates claiming the deceased earned Rs 15,000 per month and instead fixed his income at Rs 6,000 per month, applying a multip

ANIL & ORSversusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS

2018 INSC 4019 January 2018Dismissed

The case involved a claim for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act after a tractor allegedly ran over Ram Kanwar, resulting in his death. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal had awarded Rs. 21,38,000 to the claimants, finding the tractor driver negligent, but the Punjab and Haryana High Court reversed the award, ho

S. KRISHNA SRADHAversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.

[2017] 2 S.C.R. 46619 January 2017Matter referred to larger bench

The appellant, S. Krishna Sradha, was denied admission to the MBBS course under the sports quota despite being more meritorious than the candidates selected. The High Court, relying on the two‑judge decision in Jasmine Kaur, refused admission and awarded monetary compensation, holding that the cut‑off date for admissio

.JAGMOHAN BAHL & ANR.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

2014 INSC 104618 December 2014Disposed off

The appellants, Jagmohan Bahl and another, were charged under IPC sections 420 and 34 for alleged cheating in a property transaction. Their first anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the CrPC was rejected by Additional Sessions Judge‑6, but a second application was later allowed by a different Additional

BAIJNATH & OTHERSversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2016 INSC 104018 November 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased Saroj Bai was found hanging in her matrimonial home within seven years of marriage. The State alleged that her husband’s family demanded a motorcycle as dowry, subjecting her to cruelty and harassment, thereby invoking Sections 304B and 498A of the IPC and the statutory presumption under Section 113B of th

TAMIL NADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LTD. (TANGEDCO) REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN MANAGING DIRECTOR AND ANR. ETC.versusCSEPDI - TRISHE CONSORTIUM, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR & ANR.

2016 INSC 96818 October 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation (TANGEDCO) floated a tender for two 660 MW super‑critical power units. After qualifying, two bidders – CSEPDI‑TRISHE and BHEL – submitted supplementary price bids which were evaluated by an independent financial consultant. The consultant’s report awarded the contr

MONTECARLO LTD.versusNTPC LTD.

2016 INSC 97618 October 2016Dismissed

Montecarlo Ltd. submitted a techno‑commercial bid for NTPC Ltd.'s coal‑mine development project, but NTPC declared the bid technically non‑responsive because Montecarlo lacked experience in drilling for blasting. Montecarlo challenged this decision before the High Court, arguing that the qualification requirement only

SHANTI DEVI & OTHERSversusKAUSHALIYA DEVI

2015 INSC 102318 September 2015Disposed off

Ram Narayan filed a suit in 1966 which ultimately led to Civil Appeal No. 124 of 1987. The appellant died in 1994 and, because no substitution was filed within the 90‑day period prescribed by Rule 3 of Order XXII CPC and Article 120 of the Limitation Act, the appeal abated and was dismissed in default in 1997. After el

STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.versusTHE SENIOR VOCATIONAL STAFF MASTERS ASSOCIATION

2017 INSC 76918 August 2017Dismissed

The case concerned the pay‑scale disparity between Vocational Masters and Vocational Lecturers in Punjab schools. The State Government had issued a notification on 16 July 2003 restricting the higher pay‑scale (Rs.6,400‑10,640) to only those Vocational Masters appointed before 8 July 1995 and possessing certain qualifi

RAJ BALAversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ETC. ETC.

2015 INSC 58318 August 2015Disposed off

The accused were convicted under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code for abetment of suicide and sentenced by the trial court to three years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine. On appeal, the High Court upheld the conviction but reduced the term to the period already served (four months and twenty days), citing lack o

SAROJ KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2015 INSC 58218 August 2015Dismissed

Saroj Kumar, an Indian Defence Accounts Service officer, was denied promotion on the ground of downgraded entries in his Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs). The ACR entries were later communicated to him, and he filed representations contesting the downgrades, which were rejected. The Central Administrative Tribunal (C

STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARYversusP. K. SINHA AND ANR.

2018 INSC 53818 May 2018Disposed off

The Supreme Court heard contempt petitions filed by the State of Tamil Nadu (and a private party) alleging that the Union of India had failed to frame a Cauvery water‑management scheme within the six‑week period ordered by the Court. The Court examined objections raised by Karnataka and Kerala to certain clauses of the

E. SIVAKUMARversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2018 INSC 53918 May 2018Dismissed

The petitioner, a Food Safety Officer, was named in an FIR concerning illegal manufacture and sale of gutkha and pan masala. The Madras High Court issued a writ of mandamus directing the investigation to be transferred from the State Vigilance Commission to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The petitioner chal

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusVINOD KUMAR

2012 INSC 24018 May 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Rajasthan appealed against the Rajasthan High Court’s order reducing the sentences of Vinod Kumar and Heera Lal for rape (s.376 IPC) from the trial court‑imposed seven years to five years and eleven months respectively. The High Court reduced the sentences without recording any "adequate and special reason

MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIAversusV.N. PUBLIC HEALTH & EDUCATIONAL TRUST & ORS.

2016 INSC 32218 April 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The V.N. Public Health & Educational Trust applied to establish a medical college for the 2016-17 academic year, submitting an Essentiality Certificate that was later found to be conditional and not in the format prescribed by the 1999 MCI Regulations. The Medical Council of India (MCI) recommended disapproval, and the

JOINT SECRETARY, POLITICAL DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF MEGHALAYA, MAIN SECRETARIAT, SHILLONGversusHIGH COURT OF MEGAHALAYA THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR, SHILLONG

2016 INSC 27318 March 2016Case Partly allowed

The Joint Secretary, Political Department, Government of Meghalaya filed a suo motu writ petition under Article 226 seeking to give effect to the Meghalaya Lokayukta Act, 2014 and to bring the Lokayukta institution into existence. The High Court, on its own motion, stayed the eligibility clause (s.3(2)(a)) of the Act a

M/S. M.P. AGENCIESversusSTATE OF KERALA

2015 INSC 97418 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed

M/s M.P. Agencies, a distributor of the fabric whitener "Ujala Supreme" and the fabric stiffener "Ujala Stiff and Shine", appealed against the State of Kerala challenging the classification and tax rate under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The products are manufactured by Jyothy Laboratories by diluting acid vio

M/S. SOUTHERN MOTORSversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS

2017 INSC 5518 January 2017Appeal(s) allowed

M/S Southern Motors, a registered dealer under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, issued tax invoices for vehicle sales and later granted post‑sale discounts through credit notes, retaining only the net amount. The Assessing Authority disallowed deduction of these discounts from total turnover, insisting that a d

CHAIRMAN, ODISHA JOINT ENTRANCE EXAMINATIONversusJASOBANTA NAYAK AND OTHERS

2016 INSC 5518 January 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Jasobanta Nayak, secured rank 16871 in the general category and rank 80 in the physically challenged category in the 2012 Odisha Joint Entrance Examination for engineering admission. He submitted a disability certificate from the District Hospital stating a 40% visual impairment, which under the examina

STATE OF PUNJABversusLABH SINGH

2014 INSC 87617 December 2014Case Partly allowed

The State of Punjab sought to prosecute two retired public servants, Sikandar Singh and Labh Singh, for alleged corruption and related offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and the Indian Penal Code. The department had refused sanction to prosecute them both before and after their retirements, yet a cha

MS. ZversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS

2017 INSC 75617 August 2017Appeal(s) allowed

Ms. Z, a 35‑year‑old destitute woman with mild mental retardation and HIV‑positive status, alleged that she had been raped and sought termination of her 18‑week pregnancy under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971. The government hospital failed to perform the termination, involving the appellant’s father and

TEHSEEN S. POONAWALLAversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2018 INSC 61717 July 2018Directions issued

The Supreme Court entertained a writ petition under Art. 32 filed by a social activist seeking directions to curb cow‑vigilantism, lynching and mob violence. It held that such acts are unlawful, violate fundamental rights and the State has a constitutional duty to protect life and human dignity. The Court issued compre

MS. XversusTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AND ANR.

2018 INSC 52917 May 2018Disposed off

The accused, a film producer, was charged with rape, kidnapping, criminal intimidation, and related offences under the IPC. He had earlier obtained anticipatory bail, which was cancelled for not disclosing a pending 2G Spectrum case, but later secured regular bail under Section 439 of the CrPC by the High Court. The ap

THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, STATE BANK OF INDIAversusM/S ALLWYN ALLOYS PVT. LTD. AND ORS.

2018 INSC 53617 May 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The bank created an equitable mortgage over a flat by taking a loan from the directors of Allwyn Alloys. When the loan defaulted, the DRT and DRAT upheld the bank’s security and rejected the claim of the flat’s occupants (respondents 5 and 6) who relied on a later unregistered MOU. The High Court, however, set aside th

KIRAN PAL SINGHversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.

2018 INSC 53017 May 2018Dismissed

Kiran Pal Singh, the Pramukh of a Kshettra Panchayat in Uttar Pradesh, challenged a second notice of a no‑confidence motion issued by the Collector, arguing that Section 15(12) of the Uttar Pradesh Kshettra Panchayats and Zila Panchayats Act, 1961 barred any subsequent notice within a year of the first notice. The High

THE KERALA ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTORS ASSOCIATIONversusTHE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS.

2018 INSC 52817 May 2018Dismissed

The Kerala Assistant Public Prosecutors Association appealed to the Supreme Court seeking parity in retirement age with Public Prosecutors, arguing that both categories perform similar duties and that the former should retire at 60 years like the latter. The High Court had rejected this claim, holding that the modes of

AMRIT PAUL SINGH & ANR.versusTATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS.

2018 INSC 53117 May 2018Dismissed

The claimants filed a petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act for compensation after a truck, allegedly without a valid permit, struck a motorcycle on 19‑02‑2013, causing the rider's death. The insurer contended that the vehicle was unpermitted and the driver unlicensed, invoking Section 149(2) to deny lia

MOHAN LALversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2015 INSC 33417 April 2015Dismissed

Mohan Lal was convicted for possession of 10 kg of opium under Section 18 of the NDPS Act and for theft under Sections 457 and 380 of the IPC. He argued that the offence occurred before the NDPS Act came into force, that applying the Act was retrospective and violative of Art.20(1) of the Constitution, that the seizure

DAULAT RAM @ DAULTIversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2015 INSC 97317 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Daulat Ram was convicted under Sections 302 read with 34 and Section 201 of the IPC for the murder of Zile Singh, based largely on the testimony of the victim's father and his relatives who claimed to have seen the accused throwing the dead body into a dry well. The prosecution's case relied on circumstan

BLACK PEARL HOTELS (PVT) LTD.versusM/S PLANET M RETAIL LTD.

2017 INSC 126617 February 2017Appeal(s) allowed

Black Pearl Hotels (Pvt) Ltd. entered into a "conducting agreement" with M/s Planet M Retail Ltd. and later sought arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The High Court Judge, invoking s.33(2)(b) of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, referred the matter to the Registrar to determine whether the instr

ANIL KUMARversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2017 INSC 125617 January 2017Appeal(s) allowed

Anil Kumar was first convicted under Section 22 of the NDPS Act and sentenced to ten years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs.1 lakh and a default two‑year term. He was later convicted under Sections 27(b)(ii) and 28 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act and sentenced to one year' rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs

S. MUTHU KUMARANversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2017 INSC 125517 January 2017Case Partly allowed

S. Muthu Kumaran, a Havildar/Clerk in the Indian Army, was alleged to have participated in a fraudulent recruitment racket in 2006 and had earlier given a confessional statement, which he later claimed was made under coercion. The General Officer Commanding (GOC) of the 26 Infantry Division issued a show‑cause notice,

LALITA RAMESH LASE & ORS.versusJAIRAJ KANTILAL SONAWALA & ORS.

2016 INSC 115416 December 2016Dismissed

The petitioners, Lalita Ramesh Lase and others, claimed to be protected tenants of certain agricultural plots under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948, invoking Section 70(B) and seeking declaration of status dating back to the Tiller's Day of 1 April 1957. Their applications, initially approved by the

NEERU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P AND ANOTHER

2014 INSC 84116 December 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined an appeal against a High Court order that granted bail to Mitthan Yadav, a history‑sheeter accused of multiple serious offences including murder, under several IPC sections. The High Court had relied on the principle of parity, noting that a co‑accused, Ashok Kumar, had previously been releas

VARUN SAINI & ORS.versusGURU GOBI ND SINGH INDRAPRASHTHA UNIVERSITY

2014 INSC 72616 October 2014Disposed off

The petitioners sought an extension of the time schedule for online counselling and admission to technical courses of Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, arguing that many seats remained vacant and AICTE had not adhered to its prescribed timetable. The University had issued a notification for supplementary couns

J. K. LAKSHMI CEMENT LTD.versusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, PALI

2016 INSC 87716 September 2016Dismissed

J.K. Lakshmi Cement Ltd. appealed against the Commercial Tax Officer, Pali, contending that it could claim a dual benefit – the partial exemption under Notification dated 06.05.1986 and the reduced 6% tax rate under Notification dated 21.01.2000 – relying on a 1994 circular that had been withdrawn in 2001. The Court ex

KRISHANversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2014 INSC 40016 May 2014Dismissed

The appellant was convicted under Sections 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code for raping and intimidating the prosecutrix. The trial court and the High Court upheld the conviction based on medical testimony that semen was found on the victim's underwear and that the accused sustained injuries consistent with a strugg

KASHMIRI LALversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2013 INSC 34816 May 2013Disposed off

Kashmir Lal was arrested after police seized about 0.5 kg of opium from the toolbox of his scooter at a dhaba. He was convicted under Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act and sentenced to ten years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.1 lakh. On appeal, he contended that the prosec

BIVASH CHANDRA DEBNATH @ BIVASH D & OTHERSversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2015 INSC 29716 April 2015Case Partly allowed

The appellants were convicted for the murder of Ajit Nath during a dispute over land excavation, with the trial court finding them guilty under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the IPC. The Supreme Court examined whether an unlawful assembly of at least five persons existed, given that 27 co‑accused were acquitted,

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIAversusJAGBIR SINGH

2015 INSC 33116 April 2015Appeal(s) allowed

Jagbir Singh purchased a tractor with a loan from Central Bank of India. The tractor was initially insured but the insurance was not renewed after May 2005. On 24 September 2007 the uninsured tractor was involved in a fatal accident, and a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation against the driver and owner

SHAMIM SANOversusASRAF KHAN

2014 INSC 28216 April 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Shamim Bano, a Muslim wife, filed an application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) for maintenance before her divorce. While the application was pending, the divorce was finalized on 5 May 1997, after which she also filed an application under Section 3 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights

STATE OF TAMIL NADU REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTversusSIDDARAMAIAH, CHIEF MINISTER, GOVERNMENT OF KARNAKATA & ORS.

2018 INSC 15416 February 2018Disposed off

The Supreme Court considered a contempt petition (Civil) No. 225 of 2013 filed by the State of Tamil Nadu against the Chief Minister of Karnataka and others, arising out of the inter‑state Cauvery water dispute. The petition sought to hold the respondents in contempt for allegedly violating the earlier judgment in Civi

STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARYversusSTATE OF T. N. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY [DIPAK MISRA, CJI] 829 THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARYSTATE OF TAMIL NADU BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY & ORS.

2018 INSC 15316 February 2018Disposed off

The Supreme Court adjudicated appeals against the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal's 2007 award allocating waters of the inter-State river Cauvery among Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, and Puducherry. The Court upheld the Tribunal's adoption of the principle of equitable apportionment as recognized in international rules

T. A. KATHIRU KUNJUversusJACOB MATHAI & ANR.

2017 INSC 126516 February 2017Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an advocate, was charged by his client for failing to return a cheque handed over for filing a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and for not obtaining an acknowledgment of its return. The Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of India found him guilty of gross neg

JUSTICE K S PUTIASWAMY (RETD.), AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS

2017 INSC 123515 December 2017Directions issued

The Supreme Court, hearing Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India (Writ Petition No. 494 of 2012), considered interim orders that limited the use of Aadhaar to six government schemes and made its linkage voluntary pending a final decision. The petitioners argued that the Union could not make Aadhaar mandator

SRI DINESH KUMAR J. @ DINESH J.versusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS .

2017 INSC 124715 December 2017Case Allowed

The appellant, a 26‑year‑old motorcyclist, was injured in a collision with a mini‑lorry owned by the second and third respondents and insured by the first respondent. He claimed Rs 40 lakhs compensation, but the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal assessed his permanent disability at 10% and awarded Rs 9 lakhs, later reduce

RAJ KUMAR BHATIAversusSUBHASH CHANDER BHATIA

2017 INSC 124015 December 2017Appeal(s) allowed

The suit concerned possession of a property claimed to be joint Hindu family property. The appellant, Raj Kumar Bhatia, sought to amend his written statement to elaborate that the property was coparcenary undivided HUF, an argument already contained in his original statement. The Trial Court allowed the amendment under

TEESTA ATUL SETALVADversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

2017 INSC 123915 December 2017Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether the police could lawfully freeze the bank accounts of Teesta Atul Setalvad, Javed Anand and related trusts under Section 102 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) without prior notice to the account holders. The investigation, stemming from an FIR alleging misappropriation of donation

HARPAL SINGHversusASHOK KUMAR & ANR.

2017 INSC 124615 December 2017Dismissed

The respondents filed a suit for possession of land under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, which was decreed ex‑parte. During execution, the appellant objected that the suit was barred by Section 185 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act because the land was agricultural. The executing court held that the land had been bu

HALAPPAversusMALIK SAB

2017 INSC 124915 December 2017Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a 28‑year‑old agriculturist, suffered total paralysis when a tractor at a demonstration turned turtle and fell on him. He claimed compensation before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, which awarded Rs.8,66,000 based on his disability and loss of earning capacity. The insurer contended that the appellan

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.versusBRIJLAL SADASUKH MODANI

2015 INSC 104315 December 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Brijlal Sadashuk Modani, was a senior employee of Osmanabad Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd., a multi‑state cooperative bank. While in service he received notices from the Anti‑Corruption Bureau demanding details of his assets, which he contested on the ground that the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PCA)

SUMER BUILDERS PVT. LTD.versusNARENDRA GORAN!

2015 INSC 78315 October 2015Dismissed

Sumer Builders Pvt. Ltd. entered into a development agreement and MoU with Narendra Goran for a land parcel in Indore. After disputes over payment and possession, the respondent terminated the agreements and invoked the arbitration clause. The developer applied to the Bombay High Court for interim relief under Section

SARJEET SINGH (D) TH. LRS.versusHARI SINGH & ORS.

2014 INSC 72915 October 2014Dismissed

The appellants, co‑sharers of a Shami/at Patti Sayar (common village land) in village Dahina, filed a civil suit seeking declaration and possession of the land against the respondents. The trial court and the first appellate court decreed in favour of the appellants, granting them possession. The High Court set aside t

STATE, REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE CENTRAL CRIME BRANCHversusR. VASANTHI STANLEY &ANR.

2015 INSC 102215 September 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The State, represented by the Inspector of Police (Central Crime Branch), appealed against the Madras High Court's order quashing criminal proceedings against R. Vasanti Stanley and her husband for allegedly forging documents to obtain loans from several banks. The High Court had set aside the charges on the basis that

C.K. DASEGOWDA & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2014 INSC 48815 July 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, a group of ten accused, were charged with offences including voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons under Section 324 read with Section 34 of the IPC, among other sections. The trial court acquitted them, finding reasonable doubt due to inconsistencies in prosecution witnesses and lack of corrobo

BHUWAN MOHAN SINGHversusMEENA & ORS.

2014 INSC 49015 July 2014Dismissed

The husband appealed against a High Court order directing that maintenance to his wife and child be payable from the date of the application under Section 125 of the CrPC, rather than from the date of the Family Court's order. The Supreme Court observed that the wife’s application had remained pending for nine years du

JAFAR IMAM NAQVIversusELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA

2014 INSC 39615 May 2014Dismissed

Jafar Imam Naqvi, a practising advocate, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a mandamus directing the Election Commission of India to take stern action against politicians and parties making hate speeches during the election campaign, including cancellation of party recognition and candidature. The petitione

KAMLENDRA SINGH @ PAPPU SINGHversusSTATE OF M.P.

2013 INSC 16515 March 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Kamlendra Singh (Pappu Singh), was convicted under IPC sections 307 (attempt to murder) and 341 (wrongful restraint) with a common intention charge. He contended that he was a juvenile at the time of the offence (27 August 1993) and produced a high‑school mark‑sheet and admission register showing a date

ASHA RANJANversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

2017 INSC 15015 February 2017Disposed off

The petitioners, led by Asha Ranjan, sought the transfer of accused M. Shahabuddin, a notorious history‑sheeter involved in the murder of the petitioner's husband and other crimes, from Siwan Jail in Bihar to Tihar Jail in Delhi, and the conduct of his pending trials via video‑conferencing. The core issue was whether t

THE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.versusMIS HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.

2017 INSC 97714 December 2017Disposed off

The State of Jharkhand appealed against an award made by an arbitrator appointed by the Supreme Court, contending that the Court could not entertain an application to make the award a rule of court merely because it retained seisin over the arbitration. The Supreme Court examined the scope of Section 31(4) of the Arbit

SHARAT BABU DIGUMARTIversusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

2016 INSC 113114 December 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Sharad Babu Digumarti, was charged under IPC Sections 292 and 294 and IT Act Section 67 for alleged possession of obscene material in electronic form. He was discharged of the IT Act charge but the trial court framed a charge under IPC Section 292, which the High Court upheld. The Supreme Court examined

SAMEER SINGH AND ANOTHERversusABDUL RAB AND OTHERS

2014 INSC 72114 October 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Sameer Singh and another, challenged an order of a Sub‑Judge’s execution court that it had become functus officio and therefore could not entertain their application under Order XXI Rules 97, 99 and 101 of the CPC concerning a disputed immovable property. The execution court had earlier executed a decre

DR. THAKAR SINGHversusSH. MULA SINGH (D) THR. LR. & ORS.

2014 INSC 71414 October 2014Disposed off

Dr. Thakar Singh and others mortgaged several shops in Moga to Suba Singh and Saudagar Singh in 1942, later redeeming the mortgage in 1969. The mortgagees, however, retained possession and leased the premises to several tenants. The mortgagors sued for possession, and the lower court held the suit barred under the Rent

RAJNI RANI & ANR.versusKHAIRATI LAL & ORS.

2014 INSC 72214 October 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants filed a suit for declaration of ownership of a share in land and an injunction. The defendants filed a counter‑claim asserting title under a Will dated 18‑May‑1995, which the trial judge dismissed as barred by Order 2, Rule 2 of the CPC because the plea had not been raised in the earlier suit. The High C

S. NAMBI NARAYANANversusSIBY MATHEWS & OTHERS ETC.

2018 INSC 82214 September 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, former ISRO scientist S. Nambi Narayanan, was arrested in 1994 on alleged espionage charges that were later found to be false by the CBI, leading to his discharge. He spent nearly fifty days in police custody, during which the Supreme Court found that the investigation by Kerala police was malicious, cau

PANKAJ SINHAversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2018 INSC 81914 September 2018Disposed off

Pankaj Sinha filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking comprehensive measures for leprosy‑affected persons, including periodic national surveys, free multi‑drug therapy, awareness campaigns, non‑discriminatory treatment, education, rehabilitation and disability certification. The Court examined the constitutional

ANNAII MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITAL AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2017 INSC 90314 September 2017Disposed off

The petitioners, Annaii Medical College, sought confirmation of a conditional Letter of Permission (LOP) for the 2016‑17 MBBS session and relief from a decision that barred them from admitting students for 2017‑18 and 2018‑19 and authorised the Medical Council of India (MCI) to encash a Rs 2 crore bank guarantee. The M

KARPAGAM FACULTY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES . AND RESEARCHversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2017 INSC 90414 September 2017Disposed off

The appellant, Karpagam Faculty of Medical Sciences & Research, challenged the Central Government's order that barred it from admitting MBBS students for the 2017‑18 session and denied recognition under Section 11(2) of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956. The college argued that successive inspections by the Medical

RAM CHANDRA SINGHversusRAJARAM AND ORS.

2018 INSC 70014 August 2018Appeal(s) allowed

A motor accident on 10 May 2012 resulted in the death of Sanoj Kumar. The victims filed a claim before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, which awarded compensation but absolved the insurer on the ground that the driver, Shivgyani, held a fake licence. The vehicle owner appealed, arguing that the insurer should remain

STATE OF KERALA & ORS.versusM.K.JOSE

2015 INSC 57614 August 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Kerala terminated a road‑improvement contract with contractor M.K. Jose for alleged non‑completion and forfeited his security deposit. The contractor filed multiple writ petitions under Article 226 challenging the termination, extensions of time and denial of revised estimates. The High Court’s single judg

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERSversusANIL KUMAR SHARMA AND ANOTHER ,

2015 INSC 99814 May 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a challenge by the State of Uttar Pradesh to a Allahabad High Court order that, in a writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR, issued sweeping procedural directions for criminal trials, including mandating production of accused with Section 173 reports, requiring police stations to install p

DEVI DAS RAMACHANDRA TULJAPURKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA& ORS.

2015 INSC 41414 May 2015Disposed off

The appeal concerned a poem titled "Gandhi Mala Bhetala" published in a private bulletin, for which the author, publisher and printer were charged under Section 292 of the Indian Penal Code for obscenity. The Supreme Court examined whether the use of Mahatma Gandhi’s name as an allusion or symbol heightened the applica

UNION OF INDIAversusINDIAN RADIOLOGICAL AND IMAGING ASSOCIATION AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

2018 INSC 23614 March 2018Disposed off

The Union of India appealed against a Delhi High Court judgment that struck down Rule 3.3(1)(b) of the PCPNDT Rules, 1996 and Rule 6 of the Six‑Months Training Rules, 2014 on the ground that the Act did not empower the Central Government to prescribe qualifications or training for persons using ultrasound equipment. Th

ARJUN AND ANR. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2017 INSC 14114 February 2017Case Partly allowed

On 19 November 2006, a dispute over cutting a tree led three accused (Arjun, Lalaram and Padumlal) to assault the deceased Ayodhya Prasad with a katta, gandasa and a stone, causing fatal head injuries. The prosecution proved the case through the testimony of a related witness (the deceased's brother, PW‑6), four eye‑wi

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSversusMIS K. M. GANATRA & CO.

[2016] 1 S.C.R. 16214 January 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The Commissioner of Customs cancelled the Customs House Agent (CHA) licence of Mis. K.M. Ganatra & Co. after finding that the licence had been sub‑let to unauthorised persons, facilitating fraudulent export documentation and causing revenue loss. The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, exercising its po

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNEversusHINDUSTAN NATIONAL GLASS AND INDUSTRIES LIMITED

2016 INSC 4814 January 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The Commissioner of Central Excise issued a show‑cause notice to Hindustan National Glass & Industries Ltd., alleging that the company had not added the advance payments received from Coca‑Cola India and PepsiCo India to the assessable value of its glass bottles, thereby depressing the value and evading duty. The adjud

DR. SABU MATHEW GEORGEversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2017 INSC 122113 December 2017Disposed off

Dr. Sabu Mathew George filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking directions to block online advertisements and content facilitating sex selection, and to compel Google India, Yahoo! India and Microsoft Corporation to comply with the Pre‑conception and Pre‑natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection)

UNION OF INDIAversusAKHILA BHARATHIYA ADIVASI VIKASA PARISHAD & ORS.

[2017] 11 S.C.R. 25113 November 2017Disposed off

The Union of India moved a transfer petition under Article 139A seeking to shift a writ petition (Civil) No. 15798 of 2009, pending before the Andhra Pradesh High Court, to the Supreme Court. The High Court writ challenged the constitutional validity of the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recogn

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BY SEC. & ORS.versusK. BALU & ANR.

[2017] 14 S.C.R. 61413 November 2017Disposed off

The Supreme Court was approached by the State of Tamil Nadu for clarification of its 15 December 2016 order that prohibited the grant of liquor licences along national and state highways, including stretches within municipal limits. The Court clarified that the purpose of the order is to curb liquor sales along highway

INDIAN YOUNG LAWYERS ASSOCIATION & ORS.versusSTATE OF KER,ALA & ORS.

2017 INSC 104013 October 2017Matter referred to larger bench

The petitioners sought a writ directing the Kerala government, the Travancore Devaswom Board and the chief priest of Sabarimala to allow women aged 10‑50 to enter the Ayyappa temple, challenging Rule 3(b) of the Kerala Hindu Places of Public Worship (Authorisation of Entry) Rules, 1965 as unconstitutional. The High Cou

ABDUL WAHAB K.versusSTATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS

2018 INSC 81413 September 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Abdul Wahab K. challenged the order of a Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) that allowed the Public Prosecutor to withdraw prosecution under Sections 195A and 506 IPC, on the ground that the CJM had not applied the proper test under Section 321 of the CrPC. The petitioners, third parties, filed revision peti

ABDUL WAHAB K.versusSTATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS

2018 INSC 81413 September 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a criminal case where the Public Prosecutor sought to withdraw prosecution under Sections 195A and 506 IPC, and the Chief Judicial Magistrate allowed the withdrawal. The order was challenged by the accused through revision petitions filed by third‑party petitioners, which the Kerala High Cour

MAJOR S D SINGH MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL & ANRversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS

2017 INSC 88813 September 2017Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined a writ petition filed by Major S.D. Singh Medical College and Hospital challenging the Union Government’s order, based on the Medical Council of India’s (MCI) recommendation, that barred the college from admitting MBBS students for the 2017‑18 academic year and directed the encashment of a Rs

MANJIT SINGH & ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.

2013 INSC 61313 September 2013Dismissed

Manjit Singh and Paramjit Singh were convicted for the murder of Jagmohan Singh and the attempted murder of Amarjot Singh after a gang fired on a tractor following a political dispute. The appellants challenged the convictions on five grounds, chiefly that two material witnesses were not examined, that the maxim falsus

STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERSversusS. UNNIKRISHNAN NAIR AND OTHERS

2015 INSC 57213 August 2015Dismissed

The State of Kerala appealed against the Kerala High Court’s order quashing an FIR that alleged offences under Sections 182, 194, 195, 195A and 306 of the IPC based on a suicide note left by the deceased, a senior investigating officer. The Supreme Court examined whether the suicide note established a prima facie case

HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIAversusGWALIOR JHANSI EXPRESSWAY LIMITED

2018 INSC 60913 July 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) entered into a concession agreement with Gwalior Jhansi Expressway Limited (GJEL) to widen NH‑75. GJEL failed to complete the work, leading to arbitration. Both parties filed Section 17 applications before the arbitral tribunal seeking interim relief. The tribunal allowed

SUBRAMANIAN SWAMYversusUNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF LAW & ORS.

2016 INSC 42713 May 2016Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Sections 499 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code (criminal defamation) and Section 199 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioners argued that criminal defamation infringes the freedom of speech guaranteed under Article

BALRAM SINGH YADAV@ BALRAM YADAVversusABHAY KUMAR SINGH

2014 INSC 39413 May 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Abhay Kumar Singh, filed a nomination for a Bihar Legislative Council seat but the Returning Officer rejected his papers for not attaching the current electoral roll required under Section 33(5) of the Representation of People Act, 1951, as he belonged to a different constituency. The High Court set asi

RISAL SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

2014 INSC 39513 May 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Assistant Sub‑Inspector Risal Singh was dismissed by the Superintendent of Police under Article 311(2)(b) of the Constitution, who dispensed with a disciplinary inquiry and gave no reasons for the dismissal. The appellant challenged the order, arguing that a reason must be ascribed when an inquiry is waived, and the Hi

STATE OF KERALA & ORS.versusM/S. PALAKKAD HERITAGE HOTELS

2017 INSC 34313 April 2017Case Partly allowed

The respondent, Mis. Palakkad Heritage Hotels, applied for a FL‑11 beer/wine bar licence under the Foreign Liquor Rules, 1974. The Excise Commissioner recommended grant of the licence on 28‑Mar‑2012, but before the State Government could give its final approval the Rules were amended on 18‑Apr‑2012 to increase the mini

UNION OF INDIAversusM/S. SIMPLEX INFRASTRUCTURES LTD.

2017 INSC 34413 April 2017Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India entered into a reconstruction contract with M/s. Simplex Infrastructures Ltd, which it later rescinded alleging delay. An arbitrator held the rescission illegal and awarded payment to the respondent. The Union filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to set asid

PALLAV SHETHversusCANARA BANK

2016 INSC 31313 April 2016Disposed off

Pallav Sheth was convicted by a Special Court under Section 10 of the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 for dishonestly misappropriating 20,000 shares and refusing to pay the agreed price of Rs.83 lakh to Canara Bank. The Special Court also ordered a civil decree of Rs.5

THE GUJARAT MARITIME BOARDversusG.C. PANDYA

2015 INSC 98913 April 2015Case Partly allowed

G.C. Pandya, a former Deputy Engineer of the Gujarat Maritime Board, was disciplined and censured in 2002 and superannuated as Superintending Engineer. He sued for a declaration that the departmental enquiry and punishment were illegal and sought promotion to Chief Engineer effective 1 January 2002. The Board did not f

GANGA DHAR KALITAversusTHE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHERS

2015 INSC 32113 April 2015Dismissed

The appellant Ganga Dhar Kalita was accused of forging signatures of three persons, including a minor, to execute a power of attorney for the sale of land, leading to an FIR under several IPC sections. The appellant filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quash of the criminal proce

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusRAGHUWAR PAL SINGH

2018 INSC 23413 March 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent was appointed as Veterinary Compounder in the Central Cattle Breeding Farms in 1999 by the then Director In‑charge without obtaining prior written approval of the competent authority as required by the Central Cattle Breeding Farms (Class III and IV) Recruitment Rules, 1969. The Department later issued a

ESCORTS LTD.versusUNIVERSAL TRACTOR HOLDING LLC

2013 INSC 15813 March 2013

The respondent, Universal Tractor Holding LLC, sold its 49% share in Beever Creek Holdings to Escorts Agri Machinery Inc., a subsidiary of the petitioner, for $1.2 million payable in four installments. After Escorts AMI defaulted on the last two installments, the respondent sued in a North Carolina court, which entered

NAYANKUMAR SHIVAPPA WAGHMAREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2015 INSC 96413 February 2015Dismissed

The appellant, a public servant in the Finance Section of Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad, was alleged to have demanded and accepted bribes from the complainant for expediting his sister's pension and GPF dues. The complainant, after paying part of the demanded money, was caught in a trap where the accused was found with the

SURINDER PAL KAUR AND ANOTHERversusSATPAL AND ANOTHER

2015 INSC 95113 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, claiming to be landlords, filed an eviction petition under Section 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 against the respondents who asserted they were tenants of a temple. The respondents pointed to earlier proceedings under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, wher

AJAY KUMAR PALversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

2014 INSC 86712 December 2014Case Allowed

Ajay Kumar Pal was sentenced to death by a Special CBI Judge on 9 April 2007, a sentence confirmed by the Jharkhand High Court and the Supreme Court on 16 March 2010. He filed a mercy petition on 10 April 2010, which was forwarded immediately but only disposed of after a delay of three years and ten months, with the Pr

M/S. NOVA ADSversusMETROPOLITAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ORS.

2014 INSC 86412 December 2014Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether the Chennai City Municipal Corporation (the Corporation) or the Metropolitan Transport Corporation (MTCL) had statutory authority to erect and manage bus shelters under the Chennai City Municipal Corporation Act, 1919. By interpreting Sections 203, 285, and 285‑A, the Court held that

M/S. NOVA ADSversusMETROPOLITAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ORS.

2014 INSC 86412 December 2014Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether the Chennai City Municipal Corporation (the Corporation) or the Metropolitan Transport Corporation (MTCL) had statutory authority to erect and manage bus shelters under the Chennai City Municipal Corporation Act, 1919. By interpreting Sections 203, 204, 285, 285‑A and related provisio

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusM/S. AGARWAL IRON INDUSTRIES

2014 INSC 77212 November 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India challenged the Allahabad High Court's order quashing a search and seizure conducted under Section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act at the premises of M/s Agarwal Iron Industries. The High Court had held that the search warrant was issued mechanically without a reasonable basis. The Supreme Court examined

ROYAL MEDICAL TRUST AND ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

2017 INSC 88912 September 2017Disposed off

The Royal Medical Trust, which runs Kerala Medical College, applied for a Letter of Permission (LOP) to admit 150 MBBS students for the 2017‑18 academic year. After a surprise inspection by the Medical Council of India (MCI) revealed several deficiencies, the Central Government barred the college from admissions and au

VARUNARJUN TRUST & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2017 INSC 89012 September 2017Disposed off

The petitioners, Varunarjun Trust, applied for a new medical college and were granted a conditional Letter of Permission (LOP) for the 2016‑17 session. Subsequent assessments by the Medical Council of India (MCI) revealed significant deficiencies in faculty (16.79%) and residents (21.73%), as well as shortcomings in mi

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND (PREVIOUSLY STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH)versusMOHAN SINGH & OTHERS

2012 INSC 39012 September 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttarakhand appealed against the Board of Revenue’s order that had allowed a second appeal under Section 331(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, declaring that respondents had acquired Bhumidar rights by adverse possession. The Supreme Court examined whether Section 331(4) inc

KURATIKAR SUDHAKARversusSTATE OF AN DH RA PRADESH

2014 INSC 53912 August 2014Dismissed

The appellant was charged with murder under Section 302 IPC for hacking a father and son to death with an axe while they slept. The trial court acquitted him, citing a 17‑hour delay in lodging the FIR, the absence of a proven motive, and the claim that the family witnesses could not have seen the accused. On appeal, th

GOVT. OF A.P. & ANR.versusB. JAGJEEVAN RAO

2014 INSC 97312 May 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a government servant, was convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and sentenced to one year’s rigorous imprisonment. The High Court, on an application under Section 389(1) of the Cr.P.C., suspended the execution of the sentence but did not stay the conviction. The Department dismissed the

HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LTD.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.

2016 INSC 117612 April 2016Appeal(s) allowed

Hindustan Unilever Ltd. and five others were charged under Section 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration (PFA) Act for allegedly selling adulterated Kesar Pista ice‑cream. The Public Analyst’s report declared the sample adulterated, but one co‑accused invoked the right under Section 13(2) of the PFA Act to have a s

V. SEJAPPAversusTHE STATE BY POLICE INSPECTOR LOKAYUKTA, CHITRADURGA

2016 INSC 30512 April 2016Appeal(s) allowed

V. Sejappa, a public servant, was charged under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for allegedly demanding and receiving Rs 5,000 as bribe to issue a No‑Objection Certificate for a pension claim. The trial court acquitted him, holding that the prosecution failed to prove a demand and that the sanction order was def

STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.versusTATA STEEL LTD. & ORS.

2016 INSC 16012 February 2016Disposed off

Tata Steel Ltd. had been granted an eight‑year sales‑tax exemption under the Bihar Industrial Policy (1995‑2000) and enjoyed the benefit from August 2000 to March 2006. When the Jharkhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005 came into force, the exemption was withdrawn and the company applied to convert the remaining exemption pe

RELIANCE TELECOM LTD. & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2017 INSC 125412 January 2017Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined challenges to the 2015 Notice Inviting Application (NIA) for spectrum auction, where petitioners alleged that the minimum bidding requirements, classification of bidders and spectrum‑capping provisions violated Article 14 and created a non‑competitive environment. The Court held that the gove

JOGINDER SINGHversusUNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH & ORS.

2014 INSC 102511 November 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Joginder Singh, selected for the post of Constable in Chandigarh Police, was denied appointment after a criminal case (FIR No. 200) was discovered during verification. He had been honourably acquitted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhiwani, on 4 October 1999. The appellant disclosed the existence of the case and its

COMMERCIAL MOTORS LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX U.P., LUCKNOW & OTHERS

2015 INSC 102111 September 2015Appeal(s) allowed

Commercial Motors Ltd., a dealer of two‑wheelers, was granted a sales‑tax exemption for the assessment year 1990‑91 based on certificates. The revenue later discovered a shortfall of Rs 97,02,050.65 and issued a show‑cause notice on 13 March 2002 under Section 21(2) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948, seeking reassessment

SUKHJIT SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2014 INSC 58811 September 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Sukhjit Singh was convicted under Section 364 IPC for allegedly abducting his wife Kuljit Kaur and sentenced to ten years' rigorous imprisonment. The trial court and the High Court upheld the conviction, relying mainly on evidence establishing the marital relationship, while ignoring the mother’s testimon

ASOK PANDEversusSUPREME COURT OF INDIA THR. ITS REGISTRAR AND ORS.

2018 INSC 32611 April 2018Dismissed

Asok Pandey, a member of the Bar, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking mandamus directing the Supreme Court to prescribe a fixed procedure for constituting benches—three‑judge benches to consist of the Chief Justice of India and the two senior‑most judges, and Constitution benches to consist of the five senio

DENTAL COUNCIL OF !NOIAversusDR. HEDGEWAR SMRUTI RUGNA SEVA MANDAL, HINGOLI &ORS.

2017 INSC 33211 April 2017Disposed off

The Dental Council of India (DCI) sought to enforce a Government of India order disapproving a dental college's scheme to start MDS courses in Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics for 2016-17. The college obtained a stay from the High Court, which allowed it to admit students on the condition that admission was at

K.S. JOSEPHversusPHILIPS CARBON BLACK LTD. & ANR.

2016 INSC 117511 April 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, K.S. Joseph, was charged under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing bounced cheques. He challenged the magistrate's order of cognizance and issuance of summons on three grounds: the alleged non‑compliance with Section 200 of the CrPC requiring solemn affirmation, the delay of 62‑63 d

SURESH CHAND GAUTAMversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.

2016 INSC 117411 March 2016Dismissed

The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the Uttar Pradesh government to collect quantitative data on Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in its services, arguing that such data is a condition precedent for exercising the reservation in promotion power under Articles 16(4‑A), 16(4‑B) and 335 of the Constit

CHAUHARYA TRIPATHI & ORS.versusL.L.C. OF INDIA & ORS.

2015 INSC 95011 March 2015Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined appeals filed by several Development Officers of the Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) challenging a High Court order that set aside an award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal. The core issue was whether these Development Officers qualified as "workmen" under Section 2(s) of the In

RUSSEL JOYversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2018 INSC 2411 January 2018Disposed off

The petitioners, led by Russell Joy, filed a writ under Article 32 seeking a mandamus directing the Union Government to appoint an international agency to assess the lifespan of the 121‑year‑old Mullaperiyar Dam and to order its de‑commissioning, alleging that the dam, originally designed for a 50‑year life, now poses

SUPREME COURT WOMEN LAWYERS ASSOCIATIONversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2016 INSC 116311 January 2016Disposed off

The Supreme Court Women Lawyers Association filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking that the legislature impose chemical castration as an additional punishment for perpetrators of rape against girl children. The petition highlighted alarming incidents of child sexual abuse and argued that the Indian Penal Code d

CAMPAIGN FOR JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND REFORMSversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

2017 INSC 109110 November 2017Matter referred to larger bench

The Supreme Court clarified that the Chief Justice of India (CJI) is the sole authority to constitute benches and allocate cases, a principle derived from the State of Rajasthan v. Prakash Chand judgment and applicable to the Supreme Court. The Court held that a two‑judge bench cannot direct the composition of a bench

ROHIT TANDONversusTHE ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE

2017 INSC 109610 November 2017

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals of Rohit Tandon challenging the denial of regular bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The Court held that the threshold conditions of Section 45 of the PMLA were not satisfied, as the prosecution presented substantial evidence of the appellant’s involvement

MANGANESE ORE INDIA LTD.versusSTATE OF M.P. & ORS.

2016 INSC 101710 November 2016Appeal(s) allowed

Manganese Ore India Ltd. challenged the levy of a 40% electricity duty on its ferro‑manganese plant, arguing that the plant’s activities constitute manufacturing, not "processing" as defined in Explanation (b) of Part B of the Madhya Pradesh Electricity Duty Act, 1949. The State contended that the plant fell within the

CHARU KHURANA & OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

2014 INSC 102410 November 2014Hearing Adjourned

The petitioners, female make‑up artists, challenged the Cine Costume Make‑up Artists and Hair Dressers Association's bye‑laws that barred women from obtaining make‑up artist cards and required a five‑year Maharashtra residence. The Court examined the constitutional guarantees of equality (Arts. 14, 15, 21), the right t

RASHEEDA KHATOON (D) THROUGH LRS.versusASHIQ ALI S/O LT. ABU MOHD (D) THROUGH LRS.

2014 INSC 70110 October 2014Dismissed

The case concerned an alleged oral gift (hiba) of a house by Abdul Haq, a Muslim, to Rasheeda Khatoon about seven years before his death. After Haq's death, his heirs sought possession, prompting Rasheeda to file a suit for declaration of ownership. The trial court and first appellate court held the oral gift valid, de

DR. (SMT.) MANORAMA TIWARI AND OTHERSversusSURENDRA NATH RAI

2015 INSC 102010 September 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved the death of a 14‑year‑old girl who underwent surgery in a government hospital performed by three medical officers. The girl's father filed a criminal complaint alleging murder under Section 304A of the IPC. The doctors filed an application under Section 197 of the CrPC seeking a sanction from the Sta

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusEX LAC NALLAM SHIVA

2017 INSC 73210 August 2017Case Partly allowed

Corporal Nallam Shiva of the Indian Air Force overstayed his casual leave of about one and a half years without informing his superiors, leading to his conviction for desertion and overstaying leave under the Air Force Act, 1950. The District Court Martial sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment, dismissal from service

J. VASANTHI & ORS.versusN. RAMAN! KANTHAMMAL (D) REP. BY LRS. & ORS.

2017 INSC 73110 August 2017Appeal(s) allowed

The original plaintiff, J. Vasanti & Ors., filed a suit seeking a declaration that several sale deeds relating to her inherited property were null and void and also sought a permanent injunction. The defendants argued that the plaintiff, being a party to the sale deeds, was effectively seeking cancellation of those dee

GURNAIB SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2013 INSC 33910 May 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Gurnaib Singh was convicted for the death of his young wife Amarjeet Kaur, who allegedly committed suicide after being harassed for a dowry demand of Rs 50,000. The trial court and the Punjab High Court upheld a conviction under Section 3048 IPC (dowry death) and sentenced him to seven years' rigorous imp

CHHOTANBEN AND ANR.versusKIRITBHAI JALKRUSHNABHAI THAKKAR AND ORS.

2018 INSC 31910 April 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiffs, sisters and co‑owners of ancestral land, alleged that their brothers fraudulently executed a registered sale deed in 1996, forging their signatures and thumb impressions, and transferred the property without their knowledge. Upon discovering the fraud in late 2012, they filed a suit for declaration and

RAJA @ RAJINDERversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2015 INSC 31210 April 2015Dismissed

The appellant Raja Rajinder was convicted of murder and culpable homicide not amounting to murder under IPC sections 302, 201 and 34, based primarily on circumstantial evidence. The prosecution established that the deceased was last seen with the appellant, that a knife, blood‑stained clothes and burnt blanket were rec

EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATIONversusA. K. ABDUL SAMAD & ANR.

2016 INSC 25510 March 2016

The respondents were convicted by the Special Court for Economic Offences for failing to pay contributions under the Employees' State Insurance Corporation Act, 1948 and were sentenced to imprisonment until further order and a fine of Rs 1,000. The corporation appealed, contending that Section 85(a)(i)(b) mandates a mi

CHARANJIT KAURversusBIKRAM SINGH & ANR.

2016 INSC 25710 March 2016Disposed off

Charanjit Kaur filed a criminal complaint under Sections 498A, 406 and 1208 of the IPC alleging dowry harassment and criminal conspiracy by her husband, Bikram Singh. The trial court convicted the husband and sentenced him to one year imprisonment for each offence, with a fine of Rs.1,000. The Sessions Court dismissed

HARMONY INNOVATION SHIPPING LTD.versusGUPTA COAL INDIA LTD. &ANR.

2015 INSC 20110 March 2015Dismissed

Harmony Innovation Shipping Ltd. entered into a charter agreement with Gupta Coal India Ltd. that stipulated arbitration in London, governed by English law, and specified the arbitrators as members of the London Arbitration Association. The appellant sought interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Concilia

SATISH KUMAR JAYANTI LAL DABGARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2015 INSC 19310 March 2015Dismissed

Satish Kumar Jayanti Lal Dabgar was convicted under IPC sections 363 (kidnapping), 366 (kidnapping for marriage) and 376 (rape) for abducting and raping a girl who was under sixteen years of age. The trial court sentenced him to three years for kidnapping, five years for kidnapping for marriage and seven years rigorous

VIJAYPALversusSTATE (GNCT) OF DELHI

2015 INSC 19410 March 2015Dismissed

Vijay Pal was convicted under Section 302 IPC for allegedly setting his wife Savitri on fire with kerosene after a domestic quarrel. The prosecution relied on the oral dying declaration of the deceased to her brother, corroborative medical evidence showing 100% burns and kerosene residues, and eyewitness testimony of r

MD.ALL @ GUDDUversusSTATE OF U.P.

2015 INSC 19010 March 2015Dismissed

The appellants were convicted by the trial court and the Allahabad High Court for kidnapping and rape under IPC sections 363, 366 and 376 based largely on the testimony of the prosecutrix and her mother. The FIR was lodged eleven days after the alleged kidnapping, and the mother failed to file a missing report, raising

D. VELAYUTHAMversusSTATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SALEM TOWN, CHENNAI

2015 INSC 19110 March 2015Dismissed

The case involved two excise officers, a superintendent (Accused 1) and his subordinate (Accused 2), who demanded bribes from a manufacturer after issuing an illegal show‑cause notice. The complainant reported the demand, and a police‑led trap was set up; the bribe money was handed to Accused 2, who was caught and the

SHARAD KUMAR SANGHIversusSANGITA RANE

2015 INSC 96110 February 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Sharad Kumar Sanghi, Managing Director of Sanghi Brothers (Indore) Ltd., was charged under Section 420 IPC for allegedly cheating a buyer by delivering a vehicle with a replaced engine after an accident. The complaint, filed under Section 200 of the CrPC, primarily alleged wrongdoing by the company but d

ARUN BHANDARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 2910 January 2013Appeal(s) allowed

Arun Bhandari, an NRI, paid Rs.1.05 crore as part payment for a plot in Greater Noida on the basis of an agreement with respondents Savita Singh and Raghuvinder Singh, who later transferred the property to a third party. When the property was not delivered, Bhandari filed an FIR alleging cheating and criminal breach of

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.

2016 INSC 12109 December 2016Hearing Adjourned

The Supreme Court examined appeals filed by Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu challenging the final order of the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal. The core issue was whether Article 262(2) of the Constitution together with Section 11 and Section 6(2) of the Inter‑State River Water Disputes Act, 1956 bars the Court’s powe

SANTHINIversusVIJAYA VENKETESH

2017 INSC 10239 October 2017Reference answered

The Supreme Court examined whether video conferencing could be used in matrimonial disputes under the Family Courts Act, 1984, particularly in transfer petitions. It held that Section 11 of the Act obliges the court to hold proceedings in camera if either party desires, and that allowing video conferencing on the conse

H.S.SIDHUversusDEVENDRA BAPNA & ORS.

2015 INSC 10179 September 2015Appeal(s) allowed

H.S. Sidhu and Devendra Bapna, both direct recruits as Assistant Directors, were promoted to Deputy Director, with Bapna senior to Sidhu. When a vacancy for Joint Director arose, the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) prepared a merit list under Rule 15(3) of the 1987 Rules, placing Sidhu ahead of Bapna based on hi

SUNIL KUMAR VERMA AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

2015 INSC 10189 September 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The Uttar Pradesh State Cement Corporation was wound up in 1999, leaving a group of employees retrenched under the Uttar Pradesh Absorption of Retrenched Employees Rules, 1991. Earlier Supreme Court judgments had affirmed that such employees were entitled to be absorbed in government service despite the later rescissio

CHITRA SHARMA AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2018 INSC 6819 August 2018Leave Granted & Disposed off

Jaypee Infratech Ltd (JIL) defaulted on a loan from IDBI Bank, prompting the bank to initiate a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). Home buyers filed a writ petition alleging that the CIRP ignored their interests and sought a pro‑rata refund of the Rs 750

SHIVAJI AND ANR.versusDIVISIONAL MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ORS.

2018 INSC 6829 August 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The parents of a deceased driver filed a claim petition under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for compensation after a fatal accident in which the driver was also the tortfeasor. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation, but the Karnataka High Court set aside the award, holding that compensa

SANTOSH DEVI AND ORS.versusMAHAVEER SINGH AND ORS.

2018 INSC 6799 August 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased, a small‑scale seller of desi ghee and namkin bhujia, was killed in a road accident in 1992 when a government jeep struck his moped. The appellants, his wife and children, claimed a monthly income of Rs 3,500 and sought compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Clai

BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIA AND ORS.versusCRICKET ASSOCIATION OF BIHAR & ORS.

2018 INSC 6869 August 2018Directions issued

The Supreme Court, hearing Civil Appeal No. 4235 of 2014, examined the draft Constitution of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) prepared by the Committee of Administrators (CoA) to implement the Lodha Committee reforms. The Court considered submissions on membership categories, the inclusion of Maharashtr

VASANT RAO GUHEversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2017 INSC 7189 August 2017Appeal(s) allowed

Vasant Rao Guhe, a Sub‑Engineer, was charged under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for possessing assets disproportionate to his known sources of income. The trial court, and later the High Court, computed his income and expenditures by making presumptive calculations and altered the charge without framing a fre

MUKESHversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI

2018 INSC 5909 July 2018Rejected

The case concerns the infamous Nirbhaya gang‑rape and murder, where the accused Mukesh was convicted and sentenced to death by the trial court, a decision affirmed by the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court. Mukesh filed a review petition under Article 137 of the Constitution, alleging illegal arrest, police‑induced

VINAY SHARMA & ANR.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI

2018 INSC 5919 July 2018Dismissed

The petitioners, Vinay Sharma and Pawan Kumar Gupta, filed review petitions challenging the Supreme Court's order dismissing their criminal appeals in the Nirbhaya gang‑rape case. They raised numerous grounds, including the abolition of the death penalty, alleged errors in the assessment of eye‑witness testimony, the i

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.versusANAND MOHAN &ANR.

2015 INSC 4929 July 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents, who were public servants, were accused of corrupt practices in the construction of a sub‑station and the Economic Offences Wing sought prior sanction for their prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The Administrative Department declined to grant sanction, and the Special Judge direc

OM PRAKASHversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2015 INSC 4919 July 2015Dismissed

The appellant, a soldier, was involved in a drunken altercation at a farewell party where the deceased Dafadar Ram Pratap attempted to intervene and was later found stabbed to death. The appellant surrendered to police, gave a voluntary confession, and was tried before a General Court Martial, which convicted him of cu

KALPANA MEHTA AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2017 INSC 3149 May 2018Reference answered

The case arose from public interest litigation challenging the clinical trials of the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccine on adolescent girls in Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh, alleging irregularities and health risks. The petitioners relied on reports of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Health and Family Welfare (7

PRAMOD LAXMAN GUDADHEversusELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2018 INSC 4649 May 2018Dismissed

Petitioner Pramod Laxman Gudadhe filed a PIL challenging the Election Commission's decision to hold a bye‑election after the resignation of the Lok Sabha member from Bhandara‑Gondiya constituency. He argued that the remaining term would be less than one year, making the election futile and an undue burden on the excheq

KAMENG DOLOversusATUMWELLY

2017 INSC 4619 May 2017Dismissed

Kameng Dolo was elected unopposed to the Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly after the other candidate, Atum Welly, allegedly withdrew his candidature. The High Court held that the withdrawal notice did not comply with the requirements of Section 37 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 and declared Dolo's e

CONSORTIUM OF TITAGARH FIREMA ADLER S.P.A. - TITAGARH WAGONS LTD. THROUGH AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, TITAGARH TOWERS, 756, ANANDAPUR, E. M. BYPASS, KOLKATA- 700 07, WEST BENGALversusNAGPUR METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. (NMRCL) HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT METRO HOUSE, BUNGALOW NO. 28/2, ANAND NAGAR, C.K. NAIDU ROAD, CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR THROUGH ITS GENERAL MANAGER (PROCUREMENT) & ANR.

2017 INSC 4609 May 2017Dismissed

The Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation (NMRCL) issued a tender for 69 EMU rolling stock, which was won by a Chinese government-owned company (Respondent No.2) whose bid was Rs.851 crore, marginally lower than the appellant's Rs.852 crore. The appellant challenged the award, arguing that Respondent No.2 was not a "single ent

SHAFIN JAHANversusASOKAN K. M. & ORS.

[2018] 4 S.C.R. 9559 April 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a habeas corpus petition filed by the father of Hadiya (respondent No.9), alleging that his adult daughter was being illegally detained and might be taken abroad. Hadiya appeared before the Kerala High Court, asserted her freedom of choice, and later disclosed that she had married Shafin Jahan (appe

COMMON CAUSE (A REGD. SOCIETY)versusUNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER

2018 INSC 2239 March 2018Disposed off

The petitioner, Common Cause, a registered society, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a declaration that the right to die with dignity is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution, and for directions to recognize 'living wills' or advance directives. The case was referred to a Constitution B

MIS. YESHWANT GRAMIN SHIKSHAN SANSTHAversusTHE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER & ORS.

2017 INSC 12729 March 2017Appeal(s) allowed

MIS. Yeshwant Gramin Shikshan Sanstha, a society that runs 29 grant‑in‑aid schools and colleges in Maharashtra, appointed 16 part‑time librarians with the permission of the State Government. The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner claimed the society had defaulted on EPF contributions for those part‑time employees un

ARCHIT SAINI AND ANR.versusTHE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ORS.

2018 INSC 1289 February 2018Case Partly allowed

On 15 December 2011 a gas tanker was parked in the middle of a busy highway without indicators, causing a Maruti car to collide with it; the car driver and a passenger died and two others were injured. The claimants filed a claim under s.166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal held th

SUBE SINGH AND ANR.versusSHYAM SINGH (DEAD) AND ORS.

2018 INSC 1269 February 2018Appeal(s) allowed

In a motor accident on 22 September 2009, Ajit Singh, aged 23, died, and his parents filed a claim for compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal initially applied a multiplier of 15 based on the parents' age, which the High Court reduced to 14, relying on the Ash

VIJAY KUMAR RASTOGIversusUTTAR PRADESH STATE ROADWAYS TRANSPORT CORPORATION

2018 INSC 1299 February 2018Appeal(s) allowed

Vijay Kumar Rastogi suffered severe injuries in a bus accident in 2005 and claimed compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation but calculated loss of income only on his net salary of Rs 44,511, ignoring income from bank interest and commission disclosed in his inco

SHYAM NARAYAN CHOUKSEYversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

2018 INSC 149 January 2018Disposed off

Shyam Narayan Chouksey filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking directions to ensure public respect for the National Anthem, including a mandatory requirement that all cinema halls play the anthem before feature films and that audiences stand. The Supreme Court’s interim order of 30 November 2016 imposed such dir

A. ANDISAMY CHETTIARversusA. SUBBURAJ CHETTIAR

2015 INSC 9008 December 2015Disposed off

The plaintiff filed a suit for permanent injunction over a disputed property and lost at trial. He appealed, and during the pendency of the appeal filed an application seeking scientific examination of a will's signature. The first appellate court allowed the application under Order 41 Rule 27, but the defendant obtain

COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER & ORS.versusSTATE BANK OF INDIA & ANR.

2016 INSC 10068 November 2016Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered whether the State Bank of India (SBI), acting on a Reserve Bank of India (RBI) directive to purchase Exim scrips (formerly replenishment licences) at a 20% premium and subsequently cancel them, was liable to purchase tax under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941. The revenue argued tha

VOLUNTARY HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF PUNJABversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2016 INSC 10138 November 2016Disposed off

The Supreme Court heard two writ petitions challenging the implementation of the Pre‑conception and Pre‑natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 and its Rules. The petitioners sought directions for stricter enforcement, a centralised civil‑registration database, training of officials, and al

NATHIYAversusSTATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BAGAYAM POLICE STATION, VELLORE

2016 INSC 10088 November 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The trial court convicted Nathiya and Suresh under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC for the murder of Gurunathan, relying on circumstantial evidence and alleged confessional statements. The High Court upheld the conviction, but on appeal the Supreme Court examined the evidence and found no eye‑witness, an in

STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIRversusR.K. ZALPURI AND OTHERS

2015 INSC 7548 October 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed senior assistant R.K. Zalpuri in 1999 for alleged misappropriation of funds. Zalpuri filed a writ petition in 2006 challenging his dismissal, alleging non‑compliance with Rule 34 of the J&K Civil Services Rules. The State raised a preliminary objection of inordinate, unexplained d

SUBHARTI MEDICAL COLLEGEversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2017 INSC 8798 September 2017Disposed off

Subharti Medical College sought to increase its MBBS intake from 100 to 150 seats for the 2017‑18 session. The Medical Council of India (MCI) inspection flagged several deficiencies, most notably a low bed‑occupancy rate of 55.27%, while the Hearing Committee found no fault with faculty, residents or clinical material

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusLBS B.ED. COLLEGE AND ORS.

2016 INSC 11998 September 2016Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether the State Government of Rajasthan could influence the grant of recognition to private teacher‑training institutions under the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) Act, 1993 and its 2014 Regulations. The State argued that its recommendations were binding, while the NCTE conten

BALJINDER PAL KAURversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

2015 INSC 10168 September 2015Dismissed

Baljinder Pal Kaur, an Assistant Sub Inspector of Punjab Police, was dismissed after a departmental enquiry found her guilty of taking a bribe to illegally send persons to the USA. A criminal trial under IPC sections 406, 420, 1208 and the Prevention of Corruption Act resulted in her acquittal by a Special Court, with

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search