Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

B P JEEVAN REDDY

358 judgments delivered by benches including this judge — showing 1–200.

M/S. LOK NATH AND COMPANY, THE MALL, SHIMLAversusCOMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, PATJALA

1995 INSC 65331 October 1995Appeal(s) allowed

M/s Lok Nath and Company filed wealth‑tax returns late for the years 1959‑60 to 1967‑68. The Wealth‑Tax Officer, after issuing a notice under s.18(1)(a), accepted the assessee’s revised returns and made an assessment, incorrectly stating it was under s.16(3) though it was in substance under s.16(1). The Commissioner, b

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHIversusTHE ASIAN ART PRINTERS (P) LTD. AND ORS. ETC.

1994 INSC 34231 August 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) supplied electricity to Asian Art Printers Ltd. under a "Mixed Load (HT)" tariff. The tariff booklet contained clause (c) stating demand charges plus energy charges and clause (d) prescribing a minimum bill. The consumers argued that the payable amount should be whichever is hig

ORISSA .STATE ELECTRICITY BOARDversusORISSA TILES LIMITED

1993 INSC 13231 March 1993Appeal(s) allowed

The Orissa State Electricity Board entered into a five‑year electricity supply agreement with Orissa Tiles Ltd, which required the consumer to pay a stipulated minimum charge irrespective of actual consumption. The Board disconnected supply on 30 April 1968 for non‑payment and the consumer also failed to pay the minimu

TEKCHANDversusCOMPETENT AUTHORITY

1993 INSC 13331 March 1993Dismissed

Tekchand, a watch dealer, and his two sons made a voluntary disclosure of income under the Voluntary Disclosure of Income and Wealth Act, 1976 and obtained a certificate. After serving a detention order under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act (COFEPOSA), they were served no

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.versusCHAMAN LAL GOYAL

1995 INSC 8631 January 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a former Superintendent of a high‑security jail, was charged with grave lapses after a terrorist escape in January 1987. The memo of charges was served only in July 1992, five and a half years later, and an enquiry was appointed in 1993. The Punjab & Haryana High Court quashed the charges, citing the de

M/S J.B. BODA AND CO. PVT. LTD.versusCENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES, NEW DELHI

1996 INSC 125430 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed

Mis J.B. Boda & Co. Pvt. Ltd., a reinsurance broker, received a commission in US dollars after deducting its fee from the gross reinsurance premium it remitted to foreign reinsurers with RBI approval. The company claimed that the retained commission constituted "income received in convertible foreign exchange" under Se

HINDUSTAN PAPER CORPORATIONversusPURNENDU CHAKROBARTY AND ORS.

1996 INSC 125530 October 1996Disposed off

Purnendu Chakrobarty, a senior employee of Hindustan Paper Corporation, was charged in a murder case and repeatedly applied for leave without proper sanction or medical certificates, resulting in unauthorised absence for more than eight consecutive days. The corporation invoked Rule 23(vi)(E) of its Conduct, Discipline

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusM. BHASKARAN, ETC. ETC.

1995 INSC 64230 October 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents obtained appointments in the Railway Service by presenting forged casual labourer service cards. When the fraud was discovered, the Railway authorities removed them and the respondents sought reinstatement before the Central Administrative Tribunal, which ordered their reinstatement with benefits. The U

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AMRITSARversusM/S SHIV PRAKASH JANAK RAJ AND CO. PVT. LTD.

1996 INSC 112730 September 1996Case Partly allowed

The assessee company had advanced a loan to a firm whose partners were also its shareholders and directors. Interest was charged on the loan in the 1966-67 and 1967-68 assessment years, establishing it as an interest‑bearing loan. For the 1968-69 assessment year the company passed a resolution before the end of its acc

KRISHNA VEER SINGH BACHAN SINGH CHAUHANversusWASUDEO MOTIRAM KALMEGH AND ANR.

1995 INSC 51730 August 1995Disposed off

The petitioner, Krishna Veer Singh Chauhan, was appointed Secretary of the Vidharbha Rashtrabhasha Prachar Samiti in 1982 but the respondents forcibly took control of the trust's affairs and properties. The petitioner obtained orders from the Joint Charity Commissioner and the Supreme Court directing the respondents to

COLLECTOR' CENTRAL EXCISE, BOMBAYversusM/S. S.D. FINE CHEMICALS PVT. LTD.

1995 INSC 23430 March 1995Disposed off

The Collector of Central Excise, Bombay appealed against the Customs, Excise and Gold Control Appellate Tribunal's decision that the distillation and recrystallisation processes undertaken by Mis. S.D. Fine Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. did not constitute "manufacture" for excise purposes. The Tribunal was divided: the technical

JHUMMAN SINGH AND ORS.versusCENTRAL BOARD OF INVESTIGATION AND ORS.

1995 INSC 23530 March 1995Case Allowed

The petitioners, tenants of four shops, alleged that the third respondent fraudulently obtained two court decrees from Gauhati and Gaya to evict them from their premises, purchasing the decrees and powers of attorney for a sum of rupees twenty thousand each. They sought a writ under Article 32 directing the CBI to inve

EX. CAPT. HARISH UPPALversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 13230 March 1994Dismissed

Harish Uppal, a former Indian Army officer, was court‑martialed and sentenced to dismissal and two years' rigorous imprisonment for irregularities during the 1971 Bangladesh operations. While incarcerated, his advocate filed a post‑confirmation petition under Section 164(2) of the Army Act, 1950, which was rejected by

COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE ETC. ETC.versusNEOLI SUGAR FACTORY ETC. ETC.

1993 INSC 12430 March 1993Case Partly allowed

The Central Excise Collector appealed against several sugar factories claiming that they were not entitled to the excise‑duty rebate under four Government notifications because the factories had produced no sugar in the corresponding periods of the base year. The factories argued that the phrase “quantity of sugar prod

DIRECTOR, GENERAL OF ORDNANCE SERVICES AND ORS.versusP.N. MALHOTRA

1995 INSC 8330 January 1995Appeal(s) allowed

P.N. Malhotra, a civilian employee in the defence services whose salary was drawn from the Defence Estimates, was dismissed after a disciplinary enquiry conducted under the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965. He challenged the dismissal before the Central Administrative Tribunal, which held that the 1965 Rules did not apply to him

SHREE MAHAVIR OIL MILLS AND ANR.versusSTATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND ORS.

1996 INSC 141229 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Jammu & Kashmir exempted all local edible‑oil manufacturers from sales tax for ten years, while out‑of‑state manufacturers were required to pay an 8% tax. Shree Mahavir Oil Mills and other out‑of‑state producers challenged the exemption as a violation of Articles 301 and 304(a) of the Constitution, which g

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusSKIPPER CONSTRUCTION AND ANOTHER

1995 INSC 80929 November 1995

The Supreme Court examined a report by former Justice O. Chinnappa Reddy investigating Delhi Development Authority (DDA) officials who allegedly colluded with Skipper Construction to hand over land possession without full auction payment and to allow construction, causing loss to the DDA and the public. The report foun

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusSRIRAM VERMA AND ANR

1996 INSC 124929 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Rajasthan promoted thirteen officers under Rule 28‑B of the Rajasthan Administrative Service Rules, 1954, nine on seniority‑cum‑merit and four on merit. Sriram Verma, a senior officer, claimed his junior Ashok Kumar Sanvaria was promoted over him and appealed to the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribu

CALCUTTA STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, WEST BENGAL

1996 INSC 33829 February 1996Dismissed

The Calcutta State Transport Corporation (CSTC), a statutory body created under the Road Transport Corporations Act to provide road transport services, claimed that its income was exempt from tax under Section 10(20) of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961, on the ground that it was a "local authority" as defined in Section 3(31)

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BOMBAYversusBOMBAY DYEING AND MANUFACTURING CO. LTD.

1996 INSC 34129 February 1996Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered two questions raised by Bombay Dyeing & Manufacturing Co. Ltd.: (1) whether professional fees paid to solicitors for the amalgamation of Nawrosjee Wadia Ginning & Pressing Co. could be treated as revenue expenditure under the Income Tax Act, and (2) whether a contribution of Rs. 2,25,000 to

"COMMON CAUSE", A REGISTERED SOCIETY THROUGH ITS DIRECTORversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 140228 November 1996Disposed off

The Supreme Court issued a clarificatory order modifying its earlier judgment (1 May 1996) in Writ Petition (C) No. 1128 of 1986, which had provided for discharge or acquittal of accused whose criminal trials were pending for a prescribed period. The Court held that the relief does not apply where the pendency is cause

STATE OF KERALA AND ANR.versusBUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF IND!A AND ORS.

1996 INSC 140328 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 introduced optional alternate taxation provisions (Section 7(7), 7A, 7B, 11, 12) allowing contractors to pay a fixed percentage of the contract value instead of tax under Section 5(1)(iv). Several contractors who had not opted for this scheme challenged the validity of those sub‑s

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORSversusM/S. M.V. VYAVSAYA AND CO.

1996 INSC 140528 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against a series of interim orders passed by the High Court in a writ petition filed by M.V. Vyavsayand Co., the highest bidder for liquor licences, which had allegedly defaulted on contractual and statutory obligations. The High Court, despite being informed that the case involved

RANJIT KUMAR MAJUMDARversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 79628 November 1995Dismissed

Ranjit Kumar Majumdar, a civilian employee holding a civil post in the defence services, was suspended under Rule 10(1) of the Central Civil Services (Classification Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 while a criminal prosecution was pending. He challenged the suspension before the Central Administrative Tribunal, arguing

STATE OF PUNJABversusDEV DUTT KAUSHAL ETC.

1995 INSC 50828 August 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a lecturer, was employed by a private college that was taken over by the Punjab Government in 1983 under a gift deed. The deed stipulated that staff absorbed by the Government would be treated as "new entrants" and that the Government would not assume any liability for service rendered before the takeov

COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX, ORISSA AND ANR.versusJAGANNATH COTTON COMPANY AND ANR.

1995 INSC 42728 July 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The Commissioner of Sales Tax, Orissa appealed against the Orissa High Court's order granting Jagannath Cotton Company exemption from sales tax under the State's Industrial Policy Resolutions of 1986 and 1989. The company argued that its process of extracting cotton from waste cotton constituted manufacturing, thereby

ANIL KUMAR GUPTA, ETC.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS.

1995 INSC 42828 July 1995Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the admission process for medical courses in Uttar Pradesh where Lucknow University had applied a 15% horizontal reservation for five special categories (dependents of freedom fighters, children of soldiers, physically handicapped, hill area and Uttarakhand area) alongside vertical reservatio

J. RANGASWAMYversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.

1995 INSC 31328 April 1995Disposed off

J. Rangaswamy, holding a diploma in Radiological Physics from BARC, was serving in a special ad‑hoc post with pay higher than that of a professor and sought to be recognized as Professor of Radiological Physics, arguing that his diploma was an adequate qualification in lieu of a Ph.D. He filed a writ petition, a civil

S.A. RASHEEDversusDIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY AND ANOTHER

1995 INSC 31428 April 1995Dismissed

S.A. Rasheed applied in 1980 for a quarry lease of pink granite covering 300 acres. A lease was initially granted for 100 acres on 6 January 1981 and corrected to 300 acres on 6 June 1981, but before a lease deed could be executed, Rule 3(A) of the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1969, which barred private gr

GOSAR FAMILY TRUST, JAMNAGAR ETC.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1995 INSC 31128 April 1995Dismissed

The Gosar Family Trust was a private discretionary trust with two classes of beneficiaries: the first class could receive the trust's annual income, while the second class would receive the corpus and any accumulated income upon termination. The trustees had absolute discretion to distribute or retain income and could

M.S.P NADAR SONS, VIRUDHU NAGARversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), MADRAS

1993 INSC 17128 April 1993Dismissed

M.S.P. Nadar Sons, a registered firm, sold shares in several companies during FY 1972‑73, realizing a gross long‑term capital gain of Rs 5,61,508 and a long‑term capital loss of Rs 96,583. The assessee computed assessable capital gains by first applying the standard deduction of Rs 5,000 and the 50% deduction under Sec

K.B. HANDICRAFTS EMPORIUM AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

1993 INSC 17228 April 1993Disposed off

The petitioners, manufacturers of handicrafts in Haryana, purchased raw material within the state and sold the finished goods to dealers in Delhi who exported them. They claimed exemption from purchase tax under Section 9 of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, relying on the declaration form ST‑15. The Haryana Sales Tax

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXversusM/S. NARANG DAIRY PRODUCTS

1996 INSC 33228 February 1996

The assessee, Narang Dairy Products, was granted a development rebate under Section 33(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act for its entire machinery in AY 1965-66. Subsequently, part of the machinery was sold and the remaining plant was leased to Hindustan Lever Ltd for three years, within the eight‑year period prescribed by Se

PHIROZE DINSHAW LAM ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS.

1996 INSC 32928 February 1996Disposed off

Godrej & Boyce manufactured refrigerators packed in corrugated fibre containers (CFCs) and contested the inclusion of CFC value in excise valuation. The Revenue served demand notices including CFC value, leading Godrej to file writ petitions. Godrej attempted to support its case with fabricated dealer letters, which we

SH. MALAPRABHA CO-OP., SUGAR FACTORY LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA

1997 INSC 7028 January 1997Leave granted

The Supreme Court examined the fixation of levy‑sugar prices for the years 1974‑75 to 1979‑80 under Section 3(3‑C) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. Earlier the Court had directed the Government to amend the notifications to include the sugar producer’s liability under clause SA (5A) of the Sugarcane (Control) Or

ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AND ORS.versusANAM ELECTRICAL MANUFACTURING CO. ETC

1997 INSC 7128 January 1997Disposed off

The Assistant Collector of Customs appealed against Anam Electrical Manufacturing Co. challenging the levy of a ten‑percent surcharge and the handling of a refund claim under the Central Excise Act, 1944 and the Customs Act, 1962. The Supreme Court examined whether the surcharge could be upheld and, more importantly, w

MARSHALL SONS AND CO. (INDIA) LTD.versusINCOME TAX OFFICER

1996 INSC 139127 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed

Marshall Sons and Co. (India) Ltd. (the holding company) and Marshall Sons and Manufacturing Ltd. (the subsidiary) entered into a scheme of amalgamation that specified a transfer date of 1 January 1982, but the scheme was only sanctioned by the Madras and Calcutta High Courts in late 1983 and early 1984. The Income Tax

M/S. HOTEL DARPAN, MUSSORIEversusSUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, MUSSORIE AND ANR.

1995 INSC 78927 November 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The proprietor of Hotel Darpan in Mussoorie was served notices under Section 10 of the Uttar Pradesh Taxation and Land Revenue Laws Act, 1975, demanding payment of a Rs 5,000 amount and threatening a daily fine for non‑deposit. The appellant argued that the demand was for a penalty imposed for failure to file the requi

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusSH. B.K. MEENA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 112327 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Rajasthan initiated disciplinary proceedings against IAS officer B.K. Meena for alleged misappropriation of Rs 1.05 crore, while a criminal case under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was also filed. The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) stayed the disciplinary enquiry pending the criminal trial,

R. LAKSHMIversusK. SARASWATHI AMMAL

1996 INSC 112427 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The husband obtained an ex‑parte decree of divorce and subsequently died. The wife (appellant) filed an application under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the decree, asserting that it affected her marital status and property rights. The trial court dismissed the application, holding that di

SANJAY GUPTA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

1995 INSC 60227 September 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Sanjay Gupta and others, were appointed as Registration Clerks in the Sub‑Registrar's office at Jhansi after being selected by a committee under the Subordinate Offices Ministerial Staff (District Recruitment) Rules, 1985. The Inspector General later issued an order directing termination of all Registra

BENGAL IRON CORPORATION AND ANR.versusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER AND ORS.

1993 INSC 17027 April 1993

Bengal Iron Corporation, a manufacturer of cast‑iron pipes, man‑hole covers and similar items, claimed that its products fell under Item 2(i) of the Third Schedule of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957, and were therefore liable to a single point tax of 4% only. The Commercial Tax Officer levied tax at the

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRASversusGEMINI PICTURES CIRCUIT PVT. LTD.

1996 INSC 45627 March 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether a parcel of land situated on Mount Road, Madras, which had been used for raising bananas and vegetables, qualified as "agricultural land" under the Income Tax Act, 1961 and thus could be exempt from capital gains tax. The assessee argued that the land was agricultural and therefore no

STATE BANK OF PATIALA AND ORS.versusS.K. SHARMA

1996 INSC 45927 March 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, S.K. Sharma, a bank manager, was charged with temporary misappropriation of a loan amount and was removed from service after a departmental enquiry. The enquiry officer relied on statements of witnesses, but the respondent was not supplied copies of those statements nor of certain documents as required

CALCUTTA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR.versusSRI ANIL RATAN BANERJEE AND ORS.

1994 INSC 49226 October 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents obtained an eight‑storey building sanction on 27 April 1985 under the Bengal Municipal Act, 1932, but failed to commence construction within two years, causing the sanction to lapse. They later applied for a revised eight‑storey plan and a twelve‑storey plan in 1987, claiming a deemed sanction under Sec

M/S ESCORTS FARMS (RAMGARH) LTD.versusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHI

1996 INSC 111826 September 1996Dismissed

Escorts Farms (Ramgarh) Ltd., a private limited company, sold shares it had purchased after 1954 and claimed capital gains by treating the actual purchase price of the original shares as the cost of acquisition, ignoring the effect of subsequently issued bonus shares. The Income‑Tax Officer, the Appellate Assistant Com

P. KANNADASAN ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1996 INSC 80026 July 1996Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the Cess and Other Taxes on Minerals (Validation) Act, 1992, which sought to validate state levies on minerals that had been struck down by earlier judgments. The Court held that Section 2 of the Act validly creates and retrospectively validates the levy and col

THE ADMINISTRATOR MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE CHARKHI DADRI AND ANR.versusRAMJI LAL BAGLA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 41726 July 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The Administrator Municipal Committee, Charkhi Dadri (appellants) acquired 46.51 acres of land under a notification issued pursuant to Section 42 of the Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922, and an award was passed in 1976 with compensation paid and possession taken in 1977. The scheme (No. 1‑B) was required to be execute

CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH AND ORS.versusAJAY MANCHANDA ETC.

1996 INSC 45226 March 1996Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined two dismissals of police Sub‑Inspectors, Ajay Manchanda and Kuldip Singh, effected under clause (b) of the second proviso to Article 311(2) of the Constitution without a departmental enquiry. In Manchanda's case, a Deputy Superintendent’s report concluded that the complainant and witnesses we

NAGARMAL BAIJNATHversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1993 INSC 11726 March 1993Dismissed

M/s. Nagarmal Baijnath, a partnership firm, was dissolved on 2 December 1946 and its business was discontinued. Income‑tax and excess‑profits‑tax assessments for the years 1946‑47 and 1947‑48 were nonetheless made in the name of the firm after its dissolution. The assessee initially raised no objection, but later sough

HINDUSTAN PAPER CORPN. LTD. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS

1993 INSC 11826 March 1993

Hindustan Paper Corporation Ltd. entered into an agreement with the Kerala Government in 1974 that exempted its newsprint turnover from Kerala's sales tax for two years from the start of production. The company sold most of the newsprint in inter‑state trade and claimed a corresponding exemption from Central Sales Tax

GOODRICKE GROUP LTD. ETC.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

1994 INSC 55225 November 1994Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined writ petitions challenging the West Bengal Taxation Laws (Second Amendment) Act, 1989, which imposed a cess on tea estates calculated per kilogram of green tea leaves produced. The petitioners argued that the levy was a tax on tea production, falling under Union competence (Entry 84/List I) a

AKHIL BHARAT GOSEVA SANGH ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.

1994 INSC 48925 October 1994Directions issued

The Supreme Court examined the controversy surrounding the establishment of a mechanised slaughter house (Alkabeer Abattoir) at Rudraram, Medak district, Andhra Pradesh. The petitioner organisations challenged the various permissions granted to the company, arguing that the slaughter house would deplete cattle wealth a

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.versusMOHD. IDRIS ANSARI

1995 INSC 29625 April 1995Dismissed

Mohd. Idris Ansari, a retired Irrigation Department officer, was punished in 1992 for financial irregularities during 1986‑87. The High Court set aside that punishment for violating natural‑justice principles and allowed the State to start fresh proceedings. After his retirement on 31‑Jan‑1993, the State issued a notic

M/S. UNITED COPIEX (INDIA) PVT. LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX

1996 INSC 43525 March 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, manufacturers of rubber flaps used to protect tyre tubes, were taxed under sub‑entry (2) of Entry 43 of the Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948 as accessories of motor vehicles. They contended that the flaps were not accessories of a motor vehicle but only of tyres or tubes and should therefore be taxed a

UNION OF INDIAversusPALIWAL ELECTRICALS (P) LTD. AND ANR.

1996 INSC 43825 March 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India appealed a decision of the Allahabad High Court that struck down paragraph 7 of Central Excise Notification No. 175 of 1986, which excluded from exemption any small‑scale manufacturer that affixed the brand or trade name of a person not eligible for the exemption. The Court examined whether this amen

MOST REV. P.MA. METROPOLITAN AND ORS. ETCversusMORAN MAR MARTHOMA MATHEWS AND ANR. ETC.

1996 INSC 43425 March 1996Disposed off

The Supreme Court was asked to resolve a dispute between the two factions of the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church over the fairness of clause 68 (renumbered as clause 71) of the 1934 Constitution, which gave equal representation to each Parish Church irrespective of its size. The Court held that the clause was not fair

RATANLAL NATH ETC.versusSTATE OF TRIPURA AND ORS. ETC.

1997 INSC 19825 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioner, Ratanlal Nath, challenged several rules made under the Tripura Panchayats Act, 1993, alleging they were ultra vires the Act and the Constitution. The issues concerned (i) provisos allowing use of records other than the last census for determining SC/ST and total population, (ii) sub‑rules governing the

KRISHANLALversusSTATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

1994 INSC 9225 February 1994Case Allowed

Krishanlal, a clerk in the Jammu & Kashmir Home Guards, was investigated by the Anti‑Corruption Commission under the J&K (Government Servants) Prevention of Corruption Act, 1962. The Commission recommended his dismissal, but the authorities failed to furnish him a copy of the inquiry proceedings as required by Section

KARAMCHAND PREMCHAND PVT. LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUJARAT

1993 INSC 6825 February 1993Dismissed

Karamchand Premchand Pvt. Ltd. set aside Rs 4,50,000 as a provision for a possible tax liability under Section 23A of the Income‑Tax Act, 1922. The company later claimed that this amount was a reserve and should be included in its capital for the purposes of Rule 1 of the Second Schedule of the Super Profits Tax Act, 1

STANDARD TRIUMPH MOTOR CO. LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS

1993 INSC 7125 February 1993Dismissed

Standard Triumph Motor Co. Ltd., a UK non‑resident, entered a 1939 collaboration agreement with an Indian company to receive a 5% royalty on sales. The Indian company credited the royalty in its books each year, but the royalty was only remitted to the UK in sterling. The assessee claimed that, because it maintained it

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusSKIPPER CONSTRUCTION AND ANR.

1995 INSC 7525 January 1995Disposed off

The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) auctioned a commercial tower plot and awarded it to Skipper Construction Ltd., which paid only 25% of the bid and later defaulted on the balance despite multiple extensions and court orders. Skipper repeatedly violated interim orders by seeking to create third‑party rights through

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusLEUKOPLAST PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS.

1994 INSC 2725 January 1994Dismissed

The Union of India appealed against a Bombay High Court decision that a strip of surgical dressing (trade‑name Handyplast) medicated with 0.125% nitrofurozone was not a "patent or proprietary medicine" under Tariff Item 14‑E of the Central Excise and Salt Act. The product consisted of a sterile elastic adhesive pad to

SMT. HANS RAJIversusYASODANAND

1995 INSC 78524 November 1995Dismissed

The appellant, an illiterate Harijan widow, sued to cancel a sale deed she had executed in favour of the respondent, alleging fraud, that she thought she was executing a will, and that the deed was obtained without consideration. The trial court, appellate court and Allahabad High Court all held that the deed was volun

SANJAY AHLAWATversusM.D. UNIVERSITY AND ORS.

1994 INSC 54624 November 1994Dismissed

The appellant, Sanjay Ahlawat, challenged clause 3(i) of the prospectus of Maharishi Dayanand University, which awarded a ten‑mark weightage to graduates of the sole medical college in Haryana for postgraduate medical admissions. He argued that the rule was arbitrary, discriminatory and violated Article 14 of the Const

STATE OF ORISSAversusB.N. AGARWALA

1992 INSC 32224 November 1992Case Partly allowed

The State of Orissa contracted B.N. Agarwala to construct an irrigation project. After completion, Agarwala claimed extra work payments, and the dispute was referred to the Superintending Engineer, who acted as sole arbitrator and awarded Rs.1,59,298, including Rs.61,086.61 as interest for the period from 10‑Oct‑1969 t

VARKEY CHACKOversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1993 INSC 27624 August 1993Dismissed

Varkey filed his income‑tax return on 16 April 1970. The Income‑Tax Officer (ITO) made an assessment on 27 March 1972, finding concealment of income amounting to less than Rs 25,000 and, on the same day, initiated penalty proceedings and later imposed a Rs 10,000 penalty. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner set aside

THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION (ADMINISTRATION), MADRASversusS. NAGOOR MEERA

1995 INSC 13624 February 1995Appeal(s) allowed

S. Nagoor Meera, a Superintendent in the Collegiate Education Department, was convicted under IPC s.420 and the Prevention of Corruption Act s.5 and sentenced to one year rigorous imprisonment. The High Court suspended the sentence and released him on bail. The Deputy Director issued a show‑cause notice seeking his dis

SUBRAN @ SUBRAMANIAN AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KERALA

1993 INSC 6724 February 1993Case Partly allowed

Six persons were tried for a violent assault on 24 December 1986 that resulted in the death of Suku. The trial court convicted all under various IPC sections, including murder (302) read with Section 149, and the High Court later acquitted two accused while confirming the others. On special leave, the Supreme Court was

S.B. INTERNATIONAL LTD. ETC.versusASSTT. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF F.T. AND ORS. ETC.

1996 INSC 12824 January 1996Disposed off

S.B. International Ltd., an exporter of marine products, applied for advance licences under the Duty Exemption Scheme of the Export and Import (Control) Act, 1947 between May and September 1992. On 25 September 1992 the government raised the value‑addition norm from 1000% to 1900% and later issued the licences in Febru

SVENSKA HANDELSBM'KEN AND OTHERS ETC.versusINDIAN CHARGE CHROME LTD. AND OTHERS

1994 INSC 2224 January 1994

The plaintiff (borrower) sued the suppliers, lenders and guarantor over a power‑plant project, invoking credit agreements that contained arbitration clauses. The lenders, particularly Svenska Handelsbanken (defendant No. 4), instructed their counsel not to appear or take any step in the main suit, limiting a power of a

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusM/S. THE BRITANNIA BISCUITS CO. LTD.

1994 INSC 54423 November 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Maharashtra appealed against The Britannia Biscuits Co. Ltd., which sold biscuits in tins and collected a refundable deposit for the tins, refunding it only if the tins were returned within three months. The Assessing Authority treated the amount written off from unreturned tin deposits (Rs 84,013) as part

THE HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR.versusROOCHIRA CERAMICS AND ANR.

1996 INSC 120323 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) allotted an industrial plot to the respondent, who was required to pay 25% of the price upfront and the balance in six instalments. After paying only the first instalment, the respondent defaulted; HUDA issued a show‑cause notice under section 17(3) of the HUDA Act, a pena

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusPUSHPENDRA KUMAR JAIN

1994 INSC 41623 September 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) allotted a flat to the respondent after a draw of lots on 12 October 1990, but the allotment‑cum‑demand letter was sent only on 9‑13 January 1991. In the interim, DDA revised land rates by a circular dated 6 December 1990, and the respondent was asked to pay the higher price. The r

M/S. SAHAKARI KHANO UDYOG MANDALI LTD.versusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

1994 INSC 41723 September 1994Dismissed

The appellant, a cooperative society engaged in sugar manufacturing, obtained sugarcane from its farmer members, gave them advances, and processed the cane into sugar. The Sales Tax Officer assessed purchase tax under Section 14B of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, holding the supply to be a purchase, a view affirmed by

INDIAN TOOL MANUFACTURERSversusASSTT. COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NASIK AND ORS.

1994 INSC 41323 September 1994Dismissed

Indian Tool Manufacturers produced carbide "throw‑away" inserts that were initially classified under Tariff Item 68, later under Item 51A(iii) after an amendment, and subsequently re‑classified by the Assistant Collector of Central Excise as Item 62 (Tool Tips). The manufacturer appealed the re‑classification, arguing

THE UNION TERRITORY OF PONDICHERRY AND ORS.versusP.V. SURESH ETC. ETC. AND ORS.

1993 INSC 30823 September 1993Disposed off

The Union Territory of Pondicherry auctioned arrack licences for the 1981‑82 excise year, but altered the rate of supply after the auction without notifying bidders. Licencees, who had paid deposits and begun business, claimed they were entitled to the previous year’s supply rate and that the altered rate made the cont

HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATIONversusOKHA GRAM PANCHAYAT AND OTHERS

1993 INSC 30923 September 1993Disposed off

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation (successor to ESSO) stored petroleum products in Okha Gram Panchayat and paid octroi on the portion consumed locally. The Panchayat claimed octroi on all goods imported, added excise duty to the valuation, and denied refund for goods exported after two months, arguing that Rule 32 create

SITA DEVI & ORS. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

1996 INSC 93323 August 1996Dismissed

The petitioners, non‑matriculate instructors in Haryana's Adult Literacy Programme, claimed that they performed the same duties as matriculate instructors and therefore deserved the same pay scale, invoking the doctrine of "equal pay for equal work" under Article 14. They sought regularisation, back wages, and recognit

R.C. JAINversusHIGH COURT OF PATNA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 93423 August 1996Dismissed

The appellant, a District & Sessions Judge, was denied extension of service beyond age 58 and challenged the decision in a writ petition. The High Court, on the Chief Justice's direction, filed a Letters Patent Appeal (LPA) against the single judge's order, which was admitted and eventually decided by a Division Bench.

ASSOCIATED CEMENT COMPANY LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BIHAR, PATNA AND ANR.

1993 INSC 10823 March 1993Dismissed

The Associated Cement Company (ACC) entered into a contract with a contractor for loading cement bags and reimbursing certain wage components. ACC paid the contractor as per the contract but did not deduct tax under Section 194C(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Income Tax Officer issued notices for non‑deduction of

KRISHI UTPADAN MANDI SAMITI, HALDWANI ETC. ETC.versusM/S. INDIAN WOOD PRODUCTS LTD AND ANR.

1996 INSC 30423 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether, under Section 17(iii)(b) of the Uttar Pradesh Agricultural Produce Market Act, a purchasing trader remains liable to pay the market fee when the selling trader does not collect it. The dispute arose from a sale of specified agricultural produce between two traders. The Court held tha

COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER AND ORS.versusEMKAY INVESTMENTS PVT. LTD.

1996 INSC 30523 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed

EMKAY Investments Pvt Ltd, a newly set up small‑scale plywood manufacturer, claimed exemption from sales tax under Rule 3(66a) of the West Bengal Sales Tax Rules, 1941. The company used the brand name “Merinoply,” which belonged to another firm, Marinoply and Chemicals Ltd. The tax authorities denied the exemption, inv

CALCUTTA IRON MERCHANTSversusCOMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES AND ANR.

1996 INSC 30623 February 1996Disposed off

The case concerned dealers of iron and steel who, under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, were required to transport goods with a declaration signed by the consignor as mandated by Rule 89A(2). The dealers contended that the rule unfairly placed the burden of producing the declaration on them while sellers were

KRISHAN CHANDER DUTIA (SPICE) PVT. LTDversusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER AND ORS.

1994 INSC 8923 February 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, K.C.D. Pvt. Ltd., bought whole black pepper and whole turmeric in West Bengal, ground them into powder, and sold the powder. It argued that under the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1954, the powdered forms are the same goods as the whole forms, already taxed at the first point of sale, and therefore not liab

VINEET KUMAR MATHURversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 11823 January 1996Disposed off

The Supreme Court had ordered the closure of Mohan Meakin's plant on 1 April 1993 for failure to meet anti‑pollution standards. The company’s managing director and CEO operated the plant from 7‑11 April and later obtained a consent from the Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board on 21 April, restarting operations despit

CONSOLIDATED COFFEE LIMITED AND ANR.versusCOFFEE BOARD AND ANR.

1994 INSC 53122 November 1994Disposed off

The appellants, coffee growers, filed writ petitions seeking to restrain the Coffee Board from using the Pool Fund, created under Section 30 of the Coffee Act, 1942, to pay the purchase tax imposed by the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957. The High Court held that the growers were not liable to pay the tax and that the Boa

RAMESH NARAIN SAXENA AND ORS.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHI

1996 INSC 56022 April 1996Dismissed

The appellant, an exporter of hides and skins, pledged goat skins to a bank and obtained an overdraft. The skins were damaged due to the bank's improper storage, leading the appellant to file a criminal complaint. A compromise was reached whereby the bank waived Rs 1,93,159 owed by the appellant, which the appellant tr

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRASversusG.R. KARTHIKEYAN, COIMBATORE

1993 INSC 16122 April 1993Appeal(s) allowed

G.R. Karthikeyan, an individual assessee, won Rs 22,000 as prize money in the All India Highway Motor Rally and the Income‑Tax Officer included it in his total income under the definition of "income" in Section 2(24) of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner, the Tribunal and the Madras High Cou

ANAND S. BIJIversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS.

1993 INSC 16222 April 1993Disposed off

The appellant, who had appeared for the All India Post‑Graduate medical entrance examination of 1992, was not allotted any seat despite having higher marks than some candidates who were later admitted in Kerala. After the first, second and third admission lists were issued, the remaining vacant seats were surrendered t

ASSISTANT EXCISE COMMISSIONER AND ORS.versusISSAC PETER AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1994 INSC 8522 February 1994

The Supreme Court examined disputes arising from the Kerala Abkari Shops (Disposal in Auction) Rules, 1974, where licensees of arrack shops claimed the State was contractually obliged to supply additional quantities of liquor beyond the statutorily mandated monthly quota. The Court held that the monthly quota is obliga

A. SURESHversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.

1996 INSC 136921 November 1996Dismissed

The Tamil Nadu Entertainment Tax Act, 1939 was amended to levy a 40% tax on collections from cable television exhibitions. Cable TV operators challenged the amendment, alleging violations of Articles 14 and 19(1)(a) and (g) of the Constitution, claiming the tax was prohibitive, discriminatory against Doordarshan, and e

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusJAIN SABHA, NEW DELHI AND ANR.

1996 INSC 135921 November 1996Disposed off

The Union of India appealed against a Delhi High Court order that reduced the consideration payable by Jain Sabha for an additional 0.787 acres of land allotted for a school. The government had originally allotted 1.363 acres in 1967 at Rs 5,000 per acre, and later, in 1990, offered 2.15 acres with the original portion

CALCUTTA ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION LTD.versusSH. N.M. BANKA AND ANR.

1996 INSC 136121 November 1996Disposed off

The Calcutta High Court entertained a writ petition filed by a partnership firm and one of its partners seeking a mandamus directing the electricity supplier, CESC Ltd., not to disconnect supply and to refer disputed bills to an arbitrator. The petitioners had not availed the statutory remedy under Sections 26(4) and 2

SALES TAX OFFICER KANPUR AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR

1994 INSC 52721 November 1994

Twenty-six packages of utensils were seized by a Uttar Pradesh sales tax officer because they were being transported without the required documents. The railway argued that the goods were moving from a railway godown to a city booking agency, which it claimed was part of the "Railway" under the Railways Act and therefo

PAVAI AMMAL VAIYAPURI EDUCATION TRUSTversusGOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS.

1994 INSC 40821 September 1994Hearing Adjourned

The Supreme Court entertained a Special Leave Petition filed by P. Av. Education Trust, a private law college, challenging the admission procedures imposed by the Government of Tamil Nadu. The petition raised the question whether the scheme laid down in Unnikrishnan v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1993) applied to the coll

CIT MADRAS AND ANR.versusDALMIA CEMENT (BHARAT) LTD.

1993 INSC 30221 September 1993Matter referred to larger bench

The assessee filed loss returns for assessment years 1950-51 to 1955-56 after the statutory period, and the Income‑Tax Officer (ITO) communicated that no cognizance could be taken. Later, the assessee claimed set‑off of those losses against income of 1960-61 and 1961-62, and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal directed t

HOME SECRETARY, U.T. OF CHANDIGARH AND ANRversusDARSHJIT SINGH GREWAL AND ORS.

1993 INSC 24421 July 1993Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned five engineering students who had secured admission in management‑quota seats of affiliated colleges of Punjab University and sought migration to Chandigarh Engineering College on security grounds. The principal of the transferee college initially refused, later consented on the condition that additi

ORISSA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ANR. ETC.versusM/S IPI STEEL LTD. ETC.

1995 INSC 28921 April 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The Orissa State Electricity Board (OSB) entered into a contract with M/s I.P.I. Steel Ltd (the respondent) for power supply up to a maximum demand of 7,778 kVA, with a two‑part tariff comprising demand charges and consumption charges. Due to a severe generation shortfall, the State Government issued an order under Sec

N. JAGADEESAN ETC.versusDISTRICT COLLECTOR, NORTH ARCOT AND OTHERS

1997 INSC 17821 February 1997Dismissed

The National Association of Educated Self Employed Youth (NAESEY) had installed kiosks within hospital premises and on the margins of busy roads in Madras, Vellore and Tiruppur. The Tamil Nadu government ordered their removal, citing health hazards in hospitals and traffic hazards on main thoroughfares, and offered to

WALDIES LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, WEST BENGAL

1996 INSC 135520 November 1996Dismissed

Waldies Ltd. was assessed to income tax for AY 1964‑65 and subsequently to surtax under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act. The income‑tax assessment was later reopened under Section 147, increasing the tax liability, and the surtax assessment was rectified under Section 13 of the Surtax Act to allow a deduction for th

STATE OF ORISSA AND ORS.versusKALICHARAN MOHAPATRA AND ANR.

1995 INSC 58820 September 1995Appeal(s) allowed

K. Mohapatra, a retired IPS officer, faced a criminal prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act for possessing assets disproportionate to his known income. While the case was pending, the State of Orissa withheld his gratuity and refused to sanction his final pension, granting only a provisional pension. Mohap

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.versusBRIDGE AND ROOF CO. (INDIA) LTD.

1996 INSC 90620 August 1996Dismissed

The State of Uttar Pradesh entered into a works contract with Bridge & Roof Co. (India) Ltd., which required the State to deduct 4% tax at source under the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948. The Commissioner of Sales Tax, under a composition scheme, directed a reduced deduction of 1% and the State complied, prompting the contra

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX GUJARATversusSHRI UDAYAN CHINUBHAI AND ORS.

1996 INSC 90720 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents, former members of a Joint Hindu Family, received specific assets and certain family debts after a partition ordered by an arbitrator's award. They claimed that interest paid on these debts, especially to unsecured creditors, should be deductible as a diversion of income by an overriding title under the

SH. GANESH NARYAN HEDGEversusSH.S. BANGARAPPA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 28220 April 1995Appeal(s) allowed

Ganesh Narayan Hedge filed a complaint under Section 500 IPC alleging defamation by S. B. Bangarappa and two others. The Magistrate, after taking evidence, framed charges, which were challenged by a revision petition under Section 399 before the Sessions Judge, who dismissed it. The respondents then approached the Karn

ASHOK LEYLAND LIMITED ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 16420 February 1997Dismissed

Ashok Leyland Ltd., a manufacturer of trucks, sold vehicles to state transport undertakings and other buyers through its regional sales offices (RSOs) across India. The company filed Form ‘F’ with the Tamil Nadu sales‑tax authority, claiming the movement of goods to RSOs was a transfer, not a sale, and paid sales tax i

M/S PRAKASH TRADING CO.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUJARAT

1996 INSC 28620 February 1996Dismissed

Prakash Trading Co., a groundnut oil manufacturer, claimed an additional tax deduction for deoiled cakes exported or sold to exporters under the export incentive provisions of the Finance Acts of 1966 and 1967, which were linked to the First Schedule of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951. The Income

DIRECTOR, A.I.I.M.S. ETC.versusDR. NIKHIL TANDON AND ORS.

1996 INSC 28720 February 1996Dismissed

The All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) advertised for an Assistant Professor in Endocrinology. Dr. Nikhil Tandon was appointed, while Dr. Ajay Sood challenged the appointment, alleging that Tandon did not possess the required D.M. qualification or an equivalent recognised qualification. The High Court set

BIHAR DISTILLERY AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 4320 January 1997Disposed off

The petitioners, a Bihar distillery licensed under the Bihar Excise Act to manufacture industrial alcohol (rectified spirit), challenged the State’s notice of cancellation of its licence, contending that licensing and control of such distilleries fall exclusively within the Union’s competence under the Industries (Regu

MIS. ASHOK LEYLAND LTD. MADRASversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS

1996 INSC 152219 December 1996Appeal(s) allowed

Ashok Leyland Ltd., a manufacturer of trucks and spare parts, imported certain spare parts and sold them to its truck buyers. The company claimed deductions under sections 80‑E and 80‑I of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for profits earned from these imports, arguing that the income was attributable to its "priority industry"

COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE), AHEMDABADversusM/S ESSAR GUJARAT LTD. SURAT

1996 INSC 133419 November 1996Disposed off

Essar Gujarat Ltd. purchased a Direct Reduction Iron Plant from Teviot Investments Ltd. and, as a pre‑condition, obtained a process licence and technical know‑how from Midrex and Yoest Alpine (V.A.). The Collector of Customs added the licence fee (DM 2,000,000) and a portion of the engineering and consultancy fees to t

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS.versusVINAY KUMAR JAIN

1996 INSC 133619 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a cinema owner, applied to the District Magistrate for a reduction in seating capacity from 540 to 450 seats and to opt for the composite (compounded) payment of entertainment tax for FY 1995‑96. Both applications were rejected, leading to a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court, which held that the

RAMNIKLAL N. BHUTTA AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 133719 November 1996Dismissed

The State of Maharashtra issued a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to acquire two plots (CTS No. 211 and CTS No. 218) for a bus stand. The Land Acquisition Officer passed an award only for CTS No. 211, excluding CTS No. 218 on the basis of a private settlement between BEST and other partie

SRI AMIR AHMAD AND ORS.versusRAM NIWAS AGRAWAL AND ORS.

1993 INSC 37619 November 1993Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a motion of no‑confidence against the President of the Nagar Palika, Sultanpur. The meeting was presided over by an Additional Civil Judge and the votes of seventeen members (including three nominated members who had not taken the oath of allegiance) were in favour, while the President voted against.

SMT. RENU MULLICKversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1993 INSC 37519 November 1993

Ms. Renu Mullick joined the Central Excise and Customs as a Lower Division Clerk in 1974, was promoted to Upper Division Clerk, and on her own request transferred to the Allahabad Collectorate in 1987 where she was placed at the bottom of the seniority list as per the 1980 executive instructions. In 1991 she was promot

ALLAHABAD BANKversusPREM NARAIN PANDE AND OTHERS

1995 INSC 63519 October 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The employee, a Junior Management Scale‑I officer of Allahabad Bank, was served with a charge‑sheet in 1983 and an enquiry was conducted by a Deputy General Manager (DGM). While the enquiry was pending, the employee was transferred and the Assistant General Manager (AGM) of another zone was nominated as the disciplinar

STATE BANK OF BIKANER AND JAIPURversusSH. PRABHU DAYAL GROVER

1995 INSC 58119 September 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur removed its manager, P.D. Grover, for allegedly accepting a bribe and dismissed his appeal before the Executive Committee. Grover filed a civil suit challenging the departmental and appellate orders, claiming violations of Regulation 68(2)(iii) (failure to frame definite c

KRISHNA DASS AGARWALversusKANHAIYALAL

1996 INSC 75419 July 1996Dismissed

Krishna Dass Agarwal sued Kanhaiyalal to enforce a pre-emption right over a house Kanhaiyalal had purchased, relying on an alleged agreement, the Gwalior Pre-emption Act (Samvat 1992) and a customary right. The trial court decreed in favour of the plaintiff, but the defendant appealed. While the appeal was pending, the

A. NAGARAJU BROS., VISAKHAPATNAMversusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

1994 INSC 26719 July 1994Appeal(s) allowed

A. NAGARAJU BROS., a dealer in VIP suit cases made of plastic and fitted with steel bands, claimed that these suit cases were "plastic articles" under Entry 113 of Schedule I of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957, and therefore liable to tax only at the first point of sale for the assessment year 1981‑82. T

IMPERIAL CHIT FUNDS (P) LTD.versusINCOME TAX OFFICER, ERNAKULAM

1996 INSC 41219 March 1996Dismissed

Imperial Chit Funds Ltd., a company in liquidation, was served with a tax demand of Rs.1,027 by the Income Tax Officer after winding‑up proceedings had begun. The Official Liquidator argued that the tax claim could not be enforced until the claim was proved in the winding‑up process, invoking the Companies Act’s scheme

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC.versusM/S. BANGALORE WIRE RED MILLS ETC.

1996 INSC 41319 March 1996Dismissed

M/s Bangalore Wire Red Mills imported a high reversible mill in 1982 and warehoused it without paying duty, executing a bond under Section 59(1) of the Customs Act, 1962. A notice dated 7 March 1985 required clearance within fifteen days, but the goods were only cleared on 9 September 1988, at which time duty was paid

TAYABHAI M. BAGASARWALLA AND ANR.versusHIND RUBBER INDUSTRIES (P.) LTD. ETC.

1997 INSC 15619 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The landlord (appellant) sought a perpetual injunction against the tenant (defendant) to stop any construction on a building that had been destroyed by fire, claiming the tenancy had ended. The City Civil Court granted an interim injunction and later found it had jurisdiction, subsequently punishing the tenant for cont

DR. SADHNA DEVI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

1997 INSC 15819 February 1997Disposed off

The petitioners, general‑category medical graduates, challenged a Uttar Pradesh Government circular dated 31‑August‑1995 that removed the requirement of a minimum 35% qualifying mark for SC/ST/OBC candidates in the entrance test for postgraduate medical courses. They argued that the circular violated the Indian Medical

MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE, BAHADURGARHversusKRISHNAN BEHARI AND ORS.

1996 INSC 27919 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed

A clerk of the Municipal Committee, Bahadurgarh was found to have misappropriated Rs. 1,548.78 and falsified accounts. He was convicted under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code, later altered to Section 468, and the municipality dismissed him. The Director of Local Bodies reduced the punishment to stoppage of four in

EMIL WEBBERversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, V AND M, NAGPUR

1993 INSC 6119 February 1993Dismissed

Ballarpur Paper and Straw Board Mills Ltd. hired foreign personnel, including Emil Webber, to set up a plant in India. Under the contract, the salaries were to be paid free of Indian tax, and Ballarpur paid the tax on Webber’s salary to the tax authorities. The Income Tax Officer treated the tax amount paid by Ballarpu

DUTTA ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD.versusINDO MERCHANTILES PVT. LTD. AND ORS.

1996 INSC 132218 November 1996Dismissed

The Commissioner of Excise, Assam invited tenders for supplying rectified spirit and received seventeen bids. After excluding two ineligible bids, the lowest eligible offer was from Dutta Associates, but the Government introduced a "viability range" (Rs. 14.72‑Rs. 15.71) not mentioned in the tender notice and asked onl

CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION AND ANR. ETC. ETC.versusMANPREET SINGH AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1991 INSC 29818 November 1991Disposed off

The Union Territory of Chandigarh reserved 5% of seats in Punjab Engineering College for children and spouses of military/para‑military personnel, dividing them into five sub‑categories with a descending order of priority. Several applicants challenged the categorisation, arguing that the High Court had exceeded its ju

S. SATHYAPRIYA ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH ETC. ETC.

1994 INSC 33018 August 1994Disposed off

The Supreme Court, hearing contempt petitions concerning admission to professional courses in Tamil Nadu, examined the effect of the 69% reservation under Article 15(4) of the Constitution and a 5% reservation for special categories under Article 15(1). The Court found that the 5% reservation is horizontal and must be

SANJAYDUTTversusSTATE THROUGH CBI, BOMBAY

1994 INSC 33118 August 1994

Sanjay Dutt, accused in the Bombay blast case, was arrested under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA) for possession of unauthorised arms. The charge‑sheet was filed after the statutory period of 180 days, and the petitioner sought bail on the grounds that mere possession of arms witho

BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC.

1996 INSC 54418 April 1996Disposed off

Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd (BHEL), a public sector undertaking, manufactured boiler components in its Hyderabad unit and dispatched some to its Tiruchi unit and others directly to the work‑site at Angul, Orissa, for a NALCO power‑plant project. The Andhra Pradesh State began levying Central Sales Tax (CST) on these c

THE ENTRY TAX OFFICER, BANGALORE ETC. ETC.versusM/S CHANDANMAL CHAMPALAL AND CO.

1994 INSC 16018 April 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The Entry Tax Officer of Karnataka challenged the Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Area for Consumption, Use or Sale therein Act, 1979, contending that the tax applied to goods sold within a local area even when the seller intended to take them out of the area. The Karnataka High Court held that Section 3 of

NAGAR MAHAPALIKA, MEERUTversusM/S. PREM NATH MONGA BOTTLERS PVT. LTD. AND ANR.

1996 INSC 40118 March 1996Dismissed

The Meerut Municipal Corporation attempted to levy octroi on empty glass bottles of the aerated drink "Double Seven" that were brought into the municipal area for refilling. The bottling company contended that the bottles were exempt under Entry 13 of the 1975 Notification, which exempts "mineral water bottles" importe

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusBARMALT (INDIA) LTD., GURGAON

1997 INSC 15418 February 1997Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court considered whether malt and malt extract manufactured by Barmalt (India) Ltd. qualify as "food products" under Excise Notification No. 55 of 1975 and whether the company was entitled to a refund of excise duty on the basis of unjust enrichment. The Court affirmed the Delhi High Court's view that malt

STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS.versusSAMARENDRA KISHORE ENDOW AND ANR.

1994 INSC 1418 January 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a Branch Manager of State Bank of India, claimed reimbursement for moving his household goods after a transfer and was charged with five offences, including false claims and irregular loan disbursement. An enquiry officer found all charges proved on documentary evidence, and the disciplinary authority i

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusUPENDRA SINGH

1994 INSC 62317 December 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India filed disciplinary proceedings against IRS officer Upendra Singh alleging that, while handling income‑tax proceedings under sections 133A, 144A and 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, he acted illegally by ignoring incriminating evidence, acquiescing to a reduced disclosure by the assessee and directing pr

MOHAN LALversusKARTAR SINGH AND ORS.

1995 INSC 63117 October 1995Appeal(s) allowed

Mohan Lal, the father of the respondents, sued Kartar Singh for possession of land, claiming ownership and that an eviction order under Section 43 of the Pepsu Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1955, was void. The lower courts held that the landlord‑tenant relationship had ended and the Collector lacked jurisdiction,

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusSHREE GANESH STEEL ROLLING MILLS LTD. AND ANR.

1996 INSC 53917 April 1996Dismissed

The Union appealed against a Delhi High Court order staying a clause of a circular that reinterpreted the term “date of transfer” in the duty‑free licence rules. The issue arose when Shree Ganesh Steel imported goods under a licence transferred multiple times, and customs objected that the import occurred beyond six mo

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.versusTARA SINGH SHAHI

1996 INSC 54017 April 1996Appeal(s) allowed

Guru Nanak College, a private institution affiliated to Guru Nanak Dev University, was taken over by the State of Punjab under a gift deed dated 11 July 1983. The deed stipulated that only staff possessing the requisite qualifications would be absorbed as new entrants and that the incumbent Principal would be taken in

THE NEW INDIA CIVIL ERECTORS {P) LTD.versusOIL AND NATIONAL GAS CORPORATION

1997 INSC 15017 February 1997Case Partly allowed

The appellant, New India Civil Erectors Ltd., entered into a contract with ONGC to construct 304 prefabricated housing units. After termination of the contract, disputes were referred to two arbitrators who awarded the appellant a net sum of Rs. 67,82,620. The appellant sought to make the award a rule of court; the sin

THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, HYDERABAD SPECIAL BENCH, HYDERABADversusTHE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (ASSTTS.) III , HYDRABAD , ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.

1996 INSC 8617 January 1996Disposed off

Three income‑tax appeals before the Hyderabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) involved a common question of law under section 115‑J of the Income Tax Act. The President of the ITAT, exercising his power under section 255(3), constituted a Special Bench of three members to hear the appeals, which were

SMT. HARBANS KAURversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 61516 December 1994Hearing Adjourned

Smt. Harbans Kaur filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 32 alleging that her three sons were illegally detained, tortured and that one son, Gurbax Singh, died in police custody. The Court observed that two sons, Surinder Pal Singh and Sarvjeet Singh, had been produced before a Judicial Magistrate and remanded to

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusNARENDRA PANDURANG KADAM AND ORS.

1994 INSC 62016 December 1994Dismissed

The claimant, a young student, suffered multiple severe injuries in a road accident caused by the negligent driving of a bus insured by United India Insurance. He filed a compensation claim under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, which the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.1,50,000, later enhanced by the Bombay Hig

BIHARI LAL JAISWALversusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1995 INSC 74016 November 1995Appeal(s) allowed

Bihari Lal Jaiswal obtained a retail liquor licence under the Madhya Pradesh Excise Rules and entered into a partnership with ten others to run the business. He applied for registration of the partnership under sections 184 and 185 of the Income Tax Act, but the Income Tax Officer rejected the application because the p

COMMISSIONER_ OF INCOME TAX, KANPURversusKAMLA TOWN TRUST

1995 INSC 74116 November 1995Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined two tax disputes. In Commissioner of Income Tax, Kanpur v. Kamla Town Trust, a trust created in 1941 for workers’ housing was rectified in 1945 and 1955; the Court held that the 1945 deed did not create a public charitable trust, denying exemption for 1949‑55, but the 1955 deed had wholly cha

SMT. MEERA BHANJAversusSMT. NIRMALA KUMARI CHOUDHARY

1994 INSC 52216 November 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff filed a title suit seeking partition and separate possession of two plots, 73 and 74. The trial court granted partition of plot 73 and a declaration of title for plot 74; the High Court later allowed partition of plot 74 as well. The defendant filed a review petition under Order 47, Rule 1 of the CPC, cla

KULDIP SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

1996 INSC 105716 September 1996Dismissed

Head Constable Kuldip Singh was dismissed from the Punjab Police without a departmental enquiry under proviso (b) of Article 311(2) of the Constitution, on the ground that it was not reasonably practicable to hold an enquiry because witnesses feared for their lives. The dismissal was based primarily on a confession he

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS AND ANR.versusMIS DALMIA CEMENT

1995 INSC 46216 August 1995Appeal(s) allowed

Mis Dalmia Cement, a public limited company, filed loss returns for assessment years 1952‑53 to 1954‑55 after the prescribed time. The Income Tax Officer refused to take cognizance of those returns, stating that no assessment could be made. For later years (1955‑56 to 1959‑60) losses were assessed, and for 1960‑61 the

M/S. KALPETTA ESTATES LTD. ETC. ETC.versusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, COCHIN

1996 INSC 74716 July 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, owners of rubber estates, sold old, unyielding rubber trees during the assessment years 1968-69 to 1978-79. The Income Tax Officer treated the difference between the sale price and the notional price fixed under Section 55(2) of the Income Tax Act as capital gains and also taxed the replantation subsidy

SRI KRISHNA PVT. LTD. ETC.versusITO CALCUTTA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 74816 July 1996Dismissed

Sri Krishna Pvt. Ltd. claimed large unsecured hundi loans in its return for AY 1959‑60. In the assessment of the subsequent year (AY 1960‑61) the Income Tax Officer discovered that many of those loans were bogus and that the alleged lenders were near relatives of the company’s directors. Relying on this, the Officer is

STATE BANK OF BIKANER AND JAIPURversusAJAY KUMAR GULATI

1996 INSC 74916 July 1996Dismissed

The State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur ordered a fresh disciplinary inquiry against employee Ajay Kumar Gulati, appointing a new inquiry officer despite an earlier report finding the charges established. Gulati challenged the order in a writ petition before the Delhi High Court, contending that the de novo enquiry should

SMITH KLINE AND FRENCH (INDIA) LTD. ETC.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1996 INSC 53216 April 1996

The assessees, Smith Kline and French (India) Ltd., claimed a deduction for a surtax liability of Rs. 76,777 under the Companies Profits (Surtax) Act, 1964 while computing their total income for AY 1976-77. The Income Tax Officer disallowed the deduction based on Section 40(a)(ii) of the Income‑Tax Act, which bars any

PARVEEN JINDAL AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

1993 INSC 9316 March 1993Appeal(s) allowed

The Haryana Public Service Commission (HPSC) issued a 1985 notification for recruitment of Assistant Executive Engineers (AEE) in all three wings of the Public Works Department, including the Irrigation branch, even though the State Government had not sent a requisition for the Irrigation vacancies. No candidates were

BHOJA @ BHOJA RAM GUPTAversusRAMESHWAR AGARWALA AND ORS.

1993 INSC 9416 March 1993Dismissed

The appellant, a tenant, occupied a residential‑shop premises originally at a rent of Rs 55 per month. After the landlord purchased the property, the rent was unilaterally raised to Rs 65 (the landlord later claimed Rs 70) without complying with the Bihar Building (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act. The tenant paid

TARAPORE AND CO.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

1994 INSC 7716 February 1994

Tarapore & Co. entered into a contract with the State of Madhya Pradesh for the construction of a masonry dam, which required the contractor to pay not less than "fair wages" and to observe labour laws without any claim against the Irrigation Department. After the State revised minimum wages, the contractor paid the hi

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.versusSACHCHLDANAND KISHORE PRASAD SINHA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 3916 January 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Bihar and the Patna Municipal Corporation challenged the validity of the Assessment of Annual Rental Value of Holding Rules, 1993 and two notifications issued by the corporation, which classified holdings by road categories and type of construction and fixed rental rates per square foot. The Patna High Cou

SVENSKA HANDELSBANKENversusMIS INDIAN CHARGE CHROME AND ORS.

1993 INSC 33615 October 1993Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff (borrower) entered into contracts with suppliers for a 108 MW captive power plant and with a consortium of banks, including Svenska Handelsbanken, for financing. The plant was later found to have a capacity of only 60 MW, leading the plaintiff to allege fraud by the suppliers and the lender and to seek a

ROYAL HATCHARIES PVT. LTD. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANR. ETC. ETC.

1993 INSC 33715 October 1993

Royal Hatcheries Pvt. Ltd. and other hatcheries sell day‑old chicks to poultry farms. The Andhra Pradesh sales‑tax authorities treated the chicks as general goods and levied tax on the sale under Section 5(1) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957. The hatcheries contended that the chicks fell within clause

THE C.L.T., GUJARAT-I, AHMEDABADversusTHE AHMEDABAD COTTON MFG. CO. LTD. & ORS.

1993 INSC 34015 October 1993

The assessee, a cotton textile manufacturer, paid amounts to the Textile Commissioner under Clause 21‑C(1)(b) of the Cotton Textiles (Control) Order, 1948, in lieu of producing the minimum required cloth, and also paid a sum for non‑fulfilment of an export obligation under a bond. The assessee claimed these payments as

NAVIN CHEMICALS MFG. AND TRADING CO. LIMITEDversusCOLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

1993 INSC 29915 September 1993Dismissed

Navin Chemicals imported crude emetine under a duty‑exemption licence that required re‑export after processing. The goods were found to be emetine hydrochloride with impurities, leading the Additional Collector to confiscate them and offer a fine of Rs 10,000 for release. The company appealed to the Customs, Excise & G

THE DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY-CUM-REGIONAL MANAGER AND ORS.versusNIKUNJA BIHARI PATNALK

1996 INSC 52115 April 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a Scale‑I officer of the Central Bank of India serving as Branch Manager, was charged with ten counts of allowing overdrafts, issuing guarantees and sanctioning loans beyond his delegated authority. An enquiry found several charges fully established and others partially, leading to his dismissal. The Or

ITC BHADRACHALAM PAPER BOARDS LTDversusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, HYDERABAD.

1994 INSC 15915 April 1994Dismissed

ITC Paper Boards Ltd. appealed against the CEGAT order denying it full exemption from excise duty on paperboard manufactured since 1979. The exemption was granted to printing and writing paper by a 24 April 1981 notification and later extended to paperboard by a 2 April 1984 notification, with a clarifying 9 November 1

MRS. ASHA KAUL AND ANR.versusSTATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND ORS.

1993 INSC 15615 April 1993Dismissed

The Jammu & Kashmir Public Service Commission prepared a select list of twenty candidates for the post of District Munsif under the 1967 Recruitment Rules. The State Government approved only the first thirteen names and appointed them, while refusing to approve the remaining seven despite petitions and a High Court ord

STATE OF U.P. AND ANR.versusSYNTHETICS AND CHEMICALS LTD. AND ANR.

1993 INSC 8615 March 1993Dismissed

The State of Uttar Pradesh filed a Special Leave Petition challenging a Allahabad High Court order that allowed Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. to manufacture industrial alcohol without obtaining a PD‑2 licence and directed the State not to interfere, subject to preventing conversion of industrial alcohol into potable li

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUJARATversusJYOTI LTD.

1996 INSC 26015 February 1996Case Partly allowed

Jyoti Ltd., a Baroda‑based company, claimed that its reserves for doubtful debts (Rs 85,000) and gratuity (Rs 5,60,000) should be treated as part of its capital base for computing statutory deduction under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964. The Surtax Officer excluded the amounts; the Appellate Assistant Commiss

PRINTERS HOUSE PVT. LTD.versusMST. SAIDAN(DECEASED) BY L.R.

1993 INSC 33214 October 1993Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined compensation for several plots of land acquired for a printing‑machinery factory. The lands, owned by three different claimants, differed in location, size and shape. The Land Acquisition Officer and the Punjab‑Haryana High Court had fixed a uniform market‑value rate per unit area, and had al

M/S NOVOPAN INDIA LTD., HYDERABADversusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND CUSTOMS, HYDERABAD

1994 INSC 38814 September 1994Dismissed

Mis Novopan India Ltd., a manufacturer of particle boards, claimed exemption from central excise duty under Notification No.55 of 1979, which exempted "unveneered particle boards" (Item‑6 of the table). After initially producing unveneered boards, the company began manufacturing melamine faced particle boards (MFPBs) a

SMT. SARIFABIBI MOHMED IBRAHIM AND ORS.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUJARAT

1993 INSC 29414 September 1993Dismissed

The appellants owned a 30,885‑sq‑yd plot registered as agricultural land but located within municipal limits. They obtained permission under Section 63 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act to sell the land for non‑agricultural use and sold it to a housing cooperative in May 1969. The Income‑Tax authorities

SHRIYANS PRASAD JAIN (DEAD) BY LRS.versusINCOME TAX OFFICER AND ORS.

1993 INSC 29514 September 1993

Shriyans Prasad Jain, a former officer of Dalmia Cement & Paper Marketing Co., was paid Rs 7 lakhs on termination of his services and claimed the sum was compensation for loss of employment, exempt under section 7 of the Income‑Tax Act, 1922. The assessment tribunal, High Court and the Supreme Court initially held the

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusJALYAN UDYOG AND ANR.

1993 INSC 29614 September 1993Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned two ocean‑going vessels imported in 1968 under a customs exemption for ships not imported for breaking up. When the vessels were later scrapped in 1983‑84, the ship owners argued that duty should be calculated on the 1968 import value, while the Union of India contended that the exemption notificatio

VOICE (CONSUMER CARE) COUNCILversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

1996 INSC 88414 August 1996Dismissed

The State of Tamil Nadu filed an application seeking modification of the Supreme Court’s July 22, 1996 order that continued the August 18, 1994 order directing a 69% reservation for backward classes, SCs and STs in medical, engineering and other educational institutions and the creation of additional seats for general‑

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXversusKARAM CHAND THAPAR AND OTHERS

1996 INSC 88514 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The assessee, Karam Chand Thapar & others, acted as a del credere agent for coal collieries and as an agent for coal purchasers. It claimed "under‑charges" from collieries for freight overcharges on under‑loaded wagons, received the amounts before any purchaser claim, and paid purchasers when they demanded reimbursemen

UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH AND ORS.versusMOHINDER SINGH

1997 INSC 14314 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Sub‑Inspector Mohinder Singh was dismissed in 1991 by the Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) of Chandigarh without a departmental enquiry, invoking Article 311(2) proviso (b) of the Constitution on the ground that witnesses would not freely depose against him. The dismissal was based on a report alleging gross misus

STATE OF ORISSAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1994 INSC 60013 December 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Orissa, owner of mineral resources, issued a notification for regranting a mining area. Applications for mining leases were filed but not disposed of within the 12‑month period prescribed by Rule 24 of the Mineral Concession Rules, 1960, and were therefore deemed refused. The applicants sought revision bef

NAZAR SINGH AND ORS.versusJAGJIT KAUR AND ORS.

1995 INSC 72213 November 1995Appeal(s) allowed

Gurdial Singh transferred 94 kanals and 19 marlas of land to his wife Harmel Kaur in 1963 as maintenance, subject to restrictive covenants. After Singh's death, Harmel sold a portion of the land to the appellants. The second wife and three daughters of Singh sued, claiming a one‑seventh share, arguing that Harmel only

ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR.versusAL. N. RAO CHARITABLE TRUST

1995 INSC 62413 October 1995Dismissed

The A.L.N. Rao Charitable Trust claimed exemption for a surplus of Rs.85,262 under Section 11(1)(a) and Section 11(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Authority initially allowed the exemption on the basis that the Trust had invested 75% of the surplus in approved securities, but the Commissioner later issued

PLEASANT STAY HOTEL AND ANR.versusPALANI HILLS CONSERVATION COUNCIL AND ORS.

1995 INSC 57013 September 1995Disposed off

The Pleasant Stay Hotel obtained a two‑storey plan for a hotel at Kodaikanal, but after the Kodaikanal Township Committee rejected its revised plan for additional floors, the hotel proceeded to construct several extra floors in violation of the sanctioned plan and the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act, 1920. The P

MADHUKAR BAKRU PINGALversusSHRI RAJENDRA D. GAIKWAD AND ORS.

1995 INSC 56713 September 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Madhukar B. Pingal, was selected and appointed as Police Patil based on a selection scheme that allotted 50 % of the total marks to a written test and 50 % to a viva‑voce. An unsuccessful candidate (Respondent‑I) challenged the appointment before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, which held that t

DILAWAR SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.versusADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, GHAZIABAD

1995 INSC 56813 September 1995Dismissed

The appellant, Dilawar Singh (deceased) through his legal representatives, filed a return under Section 10(2) of the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960, claiming that he had gifted several parcels of land to his grand‑nephew. The Prescribed Authority and the lower appellate court held that the gift d

G. SRIDHARAMURTIversusHINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. AND ANR.

1995 INSC 56913 September 1995Dismissed

The landlord leased premises to Esso Company in 1969. When Esso merged into Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd (HPC) in 1974, the landlord filed an eviction suit under the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 alleging sub‑letting. The lower courts dismissed the suit, holding that under the Esso (Acquisition of Undertaking

HIND PLASTICS AND ANR. ETC. ETC.versusTHE COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, BOMBAY AND ANR. ETC. ETC.

1994 INSC 15613 April 1994Dismissed

Hind Plastics imported PVC and paid customs duty and additional duty. It filed writ petitions in the Bombay High Court seeking a refund of duty on the packaging, claiming exemption under Notification No. 184‑CUS dated 2 August 1976 issued under section 25 of the Customs Act. The company argued that the invoice value in

B.K. INDUSTRIES AND ORSversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

1993 INSC 14913 April 1993Dismissed

The petitioners, manufacturers of vegetable oil, challenged the levy and collection of the vegetable oils cess for the period 1 March 1986 to 31 March 1987, contending that the Finance Minister’s 1986 budget speech and a subsequent Directorate of Vanaspati letter had dispensed with the cess and that exemption powers un

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX. BOMBAYversusINDIAN ENGINEERING AND COMMERCIAL CORPN. PVT. LTD.

1993 INSC 15313 April 1993Dismissed

The assessee, a private limited company, paid cash commissions on sales to its directors in addition to their salaries. The Income Tax Officer treated these commissions as perquisites and disallowed them under section 40(a)(v) of the Income‑Tax Act for AY 1971‑72 and under section 40(A)(5) for AY 1972‑73. The Appellate

STATE BANK OF PATIALA, PATIALAversusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PATIALA

1996 INSC 37713 March 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The State Bank of Patiala had, in several assessment years, transferred sums to a "bad and doubtful debts" account and claimed that these amounts were "reserves" under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, thereby eligible for statutory deduction. The Income Tax Officer rejected the claim, but the Income Tax Appell

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SHILLONGversusJAI PRAKASH SINGH

1996 INSC 37813 March 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased B.N. Singh had not filed income‑tax returns for three assessment years and died leaving ten legal representatives. His eldest son, Jai Prakash Singh, filed the returns and the Income Tax Officer issued notices under sections 142(1) and 143(2) only to him, not to the other nine representatives, and proceede

STATE OF TRIPURA AND ORS.versusSUDHIR RANJAN NATH

1997 INSC 14013 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Tripura appealed against a Gauhati High Court decision that declared Rule 3 of its Transit Rules illegal. Rule 3 imposed licence and application fees, required licences for removal of timber and firewood, allowed the State to prohibit export of forest produce, and levied an export duty of up to 100% of mar

INDIAN COUNCIL FOR ENVIRO-LEGAL ACTIONversusUNION OF INDIA

1996 INSC 23713 February 1996Dismissed

The Supreme Court entertained a social‑action writ filed by the Indian Council for Enviro‑Legal Action on behalf of villagers of Bichhri, who suffered severe water, soil and health damage due to untreated effluents and toxic sludge from private chemical industries. The petition sought directions against the Union of In

UNION OF INDIAversusVICTORY PLASTIC PVT. LTD. AND ANR.

1996 INSC 23813 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India appealed a Bombay High Court order that had allowed a writ petition filed by Victory Plastic Pvt. Ltd. The dispute concerned customs duty on PVC resin imported under tariff Item No. 39.01/06 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. An initial 1979 notification granted full exemption from duty, but a subseque

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KERALAversusTHE KILKOTAGIRI TEA AND COFFEE ESTATE CO. LTD.

1996 INSC 23913 February 1996Dismissed

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Kerala appealed against the Kerala High Court's decision in favor of Kilkottagiri Tea and Coffee Estate Co. Ltd., which allowed the company to claim a development allowance for unclaimed expenses incurred in clearing land and planting tea bushes during 1966-67 and 1967-68. The dispute ce

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search