Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

Judgments of 2015

100 judgments, newest first.

PADMASHREE DR. D.Y. PATIL MEDICAL COLLEGEversusMEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA & ANR.

2015 INSC 62131 August 2015Dismissed

Padmashree Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College applied to the Central Government for an increase in MBBS seats for the 2015-16 academic session but failed to attach the mandatory essentiality certificate, resulting in the application’s rejection. The college sought condonation of the delay and a direction for its applicatio

INDRA VIJAY ALOKversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2015 INSC 62031 August 2015Dismissed

The appellant, a Patwari, was accused of demanding bribes to effect a mutation of land records. The complainant testified that the Patwari first demanded Rs.1900, of which Rs.900 was paid by his mother, and later demanded an additional Rs.1000, which the complainant paid and was later recovered from the Patwari during

COMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI-ILLversusMIS. EMCO LTD.

2015 INSC 100731 July 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The assessee, M/s EMCO Ltd., manufactures transformers and pays central excise duty on the price at which it sells them to State Electricity Boards. The Revenue argued that the transaction value for duty purposes must include freight and transit‑insurance costs, contending that the place of removal was the buyer’s prem

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, HYDERABADversusM/S. PENNAR INDUSTRIES LTD. &ANR.

2015 INSC 100831 July 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The assessees, Pennar Industries Ltd., imported hot‑rolled non‑alloy steel raw material duty‑free under Notification No. 30/1997 of the DEEC scheme, subject to an export obligation. They did not export the finished goods themselves but arranged third‑party exports after the DGFT amended the licence to permit such expor

RAMESH KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2015 INSC 53831 July 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a former Store Keeper Technical in the Indian Army, was reinstated after a commuted court‑martial punishment but was denied promotion to Naib Subedar and the associated pay and allowances for the period from 1 August 1997 to his actual promotion on 13 November 2000. The Departmental Promotion Committee i

S. KRISHNAMOORTHYversusCHELLAMMAL

2015 INSC 98431 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant lent Rs.2,20,000 to the respondent, who issued a post‑dated cheque that later bounced, leading to a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The respondent filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings, alleging that the loan was actually ta

MEHMOOD UL REHMANversusKHAZIR MOHAMMAD TUNDA AND ORS.

2015 INSC 98331 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners challenged a bail warrant issued by a Judicial Magistrate First Class, Srinagar, after the magistrate took cognizance of a complaint under Section 500 of the Ranbir Penal Code and issued process under Section 204 of the CrPC. The High Court rejected the petition to quash the proceedings, holding that th

SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIAversusMAGNUM EQUITY SERVICES LTD. & ORS.

2015 INSC 87130 November 2015Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether Magnum Equity Services Ltd., a corporate entity formed by converting a stock‑broking partnership, was entitled to a fee‑continuity exemption under Paragraph 1(4) of Schedule III of the SEBI (Stock Brokers and Sub‑Brokers) Regulations, 1992, after three of its original partners resigne

THE COMMITTEE-GFILversusLIBRA BUILDTECH PRIVATE LTD. & ORS.

2015 INSC 71830 September 2015Case Allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether Libra Buildtech Private Ltd. and other bidders, who had paid Rs.6.22 crore as stamp duty for sale deeds of properties of a liquidated company, could claim a refund after the sale was cancelled and the sale consideration was returned. The Court held that the cancellation of the contrac

GANGA BAIversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2015 INSC 102930 September 2015Dismissed

Ganga Bai was tried and convicted for the murder of her daughter‑in‑law and two children under IPC s.302 read with s.34 and for destroying evidence under s.201, along with co‑accused Udai Lal and Daulat Ram. The trial court and the Rajasthan High Court upheld her conviction while acquitting the co‑accused. She appealed

KANACHUR ISLAMIC EDUCATION TRUST(R)versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

2015 INSC 72230 September 2015Dismissed

The Kanachur Islamic Education Trust applied to the Government of India for permission to start a new MBBS college for 2015‑16. After obtaining state‑level clearances, the Medical Council of India (MCI) inspected the college and reported numerous deficiencies in faculty, infrastructure and clinical services. The Trust

SARASWATI MEDICAL COLLEGEversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2015 INSC 72330 September 2015Disposed off

Saraswati Medical College sought a Letter of Permission to start a new MBBS programme with 150 seats for the 2015‑16 academic year. The Medical Council of India (MCI) inspected the college, identified deficiencies, and after a second inspection raised further deficiencies, leading the Union of India to disapprove the a

JELES EDUCATION SOCIETY & ORS.versusRT. BHITALE

2015 INSC 71530 September 2015Appeal(s) allowed

Jeles Education Society (appellant) ran a private school and advertised a vacancy for a Trained Graduate Teacher of English and Sanskrit, reserving the post for backward classes. R.T. Bhitale (respondent), an Other Backward Class candidate, was appointed on a purely temporary basis from 7 December 1987 to 30 April 1988

RAJINDER KUMARversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

2015 INSC 72030 September 2015Disposed off

The appellant, a constable with fifteen years of service, was dismissed for repeated unauthorized absences, some due to treatment for chronic tuberculosis. The disciplinary and appellate authorities deemed him unfit for police service and imposed dismissal. The High Court set aside the dismissal, remanding the matter f

PEERAPPA HANMANTHA HARIJAN (D) BY LRS. & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA&ANR.

2015 INSC 53630 July 2015Disposed off

The State of Karnataka acquired agricultural land for industrial development under the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Act, 1966, and transferred it to the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (KIADB), which later allotted the land to Ultra Tech Cement Ltd on a lease basis. The landowners sought compensati

M/S. HOLOSTICK INDIA LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NOIDA

2015 INSC 27530 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed

M/s. Holostick India Ltd. manufactures security holograms by embossing a flexible metallised plastic film, applying adhesive and release coatings, and cutting the product to size for use as security devices. The Commissioner of Central Excise classified the holograms under tariff entry 39.19 (self‑adhesive plastic shee

STATE OF PUNJABversusSAURABH BAKSHI

2015 INSC 27630 March 2015

The respondent, Saurabh Bakshi, was convicted under Section 304A of the IPC for causing the deaths of two persons by rash and negligent driving. The trial magistrate sentenced him to one year of rigorous imprisonment and a fine; the High Court reduced the sentence to the 24 days already served, relying on the fact that

M/S. OSWAL CHEMICALS & FERTILIZERS LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BOLPUR

2015 INSC 27430 March 2015Dismissed

Oswal Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. purchased naphtha from BPCL/IOCL in September-October 1996 and paid excise duty because it did not possess a CT‑2 certificate. After obtaining the certificate through an appeal, it sought a refund of the duty paid for that period. The Assistant Commissioner rejected the refund claim o

CHARULATA BEHERAversusPRAVATI PARIDA & ORS.

2015 INSC 7930 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant and respondent No.1 both applied for the post of Anganwadi Worker in Odisha. The selection committee initially appointed the appellant, but the Sub‑Collector remanded the case on 26‑12‑2009, leading to a reconsideration where the appellant again emerged as the most eligible candidate. Respondent No.1 file

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusM/S PRO LAB & ORS. ETC.

2015 INSC 7630 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of Entry 25 of Schedule VI of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, which levies tax on the processing and supply of photographs, photo prints and photo negatives. The issue centered on whether the State could tax the goods component of a works contract after the 46th

M.V. JAYARAJANversusHIGH COURT OF KERALA & ANR.

2015 INSC 7830 January 2015Disposed off

M.V. Jayarajan delivered a public speech in Kannur criticizing a Kerala High Court order that prohibited meetings on public roads, using language that the court deemed abusive, including calling judges "idiots" and employing the regional term "sumbhan". The High Court convicted him of criminal contempt under Section 12

LIC OF INDIAversusINSURE POLICY PLUS SERVICES PVT. LTD. & ORS.

2015 INSC 94629 December 2015Dismissed

The petitioners, a company dealing in the purchase and resale of life‑insurance policies, challenged LIC's circulars of 2003 and 2005 that refused to register assignments of policies to firms engaged in trading such policies. They argued that Section 38 of the Insurance Act, 1938 makes policies transferable and assigna

M/S. S.K.L. CO.versusCHIEF COMMERCIAL OFFICER & ORS.

2015 INSC 94529 December 2015Disposed off

The appellant, M/s. S.K.L. Co., challenged a notification by the Railways that leased Front Second Class Luggage Rakes (FSLR) and Ventilated Parcel Vans (VP) to private lessees through an auction, alleging that the lease violated Sections 70 and 71 of the Railways Act, 1989 by giving undue preference and that the Railw

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIAversusVIRUDHUNAGAR STEEL ROLLING MILLS LTD. & ORS.

2015 INSC 94429 December 2015Dismissed

The Central Bank of India sued Virudhunar Steel Rolling Mills Ltd. and its directors (respondents 2‑4) for recovery of credit facilities totalling about Rs 12 lakh. The directors had executed personal guarantee deeds on 30 August 1974, but the company already owed approximately Rs 7.68 lakh before that date. The bank c

PEGASUS ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION P. LTD.versusM/S. HARYANACONCAST LIMITED &ANR.

2015 INSC 94729 December 2015Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether a Company Court or an Official Liquidator can control the sale of secured assets by a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act when the borrower is a company under winding up. Pegasus Assets Reconstruction Ltd, the secured creditor, sought to enforce its security over the land of Harya

PRAMODversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA& ORS.

2015 INSC 94829 December 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a senior lecturer in a private polytechnic, claimed that the vacant post of Principal must be filled by promotion under Rule 3(3) of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981. The Director of Technical Education rejected this claim, applying the Government Polytechn

THE KERALA BAR HOTELS ASSOCIATION &ANR.versusSTATE OF KERALA & ORS.

2015 INSC 94929 December 2015Dismissed

The Kerala Bar Hotels Association and other hotel operators challenged the Kerala government's 2014‑15 policy that restricted foreign liquor (FL‑3) licences to only five‑star hotels, alleging violations of Articles 14, 19 and 47 of the Constitution. The State argued that the policy is a reasonable classification aimed

POONAMversusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

2015 INSC 81329 October 2015Dismissed

The appellant, a visually‑handicapped allottee of a fair‑price shop, challenged an appellate order that restored the original allottee's licence and cancelled her own allotment. The High Court dismissed her writ petition on the ground that she was not a necessary party. The Supreme Court examined whether a subsequent a

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusRAMLAL DEVAPPA RATHOD AND OTHERS

2015 INSC 71229 September 2015Case Partly allowed

The State of Maharashtra prosecuted 34 accused for mob assault that resulted in the death of Tanaji Rathod. All prosecution witnesses except the deceased's wife (PW‑12) turned hostile; the trial court relied on PW‑12’s detailed testimony, corroborated by medical reports, spot‑panchnama and recovered weapons, convicting

NARENDER SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2015 INSC 70929 September 2015Dismissed

The case concerned the murder of a village Sarpanch on 27 June 1997, for which six accused were convicted under Sections 302, 148 and 149 of the IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. The appellants challenged the conviction on grounds that the FIR was ante‑dated, the injured eye‑witness (PW‑3) fabricated his injuries

THE CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL BHALKI, BY ITS CHIEF OFFICERversusGURAPPA (D) BY LRS. & ANR.

2015 INSC 70829 September 2015Dismissed

The deceased respondent Gurappa filed a suit in 1984 (O.S. No. 255) for declaration of title which was dismissed for lack of proper parties and proof of possession. He later filed another suit in 1993 (O.S. No. 39) seeking declaration of title, possession, injunction and correction of revenue records. The Municipal Cou

ANIL KALRAversusJ.D. PANDEY AND OTHERS

2015 INSC 71029 September 2015Disposed off

The case concerned a century‑old building in Lucknow covered by the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972. The landlord, Anil Kalra, obtained a release order under s.16(1)(b) for demolition, but several occupants, allegedly placed by the respondents through a cooperative soc

ESSAR TELEHOLDINGS LTD.versusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

2015 INSC 70629 September 2015Dismissed

Essar Teleholdings Ltd. and other petitioners challenged a Delhi High Court order and a Delhi government notification that appointed a Special Judge to try all offences, including those under the Indian Penal Code, arising from the 2G spectrum scam. They sought a joint trial of the main case and a second supplementary

NEERU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR.

2015 INSC 71329 September 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Neeru Yadav challenged the Allahabad High Court's order granting bail to respondent No.2, a repeat offender accused of multiple heinous offences including murder and armed assault. The High Court had relied primarily on the doctrine of parity, noting that other co‑accused had been released on bail, and ha

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusMIS. N.S. RATHNAM & SONS

2015 INSC 52929 July 2015Disposed off

The Union of India challenged the validity of Notification Nos.102/87‑CE and 103/87‑CE which granted exemption from excise duty on iron and steel scrap from ship‑breaking only to importers who had paid customs duty at Rs.1,400 per Light Displacement Tonnage (LDT). The respondent, N.S. Rathnam & Sons, had paid a lower c

DHARAM CHANDversusCHAIRMAN, NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND OTHERS

2015 INSC 53329 July 2015Dismissed

Dharm Chand, a hawker who had been allotted a Tehbazari kiosk opposite the Supreme Court, was ordered by the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) to relocate his stall to a site near Baroda House on security grounds following a bomb blast near the Delhi High Court in 2011. He challenged the order, invoking his constituti

RAJESHWAR BABURAO BONEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

2015 INSC 53129 July 2015Dismissed

The appellant, Rajeshwar Baburao Bone, claimed membership in the Kali Mahadev scheduled tribe to obtain a post reserved for Scheduled Tribes in the Zilla Parishad, Beed, and was issued a tribe validity certificate after a Scrutiny Committee verification in 2010. After it emerged that his brother's tribe certificate had

SHABINAABRAHAM & ORS.versusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS

2015 INSC 52829 July 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a show‑cause notice issued under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 for alleged short levy of excise duty by a sole proprietor who died in 1989. The legal heirs challenged the notice, arguing that the Act contains no provision to continue assessment against a dead person’s estate. The Supreme Cou

RAJENDRA SHANKAR SHUKLA & ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH & OR$. ETC

2015 INSC 53229 July 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, landowners in five villages of Raipur district, challenged the Kamal Vihar Township Development Scheme (KVTDS) prepared by the Raipur Development Authority (RDA) under the Madhya Pradesh Nagar Thatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973. They alleged that the scheme was formulated without the required zonal plan

INDRA DALALversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2015 INSC 43629 May 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved the murder of Nand Karan, for which three appellants were convicted of conspiracy and murder based largely on confessional statements recorded while they were in police custody and the recovery of a scooter allegedly used in the crime. The appellants challenged the admissibility of those confessions u

HIMALAYAN CO-OPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETYversusBALWAN SINGH

2015 INSC 36929 April 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The Himalayan Co‑operative Group Housing Society expelled several members, including Balwan Singh, for defaulting on deposit payments. The expulsion was approved by the Registrar of Cooperative Societies and upheld by the Revisional Authority. The respondents approached the High Court under Articles 226/227 seeking to

PRADIP NANJEE GALAversusSALES TAX OFFICER & ORS.

2015 INSC 36829 April 2015Dismissed

The appellant, a partner in a firm assessed under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, claimed that a settlement with the State Minister for Finance had discharged his individual liability for the firm’s tax dues, and that the Commissioner had acted on this settlement. The Revenue contested the existence and effect of such

M/S ARIANE ORGACHEM PVT. LTD.versusWYETH EMPLOYEES UNION & ORS.

2015 INSC 37229 April 2015Dismissed

The appellant, Ariane Orgachem Pvt. Ltd., took over the Wyeth Ltd. pharmaceutical factory and its workers under s.25FF of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. It later introduced a Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) which 45 of the 143 workers accepted. The Wyeth Employees Union later demanded reinstatement of those worke

M/S. ESCORTS LTD.versusCOMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, FARIDABAD

2015 INSC 37129 April 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether the transmission assembly, an intermediate component produced during the manufacture of tractors by M/s. Escorts Ltd., attracted excise duty under the Central Excise and Salt Act. The Court held that transmission assemblies are distinct, commercially known products and therefore quali

KHUBRAMversusDALBIR SINGH & ORS.

2015 INSC 37329 April 2015Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the appointment of Khub Ram as Chief Inspector in Haryana Roadways, finding that his experience certificates were fraudulent and did not satisfy the statutory requirement of two years in a Government or semi‑government undertaking. Consequently, his appointment was declared invalid and the di

COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS, NEW DELHI-IVversusMIS.ARYAN ELECTRONICS

2015 INSC 99129 April 2015Disposed off

The Commissioner of Customs appealed against the CESTAT order that had allowed M/s Aryan Electronics to overturn the valuation of imported VCD lens parts. The importer had declared a transaction value of Rs.36 per piece, which the Commissioner rejected and, applying Rule 6 of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988, fixed th

U. P STATE INDUSTRIAL DEV.CORPN. LTD.versusMONSANTO MANUFACTURES (P) LTD. & ANR.

2015 INSC 7329 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation (UPSIDC) leased industrial plots to several companies under licence agreements and lease deeds that contained clauses prohibiting any transfer, assignment or alteration of the lessee's interest without the lessor's written consent. The lessees later changed the

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusMANOJ DESWAL & ORS.

2015 INSC 81028 October 2015Appeal(s) allowed

Manoj Deswal, a trainee Store Hand Technical in the Army Supply Corps, was absent without sanctioned leave for 108 days between April and July 2005 and was declared a deserter after a summary enquiry. He was discharged on 27 August 2005 by the Commanding Officer under Rule 13(3) of the Army Rules, 1954, as a non‑attest

CHINTAMAN NAMDEV PATIL (DEAD)versusSUKHDEV NAMDEV PATIL & ANR.

2015 INSC 70228 September 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, Chintaman Patil, filed a suit seeking declaration of ownership and an injunction over a parcel of land. The trial court dismissed the suit, but the first appellate court reversed that decision and decreed in the plaintiff's favour. The respondents appealed to the High Court, which admitted two substantia

SAMAR PAL SINGHversusCHITRANJAN SINGH

2015 INSC 69928 September 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The landlord, Samar Pal Singh, sued his tenant, Chitranjan Singh, for eviction and arrears of rent under the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972. The tenant deposited the full arrears with interest and costs, invoking protection under Section 20(4) of the Act. The High Cou

K.P. SINGHversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI

2015 INSC 70428 September 2015Case Partly allowed

K.P. Singh was convicted under Section 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for accepting a bribe of about Rs 700 and was sentenced by the trial court to two years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs 5,000. The High Court reduced the imprisonment term to one year (with a two‑month default sentence) but uphel

STANDARD CHARTERED BANKversusANDHRA BANK FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD & ORS.

2015 INSC 61828 August 2015Appeal(s) allowed

Standard Chartered Bank (SCB) bought 17% NPCL bonds from Andhra Bank Financial Services Ltd (ABFSL) and later discovered that the bonds had been misappropriated by broker Hiten P. Dalal and Canara Bank Mutual Fund (CMF). SCB filed a suit for conversion and amended it to implead Dalal and CMF, but the Special Court held

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusMANINDER SINGH

2015 INSC 61428 August 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The CBI alleged that Maninder Singh, together with a co‑accused, obtained credit facilities from New Bank of India by submitting forged documents and colluding with a bank manager, thereby cheating the bank of over Rs 10.62 lakh. After a lengthy investigation, a charge‑sheet was filed under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471

V. K. MISHRA&ANR.versusSTATE OF UTIARAKHAND &ANR.

2015 INSC 52528 July 2015Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined the death of Archana Mishra, who died of poisoning within six weeks of marriage, and determined that she had been subjected to cruelty and harassment by her husband and in‑laws in connection with dowry demands. The prosecution established the essential ingredients of Section 3048 IPC and the

GOLBAR HUSSAIN AND ORS.versusSTATE OFASSAMANDANR.

2015 INSC 36528 April 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were acquitted by the trial court for a murder under IPC s.302 read with s.149, but the High Court convicted them on the basis of testimonies of two related witnesses, PW‑4 and PW‑5, who were brothers of the deceased. The Supreme Court examined two issues: the scope of an appellate court's power in an ap

HARI SHANKERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2015 INSC 36128 April 2015Case Partly allowed

Hari Shanker and three others were convicted for the murder of Shiv Shanker under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC. The prosecution's case rested on the eye‑witness PW2 who said Hari fired the first shot, striking the victim's wrist, while other accused fired the fatal abdominal shot. The High Court acquitte

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIAversusC. L. VIMLA & ORS.

2015 INSC 36328 April 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The Central Bank of India had mortgaged a residential property to recover a loan taken by the borrowers and obtained a settlement award from a Lok Adalat, which was signed by the borrowers and one of the guarantor's sons but not by the guarantor herself, C.L. Vimla. Vimla filed multiple writ petitions challenging the a

T. VASANTHAKUMARversusVIJAYAKUMARI

2015 INSC 36428 April 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The complainant, owner of a theatre, alleged that the defendant, a film distributor, borrowed Rs.5 lakh in May 2006 and later issued a cheque on 16 January 2007 which was dishonoured. The trial court convicted the defendant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, a decision upheld by the Fast Track Court,

UPENDRA PRADHANversusSTATE OF ORISSA

2015 INSC 36228 April 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Upendra Pradhan was convicted for murder under IPC sections 302 and 34, based on the High Court's reversal of an acquittal granted by the Additional Sessions Judge. The appellant contended that he was a juvenile at the time of the offence and that the benefit of doubt should apply, also challenging the re

KESHAVLAL KHEMCHANDAND SONS PVT. LTD. & OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

2015 INSC 7228 January 2015

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the amendment to Section 2(1)(o) of the SARFAESI Act, which altered the definition of a non‑performing asset (NPA) to allow different regulators to prescribe classification guidelines for their respective creditors. The petitioners argued that this amounted to c

SHRI WESTARLY DKHAR & ORS.versusSHRI SEHEKAYA L YNGDOH

2015 INSC 7128 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed

In a suit concerning land, the Subordinate District Council Court of the United Khasi‑Jaintia Hills Autonomous District granted an ex‑parte ad‑interim injunction on 30 September 2009. The aggrieved party appealed to the District Council Court within 30 days, which stayed and later set aside the injunction. The High Cou

JAGE RAM & ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

2015 INSC 7028 January 2015Disposed off

The case involved an altercation in 1994 where the complainant Jagdish and his sons were cutting reeds on land also claimed by the accused Jage Ram and his sons. During the fight, the second accused Rajbir (Raju) delivered a pharsi blow to the head of the son Sukhbir, causing grievous injuries that required emergency s

R.P.S. YADAVversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

2015 INSC 95828 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a Municipal Corporation of Delhi employee, was accused of demanding a bribe of Rs.1,500 for issuing a licence. The CBI organised a trap involving the complainant, a shadow witness and a middle‑man who handed over the money, after which it was recovered. The trial court and the Delhi High Court convicted

A.C. NARAYANANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

2015 INSC 6928 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court considered two criminal appeals: A.C. Narayanan, who challenged the taking of cognizance of a complaint filed by a power‑of‑attorney (POA) holder on behalf of six complainants under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and G. Kamalakar, who contested a conviction for a dishonoured c

D. N. JEEVARAJversusCHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

2015 INSC 87027 November 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether the construction of multi‑storeyed residential buildings on two adjacent plots allotted to Sadananda Gowda and D.N. Jeevaraj violated condition No. 4 of their lease‑cum‑sale agreements with the Bangalore Development Authority (BOA). The petitioners alleged that the plots had been amal

KAMLESH & ORS.versusATTAR SINGH & ORS.

2015 INSC 80527 October 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The dependants of Rishi Parkash filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the driver, owner and insurer of a Maruti car and the driver of a tempo, seeking compensation for his death in a collision. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal held both drivers negligent and awarded Rs.5,81,000 with inter

DR. SANDEEP S/O SADASHIVRAO KANSURKAR AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2015 INSC 80727 October 2015Dismissed

The petitioners challenged the domicile‑based reservation for admission to super‑specialty medical courses in Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Tamil Nadu, arguing that it violated Articles 14 and 16 and was contrary to national interest. The States relied on the 1974 Presidential Order issued under Article 371‑D and the 1

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE AND ANR.versusM/S. KANAK EXPORTS AND ANR.

2015 INSC 79927 October 2015Disposed off

The case concerned the validity of several amendments to the Export-Import (EXIM) Policy 2002-2007 made by Notification No. 28 (Jan 28, 2004) and subsequent public notices and notifications (Jan 28 2004 Public Notice, Apr 21 & 23 2004 Notifications). Exporters alleged that these changes were retrospective, ultra vires,

M/S. GMRENERGY LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, BANGALORE

2015 INSC 80227 October 2015Disposed off

M/s GMR Energy Ltd. imported hot‑section turbine parts under a Long‑Term Assured Parts Supply Agreement (LTAPSA) with GE USA, re‑exporting the used parts and paying customs duty on the invoice value. The Customs Commissioner, relying on Rules 4 and 9 of the Customs Valuation Rules, added one‑third of the invoice value,

MEHBOOBALI &ANR.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2015 INSC 80427 October 2015Dismissed

The case involved a fake currency racket in Rajasthan where accused Mehboob Ali and Firoz, while in police custody, gave statements that led to the identification and arrest of co‑accused Anju Ali, Majhar, Liyakat Ali and others, and to the recovery of forged notes. The issue before the Supreme Court was whether such s

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHENNAIversusM/S. NEBULAE HEALTH CARE LTD.

2015 INSC 80027 October 2015Dismissed

The appellants, both small‑scale industrial units, manufactured their own branded medicines and also performed job‑work for third parties, producing goods bearing the third parties' brand names. While they paid excise duty on the third‑party branded goods, they also claimed MODVAT/CENVAT credit on the inputs used. The

M/S. MERIDIAN INDUSTRIES LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE

2015 INSC 80127 October 2015Dismissed

M/s. Meridian Industries Ltd., a 100% Export Oriented Undertaking, manufactured cotton yarn using indigenous cotton and imported wax for coating. It claimed concessional excise duty under Notification No.8/97‑CE, which is available only to products made wholly from indigenous raw material. The central issue was whether

MANAGING DIRECTOR, K.S.R.T.C.versusNEW INDIAASSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS.

2015 INSC 80327 October 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) operated a bus owned by a private individual under a lease agreement. An accident caused by the bus led claimants to seek compensation. The dispute centered on whether liability for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 rested on the registered owner, the

LAL BABU PRIYADARSHIversusAMRITPAL SINGH

2015 INSC 103627 October 2015Dismissed

The appellant sought registration of the word "RAMAYAN" with a crown device for incense sticks, which the respondent opposed on the ground that the term is the title of a Hindu holy book. The Assistant Registrar dismissed the opposition, but the Intellectual Property Appellate Board set aside that order, prompting the

ASHOK RANGNTH NAGARversusSHRIKANT GOVINDRAO SANGVIKAR

2015 INSC 80627 October 2015Matter referred to larger bench

The respondents filed a suit for perpetual injunction which was dismissed by the trial court; the first appeal to the District Judge also dismissed the suit. The respondents then filed a second appeal before the Bombay High Court. The High Court reversed both the trial court and the first appellate court judgments with

S. PANNEER SELVAM & ORSversusGOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.

2015 INSC 61327 August 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, graduate Assistant Engineers of the general category, challenged the seniority of reserved‑category Junior Engineers who had been promoted to Assistant Divisional Engineer (ADE) under Rule 12 of the Tamil Nadu Highways Engineering Service Rules. The issue was whether Article 16(4A) of the Constitution

SHABNAMversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS

2015 INSC 43527 May 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners Shabnam and Salim, convicted of multiple murders and sentenced to death, challenged the issuance of death warrants by the Sessions Judge merely six days after the Supreme Court dismissed their appeals. The Court held that the warrants were issued in haste without allowing the convicts to exhaust their s

D. T. VIRUPAKSHAPPAversusC. SUBASH

2015 INSC 35927 April 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a police officer, was summoned in a private complaint alleging assault, kidnapping and other offences while investigating a death. He moved the High Court under CrPC s.482 to quash the proceedings, contending that the magistrate could not take cognizance without prior sanction from the State Government u

K. ANBAZHAGANversusSTATE OF KARNATAKAAND OTHERS

2015 INSC 32327 April 2015Disposed off

The case arose from the transfer of a corruption trial involving J. Jayalalithaa from Tamil Nadu to Karnataka. Karnataka appointed Bhavani Singh as Special Public Prosecutor for the trial, but Tamil Nadu later attempted to authorize him to appear before the Karnataka High Court for the appeal. The Supreme Court held th

UMRALA GRAM PANCHAYATversusTHE SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES UNION & ORS.

2015 INSC 27327 March 2015Dismissed

Workmen employed as safai kamdars by Umralagram Gram Panchayat were classified as daily‑wage workers despite having served for periods ranging from five to eighteen years and performing the same duties and hours as permanent employees. They raised an industrial dispute seeking permanency and associated benefits. The La

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD.AND ORS.versusHARI KLSHAN VERMA

2015 INSC 98227 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed

Hari Krishan Verma, an Additional Assistant Engineer with Punjab State Electricity Board, faced disciplinary actions and was deemed inefficient. Upon attaining the age of 55, a High Empowered Integrity Committee examined his entire service record, including past misconduct, and recommended his premature retirement unde

P. R. YELUMALAIversusN.M. RAVI

2015 INSC 27127 March 2015Disposed off

The plaintiff‑buyer entered into a sale agreement and obtained a decree for specific performance, which required him to deposit the balance consideration of Rs.33,60,000 within one month of the decree and in the form of a demand draft. The trial court extended the time by two months, making the final deadline 26‑May‑20

M/S. VIR RUBBER PRODUCTS P. LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI-ILL

2015 INSC 26927 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a small‑scale rubber products manufacturer, produced goods under its own "VIR" brand and also manufactured parts for automobile companies, marking those parts with the buyers' brand identifiers (e.g., "HM", "PAL"). It claimed exemption from excise duty under Notification No. 1/93, which requires that the

RANBEER SINGH (DEAD) BY L.R.versusSTATE OF U. P. & ORS.

2015 INSC 27027 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined an appeal by the complainant, Ranbeer Singh, against the Allahabad High Court’s acquittal of three co‑accused (Balbir Singh, Karua and Vinod) who had been convicted for murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC. The trial court had found all four accused – including the main sh

RAMAKANT MISHRA @ LALU ETC.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

2015 INSC 17527 February 2015Dismissed

The appellants were convicted under Sections 498A and 3048 of the IPC for the death of the appellant's wife, who died from severe burns allegedly after a dowry demand. The prosecution proved, on a pre‑ponderance of probability, that the death occurred within seven years of marriage, was unnatural, and was linked to rec

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHversusRAM PAL

2015 INSC 17627 February 2015Disposed off

The appellant, State of Himachal Pradesh, appealed against the High Court's order that substituted the imprisonment of the accused, Ram Pal, with a fine of Rs 40,000 for causing the death of a 20‑year‑old girl by rash and negligent driving. The Supreme Court examined whether the fine was adequate and whether compensati

NCT OF DELHI AND ORSversusJAGJIT SINGH AND ORS.

2015 INSC 17927 February 2015Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the operation of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. It held that an acquisition proceeding is deemed to have lapsed when an award under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was passed at leas

SHYAM LALversusDEEPA DASS CHELA RAM CHELA GARIB DASS

2016 INSC 49627 February 2015Matter referred to larger bench

Shyam Lal, the appellant, claimed continuous possession of agricultural land in Faridabad for about 27 years under a lease that expired in May 2005, asserting that he became a statutory tenant protected by the Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953. The respondent, Deepa Dass Chela Ram Chela Garib Dass, argued that

SURYA VADANANversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.

2015 INSC 17827 February 2015Disposed off

Surya and Mayura Vadanan, both British citizens, married in India and had two daughters in the UK. In August 2012 Mayura brought the children to India and filed for divorce. Surya obtained an interim order from the High Court of Justice in England making the children wards of that court and directing the mother to retu

M/S. SHERALI KHAN MOHAMED MANEKIAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

2015 INSC 17727 February 2015Dismissed

The appellant purchased an evacuee property and filed a suit in 1980 seeking specific performance of the sale, possession and the appointment of a court receiver. The trial court denied the receiver, but the High Court on appeal appointed one to take possession, collect rent and account for profits. The suit was finall

ZARIF AHMAD (D} THROUGH LRS. & ANOTHERversusMOHD. FAROOQ

2015 INSC 6627 January 2015Dismissed

The plaintiff, Mohd. Farooq, filed a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain the defendants, Zarif Ahmad and another, from interfering with his possession of plot No. 358, describing the land by its boundaries and municipal number. The trial court decreed in favour of the plaintiff, but the first appell

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERSversusUNITED BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2015 INSC 86726 November 2015Disposed off

The State of Uttar Pradesh leased a Nazul (government) property at 19 Clive Road, Allahabad to a private company, which later mortgaged its leasehold interest to United Bank of India without obtaining prior State sanction. The Bank obtained a mortgage decree and later sought conversion of the leasehold into freehold, i

STATE OF U.P. & ORS.versusAJAY KUMAR SHARMA & ANR

2015 INSC 86826 November 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed against a Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court that had set aside its termination of several District Government Counsels and ordered a reconsideration of their renewal. The core issue was whether the State, under Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Uttar Prade

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search