TEXMACO LTD.versusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CALCUTTA
1991 INSC 16731 July 1991Appeal(s) allowed
Texmaco Ltd. manufactured wagon bodies for the Railways and mounted them on wheel sets supplied free of charge by the Railways. Its invoices reflected only the price of the wagon bodies, excluding the wheel sets, and excise duty was paid on this invoice value. The Revenue demanded duty on the wheel sets, arguing that t…
JOGINDER SINGH WASUversusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB
1993 INSC 35229 October 1993
Joginder Singh Wasu, the Advocate General of Punjab, was appointed under a 1953 notification fixing his fee at Rs 100 per civil writ or letters‑patent appeal. In 1975 the State issued an amendment reducing fees for batch cases and capping total fees at Rs 1,000. Wasu protested, submitted bills based on the original rat…
STATE OF RAJASTHANversusSHRI UMRAO SINGH
1994 INSC 42329 September 1994Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent’s father died while serving as a Sub‑Inspector, and the respondent was appointed as a Lower Division Clerk on compassionate grounds. After accepting that appointment, he sought a promotion to Sub‑Inspector, which was denied, leading him to file a writ petition. The Rajasthan High Court Single Judge direc…
COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI.versusBALLARPUR INDUSTRIES LTD.
1989 INSC 29729 September 1989Dismissed
Ballarpur Industries Ltd. used sodium sulphate in its paper and paper‑board manufacturing process and claimed proforma credits under Notification No. 105/82‑CE. The Superintendent of Central Excise rejected the claim, holding that the chemical was burnt up and did not remain in the finished product, thus not qualifying…
CAPT. VIRENDRA KUMAR, ADV.versusSH. SHIV RAJ PATIL, SPEAKER LOK SABHA
1993 INSC 25029 July 1993Dismissed
Capt. V. Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the Lok Sabha’s voting on the impeachment motion against Justice V. Ramaswami. He alleged that his nine‑page communication to the Speaker was not circulated, that an oral whip to abstain was illegal, and that the Speaker should have compelled MPs to vote…
SHIV CHANDER KAPOORversusAMAR BOSE
1989 INSC 36428 November 1989Appeal(s) allowed
Shiv Chander Kapoor, the landlord, let the second floor of his building to Amar Bose for a three‑year limited tenancy under a permission obtained from the Rent Controller pursuant to Section 21 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, on the ground that the premises would be needed for his son’s marriage. After the tenancy…
LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIAversusMRS. ASHA RAMCHANDRA AMBEDKAR AND ANR.
1994 INSC 9328 February 1994Appeal(s) allowed
The widowed wife of a deceased LIC employee and her son applied for employment on compassionate grounds after the employee's death. The corporation rejected the wife's claim due to her exceeding the age limit and rejected the son's claim citing a circular that barred compassionate appointments when any family member wa…
GRAHAK SANSTHA MANCH AND ETC.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
1994 INSC 17527 April 1994
The petitioners, a coalition of cooperative societies running fair‑price ration shops and occupants of residential premises, challenged a State Government notice to vacate premises that had been requisitioned under the Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948 more than four decades earlier. They argued that requisition could …
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIAversusELMOT ENGINEERING COMPANY AND ORS.
1994 INSC 17627 April 1994
The Central Bank of India (appellant) had two suits in the Subordinate Court of Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh, to enforce an equitable mortgage and recover expenses against Elmot Engineering Company (a limited company) and its directors. While the winding‑up petition against the company was pending, the Bombay High Court,…
MANGILAL AND ORS.versusSTATE OF M.P.
1994 INSC 17727 April 1994
The appellants, Mangilal and others, were convicted under IPC sections 147 and 307 and appealed to the Madhya Pradesh High Court. While the appeal was listed, the counsel were absent because lawyers were on strike, leading the High Court to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and to comment on the reasons for th…
STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESHversusKHUDIRAM CHAKMA
1993 INSC 16827 April 1993Case Partly allowed
The Chakma refugees, who migrated from East Pakistan to Assam in 1964 and were later shifted to the North‑East Frontier Agency (now Arunachal Pradesh) in 1966, were allotted land under a government resettlement scheme but subsequently occupied land donated by a local Raja inside a protected inner‑line area. The State d…
UJAGAR PRINTS ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
1989 INSC 3027 January 1989Disposed off
The Supreme Court clarified the method of computing the assessable value of processed fabric for Central Excise duty. It held that the assessable value equals the value of the grey cloth in the processor's possession plus the value of the job‑work performed and the processor's manufacturing profit and expenses, i.e., t…
INRE: ROSHAN LAL AHUJAversus.
1992 INSC 32426 November 1992Dismissed
Roshan Lal Ahuja, a former Draftsman in the Ministry of Defence, repeatedly challenged his reduction in rank, loss of benefits and dismissal from service through numerous writ petitions, all of which were dismissed. After receiving a monetary award of Rs 30,000, he filed another petition using highly abusive and scanda…
TATA CELLULARversusUNION OF INDIA
1994 INSC 28326 July 1994Disposed off
The Department of Telecommunications invited tenders for cellular licences in four Indian cities, leading to a two‑stage evaluation and the selection of eight operators. Several rejected bidders challenged the final list before the Delhi High Court, alleging bias (due to a member’s son working for a bidder), arbitrarin…
IQBAL SINGHversusAVTAR SINGH AND ORS.
1994 INSC 28526 July 1994Dismissed
The appellant, Iqbal Singh, contested the 1992 Faridkot Assembly election and filed an election petition under Section 80 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, alleging that the returned candidate and a party president conspired to induce another candidate to withdraw in exchange for his appointment as General…
JAGDISH SINGHversusNATTHU SINGH
1991 INSC 31525 November 1991Modified
Jagdish Singh appealed a High Court decree that ordered specific performance of a reconveyance agreement with Natthu Singh. The Supreme Court examined whether the High Court could re‑appraise evidence in a second appeal, whether unserved notices were deemed served, and whether compensation could replace specific perfor…
SHYAM SINGHversusCOLLECTOR, DISTRICT HAMIRPUR, U.P., AND ORS.
1992 INSC 26525 September 1992Appeal(s) allowed
Shyam Singh obtained a Rs 34,000 loan from the State Bank of India for a tractor, mortgaging 22 acres of land. After defaulting, the bank invoked Section 10‑B of the U.P. Agricultural Credit Act, 1973 and the Tehsildar attached the tractor, whose estimated value exceeded the debt. Later, under Section 11‑A of the same …
JOGINDER KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
1994 INSC 17025 April 1994Disposed off
The petitioner, Joginder Kumar, a 28‑year‑old advocate, was taken into police custody in Ghaziabad on the pretext of assisting with investigations and was not produced before a magistrate for five days. His brother’s inquiries revealed that the petitioner was being held in an undisclosed location, prompting a writ peti…
SMT. NIRMALA R. BAFNA/KERSHI SHIVAX CAMBATTA AND ORS.versusKHANDESH SPINNING AND WEAVING MILLS CO. LTD. AND ANR./OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR AND ORS.
1992 INSC 5725 February 1992Disposed off
The Supreme Court considered two appeals arising from a dispute over a flat leased by Khandesh Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd., which had gone into liquidation. The appellant, Smt. Nirmala R. Bafna, claimed a sub‑tenancy created in 1979 with the landlord’s oral consent and sought protection under the Bombay Rent Contro…
ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, GUNTURversusRAMDEV TOBACCO COMPANY
1991 INSC 1525 January 1991Appeal(s) allowed
The Assistant Collector of Central Excise issued a show‑cause notice to Ramdev Tobacco Company in 1972 alleging unaccounted tobacco and later imposed a duty demand and penalty through adjudication proceedings. The company challenged the order, and the Andhra Pradesh High Court held that the proceedings were barred by t…
MOHD. ASLAM OBHURE, ACCHAN RIZVIversusUNION OF INDIA STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS.
1994 INSC 48424 October 1994Disposed off
The Supreme Court entertained contempt proceedings against the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh, Kalyan Singh, and the State Government for wilfully disobeying its orders that prohibited any construction on a 2.77‑acre land in Ayodhya acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court found that massive permanent …
COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX, JAMMU AND KASHMIR ETC. ETC ..versusM/S PINE CHEMICALS LTD. AND ORS. ETC. ETC.
1994 INSC 48024 October 1994Case Allowed
The Commissioner of Sales Tax, Jammu & Kashmir filed review petitions challenging the Supreme Court's earlier decision in Pine Chemicals Ltd. that allowed dealers to claim the benefit of sub‑section (2A) of Section 8 of the Central Sales Tax Act based on exemption granted under Government Order No. 159. The core issue …
BAHADUR SINGH AND ORS.versusSHANGARA SINGH AND ORS.
1994 INSC 48624 October 1994Dismissed
The case concerned lands occupied by respondents Nos.5‑15 since 1931. The Punjab Occupancy Tenants’ Vesting of Property Rights Act, 1952 became effective on 15 June 1951, vesting ownership in occupancy tenants. Although the tenants’ names were not entered in revenue records and they continued to pay rent until 1974, th…
DR. M. ISMAIL FARUQUI ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1994 INSC 47924 October 1994Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of the Acquisition of Certain Area at Ayodhya Act, 1993 and the Presidential reference under Article 143(1) concerning whether a Hindu temple existed before the Babri Masjid was built. The Court held that the Act was within Parliament’s legislative competence (Entry 42, …
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND ORS.versusMANGAT RAM AND ORS.
1994 INSC 48824 October 1994Disposed off
The respondents bought 132 bighas of land in Theog, Shimla, surrounded by forest, to establish an apple orchard, which required felling of trees. They applied for demarcation; an Assistant Collector Grade II demarcated the land on 7 December 1987 and submitted a report stating that verification by a Senior Land Revenue…
ALL INDIA JUDGES, ASSOCIATION AND ORSversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1993 INSC 27224 August 1993Disposed off
The All India Judges Association sought to improve the service conditions of subordinate judges, prompting the Supreme Court to issue directions on uniform hierarchy, qualifications, retirement age, pay, allowances, accommodation and training. The Union of India and several states challenged these directions, arguing t…
M. DAYANAND REDDYversusA.P. INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE CORPORATION LTD. AND ORS.
1993 INSC 11524 March 1993Dismissed
M. Dayanand Reddy, a Class I contractor, entered into a contract with A.P. Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd on 11‑December‑1986 for constructing a sewer line. When disputes arose, Reddy invoked an arbitration clause he claimed existed in Clause 3 of a copy of the agreement (Ex A‑3) that referenced the standard…
ANITA LAXMI NARAYAN SINGHversusLAXMI NARAIN SINGH
1992 INSC 8624 March 1992Appeal(s) allowed
Anita Laxmi Narayan Singh married Laxmi Narain Singh in 1987. The husband filed a divorce petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act in Bombay. The wife, residing in Ghaziabad, had to travel long distances to defend herself and applied for interim maintenance and travel expenses. The Supreme Court directed the…
SUBRAN @ SUBRAMANIAN AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KERALA
1993 INSC 6724 February 1993Case Partly allowed
Six persons were tried for a violent assault on 24 December 1986 that resulted in the death of Suku. The trial court convicted all under various IPC sections, including murder (302) read with Section 149, and the High Court later acquitted two accused while confirming the others. On special leave, the Supreme Court was…
SAROJINI TEA CO. (P) LTDversusCOLLECTOR OF DIBRUGARH, ASSAM AND ANR.
1992 INSC 2824 January 1992Case Partly allowed
Sarojini Tea Co. Ltd., a tea plantation, had 1,650 bighas of land declared excess under the Assam Fixation of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1956 and was awarded compensation of Rs.71,811 calculated on the "full rate of annual land revenue" but excluding surcharge and local rates. The District Judge enhanced the compens…
RANJIT SINGHversusUNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH & ANR.
1991 INSC 20623 August 1991Disposed off
Ranjit Singh was convicted of murder in 1979 and sentenced to life imprisonment. While on parole he committed a second murder in 1980, for which the Supreme Court in 1983 sentenced him to another term of life imprisonment, directing that the second sentence would not run concurrently with the first and that any remissi…
OIL AND NATURAL GAS COMMISSIONversusUTPAL KUMAR BASU AND ORS.
1994 INSC 22323 June 1994
Engineers India Limited, acting as consultant for the Oil and Natural Gas Commission (ONGC), advertised a tender for a Kerosene Recovery Processing Unit in newspapers across India, including West Bengal. NICCO, a company with its registered office in Calcutta, learned of the tender, submitted its bid and subsequent rev…
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAXversusM/S. SHRAVAN KUMAR SWARUP AND SONS, ETC. ETC.
1994 INSC 41122 September 1994Dismissed
The assessee, a Hindu Undivided Family, challenged the valuation of its residential properties for the assessment years 1977-78 and 1978-79, contending that Rule 1BB of the Wealth Tax Rules, 1957 (effective 1 April 1979) should be applied even though the assessments were made after the rule’s introduction. The Revenue …
SYSTOPLC LABORATORIES (PVT.) LTD. ETC. ETC.versusDR. PREM GUPTA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.
1993 INSC 30522 September 1993Dismissed
The Central Government, relying on expert opinion, issued a notification on 3 November 1988 under Section 26A of the Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940, to prohibit the manufacture and sale of fixed‑dose combinations of corticosteroids with any other drug for internal use, citing public‑health risks in asthma treatment. Sever…
MANIYARI MADHVANversusSUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND ORS.
1993 INSC 30622 September 1993
Maniyeri Madhavan, a journalist, alleged that Kerala police assaulted him and his newspaper office and sought an impartial investigation. The Kerala High Court directed a Deputy Inspector General to investigate, but the investigation stalled and the Supreme Court, exercising its Article 142 jurisdiction, ordered the CB…
SHRI MALAPRABHA CO-OP. SUGAR FACTORY LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
1993 INSC 30422 September 1993Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the validity of a series of notifications fixing the price of levy sugar under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. Sugar manufacturers contended that the Government had not taken into account the four factors prescribed in Section 3(3C) – minimum cane price, manufacturing cost, taxes and a r…
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusSURENDRA MOHAN ARORA AND ORS.
1994 INSC 27822 July 1994Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned the promotion of diploma holders and science graduates employed in Indian Ordnance Factories. The Central Administrative Tribunal had treated all initial appointments as if they were to the post of Supervisor Grade‑A and directed that, on two years of service as Supervisor‑A, the employees be promote…
ANAND S. BIJIversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS.
1993 INSC 16222 April 1993Disposed off
The appellant, who had appeared for the All India Post‑Graduate medical entrance examination of 1992, was not allotted any seat despite having higher marks than some candidates who were later admitted in Kerala. After the first, second and third admission lists were issued, the remaining vacant seats were surrendered t…
COUNCIL OF HOMEOPATHIC SYSTEM OF MEDICINE, PUNJAB AND ORS.versusSUCHINTAN AND ORS.
1993 INSC 16021 April 1993Appeal(s) allowed
The respondents, students of the DHMS diploma course, failed several subjects, re‑appeared and eventually passed the first, second and third year examinations, but the Council of Homeopathic System of Medicine refused to allow them to sit the third‑year exam because they had not completed a full one‑year period of stud…
UNION OF INDIAversusPRINCE MUFFAKAM JAH AND ORS.
1994 INSC 47120 October 1994Dismissed
The dispute concerned jewellery belonging to two trusts created by the Nizam of Hyderabad. An arbitration award directed the Union of India to pay Rs 180 crore to purchase the items, which was challenged by the Union and the trustees under Sections 15 and 16 of the Arbitration Act, 1940. Public‑spirited intervenors fil…
UNION OF INDIAversusPRINCE MUFFAKAM JAH AND ORS.
1994 INSC 47220 October 1994
The case concerned 173 items of jewellery belonging to the Nizam of Hyderabad, held in two trusts, which the Union of India sought to purchase under the Antiquities and Art Treasures Act. The parties entered a compromise agreement to resolve all disputes by arbitration, and the umpire fixed a just price of Rs 225,37,33…
UNION OF INDIAversusN.P. DHAMANIA,
1994 INSC 47420 October 1994
N.P. Dhamania, an officer of the Indian Telecommunication Service, was recommended for promotion to Senior Administrative Grade Level‑II by the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC). The Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (ACC) returned the panel for a "rigorous review" and subsequently excluded Dhamania and four o…
SUB-COMMITIEE ON JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITYversusJUSTICE V. RAMASWAMY
1994 INSC 47520 October 1994Dismissed
The Sub‑Committee on Judicial Accountability filed a suo motu criminal contempt petition against Justice V. Ramaswamy, alleging that a letter he wrote to the Enquiry Committee under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 contained sweeping allegations against judges and the judiciary. The petition invoked Section 15 of the Con…
AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHADversusGYAN DEVI (DEAD) BY L.RS. AND ORS.
1994 INSC 47620 October 1994
The Uttar Pradesh Awas Evam Vikas Parishad (the Board), a statutory body acquiring land for a housing scheme, was not impleaded in the compensation proceedings before the tribunal and the High Court. The land owners challenged the compensation awarded, leading to enhanced awards by the High Court, which did not include…
NIAZ MOHAMMAD AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
1994 INSC 40220 September 1994Dismissed
The petitioners, instructors under Haryana's Adult and Non‑formal Education Scheme, sought contempt proceedings against the State of Haryana and the Union of India for allegedly failing to pay arrears as directed by the Supreme Court on 2 June 1988, which required them to receive pay on par with squad teachers. The Cou…
SHASHIKANT LAXMAN KALE AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
1990 INSC 20820 July 1990Dismissed
The petitioners, an employee of a private‑sector firm and a trade union, challenged the constitutional validity of clause 10‑C inserted by the Finance Act, 1987 into section 10 of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961, which grants tax exemption on voluntary‑retirement payments only to employees of public‑sector companies. They arg…
MORGAN STANLEY MUTUAL FUNDversusKARTICK DAS
1994 INSC 22020 May 1994Disposed off
Morgan Stanley Mutual Fund, a SEBI‑registered domestic mutual fund, sought to issue a public fund scheme after obtaining SEBI approval for its draft scheme and advertising the issue. A prospective investor filed a petition before the Calcutta District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum seeking an ex‑parte injunction res…
SHREE BHAGWATI HOSIERY MILLS PVT. LTD. AND ANR.versusBHAGALPUR MUNICIPAL CORPN. AND ANR.
1991 INSC 34519 December 1991Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants owned several parti lands on which they constructed godowns and let them to the Food Corporation of India. The Bhagalpur Municipal Corporation revalued the holdings under Section 107 of the Bihar and Orissa Municipal Act, 1922, increasing the letting value from Rs.2 to Rs.10 per holding and issued demand…
M/S KHODAY DISTILLERIES LTD. ETC.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. ETC.
1994 INSC 46619 October 1994Disposed off
The petitioners, wholesale liquor traders, challenged several Karnataka excise rules and a Kerala government order, alleging that they violated their fundamental right under Article 19(1)(g) to carry on trade or business in liquor and were inconsistent with Articles 14, 47, 300A, 301 and 304. The Constitution Bench was…
DELHI DOMESTIC WORKING WOMEN'S FORUMversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1994 INSC 46719 October 1994Disposed off
The Delhi Domestic Working Women's Forum filed a public interest litigation under Article 32 on behalf of four tribal domestic servants who were sexually assaulted by army personnel on a train, seeking a scheme for compensation and rehabilitation. The petition argued that the National Commission for Women (NCW) should …
D.C. BHATIA AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
1994 INSC 46819 October 1994Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of Section 3(c) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (as amended in 1988), which excludes premises with a monthly rent exceeding Rs 3,500 from the Act’s protection. The appellants argued that the classification was arbitrary, violated Article 14, and was retrospecti…
MADHYA PRADESH PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONversusNAVNIT KUMAR POTDAR AND ANR. ETC. ETC.
1994 INSC 39819 September 1994Appeal(s) allowed
The Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission advertised for Presiding Officers of Labour Courts, requiring a minimum of five years' practice as an advocate under Section 8(3)(c) of the Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960. Because of a large number of applications for four general‑category posts, the Commissio…
OWNERS AND PARTIES INTERESTED IN M.V. "VALI PERO" ETC. ETC.versusFERNANDEO LOPEZ & ORS.
1989 INSC 28019 September 1989Appeal(s) allowed
Ten non‑Greek seamen of the foreign vessel M.V. "Vali Pero" sued the ship’s owners for unpaid dues. The defendants’ witnesses were examined on commission, but their depositions lacked the witnesses’ signatures, a requirement under Rule 4 of the Calcutta High Court Rules, 1914. The Calcutta High Court held the omission …
BINDESHWARI RAMversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
1989 INSC 28119 September 1989Dismissed
The appellant, Bindeshwari Ram, an Assistant Conservator of Forest, challenged a seniority list that placed several promoted colleagues (respondents 7‑12) above him, relying on a cabinet memorandum that purportedly granted him higher seniority. The matter hinged on Rule 35 of the Bihar Forest Service Rules, 1953, which…
KASINKA TRADING AND ANR. ETC. ETC>versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
1994 INSC 46318 October 1994Dismissed
The appellants, importers of PVC resins and aluminium products, relied on government notifications under Section 25(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 that exempted their goods from customs duty up to a specified date. The Central Government later issued withdrawal notifications before the expiry dates, citing changing market…
REFERENCE UNDER ARTICLE 317(1) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA., REGARDING ENQUIRY AND REPORT ON THE ALLEGATIONSversusAGAINST SH M. MEGHA CHANDRA SINGH, CHAIRMAN, MANIPUR SERVICE COMMISSION.
1994 INSC 7918 February 1994Disposed off
The President of India referred a matter under Article 317(1) of the Constitution to the Supreme Court, seeking an inquiry into allegations of misbehaviour against Shri M. Megha Chandra Singh, Chairman of the Manipur Public Service Commission, including tampering with examination papers and taking a bribe. While the re…
HARJIT SINGH AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1993 INSC 39517 December 1993Appeal(s) allowed
The petitioners, Sikh victims of the November 1984 riots, had received loans from nationalised banks that were promised to be converted into grants, but the banks later began recovery proceedings. They argued that the right to livelihood under Article 21 of the Constitution barred such recovery and sought inclusion of …
THE COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT OF PANCHAIYAPPA'S TR USTversusOFFICIAL TRUSTEE OF MADRAS AND ANOTHER
1993 INSC 37217 November 1993
The Committee of Management of Pachaiyappa's Trust (the appellant) challenged a lease of a 5.65‑ground plot vested in the Official Trustee of Madras that had been granted to a partnership (respondent No.2) for a 30‑year term. The High Court, exercising its supervisory jurisdiction under Section 25 of the Official Trust…
RENUSAGAR POWER CO. LTD. ETC.versusGENERAL ELECTRIC CO. ETC.
1993 INSC 34217 October 1993Dismissed
Renusagar Power Co. entered into a contract with General Electric for the supply of equipment for a power plant, which later gave rise to disputes and an ICC arbitration. The arbitral tribunal awarded US$12,215,622.14, including regular interest, delinquent interest, compensatory damages, and costs. Renusagar challenge…
SHEELA BARSEversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
1993 INSC 26517 August 1993Disposed off
Ms. Sheela Barse, a social activist, filed a writ petition under Article 32 alleging that numerous children and adults in West Bengal were being committed to jails as “non‑criminal lunatics” without proper medical assessment, thereby depriving them of liberty and subjecting them to inadequate care. The State of West Be…
SUPREME COURT LEGAL AID COMMITTEEversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
1989 INSC 9517 March 1989Directions issued
The Supreme Court entertained a writ petition under Article 32 seeking relief for delinquent children detained in regular jails, in light of the Juvenile Justice Act, 1986. The Court noted that earlier reports from District Judges showed significant numbers of juveniles in regular jails across several states and that t…
ALL INDIA DEMOCRATIC WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION AND JANWADI SAMITIversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
1989 INSC 9617 March 1989Disposed off
The Supreme Court dealt with a petition challenging an ex‑parte interim order that barred the performance of the Chunri ceremony in Sri Rani Satiji's Mandir and directed that all collections be deposited in a nationalised bank. The petitioners, All India Democratic Women’s Association and Janwadi Samiti, argued that th…
DINESHCHANDRA JAMNADAS GANDHIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR.
1989 INSC 1317 January 1989Dismissed
The appellant, a small‑time tradesman, was convicted under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 for selling "Kesari coloured sweet supari sali" adulterated with a yellow basic coal‑tar dye. He argued that "supari" (betel nut) should be treated as a "fruit‑product" or a "flavouring agent" under Rules 23, 28 and…
RUKMINI AMMA SARADAMMAversusKALL YANI SULOCHANA AND ORS.
1992 INSC 34416 December 1992Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a landlady, sought eviction of the tenant on grounds of rent arrears and a claim to demolish the shed. After the Rent Controller ordered eviction only on rent default, the landlady obtained a reversal of the bona fide need finding on appeal, prompting the tenant to file revisions under Section 20 of the …
STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusSHRI SHYAM LAL JOSHI AND ORS. ETC. ETC.
1993 INSC 36816 November 1993Disposed off
The petitioners, holders of National Trade Certificates (NTC), claimed that the State of Rajasthan's recognition of NTC as equivalent to the Basic School Training Certificate (BSTC) entitled them to appointment as primary school teachers in Panchayat Samiti schools. The High Court had allowed this claim, invoking promi…
UNION OF INDIAversusKOLLUNI RAMAIAH AND ORS.
1993 INSC 36916 November 1993
The Union of India sought to set aside an award that granted solatium (15%) and interest (6%) in a land acquisition case under the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952. The land, requisitioned for defence, was initially compensated at Rs 10 per square yard; the Arbitrator raised it to Rs 15 an…
SANKAR MUKHERJEE AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1989 INSC 35016 November 1989Case Allowed
The West Bengal Government, under Section 10(1) of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970, issued a notification on 9 February 1980 prohibiting contract labour in several departments of M/s Indian Iron & Steel Co. Ltd., but expressly excluded the job of loading and unloading bricks in the brick depart…
GULSHAN & ANR. ETC.versusZILA PARISHAD & ORS.
1987 INSC 28716 October 1987Disposed off
The petitioners challenged a bye‑law framed by various Zila Parishads under Section 239(2)(E)(a) of the Uttar Pradesh Kshetra Samiti and Zila Parishads Act, 1961, which required that the right to trade in carcass utilisation be awarded by public auction. Lower courts struck down the auction provision as creating a mono…
M/S LIPTON INDIA LTD. ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1994 INSC 39516 September 1994Case Allowed
Lipton (India) Ltd., a vanaspati manufacturer, sought a refund of sales tax paid on imported oil purchased from the State Trading Corporation (STC) for the period Dec 1984‑May 1988. The refund claim was based on the Parmeshwaran Committee formula, which required reimbursement of tax "subject to furnishing necessary dec…
STATE OF RAJASTHANversusPURI CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER
1994 INSC 39616 September 1994Disposed off
The State of Rajasthan and Puri Construction Co. Ltd. entered into a dam‑construction contract containing an arbitration clause. Disputes were referred to two retired judges as arbitrators, who awarded Rs 1 crore in favour of the contractor. The State challenged the award on grounds of arbitrator misconduct (one arbitr…
DIGVIJAY MOTEversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1993 INSC 26416 August 1993Dismissed
The petitioner, Digvijay Mote, filed a public‑interest writ petition alleging that the electoral process in India was distorted, citing the absence of representation from Assam and Jammu & Kashmir in successive Lok Sabhas. He sought sweeping reliefs including staying the functioning of the existing Lok Sabha, restraini…
SMT. THAKAMMA MATHEWversusM. AZAMATHULLA KHAN AND ORS.
[1992] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 54415 December 1992Appeal(s) allowed
Smt. Thakamma Mathew sold a property to M. Azmathulla Khan and later cancelled the agreement when the sale was not completed by the stipulated date. She sued for cancellation, possession and damages. The trial court cancelled the agreement and ordered restitution and damages. The Karnataka High Court, invoking Order 7 …
SHRI YOVAN, INDIA CEMENTS EMPLOYEES UNION AND ANR.versusTHE MANAGEMENT OF INDIA CEMENTS LTD. AND ORS.
1993 INSC 33815 October 1993Appeal(s) allowed
The Shri Yovan, India Cements Employees Union challenged the termination of about 300 contract workers employed through contractors of India Cements Ltd., arguing that they should be made permanent employees. After conciliation failed, the Tamil Nadu Government issued a notification under Section 10(1)(c) of the Indust…
INDER SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.
1994 INSC 39215 September 1994Disposed off
The petitioner, Inder Singh, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking the release of seven of his relatives who were allegedly abducted by a senior police officer, Baldev Singh, D.S.P., and six other policemen in October 1991. The victims remain untraced; a FIR was lodged only in Marc…
MANAGING DIRECTOR, ETC.versusK. RAMACHANDRA NAIDU AND ANR.
1994 INSC 39315 September 1994Appeal(s) allowed
The first respondent, a private transport operator, filed a writ petition in the Madras High Court challenging the scheme of nationalisation under Section 68(d) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. The High Court allowed the petition and the appellant, the Managing Director, filed a timely writ appeal, while the State of T…
THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, MADRAS AND ANR.versusF.X. FERNANDO
1994 INSC 7115 February 1994
The Registrar of Co‑operative Societies (appellant) was directed by the Tamil Nadu Government to discipline Joint Registrar F.X. Fernando (respondent) for alleged irregularities. The vigilance department delayed its inquiry, after which the Government amended Rule 12 of the Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Classification, Con…
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATIONversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS, ETC.
1989 INSC 6015 February 1989Directions issued
The Supreme Court heard a civil appeal concerning the Bhopal gas leak disaster, where Union Carbide Corporation (UCC) sought to resolve all claims arising from the tragedy. After reviewing extensive evidence, including data from U.S. courts and settlement negotiations, the Court deemed a comprehensive settlement approp…
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, HYDERABADversusM/S. P.J. CHEMICALS LTD. ETC.
1994 INSC 39114 September 1994Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether a government cash subsidy, granted as a percentage of an industrial asset's capital cost, could be deducted from the "actual cost" of the asset under Section 43(1) of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961 for the purpose of computing depreciation under Section 32. The Court noted a split among Hig…
M/S PANKAJ JAIN AGENCIESversusUNION OF INDIA
1994 INSC 25114 July 1994Dismissed
M/s Pankaj Jain Agencies, an importer of ball bearing components, challenged Notification No. 142/86-Cus., issued under Section 25(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, which reduced an earlier exemption and raised customs duty on its imports. The petitioners argued that the notification was not in force at the time of import, …
JAIN EXPORTS PVT. LTD. AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1993 INSC 22714 July 1993Dismissed
The appellants, Jain Exports Pvt. Ltd. and others, imported two consignments of refined industrial coconut oil in 1982 under an Open General Licence, but the 1980‑81 Import Policy listed coconut oil as a canalised item that could be imported only through the State Trading Corporation. The Customs Collector ordered conf…
MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIAversusSILAS NELSON AND ORS.
1993 INSC 20314 May 1993Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined the application of Silas Nelson, who sought migration from an unrecognised medical college in Dar‑es‑Salam to a recognised Indian medical college. The Medical Council of India (MCI) had rejected the migration, finding insufficient grounds and lack of equivalence, a decision the High Court lat…
RATTAN LAL SHARMAversusMANAGING COMMITTEE, DR. HARI RAM (CO-EDUCATION)HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL AND ORS.
1993 INSC 20814 May 1993Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Rattan Lal Sharma, a principal of Dr. Hari Ram Higher Secondary School, was suspended and charged with twelve offences, including the alleged misuse of Rs.129.37 from an amalgamated fund. An enquiry committee of three members, including Shri Maru Ram, was constituted; Maru Ram also acted as a witness for…
DR. A. FRANKLIN JOSEPHversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS.
1994 INSC 6814 February 1994Appeal(s) allowed
Dr. A. Franklin Joseph, a registered medical practitioner, was second on the waiting list for a Diploma in Diabetology seat that became vacant when the All India Quota seat was returned to the State. The State filled the vacancy with a service candidate who had lower marks (71.50%) than Dr. Joseph (76.75%), invoking a …
G.B. MAHAJAN AND ORSversusJALGAON MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS.
1990 INSC 27713 September 1990Dismissed
The Jalgaon Municipal Council, having received a gift of land, sought to develop it by constructing an administrative building, a vegetable market and a commercial complex on a self‑financing basis, appointing a private developer (Respondent No. 6) to execute the project and to dispose of occupancy rights for a fee. Re…
FRICK INDIA LTD. AND ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
1994 INSC 21013 May 1994Case Allowed
Frick India Ltd. and another challenged the levy of interest on purchase tax under the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 (and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956) through a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution. The petitioners argued that the interest collected was unlawful and should be refunded. The Court…
NATIONAL POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LTD.versusCORPORATE EXECUTIVE ASSOCIATION OF NTPC (CEAN) NEW DELHI AND ORS.
1992 INSC 8113 March 1992Appeal(s) allowed
The National Power Transmission Corporation (NPTC) was created to take over assets and employees of several generating corporations, including the National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC). NTPC and the Government issued instructions and a circular effecting the transfer, which the Corporate Executive Association of NT…
UNION OF INDIAversusHARNAM SINGH
1994 INSC 913 January 1994Dismissed
The Supreme Court reviewed a judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal (New Delhi) in Union of India v. Harnam Singh, wherein the Tribunal had decided the case through a single member. The Court observed that, in view of the earlier decision in Amulya Chandra Kalita's case, the matter should perhaps be remanded f…
CHANDRA GUPTA, IFSversusSECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS AND ORS.
1994 INSC 38112 September 1994Dismissed
The case concerned IFS officer Chandra Gupta, who was superseded for promotion because of adverse entries in his confidential reports. After those entries were expunged in a special review, Gupta was promoted to Chief Conservator of Forests, but other officers who had earlier been promoted contested his seniority. The …
K.S. P ARIPOORNANversusSTATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS
1994 INSC 38012 September 1994Disposed off
The bench examined whether the additional compensation provision (Section 23(1‑A)) inserted by the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984 applies to acquisition proceedings that were pending before the reference court on 24 September 1984, regardless of when the Collector’s award was made. The majority held that Sectio…
PANDURANG RAMCHANDRA MANDLIK (SINCE DEAD) BY HIS LRS. AND ANR.versusSMT. SHANTABAI RAMCHANDRA GHATGE AND ORS.
1989 INSC 27512 September 1989Dismissed
The landlords leased agricultural land to the respondents for ten years (1950‑60). After the lease expired, the landlords sought possession under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, but the application was dismissed because the land was only natural grass. They then terminated the tenancy under the Lan…
ALL INDIA JUDGES' ASSOCIATION AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1994 INSC 31712 August 1994Disposed off
The Supreme Court was asked to clarify whether Kerala's Judicial Service Rules, which require five years of standing at the Bar for appointment to the lowest judicial rung, complied with its earlier directive that a minimum of three years of legal practice is essential for recruitment. The State of Kerala filed Interlo…
RAKESH KAUL AND ORSversusTHE REGISTRAR, HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
1994 INSC 31412 August 1994
The petitioners, aggrieved by a change in university examination dates, filed writ petitions before the Jammu & Kashmir High Court. After the High Court dismissed the petitions, the petitioners allegedly attempted to assault the Assistant Controller of Examinations outside the courtroom, leading the High Court to initi…
THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.versusMIS. UNIVERSAL HYDROCARBONS CO. LTD. AND ANR.
1994 INSC 31812 August 1994
Universal Hydrocarbons Co. Ltd. purchased raw petroleum coke (RPC) and, after a manufacturing process, produced calcined petroleum coke (CPC). Sales tax was levied on the sale of CPC under the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The company claimed a refund under Section 15(b) of the Central Sa…
DR. JEEVAK ALMASTversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
1988 INSC 22012 August 1988Disposed off
Dr. Jeevak, an unsuccessful candidate in the All India Entrance Examination for postgraduate medical seats, filed a writ petition seeking to declare clauses 11 and 15(g) of the bulletin illegal, to quash the list of successful candidates, and to obtain a mandamus directing his admission to the unfilled 25% reserved sea…
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR INDIA ETC. ETC.versusAMRRATLAL PRAJIVANDAS AND ORS. ETC. ETC.
1994 INSC 20312 May 1994Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA) and the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976 (SAFEMA), both placed in the Ninth Schedule. It held that Parliament was compe…
A.S. MITTAL & ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.
1989 INSC 18812 May 1989Disposed off
The Lions Club organized an eye‑camp in Khurja, Uttar Pradesh, inviting Dr. R.M. Sahay to perform cataract surgeries. Post‑operative intra‑ocular infections rendered many operated eyes permanently blind. Two social activists filed a public‑interest writ petition under Article 32 seeking compensation for victims, an inq…
SRINIVASA THEATRE AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusGOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS. ETC. ETC.
1992 INSC 7312 March 1992Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of Section 5(A)(1) of the Tamil Nadu Entertainment Tax Act, 1939 (as amended by Act 40 of 1989), which re‑classified cinema theatres within a five‑kilometre ‘belt’ of municipal corporations and special‑grade municipalities from the ‘composition system’ to the ‘admi…
ARTI K. CHHABRA AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1992 INSC 33811 December 1992Dismissed
The appellants, originally allocated to various Group ‘A’ central services in 1989, abstained from training to appear for the 1990 Civil Services (Main) Examination in hopes of securing a more desirable posting. Their improved performance was ignored, and they were denied allocation to Indian Customs/Central Excise Ser…
PANKAJ BHARGAVA AND ANR.versusMOHINDER NATH AND ANR.
1990 INSC 38511 December 1990Appeal(s) allowed
The landlords and tenants jointly obtained permission for a five‑year limited tenancy under Section 21 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. After the tenancy expired, the landlords sought possession, but the tenants argued that a prior tenancy already existed and that the permission was obtained by fraud, rendering it …
MRS. KAVITA TREHAN AND ANR.versusBALSARA HYGIENE PRODUCTS LTD.
1994 INSC 23511 July 1994
The appellants, clearing and forwarding agents for Balsara Hygiene Products Ltd., obtained an ex‑parte injunction that allowed them to sell the respondent's goods, resulting in sales worth Rs 32.4 lakhs. The suit was later dismissed on the ground of non‑registration of the partnership under Section 69(2) of the Indian …
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.versusATUR INDIA PVT. LTD.
1994 INSC 6511 February 1994
The State of Maharashtra invited tenders for a 99‑year lease of a plot in the Backbay Reclamation area. Atur India Pvt. Ltd. responded as a promoter, seeking to transfer the lease benefit to a cooperative housing society. The Collector accepted the tender but did not effect an actual demise, and later demanded stamp du…
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusJAIN SPINNERS LTD. AND ANR.
1992 INSC 24210 September 1992Appeal(s) allowed
The respondents, manufacturers of cellulosic spun yarn, were initially allowed a concessional excise rate but later faced a show‑cause notice and were assessed a large duty. They deposited the disputed amount in the High Court, obtained a conditional order permitting withdrawal of the deposit, and later secured an appe…
OM PRAKASHversusAMARJIT SINGH & ANR.
1988 INSC 21710 August 1988Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Om Prakash, was placed ex parte in a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a small piece of land. He filed several applications to set aside the ex parte order, but they were dismissed as unsigned or time‑barred. The trial court decreed specific performance based on the plaintiff’s witnes…
R.C. POUDYAL AND ANR. ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.
1993 INSC 5110 February 1993Dismissed
The petitions filed by Sikkimese of Nepali origin challenged the reservation of twelve seats for Bhutia‑Lepcha and one seat for the Buddhist Sangha in the Sikkim Legislative Assembly, arguing that these provisions violated Articles 14, 15(1), 325, 332(3) and the basic structure of the Constitution. The Court examined w…
BLOOM DEKOR LTD. ETC. ETC.versusSUBHASH HIMATLAL DESAI AND ORS. ETC.
1994 INSC 3729 September 1994Disposed off
Bloom Dekor Ltd., a public company, issued a public share offering that was oversubscribed. A group of investors, seeking to avoid losses from speculative out‑of‑the‑ring transactions, filed a series of suits and applications in various courts (Morvi, Prantij, Baroda, Ahmedabad) alleging that the company had not obtain…
STATE OF U.P. AND ANR.versusPRAVEEN KUMAR SHARMA AND ORS.
1994 INSC 3779 September 1994Disposed off
A group of B.D.S. students studying outside Uttar Pradesh filed writ petitions in the Allahabad High Court seeking transfer to the Dental Faculty of King George Medical College, Lucknow. The High Court Single Judge allowed the petitions and directed that all pending transfer applications be considered. The State Govern…
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUJARAT, AHMEDABADversusSMT. KAMALTNI KHATAU
1994 INSC 1989 May 1994
The Supreme Court examined whether the tax authorities could choose to assess tax on either the trustees or the beneficiaries of a discretionary trust when the trust's income was distributed and actually received by the beneficiaries during the accounting year. The respondent, a beneficiary of six discretionary trusts,…
J.K. SYNTHETICS LTD.versusTHE COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER
1994 INSC 1979 May 1994
J.K. Synthetics Ltd. filed sales‑tax returns on the basis that freight charges on cement sales were not part of the taxable price and paid the tax shown in those returns. The Commercial Taxes Officer later added the freight amount to the sale price, assessed additional tax and levied interest under Section 11‑B of the …
SARDA PLYWOOD LTD. AND ANRversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1990 INSC 1309 April 1990Dismissed
Sarda Plywood Ltd. and another challenged a 1989 notification issued under the Destructive Insects and Pests Act, 1914, which restricted the import of "any plant" including timber logs. The petitioners argued that the timber, intended for plywood manufacture, would not come into contact with crops and therefore should …
BOARD OF SCHOOL EDUCATION HARYANAversusARUN RATHI AND ORS.
1994 INSC 569 February 1994Appeal(s) allowed
The Board of School Education, Haryana, under Regulation 26 of its 1990 Examination Regulations, allowed a 1% grace‑mark concession to help candidates pass but barred its use for earning compartment. After earlier High Court rulings (Anil Kumar) directing the Board to grant grace marks for compartment, the Board later,…
RAVI S. NAIK AND SANJAY BANDEKAR AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1994 INSC 579 February 1994Dismissed
The case concerned disqualification of members of the Goa Legislative Assembly under Article 191(2) read with the Tenth Schedule. Bandekar and Chopdekar were disqualified for allegedly having voluntarily given up their MGP membership, while Naik was disqualified on similar grounds after claiming a split in the party th…
THE PRADESHIYA INDUSTRIAL & INVESTMENT CORPORATION OF UTTAR PRADESHversusNORTH INDIA PETRO CHEMICAL LTD. AND ANR.
1994 INSC 609 February 1994
The Pradeshiya Industrial & Investment Corporation of Uttar Pradesh (appellant) entered into a promoters agreement with Dalmia Dairy Industries Ltd (second respondent) to promote North India Petro Chemicals Ltd (first respondent). The agreement was later cancelled by the appellant on 31 October 1992. The first responde…
ENGLISH MEDIUM STUDENTS PARENT ASSOCIATIONversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.
1993 INSC 3888 December 1993Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined a writ petition challenging Karnataka's Government Order No. 87 PRU SE BHA 88, which mandated mother‑tongue as the medium of instruction in classes I‑IV and made Kannada optional from class III for non‑Kannada speakers, with Kannada becoming a compulsory second language from class V. The peti…
STATE OF BIHARversusTHE SECRETARIAT ASSISTANT SUCCESSFUL EXAMINEES UNION 1986 AND ORS.
1993 INSC 3228 October 1993Disposed off
The Bihar State Subordinate Services Selection Board advertised for Assistant posts, held an examination in 1987 and declared results only in 1990, empaneling 309 candidates for 357 vacancies. The empanelled candidates sought appointment, but the State Government refused and ordered a fresh advertisement. The Patna Hig…
SH. GAURI SHANKAR AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.
1994 INSC 3698 September 1994Dismissed
The petitioners, who were the legal heirs of statutory tenants of residential premises under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, challenged the amendment introduced by Act 18 of 1976 that inserted clause (iii) in Section 2(1), which restricts the heritability of such residential tenancies. They argued that the clause dis…
SHRI BHAJANLAL, CHIEF MINISTER, HARYANAversusMIS JINDAL STRIPS LTD. AND ORS .
1994 INSC 3038 August 1994
The Chief Minister of Haryana challenged a writ petition alleging that the High Court had transferred his case from a Tax Bench to a bench presided over by the then Acting Chief Justice, S.S. Sodhi, and later back again, claiming this indicated bias. The appellant sought a transfer of the case on the ground of malafide…
SUB-COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITYversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1991 INSC 1368 May 1991Disposed off
The Supreme Court heard a writ petition filed by the Sub‑Committee on Judicial Accountability seeking directions concerning an inquiry into alleged misconduct of a sitting Supreme Court judge for his conduct as former Chief Justice of a High Court. The petition questioned the validity of the Lok Sabha Speaker’s admissi…
M/S DEVI DASS GOPAL KRISHAN PVT. LTD. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. ETC. ETC.
1994 INSC 1488 April 1994Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the validity of purchase‑tax provisions in the sales‑tax statutes of Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, West Bengal and Bombay, which imposed tax on goods purchased for manufacture when the finished goods were dispatched out of the state without a sale. Dealers challenged these provisions on the gro…
HALLI GOWDA & ORS.versusMANAGING DIRECTOR, K.S.R.T.C. & ANR.
1989 INSC 808 March 1989Disposed off
Thirty-two bus conductors employed on a daily‑wage basis by the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) alleged that the corporation, being a statutory body, is a "State" within Art 12 of the Constitution and that it had discriminated against them by regularising nineteen similarly placed conductors and gran…
POWER CONTROL APPLIANCES AND ORS.versusSUMEET MACHINES PVT. LTD.
1994 INSC 548 February 1994Appeal(s) allowed
The plaintiffs, Power Control Appliances and related companies, owned the copyright in the packaging, instruction manual, guarantee card and the design of the 'whipper blade' of their 'Sumeet' kitchen mixers, and the registered trade mark 'Sumeet'. The defendant, Sumeet Machines Pvt. Ltd., began manufacturing and marke…
INDIAN OIL CORPORATIONversusCONSUMER PROTECTION COUNCIL, KERALA AND ANR.
1993 INSC 3837 December 1993
Dr. P. Kamalasanan obtained an LPG connection through Karthika Gas Agency, an authorized distributor of Indian Oil Corporation, but did not receive a subscription voucher. When he sought regularisation of the connection, the corporation refused, prompting a complaint before the Consumer Redressal Forum alleging deficie…
LUXMI TEA COMPANY LIMITEDversusPRADIP KUMAR SARKAR
1989 INSC 3357 November 1989Dismissed
The respondent, Pradip Kumar Sarkar, lodged fully paid‑up shares with Luxmi Tea Co. for transfer to his name, but the Board of Directors refused to register the transfer. He filed an application under section 155 of the Companies Act, 1956 for rectification of the share register, which the Calcutta High Court allowed. …
MINERAL AND METAL TRADING CORPORATIONversusR. C. MISHRA AND ORS.
1993 INSC 1467 April 1993Appeal(s) allowed
Minerals and Metals Trading Corporation (M.M.T.C.) acted as the intermediary in a private barter scheme through which Ferro Alloys Corporation exported manganese and chrome concentrates. The parties executed contracts whereby title to the goods passed to M.M.T.C., which issued letters of credit, shipping documents and …
KUSHESHWAR DUBEYversusBHARAT COKING COAL LTD. & ORS.
1988 INSC 2636 September 1988Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, an electrical helper at Bharat Coking Coal Ltd., was charged with assaulting a supervising officer and faced both a criminal prosecution and disciplinary proceedings initiated by his employer. He filed a civil suit seeking an injunction to stay the disciplinary action pending the outcome of the criminal …
MOHAN RAWALEversusDAMODAR TATYABA@ DADASAHEB AND ORS.
1992 INSC 1956 August 1992Disposed off
The respondent, defeated in the 1991 Lok Sabha election, filed an election petition alleging corrupt practices under Sections 123(2), 123(3) and 123(3A) of the Representation of People Act, 1951. The appellant sought dismissal on three grounds: (i) the alleged corrupt acts occurred before he was a "candidate" as define…
BURMAH SHELL OIL STORAGE AND DISTRIBUTING COMPANY OF INDIA LTD. (NOW KNOWN AS BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.)versusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), CALCUTTA
1994 INSC 1436 April 1994Dismissed
The appellant, Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distribution Co. (now Bharat Petroleum), purchased iron cylinders as returnable packages for LPG distribution, costing Rs 1,09,63,754, and claimed no depreciation. In 1961 it sold the cylinders to the refinery for Rs 82,19,947, incurring a loss of Rs 27,43,807, which it sough…
MOHD. IQBAL KHANDAYversusABDUL MAJID RATHER
1994 INSC 1456 April 1994Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, a lecturer, sought ad‑hoc promotion to Associate Professor and obtained an interim order from the High Court directing the State Government to grant the promotion. The government failed to implement the order, leading the respondent to initiate contempt proceedings, after which the High Court issued a n…
SRIKANT KASHINATH JITURI AND ORS.versusCORPORATION OF THE CITY OF BELGAUM
1994 INSC 4405 October 1994Dismissed
The Corporation of the City of Belgaum revised property tax in 1984, and the plaintiffs filed a representative civil suit alleging that the increase was arbitrary, unreasonable, illegal, that assessors inspected properties without notice, and were pressured to raise taxes. The suit was dismissed by the trial court unde…
ARJUN KHIAMAL MAKHIJANI ETC.versusJAMNADAS C. TULIANI & ORS. ETC.
1989 INSC 3035 October 1989Dismissed
Jamunadas C. Tuliani, the landlord, sued five tenants and Arjun Khiamal Makhijani (defendant No.6) for eviction under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, alleging six months' rent arrears and illegal sub‑letting of a garage. The trial court decreed eviction on the grounds of rent default …
J.K. AGGARWALversusHARYANA SEEDS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. AND ORS
1990 INSC 2685 September 1990Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, J.K. Aggarwal, a Company Secretary of Haryana Seeds Development Corporation Ltd., faced a disciplinary inquiry that could lead to his dismissal. He sought permission to be represented by a lawyer under Rule 7(5) of the Haryana Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1952, but the inquiry authority …
SUBRAN AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KERALA
1993 INSC 2555 August 1993Modified
The Supreme Court reviewed its earlier judgment in Subran and others v. State of Kerala after noting that paragraph 11 could be misinterpreted as a general statement of law. The case involved four appellants, including Subran, who were convicted of murder under Section 302 of the IPC. On review, the Court held that Sub…
I. MANILAL SINGHversusDR. H. BOROBABU SINGH AND ANR.
1993 INSC 435 February 1993Disposed off
The Supreme Court heard a contempt petition filed by I. Manilal Singh, Secretary of the Manipur Legislative Assembly, who alleged that Dr. H. Borobabu Singh, the Speaker of the Assembly, had ordered his compulsory retirement as retaliation for implementing the Court’s earlier orders quashing the disqualification of cer…
KESHAVJI RAVJI & CO. ETC. ETC.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
1990 INSC 265 February 1990Appeal(s) allowed
The partnership firm Keshavji Ravji & Co. paid interest to its partners on their capital credits and also received interest from the same partners on borrowings during the assessment year 1975-76. The Assessing Officer disallowed the interest paid to partners without setting off the interest received, leading to a high…
DEVI CINE PROJECTOR MANUFACTURING CO., ETC. ETC.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
1990 INSC 275 February 1990Appeal(s) allowed
Devi Cinema and other firms challenged the disallowance of interest paid to their partners under Section 40(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had held that the entire interest paid by the firm to a partner was disallowable, ignoring any interest the partner paid back to the firm on borro…
SHIV KUMAR CHADHAversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS.
1993 INSC 1784 May 1993Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 bars civil courts from entertaining suits challenging demolition orders of unauthorised constructions. It held that the Act creates a statutory scheme that ousts court jurisdiction, and suits are maintainable only if there is a prima facie jur…
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATIONversusUNION OF INDIA ETC.
1989 INSC 1794 May 1989Directions issued
The Bhopal gas leak of December 2, 1984 killed about 2,660 people and injured tens of thousands. The Union of India and Union Carbide Corporation appealed against an interim compensation order of Rs.250 crores. The Supreme Court, considering the urgent need for relief, the range of offers (US$426‑500 million) and the g…
PREMIUM GRANITES AND ANR.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS.
1994 INSC 454 February 1994
The Supreme Court examined the validity of Rule 39 of the Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959, which permits the State Government to grant or renew quarry leases in special cases for mineral development and public interest. The petitioners argued that the rule conferred unguided, uncanalised discretion viol…
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION ETC. ETCversusUNION OF INDIA ETC. ETC.
1991 INSC 2513 October 1991Dismissed
The Union of India sued Union Carbide Corporation (UCC) in the US District Court, which ordered a $5 million interim relief to be paid to the Indian Red Cross Society for Bhopal gas victims, stating the amount was an advance payment and would be set‑off against any final judgment. After the US case was dismissed on for…
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS.versusK. M. RAMONA PERHAR
1994 INSC 3492 September 1994Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, KM Ramona Perhar, obtained admission to a private medical college in Karnataka in 1990 and sought a transfer to a government medical college in Uttar Pradesh in 1992. The Uttar Pradesh Government rejected the request based on its policy of not allowing out‑of‑state transfers. The Allahabad High Court is…
DR. PRIT SINGHversusS.K. MANGAL AND ORS.
1992 INSC 2282 September 1992Dismissed
Dr. Prit Singh was appointed Principal of a recognised college on 22 July 1986, but the Vice‑Chancellor refused to approve the appointment because Singh did not meet the prescribed qualifications of a first or high second class Master's degree. The qualifications were later amended on 15 October 1987 to relax the requi…
MANGALORE CHEMICALS & FERTILISERS LIMITEDversusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES AND ORS..
1991 INSC 1692 August 1991Appeal(s) allowed
Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilisers Ltd sought to adjust cash refunds of sales tax on raw materials against its tax liability under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, based on a 1969 government notification granting such refunds to new industries. A later 1975 notification required the dealer to obtain prior permission f…
ANDHRA STEEL CORPORATION LTD. ETCversusANDHRA PRADESH STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ORS
1991 INSC 1252 May 1991Dismissed
The appellants, owners of mini steel plants, were granted a concessional electricity tariff by the Andhra Pradesh Government in 1977. The State Electricity Board later imposed minimum consumption charges and raised the tariff, prompting the Government to issue clarifications in December 1978 and January 1980 regarding …
HINDUSTAN ZINC LTD. ETC. ETCversusANDHRA PRADESH STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS
1991 INSC 1272 May 1991Dismissed
The appellants, industrial electricity consumers, challenged the Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board’s upward revision of high‑tension tariffs and the imposition of a fuel‑cost adjustment charge. The Supreme Court held that the Board’s power to fix tariffs under s.49 of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, remains va…
ELECTRONICS CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.
1989 INSC 1682 May 1989Directions issued
Electronics Corporation of India Ltd entered into an agreement with a Norwegian firm for technical services and sought a No Objection Certificate under s.195(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to remit payments without tax deduction. The Commissioner rejected the application, holding that s.9(1)(vii) deemed the fees to acc…
RAVI RAMAN PRASAD AND ANR.versusSTATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS
1993 INSC 312 February 1993Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants owned a residential house from which Respondent No. 4, a tenant, was evicted after a civil decree in the appellants' favour. The appellants took physical possession with police assistance. Respondent claimed a sale agreement, filed a title suit, and later opened fire to retake possession, leading to a cr…
MANAGING DIRECTOR, ECIL, HYDERABAD ETC. ETC.versusB. KARUNAKAR AND ORS. ETC. ETC.
1993 INSC 3161 October 1993Disposed off
The Constitution Bench examined whether a delinquent employee is entitled to a copy of the Inquiry Officer's report before the disciplinary authority decides on guilt or punishment, especially after the 42nd Amendment removed the right to show cause on penalty. It held that when the Inquiry Officer is not the disciplin…
SMT. SHAKUNTALA MEHRISHIversusNEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COMMIITEE AND ORS.
1990 INSC 661 March 1990Appeal(s) allowed
The petitioner, a primary teacher who retired in 1977 from an aided school, had opted for pension under a 1975 notification issued under Rule 126 of the Delhi School Education Rules. Despite her retirement, the Delhi Administration delayed payment of pension and gratuity, finally promulgating a pension scheme in 1988. …