PADI KAUSHIK REDDY ETC.versusTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AND OTHERS ETC.
2025 INSC 91231 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Three BRS MLAs who were elected to the Telangana Legislative Assembly joined the INC, prompting two other BRS MLAs to file disqualification petitions under the Tenth Schedule. The Speaker delayed issuing notices for over seven months, leading the petitioners to approach the High Court, which only directed the Speaker t…
KISHORE CHHABRAversusTHE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
2025 INSC 41931 March 2025Disposed off
The appellant, Kishore Chhabra, owned land in Sultanpur, Sonipat, which was included in a 1992 notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for development. He challenged the acquisition, arguing that his land should be released because a factory had been operating there since 1970 and that other simi…
KARUPPUDAYARversusSTATE REP. BY THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, LALGUDI TRICHY & ORS.
2025 INSC 13231 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Karuppudayar was charged under Sections 294(b) and 353 IPC read with Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the SC‑ST Act for allegedly insulting a revenue inspector in his office. The High Court dismissed the appellant's petitions under Section 482 CrPC seeking quash of the proceedings, holding that the trial w…
IN RE: T. N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPADversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2024 INSC 7831 January 2024Directions issued
The petition sought the institutionalisation and reconstitution of the Central Empowered Committee (CEC), which had functioned as an ad‑hoc body since its Supreme Court‑ordered creation in 2002. The Court examined the need for a permanent statutory authority to monitor compliance with its environmental orders and consi…
K. VADIVELversusK. SHANTHI & ORS.
2024 INSC 74630 September 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant K. Vadivel was convicted of murder based on a charge‑sheet filed in 2013. After the trial concluded in 2019, the victim's wife filed a Section 311 application seeking additional witnesses, which was dismissed by the trial court and upheld by the High Court. She later filed a Section 173(8) application in …
INOX AIR PRODUCTS LIMITED NOW KNOWN AS INOX AIR PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
2025 INSC 12830 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Andhra Pradesh alleged that INOX Air Products Ltd. (now INOX Air Products Private Ltd.) sold Nitrous Oxide I.P. to a third‑party firm that allegedly lacked a Form 20B licence, thereby violating s.18(a)(vi) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and attracting punishment under s.27(d). The High Court dismisse…
M/S JM LABORATORIES AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
2025 INSC 12730 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, M/s JM Laboratories and its partners, were summoned by a Judicial Magistrate in Kurnool to appear in a case filed under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act alleging manufacture of sub‑standard drugs. They filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings, which the High Co…
PREM PRAKASHversusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
2024 INSC 63728 August 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Prem Prakash was in judicial custody for a separate ECIR (No. 4 of 2022) when the Enforcement Directorate recorded statements from him under Section 50 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) for a new ECIR (No. 5 of 2023). The High Court had denied his bail, relying on those statements, but the …
MANOHAR AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS
2025 INSC 90028 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, a group of farmers, had their land acquired in the 1990s under the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 for the Jintur Industrial Area and were awarded Rs 10,800 per acre by the Land Acquisition Officer. They filed a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 seeking enhancemen…
CHANDRABHAN SUDAM SANAPversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2025 INSC 11628 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Chandrabhan Sudam Sanap, was convicted of rape and murder of a 23‑year‑old woman and sentenced to death, based largely on circumstantial evidence, CCTV footage, witness testimonies, an alleged extra‑judicial confession and recovered items. The Supreme Court examined whether the prosecution's evidence sat…
KALVAKUNTLA KAVITHAversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
2024 INSC 63227 August 2024Appeal(s) allowed
Kalvakuntla Kavitha, a former Member of Parliament and Legislative Council, was charged under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 in CBI and Enforcement Directorate investigations relating to a Delhi excise policy conspiracy. She applied for bail, invoking the special treatment granted to women under the provi…
M/S JSW STEEL LIMITEDversusPRATISHTHA THAKUR HARITWAL & ORS.
2025 INSC 40127 March 2025Disposed off
The Supreme Court considered a contempt petition filed by JSW Steel Ltd., which had become the successful resolution applicant for the insolvent Monnet Ispat and Energy Ltd. After the National Company Law Tribunal approved the resolution plan, the State of Chhattisgarh issued demand notices for sales tax, VAT and entry…
ASLAM ALIAS IMRANversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2025 INSC 40327 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Aslam alias Imran, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for allegedly stabbing his brother's brother, Zahid Khan, with a butcher knife, leading to the victim's death. The prosecution's case rested on the testimonies of several eyewitnesses, notably the victim's brother (PW-1), who was an interested witnes…
R. SHASHIREKHAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 40227 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, R. Shashirekha, filed a complaint alleging that her husband had been cheated, blackmailed and forced to commit suicide by his business partners (respondents 2 and 3) and a manager (respondent 4). The FIR was registered under Sections 306, 420, 506 and 34 of the IPC, but the respondents obtained a quash o…
CONSTABLE 907 SURENDRA SINGH & ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND
2025 INSC 11427 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The case arose from an incident on 15 November 2004 where a Head Constable Jagdish Singh fired at a car suspected of smuggling liquor, killing the passenger. The trial court acquitted three constables – Surendra Singh, Surat Singh and Ashad Singh – on the ground that the prosecution failed to prove they shared a common…
K. SAMBA MOORTHYversusSANJIV CHADHA & ORS.
2025 INSC 11027 January 2025Case Partly allowed
The appellant, a former Bank of Baroda manager, was placed in abeyance for promotion from Scale‑II to Scale‑III due to pending disciplinary proceedings, which later resulted in a minor penalty of pay reduction. The High Court set aside the disciplinary proceedings, declaring the appellant entitled to all consequential …
KALI CHARAN AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
2024 INSC 89826 November 2024Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined land acquisition proceedings undertaken by the Uttar Pradesh government and YEIDA for the integrated development of the Yamuna Expressway and adjoining parcels. The landowners challenged the use of the urgency provisions under Sections 17(1) and 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, arguin…
JAYA BHATTACHARYAversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.
2025 INSC 27025 February 2025Disposed off
The appellant, Jaya Bhattacharya, a former L.D. Assistant in West Bengal, was absent from duty for 107 days in 1986 and subsequently from June 1987 to July 2007, claiming she was prevented from performing duties and not paid salary. The authorities treated the long absence as extraordinary leave under Rules 175 and 176…
SUNIL @ SONU ETC.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI
2024 INSC 72724 September 2024Case Partly allowed
The appellants Sunil (Accused No.1) and Nitin (Accused No.4) were convicted by the trial court and the Delhi High Court for murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC, based on a FIR lodged after a violent altercation that resulted in the death of Sachin. The prosecution proved that the injuries causing d…
M/S BENGANI FOOD PRODUCTS PVT LTD AND ANOTHERversusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 90224 July 2025Dismissed
M/s Bengani Food Products Pvt Ltd shipped a 24,700‑quintal maize consignment under a Marine Transit Open (Declaration) policy issued by National Insurance Co. The goods were unloaded at Shalimar Railway Yard on 7 February 2007 and left exposed to heavy rain, causing fungal contamination. The insurer repudiated the clai…
M/S RIMJHIM ISPAT LIMITED AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER
2025 INSC 90124 July 2025Dismissed
The appellants, M/s Rimjhim Ispat Ltd. and related companies, were investigated for alleged illegal manufacture and removal of excisable goods, leading to departmental adjudication orders imposing large duties and penalties under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Departmental order dated 31‑03‑2011 was set aside by the…
HIRALAL BABULAL SONIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
2025 INSC 26624 February 2025Disposed off
The case involved a fraud scheme where fake telegraphic transfers were used to withdraw Rs. 6.7 crore from a bank, the proceeds of which were allegedly used to purchase 205 gold bars that were later seized from accused Nandkumar Babulal Soni. The trial court convicted Soni under Sections 120B and 411 of the IPC, direct…
PRAKASHCHANDRA JOSHIversusKUNTAL PRAKASHCHANDRA JOSHI @ KUNTAL VISANJI SHAH
2024 INSC 5524 January 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant and respondent were married in 2004 and lived in Canada until 2011, when health and employment issues forced their return to India. The couple separated in February 2011, and the respondent thereafter refused to resume cohabitation, even after multiple summons and notices, effectively deserting the appell…
SUHAS CHAKMAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2024 INSC 81323 October 2024Directions issued
The petitioner, a prison inmate, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a permanent mechanism to ensure free and timely legal aid for prisoners and to address overcrowded, unhygienic prison conditions. The Court examined the constitutional mandate under Articles 21 and 39‑A, the Legal Services Authorities Act, …
PETER AUGUSTINEversusK.V. XAVIER AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 77123 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The dispute concerned a 9‑cent parcel of land in Ernakulam, with conflicting sale, conveyance and settlement deeds executed between the parties' fathers in 1955, 1964 and 1994. The respondents filed a suit for declaration of title, which the trial court dismissed; the High Court of Kerala remanded the case back to the …
RAMYASH @ LAL BAHADURversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER ETC. ETC
2025 INSC 54423 April 2025Disposed off
The complainant Ramyash lodged a FIR alleging that the accused Bhupendra Singh, Moti Lal and Prahlad assaulted his family, resulting in the death of his father. The trial court convicted the accused under Sections 302, 323, 324 (with 34) and other offences, sentencing them to life imprisonment. The Allahabad High Court…
PAWAN KUMAR AGRAWAL & ANR.versusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ORS.
2025 INSC 54523 April 2025Case Partly allowed
The appellants, selected in the 2003 recruitment for Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Chhattisgarh, were directed by the High Court on 2 May 2012 to be appointed and to have their seniority reckoned from the date of appointment. The State delayed their appointment until 8 July 2013, after which the appellants were plac…
RAJAN CHADHA & ANR.versusSANJAY ARORA
2025 INSC 54623 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, shareholders of RBT Private Ltd., filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondent, a fellow shareholder, willfully violated court and arbitral orders by removing assets and failing to pay loan EMIs. A Single Judge of the Delhi High Court on 5 December 2023 held the respondent guilty of contempt a…
HDFC BANK LTD.versusTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
2024 INSC 80722 October 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The Income Tax Department ordered HDFC Bank to stop operation of certain lockers and accounts, but later revoked the order only for the accounts, leading bank officials to mistakenly allow a locker to be operated. The department filed a complaint and an FIR was registered against the bank and its officials for multiple…
M/S C.L. GUPTA EXPORT LTD.versusADIL ANSARI & ORS.
2025 INSC 103522 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, M/s C.L. Gupta Export Ltd., was found by the National Green Tribunal (NGT) to have violated environmental laws, leading the Tribunal to impose a Rs.50 crore compensation and direct the Enforcement Directorate to pursue action under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The appellant contended th…
IN RE: ZUDPI JUNGLE LANDS versus
2025 INSC 75422 May 2025Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the status of Zudpi Jungle lands in six districts of Maharashtra, which, although recorded as forest lands, have been used for residential, agricultural, and governmental purposes for decades. The State of Maharashtra sought to treat these lands as non‑forest to avoid the restrictions of the …
THAKORE UMEDSING NATHUSINGversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
2024 INSC 19822 February 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The accused were tried for murder, dacoity and robbery after the victim's jeep was allegedly hijacked; the trial court acquitted them of murder and dacoity but convicted them of robbery. The State appealed, and the Gujarat High Court reversed the acquittal, convicting the accused of murder and related offences. The Sup…
IN RE: PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL REPORTS OF THE OFFICERS OF THE INDIAN FOREST SERVICE versus
2025 INSC 74821 May 2025
The Supreme Court examined a Government Order dated 29 June 2024 issued by the Madhya Pradesh Government that made District Collectors and Divisional Commissioners – officers of the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) – the reporting, reviewing and accepting authorities for Performance Appraisal Reports (PAR) of Indian…
SUDAM PRABHAKAR ACHATversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2025 INSC 37821 March 2025Case Partly allowed
The appellant Sudam Prabhakar Achat was convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for the death of his cousin Motiram Deoram Achat, based on testimony of relatives who witnessed a quarrel in which the appellant, armed with a stick, and a co‑accused, armed with the blunt side of an axe, assaulted the deceased…
ANMOLversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2025 INSC 25621 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Anmol, a candidate with 58% multiple disabilities, secured a rank of 2462 in the NEET‑UG 2024 PwD category but was denied admission to an MBBS course by the Disability Assessment Board, which relied solely on quantified disability and the "both hands intact" clause in Appendix H‑1 of the 2019 NMC regulations. The High …
VIKRAM BAKSHI AND OTHERSversusR.P. KHOSLA AND ANOTHER
2025 INSC 102020 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The dispute arose between the Khosla and Bakshi groups over a resort development project, leading to allegations of perjury and a criminal proceeding under Section 340 of the CrPC. The High Court initially dismissed the criminal application but later recalled its own order after a review petition was filed under Order …
GAUTAM KUMAR DASversusNCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS
2024 INSC 61020 August 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Gautam Kumar Das, lost his wife and father to COVID-19 shortly after the birth of his daughter Sugandha and temporarily handed her over to his late wife's sister. After remarrying, he sought to regain custody, filing a petition under the Guardians and Wards Act and later a habeas corpus writ, but the Del…
ALL INDIA JUDGES ASSOCIATION AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 73520 May 2025Directions issued
The Supreme Court heard a batch of writ petitions filed by the All India Judges Association seeking clarification on the promotion and recruitment mechanisms in the judicial services, including the quota for Limited Departmental Competitive Examinations (LDCE), qualifying experience requirements, and suitability tests.…
PRAKASH AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
2024 INSC 102019 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were charged under Sections 306 and 34 IPC for allegedly abetting the suicide of their daughter-in-law, who had committed suicide on 20 March 2015 after a family dispute and a court‑ordered mahalokadalat. The prosecution’s case hinged on the claim that the appellants' words at the mahalokadalat on 17 Feb…
KAVERI PLASTICSversusMAHDOOM BAWA BAHRUDEEN NOORUL
2025 INSC 113319 September 2025Dismissed
Kaveri Plastics issued a cheque of Rs 1 crore to the respondent, which was returned unpaid. The plaintiff served two demand notices under Proviso (b) of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, but each notice demanded Rs 2 crore, double the cheque amount. The Delhi High Court quashed the criminal complaint on th…
NABHA POWER LIMITEDversusPUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 100219 August 2025Dismissed
Nabha Power Ltd (NPL) and Talwandi Sabo Power Ltd (TSPL) entered into Power Purchase Agreements (PPA) with Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd (PSPCL) for a 700 MW coal‑fired project. They claimed that deemed export benefits under Paragraph 8.3 of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2009‑2014 were available at the bid cut‑of…
RAVINDER SINGH SIDHUversusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.
2025 INSC 72719 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The petitioner, Ravinder Singh Sidhu, faced 64 FIRs across ten states arising from alleged financial fraud. He filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking the clubbing and transfer of all FIRs to a single jurisdiction, later modifying the prayer to consolidation within each state. The Supreme Court examined whether …
INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY BOARD OF INDIAversusSATYANARAYAN BANKATLAL MALU & ORS.
2024 INSC 31919 April 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) filed a criminal complaint under Sections 73(a) and 235A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) against the former directors of SBM Paper Mills for non‑compliance with a One‑Time Settlement ordered by the NCLT. The Sessions Judge issued process, but the res…
GEETA DUBEY & ORS.versusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS.
[2024] 12 S.C.R. 65218 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The claimants, wife and son of the deceased Chakradhar Dubey, filed a motor accident claim after he was injured and later died following a collision between his car and a truck (MP-19-HA-1197). The First Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) awarded compensation of Rs. 50,41,289 against the truck driver and …
SIDDHANT @ SIDHARTH BALU TAKTODEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
[2024] 12 S.C.R. 83718 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Siddhant @ Sidharth Balu Taktode, was arrested under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 and remained incarcerated for about five years without being produced before the trial judge on most of the 102 scheduled dates, and without charges being framed. The Special Judge and the High Court…
ABHINAV MOHAN DELKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
2025 INSC 99018 August 2025Dismissed
Seven‑time MP Abhinav Mohan Delkar died by suicide on 22 February 2021, leaving a note that accused several officials of defamation, harassment and extortion. An FIR was filed under Section 306 IPC (now Section 108 BNS) read with Section 107 (now Section 45 BNS) alleging abetment of suicide, and the accused sought quas…
KIRPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2024 INSC 31218 April 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Kirpal Singh was convicted under Sections 302 and 307 of the IPC for the murder of his brother‑in‑law Balwinder Singh. The prosecution’s case relied primarily on the testimony of the victim’s wife, Sharan Kaur (PW‑5), and her son Daljit Singh (PW‑6), who alleged that the appellant acted out of jealousy ov…
YOGESH KUMARversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 37918 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a former stenographer appointed to the District Court, Saharanpur, was terminated after serving eight years due to an excess of appointments. He filed writ petitions seeking payment of salary for the period he worked, but the High Court dismissed them on the ground that the relief could only be obtained …
NAVAS @ MULANAVASversusSTATE OF KERALA
2024 INSC 21518 March 2024Case Partly allowed
The appellant was convicted of murdering four members of a family, house‑trespass and attempted suicide, and was originally sentenced to death for the murder under s.302 IPC. The High Court commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment with a direction that the appellant could not be released for 30 years, invoking …
SAMBHUBHAI RAISANGBHAI PADHIYARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
[2024] 12 S.C.R. 107217 December 2024Case Partly allowed
The appellant was convicted of kidnapping, brutal sexual assault and murder of a four‑year‑old boy and sentenced to death by the trial court, a sentence confirmed by the Gujarat High Court. The Supreme Court examined whether the circumstantial evidence satisfied the golden principles and whether the presumption under S…
BANO SAIYED PARWAZversusCHIEF CONTROLLING REVENUE AUTHORITY AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND CONTROLLER OF STAMPS & ORS.
2024 INSC 44317 May 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a bonafide purchaser, paid Rs.25,34,350 as stamp duty for a conveyance deed that was never lodged because the vendor had fraudulently sold the property earlier. Upon discovering the fraud, the appellant applied online for a refund of the stamp duty on 22 October 2014 and later filed a written application…
THE STATE OF HARYANAversusJAI SINGH AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 112216 September 2025Dismissed
The State of Haryana amended the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 by inserting sub‑clause (6) to s.2(g) through Haryana Act No. 9 of 1992, which declared that lands reserved for village common purposes under the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948 would vest …
MR. R.S. MADIREDDY AND ANR. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. ETC.
2024 INSC 42516 May 2024Dismissed
The appellants, former cabin crew of Air India Limited (AIL), filed writ petitions between 2011 and 2013 alleging stagnation in pay, non‑promotion and denial of allowances, invoking Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution. While the petitions were pending, the Government of India disinvested its 100 % share in AIL, …
T.N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPADversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2024 INSC 42616 May 2024Disposed off
M/s Shewalkar Developers Ltd. sought permission to construct a health/eco‑resort on Plot Nos. 14/3 and 14/4 in Pachmarhi, Madhya Pradesh, claiming the land was not forest land and that its title, derived from a 1991 sale deed, was unchallenged. The State of Madhya Pradesh contended that the plots formed part of the Pac…
MUKATLALversusKAILASH CHAND (D) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS.
2024 INSC 42816 May 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appeal concerned Mukatlal's challenge to a revenue suit filed by Kailash Chand, the adopted son and legal heir of the Hindu widow Smt. Nandkanwarbai, seeking partition of an unpartitioned joint Hindu family estate under Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The Supreme Court examined whether a Hindu wido…
KARNAIL SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
2024 INSC 42416 May 2024Case Allowed
The review petition challenged a Supreme Court judgment that had held that vesting of village common lands in the Gram Panchayat was complete upon mere assignment under Section 18(c) of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948. The petitioner argued that this view ignored the C…
RIKHAB BIRANI & ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
2025 INSC 51216 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, Rikhab Birani and Sadhna Birani, entered into an oral agreement to sell a godown for Rs 1.35 crore, which the buyer, Shilpi Gupta, failed to fully pay, leading the sellers to re‑sell the property at a lower price. The buyer subsequently approached the Metropolitan Magistrate to register an FIR alleging …
IN RE: CONSTRUCTION OF MULTI STOREYED BUILDINGS IN FOREST LAND MAHARASHTRA versus
2025 INSC 70115 May 2025
The case concerned 11.89 ha of land in Kondhwa Budruk, Pune, notified as Reserved Forest under the Indian Forest Act, 1878, which was later allotted to the Chavan family in 1998 for agricultural purposes without Central Government approval under the Forest Conservation Act, 1980. The Chavan family subsequently sold the…
TRISHA SINGHversusANURAG KUMAR
2024 INSC 45015 May 2024Case Allowed
The husband filed a petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking divorce, and the parties later reached an amicable settlement before a Supreme Court mediator, wherein the husband paid alimony and the wife agreed to dissolve the marriage. The wife subsequently withdrew from the settlement, claiming she wo…
PRABIR PURKAYASTHAversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI)
2024 INSC 41415 May 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant was arrested under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) on 3 October 2023 without the arrest memo containing the specific grounds of arrest, only generic reasons. He was presented before a Remand Judge on 4 October 2023 and remanded to police custody, but the copy of the remand application and …
C. SUBBIAH @ KADAMBUR JAYARAJ AND OTHERSversusTHE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE AND OTHERS
2024 INSC 41615 May 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The complainant, a government teacher, alleged that the accused induced him to invest in benami land deals and later failed to deliver the promised plots and profits, leading him to file both a civil suit and a criminal FIR. The accused sought quashing of the FIR and charge sheet, arguing that the dispute was purely ci…
GEORGEversusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND OTHERS
[2024] 12 S.C.R. 76913 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, George, was convicted under Sections 294(b), 341 and 302 IPC for the murder of the informant's son, based solely on the testimony of the father (PW‑1), an interested witness. The High Court, however, acquitted two co‑accused on the same testimony, finding it unreliable for them, yet upheld the appellant'…
BHARTI ARORAversusTHE STATE OF HARYANA
[2024] 12 S.C.R. 104413 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a former Superintendent of Police, was implicated by a Special Judge for allegedly fabricating a false story that led to the recovery of opium and was issued a show‑cause notice under Section 58 of the NDPS Act. The Special Judge recorded adverse findings against her and other officers without giving the…
YOGESH MADHAV MAKALWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
2025 INSC 96412 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a medical aspirant, sought validation of his Scheduled Tribe (Koli Mahadev) caste certificate, which had been confiscated and invalidated by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee. The High Court upheld the Committee’s order, dismissing the appellant’s writ petition. On appeal, the Supreme Co…
BABY SAKSHI GREOLAversusMANZOOR AHMAD SIMON AND ANOTHER
[2024] 12 S.C.R. 95811 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a child of seven years, suffered grievous injuries and moderate mental retardation in a motor vehicle accident, resulting in 75% disability which the Court treated as 100% for compensation purposes. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.5,90,750, which the Delhi High Court enhanced by Rs.5,60,000…
ARJUN S/O RATAN GAIKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
[2024] 12 S.C.R. 63711 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Arjun was detained for twelve months under section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act on the ground that his bootlegging activities threatened public peace. The detaining authority relied on six excise cases involving illicit liquor and on vague statements of two unnamed witnes…
SURENDRA KOLIversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
2025 INSC 130811 November 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Surendra Koli, a former domestic help at the Nithari residence, was convicted for the murder, rape and related offences of a minor based on a Section 164 confession and alleged discoveries under Section 27 of the Evidence Act. The Supreme Court had earlier affirmed his conviction and death sentence in 2011, and a revie…
IN RE: N. PEDDI RAJU AND OTHERS versus
2025 INSC 98911 August 2025
A transfer petition seeking to move a criminal case from the Telangana High Court to the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) contained scandalous remarks against the Telangana High Court judge hearing the matter. The Supreme Court dismissed the petition and, suo moto, issued contempt notices to the petitioner’s lawyer, th…
STATE BANK OF INDIAversusASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND OTHERS
2024 INSC 19511 March 2024
The Supreme Court had earlier declared the Electoral Bond Scheme unconstitutional and directed the State Bank of India (SBI), as the authorized bank, to furnish the Election Commission of India (ECI) with details of each bond purchased and redeemed between 12 April 2019 and 15 February 2024. SBI filed a Miscellaneous A…
RUPA AND CO. LIMITED AND ANOTHERversusFIRHAD HAKIM AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 24511 February 2025Directions issued
The appellants Rupa & Co. Ltd paid Rs.4,00,92,000 for a plot of land in New Town, Kolkata, based on HIDCO's promise to convey it on a free‑hold basis. HIDCO later altered the terms to a 99‑year lease and subsequently demanded additional payment at market rates, prompting the appellants to file a writ petition which the…
BANWARI AND OTHERSversusHARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED (HSIIDC) AND ANOTHER
2024 INSC 95110 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants' land was acquired for the Kundli Manesar Palwal Expressway and they received a compensation award in 2006. After a reference for enhancement of compensation was dismissed, a High Court enhanced the compensation in 2016 for similarly situated landowners. The appellants filed an application under Section …
MIR MUSTAFA ALI HASMIversusTHE STATE OF A.P.
2024 INSC 50310 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a Forest Section Officer, was convicted under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly demanding and accepting a bribe from a saw‑mill operator. The prosecution relied on the complainant’s testimony, a friend who acted as a shadow witness, and the recovery…
LT. COL. SUPRITA CHANDELversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2024 INSC 9429 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed
Lt. Col. Suprita Chandel, a Short Service Commissioned officer in the Army Dental Corps, was denied a third chance for permanent commission after a 2013 amendment to the age‑relaxation rules. A batch of similarly situated officers successfully obtained a one‑time age relaxation and permanent commission from the Armed F…
TATA MOHAN RAOversusS. VENKATESWARLU AND OTHERS ETC.
2025 INSC 6789 May 2025Case Partly allowed
The appellant, a Tehsildar, was ordered by the Andhra Pradesh High Court to consider representations for regularising houses on government land and to maintain the status quo pending a decision. Despite the orders, he led a police force to demolish structures and evict families, beating women and children. The High Cou…
GOVERDHAN & ANR.versusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
2025 INSC 479 January 2025Case Partly allowed
The trial court convicted two brothers, Goverdhan and Rajendra, and their father Chintaram for the murder of Suraj under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, based primarily on the testimony of Suraj's mother, Lata Bai, who was the sole eye‑witness. The High Court upheld the convictions of the brothers but acquitted t…
HARYANA POWER PURCHASE CENTRE (HPPC) AND OTHERSversusGMR KAMALANGA ENERGY LIMITED AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 10798 September 2025Dismissed
The Supreme Court considered two civil appeals challenging the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity's (APTEL) dismissal of appeals that upheld the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission's (CERC) orders directing Haryana utilities to pay supplementary bills for change‑in‑law adjustments. The disputes centered on whethe…
SELVAMANIversusTHE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
2024 INSC 3938 May 2024Dismissed
The appellant, one of five accused, was convicted for gang rape and criminal intimidation under Sections 376(g) and 506(1) of the IPC and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act. The victim, her mother and aunt turned hostile during cross‑examination, three and a half months after their exami…
SWACCH ASSOCIATION, NAGPURversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
2025 INSC 11997 October 2025Dismissed
The Swacch Association filed a public‑interest litigation alleging that Futala Tank in Nagpur was a wetland and that several constructions – a musical fountain, a viewer’s gallery, a parking plaza and an artificial banyan tree – were permanent structures violating the Wetlands (Conservation & Management) Rules, 2017. T…
MIHIR RAJESH SHAHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
2025 INSC 12886 November 2025Directions issued
The appellant, Mihir Rajesh Shah, was arrested for a fatal hit‑and‑run involving his BMW, but the police failed to provide him with a written copy of the grounds of arrest as required by Article 22(1) of the Constitution and Section 47 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court upheld the arrest de…
DEVENDRA KUMAR & ORS.versusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
2024 INSC 8416 November 2024Case Partly allowed
The appellants assaulted the deceased, Bahal, with lathis and an axe after threatening to kill him, during a land dispute that created prior enmity between the families. Bahal later died from head injuries, and the trial court convicted the appellants under Section 302 IPC and Section 307 read with Section 34, sentenci…
IN RE: T.N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPADversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 9966 August 2025Directions issued
The Supreme Court examined applications concerning the eco‑sensitive hill station of Matheran, Maharashtra, where heavy monsoon rains were causing soil erosion on the main access road and hand‑pulled carts were being used for transport. The petitioners sought permission to lay paver blocks on the Dasturi Naka–Shivaji M…
DRAVIDA MUNNETRA KAZHAGAMversusTHIRU. C. VE. SHANMUGAM
2025 INSC 9766 August 2025Disposed off
The Tamil Nadu government launched the "Ungaludan Stalin" welfare scheme, naming it after a living political leader. An opposition Member of Parliament filed a representation before the Election Commission under Clause 16A of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968, and subsequently a writ petition…
SIDDHI SANDEEP LADDAversusCONSORTIUM OF NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITIES AND ANOTHER
2025 INSC 7146 May 2025
The Supreme Court examined appeals challenging the High Court's order on six disputed Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) questions. It evaluated the correctness of answer keys for Questions 56 and 77, upheld the High Court's answer for Question 78, and found that Questions 88, 115 and 116 were either improperly framed or…
IN RE : T.N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPADversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2024 INSC 1786 March 2024Directions issued
The Supreme Court examined whether tiger safaris can be treated like zoos under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 and whether the proposed tiger safari at Pakhrau in Corbett Tiger Reserve was lawful. It held that a zoo, as defined in s.2(39), is an ex‑situ conservation establishment and tiger safaris, as envisioned b…
ABDUL NASSARversusSTATE OF KERALA & ANR.
2025 INSC 356 January 2025Dismissed
The appellant, Abdul Nassar, was convicted of raping and murdering a nine‑year‑old girl, offences punishable under Sections 376 and 302 of the IPC, and was sentenced to death. The prosecution relied on a series of circumstantial facts, forensic DNA evidence linking the appellant’s semen to the victim’s clothing, and te…
VANASHAKTIversusUNION OF INDIA
2025 INSC 9615 August 2025Case Partly allowed
The petition challenged the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change’s notification dated 29 January 2025 (S.O. 523(E)) and the accompanying Office Memorandum of 30 January 2025, which altered the regime of environmental clearance for building and construction projects under Entry 8(a) and 8(b) of the 2006 Sc…
SHAIL KUMARIversusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
2025 INSC 9365 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Shail Kumari was convicted under Section 302 IPC for allegedly drowning her two children after taking them to a pond. The trial court and the Chhattisgarh High Court upheld the conviction primarily on the testimony of a single eyewitness, PW‑2, while other potential witnesses were not examined. On appeal, the Supreme C…
NAEEMversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
2024 INSC 1695 March 2024
The deceased Shahin Parveen was set ablaze by her brother‑in‑law and his relatives, leading to her death. Her dying declaration, recorded at the District Hospital, identified the brother‑in‑law as the principal assailant and named his wife and brother as aides. The trial court and High Court convicted all three accused…
P.M. LOKANATH AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANOTHER
2025 INSC 2025 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, owners of a property in Bangalore, filed two civil suits to protect their possession and claim ownership. Respondent No.2, a rival heir, lodged an FIR under IPC sections 448 and 506 alleging threats by the appellants to withdraw the suits, leading to a criminal case. The appellants sought quashing of th…
KOUSIK DAS & ORS.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.
2025 INSC 4484 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The petitioners, who were in‑service elementary teachers as of 10 August 2017, completed an 18‑month Diploma in Elementary Education (D.El.Ed.) through NIOS under the NCTE’s ODL scheme and applied for recruitment under a 2022 West Bengal notification. The High Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Jaiveer S…
DARSHAN SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2024 INSC 194 January 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Darshan Singh, was convicted of murdering his wife, Amrik Kaur, under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC, based on the prosecution's claim that he and his paramour Rani Kaur administered aluminium phosphide poison. The trial and High Courts relied primarily on circumstantial evidence, especially the testimon…
KHALSA UNIVERSITY AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
2024 INSC 7513 October 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The Punjab government enacted the Khalsa University (Repeal) Act, 2017 to repeal the Khalsa University Act, 2016, singling out Khalsa University among sixteen private universities. The appellants challenged the repeal on the grounds that the Act arbitrarily discriminated against them and violated Article 14 of the Cons…
RAM KISHAN (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS ETC.versusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
2025 INSC 4413 April 2025Disposed off
The appellants, landowners in Dharuhera village, Haryana, challenged the compensation awarded for their lands acquired under a 2008 notification of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, arguing that it should be enhanced to match the higher compensation granted for adjoining villages (Malpura and Kapriwas) acquired under a l…
BALLU @ BALRAM @ BALMUKUND AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2024 INSC 2582 April 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were charged with murder and related offences under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the IPC for the death of Mahesh Sahu, allegedly due to a love‑relation dispute. The trial court acquitted them, finding that the prosecution's circumstantial evidence was unreliable, witnesses were inconsistent, and the chain…
THE STATE OF GOA & ANR.versusNAMITA TRIPATHI
2025 INSC 3062 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Goa filed a complaint alleging that the respondent's professional laundry service operated as a factory without a valid licence, violating the Factories Act, 1948. A Judicial Magistrate First Class issued summons on the basis of the complaint, but the High Court quashed the process, holding that dry‑cleani…
GODREJ PROJECTS DEVELOPMENT LIMITEDversusANIL KARLEKAR & ORS.
2025 INSC 1432 February 2025Case Partly allowed
The respondents booked an apartment with Godrej Projects and paid a 20% earnest money deposit as per the Apartment Buyer Agreement. After the developer offered possession in June 2017, the respondents cancelled the purchase citing a market recession and demanded a full refund of Rs.51,12,310 with interest. The NCDRC or…
KIRANversusRAJKUMAR JIVRAJ JAIN & ANR.
2025 INSC 10671 September 2025Disposed off
The case arose from an FIR filed by Kiran, a member of the Scheduled Caste ‘Mang’, alleging that Rajkumar Jain and others assaulted him, his mother and aunt with an iron rod, used caste‑based slurs and threatened to burn their house after he voted against a candidate. The accused sought anticipatory bail under Section …
THE STATE OF TELANGANA & ORS. ETC.versusKALLURI NAGA NARASIMHA ABHIRAM & ORS. ETC.
2025 INSC 10581 September 2025Disposed off
The State of Telangana and its agencies challenged the High Court's expansion of the definition of ‘local candidate’ under the Telangana Medical & Dental Colleges Admission Rules, 2017, arguing that the definition is prescribed by the Presidential Order issued under Article 371D and the 1983 Act and cannot be altered b…
MOHAMMED KHALID AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF TELANGANA
2024 INSC 1581 March 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were charged under Section 8(c) read with Section 20(b)(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act for allegedly transporting about 80 kg of ganja seized from a vehicle. The prosecution relied on a seizure panchnama, samples sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory, and confessions recorded by police officers, but failed to …
BERNARD FRANCIS JOSEPH VAZ AND OTHERSversusGOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 31 January 2025Disposed off
The appellants purchased residential plots in Bengaluru between 1995 and 1997, which were later acquired by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB) under a preliminary notification dated 29 January 2003. Although possession was taken in 2005, no compensation award was made until a Special Land Acquisit…
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHIversusGAGAN NARANG & ORS. ETC.
2025 INSC 21 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) sought approval from the Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (DERC) to conduct a tariff‑based competitive bidding for a 28 MW waste‑to‑energy (WTE) project at Narela Bawana, invoking Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The Waste to Energy Research & Technology Council c…
M/S NARESH POTTERIESversusM/S AARTI INDUSTRIES AND ANOTHER
2025 INSC 11 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
M/s Naresh Potteries (appellant) filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against M/s Aarti Industries (respondent No.1) for the dishonour of a cheque issued in the appellant's favour. The complaint was filed by the manager, Neeraj Kumar, who held a power of attorney from the sole proprieto…