YUMMAN ONGBI LEMBI LEIMAversusSTATE OF MANIPUR & ORS.
2012 INSC 24 January 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant's husband, Yumman Somendro, was arrested in January 2011 for murder and, while in police custody, was served with a detention order under the National Security Act (NSA) dated 31 January 2011, which was later confirmed by the Governor for twelve months. The order was based solely on the subjective satisfa…
HIMANSHU @ CHINTUversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI
2011 INSC 74 January 2011Dismissed
The case concerns the murder of Murari, for which Himanshu @ Chintu (A‑2) and Shesh Bahadur Pandey (A‑3) were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC. The appellants challenged the conviction on three grounds: (i) the FIR was lodged two hours after the incident, allegedly to falsely implicate them; …
DHARAM PAL AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P.
2008 INSC 114 January 2008Dismissed
The appellants were convicted of murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC for assaulting the deceased with lathis, causing fatal head injuries. On appeal, the High Court, assisted by a Government Advocate, re‑examined the record ex parte and altered the conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to m…
STATE OF U.P.versusPUNNI AND ORS.
2008 INSC 124 January 2008Dismissed
The State of Uttar Pradesh alleged that a gang of six persons assembled in a grove to commit dacoity and were arrested after a police operation that recovered unlicensed firearms. The trial court convicted them under IPC sections 399 and 402 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, relying on the testimony of two police witness…
RAJ KUMAR PRASAD TAMARKARversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.
2007 INSC 34 January 2007Appeal(s) allowed
The father of a deceased woman appealed against the High Court's acquittal of her husband, who was charged with murder under Section 302 IPC. The trial court had convicted the husband based on circumstantial evidence, a threatening letter (Exhibit 7) establishing motive, the recovery of a revolver with smoke, and the f…
GULZARversusSTATE OF M.P.
2007 INSC 74 January 2007Case Partly allowed
Gulzar was convicted of stealing an attache containing about Rs 55,000 from Vinod Kumar Aggarwal on a bus; the attache was later recovered from Gulzar’s possession but he could not explain the source of the money. The trial court sentenced him to three years’ rigorous imprisonment under Section 379 of the Indian Penal …
STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusRASHID BABUBHAI MULANI
2006 INSC 114 January 2006Appeal(s) allowed
Rashid Babubhai Mulani, a talathi, demanded Rs 1,000 to delete a mortgagee's name from revenue records; the complainant paid Rs 300 after a trap was laid. Mulani accepted the marked notes and later claimed the payment was repayment of a government loan, supported by a purported notice sent by registered post. The High …
KALLU @ MASIH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2006 INSC 124 January 2006Dismissed
On 5 July 1993, an unlawful assembly of twenty‑seven persons, armed with swords, spears and other weapons, attacked Sadruddin and four female members of his family at his house. The victim and several injured witnesses positively identified the four appellants as the assailants. The trial court acquitted all twenty‑sev…
R. JANAKIRAMANversusSTATE REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CBI, SPE, MADRAS
2006 INSC 134 January 2006Dismissed
The appellant, an Assistant Engineer of Southern Railway, was found with Rs.2,94,615 in cash during a CBI raid and was charged under Sections 5(1)(e) and 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for possessing assets disproportionate to his known income. He claimed the cash represented loans of Rs.2,50,000 from two mon…
RAJNEESH AGGARWALversusAMIT J. BHALLA
2001 INSC 54 January 2001Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Rajneesh Aggarwal, presented three cheques drawn on Bank of Baroda by Bhalla Techtran Industries Ltd. and signed by its director, Amit J. Bhalla. The cheques were dishonoured and the appellant served a notice to the director, demanding payment within 15 days. After no payment was made, a criminal complai…
OMKAR NAMDEO JADHAO AND ORS.versusSECOND ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE BULDANA AND ANR.
1996 INSC 194 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were served a notice under Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code for prosecution under Sections 194 and 195 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that they had fabricated a false case against two elderly women. The Sessions Judge relied on statements recorded under Section 161 CrPC and on the physical …
MUKHTIAR SINGH AND ANR. ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB ETC.
1995 INSC 64 January 1995Remitted to Lower Court
Eleven accused were tried before the Special Court, Ferozepur for murder and related offences under the IPC and Arms Act. The trial court convicted some and acquitted others but its judgment contained only conclusions without any discussion of evidence or reasons. Appeals were filed under Section 14 of the Terrorist Af…
KIRAN BEDI & ORS.versusCOMMITTEE OF INQUIRY & ANR.
1989 INSC 34 January 1989Rejected
The Supreme Court examined a petition by Kiran Bedi and Jinder Singh challenging orders of a Committee of Inquiry that compelled them to appear for cross‑examination at the outset of the inquiry and led to complaints against them under Section 178 of the IPC. The Committee had treated them differently from three other …
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusJAGAT RAM
2024 INSC 9523 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The CBI appealed a Punjab & Haryana High Court order that acquitted Jagat Ram, a public servant, on the ground that the sanction order authorising prosecution was not examined. The trial court had convicted him under Sections 7 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, based on evidence of a bribe demand and ac…
SUNIL TODI & ORS.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
2021 INSC 8233 December 2021Dismissed
The appellants, directors of a company, issued a post‑dated cheque as security for payment under a Power Supply Agreement, but the cheque was later presented and dishonoured after the company failed to pay for electricity supplied. A complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was filed, and the magis…
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusPANKAJ JAGSHI GANGAR
2021 INSC 8243 December 2021Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Maharashtra charged Pankaj Jagshi Gangar with offences under Sections 384, 386, 387 read with Section 34 of the IPC and under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) for running a matka business, funding an international gangster and being an active member of an organised crime syndicate. Th…
JAYANT ETC.versusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2020 INSC 6783 December 2020Disposed off
The private appellants were caught in a surprise inspection for illegal mining and were offered compounding of the offences under the Madhya Pradesh Minor Mineral Rules, which they accepted by paying a penalty. Subsequently, a magistrate, suo motu, exercised powers under Section 156(3) of the CrPC to direct registratio…
CHAMAN LALversusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
2020 INSC 6753 December 2020Dismissed
The appellant was charged with rape and criminal intimidation after a mentally retarded girl (IQ 62) became pregnant; DNA evidence established him as the child's biological father. The trial court acquitted him, citing the four‑month delay in filing the FIR and questioning the victim's mental capacity to understand con…
SUMEDH SINGH SAINIversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
2020 INSC 6793 December 2020Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a retired Director General of Police, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC after an FIR was lodged in 2020 by the brother of a deceased victim, alleging offences dating back to 1991, including murder under Section 302 IPC which was added later based on approvers' statements. The Session…
BHAWNA BAIversusGHANSHYAM AND OTHERS
2019 INSC 13133 December 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Bhawna Bai complained that her husband was found dead in the field of the first respondent, Ghanshyam, who allegedly prevented her from reaching the body. An FIR was eventually registered under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC and the trial court framed charges against the accused respondents. The…
DILBAG RAIversusTHE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
2018 INSC 11393 December 2018Disposed off
The appellant filed a complaint alleging that the respondent sold a property without title, inducing the appellant to pay Rs.10 lakh, leading to an FIR under sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 506 IPC. The High Court quashed the FIR under Section 482 of the CrPC, holding that the FIR did not show criminal intent. The…
STATE OF PUNJABversusRAKESH KUMAR
2018 INSC 11313 December 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The accused were apprehended with bulk quantities of manufactured narcotic drugs and were convicted under Sections 21 and 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The High Court, however, suspended their sentences under Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, holding that the matter shoul…
KANUBHAI BHAGVANBHAI NAYAKversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
2018 INSC 11303 December 2018Leave granted
Kanubhai Bhagvanbhai Nayak was convicted of murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code by a Sessions Court, and the Gujarat High Court affirmed the conviction. The appellant challenged the High Court's order, contending that it neither referenced nor evaluated the trial evidence nor recorded any findings on the …
OMVEER SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
2018 INSC 11343 December 2018Leave granted
Omveer Singh appealed to the Supreme Court after a Single Judge of the Allahabad High Court dismissed his application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a criminal complaint (Sections 498A, 323, 376 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act). The High Court judge relied sol…
DR. JAGDISH PRASAD & ORS.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
2018 INSC 11353 December 2018Leave granted
The appellants, Dr. Jagdish Prasad and others, filed a criminal complaint under IPC sections 498A and 323 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. They sought to quash the complaint and the proceedings by invoking Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Single Judge of the Allahabad High Court dismissed their applicat…
SANGEETA AGRAWAL & ORS.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
2018 INSC 11373 December 2018Leave granted
The appellants filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a charge sheet and criminal proceedings arising under IPC sections 498A, 304B and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The Single Judge of the Allahabad High Court dismissed the application without setting out the factual mat…
GEETA & ORS.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
2018 INSC 11383 December 2018Leave granted
Geeta and others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the FIR and proceedings under Section 498A of the IPC. The Single Judge of the Allahabad High Court dismissed the application, relying only on legal principles and without detailing the factual matrix of the case. Th…
ROSHINA TversusABDUL AZEEZ K.T. & ORS.
2018 INSC 11423 December 2018Leave granted
The dispute concerned possession of a flat in Kozhikode between private individuals Roshina T (appellant) and Abdul Azeez K.T. (respondent No.1). While a civil suit for injunction was pending, the respondent filed a writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the appellant to r…
KRISHAN LALversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.
2012 INSC 5543 December 2012Disposed off
Krishan Lal was convicted of murder and originally sentenced to death, which was later commuted to life imprisonment. The Supreme Court, in Subash Chander v. Krishan Lal (2001), held that his life sentence meant imprisonment for the rest of his life, precluding any commutation or premature release under Section 401 of …
NATIONAL BANK OF OMANversusBARAKARA ABDUL AZIZ & ANR.
2012 INSC 5563 December 2012Disposed off
The National Bank of Oman filed a private complaint in the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM), Ahmednagar, alleging that Barakara Abdul Aziz cheated the bank of AED 43,15,000. The CJM issued process under IPC sections 418 and 420 without first conducting an enquiry or ordering an investigation as required by …
N.V. SUBBA RAOversusSTATE, THROUGH INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CBI/SPE,VISAKHAPATNAM, A.P.
2012 INSC 5603 December 2012Dismissed
The case involved a bank manager (A‑1) and a private firm proprietor (A‑2) who were accused of conspiring to defraud the Central Bank of India by sanctioning loans without obtaining mandatory undertaking letters, bypassing pre‑inspection requirements, and crediting the proceeds to A‑2’s account. The prosecution present…
K.H. SHEKARAPPA & OTHERSversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2009 INSC 12823 December 2009Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined the case of seven police constables and one additional constable (appellants) accused of beating five suspects in police custody, resulting in two deaths and injuries to three others. The prosecution presented ocular testimony, extensive medical evidence, and the testimony of a hostile witnes…
GOBIND SINGHversusKRISHNA SINGH AND ORS.
2008 INSC 13903 December 2008Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined appeals against a Patna High Court order that had confirmed a death sentence awarded to Krishna Singh for murder under Sections 302 and 149 of the IPC. The appellants contended that the High Court’s findings were based on conjecture, particularly questioning the credibility of two eye‑witness…
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusBABULAL
2007 INSC 12153 December 2007Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Madhya Pradesh prosecuted Babulal for raping a married woman in broad daylight, threatening her with a knife. The trial court convicted him under Section 376(1) IPC and sentenced him to seven years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs.2,500. The High Court reduced the sentence to the two months already…
SAIKOU JABBIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2003 INSC 6873 December 2003Dismissed
Saikou Jabi, a Gambian national, was intercepted at Bombay airport with approximately 1 kg of heroin concealed in a suitcase. The baggage was screened on an X‑ray machine and the contraband was recovered from the suitcase, not from a personal search of Jabi. He was charged under Sections 21, 23, 28 and 29 of the NDPS A…
N. NATARAJANversusB.K. SUBBA RAO
2002 INSC 5073 December 2002Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent filed an application under Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code before a Designated Court, alleging that the appellant, the Chief Public Prosecutor, had made contradictory submissions in the Bombay blast case, potentially amounting to fabrication of evidence. The Designated Judge held that the resp…
R.K. KRISHNA KUMARversusSTATE OF ASSAM AND ORS.
1997 INSC 7863 December 1997Disposed off
The appellants, senior officers of Tata Tea Company, were alleged to have negotiated with ULFA militants and funded their activities, leading to an FIR under IPC sections 120‑B, 121, 121‑A, 122 and UAPA sections 10 and 13. Anticipatory bail applications were filed under CrPC section 438; the Bombay High Court granted b…
S. KALEESWARANversusSTATE BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE POLLACHI TOWN EAST POLICE STATION, COIMBATORE DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU
2022 INSC 11573 November 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were convicted for a conspiracy to commit dacoity, murder and related offences involving the theft and sale of a car, based largely on circumstantial evidence. The prosecution's case hinged on an alleged extra‑judicial confession, the "last seen together" testimony of two taxi drivers recorded six months…
MOHD. ARIF @ ASHFAQversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI)
2022 INSC 11563 November 2022Dismissed
The case concerns a review of the death sentence awarded to Mohd. Arif alias Ashfaq for the 2000 Lal Quila firing that killed three army jawans. The petitioner challenged the conviction on four grounds: the admissibility of call data records (CDRs) without a Section 65B certificate, the validity of his disclosure state…
RAJESH @ SARKARI & ANRversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2020 INSC 6283 November 2020Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants Rajesh alias Sarkari and Ajay Hooda were convicted for murder under IPC s.302 r/w s.34 based on the testimony of the victim's father (PW‑4) and brother (PW‑5) who claimed to have witnessed the shooting and taken the victim to the hospital. The Supreme Court examined inconsistencies in their statements, n…
SENIOR MANAGER (P&D), RIICO LTD.versusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.
2017 INSC 10743 November 2017Dismissed
The appellant, a senior manager of RIICO Ltd., filed an FIR alleging that a letter dated 10‑04‑1992, addressed to Respondent No.2, was forged and that the forgery constituted offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471. The police final report, relying on Section 195(1)(b)(ii) of the CrPC, held that investigation…
CHAND DEVI DAGA & ORS.versusMANJU K. HUMATANI & ORS.
2017 INSC 10733 November 2017Dismissed
The original complainant, Smt. Chandra Narayan Das, filed a criminal complaint alleging offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B, 201 and 34 IPC. The complaint was dismissed by the magistrate and a subsequent criminal revision was also rejected. While a criminal miscellaneous petition was pending before the Hig…
PARVINDERJIT SINGH AND ANR.versusSTATE (U.T. CHANDIGARH) AND ANR.
2008 INSC 12323 November 2008Disposed off
The appellants, employees of Citibank/CWA, were implicated in an FIR alleging fraud under Sections 406, 420 and 120B IPC. They sought quashing of the FIR and anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C., arguing that the allegations were civil in nature and that they would cooperate with the investigation. The Hi…
SMT. SHAMSHAD BEGUMversusB. MOHAMMED
2008 INSC 12333 November 2008Dismissed
The appellant, accused of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash proceedings in the Mangalore court, arguing that the court lacked jurisdiction because the constituent acts of the offence occurred in different places (Bangalore and…
SHANTI KUMAR PANDAversusSHAKUNTALA DEVI
2003 INSC 5963 November 2003Dismissed
The appellant, Shanti Kumar Panda, obtained a preliminary order and attachment of a shop under Sections 145 and 146 of the CrPC, while the real possessor, Shakuntala Devi, was not impleaded and was denied a hearing. The civil judge later granted her an ad‑interim injunction restraining the appellant from disturbing her…
SMT. KULDIP KAURversusSURINDER SINGH AND ANR.
1988 INSC 3423 November 1988Case Allowed
The Supreme Court considered an appeal by Smt. Kuldeep Kaur, who had been awarded maintenance for herself and her child under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The husband, respondent No.1, failed to pay the ordered amount, accruing arrears of Rs.5,090. While executing the maintenance order, the magi…
BALWANT KAURversusUNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH
1987 INSC 3073 November 1987Appeal(s) allowed
Balwant Kaur was convicted for the murder of her husband, Pritam Singh, based primarily on the testimony of co‑accused Ram Sarup, who turned approver. The prosecution alleged that Kaur conspired with Nand Singh and Sarup to murder her husband and that she had urged them to do so. The Supreme Court examined whether the …
GULAM ABBAS & ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.
1981 INSC 1883 November 1981Case Allowed
The Supreme Court examined a writ petition filed under Article 32 by the Shia community of Mohalla Doshipura, Varanasi, seeking enforcement of their customary rights to perform religious rites on nine specific plots and structures, rights previously affirmed by civil courts and Wakf registrations. The petition challeng…
RAMA DEVIversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS
2024 INSC 7553 October 2024Case Partly allowed
The case concerns the murder of MLA Brij Bihari Prasad and his bodyguard Lakshmeshwar Sahu at IGIMS Hospital in 1998. The trial court convicted several accused, but the Patna High Court acquitted all, prompting appeals by the State (through the CBI) and the victim's wife, Rama Devi. The Supreme Court examined the credi…
TARINA SENversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2024 INSC 7523 October 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, two women related to a co‑accused, were charged under Sections 120‑B, 420, 468 and 471 of the IPC and Sections 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for alleged loan fraud involving a bank. The borrowers later entered into a One‑Time Settlement with the bank, paid the full amount …
K. BHARTHI DEVI AND ANR.versusSTATE OF TELANGANA AND ANR.
2024 INSC 7503 October 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, who were wives of borrowers, were charged by the CBI under sections of the IPC and the Prevention of Corruption Act for alleged fraud in a bank loan. The borrowers had settled the entire debt through a One Time Settlement and the bank closed the loan account, obtaining a No Dues Certificate. The appella…
PANKAJ BANSALversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2023 INSC 8663 October 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, Pankaj Bansal and Basant Bansal, were arrested by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) under Section 19(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) after being summoned in connection with two Enforcement Case Information Reports (ECIRs). They had earlier obtained anticipatory bail for the firs…
ISHWARI LAL YADAVversusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
2019 INSC 11153 October 2019Disposed off
The case involved the gruesome murder of a two‑year‑old boy, Chirag, whose body was discovered in two parts inside the house of the main accused, Ishwari Lal Yadav and Kiran Bai, who claimed to be tantriks. The accused confessed to killing the child as a human sacrifice, and the confession was corroborated by independe…
RAVISHANKAR @ BABA VISHWAKARMAversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2019 INSC 11163 October 2019Case Partly allowed
The appellant was convicted of kidnapping, raping and murdering a 13‑year‑old girl and of destroying her body. The prosecution proved the case through a chain of circumstantial evidence corroborated by DNA, medical and forensic findings, including a slipper belonging to the victim recovered from the accused. The trial …
RAVI S/O ASHOK GHUMAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2019 INSC 11143 October 2019Disposed off
The appellant was found with a two‑year‑old girl under his bed after the child went missing; medical, eye‑witness, circumstantial and Y‑STR DNA evidence established that he kidnapped, raped (vaginal and unnatural intercourse) and murdered the child. The trial court and High Court convicted him under IPC sections 302, 3…
B.A. UMESHversusREGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
2016 INSC 12043 October 2016Disposed off
B.A. Umesh, an ex‑police constable, was convicted of murder, rape and robbery and sentenced to death by the Sessions Court, a decision affirmed by the Karnataka High Court and the Supreme Court. He filed review petitions contending that the trial court had not fixed a separate date for hearing on sentencing, alleging a…
RE- INHUMAN CONDITIONS IN 1382 PRISONS (JI)versus.
2017 INSC 9553 October 2016Directions issued
The Supreme Court examined a writ petition highlighting severe overcrowding in 1,382 Indian prisons, with occupancy exceeding 150% of permissible limits, and the failure of prison authorities to implement earlier court directions. The Court noted the absence of a juvenile custody manual under the Juvenile Justice (Care…
JOSE @ PAPPACHANversusTHE SUB-LNSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOYILANDY & ANOTHER
2016 INSC 9413 October 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Jose @ Pappachan, was convicted under IPC s.302 for the death of his wife, Neena, alleged to be a homicide by strangulation and hanging, while also being acquitted of IPC s.498A. The prosecution relied on circumstantial testimony of three witnesses and a post‑mortem report that was inconclusive about hom…
BENSONversusSTATE OF KERALA
2016 INSC 9443 October 2016Case Partly allowed
The appellant, Benson, was convicted in twelve separate theft cases under Sections 379 and 414 of the IPC, each tried and sentenced individually. He petitioned for the subsequent sentences to run concurrently with the sentence already being served (Crime No.8). The Supreme Court examined Section 427(1) of the Criminal …
VIKAS YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. ETC. ETC.
2016 INSC 9433 October 2016Disposed off
The appellants Vikas Yadav, Vishal Yadav and Sukhdev Yadav were convicted of murder, kidnapping and related offences (IPC ss.302, 364, 34, 201) and sentenced to life imprisonment with additional fixed‑term sentences. The State appealed for enhancement of the life sentence to death; the High Court instead imposed a fixe…
C.R. PATILversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
2008 INSC 11233 October 2008Case Partly allowed
The appellant, a director of a construction firm, had obtained a large loan from a bank that later went into liquidation. The bank filed a liquidation suit and criminal proceedings for default. The appellant was granted temporary bail with conditions, but the High Court later vacated the bail and re‑imprisoned him. The…
BABLOO PASIversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND & ANR.
2008 INSC 11243 October 2008Appeal(s) allowed
Rajesh Mahatha was arrested for offences under Sections 304B and 306 of the IPC and claimed to be a juvenile, seeking protection under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000. The Juvenile Justice Board, after obtaining a medical board opinion that his age was between 17‑18 years and noting a v…
UNION OF INDIAversusPADAM NARAIN AGGARWAL ETC
2008 INSC 11253 October 2008Case Partly allowed
The Union of India initiated customs proceedings against Padam Narain Agarwal and others for alleged export fraud, issuing summons under Section 108 of the Customs Act to record their statements. The respondents, refusing to cooperate, were later charged with offences under Sections 174 and 175 of the IPC, and they app…
SANGHI BROTHERS (INDORE) PVT. LTD.versusSANJAY CHOUDHARY AND ORS.
2008 INSC 11263 October 2008Appeal(s) allowed
Sanghi Brothers (Indore) Pvt Ltd filed a complaint alleging that the directors of Chetak Construction Ltd had taken vehicles on lease and later sold eight of them, constituting cheating and criminal breach of trust under IPC sections 420 and 406 read with section 34. The trial magistrate framed charges, but the Madhya …
STATE OF A.P.versusP. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
2008 INSC 11203 October 2008Case Partly allowed
The respondent, a Development Officer of the Andhra Pradesh Khadi and Village Industries Board, was caught demanding and receiving a Rs.500 bribe from a loan applicant (PW‑1) to revive a lapsed loan. The trial court convicted him under Sections 13(2) and 13(1)(d)(i) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, sentencing…
STATE OF U.PversusRAM BALAK AND ANR.
2008 INSC 11273 October 2008Dismissed
The State of Uttar Pradesh charged Ram Balak and another with the rape and murder of a 14‑year‑old girl, invoking IPC sections 376, 302 and 201. The trial court convicted them on the basis of five circumstantial points, including a dog‑tracking lead and an alleged extra‑judicial confession, and sentenced them to death,…
RUKMINI NARVEKARversusVIJAYA SATARDEKAR & ORS.
2008 INSC 11313 October 2008Disposed off
The appellant Rukmini Narvekar filed a criminal complaint alleging that advocate Ranjit Satardekar fraudulently obtained her signature on a Power of Attorney and used it to sell her property to his wife Vijaya Satardekar. The High Court quashed the criminal proceedings against both accused, relying on evidence from a r…
BANK OF RAJASTHANversusKESHAV BANGUR AND ANR.
2007 INSC 9993 October 2007Disposed off
The Bank of Rajasthan alleged that the Bangur group siphoned its funds, prompting a CBI inquiry and the registration of sixteen FIRs. Concurrently, the Alipore Police registered FIR No.138/2001 against the Bangurs, which was later closed because the investigation was transferred to the CBI. The respondents filed revisi…
STATE OF M.P.versusBALA @ BALARAM
2005 INSC 4643 October 2005Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed a High Court order that reduced the conviction of Bala for rape (under IPC s.376(2)(g)) from the statutory minimum of ten years' rigorous imprisonment to the nine‑month period already served. The Supreme Court examined whether the High Court could lawfully depart from the minimum pu…
BHARATBHAI @ JIMI PREMCHANDBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
2002 INSC 4233 October 2002Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined appeals by several accused convicted under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) for murder and related offences. Their convictions were based primarily on confessional statements recorded by a Superintendent of Police under Section 15 of TADA, but the officer failed…
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESHversusBIMAL KRISHNA KUNDU AND ANR.
1997 INSC 6853 October 1997Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Andhra Pradesh prosecuted Bimal Krishna Kundu and his son for conspiring to leak Public Service Commission examination question papers, alleging they used dummy firms to obtain printing contracts and printed the papers at their own press. Despite being blacklisted in 1994, the alleged leakage continued, le…
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA ETC. ETC
1991 INSC 2503 October 1991Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the court‑assisted settlement of the Bhopal gas‑leak disaster claims, where Union Carbide Corporation (UCC) agreed to pay $470 million and all civil and criminal proceedings were to be terminated. The Court held that under Article 142 of the Constitution it had jurisdiction to withdraw the ma…
RANJEET MITTALversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR. ETC. ETC.
2024 INSC 7663 September 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased Anjali Agarwal was found dead after allegedly falling from the terrace of her matrimonial home. The trial court framed charges against her husband and in‑laws under sections 498‑A, 306, 302 and 201 IPC read with section 34, alleging abetment to suicide and murder. The High Court quashed these charges, hold…
G H MANJIT SINGHversusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB
2019 INSC 9923 September 2019Dismissed
The case arose from a violent incident on 03‑03‑2001 at the Barnala Court Complex where seven accused, including Manjit Singh and Sukhwinder Singh, attacked members of a complainant party, causing grievous injuries and the death of Dalip Singh. The prosecution relied primarily on the testimony of two injured eye‑witnes…
PREMPALversusSTATF. OF HARYANA
2014 INSC 5933 September 2014Dismissed
The appellant Prempal was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for allegedly grappling his sister‑in‑law Anita, pouring kerosene on her and setting her ablaze. The conviction rested primarily on Anita's dying declaration recorded by a Tehsildar after a medical officer certified her fitness to testify, despite her …
SHAHID BALWAversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
2013 INSC 5863 September 2013Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined whether its own orders dated 11 April 2011 and 9 November 2012, issued under Articles 136 and 142 while monitoring the 2G spectrum scam investigation, could be recalled. The petitioners argued that the orders infringed their right to approach the High Courts under Articles 226, 227 and Sectio…
STATE OF WEST BENGALversusSHYAMADAS BANERJEE & ANOTHER
2008 INSC 10093 September 2008Dismissed
The case concerned Shyamadas Banerjee, a sitting MLA who was alleged to have forged medical bills in 1999. Although the offence was committed while he was an MLA, he ceased to be a member of the State Legislature in July 2000, long before a charge‑sheet was filed in 2003 and cognizance was taken by a Special Judge unde…
DHARMINDERversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
2002 INSC 3593 September 2002Dismissed
The case arose from a violent incident in which the deceased, Laiq Ram, fired a gun at the accused Durga Nand while trying to rescue his son, after which the accused seized the gun and inflicted fatal injuries on the deceased. The appellants Dharminder and Durga Nand were convicted under Sections 302/34, 307/34 and 323…
MOHD. KHALIDversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL
2002 INSC 3583 September 2002Dismissed
The case arose from a bomb blast in Bow Bazar, Calcutta, which demolished a building, killed 69 people and injured many others. The prosecution alleged that the accused conspired to manufacture and explode bombs to terrorise the public and disrupt communal harmony, charging them under Sections 1208, 302, 307, 326, 436 …
BODH RAJ @ BODHA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
2002 INSC 3603 September 2002Dismissed
The accused Bodh Raj and others were charged with murder of a moneylender under IPC sections 302 and 120B, alleging a conspiracy motivated by a large loan. The trial court convicted three of the accused and acquitted six, while the Jammu & Kashmir High Court set aside the acquittals of four and convicted them as well. …
JAGBIR AND ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB
1998 INSC 3463 September 1998Case Allowed
The police filed a report under Section 190(1)(b) CrPC and the trial court acquitted all accused. The complainant, Birbal, appealed to the High Court under Section 378(4) after obtaining leave, and the High Court convicted two of the appellants. The appellants challenged this conviction before the Supreme Court under S…
MANSUKHLAL VITHALDAS CHAUHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
1997 INSC 6373 September 1997Appeal(s) allowed
M.V. Chauhan, a Divisional Accountant, was caught in a trap involving anthracene‑treated currency notes and was prosecuted under Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 and Section 161 IPC. The Gujarat High Court, on a writ petition, directed the Secretary of the Vigilance Commission to grant sanction fo…
STATE OF KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA POLICEversusS. SUBBEGOWDA
2023 INSC 6693 August 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Karnataka Lokayukta Police appealed against the Karnataka High Court’s order that discharged S. Subbegowda, an executive engineer, from charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The respondent had faced a charge of amassing disproportionate wealth and the prosecution had examined 17 witnesses a…
N.S. NANDIESHA REDDYversusKAVITHA MAHESH
2021 INSC 3743 August 2021Disposed off
The Karnataka High Court had declared the election of N.S. Nandiesha Reddy void under Section 100(1)(c) of the Representation of People’s Act, 1951, and ordered the Registrar General to lodge a criminal complaint against Returning Officer Ashok Mensinkai under Section 193 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly giving f…
THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORSversusRAJ KUMAR @ BITTU
2021 INSC 3773 August 2021Disposed off
The State of Haryana challenged a High Court order directing the State to draft a fresh remission policy under Article 161 and to apply the 2008 policy for premature release of Raj Kumar, who had served 12 years and 25 days of a life sentence. The Supreme Court examined the interplay between the constitutional power of…
DAYAL SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF UTTARANCHAL
2012 INSC 3173 August 2012Dismissed
The appellants were convicted for the murder of Pyara Singh, who died after being assaulted with lathis by four accused. The trial hinged on the testimony of three eye‑witnesses, including the victim's son and wife, while the post‑mortem report prepared by the government medical officer (PW3) claimed no injuries and fa…
STATE TR. P.S. LODHI COLONY, NEW DELHIversusSANJEEV NANDA
2012 INSC 3203 August 2012Case Partly allowed
The appellant State prosecuted Sanjeev Nanda for a 1999 hit‑and‑run accident in which six persons died and one was injured after he, allegedly under the influence of alcohol, drove a BMW at high speed and fled the scene. The trial court convicted him under Section 304(II) IPC (culpable homicide not amounting to murder)…
VIJAY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.
2011 INSC 5423 August 2011Disposed off
Vijay Kumar, the father of Ruchi Saxena, filed a complaint alleging that officials of the Nagar Palika demanded a bribe to settle a land dispute. Two officials were arrested and tried under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The accused sought to summon Ruchi Saxena as a court witness under Section 311 of the Code…
M/S. KAPIL COREPACKS PVT. LTD. & ORS.versusSHRI HARBANS LAL (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS.
2010 INSC 4673 August 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The plaintiff sued Kapil Corepacks Pvt Ltd and others for recovery, alleging that the defendants had executed a sale agreement that was later claimed to be a forged document. The defendants filed a criminal complaint alleging forgery and denied signing the agreement. The trial court examined the managing director under…
AMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN
2010 INSC 4683 August 2010Disposed off
Amar Singh was convicted under Sections 498A and 3048 IPC for the dowry death of his wife, who died in a fire within ten months of marriage. The prosecution proved that the husband had repeatedly taunted the wife for not providing a scooter or Rs.25,000, establishing harassment in connection with a dowry demand shortly…
BHIARU RAM AND ORS.versusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND ORS.
2010 INSC 4703 August 2010Dismissed
The petitioners, accused in a CBI case under the Prevention of Corruption Act for abetting the possession of disproportionate assets by a senior income‑tax officer, filed a transfer petition under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to move the trial from the Special Court, CBI, Greater Mumbai to a Sp…
STATE OF U.P.versusKRISHNA MASTER & ORS.
2010 INSC 4713 August 2010Disposed off
The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed against the Allahabad High Court’s acquittal of Krishna Master and two others for the homicide of six persons. The trial court had convicted them under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC and imposed death sentences, which the High Court set aside. The Supreme Court examined the reliabili…
DEEPAK SINGCHIversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR.
2007 INSC 8093 August 2007Disposed off
The appellant, an informant, reported that his brother was murdered and the accused were charged with the crime. The accused applied for bail, which was rejected by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate and the Additional Sessions Judge, but the Rajasthan High Court later granted bail without recording any reasons. …
KHANJAN PALversusSTATE OF U.P.
1990 INSC 2193 August 1990Appeal(s) allowed
Khanjan Pal was accused of stabbing his co‑worker Deep Singh to death in a factory. The trial court acquitted him, discarding eye‑witness testimony and finding reasonable doubt. On appeal, the Allahabad High Court accepted the witnesses, found Pal responsible for the death, and convicted him under Section 302 IPC (murd…
KEHAR SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE (DELHI ADMN.)
1988 INSC 2003 August 1988Disposed off
The case arises from the assassination of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi on October 31, 1984, by her security guards Beant Singh and Satwant Singh. The trial was held in Tihar Jail pursuant to a High Court notification. The Supreme Court considered whether the trial in jail violated the right to open public trial, whethe…
SURENDER SINGHversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI)
2024 INSC 4623 July 2024Dismissed
The appellant, a police guard, was convicted of murder and attempted murder for shooting a man inside a Delhi police station, motivated by the victim's alleged affair with the appellant's wife. The prosecution presented multiple eye‑witnesses, forensic evidence of close‑range gunshots, and a post‑mortem report showing …
JAVED GULAM NABI SHAIKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
2024 INSC 6453 July 2024Appeal(s) allowed
Javed Gulam Nabi Shaikh was arrested in February 2020 with a large consignment of counterfeit currency and charged under Sections 489B, 489C, 120B read with 34 of the IPC and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. The investigation was taken over by the NIA and, after four years of custody, the trial court had…
UGGARSAINversusTHE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
2023 INSC 5873 July 2023Case Partly allowed
Eight persons were convicted for the death of Subhash and injuries to others, originally under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment plus additional terms. The High Court reduced the murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder (Section 304 Part II) and, relyi…
INDOFIL INDUSTRIES LTD. AND ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2017 INSC 5853 July 2017Dismissed
Indofil Industries Ltd. and others were prosecuted under the Insecticides Act for a misbranded insecticide and sought to quash the criminal complaint, contending that the spare sample had been sent to the Central Insecticides Laboratory (CIL) before any proceedings, violating Section 22(6)(ii) and depriving them of the…
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusANOOP SINGH
2015 INSC 4773 July 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Madhya Pradesh prosecuted Anoop Singh for kidnapping, assault and rape of a girl, alleging she was under 16 years old at the time of the offence. The trial court convicted Singh based on the girl’s birth certificate and middle‑school examination certificate, despite a two‑day discrepancy between them, and …
SANTOSH KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2014 INSC 4653 July 2014Case Partly allowed
Santosh Kumar Singh, a 26‑year‑old tutor, entered the home of his employers, assaulted the mother, son and daughters with an iron hammer, and looted jewellery and cash, resulting in the deaths of the mother and son. He was convicted under IPC sections 302, 307, 394, 397 and 450 and sentenced to death, with additional l…
MANNAN SK & ORS.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR.
2014 INSC 4663 July 2014Dismissed
In 1992 a bomb attack resulted in the death of Rupchand Sk, whose statement at the scene was recorded by the investigating officer (PW15) but not entered into evidence. The prosecution later sought, under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to recall PW15 to record this statement; the trial court rejected th…
NANA KESHAV LAGADversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2013 INSC 4293 July 2013Dismissed
The case arose from a land‑use dispute in Lagadwadi village where the accused assaulted the complainant (PW4) and his father with a cycle chain and stones, causing the father's death. The trial court convicted the accused under Sections 302 and 324 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, relying on the testimony…
KASHI VISHWANATHversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2013 INSC 4303 July 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Kashi Vishwanath, was convicted under Sections 498A and 302 read with 34 of the IPC for the death of his wife, who died from burn injuries. The prosecution's case rested on three dying declarations (Ex.P.12, Ex.P.22, Ex.P.29) that were recorded in Kannada despite the victim speaking only Telugu, and whic…
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHversusJAI CHAND
2013 INSC 4313 July 2013
The State of Himachal Pradesh prosecuted Jai Chand and two others for the murder of his wife under Sections 302, 34 and 498‑A IPC. The trial court convicted Jai Chand, but the Himachal Pradesh High Court acquitted him, rejecting the post‑mortem doctor’s testimony and other material witnesses. On appeal, the Supreme Cou…
RANJIT SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2013 INSC 4263 July 2013Disposed off
The appellant, Ranjit Singh, was convicted for the dowry death of his wife Jaswinder Kaur, who was found dead within four months of marriage. The prosecution proved that the deceased had been subjected to repeated harassment and demands for dowry, including a Maruti car, by the appellant and his in‑laws, leading to her…
UNION OF INDIAversusMOHANLAL & ANR.
2012 INSC 2673 July 2012
The Union of India appealed the acquittal of Mohanlal and another by the Madhya Pradesh High Court, which had held that the prosecution failed to prove the destruction of 3.36 kg of opium seized under Sections 8/18(b) read with 29 of the NDPS Act. The Supreme Court examined whether the lack of proof of destruction inva…
R. MOHANversusA.K. VIJAYA KUMAR
2012 INSC 2613 July 2012Disposed off
The accused R. Mohan was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque without sufficient funds and was sentenced to three months' simple imprisonment and ordered to pay Rs.5 lakh compensation to the complainant A.K. Vijaya Kumar under Section 357(3) of the CrPC, with an additional …
VINOD DUAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2021 INSC 3043 June 2021Case Partly allowed
Renowned journalist Vinod Dua was charged under sections 124A, 505(1)(b), 501, 268 of the IPC, sections 52 and 54 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005 and section 188 of the IPC for remarks made in a YouTube talk‑show about the COVID‑19 pandemic and alleged political use of the crisis. He filed a writ petition under Ar…
SOMASUNDARAM @ SOMUversusTHE STATE REP. BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
2020 INSC 4123 June 2020Disposed off
The case concerns the abduction, extortion and murder of former MLA M.K. Balan, whose body was cremated under a fictitious name. The prosecution relied on extensive circumstantial evidence, the testimony of two accomplices (PW10 and PW11), recoveries of vehicles, a false death certificate, and statements recorded under…
SATISH SHETTYversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2016 INSC 4363 June 2016Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined the appeal of Satish Shetty, convicted under IPC sections 498A (cruelty) and 306 (abetment of suicide) for the death of his wife, who had left a ten‑month‑old son and was twenty weeks pregnant. The High Court had set aside the trial court’s acquittal, invoking the presumption under Evidence A…
DR. RINI JOHAR & ANR.versusSTATE OF M.P. & ORS.
2016 INSC 4413 June 2016Case Allowed
Dr. Rini Johar, a doctor, and a senior advocate were arrested in November 2012 on a FIR alleging fraud under IPC sections 420 and 34 and the Information Technology Act. The arrest was carried out without complying with Sections 41 and 41‑A of the CrPC, nor the D.K. Basu guidelines, and the petitioners were taken to Bho…
ACHIN GUPTAversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR.
2024 INSC 3693 May 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Achin Gupta, was the sole accused in a chargesheet under IPC sections 323, 406, 498A and 506 arising from an FIR filed by his wife alleging dowry demands and cruelty. The FIR was lodged in April 2021, more than two years after the husband had filed a divorce petition and after the wife’s mother filed a d…
ANEESversusTHE STATE GOVT. OF NCT
2024 INSC 3683 May 2024Dismissed
The appellant was convicted of murdering his wife inside their home, where their five‑year‑old daughter also lived. The prosecution relied on forensic evidence, the appellant's blood‑stained clothes, and his conduct in leading police to the weapon, while the defence claimed unknown intruders were responsible. The key l…
ALAUDDIN & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF ASSAM & ANR.
2024 INSC 3763 May 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the IPC for the murder of Sahabuddin Choudhury. They challenged the convictions on the ground that the prosecution witnesses' statements contained material omissions and contradictions, and that the "last seen together" theory and motive were not …
PEETHAMBARANversusSTATE OF KERALA & ANR.
2023 INSC 4813 May 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Peethambaran, was charged under Section 420 IPC for allegedly cheating persons by promising jobs in exchange for money. The FIR led to two police final reports: the first concluded the case was false due to lack of evidence, while the second recorded a further investigation ordered by the District Police…
VASANTA SAMPAT DUPAREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2017 INSC 4363 May 2017Dismissed
The petitioners, Vasanta Sampat Dupare, were convicted of raping and murdering a four‑year‑old girl and sentenced to death. They sought review, arguing that the trial court violated Section 235(2) of the CrPC by not granting a separate hearing on sentencing, that the State failed to discharge its burden under Bachan Si…
MANGA @ MAN SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND
2013 INSC 3023 May 2013Dismissed
The appellants, a group of fifteen men, were convicted for firing on the complainant's family, causing two deaths and multiple injuries, under Sections 147, 148, 302, 307 read with Section 149 of the IPC. They challenged the convictions on grounds of alleged delay in lodging the FIR and forwarding the express report to…
MADHAO AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
2013 INSC 3053 May 2013Dismissed
The Government of Maharashtra framed a scheme to purchase land and allocate it to Scheduled Castes and neo‑Buddhists below the poverty line. While implementing the scheme, the appellant officials executed sale deeds in favour of the Government. A social worker filed a criminal complaint alleging that the land had been …
BHAIKON @ BAKUL BORAHversusSTATE OF ASSAM
2013 INSC 3063 May 2013Dismissed
The appellant, Bhaikon @ Bakul Borah, was convicted of rape (IPC s.376) and murder (IPC s.302) of Rupamoni Dutta based on the testimony of an eye‑witness (PW‑1) corroborated by the victim's father (PW‑2) and the post‑mortem doctor (PW‑9). The trial court sentenced him to death for murder and life imprisonment for rape;…
VIDYA DHAR & ORS.versusMULTI SCREEN MEDIA PVT. LTD.
2013 INSC 3013 May 2013Dismissed
Three petitioners convicted in the Junior Basic Trained (JBT) teachers recruitment scam appealed their convictions before the Delhi High Court. While the appeal was pending, the respondent, a television producer, sought to broadcast a dramatized episode of "Crime Patrol Dastak" depicting the scam. The petitioners obtai…
MD. ISHAQUE AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS
2013 INSC 3073 May 2013Disposed off
The case concerned a mob assault on 5 July 1983 in Siktahar village, where 200‑250 persons, including the accused, forced people out of their houses and attacked them with sharp and blunt weapons, resulting in one death and serious injuries to three others. The trial court convicted the appellants under Section 302 IPC…
ANKUSH SHIVAJI GAIKWADversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2013 INSC 3093 May 2013Disposed off
Ankush Shivaji Gaikwad and two others were convicted of murder for the death of Nilkanth Pawar after a sudden quarrel over a barking dog, during which Gaikwad struck the victim on the head with an iron pipe. The appellant argued that the incident was a sudden fight without pre‑meditation and that Exception 4 to Section…
ARJUNversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2012 INSC 1993 May 2012Disposed off
The appellant, Arjun, was convicted of murder (s.302 IPC) and causing grievous hurt (s.326 IPC) after he attacked Jagannath and his family during a property dispute, using a large knife to inflict fatal head injuries on the deceased and injuries on the deceased's wife. The appellant claimed he acted in private defence,…
KRISHNA KUMAR VARIARversusSHARE SHOPPE
2010 INSC 2633 May 2010Appeal(s) allowed
Krishna Kumar Variar, accused under Sections 415 and 420 IPC, was summoned by a Delhi court. He contended that only a Bombay court had jurisdiction and filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC in the Delhi High Court, which dismissed his challenge. On appeal, the Supreme Court held that an accused must first appr…
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusHOPESON NINGSHEN & ORS.
2010 INSC 2593 May 2010Disposed off
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) sought transfer of two kidnapping‑murder cases involving an NSCN (IM) activist from the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court in Ukhrul, Manipur to a CBI‑court in Delhi under Section 406 of the CrPC. The incidents involved the abduction and killing of three government employees, sp…
DAMODAR S. PRABHUversusSAYED BABALAL H.
2010 INSC 2603 May 2010Disposed off
The appellant and respondent were parties to commercial transactions in which five cheques issued by the appellant were dishonoured, leading to criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. After protracted litigation up to the Supreme Court, the parties reached a settlement and sought…
MUKESH KISHANPURIAversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL
2010 INSC 2663 May 2010Disposed off
The petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which the Calcutta High Court rejected. He filed a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court challenging that order. The Court examined the record and found no justification to grant anticipatory bail. However, it clarified …
DAYAL SINGHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2007 INSC 5173 May 2007Dismissed
Dayal Singh was convicted under Sections 498A and 302 IPC for cruelty and murder of his wife, Tejinder Kaur, based primarily on her dying declaration recorded by a police head constable in the presence of a doctor. The appellant challenged the admissibility of the declaration, arguing it was not recorded by a magistrat…
SAHEBRAO AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2006 INSC 2843 May 2006Dismissed
Sahebrao and Bhausaheb, husband and brother-in-law of Sangita, repeatedly demanded additional dowry (Rs 10,000 and a tape recorder) after her marriage, subjecting her to mental and physical cruelty. Within four months of marriage Sangita complained of harassment, was beaten, and eventually committed suicide. Her father…
PURAN ETC. ETC.versusRAMBILAS AND ANR. ETC. ETC.
2001 INSC 2513 May 2001Dismissed
The appellants were charged under Sections 498‑A and 304‑B of the IPC for a dowry‑death. The Additional Sessions Judge granted them bail on 13 November 2000 without recording any reasons, prompting the father of the deceased to move the High Court, which cancelled the bail on the ground that the order was perverse and …
M/S. SIL IMPORT, USAversusM/S. EXIM AIDES SILK EXPORTERS, BANGALORE
1999 INSC 2143 May 1999Appeal(s) allowed
Sil Import USA issued post‑dated cheques that were returned for insufficient funds. Exim Aides Silk Exporters sent a notice of demand to the drawer by fax on 11‑June‑1996 and again by registered post on 25‑June‑1996. A complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was filed on 8‑August‑1996, beyond the …
STATE OF HARYANAversusTEK SINGH AND ORS.
1999 INSC 2153 May 1999Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Haryana appealed against the Punjab & Haryana High Court’s acquittal of five of eight accused in a murder case involving Tek Singh and Gurdev Singh. The Sessions Court had convicted all eight under Sections 148, 149, 302 and 449 IPC based on eye‑witness testimony, medical reports and circumstantial evidenc…
SHAMBHU DAYAL AGARWALAversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR.
1990 INSC 1853 May 1990Dismissed
The petitioner, a mustard oil manufacturer, had 562 bags of mustard seeds and 262 tins of oil seized under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 for alleged licence violations. After the seizure, the Collector, invoking section 6E, ordered the release of the goods to the petitioner, even though confiscation proceedings w…
STATE OF U. P.versusSURESH CHANDRA SRIVASTAVA & ORS
1984 INSC 1013 May 1984Dismissed
In 1967, court staff removed used court‑fee stamps from old High Court files and reused them in new cases, prompting an investigation that led to charge‑sheets under sections 262, 263, 467, 471, 380, 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The accused contended that the offences under sections 467, 471 and 120B IPC fell…
SHAFHI MOHAMMADversusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
2018 INSC 753 April 2018Directions issued
The Supreme Court considered the use of videography at crime scenes as a tool to improve criminal investigations. Submissions highlighted international practice, the benefits of body‑worn cameras, and the need for safeguards under evidentiary law. The Court examined prior judgments on electronic evidence and the admiss…
BABUBHAI BHIMABHAI BOKHIRIA & ANR.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
2014 INSC 2433 April 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Babubhai Bhimabhai Bokhiria, was summoned as an accused under Section 319 of the CrPC after the trial court relied on a letter written by the deceased a year earlier, in which the deceased alleged the appellant intended to kill him. The Supreme Court examined whether the letter qualified as a dying decla…
YOGENDRA PRATAP SINGHversusSAVITRI PANDEY & ANR.
2012 INSC 1613 April 2012Matter referred to larger bench
The appellant filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against the respondent for dishonoured cheques, after serving a statutory notice on 23‑09‑2008. The complaint was lodged on 07‑10‑2008, i.e., before the expiry of the 15‑day period prescribed in the proviso to Section 138(c). The magist…
DAYA NANDversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2008 INSC 4483 April 2008Case Partly allowed
The appellant Daya Nand was convicted by the trial court and the High Court for murder under Section 302 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act for firing a shotgun that killed Chhajju Ram during an irrigation dispute. The Supreme Court examined whether the facts satisfied the statutory definition of murder under Section 3…
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusR.S. PAI AND ANR.
2002 INSC 1783 April 2002Appeal(s) allowed
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed a charge sheet in a fraud case and later sought the Special Court's permission to produce additional documents that were gathered during the investigation but not submitted with the charge sheet. The Special Court rejected the application, prompting the CBI to appeal to t…
STATE OF U.P.versusSIKANDER ALI AND ORS.
1998 INSC 1713 April 1998Disposed off
The State of U.P. appealed the acquittal of Sikandar Ali and others, who had been convicted by a trial court for the murder of two brothers‑in‑law, Shamsher Singh and Ramji Tripathi, based on the testimony of two eye‑witnesses (PW‑1 and PW‑2) recorded in the FIR within an hour of the incident. The High Court set aside …
GHULAM DIN BUCH ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
1996 INSC 4803 April 1996Disposed off
The case concerned the alleged conspiracy by senior officials of the Jammu & Kashmir Power Department to award transport contracts for bamboo poles at inflated per‑kilometre‑per‑pole rates, causing wrongful loss to the State. The prosecution proved that the officials deliberately selected non‑transport firms, fixed unr…
STATE OF U.P.versusAMEER ALI
1996 INSC 4783 April 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased wife was attacked by her husband, who beat her, poured kerosine on her and set her on fire. She gave two dying declarations, one to an Executive Magistrate on the day of the incident and another to a Sub‑Inspector the following day, both describing the accused's actions. At trial, the Sessions Court convic…
MAHESH CHANDER AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF DELHI
1991 INSC 883 April 1991Appeal(s) allowed
The case involved the murder of Hanumant Singh, allegedly over a dispute concerning gold ornaments, with Mahesh Chander and Mohinder Singh convicted on the basis of eye‑witness testimony. The appellants challenged the conviction, arguing that the FIR was delayed, the names of the accused were omitted, and the refusal t…
BEGUM SUBANU ALIAS SAIRA BANU & ANR.versusA.M. ABDUL GAFOOR
1987 INSC 953 April 1987Appeal(s) allowed
Begum Subanu, a Muslim wife, filed a petition under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking maintenance for herself and her minor daughter after her husband, Abdul Gafoor, married a second wife. The lower courts dismissed her claim, holding that the husband's offer to take her back and maintain her negated …
SURESHversusSTATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
2025 INSC 3183 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for allegedly pouring kerosene on his wife and setting her on fire. The prosecution's case relied heavily on a dying declaration recorded by a Judicial Magistrate, which accused the appellant, while earlier statements by the deceased to a doctor and a police c…
C. KAMALAKKANNANversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE C.B.C.I.D., CHENNAI
2025 INSC 3093 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant was convicted under Sections 120B, 468 and 471 of the IPC for allegedly preparing a postal cover that transmitted a forged marksheet. The prosecution’s case hinged on the testimony of a handwriting expert who claimed the cover bore the appellant’s handwriting, but the original postal cover was never produ…
K.S. MEHTAversusM/S MORGAN SECURITIES AND CREDITS PVT. LTD.
2025 INSC 3153 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, K.S. Mehta and Basant Kumar Goswami, were non‑executive directors of Blue Coast Hotels & Resorts Ltd. and were implicated in criminal complaints under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoured cheques issued to repay an inter‑corporate deposit. They neither atte…
PREMCHANDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2023 INSC 2073 March 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Premchand was convicted by the trial court of murder (s.302 IPC) and attempted murder (s.307 IPC) based on oral testimony of prosecution witnesses, while his written statement under s.313(5) CrPC was not considered. The High Court affirmed the conviction. On appeal, the Supreme Court observed that the tri…
SATPALversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2021 INSC 1433 March 2021Leave Granted & Dismissed
The appellant Satpal was convicted for the murder of his wife Pooja Rani, who died from severe burns after he allegedly poured kerosene on her and set her ablaze. A dying declaration was recorded by a Judicial Magistrate while the victim was still alive and fit to speak, in which she identified the appellant as the ass…
K. VIRUPAKSHA & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR.
2020 INSC 2613 March 2020Appeal(s) allowed
The petitioners, two senior bank officials, challenged a criminal complaint filed under Section 200 of the CrPC alleging that they colluded with an auction purchaser to cause wrongful loss to the borrower, K. Virupaksha, after the bank invoked the SARFAESI Act to enforce a secured loan of Rs.2.68 crore. The borrower’s …
PHULA SINGHversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
2014 INSC 1613 March 2014Dismissed
The appellant, a Kanungo, was accused of demanding and accepting a bribe under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 after a trap was laid by the complainant. Although the trial court acquitted him, the High Court convicted him, sentencing him to one year imprisonment and a fine. On appeal, the…
MILIND SHRIPAD CHANDURKARversusKALIM M. KHAN & ANR.
2011 INSC 1773 March 2011Dismissed
The appellant, claiming to be the sole proprietor of Vijaya Automobiles, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against the respondent who issued a cheque in the name of the firm that later bounced. The trial court and appellate court convicted the respondent, but the High Court set aside…
CENTRE FOR PIL & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2011 INSC 1753 March 2011Case Allowed
The Supreme Court examined the legality of Shri P.J. Thomas's appointment as Central Vigilance Commissioner under Section 4(1) of the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003, which was based on a recommendation by the High Powered Committee (HPC). The Court found that the HPC failed to consider material indicating pendi…
MAHESH CHOUDHARYversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.
2009 INSC 2963 March 2009Dismissed
Mahesh Chaudhary, a partner of a carpet exporting firm, was alleged to have withheld commission payable to another firm under a 10% commission agreement, leading to a complaint of criminal breach of trust, cheating and forgery. A magistrate ordered an FIR and later took cognizance of offences under IPC sections 420, 46…
SYED ASKARI HADI ALI AUGUSTINE IMAM & ANR.versusSTATE (DELHI ADMN.) & ANR.
2009 INSC 2903 March 2009Dismissed
The appellants sought registration and mutation of a will dated 3 May 1998, which was contested by the testatrix's heir in both civil and criminal proceedings alleging forgery. While the criminal case (IPC 420, 468, 444, 34) was instituted before the probate suit under the Indian Succession Act, the appellants applied …
V. LAXMINARASAMMAversusA. YADAIAH (DEAD) & ORS.
2009 INSC 2913 March 2009Disposed off
The Supreme Court was asked to resolve a conflict between two earlier decisions on whether the Special Tribunal or Special Court created under the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 could decide questions of adverse possession. The Court examined the provisions of the Act, its non‑obstante clause, and…
RAMATHAL & ORS.versusINSPECTOR OF POLICE & ANR.
2009 INSC 3073 March 2009Disposed off
The appellants, Ramathal and others, were charged under Sections 120‑B and 420 IPC for allegedly cheating a buyer by misrepresenting the status of a mortgaged property and receiving a large advance. Anticipating arrest, they filed an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.…
I. GLASKASDEN GRACE & ORS.versusINSPECTOR OF POLICE & ANR.
2009 INSC 3083 March 2009Disposed off
The appellants, accused of forging documents and cheating a complainant of Rs.62.62 lakh in a property transaction, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC. The Madras High Court granted bail on the condition that they deposit title deeds worth Rs.20 lakh and furnish a personal bond. The Supreme Court he…
RENU KUMARIversusSANJAY KUMAR AND ORS.
2008 INSC 2783 March 2008Case Allowed
Renu Kumari, the wife of Respondent No.3, filed a complaint under Section 498A IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act alleging dowry harassment. The police registered an FIR and a charge‑sheet was filed. The respondents sought discharge under Section 239 CrPC, which was rejected, and their revision was dis…
KAILASHversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.
2008 INSC 2833 March 2008Case Allowed
An FIR was lodged against several persons, including the appellant Kailash, for offences under various IPC sections, but Kailash was not named in the charge‑sheet. During trial the complainant moved an application under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to join Kailash as an accused. The trial court…
VINAY D. NAGARversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN
2008 INSC 2853 March 2008Case Allowed
Vinay D. Nagar was convicted for the murder of Kalu, a chowkidar who had been a prime witness in an abduction case against Nagar. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence and on Kalu's statement recorded under Section 161 of the CrPC to establish motive. The Supreme Court examined whether that statement could …
RESHMA BANOversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.
2008 INSC 2803 March 2008Case Allowed
The appellant, Reshma Bano, sister of an accused in a kidnapping case, filed a writ petition under Section 482 of the CrPC and Article 226 of the Constitution seeking to quash criminal proceedings initiated against her on the basis of FIR No. 316 of 2007. The FIR merely noted that questioning the sister might be advant…
K.L.E. SOCEITY AND ORS.versusSIDDALINGESH
2008 INSC 2873 March 2008Case Allowed
The respondent, a former peon of K.L.E. Society, filed a private complaint alleging offences under IPC ss.403, 405 and 415 r/w s.34, claiming that salary deductions were made without justification. The Judicial Magistrate took cognizance and issued process, prompting the society to move the Karnataka High Court under s…
REKHA PATELversusPANKAJ VERMA AND ORS.
2008 INSC 2883 March 2008Disposed off
The appellant, married to the first respondent, alleged dowry harassment and a FIR was lodged under sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The respondents filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking quash of the FIR and a stay of arrest. The Allahabad High Court refused …
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.versusBHAURAO PUNJABRAO GAWANDE
2008 INSC 2893 March 2008Case Allowed
Bhaurao Punjabrao Gawande, a petroleum transporter, was alleged to have repeatedly engaged in black‑marketing of kerosene and faced several prosecutions under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The Commissioner of Police, acting under the Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodit…
RAMESH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU
2005 INSC 1163 March 2005Disposed off
The wife filed a complaint in Trichy alleging offences under Sections 498‑A, 406 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act against her husband, his relatives and the husband’s sister, Gowri Ramaswamy. The accused filed petitions under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashment on grounds of frivolous allegations, l…
KOVVURI SURYA BHASKARA REDDY ETC.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH ETC.
1998 INSC 1233 March 1998Disposed off
The case involved six accused who attacked and killed Buchi Reddi with knives, spears and an axe. The trial court convicted all of them under Sections 148 and 302 IPC, and also under Sections 307, 326 and 324 IPC. The High Court set aside the convictions of four accused, reasoning that the FIR did not specify the manne…
THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS.versusDILIPBHAI NATHJIBHAI PATEL
1998 INSC 1243 March 1998Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Gujarat filed a criminal appeal against Dilipbhai Nathjibhai Patel challenging a High Court order that a prior hearing was required before granting sanction for prosecution under Section 147(1)(d) of the Gujarat Cooperative Societies Act. The appellant had obtained sanction from the District Registrar as m…
RAJAYANversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ANR.
1998 INSC 1253 March 1998Dismissed
The appellant, Raja Yan, was married to Sanalkumari who later committed suicide. The prosecution alleged that the appellant repeatedly demanded dowry before and after the marriage, leading to mental and physical cruelty that caused her death. The trial court acquitted the appellant, but the Kerala High Court reversed t…
S.K. VISWAMBARANversusE. KOYAKUNJU & ORS.
1987 INSC 683 March 1987Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined an appeal by Deputy Superintendent of Police S.K. Viswambaran (appellant) who sought expunction of adverse remarks made against him by the Kerala High Court in an order relating to petitions filed by two police officers (respondents). The High Court, while considering the respondents' request…
WAHIDversusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
2025 INSC 1453 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, Wahid and Anshu, were convicted for robbery under IPC sections 392/397 and for possession of arms under the Arms Act, based on an FIR that named no specific perpetrators. The prosecution’s case relied on the complainant’s identification of the accused at a bus depot two days after the incident and the r…
RAMU APPA MAHAPATARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2025 INSC 1473 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Ramu Appa Mahapatar, was convicted for the murder of his live-in partner Manda based primarily on an extra‑judicial confession he allegedly made to the landlord (PW‑1) and the deceased's brother (PW‑3), which was later endorsed by PW‑4 and PW‑6. The Supreme Court examined whether such a confession, coupl…
AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIAversusPRADIP KUMAR BANERJEE
2025 INSC 1493 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, an Assistant Engineer of the Airports Authority of India, was arrested and convicted for demanding illegal gratification, leading to his dismissal from service. After being acquitted on benefit of doubt in a criminal appeal, he sought reinstatement, but the Authority initiated fresh disciplinary proceed…
NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (NOIDA)versusYUNUS & ORS.
2022 INSC 1423 February 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The dispute arose from a land acquisition notification where the original compensation award was Rs.24,033 per bigha. The respondents did not file an application under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, but later a reference was made and a Lok Adalat, under Section 20 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, p…
SMT. REKHA JAIN AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS.
2022 INSC 1413 February 2022Appeal(s) allowed
An FIR was lodged under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B IPC against six persons, including Smt. Rekha Jain and Smt. Minakshi Jain, alleging misappropriation of deposits and the sale of an attached property. The FIR primarily implicated a co‑accused, Arun Kumar Maheshwari, while the only allegation against th…
VISHWAS BHANDARIversusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.
2021 INSC 573 February 2021Appeal(s) allowed
An FIR was lodged alleging that the appellant and another accused had kidnapped a 17½‑year‑old girl for the purpose of marriage. The complainant later limited her allegations to the other accused, Vikram Roop Rai, and the prosecutrix testified that she had voluntarily married Vikram with family consent and bore two chi…
N. VIJAYAKUMARversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU
2021 INSC 603 February 2021Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a Sanitary Inspector, was charged under Sections 7, 13(2) and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for demanding Rs.500 and a cell phone as bribe from a supervisor to process a contract extension. The trial court acquitted him, but the Madras High Court reversed the acquittal and convicted him, r…
OPTO CIRCUIT INDIA LTD.versusAXIS BANK & ORS.
2021 INSC 563 February 2021Case Partly allowed
The Enforcement Directorate, invoking the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA), issued a communication on 15 May 2020 directing several banks to debit‑freeze the accounts of Opto Circuit India Ltd. The company challenged the order, seeking its quash and the defreezing of the accounts to enable payment of sta…
STATE OF RAJASTHANversusFATEHKARAN MEHDU
2017 INSC 1043 February 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Rajasthan appealed against the High Court’s order quashing charges framed by a Special Judge against mining engineer Fatehkaran Mehdu and Kishan Singh Rawat under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The charges alleged that Mehdu, while granting a quarry licence, sanctioned an area of 80,000 sq. ft. on…
AVEEK SARKAR & ANR.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.
2014 INSC 753 February 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, editors and publishers of Sports World magazine and Anandabazar Patrika, reproduced a semi‑nude photograph of tennis player Boris Becker and his fiancée Barbara, originally published in the German magazine STERN, which was intended to protest apartheid and promote interracial love. A lawyer filed a comp…
BACHU DASversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS
2014 INSC 9193 February 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The complainant filed a criminal complaint under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 448 of the IPC and Section 3 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The Sessions Judge held that a prima facie case was made out against the accused. The High Court, however, granted anticipatory ba…
SUSANTA GHOSHversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL
2012 INSC 743 February 2012Disposed off
Susanta Ghosh, a sitting MLA, was named in a fourth FIR lodged nine years after a 2002 incident in which seven persons were killed. The earlier three FIRs and charge‑sheets did not mention him. He had earlier been granted anticipatory bail, but the trial court denied regular bail, prompting an appeal to the Calcutta Hi…
ASHOK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR.
2009 INSC 943 February 2009Disposed off
The appellant, the complainant, challenged a bail order granted by the Allahabad High Court to accused Kamal Singh, who was charged with murder and related offences. The High Court had allowed bail on the basis of a ballistic report stating that the pellets recovered from the victim could not have been fired from the a…
STATE OF M.P.versusRAMESH @ CHHINGE & ORS.
2009 INSC 973 February 2009Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Madhya Pradesh prosecuted Ramesh (alias Chhinge) and three others for the murder of Ramavtar and attempted murder of two others. The trial court convicted them under IPC s.302 and s.302 r.w. s.34, and also under the Arms Act. The Madhya Pradesh High Court acquitted the accused, relying on alleged discrepan…
DALBIR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.
2009 INSC 983 February 2009Disposed off
The petitioner, Dalbir Singh, filed a writ petition alleging that his 17‑year‑old son, Somvir Singh (Sonu), died as a result of custodial torture by Noida police and that the police attempted to portray the death as a suicide. The State of Uttar Pradesh responded that an FIR had been lodged, police officials were charg…
JITENDRA PANCHALversusINTELLIGENCE OFFICER, NCB & ANR.
2009 INSC 1003 February 2009Dismissed
Jitendra Panchal was arrested in Austria, extradited to the United States and convicted under the US Controlled Substances Act for conspiracy to possess and distribute hashish, serving a 54‑month sentence. After deportation to India, he was arrested by the Narcotics Control Bureau and charged under the NDPS Act for imp…
MOHABBAT AND ORS.versusSTATE OF M.P.
2009 INSC 1013 February 2009Case Partly allowed
Nine persons were convicted of murder under IPC s.302 read with s.149, 147 and 148 based largely on the testimony of PW‑6, the brother of the deceased. Three of the convicted appealed, arguing that PW‑6, being a close relative, was a partisan witness and that the dying declaration did not name them. The Supreme Court h…
SUBE SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
2006 INSC 673 February 2006Disposed off
Petitioner Sube Singh alleged that police illegally detained and tortured him and his family while trying to locate his son, who had killed a constable. He filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking directions to stop the alleged atrocities and compensation as a public law remedy for violation of Article 21. The Co…
SHIVA NATH PRASADversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
2006 INSC 723 February 2006Dismissed
The case arose from a criminal complaint alleging that the deceased Priyamvada Devi Birla (PDB) and her husband Madhav Prasad Birla (MPB) had created five mutual trusts intended for charitable institutions, which were later allegedly revoked and the assets misappropriated through a forged will in favour of R.S. Lodha. …
STATE OF U.PversusNAWAB SINGH (DEAD) AND ORS.
2004 INSC 753 February 2004Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased, a witness in a murder case, was shot dead at his home by the accused who sought to silence him. The trial court, relying on eye‑witness testimony and a post‑mortem report showing multiple gunshot injuries, convicted the accused under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC and sentenced them to life imprisonment. …
KAMMARI BRAHMIAH AND ORS.versusPUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF AP .
1999 INSC 373 February 1999Dismissed
Six accused were tried for murder (IPC s.302). The Sessions Court acquitted them, but the High Court on appeal convicted one under s.304(II), another under s.325 and the remaining four under s.325 read with s.149, even though the trial court had not framed a charge under s.149. The appellants contended that conviction …
SACHIDA NAND SINGH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.
1998 INSC 523 February 1998Dismissed
The appellants forged a certified copy of a Jamabandi (Rent Roll) and introduced it in a court of Executive Magistrate during proceedings under Section 145 of the CrPC. A complaint alleging forgery offences (IPC §§ 468, 469, 471) was filed before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, who forwarded it to police, leading to an …
STATE OF UPversusDAN SINGH AND ORS.
1997 INSC 853 February 1997Disposed off
The State of Uttar Pradesh alleged that a large mob of villagers attacked a scheduled‑caste marriage party, killing 14 and injuring 7. The key issue was whether the mob constituted an unlawful assembly with the common object of killing the Doms, and whether the accused could be held liable under Section 149 IPC based o…
K.I. PAVUNNYversusASSISTANT COLLECTOR (HEAD QUARTER), CENTRAL EXCISE COLLECTORATE, COCHIN
1997 INSC 843 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant was found with 200 gold biscuits concealed in his house and gave a written confession to Customs officers under Section 108 of the Customs Act, which he later retracted. The issue before the Supreme Court was whether such a statement, recorded before the appellant became an accused, was admissible under S…
SANTOSH DE AND ANOTHERversusARCHNA GUHA AND ORS.
1994 INSC 433 February 1994Dismissed
The complainant, Archna Guha, filed a private complaint in 1977 alleging torture by five police officers in 1974. Two of the accused, Santosh De and Ranjit Guha Niyogi, sought discharge under Section 245(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, arguing that the prosecution had failed to produce all evidence within four years…
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORSversusASSOCIATION OF RETIRED SUPREME COURT AND HIGH COURT JUDGES AT ALLAHABAD & ORS
2024 INSC 43 January 2024
The Allahabad High Court, hearing a writ petition filed by the Association of Retired Supreme Court and High Court Judges, directed the Uttar Pradesh Government to notify rules framed by the Chief Justice concerning domestic help and other post‑retirement benefits for former judges, and later held a recall application …
SATISH P. BHATTversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR
2024 INSC 163 January 2024Dismissed
Satish P. Bhatt and Vishwanath R. Nayak, directors of Astral Glass Pvt Ltd, were convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to ten months imprisonment with a compensation liability of Rs.1.10 crore. They entered into a settlement undertaking on 3 July 2018 to pay Rs.4.63.5 lakh to the c…
NEERAJ SHARMAversusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
2024 INSC 63 January 2024Case Partly allowed
The appellants, Neeraj Sharma and Ashwani Kumar Yadav, abducted an 18‑year‑old student, attempted to murder him by strangulation and burning, and stole his money and phone. The trial court and High Court convicted them under Sections 307/120B, 364‑A, and 392/397 of the IPC, imposing life imprisonment for the 364‑A char…
BRIJ NARAYAN SHUKLA (D) THR. LRS.versusSUDESH KUMAR ALIAS SURESH KUMAR (D) THR. LRS. & ORS.
2024 INSC 93 January 2024
The appellant, Brij Narayan Shukla, purchased a 3500 sq. ft. plot by a registered sale deed dated 21 January 1966 and sought an injunction with alternative relief for possession after the respondents obstructed construction in 1975. The respondents claimed title by adverse possession, alleging continuous possession sin…