STATE OF BIHARversusKAMLA PRASAD SINGH AND ORS.
1998 INSC 2216 May 1998Case Allowed
Kamla Prasad Singh filed a complaint alleging that police officers raided his house without a warrant, assaulted his wife, abused occupants and seized his property. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, after an inquiry under Section 202 of the CrPC, found that the raid was conducted under a valid warrant and supervised by an…
TANVIBEN PANKAJ KUMAR DIVETIAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
1997 INSC 4856 May 1997Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Tanviben Pankaj Kumar Divetia, was convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC for the murder of her mother‑in‑law, based solely on circumstantial evidence. The conviction was upheld by a third judge of the Gujarat High Court after a division bench was split, and the appellant appealed to…
HARI SHANKER ETCversusSTATE OF U.P. ETC.
1996 INSC 6226 May 1996Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined the murder of Parshadi Lal, in which Hari Shanker fired a licensed 12‑bore gun belonging to Shiam Behari, killing the victim while the motorcycle was being pushed. The Court held that the medical evidence of blackening and a cork wad indicated a firing distance of roughly three feet to two ya…
BHAGWANT SINGHversusCOMMISSIONER OF POLICE, DELHI
1983 INSC 626 May 1983Disposed off
Bhagwant Singh, a senior Indian Revenue Service officer, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution alleging that his daughter Gurinder Kaur was murdered in a dowry‑related dispute and that the Delhi police investigation was irregular, delayed and failed to collect crucial evidence. The Supreme Court ex…
SIVAKUMARversusSTATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
2026 INSC 3186 April 2026Case Partly allowed
The case arose from a boundary dispute between close relatives in which the deceased Ganesan’s brother was killed after a heated altercation. The accused Senthil (A‑1) and Sivakumar (A‑2) were originally convicted of offences under Sections 324 and 325 IPC respectively, while the trial court acquitted them of the more …
DR. S. BALAGOPALversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU & ANR.
2026 INSC 3196 April 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a pediatric surgeon, performed an orchidectomy on a 1½‑year‑old boy after obtaining a consent form that listed both orchidopexy and orchidectomy, but the father alleged that consent for orchidectomy was never given and that the term was interpolated. An FIR was filed under multiple IPC sections and the c…
SAJAL BOSEversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
2026 INSC 3226 April 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned an FIR registered on 18 October 2022 alleging assault, criminal intimidation and related offences against eight persons, including Sajal Bose, his wife Nabina Bose and Chandidas Joardar. The High Court quashed the proceedings against two co‑accused but refused to grant the same relief to the three ap…
JASPAL SINGH KAURALversusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
2025 INSC 4576 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Jaspal Singh Kaural, had a consensual physical relationship with the complainant after promising to marry her and care for her children, leading her to obtain a divorce. When the appellant later refused to marry and threatened her children, the complainant filed an FIR under Sections 376 and 506 IPC. The…
BISWAJYOTI CHATTERJEEversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR.
2025 INSC 4586 April 2025Case Allowed
The appellant, a former judicial officer, was charged under Sections 376(2)(f), 417 and 506 IPC for allegedly promising marriage to a woman who was in the midst of a divorce, subsequently having a consensual relationship and later avoiding her. The complainant claimed the appellant used his position to exploit her, whi…
DR. SOU JAYSHREE UJWAL INGOLEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.
2017 INSC 3176 April 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased, a haemophiliac road‑accident victim, was admitted to Irvin Hospital. On 5 September 1997, after developing abdominal pain, the Emergency Medical Officer called Dr. Jayshree Ingole, the surgeon on call, who examined the patient, ordered a physician to be summoned and then left the hospital at about 11 p.m.…
DEVENDRA NATH SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P.
2017 INSC 3166 April 2017Dismissed
Devendra Nath Srivastava was convicted by a trial court for murdering his wife after assaulting her with a brick, resulting in her death by asphyxia due to multiple ante‑mortem injuries. The trial court sentenced him to death under Section 302 IPC. On appeal, the Allahabad High Court set aside the murder conviction, ho…
JASBIR SINGH @ JAVRI @ JABBAR SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2015 INSC 2846 April 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Jasbir Singh was convicted under Sections 399 and 402 of the IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act for allegedly planning and attempting a dacoity with firearms. The Supreme Court examined the evidence, noting the absence of independent witnesses, the fact that the investigating officer himself conducted the…
UTTAM CHAKRABORTYversusSTATE OF ASSAM
2010 INSC 1986 April 2010Appeal(s) allowed
An eight‑month‑pregnant woman was found dead with severe abdominal injuries and the foetus removed. The husband, Mission Suklabaidhya, and his friend, Uttam Chakraborty, were convicted of murder; the husband received the death penalty and the friend life imprisonment. Both appealed to the Supreme Court, which examined …
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusRAMESHWAR & ORS.
2009 INSC 4566 April 2009Disposed off
The State of Madhya Pradesh prosecuted directors of Indore Premier Co-operative Bank for allegedly sanctioning loans without proper verification, invoking Sections 409, 418, 420, 120‑B IPC and Section 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The Trial Court framed charges, but the High Court …
GUBBALA VENUGOPALASWAMY AND ORS.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
2004 INSC 2386 April 2004Disposed off
The appellants were convicted of murder (IPC 302) and related offences (IPC 326, 324) based largely on the testimony of a single eye‑witness (PW‑1) whose evidence was held by the trial and high courts to be not wholly reliable, while two other eye‑witnesses turned hostile. The appellants challenged the convictions, arg…
STATE OF WEST BENGALversusNARAYAN K. PATODIA
2000 INSC 1976 April 2000Appeal(s) allowed
The West Bengal Sales Tax Bureau, after investigating alleged fraud by Narayan K. Patodia involving forged applications and tax evasion, forwarded a complaint to the police which resulted in the registration of an FIR under several IPC offences and sections of the West Bengal Sales Tax Act. The Calcutta High Court quas…
NARINDER SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2000 INSC 1986 April 2000Dismissed
The appellants, Narinder Singh and Ravinder Singh alias Khanna, were charged with murdering Gurdev Singh, the Granthi of a village Gurudwara, after threatening him to relinquish his post. The Sessions Court acquitted them, holding that the prosecution failed to prove motive, that key witnesses were unreliable, and that…
SIKANDER @MOHD. SAFIQversusTHE STATE (DELHI ADMN.)
1999 INSC 1576 April 1999Dismissed
The appellant, Sikander (Mohammad Shafiq), was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for stabbing his step‑mother Zohra Bi and step‑sister Guizar to death during a family property dispute. He appealed, contending that the killings occurred in a sudden fight and heat of passion, thereby falling under Exce…
SMT. KEWAL PATIversusSTATE OF U.P AND ORS.
1995 INSC 2516 April 1995Case Allowed
Ramjit Upadhaya, a convict serving a sentence under Section 302 IPC in Central Jail, Varanasi, was killed by a co‑accused inmate. His wife and three children filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking compensation, arguing that the State failed to protect his life while in custody. The State contended that the Utta…
BHUPINDER SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
1988 INSC 936 April 1988Dismissed
Bhupinder Singh, his father Sher Singh and mother Mukhtiar Kaur were convicted of murdering Bhupinder's wife Gian Kaur by administering an organophosphorus poison, motivated by dowry demands. The trial and High Courts upheld the conviction of Bhupinder and Sher, acquitting Mukhtiar. On appeal, the Supreme Court examine…
GYANENDRA SINGH @ RAJA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.
2025 INSC 3356 March 2025Case Partly allowed
The appellant, Gyanendra Singh, was convicted for raping his nine‑year‑old daughter, resulting in convictions under Sections 376(2)(f) and 376(2)(i) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, with a life sentence and a fine. He appealed, arguing that because the offences overlapped, the special law (POCSO) under…
YUVRAJ LAXMILAL KANTHER & ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2025 INSC 3386 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, a contractor and a store manager, were charged with offences under Sections 304 Part II, 304A, 182 and 201 read with Section 34 of the IPC for the deaths of two employees who were electrocuted while working on a sign board using an iron ladder. They filed discharge applications under Section 227 of the …
XXXXversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANOTHER
2024 INSC 1816 March 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant sought to quash FIR No. 52, registered under Sections 376(2)(n) and 506 IPC, alleging that the complaint was an abuse of process because the complainant, a married woman, had voluntarily entered into a relationship with him. The High Court dismissed the petition, but the Supreme Court examined the complai…
RAVINDER KUMARversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI
2024 INSC 2116 March 2024Case Partly allowed
The appellant, Ravinder Kumar, was convicted for the murder of his wife Meena under Section 302 IPC, along with convictions under Sections 304B/34 and 498A/34. The prosecution's case relied entirely on circumstantial evidence, including blood‑stained clothes recovered from the appellant's parental home, an English cale…
VISHNU CHANDRU GAONKARversusN.M. DESSAI
2018 INSC 2146 March 2018Dismissed
Vishnu Chandra Gaonkar, a legal heir, alleged that advocate N.M. Dessai forged the thumb impression of a deceased appellant, Shaba Manju Velip, to withdraw a civil appeal and related execution proceedings. Gaonkar filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 195(1)(b)(ii) of the Criminal Procedure Code seek…
JOYDEB PATRA & ORS.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL
2013 INSC 1376 March 2013Appeal(s) allowed
Madhabi Patra died after a ceremonial function and the prosecution alleged she was poisoned by her husband Joydeb Patra and his relatives. The trial court and the Calcutta High Court convicted the accused under IPC s.302 read with s.34, relying solely on the ocular testimony of the doctor who performed the post‑mortem …
RAKESH KUMARversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2009 INSC 3356 March 2009Appeal(s) allowed
Kusum Lata died from severe burns and her husband Rakesh Kumar was convicted under IPC sections 304‑8 and 498‑A based on the testimony of her father and letters allegedly written by the deceased. The prosecution also relied on a dying declaration recorded by an Executive Magistrate, while the police failed to record it…
IZHARUL HAQ ABDUL HAMID SHAIKH & ANR.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT
2009 INSC 3326 March 2009Disposed off
Three criminal appeals under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA) sought bail for appellants – Izharl Haq Abdul Hamid Shaikh, Amir Gulam Husein Bandukwala and labourer Jivan Raghu Varli – who had been denied bail by Designated TADA Courts. The appellants argued that the FIRs were lodged…
SAMIRA KHANUMversusMD. AFSAR TOWHEED AND ANR
2009 INSC 3346 March 2009Appeal(s) allowed
The case arose from a complaint by Samira Khanum alleging dowry harassment, cruelty and breach of trust under Sections 498‑A and 406 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The trial magistrate ordered summons against the husband and his parents, which the husband challenged by filing an application unde…
MOHD. ASIFversusSTATE OF UTTARANCHAL
2009 INSC 3366 March 2009Dismissed
The appellant, Mohd. Asif, assaulted the deceased, Mohd. Saeed, with a knife in a cinema hall, causing a stab wound that required surgery. The victim died four days later, with the post‑mortem attributing death to pulmonary embolism, which the defence argued was an intervening cause unrelated to the injury. The trial c…
STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusMANGI LAL
2009 INSC 3406 March 2009Dismissed
The State of Maharashtra appealed the acquittal of Mangilal, who was charged with the murder of four members of a family in August 1998. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence, including alleged illicit relationships, prior threats, a statement under Section 164 CrPC, alleged beating of an eye‑witness who la…
JAGJIT SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2009 INSC 3426 March 2009Dismissed
Jasprit Kaur, married to Jagjit Singh, died within 1 year 3 months of marriage, her body found hanging from a ceiling fan. The prosecution alleged that Jagjit and his parents subjected her to cruelty and demanded Rs 1 lakh for a house purchase, constituting dowry demand, leading to her death. The trial court acquitted …
SANTOSH DEVIDAS BEHADE AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2009 INSC 3436 March 2009Dismissed
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal of Santosh Devidas Behade and others, upholding their conviction under Sections 147, 148, 302 read with Section 149 of the IPC for the murder of Bharat Kharat. The Court held that the prosecution had proved a common object of the unlawful assembly, satisfying the requirements of S…
IN RE: ARUNDHATI ROY - CONTEMNORversus-
2002 INSC 1236 March 2002Disposed off
The Supreme Court, hearing a suo‑motu criminal contempt petition, examined statements made by writer Arundhati Roy in an affidavit that alleged the Court was acting with bias, silencing dissent and damaging its reputation. The Court held that such statements scandalised the authority of the Supreme Court and amounted t…
G.V. RAOversusL.H.V. PRASAD AND ORS.
2000 INSC 1226 March 2000Dismissed
The petitioner, a forward‑community scientist, married respondent No.4 after being told she belonged to a forward caste, later discovering she was from a Scheduled Tribe. He filed a criminal complaint under IPC sections 415, 419, 420 read with 34, alleging cheating due to the caste misrepresentation. The respondents ob…
M/S. NAV NIRMAN BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, NAVEEN SINGHversusTHE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, GOVT OF INDIA RANCHI, JHARKHAND
2026 INSC 1306 February 2026Appeal(s) allowed
Nav Nirman Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. (appellant) had two parcels of land provisionally attached under the Prevention of Money‑Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) and a confirmation order under s.8(3) was challenged before the Appellate Tribunal under s.26. While the appeal was pending, the Enforcement Directorate filed a…
GOPAL SINGH & ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND
2025 INSC 2636 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were charged with murder and causing hurt under Sections 302, 323 and 34 of the IPC, later reduced to Section 304 Part II by the High Court. The prosecution relied on two alleged eye‑witnesses, PW‑1 and PW‑3, and four court witnesses, none of whom identified the appellants in the presence of the court. T…
SANJAYversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
2025 INSC 3176 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Sanjay was convicted of murder and rape of a four‑year‑old girl, X, and sentenced to death by the trial court, a decision affirmed by the High Court. The prosecution's case relied on the victim’s last‑seen testimony, an extra‑judicial confession by the accused that led to the recovery of the body and clot…
VIHAAN KUMARversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR.
2025 INSC 1626 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Vihaan Kumar was arrested on 10 June 2024 for alleged offences under the IPC, but he was not informed of the grounds of his arrest as required by Article 22(1) of the Constitution and Section 50 of the CrPC. The High Court held that the information given to his wife and the entry in the police diary did n…
AYYUB & ORS.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
2025 INSC 1686 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The case arose from a suspected romantic relationship between Ziaul Rahman and his cousin Tanu. After Ziaul’s death in a physical assault, Tanu allegedly committed suicide, and the complainant Vijay (R‑2) filed an FIR accusing the appellants of abetting her suicide under Section 306 IPC. The High Court refused to quash…
RAJA KHANversusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
2025 INSC 1676 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Raja Khan was convicted for murder and concealment of evidence based on circumstantial evidence, including a weapon and gold chains recovered after his alleged disclosure under Section 27 of the Evidence Act. The prosecution relied on the recovery of a stone, a gandasa, and gold chains, as well as testimo…
VINUBHAI MOHANLAL DOBARIAversusCHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR
2025 INSC 1556 February 2025Disposed off
The appellant, an individual with salary and partnership income, filed his income‑tax returns for AY 2011‑12 and AY 2013‑14 well after the statutory due dates, attracting show‑cause notices under section 276CC of the Income Tax Act. He sought compounding of the offences under the 2014 Guidelines; the first application …
GEDDAM JHANSI & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF TELANGANA & ORS.
2025 INSC 1606 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The complainant alleged dowry demands, mental and physical harassment by her husband and in‑laws, and implicated the appellant Geddam Jhansi (her mother‑in‑law’s sister) and her son Geddam Sathyakama Jabali as pressurising her to obey her husband’s wishes. The High Court declined to quash criminal proceedings under Sec…
STATE OF PUNJABversusGURPREET SINGH & ORS.
2024 INSC 1546 February 2024Disposed off
The State of Punjab appealed against the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s acquittal of Gurpreet Singh and three co‑accused under sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Amarjit Kaur. The trial court had convicted them based on the eyewitness testimony of the victim’s husband and daughter, the reco…
CHHOTA AHIRWARversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2020 INSC 1386 February 2020Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant and the main accused, who were related to the complainant, got into a quarrel over a land dispute on 22 October 1992. The main accused drew a pistol and fired, injuring the complainant, and the prosecution alleged that the appellant had instigated the shooting, seeking conviction under Section 307 read wi…
DATARAM SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
2018 INSC 1076 February 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant was charged under Sections 419, 420, 406 and 506 of the IPC and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for cheating a complainant of over Rs. 37 lakh. During a seven‑month investigation he was never arrested, and when he sought to quash the FIR the High Court granted him time to appear before the t…
MADAN @ MADHU PATEKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2018 INSC 1046 February 2018Dismissed
The appellant, Madan (also known as Madhu) Patek, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for allegedly pouring kerosene on the deceased, Latabai, and setting her on fire. The conviction was based primarily on two dying declarations recorded by a Special Executive Magistrate and a police constable, both certified by a medi…
ANGANA & ANR.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN
2009 INSC 1126 February 2009Disposed off
The appellants Angana and others were convicted under IPC s.326 read with s.34 and sentenced to four years' rigorous imprisonment. They had been on bail during the trial, and most co‑accused were acquitted. While their appeal was pending before the High Court, they filed an application under Section 389 of the CrPC see…
SHAIKH KARIMULLAH @ BABU AND ORS.versusSTATE OF A.P.
2009 INSC 1136 February 2009Case Partly allowed
The appellants were accused of assaulting the deceased during a dispute, resulting in his death. One witness (PW‑1) testified that the appellant struck the deceased with a stick, while the remaining eye‑witnesses testified that the appellant delivered a fist blow. No charge under Section 34 of the IPC (common intention…
ZINDAR ALI SKversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR.
2009 INSC 1166 February 2009Disposed off
The appellant Zindar Ali SK, aided by a juvenile accomplice, was charged with rape (IPC s.376), cheating (IPC s.417) and criminal conspiracy (IPC s.120‑B) after forcibly raping the prosecutrix Chandmoni Khatoon, who had refused his marriage proposal. The prosecutrix reported the incident to her family; a village meetin…
ARJUN SINGHversusSTATE OF H.P.
2009 INSC 1186 February 2009Case Partly allowed
Arjun Singh, a bus conductor, was alleged to have forcibly sexually assaulted a girl under 16 years of age and kidnapped her. He was convicted by the trial court and the Himachal Pradesh High Court under IPC sections 376 (rape), 511 (attempt to commit rape), 365, 366 (kidnapping) and 109 (abetment). On appeal, the Supr…
BALWANT SINGH AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2008 INSC 1456 February 2008Dismissed
The appellants, Balwant Singh and his three sons, were armed with kirpans and gandasas and attacked Kuldeep Singh at the house of his mother Amarjit Kaur, inflicting multiple injuries that proved fatal. The prosecution relied on the testimony of two surviving witnesses, Amarjit Kaur and Sukhjit Kaur, whose accounts wer…
GANANATH PATTANAIKversusSTATE OF ORISSA
2002 INSC 666 February 2002Appeal(s) allowed
The wife, Rashmirekha, hanged herself at home, leading her father to file an FIR alleging that her husband, Ganatanii Paitanaik, and his family murdered her over dowry demands. The trial court acquitted the husband of the dowry‑death charge (Sec. 304B IPC) but convicted him under Sec. 498A IPC for cruelty, sentencing h…
ARVIND DHAMversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
2026 INSC 126 January 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a former promoter and non‑executive chairman of Amtek Auto Ltd., was arrested in July 2024 on allegations of massive bank fraud and money‑laundering under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA). Despite cooperating with the investigation and being the sole accused taken into custody among 28…
THE STATE (NCT) OF DELHIversusKHIMJI BHAI JADEJA
2026 INSC 256 January 2026Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Delhi appealed against a Delhi High Court decision that held each deposit made by investors in a large cheating scheme constituted a separate transaction and that separate FIRs and charge sheets were required. The scheme, alleged to involve 1,852 victims defrauded of ₹46.40 crore, was initially investigate…
ABDUL NASSARversusSTATE OF KERALA & ANR.
2025 INSC 356 January 2025Dismissed
The appellant, Abdul Nassar, was convicted of raping and murdering a nine‑year‑old girl, offences punishable under Sections 376 and 302 of the IPC, and was sentenced to death. The prosecution relied on a series of circumstantial facts, forensic DNA evidence linking the appellant’s semen to the victim’s clothing, and te…
VELTHEPU SRINIVAS AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (NOW STATE OF TELANGANA) AND ANR.
2024 INSC 876 January 2024Disposed off
The appellants, four members of the same family, were convicted for the murder of a villager amid a political rivalry, with the trial court and High Court finding them guilty under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC and imposing life imprisonment. The Supreme Court examined the evidence, particularly the role …
THE STATE OF TELANGANAversusHABIB ABDULLAH JEELANI & ORS.
2017 INSC 326 January 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Telangana filed a criminal appeal against a Hyderabad High Court order that, while refusing to quash FIR No. 205/2014 (offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 149 and 307), directed the police not to arrest the three accused. The Supreme Court held that such a direction amounts to an order under Section 438 …
MD. SAJJAD @ RAJU @ SALIMversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL
2017 INSC 296 January 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Md. Sajjad, was convicted under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Ramchandra Singh, based primarily on the testimony of three eyewitnesses and the suspicion of the victim's widow. The eyewitnesses identified the accused in a test identification parade held more than two month…
SRI GANESHversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.
2017 INSC 346 January 2017Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant was accused of having sexual intercourse with the complainant on five to six occasions, allegedly on a false promise of marriage, the last of which occurred in August 2009. The trial court, relying on documentary evidence, held that the appellant was born on 19 October 1991 and was therefore a juvenile at…
SUSANTA DAS & ORS.versusSTATE OF ORISSA
2016 INSC 186 January 2016Dismissed
The appellants, five accused persons, were convicted for the murder of Padma Lochan Jena and grievous hurt to two others under Section 302 IPC read with Section 149 IPC. The prosecution proved that all five were present at the scene, armed with deadly weapons, and acted with a common object of revenge stemming from a c…
PREM SAGAR MANOCHAversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI)
2016 INSC 196 January 2016Appeal(s) allowed
In the Jessica Lal murder investigation, the police sought a forensic opinion on two .22 cartridges. The appellant, Deputy Director of the State Forensic Science Laboratory, reported that the cartridges were .22 caliber and likely from a pistol, but could not give a definitive opinion on whether they were fired from th…
DARSHAN SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2016 INSC 176 January 2016Dismissed
The dispute arose between two families over irrigation rights and escalated into a violent clash in a court premises on 17 February 1995, resulting in two deaths and several injuries. Darshan Singh, the appellant, was charged with murder (IPC s.302) of Santa Singh and voluntarily causing hurt (IPC s.324) to others, but…
STATE OF A.P.versusPATCHIMALA VIGNESWARUDU@ VIGGANNA @ GANAPATHI
2016 INSC 156 January 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Andhra Pradesh prosecuted Patchimala Vigneswarudu for the murder of his wife, alleging he strangled her after a night out, motivated by strained marital relations and suspicion of venereal disease transmission. The trial court convicted him under Section 302 IPC, but the High Court acquitted him, holding t…
INDER SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN
2015 INSC 76 January 2015Disposed off
Four villagers were killed and an informant seriously injured in a violent clash in Dhodi village, Rajasthan, leading to the charge of murder and grievous hurt against 29 co‑villagers. The trial court convicted 24 of them under Sections 302, 307 and 149 of the IPC, while five were acquitted; subsequent appeals raised q…
STATE OF TAMIL NADU BY INS.OF POLICE VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTIONversusN. SURESH RAJAN & ORS.
2014 INSC 116 January 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Tamil Nadu challenged the discharge orders passed by a Special Judge and affirmed by the Madras High Court against former ministers and their relatives accused of possessing assets disproportionate to their known income under Section 109 IPC and Sections 13(1)(e) & 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act…
M.B. SURESHversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2014 INSC 76 January 2014Disposed off
M.B. Suresh and his father were charged with murder, attempt to murder and offences under the Arms Act arising from a shooting incident over a land dispute. The trial court acquitted them, but the Karnataka High Court convicted Suresh under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to life imprisonment. On appeal, the Supreme …
DR. MRS. NUPUR TALWARversusC.B.I., DELHI & ANR.
2012 INSC 86 January 2012Disposed off
The case arose from the murder of a young girl, Arushi, and a domestic help, Hemraj, where the CBI filed a closure report. The father of the deceased filed a protest petition, leading the Special Judicial Magistrate to take cognizance of offences under Sections 302/34 and 201/34 IPC against Dr. Rajesh Talwar and Dr. Nu…
STATE OF PUNJABversusBALWINDER SINGH AND ORS.
2012 INSC 96 January 2012Appeal(s) allowed
In 1992 a bus and a truck, both traveling at high speed, collided on a highway in Punjab, resulting in the deaths of five passengers. The drivers of the bus (Balwinder Singh) and the truck were convicted under IPC sections 304A, 337 and 279 and sentenced to two years rigorous imprisonment for the 304A charge and six mo…
LAXMICHAND @ BALBUTYAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2011 INSC 166 January 2011Case Partly allowed
The appellant, Laxmichand, was involved in a quarrel with the deceased, Gyaniram Mahajan, who was intoxicated and refused to leave the appellant's house. The appellant dragged the deceased outside and struck him on the head with a spade, causing injuries that led to death after seven days. The appellant made several ex…
SURENDERA MISHRAversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND
2011 INSC 176 January 2011Dismissed
Surendra Mishra was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC and for illegal possession of a firearm under Section 27 of the Arms Act after he shot dead Chandrashekhar Choubey. He appealed, claiming that he was of unsound mind at the time of the offence and therefore entitled to the protection of Section 84 IPC. The S…
HARI KISHANversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2010 INSC 136 January 2010Disposed off
The appellant Hari Kishan was convicted under sections 302 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his brother's sibling Dinesh, based primarily on the testimony of Harkesh (PW‑2), who claimed to be an eye‑witness and to have sustained injuries in the same incident. The trial and High Courts accepted his evi…
BODDELLA BABUL REDDYversusPUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P.
2010 INSC 146 January 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Boddella Babul Reddy, was convicted by the Andhra Pradesh High Court for murder (Sec. 302 IPC) arising from a factional clash in which he was alleged to have hurled a bomb that killed a coolie. The trial court had acquitted all accused, including the appellant, on the ground that the prosecution evidence…
HARINARAYAN G. BAJAJversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
2010 INSC 156 January 2010Dismissed
In a criminal proceeding under Sections 406 and 114 IPC, the trial court had framed charges against respondents No.2‑4 and later, under Section 319(1) Cr.P.C., added respondent No.5 as a co‑accused. The newly added accused sought to have the proceedings against him commenced afresh from the inquiry stage (Section 244) …
INDRESH KUMARversusRAM PHAL AND ORS.
2010 INSC 166 January 2010Appeal(s) allowed
Indresh Kumar alleged that Inspector Ramphal and six other police officers tortured him and his family in 1992. The trial court convicted Ramphal under IPC sections 218, 342 and 323, while acquitting the six co‑accused. The High Court later set aside Ramphal’s conviction and acquitted all accused, dismissing Indresh Ku…
SUNIL KUMAR AND ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P.
2010 INSC 176 January 2010Dismissed
The appellants Sunil Kumar, Tilak Singh and Ram Singh were convicted under Section 304 Part II read with Sections 147 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code for the death of Salim, who died from head injuries inflicted with sticks. The prosecution relied on the testimony of three eye‑witnesses, including the deceased's fathe…
RABINDRA MAHTO AND ANR.versusSTATE OF JHARKHAND
2006 INSC 166 January 2006Dismissed
The appellants, members of a Mahto clan, attacked two men who were ploughing a field they claimed as their own, using swords, knives and lathis, resulting in the deaths of Sohrai Puran and Ram Mohan Puran and injuries to others. An FIR was lodged the next day and sent to the magistrate a day later; the defence argued t…
NEW BIHAR BIRI LEAVES CO. & ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
1981 INSC 16 January 1981Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined the Bihar Kendu Leaves (Control of Trade) Act, 1973, which created a state monopoly over the sale of Kendu leaves for bidi manufacturing. The petitioners, traders in Kendu leaves, challenged Clause 13 (a minimum royalty of 75% of the estimated yield) and Clause 4(bb) (purchasers could not obj…
RAMA NAND AND ORS.versusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
1981 INSC 26 January 1981Dismissed
Rama Nand was convicted for the murder of his wife Sumitra under Section 302 IPC, with co‑accused Shish Ram and Kali Datt convicted under Section 201 IPC. The prosecution relied on a series of circumstantial facts: a strong motive demonstrated by threatening letters, Sumitra’s last sighting with the accused, the planti…
STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CBI/ACB/BANGALOREversusB.A. SRINIVASAN AND ANR.
2019 INSC 13225 December 2019Appeal(s) allowed
B.A. Srinivasan, a former Assistant General Manager of Vijaya Bank who retired on 31‑Oct‑2012, was alleged to have conspired with others to fraudulently sanction and disburse loans, violating bank rules. An FIR was lodged in 2013 and a charge‑sheet filed in 2014, charging him under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471,…
MAHIPALversusRAJESH KUMAR @ POLIA & ANR.
2019 INSC 13255 December 2019Appeal(s) allowed
Mahipal filed a criminal appeal challenging the Rajasthan High Court's order granting bail to five accused in the murder of his nephew, Akhilesh. The FIR alleged that the accused assaulted the victim with rods, causing fatal head injuries, as corroborated by a post‑mortem report and a Section 161 statement of an eyewit…
STATE OF NCT OF DELHIversusSHIV CHARAN BANSAL & ORS.
2019 INSC 13215 December 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined the State’s appeal against the discharge of several accused in the murder of S.N. Gupta. The prosecution alleged a pre‑planned criminal conspiracy involving Shiv Charan Bansal, his son, and others, supported by call‑detail records, recovered weapon, ballistic reports and statements. The Court…
MAHENDER CHAWLA & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2018 INSC 11535 December 2018Disposed off
The petitioners, who were witnesses or relatives of witnesses in the Asaram rape cases, alleged that they faced threats, attacks and even murders, and that the State failed to provide any protection, violating their right to a fair trial under Art. 21. They sought a court‑monitored witness‑protection programme and the …
KANCHANBEN PURSHOTTAMBHAI BHANDERIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
2014 INSC 8395 December 2014Dismissed
The case involved the suicide of Hina, a daughter‑in‑law, who allegedly faced mental and physical harassment and dowry demands from her mother‑in‑law, Kanchanben. The trial court convicted Kanchanben under IPC sections 3048 (dowry death) and 498A (cruelty) and under sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, senten…
NARINDER SINGH ARORAversusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS.
2011 INSC 8335 December 2011Disposed off
The appellant filed a complaint in 1988 leading to an FIR and charges under Sections 498‑A, 304‑B, 34 and 302 of the IPC. The trial was initially assigned to Additional Sessions Judge S.N. Dhingra, who on 25 September 2000 recused himself for personal reasons and the case was transferred to another judge, resulting in …
AKRAM KHANversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL
2011 INSC 8355 December 2011Dismissed
The appellant, Akram Khan, was one of seven accused who kidnapped a four‑year‑old boy in Kolkata and demanded ransom, threatening to kill the child if the demand was not met. The prosecution proved the kidnapping, detention, and ransom demands through the testimony of the child, his father, a newspaper vendor and a tel…
LAXMANJI AND ANR.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT
2008 INSC 14045 December 2008Appeal(s) allowed
Four accused went to the victim's house; the unarmed accused No.2 and No.3 restrained the victim while accused No.1, armed with a knife, inflicted fatal blows. The victim died, leading to conviction of accused Nos.1,2,3 under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC, while No.4 was acquitted. The appellants, Nos.2 a…
ARUN BHAKTA @ THULUversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL
2008 INSC 14055 December 2008Appeal(s) allowed
Arun Bhakta (Thulu) was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his wife Jyotsna, based largely on circumstantial evidence and the "last seen" theory that the couple were together the night before her death. The prosecution's case relied on statements of witnesses that were later contradicted: the sister clai…
SUBHASH HARNARAYANJI LADDHAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2006 INSC 9555 December 2006Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased Yadav Navkar allegedly entered into a sale agreement for his land with the appellants, but a forged General Power of Attorney was later executed by accused No.1, leading to a sale deed in favour of the appellants. After Navkar went missing, his wife filed a report, a FIR was lodged under Sections 364 and 3…
SALIM SAHABversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2006 INSC 9565 December 2006Appeal(s) allowed
Salim assaulted his father‑in‑law’s brother Saleem with a pair of scissors during a heated quarrel, causing injuries that led to Saleem’s death. The trial court convicted Salim under Section 324 IPC (grievous hurt) and sentenced him to five years’ rigorous imprisonment. On appeal, the High Court upgraded the conviction…
HORI LAL AND ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P
2006 INSC 9575 December 2006Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined a land‑dispute‑related shooting in which members of an unlawful assembly opened fire, killing Hori Lal and Smt Ram Shree and injuring others. The appellants challenged the conviction on grounds that the FIR was ante‑timed, the prosecution failed to prove a common object, the medical evidence …
KULWINDER SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2006 INSC 9585 December 2006Dismissed
The appellant, Kulwinder Singh, was convicted along with three others for the murder of Rajbir Singh, allegedly hired by Nirpal Singh, Nardev Singh and their father Pargat Singh in a land‑dispute motive. The prosecution’s case rested on the statements of eyewitness PW‑3, the extra‑judicial confession recorded by PW‑7, …
OM PRAKASH @ RAJAversusSTATE OF UTTARANCHAL
2002 INSC 5205 December 2002Dismissed
The appellant, a domestic servant employed by retired Brigadier Shyam Lal Khanna, was convicted of murdering three members of the Khanna family and attempting to murder the wife. The prosecution proved the offences through the testimony of the surviving wife (PW‑1), corroborated by a sweeper and forensic evidence, show…
SATISH SHARMA AND ANR.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT
2002 INSC 5215 December 2002Appeal(s) allowed
The accused were charged with offences under IPC sections 114 and 302 and the Arms Act. Their applications for anticipatory bail were rejected by the Sessions Court and the Gujarat High Court. While the bail matter was pending, two police officers (the appellants) filed a report under Section 169 of the Criminal Proced…
SUDAMA PANDEY AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR
2001 INSC 5965 December 2001Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were charged with the murder of a 12‑year‑old girl, Gudia Kumari, and were convicted by the Sessions Court and sentenced to death on the basis of circumstantial evidence; the High Court confirmed the conviction but commuted the sentence to life imprisonment. On appeal to the Supreme Court under Article 1…
STATE OF TAMIL NADU ETC.versusSURESH (A-2) AND ANR.
1997 INSC 7915 December 1997Appeal(s) allowed
A pregnant housewife fell from the fourth floor of her apartment and died. The prosecution alleged that the husband, his brother (A‑2 Suresh) and two employees conspired to murder her; the husband was abroad. The only direct evidence was the testimony of an approver (PW‑1) who confessed and implicated A‑2 and A‑3, supp…
RAVJI @ RAM CHANDRAversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN
1995 INSC 8425 December 1995Dismissed
The appellant, Ravji, was convicted of murdering his pregnant wife and three minor children with an axe, attempting to kill his mother, attempting to murder a neighbour's wife, and murdering the neighbour's father‑in‑law. The trial court and High Court found the prosecution's circumstantial and eyewitness evidence suff…
STATE OF ORISSAversusBANSIDHAR SINGH
1995 INSC 8435 December 1995Appeal(s) allowed
Santush Kumar Nayak was admitted with severe burns and, on his deathbed, gave a dying declaration to Dr. P.K. Sahu that his brother‑in‑law Bansidhar Singh had poured kerosene on him. The police initially registered a case under Section 309 IPC (attempted suicide) based on an FIR from the respondent's son, but after the…
R. BALAKRISHNA PILLAIversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ANR.
1995 INSC 8455 December 1995Appeal(s) allowed
R. Balakrishna Pillai, a former Kerala Minister for Electricity, was charged with criminal conspiracy (IPC s.120‑B) and an offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act for supplying electricity to a private firm in Karnataka without the Kerala Government's consent. The Kerala High Court held that sanction under CrPC …
KARAKKATTU MUHAMMED BASHEERversusTHE STATE OF KERALA
2024 INSC 8385 November 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Karakkattu Muhammed Basheer, was convicted under Sections 302 and 201 of the IPC for the murder of Gouri, based solely on circumstantial evidence presented by the prosecution. The prosecution alleged an illicit relationship between the appellant and another accused, motive for the murder, and attempted t…
XYZversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
2024 INSC 8695 November 2024Case Partly allowed
The appellant, an illiterate woman, filed an FIR alleging serious offences including rape (IPC s.376(2)(N)), criminal intimidation (IPC s.506) and caste-based atrocities (SC/ST Act s.3(1)(R), s.3(1)(w), s.3(2)(5)). The accused sought quashing of the charge sheet on the basis of a purported settlement, and the Gujarat H…
SUBRATA CHOUDHURY @ SANTOSH CHOUDHURY & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF ASSAM & ANR.
2024 INSC 8345 November 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants filed an original complaint on 11.11.2010 alleging offences under Sections 406, 420 and 34 IPC, which led to a police investigation and a negative final report accepted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) on 06.06.2011 after rejecting the complainant's protest (narazi) petition. Dissatisfied, the comp…
HITESH VERMAversusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ANR.
2020 INSC 6365 November 2020Disposed off
The appellant, Hitesh Verma, challenged a charge‑sheet filed under Sections 452, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(e) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, alleging that the FIR was based on a property dispute and was false. The High Court dismissed his petition under Sec…
ROHTAS & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF HARYANA
2019 INSC 12045 November 2019Dismissed
The appellants Rohtas and Surender Singh were convicted under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC for stabbing the deceased Mohar Pal, based on the testimony of two eye‑witnesses (PW‑1 and PW‑2). They challenged the conviction in a special leave petition, alleging deficiencies in the investigation, delay in FIR registration…
MANJUNATH GANESH HEGDE & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2008 INSC 12465 November 2008Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were charged with offences under Sections 341, 324, 326, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the IPC for an assault that injured three witnesses. The trial court acquitted them, finding the prosecution evidence insufficient. The High Court, acting as the first appellate court, partially set aside the acquit…
DHARAM CHANDversusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.
2008 INSC 12475 November 2008Case Partly allowed
The appellant, brother of the deceased Anju Devi, challenged the High Court's order that acquitted three accused who lived separately and released the husband on the ground that he had already served his sentence. The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of the three accused, finding that the evidence did not prove their…
MOHD. AZAD @ SAMINversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL
2008 INSC 12485 November 2008Dismissed
The appellants were convicted for the murder of a young man whose body was found half‑dug in a cemetery after the accused allegedly scaled the wall, consumed wine and later assaulted a worker. The prosecution relied on extensive circumstantial evidence, including eyewitnesses who last saw the accused with the deceased,…
STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusARJUN
2008 INSC 12495 November 2008Dismissed
The State of Maharashtra prosecuted Arjun (A-2) and another accused (A-1) under IPC sections 302/34 and 201/34 for the murder of Jagnandan Singh. The trial court convicted both based solely on five pieces of circumstantial evidence, including alleged purchase of rat poison, a gunny bag, ropes, and the discovery of the …
STATE OF PUNJABversusRAJINDER SINGH & ORS. ETC.
2008 INSC 12445 November 2008Dismissed
The incident on 23 September 1996 involved a violent assault by several accused on the family of Surjit Kaur, resulting in the death of Jangir Singh. The trial court convicted multiple accused under sections 302, 364, 323, 149 and related provisions of the Indian Penal Code. On appeal, the Punjab and Haryana High Court…
MADHYA PRADESH SPECIAL POLICE ESTABLISHMENTversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS.
2004 INSC 6425 November 2004Leave Granted & Allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether the Governor of Madhya Pradesh could, in his own discretion, grant sanction for the prosecution of two former ministers despite the Council of Ministers' refusal to do so. A Lokayukta report had found prima facie evidence of corruption and conspiracy under the Prevention of Corruption…
JAYAWANT DATTATRAY SURYARAOversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2001 INSC 5585 November 2001Dismissed
The case involved a shoot‑out at J.J. Hospital in Mumbai on 12 September 1992, resulting in the murder of a prisoner and two police constables and injuries to several others. The accused – A‑2 (Jayawant Dattatray Suryarao), A‑6 (Subhashsingh Thakur) and A‑7 (Shamkishore Garikapatti) – were convicted under the Terrorist…
IN RE: AJAY KUMAR PANDEY...CONTEMNERversus.
1996 INSC 12835 November 1996Disposed off
Advocate Ajay Kumar Pandey filed petitions and letters containing intemperate, insulting language against two Supreme Court judges, demanded apologies and compensation, and threatened to prosecute them, also filing a criminal complaint in a magistrate's court. The Supreme Court, after giving him opportunities to delete…
S.K. NAIRversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
1996 INSC 12855 November 1996Dismissed
The appellant, an army personnel, was convicted of murder and causing injuries with a khukri in a barracks. He appealed, asserting that he was a diagnosed paranoid and therefore incapable of understanding his acts, seeking protection under Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code. The Supreme Court examined whether the ment…
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusDHIRENDRA KUMAR
1996 INSC 12865 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Madhya Pradesh prosecuted Dhirendra Kumar for the murder of Munibai, alleging motive stemming from an 'evil eye' and supported by eye‑witness testimony, a dying declaration, and the recovery of the murder weapon, a revolver stolen from the police malkhana. The trial court convicted Kumar under s.302 IPC an…
M/S IVECO MAGIRUS BRANDSCHUTZTECHNIK GMBHversusNIRMAL KISHORE BHARTIYA & ANR
2023 INSC 8805 October 2023Dismissed
The German company Iveco Magirus Brandschutztechnik GmbH (appellant) challenged a summons issued by an Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate in Delhi after a private complaint of defamation was filed by Nirmal Kishore Bhartiya (respondent). The complaint alleged that letters written by the appellant’s authorised age…
GEO VARGHESEversusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.
2021 INSC 6185 October 2021Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a Physical Training Teacher, was charged under Section 306 IPC for alleged abetment of his student’s suicide, based on an FIR alleging harassment and insult. The High Court dismissed the appellant’s petition under Section 482 CrPC to quash the FIR, holding that the FIR disclosed a cognizable offence. On …
M/S. METERS AND INSTRUMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.versusKANCHAN MEHTA
2017 INSC 10095 October 2017Disposed off
The appellants, M/s. Meters and Instruments Private Ltd. and others, were charged under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonoured cheque to the complainant, Kanchan Mehta. The complainant refused to accept a demand draft, while the accused offered to pay the cheque amount with interest and…
BALIYA@ BAL KISHANversusSTATE OF M.P.
2012 INSC 4515 October 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants Baliya and Gopal were convicted under Sections 120B and 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Pradeep, based on alleged conspiracy to kill him after a pamphlet scandal. The prosecution relied on two alleged eye‑witnesses, one of whom was declared hostile, and on circumstantial evidence such as t…
SUDHAKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2012 INSC 4525 October 2012Case Partly allowed
The appellant was convicted of murdering his son under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. Evidence showed that only the appellant, his wife (the mother), and the deceased were present, and the appellant's blood‑stained clothes matched the victim's blood group. The trial and high courts affirmed the con…
SHAHEJADKHAN MAHEBUBKHAN PATHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
2012 INSC 4535 October 2012Disposed off
The appellants were arrested for transporting 500 grams of brown sugar, a commercial quantity under the NDPS Act, and were convicted under Sections 8(c), 21 and 29, receiving 15 years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.1.5 lakh with a default imprisonment of three years for non‑payment. They appealed, seeking redu…
SHANTI DEVIversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN
2012 INSC 4555 October 2012Dismissed
Shanti Devi was convicted for murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and for causing the disappearance of a body (Sec. 201 IPC) after the father of PW2 allegedly visited her house on 22‑08‑1997 and never returned. The prosecution relied on a series of circumstantial facts: the victim’s disappearance, the appellant’s misleading statemen…
THANU RAMversusSTATE OF M.P.
2010 INSC 6735 October 2010Dismissed
Thanu Ram's wife, Hirabai, committed suicide by self‑immolation in the fourth year of their marriage while six months pregnant. She made a dying declaration before a Naib Tahsildar, which a doctor affirmed was given in a sound mental state. The prosecution proved that the husband and his mother subjected Hirabai to men…
KANWAR NATWAR SINGHversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT & ANR
2010 INSC 6765 October 2010Dismissed
Kanwar Natwar Singh and others appealed against the Directorate of Enforcement after a show‑cause notice was issued under Rule 4(1) of the Foreign Exchange Management (Adjudication Proceedings and Appeal) Rules, 2000. The appellants demanded that the adjudicating authority furnish copies of all documents in its possess…
ARUN KUMAR SHARMAversusSTATE OF BIHAR
2009 INSC 11625 October 2009Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined the murder conviction of Arun Kumar Sharma under Section 302 IPC for the death of his wife Sushma Devi. The prosecution's case rested on the testimony of a single eye‑witness, PW‑1, whose statements were found to be casual, contradictory and unexplained, especially his failure to report the i…
UMASHANKARversusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
2001 INSC 4885 October 2001Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Umashankar, was charged with circulating counterfeit currency after paying for mangoes with a fake Rs 100 note and police recovered additional counterfeit notes and related items from his possession. He was convicted under IPC sections 489‑B (using counterfeit notes as genuine) and 489‑C (possession of c…
SATVINDER KAURversusSTATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI) AND ANR.
1999 INSC 4555 October 1999Appeal(s) allowed
Satvinder Kaur filed a complaint alleging dowry harassment and torture by her husband Rajinder Singh and his parents in Patiala. An FIR under IPC sections 406 and 498A was later lodged in Delhi. The husband sought quashing of the FIR on the ground that the Delhi police officer lacked territorial jurisdiction to investi…
STATE OF KARNATAKAversusK. YARAPPA REDDY
1999 INSC 4565 October 1999Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Karnataka prosecuted K. Y. Reddy under Section 302 IPC for murdering his lover Rekha with a chopper inside the house of a family friend (PW‑11). The trial court convicted Reddy based primarily on the eye‑witness testimony of PW‑11, who saw the accused stab the victim, and on forensic evidence linking the b…
BUDHWA ALIAS RAMCHARAN AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
1990 INSC 3025 October 1990Disposed off
The appellants were charged with murder, rioting and unlawful assembly under IPC ss. 147, 149 and 302 for the killing of Hanuwa, a villager, during a group rivalry. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on the testimony of the victim’s mother (PW‑1) and sister (PW‑5), who were close relatives and thus interested witness…
DILAVER HUSSAIN SON OF MOHAMMADBHAL LALIWALA ETC.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR.
1990 INSC 3015 October 1990Appeal(s) allowed
The case arose from the June 9, 1985 communal riot in Dabgarwad, Gujarat, where a mob set fire to the house of Maniben, killing her, her daughters, grandchildren and a neighbour’s son. The appellants were charged under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 and several sections of the Indian Pen…
HARILAL ETC.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH (NOW CHHATTISGARH)
2023 INSC 8015 September 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants Harilal and Parasram were convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment for murder under Section 302 IPC based on the testimony of two eye‑witnesses and the seizure of a lathi and clothes allegedly belonging to them. The Supreme Court examined the credibility of the witnesses, noting that the FIR was lodg…
MAKKELLA NAGAIAHversusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
2023 INSC 8005 September 2023Appeal(s) allowed
Makkella Nagaiah was convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC for a murder committed on 21‑12‑2005 and sentenced to life imprisonment. He later filed a writ petition under Article 32 claiming that he was a juvenile at the time of the offence, asserting a date of birth of 02‑05‑1989, which would make …
STATE THROUGH DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICEversusR. SOUNDIRARASU ETC.
2022 INSC 9155 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Tamil Nadu, through a Deputy Superintendent of Police, appealed against the High Court’s order discharging a public servant (R. Soundirarasu) and his wife from prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and IPC s.109 for possessing assets disproportionate to the servant’s known sources of inc…
P. CHIDAMBARAMversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
2019 INSC 10105 September 2019Dismissed
The appellant, former Finance Minister P. Chidambaram, was charged with alleged irregularities in a foreign investment clearance and money‑laundering offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act and the Prevention of Money‑Laundering Act (PMLA). The Enforcement Directorate (ED) produced a sealed cover containing doc…
DR. ASHWANI KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER
2019 INSC 10075 September 2019Disposed off
Dr. Ashwani Kumar, a former Law Minister, filed a miscellaneous application seeking a Supreme Court direction to Parliament to enact a comprehensive law against custodial torture, invoking the UN Convention against Torture and arguing that such torture violates Article 21 of the Constitution. The Court noted that the m…
C. R. KARIYAPPAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2018 INSC 7865 September 2018Case Partly allowed
The appellant, a school teacher, struck a second‑standard student with a wooden stick, causing loss of sight in the child's left eye. The trial court acquitted him, citing contradictions in eye‑witness testimony, alleged tutoring of the child witness, and a 25‑day delay in filing the FIR. The High Court reversed the ac…
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.versusTASNEEM RIZWAN SIDDIQUEE
2018 INSC 7835 September 2018Leave Granted & Allowed
The police, investigating a case involving illegal sale of call detail records, arrested Rizwan Alam Siddique and obtained a magistrate's order remanding him to police custody until 23 March 2018. His wife, Tasneem Rizwan Siddiquee, filed a writ of habeas corpus in the High Court alleging unlawful detention; the High C…
PRABHU CHAWLAversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.
2016 INSC 8515 September 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court heard appeals by Prabhu Chawla and Jagdish Upasane challenging a Rajasthan High Court order that dismissed their petitions under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., on the ground that the same relief could be obtained through a revision petition under Section 397. The Court examined a conflict between two ear…
PARGAN SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.
2014 INSC 6095 September 2014Dismissed
In 1999, two men withdrew Rs. 4 lakh from a bank, were ambushed, shot, and robbed of the money bag. One victim, Varun Kumar, died; another, Kamaljit Singh (PW‑2), was injured. After a seven‑year investigation, the accused were arrested and tried. The trial court, affirmed by the High Court, convicted them under IPC sec…
SAMAR BAHADUR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.
2011 INSC 6475 September 2011Dismissed
The appellant, a constable in the Provincial Armed Constabulary, was found absent without permission and later forcibly seized a bottle of liquor from a wine shop while under the influence of alcohol. He was charged in a criminal case under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code, but was acquitted. Separate departmental …
MRINAL DAS & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF TRIPURA
2011 INSC 6505 September 2011Dismissed
The case involved the murder of Tapan Chakraborty on 31 August 2000, for which thirteen persons were charged. One accused, Ratan Sukladas (A‑12), applied for and was granted pardon, becoming an approver whose testimony formed the core of the prosecution's case. The trial court convicted only two accused (A‑5 and A‑11) …
RAVIversusSTATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
2008 INSC 10165 September 2008Dismissed
The appellants were convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for the killing of Albert Walter, based primarily on the testimony of PW‑1, the deceased's brother, who identified the accused and asserted that sufficient street lighting enabled him to see the incident. The appellants challenged the conviction, arguing tha…
FAKHRUDDIN AHMADversusSTATE OF UTTARANCHAL AND ANR.
2008 INSC 10185 September 2008Disposed off
The appellant, a poultry farmer, was accused by a complainant of forging a cheque and was charged under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471. The complainant claimed the cheque was a blank cheque misplaced by a third party, while the appellant alleged the cheque was fraudulently used. The Judicial Magistrate, instead of …
SHIVAJI @ DADYA SHANKAR ALHATversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2008 INSC 10195 September 2008Dismissed
The appellant, Shivaji @ Dadya Shankar Alhat, was convicted of raping and murdering a nine‑year‑old girl and sentenced to death under Sections 302 and 376(2)(5) IPC. The prosecution case rested entirely on circumstantial evidence, including eyewitnesses who saw the accused with the victim, the recovery of the victim’s …
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHversusRAM VEER SINGH AND ORS.
2007 INSC 8925 September 2007Dismissed
The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed the Allahabad High Court's acquittal of three accused who had been convicted for murder under Sections 302, 34 and 201 of the IPC. The prosecution's case relied on the identification of a decomposed body recovered a month after the incident, based solely on the clothes worn, and on t…
DILAWAR SINGHversusSTATE OF DELHI
2007 INSC 8935 September 2007Disposed off
The appellant Dilawar Singh was accused of robbing a temple priest on 8 August 1984, allegedly with accomplices who tied the priest and stole cash. The prosecution relied solely on the priest's testimony, claiming the accused carried weapons, but no injury was inflicted. The FIR was lodged only on 31 August 1984, creat…
SURINDER SINGH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P.
2003 INSC 4555 September 2003Dismissed
The appellants were convicted of murder under IPC s.302 read with s.34 for the killing of Hamam Singh. The trial court had acquitted them, relying on the alleged unreliability of witnesses who were relatives of the deceased, the absence of independent shop‑keeper witnesses, a site‑plan omission, and a perceived conflic…
STATE OF KARNATAKAversusM.N. RAMDAS
2002 INSC 3665 September 2002Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Karnataka prosecuted M.N. Ramdas for the murder of his companion Ananthu in a lodge in Mysore on 28 June 1988. The accused made an extra‑judicial confession to a lodge counter clerk (PW2), who promptly informed the lodge proprietor’s father (PW3) and the police; the police subsequently found the accused in…
GROSONS PHARMACEUTICALS (P) LTD. AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS.
2001 INSC 4275 September 2001Dismissed
Grosons Pharmaceuticals Ltd., an approved contractor for supplying drugs to the Uttar Pradesh government, was blacklisted after a vigilance inquiry uncovered irregularities and a criminal prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 120 IPC was launched. The State issued a show‑cause notice, the appel…
NARAYAN CHETANRAM CHAUDHARY AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2000 INSC 4325 September 2000Dismissed
The appellants, Narayan Chetanram Chaudhary and Jitu, along with Raju, murdered seven members of a family, including two children and a pregnant woman, to conceal a robbery. Raju later became an approver after the trial court granted him pardon and recorded his confession. Both the trial court and the High Court convic…
P.P. UNIKRISHNAN AND ANR.versusPUTTIYOTTIL ALIKUTTY AND ANR.
2000 INSC 4335 September 2000Dismissed
The petitioners, a Sub‑Inspector and a Constable of the Kerala Police, were charged with offences of assault, grievous hurt, attempt to murder and criminal intimidation under the IPC for illegally confining and beating a shop‑keeper in a police lock‑up. They argued that the trial court should not have taken cognizance …
GOPALAKRISHNA MENON AND ANOTHERversusD. RAJA REDDY AND ANOTHER
1983 INSC 1135 September 1983Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, a father and son, entered into a printing‑press agreement with the first respondent and later filed a civil suit for recovery of a deposit and damages, producing the original contract and a money receipt. The respondent complained that the signature on the receipt was forged, alleging offences under Sec…
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR BIHAR STATE FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLY CORPORATION LIMITED & ANR.versusSANJAY KUMAR
2025 INSC 9335 August 2025Dismissed
The Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation entered into contracts with rice millers for paddy procurement and included an arbitration clause. Allegations of massive fraud and misappropriation of public funds led to criminal FIRs, charges under the Penal Code, and recovery proceedings under the Bihar & Orissa P…
SHAIL KUMARIversusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
2025 INSC 9365 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Shail Kumari was convicted under Section 302 IPC for allegedly drowning her two children after taking them to a pond. The trial court and the Chhattisgarh High Court upheld the conviction primarily on the testimony of a single eyewitness, PW‑2, while other potential witnesses were not examined. On appeal, the Supreme C…
KALLU NAT ALIAS MAYANK KUMAR NAGARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR.
2025 INSC 9305 August 2025Dismissed
The petition challenged the order of the trial court and the High Court that summoned Kallu Nat alias Mayank Kumar Nagar as an accused under Section 193 of the CrPC in a murder‑rape case, despite his name being omitted from the charge‑sheet. The core issue was whether a Court of Session, after a case is committed to it…
KATHI DAVID RAJUversusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR.
2019 INSC 8615 August 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant was charged under the IPC for allegedly obtaining a false Scheduled Caste certificate by misrepresenting his parentage and caste. The police, shortly after his arrest, applied to a civil court under Section 53 of the CrPC for a DNA test of the appellant, his mother and brothers, and the Additional Junior …
SWAMI ACHYUTANAND TIRTH & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2016 INSC 5755 August 2016Disposed off
Petitioners filed a public‑interest writ seeking a mandamus directing the Union and several State governments to curb the sale of adulterated and synthetic milk, relying on a 2011 FSSAI report that 68.4% of milk samples nationwide were non‑conforming. The respondents argued that the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 …
RAGHBIR CHAND & ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2013 INSC 5155 August 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, four accused, were charged with murder (s.302), voluntarily causing grievous hurt (s.324) and simple hurt (s.323) read with s.34 IPC for assaulting several witnesses and killing the deceased Rajinder Kumar. The trial court and High Court convicted all four under s.302 read with s.34, as well as under s.…
ABU SALEM ABDUL QAYYUM ANSARIversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ANR.
2013 INSC 5125 August 2013Disposed off
Abu Salem, an accused in the 1993 Bombay bomb blasts, was extradited from Portugal to India in 2005 on the assurance that he would not face the death penalty or imprisonment beyond 25 years. After his return, the Designated Court framed additional charges beyond those covered by the extradition, which Abu Salem argued …
SADANANDA MONDALversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL
2013 INSC 5165 August 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Sadananda Mondal, was charged along with 13 others for the murder of Bharat Mondal, who died from a gunshot wound during a picnic dispute. The trial court convicted eight accused, including the appellant, under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC, while the High Court acquitted all but the appellant. On appea…
SHAH NAWAJversusSTATE OF U.P. & ANR.
2011 INSC 5485 August 2011Appeal(s) allowed
An FIR was lodged under Sections 302 and 307 IPC against Shah Nawaj. His mother applied to the Juvenile Justice Board claiming he was a minor, relying on his school mark sheet and school leaving certificate showing a birth date of 18‑06‑1989. The Board declared him a juvenile, but the Additional Sessions Judge and the …
DEBASHIS DAW & ORS.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL
2010 INSC 4795 August 2010Disposed off
The appellants were convicted for forming an unlawful assembly armed with deadly weapons, assaulting a victim who later died, and injuring another person. The trial court and High Court upheld the convictions under Sections 148, 149, 324 and 304 IPC based on eyewitness testimony of the victim, his parents, and medical …
STATE OF U.P.versusSIYA RAM & ANR.
2010 INSC 4825 August 2010Case Partly allowed
The case concerned three accused charged with an offence under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The trial court acquitted one accused and convicted the other two. On appeal, the Allahabad High Court acquitted Siyaram on the ground that his shot did not cause injury and reduced Jiya Lal’s sente…
TAMILSELVANversusSTATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TAMIL NADU
2008 INSC 9055 August 2008Case Allowed
The case involved six sandalwood smugglers accused of shooting a forest guard and injuring a gardener. The FIR described the assailants only as unidentified persons in a group of about 50, and no names were recorded. The trial court convicted all six under Section 302 IPC, but the High Court acquitted five, upholding o…
PRIYA VRAT SINGH & ORS.versusSHYAM JI SAHAI
2008 INSC 9065 August 2008Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, Priya Vrat Singh and others, sought to quash criminal proceedings filed under Sections 494, 120B and 109 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged dowry harassment and bigamy. The High Court had dismissed their Section 482 CrPC application, but the Supreme Court examined w…
BANGARU VENKATA RAOversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
2008 INSC 9095 August 2008Case Partly allowed
Bangaru Venkata Rao was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for stabbing his wife Polamma, who later died. He appealed, claiming the act was in private defence and that only a single blow was given in a sudden quarrel, invoking Exception 4 of Section 300 IPC. The Supreme Court examined the elements of Exception 4…
JACOB MATHEWversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.
2005 INSC 3345 August 2005Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Dr. Jacob Mathew, was charged under Section 304A IPC for the death of a patient who died after an empty oxygen cylinder was attached to him in a private hospital. The trial court framed charges and the High Court dismissed the petition to quash the FIR. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined whether the d…
BAPPA ALIAS BAPUversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
2004 INSC 4225 August 2004Case Partly allowed
The appellant, Bappa alias Bapu, was convicted under IPC Section 307 for stabbing the victim, Bibhishan, on the stomach, back and neck, causing serious injuries but not death. He appealed, contending that the injuries did not amount to an attempt to murder and that the ten‑year rigorous imprisonment was excessive. The …
SURJIT SINGHversusNAHARA RAM AND ANR.
2004 INSC 4235 August 2004Leave Granted & Allowed
The informant, Surjit Singh, alleged that the accused, Nahara Ram and another, fired shots at him while he was spraying his paddy field, causing injuries. The trial court convicted them under Section 326 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act, sentencing them to five years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.2,0…
KARNAM RAM NARSAIAH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
2004 INSC 4245 August 2004Dismissed
Seventeen persons were tried for offences including murder; five were convicted, and the High Court upheld the murder convictions of A1‑A4 under Section 302 read with Section 34. The appellants argued that the charge sheet did not specifically allege an offence under Section 34 and that the evidence did not identify wh…
STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)versusPREM RAJ
2003 INSC 3675 August 2003Appeal(s) allowed
Prem Raj was convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and sentenced to two years of rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs.500, and an additional three years of rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs.1,000, to run concurrently. He appealed to the Delhi High Court seeking a reduction in the term of impri…
ARVINDER VIR SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR
1998 INSC 2875 August 1998Case Partly allowed
The case arose from a criminal proceeding for the abduction and murder of an advocate and his family. The CBI, after a Supreme Court direction, filed a charge‑sheet against the appellant SI Avindervir Singh and three other police officers for offences under Sections 193, 194, 211 and 218 IPC, alleging false implication…
SUBRAN AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KERALA
1993 INSC 2555 August 1993Modified
The Supreme Court reviewed its earlier judgment in Subran and others v. State of Kerala after noting that paragraph 11 could be misinterpreted as a general statement of law. The case involved four appellants, including Subran, who were convicted of murder under Section 302 of the IPC. On review, the Court held that Sub…
SARDAR HUSSAIN & ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
1988 INSC 2065 August 1988Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, Sardar Hussain and a co‑accused, were charged with murdering Islam, the younger brother of PW 1, to conceal a fraudulent sale deed that purportedly transferred Islam's land to the wife of appellant No. 1. The prosecution relied solely on circumstantial evidence: a motive derived from the alleged fraud, …
PRADEEPversusTHE STATE OF HARYANA
2023 INSC 5995 July 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, accused No.2, was convicted along with another accused for murder and related offences based solely on the testimony of his 12‑year‑old son, PW‑1, who claimed to have witnessed the crime. The trial court administered an oath to the child after a perfunctory preliminary examination consisting of only thre…
PRITINDER SINGH @ LOVELYversusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB
2023 INSC 6145 July 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, Pritinder Singh (alias Lovely) and Manjit Kaur, were convicted for murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC based on circumstantial evidence, an alleged extra‑judicial confession, and the "last seen" theory. The Supreme Court examined the reliability of the extra‑judicial confession, the…
STATE OF U.PversusSONU KUSHWAHA
2023 INSC 6035 July 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed against a High Court order that reduced the conviction of Sonu Kushwaha from aggravated penetrative sexual assault under Section 6 of the POCSO Act to penetrative sexual assault under Section 4, thereby lowering his sentence. The facts involved Kushwaha inserting his penis into the m…
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ANRversusMOHD. PARVEZ ABDUL KAYUUM ETC
2019 INSC 7245 July 2019Disposed off
The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Gujarat High Court's judgment that acquitted several accused of murder and terrorism charges in the killing of former Home Minister Haren Pandya and the attempted murder of Jagdish Tiwari. The CBI had investigated and found both incidents were part of a larger conspiracy…
LALIT YADAVversusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
2018 INSC 5855 July 2018Dismissed
The petitioner was convicted by the trial court and affirmed by the High Court for offences under Sections 376 and 342 of the IPC. In both judgments, the victim (PW‑2) was named throughout, which the Supreme Court held to be inconsistent with Section 228‑A of the IPC that protects the identity of rape victims. The Cour…
MAHIPAL SINGH RANA, ADVOCATEversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
2016 INSC 4925 July 2016Disposed off
Advocate Mahipal Singh Rana threatened a civil judge in Etah on two occasions, leading the Allahabad High Court to convict him of criminal contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and impose two months' imprisonment, a fine, and a ban on appearing in Etah courts until he purged the contempt. The High Court also …
MANOJ AND ANR.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2013 INSC 4465 July 2013Disposed off
The case concerned two accused, Manoj and his father, charged with murder and criminal intimidation for the death of Sadashiv under Sections 302, 506 read with Section 34 of the IPC. The trial court convicted both of murder and intimidation; the High Court affirmed the murder conviction but set aside the intimidation c…
S.D. BANDIversusDIVISIONAL TRAFFIC OFFICER, KSRTC & ORS.
2013 INSC 4405 July 2013Disposed off
The appeal arose from the appellant, a driver of KSRTC, who failed to vacate a government quarter after being transferred and whose eviction order was upheld by the High Court but later set aside by the Supreme Court. The Court examined the effectiveness of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, …
ELAVARASANversusSTATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
2011 INSC 4545 July 2011Case Partly allowed
The appellant, a government watchman, assaulted his wife and mother with a sharp weapon and caused the death of his one‑year‑old daughter during a sudden quarrel. He pleaded insanity under Section 84 of the IPC, but the trial and High Courts rejected the plea due to lack of credible medical or behavioural evidence. The…
CHUNNI LALversusSTATE OF U.P.
2010 INSC 3465 July 2010Dismissed
Chunni Lal was convicted of murdering his uncle Heera Lal by firing a gun, and the Supreme Court upheld the life sentence. The appellant argued there was no motive, that only interested witnesses were examined, and that the delay in lodging the FIR and commencing investigation tainted the case. The Court found a clear …
BUNNILAL CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF BIHAR
2006 INSC 3975 July 2006Disposed off
The case arose from a dispute over the balance payment for a she‑buffalo which led to a violent confrontation in which Bunnilal Chaudhary (A‑1) stabbed the victim Shambhu Raut on the left side of the chest, causing his death. The trial court convicted all ten accused of murder under Section 302 read with Section 149 IP…
SHRI BALASAHEB K. THACKERAY AND ANR.versusSHRL VENKAT @ BABRU AND ANR.
2006 INSC 4015 July 2006
The complainant filed a private defamation complaint under IPC s.500 read with s.34 against the editor, printer and publisher of a newspaper. The trial court issued process, but a petition under CrPC s.482 was dismissed by the High Court. While the appeal was pending before this Court, the complainant died. The appella…
KANTI BHADRA SHAH AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL
1999 INSC 2685 July 1999Dismissed
A charge sheet under IPC sections 454, 380 and 120B was filed against the appellants before a Metropolitan Magistrate who, after hearing them, framed charges and dismissed their petition for discharge. The appellants approached the Calcutta High Court seeking quash of the charge; the High Court set aside the charge but…
M/S BALAJI TRADERSversusTHE STATE OF U.P. & ANR.
2025 INSC 8065 June 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The complainant, a betel nut trader, was threatened at gunpoint by the accused and his associates, who demanded a monthly payment of five lakh rupees and attempted to kidnap him. The trial court issued a summons under Section 387 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for putting the complainant in fear of death to commit exto…
SHIV ANAND MALLAPPA KOTIversusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA
2007 INSC 6815 June 2007Appeal(s) allowed
The husband (appellant) was convicted under Section 498‑A of the IPC for the death of his wife by burn injuries, the prosecution alleging a dowry demand. The trial court also convicted the mother‑in‑law and brother‑in‑law under the same provision and the Dowry Prohibition Act, but the High Court acquitted the mother‑in…
JAGVIR SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE(DELHI ADMN.)
2007 INSC 6845 June 2007Dismissed
The appellants Jagvir Singh and others were convicted by a trial court under IPC sections 342, 365, 330 read with 34. The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction, observing that the appellants’ counsel had not challenged the conviction but only argued on the quantum of sentence, and it found the sentence not disproporti…
STATE OF HARYANAversusSURESH
2007 INSC 6875 June 2007Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant State of Haryana appealed the High Court's acquittal of Suresh, who had been convicted under Section 18 of the NDPS Act for possession of opium discovered in a false bottom of his attaché case. The High Court set aside the conviction on the ground that the search of the bag violated the mandatory requirem…
RAJINDERversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2006 INSC 3685 June 2006Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Rajinder was convicted for the death of his nephew Subhash, who died from a thigh wound inflicted by a firearm. The trial court and High Court upheld a conviction under Section 302 IPC (murder) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined the distinction between murder and culpabl…
HARJINDER SINGHversusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.
2025 INSC 6345 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, father of the deceased Dharminder Singh, challenged the High Court's order quashing a summons issued by the trial court under Section 319 of the CrPC against respondent No.2 (Varinder Singh) for alleged abetment to suicide. The incident involved a confrontation on 10 May 2016 where the deceased was taunt…
J. SEKAR @SEKAR REDDYversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
2022 INSC 5195 May 2022Appeal(s) allowed
J. Sekar Reddy, managing partner of SRS Mining, was searched by the Income Tax Department in December 2016, leading to the seizure of about Rs 107 crore in cash and gold. The CBI registered FIRs for scheduled offences under the IPC and the Prevention of Corruption Act, and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) attached the …
MS. PversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
2022 INSC 5145 May 2022Appeal(s) allowed
Ms. P filed a criminal appeal against the State of Madhya Pradesh and the accused (respondent No.2) challenging the High Court's order granting regular bail under Section 439 of the CrPC in a case involving offences of rape (IPC s.376(2)(n)) and criminal intimidation (IPC s.506). The High Court had granted bail on the …
KUMARANversusSTATE OF KERALA & ANR.
2017 INSC 4475 May 2017Dismissed
The appellant was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and was ordered to pay Rs.2.75 lakh as compensation under Section 357(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, with a default imprisonment of one month for non‑payment. He served both the principal sentence and the default imprisonment, after …
MUKESH & ANR.versusSTATE FOR NCT OF DELHI & ORS.
2017 INSC 4485 May 2017Dismissed
On 16 December 2012, a 23-year-old paramedical student and her male friend boarded a bus in Delhi. Six men, including the appellants, gang-raped her, inserted an iron rod into her private parts causing severe internal injuries, and threw both victims out of the moving bus. The woman died from her injuries. The appellan…
R. RACHAIAHversusHOME SECRETARY, BANGALORE
2016 INSC 11825 May 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, including R. Rachaiah, were originally charged under Section 306 IPC for abetting suicide and later, at the close of trial, the prosecution sought and the trial court framed an alternative charge of murder under Section 302 IPC. The court failed to follow the mandatory procedures of Sections 216 and 217…
SUMER SINGHversusSURAJBHAN SINGH AND OTHERS
2014 INSC 9695 May 2014Case Partly allowed
The case concerns a criminal appeal filed by the injured party, Sumer Singh, under Article 136 of the Constitution seeking enhancement of the sentence imposed on Surajbhan Singh and others for grievous hurt (IPC s.326) and related offences arising from a land dispute. The High Court had reduced the sentence to the seve…
NAGESARversusSTATE OF CHHATISGARH
2014 INSC 3565 May 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The case involved seven accused persons charged with offences under Sections 147, 148 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Korma Rao. Two of the accused, Nagesar and Khetro (Accused Nos. 6 and 7), appealed their convictions on the ground that they were not named in the FIR and that no eyewitness identifie…
STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusRAVIKANT SHANKARAPPA PATIL & ORS.
2011 INSC 3585 May 2011Dismissed
The State of Maharashtra prosecuted Ravikant Shankarappa Patil and others for alleged intimidation, forced marriage (Nikah) and rape of a student, invoking IPC sections 376, 386, 148, 452/149, 366/149, 342/149, 323/149, 506(2)/149 and Section 25(1)(a) of the Arms Act. The trial court convicted them, but the Bombay High…