Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

Judgments of 1997

840 judgments, newest first — showing 1–200.

P.S. RAMAMOHANA RAOversusA.P. AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY AND ANR.

1997 INSC 58631 July 1997Appeal(s) allowed

P.S. Ramamohana Rao, employed as Physical Director at Bapatla Agricultural College and later transferred to Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University, was ordered to retire at age 58. He challenged the order, contending that under Section 2(n) of the Andhra Pradesh Act 24 of 1963 a Physical Director is a "teacher" and the

STATE OF WEST BENGALversusO.P. LODHA AND ANR.

1997 INSC 33531 March 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent firm, M/s Prakash Trading Corporation, sold goods both on its own account and as a commission agent for 24 disclosed principals. The Commercial Tax Officer assessed sales tax under Section 6‑B of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 on the firm’s total turnover, including the commission sales. The We

G. RAMESANversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ANR.

1997 INSC 33631 March 1997Dismissed

The Kerala High Court classified 17 acres of land acquired for a Kerala Road Transport Corporation depot into two belts – land abutting the road and low‑lying land below one metre – and awarded different compensation rates. The appellant challenged this classification, arguing that the belting principle should apply on

STATE OF ORISSA AND ANR.versusDAMODAR NAYAK AND ANR.

1997 INSC 33731 March 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

The appeal concerned whether a lecturer appointed in 1976 without the requisite qualifications could receive salary under the Government's Grant‑in‑Aid Scheme. The State clarified in 1987 that unqualified lecturers with at least second‑class marks could be eligible, and a 1983 resolution prescribed specific qualificati

UNION OF INDIAversusR.V. SWAMY@ VELLAICHAMY

1997 INSC 33831 March 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

R.V. Swamy, a deceased freedom fighter, claimed a Central Freedom Fighters pension based on certificates issued by prominent freedom fighters. The Madras High Court, after appreciating the evidence, directed that the pension be granted to his legal representatives. The Government of Tamil Nadu re‑examined the claim and

LUXMI DEVIversusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 33931 March 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Luxmi Devi, joined the police service as a Constable in 1981 and, through superior performance, was promoted and confirmed ahead of respondent No.6, Asha Rani, who was later transferred to Rohtak range at her own request. After the appellant's deputation period ended, the State attempted to revert her to

HARINARAYAN SHRIVASTAVversusUNITED COMMERCIAL BANK AND ANR.

1997 INSC 34031 March 1997Dismissed

The petitioner, a bank employee, was charged with sanctioning loans to fictitious persons and a domestic enquiry was initiated. He applied for permission to engage an advocate, which was denied by the bank and upheld by the High Court. The petitioner argued that the pending criminal case on the same allegations made le

COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT, ARYA NAGAR INTER COLLEGE, ARYA NAGAR, KANPUR THROUGH ITS MANAGER AND ANR.versusSREE KUMAR TIWARY AND ANR.

1997 INSC 34131 March 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

The Committee of Management of Arya Nagar Inter College appointed Sree Kumar Tiwari as an ad‑hoc teacher on 1 July 1986 for a short‑term vacancy. His services were terminated on 30 May 1988 effective 30 June 1988, after which he challenged the termination by a writ petition. While the petition was pending, a stay was g

KRISHAN KUMAR, ASSISTANT SECRETARY, MARKET COMMITTEE, BHIWANI, DISTRICT BHIWANI, (HARYANA)versusHARYANA STATE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BOARD, PANCHKULA THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY.

1997 INSC 34231 March 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

The Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board advertised for Assistant Secretary posts requiring a graduate degree, knowledge of the Punjab Agricultural Produce Marketing Act and at least three years of experience in a government or semi‑government body. Krishan Kumar was appointed based on experience certificates, in

MIS. FABRIL GASOSAversusLABOUR COMMISSIONER AND ORS.

1997 INSC 8031 January 1997Dismissed

M/s. FabriL Gasosa entered into a written settlement with the employees' union in 1986 providing for Variable Dearness Allowance (VDA). The union later gave notice of termination and issued a fresh charter of demands, but did not alter the VDA rate. The employer unilaterally froze VDA and claimed an oral agreement to t

NITIN RASHMIKANT KANT AW ALAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 8131 January 1997Disposed off

The appellant challenged the Delivery of Postal Articles Orders of 1991 and 1996, arguing that delivering mail to a mailbox in a high‑rise building was beyond the powers granted under the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, and that existing buildings lacking mailbox space should be exempt. The High Court upheld the orders,

SUBHASH CHANDRA CHAUDHARI AND ORS.versusRAM MILAN AND ORS.

1997 INSC 8231 January 1997Dismissed

The appellants were granted a one‑year lease on 5 December 1994, which expired on 5 December 1995. The lease was cancelled by the Commissioner on 17 February 1995, but the State Government set aside that cancellation on 23 March 1995. The Government’s subsequent order was stayed by the High Court, which directed that t

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHversusDR. DINA NATH SHUKLA AND ANR.

1997 INSC 8331 January 1997Disposed off

The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed against a High Court judgment that declared a government clarification on reservation in university recruitment invalid. The clarification treated the University of Allahabad and its colleges as a single unit for applying the Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Reservation for Scheduled C

HARYANA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ANR.,versusHAKIM SINGH

1997 INSC 68030 September 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The father of the respondent, Hakim Singh, a lineman with the Haryana State Electricity Board (HSEB), died in 1974. Fourteen years later, his widow applied for a compassionate appointment for their son, relying on HSEB circulars that allowed one family member to be considered for employment within three years of the em

THE STATE BANK OF INDIAversusA.N. GUPTA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 68130 September 1997Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined two appeals by the State Bank of India against Delhi High Court orders directing payment of pension and provident fund to former assistants A.N. Gupta and Gulati, who had retired on superannuation. The Bank argued that under Rule 11 of the Imperial Bank of India Pension Rules, pension could b

HA MALBARI (DEAD) BY LRS.versusNASIRUDDIN PIRMOHMAD AND ORS.

1997 INSC 68230 September 1997Dismissed

The petitioners, legal heirs of a deceased licensee, challenged the continuation of summary ejectment proceedings under Section 41 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882, after the licensee's death. They argued that the cause of action was personal and should abate with the licensee's demise, relying on earlier

MOHAN DUTT SHARMAversusCHIEF JUSTICE, PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

1997 INSC 58330 July 1997Disposed off

M.D. Sharma, a clerk who rose to Assistant and Senior Assistant in the Punjab and Haryana High Court, qualified in the Subordinate Accounts Services examination and was promoted on an ad‑hoc basis to Superintendent Grade‑II and later to Superintendent Grade‑I in newly created posts. Both promotions were conditioned on

N.S.M. AHMED JAMALIA BEEVIversusD.N. SHAH

1997 INSC 58430 July 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a landlady, leased premises to the respondent with permission to sub‑let. The respondent defaulted on rent from September 1990 and, despite notices and multiple proceedings, failed to pay any arrears. The Rent Controller and the Appellate Authority ordered eviction and directed the tenant to deposit the

SMT. SUJATA MUKHERJEEversusPRASHANT KUMAR MUKHERJEE

1997 INSC 45730 April 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Smt. Sujata Mukherjee filed a criminal complaint under Sections 498A, 506 and 323 IPC alleging dowry demand, maltreatment and assault by her husband and his family. The alleged offences occurred at Raigarh (in‑laws' residence) and also at Raipur where the husband allegedly assaulted her. The husband and other responden

MEHARBAN AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

1997 INSC 45630 April 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined appeals by landowners (Meharban & others) against the State of U.P. concerning compensation for lands acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for the planned development of Meerut City. The High Court had reduced the compensation awarded by the reference court to very low rates (e.g., R

UNION OF INDIAversusB.S. AGARWAL AND ANR. ETC.

1997 INSC 67729 September 1997Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined three civil appeals arising from orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal that appointed junior officers to the post of General Manager (GM) and equivalent in the Indian Railways, allegedly bypassing senior officers. The dispute centered on the interpretation of paragraph 7.3 of the Sche

EUGENIO MISQUITA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF GOA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 67929 September 1997Dismissed

The appellants challenged a declaration under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on the ground that it was barred by the one‑year limitation prescribed in the proviso to Section 6(1)(ii). A notification under Section 4(1) was published in the Official Gazette on 6 August 1992; the declaration was made on 3 Aug

RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD.versusPRAVINBHAI JASBHAI PATEL AND ORS.

1997 INSC 62929 August 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by Reliance Industries Ltd. against the Gujarat High Court’s dismissal of its review petition challenging a writ order passed under Article 226 that directed polluting industries to install effluent treatment. The division bench of the High Court had differed on the merits, and di

GOPI AQUA FARMS AND ORS. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA

1997 INSC 57929 July 1997Dismissed

Gopi Aqua Farms and others filed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging a 19‑Feb‑1991 notification issued under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, after the Supreme Court had delivered its judgment in Jagannath v. Union of India. The petitioners argued that they were not parties to the earlier case, that the

NOORSABA KHATOONversusMOHAD. QUASIM

1997 INSC 58029 July 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Noorsaba Khatoon, a Muslim woman, filed a petition under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) seeking maintenance for herself and her three minor children after being deserted by her husband, Mohd. Quasim, who later divorced her and took a second wife. The trial court ordered maintenance for the wife an

NATIONAL RAYON CORPORATION LTD.versusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS

1997 INSC 58129 July 1997Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered whether Rs. 79 lakh set aside by National Rayon Corporation Ltd. as a Debenture Redemption Reserve for the assessment year 1967‑68 should be treated as a provision or a reserve for the purpose of computing the company's capital under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964. The company arg

DAULAT RAMversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

1997 INSC 45229 April 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Daulat Ram, a Punjab police constable, was convicted of murdering a 25‑year‑old man, Narinder Singh, under Section 302 IPC read with Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution relied on two alleged eyewitnesses, the victim's uncle and a companion, and asserted that the killing occurred at 2 p.m., supported by a post‑m

BALO YADAV AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF BIHAR

1997 INSC 45329 April 1997Dismissed

The victim Ramdeo Yadav was attacked and killed with sharp-edged weapons while sleeping in a field; his son Gajendra (PW 8) witnessed the assault using a torchlight. The Sessions Court convicted all fourteen accused based on eyewitness testimony, but the Patna High Court upheld convictions only against six appellants,

UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHERversusP. SATHIKUMARNA NAIR AND OTHERS

1997 INSC 45429 April 1997

Four lecturers of junior colleges in the Union Territory of Lakshadweep were originally designated as lecturers but later re‑designated as junior lecturers and placed on a lower pay scale. They challenged the re‑designation, and the Kerala High Court held that their duties were comparable to those of lecturers in degre

MIHIR TEXTILES LTD. ETC.versusCOLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, BOMBAY ETC.

1997 INSC 45529 April 1997Dismissed

Mihir Textiles Ltd. and another importer sought refund of customs duty on the basis that they were eligible for the 40% concessional rate under Entry 84.66 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Both had cleared their goods after paying full duty and later applied for registration of the import contract as a "project import"

D-BLOCK ASHOK NAGAR (SAHIBABAD) PLOT HOLDERS ASSOCIATION (REGD.)versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

1997 INSC 44629 April 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

The appellant Plot Holders Association challenged the award made under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for a large parcel of land in Sahibabad, contending that the authorities were not liable to pay solatium and interest under the 1984 amendment. The Special Land Acquisition Officer had already granted compensation, sol

STATE OF M.P. AND ORS.versusMAHESH KUMAR AND ORS ETC. ETC.

1997 INSC 44729 April 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

The respondents, who were Head Constables, appeared for the promotion examination to Assistant Sub‑Inspectors in December 1993. Because very few candidates passed, the Director‑General of Police (DGP) granted 15% grace marks to general candidates and 10% to reserved‑category candidates, but only for the Jabalpur zone,

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusSHRI RISAL SINGH

1997 INSC 44829 April 1997Leave Granted & Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by the Union of India challenging the enhanced compensation awarded by a reference court in a land acquisition proceeding. The acquisition was made under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and the compensation was initially set by the Land Acquisition Officer and late

SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR AND ANR. ETC.versusKURRA SAMBASIVA RAO AND ORS. ETC.

1997 INSC 44929 April 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

The Supreme Court examined the compensation payable for 97 acres of agricultural land acquired for a colony for weaker sections in Guntur district. The Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded Rs 22,940 per acre, which was enhanced by the Subordinate Judge to Rs 1,00,000 per acre and further by the High Court to Rs 2

UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI AND ORS.versusA. AJIT SINGH S/O. S. CHET SINGH R/O. NO. 19, FAIZ BAZAR, DARYAGANJ, DELHI-6

1997 INSC 45029 April 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

The respondent was granted a 30‑year lease of Government land in 1949, renewable up to 99 years, but the lease was terminated in 1960. The land was later acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and the Land Acquisition Officer awarded Rs 4,000 per bigha in 1967. The reference court enhanced the award to Rs 17,00

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC.versusMANGATU RAM ETC.

1997 INSC 45129 April 1997

The Supreme Court examined a large land acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 where the Collector had initially classified lands into four belts and awarded uniform compensation. On reference, the lower court re‑classified the lands into Classes A and B and enhanced compensation, but the High Court later gra

REFERENCE UNDER ARTICLE 317(1) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA REGARDING ENQUIRY AND REPORT ON ALLEGATION AGAINST SHRI SHER SINGH, MEMBER, HPSCversusREFERENCE CASE NO. 1 OF 1995

1997 INSC 7829 January 1997Reference answered

The President of India referred a matter under Article 317(1) of the Constitution to the Supreme Court, seeking an enquiry into whether Shri Sher Singh, a member of the Haryana Public Service Commission, should be removed for misbehaviour. The allegation was that Sher Singh repeatedly attempted to influence the written

BHARAT RAM MEENAversusRAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JODHPUR AND ORS .

1997 INSC 7929 January 1997Dismissed

Bharat Ram Meena, a Munsiff/Judicial Magistrate, challenged adverse remarks recorded in his 1990 Annual Confidential Report (ACR) that questioned his integrity, impartiality, and conduct. The remarks were based on allegations of unauthorized absences during election duties and alleged manipulation of judicial records,

STATE OF ORISSAversusB.N. AGARWALLA

1997 INSC 7729 January 1997Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether an arbitrator under the Arbitration Act, 1940 could award interest for three distinct periods – pre‑reference, pendente lite, and post‑award – in light of the Interest Act, 1978 and contractual terms. It held that an arbitrator may award pre‑reference interest only when the dispute ar

DUKHISHYAM BENUPANI, ASSTT. DIRECTOR, ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE (FERA)versusARUN KUMAR BAJORIA

1997 INSC 76828 November 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) raided Arun Kumar Bajoria's residence and issued summons under Section 40 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA). Bajoria filed a writ petition challenging the summons and later obtained anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC from the City Sessions Court, with a conditio

RAJIV MITTALversusMAHARSHI DAYANAND UNIVERSITY AND ORS.

1997 INSC 76728 November 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned admission to the MBBS programme at Rohtak Medical College, where 60 seats were divided into 49 open‑category and 11 backward‑class reserved seats. Sunil Yadav (S) ranked first in the backward‑class list but 62nd in the open list; he failed to obtain an open‑category seat in the first counselling and

STATE OF U.P AND ANR.versusJOGENDRA SINGH AND ANR.

1997 INSC 76928 November 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a Senior Prosecuting Officer, voluntarily retired on 12‑April‑1976 under Uttar Pradesh Fundamental Rule 56 and received pension and gratuity. In 1976 the Rule was amended by adding a proviso that allowed an additional five years of service to be counted for pension and gratuity for those who retired vol

K.S. YADAVversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND ORS.

1997 INSC 77028 November 1997Dismissed

The appeal concerned the promotion of Headmasters/Headmistresses of Government High Schools and lecturers of Higher Secondary Schools to Class‑II (Gazetted) posts under the Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Promotion Rules of 1980. The appellant argued that 234 Class‑II posts already occupied by Headmasters at the time

VINITA M. KHANOLKARversusPRAGNA M. PAI AND ORS.

1997 INSC 77128 November 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned an appeal to the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court against an order dated 15 November 1994 passed by a Single Judge in a suit for dispossession under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act. The respondents argued that Section 6(3) of the Act barred any appeal or revision against such orders, rend

STATE OF ORISSAversusM/S ORISSA ROAD TRANSPORT CO. LTD. ETC. ETC.

1997 INSC 62528 August 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Orissa assessed sales tax on M/s Orissa Road Transport Co. Ltd. for the periodic sale of obsolete and unserviceable spare parts, alleging that the corporation was a dealer under the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 but had not registered. The Sales Tax Officer levied tax and penalty under Section 12(5) (earlier

COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISEversusUSHA MARTIN INDUSTRIES

1997 INSC 62628 August 1997Dismissed

The Collector of Central Excise appealed against Usha Martin Industries, which claimed exemption from central excise duty on wire‑rods manufactured from steel billets that were themselves exempt from duty. The dispute centered on whether the phrase “on which appropriate amount of duty of excise has already been paid” i

DAYARAM DAYALversusSTATE OF M.P. AND ANR.

1997 INSC 62828 August 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Dayaram Dayal was appointed Civil Judge, Class II in Madhya Pradesh in 1985 with a two‑year probation that could be extended for a further two years, making a maximum probation of four years under Rule 24 of the M.P. Judicial Services Rules, 1955. After several adverse performance reports, suspensions and a full‑court

T.V.L. NILSIN INDUSTRIES ETC.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

1997 INSC 57728 July 1997Dismissed

The assessees, T.V.L. Nilsin Industries, challenged the classification of ultramarine blue for sales tax purposes, arguing it should be taxed as a chemical under Item 138 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. The Sales Tax authorities classified it as a pigment under Item 110, making it taxable. The Madras Hig

SAHIB SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

1997 INSC 57828 July 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Sahib Singh was convicted under the IPC and TADA for the murder of Om Prakash based on the testimony of three brothers—sons of the deceased—and a confession recorded under Section 15 of the TADA Act. The Supreme Court examined whether relatives of the deceased are competent witnesses, the effect of a delayed FIR, and t

KUM. MADHURI PATIL AND ANR.versusADDL. COMMISSIONER, TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT, THANE AND ORS.

1997 INSC 44428 April 1997Disposed off

The petition sought to recall the Bombay High Court's order dated 2 September 1994 that delegated the power to issue social‑status (caste) certificates to the Sub‑Divisional Officer and to replace the directions concerning the composition of caste‑scrutiny committees. The court examined whether the earlier order should

THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, HYDERABADversusB. ASHOK KUMAR

1997 INSC 44528 April 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

The Government of Andhra Pradesh dismissed Inspector B. Ashok Kumar after he was found to have demanded and accepted a Rs. 3,000 illegal gratification to refrain from filing a complaint. The Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, after a disciplinary inquiry, held the charge proved and recommended a penalty of stoppag

PANDAPPA HANUMAPPA HANAMAR AND ANR.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

1997 INSC 20428 February 1997Dismissed

The appellants were accused of murdering their brother‑in‑law, Hanamappa, and of acting with common intention under IPC sections 302 and 34. The trial court acquitted them, disbelieving the eye‑witness P.W.2, the hostile witness P.W.1 and several independent villagers, and giving undue weight to minor contradictions an

STATE OF HARYANAversusGHASEETA RAM

1997 INSC 20528 February 1997Dismissed

Ghaseta Ram, a life‑imprisoned prisoner, participated in an unlawful assembly to escape from jail and assaulted a jail warden. He was tried and convicted by the Sessions Court and sentenced to several terms under the IPC. Earlier, the Superintendent of the District Jail, invoking para 633‑A of the Punjab Jail Manual an

M/S. GUJARAT STATE FERTILIZERS CO.versusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE

1997 INSC 20628 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Gujarat State Fertilizers Co., a manufacturer of fertilizers, ammonia and chemicals, claimed a concessional excise duty rate on raw naptha used to produce ammonia and a total exemption on ammonia used to make molten urea, invoking Notification No. 75/1984 and Notification No. 40/1985. The Revenue argued that because th

MOHD. NAZIRversusBECHAND PRASAD AND ORS.

1997 INSC 20728 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Mohd. Nazir, was allotted a building in Banaras under an order dated 17 May 1995 pursuant to Section 16 of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972. After being put in possession, he was ousted by the landlord and a dancing girl with two musicians who later occupied t

RADHA KISHUNversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 20828 February 1997Dismissed

The petitioner, a tele‑communications officer, was required to retire on 31 May 1991 upon attaining the age of superannuation but continued in service until 31 May 1994. The Government sought to recover salary and allowances paid to him for the period after his statutory retirement date, and the petitioner challenged t

SH. RABINDRANATH MUKHOPADHYAY AND ANR.versusCOAL INDIA LTD. AND ANR.

1997 INSC 20928 February 1997Dismissed

Coal India Ltd. introduced a resolution on 14 September 1996 allowing executive employees to either avail the Leave Travel Concession (LTC) or encash it without producing a travel certificate, effective from 1 January 1997. The petitioners contended that fixing this date was arbitrary and discriminatory, especially aga

RAE BARELI KSHETRIYA GRAMIN BANKversusBHOLA NATH SINGH AND ORS.

1997 INSC 21028 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a cashier‑cum‑clerk of Rae Bareli Kshetriya Gramin Bank, was charged with forging signatures and fraudulently withdrawing Rs 28,500. An ex‑parte inquiry found him guilty, a show‑cause notice was issued, and the disciplinary authority dismissed him; the dismissal was affirmed by the Board. The respondent

KRISHNAKANT RAGHUNATH BIBHAVNEKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 21128 February 1997Dismissed

The appellant, a compositor in a Government of India printing press, was charged under Section 409 of the IPC and suspended pending trial, receiving only a subsistence allowance. After being acquitted, he was reinstated but denied back wages, increments, and pension benefits that he claimed as consequential benefits. H

H.R. RAMACHANDRAIAH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 21228 February 1997Dismissed

The petitioners, appointed as Laboratory Attenders in the Karnataka Horticulture Department, claimed promotion to the post of Field Assistant by treating themselves as equivalent to Head Gardeners under the Karnataka Horticulture (Department) Recruitment Rules, 1974. The Karnataka Administrative Tribunal rejected the c

FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIAversusSTATE OF KERALA

1997 INSC 7328 January 1997Dismissed

The Food Corporation of India (FCI) purchased food grains from the State of Uttar Pradesh under levy orders issued pursuant to Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, and also distributed fertilizers under the Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1957. The State sought to levy purchase tax and a 5% surcharge on the FC

SUNIL KUMARversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

1997 INSC 7428 January 1997Dismissed

The appellants, involved in a land dispute, attacked Dayashankar and his brother Ramesh, dismembering the former and severely injuring the latter. Ramesh (PW‑1) survived, narrated the incident to his mother (PW‑2) and nephew (PW‑3), and later gave a statement to the police and a dying declaration to a magistrate. PW‑3

M/S JK SYNTHETICS AND ANR. ETC.versusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER AND ANR

1997 INSC 6928 January 1997Disposed off

J.K. Synthtics Ltd., a manufacturer of tyre‑cord fabric, claimed exemption from sales tax under a 1957 notification issued under Section 8(5) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The State of Rajasthan later issued notifications in 1980 and 1981, the latter stating that "all the notifications" issued under Section 8(5)

R.K. SETHI AND ANOTHER ETC.versusOIL AND NATURAL GAS COMMISSION

1997 INSC 7528 January 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the merger of Telex Operators into the Assistant Grade‑II (AG‑II) cadre of the Oil and Natural Gas Commission (ONGC) and the consequent seniority and promotion issues. The Telex Operators were redesignated as AG‑II employees on 25 April 1980 and placed en bloc below regular AG‑II staff, with

HIKMAT ALI KHANversusISHWAR PRASAD ARYA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 7628 January 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Ishwar Prasad Arya, a practising advocate, was convicted under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code for assaulting an opponent with a knife in a courtroom and sentenced to three years' rigorous imprisonment. The State Bar Council suspended him from practice for three years under Section 35 of the Advocates Act, 1961. H

SH. MALAPRABHA CO-OP., SUGAR FACTORY LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA

1997 INSC 7028 January 1997Leave granted

The Supreme Court examined the fixation of levy‑sugar prices for the years 1974‑75 to 1979‑80 under Section 3(3‑C) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. Earlier the Court had directed the Government to amend the notifications to include the sugar producer’s liability under clause SA (5A) of the Sugarcane (Control) Or

ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AND ORS.versusANAM ELECTRICAL MANUFACTURING CO. ETC

1997 INSC 7128 January 1997Disposed off

The Assistant Collector of Customs appealed against Anam Electrical Manufacturing Co. challenging the levy of a ten‑percent surcharge and the handling of a refund claim under the Central Excise Act, 1944 and the Customs Act, 1962. The Supreme Court examined whether the surcharge could be upheld and, more importantly, w

GULINGAPPA AND ORSversusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, GULBARG

1997 INSC 7228 January 1997Dismissed

The petitioners, Gurlingappa and others, challenged the compensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for land acquired for the Amerja Project. The officer had fixed Rs. 3,000 per acre, which the District Court enhanced to Rs. 6,300 (dry land) and Rs. 9,820 (cultivable land);

NAGA PEOPLE'S MOVEMENT OF HUMAN RIGHTS ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA

1997 INSC 76327 November 1997Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined challenges to the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 (AFSPA) and the Assam Disturbed Areas Act, 1955, along with notifications declaring disturbed areas in several northeastern states. Petitioners argued that Parliament lacked competence to enact AFSPA, that the Act was colourable legisl

SURESH KUMAR BHIKAMCHAND JAINversusPANDEY AJAY BHUSHAN AND ORS.

1997 INSC 76527 November 1997Dismissed

The President of Jalgaon Municipality filed a criminal complaint against four senior government officials who, while preventing the demolition of an illegal encroachment, assaulted him and others. The trial court issued process against three respondents but discharged the fourth for lack of sanction under Section 197 o

TVL K.A.K. ANWAR AND CO. ETC.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

1997 INSC 76427 November 1997Dismissed

The appellants, dealers in hides and skins, purchased raw hides and skins, paid sales tax on them, and later tanned them into dressed hides and skins which were sold inter‑state. They contended that under Section 14(iii) of the Central Sales Tax Act, raw and dressed hides constitute a single commodity, and that Section

BHOLA BHAGAT ETC.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

1997 INSC 71227 October 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were convicted for murder and related offences under Sections 302, 149 and 148 of the IPC for the killing of Ram Naresh Choubey in 1978. They later claimed that they were children at the time of the offence and sought the benefit of the Bihar Children Act, 1970/1982 and the Juvenile Justice Act, 1986. Th

M/S. EASTERN DIECASTING INDUSTRYversusTHE COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CALCUTTA

1997 INSC 61927 August 1997Dismissed

Eastern Diecasting Industry, which manufactures railway overhead equipment and fittings, was classified under Central Excise Tariff Item 68 and faced a demand for duty and a penalty under Rule 173 Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, for allegedly exceeding exemption limits. The company argued that the goods should be

SMT. JASBIR KAUR SEHGALversusTHE DISTRICT JUDGE DEHRADUN AND ORS.

1997 INSC 62027 August 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The wife, Jasbir Kaur Sehg al, filed for divorce and, having no income, was supporting her eldest unmarried daughter. She applied for maintenance pendente lite under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, which the High Court had enhanced to Rs 1500 per month. The Supreme Court examined whether maintenance should also c

SURINDER SINGH AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. ETC.

1997 INSC 62127 August 1997Dismissed

The Punjab government advertised 2,461 teacher vacancies in 1992 but, during the selection process, 7,737 posts became vacant and were filled by candidates who had applied for the advertised posts. The High Court quashed the excess appointments, limiting selections to the advertised number, and the State later made ad‑

UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHERversusG. GANAYUTHAM (DEAD) BY LRS.

1997 INSC 62227 August 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a Central Excise Superintendent, was found guilty of several charges in a departmental inquiry and, under Rule 9 of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, had 50% of his pension and 50% of his gratuity withheld. The Central Administrative Tribunal held that Rule 9 did not permit withholding g

PATNA UNIVERSITY AND ANR.versusDR. (MRS.) AMITA TIWARI

1997 INSC 62327 August 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Amita Tiwari, was appointed on an ad‑hoc basis as a lecturer in Home Science at Patna Women's College despite not possessing the post‑graduate qualification in Home Science required by the university statutes, though she held an M.A. in Sociology, an allied subject. The Chancellor later issued orders di

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHIversusSTEPWELL INDUSTRIES LTD. ETC. ETC.

1997 INSC 62427 August 1997Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined a series of civil appeals concerning the claim of weighted deduction under Section 35B(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It held that the onus lies on the assessee to prove that any expenditure falls within the specific sub‑clauses of Section 35B(b); mere occurrence of activities abroad does

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX BOMBAY ETCversusM/S PODAR CEMENT PVT.LTD.

1997 INSC 51527 May 1997Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether a purchaser who has taken possession of flats after full payment, but without a registered deed, is the "owner" for tax purposes under Section 22 of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961. The assessee argued that the rental income should be taxed under Section 56 as "income from other sources" bec

GARHWAL JAL SANSTHAN KARMACHARI UNION AND ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR.

1997 INSC 32527 March 1997Dismissed

The Uttar Pradesh Government created two separate corporations under the U.P. Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1975: the state‑wide Jal Nigam and the locally‑jurisdictioned Jal Sansthans. Employees of the Garhwal Jal Sansthan Karmachari Union sought parity in pay with Jal Nigam employees, relying on a resolution passed b

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC.versusK.G. KULKARNI ETC.

1997 INSC 32627 March 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

K.G. Kulkarni, a former sorter in the Railway Mail Service who was working as a clerk in the Speed Post Section, was denied an opportunity to appear for the departmental examination for promotion to Postal Superintendent/Postmaster Group B. He challenged the decision before the Central Administrative Tribunal, which se

U.P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, ALIGARHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

1997 INSC 32727 March 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation sought higher compensation for 24.9 acres of land acquired for a road transport depot. The Collector initially awarded Rs. 11.25 per square yard, which was enhanced to Rs. 25 per square yard by the Additional District Judge under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act.

GANPATBHAI M. SOLANKIversusDISTRICT COLLECTOR, VADODARA AND ANR.

1997 INSC 32827 March 1997Dismissed

The case concerned the Baroda District Cooperative Milk Producers' Union Ltd., where the Committee was elected for a three‑year term, but the Collector convened a meeting to elect a President and Vice‑President for a one‑year term. The petitioners argued that, under Sections 74‑C and 145(2) of the Gujarat Co‑operative

STATE OF U.P. AND ANR.versusBRIJ NATH MISRA

1997 INSC 32927 March 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

B.N. Misra was appointed on an ad‑hoc basis as an Ayurvedic Medical Officer in October 1983. After an unauthorised five‑year absence, a government order dated 8 September 1989 allowed him to resume duty upon production of a fitness certificate, treating the absence as a break in service. A selection committee later fou

DR. S.C.V. REDDY, AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 33027 March 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

The Supreme Court examined the applicability of the Mysore Agricultural Department Service (Recruitment) Rules, 1961, to determine the inter‑se seniority between directly recruited officers and promotees in the Karnataka Agricultural Service. The appellants contended that the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal erred in

MADANLAL SETHI AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF M.P. AND ORS. ETC.

1997 INSC 33227 March 1997Dismissed

The appellants, owners of saw‑mills, challenged the constitutionality of the Madhya Pradesh Kashtha Chiran (Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 1984 and the M.P. Transit (Forest Produce) Rules, 1961, contending that the mandatory maintenance of detailed records (Forms D‑1, D‑2, D‑3) and the consequent risk of confiscation violated t

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.versusG.S. GILL AND ANR.

1997 INSC 33327 March 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

The State of Punjab appointed a general‑category employee as Junior Technical Assistant and later promoted a Scheduled Caste candidate to the sole Assistant Superintendent post, which was reserved under the roster. The aggrieved general‑category employee sought a mandamus to de‑reserve the post, arguing that reservatio

RAJEEV MANKOTIAversusTHE SECRETARY TO THE PRESIDENT OF INDIA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 33427 March 1997Disposed off

The petitioner, Rajeev Mankotia, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking protection of the Viceregal Lodge in Shimla as an ancient monument of national importance, opposing the Union Government's plan to convert it into a tourist hotel. The Court examined the definition of "ancient monument" and the duties of th

STATE OF GOA AND OTHERSversusLEUKOPLAST (INDIA) LTD. ETC.

1997 INSC 20227 February 1997Case Allowed

Leukoplast (India) Ltd. manufactured plasters, dressings and bandages under a licence from the Drug Controller and paid Central and Goa local sales tax at the rates applicable before certain notifications exempted "drugs and medicines". The company claimed a refund, asserting its products fell within the exemption, but

BROOKE BOND INDIA LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, WEST BENGAL-III.

1997 INSC 20327 February 1997Dismissed

The appellant, Brooke Bond India Ltd., a public limited company, issued ordinary shares at a premium to increase its share capital and incurred Rs 13,99,305 in expenses, which it claimed as a deductible revenue expense under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction on th

M/S. PONDS INDIA LTD.versusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MADRAS

1997 INSC 6127 January 1997Appeal(s) allowed

M/s. Ponds India Ltd. challenged the collection of special excise duty on goods that were manufactured before 28 February 1988 but cleared after 1 March 1988. The Revenue argued that Rule 9A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 made the goods liable to the duty levied under the Finance Act 1988. The Court held that specia

M/S GOODYEAR INDIA LTDversusCOLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, BOMBAY

1997 INSC 6227 January 1997Appeal(s) allowed

M/s. Goodyear India Ltd. imported nylon woven dipped diffusion resistance fabric and paid the additional duty levied under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The importer claimed a refund, contending that the goods fell under the exemption Notification No. 55/78 as "textured yarn produced out of base yarn" and should attrac

STATE OF U P . AND ORSversusSMT. DAMYANTI SINGH AND ORS.

1997 INSC 6327 January 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The appeal arose from a dispute over the appointment of Smt. Damyanti Singh as a teacher in Mahadeo Prasad Girls High School, which had been upgraded on July 14, 1977. The respondent claimed she was regularly appointed and therefore entitled to permanent status and arrears of salary under the U.P. Intermediary Educatio

PRAMOD KUMAR MANTRI AND ANR.versusSTATE OF ORISSA

1997 INSC 6427 January 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The State alleged that on 28 May 1988 three accused entered the house of the deceased Bauribandhu, assaulted him and dragged his body outside, leading to charges under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC. The trial court convicted the appellants under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, and two of them under Sectio

J HINDUSTAN MACHINES TOOLS LTD. AND ANR.versusM.S. KANG/P.N. KASHYAP

1997 INSC 6527 January 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Hindustan Machine Tools Ltd. introduced a special voluntary retirement scheme for employees aged 45 with at least 15 years of service, and the respondents retired under this scheme. After their retirement, the company issued Office Order No. 45/90 revising pay scales for existing employees and certain retirees, and the

SMT. BHAGTI (DECEASED) THROUGH HER L.RS. JAGDISH RAM SHARMAversusTHE STATE OF HARYANA

1997 INSC 6627 January 1997Dismissed

The petitioners, heirs of the deceased Smt. Bhagti, sought redetermination of compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, after the High Court enhanced the award. They filed an application under Section 28‑A(1) within 30 days of the High Court judgment, but the Land Acquisition Officer dismisse

HIMACHAL PRADESH NAGAR VIKAS PRADHIKARANversusM/S. AGGARWAL & CO.

1997 INSC 6727 January 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The Himachal Pradesh Nagar Vikas Pradhikaran (appellant) entered into a construction contract with Mis. Aggarwal & Co. (respondent). An arbitrator awarded the respondent a 25% increase over tendered rates for work completed after the stipulated date due to delay caused by the Executive Engineer. The appellant deducted

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusRAMESH TAURANI

1997 INSC 76126 November 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the Bombay High Court’s order granting bail to Ramesh Taurani, who was arrested for allegedly conspiring to murder film producer Gulshan Kumar by financing contract killers. The High Court had relied on the fact that Taurani’s name did not appear in the remand applications of o

JAGBLR WALIAversusDELHI ADMINLSTRATION

1997 INSC 76226 November 1997Dismissed

The appellant, Jagbir Walia, was convicted under Section 9 of the Suppression of Immoral Traffic Act, 1956. He appealed, arguing that the investigation was illegal because a Sub‑Inspector, not the Assistant Commissioner of Police appointed for that purpose, conducted it, and he sought to introduce additional police rec

STATE OF PUNJABversusHARI KISHAN AND ORS.

1997 INSC 67426 September 1997Dismissed

The State of Punjab appealed against the acquittal of Hari Kishan and his brothers, who were originally convicted for the murder of Jai Rani under Sections 302 and 201 IPC. The prosecution alleged that the accused demanded dowry, ill‑treated the victim and strangled her, relying on circumstantial evidence, a purported

COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX ORISSA AND ANR.versusM/S HALARI STORE ETC.

1997 INSC 67526 September 1997Appeal(s) allowed

M/s Halari Store, a registered dealer under the Orissa Sales Tax Act, was assessed after its books were rejected by the Sales Tax Officer. The dealer appealed to the Assistant Commissioner, who partially upheld the appeal. The Additional Commissioner then, suo motu, issued notices under Section 23(4)(a) read with the a

M.V.JAVALversusMAHAJAN BOREWALL AND CO. AND ORS.

1997 INSC 67626 September 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax alleged that a partnership firm, Mahajan Borewell & Co., and its three partners had failed to deduct tax at source, violating Section 276‑B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Special Court discharged the respondents on procedural grounds, and the High Court upheld the discharge, h

MODI RUBBER LIMITEDversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1997 INSC 61826 August 1997Dismissed

Modi Rubber Ltd. imported polypropylene liner fabric (PPLF) for use as a protective liner in tyre‑manufacturing machinery and argued that it should be classified as a component part of the machines under ICT Item 72(3), attracting a lower duty. The Customs Department classified the fabric under Item 53 as a textile man

HIMANSHU KUMAR VIDYARTHI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.

1997 INSC 32226 March 1997Dismissed

The petitioners, who were appointed as daily‑wage assistant, driver and peons in a cooperative training institute of the Bihar government, had their services terminated by the institute's principal. They filed a writ petition alleging that their dismissal violated Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, claim

S.P. SUBRAMANYA SHETTY AND ORS.versusKARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ORS.

1997 INSC 32326 March 1997Dismissed

The petitioners' land was acquired by the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and the acquisition became final after the Supreme Court dismissed their earlier special leave petition. The petitioners later offered to give part of the land free of cost and soug

A.K. JADHAVversusSTATE OF M.P. AND ORS.

1997 INSC 32426 March 1997Leave Granted & Dismissed

While serving as a Tehsildar, A.K. Jadhav was caught in a trap for demanding and accepting an illegal gratification of Rs.20,000. The Commissioner of the district suspended him on 21 March 1996 pending investigation. Jadhav challenged the suspension, arguing that only the State Government, as the appointing authority u

PRAHLAD SARAN GUPTAversusBAR COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

1997 INSC 20026 February 1997Case Partly allowed

Prahlad Saran Gupta, a senior advocate and standing counsel for the Railways, was disciplined by the Bar Council of India for alleged professional misconduct, including drafting a notice for a private client while acting for the Railways, handing a letter to a judgment debtor to obtain a stay of execution, and wrongful

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusSHRI CHANDRASWAMI @ NEMI CHAND JAIN ETC.

1997 INSC 20126 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) was directed by the Delhi High Court on 18‑12‑1996, in an anticipatory bail application, to give the applicant three days’ notice before any arrest. The CBI issued such a notice on 18‑01‑1997, after which the High Court restrained the CBI from acting on the notice. The CBI appe

STATE OF TAMIL NADUversusK. SABANYAGAM AND ANR. ETC.

1997 INSC 75425 November 1997Dismissed

The Tamil Nadu Housing Board was exempted from the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 by two Government Orders issued under Section 36 of the Act (1979 and 1982). Employees of the Board challenged the exemptions, and the Madras High Court set aside the orders, directing the Board to pay statutory bonus from the 1978‑79 account

M/S. SHREE BHAGWATI ROLLER FLOUR MILLSversusTHE COMMISSIONER OF SALES (TRADE) TAX

1997 INSC 75525 November 1997Dismissed

Shree Bhagwati Roller Flour Mills, a new unit manufacturing notified commodities, claimed exemption from purchase tax on wheat bought from the open market, relying on a 1979 notification under Section 4‑B of the U.P. Sales Tax Act that exempted roller flour mills provided the wheat was purchased from the Food Corporati

KASAMBHAI F. GANCHIversusCHANDUBHAI D. RAJPUT AND ORS.

1997 INSC 75325 November 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, K.F. Ganchi, a member of the Backward Classes, was elected as a councillor from a general (unreserved) ward of Jambusar Municipality. The roster for 1997 required that the President of the municipality be a Backward Class member. Respondent No.1, Chandubhai Rajput, contended that only Backward Class coun

UNION OF INDIAversusW.S. CHONA

1997 INSC 75625 November 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Maj. Gen. W.S. Chona, a non‑General Cadre officer of the Corps of Engineers, sought promotion to Lt. General in the Army’s "Staff Only" stream under the 1986 two‑stream concept. The Special Selection Board found him unfit because he had not satisfied clause (b) of the Qualitative Requirements, which demands a staff app

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusDR. S. BALIAR SINGH

1997 INSC 75725 November 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Dr. S. Bialiar Singh, after serving ten years with the Government of Orissa and three years with the Government of Chandigarh, joined the Central Railway in December 1975 and voluntarily retired in April 1987 after 11 years, 2 months and 9 days of railway service. Although his prior government service and a five‑year w

SRI SURYANARAYAN SAHU ETC.versusTHE COUNCIL OF SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH

1997 INSC 75825 November 1997Case Partly allowed

The appellant S. Suryanarayan Sahu, a senior draughtsman in CSIR, challenged the pay scales applied to senior draughtsmen, seeking the higher scale of Rs.425‑700 from 1974 and the Rs.550‑900 scale from 1974, alleging violation of the constitutional principle of equal pay for equal work. The Central Administrative Tribu

THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.versusNARANJAN DASS DOOMRA RICE AND GEN. MILLS AND ORS. ETC.

1997 INSC 75925 November 1997Dismissed

During President's Rule in Punjab, the President of India issued an order exempting raw cotton, narma and oilseeds from octroi and directing municipal committees to impose an Urban Development Cess on these items. The State of Punjab issued a memo to municipal bodies, the cess was levied and collected, and the affected

VED PRAKASH GARG ETC.versusPREMI DEVI AND ORS. ETC.

1997 INSC 67125 September 1997Case Partly allowed

The owners of motor trucks, who employed drivers and cleaners, suffered fatal accidents and their employees' heirs filed claims under the Workmen's Compensation Act, invoking Section 167 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The Workmen's Commissioner awarded compensation, interest, and penalty, holding the insurance companies jo

DUKHMOCHAN PANDEY AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

1997 INSC 67225 September 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a mob of about 200 armed persons who attacked labourers transplanting paddy on a field, resulting in the deaths of Razaullah and Ahmed Shah. The trial court convicted all accused under Sections 302/149 and 302/34 IPC; the High Court set aside the 302/149 convictions but upheld the 302/34 convictions

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.versusSHRI OM PRAKASH BHASIN (D) BY L.RS. AND ORS.

1997 INSC 67325 September 1997Disposed off

The State of Haryana acquired land under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and awarded compensation of Rs.10 per square yard, which was later enhanced to Rs.12 and then Rs.15 per square yard by the District Judge and the High Court respectively. The landowner also claimed a solatium of 30% on the increase and interest at

K. AJIT BABU AND OTHERS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 57525 July 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, senior officers of the Chief Controller of Imports and Exports, challenged a seniority list prepared on the basis of a 1987 Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) judgment that affected their promotion prospects. After review petitions were rejected, they filed an application under Section 19 of the Admi

CHAIRMAN, RAILWAY BOARD AND ORS.versusC.R. RANGADHAMAIAH AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1997 INSC 57325 July 1997Dismissed

The case concerned railway employees who retired between 1 January 1973 and 4 December 1988 and whose pension was to be calculated under Rule 2544 of the Indian Railway Establishment Code, which then allowed a running allowance of up to 75% of other emoluments. The Railway Board later issued notifications on 5 December

K.C. SHARMA AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA

1997 INSC 57425 July 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, former guards of the Northern Railway who retired between 1980 and 1988, challenged a 1988 notification that retrospectively reduced the percentage of running allowance used to calculate pension from 75% to 45% (1973‑1979) and to 55% thereafter. The Full Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT

RAJESH KUMAR AND ANR.versusTHE INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERS (INDIA)

1997 INSC 57625 July 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Rajesh Kumar and Harbir Singh appeared for the Institute of Engineers (India) examination in 1990. The Institute alleged copying based on similarity of answer books and cancelled their results, also disqualifying them from two subsequent exams. The appellants challenged the cancellation in civil court, which initially

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRASversusM/S. AMALGAMATION PVT. LTD.

1997 INSC 43625 April 1997Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether Amalgamation Pvt. Ltd., a bulk shareholder holding investments in numerous subsidiaries, could claim a capital loss on the forced sale of shares to a subsidiary of a subsidiary, whether a loss incurred while guaranteeing a subsidiary's loan qualified as a business loss, and whether re

STATE OF PUNJABversusJUSTICE S.S. DEWAN (RETIRED CHIEF JUSTICE) AND ORS.

1997 INSC 43425 April 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Justice S.S. Dewan, former Chief Justice of the Punjab & Haryana High Court, retired on 31‑12‑1989 and elected pension under Part III of Schedule I of the High Court Judges (Conditions of Service) Act, 1954, governed by the Punjab Superior Judicial Service Rules, 1963. On 20‑Feb‑1990 Rule 16 of those rules was amended

THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.versusMANOHAR LAL MIRCHEA

1997 INSC 43525 April 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Manohar Lal Mirchea retired as a District and Sessions Judge in 1984, when his death‑cum‑retirement benefits were governed by the All India Services (Death‑cum‑Retirement Benefits) Rules, 1958. In 1990 Punjab amended Rule 16 of the Punjab Superior Judicial Service Rules, making the Punjab Civil Service Rules (specifica

D. STEPHEN JOSEPHversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 43725 April 1997Leave Granted & Dismissed

The case concerned the interpretation of a promotion rule reserving 50% of Assistant Engineer posts for candidates holding a degree in Electrical Engineering and three years of regular service as Junior Engineers. The dispute was whether the three‑year service requirement should be counted from the date the degree was

V. GANGARAMversusTHE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR AND ORS.

1997 INSC 43825 April 1997Leave Granted & Disposed off

V. Gangaram, a teacher appointed in 1959, obtained successive qualifications (B.A., M.A., B.Ed., M.Ed.) and was granted advance increments on the pay scale each time. The government circulars allowed one increment for a B.A. or equivalent, one for B.Ed., one for M.A., and one for M.Ed., but the post of Junior Lecturer

K. JAYAMOHANversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ANR.

1997 INSC 43925 April 1997Leave Granted & Dismissed

The appellant, placed at No.10 on a select list of ten candidates for two lecturer positions in Physical Education, sought appointment after two candidates were already appointed. The government rejected his claim, citing an amendment to the Kerala Collegiate Education Service Special Rules, 1994, which imposed higher

K.K. SHARMAversusKULWANT SINGH AND ORS.

1997 INSC 44025 April 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

The Chairman of a bank, Kulwant Singh, was surcharged for allegedly using a bank car for unofficial purposes and purchasing furniture, with the bank seeking personal recovery of the expenses. The High Court quashed the surcharge, prompting the bank to appeal. The Supreme Court directed the Joint Registrar of Co‑operati

SMT RAM RATIversusSAROJ DEVI AND ORS.

1997 INSC 44125 April 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

The 1994 Gram Panchayat Sarpanch election in Rewa district resulted in Smt. Ram Rati being declared elected over Saroj Devi. Saroj Devi filed an election petition alleging that the election was not properly conducted and that a recount was not carried out despite an alleged application. The Tribunal ordered a recount,

D.V. SHANMUGHAM AND ANR.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

1997 INSC 44225 April 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a violent incident on 22 September 1990 in which five accused formed an unlawful assembly and attacked two victims, resulting in the deaths of Mohan and Sekhar. The prosecution charged the accused under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, including murder (302) and attempted murder (307). The

KALIKA TIWARI AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

1997 INSC 31625 March 1997Case Partly allowed

The case involved a dacoity on 22 December 1987 at the house of Sanfula Devi, during which three persons were murdered and valuables stolen. The trial court convicted twelve accused under Sections 396 and 120‑B IPC, and the High Court added convictions under Sections 302 and 34 IPC. The Supreme Court examined whether t

CHHEDA INDUSTRIESversusCOLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, MADRAS

1997 INSC 31725 March 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants imported stainless steel circles in October 1980 and were assessed customs duty under Tariff Heading 73.15(2), which carried a higher rate. They contended that circles should be classified under the residuary sub‑heading 73.15(1) at a lower rate. The Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal

SRI N. UMAPTHYversusB.V. MUNIYAPPA

1997 INSC 31825 March 1997Leave Granted & Dismissed

The respondent, Sri N. Umapathy, purchased the suit property and associated machinery from his vendor and has been in continuous possession since November 1989. The appellant, B.V. Muniyappa, holds a mining lease over the same land, granted by the Government on 29 November 1993. The trial court refused an ad‑interim in

MRS. P.K. SANDHUversusSHIV RAJ V. PATIL ETC.

1997 INSC 31925 March 1997Dismissed

Mrs. P.K. Sandhu, an in‑service officer of the Lok Sabha Secretariat, filed a writ of quo warranto challenging the appointments of several Additional Secretaries, Joint Secretaries and the Secretary to the Speaker who had been placed on deputation before the recruitment rules were amended. The petition contended that t

MAKHAN LALversusASHARFI LAL AND ORS.

1997 INSC 32025 March 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

The respondents, who were licensees of a portion of a house belonging to Baij Nath, sued Makhanlal for permanent injunction, possession and damages, claiming they had no right to remain after the licence was revoked. Makhanlal contended that he had contributed half the cost of constructing the house, that the property

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusSHRI BIHARI LAL SIDHANA

1997 INSC 32125 March 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

Shri B.L. Sidhana, a temporary cash clerk in the Delhi Milk Scheme, was accused of misappropriating funds and was placed under suspension. While the criminal prosecution was pending, the competent authority terminated his services under Rule 5(1) of the Central Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules, 1965, mentioning

RATANLAL NATH ETC.versusSTATE OF TRIPURA AND ORS. ETC.

1997 INSC 19825 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioner, Ratanlal Nath, challenged several rules made under the Tripura Panchayats Act, 1993, alleging they were ultra vires the Act and the Constitution. The issues concerned (i) provisos allowing use of records other than the last census for determining SC/ST and total population, (ii) sub‑rules governing the

M/S. SOUTH INDIA STEEL ROLLING MILLS, MADRASversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS

1997 INSC 19925 February 1997Dismissed

The appellant, a partnership firm, had claimed a development rebate under sections 33(1)(a) and 34(3)(a) of the Income Tax Act for several assessment years. One partner died, causing the firm to dissolve on 3 March 1968, before the eight‑year utilisation period prescribed by section 34(3)(a). A new partnership was form

SHRI CHARAN LAL SAHU AND ANR.versusSHRI K.R. NARAYANAN AND ANR.

1997 INSC 75124 November 1997Dismissed

Two petitioners, Charan Lal Sahu and Mithilesh Kumar, filed an election petition challenging the election of K.R. Narayanan as President of India. Their nomination papers were rejected because they did not satisfy the mandatory requirement of Section 5B(1)(a) of the Presidential and Vice‑Presidential Elections Act, 195

DHARTI PAKAR MADAN LAL AGRAWALversusK.R. NARAYANAN AND ORS.

1997 INSC 75024 November 1997Dismissed

The petitioner, Dharti Pakar Madan Lal Agrawal, filed a composite election‑petition‑cum‑writ petition under Article 32 challenging the constitutionality of Sections 5‑B and 5‑C of the Presidential and Vice‑Presidential Elections Act, 1952 as amended by the 1997 Ordinance. The Supreme Court held that such a composite pe

GOVERNMENT OF ORISSAversusSHRI HARAPRASAD DAS AND ORS.

1997 INSC 75224 November 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The Government of Orissa issued a selection list on 13 July 1993 for six copy‑holder posts in the State Press, but later imposed a ban on filling two‑thirds of the vacancies and the list expired on 12 July 1994 under Rule 11(v) of the 1978 Service Rules. Four candidates whose names appeared on the list sought a directi

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.versusM/S SHEO NARAIN JAISWAL PVT. LTD. AND ORS.

1997 INSC 71124 October 1997Dismissed

The State of Bihar, under the Bihar Excise Act, 1915, granted exclusive privilege for manufacturing and wholesale supply of country liquor in nine zones through a tender process. Unlike earlier practice of awarding a single contractor per zone, the 1995 tender allowed more than one contractor in each zone, and the lice

THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ANR.versusSHRI BIJOY KUMAR MISHRA

1997 INSC 66824 September 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Bijoy Kumar Mishra was appointed as a probationary officer of the State Bank of India in October 1980. He remained unauthorisedly absent from duty from April 1981 and, after a brief appearance in August 1983, was absent until 1988. The bank’s service rules fixed a maximum probation period of three years, which expired

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.versusINDIAN ALUMINIUM COMPANY AND ORS.

1997 INSC 66724 September 1997Dismissed

The State of Bihar enacted the Bihar Forest Restoration and Improvement of Degraded Forest Land Taxation Act, 1992 to levy a tax on the excavation and use of forest land for non‑forest purposes. Respondents, including Indian Aluminium Company, held mining leases under the Mines and Minerals Regulation Act, 1957 and cha

H.M. KELOGIRAO AND ORS., ETCversusGOVERNMENT OF A.P. AND ORS.

1997 INSC 67024 September 1997Dismissed

The Government of Andhra Pradesh, at the request of the State Road Transport Corporation, acquired 9.87 cents of land in Anantapur for a bus stand under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, publishing a Section 4(1) notification and invoking emergency provisions. Earlier writ petitions had quashed the original notification

JIBRIAL DIWANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

1997 INSC 57124 July 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved a cultural show organized by a minister where invitation letters on the minister's letterhead were forged. The appellant delivered the forged letters to the invitees but did not forge them himself. He was convicted by the High Court under IPC sections 417 (cheating), 465 (forgery), and 471 (using a fo

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANKversusK.C. CHOPRA AND ANR.

1997 INSC 57224 July 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, originally an Assistant Director in a government organization, was deputed to Punjab National Bank (PNB) on 10 March 1970 and absorbed permanently on 10 March 1972. PNB's 1979 Officers Service Regulations stipulated that officers recruited before 19 July 1969 retire at 60, while those recruited on or af

M/S. MODERN TAILORING HALL ETC.versusSHRI H.S. VENKUSA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 43324 April 1997Dismissed

The landlord sought eviction of tenants under the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1986, claiming a bona‑fide requirement for his own occupation after demolishing and reconstructing the premises. The tenants argued that the landlord’s claim should fall under Section 21(1)(j), which provides a right of re‑entry to the tenant

AHMEDABAD WOMEN ACTION GROUP AND ORS. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA

1997 INSC 18524 February 1997Dismissed

The Supreme Court dismissed three public‑interest writ petitions that sought to declare various provisions of Muslim, Hindu and Christian personal laws unconstitutional. The petitioners argued that polygamy, unilateral talaq, and discriminatory inheritance rules violated Articles 13, 14 and 15 of the Constitution. The

SANDEEP KUMAR SHARMAversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

1997 INSC 18824 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Sandeep Kumar Sharma, brother of an IPS officer who had distinguished service against terrorism, applied for the post of Deputy Superintendent of Police. He satisfied all selection criteria except the minimum height requirement, falling short by 1.20 cm. The Punjab Government, invoking a policy to give special consider

M/S. HAJEE S.V.M. MOHAMED JAMALUDEEN BROS. AND CO.versusTHE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU

1997 INSC 18924 February 1997Dismissed

The appellant, a private firm, obtained a three‑year licence from the Government of Tamil Nadu to collect chank shells from coastal sites, the agreement containing Clause 7 which allowed the government to terminate the licence at any time without cause. After commencing operations, the government invoked Clause 7 and t

BRAJ KISHORE THAKURversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

1997 INSC 19024 February 1997Disposed off

A senior District & Sessions Judge (the appellant) granted bail to two accused under Section 20(b)(i) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985. The Patna High Court Single Judge cancelled the bail and harshly criticised the judge, alleging extraneous considerations, ignorance of Section 37, an

GOODYEAR INDIA LTD. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

1997 INSC 18724 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Goodyear India Ltd manufactured tyres of size 1800 mm and above for heavy moving vehicles such as dumpers and earth‑movers. Excise duty was levied on these tyres as "tyres for motor vehicles" at 60% ad valorem. The company claimed a refund, arguing that such tyres should be classified under the residuary sub‑item 3 "al

M. HARA BHUPALversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 19224 February 1997Dismissed

M. Hara Bhupal, a Section Officer in the Intelligence Bureau, was deputed to the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) as Private Secretary on 14 June 1989. He later sought absorption in the CAT as a Section Officer, which was granted effective 4 November 1996, and claimed seniority either from his promotion date in th

LAXMI NARAIN MEHARversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 19324 February 1997Dismissed

The petitioner, a Scheduled Caste officer, was transferred from Kola to Mumbai on the ground of administrative necessity, despite his claim that the transfer was made on compassionate grounds and was therefore invalid. He contended that, under instructions to retain SC/ST officers near their hometowns, the transfer vio

MST. BHABIA DEVIversusPERMANAND PD. YADAV

1997 INSC 19424 February 1997Dismissed

The respondent filed a suit for specific performance against Mst. Bhabia Devi, and an ex‑parte decree was granted when she failed to appear. She later applied under Order IX Rule 13 of the CPC to set aside the decree, alleging that notice was not served because she was not residing at the alleged address. Evidence show

SHIBA KUMAR DUTTAND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 19524 February 1997Dismissed

The petitioners, employed as Fitters (T & G), sought to be merged with the Jig Borers category and to receive equal pay, alleging that the removal of separate nomenclatures and their fusion into a single Fitter category resulted in arbitrary and discriminatory treatment. The Central Administrative Tribunal had refused

STATE OF GUJARATversusDAHYABHAI ZAVERBHAI

1997 INSC 19624 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Gujarat entered into agreement No. B‑1/17 of 1981‑82 with the contractor Dahyabhai to carry out protective measures for a road bridge over the Ambica River. Although the work order was issued on 3 June 1981, the contractor delayed in receiving the work sheet and specifications and ultimately abandoned the

TARA CHAND VYASversusCHAIRMAN AND DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY AND ORS.

1997 INSC 19724 February 1997Dismissed

The petitioner, a former Branch Manager of a Gramin Bank, was charged with fourteen counts of dereliction of duty for granting loans without securing adequate securities or ensuring supply of implements to borrowers, resulting in loss to the bank. An inquiry officer found all charges proved based on documentary evidenc

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusSUSHIL KUMAR MODI AND ORS.

1997 INSC 5124 January 1997Disposed off

The Supreme Court reviewed orders of the Patna High Court that were monitoring the Central Bureau of Investigation's (CBI) probe into the Bihar scam. The Court clarified that the High Court's role is limited to ensuring that the CBI performs its statutory duty and must not pass on the merits of the accusations. It reaf

ANARKALI SARABHAI, :SHAHIBAG HOUSE, AHMEDABADversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AHMEDAHAD

1997 INSC 5324 January 1997Dismissed

Anarkali Sarabhai held 297 redeemable preference shares of Universal Corporation Pvt Ltd, purchased for Rs 2,68,550. The company redeemed the shares, paying the face value of Rs 2,97,000, resulting in a surplus of Rs 30,450. The Income Tax Officer treated the surplus as a capital gain under Section 45 of the Income‑Tax

KRISHNAN AND ANR.versusKRISHNA VENI AND ANR.

1997 INSC 5224 January 1997Dismissed

The respondents complained that the appellants fraudulently obtained their signature on a sale agreement and filed a criminal case under Sections 420 and 406 IPC. The Judicial Magistrate discharged the appellants, a revision before the Sessions Court was dismissed, and a second revision was filed before the High Court,

SODAGAR SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

1997 INSC 5424 January 1997Dismissed

The petitioner, Sodagar Singh, was appointed on an ad‑hoc basis as a Legal Assistant in Punjab Roadways under the direct‑recruitment quota provided by Rule 8 and 9 of the Punjab Roadways (Ministerial) State Service Class‑III Rules, 1977. The Punjab & Haryana High Court held that such an ad‑hoc appointment could not be

THIRUMALAI TRANSPORT SERVICE ETC.versusP. SAMIAPPA GOUNDER AND ORS. ETC.

1997 INSC 5524 January 1997Dismissed

The dispute arose over a permit granted by the Regional Development Authority under Motor Vehicles Rules Rule 155‑A(6). The Madras High Court held that the order was a nullity because it failed to record any reasons, as mandated by the rule. The appellants challenged this finding, contending that the High Court erred i

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. ETC.versusJOGINDER SINGH ETC

1997 INSC 5624 January 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Haryana acquired 2,916 acres for a canal under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The District Judge fixed differentiated market values for abbi, barani and gair‑mumkin lands and, on reference under Section 18, enhanced the compensation. The Punjab & Haryana High Court single judge, however, ignored these dis

M/S. SWASTIC INDUSTRIESversusMAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD

1997 INSC 5724 January 1997Dismissed

M/s Swastic Industries challenged the Maharashtra State Electricity Board’s right to issue a supplementary bill of Rs 317,659 and disconnect its electricity supply after the bill was paid under protest. The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission held that the Board’s claim was barred by a three‑year limitation un

BHAKTA RAME GOWDA AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR. ETC.

1997 INSC 5824 January 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants challenged amendments to Karnataka Civil Services (General Recruitment) Rules, 1977 concerning reservation in promotion and the concept of backlog vacancies. The Supreme Court examined whether the first proviso added to Rule 8 could be applied retrospectively and whether the second proviso, which introdu

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.versusSWARAN SINGH

1997 INSC 5924 January 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Punjab initiated disciplinary proceedings against Swarans Singh, who retired before the proceedings concluded. The disciplinary authority found misconduct and imposed a minor penalty, but the appellate authority on review imposed a 15% reduction in his pension. Singh filed a civil suit challenging the pens

SUN EXPORT CORPORATION AND ANR.versusBOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF BOMBAY

1997 INSC 70723 October 1997Dismissed

Sun Export Corporation (appellant No. 1) and its partner imported stainless‑steel tubes in 1973‑74 under licences held by Laxmi Engineering Co. They were authorised by letters of authority to clear the goods from the Bombay Port Trust warehouses, but failed to do so. The goods were subsequently confiscated by the Custo

PARDEEP AGGARBATTI, LUDHIANA ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

1997 INSC 70823 October 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a registered dealer in dhoop and agarbatti, was assessed sales tax under Entry 16 of Schedule A of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948, which listed "cosmetics, perfumery and toilet goods". The issue was whether dhoop and agarbatti fell within the term "perfumery". A single High Court judge allowed th

NAZRUL MONDAL AND ORS.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

1997 INSC 70923 October 1997Dismissed

The appellants were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the IPC for the murder of Babar Ali, based primarily on the testimony of six eye‑witnesses who were relatives of the deceased. The appellants challenged the admissibility of those witnesses, argued that no specific allegation against them was made

STATE OF U.P.versusBHOORA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 71023 October 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttar Pradesh prosecuted Bhoora and Vishram Singh for dacoity with murder under IPC sections 396 and 34. Four eye‑witnesses testified that they saw the accused, identifiable by the colour of their khaki uniforms and hats, under the illumination of two electric poles during the incident. The trial court acc

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusSHRI RAG HA VENDRA SESHAGIRI RAO KULKARNI

1997 INSC 66623 September 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, appointed as a Development Officer on probation by Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), was terminated on 22 May 1986 under Regulation 14(4) of the LIC Staff Regulations, which allows discharge without notice or cause during probation. He challenged the termination before the Karnataka High Court,

SH. M.V. SRINIVASA AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 56723 July 1997Dismissed

The Karnataka Government had initially granted project staff free quarters, electricity and water, extending these amenities even to those posted at taluk headquarters. A later government order of 20 August 1987 sought to withdraw these amenities, initially claiming retrospective effect from 19 December 1985, which was

AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONversusVIRENDRA KUMAR JAYANTIBHAI PATEL

1997 INSC 56823 July 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation regularly engaged Dr. V. K. Jayantibhai Patel on a daily fee basis to cover for its dental surgeons on leave. When permanent dental surgeon posts were advertised, Patel applied but was not selected, and he claimed permanent status based on 1,034 days of service, invoking an Industria

MADHU BALAversusSURESH KUMAR AND ORS.

1997 INSC 56923 July 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Madhu Bala filed two complaints alleging offences under Sections 498A and 406 IPC before Chief Judicial Magistrates. The magistrates, invoking Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, directed the police to register a case and investigate; the police registered FIRs, investigated, and submitted charge‑sheets. The

SINDAV HARI RANCHHODversusJADEV LAIJI JAYMAL & ORS.

1997 INSC 57023 July 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiffs, sons of a borrower, sued to declare the sale deeds executed by their father null and void, alleging that the transactions violated Section 49 of the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act because the father had an outstanding loan to the Rampara Seva Sahakari Mandali. The trial court found no evidence of il

SANGARABOINA SREENUversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

1997 INSC 43123 April 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was tried before the Sessions Court for uxoricide and was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for murder. On appeal, the Andhra Pradesh High Court set aside the murder conviction and, invoking Section 222 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, convicted him instead under Section 306 IPC for a

UNION OF INDIAversusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ORS.

1997 INSC 70522 October 1997Dismissed

A super‑fast train collided with a hired passenger bus at an unmanned level crossing in Kerala, killing most of the bus occupants. The Supreme Court examined whether the bus driver was negligent, whether his negligence could be imputed to the passengers, and whether the railways owed a common‑law duty of care despite t

HARI CHARAN AND ANR.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

1997 INSC 70622 October 1997Dismissed

An armed group stopped a bus at gunpoint, attempted to drag out the conductor Ram Babu, and shot him, resulting in his death. The prosecution relied on the testimony of an eye‑witness, Kedarnath, corroborated by a police informant, to convict the principal shooter (A‑1) under Section 302 IPC and the remaining accused,

R. KANDASAMYversusTHE CHIEF ENGINEER, MADRAS PORT TRUST

1997 INSC 61722 August 1997Appeal(s) allowed

R. Kandasamy applied for a Mazdoor position in the Madras Port Trust and submitted a Community Certificate issued by the Tehsildar in 1987. The Trust rejected the certificate, insisting on a newer one from the Revenue Divisional Officer, citing G.O. No. 2137 dated 11‑Nov‑1989 which mandated post‑date certificates be is

GTC INDUSTRIES LTD.versusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI

1997 INSC 56622 July 1997Appeal(s) allowed

GTC Industries Ltd., a cigarette manufacturer, was served with three show cause notices demanding excise duty for different periods and factories. The High Court allowed the revenue to adjudicate the first notice but ordered that the adjudication order not be communicated to the assessee, later directing that the seale

BINDESHWARY CHOUDHARY AND ANR.versusAJAY KUMAR

1997 INSC 42622 April 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

The landlord filed an eviction suit under Section 11(l)(c) of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Act, 1982 and simultaneously moved an application under Section 15 for arrears of rent both before and after the filing of the suit. The Subordinate Court ordered the tenant to deposit all arrears, but the Patna H

M/S. CHILLIES EXPORTS HOUSE LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1997 INSC 42722 April 1997Appeal(s) allowed

M/s. Chillies Export House Ltd., a public limited company engaged in exporting chillies, claimed that its activities of sorting, grading, clipping, stemming and fumigation (the latter performed by a contractor) amounted to "processing of goods" under the Finance Acts, making it an "industrial company" eligible for a co

HINDUSTAN STEEL WORKS CONSTRUCTION LTD.versusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 42822 April 1997Dismissed

Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd., a wholly‑owned Central Government company, entered into a contract to build a stadium for the Greater Cochin Development Authority. The Authority deducted 1% of the contract value as a contribution under the Kerala Construction Workers Welfare Funds Act, 1989. The company claime

SHRI ABHEY RAM (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 42522 April 1997Leave Granted & Dismissed

The appellants owned 25 bighas of land in Khirkee village that were covered by a composite notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 issued on 5 November 1980, and a subsequent declaration under Section 6 published on 7 June 1985, more than three years later. Several writ petitions were filed ch

DEONARAYAN SINGH AND ORS.versusTHE COMMISSIONER OF BHAGALPUR AND ORS.

1997 INSC 42922 April 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants inherited land that had been sold by a Mool Raiyat in 1939 to Bimal Kanti Roy Choudhury and subsequently in 1950 to their father, Radha Prasad Singh. The sale of 38.09 acres was approved and mutated by the Sub‑Divisional Officer and Deputy Commissioner after a seven‑month scrutiny, creating a vested righ

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search