Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

Judgments of 1997

840 judgments, newest first — showing 201–400.

UNION OF INDIAversusMAKHAN CHANDRA ROY ETC.

1997 INSC 43022 April 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India challenged two orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) that had granted higher pay‑scales to a laboratory assistant and a malaria technician beyond those prescribed in the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 1986. The Supreme Court held that the Tribunal had overstepped its jurisd

BRAHMDEO CHAUDHARYversusRISHIKESH PRASAD JAISWAL AND ANR.

1997 INSC 4922 January 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Brahmdeo Chaudhary, a stranger to a decree for eviction in favour of respondent No.1, resisted the execution of a warrant for possession against respondent No.2. The decree‑holder applied for a warrant with police assistance; the appellant filed an application before the executing court seeking a stay an

INCOME TAX OFFICER, JODHPURversusPURUSHOTTAM DAS BANGUR AND ANR.

1997 INSC 5022 January 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The Income Tax Officer had completed assessments for 1969-70 and 1971-72, accepting the assessee's claim of a long‑term capital loss on the sale of shares. Later, a letter from the Deputy Director of the Directorate of Inspection, supported by documentary evidence, indicated that the fair market value of those shares w

SHIV RAM AND ANR. ETC.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

1997 INSC 69921 October 1997Dismissed

The case involved a mass murder in which 24 persons were accused of killing five members of a family, including the brutal decapitation of three victims and the burning alive of a ten‑year‑old boy, allegedly as revenge for the earlier murder of A‑1's brother. The prosecution relied on two eye‑witnesses who were close r

GULJAR ALI ETC.versusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

1997 INSC 70021 October 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Three brothers—Raj Mohammad, Niaz Ali and Gulzar Ali—were convicted for the murder of Tara Chand, a factotum of Jai Paul, based on circumstantial evidence, letters showing motive, and recovered weapons. The prosecution relied on letters seized from the accused, expert handwriting analysis, and statements by the accused

SMT, VIJAY GOEL AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 70121 October 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, who had been appointed as Lower Division Clerks (LDCs) in Safdarjung Hospital on an ad‑hoc basis, were later regularised under the Safdarjung Hospital (Class III Posts) Recruitment Rules, 1973. After several years of service, the Government, relying on a memo that the regularisation of ad‑hoc LDCs who h

BANARSI DASversusBRIG MAHARAJA SUKHJIT SINGH AND ANR.

1997 INSC 70221 October 1997Dismissed

Banarsi Das filed a suit for permanent injunction claiming peaceful cultivation of land he alleged to have inherited, while the defendants asserted ownership and produced documentary evidence of a sale deed. The trial court dismissed the suit; the District Judge reversed that decision and decreed in favor of the plaint

A. DEIVENDRANversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

1997 INSC 70321 October 1997Disposed off

The case involved a dacoity and murder where five accused were committed to the Sessions Court; one accused, MR, was granted pardon by the Chief Judicial Magistrate after commitment and examined as an approver. The Supreme Court held that after a case is committed to a Sessions Court, only that Court can grant pardon u

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, GUJARAT-III, AHMEDABADversusELLIS BRIDGE GYMKHANA ETC. ETC.

1997 INSC 70421 October 1997Case Partly allowed

The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Gujarat sought to assess Ellis Bridge Gymkhana, an unincorporated club, for wealth tax for assessment years 1970‑71 to 1977‑78, arguing that the club fell within the term “individual” in Section 3 of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957. The club contended that an association of persons is not an in

JAGDISH NEGI, PRESIDENT, UTIARAKHAND JAN MORCHA AND ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR.

1997 INSC 61321 August 1997Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court heard a public‑interest writ petition filed by Uttarakhand Jan Morcha on behalf of residents of nine hill districts of Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand) seeking enforcement of the 27% reservation for socially and educationally backward classes under the U.P. Public Services (Reservation for SC, ST and OBC)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusM/S. EMBEE CORPORATION, BOMBAY

1997 INSC 61421 August 1997Dismissed

M/s Embee Corporation entered into a contract with the Directorate General of Supplies & Disposal (DGS&D) to import carbamite from West Germany for use in a government explosives factory. The importer claimed exemption from Central Sales Tax, arguing that the sale was in the course of import under Section 5(2) of the C

M/S. L.M.L. LIMITEDversusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KANPUR

1997 INSC 61521 August 1997Appeal(s) allowed

L.M.L. Ltd., a scooter manufacturer, purchased duty‑paid cold‑rolled steel sheets under tariff heading 7212.50 and claimed MODVAT credit. After cutting the sheets, the remaining off‑cuts were used to make small ancillary parts. The Collector of Central Excise held that the off‑cuts should be classified as sheets and ta

EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATIONversusDWARKA NATH BHARGWA

1997 INSC 61621 August 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) sought to recover unpaid ESI contributions from employer Dwarka Nath Bhargwa that were due on 27‑01‑1967 and 24‑01‑1968. ESIC issued notices under Section 45B of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948, which had come into force on 28‑01‑1968, to recover the arrears as l

THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND SUB-COLLECTOR, GADWALversusSMT. SREELATHA BHOOPAL AND ANR.

1997 INSC 41521 April 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

The State issued a notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to acquire land in Gadwal for a bus depot. The Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded compensation of Rs 8,000 per acre, which was enhanced by the Civil Court to Rs 20 per square yard and confirmed by the Andhra Pradesh High Court.

MAHARASHTRA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONversusDR. BHANUMATI PURUSHOTTAM TATHOD AND ORS.

1997 INSC 41621 April 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

The Maharashtra Public Service Commission sought to appoint a Deputy Medical Superintendent, prescribing a post‑graduation in Medicine and fifteen years of experience as mandatory qualifications. Dr. Bhanumati Purushottam Tathod, the respondent, had only fourteen years of experience and was not called for interview. Th

BERHAMPUR UNIVERSITY AND ANR.versusDR. SAILABALA P ADHI

1997 INSC 41721 April 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

Dr. Sailabala Padhi applied for the post of Professor of Environmental Science at Berhampur University. The Selection Committee found no candidate qualified, but the Sub‑Committee of the Syndicate recommended her appointment based on her marks and her MSc in Botany (Algology) and PhD in Algology. The Chancellor, acting

GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.versusK. RAJARAM APPASAMY

1997 INSC 41821 April 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

The respondent, a doctor employed by the Government of Tamil Nadu, was absent from duty without authorization for five years (May 1 1982 to May 1 1987). A departmental enquiry under Rule 17(b) of the Tamil Nadu Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules led to his removal from service. The Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribuna

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusSMT. NALINI AGGARWAL ETC. ETC.

1997 INSC 41921 April 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

The Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUD A) issued a notification inviting applications for allotment of houses, requiring applicants to deposit earnest money and stipulating that no interest would be payable on such deposits. The respondents applied on 20 April 1993, but were unsuccessful in the lot draw, which wa

UNION OF INDIAversusGURBACHAN SINGH AND ANR.

1997 INSC 42021 April 1997Dismissed

The respondent, who had not produced documentary proof of his date of birth, was assessed by a medical board to be about 25 years old and was allowed to retire in 1984 instead of 1980. He filed an application before the Labour Court under Section 33-C(ii) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, seeking all retirement ben

SENIOR REGIONAL MANAGER, FOOD CORPN. OF INDIA, CALCUTTAversusTULSI DAS BAURI AND ORS.

1997 INSC 42121 April 1997Leave Granted & Dismissed

The respondents, engaged as contract labour by a contractor, were denied full payment of their wages and claimed arrears. The Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court held that the principal employer, the Senior Regional Manager of Food Corp. of India, was liable to pay the outstanding balance. On appeal, the appellan

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.versusRAI CHAND JAIN AND ORS.

1997 INSC 42221 April 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

The respondents, teachers in the Haryana Education Department, sought payment of salary in the selection‑grade pay‑scales, which the Punjab & Haryana High Court had granted. The Government issued an order (20 August 1996) stating that selection‑grade posts would be computed on the basis of total cadre strength, includi

STATE OF ORISSA AND ORS. ETC.versusNIRANJAN NA YAK AND ANR. ETC.

1997 INSC 42321 April 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

The State of Orissa appealed against the Orissa High Court’s order that allowed writ petitions of teachers seeking additional amounts based on a cut‑off date of 1 April 1981 for acquiring qualifications. The Supreme Court examined whether the cut‑off date prescribed by the Government was valid and whether the High Cour

HARYANA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ANR.versusMAHA SINGH AND ANR.

1997 INSC 42421 April 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

The Haryana State Electricity Board (the Board) had a policy that, when land was acquired, one member of the landowner's family must be given employment. Shamsher Singh, a son of the landowner, applied for appointment but died before the Board could appoint him. The Board then appointed his widow, Smt. Suresh Bala, in

PREMIER FABRICATORS, ALLAHABADversusHEAVY ENGINEERING CORPN. LTD., RANCHI

1997 INSC 30421 March 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Premier Fabricators entered into a contract with Heavy Engineering Corp. that contained an arbitration clause. Disputes over items 2‑5 of the claim were referred to two arbitrators, who agreed the items were arbitrable but could not agree on the merits, so they appointed an umpire. The umpire issued a non‑speaking awar

SHRI DIGVIJAY CEMENT CO. ETC.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. ETC.

1997 INSC 30521 March 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

The appellants, Gujarat cement manufacturers, challenged three Rajasthan notifications that reduced the Central Sales Tax on inter‑state cement sales to 7% and later 4% and dispensed with the mandatory Form C declaration. They argued that the notifications were not issued in public interest, violated Articles 301, 302,

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusSUJIR GANESH NAYAK AND CO. AND ANR.

1997 INSC 30621 March 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

The appellant National Insurance Co. Ltd. issued two fire policies with a Riot and Strike endorsement to the respondent Sujir Ganesh Nayak & Co. When a strike halted production and caused damage, the insurer denied liability, invoking Special Condition 5(i)(b) which excludes loss from cessation of work, Clause 19 which

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BOMBAYversusM/S. BANQUE NATIONALE DE-PARIS

1997 INSC 30921 March 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The non‑resident company Banque Nationale de‑Paris challenged a Super Profits Tax assessment that included interest received on Central and State Government securities. It argued that, under Clause X of Rule 1 of the First Schedule of the Super Profits Tax Act, 1963, such interest should be excluded from chargeable pro

K. GOPINATHAN NAIR ETC.versusSTATE OF KERALA

1997 INSC 30721 March 1997

The appellants, processors of cashew nuts in Kerala and Karnataka, purchased raw cashew nuts imported by the Cashew Corporation of India (CCI), a canalising agency, and argued that these purchases were "in the course of import" and thus exempt from state sales tax under Section 5(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.

ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA AND ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

1997 INSC 30821 March 1997Dismissed

The petitioners challenged the promotions of several engineers in the Uttar Pradesh Public Works Department, arguing that the Supreme Court's decision in Indira Sawhney (Mandal) that reservation in promotion was unconstitutional could not be postponed for five years. The Court examined whether the right to promotion is

THE HIMACHAL ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ANR.versusSHRI KEWAL KRISHAN

1997 INSC 31121 March 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

The Himachal Road Transport Corporation (HRTC) initiated disciplinary proceedings against conductor Shri Kewal Krishan for failing to issue tickets. The enquiry was started by the Assistant Manager, Mr K.N. Uppal, who had been designated as Head of Office under the HRTC (Class III & IV) Services Regulations, 1975, and

THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT AND ANR.versusK. MUNNIAPP AN

1997 INSC 31221 March 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether a civil servant can be suspended before retirement when an enquiry into a grave criminal offence is merely contemplated. K. Munniappan, a Divisional Engineer, was served a suspension order under Rule 17(e)(1) of the Tamil Nadu Civil Services (CCA) Rules because an investigation into a

C.S. JOSHIversusINDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, KANPUR AND ANR.

1997 INSC 31421 March 1997Leave Granted & Dismissed

C.S. Joshi, a lower‑division clerk at IIT Kanpur, was removed for fabricating records and misappropriating funds. Under Section 4‑K of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, the Labour Court ordered his reinstatement with 50% back‑wages. The institute obtained a writ petition and the High Court reduced the back‑wages to 25%

M/S. BEJGAM VEERANNA VENKATA NARASIMLOO ETC.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.

1997 INSC 31521 March 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, rice millers, supplied rice to the Food Corporation of India under the Andhra Pradesh Rice (Procurement Ex‑Mill Prices) Order, 1975 and were paid the notified procurement price. The State later issued a memorandum (Nov 2 1976) extending that price to the 1976‑77 crop and, by a Gazette notification dated

N. JAGADEESAN ETC.versusDISTRICT COLLECTOR, NORTH ARCOT AND OTHERS

1997 INSC 17821 February 1997Dismissed

The National Association of Educated Self Employed Youth (NAESEY) had installed kiosks within hospital premises and on the margins of busy roads in Madras, Vellore and Tiruppur. The Tamil Nadu government ordered their removal, citing health hazards in hospitals and traffic hazards on main thoroughfares, and offered to

LAL CHANDversusVIIITH ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE AND ORS.

1997 INSC 17921 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant had entered into a contract to sell a parcel of land to the respondent, who later sued for specific performance but the suit was dismissed and a decree for refund of earnest money was granted. The decree-holder sought execution of the decree, leading the court to attach and auction the appellant's land. T

DR. (CAPT.) AKHOURI RAMESH CHANDRA SINHAversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.

1997 INSC 18021 February 1997Disposed off

The petitioner, Dr. (Capt.) Akhouri Ramesh Chandra Sinha, filed a contempt petition alleging that the State of Bihar had failed to implement the Supreme Court’s earlier judgment fixing his seniority from 6 September 1966 and the consequent promotional benefits. He further claimed that officers who were not entitled to

RAM SAKAL SINGHversusMOSAMAT MONAKE DEVI (DEAD) AND ORS.

1997 INSC 18121 February 1997Dismissed

The appellant, a member of a joint Hindu family, executed a gift deed in favour of a stranger in 1959, later cancelled it and sold the property to the respondent. The respondent sued for a declaration that the gift deed was obtained by fraud and therefore voidable, and for possession based on the subsequent sale deed.

K. KRISHNAMACHARYULU AND ORS.versusSHRI VENKATESWARA HINDU COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND ANR.

1997 INSC 18221 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Six lab assistants employed on daily wages at a private college filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking equal pay with government employees, invoking Article 39(d) and executive instructions. The High Court dismissed the petition, and the matter reached the Supreme Court on appeal. The Court examined whether a

STATE OF U.P.versusYAMUNA SHANKER MISRA AND ANR.

1997 INSC 18321 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The State of U.P. appealed against a Service Tribunal and High Court order that quashed adverse remarks recorded in the confidential reports of Yamuna Shanker Misra and another employee for the years 1987‑88 and 1988‑89, which had denied their promotion. The Tribunal held the remarks were made with malice and arbitrari

BANDHUA MUKTI MORCHA ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS .

1997 INSC 18421 February 1997Disposed off

The Bandhua Mukti Morcha filed a public‑interest writ under Article 32 seeking a total ban on employment of children below 14 years in the carpet industry of Uttar Pradesh and direction to provide education, health, nutrition and other welfare facilities. The Court examined evidence showing widespread child‑bondage, ph

VAM ORGANIC CHEMICALS LTD. AND ANR.versusU. P. EXCISE ACT 1910

1997 INSC 4521 January 1997Dismissed

Vam Organic Chemicals Ltd. and two other firms, licensed to produce industrial alcohol (rectified spirit) for chemical manufacturing, challenged Uttar Pradesh's Notification No. 25/Licence/Part‑3 dated 18‑May‑1990 which imposed a denaturation fee of 7 paise per litre under Section 41 of the U.P. Excise Act, 1910. The p

PHOOIL CHAND GUPTAversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

1997 INSC 4621 January 1997

M/s. Phool Chand Gupta, a dealer in oilseeds, claimed exemption under Section 6(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act for the sale of Mohwa seeds purchased in transit and sold to dealers outside Andhra Pradesh. The Deputy Commissioner withdrew the exemption because the dealer had not furnished Form C, a requirement under Rul

STATE OF ORISSA AND ORS.versusMIS. KRISHNA STORES

1997 INSC 4721 January 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Orissa appealed against the High Court's order quashing the Commissioner of Sales Tax's revision of assessment orders for the assessment years 1969-70 and 1970-71 against Mis. Krishna Stores. The assessments had been reassessed under Sections 12(4) and 12(8) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, and the firm’s appe

M/S. ORIENT TRADING COMP ANY LIMITEDversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CALCUTTA

1997 INSC 4821 January 1997Dismissed

M/s Orient Trading Co. held 14,500 shares of Asiatic Oxygen & Acetylene Co. as stock-in-trade, valued at Rs 1,45,000. It exchanged these for 55,100 shares of Asiatic Oxygen Ltd. at a ratio of 38:10. The Income Tax Officer valued the received shares at Rs 5,51,000 (based on market price of Rs 10 per share) and taxed the

GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.versusS. ARUMUGHAM AND ORS.

1997 INSC 74820 November 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The Government of Tamil Nadu issued G.O.Ms. No.145 (Revenue) on 29 January 1990 increasing the quota of Superintendents eligible for deputation as Tehsildars, a step contested by the Superintendents. The Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal set aside the order and directed the government to revise its policy and allocati

M.C. MEHTAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC.

1997 INSC 74720 November 1997Directions issued

The Supreme Court entertained a writ petition filed by environmental lawyer M.C. Mehta under Article 32 seeking directions to curb the growing menace of unregulated traffic in the National Capital Region (NCR) and National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi. Relying on the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and the Constitution, t

ARUN KUMAR ROUT AND ORS.versusSTA TE OF BIHAR AND ORS.

1997 INSC 74920 November 1997Disposed off

The appellants, twenty daily‑wage employees appointed in 1980 to Class III and IV posts in the Bihar Health Department, were regularised in 1989 but later faced termination in 1993 after a show‑cause notice. The High Court dismissed their writ petition for regularisation, prompting this appeal. The Supreme Court observ

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusB.M. ASHRAF AND CO.

1997 INSC 69820 October 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a registered dealer under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, purchased fish oil from unregistered dealers and sold it within Karnataka to another dealer, Kalbhavi, who intended to export the oil. The issue was whether the purchase of the fish oil attracted purchase tax under Section 6 of the Karnataka Sales T

GUJARAT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONversusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1997 INSC 61120 August 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC), created under the Gujarat Industrial Development Act, 1962, sought exemption from income tax under Section 10(20A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, claiming that its income arose from planning, development, or improvement of cities, towns, and villages. The Income Tax

THE STATE OF GUJARATversusRATILAL LALJIBHAI TANDOL AND ANR.

1997 INSC 61220 August 1997Disposed off

The Gujarat Government, through its Legal Department, issued a circular directing that proposals to file an appeal against an acquittal be routed through the District Magistrate, whose opinion was considered essential before the State took a final decision. The High Court, concerned about delays, ordered that such prop

THIRU AROORAN SUGARS LTD., MADRASversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS

[1997] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 15120 July 1997Dismissed

Thiru Arooran Sugars Ltd., a sugar manufacturer, cultivated sugarcane for its own factory and also bought large quantities of sugarcane from the market. Because part of its income was agricultural and part was business, the company sought to deduct the market value of the sugarcane it used as raw material under Rule 7

COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MADRASversusM/S. ARESON AND COMPANY

1997 INSC 29520 March 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a manufacturer of trailers and steel furniture, sought a refund of excise duty on the ground that the aggregate value of clearances of both items in the preceding financial year was below Rs 20 lakhs, invoking paragraph 2(ii) of Notification No. 80/80. The Assistant Collector rejected the claim because

STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.versusRAMESH CHANDRA AND ANR. ETC.

1997 INSC 29620 March 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Dr. Chaudhary, originally appointed as an Associate Professor of Neurosurgery on an ad‑hoc basis, was later promoted to Professor. Dr. Ramesh Chandra challenged the promotion, arguing that Chaudhary lacked the requisite qualifications under the Indian Medical Council Regulations (IMCR) 1971, specifically the two‑year "

DELHI STOCK EXCHANGE ASSOCIATION LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHI

1997 INSC 29720 March 1997Dismissed

The Delhi Stock Exchange Association Ltd., a company limited by shares, claimed exemption from income tax under Section 11 read with Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, asserting that its income was derived from property held in trust for charitable purposes. The claim pertained to assessment years before Decemb

BALESHWAR TEWARI (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.versusSHEO JATAN TIWARY AND ORS.

1997 INSC 29920 March 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent purchased three bighas and six kathas of land from the Raja Dumraon Raj in 1957 and filed a suit for declaration of title. The appellant claimed he had been in possession of the land as a lessee since 1925 and the trial court dismissed the suit, finding the appellant to be a raiyat. The Subordinate Judge

JAI PRAKASH SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

1997 INSC 30120 March 1997Dismissed

J.P. Sharma, who had been Headmaster of a Junior High School since July 1974, contested the appointment of Man Singh Verma as Headmaster of the same school after it was upgraded to a High School in July 1976. The selection was made under Section 16‑E(2) of the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921, which requires a min

SMT. RAM SAKHI DEVI ETC.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. ETC.

1997 INSC 30220 March 1997Dismissed

The appellant, Ram Sakhi Devi, was appointed headmistress of a junior high school that was upgraded to a high school. The managing committee selected her under the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921, but the District Inspector did not ratify the appointment. The appellant challenged the dismissal of her writ petitio

SHRI DINESH TRIVEDI, M.P. AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 30320 March 1997Disposed off

A writ petition filed by MP Dinesh Trivedi and NGOs under Article 32 sought full disclosure of the Vohra Committee Report, its supporting annexures, and the names of officials implicated, and challenged the constitutionality of Section 5 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923. The Court held that the Report tabled in Parlia

ASHOK LEYLAND LIMITED ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 16420 February 1997Dismissed

Ashok Leyland Ltd., a manufacturer of trucks, sold vehicles to state transport undertakings and other buyers through its regional sales offices (RSOs) across India. The company filed Form ‘F’ with the Tamil Nadu sales‑tax authority, claiming the movement of goods to RSOs was a transfer, not a sale, and paid sales tax i

M/S. NORTHERN PLASTICS LTD.versusHINDUSTAN PHOTO FILMS MFG. CO. LTD. AND ORS.

1997 INSC 16520 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Northern Plastics Ltd. imported X‑ray and graphic art films and claimed a concessional customs duty under a government notification, which was denied by the Assistant Collector of Customs. The Additional Collector later allowed clearance on full duty, prompting Hindustan Photo Films Ltd. (HPF), a business rival, and th

M/S. PROGRESSIVE FINANCERSversusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS

1997 INSC 16620 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Progressive Financers, a partnership of five persons including a minor admitted to the benefits of the firm, applied for registration under Section 184 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for AY 1967-68 and for renewal for AY 1969-70 and 1970-71. The Income Tax Officer rejected the application, treating the firm as an Associat

STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD.versusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BOLPUR

1997 INSC 16720 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Steel Authority of India Ltd (SAIL) manufactured steel ingots using pig iron as a captive input and followed the "later the better" principle, paying excise duty only on the final steel ingots while steel‑melting scrap, a by‑product, was exempt under Notification No.150/77. The Central Excise Department issued show‑cau

ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MADRASversusV. KRISHNAMOORTHY AND ORS.

1997 INSC 16820 February 1997Dismissed

The Assistant Collector of Central Excise, acting as complainant, appealed to the High Court against the sentences imposed on V. Krishnamurthy and others for offences investigated by a Customs Officer, invoking Section 377(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Supreme Court examined whether a Customs Department off

SHAM LALversusSTATE OF HARYANA ETC.

1997 INSC 16920 February 1997Dismissed

Neelam Rani died from burns in 1987. The husband (appellant) and his father were convicted by the Sessions Court of murder (Sec. 302 IPC), dowry death (Sec. 304B IPC) and cruelty for dowry (Sec. 498A IPC). The High Court upheld the murder conviction and acquitted the father. On appeal, the Supreme Court held that the e

SHRI SHIVJIversusSHRI RAGHUNATH (DEAD) AND ORS.

1997 INSC 17020 February 1997Dismissed

The deceased respondent and Smt. Reshambai jointly purchased 9 acres of land. Reshambai executed an agreement of sale in favour of the appellant, promising to convey her share to the respondent, but later refused to execute the deed, alleging fraud and that the agreement was void under the rule against perpetuity. The

RANA PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

1997 INSC 17120 February 1997Dismissed

The appellant, Rana Pratap Singh, was temporarily promoted to Sub‑Inspector in February 1976 and served in that post until his reversion on 7 May 1983. The Government later created 1,300 super‑numerary police posts in December 1984, stipulating that only Sub‑Inspectors who had served three years or more up to 30 Septem

N. MURLEEDHARAN AND ORS. ETC.versusTHE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 17220 February 1997Dismissed

The appellants, Kerala recruits in the Land Revenue Department, challenged the validity of the Special Rules issued by the Government of Kerala on 16 June 1980, which retrospectively required Lower Division Clerks to pass certain promotion tests dating back to 1963 and 1964. The Kerala High Court struck down those rule

STATE OF HARYANAversusDR. A.K. SINHA

1997 INSC 17320 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Dr. A.K. Sinha, an IAS officer allotted to the Haryana cadre, obtained a Ph.D. in 1979 and sought four advance increments under Rule 2(b) of the All India Services (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1960. The Haryana State Government denied the request, but the Punjab & Haryana High Court directed the State to grant the in

BHOLA NATH MISRAversusRAJENDRA PANDEY AND ANR.

1997 INSC 17420 February 1997Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined a civil appeal concerning a decree that granted a perpetual injunction against the appellant and a second defendant in a land dispute. The decree against the second defendant had become final because he did not contest it, while the appellant appealed the decree. The Allahabad High Court dism

THE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.versusRAM KUMAR MANN

1997 INSC 17520 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a Smallpox Supervisor in the Haryana Health Department, resigned to contest state assembly elections and his resignation was accepted. After losing the election, he applied to withdraw his resignation, but the application was rejected, leading him to file a writ petition. The Punjab & Haryana High Court

SMT. KAMESHWARI DEVI @ KALESHWARI DEVIversusSMT. BARHANI (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.

1997 INSC 17620 February 1997Dismissed

The appellant, Kameshwari Devi, was a minor when a partition suit (Suit No. 178/57) was filed in 1957 concerning the estate of her father, Bigan Kumhar. A court‑appointed guardian represented her, and the suit resulted in a decree granting a 1/42 share to each branch, based on a registered partition deed (Phatbandi). A

SATISH KUMARversusZARIF AHMED AND ORS.

1997 INSC 17720 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Satish Kumar, leased immovable property to the respondent, Zarif Ahmed, for eleven months at a monthly rent of Rs.220. After the tenant defaulted, the landlord obtained a decree of ejectment from the trial court, which the High Court set aside on the ground that the unregistered lease deed could not be a

MIS. NEW KENILWORTH HOTEL (P) LTD.versusORISSA STATE FINANCE CORPORATION AND ORS.

1997 INSC 4120 January 1997Dismissed

M/s New Kenilworth Hotel filed a suit challenging actions of the Orissa State Finance Corporation under Section 29 of the State Financial Corporation Act and sought a permanent injunction to protect its possession of a hotel. The trial court granted a status‑quo order, which was later vacated by a single Judge of the O

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusDINESH KUMAR BHARTI

1997 INSC 4220 January 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Rajasthan terminated the service of Dinesh Kumar Bharti, an ad‑hoc teacher appointed on 30 September 1970, after a Screening Committee under Rule 25 of the Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951 found him unfit for regularisation. Bharti challenged the termination; the trial court upheld it and the appellate court

BIHAR DISTILLERY AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 4320 January 1997Disposed off

The petitioners, a Bihar distillery licensed under the Bihar Excise Act to manufacture industrial alcohol (rectified spirit), challenged the State’s notice of cancellation of its licence, contending that licensing and control of such distilleries fall exclusively within the Union’s competence under the Industries (Regu

T.C. LIMITEDversusDEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

1997 INSC 83219 December 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The bank had issued letters of credit to the appellant (seller) for buyers, and the appellant drew funds despite alleged non‑shipment of cigarettes. The bank sued the buyers and the appellant for recovery of Rs 52,59,639.66. The appellant moved to reject the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, claiming no cause of action

STATE OF KERALAversusMADRAS RUBBER FACTORY

1997 INSC 83019 December 1997

The State of Kerala appealed against the Kerala High Court’s decision that the rubber cess imposed under the Rubber Act, 1947 could not be included in the purchase turnover of dealers for sales‑tax purposes. The dealers argued that the cess was payable only by the manufacturer and therefore not part of the purchase pri

MALPE V!SHWANATH ACHARYA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

1997 INSC 83119 December 1997Disposed off

The appellants, a group of landlords, challenged Sections 5(10)(B), 11(1) and 12(3) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, which fixed "standard rent" at the level prevailing on 1 September 1940 or at the first letting, thereby preventing rent increases. They argued that the provisions ha

SURENDRA KUMAR JAINversusROYCE PEREIRA

1997 INSC 74019 November 1997Dismissed

The appellant, S.K. Jain, was inducted by the respondent, Royce Pereira, as a paying guest in 1971 and later claimed to be a licensee and tenant. The dispute centered on the interpretation of Section 5(6A) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, 1947, specifically whether the licensor must res

STATE OF U.PversusNAND KUMAR AGGARWAL AND ORS.

1997 INSC 74119 November 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed against a High Court order that exempted a parcel of land in village Para, Lucknow, from the ceiling provisions of the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulations) Act, 1976 on the ground that it was agricultural land. The land was entered as agricultural in revenue records and shown as such i

SMT. REBTI DEVIversusRAM DUTT AND ANR. ETC.

1997 INSC 74219 November 1997Dismissed

Smt. Rebati Devi (deceased) filed a suit for possession of a property against her son Ram Dutt Gupta, who claimed the property was purchased by her husband in her name, i.e., a benami transaction. The trial court held the plaintiff was not a benamidar, but the appellate court reversed that decision and the High Court a

AAMENABAI TAYEBALY AND ORS.versusCOMPETENT AUTHORITY UNDER SAFEMA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 74319 November 1997Dismissed

The case concerned the sale of a flat owned by Tahira Sultana, the wife of a COFEPOSA detainee, to Tayab Ali, who later died and whose heirs appealed. The property had been subject to a forfeiture order under the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976 (SAFEMA) and a stay was impo

DENA BANKversusKRITI KUMAR T. PATEL

1997 INSC 74419 November 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, K.T. Patel, was dismissed from Dena Bank and the Central Industrial Tribunal ordered his reinstatement, which the bank challenged before the Gujarat High Court. The High Court stayed the award but required the bank to pay wages under Section 17‑B of the Industrial Disputes Act. The respondent sought pay

HEERALALversusKALYANMAL AND ORS.

1997 INSC 74519 November 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant filed a partition suit for ten immovable properties (Schedule A) and additional properties (Schedule B). The defendants, in their written statement, admitted that seven of the Schedule A properties were joint family assets and that the appellant was entitled to a one‑third share, while three were exclusiv

M/S HUNSUR PLYWOOD WORKS LTD.versusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1997 INSC 74619 November 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Mis Hunsur Plywood Works Ltd., a public limited company, claimed a development rebate under Section 33 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 1972-73 to 1974-75, which was initially allowed. The assessing authority later observed that the company had transferred amounts from the development rebate reserve to it

WESTERN INDIA PLYWOOD LTD.versusSHRI. P. ASHOKAN

1997 INSC 66319 September 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, an employee of Western India Plywood Ltd., suffered a hand amputation while at work and received disability benefits under the Employees' State Insurance (ESI) Act, 1948. He later sought permission to file a suit for additional compensation against his employer under tort law, but the trial court dismis

P.K. RAMACHANDRANversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ANR.

1997 INSC 66519 September 1997Dismissed

The State of Kerala filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal against a Sub‑Court decree in an arbitration matter, but the appeal was filed 565 days after the limitation period expired. The High Court, despite the respondent’s strong opposition, condoned the delay without recording any satisfaction that the explanation offere

KADRA PAHADIYA AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF BIHAR ETC.

1997 INSC 29319 March 1997Disposed off

The petitioners filed writ petitions seeking a Supreme Court direction that all States appoint sufficient Special Judicial Magistrates (SJM) and Special Metropolitan Magistrates (SMM) under Sections 13(1) and 18(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, to clear the massive backlog of petty criminal cases and ensure spe

JAI PARKASH AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA

1997 INSC 29419 March 1997Leave Granted & Dismissed

The appellants, Jai Parkash and others, challenged the compensation awarded for land acquired by the Union of India in village Keshopur under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Land Acquisition Collector had divided the land into blocks with varying rates, which were later raised by the Additional District Judge. The

TAYABHAI M. BAGASARWALLA AND ANR.versusHIND RUBBER INDUSTRIES (P.) LTD. ETC.

1997 INSC 15619 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The landlord (appellant) sought a perpetual injunction against the tenant (defendant) to stop any construction on a building that had been destroyed by fire, claiming the tenancy had ended. The City Civil Court granted an interim injunction and later found it had jurisdiction, subsequently punishing the tenant for cont

KATTITE VALAPPIL PATHUMMA AND ORS.versusTHE TALUK LAND BOARD AND ORS.

1997 INSC 15719 February 1997Dismissed

The deceased declarant, who had three wives and ten children, had elected his first wife and her minor children as his statutory family under Explanation I to Section 82 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963. The Taluk Land Board ordered him to surrender 160.54 acres of surplus land; after revisions the Board fixed a su

DR. SADHNA DEVI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

1997 INSC 15819 February 1997Disposed off

The petitioners, general‑category medical graduates, challenged a Uttar Pradesh Government circular dated 31‑August‑1995 that removed the requirement of a minimum 35% qualifying mark for SC/ST/OBC candidates in the entrance test for postgraduate medical courses. They argued that the circular violated the Indian Medical

MD. ALIMUDDINversusWAIZUDDIN AND ANR.

1997 INSC 15919 February 1997Dismissed

The case concerned a decree for specific performance granted in 1982, which became final after the Supreme Court dismissed a Special Leave Petition. The trial court had directed the respondents to deposit Rs. 500 and execute a sale deed by June 7, 1982, and later extended the time for compliance on August 20, 1982, not

M/S. ASHOK CATERERSversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER BOMBAY (BEST UNDERTAKING)

1997 INSC 16019 February 1997Dismissed

The petitioner, Mis. Ashok Caterers, occupied premises under a monthly lease that was offered for five years but never accepted; the lease expired in January 1990 and the tenancy was later determined by order on 24 December 1994. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay initiated summary eviction proceedings under S

SMT. BULAKI (DEAD) BY LRS.versusLAL DHAR AND ORS.

1997 INSC 16119 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Bechan, a bhumidar under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, executed three gift deeds in favour of his stepson Laldhar—two in June 1951 and one on 18 November 1957. The first two gifts were challenged on the ground that permission for alienation was not properly obtained, but the court held that t

S.S. DAYANANDAversusK.S. NAGESH RAO AND ORS.

1997 INSC 16219 February 1997Dismissed

The respondent obtained a decree for Rs. 3,825.85 and his property was sold on December 18, 1978; the petitioner bought it for Rs. 67,000. The respondent filed an application under Order XXI, Rule 90 of the CPC to set aside the sale, which the executing court dismissed. On appeal, the appellate court set aside the sale

RAMBIR DAS AND ANR.versusKALYAN DAS AND ANR.

1997 INSC 16319 February 1997

The case concerned the succession to the shebaitship of the Shri Jugal Kishoreji Maharaj Mandir founded by Hari Dass. After the founder's death, his four chelas were nominated but none exercised the power to appoint a successor. The last serving chela, Bansi Dass, executed a will nominating Rambir Das and his brother a

VINEET NARAIN AND ORSversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1997 INSC 82618 December 1997Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined public‑interest writ petitions filed after the CBI seized diaries implicating senior politicians and bureaucrats. The petitions alleged that the CBI and revenue authorities had failed to investigate the allegations and that a government "Single Directive" requiring prior sanction of the conce

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS.versusM.P. OJHA AND ANR.

1997 INSC 82818 December 1997Dismissed

The case concerned whether a retired government servant, receiving a modest pension, could be deemed "wholly dependent" on his son under Rule 2(d) of the M.P. Civil Services (Medical Attendance) Rules, 1958, thereby allowing the son to claim reimbursement of medical expenses incurred for the father's treatment outside

STATE OF M.P.versusMANGI LAL SHARMA

1997 INSC 82918 December 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Mangi Lal Sharma, a clerk in the Madhya Pradesh Irrigation Department, resigned after a denied transfer request and remained absent for over five years, leading the State to treat his service as terminated. He filed a suit under Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act for a declaration that he remained in service, and th

PREMIER BREWERIES ETC.versusSTATE OF KERALA

1997 INSC 82718 December 1997Dismissed

Premier Breweries, a dealer in Indian Made Foreign Liquor, sold liquor in bottles packed in cardboard cartons and was assessed sales tax at 8% on the cartons under Entry 97 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. The Deputy Commissioner, invoking sections 5(5) and 5(6) of the Act, revised the assessment to tax the c

NAJJAM FARAGHI ALIAS NAJJAM FARUQUIversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

1997 INSC 73218 November 1997Dismissed

The appellant was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for allegedly pouring kerosene on his wife and setting her on fire. The victim survived for about twenty days after the incident, during which she gave two statements to a police Sub‑Inspector and a magistrate accusing her husband. The defence argued that thes

HARGOVANDAS DEVRAJBHAI PATEL AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

1997 INSC 73318 November 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Police officers were accused of murdering a man identified as Kantuji Mohan Singh after beating him during interrogation at a police station. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence, including the discovery of a decomposed body in a jungle and identification of the body by relatives based on clothing and arti

BHANA KHALPA BHAI PATELversusASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, BULSAR, GUJARAT AND ANR.

1997 INSC 73418 November 1997Dismissed

The appellant, Bhana Khalpa Bhoi Patel, was charged under Sections 135(1-A) and 135(1-B) of the Customs Act, 1962 and Section 25 of the Gold Control Act, 1968 for involvement in the smuggling of contraband gold. The prosecution relied on statements recorded under Section 108 of the Customs Act from several co‑accused a

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusA. NAGAMALLESHWAR RAO

1997 INSC 73518 November 1997Appeal(s) allowed

A. Nagamalleswara Rao was appointed as a telephone operator by falsely claiming 79.80% marks in his SSC examination, whereas he had actually secured only 48.6%. He failed to produce the original or a duplicate SSC certificate despite repeated requests, leading to a departmental inquiry under Rule 3(1)(i)(iii) of the Ce

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHversusSHRI J. L. SHARMA AND ANR.

1997 INSC 73618 November 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned whether the training period of direct recruits to the Himachal Pradesh Forest Service (Class II) should be counted for seniority. Respondents, who were promotee officers, applied to the Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal for a direction that seniority be measured from the date of joining the se

AMMINI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KERALA

1997 INSC 73718 November 1997Dismissed

The appellants, four accused, were alleged to have conspired to murder Merli and her two children by administering potassium cyanide. The prosecution relied on extensive circumstantial evidence, including the accused's movements, fingerprint on a glass, forensic laboratory report, medical certificates, and a confession

BALWINDER KAURversusHARDEEP SINGH

1997 INSC 73818 November 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Balwinder Kaur married Hardeep Singh under Sikh rites and later filed a divorce petition on grounds of cruelty and desertion. The husband did not appear, and the District Judge granted an ex‑parte decree of divorce. The wife appealed to the High Court under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, alleging that her husban

GENERAL MANAGER, TELECOMversusS. SRINIVASA RAO AND ORS .

1997 INSC 73118 November 1997Dismissed

The Department of Telecom (DoT) of the Union of India appealed a High Court order that held the DoT to be an "industry" under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Supreme Court examined whether the DoT, engaged in commercial telecommunications services and not performing sovereign functions, falls within the definiti

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusSANTRO DEVI AND ORS. ETC.

1997 INSC 73918 November 1997Case Partly allowed

A motor accident gave rise to a compensation claim by Santro Devi and others against National Insurance Co. Ltd. The Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal found that the driver of the offending vehicle held a valid licence that had been duly renewed, and the Punjab & Haryana High Court affirmed this finding. The High Court, h

SMT. SHANTI RANI DAS DEWANJEEversusDINESH CHANDRA DAY (DEAD) BY LRS.

1997 INSC 66218 September 1997Dismissed

The appellant challenged a lower court order that rejected her claim that filing a counter‑claim under Order VIII Rule 6A of the Code of Civil Procedure after the written statement was barred. The suit (Civil Case No. 248/82) was instituted on 15‑July‑1982 and the application for a counter‑claim was filed on 22‑June‑19

L. CHANDRA KUMAR ETC. ETC.versusTHE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1997 INSC 28818 March 1997Disposed off

The seven‑Judge Constitution Bench examined the constitutional validity of sub‑clause (d) of Article 323A and Article 323B, which sought to exclude the jurisdiction of all courts except the Supreme Court under Article 136, and Section 28 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, which attempted a similar exclusion of

NAGPUR IMPROVEMENT TRUSTversusNAGPUR TIMBER MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION AND ANR. ETC.

1997 INSC 29018 March 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

The Nagpur Improvement Trust (NIT) was liable to pay non‑agricultural assessment levied under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code on lands it had leased to various lessees. The lessees contested this liability, arguing that Rule 9 of the Nagpur Improvement Trust (Land Disposal) Rules, 1955 made the Trust solely responsib

POLAMMARASETTI VARANA VENKA SATYANARAYANAversusSUDDHA APPARAO NAIDU (DEAD) AND ORS

1997 INSC 29118 March 1997Dismissed

The plaintiff, a mortgagee, sought redemption of a usufructuary mortgage created in 1946 over a property that was then under a lease expiring in 1948. The defendant, the lessee, claimed that his leasehold right survived the mortgage and gave him a non‑evictable interest, preventing the mortgagee from taking possession

THE BOMBAY DYEING AND MANUFACTURING CO. LTD.versusCOLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, BOMBAY

1997 INSC 15318 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Bombay Dyeing & Manufacturing Co. Ltd entered into a contract with a U.S. firm to import a plant for manufacturing dimethyl terephthalate and applied for registration under the Project Import (Registration of Contract) Regulations, 1965. The contract was approved for a CIF value of US$17 million plus dismantling and te

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusBARMALT (INDIA) LTD., GURGAON

1997 INSC 15418 February 1997Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court considered whether malt and malt extract manufactured by Barmalt (India) Ltd. qualify as "food products" under Excise Notification No. 55 of 1975 and whether the company was entitled to a refund of excise duty on the basis of unjust enrichment. The Court affirmed the Delhi High Court's view that malt

TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY BOARDversusM/S. BRIDGE TUNNEL CONSTRUCTIONS AND ORS.

1997 INSC 15518 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (TN EB) contracted Bridge Tunnel Constructions to build inter‑connecting tunnels for the Suruliyar Hydroelectric Project. After the contract was completed late, a dispute arose over additional payments. The respondent invoked the arbitration clause (clause 50) and appointed a sole arbit

COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISEversusMIS. WOOD POLYMERS LTD. ETC.

1997 INSC 82117 December 1997Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the classification of paper‑based decorative laminated sheets, cotton‑fabric‑based laminates and paper‑based electrical insulators manufactured by M/s Wood Polymers Ltd. The Revenue argued that the products fell under Chapter 48 (sub‑headings 4818.90/4823.90) and were eligible for concessiona

SHARAD VASANT KOTAK AND ORS.versusRAMNIKLAL MOHANLAL CHAWDA AND ANR.

1997 INSC 82217 December 1997Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether a suit for dissolution and accounts filed by a founding partner of M/s Paramount Builders was barred by Section 69(2A) of the Partnership Act, as amended by Maharashtra. The firm, originally registered in 1980, had admitted the widow of a deceased partner in 1986 without notifying the

HINDUSTAN LEVER LTD.versusCOLGATE PALMOLIVE (I) LTD. AND ANR.

1997 INSC 82317 December 1997Dismissed

Hindustan Lever Ltd. advertised its New Pepsodent toothpaste as 102% superior in antibacterial action to the "leading toothpaste", which the MRTP Commission identified as Colgate Dental Cream. Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd. and a consumer filed a complaint under Sections 10, 36A(viii), 36A(x) and 36B of the Monopolies

RAM BETI ETC. ETC.versusDISTRICT PANCHAYAT RAJADHIKARI AND ORS.

1997 INSC 82417 December 1997Dismissed

The appeal arose from the removal of several Pradhans of Gram Sabhas in Uttar Pradesh under Section 14 of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 (as amended by Act 9 of 1994). The Pradhans challenged the provision, arguing that only the members of the Gram Sabha who elected them could remove them and that the statute violate

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHversusSTATE OF NAGALAND AND ORS.

1997 INSC 82517 December 1997Disposed off

The State of Uttar Pradesh filed a Special Leave Petition against an interim order passed by the Gauhati High Court in C.R. No. 4986 of 1997, seeking relief against the State of Nagaland and others. Both parties presented extensive arguments before a two‑Judge Bench of the Supreme Court. The Court noted that the writ p

PREM CHAND ALIAS PREM NATHversusSMT. SHANTA PRABHAKAR

1997 INSC 73017 November 1997Dismissed

The landlord filed an eviction petition under Section 14(3)(c) of the Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, claiming the tenant defaulted on rent and that the premises were needed bona fide for building or rebuilding. The Rent Controller dismissed the petition for lack of evidence about the building's conditio

STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD.versusSHRI AMBICA MILLS LTD. AND ORS.

1997 INSC 69617 October 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The Steel Authority of India Ltd. (SAIL) supplied hot rolled steel strips to Ambica Mills Ltd. under an Import‑Export Policy scheme that required the importer to hold a valid advance licence, duty exemption certificate, export bond and an irrevocable Letter of Credit. The importer submitted a licence on 20‑Aug‑1983 tha

STATE OF M.P. AND ORS.versusR.N. MISHRA AND ANR.

1997 INSC 66117 September 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a Forest Range Officer, was alleged to have committed misconduct and a preliminary inquiry was launched in 1976. While the inquiry was pending, he was promoted to Assistant Conservator of Forest in 1977. After the inquiry concluded, the State Government penalised him by withholding two salary increments

SHRI JAGANNA TEMPLE PURI MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS ADMINISTRATOR AND ANR. ETC.versusCHINTAMANI KHUNTIA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 66017 September 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of Sections 28‑B(5) and 28‑C(9) of the Shri Jagannath Temple Act, 1954, which barred temple attendants (Sevaks) from receiving any share of offerings placed in newly installed hundis and from claiming a share of the foundation fund. The Sevaks argued that these pro

SMT. K. PONNAMMAversusTHE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 27717 March 1997Dismissed

The petitioner, K. Ponnamma, and her husband were charged under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code; the husband was convicted while the petitioner was acquitted. During the pendency of the criminal trial she was suspended under Kerala Service Rule 57, which bars drawing any pay except a subsistence allowance

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusBRIJ LAL THAKUR

1997 INSC 27817 March 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The vacancy for an E.C.G. Technician in the Northern Railway Hospital was filled by promoting a Scheduled Caste candidate, Prakash Kaur, under a 40‑point roster and rule of rotation that reserved the post for SCs. An unsuccessful general‑category candidate challenged the promotion, arguing that reserving a solitary pos

THE FLAG OFFICER COMMANDING-IN-CHIEF AND ANR.versusMRS. M.A. RAJANI AND ANR.

1997 INSC 27917 March 1997Dismissed

The Flag Officer Commanding‑in‑Chief and others appealed against a decision of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) that ordered the appointment of Mrs. M.A. Rajan, a Scheduled Caste candidate, to a Grade III Stenographer post in the Ministry of Defence. The recruitment rules prescribe three sources of appointment

HUKAM RAJ KHINVSARAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 28017 March 1997Dismissed

The appellant, a government employee, was dismissed after suspension but the Central Administrative Tribunal set aside the dismissal and reinstated him on 13 March 1992, also directing that he receive all consequential benefits. The appellant did not receive those benefits, filed a contempt petition which was dismissed

MOHAN LAL AND ORS.versusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, SHIMLA-2 AND ORS.

1997 INSC 28117 March 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Mohan Lal and others appealed against an order of the Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal concerning the inter‑seniority of direct‑recruits to the Excise and Taxation Inspectorate (Class III) Service. The dispute centered on the interpretation of Rule 11 and Rule 4 of the Himachal Pradesh Excise and Taxation Depar

POWER FINANCE CORPORATION LTD.versusPRAMOD KUMAR BHATIA

1997 INSC 28317 March 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, an employee of Power Finance Corporation Ltd., applied for voluntary retirement under a scheme intended to reduce surplus staff. The corporation accepted his resignation on 20 December 1994, subject to the clearance of outstanding dues, and said the acceptance would be effective from 31 December 1994. T

PALLAVA GRANITES INDUSTRIES INDIA (P) LTD.versusGOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.

1997 INSC 28417 March 1997Dismissed

The petitioner applied for a 15‑year mining lease over 12.08 acres of private land in Prakasam district, Andhra Pradesh. The Director initially granted a six‑month lease, but the landowners challenged the grant and the High Court ordered that any lease could be issued only with the owners' consent. Despite this directi

SMT. SATI RANI SENversusM/S. INDIAN STANDARD CASTING CO. AND ANR.

1997 INSC 28517 March 1997Disposed off

The case involved parallel suits concerning Premises No. 31, Raja Santosh Road, Alipore, where the landlord (Indian Standard Casting Co.) obtained an ex parte decree in a suit against the principal tenant and executed possession, despite a pending suit in another court that had granted a status‑quo order and an ad inte

GANESH S/O GULABRAO SUROSHEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 28617 March 1997Dismissed

The appellant, Ganesh, a member of the forward caste ‘Thakur’, claimed that he belonged to the Scheduled Tribe categories ‘Ma Thakur’ or ‘Ka Thakur’ in Maharashtra and applied for a caste certificate. The Scrutiny Committee examined his claim and rejected it, finding that he did not satisfy the affinity test required f

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.versusAJAY KUMAR

1997 INSC 14617 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Ajay Kumar, was appointed on a daily‑wage basis as a Class IV Nursing Orderly in a medical college on 14 February 1985. He filed a writ petition seeking regularisation, but the single judge held that no statutory rule or administrative instruction existed to convert his daily‑wage appointment into a per

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS.versusA. GURUSAMY

1997 INSC 14717 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, A. Gurusamy, obtained a certificate in 1971 claiming Scheduled Tribe (Kattunaicken) status, which was later cancelled after an enquiry revealed he belonged to a Scheduled Caste (Thotti). He filed a civil suit seeking a declaration that he is a Scheduled Tribe; the trial court and appellate court granted

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusR. DAYAL AND ORS.

1997 INSC 14817 February 1997Disposed off

The case concerned appointments of two engineers, B.S. Bhatnagar and H.L. Meena, to vacancies in the Rajasthan Service of Engineers (Building and Roads Branch) after the Rules were amended on 24 July 1995. The respondents challenged the appointments, arguing that the amended rules, which introduced new qualification cr

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC.versusB. PRASAD, B.S.O., AND ORS. ETC .

1997 INSC 14917 February 1997Disposed off

The Supreme Court heard appeals arising from the Central Administrative Tribunal’s orders concerning the payment of Special Duty Allowance and Special Compensatory (Remote Locality) Allowance to defence civilian employees posted in the North‑Eastern region. The Union of India argued that the employees were entitled to

THE NEW INDIA CIVIL ERECTORS {P) LTD.versusOIL AND NATIONAL GAS CORPORATION

1997 INSC 15017 February 1997Case Partly allowed

The appellant, New India Civil Erectors Ltd., entered into a contract with ONGC to construct 304 prefabricated housing units. After termination of the contract, disputes were referred to two arbitrators who awarded the appellant a net sum of Rs. 67,82,620. The appellant sought to make the award a rule of court; the sin

SADHVI RITUMBHARAversusDIGVIJA Y SINGH AND ANR.

1997 INSC 15117 February 1997

The Supreme Court disposed of an appeal from the Madhya Pradesh High Court and directed lower courts to decide the matter on its merits without being influenced by the High Court’s findings. After the order, M.P. Mishra, Assistant Director of Public Relations, issued a press release falsely stating that the Supreme Cou

VINAY PRAKASH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

1997 INSC 15217 February 1997Dismissed

The petitioners, members of the Lohar community in Bihar, sought recognition as a Scheduled Tribe (ST) under the name "Lohara" based on a Presidential notification. The Supreme Court examined whether the erroneous inclusion of "Lohars" in the Hindi translation of the notification, absent in the English version, could c

THE STATE BANK OF INDOREversusGO VIND RAO

1997 INSC 3317 January 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Govindrao, an agent of the State Bank of Indore, was charged with causing loss to the bank by allowing large loans to be granted in violation of banking rules, which later became irrecoverable. The disciplinary authority dismissed him from service, and his subsequent appeals—including a special appeal—were rejected. Af

RAJKOT MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONversusMANJULBEN JAYANTILAL NAKUM AND ORS.

1997 INSC 3417 January 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased Jayantilal was killed when a roadside tree, planted by the Rajkot Municipal Corporation, fell on him while he was walking on a footpath. His widow and children sued the corporation for damages, alleging negligence in failing to maintain the tree in a safe condition. The trial court and the Gujarat High Cou

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusSUBODH KUMAR DUTTA AND ANR.

1997 INSC 3517 January 1997Disposed off

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed a charge sheet against Subodh Kumar Dutta under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 for allegedly accepting a bribe of Rs. 700. A Special Judge, appointed under the West Bengal Special Courts Act, 1949, took cognizance of the offence on 9 July 1988. The 1947 Act was re

MR. SANTOSH KUMAR VERMA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 3717 January 1997Dismissed

The appellants were appointed as Assistant Engineers on daily wages and later placed on a regular pay scale under Section 6(3) of the Bihar Regional Development Authority Act, 1981. The Authority sought to regularise their services, but the Government referred the matter to the Public Service Commission, which did not

STATE OF UP & ORS ETCversusSRI LAXMAN RICE MILLS AND ORS. ETC.

1997 INSC 3817 January 1997Disposed off

The State of Uttar Pradesh challenged the levy imposed on Sri Laxman Rice Mills under the U.P. Rice and Paddy (Levy and Regulation of Trade) Order, 1985, contending that the levy was effective from the night of 30 September/1 October 1995 and therefore covered the rice stock already held by the millers. The State argue

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.versusHARNAM SINGH AND ORS.

1997 INSC 3917 January 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned teachers who were employed by District Boards and Zilla Parishads in Punjab and whose schools were taken over by the Government of Punjab in 1957‑58. The deed of takeover stipulated that the government was under no obligation to retain the existing staff and that any staff taken on would be treated a

STATE OF UP AND ANR. ETC.versusC.O.D. CHHEOKI EMPLOYEES' CO-OP SOCIETY LTD. AND ORS. ETC.

1997 INSC 4017 January 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttar Pradesh challenged provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 and the 1968 Rules that reserve seats for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Other Backward Classes and women in the Committee of Management of co‑operative societies, arguing that the reservation and nomination powe

ASSOCIATED CEMENT COMPANY LTD.versusKESHVANAND

1997 INSC 81916 December 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Associated Cement Company Ltd. filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against Kesvanand. The magistrate examined the company’s authorized representative, Puneet Aggarwal, on oath, but on two consecutive dates the representative was absent and the magistrate acquitted the accused under Sec

SIYA RAMversusUNION OF INDIA AND. ORS.

1997 INSC 82016 December 1997Dismissed

The appellant, Siya Ram, challenged his non‑selection for the post of Chief Personnel Inspector in the Indian Railways, alleging bias by a member of the Selection Board and contending that the selection based solely on a viva voce, with a high weightage, was arbitrary. The Central Administrative Tribunal had dismissed

M.C. MEHTA ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 81816 December 1997Directions issued

In M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (Writ Petition (C) No.13029 of 1985), the Supreme Court issued comprehensive directions under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and the Motor Vehicles Rules, 1993 to improve road safety and curb environmental pollution. The Court ordered verification of all commercial licences issued between

RAO SOMASHEKARA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.

1997 INSC 65716 September 1997Dismissed

The petitioners, secondary school teachers in Karnataka who were originally allotted from the former State of Hyderabad, claimed that the pay‑scale disparity persisting from 1 January 1957 to 31 December 1969 violated Article 14 of the Constitution. The State had, based on the Justice Tukol Commission report, equalised

C. SAMPATH KUMARversusTHE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE, MADRAS

1997 INSC 65916 September 1997Dismissed

The appellant was served a summons under Section 40 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, requiring him to appear before the Enforcement Officer and give a written, signed statement. He challenged the summons, contending that he could not be compelled to provide a written statement, alleging that the process am

INDIA CARBON LTD. ETC.versusTHE STATE OF ASSAM

1997 INSC 56516 July 1997Appeal(s) allowed

India Carbon Ltd. and other appellants, manufacturers of petroleum coke, were liable to pay Central Sales Tax under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1957 on inter‑state sales. They delayed payment and the Assam Sales Tax authorities demanded interest under Section 35A of the Assam Sales Tax Act, 1947. The appellants challeng

SALES TAX OFFICER AND ANR.versusM/S SHREE DURGA OIL MILLS AND ANR.

1997 INSC 81715 December 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Orissa issued an Industrial Policy Resolution (IPR) in 1979 promising five‑year sales‑tax exemption for new small‑scale industries, but actual exemption required a notification under Section 6 of the Orissa Sales Tax Act. M/s Shree Durga Oil Mills set up its oil mill in 1980 and claimed exemption, invoking

ASSOCIATE BANKS OFFICERS ASSOCIATIONversusSTATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 69215 October 1997Dismissed

The Associate Banks Officers Association, representing officers of the State Bank of India’s subsidiary banks, filed a writ petition seeking parity in terminal benefits, medical benefits and extra increments with employees of the State Bank of India (SBI). SBI contended that, under Section 50(2) of the State Bank of In

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.versusMINISTERIAL KARAMCHARI SANGH

1997 INSC 69315 October 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a dispute over pay‑scale discrimination between ministerial employees of the Uttar Pradesh Directorate of Information and those of the State Secretariat. A 1964 Pay Rationalisation Committee recommended that, from 1‑April‑1965, new appointments in the Information Directorate be placed on a lower cler

MOHD. YUNUSversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

1997 INSC 69415 October 1997Disposed off

Mohd Yunus was charged under Sections 3 and 5 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987. Section 20A(1) of the Act requires prior written approval of the District Superintendent of Police before recording any information about an offence. The prosecution claimed an oral permission was given by t

VENKATESH THIMMAIAH GURJALKARversusS.S. HAWALDAR

1997 INSC 69515 October 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant continued to operate a hair‑cutting shop that had been let to his father in 1940, a non‑residential premises, after his father's death in 1974. The landlord filed a petition for eviction under Section 21 read with Section 51(2) of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961, asserting that the appellant was not

MIS. KALYANI BREWERIES LTD.versusST ATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

1997 INSC 65615 September 1997Dismissed

The appellant, Kalyani Breweries Ltd., collected deposits on beer bottles, refunded deposits on return, and transferred unrefunded amounts to a "Bottle Deposit Forfeited" account. The Commercial Tax Officer treated the forfeited amount as sales revenue and levied sales tax, which was upheld by the Assistant Commissione

MIS FARIDABAD CT. SCAN CENTREversusD.G. HEALTH SERVICES AND ORS.

1997 INSC 65515 September 1997Dismissed

The Faridabad CT Scan Centre, a private diagnostic centre not attached to any hospital, sought exemption from customs duty on imported hospital equipment under Notification No. 64188 dated 1‑3‑1988. It argued that similar centres had been granted the exemption and that denial violated Article 14 of the Constitution. Th

A.P. STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION ETC.versusV AJRA CHEMICALS AND ORS. ETC.

[1997] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 70215 July 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation (AP SFC) had sanctioned a term loan to Vajra Chemicals Ltd., which defaulted despite several notices and a recall‑cum‑sale notice under Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act. After the borrower failed to honour post‑dated cheques, the corporation seized the un

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusBOLLARPRAGADA SURYANARAYANA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

[1997] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 71515 July 1997Dismissed

The respondents were part‑time Village Officers in Andhra Pradesh whose posts were abolished by an Ordinance on 6 January 1984, later replaced by the Part‑time Village Officers Abolition Act, 1985 (sections 3 and 5). Prior to abolition they had contributed to a Family Benefit Scheme (G.O. No. 3420, 1 August 1980) and w

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.versusAMAR NATH BANSAL

1997 INSC 3215 January 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Amar Nath Bansal, originally a civilian clerk in the Jind State Civil Service (1943), later served in the merged state of PEPSU, then Punjab, and finally Haryana. The Jind Service Regulations of 1945 fixed the retirement age at 62, but after the formation of PEPSU the Raj Pramukh issued Ordinances No. 1 and No. 16 of 2

S.K.G SUGAR LTD.versusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.

1997 INSC 2915 January 1997Dismissed

S.K.G. Sugar Ltd., a sugar factory with a reserved area under the Bihar Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1981, paid the Central Government‑fixed minimum price of Rs.13.92 per quintal for sugarcane as prescribed in the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966. The State Government, acting in its statutory capac

DR. K. RAMULU AND ANR. ETC.versusDR. S. SURYAPRAKASH RAO AND ORS.

1997 INSC 3015 January 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a Veterinary Assistant Surgeon in the Andhra Pradesh Animal Husbandry Department, filed an application seeking a promotion panel for the post of Assistant Director under the then‑applicable Rule 4 of the A.P. Subordinate Service Rules. The Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal directed the Government t

SARDAR MOHAR SINGH THROUGH POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, MANJIT SINGHversusMANGILAL @ MANGTYA

1997 INSC 3115 January 1997Dismissed

The petitioner entered into a contract to sell agricultural land to the respondent, who defaulted, leading to a decree for specific performance directing the respondent to pay earnest money and damages within three months. After a delay of about seven and a half years, the respondent applied to rescind the decree and s

ASHIM KUMAR ROYversusBIPINBHAI VADILAL MEHTA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 68914 October 1997Dismissed

Ashim Kumar Roy, a trade‑union secretary, filed a criminal complaint alleging that Bipinbhai Vadilal Mehta and his son conspired to commit criminal breach of trust and conspiracy (IPC §§120‑B, 409) and violated Section 77 of the Companies Act by diverting company funds to acquire control of Sayaji Industries Ltd. A mag

MAHESH KUMAR SAHARIAversusSTATE OF NAGALAND AND ORS.

1997 INSC 69014 October 1997Dismissed

M.K. Saharia, former Managing Director of Nagaland Forest Products Ltd., challenged the Nagaland Forest Products Ltd. (Acquisition of Shares) Ordinance, 1981 and the subsequent Act, 1982, which transferred the State's acquisition of the company's S‑class shares. He argued that the State's takeover of shares amounted to

PARSION DEVI AND ORS.versusSUMITRI DEVI AND ORS.

1997 INSC 69114 October 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a review order that had set aside a High Court revision upholding an execution application concerning an injunction decree. The review petition, filed by the judgment debtors, sought to overturn the revision on the ground of limitation but did not point out any error apparent on the face of t

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS.versusBHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS

1997 INSC 60814 August 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents, registered dealers under the Sales Tax Acts, manufactured and sold goods both locally and outside the local area. Under the Madhya Pradesh Entry Tax Act, 1976, they were required to declare that goods sold were local and that no entry tax had been paid; failure to do so invoked Section 7(5), which pres

AJIT SAVANT MAJAGAVIversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

1997 INSC 60914 August 1997Dismissed

The appellant, Ajit Savant Majagavi, was charged with murdering his wife, Padmavathi, and was acquitted by the Sessions Court on the ground that the prosecution failed to prove his presence at the lodge where the death occurred and that key witnesses had turned hostile. The State appealed under Section 378 of the CrPC,

BEHARI KUNJ SAHKARI AWAS SAMITI AND ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

1997 INSC 61014 August 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The Custodian of Evacuee Property, U.P. ordered the transfer of a property to Harnath Chaturvedi on 11 November 1982, and the order was approved by the Assistant Custodian General, a delegate of the Custodian General under Section 55 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950. The State of U.P. filed a revisio

MEHNGA RAM AND ANR.versusO.P. SAXENA ETC.

[1997] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 69514 July 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents, promoted from the running cadre (Driver Grade‑C) to the stationary post of Loco Supervisor before 1 January 1986, claimed that their pay should be stepped up to match that of a senior colleague, Sh. P.N. Kareer, who was promoted after the revised pay scales came into force and therefore received a high

KASHINATH S. BANDEKAR AND ORS.versusATMARAM VASSUDEVA NAIQUE AND ORS.

1997 INSC 26914 March 1997Dismissed

The appellants filed a suit in 1961 seeking declaration of ownership and possession of certain immovable properties, which was tried under the Portuguese Civil Procedure Code. The trial court prepared an especificacao and questionnaire under Articles 515 and 516, but dismissed the suit. On appeal, various courts (Judic

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORSversusBATESHWAR SHARMA

1997 INSC 27214 March 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Bateshwar Sharma, was serving as an ad‑hoc Superintending Engineer while several departmental misconduct proceedings were pending against him. The Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) examined his suitability for promotion from Executive Engineer and found him unfit for promotion up to 16‑Jan‑1994. Th

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.versusKRISHAN NIWAS

1997 INSC 27314 March 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Krishan Niwas, a government employee, was convicted under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment, leading to his removal from service under Article 311(2). The conviction was later modified to Section 325 IPC with a 1½‑year sentence. After serving the term, a departmental appeal reduced his penalty to a low

SRI DOKKA SAMUELversusDR. JACOB LAZARUS CHELLY

1997 INSC 27414 March 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant filed a suit for declaration of ownership and possession of two plots, which was dismissed by the trial court and affirmed by the appellate court. The High Court, in a review, reversed the appellate decree, claiming that relevant precedents were not cited, and held the transaction to be a genuine sale. Th

SAMBHOO NATH MISRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

1997 INSC 27514 March 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Sambhoo Nath Misra filed a private complaint against R.D. Tripathi, a government servant, alleging offences under IPC sections 409, 420, 465, 468 and 477A for forging his signature and misappropriating Rs.443.90. The magistrate dismissed the complaint on the ground that sanction under Section 197 of the CrPC had not be

PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ANR.versusASHWANI KUMAR

1997 INSC 27614 March 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The Punjab State Electricity Board supplied electricity to Ashwani Kumar, later issuing a bill of Rs.1,90,498.79 for the period Dec 1983‑Jan 1985. Kumar filed a civil suit seeking a permanent injunction to restrain the Board from recovering the amount. The trial court decreed in his favour, an appeal upheld the decree,

STATE OF U.P. AND ANR.versusGIRISH BIHARI AND ORS.

1997 INSC 14114 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Dr. Girish Bihari, an IPS officer, was due to retire on 31 March 1996. The Governor of Uttar Pradesh ordered, on 20 March 1996, an extension of his service for six months under Rule 16 of the All India Services (Death‑cum‑Retirement Benefits) Rules, 1958. On 23 March 1996, the Governor cancelled that extension order un

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR.versusPREM RAJ

1997 INSC 14214 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents, pre‑1979 retirees of the Rajasthan government, challenged the 1970 and 1974 notifications that liberalised pension benefits with cut‑off dates, alleging discrimination under Article 14. They did not challenge the later 2 September 1985 notification which extended the revised pension formula to all pre‑

UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH AND ORS.versusMOHINDER SINGH

1997 INSC 14314 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Sub‑Inspector Mohinder Singh was dismissed in 1991 by the Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) of Chandigarh without a departmental enquiry, invoking Article 311(2) proviso (b) of the Constitution on the ground that witnesses would not freely depose against him. The dismissal was based on a report alleging gross misus

NIRMALA JAGDISHCHANDRA KABRAversusTHE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER AND ORS.

1997 INSC 14414 February 1997Dismissed

Petitioner Nirmala Jagdishchandra Kabra held a contract carriage permit but was alleged to be operating the vehicle as a stage carriage by collecting individual fares, violating the permit conditions. The Motor Vehicle Inspector seized and detained the vehicle under Section 207(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Kabra

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search