Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

333 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act — showing 201–333.

S. CHANDRASEKHARAN & ORS.versusM. DINAKAR & ANR

2022 INSC 70111 July 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, family members of a homemaker who died in a road accident, claimed compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation based on one‑third of the husband’s income, following Arun Kumar Agrawal’s precedent, while the High Court reduced the award by usin

THE COMMISSIONER, BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKEversusK.K. UMESH KUMAR & ORS.

2026 INSC 63711 June 2026Disposed off

The appellant, the Commissioner of Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike, was sued for injuries suffered by a passenger when a branch from a roadside tree fell on a stationary auto‑rickshaw during heavy rain. The passenger filed a claim under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation, which was initially dismisse

SMT. SUVARNAMMA & ANR.versusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ANR.

2018 INSC 32811 April 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased was killed when a tractor, driven rashly by its owner, struck him as a pedestrian on a footpath. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal held both the tractor's owner and the insurer jointly and severally liable for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and awarded Rs.4,31,000 plus interest. The insu

SRI NAGARAJAPPAversusDIVISIONAL MANAGER, ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

2011 INSC 28811 April 2011Appeal(s) allowed

Sri Nagarajappa, a coolie, was injured in a motor accident caused by a negligent bus driver and claimed compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 1,70,200, using a 20% disability figure (based on whole‑body disability) and a multiplier of 11 (age 55).

MUKUND DEWANGANversusORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ETC.

2017 INSC 57611 February 2016Matter referred to larger bench

The appeal concerned whether a holder of a licence to drive a light motor vehicle (LMV) must obtain a separate endorsement to drive a transport vehicle that falls within the LMV weight class. The Court examined the definitions of "light motor vehicle" and "transport vehicle" under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the effe

KUM. MICHAELversusREGIONAL MANAGER ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

2013 INSC 9111 February 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an 8‑year‑old boy, was struck by a motorcycle in 2001, sustaining a fractured right leg, permanent disability of 16% and a 1 cm shortening of the limb. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 77,000 as compensation, which the Karnataka High Court enhanced to Rs 1 lakh. The appellant appealed to the

KUNJAN SADANA & ANR.versusMAHESH KUMAR & ORS

2019 INSC 134810 December 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The claimants, the mother and minor brother of 19‑year‑old Yitesh Sadana, sought compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act after his death in a bus accident caused by driver negligence. The Tribunal and the Delhi High Court awarded loss of dependency using a multiplier of 15, based on the mother’s age, and did not acco

ABHAY SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 81910 December 2013Directions issued

The Supreme Court examined the widespread misuse of red lights and multi‑toned horns on motor vehicles, which were being employed by a large number of public officials and private citizens beyond the limited class intended by law. The petition, led by senior counsel Harish Salve, raised constitutional concerns that suc

VADODARA MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONversusPURSHOTTAM V. MURJANI AND ORS.

2014 INSC 61610 September 2014Dismissed

A boat operated by Ripple Aqua Sports under a licence from Vadodara Municipal Corporation was overloaded with 38 passengers (capacity 22) and capsized, killing 22. The victims filed a consumer complaint alleging deficiency in service. The State Consumer Commission and the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

JANABAI WD/O DINKARRAO GHORPADE & ORS.versusM/S. I.C.I.C.I. LAMBORD INSURANCE COMPANY LTD

2022 INSC 81110 August 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased was killed in a motor accident when a car collided with his motorcycle; his wife filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.8,90,000. The insurer appealed, and the High Court set aside the award, doubting the claimant's statements and t

SRI ANTHONY ALIAS ANTHONY SWAMYversusTHE MANAGING DIRECTOR, K.S.R.T.C.

2020 INSC 42110 June 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a painter, was injured in a bus accident caused by the driver’s negligence, resulting in amputation of his left leg. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 4,08,850 as compensation, which the Karnataka High Court enhanced to Rs 5,10,350. The appellant contended that the award was grossly inadequat

CHAIRMAN, RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ORS.versusSMT. SANTOSH & ORS.

2013 INSC 34110 May 2013Disposed off

The petition challenged a Rajasthan High Court order that placed the entire liability for compensation on the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (RSRTC) and exempted the driver and owner of a 'Jugaad' vehicle. The Supreme Court examined whether a 'Jugaad' falls within the definition of "motor vehicle" under Sec

RACHANA GANGU & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2026 INSC 21810 March 2026Disposed off

The petitioners, parents of individuals who died after receiving COVID‑19 vaccines, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking an independent medical board, protocols for early detection of adverse events and compensation. Similar petitions were filed in the Kerala High Court, which directed the Union to formulate

R. VALLI & ORSversusTAMIL NADU STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION LTD.

2022 INSC 17010 February 2022Disposed off

The legal heirs of V. Rajasekaran appealed against a compensation award of Rs.15,12,628 for his death in a motor vehicle accident. The Motor Accident Claim Tribunal had applied a split multiplier—3 up to the superannuation age and 8 thereafter—based on the deceased’s remaining years of service. The High Court affirmed

MOHAN SONIversusRAM AVTAR TOMAR AND ORS.

2012 INSC 1310 January 2012Appeal(s) allowed

Mohan Soni, a cart puller, lost his left leg below the knee in a motor vehicle accident and claimed compensation under section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.2,03,400, fixing his disability at 50% based on Schedule 1 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, and the Hi

RAJWATI @ RAJJO & ORS.versusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS.

2022 INSC 12679 December 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The dependents of two deceased motor‑vehicle accident victims filed claim petitions under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation. The Motor Accident Claim Tribunal awarded compensation based on the deceased's salary certificate, pay slip and testimony of the wife and co‑workers, applying a mu

MOHD. SABEER @ SHABIR HUSSAINversusREGIONAL MANAGER, U. P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION

2022 INSC 12669 December 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a scrap dealer, was injured in a bus accident caused by the negligent driving of the respondent. He suffered a permanent disability of 70% including amputation of his right lower limb and claimed compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 15,76,465, which the

MALARVIZHI & ORS.versusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ANR.

2019 INSC 13419 December 2019Case Partly allowed

The deceased Aranganathan died in a motor accident and his wife and four daughters claimed compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 59.04 lakh, which the Madras High Court reduced to Rs 33.55 lakh by fixing the deceased's annual income at Rs 2.5 lakh.

PUTTAMMA & ORS.versusK. L. NARAYANA REDDY & ANR.

2013 INSC 8149 December 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners claimed compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 after the death of a 48‑year‑old employee who earned Rs.13,331 per month; the Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.9.03 lakh, which the Karnataka High Court enhanced to Rs.11.25 lakh by applying a split‑multiplier and a lower multiplier of 10.

SHAKTI DEVIversusNEW INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.

2010 INSC 7679 November 2010Case Partly allowed

Shakti Devi, the mother of a 22‑year‑old son who died in a bus‑truck collision, filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for compensation. The Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Tribunal fixed the deceased's monthly earnings at Rs 1,000, applied a multiplier of 8 and awarded a net compensation of Rs 3

RAHULversusNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ANOTHER

2024 INSC 5989 August 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a pillion rider, was injured in a motor accident on 27 January 2013, sustaining fractures of both forearms and undergoing surgery with plates and screws. A medical disability certificate issued by Dr. N.Y. Joshi recorded a 50% permanent disablement. The Tribunal awarded compensation based on a 25% disabi

SHIVAJI AND ANR.versusDIVISIONAL MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ORS.

2018 INSC 6829 August 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The parents of a deceased driver filed a claim petition under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for compensation after a fatal accident in which the driver was also the tortfeasor. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation, but the Karnataka High Court set aside the award, holding that compensa

SANTOSH DEVI AND ORS.versusMAHAVEER SINGH AND ORS.

2018 INSC 6799 August 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased, a small‑scale seller of desi ghee and namkin bhujia, was killed in a road accident in 1992 when a government jeep struck his moped. The appellants, his wife and children, claimed a monthly income of Rs 3,500 and sought compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Clai

MUTHYALA SUNIL KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2024 INSC 4999 July 2024Disposed off

Transporters and tour operators filed a batch of 117 writ petitions under Article 32 challenging the levy of Border Tax/Authorization Fee by several State Governments, alleging that the All India Tourist Vehicles (Permit) Rules, 2023 had abolished such levies. The petitioners claimed double taxation and argued that the

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusBALKAR RAM & ORS.

2013 INSC 4559 July 2013Dismissed

The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal held that both the owner of a vehicle and the insurer, National Insurance Co. Ltd., were jointly and severally liable to pay Rs.1,24,035 as compensation for a road accident that occurred on 19‑April‑2000. The insurer appealed, contending that the insurance policy was invalid because

JAWAHAR SINGHversusBALA JAIN & ORS.

2011 INSC 3699 May 2011Dismissed

The deceased was riding a scooter when a motorcycle driven by a minor, Jatin, collided with it, causing the deceased's death. The claimants obtained a compensation award from the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, which held the owner of the motorcycle liable because the driver was a minor without a licence. The Delhi Hig

KARIKHO KRIversusNUNEY TAYANG AND ANOTHER

2024 INSC 2899 April 2024Disposed off

In the 2019 Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly election, independent candidate Karikho Kri was elected from Tezu (ST) constituency. Nuney Tayang challenged the election, alleging that Kri failed to disclose three vehicles, a no‑dues certificate for government accommodation, and municipal/property tax liabilities, t

M/S. ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusMANDALA YADAGARI GOUD & ORS.

2019 INSC 4899 April 2019Disposed off

The case concerned a motor accident in which a bachelor died, and the dependents claimed compensation under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The High Court had calculated the multiplier for loss of dependency based on the age of the deceased's parents, leading to a lower compensation amount. The insurer app

ARCHIT SAINI AND ANR.versusTHE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ORS.

2018 INSC 1289 February 2018Case Partly allowed

On 15 December 2011 a gas tanker was parked in the middle of a busy highway without indicators, causing a Maruti car to collide with it; the car driver and a passenger died and two others were injured. The claimants filed a claim under s.166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal held th

SUBE SINGH AND ANR.versusSHYAM SINGH (DEAD) AND ORS.

2018 INSC 1269 February 2018Appeal(s) allowed

In a motor accident on 22 September 2009, Ajit Singh, aged 23, died, and his parents filed a claim for compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal initially applied a multiplier of 15 based on the parents' age, which the High Court reduced to 14, relying on the Ash

VIJAY KUMAR RASTOGIversusUTTAR PRADESH STATE ROADWAYS TRANSPORT CORPORATION

2018 INSC 1299 February 2018Appeal(s) allowed

Vijay Kumar Rastogi suffered severe injuries in a bus accident in 2005 and claimed compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation but calculated loss of income only on his net salary of Rs 44,511, ignoring income from bank interest and commission disclosed in his inco

M/S. PUROHIT AND COMPANYversusKHATOONBEE AND ANR.

2017 INSC 1229 February 2017Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents' daughter died in a motor accident on 02‑02‑1977. A claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 was filed before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal on 23‑02‑2005, more than 28 years after the accident. The Tribunal entertained the claim, and the High Court upheld it, holding that th

REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER & ORS. ETC.versusK. JAYACHANDRA & ANR. ETC.

2019 INSC 409 January 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether structural modifications to motor vehicles that alter dimensions or specifications beyond those originally specified by the manufacturer constitute a prohibited "alteration" under section 52 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 as amended by Act 27 of 2000. Several writ petitions challenge

RASMITA BISWAL & ORS.versusDIVISIONAL MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ANR.

2021 INSC 8448 December 2021Disposed off

Manoj Kumar Biswal died in a motor accident on 9 May 2013, leaving behind his wife and two minor sons who claimed compensation. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 30,24,000 for loss of dependency, applying a multiplier of 16 for his age (33) and adding 40% of his income for future prospects as mandated in Pr

HIND SAMACHAR LTD. (DELHI UNITversusNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS.

2025 INSC 12048 October 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved a fatal collision between a truck owned by Hind Samachar Ltd. and a Matador van, resulting in nine deaths and two injuries. The insurer, National Insurance Company Ltd., paid compensation to the victims but sought to recover the amount from the truck's owner, alleging collusion with the driver to use

RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPN.versusALEXIS SONIER & ANR.

2015 INSC 7528 October 2015Disposed off

The claimant, an American citizen, was injured when a Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation bus struck him during a peace march in India. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded compensation, including US$125,348.01 for medical expenses covered by California's Medi‑Cal program, and Rs.10 lakhs for a lifelong a

DULCINA FERNANDES & ORS.versusJOAQUIM XAVIER CRUZ & ANR.

2013 INSC 6958 October 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased Nicolau Fernandes was killed when his scooter was struck by a pick‑up van driven by Joaquim Xavier Cruz on 29 June 1997. His wife and daughters filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, which assessed compensation of Rs 6,66,041.78 b

SHAMANNA AND ANOTHERversusTHE DIVISIONAL MANAGER THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ORS.

2018 INSC 6788 August 2018Case Partly allowed

The appellant's son died in a motor vehicle accident while being driven by an unlicensed driver, and the claim petitioners sought compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act. The Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.3,55,500 and, invoking the "pay and recover" doctrine, directed the insurer to pay the amount and later recover it f

U.P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusRAJENDRI DEVI & ORS.

2020 INSC 4178 June 2020Appeal(s) allowed

A 45‑year‑old cyclist was killed when a bus hired by the Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (UPSRTC) struck him. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) held the accident resulted from the driver’s rash and negligent driving and awarded Rs 1.65 lakhs plus interest as compensation. The High Court, relying

CHANDRAKANTA TIWARIversusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ANR.

2020 INSC 4198 June 2020Appeal(s) allowed

On 18 March 2004 the son of the claimant, who was a pillion rider, died in a road accident. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) held the insurer liable under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and awarded Rs.1.99 lakh with interest, using a multiplier of 8 based on the claimant's age. The High Court set

BALVEER BATRAversusTHE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY & ANR.

2024 INSC 3618 February 2024Disposed off

The appellant, father of a deceased motor‑vehicle accident victim, filed an application under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) at Nainital. The Tribunal, after hearing witnesses, held that it lacked territorial jurisdiction and, on that basis alone, dismissed the cl

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY & ANR.versusMAHENDRA GUPTA & ORS.

2018 INSC 1228 February 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The State Transport Authority of Madhya Pradesh heard an application on 16‑Oct‑2014 for modification of a vehicle’s time schedule. The meeting had the Chairperson and two members, satisfying the quorum of three under Rule 68(1). The order was issued on 15‑Dec‑2014, but only the Chairperson and one member signed it beca

ULTRATECH CEMENT LTD.versusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

2026 INSC 438 January 2026Appeal(s) allowed

Ultratech Cement Ltd., which operates two cement plants in Gujarat, used heavy earth‑moving and construction equipment such as dumpers, loaders, excavators and dozers within its factory premises. The Gujarat State authorities directed registration of these machines and levied road tax under the Gujarat Motor Vehicles T

MOHAMMED SIDDIQUE & ANR.versusNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS.

2020 INSC 178 January 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The son of the appellants, aged 23, died when a car struck the motorcycle on which he was a pillion rider; the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.11,66,800 as compensation, which the High Court reduced to Rs.4,14,000 by invoking a 10% deduction for contributory negligence, using a lower multiplier and a minimum‑

S. RAJASEEKARANversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2025 INSC 11897 October 2025Directions issued

Dr. S. Rajaseekaran filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking comprehensive road‑safety measures, especially for pedestrians, helmet use, lane discipline and vehicle lighting. The Court examined the statutory framework under the Motor Vehicles Act, Road Regulations and related rules, and considered extensive data

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDversusSMT. SOMWATI AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 5357 September 2020Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court heard a series of appeals filed by three insurance companies challenging the awards of compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for "loss of consortium" and a separate head of "loss of love and affection" granted by various High Courts and Motor Accident Claims Tribunals. The Court examined whe

MAMTAJ BI BAPUSAB NADAF & ORS.versusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. & ORS.

2010 INSC 5807 September 2010Dismissed

Two workmen were unloading maize from a tractor‑trailer into an underground storage bin when they fell into a pit while cleaning it and died of asphyxia. Their legal representatives filed claim petitions under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation held United India Insurance liab

BRAHAMPAL @ SAMMAY AND ANR.versusNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY

2020 INSC 4837 August 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased died in a road accident and his parents claimed compensation before the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, which awarded Rs.2.24 lakh. They filed an appeal to the High Court for enhancement 45 days after the 90‑day limit, citing the illness of the appellant's wife as the reason for delay. The High Court dismis

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusSMT. SUNITA SHARMA AND ORS.

2025 INSC 4697 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a claim for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 following the death of a government employee, where the dependents were also entitled to ex‑gratia assistance under the Haryana Compassionate Assistance Rules, 2006. The High Court had deducted only 50% of the amount payable under the Rules

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusGOPU & ANR.

2025 INSC 5117 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased, a junior public health nurse, died in a 2000 motorbike accident. Her husband and two minor children filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.6,53,000. After ten years, the children alone appealed to the Kerala High Court,

M/S CHATHA SERVICE STATIONversusLALMATI DEVI & ORS.

2025 INSC 4687 April 2025Dismissed

An oil tanker carrying hazardous goods collided with a bicyclist and a pedestrian, killing both. The driver of the tanker did not have the statutory endorsement on his licence required under Section 11 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 read with Rule 9 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989. The Motor Accidents Claims

MALLAMMA (DEAD) BY L.RS.versusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS.

2014 INSC 2517 April 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased driver of a tractor, employed by Jeeva Rathna Setty, died in an accident while the tractor was owned by Setty, although the original registration was in the name of Gangadhara. The claimants filed a workmen's compensation claim, and the Commissioner held that the insurance policy, though originally issued

PURNYA KALA DEVIversusSTATE OF ASSAM & ANR.

2014 INSC 2537 April 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Purnya Kala Devi, a widow, claimed compensation after her husband was killed in a road accident caused by a private bus owned by Md. Abdul Salam, which was under requisition by the State of Assam and uninsured at the time of the accident on 16 February 1993. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal held the registered owner

MANINDERJIT SINGH BITTAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2011 INSC 2807 April 2011Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the implementation of the High Security Registration Plates (HSRP) scheme introduced under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and the Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989. While earlier judgments upheld the Central Government's power to issue the scheme, many states failed to comply, either by delaying tende

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusREKHABEN & ORS.

2017 INSC 2097 March 2017Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined two appeals filed by National Insurance Co. Ltd. against judgments that enhanced compensation awarded to the dependents of a deceased employee and an injured employee under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. In both cases, the dependents had been given compassionate appointments by the deceased/in

ROPPEN TRANSPORTATION SERVICES PVT LTDversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2023 INSC 1027 February 2023Disposed off

Roppen Transportation Services Pvt Ltd, an aggregator for two‑wheeler ride‑pooling, applied for a licence under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 but the Pune RTO rejected the application for non‑compliance with the Motor Vehicle Aggregator Guidelines 2020. While the petition was pending, the Maharashtra Government issued a

MANINDERJIT SINGH BITTAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2012 INSC 787 February 2012Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the persistent failure of several State Governments and Union Territories to implement the High Security Registration Plates (HSRP) scheme mandated under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The petitioners sought enforcement of the statutory provisions and earlier Supreme Court directions, while th

SUNIL SHARMA & ORS.versusBACHITAR SINGH & ORS

2011 INSC 1047 February 2011Case Partly allowed

The legal heirs of Mrs. Sunita Sharma, who died in a motor accident, appealed the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) and the High Court. The Supreme Court examined how the deceased’s income should be computed, rejecting deductions for HRA, CCA, EPF, GIS and allowing inclusion of these all

RAMKHILADI & ANR.versusTHE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY & ANR.

2020 INSC 117 January 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased was riding a motorcycle borrowed from its registered owner when he was killed in a collision caused by the rash driving of another motorcyclist. The claimants filed a claim under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act against the owner and insurer of the borrowed vehicle, without joining the owner or insur

SMT. ANJALI & ORSversusLOKENDRA RATHOD & ORS.

2022 INSC 12586 December 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The heirs of Rajesh, who died in a motor accident, filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal fixed the deceased's monthly income at Rs 4,000 and awarded Rs 6,24,000, while the Madhya Pradesh High Court raised the income to Rs 5,000, added 40

PREETHA KRISHNAN & ORS.versusTHE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS.

2025 INSC 12936 November 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased, an Assistant Engineer aged 51, died in a road accident and his wife and children claimed compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.44,04,912, applying a multiplier of 9 and other heads of loss. The Kerala High Court reduced the loss of d

M/S BAJAJ ALLIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusRAMBHA DEVI & ORS.

2024 INSC 8406 November 2024Reference answered

The Supreme Court examined whether a holder of a Light Motor Vehicle (LMV) licence, defined under Section 2(21) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, may drive a Transport Vehicle whose gross weight does not exceed 7,500 kg without a separate endorsement under Section 10(2)(e). After analysing the definitions, the 1994 amen

NHPC LTD.versusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SECRETARY & ORS.

2023 INSC 8106 September 2023Dismissed

NHPC Ltd. provides free bus transport for its employees and their children in Himachal Pradesh. The State assessed passenger tax on this service under the Himachal Pradesh Passengers and Goods Taxation Act, 1955, which the High Court had held did not apply to gratis transport. The State later enacted the Himachal Prade

ABHIMANYU PARTAP SINGHversusNAMITA SEKHON & ANOTHER

2022 INSC 6626 July 2022Case Partly allowed

Abhimanyu Partap Singh, who suffered 100% permanent disability in a road accident at the age of five and a half, appealed against the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Rs 9,00,000) and the Punjab & Haryana High Court (Rs 23,20,000). The Supreme Court examined the appropriate method for assessi

SMT. V. SUDHAversusP. GANAPATHI BHAT & ANR.

2013 INSC 3116 May 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a 36‑year‑old woman, suffered grievous injuries to her left leg and forearm when a motorcycle driven by the first respondent collided with her. She claimed compensation of Rs.3,50,000 under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, citing loss of earnings, pain and suffering, and future medical expenses for a femora

SOUTH BENGAL STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusASHOK KUMAR GHOSH AND ORS.

2010 INSC 2776 May 2010Case Partly allowed

The South Bengal State Transport Corporation disciplined a conductor for allowing a ticketless passenger and possessing excess cash, relegating him to a Daily Rated Conductor. The employee challenged the punishment, alleging bias because the Enquiry Officer was appointed before his reply was considered and contending t

BHARTIBEN NAYABHA KER AND ORSversusSIDABHA PETHABHA MANKE AND ORS

2018 INSC 3056 April 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased, Nayabha Mapbha Ker, died in a motor‑vehicle collision in 1993. His heirs filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 7.78 million with interest at 12% per annum; the Gujarat High Court added Rs 33,000 for loss of life, expenses and consort

MANGLA RAMversusTHE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS.

2018 INSC 3116 April 2018Appeal(s) allowed

Mangla Ram, a motorcyclist, was hit by a jeep (No. RST‑4701) driven by respondent No.2, resulting in amputation of his right leg. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation but reduced it on the ground that the claimant contributed to the accident by riding on the wrong side of the road. The High Court set

JAGDISH KUMAR SOODversusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ORS

2018 INSC 2096 March 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The husband of the third respondent died in a motor accident caused by a collision with a truck. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation but absolved United India Insurance Co. Ltd., the insurer, on the ground that the vehicle was a Light Goods Vehicle and the driver lacked a specific endorsement to dri

SINGH RAMversusNIRMALA AND ORS.

2018 INSC 2066 March 2018Dismissed

The accident occurred on 22 March 2010 when a motor‑cycle, owned and driven by the appellant, collided, killing Sunil Kumar. The appellant did not possess a valid driving licence at the time; the licence he produced was found to be fake and the other licence he attempted to produce had expired and was renewed after a t

ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusAJAY KUMAR MOHANTY & ANR.

2018 INSC 2076 March 2018Disposed off

The claimant, Ajay Kumar Mohanty, suffered a 55% temporary disability in a motor accident. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 22,85,322 compensation, assuming permanent disability and using inconsistent income figures. The insurer appealed; the High Court reduced the award to Rs 12,00,000 without providing r

V. PATHMAVATHI & ORS.versusBHARTHI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD & ANR.

2026 INSC 1316 February 2026Disposed off

The appellant claimants, the widow, minor children and parents of a 37‑year‑old driver who died instantly when his two‑wheeler was hit by a tanker, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking just compensation. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal initially assessed the victim's monthly income at R

NAVEEN KUMAR V. VIJAY KUMAR AND ORS.versusVIJAY KUMAR AND ORS.

2018 INSC 1006 February 2018Appeal(s) allowed

A motor vehicle registered in the name of Vijay Kumar (the first respondent) struck two pedestrians, killing one and injuring another. The vehicle had allegedly been sold through a chain of transfers before the accident, but the registration certificate remained in Vijay Kumar's name. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal

SHIVRAJversusRAJENDRA & ANR.

2018 INSC 7815 September 2018Disposed off

The appellant, a 25‑year‑old coolie, was injured when the tractor he was riding in collided with a mud stone due to the driver’s rash driving. He filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking Rs.9,02,324 as compensation, which the tribunal awarded jointly against the tractor owner and the ins

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusGOPALI & ORS.

2012 INSC 2715 July 2012Dismissed

The case involved a claim for compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act after the death of Nanag Ram, a 36‑year‑old machine operator, in a road accident. The claimants sought Rs.24 lakh, while the insurer challenged the award on several grounds. The Supreme Court examined whether the High Court should ha

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.versusS.K. NURUL AMIN

2010 INSC 3495 July 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent applied to the West Bengal State Transport Authority for permanent stage carriage permits covering routes from Dhulian Bazar to Kolkata and from Raghunathganj to Kolkata. The Authority issued permits that curtailed the routes at Barasat, omitting the final leg to Kolkata, citing traffic congestion and po

RASID JAVED & ORS. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ANR. ETC. ETC.

2010 INSC 3525 July 2010Dismissed

The appellants, private bus operators, claimed that a 1999 notification under s.102(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which purported to modify the 1993 scheme and allow them to operate on the Saharanpur‑Delhi inter‑state route, was validly approved by a Hearing Authority and could not be rescinded. The State of Utta

B. SANGEETHA & ANR.versusOMR TRAVEL ACCESS PVT. LTD. & ANR.

2020 INSC 4165 June 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased was killed in a motor accident on 21 June 2012. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal initially awarded compensation based on a monthly income of Rs 9,000, which the Madras High Court enhanced to Rs 33,07,000 by assuming a monthly income of Rs 15,000. The Supreme Court examined the salary certificate for May

M.R. KRISHNA MURTHIversusTHE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. & OTHERS

2019 INSC 3175 March 2019Disposed off

The appellant, an 18‑year‑old student from a family of senior Supreme Court lawyers, suffered a 40% permanent disability in a motor accident. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 8,48,000 compensation with interest; the Delhi High Court added a Rs 50,000 lump‑sum and later enhanced the award by Rs 24,000 on r

KAJALversusJAGDISH CHAND & ORS.

2020 INSC 1355 February 2020Disposed off

Kajal, a 12‑year‑old girl who suffered 100% physical and severe mental disability after a truck hit the tractor she was travelling in, filed a claim under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.11,08,501 and the High Court enhanced it to Rs.25,78,501. The Supreme Court re‑assessed t

ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusDYAMAWA & ORS.

2013 INSC 765 February 2013Dismissed

The husband of Dyamavva Yalgurdappa, a pump operator employed by Mormugao Port Trust, died in a road accident on 19 April 2003. The dependents filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 on 30 May 2003, while the employer later deposited compensation under Section 8 of the Workmen's Compensation Act

SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE LTD.versusRAMJAN ALI & ORS.

2021 INSC 35 January 2021Appeal(s) allowed

Srei Equipment Finance Ltd. entered into a hire‑purchase agreement for a JCB machine with Amarnath Yadav, the original owner, and the vehicle was registered with a hypothecation entry in favour of the financier. After the owner defaulted, an arbitrator awarded the loan amount to the financier, but the owner later filed

KIRTI & ANR. ETC.versusORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

2021 INSC 65 January 2021Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court heard appeals by the surviving dependents of two deceased motor accident victims against Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., challenging the reduction of compensation awarded by the High Court. The Court held that claims under the Motor Vehicles Act crystallise at the time of the accident and are not alt

MALATI SARDARversusNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS.

2016 INSC 125 January 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased Diganta Sardar was killed in a bus accident in Hooghly, West Bengal, and his widow filed a claim for compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) in Kolkata, where the insurer had its business office. The Tribunal awarded Rs.16,12,200 as compens

THE STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESHversusRAMCHANDRA RABIDAS @ RATAN RABIDAS & ANR.

2019 INSC 11264 October 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Arunachal Pradesh appealed against a Gauhati High Court order that road‑traffic offences must be dealt with solely under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and that prosecution under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) was without legal sanction. The Supreme Court examined whether the special Motor Vehicles Act override

SHYAM LALversusSHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND OTHERS

2025 INSC 10784 September 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The owner of a utility van involved in a fatal accident filed five claim petitions and appealed against the High Court's order directing the insurer to "pay and recover". The insurer argued that the policy’s "limitation as to use" clause barred coverage for passengers, contending the vehicle was effectively a goods car

NARINDER SINGH.versusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS.

2014 INSC 6054 September 2014Dismissed

The complainant insured a Mahindra Pick‑up vehicle whose temporary registration expired on 11‑January‑2006, yet the vehicle was involved in an accident on 2‑February‑2006 while being driven without any valid registration. The insurer denied the claim, leading to proceedings before the District Consumer Forum, State Com

SHANTABAI ANANDA JAGTAP & ANR.versusJAYRAM GANPATI JAGTAP & ANR.

2023 INSC 5924 July 2023Dismissed

The legal heirs of Machindra Ananda Jagtap, who died in a road accident while driving a jeep owned by Jayram Ganpati Jagtap, filed a claim for compensation under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 in 2004, more than nine years after the accident. The Commissioner rejected the claim on grounds of delay and on merits,

SARNAM SINGHversusSHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS

2023 INSC 5974 July 2023

The appellant, a gunman employed by Bharat Hotels Ltd., suffered an amputation of his right leg above the knee in a road accident, resulting in 85% permanent disability and termination of his employment. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded him compensation of Rs. 34,29,800, assessing his loss of earning capacity

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusSHYAM SINGH AND ORS.

2011 INSC 4404 July 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The parents of a 19‑year‑old mechanical fitter who died in a motor accident claimed compensation for loss of dependency. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 1,72,000 using a multiplier of 9 based on the average age of the parents (55‑56 years). The High Court enhanced the multiplier to 18, relying on the dece

THE ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDversusSMT. HONNAMMA & ORS.

2025 INSC 6254 May 2025Dismissed

The deceased was a coolie travelling on a trailer that was being pulled by a tractor insured by The Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company. Due to rash driving, the tractor and trailer toppled, causing the deceased's death. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.9,50,000 compensation and held that the employe

AMRIT BHANU SHALI & ORS.versusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS.

2012 INSC 1634 April 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased, a 26‑year‑old unmarried man, was killed in a road accident. His parents and unmarried sister filed a claim under s.166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for compensation. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 8,66,000, applying a 50% deduction for personal and living expenses and a multiplier of 17

NIRMALA KOTHARIversusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.

2020 INSC 2634 March 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant's husband owned a Hyundai car insured for Rs.5,00,000, which met with a fatal accident. The insurer denied the claim, alleging that the driver’s licence was fake and could not be verified with the licensing authority. The consumer forums allowed the claim, but the insurer appealed, contending a breach of

SANT SINGHversusSUKHDEV SINGH AND ORS.

2011 INSC 1864 March 2011Appeal(s) allowed

Sant Singh, a 48‑year‑old work‑munshi, was injured as a pillion rider when a four‑wheeler collided with his scooter, fracturing both legs. He filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking Rs 5 lakh and 24% interest. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 1,47,209 with 7.5% int

M. MANSOOR & ANR.versusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.

2013 INSC 6683 October 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The parents of a 24‑year‑old bachelor who died in a motor‑vehicle accident filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation. The Motor Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 24,65,668 after deducting one‑third of the deceased’s income for personal expenses and applying a multiplier of 17. The Ma

SANOBANU NAZIRBHAI MIRZA & ORS.versusAHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL TRANSPORT SERVICE

2013 INSC 6693 October 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased Nazirbhai, a 25‑year‑old skilled polisher earning Rs 4,000‑5,000 per month, was killed by an Ahmedabad Municipal Transport Service bus. His legal representatives filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 3,51,300 based on a notio

VAIBHAV JAINversusHINDUSTAN MOTORS PVT. LTD.

2024 INSC 6523 September 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Vaibhav Motors, was a dealer of Hindustan Motors and was sued for compensation after a Hindustan Motors employee died in a test‑drive accident involving a vehicle that had not been sold to the dealer. The key question was whether the dealer could be deemed the "owner" of the vehicle and thus jointly liab

HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusMUKESH KUMAR & ORS.

2021 INSC 3733 August 2021Appeal(s) allowed

The appeal concerned HDFC ERGO General Insurance Ltd. challenging directions of the Delhi High Court that required the insurer to provide a prosthetic limb with a lifetime warranty and to maintain it by periodic inquiries, as well as to keep a large interest‑bearing deposit to fund attendant wages for the permanently d

STATE TR. P.S. LODHI COLONY, NEW DELHIversusSANJEEV NANDA

2012 INSC 3203 August 2012Case Partly allowed

The appellant State prosecuted Sanjeev Nanda for a 1999 hit‑and‑run accident in which six persons died and one was injured after he, allegedly under the influence of alcohol, drove a BMW at high speed and fled the scene. The trial court convicted him under Section 304(II) IPC (culpable homicide not amounting to murder)

BIMLESH & ORS.versusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.

2010 INSC 4723 August 2010Case Partly allowed

The owner of a Jeep, who also drove the vehicle, died in a road accident and his dependants filed a claim for compensation under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The insurer contended that the petition was not maintainable because the deceased was not a third party and the policy covered only third‑party

KALIM KHAN & OTHERSversusFIMIDABEE & OTHERS

2018 INSC 5733 July 2018Case Partly allowed

The deceased's family filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation for death caused by a stone that fell during a blasting operation used to dig a well. The tribunal held the accident to be a vehicular accident because the tractor’s battery, still installed on the vehicl

MUKUND DEWANGANversusORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

2017 INSC 5763 July 2017Reference answered

The Supreme Court examined whether a holder of a licence to drive a light motor vehicle (LMV) must obtain a separate endorsement to drive a transport vehicle of the same class. By interpreting the definitions in the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, particularly section 2(21) and section 10(2)(d), the Court held that a transpo

SANT LALversusRAJESH & ORS. ETC.

2017 INSC 5813 July 2017Appeal(s) allowed

The owner appealed an award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) which held that the driver, who possessed only a licence for light motor vehicles (LMV), was unlicensed to drive a tractor attached to a trolley—a transport vehicle—thus breaching the insurance policy. The High Court affirmed this award. The Supre

VIMAL KANWAR & ORS.versusKISHORE DAN & ORS.

2013 INSC 3043 May 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by the wife, daughter and mother of a 28‑year‑old Assistant Engineer who died in a motor accident caused by the negligent driver of a jeep. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal had reduced the deceased's salary, deducted amounts for provident fund, pension, insurance and income tax, and

JITENDRA KHIMSHANKAR TRIVEDI & ORS.versusKASAM DAUD KUMBHAR & ORS.

2015 INSC 893 February 2015Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by the husband and relatives of Smt. Jayvantiben Jitendra Trivedi, a 22‑year‑old housewife who died in a motor accident caused by the negligent driving of the respondent. The claimants sought enhancement of compensation beyond the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal award of Rs.2,24,0

M/S. MUTHOOT LEASING AND FINANCE LIMITED AND ANOTHERversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

2023 INSC 53 January 2023Appeal(s) allowed

Muthoot Leasing and Finance Ltd and another, classified as credit institutions, challenged the levy of interest tax on the interest component embedded in hire‑purchase instalments under the Interest‑Tax Act, 1974. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that hire‑purchase agreements are composite transactions wit

MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusSAJU P. PAUL AND ANOTHER

2013 INSC 33 January 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The claimant, Saju P. Paul, a heavy‑vehicle driver employed by another company, was travelling as a "spare driver" in the cabin of a goods vehicle that met with an accident in 1993. The vehicle owner had taken a motor‑vehicle insurance policy covering only the driver and cleaner, not a spare driver. The Motor Accident

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusMAYA DEVI & ORS.

[2024] 9 S.C.R. 9992 September 2024Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered appeals by National Insurance Company Ltd. against compensation awarded by the Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal (MACT) to the families of two deceased victims of a road accident on 11 April 2017. The insurer contended that the vehicle it insured was not involved in the accident, that the poli

M.C. MEHTAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2019 INSC 9822 September 2019Directions issued

The Supreme Court, hearing M.C. Mehta's writ petition concerning the acute parking shortage in Delhi, observed that inadequate public transport and unplanned urban growth have led to severe congestion, pollution, and safety hazards, violating the right to life under Article 21. The Court noted the government's failure

MINU ROUT & ANR.versusSATYA PRADYUMNA MOHAPATRA & ORS.

2013 INSC 5842 September 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The husband of Minu Rout, a 35‑year‑old car driver, died in a head‑on collision with a truck. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACA) held that both drivers were equally negligent and reduced the loss‑of‑dependency compensation by 50% on the basis of alleged contributory negligence by the deceased, awarding Rs.2,00,0

RAM CHANDRAversusREGIONAL MANAGER UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.

2013 INSC 5092 August 2013Appeal(s) allowed

Ram Chandra, a cleaner injured in a motor accident while employed, claimed compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act. The insurer, United India Insurance Co., argued that liability was limited to the Workmen's Compensation Act and that any excess should be borne by the vehicle owner. The Supreme Court examined the stat

M/S. SHARMA TRANSPORTSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2011 INSC 5372 August 2011Dismissed

The appellants, permit‑holders of tourist buses, were fined for loading luggage on the roof of their vehicles and challenged the fines on the ground that Rule 128(9) of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 does not expressly forbid such carriage and that the restriction violates their Article 19(1)(g) right to trade.

JIJU KURUVILA & ORS.versusKUNJUJAMMA MOHAN & ORS

2013 INSC 4092 July 2013Disposed off

The claimants, the wife, children and mother of Joy Kuruvila, who died in a road accident while employed in the US, filed a claim for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking a sum in Indian rupees. The key issues were the appropriate date for fixing the foreign exchange rate to convert the deceased's U

RESHMA KUMARI AND ORS.versusMADAN MOHAN AND ANR.

2013 INSC 2002 April 2013Reference answered

The Supreme Court examined whether the multiplier in the Second Schedule of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 should be applied to compensation claims under s.166 (fault liability). It approved the multiplier table and related guidelines formulated in Sarla Verma’s case for selecting the multiplier, adding future‑prospect i

KUSUM LATA & ORS.versusSATBIR & ORS.

2011 INSC 1722 March 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The deceased Surender Kumar, a 29‑year‑old villager, was fatally injured when a tempo (HR‑34‑8010) struck him. His widow and three minor children filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and the High Court rejected the claim because the FIR did not rec

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusSUNIL KUMAR & ANR.

2017 INSC 11431 December 2017Heard

The appellant United India Insurance Co. Ltd. had earlier ordered that 50% of the compensation deposited in the Registry be released to the claimants upon identification. In the judgment dated 24 November 2017, paragraph II contained that direction. Upon clarification sought by the respondents, the Court read the parag

HDFC BANK LTD.versusKUMARI RESHMAAND ORS.

2014 INSC 8221 December 2014Appeal(s) allowed

HDFC Bank had financed a motor vehicle that was hypothecated to a borrower. The vehicle, uninsured at the time, was involved in a road accident causing injury to a third‑party claimant who obtained a compensation award. The issue was whether the financier, as the registered owner, could be held liable as the "owner" un

SUBULAXMIversusM.D., TAMIL NADU STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION

2012 INSC 5021 November 2012Case Partly allowed

The claimant, a 30‑year‑old bus worker, suffered amputation of her left leg and right foot in a motor vehicle accident and claimed Rs 6,50,000 as compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 2,00,000, including Rs 86,000 for permanent disability, while t

CHANDRA @ CHANDA @ CHANDRARAM & ANR.versusMUKESH KUMAR YADAV & ORS.

2021 INSC 5931 October 2021Case Partly allowed

The parents of a 32‑year‑old heavy‑vehicle driver who died in a road accident filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for loss of dependency and parental consortium. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal fixed the deceased's monthly income at the minimum wage for skilled labour (Rs.5,746) despite t

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusCHAMUNDESWARI & ORS.

2021 INSC 5921 October 2021Leave Granted & Dismissed

The deceased, a 35‑year‑old manager, was killed in a road accident on 14 October 2013 when the Eicher van ahead of his car turned right without signalling. The wife and minor son claimed compensation under s.166 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.10.40 lakh, attributing 75% contrib

REKHA JAIN & ANR.versusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

2013 INSC 5071 August 2013Appeal(s) allowed

Dr. Grace Jain, a government-employed doctor, died in a motor vehicle accident. Her daughter Rekha Jain and husband T.A. Sebastian claimed compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.10,62,000 with interest, using a monthly income of Rs.12,000, a one‑third deduction f

REKHA JAINversusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

2013 INSC 5061 August 2013Appeal(s) allowed

Rekha Jain, a 24‑year‑old film actress, was injured in a road accident caused by a negligent truck driver, sustaining grievous facial injuries and 30% permanent physical disability. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) awarded her total compensation of Rs.23,51,726, including Rs.17,51,726 as pecuniary damages for

PARMINDER SINGHversusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS.

2019 INSC 7041 July 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a driver, was severely injured and permanently disabled in a 2009 road accident caused by two trucks whose drivers lacked valid licences. He filed a claim before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) which awarded compensation based on a notional monthly income of Rs 6,000. The High Court enhanced th

S. IYYAPANversusM/S UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ANOTHER

2013 INSC 3961 July 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The claimants, the dependants of a deceased motorcyclist, were awarded compensation by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal after a fatal accident involving a Maxi Cab. The insurer, United India Insurance Co., appealed, arguing that the driver, who held a licence for light motor vehicles but not an endorsement for comme

NEERUPAM MOHAN MATHURversusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.

2013 INSC 3811 July 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Neerupam Mohan Mathur, lost his right hand in a bus‑truck collision caused by the negligent driver of a chartered bus. He claimed compensation under Section 110‑A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.3,20,000. The Punjab & Haryana High Court enhanced the awar

S. MANICKAMversusMETROPOLITAN TRANSPORT CORP. LTD.

2013 INSC 3931 July 2013Case Partly allowed

The appellant, a 45‑year‑old proprietor who lost his right leg below the knee in a bus accident, claimed Rs. 21,00,000 as compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 9,42,822, applying a multiplier of 13 and granting Rs. 1,00,000 for 85% permanent disability. The Hig

V. KALA BHARATHI & ORS.versusTHE ORIENTAL INS. CO. LTD., BR. CHITOOR

2014 INSC 2361 April 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, legal heirs of a deceased road‑accident victim, were awarded Rs.98.40 million with 12% interest by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The insurer appealed, reduced the principal to Rs.56.40 million but retained the interest rate, and made several partial payments. The Executing Court adjusted those pay

MULTANI HANIFBHAI KALUBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

2013 INSC 691 February 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant’s Eicher truck was seized by police for transporting 28 buffalo calves, and the appellant sought its release under Section 451 of the CrPC. The lower courts rejected the application, invoking Section 68(3) of the Gujarat Animal Preservation (Amendment) Act, 2011, which bars release of a seized vehicle for

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search