M.C. MEHTAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

                           [2019] 11 S.C.R. 1053                            1053


                            M.C. MEHTA                                      A
                                   v.
                     UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
               (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 13029 of 1985)
                        SEPTEMBER 02, 2019                                  B
         [ARUN MISHRA AND DEEPAK GUPTA, JJ.]
      Urban Development:
       Town planning - Problem of parking of motor vehicles - Held:
Parking problem has arisen as there is an abject failure on the             C
part of the Government and the Authorities to provide adequate
public transport - Proper parking policies will lead to less
pollution, less crime and a better and more dignified life as
envisaged u/Art. 21 of the Constitution - Adequate parking
arrangements need to be made at Transport Hubs (i.e. bus depots,
                                                                            D
railway stations, metro-stations, airports, etc.), at Institutional areas
(i.e. Universities, Hospitals, Government buildings, Courts, etc.),
and at Commercial areas (i.e. malls, cinema halls, market places,
corporate offices, vegetable markets, grain markets, etc.,)
according to their specific requirements - There need to be a
statutory regime wherein before giving permission to build and              E
operate such Transport hubs, institutions and commercial areas,
assessment for the next 25 years should be made - In the residential
areas especially those where people belonging to middle class
reside, the problem of parking is more - Though municipal
authorities are alive to the problem, but the pace at which they are
                                                                            F
moving is very slow and there is lack of innovation in finding
solutions - Environment Pollution (Prevention and Control)
Authority (EPCA) in consultation with the South Delhi Municipal
Corporation (SDMC) has earmarked the area of Lajpat Nagar to
run a pilot project to ease the problem of parking - Transport
Department of the NCT of Delhi has also notified the draft for              G
Delhi Maintenance and Management of Parking Places Rules,
2019 in exercise of powers u/cl. 41 of s. 2 r/w. s. 117, sub-section
(3) of s. 127 and cls. (e),(h) and (i) of sub-section (2) of s. 138 of
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Clause 11 of the policy deals with
parking in residential streets and lanes - Parking lots can be of
                                                                            H
                                 1053
1054            SUPREME COURT REPORTS                       [2019] 11 S.C.R.


 A     various types and different modules of parking will be required in
       different areas viz. traditional method (i.e. parking in open space),
       multi-level parking (including automated multi-level parking and
       automated spiral parking), and stack parking - Modern technology
       like Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) tags must be used to
       ensure that parking spaces are utilised to the maximum - The
 B
       Municipal Corporations of Delhi and the Delhi Cantonment Board
       are directed to ensure that all the pavements, in the residential areas
       are cleared from all encroachments - The encroachers are required
       to be given notice to remove the encroachment and on failure,
       Authorities to remove the same at the cost of the encroachers - The
 C     Authorities are also directed to consider framing of rules to
       discontinue municipal services to habitual encroachers - It is
       directed that draft rules of Delhi Maintenance and Management
       of Parking Places Rules, 2009 be notified and after its notification
       to ensure its enforcement in letter and spirit - Govt. of NCT is
       directed to ensure that while granting permission to build any
 D
       structures, there is proper assessment of parking needs for the next
       25 years - Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Municipal Authorities and EPCA
       are directed to consider the viability and effectiveness of
       introducing RIFD tags, parking guidance and information systems
       and last mile connectivity from parking spaces to commercial areas,
 E     institutions etc - Matters adjourned to be listed after receipt of
       reports on pilot project.
            CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION : Writ Petition (Civil) No.
       13029 of 1985.
             (Under Article 32 of The Constitution of India)
 F
            Harish N. Salve, Ms. Aparajita Singh, Sr. Advs, A. D. N. Rao,
       Siddhartha Chowdhury, Advs. (A.Cs.),
             Tushar Mehta, SG, A.N.S. Nadkarni, ASG, Balaji Srinivasan, AAG,
       S. Wasim A. Qadri, R. S. Suri, Dhruv Mehta, Sanjiv Sen, R. S. Grewal,
 G     Sr. Advs., Ms. Suhasini Sen, Ms. Archana P. Dave, Ms. Shraddha
       Deshmukh, Rajat Nair, D. L. Chidananda, R. B. Yadav, G. S. Makker,
       S. S. Rebello, Bhavanishankar V. Gadnis, Mrs. Snidha Mehra,
       B. V. Balram Das, S. Venkatesh, Varun Khanna, Vikas M., Sunil B.,
       Ms. Nishtha Kumar, Chirag M. Shroff, Ms. Mahima C. Shroff, Balaji
       Srinivasan, Ms. Pallavi Sengupta, Ms. Garima Jain, Siddhanth Kohli,
 H     Ms. Lakshmi Rao, Akash Chatterjee, Aishwarya Chowdhury, Ms. Anini
            M.C. MEHTA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                              1055


Debarman, Praveen Swarup, Ajay Bansal, Gaurva Yadava, Ms. Sayan              A
Ray, Karmendra Pratap Singh, B. Vinodh Khanna, Mrs. Chitrakala G.,
B. K. Prasad, Sanjay Kr. Visen, Abhishek, Ms. Ruchi Kohli,
B.V. Balramdas, Ms. Anil Katiyar (for M/s. S Narain and Co.), Ms.
Garima Prashad, G. S. Oberoi, Mohit Kumar Bansal, Rajesh Katyal,
Kuldip Singh, Hitesh Kumar Sharma, Ms. Meenakshi Khanna, Rohit
K. Singh, Tarun Johri, Ritwik Dutta, Arvind Kumar Sharma, E. C.              B
Agrawala, Talha Abdul Rahman, Ms. Sakya Singh Chaudhuri,
Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Preshit Surshe, Rajiv Yadav, Guntur Prabhakar,
Gaurav Shrivastava, Pradeep Misra, Advs. for the appearing parties.
      The Order of the Court was passed by
                                                                             C
      DEEPAK GUPTA, J.
      1. Modern conveniences bring with them their own problems.
One of the most important conveniences of the industrial age is motor
transport. This has brought with it many problems but we may highlight
only two:- (1) pollution and (2) parking space. It is the problem of         D
parking which we seek to address in this order.
      2. A vehicle, whether be it a motor car, bus, three-wheeler,
scooter or a small scooty, transports one or more individuals from one
place to the other. Once passengers /occupants of the vehicles have
been taken to their destination, the vehicle in question has to be parked.   E
This requires a lot of space, a lot of planning, a lot of infrastructure
and a lot of money. The tendency of individuals is to save as much
money as possible and not pay anything for parking.
      3. Till the late 1970s motor cars were the prerogative of the rich.
                                                                             F
Most people who could afford motor cars lived in houses with drive-
ways and garages. But as the economy of the country has improved
and the earning capacity of people has risen there are more and more
vehicles on the road. At the same time due to paucity of space and the
astronomical rise in land prices the size of dwelling houses has become
smaller and smaller. The biggest casualty in this conflict between           G
increasing number of cars and dwindling availability of land is "parking
space" for vehicles. Even in those houses which had garages, these
were converted to rooms utilised for other purposes. Then cars started
getting parked in drive-ways but as the number of members of the
households expanded, from drive-ways the cars have now spilled over
                                                                             H
1056             SUPREME COURT REPORTS                          [2019] 11 S.C.R.


 A     to the roads outside the house. This is not the only problem. The
       municipal authorities, for reasons best known to them, without carrying
       out any study with regard to the carrying capacity of the colonies/areas/
       towns/cities/metropolises are permitting additional constructions including
       additional floors in these colonies. Setbacks are being decreased or
       abolished. The constructed area is rising vertically and horizontally.
 B
       Resultantly where, about 50 years ago, there was a single storey house
       with one family and one car, there is now a four storey- structure, if
       not higher with may be 8 flats and 16 cars if not more. This has created
       many problems and one of the most serious problems is that of parking.
              4. The Golden Rule is "Love thy neighbour". Today the social
 C
       fabric of neighbourhoods is being torn asunder because of fights over
       this most petty issue of parking of vehicles. Therefore, we feel there
       is a need to pass a detailed order on a mundane issue like parking
       because this may impact town planning. Proper parking policies will
       also lead to less pollution, less crime and a better and more dignified
 D     life which every citizen is entitled to under Article 21 of the Constitution
       of India.
              5. Before dealing with the issue of parking, we have to note that
       there is an abject failure on the part of the government and the authorities
       to provide adequate public transport to the citizens of the country.
 E     Individual vehicles are owned by about 2% of the population. However,
       this 2% of the population wants to monopolise all the resources and
       infrastructure with regard to transportation. It is only in the last two
       decades that cities have moved towards introducing schemes for mass
       transportation but we still have a long way to go.
 F            6. In this order we shall mainly deal with the issue of parking in
       residential areas but while dealing with the issue in a holistic manner
       we shall have to deal with the issue of parking in general. This is
       necessary because if adequate parking is not provided in transport hubs,
       institutional areas, commercial areas, etc., the spill-over will go to the
       residential areas.
 G
       Transport Hubs
              7. Wherever there are large transport hubs such as bus depots,
       railway stations, metro stations, airports, etc. where a large number of
       people come, there should be adequate facilities for parking. In most
 H     of the areas people just want to be dropped off. Therefore, emphasis
            M.C. MEHTA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                                 1057
                    [DEEPAK GUPTA, J.]

should be more on "drop and go" arrangements. This aspect should be             A
encouraged by having a very low or no fees for drop-offs and heavy
fees for parking vehicles. Parking facilities will have to be provided at
transport hubs, especially when we talk of mass rapid transport systems
where people will come from peripheral towns to a metropolis like
Delhi. Today we have plans on the anvil to introduce Regional Rapid
                                                                                B
Transit Systems (RRTS) connecting the metropolises in the country with
the peripheral towns. Two such RRTS are Delhi-Meerut and Delhi-
Alwar. While planning these the authorities must ensure that adequate
parking facilities are available at Alwar, Meerut and other intervening
stations. People working in Delhi coming from the suburbs or peripheral
towns would take their private transport to these hubs and therefore            C
adequate planning for the same should be made.
Institutional Areas
       8. Institutional areas can be universities, hospitals, government
buildings, courts, etc. When such buildings are planned very little attention
is paid to the parking problem. Even when someone addresses these               D
parking issues, normally only the needs of the officials and the
employees are addressed. To give an example there are very few courts
which have adequate facilities for parking of vehicles by litigants.
Similarly, in hospitals almost no space is available for parking of vehicles
of the patients or their attendants and the entire parking space is used        E
by doctors, nurses and other hospital staff.
Commercial Areas
        9. Commercial areas such as commercial malls, cinema halls,
market places, corporate offices, vegetable markets, grain markets, etc.
have different requirements. In markets where bulk items have to be             F
transported like subji mandis, fruit mandis, etc. there has to be adequate
provision for parking of transport vehicles like trucks, tempos, etc. In
fact, it is not only parking but other facilities, such as CNG stations,
petrol stations, electric charging points, etc. which should be made
available within these areas.
                                                                                G
       10. Whether it be a transport hub, an institution or commercial
area, each will have its own specific requirements and these have to
be addressed by the planners and architects to ensure that adequate
arrangement is made for parking of vehicles and the persons visiting
these transport hubs, institutions, commercial areas are not forced to
park on the roads or in spaces which are not meant for parking.                 H
1058            SUPREME COURT REPORTS                         [2019] 11 S.C.R.


 A           11. There should be in our view a statutory regime wherein before
       any person/authority is given permission to build and operate such
       transport systems, institutions and commercial areas assessment with
       regard to the needs of parking for the next 25 years at least should be
       made and parking space should be developed accordingly.
 B            12. Having said that we are not oblivious to the hard reality that
       in certain colonies and areas parking of some vehicles will have to be
       permitted on the roads because the number of vehicles is much more
       than those which can be parked inside the houses. In fact in some
       colonies, especially in colonies where people belonging to middle class
       and lower middle class reside there is virtually no space within the plots
 C     to park vehicles.
              13. It is not as if the municipal authorities and other authorities
       are not alive to the problem of parking. However, the pace at which
       they are moving is extremely slow. There is also total lack of innovation
       in finding solutions. Environment Pollution (Prevention and Control)
 D     Authority (EPCA) in consultation with the South Delhi Municipal
       Corporation (SDMC) has earmarked the area of Lajpat Nagar to run
       a pilot project to ease the problem of parking. Two other colonies,
       Kamla Nagar in North Delhi and Krishna Nagar in East Delhi have
       also been identified by the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (NDMC)
 E     and the East Delhi Municipal Corporation (EDMC) respectively for
       running such similar pilot projects. These are the colonies which
       probably face the highest problem of parking. If the pilot project is
       successful in these colonies we see no reason why such a project should
       not be followed in other areas too.
 F            14. If we take up the case of Lajpat Nagar itself, this is a colony
       which was inhabited initially by people who came as refugees from what
       is now called Pakistan. They were given small tenements and over a
       period of time the single storey constructions have become double and
       triple storeys. The plot sizes are by and large small though there are a
       few big houses. The Central Market in Lajpat Nagar is one of Delhi's
 G     most popular and crowded markets. It is almost impossible to find
       parking space during the market hours. In the last 1 or 2 years there
       has been some improvement after linking Lajpat Nagar with metro rail
       and also by making traffic move one way. However, the problem is so
       acute that a large number of visitors end up parking their vehicles in
 H     the residential areas which causes problems to the residents.
            M.C. MEHTA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                                1059
                    [DEEPAK GUPTA, J.]

       15. On the other hand these residential houses where the                A
inhabitants were supposed to have only one vehicle now have 3-4
vehicles and as per the Report No. 98 of EPCA there are approximately
3.6 floors per plot and there are at least 2 cars per floor and the average
plot area is 150 sq.metres, meaning thereby that there are about 7-8
cars per plot. The plot sizes are so small that 8 cars cannot be parked        B
in a plot of that size. Resultantly, most of the cars if not all, are parked
on the road which clogs up the roads and even ambulances, fire
brigades, etc., cannot move. This situation cannot be allowed to go on.
       16. As noted by EPCA there is a huge gap between the available
space for parking and the demand. EPCA has involved the Residents              C
Welfare Associations (RWAs), and along with the RWAs has come up
with certain suggestions for this pilot project. One of the suggestions is
that parking permits can be issued to the residents whereby they will
be issued stickers which would identify the cars of residents as the ones
that can be parked in that area. EPCA has suggested that there should          D
be monthly charges for the same but the Government of NCT has
opposed the same and at this stage we are not passing any orders in
this regard. However, it would not be unreasonable to expect the
residents to at least share the burden of administrative costs to pay for
the stickers, and hiring of security guards etc.
                                                                               E
       17. The Transport Department of the NCT of Delhi has also
notified the draft for Delhi Maintenance and Management of Parking
Places Rules of 2019 in exercise of the powers conferred under Clause
41 of section 2 read with Section 117, sub-section (3) of Section 127
and clause (e), (h) and (i) of sub-section (2) of Section 138 of the Motor
                                                                               F
Vehicle Act, 1988 (59 of 1988). This policy envisages area parking plans
to be notified within 4 months from the coming into force of these Rules.
One heartening feature of this policy is that in its order of priority, it
gives first priority to pedestrians/cyclists, secondly to mass public
transport; thirdly to emergency vehicles, fourthly to vehicles for
differently abled persons - their pick up and drop; then comes personal        G
motor vehicle parking; short duration parking; on-street parking;
overnight parking for transport vehicles etc. Another important aspect
of this policy is that it lays down that parking arrangements must not
impinge on the free movement of traffic. It has other rules relating to
payment of parking fees etc.                                                   H
1060            SUPREME COURT REPORTS                          [2019] 11 S.C.R.


 A           18. Clause 11 of the Policy deals with parking in residential streets
       and lanes. This reads as follows :-
             “11. Parking in residential streets and lanes - (1) The Area
             Parking Plan made by civic agencies shall include, in their scope,
             parking arrangements within residential areas. The plan within
 B           such areas shall be made in consultation with the residents/
             Resident Welfare Associations.
             (2) The civic agencies shall consider developing open areas, other
             than designated green areas / parks, near the colonies as parking
             lots on payment basis. Regular shuttle services may be prescribed
 C           as a part of parking facility, the charges for which shall be
             included in the parking fees.
             (3) Further, the owners of vacant plots in the residential colonies
             and commercial areas should be authorized for use of these plots
             as parking places against parking fees. Upon permission to use
 D           such vacant plot also as multi-level parking under building bye
             laws, such plots can be used as such for that purpose.
             Appropriate tax measures may be adopted by civic agencies to
             incentivize this process.
             (4) Parking on footpaths shall be strictly prohibited and civic
 E           agencies shall tow such illegally parked vehicles.
             (5) On all lanes and streets, a lane must be earmarked for
             unhindered movement of emergency vehicles like ambulances,
             fire tenders, police vehicles, etc. No parking shall be allowed on
             this lane.”
 F
              Therefore, this Policy envisages the preparation of area parking
       plans, the scope and ambit of such plans and the preparation of these
       plans in consultation with the residents or the RWAs. This Policy also
       encourages the use of open areas other than the designated green areas
       and parks near the colonies as parking lots on payment basis. Private
 G     parking is also encouraged where vacant land is owned by private
       parties. An important aspect of this Policy is that it envisages that the
       parking charges would include the cost of transporting the person from
       the place where his/her vehicle is parked to the market area by providing
       shuttle service. We direct that such facility should be by non-polluting
 H     vehicles such as electric or battery operated vehicles, golf-carts etc.
            M.C. MEHTA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                              1061
                    [DEEPAK GUPTA, J.]

       19. This Clause also has two other very important aspects.            A
Parking on footpaths is strictly prohibited. There can be no violation of
this and it cannot be permitted under any circumstances. Footpaths are
meant for pedestrians. Many houses encroach footpaths for many
reasons such as extending the garden, making security guard cabins
etc. All these are encroachments of public space. We direct that all
                                                                             B
security guard cabins should be built within the plot area and not on
the footpaths. In any colony where the footpath is found to be
encroached upon, strict action should be taken against the owner and
the encroachment should be removed from the footpath. In case such
house owners after removal of the encroachment again encroach upon
the footpath then rules may be framed to discontinue municipal services      C
like water, electricity, sewage etc. to the residence of the encroachers.
      20. The policy relating to residential areas also provides that a
lane must be earmarked for unhindered movement of vehicles like
ambulances, fire tenders, police vehicles etc. This is very essential not
only to take care of medical emergencies, fire hazards etc., but also to     D
ensure that the law and order enforcement agencies can move without
any hinderance. This lane will also obviously be used by the residents.
This lane should be clearly earmarked on both sides by yellow
fluorescent paint or strips and not even an inch of space within the two
yellow lines should be permitted to be used for parking. This will prevent
perpendicular parking and encourage parallel parking.                        E

       21. EPCA has prepared a Report for pilot project for Lajpat
Nagar-III but the same Report with minor variations can be utilised
for other two colonies also. Without expressing our opinion on the report
at this stage we prima facie feel that the pilot project should continue
in Lajpat Nagar as suggested by the EPCA for at least a period of 3          F
months, where after this Court would be in a better position to evaluate
both the short-comings and the benefits of the project. We are not at
this stage going into the details of the pilot project because we do not,
in any way, want to influence the working of the said project. At the
same time we would like to emphasise that what we have culled out            G
above from the parking policy must not be compromised and the draft
parking policy must be followed in letter and spirit.
       22. The pilot project envisages a demand for parking of 3510
cars in Lajpat Nagar-III whereas the demarcated legal parking can only
accommodate 1830 cars. This means there is a gap of 1680 cars.               H
1062             SUPREME COURT REPORTS                          [2019] 11 S.C.R.


 A     EPCA has identified sufficient alternative space to accommodate these
       cars in various parking spaces available and through shared parking with
       hospitals and educational institutions. Institutions like hospitals, schools
       etc. do not require parking space once the working hours are over.
       Therefore, this idea of sharing the parking space is very good and could
       be extended to other areas too. However, in such event, the owners of
 B
       such institutions may have to be monetarily compensated and we leave
       that question open for determination at a later stage.
              23. Parking lots can be of various types and different modules
       of parking will be required in different areas. Traditionally, parking areas
       are open pieces of land where the parking areas are marked. A lot of
 C
       area has to be left for the movement of vehicles. This is the least
       expensive but also the least efficient way of providing parking.
       However, this can be a solution in residential areas where the problem
       of parking is not so acute. If after identification of the requirements of
       parking as done in the case of Lajpat Nagar by EPCA, sufficient open
 D     land can be identified for accommodating all the vehicles. This traditional
       method may be the solution.
              24. The second type of parking is multi-level parking which
       includes both underground and over ground parking. Underground
       parking though more expensive to construct, is sometimes better in the
 E     longer run especially when colonies are being developed because the
       land above the parking area can be used as a park. Parks and parking
       can be effectively combined. This is a concept used in various countries
       all over the world where there are 2 to 3 or even more levels of
       underground parking. As far as over-ground parking is concerned, it
       is definitely cheaper than underground parking to construct but care
 F     should be taken that the number of floors over the ground do not violate
       the building norms and multilevel parking does not become an eyesore.
       The problem of both multilevel and underground parking is that, though
       due to increase of levels more cars can be parked in the same area, a
       lot of space is wasted for providing access to the vehicles to move in
 G     and out of the parking areas. Spiral parking is another effective way
       of increasing parking space in the same area. The structure for the
       parking is circular in area and parking is done in concentric circles.
             25. If automatic parking is introduced in these multilevel and spiral
       parkings then the amount of usable area becomes large and the number
 H     of vehicles which can be parked in the same area rises exponentially.
            M.C. MEHTA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                               1063
                    [DEEPAK GUPTA, J.]

When automation takes place in spiral parking only the central hub of         A
the parking area is used for the automated lift(s) and that will require
at the best the space of two or three vehicles.
       26. Open parking or multi-level parking may be useful in residential
areas but automated multi-level parking and automated spiral parking
is the need of the hour for parking in institutions like hospitals, courts,   B
transport hubs, etc. where the demand for parking of vehicles is very
high.
       27. Another type of parking is stack parking. This requires no
permanent construction. A frame-structure is raised and depending on
the height of the structure, 2 or 3 cars are parked or 'stacked' one above    C
the other by means of automated lifts. This type of parking is also useful
in crowded areas and markets where availability of space is less and
also where the alternative multi- level parking is being constructed but
will take a lot of time to be built.
       28. Obviously these parking facilities come at a price. They are       D
not cheap to erect and maintain. It is for the authorities to plan out how
these parking facilities are to be financed. It is for the State to decide
whether it will bear the cost or it wants the users to pay for the parking
area. However, one thing is certain. It is the responsibility of the State
to ensure that the roads are free and clear, free from parking and that
there is reasonably large amount of parking space available to citizens       E
in residential areas, commercial areas, institutional area, transport hubs
etc.
       29. Modern technology must be used to ensure that parking
spaces are utilised to the maximum and for that it is necessary to have
Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) tags for all vehicles coupled with      F
the parking guidance and information system in transport hubs,
institutions and commercial areas. Parking charges, if any can be paid
directly to the parking operator through the RFID tags which will reduce
human intervention and corruption. One RFID tag can be used not only
to pay parking charges but also at toll barriers etc., wherever vehicles
have to pay charges for use of the road or parking space. Payment             G
through RFID tags is automatic and speedy. Since there is no human
intervention there is no dispute and the daily news of persons being
beaten up at toll plazas would hopefully go down. For vehicles which
are exempt from payment of such toll charges etc., the RFID tags can
be programmed accordingly and these vehicles on the basis of RFID             H
1064            SUPREME COURT REPORTS                         [2019] 11 S.C.R.


 A     tag identification can go through these toll plazas without payment of
       fees. This will virtually do away with the need of having separate lanes
       for exempted category vehicles.
               30. In any parking facility where more than 100 cars can be
       parked parking guidance and information systems should be
 B     compulsorily used. The number of vacant parking spaces should be
       clearly identified and displayed prominently on signages outside the
       institutional/commercial areas as well as outside the parking. The parking
       guidance system should clearly indicate which entrance/route the motor
       vehicle users should use to reach the nearest vacant parking. This will
       help in making parking not only more efficient but also reduce the traffic
 C
       jams outside the parking area.
              31. The pilot project of EPCA started in Lajpat Nagar from April,
       2018 and we expect EPCA to give us a detailed report of the working
       of the pilot project in Lajpat Nagar by 30.12.2019. We request EPCA
       to prepare pilot project(s) for Krishna Nagar and Kamla Nagar within
 D     two weeks, immediately whereafter such pilot projects will be started
       there. With regard to the working of such pilot projects let the report
       be submitted by 30.12.2019.
              32. In view of the above discussion we issue the following
       directions:-
 E
               1. We direct the New Delhi Municipal Corporation, North
                  Delhi Municipal Corporation, South Delhi Municipal
                  Corporation, East Delhi Municipal Corporation and Delhi
                  Cantonment Board to ensure that all the pavements, in the
                  residential areas are cleared from all encroachments and
 F                ensure that the pavements are made usable by pedestrians.
                  The persons who have encroached upon the pavements shall
                  be given notice of 15 days to remove the encroachment and
                  in case they fail to do so the encroachment shall be
                  removed by the municipal authority/authority concerned at
 G                the cost of the encroacher which shall be recovered as
                  arrears of land revenue. The authorities may also consider
                  framing rules to discontinue municipal services to repeat
                  encroachers.
               2. We direct that the draft rules of the Delhi Maintenance and
 H                Management of Parking Places Rules 2019 be notified at
             M.C. MEHTA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                                1065
                     [DEEPAK GUPTA, J.]

             the earliest and not later than 30.09.2019. List for               A
             compliance on 04.10.2019.
         3. Once the rules are notified it shall be the duty of all
            concerned to ensure that the said rules are enforced in letter
            and spirit.
         4. The Govt. of NCT is directed to ensure that while granting          B
            permission to build any structures, there is proper assessment
            of the parking needs for the next 25 years and requisite
            parking facilities are available.
         5. We direct EPCA and the municipal authorities to take into
            consideration what has been stated in the judgment while            C
            evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of the pilot
            project.
         6. The Govt. of NCT of Delhi, the municipal authorities and
            EPCA are directed to consider the viability and effectiveness
            of introducing RIFD tags, parking guidance and information          D
            systems and last mile connectivity from parking spaces to
            commercial areas, institutions etc. and submit a report in
            this behalf by 30.09.2019 and for this purpose let the matter
            be listed in Court 04.10.2019.
         7. After the reports on the pilot project are received further         E
            directions shall be issued.
       33. List this matter on 13.01.2020.


Kalpana K. Tripathy                                        Directions Issued.   F




                                                                                G




                                                                                H