Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

A M AHMADI

328 judgments delivered by benches including this judge — showing 201–328.

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusDIGAMBAR

1995 INSC 37112 May 1995Appeal(s) allowed

During the severe drought of 1971‑72, the Maharashtra government undertook scarcity‑relief road works, taking land without compensation. In 1991, an agriculturist filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking compensation, alleging a 20‑year delay (laches). The Bombay High Court dismissed the laches defence and grant

G.C. KANUNGOversusSTATE OF ORISSA

1995 INSC 37812 May 1995Case Allowed

The petitioners, contractors who had contracts with the State of Orissa, obtained arbitral awards from Special Arbitration Tribunals which were later made "Rules of Court" by civil courts. The State subsequently enacted the Arbitration (Orissa Second Amendment) Act, 1991, which retrospectively nullified those awards, e

GAINDA RAM AND ORS. ETC.versusM.C.D. TOWN HALL AND ORS. ETC.

1993 INSC 19512 May 1993Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the scheme devised by the Delhi Municipal Corporation (MCD) for granting Tehbazari (market) permission to squatters and hawkers under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act. The Court clarified that the MCD's sub‑classification of squatters—those possessing a survey‑report receipt versus those p

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ETC.versusSOM NATH THAPA ETC.

1996 INSC 50712 April 1996Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the 1993 Bombay bomb blasts case, where 145 persons were charged under the IPC and the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA). The Court clarified the law on criminal conspiracy, holding that knowledge of an illegal use can be inferred when the goods (e.g., RDX) hav

GAURI SHANKER SHARMA ETC.versusSTATE OF U.P. ETC.

1990 INSC 712 January 1990Dismissed

The case concerned the death of Ram Dhiraj Tiwari while in police custody. The prosecution alleged that Sub‑Inspector Rafiuddin Khan (Accused No.1) beat the deceased with lathis and dandas after his arrest on 19 Oct 1971, causing 28 injuries that led to death, and also demanded a bribe. The defence claimed the arrest o

SALAUDDIN ABDULSAMAD SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

1995 INSC 87511 December 1995Disposed off

The petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the High Court granted an ad‑interim order valid until 26 September 1995, imposing a condition that he report daily to the police station. Upon expiry of that order, the High Court judge directed the petitioner to file a re

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADURAIversusM/S. T.V. SUNDARAM IYENGAR AND SONS LTD.

1996 INSC 103511 September 1996Disposed off

M/s T.V. Sundaram Iyengar & Sons Ltd. received deposits from customers in the ordinary course of its trade. The deposits were initially recorded as capital receipts (security deposits). When a portion of these deposits remained unclaimed for a long period, the company wrote them off to its profit and loss account. The

THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, E.S.I. CORPORATION AND ANR.versusFRANCIS DE COSTA AND ANR.

1996 INSC 103711 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The employee, Francis De Costa, was injured in a road accident while riding his own bicycle to work, about one kilometre from his factory and fifteen minutes before his shift began. He claimed disablement benefit under the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, and the ESIC Court allowed the claim, which was later dismi

AHMEDABAD URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusMANILAL GORDHANDAS AND ORS.

1996 INSC 103611 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation submitted a revised development plan under the Bombay Town Planning Act in January 1976. The Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Act, 1976 came into force on 30 January 1978, repealing the Bombay Act and establishing the Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority (AUDA) with power

KARNEL SINGHversusTHE STATE OF M.P.

1995 INSC 45211 August 1995Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the appeal of Karnel Singh, convicted under Section 376 IPC for raping a female labourer, Panchbai, at a factory on 28 August 1987. The prosecution presented the victim's testimony, medical evidence of semen stains on her petticoat and in her vagina, and noted the absence of physical injuries

ANIRUDHSINHJI KARANSINHJI JADEJA AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

1995 INSC 45111 August 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The murder of Jayantilal Vadodaria led to the arrest of four assailants and two villagers, Anirudhsinh Jadeja (Sarpanch) and Digubha Jadeja, who had concealed the murder weapons on the latter's field. The State invoked the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA) against the two villagers and a

A. NEELALOHITHADASAN NADARversusGEORGE MASCRENE AND OTHERS

1994 INSC 15011 April 1994Dismissed

The appellant, A. Neelalohithadasan Nadar, was declared elected from the Kovalam Assembly seat, but the first respondent, George Mascrene, filed an election petition alleging double voting and void votes under Section 62(4) of the Representation of People Act, 1951. The Kerala High Court inspected ballot papers and ele

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.versusRAMJEE PRASAD AND ORS.

1990 INSC 13611 April 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Bihar advertised vacancies for junior teaching posts in its medical colleges and fixed 31 January 1988 as the last date for receipt of applications, requiring three years of experience as a Resident or Registrar. Several junior teachers, including Ramjee Prasad, challenged the cut‑off date, alleging it was

S.R. BOMMAIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 11111 March 1994

This landmark judgment concerns the scope of Article 356 of the Constitution of India, which empowers the President to impose President's Rule in states upon failure of constitutional machinery. The case consolidated challenges to proclamations dissolving legislative assemblies in Karnataka, Meghalaya, Nagaland, Madhya

KISHUN SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

1993 INSC 511 January 1993Dismissed

The appellants, Kishun Singh and others, were not named in the charge‑sheet filed after a police investigation of a murder, but were listed in the FIR. The Sessions Judge, after the case was committed to his court under Section 209 of the CrPC, impleaded them as co‑accused under Section 319 before any trial evidence wa

S.V. CHANDRA PANDIAN AND ORS.versusS.V. SIVALINGA NADAR AND ORS.

1993 INSC 411 January 1993Appeal(s) allowed

Six brothers who were partners in two firms entered into arbitration to resolve disputes. The arbitrators awarded a division of the firms' assets, including immovable properties, among the brothers upon dissolution. A Single Judge ordered the award to be registered before it could be made a rule of court; the Division

ALL INDIA RESERVE BANK RETIRED OFFICERS ASSOCIATION AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1991 INSC 33310 December 1991Dismissed

The Reserve Bank of India introduced a new pension scheme in 1990, replacing the Contributory Provident Fund (CPF) scheme. Regulations 3(3) and 31 fixed a cut‑off date of 1 January 1986, allowing only employees who retired on or after that date (and before 1 November 1990) to opt into the pension scheme by refunding CP

INDER MANI AND ORS.versusMATHEHWARI PRASAD AND ORS.

1996 INSC 117510 October 1996Disposed off

The petitioners filed a writ in the Allahabad High Court which was initially listed before Justice A.P. Singh. On 22 December 1995 the Chief Justice reconstituted a Division Bench comprising Justice V.N. Khare and Justice A.P. Singh, but Justice Singh refused to sit on the bench and instead heard the matter singly, gra

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.versusM.NEETHI CHANDRA, ETC. ETC.

1996 INSC 102410 September 1996Disposed off

The State of Bihar issued a resolution (No.20) that candidates from reserved categories who qualified on merit would not be adjusted against the reserved quota, leading to grievances that such candidates were denied their preferred courses. The Patna High Court devised a seat‑allocation scheme whereby reserved seats we

MRS. R.D. BHATIAversusSMT. RAJINDER KAUR AND ORS.

1996 INSC 101910 September 1996Disposed off

The appellant, an advocate, was suspended for two years by the Bar Council of India on a complaint that she colluded with the opposing party and other lawyers to set aside an ex‑parte decree, allegedly acting as a mediator and misappropriating Rs. 3,500. The disciplinary committee relied on the complainant's affidavit,

DR. TRILOKI NATH SINGHversusDR. BHAGWAN DIN MISRA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 22810 August 1990Dismissed

A selection committee was formed to appoint a Reader in Linguistics in the Department of Hindi at the University of Lucknow. The committee, comprising three experts in Hindi literature rather than linguistics, recommended Dr. Triloki Nath Singh for the post, placing Dr. Bhagwan Din Misra second. Dr. Misra challenged th

ASHOK KUMAR ALIAS GOLUversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1991 INSC 14510 July 1991Dismissed

Ashok Kumar was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. He sought premature release under the Rajasthan Prisons (Shortening of Sentences) Rules, 1958, arguing that Section 433A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – which imposes a 14‑year minimum before any release for life convicts of capital offen

PRADEEP KRISHENversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 66510 May 1996Disposed off

Pradeep Krishen, an environmentalist, filed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging a Madhya Pradesh Forest Department order that allowed villagers around sanctuaries and national parks to collect tendu leaves. He argued that the order was ultra‑violet to the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 and violated Articles

GAN GAD HARANversusJANARDHANA MALLAN AND OTHERS

1996 INSC 66610 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant purchased a joint‑family property from the father of the respondents when the latter were minors, for Rs 9,000. After the father's death, the respondents filed a partition suit alleging that the sale was for inadequate consideration, that there was no legal necessity, and that most of the alleged antecede

HASHMATTULLAHversusSTATE OF M.P. AND ORS.

1996 INSC 66710 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a butcher, challenged the 1991 amendment to the Madhya Pradesh Agricultural Cattle Preservation Act that imposed an absolute ban on slaughter of bulls and bullocks, alleging it violated his fundamental right to trade under Article 19(1)(g) and was not a reasonable restriction in the public interest. The

INDER SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

1995 INSC 36010 May 1995Disposed off

The Supreme Court entertained a habeas corpus petition filed by the relatives of seven men who were allegedly abducted by a Punjab police party led by a Deputy Superintendent of Police on suspicion of involvement in a militant kidnapping. The Court ordered a CBI inquiry, which concluded that the victims were unlawfully

M/S. RAMNARAYAN SATYANARAYAN AGRAWALversusASSOCIATED ALCOHOLS AND BREWERIES LTD. AND ORS.

1995 INSC 36210 May 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Mis. Ramnarayan Satyanarayan Agrawal Distilleries Pvt. Ltd., employed only 22 workers and sought to manufacture potable alcohol under a state‑granted permission. Respondents, Associated Alcohols & Breweries Ltd. and others, challenged the appellant's tender, arguing that only a licence from the Central G

F.A. SAPA ETC. ETC.versusSINGORA AND ORS. ETC.

1991 INSC 13810 May 1991Case Partly allowed

In the 1989 Mizoram Assembly elections, fifteen unsuccessful MNF candidates filed election petitions alleging corrupt practices by the elected Congress(I) candidates. The High Court rejected preliminary objections, allowed certain amendments, and struck out vague paragraphs, prompting the returned candidates to appeal

STATE OF PUNJABversusIQBAL SINGH AND ORS.

1991 INSC 13910 May 1991Appeal(s) allowed

The wife of Iqbal Singh set herself and her three children on fire on 7 June 1983 after prolonged dowry harassment by her husband, his mother and sister. She had previously complained to police and written letters detailing the abuse and her fear for her life. The husband, his mother and sister were charged under Secti

MALKIAT SINGH AND ORSversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

1991 INSC 9810 April 1991Case Partly allowed

The case concerned the murder of four liquor‑shop workers and the attempted murder of a fifth person. The prosecution relied mainly on the ocular testimony of two injured witnesses (PW‑3 and PW‑4), ballistic evidence linking a rifle owned by the accused A‑1, and circumstantial evidence. The appellants challenged the ad

ALLIED MOTORS (P) LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI

1997 INSC 23710 March 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Allied Motors (P) Ltd. claimed a deduction for sales‑tax collected in the last quarter of its accounting year 1983‑84, which was paid to the treasury in the next year but before the filing deadline. The Income‑Tax Officer disallowed the deduction under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petitioner argued that

SUWALAL ANANDILAL JAINversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BIHAR, RANCHI

1997 INSC 23810 March 1997

The assessee firm, whose partners were Karta of their respective Hindu Undivided Families, advanced personal funds to the firm and received interest on those deposits. The firm claimed a deduction for this interest under Explanation 2 to Section 40(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, but the Income Tax Officer disallowed i

PROCESS TECHNICIANS AND ANALYSTS' UNIONversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 24010 March 1997Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (Determination of Conditions of Service of Employees) Act, 1988 and the schemes framed under it in 1989 and 1996. The appellant union argued that Section 3 of the Act gave the Central Government unguided power, that the retr

COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, HYDERABADversusBAKELITE HYLAM LTD.

1997 INSC 24110 March 1997Case Partly allowed

The Collector of Central Excise appealed against the classification of three types of laminated sheets—decorative, industrial (paper‑based), and glass‑epoxy—manufactured by Bakelite Hylam Ltd. The issues concerned whether the sheets fell under Entry 15A(2) of the 1944 Excise Act, the residuary Entry 68, or various entr

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.versusMD. KALIMUDDIN AND ORS.

1996 INSC 4510 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Bihar prepared a panel of 273 candidates for Assistant Teacher posts under the 1975 Bihar Government Assistant Teachers Service Encadrement Appointment and Transfer Rules. While 98 candidates were appointed (91 joined), the remaining candidates were placed on a waiting list. The High Court, by interim orde

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIAversusC. BERNARD

1990 INSC 3049 October 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The Central Bank of India charged its employee C. Bernard with claiming a loss‑adjustment facility using forged travel receipts. The Bank appointed Shri U.B. Menon as Enquiry Officer and Disciplinary Authority, but Menon retired during the enquiry and continued to conduct it, ultimately ordering Bernard's discharge. Th

SANJAY DUTTversusTHE STATE THROUGH C.B.I. BOMBAY

1994 INSC 3719 September 1994Dismissed

The petitioners, accused in the 1993 Bombay blast case, were charged under Section 5 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) for knowingly possessing an AK‑56 rifle and ammunition. They argued that the possession was for self‑defence, not for terrorist purposes, and sought bail. The Supreme C

AMIR SHAD KHAN AZIZ AHMEDKHAN @ AZIZ MOHD. KHANversusL. HMINGLIANA AND ORS.

1991 INSC 1799 August 1991Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Amir Shad Khan and Aziz Ahmed Khan, were detained under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 after gold bars were recovered from their vehicle. They were served detention orders that allowed them to make representations to the State Government, Central Go

BANI SINGH AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

1996 INSC 7099 July 1996

The appellants were convicted under IPC sections 366 and 368 and sentenced to three years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine. They appealed to the Allahabad High Court, which admitted the appeal, stayed the sentence, and granted bail, but later dismissed the appeal for non‑prosecution because the appellant and his coun

THE SECRETARY, HAILAKANDI BAR ASSOCIATIONversusSTATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.

1996 INSC 6589 May 1996Disposed off

The Hailakandi Bar Association filed a writ petition under Article 32 alleging that Superintendent of Police A.K. Sinha Cashyap submitted a false report and affidavit to the Supreme Court to conceal police brutality that led to the death of under‑trial prisoner Nurul Haque. The Court examined the CBI investigation, med

BRIG. (RETD) D.K JETLEYversusARMY WELFARE HOUSING ORGANISATION AND ANR.

1995 INSC 3469 May 1995Disposed off

The Army Welfare Housing Organisation (AWHO) was tasked with constructing 422 flats in Som Vihar, New Delhi, and invited applications from serving and retired army officers in 1979. Four senior officers – Brig. D.K. Jetley, Col. Dahiya, Col. Gupta and Col. Khandpur – each claimed entitlement to two of the flats, relyin

MADANLAL PHULCHAND JAINversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

1992 INSC 1059 April 1992Dismissed

M.P. Jain, adopted into his uncle's family, received 28 acres from the adoptive family and inherited 19 acres 19.5 gunthas from his natural father, who became his uncle after adoption. The Commissioner under Section 45(2) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 held that the inherited land

DR. AJAY SINGH RAWATversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

1995 INSC 1779 March 1995Disposed off

Dr. Ajay Singh Rawat, a member of the Nainital Bachao Samiti, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions to curb severe environmental degradation in Nainital caused by water, air, noise and other forms of pollution. The Supreme Court appointed a commissioner to investigate issues such

CHAIRMAN, THIRUVALLUVAR TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusCONSUMER PROTECTION COUNCIL

1995 INSC 1079 February 1995Appeal(s) allowed

Shri K. Kumar died in a bus accident in 1990. The Consumer Protection Council, Tamil Nadu, filed a claim before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) on behalf of his legal representatives, seeking compensation. The NCDRC awarded Rs. 5.10 lakh without addressing the question of its jurisdiction. T

UNION OF INDIAversusS.S. UPPAL AND ANR.

1996 INSC 349 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed

S.S. Uppal, a State civil servant, was selected for absorption into the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) against a non‑state quota. Although his name appeared in a panel for a vacancy that arose on 1‑Feb‑1989, he was actually appointed on 15‑Feb‑1989, after the seniority rules were amended on 3‑Feb‑1989. Uppal chall

PATEL MOT!BHAI NARANBHAI AND ANR.versusDINUBHAI MOTIBHAI PATEL AND ORS.

1996 INSC 359 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute concerned ownership of certain properties and was referred to arbitration, resulting in an award on 26 February 1986. Neither party applied to file the award in court within the 30‑day period prescribed by Article 119 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Six years later, the arbitrator himself filed the award and s

NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSIONversusSTATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH AND ANR.

1996 INSC 389 January 1996Case Allowed

The National Human Rights Commission filed a writ petition under Article 32 on behalf of about 65,000 Chakma refugees settled in Arunachal Pradesh, alleging persecution, quit notices and threats of eviction by the All Arunachal Pradesh Students Union. The Chakmas had applied for Indian citizenship under Section 5(1)(a)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.versusM/S. NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION CO., BOMBAY AND ANR.

1996 INSC 399 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Maharashtra entered into a construction contract with National Construction Co. and obtained a performance guarantee from the Central Bank of India. When the contractor abandoned the work, the State sued the bank alone for the guaranteed amount; the suit was dismissed for non‑joinder of the contractor and

KARAMJEET SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA

1992 INSC 2698 October 1992Dismissed

Karamjeet Singh filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution claiming to be the next friend of two convicts sentenced to death for desecrating a religious shrine, alleging that the convicts were under a legal disability due to an intense religious obsession. The convicts had expressly instructed that no r

UNIVERSITY OF DELHIversusRAJ SINGH

1994 INSC 3708 September 1994Dismissed

The Delhi High Court upheld the University Grants Commission (UGC) Regulations of 1991 that require a written eligibility test for appointment of lecturers in Delhi University and its affiliated colleges. The University challenged the regulations as beyond UGC's competence, directory rather than mandatory, and an infri

GAYA BAKSH YADAVversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 6428 May 1996Disposed off

The case concerned the method of preparing an All‑India seniority list for officers of the Customs Appraisers Service, Class II. The Government had issued a circular in 1986 that placed promotee appraisers together based on continuous service and direct recruits based on UPSC ranking, then merged the two lists in a 1:1

SMT. SWATI AND ORS.versusSH. DAMODAR ANANT KARANDIKAR AND ORS.

1996 INSC 6498 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Bombay Port Trust fixed reservation percentages for promotional posts at 15% for Scheduled Castes (SC) and 7.5% for Scheduled Tribes (ST), matching the All‑India policy, whereas the State of Maharashtra prescribed 7% for SC and 9% for ST at the time of initial recruitment. The Bombay High Court held that the Trust

DR. HANIRAJ L. CHULANIversusBAR COUNCIL OF MAHARASHTRA AND GOA

1996 INSC 4918 April 1996Dismissed

Dr. Haniraj L. Chulani, a practising surgeon, applied for enrollment as an advocate but was rejected by the Maharashtra and Goa State Bar Council under Rule 1, which bars persons engaged in any other profession from being enrolled. He challenged the rule on grounds of excessive delegation of legislative power and viola

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.versusDEEP NARAIN TRIPATHI AND ORS.

1996 INSC 4928 April 1996Dismissed

The respondent was appointed as an ad‑hoc lecturer in 1985 at a college affiliated to Purvanchal University (formerly Gorakhpur University) after selection by a committee and approval by the Vice‑Chancellor. The 1991 Uttar Pradesh Higher Education Services Commission (Amendment) Ordinance introduced Section 31‑C, allow

MOHAMED IQBAL MADAR SHEIKH AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

1996 INSC 268 January 1996Dismissed

The appellants were charged under the IPC and Sections 3(1) and 3(2)(i) of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) for setting fire to a house during the 1993 Bombay riots, resulting in many deaths. The Designated Court denied bail, and the appellants contended that because TADA was a temporary

DR. BIPIN SHANTILAL PANCHALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

1996 INSC 278 January 1996Dismissed

Dr. B.S. Panchal was arrested under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act on 8 November 1993. Both the City Sessions Judge and the Gujarat High Court denied his bail applications, relying on Section 37 of the NDPS Act and the precedent set in Narcotics Control Bureau v. Kishan Lal. The appellant con

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE PORT OF CALCUTTAversusENGINEERS-DE-SPACE-AGE

1995 INSC 8617 December 1995Dismissed

The Board of Trustees for the Port of Calcutta contracted with Engineers‑de‑Space‑Age, including a clause (13(g)) that barred the Commissioners from entertaining any claim for interest on delayed payments. An arbitrator, however, awarded interest pendente lite. The Board appealed, contending that the clause prohibited

JAENENDRA KUMAR PHOOLCHAND DAFTARIversusRAJENDRA RAMSUKH MISHRA

1993 INSC 3847 December 1993

The appellant, J.P. Daftari, was elected Sarpanch of Seloo Gram Panchayat by secret ballot, but the election was set aside by the Collector because no member had demanded a secret ballot, as required by Rule 10(2) of the Bombay Village Panchayat (Sarpanch and Upa‑Sarpanch) Election Rules, 1964. The Commissioner upheld

CHANDRASWAMI AND ANOTHERversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

1996 INSC 13017 November 1996Disposed off

The petitioners, Chandraswami and another, were accused of cheating under Sections 120B and 420 of the IPC for allegedly obtaining US$1 lakh from a complainant in 1983. They were arrested in 1988, released on bail with conditions, and later permitted to travel abroad. After a Supreme Court‑ordered restraint on foreign

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.versusJASMER SINGH AND ORS.

1996 INSC 13057 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Haryana appealed a High Court order that had granted daily‑wage mail‑cum‑chowkidars and pump operators the same salary as regular employees of the same posts. The Supreme Court held that the principle of "equal pay for equal work" cannot be mechanically applied to daily‑rated workers because they differ in

STATE OF HARYANAversusDHARAMPAL, WATER PUMP OPERATOR AND ORS.

1996 INSC 13067 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Haryana appealed against orders of the Punjab and Haryana High Court that had granted regularisation and equal‑pay relief to a group of casual water‑pump operators led by Dharampal. The workers claimed that, on the principle of equal pay for equal work, they were entitled to be regularised and to receive p

THE ASSTT. COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISEversusBATA INDIA LTD.

1996 INSC 6257 May 1996Dismissed

The Assistant Collector of Central Excise appealed against Bata India Ltd. alleging that the manufacturer could not claim exemption under a notification that exempted footwear valued up to Rs.60 per pair when its wholesale price exceeded that limit. Bata argued that by deducting the 10% excise duty from the wholesale p

U.P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ORS.versusTRILOK CHANDRA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 6267 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, U.P. State Road Transport Corporation, was sued for compensation after its omnibus caused the death of Prem Chandra, aged 26. The claimants calculated loss of dependency based on a monthly surplus of Rs.200 and applied a multiplier of 24 years, which the Tribunal used; the High Court corrected the multip

V.S.MURTHYversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1992 INSC 1527 May 1992Dismissed

V.S. Murthy, a former railway clerk, was deputed to Hindustan Organic Chemicals Limited, a public sector undertaking, and later absorbed permanently. While on deputation he received his regular railway pay plus a deputation (duty) allowance. Upon retirement he claimed that the allowance should be counted as "emoluments

INACIO MARTINS DECEASED THROUGH LRS.versusNARA YAN HARI NAIK AND ORS.

1993 INSC 1457 April 1993Appeal(s) allowed

Inacio Martins filed a suit for declaration and injunction concerning his tenancy of a coconut grove, which was dismissed because he was not in possession. He subsequently filed a suit for restoration of possession, alleging unlawful dispossession by the defendants. The defendants contended that the second suit was bar

M/S VOLTAS LTD. BOMBAYversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 1027 February 1995Appeal(s) allowed

Mis Voltas Ltd. entered into exclusive distribution agreements with numerous manufacturers, containing territorial and exclusive dealing clauses. The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission (MRTPC) issued notices under Section 10(a)(iii) and Section 37 of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act

SHARMIK UTTARSH SABHAversusRAYMOND WOOLLEN MILLS LTD. AND ORS.

1995 INSC 1037 February 1995Dismissed

The appellant, Sharimk Uttarsah Sabha, a trade union, sought to be impleaded in an Industrial Court proceeding where Raymond Woolen Mills Ltd. had complained of unfair labour practices under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971. The Industrial Court had restrai

MALKHAN SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 87 January 1997Disposed off

The petitioner, a practising advocate belonging to a Scheduled Caste, applied for an Additional District & Sessions Judge vacancy in 1985, which was reserved for a Scheduled Tribe (ST) candidate. No suitable ST candidate was available, and the vacancy remained unfilled while three Scheduled Caste candidates were select

CHEMICAL AND FIBRES OF INDIA LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 97 January 1997Dismissed

The appellant, Chemical and Fibres of India Ltd., manufactured nylon yarn and, in the process, produced polymer chips (Nylon 6 chips) from caprolactam monomer. The issue was whether these polymer chips fell within Item 15A of Schedule I to the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944, as it stood between 1962‑1972 – first as

MAHMOOD HASAN AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

1997 INSC 67 January 1997Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined a massive promotion anomaly in the Uttar Pradesh Food and Civil Supplies Department where numerous junior clerks were promoted to Supply Inspector posts in violation of seniority rules, depriving senior employees of their rightful promotions. The petitioners argued that these promotions breac

COMMON CAUSE REGISTERED SOCIETYversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1993 INSC 27 January 1993Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the sluggish implementation of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, specifically the failure of many States and Union Territories to establish District Forums as mandated by Section 9. The petitioners, a registered society, sought directions under Article 32 to compel the governments to set up

P. K. JAISWALversusMS. DEBI MUKHERJEE AND ORS.

1992 INSC 17 January 1992Dismissed

The Union Government sent a requisition to the UPSC to fill a vacancy of Assistant Director General (Prevention of Food Adulteration) by direct recruitment. Before the UPSC could advertise, the Government informed it that it was considering amending the rules to allow promotion from Assistant Secretary and asked the UP

CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTSversusJAGANNATH MARUTI KONDHARE

1995 INSC 8476 December 1995Dismissed

The workmen employed by the Maharashtra Forest Department under the Panchgaon Parwati Scheme and social‑forestry projects alleged that they had been kept as casual labourers for five to six years, constituting an unfair labour practice under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Pr

S.P. ANAND, INDOREversusH.D. DEVE GOWDA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 12936 November 1996Dismissed

The petitioner, S.P. Anand, filed a public‑interest litigation under Article 32 challenging the appointment of H.D. Deve Gowda as Prime Minister on the ground that he was not a member of either House of Parliament, alleging violations of Articles 14, 21 and 75 of the Constitution. The Court examined the constitutional

DR. K. MADANversusKRISHNAWATI (SMT.) AND ANOTHER

1996 INSC 12916 November 1996Disposed off

The appellant, a lady doctor, rented the ground floor of a house in 1963 for residential-cum-clinic purposes. She later built her own house and shifted her residence, but continued using the rented premises solely as a clinic. The respondent landlady filed for eviction under Section 14(1)(k) of the Delhi Rent Control A

SUPREME COURT ADVOCATES-ON-RECORD ASSOCIATION AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA

1993 INSC 3186 October 1993Disposed off

This public interest litigation concerned the appointment of judges to the Supreme Court and High Courts, and the transfer of High Court judges. The case was referred to a nine-judge bench to reconsider the majority view in S.P. Gupta v. Union of India (1982), which held that the Central Government had primacy in judic

LT. COL. SAWAI BHAWANI SINGH ETCversusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1886 February 1996Dismissed

The appellants challenged the constitutional validity of the Rajasthan Urban Lands Tax Act, 1964 as amended in 1973 to levy tax on both lands and buildings, arguing that the amendment exceeded the State's legislative competence and rendered the entire legislation "still‑born." The High Court dismissed the writ petition

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusSMT. SHANTI BAI AND ORS.

1995 INSC 976 February 1995Appeal(s) allowed

New India Assurance Co. issued a comprehensive insurance policy for a bus owned by respondent No.4. The bus was involved in an accident caused by the negligent driving of respondent No.5, resulting in the death of a passenger, Laxman Singh, who was riding on the roof with the driver’s permission. The legal heirs claime

LAL BABU HUSSEIN AND ORS.versusELECTORAL REGISTRATION OFFICER AND ORS.

1995 INSC 986 February 1995Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the Election Commission's directives that empowered district collectors and police to determine a person's citizenship and delete alleged foreign nationals from electoral rolls. Petitioners challenged the procedure, arguing that notices relied solely on police reports, limited the documents t

R.D. HATTANGADIversusMIS. PEST CONTROL (INDIA) PVT. LTD. AND ORS.

1995 INSC 126 January 1995Appeal(s) allowed

R.D. Hattangadi, a practising advocate, was severely injured in a head‑on collision between a car owned by Mis. Pest Control (India) Pvt. Ltd. and a motor lorry, resulting in 100% disability and paraplegia. He filed a claim under Section 110‑A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 seeking compensation for medical expenses, l

R. BALAKRISHNA PILLAIversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ANR.

1995 INSC 8455 December 1995Appeal(s) allowed

R. Balakrishna Pillai, a former Kerala Minister for Electricity, was charged with criminal conspiracy (IPC s.120‑B) and an offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act for supplying electricity to a private firm in Karnataka without the Kerala Government's consent. The Kerala High Court held that sanction under CrPC

TMT. NOORJAHANversusTMT. SULTAN RAJIA @THAJU AND ORS.

1996 INSC 12825 November 1996Dismissed

Syed Abu Thakir was injured while alighting from a bus owned by the appellant and died en route to the hospital. His family claimed Rs 92,000 compensation from the bus owner, the insurer, and the driver. The Motor Vehicles Tribunal awarded the full amount but limited the insurer's liability to Rs 10,000, invoking Secti

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ANDHRA PRADESHversusB. POSETTY AND CO.

1996 INSC 12815 November 1996Dismissed

The main partnership, Mis. Nizamabad Group Sendhi Contractors, was a licensed lessee under the Abkari Act and was registered under the Income Tax Act. One of its partners, B. Posetty, could not meet his capital contribution, so he and nine others formed a sub‑partnership, "B. Posetty and Co.," to finance his share. The

STATE OF WEST BENGALversusFALGUNI DUTTA AND ANOTHER

1993 INSC 1825 May 1993Case Partly allowed

The State of West Bengal prosecuted Falguni Dutta and another for contravening orders under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The respondents were arrested on 16 March 1984, but the charge‑sheet was filed after the statutory six‑month period, and the Special Court under Section 12A took cognizance on 13 March 1987.

S.N. THAPAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

1994 INSC 1415 April 1994Disposed off

The appellant, an Additional Collector of Customs, was charged under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 in the Bombay bomb blast case for allegedly colluding with smugglers to import arms and explosives. The Designated Court dismissed his bail application under Section 20(8) of TADA, relying

M/S INDIAN PETROCHEMICALS CORPORATION LTD.versusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, VADODARA

1997 INSC 2325 March 1997Appeal(s) allowed

M/s Indian Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd. obtained raw naphtha at a concessional rate under Notification No. 27/89‑CE for manufacturing chemicals listed in the schedule. The raw naphtha was thermally cracked, producing olefinic rich gas, pyrolysis fuel oil and pyrolysis gasoline; the latter was further processed to yi

ANIMAL AND ENVIRONMENT LEGAL DEFENCE FUNDversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 2315 March 1997Disposed off

The Animal and Environment Legal Defence Fund challenged the Madhya Pradesh government's order granting 305 fishing permits to tribals residing in the Pench National Park area, arguing that such permits would damage the park's biodiversity and contravene the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 and the Indian Forest Act. T

THE AJMER CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. AJMER, THROUGH THE MANAGING DIRECTORversusTHE PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY UNDER THE RAJASTHAN SHOPS AND CO. ESTABLISHMENT ACT, AIMER AND ORS.

1996 INSC 215 January 1996Dismissed

The manager of a village cooperative Samiti (the second respondent) was dismissed on charges of embezzlement. Claiming that the dismissal order was never served, he filed a civil suit for injunction, which was later withdrawn, and also lodged a complaint under Section 28‑A of the Rajasthan Shops and Establishment Act.

SASADHAR CHAKRAVARTY AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 12724 November 1996Dismissed

The petitioners, a retired employee of Indian Oxygen Ltd. and a pensioners’ society, challenged the scheme of the company’s non‑contributory approved superannuation fund. They argued that improvements made to the fund in 1985 should have been extended to existing pensioners and that the denial of such benefits violated

INDIRA SAWHNEYversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 12734 November 1996Disposed off

The Supreme Court revisited the implementation of its earlier Mandal judgment, which required the exclusion of socially advanced persons (the "creamy layer") from reservations for Other Backward Classes (OBCs). The State of Kerala had repeatedly failed to comply with the Court's directions despite multiple extensions,

MAHE BEACH TRADING COMPANY AND ETC.versusUNION TERRITORY OF PONDICHERRY AND ORS.

1996 INSC 4854 April 1996Dismissed

The appellants, dealers in petrol and diesel in Mahe, challenged the levy of a municipal tax on fuel and the subsequent Pondicherry Municipal Decree (Levy and Validation of Taxes, Duties, Cesses and Fees) Act, 1973. The High Court had struck down the original levy and later upheld the Validation Act as intra vires. On

MAGUNI CHARAN PRADHANversusSTATE OF ORISSA

1991 INSC 914 April 1991Dismissed

The appellant, a lawful owner of a field, discovered the deceased Bhikari Pradhan and his companions illegally ploughing the land. He demanded they unyoke their bullocks; when they refused, he struck the unarmed, seated deceased on the head with a stick, causing fatal injuries. The trial court acquitted him on the basi

MS. KAMINI JAISWAL, ADVOCATEversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 2234 March 1997Disposed off

Ms. Kamini Jaiswal filed a public interest writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking the closure of high‑pressure gas pipelines operated by GAIL and ONGC until an independent expert inquiry certified their safety. The petitioner alleged that the pipelines, particularly the DESU‑Maruti spurline, were la

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADUversusMC. DOWELL AND COMPANY LTD. MADRAS

1997 INSC 2244 March 1997Dismissed

The State of Tamil Nadu challenged the inclusion of bottle deposit amounts collected by Mc. Dowell & Co. Ltd., a liquor distributor, in its sales turnover for sales tax purposes. The distributor paid a deposit to its principal, United Breweries Ltd., for each bottle supplied and collected an equal deposit from its cust

UNITED BREWERIES LTD.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

1997 INSC 2254 March 1997Appeal(s) allowed

United Breweries Ltd. (the appellant) challenged the assessment of sales tax on the value of bottles and crates supplied with its beer, arguing that these were not sold but were returned against a refundable deposit. The Commercial Tax Officer, the Tribunal and the Andhra Pradesh High Court held that the bottles and cr

B.V. RADHA KRISHNAversusSPONGE IRON INDIA LTD.

1997 INSC 2304 March 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant contracted to transport waste and finished products for the respondent. A dispute arose and the appellant invoked Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, leading to a sole arbitrator’s award of Rs 5,29,864.55 with 18% interest from 1 April 1983. The City Civil Court confirmed the award, but the High Cour

MAKAR DHWAJ PAL AND ORS. ETC.versusSMT. NEERA YADAV AND ANR. ETC.

1994 INSC 14 January 1994Disposed off

The Supreme Court heard contempt petitions filed by Assistant Conservators of Forest (direct recruits and promotees) who alleged that the Uttar Pradesh Government had violated the Court's earlier directions in Keshav Chander Joshi v. Union of India regarding the fixation of inter se seniority. The petitioners contended

UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION ETC. ETCversusUNION OF INDIA ETC. ETC.

1991 INSC 2513 October 1991Dismissed

The Union of India sued Union Carbide Corporation (UCC) in the US District Court, which ordered a $5 million interim relief to be paid to the Indian Red Cross Society for Bhopal gas victims, stating the amount was an advance payment and would be set‑off against any final judgment. After the US case was dismissed on for

S.K. MUKHERJEEversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

1994 INSC 2963 August 1994Dismissed

The petitioner, appointed as a temporary Staff Officer‑cum‑Instructor in the West Bengal Directorate of Civil Defence in 1965, claimed to be a member of the Civil Defence Corps and sought uniform service conditions under the Central Civil Defence Act, 1968. He argued that the Central Government, which can frame regulat

RAMLAL KHURANA (DEAD) BY LRS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.

1989 INSC 2263 August 1989Dismissed

R.L. Khurana, originally a clerk in the Punjab Police, was appointed as an Excise Sub‑Inspector and later reverted to his parent department. He obtained a decree from a civil court confirming his right to continue in the substantive Excise post, overturning the reversion. Subsequently, the Excise Commissioner retired h

SAIYAD MOHD. SAIYAD UMAR SAIYED AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

1995 INSC 2413 April 1995Appeal(s) allowed

Three appellants were arrested in Gujarat and, after a police search, charas was seized from them. They were convicted under Section 20 of the NDPS Act and Sections 65 and 66 of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The appellants argued that the police had not informed them of their right, under Section 50 of the NDPS Act, to b

BURN STANDARD COMPANY LIMITEDversusMCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL INC. AND ANOTHER

1991 INSC 873 April 1991Dismissed

Burn Standard Company Ltd., a Government undertaking, entered into a technical collaboration agreement with McDermott International Inc. to obtain foreign technical know‑how, requiring RBI permission under Section 28(1)(b) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (FERA). The agreement received approval from the Sec

GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ETC. ETC.versusP. DILIP KUMAR AND ANR. ETC. ETC.

1993 INSC 363 February 1993

The Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission advertised 60 vacancies for Deputy Executive Engineers and, following Rule 4 of the Andhra Pradesh Engineering Service Rules, gave preference to candidates with post‑graduate qualifications. Graduates who scored higher marks were excluded, leading to challenges in the Admini

OXFORD ENGLISH SCHOOLversusTHE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS. ETC.

1995 INSC 4342 August 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The Oxford English School challenged the acquisition of its land by the Government of Tamil Nadu. A notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was published on 8 September 1982 and a declaration under Section 6 was issued on 19 December 1983 (published 15 February 1984). The school obtained a sta

COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHANDIGARHversusM/S. STEEL STRIPS LTD. SANGRUR

1995 INSC 3242 May 1995Dismissed

The assessees, M/s Steel Strips Ltd., manufactured cold‑rolled steel strips from hot‑rolled strips, which under Central Excise Tariff Item 26AA attracted a higher duty (Rs 650/MT) than hot‑rolled strips (Rs 450/MT). The excise authorities contended that the cold‑rolled strips were the result of a distinct manufacturing

THE HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.versusGOVERNOR OF ORISSA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 1572 March 1995Appeal(s) allowed

Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. entered into a dam‑construction contract with the Government of Orissa. A dispute over escalation charges and other sums exceeding Rs 1 crore was referred to an Arbitration Tribunal, which directed the State to refer the matter to a Special Arbitration Tribunal under the proviso to sub‑s

MOSTT. SIMRIKHIAversusSMT. DOLLEY MUKHERJEE @ SMT. CHHABI MUKHERJEE & ANR.

1990 INSC 732 March 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant filed a private complaint for offences under IPC sections 323 and 452 before a Judicial Magistrate First Class, who transferred the case to a Second Class Magistrate for enquiry under CrPC sections 192(2) and 202. The Second Class Magistrate issued process against the respondents, who challenged the issua

B!JAYA KUMAR AGARWALA ETC.versusSTATE OF ORISSA

1996 INSC 8151 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants Bijaya Kumar Agarwala and Jagdish Prasad were stopped while transporting paddy in trucks that exceeded the quantity permitted for storage under the Orissa Rice and Paddy Control Order, 1965, and were convicted under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 for allegedly storing the commodity with

SATISH CHANDRAversusUNION OF INDIA

1994 INSC 2951 August 1994Disposed off

Satish Chandra challenged Sections 4, 5, 16, 21 and 27 of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988 on the grounds that Parliament lacked competence to create the Company Law Board (CLB) and that the Act failed to protect minority shareholders. The petition argued that the power under Section 397 of the Companies Act, 1956 w

BOBBY ART INTERNATIONALversusOM PAL SINGH HOON AND ORS.

1996 INSC 5951 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The film "Bandit Queen", based on the life of Phoolan Devi, was certified 'A' by the Appellate Tribunal under the Cinematograph Act after it was found to depict the consequences of social evils such as rape and oppression. The petitioner, Bobby Art International, challenged the High Court's order that quashed the certi

I. VIKHESHE SEMAversusHOKISHE SEMA

1996 INSC 6011 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed

In the 1993 Nagaland Legislative Assembly election for Dimapur Constituency No.1, Vikheshe Sema was declared winner by a margin of 137 votes over Hokishe Sema. The respondent filed an election petition alleging that duplicate entries in the electoral roll had allowed some voters to cast more than one vote, thereby mate

GUJARAT UNIVERSITYversusRAJIV GOPINATH BHATT AND ORS.

1996 INSC 5961 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed

Gujarat University prescribed a rule for admission to its limited super‑speciality (M.Ch./D.M.) courses giving first preference to its own graduates, second preference to other Gujarat‑state university graduates, and leaving any remaining vacancies unfilled. Rajiv G. Bhatt, not a Gujarat University graduate, was denied

S.P. VAITHIANATHANversusK. SHANMUGANATHAN

1994 INSC 991 March 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an arrack shop in‑charge, complained to senior police officials that the Additional Superintendent of Police, K. Shanmuganan, was colluding with illicit distillers. The respondent summoned the appellant, beat him and later tortured him. The appellant filed a criminal complaint under several IPC sections.

M/S. WARDEN AND CO., (INDIA) PVT. LIU.versusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, THANE

1995 INSC 901 February 1995Dismissed

M/s. Warden and Co. (India) Pvt. Ltd. manufactures fibre drums whose cylindrical side is paper, while the lids and bottom are plywood reinforced with steel rings. The company sought to have the drums classified under Central Excise Tariff Item No. 17(4) and to claim exemption under Notification No. 66/1982. The Assista

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR.versusRAKESH MENON AND ANR. ETC. ETC.

1995 INSC 881 February 1995Appeal(s) allowed

A Division Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the State could not reduce the minimum qualifying marks in General English for admission to medical and dental colleges to create seats for SC/ST candidates. The State of Madhya Pradesh filed Special Leave Petitions challenging that order. The Supreme Court, r

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search