Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

Judgments of 2001

520 judgments, newest first — showing 1–200.

P. NIRATHILINGAMversusANNAYA NADAR AND ORS.

2001 INSC 54431 October 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a debtor, mortgaged land and later applied to the Special Tahsildar under the Tamil Nadu Debt Relief Act, 1980 for relief. The creditor, having been assigned the mortgage, opposed the application and filed a civil suit for recovery of the mortgage amount. The Special Tahsildar, after inquiry, granted rel

GANESH LALversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2001 INSC 54531 October 2001Dismissed

The appellant Ganesh Lal was convicted for raping, murdering and stealing from an 11‑year‑old girl. The prosecution relied on a series of circumstantial facts: the recovery of the victim's silver ornaments (kuralias) and a blood‑stained axe at the accused's direction, possession of blood‑ and semen‑stained clothes hidd

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusADANI EXPORTS LTD. AND ANR.

2001 INSC 54631 October 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India and others appealed against the Gujarat High Court’s order allowing special civil applications filed by Adani Exports Ltd. and others seeking the benefit of a Pass‑Book Scheme under the Import‑Export Policy for shrimp exports. The central issue was whether the Gujarat High Court at Ahmedabad possesse

SRI KEMPAIAHversusLINGAIAH AND ORS.

2001 INSC 54731 October 2001Dismissed

The landlord, Sri Kempaiah, filed an eviction petition under the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961, claiming a reasonable and bonafide requirement for the premises and alleging arrears of rent. The trial court allowed eviction on the basis of bonafide requirement but rejected the landlord’s claim of arrears because he c

RAM PRAKASH PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR.

2001 INSC 41031 August 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, husband of a murder victim, challenged the Allahabad High Court's order granting bail to Respondent No.2, a life‑convicted prisoner who, while on bail pending appeal, allegedly murdered the appellant's wife. The High Court had granted bail despite Section 437(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, w

TAMIL NADU WAKF BOARDversusHATHIJA AMMAL (DEAD) BY LRS. ETC. ETC.

2001 INSC 41131 August 2001Dismissed

The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board filed nine suits seeking possession of properties it claimed were public wakf, based on a 19th‑century deed. The defendants argued that the properties were not listed in the Wakf Board's notification under Section 5(2) of the Wakf Act, 1954, and had been sold in revenue auctions. The trial cou

S. NAGALINGAMversusSIVAGAMI

2001 INSC 41331 August 2001Dismissed

The appellant, S. Nagalingam, was first married to Sivagami on 6 September 1970. While that marriage subsisted, he contracted a second marriage with Kasturi on 18 June 1984 in a temple in Tamil Nadu, where garlanding and tying of the thali were performed. The trial court acquitted him, holding that the essential "Sapta

RAVINDER KUMAR AND ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2001 INSC 41431 August 2001Dismissed

The appellants, Ravinder Kumar and Surinder Kumar, were convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for killing broker Amar Kumar Gupta, concealing the body in a wooden parcel, and were sentenced to life imprisonment. They appealed, contending that the FIR was filed two days after the crime, that the rickshaw‑puller’s te

BIRENDERA KUMAR DUBEY AND ANR.versusGIRJA NANDAN DUBEY AND ORS.

2001 INSC 41531 August 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a second appeal (Civil Appeal No. 6060 of 2001) filed by Birendra Kumar Dubey and another against a judgment of the Patna High Court that had set aside the first appellate court's decision and restored the trial court's decree. The High Court had entertained the second appeal without first fr

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.versusMANISHA DWIVEDI AND ANR.

2001 INSC 41631 August 2001Dismissed

The State of U.P. and others filed special leave petitions under Article 136 of the Constitution against interlocutory orders of the Allahabad High Court dated 2 September 1999 and 12 January 2000. The petitions were filed more than a year after the latter order, and the petitioners could not explain the delay. The Sup

SMITA CONDUCTORS LTD.versusEURO ALLOYS LTD.

2001 INSC 41731 August 2001Dismissed

Smita Conductors Ltd. (appellant) and Euro Alloys Ltd. (respondent) entered into contracts for the supply of aluminium rods that contained an arbitration clause but were never signed by the appellant. The appellant opened irrevocable letters of credit and made shipments, but later invoked a force‑majeure clause after R

NILANGSHU BHUSHAN BASU ETC.versusDEB K. SINHA AND ORS. ETC.

2001 INSC 41831 August 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The Calcutta Municipal Corporation needed to fill the post of Chief Municipal Engineer (Civil) and selected Nilangshu Bhushan Basu by direct recruitment in consultation with the State Public Service Commission, as permitted by the Calcutta Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 and the 1985 Rules. The Calcutta High Court set

SHYAM SUNDER AND ANR.versusRAM KUMAR AND ANR.

2001 INSC 32331 July 2001Dismissed

The appellants purchased agricultural land from vendors and the respondents, as co‑sharers, filed a suit claiming a statutory right of pre‑emption. The trial court decreed in favour of the respondents and they deposited the purchase money under Order 20 Rule 14 CPC. While the appeal was pending, the Haryana Amendment A

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER AND ORS.versusTATA IRON AND STEEL CO. AND ANR.

2001 INSC 32431 July 2001Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the Cess and Other Taxes on Minerals (Validation) Act, 1992 to determine whether it merely validated cess and tax already collected under invalid State laws or also authorised fresh levy and collection of amounts due up to 4 April 1991. The Court held that the Act validates only the levy and

NEERAJ KAPOORversusRANBIR SINGH DAHIYA AND ORS.

2001 INSC 32731 July 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute concerned a 3‑sq‑yard municipal plot in Sonepat leased by the Municipal Committee to Prem Kumar Sardana, who sub‑let the ground floor to Janak Raj Kapoor (now the appellant) and the first floor to the first respondent. After the Haryana Government’s 1991 policy to grant direct leases to sub‑lessees, the fir

RONAL KIPRONO RAMKATversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2001 INSC 32531 July 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Ramkat Ronald, was convicted under IPC sections 376 (rape) read with 511 (attempt to commit rape) and 302 (murder) based largely on a dying declaration allegedly made by the deceased, Betty, to her brother (PW‑5). The Supreme Court examined the reliability of that declaration, noting inconsistencies, lac

GOPI NATH @ JHALLARversusSTATE OF U.P.

2001 INSC 32831 July 2001Dismissed

The appellant Gopi Nath was convicted of murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the killing of Ram Chandra, who was attacked by three accused armed with weapons. The appellant argued that he only inflicted a simple injury and should be liable only under Section 324, not for murder. T

DHYAN INVESTMENTS AND TRADING CO. LTD.versusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND ORS.

2001 INSC 32931 July 2001Disposed off

The Central Bureau of Investigation filed a criminal case before the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) alleging conspiracy by Dhy An Investments and Trading Co. Ltd. The company sought transfer of the case from one Special Court judge to another, invoking Section 407 of the Crimin

V.S. ACHUTHANANDANversusP. J. FRANCIS AND ANR.

2001 INSC 5731 January 2001Appeal(s) allowed

In the 1996 Kerala Legislative Assembly election for the Mararikulam constituency, P.J. Francis was declared elected, defeating V.S. Achuthanandan by 1,965 votes. Achuthanandan filed an election petition alleging corrupt practices, improper reception of void votes, and violations of the Constitution and the Representat

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS, ETC. ETC.versusTHANTHI TRUST ETC. ETC.

2001 INSC 5831 January 2001Case Partly allowed

The Thanthi Trust, created in 1954 to run a Tamil daily newspaper, claimed tax exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the newspaper's income, arguing that surplus earnings were used for charitable purposes such as education and relief of the poor. The Income Tax Officer disallowed the exemption for

SOUTH MALABAR GRAMIN BANKversusCO-ORDINATION COMMITTEE OF SOUTH MALABAR GRAM IN BANK H1PLOYEES UNION AND SOUTH MALABAR GRAMIN BANK OFFICERS FEDERATION AND ORS.

2001 INSC 5931 January 2001Disposed off

The case arose from writ petitions under Article 32 seeking pay parity for employees of South Malabar Gramin Bank (a Regional Rural Bank) with employees of nationalised commercial banks. A National Industrial Tribunal, chaired by Justice S. Obul Reddi, awarded parity based on the 4th and 5th Bipartite Settlements and t

S.N. DHINGRA AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2001 INSC 6031 January 2001Dismissed

The petitioners, who were direct recruits to the Delhi Higher Judicial Service (DHJS) in 1988, challenged a gradation list prepared by the Delhi High Court that included five promotee respondents appointed as Chief Metropolitan Magistrates in 1986. The respondents argued that their appointments, though labelled "fortui

STATE OF PUNJABversusRAGHBIR CHAND SHARMA AND ANR.

2001 INSC 53530 October 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Punjab issued a notification for the post of Assistant Advocate General and prepared a select panel of three candidates. The first candidate accepted the offer, was appointed, and later resigned; the second candidate declined the appointment. The State then appointed the second respondent from the service

PARMESHWAR PRASADversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2001 INSC 53630 October 2001Dismissed

Parmeshw ar Prasad, a Bihar Statistical Service officer, was recommended for appointment to the IAS cadre by selection under the IAS (Appointment by Selection) Regulations, 1956. The State Scrutiny Committee failed to hold meetings for short‑listing candidates for 1994‑95 and 1995‑96, and in 1996 his name was rejected

B.D. SHETTY AND ORS.versusM/S. CEAT LTD. AND ANR.

2001 INSC 53730 October 2001Leave Granted & Allowed

The workmen (appellants) left their original trade union, were falsely accused of assault, arrested and suspended, and a domestic inquiry was initiated under the Model Standing Orders. They obtained a stay of the domestic inquiry from the Labour Court pending the criminal trial, after which the employer reduced their s

STATE OF TAMIL NADUversusPARAMASIVA PANDIAN

2001 INSC 53830 October 2001Leave Granted & Dismissed

Special Courts were created under the Essential Commodities (Special Provisions) Act, 1981 to try offences under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, and later were also empowered to try NDPS offences. The EC (Special Provisions) Act lapsed in 1998, causing those courts to lose jurisdiction over EC cases, although they

ANTONYSAMIversusARULANANDAM PILLAI (D) BY LRS. AND ANR.

2001 INSC 53930 October 2001Dismissed

The appellant, Antonysami, obtained a decree for specific performance of a sale, directing the judgment debtor to measure and demarcate the land by 23‑Sep‑1966 and to deposit the balance price by the same date. The appellant complied with the deposit, but the debtor delayed the measurement until 1973. An execution peti

SANTOSH YADAVversusNARENDER SINGH

2001 INSC 53330 October 2001Dismissed

In the 2000 Haryana Assembly election for the Ateli constituency, the appellant Santosh Yadav (INLD) lost to Narender Singh (INC) by a margin of 334 votes. Yadav challenged the result, alleging that the election was materially affected by the improper acceptance of the nomination of independent candidate Naresh Yadav,

ASIA RESORTS LTD.versusUSHA BRECO LTD.

2001 INSC 54030 October 2001Disposed off

Asia Resorts Ltd. contracted Usha Breco Ltd. to install a ropeway system which failed to meet specifications. Asia Resorts issued a notice on 17 April 1990 and received a definitive denial on 17 May 1990, after which it filed a petition under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act on 30 November 1993. The Supreme Court held

MANAGEMENT OF M/S. MYSORE STRUCTURALS LTD. AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.

2001 INSC 54130 October 2001Disposed off

MIS Mysore Structurals Ltd. terminated three workmen, prompting an industrial dispute. The Labour Court awarded reinstatement with back wages, an award that became final but was not implemented by the company. The workers' union sought and obtained sanction under Section 34 of the Industrial Disputes Act to prosecute t

THANEDAR SINGHversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2001 INSC 53430 October 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Thanedar Singh, was convicted for murder by the Madhya Pradesh High Court after the trial court had acquitted him. The Supreme Court examined whether the High Court erred in overturning the acquittal, focusing on the credibility of the eye‑witness (the victim's father), the correctness and timing of the

JOHN MATHAI ABRRAHAMversusM/S. BRITISH PHYSICAL LAB. INDIA LTD.

2001 INSC 54230 October 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, John Mathai Abraham, owned a fractional undivided share in a large building in Bangalore and sought eviction of the respondent, British Physical Lab India Ltd, under Section 21(1)(h) of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961, claiming a bona fide need for personal residence and professional use. The Rent C

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BOMBAY CITY-III, BOMBAYversusBRITISH BANK OF MIDDLE EAST

2001 INSC 40830 August 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The British Bank of Middle East, a non‑resident banking company, provided free cars to its employees for the assessment years 1975‑76 and 1976‑77. The assessing officer disallowed the perquisite value of the cars under Section 40A(5) of the Income‑Tax Act, estimating it at 50% of the actual running expenses. The Commis

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, NEW DELHIversusPARASRAMPURIA SYNTHETICS LTD.

2001 INSC 40930 August 2001Appeal(s) allowed

Parasrampuria Synthetic Ltd imported a large number of printed drawings, designs and plans under a foreign technology‑transfer agreement for setting up a polyester plant. The importer claimed that the items fell within Serial No. 10 of Customs Notification No. 25/95 (dated 16‑03‑1995), which provides a nil rate of duty

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR.versusM/S BANALATA INVESTMENT PVT. LTD. AND ANR.

2001 INSC 23330 April 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The State of West Bengal sought to evict Mis Banalata Investment Pvt. Ltd. and others from premises it claimed as government property. The Calcutta High Court held that the eviction could only be effected under the West Bengal (Public Land Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1962 and not under the West Bengal Gove

SRI MOHAN WAHIversusCOMMISSIONER, INCOME TAX, VARANASI AND ORS

2001 INSC 18730 March 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a partnership firm, owned a house property that was attached and proclaimed for sale under tax recovery proceedings. The property was auctioned in 1980 and a bid was accepted, but the tax demands against the firm were later reduced to nil after successful appeals before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusRAKESH KUMAR

2001 INSC 18830 March 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a former constable of the Border Security Force (BSF), resigned after 12 years and 8 months of service under Rule 19 of the BSF Rules, 1969. The Government of India, relying on a 1995 Government Order, granted him full pensionary benefits, which were not released, leading to a writ petition and subseque

C/M. ST. JOHN INTER COLLEGEversusGIRDHARI SINGH AND ORS.

2001 INSC 18930 March 2001Case Allowed

C/M. St. John Inter College, a minority educational institution under Article 30, terminated the services of its employees without obtaining prior approval of the Inspector as required by Section 16G(3)(a) of the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 and Regulation 44. The Allahabad High Court set aside the termination

BABUA@ TAZMUL HOSSAINversusTHE STATE OF ORISSA

2001 INSC 5130 January 2001Dismissed

The petitioner, Babua, was charged under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 for allegedly abetting a conspiracy to possess and sell cannabis and other drugs. The charge was based on statements of a co‑accused who said Babua worked for the alleged drug dealer. The petitioner applied for bail, argui

M/S LAKSHMANI STONE PRODUCTS AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2001 INSC 5330 January 2001Dismissed

The appellants, Lakshmani Stone Products, operated stone quarries and performed crushing of stones. They challenged the applicability of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, arguing that no notification under Section 4 had listed stone quarries in the Schedule, and therefore the Act sh

M/S. L AND T MC NEILL TD. ETC. ETCversusGOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU

2001 INSC 5530 January 2001Case Allowed

The Government of Tamil Nadu issued a notification under Section 10(1) of the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970 prohibiting the use of contract labour for sweeping and scavenging in establishments employing fifty or more workers. Mis. Landt Mc Neil Ltd. challenged the notification, alleging that the St

JATINDER SINGHversusRANJIT KAUR

2001 INSC 5630 January 2001Dismissed

Ranjit Kaur filed a criminal complaint against Jatinder Singh under IPC 494 for bigamy and against four others under IPC 109 for abetment. The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the complaint for default because the complainant was absent, and she subsequently filed a second complaint with the same allegations before the sa

M/S. PHOENIX INTERNATIONAL LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, DISTT. RAIGAD, MAHARASHTRA

2001 INSC 58829 November 2001Dismissed

Phoenix International Ltd, a footwear exporter, obtained a Value Based Advance Licence (VBAL) permitting duty‑free import of "printed PVC" (PVC leather cloth) under Notification No. 79/95‑Cus, Section 25(1) of the Customs Act. The customs officer classified the imported sheets as "shoe uppers" (heading 6406.10) because

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, NEW DELHIversusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

2001 INSC 58729 November 2001Dismissed

The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) failed to deduct tax at source on interest paid to flat buyers, leading to a tax demand for assessment years 1987-88, 1988-89 and 1989-90. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal set aside the assessments, held the payments were not "interest" within Section 2(28A), and ordered a refund.

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusAVTAR SINGH AND ORS.

2001 INSC 40529 August 2001Appeal(s) allowed

Brigadier Avtar Singh (Respondent) had adverse remarks recorded in his Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) for 1990-91 and 1991-92, which were partially expunged on appeal. He was empanelled for promotion to Major General in April 1995 but, due to the absence of a vacancy, retired as a Brigadier in December 1995. He fil

STATE OF U.P.versusSHAMBHU NATH SINGH AND ORS.

2001 INSC 18529 March 2001Disposed off

The State of Uttar Pradesh prosecuted Shambhu Nath Singh and others for murder and related offences under IPC sections 302, 307 and 149. The prosecution’s key eye‑witness, PW‑1, was examined in chief but his cross‑examination was repeatedly postponed despite his presence on numerous dates, while the accused were often

SUBHASH CHANDER ETC. ETC.versusKRISHAN LAL AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

2001 INSC 18629 March 2001Disposed off

The case arose from a long‑standing feud between the families of Bhagwan Ram and Krishan Lal. On the night of 21‑22 August 1992 the accused entered Bhagwan Ram's house and fired indiscriminately, killing Bhagwan Ram, his son Sunder Ram and his mother Chando Devi, and injuring Subhash Chander (PW2) and his sister Raj Ku

UDAY MOHANLAL ACHARYAversusSTATE OF MAHARASIITRA

2001 INSC 18429 March 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was remanded to judicial custody for offences under the IPC and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act. After the statutory 60‑day period for filing a charge‑sheet elapsed, he applied for bail, asserting the indefeasible right under the proviso to Section 167(2) of the CrPC. The Special

STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.versusMD. KHALIQUE AND ANR.

2001 INSC 58428 November 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Bihar filed an FIR alleging that six government revenue officers colluded with two private individuals to forge assessment orders under the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1955, thereby misappropriating state funds. The FIR, registered under IPC sections 419, 420, 467 and 120B, named eight accused. The Patna High

SUKHAN RAUT AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

2001 INSC 58528 November 2001Disposed off

The incident occurred on 21 July 1981 when a group of accused, armed with lathis, entered the field of Sardari Raut and Hakim Raut to forcibly dispossess them of land. During the confrontation, Sukhan Raut ordered Bhaiya Mani Raut to strike Sardari Raut, who received a blow to the head and later died, allegedly after a

S. SUNDARESA PAI AND ORS.versusMRS. SUMANGALA T. PAI AND ANR.

2001 INSC 58628 November 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, a daughter of the deceased Indira Bai, sued her siblings and father claiming a one-sixth share of the estate, alleging the will dated 26 August 1981 was forged. The trial court upheld the will based on attesting witnesses, but the Kerala High Court set aside that finding, deeming the will "unnatural" due

SHAILENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.

2001 INSC 58328 November 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant alleged that his mother was murdered and the accused were charged under Sections 148, 149, 323, 449 and 302 of the IPC. The Sessions Judge closed the prosecution evidence because the appellant did not request further examination of witnesses. After the case was transferred, a new Sessions Judge recalled t

STATE OF PUNJABversusNAIB DIN

2001 INSC 47028 September 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Punjab convicted Naib Din under Section 9 of the Opium Act for possession of opium, relying in part on affidavits of two police officers who had handled the seized sample. The High Court, on revision, quashed the conviction because the affidavits were not cross‑examined and their contents were not put to t

ADDHAversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

2001 INSC 47128 September 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Addha was convicted of murder (Section 302 IPC) for allegedly striking the deceased Sher Singh with a lathi during a sudden quarrel between two groups. The prosecution's case relied on the testimony of PW‑1, who did not specifically state that Addha caused the fatal head injury, only that he struck the ri

KALYAN AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P.

2001 INSC 47228 September 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were charged with murder and related offences under Sections 302, 307, 147, 148, 149 and 1208 of the IPC for an incident alleged to have occurred on 27 June 1977 in Badayun, Uttar Pradesh. The trial court acquitted all accused, holding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt

DANIAL LATIFI AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA

2001 INSC 46828 September 2001Dismissed

The petitioners, a group of Muslim women, challenged the constitutional validity of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, arguing that it discriminated against them by excluding Muslim divorced women from the protection of Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Court examined whether

HARSH DHINGRAversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS,

2001 INSC 46928 September 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned allotments of land under the discretionary quota of the Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1988, Section 30. The Punjab & Haryana High Court had earlier laid down principles for such allotments in S.R. Dass (1988) and later in Anil Sabharwal (1997) introduced new principles, refusing to apply t

SRI T. PHUNZATHANGversusSRI HANGKHANILIAN AND ORS.

2001 INSC 40028 August 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Sri T. Phunzathang, filed an election petition challenging the election of Sri Hangkhanilian on the ground of alleged corrupt practice under Section 123 of the Representation of People Act, 1951. The respondent contended that the copies of affidavits served on him lacked the Oath Commissioner’s endorseme

MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIAversusSARANG AND ORS.

2001 INSC 40228 August 2001Disposed off

A medical student (respondent No.1) applied to migrate from a college in New Mumbai to a college in Aurangabad on medical grounds. The Medical Council of India (MCI) allowed the migration subject to Regulation 6(5) of its 1997 Graduate Medical Education Regulations, which requires the student to complete 18 months of p

PUNJAB UNIVERSITYversusV.N. TRIPATHI AND ANR.

2001 INSC 40328 August 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The Punjab University filed appeals against trial court judgments in suits brought by Dr. V.N. Tripathi and Shimla Devi, with the University’s Registrar acting as the appellant. The respondents contended that the Registrar lacked authority to file the appeals without a prior resolution of the Senate, leading the lower

MIS. BIRLA CEMENT WORKSversusTHE CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES AND ORS.

2001 INSC 12628 February 2001Appeal(s) allowed

Birla Cement Works, a cement manufacturer, paid transport operators for carriage of its goods without deducting tax at source under Section 194C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) issued a circular on 8 March 1994 extending the applicability of Section 194C to all contracts, including

JAYALAKSHMI COELHOversusOSWALD JOSEPH COELHO

2001 INSC 12728 February 2001

Jayalakshmi Coelho and Oswald Joseph Coelho, married under the Special Marriage Act, executed a mutual‑consent divorce agreement on 26 July 1991 that also dealt with property and child‑custody matters. Their petition for divorce sought only a decree of divorce, and the Family Court granted it without incorporating the

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR.versusM/S. NAV BHARAT CONSTRUCTION CO.

2001 INSC 58227 November 2001Disposed off

The State of Rajasthan appealed against an arbitration award that granted the contractor, M/s Nav Bharat Construction Co., interest of 18% on delayed payments. The contractor had also obtained a district court award of 15% interest, both of which were confirmed by the Rajasthan High Court. The appellant argued that the

SATVIR SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.

2001 INSC 46427 September 2001Disposed off

The case involved Tejinder Pal Kaur, who attempted suicide after alleged dowry‑related cruelty by her husband Satvir Singh and his parents. The trial court convicted the accused under Section 116 read with Sections 306 and 304B IPC and under Section 498A IPC. On appeal, the Supreme Court held that Section 306 IPC punis

DR. T. V. JOSEversusCHACKO P.M. @ THANKACHAN AND ORS.

2001 INSC 46527 September 2001Dismissed

A passenger died in a car accident on 9 April 1987. The claimants filed a suit before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal against the appellant (Dr. T.V. Jose), the driver and the insurer. The appellant asserted that he had transferred ownership of the car before the accident, but the transfer was never recorded in the

LAXMAN DUNDAPPA DHAMONEKAR AND ANR.versusMANAGEMENT OF VISHWA BHARATA SEVA SAMITI AND ANR.

2001 INSC 46627 September 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, appointed as assistant teachers in a private government‑aided school, were terminated on the ground of unauthorised absence and alleged lack of approval of their appointments by the Director of Public Instructions. They challenged the termination before the Tribunal, which ordered reinstatement; the man

SUGARBAI M. SIDDIQ AND ORS.versusRAMESH S. HANKARE (D) BY LRS.

2001 INSC 46727 September 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The landlords (appellants) sued the tenant (respondents) for eviction under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, 1947, alleging non‑payment of rent for the six‑month period January‑June 1978. A notice of demand was served on 14 July 1978, giving the tenant until 14 August 1978 to pay. The tena

GOVT. OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.versusMOHD. GHOUSE MONINUDDIN AND ORS.

2001 INSC 39727 August 2001Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined appeals filed by the Government of Andhra Pradesh against an Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal order that directed re‑determination of seniority and promotion for non‑gazetted posts in the Commercial Tax, Revenue and Police Departments. The Tribunal had held that the State Government's 1

MIS. AMBALAL SARABHAI ENTERPRISES LTD.versusMIS. AMRIT LAL AND CO. AND ANR.

2001 INSC 39827 August 2001Dismissed

The landlord filed an eviction petition against the tenant under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 on the ground of illegal sub‑letting. While the petition was pending, Section 3(c) of the Act was amended (effective 1‑Dec‑1988) to exclude premises with rent above Rs 3,500 from the Act’s jurisdiction. The tenant argued t

M/S. BHASKAR INDUSTRIES LTD.versusM/S. BHIWANI DENIM AND APPARELS LTD. AND ORS.

2001 INSC 39927 August 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Bhaskar Industries Ltd., filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act before a Judicial Magistrate in Bhopal. The magistrate issued summons, and when the second accused, Bhiwani Denim and Apparels Ltd., failed to appear, he applied for exemption from personal appearance under Sec

LAXMIDAS BAPUDASS DARBAR AND ANR.versusSMT. RUDRAVVA ORS.

2001 INSC 39627 August 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, owners of a 99‑year lease of non‑agricultural land, sought eviction of the lessees under Section 21(1)(h) of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, claiming a bona‑fide requirement for their own business. The trial court allowed the petition, but the district court held the lease to be perpetual and dismissed

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, COIMBATORE AND ORS.versusJAWAHAR MILLS LTD. AND ORS.

2001 INSC 32227 July 2001Dismissed

Jawahar Mills Ltd. and other manufacturers claimed Modvat credit for duty paid on items such as power cables, capacitors, control panels, switches and air compressors, treating them as "capital goods" under Explanation to Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Revenue disallowed the claim, but the Customs, Exc

ASSURANCE CO., SHIMLAversusKAMLA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

2001 INSC 17827 March 2001Disposed off

An accident on 1 March 1993 involving a truck driven by Liaqat Ali resulted in three deaths. The insurer, New India Assurance Co., claimed it was not liable for third‑party compensation because the driver allegedly held a forged licence, constituting a breach of the insurance policy. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal

E.L.D. PARRY (I) LTDversusG. OMKAR MURTHY AND ORS.

2001 INSC 17927 March 2001Dismissed

The respondents, former employees of E.I.D. Parry (I) Ltd., retired under a voluntary scheme in 1984 and received gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Because their monthly wages exceeded Rs 1,000, they were not covered by the definition of "employee" in Section 2(e) of the Central Act, and therefore could

HANUMAN PRASAD BAGRI AND ORS.versusBAGRESS CEREALS PVT. LTD. AND ORS.

2001 INSC 18027 March 2001Dismissed

A petition under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 was filed by several shareholders alleging oppression and mismanagement, including the illegal removal of a director and unfair share valuation. The Company Judge found the grievance legitimate, ordered the petitioners to sell their shares at a valuation,

V.M.KURIANversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS.

2001 INSC 18127 March 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a resident adjoining a plot owned by the 5th respondent, challenged the Kerala State Government's orders granting exemption from the Kerala Municipal Building Rules, 1968 for the construction of an eight‑storeyed building. The exemption was issued despite the application not being processed through the G

MARUTI WIRE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.versusS.T.O.1ST CIRCLE, MATTANCHERRY AND ORS.

2001 INSC 17727 March 2001Case Allowed

Maruti Wire Industries Pvt Ltd supplied imported tallow to Tata Oil Mills but failed to file a return of turnover under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. The Sales Tax Officer assessed the tax, which was paid, and later demanded penal interest under Section 23(3) for the period from the due date of the return to

B. KANDASAMY REDDJAR ETC.versusO GOMATHI AMMAL

2001 INSC 18227 March 2001Dismissed

The landlady, owner of Gomathi Lodge, filed eviction proceedings against several tenants seeking demolition and reconstruction of the premises under Section 14(1)(b) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, and later amended the petition to claim additional accommodation under Section 10(3)(c). T

LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND MANDAL REVENUE OFFICERversusV. NARASAIAH

2001 INSC 11827 February 2001Dismissed

The State, represented by the Land Acquisition Officer and Mandal Revenue Officer, sought to acquire 7.35 acres of land and initially valued it at Rs 17,200 per acre. The District Court enhanced the valuation to Rs 65,762 per acre, and the Andhra Pradesh High Court further raised it to Rs 75,000 per acre, relying on ce

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.versusBHAJAN SINGH AND ANR.

2001 INSC 12227 February 2001Dismissed

The respondent, Bhabhan Singh, was elected President of a municipal council in Samrala, Punjab, but the State Government failed to publish a notification of his election as required by Section 24(2) of the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911. The Principal Secretary also issued a show‑cause notice and later a notification remov

KANHAI MISHRA @ KANHAIYA MISARversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2001 INSC 11927 February 2001Appeal(s) allowed

KanHai Mishra was convicted by the trial court and the Patna High Court for the rape and murder of Rita Kumari, based solely on six alleged circumstantial facts. The Supreme Court examined whether those circumstances satisfied the legal test that circumstantial evidence must be wholly inconsistent with the accused's in

STATE OF GUJARATversusUMEDBHAI M. PATEL

2001 INSC 12327 February 2001Dismissed

The respondent, an Executive Engineer in Gujarat, was suspended pending disciplinary proceedings and was compulsorily retired under Rule 161(1)(i)(aa) of the Bombay Civil Services Rules, 1959. The High Court set aside the retirement order, holding it punitive because it was passed without a completed enquiry and withou

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAIversusBHUPEN CHAMPAK LAL DALAL AND ANR. ETC.

2001 INSC 12427 February 2001

Criminal proceedings under the Income‑Tax Act were instituted against the respondents while appeals against the income‑tax assessments were pending before the Income‑Tax Appellate Tribunal. The respondents sought a stay of the criminal case, which was granted by the Metropolitan Magistrate, affirmed by the Sessions Cou

M/S. DAMODAR MANGALJI AND CO. ETC.versusTHE REGIONAL DIRECTOR

2001 INSC 12527 February 2001Dismissed

The mining company Damodar Mangalji & Co. challenged a 1977 notification issued by the Government of Goa, Daman & Diu under the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, arguing that the Act should not apply to mining establishments because the term "mine" should be limited to the ore‑extraction site and the "appropriate G

MARIYAM BEGUMversusBASHEERUNNISA BEGUM AND ORS.

2001 INSC 46226 September 2001Disposed off

The landlady filed three eviction petitions against the tenant under the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960, alleging wilful default in rent and unauthorised sub‑letting. The tenant contended that, because an interlocutory application under Section 11 was pending, she was justified in

KIZHAKKAYIL SUHARA AND ORS.versusMANHANTAVIDA ABOOBACKER (D) BY LRS. AND ANR.

2001 INSC 46326 September 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, legal representatives of a deceased tenant, occupied a shop room. The landlords sought eviction under Section 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, claiming a bona‑fide need for the premises to be used by their daughter and son‑in‑law. The tenants contested, arguing that the

MAHABIR SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2001 INSC 32026 July 2001Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the murder trial of Ranbir Singh and three co‑accused, where the trial court convicted Ranbir Singh under Section 302 IPC and acquitted the others, but the High Court reversed the acquittals. The Court held that an omission in a statement under Section 161 CrPC can constitute a material contr

O.N.G.C. AND ANR.versusASSN. OF NATURAL GAS CONSUMING INDS. AND ORS.

2001 INSC 32126 July 2001Case Allowed

The Oil and Natural Gas Commission (ONGC) supplied natural gas to several industrial respondents under contracts that expired on 31 March 1979. The respondents challenged ONGC's attempt to renew the contracts at higher rates, and the Gujarat High Court, by interim order, directed ONGC to continue supply at the existing

ARVIND SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2001 INSC 23226 April 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved the death of Minta Devi, who was allegedly burnt to death by her husband Arvind Singh and his in‑laws. The trial court convicted all four accused under Sections 304B (dowry death) and 498A (cruelty) and sentenced them to life imprisonment; the High Court set aside the conviction of three relatives und

M.C.MEITTAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2001 INSC 17026 March 2001Modified

The Supreme Court, hearing M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, examined the failure of the Delhi government and private bus operators to meet its earlier order (28 July 1998) that the entire city bus fleet be converted to CNG by 31 March 2001 and that no bus older than eight years operate on diesel after 1 April 2000. Applic

SYNDICATE BANKversusMR. PRABHA D. NAIK AND ANR. ETC.

2001 INSC 17126 March 2001Dismissed

Syndicate Bank filed a suit in Goa to recover a loan advanced to Mr. Prabha D. Naik and others, alleging default on a promissory note. The trial court and the High Court dismissed the suit as barred by limitation, holding that the Portuguese Civil Code's Article 535 governed limitation in Goa. The Bank appealed, conten

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORSversusVATAN MEDICAL AND GENERAL STORE AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

2001 INSC 17226 March 2001Disposed off

The Rajasthan Government, by a 1990 notification, declared medicinal and toilet preparations containing more than 20% proof alcohol to be "liquor" under the Rajasthan Excise Act and its 1989 Rules. Several manufacturers of Ayurvedic medicines challenged the notification and the Rules as beyond the State's legislative c

CADILA HEALTH CARE LTD.versusCADILA PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.

2001 INSC 17326 March 2001Disposed off

Cadila Health Care Ltd. (appellant) and Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (respondent) are successor companies of the former Cadila Group, each manufacturing drugs for cerebral malaria under the brand names 'Falcigo' and 'Falcitab' respectively. The appellant sought an injunction on the ground that the similarity of the two

SMT. VIJAYALAKASHMAMMA AND ANR.versusB.T. SHANKAR

2001 INSC 17526 March 2001Disposed off

The deceased A.T. Nanjappa Rao left two widows, a senior and a junior, and no issue. The senior widow adopted B.T. Shankar, the plaintiff, without the junior widow's consent. The junior widow contested the adoption, arguing that under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 a widow must obtain the consent of a co

PATANGRAO KADAMversusPRITHVIRAJ SAYAJIRAO YADAV DESHMUKH AND ORS.

2001 INSC 11726 February 2001Dismissed

Patangrao Kadam challenged the election of Prithviraj Yadav Deshmukh in a Maharashtra Assembly by‑election, alleging corrupt practices under Sections 100(1)(b), 100(1)(d)(ii), 100(1)(d)(iv) read with Section 123(4) of the Representation of People Act, 1951. The petition also named Sampatrao Chavan, a duly nominated can

SATYA NARAYAN SHARMAversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2001 INSC 45525 September 2001Dismissed

The appellant was charged under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and the IPC, and obtained a stay of trial by filing a petition under CrPC Section 482 in the Rajasthan High Court, which was used to delay the trial for seven years. The High Court dismissed the petition, and the appellant appealed to the Supreme Co

RAM GULAM CHAUDHURY AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

2001 INSC 45625 September 2001Dismissed

The appellants were convicted of murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and related offences for the killing of Krishnanand Chaudhary, despite the victim's body not being produced. The appellants argued that the prosecution failed to prove the victim's death and that the lack of corpus delicti, non‑examination of the investigating offi

SMT. VINITHA ASHOKversusLAKSHMI HOSPITAL AND ORS.

2001 INSC 45725 September 2001Dismissed

The appellant, Vinitha Ashok, filed a consumer complaint alleging medical negligence after losing her uterus during a termination of pregnancy at Lakshmi Hospital. She claimed the doctors performed an unnecessary MTP without ultrasonography, used an improper cervical dilatation device, and failed to send the uterus for

THE BRAHMA VART SANATANversusKANHYALAL BAGLA AND OTHERS

2001 INSC 45825 September 2001Appeal(s) allowed

Durga Prasad Bagla executed a 1917 Will bequeathing all his estate to his third wife, Mst. Durgi, using the term "puree malik" indicating absolute ownership. After Durga's death, Durgi adopted Kanhaiya Lal, whose later suit sought possession of the property and declared Durgi's subsequent Will and settlement deed in fa

GURDIAL SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2001 INSC 45925 September 2001Appeal(s) allowed

Gurial Singh applied for a Freedom Fighters Pension under the 1972 scheme on 13 March 1973, providing various documents to prove his service in the Indian National Army. His claim was initially rejected, later a provisional pension was granted in 1998 by both the State of Punjab and the Central Government. Unsatisfied,

HEM CHAND AND ORS.versusHARI KISHAN ROHTAGI AND ORS.

2001 INSC 46025 September 2001Dismissed

The landlords (Hem Chand and others) filed a suit under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 seeking eviction of tenants and sub‑tenants on the ground of unauthorised sub‑letting. Only one sub‑tenant (respondent 5) was found to have been inducted without the landlord’s written consent, while six other sub‑tenants had been

TARLOCHAN DEV SHARMAversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

2001 INSC 30925 July 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Tarlochan Dev Sharma, was the elected President of Rajpura Municipality and was removed under Section 22 of the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 on the ground of "abuse of his powers" for allegedly withholding payment for a fogging machine. He contended that the machine was defective, that his decision was mad

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusSARDAR

2001 INSC 31425 July 2001

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed the acquittal of Sardar, who had been convicted of murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC. The High Court had set aside the conviction on the ground that, because two other accused had been given the benefit of doubt, Sardar should also receive the same benefit. Th

STATE OF HARYANAversusRAM SINGH

2001 INSC 31525 July 2001Dismissed

The State of Haryana acquired about 180 acres of land for a feeder project and awarded uniform compensation rates. The High Court, relying on a single sale deed, directed the State to pay Rs.1,72,000 per acre plus an additional Rs.30,000 for "potential value". The State appealed, arguing that certified copies of other

NAWAL KISHORE TULARAversusDINESH CHAND GUPTA AND ORS.

2001 INSC 31025 July 2001Disposed off

Ram Sahay filed a suit for declaration of ownership and possession of a shop. The defendant, Nawal Kishore, claimed an agreement to sell the shop existed, but the plaintiff objected to its exhibition on the grounds that it was unregistered and insufficiently stamped. The trial court upheld the objection, holding the do

RAKESH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

2001 INSC 31325 July 2001Dismissed

The father of a minor girl lodged an FIR alleging that three men, including the appellants, had abducted her for rape. Police investigation found only one of the alleged persons, Prem Chand, involved and framed charges against him. During the trial, after the prosecutrix’s cross‑examination began, the public prosecutor

I.T.C. AGRO TECH LTD.versusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER AND ORS.

2001 INSC 31225 July 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The Andhra Pradesh government issued circulars interpreting Entry 24‑B of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 to limit the concessional 2% tax rate on refined vegetable oils only to those obtained from non‑refined oils that had already been taxed under Entry 24‑A, imposing a 10% rate otherwise. The High Cour

HINCH LAL TIWARIversusKAMALA DEVI AND ORS.

2001 INSC 31725 July 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute concerned the allotment of 15 biswas of a pond (Talab) in village Ugapur to ten members of a Scheduled Caste family for house sites under the UP Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. Objections were raised, the Additional Collector cancelled the allotment, and the Commissioner upheld the cancellat

THE DENTAL COUNCIL OF INDIAversusSUBHARTI K.K.B. CHARITABLE TRUST AND ANR.

2001 INSC 22625 April 2001Case Partly allowed

The Subharti K.K.B. Charitable Trust sought to establish a dental college with an annual intake of 100 students, but the Dental Council of India (DCI) recommended only 60 seats, which the Central Government accepted. The Allahabad High Court issued a mandamus directing the DCI and the Central Government to permit 100 a

M/S. INTERNATIONAL WOOLEN MILLSversusM/S. STANDARD WOOL (U.K.) LTD.

2001 INSC 22725 April 2001Case Partly allowed

International Woolen Mills (appellant) placed an order for wool with Standard Wool (U.K.) Ltd. (respondent) which it later rejected as inferior and withheld payment. The respondent obtained an ex‑parte decree in the Central London County Court and sought execution in Ludhiana, India. The appellant filed two application

SRI SINGAM CHETTY ATTENDROOLOO AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS.

2001 INSC 22825 April 2001Dismissed

In 1899 a deed of settlement was executed containing donations of both religious and secular character (list E). The Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Board, invoking Section 77 of the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1927, ordered that fifty per cent of the trust's income be treated as a religiou

S. VENKATAPPAversusNARAYANAPPA AND ORS.

2001 INSC 22925 April 2001Disposed off

The appellant claimed occupancy rights over a parcel of land under Sections 44 and 45 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961, relying on revenue records, rent receipts and oral testimony that he had been a tenant until 1975. The Land Tribunal and the Land Reforms Appellate Authority accepted this evidence and granted

STATE OF KERALAversusM.M. MANIKANTAN NAIR

2001 INSC 22525 April 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The Secretary of a Gram Panchayat was prosecuted for offences under the IPC and the Prevention of Corruption Act. He moved the High Court under Section 482 CrPC to quash the prosecution, arguing that no sanction under Section 122 of the Kerala Panchayat Act was obtained. The High Court first dismissed the petition on 3

BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.versusMUMBAI SHRAMIK SANGHA AND ORS .

2001 INSC 22425 April 2001Hearing Adjourned

In Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. Mumbai Shramik Sangha (2001), a civil appeal arose from a Bombay High Court order concerning the scope of Section 10 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970. Two learned judges of the Supreme Court expressed doubt about the correctness of the Constitution Benc

M/S ASSOCIATED CEMENT COMPANIES LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

2001 INSC 4725 January 2001Disposed off

The appellants, Indian public corporations engaged in manufacturing, imported technical drawings, designs and manuals from foreign collaborators on media such as paper and diskettes under technical collaboration agreements. The Customs Commissioner issued show‑cause notices under Section 28(1) of the Customs Act allegi

BHARATHIDASAN UNIVERSITY AND ANR.versusALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND ORS.

2001 INSC 45424 September 2001Appeal(s) allowed

Bharathidasan University, a full‑fledged university recognised under the UGC Act, began offering several technology programmes without obtaining prior approval from the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE). AICTE filed a writ petition seeking to restrain the university from running those courses, arguing t

T.I. CYCLES OF INDIA, AMBATTURversusM.K. GURUMANI AND ORS.

2001 INSC 39224 August 2001Appeal(s) allowed

Workmen who retired from T.I. Cycles of India claimed that incentive wages paid for extra work should be treated as "wages" under Section 2(s) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and thus be included in the calculation of gratuity under Section 4(2). The Controlling Authority and the Madras High Court held the incenti

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusBHOORAJI AND ORS.

2001 INSC 39324 August 2001Disposed off

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed a Madhya Pradesh High Court order that quashed the conviction of Bhooraji and others and directed a retrial because the trial had been conducted by a specified Sessions Court without a prior committal order from a magistrate. The accused were charged under the IPC and the Scheduled

A.I.I.M.S STUDENTS UNIONversusA.I.I.M.S. AND ORS.

2001 INSC 39124 August 2001Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the AIIMS policy of reserving 33% of postgraduate seats for its own in‑house graduates and a further 50% discipline‑wise reservation, which resulted in lower‑merit candidates being allocated coveted "creamy" specialties over higher‑scoring open‑category candidates. The Court held that such in

MULAYAM SINGH YADAVversusDHARAMPAL YADAV AND ORS.

2001 INSC 30324 July 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined an election petition filed after the 1998 parliamentary election in Sambhal, where Mulayam Singh Yadav was declared elected and Dharampal Yadav challenged the result alleging large‑scale booth capturing, arson and violence. The petition relied on a video cassette, mentioned and verified in Sc

P.K. PRADHANversusSTATE OF SIKKIM REPRESENTED BY THE CENTRAL BUREAU

2001 INSC 30424 July 2001Dismissed

The appellant, P.K. Pradhan, a former Secretary of the Rural Development Department of Sikkim, and the then Chief Minister were charged under Section 120‑B IPC and the Prevention of Corruption Acts for conspiring to award rural water‑scheme contracts at low rates. The Special Judge held that no prior sanction under Sec

DHURANDHAR PRASAD SINGHversusJAI PRAKASH UNIVERSITY AND ORS.

2001 INSC 30824 July 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, D.P. Singh, sued Jai Prakash University and others for a declaration that an order terminating his services was illegal. The suit was decreed ex parte against the college's governing body, which later became a constituent unit of the university, but the university was not impleaded. In execution, the uni

SHAMNSHAEB M. MULTTANIversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2001 INSC 4324 January 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, his brother and father were tried for murder (IPC s.302) of the appellant's wife; the trial court acquitted them after witnesses turned hostile. The Karnataka High Court, however, convicted the appellant under IPC s.304B (dowry death) and s.498A without a specific charge for s.304B. The Supreme Court exa

TEK CHANDversusDILE RAM

2001 INSC 4424 January 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent challenged the election of the appellant, Tek Chand, alleging that the independent candidate Nikka Ram's nomination was improperly accepted because he was allegedly holding an office of profit and was a BJP/RSS activist whose votes allegedly cut into the respondent's tally, thereby materially affecting t

U.P. POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD AND ORS.versusKANORIA INDUSTRIAL LTD. AND ANR.

2001 INSC 4624 January 2001Dismissed

The respondents, owners of sugar and distillery units, were levied water cess under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Cess Act, 1977 and paid it under protest. After the Supreme Court in Saraswati Sugar Mills v. Haryana State Board held that sugar industries were not covered by Entry 15 of Schedule I, the

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESSversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

2001 INSC 4524 January 2001Dismissed

Oxford University Press, a branch of the UK university, claimed exemption from income tax for its 1976-77 earnings under Section 10(22) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arguing that the income belonged to a university existing solely for educational purposes. The Income Tax Officer rejected the claim; the Commissioner (App

N.S.S NARAYANA SARMA AND ORS.versusM/S. GOLDSTONE EXPORTS (P) LTD. AND ORS.

2001 INSC 58023 November 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The original suit sought partition of a 196‑acre property in Hydernagar village, resulting in a preliminary decree that became final and a commissioner was appointed for division. Respondents, assignees of decree‑holders, obtained possession of their shares through execution proceedings. The appellants, who claimed to

RACHAKONDA NARAYANAversusPONTHALA PARVATHAMMA AND ANR.

2001 INSC 39023 August 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff entered into an agreement to purchase two plots of land, paying earnest money, but later learned that the seller lacked title to one plot (Plot B). The plaintiff sought specific performance of the contract for the remaining plot (Plot A) after relinquishing any claim to Plot B and paying the full contract

KEWAL CHAND MIMANI (D) BY LRSversusS.K. SEN AND ORS.

2001 INSC 30223 July 2001Dismissed

The appellants, K.L. Mimani and others, had a 50‑year lease of land in Howrah which was requisitioned under the West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948. Their writ petition challenging the requisition was dismissed and an appeal was filed, but the lease expired by efflux of time during the pendency of

THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND ORS.versusSMT. SHAIK HASMATH BEEBI

2001 INSC 22323 April 2001

The State Government detained Smt. Shaik Hasmath Beebi under Section 3 of the Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1986, and the detention was confirmed by an advisory board. The detenu applied for temporary release under Section 15 of the same Act on 27 April 2000; the application was received on 2 M

PRAHLAD SINGH BHATversusN.C. T., DELHI AND ANR.

2001 INSC 16823 March 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, father of a woman allegedly murdered by her husband (respondent No.2), challenged the grant of regular bail by a Metropolitan Magistrate in a murder case (Section 302 IPC) after the accused had earlier obtained anticipatory bail for lesser offences. The High Court dismissed the revision petition without

STATE OF U.P. AND ANR.versusLALSARAM

2001 INSC 11423 February 2001Appeal(s) allowed

Lalsa Ram, a direct‑recruit Naib Tehsildar, was promoted to Deputy Collector solely on seniority. The Uttar Pradesh government later ordered his compulsory retirement under Rule 56(c) of the U.P. Fundamental Rules, relying on several adverse entries in his service record that pre‑dated his promotion. The Allahabad High

H.F. SANGATIversusR.G. HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.

2001 INSC 11123 February 2001Dismissed

Two probationary Munsifs, H.F. Sangati and Kittur Muthappa Hanumanthappa, were discharged from service under Rule 6(1) of the Karnataka Civil Services (Probation) Rules, 1977 on the ground of unsuitability. They challenged the discharge, arguing that the order was punitive, cast a stigma and violated the principles of

M/S J.K. INTERNATIONALversusSTATE, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.

2001 INSC 11223 February 2001Appeal(s) allowed

J.K. International filed a complaint alleging criminal breach of trust and cheating, leading to an FIR and a charge‑sheet. The accused sought a writ in the Delhi High Court to quash the criminal proceedings, and the complainant applied to be impleaded as a party so that he could be heard. The High Court dismissed the a

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHINversusMRS. GRACE COLLIS AND ORS.

2001 INSC 11323 February 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents, shareholders of Ambassador Steamship Ltd., received 14 shares of Collis Line Ltd. for each share they held in the amalgamating company under a scheme of arrangement. They later sold 45,318 of these new shares at a profit, and the Income Tax Officer levied capital gains tax, treating the transaction as

K. DURAISAMY AND ANRversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS.

2001 INSC 4123 January 2001Dismissed

The Tamil Nadu Government issued a order reserving 50% of postgraduate medical seats for in‑service medical officers and the remaining 50% for non‑service (private) candidates, each category being filled on inter‑se merit within that group. In‑service candidates challenged the scheme, arguing that the reservation shoul

KRISHNA S/O BULAJI BORATEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

2001 INSC 4223 January 2001Dismissed

Krishna was appointed a trustee of the Nagpur Improvement Trust for a five‑year term under Section 4(1)(e) of the Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936. The State Government removed him before the term expired by invoking Section 6 of the Act. Krishna challenged the removal, arguing that the removal should follow the proc

KAMALESHWAR KISHORE SINGHversusPARAS NATH SINGH AND ORS.

2001 INSC 57922 November 2001Appeal(s) allowed

Kamaleshwar Kishore Singh filed a partition suit valued at Rs 16 lakhs and paid a fixed court fee of Rs 29.25, assuming it was a simple partition case. Defendant No. 20 objected, leading the trial court to order payment of ad‑valorem court fee on 10% of the sale‑deed value of certain properties. The defendant later cla

COMMON CAUSE,REGISTERED SOCIETYversusUNION OF INDIA

2001 INSC 57822 November 2001Dismissed

The petitioners challenged the constitutional validity of Section SA (also referred to as Section 8A) of the Salaries, Allowances and Pension of Members of Parliament Act, 1954, which provides a pension to former Members of Parliament. They argued that Article 106 of the Constitution only authorises salaries and allowa

BHARAT BHAWAN TRUSTversusBHARAT BHAWAN ARTISTS ASSOCIATION AND ANR.

2001 INSC 38722 August 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The Bharat Bhawan Trust, a statutory body created to promote art and culture, engaged a group of artists for drama production and theatre management. The artists later raised a dispute before the Labour Court, to which the Trust objected on the preliminary ground that it was not an "industry" and the artists were not "

JAYPEE REWA CEMENTversusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, M.P.

2001 INSC 38622 August 2001

Jaypee Rewa Cement, a cement manufacturer, used explosives to mine limestone, an essential raw material. The explosives attracted excise duty, and the company claimed credit for this duty under Rule 57‑A of the Central Excise Rules, arguing that the explosives were inputs used in relation to the manufacture of the fina

AKHTARIBIversusSTATE OF M.P.

2001 INSC 16522 March 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment, filed an appeal that remained pending in the Madhya Pradesh High Court for many years without being listed for hearing. The High Court rejected her bail application, prompting a petition before the Supreme Court. The Court held that speedy trial is

UGAR SUGAR WORKS LTD.versusDELHI ADMINIS1RATION AND ORS.

2001 INSC 16322 March 2001Case Allowed

Ugar Sugar Works Ltd., a manufacturer of Indian Made Foreign Liquor, challenged a Delhi Administration notification issued under the Punjab Excise Act, 1914 and Delhi Liquor Licence Rules, 1976 that imposed Minimum Sales Figures (MSF) as a condition for obtaining an L‑1 licence for the excise year 2000‑2001. The petiti

KANDASWAMYversusBD. OF MANAGEMENT, H.S.I. SAID MOSQUE

2001 INSC 16722 March 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The Board of Management of H.S.I. Said Mosque (landlord) sought to evict tenant Kandaswamy from a vacant plot in Bangalore under Section 21(1)(i) of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961, claiming the land was needed for a new building. The trial court initially granted eviction, but the Karnataka High Court set aside t

BIPIN SHANTILALPANCHALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR.

2001 INSC 10622 February 2001Disposed off

Bipin S. Panchal was arrested under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act for a massive seizure of methaqualone tablets. The trial court failed to complete the trial within the six‑month period ordered by this Court, leading the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence to seek a further six‑month extension. Whi

SHRI ISHAR ALLOY STEELS LID.versusJAYASWALS NECO LTD.

2001 INSC 10722 February 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant issued a cheque drawn on State Bank of Indore which was presented by the respondent to its own bank and later to a collecting bank, but the cheque reached the drawer's bank after the six‑month period prescribed under the proviso to Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. A criminal complaint

SOLOMON ANTONY AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS.

2001 INSC 10822 February 2001Dismissed

The appellants, contractors licensed to vend arrack, challenged the Kerala government's demand for excise duty on a designated quantum of rectified spirit, arguing that the duty was unconstitutional, arbitrary and payable only on spirit actually imported. The State had amended Rule 8 of the Kerala Abkari Shops (Disposa

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BIHAR-II, RANCHIversusSMT. SANDHYARANI DUTIA

2001 INSC 10922 February 2001Appeal(s) allowed

A Hindu male governed by the Dayabhaga school died intestate, leaving his widow and two daughters. The widow and daughters entered into an agreement to form a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) and the widow contributed her share of the inherited property to the HUF, omitting the income from her tax returns for AY 1974-75 an

BALKRISHANversusSATYAPRAKASH AND ORS.

2001 INSC 3922 January 2001Dismissed

The appellant, Balkrishan, purchased agricultural land in 1960 that was under attachment and later auctioned to a minor son of Mohan Singh. Rajendra Singh, the minor's predecessor, filed an application under Section 250 of the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code seeking restoration of possession, and the Tehsildar ordered

KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusB.S. HULLIKATTI

2001 INSC 4022 January 2001Disposed off

The respondent, a bus conductor with the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, was found in a domestic inquiry to have issued tickets of Rs 1.75 instead of the correct fare of Rs 2.25 for 35 passengers, thereby short‑charging each passenger. He was dismissed, but the Labour Court set aside the dismissal, holding

PRITISHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

2001 INSC 57621 November 2001Dismissed

The appellant, a beneficiary of an enhanced compensation award in a land‑acquisition case, was found by the reference court to have used forged documents and was directed to be prosecuted under Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. He appealed to the High Court under Section 341, contending that the referen

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.versusJAIN PLASTICS AND CHEMICALS LTD.

2001 INSC 57721 November 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Bihar and others entered into a contract with Jain Plastics & Chemicals Ltd. for the supply of PVC pipes and fittings, but the company delayed delivery, leading the appellants to terminate the contract and procure the fittings at a higher price. The appellants deducted the additional cost from the final pa

B.R. KAPURversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.

2001 INSC 45321 September 2001Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether J. Jayalalithaa, convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced to three years' rigorous imprisonment, could be appointed Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu after her party won a majority. The Court held that a person convicted and sentenced to imprisonment of two years or m

MRS. KAPIL BHARGAVA AND ORS.versusSUBHASH CHAND AGGARWAL AND ORS.

2001 INSC 38221 August 2001Dismissed

The landlord filed an eviction petition under Sections 14(1)(b), (d) and (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 against a tenant and his sub‑tenant, who had been in possession since before 9 June 1952 without the landlord's written consent and without serving the notice required by Section 17(2). The Rent Controller,

M/S. K.P. MADHUSUDHANANversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN

2001 INSC 38121 August 2001Dismissed

The appellant, a partnership firm, filed its 1986-87 return showing a total income of Rs.6,76,890, but the Assessing Officer added Rs.93,000 as unexplained investment after noting that certain rice purchase transactions were not entered in the books on the correct dates. The assessee explained that cash shortages force

BIBI SALMA KHATOONversusSTATE OF BLHAR AND ORS.

2001 INSC 38321 August 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant claimed a right of pre-emption under Section 16(3) of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1961 after a sale deed was registered on 30 January 1988. He filed an application on 30 April 1988, seeking to have the land transferred to him. The issue before the Supreme Court was whether this application was filed withi

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MEERUTversusM/S. KISAN SAHKARI CHINNI MILLS LTD.

2001 INSC 38421 August 2001Dismissed

The Uttar Pradesh government imposed administrative charges on molasses sold by sugar factories under Section 8(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Sheera Niyantran Adhiniyam, 1964. The Commissioner of Central Excise held that these charges should be included in the assessable value of molasses under the Central Excise Act, 1944,

ASSAM COMPANY LTD. AND ANR.versusSTATE OF ASSAM AND ORS.

2001 INSC 15521 March 2001Appeal(s) allowed

Assam Company Ltd. and another were engaged in cultivation, manufacture and sale of tea, a composite income taxable under both the Central Income Tax Act, 1961 and the Assam Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1939. The State Agricultural Income Tax Officer refused to accept the agricultural income computation made by the Cen

KULWANT KAUR AND ORS.versusGURDIAL SINGH MANN (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.

2001 INSC 15821 March 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants filed a suit for partition and rendition of accounts which was decreed by the lower appellate court. The Punjab and Haryana High Court entertained a second appeal under Section 41 of the Punjab Courts Act, 1918, set aside the decree, and did so without framing a substantial question of law as required by

RAJA RAM MAIZE PRODUCTSversusINDUSTRIAL COURT OF M.P. AND ORS.

2001 INSC 15921 March 2001Dismissed

The employer (Raja Ram Maize Products) directed workmen to resume duties after a strike, but refused to let them work. The workmen filed applications under the Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act seeking a direction to be allowed to resume work and claim wages. The employer contended that the cause of action arose

WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY AKHIL BHARTIYA KOYLA KAMGAR UNIONversusEMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF INDUSTRY COLLIERY OF M/S BHARAT COKING COAL LTD AND ORS

2001 INSC 16021 March 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The workmen of a coking coal colliery were retrenched in June 1971 before the mine was taken over by the Central Government and nationalised under the Coking Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1972. After nationalisation, the new management, Bharat Coking Coal Ltd., refused to re‑employ the 111 retrenched workers. The I

K.D. INDUSTRIESversusBIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ORS.

2001 INSC 16121 March 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The Bihar Government’s 1995 Industrial Policy, under Section 78‑A of the Electricity Supply Act, 1948, granted exemption from minimum guarantee charges to new industrial units with a connected load up to 500 kVA. The Bihar State Electricity Board (BSEB) issued a resolution to implement this exemption but later refused

V.S. MALLIMATHversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2001 INSC 15621 March 2001Dismissed

V.S. Mallimath, a retired Chief Justice of the Kerala High Court, was appointed Chairman of the Central Administrative Tribunal and later a Member of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) until he turned 70. He challenged three deductions: the deduction of his judicial pension from his NHRC salary under Rule 3(b)

RAM SAHAN RAIversusSACHIV SAMANAYA PRABANDHAK AND ANR.

2001 INSC 10121 February 2001Disposed off

The appellant, a clerk of a District Cooperative Bank, was dismissed without a charge‑sheet, show‑cause notice or hearing. He filed a suit seeking a declaration that the dismissal was illegal and that he should be reinstated with consequential benefits. The lower appellate court held the dismissal void for violation of

BHARAT COKING COAL LTD.versusM/S I.K. AHUJA AND CO.

2001 INSC 10221 February 2001Disposed off

Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. awarded two construction contracts to L.K. Ahuja & Co. which later led to disputes and were referred to a sole arbitrator, M.P. Sharma, a former officer of the employer. The arbitrator issued hybrid awards that largely relied on joint statements but decided only the material‑escalation claim, le

BUDDHI NATH CHAUDHARY AND ORS.versusABAHI KUMAR AND ORS.

2001 INSC 10421 February 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were selected by the Bihar Public Service Commission as Motor Vehicle Inspectors under recruitment rules that required specific technical qualifications and years of practical experience. Several writ petitions challenged their appointments on the ground that the candidates lacked the requisite experienc

THE SOCIETY OF ST. JOSEPH'S COLLEGEversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2001 INSC 57320 November 2001Disposed off

The Society of St. Joseph's College, a religious minority educational institution, owned a building that the State sought to acquire under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The college filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a declaration that Article 30(1A) of the Constitution bars the application of the general

G.C.KAPOORversusNAND KUMAR BHASIN AND ORS.

2001 INSC 57420 November 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The landlord, G.C. Kapoor, let a premises to a tenant when his son Rohit was a minor. After Rohit obtained a post‑graduate diploma in computer science, the landlord filed an eviction petition under Section 21(1)(a) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, claiming a bon

MADHEGOWDA (D) BY LRS.versusANKEGOWDA (D) LRS. AND ORS.

2001 INSC 57520 November 2001Dismissed

The appellant Madhegowda purchased the share of a minor, Sakamma, in a property from her sister Madamma, who acted as a de facto guardian, in 1961. After attaining majority, Sakamma sold the same share to Ankegowda in 1967, leading to a suit for declaration of title, partition and possession. The trial court and first

THE OWNERS AND PARTIES INTERESTED IN THE VESSEL M.V. "BALTIC CONFIDENCE" AND ANR.versusSTATE TRADING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. AND ANR.

2001 INSC 38020 August 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The owners of the vessel M.V. Baltic Confidence and the charterer (respondent No.2) issued five bills of lading that incorporated the terms of their time‑charter party, including an arbitration clause. The holder of the bills of lading (respondent No.1) sued them in admiralty court for negligence and breach of carriage

VEDABAI @VAIJAYANATABAI BABURAO PATILversusSHANTARAM BABURAO PATIL AND ORS.

2001 INSC 30120 July 2001Appeal(s) allowed

Vedabai filed an appeal against a trial court order but missed the prescribed period by seven days, citing illness as the reason. The Additional District Judge dismissed her application for condonation of delay, and the Bombay High Court upheld that dismissal. The Supreme Court examined whether a short delay of a few d

ANIL RATAN SARKAR AND ORS.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

2001 INSC 22120 April 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, graduate laboratory assistants employed in non‑government colleges, performed teaching functions but were re‑designated as non‑teaching staff and paid the Group B pay scale of Rs 1390‑2970. They sought a writ directing that they be treated as teachers and receive the pay scale of physical instructors (R

M/S. ATUL CASTINGS LTD.versusBAWA GURVACHAN SINGH

2001 INSC 22220 April 2001Appeal(s) allowed

Atul Castings Ltd., the tenant, occupied a building leased for residential purposes and kept an office table and equipment in one room to dispose of office files, which the family also used for study. The landlord filed an eviction petition under Section 13(2)(ii)(b) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949,

MADHUKAR AND ORS.versusSANGRAM AND ORS.

2001 INSC 22020 April 2001Disposed off

The respondents filed a declaratory suit claiming joint ownership of the suit property and seeking to declare certain gift and sale deeds ineffective. The trial court dismissed the suit on the grounds of limitation and that a prior decree (O.S. No. 93/71) operated as res judicata against Defendant No. 1 only, despite s

HIRACHAND SR!NIVAS MANAGAONKARversusSUNANDA

2001 INSC 15320 March 2001Dismissed

In a marriage governed by the Hindu Marriage Act, the wife obtained a decree of judicial separation on the ground of the husband's adultery, and the husband was ordered to pay maintenance to his wife and daughter, which he failed to do. The husband later filed a petition for divorce under Section 13(1‑A) claiming that

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.versusCHANDRA PRAKASH PANDEY AND ORS.

2001 INSC 15420 March 2001Dismissed

The respondents, appointed as Kurk Amins on commission basis by District Magistrates/Collectors of Uttar Pradesh, were tasked with recovering outstanding dues of cooperative societies. The State of Uttar Pradesh contended that such Kurk Amins, being appointed under a scheme of the Registrar of Cooperative Societies, we

DAYA SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2001 INSC 9620 February 2001Dismissed

In 1988 a terrorist attack on Dr. Harnam Singh's house in Kurukshetra resulted in four deaths and several injuries. Fourteen accused, including Daya Singh, were tried under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act and the IPC for murder and attempted murder. The trial court convicted Daya Singh on the b

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusSEEMA MALHOTRA AND OTHERS

2001 INSC 9720 February 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The insured, Yash Paul Malhotra, entered into a motor insurance contract on 21‑12‑1993, gave a cheque for the first premium and received a cover note. He died in a road accident on 31‑12‑1993, and the insurer discovered that the cheque had bounced on 10‑01‑1994, cancelling the policy on 20‑01‑1994. The legal heirs clai

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.versusBASKAR

2001 INSC 9820 February 2001Disposed off

The State of Tamil Nadu appealed against a Madras High Court order that had quashed a preventive detention order issued on 2 August 1999 against Baskar and three others. The High Court had held the detention order vague because it allegedly did not specify the exact overt act attributable to each accused. The Supreme C

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.versusBALASUBRAMANIAM

2001 INSC 9920 February 2001Disposed off

The State of Tamil Nadu issued a preventive detention order against Balasubramaniam in 1999. The Madras High Court, hearing a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 21 of the Constitution, quashed the order on the ground that the sponsoring authority’s affidavit mentioned six cases while the detention order refe

SRINIWAS RAMNATH KHATODversusSTATE OF MAHARSHTRA AND ORS.

2001 INSC 57119 November 2001Dismissed

The appellant's land was acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. A notification under s.4 was last published on 30‑Jan‑1986 and a declaration under s.6 was made on 29‑Jan‑1987, with its first newspaper publication on 30‑Jan‑1987 and later publication in the Official Gazette on 19‑Mar‑1987. The appellant contende

V. PURUSHOTHAM RAOversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2001 INSC 52619 October 2001Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined appeals against the Delhi High Court’s cancellation of petrol pump, LPG and SKO dealership allotments made by the Minister of Petroleum under a discretionary quota. The Court held that the 1995 Supreme Court guidelines did not tacitly approve prior allotments, and that the principle of constr

STATE (DELHI ADMINISTRATION)versusDHARAMPAL

2001 INSC 52719 October 2001Disposed off

The State of Delhi appealed the acquittal of Dharampal, who had been convicted under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act for selling adulterated "lal mirch kutti". The Sessions Judge had set aside the conviction on the ground that the contents of the Central Food Laboratory certificate were not read out to the accu

STATE OF BIHARversusBAIDNATH PRASAD@ BAIDYANATH SHAH AND ANR.

2001 INSC 52819 October 2001Leave Granted & Allowed

An FIR under Section 3 of the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966 was filed in 1991 and a complaint was lodged before a Judicial Magistrate on 13‑01‑1992. After a series of revisions and a long period of inactivity—largely caused by the accused’s own challenges and absence—the case remained pending for mor

VEERAYEE AMMALversusSEENI AMMAL

2001 INSC 52919 October 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant entered into a sale agreement for land where time was not stipulated as the essence. When the respondent failed to execute the sale deed, the appellant sued for specific performance. The trial court and the first appellate court both held that time was not essential, the appellant was ready to perform, an

JASBIR RANI AND ORS.versusSTATE OFPUNJAB AND ANR.

2001 INSC 53219 October 2001Dismissed

The State of Punjab issued two separate advertisements for 700 Panchayat Secretary posts, one for male candidates (18‑Sept‑1997) and another for female candidates (19‑Sept‑1998), both fixing 1‑Sept‑1997 as the cut‑off date for satisfying the age eligibility of 18 to 35 years as prescribed by Rule 5 of the Punjab Pancha

RAJINDER PRASADversusBASHIR AND ORS.

2001 INSC 45219 September 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Rajinder Prasad filed applications before a Judicial Magistrate to add offence under Section 395 IPC and to implead four additional accused. The magistrate, invoking Chapter XIV of the Cr.P.C., allowed the applications and committed the case to the Sessions Court, which framed charges including Section 39

M/S. NEYVELI LIGNITE CORPORATION LTD.versusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, CUDDALORE AND ANR.

2001 INSC 45119 September 2001Appeal(s) allowed

Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd., a fertilizer manufacturer, received a government subsidy under the Retention Price Scheme, which compensated the difference between the retention price and the maximum price fixed by the Fertilizer (Control) Order. The Tamil Nadu tax authority treated the subsidy as part of the company

SUNDERversusUNION OF INDIA

2001 INSC 45019 September 2001Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether the solatium amount under Section 23(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 forms part of the compensation for which interest under Sections 28 and 34 must be paid. The Court noted that the Collector is statutorily obliged to pay the entire amount awarded under Section 23, which include

SHIBU SORENversusDAYANAND SAHAY AND ORS.

2001 INSC 30019 July 2001Dismissed

Shibu Soren was elected to the Rajya Sabha while serving as Chairman of the Interim Jharkhand Area Autonomous Council (JAAC). A defeated candidate, Dayanand Sahay, challenged the election on the ground that Soren held an "office of profit" under the State Government, rendering him disqualified under Article 102(1)(a) o

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search