RAMAYANA ISPAT PVT. LTD. AND ANR.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.
2025 INSC 42431 March 2025Dismissed
The appellants, large industrial consumers and captive power generators, challenged the Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission's (RERC) 2016 Open Access Regulations, alleging that they exceeded RERC's jurisdiction over inter‑state open access, imposed unreasonable penalties for drawal variations, required a 24‑hou…
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD.versusJHABUA POWER LIMITED AND OTHERS
2024 INSC 76830 September 2024Disposed off
The Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) procured power through competitive bidding but accepted tariffs and quantities that deviated from standard bidding guidelines, leading to the execution of Power Supply Agreements (PSAs) for 865 MW. KSEB sought approval of these PSAs from the Kerala State Electricity Regulatory …
M/S KKK HYDRO POWER LIMITEDversusHIMACHAL PRADESH STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LIMITED AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 105729 August 2025Dismissed
The appellant, KKK Hydro Power Ltd, entered into a 3 MW power purchase agreement (PPA) with HPSEB in 2000 fixing a tariff of ₹2.50/kWh, later augmenting the project to 4.90 MW and attempting to raise the tariff to ₹2.95/kWh through a supplementary PPA in 2010 without the Himachal Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commissi…
JAIPUR VIDYUT VITARAN NIGAM LIMITED AND ORS.versusRAJASTHAN TEXTILE MILLS ASSOCIATION & ANR. ETC.
2025 INSC 59229 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court considered appeals by Jaipur Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Ltd. and other distribution licensees challenging an Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) order that set aside the Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission's (State Commission) determination of Cross‑Subsidy Surcharges (CSS) effective 1 Decemb…
BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITEDversusHIREHALLI SOLAR POWER PROJECT LLP & OTHERS
2024 INSC 63127 August 2024Dismissed
The appellant, Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Ltd., entered into a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with a solar project SPV and a farmer under Karnataka's solar policy, requiring commercial operation within 18 months. Delays occurred in land conversion, evacuation approvals, and other regulatory processes, leading…
GUJARAT URJA VIKAS NIGAM LIMITEDversusESSAR POWER LIMITED AND ANOTHER
2025 INSC 116025 September 2025Disposed off
Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd (GUVNL), successor to Gujarat Electricity Board, entered into a power purchase agreement (PPA) with Essar Power Ltd (EPL) for 300 MW of a 515 MW plant, while EPL had a separate PPA with its sister company Essar Steel Ltd (ESL) for the remaining 215 MW. EPL repeatedly supplied electricity to…
CHAMUNDESHWARI ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LTD. (CESC)versusSAISUDHIR ENERGY (CHITRADURGA) PVT. LTD. & ANR.
2025 INSC 103425 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned a 10 MW solar power project where Chamundeshwari Electricity Supply Company Ltd. (CESC) entered into a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with Saisudhir Energy (Chitradurga) Pvt. Ltd. (the Developer) and relied on Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. (KPTCL) to commission two 220 kV evacuation l…
JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS.versusADANI POWER RAJASTHAN LTD. & ANR.
2025 INSC 77023 May 2025Dismissed
The dispute arose from a Coal India notification dated 19‑12‑2017 imposing Evacuation Facility Charges (EFC) on coal dispatches, which the power generator (Adani Power Rajasthan Ltd.) claimed constituted a "change in law" under the Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with the Rajasthan distribution companies. The generator …
M K RANJITSINH & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2024 INSC 28021 March 2024Directions issued
The petitioners sought a blanket prohibition on the installation of overhead transmission lines for solar power across roughly 99,000 square kilometres in Rajasthan and Gujarat, arguing that such lines threaten the critically endangered Great Indian Bustard (GIB). The Supreme Court had earlier ordered the conversion of…
KALPATARU POWER TRANSMISSION LTD. (NOW KNOWN AS KALPATARU PROJECTS INTERNATIONAL LTD.)versusVINOD AND ORS. ETC.
2025 INSC 100419 August 2025Disposed off
The case concerned compensation disputes arising from the erection of transmission towers and power lines under a 400 kV project that traversed four districts in Haryana. Landowners claimed that the compensation awarded by the District Judges and upheld by the High Court was inadequate, while the contractor sought to l…
NABHA POWER LIMITEDversusPUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 100219 August 2025Dismissed
Nabha Power Ltd (NPL) and Talwandi Sabo Power Ltd (TSPL) entered into Power Purchase Agreements (PPA) with Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd (PSPCL) for a 700 MW coal‑fired project. They claimed that deemed export benefits under Paragraph 8.3 of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2009‑2014 were available at the bid cut‑of…
M/S SUNDEW PROPERTIES LIMITEDversusTELANGANA STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & ANR.
2024 INSC 43917 May 2024Case Partly allowed
The appellant, Sundew Properties Ltd., was notified by the Ministry of Commerce & Industry as a developer of a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) and claimed that, under the 2010 Notification inserting a proviso to section 14(b) of the Electricity Act, it automatically became a deemed distribution licensee without needing to …
THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & ANR.versusJSW HYDRO ENERGY LIMITED & ORS.
2025 INSC 85716 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The Himachal Pradesh government entered into an Implementation Agreement with JSW Hydro Energy Ltd (formerly JIL) to supply 12% free power for the first 12 years and 18% thereafter from a 1045 MW hydro project. When the free‑power obligation rose above the 13% cap prescribed in CERC (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Reg…
POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITEDversusMADHYA PRADESH POWER TRANSMISSION COMPANY
2025 INSC 69715 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd (the appellant) sought CERC orders to approve the commercial operation date of its inter‑state transmission assets and to recover compensation for delays caused by Madhya Pradesh Power Transmission Company Ltd (respondent No.1). CERC, exercising powers under s.79(1) of the Electricit…
TORRENT POWER LIMITEDversusU.P. ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & ORS
2025 INSC 83814 July 2025Case Allowed
The Supreme Court examined a petition filed by an individual (respondent No.4) before the Uttar Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (UPERC) seeking an investigation under Section 128 of the Electricity Act, 2003 into a Distribution Franchisee Agreement (DFA) between Torrent Power Limited (the appellant) and the d…
THE HP POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LTD.versusM/S BRUA HYDROWATT PVT. LTD. & ORS.
2025 INSC 68014 May 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The Himachal Pradesh Power Transmission Corporation Ltd (HPPTC) built a 66 kV Bay at Urni for three generating companies and sought the full construction cost from Brua Hydrowatt Pvt Ltd (BHP), the lead partner, under a Connection Agreement dated 02‑07‑2021. BHP argued that the cost should be shared proportionately wit…
HARYANA POWER PURCHASE CENTRE (HPPC) AND OTHERSversusGMR KAMALANGA ENERGY LIMITED AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 10798 September 2025Dismissed
The Supreme Court considered two civil appeals challenging the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity's (APTEL) dismissal of appeals that upheld the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission's (CERC) orders directing Haryana utilities to pay supplementary bills for change‑in‑law adjustments. The disputes centered on whethe…
K.P. KHEMKA & ANR.versusHARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS.
2024 INSC 3968 May 2024
The appellants, guarantors of a term loan granted by the Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (HSIDC) to Khemka Ispat Ltd, faced recovery notices under the Haryana Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1979 and the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 after the loan defaulted. They conte…
JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS.versusMB POWER (MADHYA PRADESH) LIMITED & ORS.
2024 INSC 238 January 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission (State Commission) was asked to approve the procurement of 1,000 MW of power through a competitive bidding process. After negotiations, the Commission approved only 500 MW and adopted the tariffs of the lowest bidders, while the higher‑priced bids of L‑4 and L‑5 were reje…
BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. & ANRversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS
2025 INSC 9376 August 2025Directions issued
The three Delhi distribution companies (BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd., BSES Yamuna Power Ltd., and Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd.) challenged the Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission’s (DERC) tariff orders that created and perpetuated a large regulatory asset to bridge revenue gaps, which had ballooned to over Rs 27,…
POWERGRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITEDversusCENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & ORS.
2025 INSC 6264 May 2025Dismissed
Powergrid Corporation of India Ltd., a central transmission utility, suffered failure of three inter‑connecting transformers (ICTs) in its Rihand I system in 2006 and temporarily replaced them with transformers from its Rihand II system. Powergrid sought de‑capitalisation of the removed ICTs and additional capitalisati…
GUJARAT URJA VIKAS NIGAM LIMITEDversusGREEN INFRA CORPORATE WIND PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHERS ETC.
2025 INSC 9223 August 2025Dismissed
Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited (GUVNL) entered into power purchase agreements (PPAs) with four wind‑energy companies, fixing a tariff of Rs 3.56 per kWh that was applicable only to projects availing accelerated depreciation under the Income‑Tax Act. The respondents later approached the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory …
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHIversusGAGAN NARANG & ORS. ETC.
2025 INSC 21 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) sought approval from the Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (DERC) to conduct a tariff‑based competitive bidding for a 28 MW waste‑to‑energy (WTE) project at Narela Bawana, invoking Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The Waste to Energy Research & Technology Council c…