Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

Judgments of 2022

100 judgments, newest first.

THE STATE OF JHARKHANDversusSHAILENDRA KUMAR RAI @ PANDAV RAI

2022 INSC 113931 October 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The victim was allegedly raped and set on fire by the accused, Shailendra Kumar Rai, and later died of septicemia caused by the burn injuries. While on her way to death she gave a statement to police officer Lallan Prasad, which was read back to her, signed, and later treated as a dying declaration. The Sessions Court

AROON PURIEversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

2022 INSC 114231 October 2022Disposed off

The case arose from an India Today article titled “Mission Misconduct” that alleged sexual misconduct and other improprieties by an Indian Foreign Service officer. The officer, after disciplinary action, filed a criminal complaint against the magazine’s Editor‑in‑Chief (A‑1), the article’s author (A‑2) and several publ

GUJARAT STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD.versusMAHAKALI FOODS PVT. LTD. (UNIT 2) & ANR

2022 INSC 114031 October 2022Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined a series of appeals arising from disputes between buyers and micro‑small suppliers under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSMED Act) and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The core issue was whether Chapter V of the MSMED Act, which provides a special, t

DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENTversusPADMANABHAN KISHORE

2022 INSC 114331 October 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The Enforcement Directorate registered a case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PML Act) against Padmanabhan Kishore for allegedly handing over Rs 50 lakh as a bribe to an Additional Commissioner of Income Tax. Kishore contended that the money remained "untainted" while in his possession and only beca

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusMUNSHI RAM

2022 INSC 114131 October 2022Dismissed

The case concerned commission vendors of the Northern Railway who, after being absorbed into regular railway service, sought to have 50% of their pre‑absorption service counted as qualifying service for pension benefits, as had been granted to similarly situated vendors in other railway zones. The Union of India appeal

NADAKERAPPA SINCE DECEASED BY LRS. & ORS.versusPILLAMMA SINCE DECEASED BY LRS. & ORS.

2022 INSC 37431 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the grant of occupancy rights to Nadakerappa, a protected tenant, under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961. The Land Tribunal had awarded occupancy rights in 1982, which the landowners later challenged through multiple writ petitions and appeals. The High Court Single Judge dismissed one petition o

DR. Y. IBEHAIBI DEVI (D) BY LRS. & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MANIPUR REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER (HIGHER AND TECHICAL EDUCATION) GOVERNMENT OF MANIPUR & ANR.

2022 INSC 37531 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, eight retired assistant professors and a college librarian from Manipur, claimed a revised pension entitlement effective from 1 April 2010 based on an Office Memorandum (OM) dated 5 May 2010, which was issued by the Governor and had statutory force. The State Government issued a later OM on 24 December

PATTALI MAKKAL KATCHIversusA. MAYILERUMPERUMAL & ORS.

2022 INSC 37831 March 2022Disposed off

The Tamil Nadu Legislature enacted the 2021 Special Reservation Act, earmarking 10.5% of the 20% reservation for Most Backward Classes (MBCs) and Denotified Communities (DNCs) for the Vanniyakula Kshatriya community. Several writ petitions challenged the Act on the ground that the State lacked legislative competence af

KALYAN DOMBIVALI MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONversusSANJAY GAJANAN GHARAT AND ANOTHER

2022 INSC 37731 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation (KDM Corp) and the State of Maharashtra appealed against a Bombay High Court order that set aside the suspension of Sanjay Gajanan Gharat, an Additional Municipal Commissioner (AMC), and quashed the departmental inquiry against him. Gharat had been arrested under the Preventio

PAPPU TIWARYversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND

2022 INSC 11831 January 2022Dismissed

On 7 March 2000 Vikas Kumar Singh was shot by Pappu Tiwari and subsequently stabbed by five others, resulting in his death. All six accused were convicted under IPC sections 302 and 34 and, in Pappu Tiwari's case, also under Section 27 of the Arms Act. The appellants challenged the convictions on several grounds, inclu

KERALA TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITEDversusBASIL T K & ORS

2022 INSC 12131 January 2022Disposed off

The respondents were initially appointed as contract Assistant Managers in 2000 and were regularised in 2006, but their regularisation was cancelled in 2007. The High Court set aside the cancellation and ordered their reinstatement with continuity of service from 12 September 2007, but without any monetary benefits for

M/S AGMATEL INDIA PVT. LTD.versusM/S RESOURSYS TELECOM & ORS.

2022 INSC 12631 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti (NVS) issued a notice inviting tenders on the GeM portal for 68,940 tablets, requiring bidders to have supplied the same or similar category products for at least 60% of the bid quantity in the preceding three financial years. M/s. Resoursys Telecom supplied only smart phones and claimed t

NATIONAL HIGH SPEED RAIL CORPORATION LIMITEDversusMONTECARLO LIMITED & ANR

2022 INSC 12431 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited (NHSRCL) issued a tender for the Mumbai‑Ahmedabad Bullet Train project, which is funded by a loan from Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). Monte Carlo Limited submitted a technical bid that was rejected by NHSRCL as non‑responsive due to material deviations, a

MATA PRASADversusTHE STATE OF U.P. & ANR.

2022 INSC 12331 January 2022Case Allowed

Mata Prasad, convicted of murder and related offences and sentenced to life imprisonment, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking premature release under the Uttar Pradesh Governor's 2018 policy for Republic Day releases. Although he satisfied the 2018 criteria, his application was rejected, and the State cited

M/S MONGIA REALTY AND BUILDWELL PRIVATE LIMITEDversusMANIK SETHI

2022 INSC 12231 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Mongia Realty and Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. (appellant) sued Manik Sethi (respondent) for recovery of alleged business loans, claiming the loans were repayable within one year of the last instalment and that the suit was filed within the limitation period. The respondent denied any loan relationship, asserting the payments w

UNITED BANK OF INDIAversusBISWANATH BHATTACHARJEE

2022 INSC 11731 January 2022Dismissed

The appellant, United Bank of India, dismissed Biswanath Bhattacharjee, a former branch manager, on five charges including non‑recording of a subsidy, disbursement to fictitious beneficiaries, misappropriation of loan and subsidy amounts, removal of documents and unauthorized demand‑draft transfers. The disciplinary en

K. RAMYAversusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.

2022 INSC 104430 September 2022Disposed off

The deceased businessman K. Kumareshan died in a motor accident, leaving a widow, minor children and parents as dependents who claimed compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 4,29,37,700 based on the deceased's income tax returns and audit reports, but the

C.S. RAMASWAMYversusV. K. SENTHIL & ORS

2022 INSC 104630 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiffs filed suits in 2015‑2016 to cancel sale deeds executed in 2005, alleging fraud. The defendant moved to reject the plaints under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the CPC, contending the suits were barred by the 10‑year limitation period. The trial court and High Court refused to reject the plaints, holding that li

SANGHI INDUSTRIES LIMITEDversusRAVIN CABLES LTD., AND ANR

2022 INSC 105030 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Sanghi Industries Ltd invoked performance bank guarantees issued by Ravin Cables Ltd in respect of three purchase orders and subsequently commenced arbitration. Ravin Cables filed two applications under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before Commercial Courts seeking to secure the disputed amoun

M/S. EMAAR INDIA LTD.versusTARUN AGGARWAL PROJECTS LLP & ANR.

2022 INSC 104930 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

M/s Emaar India Ltd entered into a Collaboration Agreement and a 2011 Addendum with Tarun Aggarwal Projects LLP. A dispute arose concerning performance under clauses 3, 6 and 9 of the Addendum, and the parties invoked Clause 36, which permits specific performance in a court, while Clause 37 provides for arbitration of

SUSHANTA KUMAR BANIKversusSTATE OF TRIPURA & ORS.

2022 INSC 105330 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Sushanta Kumar Banik, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 on the basis of two FIRs for alleged drug trafficking. The State of Tripura sought preventive detention, arguing that he was a habitual offender, while the ap

FERTILIZERS AND CHEMICALS TRAVANCORE LTD. & ORSversusANUSREE K.B.

2022 INSC 105130 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The father of the respondent, Anusree K.B., died in service in 1995, leaving a widow who was already employed and a minor daughter. Fourteen years after his death, the daughter applied for a compassionate appointment, which was rejected on the ground that she was not listed as a dependent and that the policy favoured w

HDFC BANK LTD. & ORSversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2022 INSC 105630 September 2022Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered a batch of writ petitions filed by several banks challenging the Reserve Bank of India's directions to disclose confidential information under the Right to Information Act, 2005. The banks argued that the directions conflicted with Section 8 of the RTI Act, the RBI Act and the Banking Regul

KAZI MOINUDDIN KAZI BASHIRODDIN & ORS.versusTHE MAHARASHTRA TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, THROUGH ITS SENIOR REGIONAL MANAGER REGIONAL OFFICE, MTDC, AURANGABAD, MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

2022 INSC 105530 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, land owners, challenged the High Court's order allowing the Maharashtra Tourism Development Corporation (MTDC) to withdraw Rs 1,37,50,547 that it had deposited on 20 March 2018 as part of the compensation awarded in a land‑acquisition case. The dispute centred on whether the Supreme Court’s order of 29 

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (R AND B) AND OTHERSversusGOKUL CHANDRA KANUNGO (DEAD) THR. HIS LRS.

2022 INSC 104330 September 2022Case Partly allowed

The appellants, contractors, obtained an arbitral award that granted them a sum of money plus interest at 18% per annum for the pre‑reference, pendente lite and post‑award periods. The arbitrator did not provide any reasons for fixing the rate of interest. The respondents had remained silent for long periods (1977‑1989

SHRI CHATRAPATI SHIVAJI GAUSHALAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

2022 INSC 104530 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

A truck transporting eighteen cattle was intercepted for lacking proper permits, leading to seizure of the animals and registration of FIRs under the Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act and related statutes. The private respondents, claiming ownership, applied under CrPC sections 451 and 457 for interim custody, which

AJWARversusNIYAJ AHMAD & ANR.

2022 INSC 105430 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was charged in a FIR for the murder of two sons of the complainant, along with several other offences. Although not named in the FIR, his involvement emerged during investigation and he was later added to the charge‑sheet under Section 161 of the CrPC. The trial court denied bail, but the Allahabad High C

AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIAversusCENTRE FOR AVIATION POLICY, SAFETY & RESEARCH (CAPSR) & OTHERS

2022 INSC 104730 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The Airport Authority of India (AAI) issued Request for Proposals for ground handling services at various airport groups, setting eligibility criteria that included regional clustering, a 36‑month experience requirement for scheduled flights, and a minimum annual turnover of Rs 30 crore (later reduced to Rs 18 crore).

BOHATTI DEVIversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.

2022 INSC 105230 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed against the Allahabad High Court's order granting bail to respondent No.2, who is charged with murder (IPC s.302) and criminal conspiracy (IPC s.120B). The Supreme Court observed that the High Court failed to consider the gravity of the offences, the charge‑sheet details, the earlier

MUNIKRISHNA @ KRISHNA ETC.versusSTATE BY ULSOOR PS

2022 INSC 132230 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The State prosecuted four appellants for the murder of a 72‑year‑old man in Ulsoor, alleging they confessed to the crime while in police custody and led investigators to a knife and stolen gold. The trial court and the Karnataka High Court convicted them under IPC s.302 r.w. s.34 and sentenced them to life imprisonment

SANJEET KUMAR SINGH @ MUNNA KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2022 INSC 88330 August 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Sanjeet Kumar Singh, was convicted under the NDNDPS Act for possession of 47.37 kg of ganja after a police search of his car. The prosecution’s case relied heavily on the testimony of PW‑7, a police officer who was both the informant and the investigating officer, and on his claim that the search was con

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIAversusRAJKUMAR NAGPAL & ORS

2022 INSC 88530 August 2022Case Partly allowed

Reliance Commercial Finance Ltd (RCFL) issued non‑convertible debentures and defaulted in March 2019. The RBI issued a prudential framework requiring lenders to enter into an inter‑creditor agreement (ICA) before a resolution plan, and SEBI later issued a circular on 13 Oct 2020 standardising the procedure for debentur

DIBAKER NUNIA & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF ASSAM

2022 INSC 88630 August 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants Dibakar and Babul were convicted for murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC based primarily on the testimony of the deceased's parents, who claimed to have witnessed the assault. The trial and High Courts accepted this testimony despite inconsistencies, such as the parents allegedly returning home,

MAHADEO & ORSversusSMT. SOVAN DEVI & ORS

2022 INSC 88830 August 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The widow of a permanently disabled ex‑serviceman, Smt. Sovan Devi, claimed that a 1971 inter‑departmental letter from the Soldier Welfare Department to the District Collector constituted a valid allotment of 25 bighas of land to her late husband under the Rajasthan Special Assistance to Disabled Ex‑Servicemen Rules, 1

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANKversusMR. VIJAY SITARAM DANDNAIK & ANR.

2022 INSC 88730 August 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Punjab National Bank (PNB) filed a petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against Jailaxmi Sugar Products Pvt Ltd, alleging default and seeking initiation of a corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP). The Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) issued a certificate of recovery on 1 November 20

KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITEDversusA. BALAKRISHNAN & ANR.

2022 INSC 63030 May 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Kotak Mahindra Bank (the appellant) sought initiation of a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Prasad Properties and Investments Pvt. Ltd. (the corporate debtor) under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The corporate debtor had stood as guarantor for loans to three borrower

CHANDRA PRAKASH MISHRAversusFLIPKART INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.

2022 INSC 37030 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Deputy Commissioner (Commercial Tax), challenged the High Court's observations and cost orders that accused him of deliberate, malafide actions in passing ex‑parte provisional assessment orders against Flipkart India Private Limited under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act. The High Court had set asid

SWARNALATHA & ORS.versusKALAVATHY & ORS.

2022 INSC 37230 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The married couple Mannar Reddiar and Adhilakshmiammal executed separate wills bequeathing their properties to their two sons, excluding their daughter Kalavathy who had earlier received gifts. After the death of the testators, the daughter and the second son filed a suit for partition and contested the probate of the

P. NAZEER ETC.versusSALAFI TRUST & ANR. ETC.

2022 INSC 36930 March 2022Dismissed

The dispute concerned the management of Salafi Juma Masjid, a waqf registered under the Waqf Act, 1995. The Mahal Committee, claiming to be a local (Sakha) unit of the registered society Kerala Naduvathil Mujahideen, sued the Salafi Trust seeking a declaration that a certificate of registration issued under s.36 of the

SANSERA ENGINEERING LIMITEDversusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER, LARGE TAX PAYER UNIT, BENGALURU

2022 INSC 123429 November 2022Dismissed

Sansera Engineering Ltd, a manufacturer of excisable goods, exported products in August‑October 2015 and paid excise duty. It claimed rebate of the duty under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 in February 2017, but the claims were rejected as being beyond the one‑year limitation prescribed in Section 11B of the

SUNEETHA NARREDDY & ANOTHERversusTHE CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND OTHERS

2022 INSC 123829 November 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, the daughter and wife of the deceased Y.S. Vivekananda Reddy, sought transfer of the CBI trial concerning his mysterious murder from the CBI Special Court in Kadapa to a court outside Andhra Pradesh, alleging threats to witnesses and potential bias in the investigation. They argued that key witnesses h

B.R.K. AATHITHANversusSUN GROUP & ANR.

2022 INSC 123629 November 2022Dismissed

The appellant, B.R.K. Aathithan, filed a criminal complaint under Sections 499 and 500 IPC alleging defamation by the respondents for broadcasting his arrest. The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the complaint, finding that the allegations fell within the fourth exception to Section 499. The appellant sought redress throu

M/S PRIME PROPERTIESversusSANA LAKSHMI DEVI (DIED) THROUGH HER LRS. & ORS.

2022 INSC 104129 September 2022Disposed off

The case involved a series of civil suits filed in 2001 that had been repeatedly amended and impleaded, leading to a long pendency. The plaintiff sought to file a rejoinder after the defendants had filed written statements, but the trial court initially rejected the application, later allowing it on review. The High Co

SUKHBIRI DEVI & ORSversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2022 INSC 103729 September 2022Dismissed

The appellants filed a declaratory suit challenging a relinquishment deed and were dismissed by the trial court on a preliminary issue of limitation, a decision affirmed by the first appellate court and the Delhi High Court. They contended that the limitation period should be extended to twelve years under Article 136

INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS’ FEDERATION OF INDIA (REGD.)versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

2022 INSC 87929 August 2022Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the Payment of Gratuity (Amendment) Act, 2009, which amended the definition of “employee” in the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and inserted Section 13A with retrospective effect from 3 April 1997 to extend gratuity benefits to teachers in private schools. The pe

HARKIRAT SINGH GHUMANversusPUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT & ORS.

2022 INSC 88129 August 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Harkirat Singh Ghuman, contested the 2019 Punjab/Haryana Superior Judicial Service examination, alleging procedural irregularities such as a missing question in Paper V (Criminal Law), absence of an OMR sheet and transparent answer key for Paper VI (General Knowledge), non‑provision of Bare Acts, and den

DAXABENversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

2022 INSC 77129 July 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The widow of Shaileshkumar Patel challenged the quashing of FIR No. I‑11209016200112, filed under Section 306 IPC for alleged abetment of his suicide, on the ground that the complainant and accused had reached a monetary settlement. The Gujarat High Court, invoking its inherent power under Section 482 of the CrPC, set

M/S BHAGWANDAS B. RAMCHANDANIversusBRITISH AIRWAYS

2022 INSC 76829 July 2022Dismissed

The appellant, a cargo importer, claimed damages from British Airways for loss of perishable goods shipped from Mumbai to Canada, filing suit in 2012. The trial court held the claim was not time‑barred, but the Bombay High Court dismissed it, holding that the two‑year limitation under Rule 30 of the Carriage by Air Act

ROHITH THAMMANA GOWDAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

2022 INSC 77029 July 2022Disposed off

The appellant, a US permanent resident, filed a writ petition in Karnataka High Court seeking habeas corpus to have his 11‑year‑old son, a naturalised US citizen born in the United States, returned to the US. The child had been taken to India by the mother without the father's consent in March 2020, and US courts had i

NATIONAL PETROLEUM CONSTRUCTION COMPANYversusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(2), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI & ANR.

2022 INSC 77229 July 2022Matter referred to larger bench

National Petroleum Construction Co., a UAE‑incorporated firm, sought a Section 197 certificate for a 4% TDS rate on payments from ONGC for contracts involving both onshore and offshore work in FY 2019‑20. The Deputy Commissioner issued a certificate directing 4% TDS on the entire amount, despite the appellant’s earlier

M. V CHANDRAKANTHversusSANGAPPPA & ORS

2022 INSC 76929 July 2022Dismissed

M. V. Chandrakanth (appellant) challenged a Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court that had set aside a Single Judge's order dismissing a writ petition filed by Respondent No.1, who claimed Other Backward Class (OBC) reservation as a member of the Ganiga caste. The central issue was whether a person belonging to th

THE NATIONAL MEDICAL COMMISSIONversusPOOJA THANDU NARESH & ORS.

2022 INSC 49429 April 2022Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether a student who obtained an MBBS degree from a Chinese university, where the tenth‑semester clinical training was delivered online due to COVID‑19, is entitled to provisional registration by the National Medical Commission (NMC). The Court held that the Eligibility Regulations require t

ATBIRversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI

2022 INSC 49229 April 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Atbir, convicted of multiple murders and originally sentenced to death, had his sentence commuted to life imprisonment by a presidential order that barred parole and any remission for the remainder of his natural life. He applied for furlough under the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018, but the Director General of Prisons denie

WAQF BOARD, RAJASTHANversusJINDAL SAW LIMITED & ORS

2022 INSC 49329 April 2022Dismissed

The Rajasthan Waqf Board claimed that a structure identified as the Qalandari Masjid on Tiranga Hill was a waqf religious site situated within Survey No. 6731, which had been leased to Jindal Saw Ltd for mining. The High Court allowed the mining lease to proceed, prompting the Board to appeal. The Supreme Court examine

OMKAR SINHA & ANRversusSAHADAT KHAN & ORS

2022 INSC 49129 April 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned whether a 1977 circular issued by the Governor of undivided Madhya Pradesh, which granted entry into Ranger training for Forest Guard trainees who topped their training, remained in force after the creation of Chhattisgarh in 2000. The State of Chhattisgarh issued several communications in 2009 and 2

JAI BHAVANI SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDALversusRAMESH & ORS.

2022 INSC 35829 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an educational society, dismissed its principal (the first respondent) after a departmental inquiry found several charges proved. The principal appealed to the School Tribunal, which set aside the dismissal on the ground that the Inquiry Committee was not constituted as required by Rule 36(2)(b) of the 1

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusRAJAN SOOD & ORS.

2022 INSC 36229 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) and the Government of NCT of Delhi appealed a Delhi High Court order that had declared the land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 as deemed to have lapsed under section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabili

MEKHA RAM AND OTHERS ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS ETC. ETC.

2022 INSC 36029 March 2022Disposed off

The appellants, employees of the Rajasthan Medical & Health Subordinate Service, applied for a three‑year General Nursing Training as in‑service candidates and sought to have their study leave treated as deputation. A Single Judge of the Rajasthan High Court allowed the petitions, directing the State to grant deputatio

RAJESH GUPTAversusSTATE THROUGH CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

2022 INSC 35929 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a senior Income Tax officer, was convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs.15,000 from the complainant, Madhu Bala, during a CBI‑operated trap. The prosecution relied primarily on the complainant’s testimony and on the recovery of currency notes

MASTER AYUSHversusTHE BRANCH MANAGER, RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.

2022 INSC 36429 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court considered the claim of a five‑year‑old child who became a paraplegic after a road accident in 2010. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 18,24,000, which the Karnataka High Court reduced to Rs 13,46,805. On appeal, the Court examined the method of calculating compensation under the Motor Veh

TARLOCHAN SINGH @ RANAversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2022 INSC 35629 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Tarlochan Singh, was the licensed holder of a double‑barrel 12‑bore rifle that was used to murder Gurdeep Singh. The prosecution alleged that the appellant had delivered the firearm to co‑accused Gurpreet Singh, who then used it in the killing, leading to convictions under Sections 29 and 30 of the Arms

RAM KUMARversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS.

2022 INSC 103428 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Ram Kumar, was allotted a Fair Price Shop licence during the pendency of an appeal by the earlier licence holder, Kiran Devi (respondent No.9), whose licence had been cancelled by the Deputy Collector. Kiran Devi challenged the cancellation in the High Court, which set aside the cancellation, holding tha

ANJU GARG & ANRversusDEEPAK KUMAR GARG

2022 INSC 103328 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The wife (appellant) and her son filed a maintenance petition under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code, alleging that the husband subjected her to cruelty, dowry harassment and forced her to leave the matrimonial home. The Family Court dismissed the wife’s application but granted maintenance to the son, a decis

CHOTKAUversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2022 INSC 103228 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Chotkau, was convicted and sentenced to death for the rape and murder of a six‑year‑old girl based solely on the testimonies of three prosecution witnesses and circumstantial evidence. The Supreme Court found serious contradictions in the witnesses' accounts regarding the FIR filing, the handling of the

SUNIL SIKRIversusGURU HARKRISHAN PUBLIC SCHOOL & ANR.

2022 INSC 76428 July 2022Dismissed

The appeal concerned Sunil Sikri, a former teacher of Guru Harkrishan Public School, who challenged a Tribunal order directing his reinstatement with 50% back wages. The key issues were whether Sections 8 and 11 of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 empower the Tribunal to award back wages, whether Rule 121 of the De

SHIV KUMAR SHARMAversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2022 INSC 76528 July 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a public servant, was convicted under Section 13(1)(d)(ii) read with Section 15 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 477A of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly manipulating measurement books and causing excess payment in school construction works. The prosecution alleged that he reduced

THE KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD & ANRversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS

2022 INSC 76228 July 2022Directions issued

The Karnataka Housing Board (KHB) initiated compulsory land acquisition under Section 33(2) of the Karnataka Housing Board Act, 1962 without a housing scheme having been sanctioned under Section 24(2). Petitioners argued that such acquisition was void for lack of a sanctioned scheme, relying on earlier decisions in Moh

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANRversusB. R. MURALIDHAR & ORS.

2022 INSC 76128 July 2022Disposed off

The State of Karnataka issued a land acquisition notification under Section 17 of the Karnataka Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1973. The petitioners challenged the notification on grounds of inadequate consideration of objections, alleged lapse of the acquisition process, and the constitutionality of Secti

MRS. AKELLA LALITHAversusSRI KONDA HANUMANTHA RAO & ANR.

2022 INSC 75928 July 2022Case Partly allowed

The mother, Akella Lalitha, gave birth to a child with her first husband Konda Balaji, who died shortly after. She later remarried Akella Ravi Narasimha Sarma, and the child's grandparents sought guardianship and visitation, later prompting the High Court to order a restoration of the child's original surname and to re

SANJAY PURAN BAGDE & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2022 INSC 76628 July 2022Dismissed

On the night of 2-3 November 2015, the deceased Vilas Gawande was attacked by four accused; two of them wielded an axe while the other two, Sanjay Puran Bagde and Rajratna (Nandu) Bagde, held the victim. The victim’s wife, an eyewitness, testified that all four were present and that the accused had a pre‑meditated plan

BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED & ANR.versusSANDEEP CHOUDHARY & ORS.

2022 INSC 48928 April 2022Dismissed

BSNL conducted a recruitment exam for Telecom Technical Assistants. Two OBC candidates (Alok Kumar Yadav and Dinesh Kumar) scored higher than the last selected general‑category candidate. The question was whether such OBC candidates must be adjusted to the general‑category pool and not counted against the OBC quota, wi

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusMUKESH KUMAR MEENA

2022 INSC 49028 April 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Mukesh Kumar Meena, an ST employee, appeared for the departmental exam for Income Tax Inspector and passed in his reserved category with 43% in the "Other Taxes" paper, exceeding the 40% threshold for ST candidates. He sought two grace marks to reach the 45% required for the general category, aiming for promotion. The

JAI NARAIN VYAS UNIVERSITY, JODHPUR AND ANR.versusMUKESH SHARMA ETC. ETC.

2022 INSC 35128 March 2022Case Partly allowed

The petitioners, who had been employed on contractual or daily‑wage terms for 15 to 30 years at Jai Narayan Vyas University, filed writ petitions seeking regularisation and parity with similarly situated permanent staff. The Rajasthan High Court ordered their regularisation with all consequential benefits, a decision t

VISHAL ASHWIN PATELversusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 25(3) & ORS.

2022 INSC 35328 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Vishal Ashwin Patel and others challenged the reopening of their income‑tax assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by filing writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution. The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petitions in a terse order stating it was not inclined to entertain them, without

CHANDRA SEKHAR JHAversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2022 INSC 24628 February 2022Dismissed

Chandra Sekhar Jha was intercepted in 2013 while smuggling gold and was penalised Rs 75 lakhs. He appealed the penalty before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal in 2017, but the Tribunal dismissed the appeal because he had not made the pre‑deposit required under Section 129E of the Customs Act. The

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL GONDIAversusDIVI WORKS & SUPPLIERS, HUF & ORS.

2022 INSC 24428 February 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The Municipal Council of Gondia issued a work order to Divi Works & Suppliers for school furniture, but suspended and later cancelled it due to the COVID‑19 pandemic and a government circular restricting non‑priority expenditure. The original petitioner claimed it had already manufactured the customized goods and sough

AMRITLALversusSHANTILAL SONI & ORS.

2022 INSC 24328 February 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant filed a written complaint on 10 July 2012 alleging that the respondents had failed to return silver entrusted to them, with the alleged offence dated 4 October 2009. An FIR was registered and a charge‑sheet filed, after which the Judicial Magistrate took cognizance on 4 December 2012. The respondents cont

RAJBIRversusSURAJ BHAN & ANR

2022 INSC 24728 February 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Rajbir, entered into a sale agreement which later resulted in a suit for specific performance. The trial court decreed that the respondents, Suraj Bhan and others, must execute a sale deed in favour of the appellant and deposit the balance consideration. The respondents filed an execution petition and su

SURJEET SINGH SAHNIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

2022 INSC 24528 February 2022Dismissed

The petitioner entered into a sale deed with NOIDA in 2001 that promised a 10% plot allocation. After ten years he made a representation to NOIDA, and eleven years after the deed filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking specific performance. The High Court entertained the petition, directed NOIDA to decide the r

MESSER GRIESHEIM GMBH (NOW CALLED AIR LIQUIDE DEUTSCHLAND GMBH)versusGOYAL MG GASES PVT. LTD.

2022 INSC 11328 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Messer Griesheim GmbH (now Air Liquide Deutschland GmbH) obtained a money decree of the English High Court, a superior court of a reciprocating territory, for US $5.8 million. The decree, exceeding Rs 20 lakhs, was filed for execution before the Delhi High Court. The Division Bench held that only a District Court could

CENTRUM FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITEDversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.

2022 INSC 11528 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Centrum Financial Services Ltd., a non‑banking financial company, filed a criminal appeal against the Delhi High Court’s order granting bail to Jayant Kumar Jain (Respondent No.2) in a case involving alleged siphoning of Rs 25 crore through shell companies and offences under IPC sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120

THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT & ANR.versusK. SUDHEESH KUMAR & ORS.

2022 INSC 11428 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, former Assistant Enforcement Officers, claimed that on their third financial upgradation under the Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) Scheme they were entitled to a grade pay of Rs.6600, the grade pay of the next promotional post. The High Court allowed this claim, interpreting the scheme to fo

PRAVEEN KUMAR C.PversusKERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS.

2022 INSC 11228 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

In a miscellaneous application (No. 1769 of 2021) filed in Civil Appeal No. 4846 of 2021, the petitioner sought correction of a typographical error in the cause title of the judgment dated 17‑08‑2021. The judgment incorrectly read the respondent's name as "Kerala Public Service Commission Commission & Ors." The Supreme

AMAR NATH (DEAD) THROUGH L.R.versusGIAN CHAND AND ORS.

2022 INSC 10628 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, Amar Nath, executed a special power of attorney (PoA) on 28‑01‑1987 in favour of the second defendant to sell his land for Rs.55,000. When the first defendant could not pay, the second defendant allegedly returned the PoA on 02‑02‑1987 and the plaintiff claimed it was cancelled, yet no formal notice or r

JARNAIL SINGH & ORSversusLACHHMI NARAIN GUPTA & ORS

2022 INSC 10528 January 2022Directions issued

The Supreme Court examined the legal framework governing reservation in promotions for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes under Articles 16(4‑A) and 16(4‑B) of the Constitution. It clarified that the State must collect quantifiable, cadre‑wise data to demonstrate backwardness and inadequate representation, but no fi

SUBHASH CHANDER & ORS.versusM/S BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.(BPCL) & ANR.

2022 INSC 10728 January 2022Dismissed

The appellants, owners of a 10,000 sq ft plot in Kaithal, sued the respondents for possession after a lease to Burmah Shell (later transferred to Bharat Petroleum) expired in 1998. The lease had a renewal clause exercised once, and the Central Government, under the Burmah Shell (Acquisition of Undertakings) Act, 1976,

DEEPAK S/O LAXMAN DONGREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2022 INSC 11028 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Deepak Dongre, was ordered to leave District Jalna for two years under Section 56(1)(a)(b) of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, based on five offences (three dated 2013‑2018 and two from 2020) and confidential witness statements. He challenged the externment order through a statutory appeal and a writ pe

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search