Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

B N AGRAWAL

87 judgments delivered by benches including this judge.

SONALI MUKHERJEEversusUNION OF INDIA

2009 INSC 116130 September 2009Dismissed

The case involved the death of Biswajit, alleged to be a murder committed by his wife Sonali Mukherjee (A‑1) and her alleged lover Assadid Poddar (A‑2) through gardenal poisoning. The trial court convicted both under s.302 IPC; the Madras High Court acquitted A‑2 and reduced A‑1's conviction to s.304(Part I) IPC. On ap

R.K. ANANDversusREGISTRAR, DELHI HIGH COURT

2009 INSC 95929 July 2009Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the criminal contempt proceedings against senior advocate R.K. Anand and former special public prosecutor I.U. Khan arising from a televised NDTV sting operation that captured their alleged attempts to influence a prosecution witness in the high‑profile BMW hit‑and‑run trial. The Court held t

UNION OF INDIAversusPUSHPA RANI & OTHERS

2008 INSC 87629 July 2008Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, railway clerks belonging to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, challenged a Railway Board letter dated 9 October 2003 that applied the reservation policy to posts created by a cadre‑restructuring exercise in Group C and D. The Central Administrative Tribunal had struck down the reservation clau

NAGENDRA CHANDRA ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.

2007 INSC 119528 November 2007Dismissed

A large number of police constables were appointed in 1990 by posting vacancies on a notice board, contrary to Rule 663(d) of the Bihar Police Manual which mandates advertisement in newspapers and through the employment exchange. When the irregularity was discovered, the Director General ordered their dismissal, which

Y. SATYANARAYAN REDDYversusMANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, A.P.

2009 INSC 108528 August 2009Dismissed

The appellant, Y. Satyanarayana Reddy, occupied 1 acre 21 guntas of government land in Lingojiguda, Andhra Pradesh. The Mandal Revenue Officer filed a land‑grabbing petition, leading the Land Grabbing Tribunal to order eviction. The Special Court, however, remitted the matter, later allowing the appellant to retain pos

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION CHANDIGARH AND ORS. ETC.versusM/S SHANTIKUNJ INVESTMENT PVT. LTD.

2006 INSC 12928 February 2006Disposed off

Allottees of residential and commercial plots in Chandigarh were required to pay the balance of the premium in instalments, together with interest, penalty and ground rent, after an initial payment. They contended that the State could not demand these payments until basic amenities such as roads, water supply and drain

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusLEHRU AND ORS.

2003 INSC 13328 February 2003Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined an appeal by United India Insurance Company Ltd, which sought to avoid liability for a motor accident on the ground that the driver’s licence was allegedly fake. The accident involved a vehicle driven by Janu, who presented a licence that appeared genuine; the insurer attempted to prove a dif

K.C. BUILDERS AND ANR.versusTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

2004 INSC 6528 January 2004Appeal(s) allowed

K.C. Builders, a partnership engaged in construction, filed original income tax returns for AY 1983-84 to 1986-87 and later revised them based on an approved valuer's report. The Assessing Officer treated the difference as concealed income and levied penalties under Section 271(1)(c) and initiated prosecution under Sec

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.versusM/S. SUPER MAX INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. & ORS.

2009 INSC 108127 August 2009Dismissed

The State of Maharashtra, as landlord, obtained a decree of ejectment against M/s Super Max International, the tenant, under sections 13(3)(a) and 13(1)(g) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, on grounds of tax defaults and the landlord's bona‑fide need. The High Court stayed execution

M/S. GIRNAR TRADERSversusST ATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

2007 INSC 86627 August 2007Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai had taken the statutory "steps" required under Section 126 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning (MRTP) Act to commence acquisition of land reserved for a public purpose, after the appellants served a purchase notice under Section 12

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIAversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS.

2009 INSC 28627 February 2009Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether the statutory first‑charge provisions in the Bombay Sales Tax Act (s.38C) and the Kerala General Sales Tax Act (s.26B) conflicted with the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (ORT Act) and the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and En

PROBODH PURKAITversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS

2007 INSC 21627 February 2007Dismissed

The case concerned a double murder that occurred on 15 January 1985 when an alleged unlawful assembly, allegedly led by Probodh Purkait, attacked the houses of Payed Ali Laskar and Dr. Srinibas Roy, dragging out and killing Abdur Rahaman Laskar and Abdur Molla. The trial court convicted six persons under Sections 148,

SAMARGHOSHversusJAYA GHOSH

2007 INSC 33826 March 2007Disposed off

The case involved two senior IAS officers who married under the Special Marriage Act in 1984. The wife unilaterally decided not to have children, refused cohabitation, neglected her husband during illness, insulted him and eventually forced him out of their home, leading to a separation that lasted over sixteen years.

SHANTI SPORTS CLUB & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2009 INSC 107725 August 2009Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether a ministerial note dated 8 June 1999 could be treated as a decision under Section 48(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to withdraw from the acquisition of land occupied by Shanti Sports Club, and whether the Government’s refusal to de‑notify the land (letter dated 9 June 2000) was

ABDUL KADERversusG.D. GOVINDARAJ (D) BY LRS.

2002 INSC 23024 April 2002Dismissed

The tenant held premises under a lease that required payment of monthly rent of Rs 100 and, additionally, Rs 111 as half of the annual property tax. The tenant failed to pay rent for January‑March 1990 and the agreed tax for three years. After a two‑month notice demanding the arrears, the tenant tendered only the rent,

M/S. KARTA RAM RAMESHWAR DASSversusRAM BILAS AND ORS.

2005 INSC 58423 November 2005Case Partly allowed

The case involved a shop jointly owned by two brothers, one of whom had let out the front portion to a tenant with the other co‑owner's consent. After the death of the co‑owner, his heirs sold their share and the surviving co‑owner filed a suit for partition. The trial court ordered a longitudinal partition with a wall

PAWAN KUMARversusSTATE OF HARYANA

2003 INSC 32923 July 2003Appeal(s) allowed

Pawan Kumar and Balwinder Singh (Binder) were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of a taxi driver whose body was found in a hotel room. The prosecution relied solely on circumstantial evidence that the accused hired the taxi, stayed in the hotel with the driver, and

SUSHIL KUMAR SABHARWALversusGURPREET SINGH AND ORS.

2002 INSC 22023 April 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a landlord‑tenant suit where the landlord obtained an ex‑parte decree for rent arrears and eviction. The tenant contended that he never received a summons because the process server’s report was unreliable and he testified under oath that no summons was served. The Court evaluated the require

PEOPLE'S UNION FOR CIVIL LIBERTIES AND ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

2009 INSC 23823 February 2009Matter referred to larger bench

The petitioners sought to strike down Rules 41(2) and 49‑0 of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 and to direct the Election Commission to provide for negative voting and its secrecy in ballot papers and EVMs. The Court examined the constitutional status of the right to vote, the concept of negative voting, and the sco

SWAMY SHRADDANANDA @ MURALI MANOHAR MISHRAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2008 INSC 85322 July 2008Disposed off

Swamy Shraddananda, convicted of murdering his wife Shakereh under sections 302 and 201 IPC, was sentenced to death by the trial court and the Karnataka High Court affirmed the sentence. The Supreme Court, hearing a split decision on sentencing, noted that while the murder was cold‑blooded and motivated by greed, the d

MUKHTIAR AHMED ANSARIversusSTATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI)

2005 INSC 22421 April 2005Appeal(s) allowed

Mukhtiar Ahmed Ansari was convicted under TADA (Sec. 5) and the Arms Act (Sec. 25(IB)) for allegedly possessing firearms and ammunition in a notified area after being arrested near Delhi's Bahai Temple in 1993. He had earlier been acquitted of the related kidnapping charge. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined whether

NAVEEN KOHLIversusNEELU KOHLI

2006 INSC 15721 March 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The husband, Naveen Kohli, filed a petition for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on the ground of cruelty, alleging that his wife, Neelu Kohli, was bad‑tempered, engaged in indecent conduct, transferred property to herself, and repeatedly harassed him through criminal and civil complaints. The trial court fou

STATE OF U.P.versusKISHAN CHAND AND ORS.

2004 INSC 45920 August 2004Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttar Pradesh charged five accused with murder and other offences arising from a violent incident on 3 August 1974 during a festival, where the accused formed an assembly, used firearms and sticks, and killed two persons while injuring others. The trial court convicted them under Sections 302/34, 302/149 a

NATURE LOVERS MOVEMENTversusSTATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS

2009 INSC 37120 March 2009Disposed off

The Nature Lovers Movement challenged the Kerala government's regularisation of forest land occupied by unauthorised settlers, arguing that Section 2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 is not prospective and that the state could assign forest land without Central Government approval. The Supreme Court examined the

FOMENTO RESORTS AND HOTELS LTD. AND ANOTHERversusMINGUEL MARTINS AND OTHERS

2009 INSC 3920 January 2009Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the acquisition of land (survey Nos.803 and 804) by the State of Goa for a tourism development project undertaken by Fomento Resorts and Hotels Ltd. The Court had to decide whether the acquisition fell under Section 40(1)(aa) or Section 40(1)(b) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and whether

MOHMED AMIN @ AMIN CHOTELI RAHIM MIYAN SHAIKH & ANR.versusC.B.I THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR

2008 INSC 131318 November 2008Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the validity of confessions recorded under Section 15 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA) in a murder‑conspiracy case. The appellants argued that their confessions were involuntary, obtained while in police custody, and later retracted, and that no corrobo

LAXMIDAS MORARJI (DEAD ) BY LRS.versusMISS BEHROSE DARAB MADAN

2009 INSC 115318 September 2009Dismissed

The landlord of a flat in Greater Bombay filed a suit under Section 28 of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging Houses Rates Control Act, 1947 seeking eviction of the occupant, who claimed tenancy rights as a family member of the deceased tenant. The Small Causes Court entertained the suit, but the appellate court held t

ANAR DEVI AND ORS.versusPARMESHWARI DEVI AND ORS.

2006 INSC 62818 September 2006Appeal(s) allowed

Nagar Mal, a Mitakshara coparcener, adopted Nemi Chand, thereby creating a joint coparcenary. Upon Nagar Mal's intestate death in 1989, his undivided half‑share in the ancestral property had to be allotted among his three heirs – the adopted son and his two daughters. The trial court erroneously awarded each daughter a

M.C. MEHTAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ON BEHALF OF MONITORING COMMITTEE

2003 INSC 49518 September 2003

The Supreme Court, hearing a writ petition under Article 32 filed by environmental activist M.C. Mehta on behalf of a Monitoring Committee, examined the Taj Heritage Corridor project undertaken near the Taj Mahal. The Court found that construction and river‑bed reclamation work had commenced without the mandatory clear

PARDEEP KUMARversusUNION ADMINISTRATION, CHANDIGARH

2006 INSC 51618 August 2006Appeal(s) allowed

Five men were tried for a gang rape under Section 376 of the IPC. The trial court convicted all, and the High Court upheld the conviction of Pardeep Kumar, while acquitting one accused and two died during appeal. Pardeep Kumar appealed, arguing that the prosecutrix had expressly stated that he did not rape her and that

VIJA Y KUMAR MADAN AND ORS.versusR.N. GUPTA TECHINCAL EDUCATION SOCIETY AND ORS.

2002 INSC 21318 April 2002Disposed off

The plaintiffs, owners of a leasehold premises in Gurgaon, sued the defendants for recovery of rent arrears and ejectment. The defendants failed to appear on the scheduled date, leading the trial court to proceed ex-parte and later set aside the ex-parte order under Order 9 Rule 7, imposing a condition that the defenda

STATE OF A.P.versusS. JANARDHANA RAO

2004 INSC 65417 November 2004Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Andhra Pradesh prosecuted S. Janardhana Rao, a Metropolitan Sessions Judge, for demanding Rs 6 lakh (later reduced to Rs 3 lakh) as illegal gratification to secure the acquittal of accused in a pending Sessions case. A trap, authorized by the Chief Justice, led to the money being handed to the judge's wife

SHAILENDRA DANIA AND ORS.versusS.P. DUBEY AND ORS.

2006 INSC 22817 April 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned promotion of Junior Engineers in the Slum Wing of the Delhi Development Authority (DDA). The rules provided separate promotion quotas for graduate and diploma holders, requiring three years of service for graduates and eight years for diploma holders to be promoted to Assistant Engineer. The dispute

RAMINDER SINGH SETHIversusD. VIJAYARANGAM

2002 INSC 21117 April 2002Dismissed

The landlord filed an eviction suit under clause (a) of Section 21(1) of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961, alleging that the tenant was in arrears of rent. The tenant argued that the advance rent paid at the commencement of tenancy should be adjusted against the arrears, and that Section 18, which limits advance re

SYED ABDUL QADIR & ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

2008 INSC 143616 December 2008Case Partly allowed

The case concerned assistant teachers of Bihar's Nationalised Schools whose pay on promotion had been fixed under the now‑defunct Fundamental Rule 22‑C (FR.22‑C). The State of Bihar issued an office order in 2000 directing re‑fixation of pay under the amended provisions FR.22(1)(a)(1) and FR.22(1)(a)(2) and recovery of

NARAYAN CHANDRA GHOSH AND ORS.versusKANAILAL GHOSH AND ORS.

2005 INSC 56716 November 2005Dismissed

The case concerned eviction suits filed by thika tenants (Kanailal Ghosh and others) against Bharatias (Narayanchandra Ghosh and others) occupying rooms in a house. The suits were filed under the Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act, 1949, before the Calcutta Thika Tenancy (Acquisition and Regulation) Act, 1981 came into force.

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusA K. PANDEY

2009 INSC 113916 September 2009Dismissed

The case concerned A.K. Pandey, an army officer charged with selling a weapon, who was informed of the charges on 2 November 1995 and tried by a General Court Martial on 6 November 1995, but the trial began at 10:10 a.m., less than the 96‑hour interval mandated by Rule 34 of the Army Rules, 1954. Pandey pleaded guilty,

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERSversusKAMAL SENGUPTA AND ANOTHER

2008 INSC 75916 June 2008Case Allowed

The State of West Bengal appealed against a West Bengal Administrative Tribunal order that granted higher pay scales to two officers, Kamal Sengupta and another, after a review application was allowed. The respondents contended that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to review its own order on the basis of a later decisi

SATYAWATI SHARMA (DEAD) BY LRS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2008 INSC 49516 April 2008Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Satyawati Sharma, purchased a house in Delhi and sought eviction of tenants who were using the premises for a watch shop and a clinic, invoking the landlord's bona‑fide need under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. The Act’s Section 14(1)(e) permits eviction only when the premises are let for residential

BANWAR LAL & ORS.versusG. KALAVATHI (DEAD) BY LRS. & ORS.

2008 INSC 49416 April 2008Disposed off

The predecessor‑in‑interest of the respondents owned ten acres of land in Hyderabad and had leased it to Hyderabad Industries Ltd. The Mandal Revenue Officer issued a notice under Section 6 of the Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905, to vacate the land. The notice was challenged and the High Court quashed it, di

SAMIRA KOHLIversusDR. PRABHA MANCHANDA & ANR.

2008 INSC 5616 January 2008Case Allowed

The appellant, a 44‑year‑old unmarried woman, was admitted for a diagnostic laparoscopy but, while under general anaesthesia, the respondent doctors performed an abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo‑oophorectomy without her informed consent. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissed her cla

DELHI BAR ASSOCIATIONversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2008 INSC 67815 May 2008Dismissed

The Delhi Bar Association challenged a notification issued by the Lieutenant Governor of the National Capital Territory of Delhi that divided the territory into nine civil districts, alleging that the Lt. Governor lacked authority and that the decision was a policy matter not subject to judicial review. The Supreme Cou

RAMA NARANGversusRAMESH NARANG AND ANOTHER

2007 INSC 29315 March 2007Disposed off

The father, Rama Narang, filed a contempt petition against his two sons, Ramesh and Rajesh Narang, alleging that they deliberately violated a Supreme Court consent order that required joint management of their family company, NIHL, and joint signing of cheques for transactions exceeding Rs 10 lakhs. The Court examined

RAM SINGHversusSONIA AND ORS.

2007 INSC 14315 February 2007Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the murder of a family of ten, including three infants, committed by A‑1 (Sonia) and her husband A‑2 (Sanjiv) to prevent the transfer of property to the step‑brother. The trial court convicted them under Sections 302, 34 and 120‑B IPC and sentenced them to death, a decision the High Court lat

M/S. ANITA ENTERPRISES AND ANR.versusBELFER COOP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. & ORS.

2007 INSC 115014 November 2007Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined a dispute where two firms (the appellants) were occupying rooms in a flat allotted to a member of a tenant co‑partnership housing society. The member had inducted the firms as tenants without the society’s consent, allegedly violating Section 29(2) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act

LALLAN RAJ AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR

2002 INSC 47314 November 2002Disposed off

The case involved fourteen accused who, on the night of Holi, encircled and assaulted Bindeshwari Rai with deadly weapons, resulting in his death. The trial court convicted all of them under Section 302 IPC, with some also under Section 307 IPC, while the High Court later acquitted them of the Section 302/149 charge bu

NIZAM'S INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCESversusPRASANATH S. DHANANKA & ORS.

2009 INSC 81114 May 2009Disposed off

The case involves a 20‑year‑old engineering student who underwent excision biopsy of a mediastinal neurofibroma at Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences and subsequently suffered acute paraplegia. The complainant alleged negligence before, during and after the operation and claimed compensation of over Rs. 4.61 crore,

E.T. SUNUPversusC.A.N.S.S. EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION AND ANR.

2004 INSC 60013 October 2004Disposed off

The State Government of Nagaland issued an order stopping all payments to its employees except salaries and pensions, including a ban on withdrawals from the General Provident Fund (GPF). The ban was challenged by the CANSSEA Employees Association, leading the Gauhati High Court to direct the State to lift the ban; the

PREM SURANAversusADDL. MUNSIF AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE AND ANR.

2002 INSC 33513 August 2002Dismissed

Advocate Prem Surana, who was also an accused in a criminal case, entered the Jaipur District Court and, after his application for exemption from appearance was rejected and a non‑bailable warrant issued, verbally abused and slapped the presiding Judicial Magistrate in open court. The District Judge referred the incide

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTDversusM/S HIRA LAL RAMESH CHAND & ORS.

2008 INSC 75113 June 2008Appeal(s) allowed

The complainants, exporters of rugs, insured multiple consignments shipped from India to the United States under "warehouse‑to‑warehouse" marine policies covering all risks. The buyer failed to pay and the original documents of title were not presented, leading the exporters to claim loss of the consignments before the

EASTERN BOOK COMPANY & ORS.versusD.B. MODAK & ANR.

2007 INSC 126612 December 2007Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether the copy‑edited versions of Supreme Court judgments published in the law report "Supreme Court Cases" (SCC) qualify as original literary works eligible for copyright. It held that the judgments themselves are government works in the public domain and their reproduction does not infrin

SAVITA GARGversusTHE DIRECTOR, NATIONAL HEART INSTITUTE

2004 INSC 59712 October 2004Appeal(s) allowed

Savita Garg filed a consumer complaint before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) alleging that her husband, A.K. Garg, died due to medical negligence at the National Heart Institute. The Commission dismissed the petition on the ground that the treating doctors and nurses were not impleaded as p

PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND OTHERSversusJAGJIWAN RAM AND ORS.

2009 INSC 16012 February 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The Punjab State Electricity Board introduced a scheme granting time‑bound promotional scales after 9/16 years of regular service and promotional increments after 23 years of regular service. A group of employees who had initially been engaged as work‑charged staff and later regularised claimed that their prior work‑ch

SAHARA INDIA (FIRM), LUCKNOWversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-I & ANR.

2008 INSC 48411 April 2008Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether a pre‑decisional hearing must be afforded before an Assessing Officer orders a special audit under Section 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that, although the provision is silent, the order has civil consequences and therefore the principles of natural justice, part

RAJAN RAIversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2005 INSC 55910 November 2005Dismissed

The appellant Rajan Rai was convicted of murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC and under Sections 3 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act for allegedly throwing a bomb that killed his brother. Four co‑accused were earlier acquitted by the High Court, while a fifth co‑accused had died before trial. Th

S.K. SHUKLA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS

2005 INSC 56110 November 2005

The Supreme Court examined a raid that uncovered AK‑56 rifles, ammunition and about 600 g of explosive material at the residence of three accused, leading to prosecution under the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (POTA). The State Government’s order withdrawing the POTA cases and the Review Committee’s finding of no p

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHversusMAST RAM

2004 INSC 50910 September 2004Appeal(s) allowed

The State prosecuted Mast Ram for murder under IPC 302, alleging he shot the deceased Uttam Chand with a double‑barrel muzzle‑loaded gun. The trial court, relying on eyewitness accounts, a post‑mortem report, a ballistic expert report and a spot‑inspection that placed the victim within firing range, convicted the accus

GURPREET SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2005 INSC 5579 November 2005

The Supreme Court examined the murder of Kuljit Singh, where the accused Gurpreet Singh and Mohinder Pal Singh, along with others, were convicted under Section 302 IPC. The prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused shared a common intention to kill, supported by eyewitness testimony and medical eviden

P.V. RADHA KRISHNA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF A. P. AND ORS.

2009 INSC 11839 October 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the status of Hyderabad City Police officers under the Andhra Pradesh Employment (Organization of Local Cadres and Regulation of Direct Recruitment) Order, 1975 (the Presidential Order) and the Hyderabad City Police Act, 1348 Fasli. The petitioners, appointed as Sub‑Inspectors of Hyderabad City Polic

RAMCHANDRA DAGDU SONAVANE (DEAD) BY LRS. & ORS.versusVITHU HIRA MAHAR (DEAD) BY LRS. & ORS.

2009 INSC 11789 October 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, heirs of a Watandar, sued the respondents for a permanent injunction, asserting their right to the watan lands based on a 1941 declaration. The respondents claimed they were the adopted son of the deceased Watandar, relying on a 1931 order of the Mamlatdar, and sought re‑grant of the land. The trial cou

HARIOM AGRAWALversusPRAKASH CHAND MAL VIYA

2007 INSC 10128 October 2007Dismissed

The appellant Hariom Agrawal sought to admit a photocopy of a tenancy agreement as secondary evidence after the original was allegedly stolen. The agreement, required to bear a Re.1 stamp, instead had a notarial stamp of Rs.4, i.e., a stamp of sufficient amount but improper description. The trial court admitted the pho

KISHORELALversusCHAIRMAN, E.S.I. CORPORATION

2007 INSC 5278 May 2007Appeal(s) allowed

Kishore Lal, an employee insured under the Employees' State Insurance (ESI) scheme, complained that his wife received negligent medical treatment at an ESI dispensary, leading to her condition worsening. He filed a complaint before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum seeking compensation for negligence, but

KUSUM DEVIversusMOHAN LAL (DEAD) BY LRS

2009 INSC 4638 April 2009Appeal(s) allowed

Kusum Devi, the landlady, filed a suit for eviction of tenant Mohan Lal under sections 12(1)(e) and 12(1)(g) of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961, claiming a bona‑fide need for residential occupation and for repairs because the premises were unsafe. The trial court and the first appellate court granted

RAMESHWAR PRASAD AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2005 INSC 4917 October 2005

The Supreme Court examined writ petitions challenging the Governor's proclamation dated 23 May 2005 that dissolved the Bihar Legislative Assembly after the state had been placed under President's Rule on 7 March 2005. The petitions argued that the dissolution was unconstitutional because the assembly was kept in suspen

G.M. INDIAN BANKversusR. RANI & ANR.

2007 INSC 12356 December 2007Dismissed

The respondents were appointed to bank positions reserved for Scheduled Tribes on the basis of caste certificates claiming membership in the Konda Reddy community. A District Level Committee later cancelled those certificates after an enquiry, leading to their termination. The High Court quashed the committee’s orders,

S. BHAGIRATH AMMALversusPALANI ROMAN CATHOLIC MISSION

2007 INSC 12336 December 2007Dismissed

The Palani Roman Catholic Mission (landlord) leased a plot to S. Bhagirath Ammal (tenant) who erected a structure. After the lease expired, the Mission sought possession, and the tenant filed an application under Section 9 of the Madras City Tenants Protection Act, 1921 to purchase the land. While the application was p

COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY & ANR.versusTHOMAS P. JOHN & ORS.

2008 INSC 5856 May 2008Appeal(s) allowed

The Cochin University of Science & Technology (Cochin University) introduced a B.Tech. programme in 1995 reserving 10% seats for NRI students, charging them a one‑time development fee of US$5,000 and a semester fee of Rs.20,000, while other students paid only Rs.20,000 per semester. In 1996‑97 the university raised the

M/S. YASHA OVERSEASversusCOMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX & ORS.

2008 INSC 5866 May 2008Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined a batch of six appeals concerning the taxability of Replenishment Licences (REP licences) and the Duty Entitlement Passbook (DEPB) scheme under various State sales tax statutes. The appellants argued that the three‑judge decision in Vikas Sales Corporation v. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes,

KAMALANANTHA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

2005 INSC 1835 April 2005Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the conviction of a swami and his associates for the systematic rape of thirteen orphaned girls in an ashram and the murder of a male inmate. The Court held that the victims' consent was obtained by deceit and threat, rendering it invalid under Section 375 IPC, and that the rape charges were

IN RE: DEA TH OF 25 CHAINED INMATES IN ASYLUM FIRE IN TAMIL NADUversus.

2002 INSC 635 February 2002Disposed off

A tragic fire at a mental asylum in Ervadi, Tamil Nadu, killed 25 chained patients, prompting the Supreme Court to take suo motu action under Article 32. The Court examined the failure of the Central and State governments to implement the Mental Health Act, 1987 and related disability statutes, noting that chaining of

OFFICIAL LIQUIDATORversusDAYANAND AND OTHERS

2008 INSC 12344 November 2008Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned employees engaged by Official Liquidators under Rule 308 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 who were paid from the liquidated company's fund ("company paid staff"). They sought regularisation, absorption into the regular cadre of the Department of Company Affairs and parity in pay with Central Gove

JIMMY JAHANGIR MADANversusBOLLY CARIYAPPA HINDLEY (D) BY LRS.

2004 INSC 6394 November 2004Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved two complaint proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act where the complainant died during trial, leaving heirs who had executed general powers of attorney. The heirs' attorneys filed applications under Section 302 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking permission to continue t

J.K. GUPTAversusD.G. INVESTIGATION AND REGISTRATION AND ORS.

2004 INSC 6404 November 2004

A complaint was lodged before the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices (MRTP) Commission against a computer training institute for admitting students to unrecognised courses and for publishing misleading advertisements. The Commission issued an interim injunction and, after the institute’s service advisor (the ap

GREATER BOMBAY CO-OP. BANK LTD.versusM/S UNITED YARN TEX. PVT. LTD. & ORS.

2007 INSC 3704 April 2007Reference answered

The Greater Bombay Co‑operative Bank Ltd. advanced loans to its member company United Yarn Tex Pvt. Ltd. and sought recovery of the dues under the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act, 1960. The High Courts held that, after the establishment of the Debt Recovery Tribunal under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and F

IN RE: BINEET KUMAR SINGHversus-

2001 INSC 2503 May 2001Disposed off

The State of Maharashtra introduced a CPED course, but a private institution, Lokmata Indira Gandhi College of Sports, admitted students without permission for the 1994-95 session. After several writ petitions were dismissed, a forged Supreme Court order dated 28 August 1998 was allegedly sent to the State, directing i

D. BOOPALAN & ORS.versusMADRAS METROPOLITAN W.S.S. BOARD & ORS.

2007 INSC 11222 November 2007Disposed off

The Madras Metropolitan Water Supply & Sewerage Board amended its Leave Regulations in 1993 to grant engineers who obtained a post‑graduate degree accelerated seniority (two years for first class, one year for second class). A 1995 amendment withdrew this benefit and applied the withdrawal even to officers already on s

STATE OF GOAversusSANJAY THAKRAN AND ANR.

2007 INSC 2412 March 2007Dismissed

The State of Goa appealed the acquittal of Sanjay and Anjali Thakran for murder, robbery and criminal conspiracy of a newly‑wed couple. The prosecution relied solely on circumstantial evidence – the accused were last seen with the victims, some jewellery and clothing were recovered from them, and the accused gave no ex

POLYMAT INDIA P. LTD. AND ANR.versusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ORS.

2004 INSC 6851 December 2004Dismissed

Polymat India Ltd. and an associate insured their factory premises against fire under two policies issued by National Insurance Co. Ltd. The policies described the location as "factory‑cum‑godown" and the insured answered in the negative to a query about goods stored in the open. After a fire destroyed the building, pl

DEB NARAYAN SHYAM AND ORS.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

2004 INSC 6861 December 2004Dismissed

A group of Amins employed by the West Bengal government sought to be placed in the same pay scale as Surveyors, invoking the principle of ‘equal pay for equal work’. The High Court had earlier granted such parity in a number of writ petitions without examining the distinct qualifications and duties of the two posts, an

BIHAR STATE COUNCIL OF AYURVEDIC AND UNANI MEDICINEversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.

2007 INSC 11181 November 2007Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether the Graduate of Ayurvedic Medicine and Surgery (GAMS) degree awarded by the Bihar State Faculty under the Bihar Development of Ayurvedic and Unani Systems of Medicine Act, 1951 remains a recognized qualification in view of the Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970, the Bihar Indig

PARWATI BAIversusRADHIKA

2003 INSC 2721 May 2003Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a lessee of a non‑residential municipal premises, sub‑let the property to the respondent and later served a notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act to terminate the tenancy for non‑payment of rent and self‑occupation. The respondent filed an eviction suit which was dismissed by the trial

ABDUL SATTARversusKHUTEJABI AND ORS.

2003 INSC 2731 May 2003Dismissed

The landlord Abdul Sattar sought eviction of the heirs of his former tenant Mohammed Gouse under clause (p) of Section 21(1) of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961, alleging that one heir had been allotted a house by the Housing Board. The house was allotted in 1984 to the son, Mohammed Ismail, while the original tena

MAHENDRA SAREE EMPORIUMversusG.V. SRINIVASA MURTHY

2002 INSC 2521 May 2002Disposed off

The landlord filed eviction proceedings against the tenant under Section 21 of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961, and obtained a decree for possession. The tenant appealed to the Supreme Court under Article 136. While the appeal was pending, the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999 came into force, repealing the 1961 Act. Secti

ALL INDIA ANNA DRAVIDA MUNNETRA KAZHAGAMversusL.K. TRIPATHI AND OTHERS

2009 INSC 4511 April 2009Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined contempt petitions filed by the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) alleging that senior Tamil Nadu officials (respondents 1‑5) willfully disobeyed a Court order restraining political parties from calling a bandh on 1 October 2007, and that Union Minister T.R. Baalu (respondent 

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search