MAHENDRA SAREE EMPORIUMversusG.V. SRINIVASA MURTHY

A                        MAHENDRA SAREE EMPORIUM
                                      v.
                           G.V. SRINIVASA MURTHY

                                    MAY 1, 2002 ·

B                    [R.C. LAHOTI AND B.N. AGRAWAL, JJ.]


            Karnataka Rent Act, 1999:

            ss.2(3)(g) and 70(2)(0.)-Abatement of proceedings-Non-residential
C premises-Eviction of tenant sought by landlord u/s. 21 of Karnataka Rent
   Control Act, 1961-Allowed by High Court-Pending appea' before Supreme
   Court, the 1999 Act came into force-Area of premises exceeds 14 square
   meters-Jn view of s.2(J)(g), 1999 Act does not apply to suit premises and
 . therefore, by virtue of clause (c) of s. 70(2) these proceedings shall stand
D abated~Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961-s.21.
                                         'i
            CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 6296 of
    1998.

            From the Judgment and Order dated 25.9.1998 of the Kamataka High
E Court in H.R.R.P. No. 2491 of 1991.
            A. Subba Rao and A.T. Rao for the Appellant.

            P.R. Ramasesh for the Respondent.

            The Judgment of the Court was delivered by
F
          Proceedings for eviction of tenant from the suit premises were initiated
    under Section 21 of the Kamataka Rent Control Act, 1961 before the court.
    The High Court has allowed the landlord's claim for recovery of possession
    of the suit premises on the ground of sub-Jetting by the tenant. The decree
    passed by the High Court has been put in issue by the tenant by filing this
G   appeal under Article 136 of the Constitution by special leave. During the
    pendency of the appeal the Kamataka Rent Act, 1999 has: come into force
    with effect from 31st December, 2001. Section 70 of the 1999 Act-dealing
    with repeal and savings provides as under :

             "70. Repeal and Savings-()) The Kamataka Rent Control Act, 1961
H                                       694
                  MAHENDRA SAREE EMPORIUM v. G.V. SRINIVASA MURTHY                         695

                  (Karnataka Act 32 of 1961) is hereby repealed.                                  A
                  (2) Notwithstanding such repeal and subject to the provisions of



--                Section 69 -

                  (a) all proceedings in execution of any decree or order passed under
                  the repealed Act, and pending at the commencement of this Act, in
                  any Court shall be continued and disposed of by such Court as if the
                  said enactment had not been repealed;
                                                                                                  B


                  (b) all cases and proceedings other than those referred to in clause (a)
                  pending at the commencement of this Act before the Controller, Deputy
                  Commissioner, Divisional Commissioner, Court, District Judge or the             C
                  High Court or. other authority, as the case may be, in respect of the
                  premises to which this Act applies shall be continued and disposed of
                  by such Controller, Deputy Commissioner, Divisional Commissioner,
                  Court, District Judge or the High Court or other authority in accordance
                  with the provisions of this Act.
                                                                                                  D
                  (c) all other cases and proceedings pending in respect of premises to
                  which this Act does not apply shall as from the date of commencement
     ,.           of the Act stand abated.

                  (3) Except as otherwise provided in Section 69 and in sub-section (2)
                  of this section, provisions of Section 6 of the Karnataka General               E
                  Clauses Act, 1899 (Karnataka Act III of 1899), shall so far as may
                  be applicable in respect of repeal of the said enactment, and Sections
                  8 and 24 of the said Act shall be applicable as if the said enactment
                  had been repealed and re-enacted by this Act."

                 It is not disputed that the area of the suit premises used for non-residential   F
          purposes exceeds fourteen square meters. Hence looking to the provisions of
          clause (g) of sub-section (3) of Section 2 of the 1999 Act, the provisions of
          the 1999 Act do not apply to the suit premises and, therefore, by virtue of

-·        clause (c) of sub-section (2) of Section 70 of the 1999 Act these proceedings
          shall stand abated.
                                                                                                  G
                That being the position of law this appeal cannot be decided on merits
          and stands abated without any adjudication on merits. It be treated as disposed
          of.

          R.P.                                                          Appeal disposed of.