Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA

43 judgments delivered by benches including this judge.

SMT. SHASHI JAINversusTARSEM LAL (DEAD) & ANR.

2009 INSC 44331 March 2009Appeal(s) allowed

Shashi Jain, the landlady, filed an eviction application under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, claiming she needed the premises for her own and her aged mother's personal use and that the tenant, Tarsem Lal, had sub‑let part of the premises to Rakesh Kumar without her written consent. Th

SATISH JAGGIversusSTATE OF CHATTISGARH & ORS.

2007 INSC 50330 April 2007Disposed off

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by the State of Chhattisgarh challenging a High Court order that granted bail to an accused (respondent No.3) charged under Sections 302 and 1208 IPC for the murder of a rival political leader during an election campaign. The High Court, while granting bail, examined the credibility an

STATE OF A.P. & ANR.versusT. YADAGIRI REDDY & ORS

2008 INSC 136528 November 2008Dismissed

The State of Andhra Pradesh appealed against the High Court’s order that five respondents, who were the sons of a late protected tenant, were the absolute owners of 123 acres of agricultural land and could not be declared surplus under the Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973. The Su

K.A. NAGAMANIversusINDIAN AIRLINES & ORS.

2009 INSC 42327 March 2009Dismissed

K.A. Nagamani, a former programmer and Assistant Manager (Systems) with Indian Airlines, challenged the promotion of three colleagues to Deputy Manager (Maintenance/Systems) and the merger of hardware and software cadres, arguing that the Recruitment and Promotion Rules were statutory and could not be overridden by an

M/S. KLASSIC CONSTRUCTION (PVT.) LTD.versusM/S. ARMY WELFARE HOUSING ORGANISATION

2006 INSC 36325 May 2006Disposed off

The appellant Klassic Construction entered into a construction contract with the Army Welfare Housing Organisation that contained an arbitration clause requiring disputes to be referred to a sole arbitrator appointed by the Chairman. After an earlier arbitrator could not complete the proceedings, the Supreme Court dire

M.P. HOUSING BOARDversusSHIV SHANKAR MANDIL & ORS.

2008 INSC 121824 October 2008Dismissed

The respondents applied to the District Industries Centre for a parcel of Nazul land (Survey No. 462) to set up an industrial unit. The Collector transferred the land to the Industries Centre on 27 July 1991 and later, after the Madhya Pradesh Housing Board objected, ordered a status‑quo restraining construction. While

INDIAN BANKSversusGODHARA NAGRIK COOP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD. & ANR. ETC. ETC.

2009 INSC 39424 March 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court was asked to clarify certain directions given in its 16 May 2008 judgment concerning the Indian Bank scam involving cooperative societies' fixed deposits (FDRs). The Court observed that, unlike the Bank of Baroda case, there was no Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe in the Indian Bank matters

MS. INS. MALHOTRAversusDR. A. KRIPLANI & ORS.

2009 INSC 39824 March 2009Dismissed

The appellant, sister of the deceased Priya Malhotra, alleged that doctors and Bombay Hospital were negligent, leading to Priya's death from peritonitis and renal failure. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissed the complaint for lack of proof of negligence, a decision the appellant challenged bef

C.M. GIRISH BABUversusC.B.I. COCHIN, HIGH COURT OF KERALA

2009 INSC 24324 February 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, C.M. Girish Babu, and another accused were tried for demanding and accepting a bribe under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and for criminal conspiracy under IPC s.1208. The trial court convicted them; the Kerala High Court upheld the conviction under s.7 but acqui

MAHENDRA PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

2009 INSC 24424 February 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The incident occurred on 12 February 1975 at Lalitpur bus stand where the appellant Mahendra Pratap Singh was alleged to have fired a single bullet from a rifle, causing the death of Devendra Singh and injuries to three others. The trial court acquitted him, but the Allahabad High Court convicted him under IPC sections

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORLTYversusARUN LAL SATIJA AND ORS.

2007 INSC 117823 November 2007

The father of respondent No.1 was a member of a cooperative housing society and died before any land allotment was made. The society transferred his membership to his son, who applied for inclusion in the draw of lots for a plot, but the Registrar of Cooperative Societies rejected the application. The Delhi High Court

T. ANJANAPPA AND ORS.versusSOMALINGAPPA AND ANR.

2006 INSC 53622 August 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants filed a suit claiming title to a municipal allotment, purchasing the land two days after filing, and alleged that the respondents had encroached on a portion of the property by erecting a hutment three years earlier. The respondents contended that they had been in possession since 1969, paid municipal ta

GEN. OFFICER COMM. IN CHIEF, LUCKNOW AND ORS.versusR.P. SHUKLA (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.

2006 INSC 35122 May 2006Appeal(s) allowed

Three short‑term army personnel were convicted by a Summary Court Martial of serious misconduct and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment and dismissal. They challenged the proceedings before the High Court on the ground that Army Rule 180 was not observed, and the High Court set aside the martial proceedings and ordered

BHARAT CO-OPERATIVE BANK (MUMBAI) LTD.versusCO-OPERATIVE BANK EMPLOYEES UNION

2007 INSC 33122 March 2007Dismissed

Bharat Co-operative Bank (Mumbai) Ltd., a multi‑state co‑operative bank, challenged the jurisdiction of the Maharashtra Trade Union Act, arguing that under Section 2(a) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 the "appropriate Government" for a "Banking Company" with branches in more than one state is the Central Governmen

COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, AHMEDABADversusSARABHAI HOLDINGS PVT. LTD.

2008 INSC 120221 October 2008Dismissed

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Ahmedabad appealed against the Gujarat High Court’s judgment in favour of Sarabhai Holdings Pvt. Ltd. concerning interest on a deferred sale consideration. The assessee had sold a business unit and agreed to pay interest at 11% on the unpaid balance, later modifying the payment terms by

VISHWANATH GUPTAversusSTATE OF UTTARANCHAL

2007 INSC 32921 March 2007Dismissed

The petition concerned a kidnapping for ransom where the victim was abducted in Lucknow (U.P.), ransom demands were made in Haldwani (Uttarakhand) and the bodies were recovered in Unnao (U.P.). The FIR was lodged and investigation commenced at Haldwani. The question before the Supreme Court was which court had territor

SATVIRversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2009 INSC 4921 January 2009Dismissed

Eight persons were tried for the murder of Hari Dutt Singh. The trial court convicted all under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC and sentenced them to life imprisonment. On appeal, the High Court converted the convictions of Satvir (appellant), Ram Saran and Harbir to Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC and acqui

M.P. HOUSING BOARDversusPROGRESSIVE WRITERS & PUBLISHERS

2009 INSC 37520 March 2009Dismissed

The M.P. Housing Board and Progressive Writers & Publishers entered into three successive agreements concerning the construction and ownership of a press complex. The third agreement of 31 May 1980 required full payment by 31 October 1980, failing which it would be cancelled. The Board alleged the arbitrator exceeded h

PARAG CONSTRUCTIONversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2008 INSC 132319 November 2008Dismissed

Parag Construction and other appellants bought land in Borivali (Final Plots 22A, 228 and 22C) at a court auction in 1981 and later challenged the acquisition of that land by the arbitrator under the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966, arguing that they were not given notice and therefore the acquisition was

STATE OF HARYANAversusDILBAGH SINGH

2006 INSC 71018 October 2006Dismissed

The respondent, Dilbagh Singh, a Beldar in the Public Works Department, was terminated on 25‑December‑1999. A dispute under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was referred to the Labour Court, which held that his termination violated Sections 25‑G and 25‑H because junior employees remained in service, and ordered his re

PANAKANTI SAMPATH RAOversusSTATE OF A.P.

2006 INSC 34618 May 2006Dismissed

The appellant, a medical representative, was married to Panakanti Kavitha who was found dead in their rented house within three months of marriage. The prosecution alleged that the appellant had repeatedly harassed her for dowry, leading to her death by asphyxia due to throttling, and charged him under Sections 498-A,

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusK.G.SONI

2006 INSC 51217 August 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent K.G. Soni, a store attendant in the Bank Note Press, was charged with misconduct for not disclosing his first wife's name on an attestation form and for marrying a second woman while his first marriage subsisted. A departmental inquiry under the Central Civil Services (Clarification, Control and Appeal)

KANTI LALversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2009 INSC 55417 April 2009Dismissed

The case concerned the death of Smt. Laxmi, who suffered 90% burn injuries within seven years of marriage. The prosecution alleged that her husband (A-1) and his brother (A-3) harassed and tortured her to extract dowry, leading to her death, and secured convictions under Sections 304B and 498A IPC. The defence relied o

MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusASSOCIATION OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES & ANR.

2009 INSC 55717 April 2009Disposed off

The Meerut Development Authority (MDA) invited tenders for two parcels of land to be used for educational purposes, fixing a reserved price of Rs.690 per sq.m for 20,000 sq.m and Rs.500 per sq.m for 37,000 sq.m. The Association of Management Studies (AMS) bid below the reserved price for the 20,000‑sq.m plot and later

KRISHNA RAMversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2009 INSC 35617 March 2009Dismissed

Krishna Ram, a Patwari, was accused of demanding and accepting Rs.500 as a bribe for issuing a favourable land lease report. The complainant, Gurmukh Singh, arranged a trap in which the money was marked with phenolphthalein and handed to the accused, who was later caught with the cash and a pink‑stained shirt. The tria

KUSUMAM HOTELS (P) LTD.versusKERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.

2008 INSC 72916 May 2008Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether the Kerala Government Order of 26 September 2000, which retrospectively withdrew electricity tariff concessions granted to classified hotels under a tourism‑industry policy, was valid. The hotels argued that the withdrawal violated their accrued rights, the doctrine of promissory esto

MANZAR SAYEED KHAN & ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

2009 INSC 53416 April 2009Disposed off

Manzar Sayeed Khan, the publisher of the book "Shivaji: Hindu King in Islamic India", and Vinod Hansraj Goyal, the printer, filed criminal miscellaneous petitions seeking clarification of a Supreme Court judgment dated 5 April 2007. The 2007 judgment had directed that the State of Maharashtra not proceed against the au

RAVINDERA SADASHIO KSHIRSAGARversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2009 INSC 35516 March 2009Dismissed

The appellant, a Commander (Time Scale) in the Indian Navy, challenged a 2005 Ministry of Defence (Navy) scheme that deferred promotion to Captain (Time Scale) until all acting Commanders (Select List) were promoted or retired. He argued that the scheme would effectively deny him and similarly situated officers the opp

KAUSHALYA DEVIversusSHRI KARAN ARORA AND ORS.

2007 INSC 57314 May 2007Dismissed

A claim petition under Sections 166, 140 and 141 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 was filed by the husband of Kaushalya Devi after their 14‑year‑old son died in a road accident. The driver, Karan Arora, was a minor without a licence; the Tribunal held the driver not liable but held the vehicle owner liable, awarding Rs 

BIHARI LAL RADAversusANIL JAIN (TINU) & ORS.

2009 INSC 18113 February 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Bihari Lal Rada, was elected President of the Hisar Municipal Council, but the election was set aside by the High Court on the ground that the post was reserved for the general category and only councilors elected from unreserved wards could contest. The Supreme Court examined whether the Haryana Municip

GAJANAND AGARWALversusSTATE OF ORISSA AND ANR.

2007 INSC 41512 April 2007Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant's daughter died within five months of her marriage, leading to FIRs under Sections 498A, 304B, 302, 406 IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Multiple bail applications under Section 438 of the CrPC were filed by the accused, initially rejected by the Sessions Judge and the High Court, but later

ARUNversusSTATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TAMIL NADU

2008 INSC 141411 December 2008Case Partly allowed

The appellant (A‑5) was tried with seven others for the murder of Venkatesan Seshastripuram. A‑4 entered the deceased's house and shot him, resulting in death. The trial court convicted A‑4 under s.302 IPC and A‑5 under s.398 and s.457(1) IPC, acquitting A‑5 of s.302 read with s.34 IPC. The Madras High Court reversed t

RAJENDER SINGH & ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

2009 INSC 119 January 2009Dismissed

The case concerned the murder of Dinesh, who was allegedly confined, tied, and assaulted with a wooden stick in the house of Suraj Bhan (A‑1). Eye‑witnesses, including the victim's father and grandfather, testified that they saw the accused beating the victim, and a post‑mortem report confirmed multiple fatal injuries.

UMESHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2007 INSC 1117 February 2007Dismissed

Umesh was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Dilip Ganpatrao Shirbhate on 26 November 1997. The prosecution’s case rested on two eyewitnesses who saw Umesh stab the victim, forensic evidence showing the victim’s blood group on Umesh’s shirt, and the recovery of the alleged murder weapon at Umesh’s reside

DEEN DAYAL & ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P.

2009 INSC 67 January 2009Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the death of Asha Devi, who was found dead in a well after 15 months of marriage to Amar Singh. Medical evidence showed two distinct head injuries inconsistent with a fall, indicating she was beaten before being dumped in the well. Witnesses, including the deceased's father, brother, and moth

CITIBANK, N.AversusTLC MARKETING PLC AND ANR.

2007 INSC 10115 October 2007Disposed off

Citibank entered into a tripartite agreement with TLC Marketing PLC (UK) and Wunderman India Pvt Ltd (WIPL) to run a "Fly for Sure" scheme offering free return flight vouchers to its credit‑card customers. After numerous complaints that TLC and WIPL failed to honour the vouchers, Citibank terminated the agreement and i

FULENA SINGHversusVIJAY KUMAR SINHA & ORS.

2009 INSC 1035 February 2009Appeal(s) allowed

Fulena Singh filed an election petition challenging the election of Vijay Kumar Sinha on the ground of double voting and multiple enrolments. To substantiate his claim, Singh applied under Rule 93(1)(dd) of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 for inspection of voter registers in Form 17A. The trial court allowed the ap

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusSURESH K.K. & ANR.

2008 INSC 4564 April 2008Case Allowed

The claimant, a coolie, hired a three‑wheeler auto‑rickshaw (a goods carriage) and was seated beside the driver when the vehicle overturned, causing serious injuries. He claimed compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, asserting that he was covered by the compulsory insurance under Section 147(1) as th

INDRA PAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

2008 INSC 13862 December 2008Dismissed

The trial court acquitted the accused of murder, but the High Court convicted them under Sections 302 read with 149 and 148 of the IPC. The appellants argued that the FIR was lodged late, that the eye‑witnesses (PW‑1 and PW‑4) gave contradictory and unreliable statements, that their testimony conflicted with the post‑m

SUDHIR KUMAR BHALLAversusJAGDISH CHAND ETC. ETC.

2008 INSC 5681 May 2008Disposed off

Sudhir Kumar Bhalla, a partner of a trading firm, issued six cheques to Jagdish Chand and his wife Ramesh Rani for payment of goods. Five of the cheques were dishonoured, leading the respondents to file complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and various provisions of the IPC. The trial court acq

RAZAK JINNESAB KARAJAGI & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2009 INSC 4461 April 2009Case Partly allowed

The case involved four accused (A‑1 to A‑4) charged with murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC, along with offences under Sections 201/34 and 506 IPC. The prosecution relied on a motive stemming from a land dispute, the testimony of two eye‑witnesses (PW‑1 and PW‑2) who were relatives of the deceased

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search