Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

Judgments of 2019

1,050 judgments, newest first — showing 1,001–1,050.

UNION OF INDIAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

2019 INSC 11021 October 2019Case Allowed

The Union of India sought review of the Supreme Court's directions in Dr. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan v. State of Maharashtra, which required approval of the appointing authority for arresting a public servant and of the SSP for a non‑public servant, and mandated a preliminary inquiry by a Dy SP before registering an FIR

THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS.versusGRACE SATHYAVATHY SHASHIKANT & ORS.

2019 INSC 11081 October 2019

The Government of Andhra Pradesh and others challenged the allotment of a parcel of land (Survey No. 129/45/D) to Andhra Prabha Publications under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. A Single Judge ordered a survey to determine the true identity of the land; the High Court set aside that order, but the S

SUDAM @ RAHUL KANIRAM JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2019 INSC 11071 October 2019Case Partly allowed

Sudam @ Rahul Kaniram Jadhav was convicted under Sections 302 and 201 IPC for the murder of his wife Anita and their four children, based largely on circumstantial evidence, two extra‑judicial confessions and motive. The petitioner sought a review of the Supreme Court's affirmation of his conviction and death sentence,

BRIJESH KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSHARDABAI (DEAD) BY LRS. AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 11041 October 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, Matadin, filed a suit in 1990 claiming adverse possession of land based on Khasra entries from 1960‑61, asserting continuous possession for over 30 years. The original owners had sold the land to Urmila Devi on 11‑Oct‑1972, and her name appears in the Khasra in blue ink for subsequent years, while the pl

SATISH UKEYversusDEVENDRA GANGADHARRAO FADNAVIS AND ANR.

2019 INSC 11031 October 2019Appeal(s) allowed

Satish Ukey filed a criminal complaint under Section 125-A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 alleging that MLA Devendra Fadnavis concealed two criminal cases in his Form‑26 affidavit, where cognizance had been taken by the courts. The trial court dismissed the complaint, a Sessions Court remanded it for fre

DIST. COLLECTOR SATARA & ANR.versusMANGESH NIVRUTTI KASHID

2019 INSC 11061 October 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the validity of caste certificates issued under a 30 July 2011 notification that created district‑level Caste Scrutiny Committees to verify certificates for local body elections. The High Court had quashed the notification, directing recovery and destruction of the certificates, but the order was sta

SHASHI BHUSAN PRASADversusINSPECTOR GENERAL CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE & ORS.

2019 INSC 8501 August 2019Dismissed

Shashi Bhushan Prasad, a constable of the Central Industrial Security Force, was charged criminally under Section 25(1) of the Arms Act for allegedly supplying an unlicensed revolver used in a murder, and was acquitted when prosecution witnesses turned hostile. Simultaneously, a departmental inquiry under Rule 34 of th

BAIJU KUMAR SONI & ANR.versusSTATE OF JHARKHAND

2019 INSC 8541 August 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were convicted for kidnapping, rape, and murder of a three‑year‑old girl based largely on circumstantial evidence, including telephone call records, a scarf, a drawing book, a rexin bag, and chocolate wrappers. The prosecution alleged that the appellants made threatening calls, possessed the bag in which

MADHUSUDAN BHANUPRASAD PANDYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

2019 INSC 8531 August 2019Dismissed

Madhusudan Bhanuprasad Pandya, who operated a cement pipe manufacturing business on leasehold land in Ahmedabad, applied for exemption under Section 20 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. The State Government rejected the application, and the High Court dismissed his writ petition, holding that the la

ALIYATHAMMUDA BEETHATHEBIYYAPPURA POOKOYA & ANR.versusPATTAKAL CHERIYAKOYA & ORS.

2019 INSC 8491 August 2019Dismissed

The dispute concerned the office of mutawalli of the historic Andrott Jumah mosque in Lakshadweep. The senior members of the Pattakal family claimed a hereditary customary right to the office, tracing it to Saint Ubaidulla, the mosque’s founder, while the appellants, representing island residents, argued that the right

MANOHARANversusSTATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VARIETY HALL POLICE STATION, COIMBATORE

2019 INSC 8511 August 2019Disposed off

Manoharan was convicted for kidnapping, gang‑rape of a 10‑year‑old girl and the murder of the girl and her 7‑year‑old brother, who were thrown into a canal after a failed poisoning attempt. The prosecution proved the offences beyond reasonable doubt through extensive witness testimony, forensic DNA evidence linking Man

MADHAV PRASAD AGGARWAL & ANR.versusAXIS BANK LTD. & ANR.

2019 INSC 7071 July 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, home buyers, filed suits against the builder and Axis Bank seeking specific performance, possession and other reliefs concerning flats in the Orbit Heaven project. Axis Bank moved a notice of motion under Order 7 Rule 11(d) of the CPC to have the plaint rejected only against it, invoking the bar under S

ASIM SHARIFFversusNATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY

2019 INSC 7091 July 2019Dismissed

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) investigated the murder of Rudresh and charged Asim Shariff, the Bengaluru unit president of the Popular Front of India, along with four others under multiple provisions of the IPC, Arms Act and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. Shariff filed an application for discharge

SATVINDER SINGH @ SATVINDER SINGH SALUJA & ORSversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

2019 INSC 7101 July 2019Disposed off

The appellants, a group of Rotarians, were traveling from Jharkhand to Bihar in a private vehicle when they were stopped at a check post in Nawada. Although no liquor was found in the vehicle, a breath analyser indicated the presence of alcohol in some of the appellants, leading to charges under Section 53(a) of the Bi

PRADEEP RAMversusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ANR.

2019 INSC 7061 July 2019Dismissed

The appellant, Pradeep Ram, was granted bail in 2016 for offences under the IPC, Arms Act and Criminal Law Amendment Act. Subsequent addition of serious offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act led the investigating agency to seek his arrest and the Special NIA Judge remanded him to judicial custody. The

R. S. ANJAYYA GUPTAversusTHIPPAIAH SETTY & ORS.

2019 INSC 6991 July 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant challenged a partition suit filed by his brother, claiming the properties were self‑acquired, while the plaintiff alleged they were bought with joint family funds and thus belonged to the Hindu joint family. The trial court held the properties were joint family assets and ordered partition; the High Court

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADUversusDR. VASANTHI VEERASEKARAN

2019 INSC 6981 July 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether the State of Tamil Nadu was legally bound to provide alternate housing sites to landowners whose property was acquired for the Mass Rapid Transit System (MRTS) railway project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The High Court had directed the State and the Tamil Nadu Housing Board

VASAVI ENGINEERING COLLEGE PARENTS ASSOCIATIONversusSTATE OF TELANGANA AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 7051 July 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The Telangana Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee (TAFRC) fixed fee structures for private unaided professional institutions for the 2016‑17 to 2018‑19 block period. The High Court, dissatisfied with the TAFRC's recommendations, remitted the matter, then independently fixed higher fees, effectively usurping the Comm

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, M.I.W.versusVITTHAL DAMODAR PATIL AND ANR

2019 INSC 7021 July 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The Executive Engineer appealed a High Court order that had enhanced compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, relying on a valuation report prepared by Mr. Ravindra Ghanshyam Chaudhari. The appellant contended that the High Court failed to scrutinise the valuer's competency, eligibility and

PARMINDER SINGHversusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS.

2019 INSC 7041 July 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a driver, was severely injured and permanently disabled in a 2009 road accident caused by two trucks whose drivers lacked valid licences. He filed a claim before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) which awarded compensation based on a notional monthly income of Rs 6,000. The High Court enhanced th

ARSHNOOR SINGHversusHARPAL KAUR & ORS.

2019 INSC 7081 July 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Arshnoor Singh, is the great‑grandson of Lal Singh whose agricultural land passed to his son Inder Singh in 1951, before the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The property was partitioned among Inder Singh’s three sons in 1964, and the share allotted to Dharam Singh (the appellant’s father) remained coparcenar

M/S NEWS INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusM/S LUXRA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. & ANR.

2019 INSC 6071 May 2019Disposed off

Luxra Enterprises (the complainant) insured its garment factory against fire for Rs 85 lakh. After a fire on 12‑07‑2000 it claimed the loss. The insurer’s head office appointed a first surveyor who accepted a loss of Rs 54,93,865. The insurer later appointed a second surveyor who reduced the loss to Rs 24,76,585 and su

PRAVEEN SINGH RAMAKANT BHADAURIYAversusNEELAM PRAVEEN SINGH BHADAURIYA

2019 INSC 6151 May 2019Disposed off

The appellant and respondent were married in 1998 and later lived separately, leading the husband to file a suit for dissolution of marriage which was dismissed by the trial, district and high courts. While the appeal was pending before the Supreme Court, the parties reached an amicable settlement through mediation, ag

MAHARASHTRA ARCHERY ASSOCIATIONversusRAHUL MEHRA AND ORS.

2019 INSC 6101 May 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the conduct of a court‑appointed Administrator who was tasked with amending the Constitution of the Archery Association of India (AAI) and conducting elections. The Administrator unilaterally introduced several amendments beyond the four changes expressly approved by the Court in its order of

UP HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARDversusRAMESH CHANDRA AGARWAL

2019 INSC 6141 May 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The Uttar Pradesh Housing and Development Board (the Board) floated a housing scheme for economically weaker sections in 1982, for which the respondent paid a registration fee of Rs.500 (later Rs.1000). The registration booklet and the U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad Rules, 1979, required a written consent for participat

SHREE SHREE RAM JANKI JI ASTHAN TAPOVAN MANDIR & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.

2019 INSC 6091 May 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The Shree Shree Ram Janki Ji Asthan Tapovan Mandir Trust and its pujari challenged a Jharkhand High Court order that, based on a public‑interest writ, directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to probe the alleged illegal transfer of land belonging to the deity. The High Court had held that the original trust

SEEMA SARKARversusEXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ORS.

2019 INSC 6121 May 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The Little Andaman Panchayat Samiti, consisting of five elected members and one Member of Parliament (MP) as an ex‑officio member, scheduled a special meeting to consider a no‑confidence motion against the Pramukh. Only three elected members attended, and the Executive Officer dissolved the meeting, holding that a quor

RAJESH & ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

2019 INSC 6131 May 2019Dismissed

The appellants were among ten persons named in an FIR for a violent incident but were not listed in the charge‑sheet after the investigating officer concluded they were not present at the scene. The investigating officer and the SHO later applied to a magistrate for their release from judicial custody, which the magist

THULASIDHARA & ANOTHERversusNARAYANAPPA & OTHERS

2019 INSC 6031 May 2019Disposed off

The original plaintiff filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction, claiming ownership of a property based on a registered sale deed. The defendants contended that the property had become part of a joint family and that the sale deed was merely a security instrument, not an operative transfer, and th

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ETC. ETC.versusS. MAADASAMY AND ANR. ETC. ETC.

2019 INSC 6041 May 2019Disposed off

The case concerned an amendment to the recruitment rules of the Labour Department of Pondicherry that equated the post of Principal, Grade ‘A’ (Senior Scale) with the post of Joint Chief Inspector of Factories (JCIF). The Central Administrative Tribunal and the Madras High Court had set aside the amendment, holding tha

S. SUBRAMANIANversusS. RAMASAMY ETC. ETC.

2019 INSC 6061 May 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned two suits filed by S. Ramasamy for injunction and partition of certain immovable properties, which the trial court dismissed on the ground that the properties were self‑acquired by the father and not part of a joint Hindu family. The first appellate court affirmed this view. The High Court, exercisin

STATE BY KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA POLICE STATION, BENGALURUversusM.R. HIREMATH

2019 INSC 6111 May 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The State by Karnataka Lokayukta Police Station appealed against a High Court order that quashed criminal proceedings against M.R. Hiremath on the ground that a certificate under Section 65B(4) of the Evidence Act was not produced. The Court examined whether the certificate must be produced at the stage of filing the c

STATE OF ORISSA & ORS.versusCHANDRA NANDI

2019 INSC 4471 April 2019

The respondent, a retired employee, filed an original application before the Orissa State Administrative Tribunal seeking full post‑retirement benefits; the Tribunal granted some benefits but denied others. He then filed a writ petition in the High Court, which partially allowed the petition and directed the State to g

MANIversusSTATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 4481 April 2019Disposed off

The case arose from a violent incident on 28 September 2005 near Rosy School, Chozhiyamkod, where the appellant Mani stabbed a victim, Soman, who later died, and eight persons were injured. The trial court convicted Mani under Section 302 IPC and the other three accused under Sections 324 and 341 read with Section 34,

DR. D.J. DE SOUZAversusMANAGING DIRECTOR CPC DIAGNOSTICS PVT. LTD.

2019 INSC 4451 April 2019Dismissed

Dr. D.J. De Souza purchased a TurboChem 100 analyzer from CPC Diagnostics, paying 50% of the price. The contract required the buyer to provide an efficiently air‑conditioned room, a 1 KVA online UPS, and broadband for remote diagnostics before installation. The service engineer rejected the buyer’s existing UPS and ins

ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDversusMAHENDRA CONSTRUCTION

2019 INSC 4441 April 2019Appeal(s) allowed

Mahendra Construction purchased a hydraulic excavator that was previously insured with New India Assurance (NIA) from November 2004 to November 2005, during which a claim of Rs 36.66 lakhs was settled. The excavator was later insured with Oriental Insurance for the period October 2006‑October 2007, and a fire incident

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.versusGURBARAN SINGH

2019 INSC 3031 March 2019Disposed off

Gurbaran Singh, a pharmacist employed by the Punjab State Health Services since 1975, resigned in 1986 and was granted only gratuity and provident fund, not pension. He filed a suit seeking pensionary benefits, and the trial and appellate courts awarded him pension, which the State of Punjab appealed. The Supreme Court

THE GOVT. OF INDIA & ANR.versusP. VENKATESH

2019 INSC 3021 March 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The father, a Union employee, died in May 1996 and his widow sought a compassionate appointment for her son. Initial representations were rejected in 1997 and 1999, and the son only approached the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in 2007, more than a decade after the death. The CAT rejected the application, and su

KHODAY DISTILLERIES LTD. (NOW KNOWN AS KHODAY INDIA LIMITED) AND OTHERSversusSRI MAHADESHWARA SAHAKARA SAKKARE KARKHANE LTD., KOLLEGAL (UNDER LIQUIDATION) REPRESENTED BY THE LIQUIDATOR

2019 INSC 2981 March 2019Disposed off

The case involved two civil appeals (Nos. 2432 and 2433) arising from special leave petitions (SLPs) filed by Khoday Distilleries Ltd. after a High Court decree in a money suit. Both SLPs were dismissed by the Supreme Court in limine without reasons. The appellants then sought review of the High Court's judgment, raisi

VARUN PAHWAversusMRS. RENU CHAUDHARY

2019 INSC 3041 March 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a director of Siddharth Garments Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 25,00,000 as an individual, although the loan was advanced by the company. The plaint mistakenly named the plaintiff as "Varun Pahwa through Director of Siddharth Garments Pvt. Ltd." instead of "Siddharth Garments Pvt. Ltd. thro

FED. OF BANK OF INDIA STAFF UNIONS & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR

2019 INSC 3001 March 2019Dismissed

The Federation of Bank of India Staff Unions and an employee sought to have three workmen nominated as directors of the Bank of India under the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970. The Central Government rejected the panel because the candidates had less than three years of service

M/S. VIJAY INDUSTRIESversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

2019 INSC 2961 March 2019Appeal(s) allowed

M/s. Vijay Industries appealed against the Commissioner of Income Tax seeking a 20% deduction under Section 80HH for the assessment years 1979‑80 and 1980‑81. The dispute centered on whether the deduction should be calculated on gross profits and gains (before depreciation, unabsorbed depreciation and investment allowa

STATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERS ETC.versusJAYESHBHAI KANJIBHAI KALATHIYA ETC.

2019 INSC 2971 March 2019Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered two writ petitions challenging a Gujarat Government resolution and subsequent amendment of the Gujarat Minor Mineral Rules that prohibited the movement of sand excavated in Gujarat to other states or countries. The petitioners argued that the State’s rule‑making power under Sections 15 and

G. RATNA RAJ (D) BY LRS.versusSRI MUTHUKUMARASAMY PERMANENT FUND LTD. & ANR.

2019 INSC 1231 February 2019Dismissed

G. Ratna Raj filed a civil suit for redemption of mortgage and injunction against Sri Muthukumarasamy Fund Ltd. The plaintiff presented his evidence and closed his case, after which the suit was called for recording the defendants' evidence. The defendants failed to appear and had not led any evidence, prompting the tr

ASHARFI DEVI (D) THR. LRS.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

2019 INSC 1241 February 2019Dismissed

The original appellant, owner of land subject to the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, claimed that ceiling proceedings became void after the Act was repealed in 1999 and filed a writ petition in 2002. The Allahabad High Court dismissed the writ on 14 March 2008, finding the appellant could not prove posse

ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCESversusSANJIV CHATURVEDI & ORS.

2019 INSC 1271 February 2019Dismissed

The appeal concerned an order of the Chairman of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) who, sitting alone, stayed proceedings before a two‑member bench and rendered its interim orders ineffective. The petitioner (All India Institute of Medical Sciences) argued that the Chairman had acted beyond his statutory author

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search