Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

K S RADHAKRISHNAN

245 judgments delivered by benches including this judge — showing 201–245.

SUBRATA ROY SAHARAversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2014 INSC 3676 May 2014Dismissed

The Supreme Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Subrata Roy Sahara challenging an order dated 4.3.2014 directing his arrest and detention for non-compliance of earlier orders to refund money collected through Optionally Fully Convertible Debentures (OFCDs). The Court held that the two Sahara companies flouted orde

G. SUNDARRAJANversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2013 INSC 3146 May 2013Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the legality of the Kudankulam Nuclear Power Project (KKNPP) amid public opposition, focusing on whether the plant complied with environmental, coastal‑zone, and safety regulations. It held that the project was undertaken under the national nuclear policy reflected in the Atomic Energy Act, 1

AVINASH CHAND & ORS.versusAGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEES

2010 INSC 2796 May 2010Dismissed

The appellants, who had been working as auctioneers on a commission basis in the Kaithal Market Committee since 1963‑64, were terminated in 2000 after the Chief Administrator of the Haryana State Agricultural Board reiterated a 1982 directive that auctioneers should not work beyond the age of 60. They challenged the re

STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERSversusPRESIDENT, PARENT TEACHER ASSN. SNVUP AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 786 February 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Kerala challenged a Kerala High Court order that directed the Secretary of the General Education Department to verify the actual strength of students in all aided schools through police assistance, after a school was found to have obtained staff fixation orders through bogus admissions. The High Court had

PARAS NATH RAI AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.

2012 INSC 4575 October 2012Appeal(s) allowed

A partition suit filed by the father of the appellants was dismissed by the trial court for procedural defects. The appellants filed title appeals, but while the appeals were pending the State issued a notification under Section 3 of the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 bringing

S.K. DASGUPTA & ORS.versusVIJAY SINGH SENGAR & ORS.

2010 INSC 2755 May 2010Appeal(s) allowed

Vijay Singh Sengar filed a public interest writ petition alleging that power cuts in Madhya Pradesh were endangering patients in government hospitals and disrupting street lighting. The Madhya Pradesh High Court issued interim orders directing the State Electricity Board to provide round‑the‑clock electricity to hospit

SYED YOUSUF HUSSAINversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2013 INSC 2175 April 2013Dismissed

Two traffic police officers intercepted a lorry on 4 January 1994, demanded Rs 100 to return the vehicle's documents and to refrain from filing a traffic case. The driver complained, a trap was set, and the co‑accused accepted the bribe, which was later recovered. Both were convicted under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read

STATE THROUGH CBI NEW DELHIversusJITENDER KUMAR SINGH

2014 INSC 805 February 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined two appeals concerning the jurisdiction of Special Judges appointed under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PC Act). In the first appeal, a public servant died after the Special Judge had framed charges under the PC Act and IPC against him and several private persons. The Court held tha

UNIVERSITY OF RAJASTHAN AND ANOTHERversusPREM LATA AGARWAL

2013 INSC 775 February 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents were appointed as ad‑hoc Assistant Professors/Lecturers under section 3(3) of the Rajasthan Universities' Teachers and Officers (Selection for Appointment) Act, 1974, with their services renewed annually for more than two decades. After the University Pension Regulations, 1990 came into force, they opte

JAYESH DHANESH GORAGANDHIversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI & ORS.

2012 INSC 5664 December 2012Dismissed

The appellants, heirs of a plot of land in Borivali, challenged the reservation of their land for a municipal office under a Town Planning Scheme prepared under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP Act). After the scheme was finalized, an arbitrator determined compensation, which was paid, and the

JEETU @ JITENDERA & ORS.versusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2012 INSC 5634 December 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were convicted under Sections 147 and 327/149 of the IPC and sentenced to three months and three years rigorous imprisonment respectively. In the High Court appeal they did not contest the conviction but sought a reduced sentence, which the High Court partially granted by lowering the term for the Sectio

BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED AND ANOTHERversusG. SARVOTHAMAN

2013 INSC 6744 October 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a physically handicapped employee of BSNL, had opted for the Telecom Operating Assistant (TOA) cadre after a 1992 restructuring and later applied for promotion under the physically handicapped reservation quota. His claim was rejected, and the Chief Commissioner, exercising powers under Section 59 of th

STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERSversusTHE TRIBAL MISSION

2012 INSC 3754 September 2012Disposed off

The Tribal Mission established an unaided English‑medium school in Kerala in 2001 and applied for state recognition in 2003. The Government, relying on its 2007 policy and the Kerala Education Rules (KER) 1959, rejected the application, noting that three recognized schools existed nearby and that granting recognition c

GURGAON GRAMIN BANKversusSMT. KHAZANI & ANR.

2012 INSC 3724 September 2012Dismissed

Smt. Khazani obtained a loan from Gurgaon Gramin Bank to purchase a buffalo and insured the animal for Rs.15,000 with New India Assurance. After the buffalo died, the bank failed to process her insurance claim, prompting her to file a complaint before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, which ordered the in

RASHMI REKHA THATOI & ANR.versusSTATE OF ORISSA & ORS.

2012 INSC 2024 May 2012Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether a High Court could, while refusing anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, direct that the accused would be released on bail by a magistrate upon surrender. The Court held that such a blanket direction is beyond the statutory mandate of Section 438, viol

VINOD KUMARversusSTATE OF KERALA

2014 INSC 2494 April 2014Appeal(s) allowed

Vinod Kumar, already married, entered into a relationship with a 20‑year‑old college student (PW2) and they signed a "marriage agreement" on 19 April 2000, which was not a legal marriage. The prosecution alleged that Kumar deceived PW2 about his marital status and thereby committed rape under Section 376 IPC. The trial

SOOGURU SUBRAHMANYAMversusSTATE OF A.P.

2013 INSC 2144 April 2013Dismissed

The appellant, a husband, was charged with murdering his wife by smothering her in their rented house. Medical evidence established death by asphyxia, not suicide or rape. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence: the wife was found dead in a locked room, the husband was present in the house the previous night

KHACHAR DIPU @ DILIPBHAI NAKUBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2013 INSC 2134 April 2013Dismissed

The appellant, Khachar Dipu, was accused of dashing his motor vehicle into the deceased's bicycle, throwing him off, tying him to the vehicle and dragging the body for several kilometres, resulting in fatal injuries. The trial court convicted him under Section 304 Part I IPC, sentencing him to five years' rigorous impr

BAJAJ AUTO LIMITEDversusRAJENDRA KUMAR JAGANNATH KATHAR & ORS.

2013 INSC 2124 April 2013Disposed off

The workmen of Bajaj Auto Ltd. alleged that the company repeatedly employed them on temporary contracts for seven months each year from 1990 to 1999, terminating them before they could acquire permanent status, thereby violating Item 6 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfai

C.B.I.versusKARIMULLAH OSAN KHAN

2014 INSC 1654 March 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) sought to add charges of murder and other offences against Karimullah Osan Khan, an accused in the 1993 Bombay bomb blasts, under Section 216 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). The Designated Court under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) rej

ASHOK DEBBARMA @ ACHAK DEBBARMAversusSTATE OF TRIPURA

2014 INSC 1674 March 2014Disposed off

In 1997 a group of 30‑35 extremists set fire to houses in Jarulbachai village, Tripura, killing 15 people and injuring several others. Ashok (Achak) Debbarma was charged under IPC sections 326, 436 and 302 read with section 34 and under section 27(3) of the Arms Act; the latter charge was later set aside as unconstitut

VOLUNTARY HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF PUNJABversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

2013 INSC 1344 March 2013Hearing Adjourned

The Voluntary Health Association of Punjab filed a writ petition seeking effective implementation of the Pre‑Conception and Pre‑Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex‑Selection) Act, 1994, alleging that many states had failed to enforce its provisions and that sex‑selective abortions continued unabated. The Co

CINE EXHIBITION PVT. LTD.versusCOLLECTOR, DISTRICT GWALIOR AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 64 January 2013Dismissed

Cine Exhibition Pvt. Ltd. filed Interlocutory Applications No.5 and 6 under Order XVIII Rule 5 seeking clarification or modification of a Supreme Court judgment dated 11 January 2012. The applications aimed to alter specific paragraphs, obtain official records, and modify operative directions concerning the Gwalior Dev

NATIONAL BANK OF OMANversusBARAKARA ABDUL AZIZ & ANR.

2012 INSC 5563 December 2012Disposed off

The National Bank of Oman filed a private complaint in the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM), Ahmednagar, alleging that Barakara Abdul Aziz cheated the bank of AED 43,15,000. The CJM issued process under IPC sections 418 and 420 without first conducting an enquiry or ordering an investigation as required by

RAM KARAN GUPTAversusJ.S. EXIM LTD. AND ORS.

2012 INSC 5593 December 2012Dismissed

In a partition suit, the suit property was ordered to be sold by public auction. J.S. Exim Ltd., the highest bidder, paid 25% of the bid amount by demand drafts on the auction day and the remaining 75% within the statutory period. The judgment debtor, Ram Karan Gupta, challenged the sale alleging non‑compliance with Or

PRAVIN GADA AND ANOTHERversusCENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2012 INSC 5573 December 2012Disposed off

The Supreme Court dealt with the sale of immovable property of Jay Electric Wire Corporation Ltd., a company under liquidation, which had been sold to the appellants for Rs. 2.50 crore in 2006. Secured creditors and the workmen's union challenged the sale, alleging procedural irregularities, unfair price, and the limit

ENVIRONMENT & CONSUMER PROTECTION FOUNDATIONversusDELHI ADMINISTRATION & ORS.

2012 INSC 4423 October 2012Disposed off

The Environment & Consumer Protection Foundation filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking directions to improve basic infrastructure in government, aided and locally‑run schools so that the right to free and compulsory education under Article 21A could be realised. While the petition was pending, Parliament enact

M.R. PRABHAKAR AND OTHERSversusCANARA BANK AND OTHERS

2012 INSC 4433 October 2012Dismissed

The appellants were officers of Canara Bank who resigned between 1986 and June 1993, i.e., before the statutory settlement dated 29‑Oct‑1993 and the Canara Bank Employees' Pension Regulations, 1995 came into force. They claimed entitlement to a pension in lieu of the Contributory Providable Fund, relying on the pension

GIRISH RAMCHANDRA DESHPANDEversusCEN. INFORMATION COMMR. & ORS.

2012 INSC 4453 October 2012Dismissed

The petitioner filed an RTI application seeking the third respondent's service records, disciplinary memos, and details of his assets and gifts, most of which were contained in his income‑tax returns. The Central Information Commissioner (CIC) held that the requested information fell within the definition of "personal

JODHBIR SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2012 INSC 3713 September 2012Appeal(s) allowed

Jodhbir Singh was arrested for possession of 2 kg of heroin under the NDPS Act. He claimed to be a juvenile at the time of the offence, producing a school leaving certificate and a State Council certificate showing his date of birth as 20‑07‑1996. The Sessions Court and the High Court rejected his claim, relying on his

SATYAPRATA SAHOO & ORS.versusSTATE OF ORISSA & ORS.

2012 INSC 3183 August 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, who qualified for postgraduate medical courses in Odisha as direct (open) candidates, challenged Clause 11.2 of the prospectus and the third proviso to Clause 9(2)(d) of the MCI regulations that gave additional weightage to in‑service candidates applying through the open category. They argued that the w

DR. MEHMOOD NAYYAR AZAMversusSTATE OF CHATTISGARH AND ORS.

2012 INSC 3193 August 2012Appeal(s) allowed

Dr. Mehmoood Nayar Azam, an Ayurvedic doctor and social activist, was arrested and taken into police custody where he was forced to hold a placard with self‑condemning words and photographed; the photograph was later circulated, causing humiliation and mental trauma. The High Court found that he had been subjected to c

REGISTRAR GENERAL, CALCUTTA HIGH COURTversusSHRINIVAS PRASAD SHAH AND OTHERS,

2013 INSC 3033 May 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent applied for the West Bengal Judicial Service Examination 2007, claiming Scheduled Tribe status and attaching a certificate issued by the Director, Backward Class Welfare, West Bengal. The examination notification required a caste certificate from a "competent authority" as defined in the West Bengal Sche

MD. ISHAQUE AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 3073 May 2013Disposed off

The case concerned a mob assault on 5 July 1983 in Siktahar village, where 200‑250 persons, including the accused, forced people out of their houses and attacked them with sharp and blunt weapons, resulting in one death and serious injuries to three others. The trial court convicted the appellants under Section 302 IPC

ARJUNversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2012 INSC 1993 May 2012Disposed off

The appellant, Arjun, was convicted of murder (s.302 IPC) and causing grievous hurt (s.326 IPC) after he attacked Jagannath and his family during a property dispute, using a large knife to inflict fatal head injuries on the deceased and injuries on the deceased's wife. The appellant claimed he acted in private defence,

AVEEK SARKAR & ANR.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

2014 INSC 753 February 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, editors and publishers of Sports World magazine and Anandabazar Patrika, reproduced a semi‑nude photograph of tennis player Boris Becker and his fiancée Barbara, originally published in the German magazine STERN, which was intended to protest apartheid and promote interracial love. A lawyer filed a comp

JOYDEEP MUKHARJEEversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

2011 INSC 943 February 2011Dismissed

The petitioner, Joydeep Mukharjee, filed a public interest litigation challenging the allotment of government lands in Salt Lake City, Kolkata, alleging that the Chief Minister's use of a discretionary quota was arbitrary, illegal, and violated the Master Plan as well as Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution. The matt

STATE OF UTTRAKHAND & ORS.versusDEEP CHANDRA TEWARI & ANR.

2013 INSC 7391 November 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The Uttarakhand Director of School Education advertised for Assistant Teachers (General) requiring a B.Ed. degree simplicitor. The respondents held B.Ed. degrees with Specialisation in Vocational Education, which the authorities deemed not to satisfy the qualification. The High Court set aside the rejection, but the St

SUBULAXMIversusM.D., TAMIL NADU STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION

2012 INSC 5021 November 2012Case Partly allowed

The claimant, a 30‑year‑old bus worker, suffered amputation of her left leg and right foot in a motor vehicle accident and claimed Rs 6,50,000 as compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 2,00,000, including Rs 86,000 for permanent disability, while t

ANIL KUMAR & ORS.versusM. K. AIYAPPA & ANR.

2013 INSC 6661 October 2013Dismissed

The appellants filed a private complaint under Section 200 of the CrPC alleging that the respondent, a public servant, committed offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The Special Judge referred the complaint for investigation by the Karnataka Lokayukta under Section 156(3) of the CrPC without obtaining

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusSHRAVAN RAM & ANR.

2013 INSC 2951 May 2013Dismissed

Guddi, a 19‑year‑old married woman, died from 99% burn injuries while in the custody of her father‑in‑law and husband. The prosecution relied on three alleged dying declarations: a Parcha Bayan recorded by an ASI, a magistrate‑signed declaration that was never produced, and a statement recorded under Section 161 CrPC b

HABIBversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

2013 INSC 2991 May 2013Dismissed

The accused Habib and Manuwa were acquitted by the trial court for murder under IPC s.302, but the Allahabad High Court set aside the acquittal of Habby and Manuwa, convicting them based on eyewitness and medical evidence. The Supreme Court examined whether an appellate court may re‑appreciate evidence in an appeal aga

K.S. PANDURANGAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2013 INSC 1311 March 2013Disposed off

The appellant, a superintendent at KAVIKA, was convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demanding and accepting a Rs 5,000 bribe in exchange for allocating transport loads. The Supreme Court examined whether the statutory presumption under s.20 of the Act could be rebutted; it held that the appellant’

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search