COAL MINES PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONERversusRAMESH CHANDER JHA
1990 INSC 2331 January 1990Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent filed a suit against the Coal Mines Provident Fund Commissioner without the notice required under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC). The Commissioner contended that he was a "public officer" within the meaning of Section 2(17)(h) CPC, making the suit incompetent. The trial court and the Pat…
RAM CHANDRA SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LEGAL HEIRSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
1990 INSC 26130 August 1990Dismissed
The appellant, legal heirs of the deceased Ram Chandra Singh, challenged the inclusion of a parcel of land gifted by his father in 1971 in his holding for the purpose of determining surplus land under the Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960, as amended in 1973 and 1975. The prescribed authori…
HIRA LAL AND ANOTHERversusGAJJAN AND OTHERS
1990 INSC 1930 January 1990Dismissed
The plaintiff, Hira Lal, claimed that his father was a sub‑tenant recorded in Khasra 1356 Fasli and had acquired adhivasi and sirdari rights under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, which extinguished the defendants' title. The trial court and the first appellate court rejected this claim, holding…
PLASMAC MACHINE MANUFACTURING CO. PVT.LTD.versusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BOMBAY.
1990 INSC 37027 November 1990Dismissed
Plasmac Machine Manufacturing Co., a maker of injection moulding machines, also produced a part called "Tie Bar Nuts" which it initially classified under tariff item 68 (the residuary category). The Central Excise department directed re‑classification under item 52 (bolts and nuts) and the Collector of Central Excise i…
POLLISETTI PULLAMMA AND ORS.versusKALLURI RAMESWARAMMA AND ORS.
1990 INSC 32726 October 1990Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined a dispute between tenants (appellants) and former landholders (respondents) over tenanted agricultural lands in former inam estates after the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1948 came into force. The landholders claimed the lands were private…
BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATNA AND ORSversusGREEN RUBBER INDUSTRIES AND ORS.
1989 INSC 36124 November 1989Appeal(s) allowed
The Bihar State Electricity Board (BSEB) entered into a supply agreement with Green Rubber Industries that included a clause obligating the consumer to pay minimum guaranteed charges irrespective of actual consumption. The firm requested disconnection in June 1981, consumed no electricity, but was billed for the minimu…
GRAM PANCHAYAT, VILLAGE KANONDA, TEHSIL BAHADURGARH, DISTRICT ROHTAK, THROUGH ITS SARPANCHversusDIRECTOR, CONSOLIDATION OF HOLDINGS, HARYANA, CHANDIGARH AND ORS.
1989 INSC 31824 October 1989Appeal(s) allowed
The Gram Panchayat owned 1,200 bighas of land that was consolidated and allotted to others under a scheme confirmed in 1974. The Panchayat filed an application under Section 42 of the East Punjab Holdings Act in 1977 to set aside the scheme, but the application was beyond the six‑month limitation prescribed by Rule 18.…
VINAYA KUMAR SHUKALversusLAKHPAT RAM AND ANOTHER
1990 INSC 25222 August 1990Appeal(s) allowed
Vinaya Kumar Shukal, the owner of a plot let to Lakhat Ram in 1957 at a rent of Rs.170 per annum, sought fixation of a new rent under Section 29-A of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 after a building was erected on the land. The Delegated Authority rejected the application, …
PUNDALIKversusDISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, CHANDRAPUR AND ORS.
1991 INSC 6422 February 1991Dismissed
Pundalik was elected Director of the District Central Co‑operative Bank, Chandrapur on 18 August 1986 while he was in arrears on a loan from the bank. The Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act, 1960 (section 73FF) disqualifies a defaulter from being elected or continuing as a committee member, and the Act came into fo…
MITHLESH KUMARI AND ANR.versusFATEH BAHADUR SINGH AND ANR.
1991 INSC 6622 February 1991Disposed off
The plaintiff, Fateh Bahadur Singh, sued Jang Bahadur (the second respondent) and two non‑tenure‑holders, Kalawati and Mithlesh Kumari, for specific performance of a sale agreement for a plot of land. The lower courts held that the plaintiff was entitled to specific performance, treating the sales to the appellants as …
CAPTAIN SUBASH KUMARversusPRINCIPAL OFFICER, MERCANTILE MARINE DEPARTMENT, MADRAS
1991 INSC 6822 February 1991Appeal(s) allowed
Captain Subash Kumar, master of the Panamanian‑flagged MV Eamaco, was charged under section 363 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 for alleged negligence in failing to launch lifeboats when the ship sank 232 nautical miles from India. The appellant contended that the Act did not apply because the vessel was foreign, th…
K.V. SWAMYNATHAN AND ORS.versusE.V. PADMANABHAN AND ORS.
1990 INSC 40121 December 1990Dismissed
The appellants, sons of K.S. Vaiyapuri Chettiar, claimed ownership of six house doors in Town Survey No. 666/2 based on sale deeds executed in the 1940s and a decree for specific performance. The respondents, occupying the doors, argued that they held the property by long‑term permissive leases and had acquired title b…
SOHAN LAL AND ORS.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN
1990 INSC 24021 August 1990Appeal(s) allowed
An FIR was lodged alleging that the appellants stone‑pelleted an informant’s house, causing damage and injuring three women. The Judicial Magistrate discharged two appellants (Vijya Bai and Jiya Bai) of all charges and limited the remaining three appellants (Sohan Lal, Padam Chand and Vishnu) to a charge under s. 427 I…
VASANTKUMAR RADHAKISAN VORAversusBOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF BOMBAY
1990 INSC 24121 August 1990Dismissed
V. R. Vora, a tenant of a room owned by the Bombay Port Trust, was served a quit notice under Section 106 read with Section 111(h) of the Transfer of Property Act, terminating his lease effective 28 February 1975. While the notice period was running, the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 (a Central Act) was applied to the Po…
T.N. RUGMANI AND ANOTHERversusC. ACHUTHA MENON AND ORS.
1990 INSC 39620 December 1990Appeal(s) allowed
The Kerala Municipal Council framed a West Road scheme in 1976 which lapsed because it was not published within two years. After the Trichur Urban Development Authority (TUDA) was created in 1981, it failed to act, leaving land owners, including the petitioners, unable to obtain construction permission. The State Gover…
SRI KRISHNA DASversusTOWN AREA COMMITTEE, CHIRGAON
1990 INSC 9420 March 1990Dismissed
S.K. Das, a commission agent dealing in grains and other commodities in Chirgaon, was levied weighing dues under market bye‑laws framed by the Town Area Committee (TAC) of Chirgaon. He challenged the demand of Rs.1892.26 in a writ petition, arguing that the bye‑laws were ultra vires, that the dues were a fee (not a tax…
BHAVANI TEA AND PRODUCE CO. LTD.versusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS. AND VICE VERSA
1991 INSC 5520 February 1991Appeal(s) allowed
Bhavani Tea and Produce Co. Ltd., a plantation company, owned 3,151.20 acres in the Western Ghats and sought a declaration that none of its land should vest in the State under the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting & Assignment) Act, 1971. The Tribunal and the Kerala High Court identified certain plots as private forests …
PURAN SINGH SAHNIversusSMT. SUNDARI BHAGWANDAS KRIPALANI AND OTHERS
1991 INSC 5720 February 1991Dismissed
P.S. Sahni occupied a flat in Shyam Cooperative Housing Society under a written agreement dated 11 June 1969 that was labeled a "leave and licence" and expressly stated that the licensee would not claim tenancy. The Society and the licensor terminated the licence on 10 March 1972, after which Sahni refused to vacate an…
RAJRATHA NARANBHAI MILLS. CO. LTD.versusSALES TAX OFFICER, PETLAD
1991 INSC 5219 February 1991Appeal(s) allowed
The company Rajratha Naranbhai Mills Ltd. was ordered to be wound up on 26 June 1967 and the liquidator invited creditors to prove claims for priority under s.530(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 1956. The Sales Tax Officer claimed priority for sales tax and penalties, arguing that the assessment orders and demand notices w…
OM PRAKASH PURI AND ANR.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
1991 INSC 4916 February 1991Dismissed
Om Prakash Puri and partners, who operated the Trinca's restaurant in Calcutta, were assessed an ad‑hoc luxury tax of Rs.2,40,000 under Sections 3 and 4 of the West Bengal Entertainments and Luxuries (Hotels and Restaurants) Tax Act, 1972 (as amended 1974). They challenged the tax on the grounds that it was discriminat…
HIRAJI TOLAJI BAGWANversusSHAKUNTALA
1990 INSC 1016 January 1990Appeal(s) allowed
Hiraji Tolaji Bagwan, a protected lessee of agricultural land, challenged the eviction proceedings initiated by Shakuntala, who claimed to be landlady after a partition of the ancestral property on 29 June 1959. The Supreme Court examined whether a partition of joint family (ancestral) land could lawfully give a share …
SPENCES HOTEL PVT. LTD. AND ANR.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
1991 INSC 4615 February 1991Dismissed
Spences Hotel Pvt. Ltd. and others, owners of an air‑conditioned hotel and restaurant, challenged the West Bengal Entertainments and Luxuries (Hotels and Restaurants) Tax Act, 1972 which levied a flat luxury tax of Rs 100 per 10 sq m of air‑conditioned floor space. They argued that the tax violated Article 14 of the Co…
MATHURA REFINERY MAZDOOR SANGH THROUGH ITS SECRETARYversusINDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD., MATHURA REFINERY PROJECT, MATHURA AND ANR.
1991 INSC 4715 February 1991Dismissed
The Mathura Refinery Mazdoor Sangh, representing about 900 casual labourers employed under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1971, sought parity in wages and conditions with regular refinery employees. Some workers had contracts directly with the refinery through co‑operative societies, while others w…
GURDIP SINGH AND ANR.versusAMAR SINGH AND ANR.
1991 INSC 3914 February 1991Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned a gift of land made by Kehar Singh in 1947 to his second wife, Basant Kaur, as maintenance. After the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the widow’s step‑grandsons claimed the gift gave her only a limited estate under Section 14(2) and that the estate could not be enlarged. The High Court held the gift fell…
NARAIN DAS JAIN (SINCE DECEASED) BY L.RSversusAGRA NAGAR MAHAPALIKA, AGRA
1991 INSC 4014 February 1991Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, N.D. Jain, owned land that was acquired by the Agra Town Improvement Trust under the U.P. Town Improvement Act, 1919. He received only a nominal compensation and no solatium, prompting him to seek a reference before the Nagar Mahapalika Tribunal, which increased the compensation but still denied solatium…
GOKAK PATEL VOLKART LTD.versusDUNDAYYA GURUSHIDDAIAH HIREMATH AND ORS.
1991 INSC 4114 February 1991Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Gokak Patel Volkart Ltd., filed criminal complaints under Section 630(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956 and Section 406 IPC against former employees who, after retirement, failed to vacate company quarters. The trial magistrate dismissed the complaints as time‑barred under the six‑month limitation prescri…
BRITISH INDIA STEAM NAVIGATION CO., LTD.versusSHANMUGHA VILAS CASHEW INDUSTRIES AND ORS.
1990 INSC 8513 March 1990Appeal(s) allowed
British India Steam Navigation Co., Ltd. chartered the vessel Steliosm to ship 4,445 bags of cashew nuts for Shanmughavilas Cashew Industries, but only 3,712 bags were delivered. The respondent sued the appellant in the Cochin Sub‑ordinate Court for the shortage; the trial court decreed in favour of the respondent and …
S.M.D. KIRAN PASHAversusGOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.
1989 INSC 3409 November 1989Appeal(s) allowed
S.M.D. Kiran Pasha, a municipal councillor, was detained under the Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1986, after alleging political vendetta. He filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the detention, but the High Court dismissed it, insisting he first surrender and seek habeas corpus. T…
STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.versusDELHI CLOTH MILLS & ANR.
1990 INSC 3099 October 1990Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Uttar Pradesh sought to recover differential excise duty on excess wastage of military rum that was exported by the respondents, Delhi Cloth Mills, under a lower export duty rate. The respondents argued that the duty on excess wastage could not be levied, and the Allahabad High Court quashed the demand. Th…
COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE, BHUBNESHWAR, DISTRICT PURIversusPARADIP PORT TRUST AND ANR.
1990 INSC 2268 August 1990Appeal(s) allowed
A commercial vessel, M.V. Jag Darshan, was detained and rummaged by customs officers at Paradip Port, leading to the seizure of contraband goods. The Deputy Conservator of Paradip Port Trust, the second respondent, ordered the vessel to be moved to a distant anchorage, interrupting the rummage and allowing the contraba…
INDIAN OVERSEAS BANKversusINDUSTRIAL CHAIN CONCERN
1989 INSC 3367 November 1989Appeal(s) allowed
Industrial Chain Concern sued Indian Overseas Bank for Rs.26,383.49, alleging that the bank negligently allowed its manager, Sethuraman, to open a fictitious account in the firm's name, deposit stolen drafts and cheques, and collect the proceeds. The bank contended it acted in good faith, declined an overdraft facility…
J.K. AGGARWALversusHARYANA SEEDS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. AND ORS
1990 INSC 2685 September 1990Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, J.K. Aggarwal, a Company Secretary of Haryana Seeds Development Corporation Ltd., faced a disciplinary inquiry that could lead to his dismissal. He sought permission to be represented by a lawyer under Rule 7(5) of the Haryana Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1952, but the inquiry authority …
MUNICIPAL BOARD, BAREILLYversusBHARAT OIL COMPANY AND ORS.
1989 INSC 3724 December 1989Appeal(s) allowed
The Municipal Board of Bareilly imposed octroi on mineral oils in 1969, invoking rules framed in 1963 that removed the earlier exemption. Bharat Oil Company challenged the levy, arguing that Rule 131 of the 1925 Octroi Rules, which exempted mineral oil, still barred the Board. The Supreme Court examined whether the 196…
UTTAR PRADESH RESIDENTS EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY AND ORS.versusNEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR.
1990 INSC 1833 May 1990Disposed off
The U.P. Residents Employees Co‑operative Housing Society, which had acquired about 70 acres of land between 1973‑75, challenged the acquisition of its land by the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) under notifications issued under the Land Acquisition Act after the enactment of the U.P. Industrial Area…
TARA CHAND AND ANR.versusRAM PRASAD
1990 INSC 1843 May 1990Dismissed
Anandi Bai held a shop in Jaipur under an 11‑month lease that was terminated by a notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, but she continued in possession and paid rent, becoming a statutory tenant. She died in September 1966 and her heirs (the appellants) were sued for ejectment by the landlord, who a…