THE MAHARASHTRA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.versusBABULAL LADE & ORS.
- Citation
- 2023 INSC 295
- Decided
- 24 March 2023
- Disposal
- Disposed off
- Bench
- M R SHAH
Holding
The Court directed that the deposited amounts, together with accrued interest, be transferred to the Collector, Bhandara, for verification and distribution to the employees or their legal heirs, and that any surplus after such payment be returned to the bank.
Summary
The Maharashtra State Co‑operative Bank Ltd., as the appellant‑bank, was ordered by the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 232 of 2016 to pay the outstanding salary and wage dues of employees of a sugar factory that had gone into liquidation, using proceeds from the auctioned property. The bank deposited 25 % of the total amount (Rs 3.52 crore) with the Supreme Court and also paid Rs 13.89 crore to the Industrial Court, Bhandara, together with accrued interest. By a miscellaneous application, the bank sought direction to transfer these sums, together with interest, to the Collector of Bhandara for distribution to the employees or their legal heirs after proper identification, and also requested permission to withdraw any excess amount remaining after payment. The Court held that the amounts deposited, along with interest, must be transferred to the Collector, who is to verify claims and disburse the dues directly into the bank accounts of the employees or heirs at 7.5 % interest, and that any balance after such payment should be returned to the bank. The Court further directed that the distribution be completed by 31 December 2023 and disposed of the applications.
Issues considered
- Whether the amounts deposited by the bank with the Supreme Court and the Industrial Court should be transferred to the Collector for distribution to the employees/legal heirs.
- Whether the bank is entitled to withdraw any excess amount after the employees’ dues have been paid.
- What is the extent of the bank’s liability concerning only salary/wages versus other statutory dues of the liquidated sugar factory employees.
Subjects
Judgment
[2023] 3 S.C.R. 649 649
THE MAHARASHTRA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. A
v.
BABULAL LADE & ORS.
(Miscellaneous Application No. 1308 of 2020
in B
(Civil Appeal No. 232 of 2016)
MARCH 24, 2023
[M. R. SHAH AND KRISHNA MURARI, JJ.]
C
Service Law: Salary/wages – Payment of – Payment of dues
of the employees of the sugar factory in liquidation by the appellant-
Bank, out of the sale proceeds from the auctioned property –
Appellant Bank deposited 25% of the total amount due, in this Court
as also deposited certain sum with the Industrial Court – Appellant
Bank then sought transfer of that amount along with interest to the D
account of the Collector with the direction to distribute the amount
as per the entitlement of each and every employee of the sugar
factory after proper identification proportionately – Held: The
amount due and payable towards the wages/salaries of the
concerned employees of the sugar factory in liquidation to be paid
to them and/or to their legal heirs – Furthermore, the full particulars E
including the bank account particulars of the concerned employees
required to see that the amount goes to the right person – Thus,
issuance of certain directions – Amount deposited with this Court
along with interest accrued and the amount deposited with the
Industrial Court be transferred to the Collector to distribute the F
same to the said employees/legal heirs of the employees after proper
identification and verification of the claims – Appellant Bank also
permitted to withdraw the excess amount deposited.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Miscellaneous Application
No. 1308 of 2020 in Civil Appeal No. 232 of 2016. G
From the Judgment and Order dated 04.12.2019 in C.A. No. 232
of 2016 of the Supreme Court of India.
With
H
649
650 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 3 S.C.R.
A Miscellaneous Application Diary No. 1755 of 2021 in Civil Appeal
No. 232 of 2016.
M. Y. Deshmukh, Ms. Manjeet Kripal, Adweetiya Sharma,
Amitkumar Pathak, Satyajit A. Desai, Ms. Anagha S. Desai, Satya Kam
Sharma, Gajanan N. Tirthkar, Saurabh Anand, Dharmendra Kumar Sinha,
B Raju Sonkar, Ms. Mamta Srivastava, Mrs. Pooja Sonkar, Chander
Shekhar Ashri, Advs. for the appearing parties.
The Order of the Court was passed by
M. R. SHAH, J.
C Delay condoned.
1. By Miscellaneous Application No. 1308 of 2020 in Civil Appeal
No. 232 of 2016, the original appellant – applicant – The Maharashtra
State Co-operative Bank Ltd. has prayed to transfer the amount of
Rs. 3.52 crores deposited by the appellant – bank with this Hon’ble
D Court in the account of Collector, Bhandara alongwith interest. It is further
prayed to direct the Collector, Bhandara to distribute the amount as per
the entitlement of each and every employee of the sugar factory after
proper identification proportionately.
1.1 One another I.A./M.A. is preferred by the bank permitting
the bank to withdraw the excess amount so deposited by the appellant -
E
bank with accrued interest till date, i.e., Rs. 4,95,94,737/-. In M.A. Diary
No. 1755 of 2021, the bank has prayed to direct the employees of the
respondent-sugar factory, whose legal dues are pending, to submit the
relevant documents in support of dues and their claims so as to prove
their legal dues and to furnish such a detail including the necessary details
F of their bank accounts for remitting their legal dues and furnishing their
particulars alongwith a tabulation of total dues from the sugar factory till
date in view of the order passed by this Hon’ble Court dated 04.12.2019
passed in Civil Appeal No. 232 of 2016.
2. At the outset, it is required to be noted that by a detailed judgment
G and order dated 04.12.2019 in Civil Appeal No. 232 of 2016, this Court
has upheld the right of the employees of the sugar factory to receive the
amount from the appellant - bank and has held that the applicant/appellant
bank must pay the employees’ dues out of the sale proceeds from the
auctioned property. However, it is required to be noted that so far as the
liability of the appellant - bank would be to pay only the employees dues
H
THE MAHARASHTRA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. v. 651
BABULAL LADE & ORS. [M. R. SHAH, J.]
of salary/wages and so far as all other statutory dues in relation to A
employees namely provident fund, gratuity, bonus etc. are concerned,
the liability has been fastened upon the subsequent purchaser. It appears
that during the pendency of the aforesaid appeal and while passing the
interim order, this Court directed the applicant/appellant bank to deposit
25% of the total amount of wages and pursuant to the same, the applicant/
B
appellant bank deposited the amount of Rs. 3.52 crores with this Court
and the same has been invested in the fixed deposit. It is reported that
alongwith interest, the amount comes to Rs. 4,95,94,737/-. It has come
on record that earlier pursuant to the order passed by the Industrial
Court, Bhandara, the appellant bank had deposited a sum of
Rs. 13,89,84,334/- by demand draft dated 11.02.2021 in favour of C
“Member, Industrial Court, Bhandara”.
3. Thus, the amount due and payable towards the wages/salaries
of the concerned employees of the sugar factory in liquidation shall have
to be paid to them and/or to their legal heirs (in case the original employee
has died) out of the aforesaid amount (Rs. 13,89,84,334/- + D
Rs. 4,95,94,737/-), which shall have to be paid on the due verification
and identity as per the certificate issued by the Collector, as on 23.08.2011,
whereas a total sum of Rs. 13,89,84,334/- is due and payable to the
employees, which amount includes the amount due and payable towards
the statutory dues namely the provident fund, gratuity, bonus etc. However,
at the same time, it is required to be seen that the amount goes to the E
right person, who is entitled to receive the amount due and payable to
him and for that purpose there shall be full particulars including the bank
account particulars of the concerned employees.
4. Having heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
respective parties and taking into consideration the earlier order passed F
by this Court in Civil Appeal No. 232/2016, the present applications are
disposed of with the following directions: -
(i) The amount of Rs. 3.52 crores deposited by the appellant –
bank, deposited with this Court pursuant to the earlier order passed
by this Court with the interest accrued thereon be transferred in G
the account of the Collector, Bhandara so as to enable the Collector,
Bhandara to distribute the same to the concerned employees/legal
heirs of the employes of the sugar factory in liquidation;
(ii) The amount of Rs. 13,89,84,3374/- lying with the Industrial
Court, Bhandara along with the interest accrued thereon also be H
652 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 3 S.C.R.
A transferred to the Collector, Bhandara in the account of Collector,
Bhandara;
(iii) The Collector, Bhandara is hereby directed to pay/disburse
respective employees’ dues of salaries/wages to the concerned
employees/legal heirs of the employes of the sugar factory in
B liquidation on proper identification and verification of the claims
and to be deposited/paid directly in the bank account of the
concerned employees/legal heirs of the employes of the sugar
factory in liquidation along with the interest @ 7.5% on their
respective dues.
C (iv) The aforesaid amount to be disbursed to the concerned
employees/legal heirs of the employes of the sugar factory in
liquidation at the earliest but not later than 31st December, 2023,
as observed hereinabove with the utmost transparent manner and
proper identification and verification of the claims of the respective
employees/legal heirs of the employes of the sugar factory in
D liquidation.
(v) The balance amount, if any, remaining after making the payment
as above to the concerned employees/legal heirs of the employees
of the sugar factory in liquidation as above, be dealt with in
accordance with law and the balance amount be paid to the
E appellant – bank towards dues of the bank.
With this, present applications stand disposed of.
Nidhi Jain Applications disposed of.
(Assisted by : Shashwat Jain, LCRA)
F
G
H
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.