Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

THE COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PATNAversusTATA ENGINEERING AND LOCOMOTIVE CO. JAMSHEDPUR ETC.

Citation
1997 INSC 497
Decided
7 May 1997
Disposal
Dismissed

Holding

The value for the automobile cess must be computed in accordance with the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, as applied through Rule 3 of the Automobile Cess Rules, 1984, not as defined in the Explanation to Section 9(1) of the IDR Act.

Summary

The Collector of Central Excise, Patna appealed against the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal’s order that the value of motor vehicles for the automobile cess should be computed under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, as per Rule 3 of the Automobile Cess Rules, 1984. The assessee, Tata Engineering & Locomotive Co., argued that the valuation should follow the Explanation to Section 9(1) of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951, which defines "value" as the wholesale cash price. The Supreme Court held that the Explanation to Section 9(1) applies only to that subsection and not to the cess valuation; the relevant provision is Rule 3, which incorporates the Central Excises and Salt Act for cess calculation. Consequently, the cess is to be levied on the value determined as if it were excise duty, and the appeals were dismissed.

Issues considered

  • The proper basis for determining the "value" of motor vehicles for the levy of automobile cess under Section 9(1) of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951.
  • Whether the Explanation to Section 9(1) governs the valuation for cess, or the provisions of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 as incorporated by Rule 3 of the Automobile Cess Rules, 1984.

Legislation cited

Subjects

automobile cessvaluation of goodsIndustries Development and Regulation ActCentral ExciseRule interpretationtax assessment

Judgment

             THE COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PATNA                                 A
                               v.
              TATA ENGINEERING AND LOCOMOTIVE CO.
                        JAMSHEDPUR ETC.

                                   MAY 7, 1997
                                                                                    B
           [S.P. BHARUCHA AND M. JAGANNADHA RAO, JJ.)

          Industries (Development and Regulation) Act 1951, s. 9(1) r/w.
    Automobile Cess Rules 1984, Rule 2-Value of motor vehicle for pwposes of
f
    levy of ces~~Held, to be calculated applying provisions of Central Excises      C
    and Salt Act, 1944 and not as set out in Explanation to s. 9( 1).

           S. 9 of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951, ('IDR
    Act') provided for imposition of cess on scheduled industries. Under the
    proviso to sub-section (1) thereof, the rate of cess could not exceed two       D
    annas per cent of value of the goods. The Explanation thereunder stated
    that the "value" would be deemed to be the wholesale cash price for which
    goods of like kind were sold for delivery at the place of manufacture and
    at the time of their removal therefrom without any abatement or deduction
    whatever except trade discount and the amount of duty payable thereon.
    Under a notification issued under s. 9(1) of the IDR Act, the rate of excise    E
    duty, to be collected as a cess, was fixed at 118 per cent ad valorem for
    motor cars and all other automobiles.

          The respondent assessee contended that the assessable value was to
    be calculated according to Rule 3 of the Automobile Cess Rules, 1984 which      F
    provided that in relation to levy and collection of cess, the Central Excises
    and Salt Act, 1944 would apply. The Tribunal accepted this contention.
    Revenue appealed to this Court.

          Dismissing the appeal, this Court
                                                                                    G
         HELD : In calculating 1/8 per cent ad valorem, the value of the goods
    was not be determined as set out in the Explanation to s. 9(1) of Industries
    (Development and Regulation) Act. The provision relevant was Rule 3 of
    the Automobile Cess Rules, 1984, which stated that the provisions of the
    Central Excise and Salt Act shall apply so far as may he in relation to the     H
                                        229
    230                   SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1997] SUPP. 1 S.C.R.

A levy and collection of the cess. The opening words of the Explanation to
    s.9(1) made it clear that it defined "value" only for the purposes of that
    sub-section. (232-G-11]

          CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal Nos. 3596-97
    of 1989 Etc.
B
          From the Judgment and Order dated 4.6.87 of the Customs, Excise
    & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi in A. No. 2094 and 2749
    of 1986-A (Order No. 432-433/87-A).

          C.V.S. Rao, S.D. Sharma and Sushma Suri for the Appellant.
c                                                                                      t


          V. Lakshmikumaran for M/s. J.B.D. & Co. for the Respondents.

          The following Judgment/Order of the Court was delivered :

D         S.P. BHARUCHA, J. The Revenue assails the correctness of the
    judgment and order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate
    Tribunal. The appeals involve the interpretation of Section 9 of the In-
    dustries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951, the notification dated
    28th December, 1983, issued thereunder and Rules 2 and 3 of the                        I
E
    Automobile Cess Rules, 1984. The relevant provisions are reproduced :

             The l11dustries (Developme11t & Regulatio11) Act, 1951 :
                                                                                       {
            "S. 9. - Imposition of cess on scheduled industries in certain cases:
            (1) There may be levied and collected as a cess for the purposes
            of this Act on all goods manufactured or produced in any such
F           scheduled industry as may be specified in this behalf by the Central
            Government by notified order a duty of excise at such rate as may
            be specified in the notified order, and different rates may be
            specified for different goods or different classes of goods :

                Provided that no such rate shall in any case exceed two annas
G            per cent of value of the goods.

             Expla11atio11 : In this sub-section, the expression "value" in relation
             to any goods shall be deemed to be the wholesale cash price for
             which such goods of the like kind and quality are sold or are
H            capable of being sold for delivery at the place of manufacture and
C.C.E.,PATNA v. TATAENGG.&LOCOMOTIVECO.[S.P.BHARUCHA,J.]          231

   at the time of their removal therefrom, without any abatement or      A
   deduction whatever except trade discount and the amount of duty
   then payable.

   (2) The cess shall be payable at intervals, within such time and in
   such manner as may be prescribed, and any rules made in this
   behalf may provide for the grant of a rebate for prompt payment       B
   of the cess.

   (3) The said cess may be recovered in the same manner as an
   arrear of land revenue.

   ( 4) The Central Government may handover the proceeds of the          C
   cess collected under this section in respect to the goods manufac-
   tured or produced by any scheduled industry or group of scheduled
   industries to the Development council established for that industry
   or group of industries, and where it does so, the Development
   Council shall utilise the said proceeds :-
                                                                         D
   (a) to promote scientific and industrial research with reference to
   the scheduled industry or group of scheduled industries in respect
   of which the Development Council is established;

   (b) to promote improvements in design and quality with reference      E
   to the products of such industry or group of industries;

   (c) to provide for the training of technicians and labour in such
   industry or group of industries;

   (d) to meet such expenses in the exercise of its functions and its
   administrative expenses as may be prescribed."                        F

   Notification No. S.O. 932 (E) dated 28.12.1983.

   "In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section ( 1) of Section
   9 of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 (65
   of 1951), the. Central Government hereby specifies the classes of G
   goods manufactured ·or produced in the schedule industry of
   transportation as mentioned in column (1) of the Table below on
   which a duty of excise shall be levied and collected as a cess for
   the purpose of the said Act, with effect from 1st January, 1984 at
   the rate specified in the corresponding entry in column (2) of the H
    232                   SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1997) SUPP. 1 S.C.R.

A           said Table.

                                         TABLE
           Description of                     Rate of duty of excise
           class of goods

B          (1)                                (2)
           Motor cars, buses, trucks, jeep- 1/8 per cent ad valorem
           type vehicles, vans, scooters,
           Motor-cycles, mopeds and all
           other automobiles.
c         The Automobile Cess Rules, 1984 :

            "R.2 - Definitions. - In these rules, unless the context otherwise
            reqmres, -

            (c) "Cess" means the cess levied and collected in terms of Notifica-
D           tion No. S.O. 932(E), dated 28.12.1983 of Department of Heavy
            Industry issued under sub-section (1) of Section 9 of the Act;

            (t) Words and expression used herein and not defined but defined
            in the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (1 of 1944) or the rules
E           made thereunder, shall ha\ie the meaning respectively assigned to
            them in the Act or the Rules.

            R. 3. - Application of Central Excise and Salt Act and the Rules
            made thereunder : Save as otherwise provided in these Rules, the
            provisions of Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (1 of 1944) and
F           the rules made thereunder including those relating to refund of
            duty, shall so far as may, apply in relation to the levy and collection
            of the cess as they apply in relation to the levy and collection of
            the duty of excise on manufacture of automobiles under the Act
            and the Rules."
G         It is contended by learned counsel for the Revenue that the cess must
    be levied at 1/8 per cent of the value of the motor vehicle, the value being
    computed as explained in Section 9(1). In other words, the value of the
    motor vehicle for this purpose must be deemed to be the wholesale cash
    price for which it is or is capable of being sold for delivery at the place of
H   its manufacture and at the time of its removal therefrom "without any
     C.C.E., PA1NA v. TATA ENGG. & LOCOMOTIVE CO. [S.P. BHARUCHA, J.]    233

abatement or deduction whatever except trade discount and the amount of        A
duty then payable".

      Learned counsel for the assessee submits that the value of the motor
vehicle for the purposes of the levy of the cess has to be calculated in the
manner laid down in the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, for which
purpose he places reliance upon Rule 3 of the Automobile Cess Rules.           B
      The Tribunal in the order under appeal accepted the contention of
the assessee and we are inclined to agree.

      Section 9(1) of the Industries (pevelopment & Regulation) Act, C
1951, empowers the levy and collection of a cess on goods manufactured
or produced in a scheduled industry at such rate as may be specified by
the Central Government, different rates being permissible for different
goods or different classes of goods. The provision contemplates the exer-
cise by the Central Government of the function of fixing the rate of the
cess. The legislature, by the proviso to Section 9(1), has laid down the limits D
of the Central Government discretion in fixing such rate, namely, that such
rate shall not exceed two annas per cent of the value of the goods. It is for 1
this purpose that the Explanation in Section 9(1) defines the expression
"value" and states that it shall be deemed to be the wholesale cash price
for which such goods of the like kind and quality are sold or are capable E
of being sold for delivery a.t the place of manufacture and at the time of
their removal therefrom without any abatement or deduction whatever,
except trade discount and the amount of duty then payable. The opening
words of the Explanation make it clear that it defines the expression "value"
thus only for the purposes of Section 9(1).
                                                                               F
       The definition of the expression "value" for the specific purpose of
Section 9(1) does not, therefore, apply to the valuation of goods to be made
for the purposes of computation of the cess under the said notification. In
other words, in calculating 1/8 per cent ad valorem, the value of the goods
is not to be determined as set out in the Explanation to Section 9(1). For
this purpose, what is relevant is Rule 3 of the Automobile Cess Rules, 1984, G
which states that the provisions of the Central Excises and Salt Act shall
apply so far as may be in relation to the levy and collection of the cess.
The calculation of 118 per cent ad valorem of the motor vehicle for the
purposes of the levy and collection of the cess must, therefore, be made as
if it was excise duty that was being calculated and applying the provisions H
     234                     SUPREME COURT REPORTS (1997) SUPP.1 S.C.R.

A ofthe Central Excises and Salt Act for the purpose.
              Accordingly, the appeals fail and are dismissed, with no order as to
     costs.

           The principle laid down in the judgment delivered by us today in
B    Civil Appeal Nos. 3596-97 of 1989 - Collector of Central Excise, Patna v.
     Tata Engineering & Locomotive Co., lamshedpur, being applicable, these
     appeals are also dismissed, with no order as to costs.

     S.M.                                                      Appeals dismissed.

                                         0




 /


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "automobile cess"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.