Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

619 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act — showing 601–619.

NATWAR PARIKH AND CO. LID.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.

2005 INSC 3931 September 2005Dismissed

Natwar Parikh & Co. Ltd., a transporter of heavy equipment, used tractors (registered as non‑transport vehicles) coupled with trailers (registered as transport vehicles) to move transformers into Karnataka. The Karnataka taxation authority issued demand notices demanding motor‑vehicle tax on the tractor‑trailer combina

MUTHAIAH SEKHARversusNESAMONY TPT. CORPORATION LTD. AND ANR.

1998 INSC 3321 September 1998Appeal(s) allowed

Muthiah Sekhar, a 25‑year‑old lawyer, was injured in a collision between a taxi and a bus owned by Nesamony TPT. Corporation Ltd. He suffered permanent dislocation of the right hip, 60% loss of vision in the left eye and 50% loss of hearing in the left ear, and had to travel to New York for balloon embolisation of a ca

STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusREGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY AND ORS. ETC.

1998 INSC 3371 September 1998Disposed off

The U.P. State Road Transport Corporation sought permits for routes covered by an exclusive scheme and was told by the Regional Transport Authority that, under Section 58(2)(a) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, the permits had to be renewed every three years. The corporation challenged this, arguing that Rule 10(4) of t

REKHA JAIN & ANR.versusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

2013 INSC 5071 August 2013Appeal(s) allowed

Dr. Grace Jain, a government-employed doctor, died in a motor vehicle accident. Her daughter Rekha Jain and husband T.A. Sebastian claimed compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.10,62,000 with interest, using a monthly income of Rs.12,000, a one‑third deduction f

REKHA JAINversusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

2013 INSC 5061 August 2013Appeal(s) allowed

Rekha Jain, a 24‑year‑old film actress, was injured in a road accident caused by a negligent truck driver, sustaining grievous facial injuries and 30% permanent physical disability. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) awarded her total compensation of Rs.23,51,726, including Rs.17,51,726 as pecuniary damages for

SAMUNDRA DEVI AND ORS.versusNARENDRA KAUR AND ORS.

2008 INSC 8921 August 2008Case Allowed

A truck owned by Respondent No.1 and driven by Respondent No.2, insured by Respondent No.3, collided with a car, causing the death of the car occupant. The claimants filed a compensation claim under s.166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and the Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.13,32,000, holding that the driver lack

RAM BABUversusUNITED INDIAN INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS.

2008 INSC 8931 August 2008Dismissed

The case arose from a motor accident on 27 January 1996 in which two relatives of the claimant died or were injured, leading the dependents to claim compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation and held United Indian Insurance Co. Ltd. liable to

PARMINDER SINGHversusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS.

2019 INSC 7041 July 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a driver, was severely injured and permanently disabled in a 2009 road accident caused by two trucks whose drivers lacked valid licences. He filed a claim before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) which awarded compensation based on a notional monthly income of Rs 6,000. The High Court enhanced th

S. IYYAPANversusM/S UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ANOTHER

2013 INSC 3961 July 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The claimants, the dependants of a deceased motorcyclist, were awarded compensation by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal after a fatal accident involving a Maxi Cab. The insurer, United India Insurance Co., appealed, arguing that the driver, who held a licence for light motor vehicles but not an endorsement for comme

NEERUPAM MOHAN MATHURversusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.

2013 INSC 3811 July 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Neerupam Mohan Mathur, lost his right hand in a bus‑truck collision caused by the negligent driver of a chartered bus. He claimed compensation under Section 110‑A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.3,20,000. The Punjab & Haryana High Court enhanced the awar

S. MANICKAMversusMETROPOLITAN TRANSPORT CORP. LTD.

2013 INSC 3931 July 2013Case Partly allowed

The appellant, a 45‑year‑old proprietor who lost his right leg below the knee in a bus accident, claimed Rs. 21,00,000 as compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 9,42,822, applying a multiplier of 13 and granting Rs. 1,00,000 for 85% permanent disability. The Hig

NORTH WEST KARNATAKA RD. TRANSPORT CORP.versusGOURABAI AND ORS.

2009 INSC 6611 May 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by North West Karnataka Road Transport Corp. against an award of Rs.2,59,400 made by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) to the family of a deceased person. The appellant argued that the deceased suffered a fatal head injury after falling from a height of 8‑10 feet in his own hou

GAJRAJ SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

2001 INSC 2381 May 2001Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the validity of a draft scheme under the Motor Vehicles Acts (1939 and 1988) to nationalise 39 road‑transport routes in Uttar Pradesh, of which 38 routes were distinct from the Saharanpur‑Shahdra‑Delhi route previously dealt with in Ram Krishna Verma. The Court held that the statutory right t

V. KALA BHARATHI & ORS.versusTHE ORIENTAL INS. CO. LTD., BR. CHITOOR

2014 INSC 2361 April 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, legal heirs of a deceased road‑accident victim, were awarded Rs.98.40 million with 12% interest by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The insurer appealed, reduced the principal to Rs.56.40 million but retained the interest rate, and made several partial payments. The Executing Court adjusted those pay

BIJOY KUMAR DUGARversusBIDYADHAR DUTT AND ORS.

2006 INSC 1311 March 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved a head‑on collision between a car and a bus in which the car driver, Raj Kumar Dugar, died. His parents claimed compensation from the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT), which awarded a sum based on his present earnings, applied a multiplier, and held both drivers equally liable, directing the ins

MULTANI HANIFBHAI KALUBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

2013 INSC 691 February 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant’s Eicher truck was seized by police for transporting 28 buffalo calves, and the appellant sought its release under Section 451 of the CrPC. The lower courts rejected the application, invoking Section 68(3) of the Gujarat Animal Preservation (Amendment) Act, 2011, which bars release of a seized vehicle for

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.versusMAM CHAND AND ANR.

2007 INSC 851 February 2007Appeal(s) allowed

Mam Chand filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for injuries caused by a motorcycle driven by Mohinder Pal. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal held National Insurance Co. liable to pay Rs.60,000. The insurer appealed, contending that the vehicle was not insured at the time of the acci

BOSE ABRAHAM ETC.versusSTATE OF KERALA AND ANR.

2001 INSC 641 February 2001Dismissed

The Kerala Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicles into Local Areas Act imposes a tax on any motor vehicle that enters a local area for use or sale and is liable for registration under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Petitioners Bose Abraham and others challenged the tax's applicability to excavators and road rollers, arguing tha

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search