DR. VIJAY LAXMI SADHOversusJAGDISH
2001 INSC 95 January 2001Dismissed
In the 1998 Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly election, the appellant was declared elected and the defeated respondent filed an election petition alleging corrupt practices. The petition and its supporting affidavit were drafted in Hindi, contrary to the High Court Rule requiring English, and the affidavit was not in…
SRI RAMENDRA KISHORE BISWASversusTHE STATE OF TRIPURA AND ORS.
1998 INSC 4604 December 1998Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a civil servant, was found guilty in a departmental enquiry and dismissed from service. He challenged the dismissal by filing a civil suit, which was initially dismissed, but the District Judge later set aside the dismissal order, declaring it illegal. The respondents appealed to the High Court, which he…
BHOOP ALLEGED SON OF SHEOversusMATADIN BHARDWAJ SON OF LAKMI CHAND
1990 INSC 3734 December 1990Dismissed
In a suit for pre-emption of agricultural land, the Sub‑Judge granted a decree in favour of Shanti Devi, requiring her to deposit four‑fifths of the purchase price by 18 Nov 1968. She deposited the amount on 19 Nov 1968 due to administrative delays. The Sub‑Judge held that the failure to deposit on the exact date extin…
DUSHYANT N. DALAL AND ANOTHERversusSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA
2017 INSC 10044 October 2017Disposed off
The petitioners, Dushyant N. Dalal and his wife, were ordered by SEBI to disgorge unlawful gains of Rs.4.05 crore and pay a penalty of Rs.6 crore, with a debarment of seven years if unpaid. They challenged the SEBI order, arguing that interest could not be levied retrospectively under Section 28A of the SEBI Act and th…
SHREE BAIDYANATH AYURVED BHAWAN PVT. LTD.versusPRAVEEN BHATIA & ORS.
2009 INSC 10064 August 2009Case Allowed
Shree Baidyanath Ayurved Bhawan Pvt. Ltd. entered into a distribution agreement with M/s S. Bhatia Enterprises that contained an arbitration clause designating the court at Jhansi, U.P., as the forum for disputes. Disagreements led to the appointment of two different arbitrators, each issuing an award, and the parties …
ANITA INTERNATIONALversusTUNGABADRA SUGAR WORKS MAZDOOR SANGH - AND OTHERS
2016 INSC 4894 July 2016Dismissed
Deve Sugars Ltd. was ordered to be wound up and its assets were taken over by an Official Liquidator. The State Bank of Mysore sought to recover a debt under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 and obtained leave from the Company Court (High Court, Madras) on 10 March 2000, subject t…
SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES LTD.versusMUSIC BROADCAST PVT. LTD.
2012 INSC 2004 May 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether the Copyright Board, under Section 31(1)(b) of the Copyright Act, 1957, could grant an interim compulsory licence while a complaint was pending. The Board had earlier held it lacked such power, but the Delhi High Court reversed that view and directed the Board to grant an interim lice…
P. SWAROOPA RANIversusM. HARI NARAYANA@ HARI BABU
2008 INSC 2994 March 2008Disposed off
The appellant, owner of a cinema theatre, entered into a sale agreement with the respondent for Rs. 94 lakh, of which Rs. 32.97 lakh was paid. The respondent filed a suit for specific performance, relying on a receipt (Ex A.15) for a further Rs. 4.03 lakh and claiming possession of the property. The trial court dismiss…
EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD. & ORS.versusKALYAN BANERJEE
2008 INSC 3014 March 2008Case Allowed
Kalyan Banerjee, an employee of Eastern Coalfields Ltd., was appointed and later terminated in the Mugma area of Jharkhand. He filed a writ petition in the Calcutta High Court challenging his dismissal, arguing that the High Court had jurisdiction because the company's head office is located in West Bengal. The questio…
BUDHWANTI AND ANR.versusGULAB CHAND PRASAD
1987 INSC 704 March 1987Dismissed
The case concerned a long‑standing tenancy that began in 1932, where the rent was progressively increased from Rs.16 to Rs.60 in violation of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act. After the landlord, who became the Karta of the joint family, served a notice of termination, the tenants were sued fo…
JETHA BAI & SONS, JEW TOWN, COCHIN, ETC. ETC.versusSUNDERDAS RATHENAI, ETC. ETC .
1988 INSC 334 February 1988Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether a further revision by a High Court under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is permissible against a District Court's revisional order made under Section 20 of the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent) Control Act, 1965. Earlier decisions – Aundal Ammal v. Sadasivan Pillai (Kerala) …
CAPT. (NOW MAJOR) ASHOK KSHYAPversusMRS. SUDHA VASISHT & ANR.
1987 INSC 334 February 1987Appeal(s) allowed
The dispute concerned the inheritance of immovable and movable property of a deceased father and was referred to arbitration. The arbitrator's award directed payment of sums and stipulated residence rights, but did not actually create or extinguish any right in the immovable property. The first respondent objected that…
CINE EXHIBITION PVT. LTD.versusCOLLECTOR, DISTRICT GWALIOR AND OTHERS
2013 INSC 64 January 2013Dismissed
Cine Exhibition Pvt. Ltd. filed Interlocutory Applications No.5 and 6 under Order XVIII Rule 5 seeking clarification or modification of a Supreme Court judgment dated 11 January 2012. The applications aimed to alter specific paragraphs, obtain official records, and modify operative directions concerning the Gwalior Dev…
M/S EMBASSY PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS PVT. LTD.V. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS
2019 INSC 13103 December 2019Dismissed
The corporate debtor, holding a mining lease that was about to expire, sought a deemed extension of the lease through its resolution professional during a corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP). The Karnataka Government rejected the extension, prompting the resolution professional to obtain a direction from the…
GAYA PRASAD KARversusSUBRATA KUMAR BANERJEE
2005 INSC 4703 October 2005Appeal(s) allowed
The landlord claimed the tenant defaulted on rent from March 1994 and filed an eviction suit under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956. The tenant had tendered the March rent twice in April 1994, but the landlord refused to accept it, prompting the tenant to deposit the rent with the Rent Controller and later wi…
CANBANK FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.versusTHE CUSTODIAN AND ORS.
2004 INSC 4943 September 2004Appeal(s) allowed
Canbank Financial Services Ltd., a subsidiary of Canara Bank, purchased CANCIGO units worth Rs 33 crore from a stock broker (Respondent 2) who had applied for the units through two other banks (Respondents 3 and 4) that held the certificates in their names but transferred possession to the broker. The Special Court hel…
REFERENCE UNDER ARTICLE 317(1) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIAversus-
1990 INSC 2183 August 1990Disposed off
The President of India referred a complaint under Article 317(1) to the Supreme Court alleging that a member of the Punjab Public Service Commission, G.K. Saini, slapped the Chairman, Santosh Chowdhary, without provocation. After extensive evidence, including affidavits of the Chairman, three other members, and the res…
AJUDH RAJ AND ORS.versusMOTI, S/0 MUSSADI
1991 INSC 1303 May 1991Appeal(s) allowed
Ajudh Raj and others (plaintiffs) challenged an order passed by the Compensation Officer under Section 27(4) of the Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estates and Land Reforms Act, 1953, which granted Moti, the respondent, rights as a sub‑tenant. The plaintiffs claimed Moti was merely a labourer and that the offi…
ORISSA OLYMPIC ASSOCIATION TH. GENERAL SECRETARYversusSTATE OF ORISSA & ANR.
2017 INSC 3103 April 2017Directions issued
The Orissa Olympic Association (OOA) was granted a lease of 20.808 acres for a stadium but later constructed 23 shops and a Kalyan Mandap (Barabati Palace) on land the State claims lies outside the lease. The Supreme Court, after a committee measured the leasehold area, found that the shops and part of the Mandap are o…
KESRI COMMISSARIAT & OTHERSversusMINISTRY OF FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES, GOVT. OF MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI & ANR.
2012 INSC 1603 April 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The Parsee Girls' School Association, a public trust, leased two floors of its school building to New India Assurance Company Ltd. (NIAC) in 1954. NIAC sub‑let the premises to the Ministry of Food and Civil Supplies, Government of Maharashtra in 1959 without the trust's consent. The trust sought recovery of possession …
N.ANANTHA REDDYversusANSHU KATHURIA & ORS.
2013 INSC 8022 December 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The plaintiff filed a suit against the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation and the Assistant City Planner challenging a notice issued under Section 452 of the GHMC Act, 1955. The plaintiff's neighbour (appellant) sought to be impleaded, claiming infringement of his right to light and air. The trial court allowed th…
B. R. MEHTAversusSMT. ATMA DEVI & ORS.
1987 INSC 2362 September 1987Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, B.R. Mehta, had been a tenant of a house in Kalkaji since 1968. In 1978 his wife, a government teacher, was allotted a separate government quarter, which she later vacated and rejoined the family home. The landlord sought eviction of the appellant under Section 14(1)(h) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, cla…
MALKHAN SINGHversusSOHAN SINGH & ORS.
1985 INSC 1912 September 1985Appeal(s) allowed
Kishan Singh's agricultural land was allotted under the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act and the allotment became final under section 23. After Kishan's death, Malkhan Singh claimed to be his adopted son to inherit the land, while other claimants denied the adoption. The consolidation authorities, in mutatio…
MRS. ARUNA BASU MULLICKversusMRS. DOROTHEA MITRA
1983 INSC 862 August 1983Dismissed
Mrs. Dorothea Mitra obtained a decree of divorce in 1962 granting her permanent alimony of Rs.300 per month until remarriage, under Section 37 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954. The husband, Prafulla Kumar Mitra, died in 1965 without providing for the decree in his will, and the executrix failed to continue payments af…
VANEET JAINversusJAGJIT SINGH
2000 INSC 2772 May 2000Disposed off
The landlord applied to the Rent Controller under Section 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, seeking eviction of the tenant on the ground of a bona‑fide need to start a Karyana business, despite being unemployed and suffering from asthma. The Rent Controller and the appellate authority fo…
KRISHNA KUMAR KHEMKAversusGRINDLAYS BANK P.L:C AND ORS.
1990 INSC 1752 May 1990Dismissed
The appellant sought a declaration that certain properties belonged to a joint family and that a trust over them was void. A receiver was appointed with an injunction restraining any "transfer" of the properties. Grindlays Bank, the original tenant of four flats, surrendered two flats to Tata Finlay, and the receiver l…
THE A.P. STATE WAKF BOARD HYDERABADversusALL INDIA SHIA CONFERENCE (BRANCH) A.P. AND ORS.
2000 INSC 1172 March 2000Appeal(s) allowed
The All India Shia Conference (Branch) and others sued the Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Board seeking a declaration that institutions such as Panjas, Alams, Ashrukhanas, Asthanas and Imambadas were Shia wakfs and not Sunni wakfs. The trial court and the Andhra Pradesh High Court declared all the institutions to be Shia wa…
RAJNI SANGHIversusWESTERN INDIAN STATE MOTORS LTD. & ORS.
2015 INSC 8741 December 2015Disposed off
The case involved four brothers who owned a family business and entered into an arbitration agreement in 1984 to partition the business. An arbitrator issued an award in 1987, but subsequent litigation in the Bombay, Rajasthan and Delhi High Courts resulted in family settlement schemes in 1994 and an amended settlement…
M.S. ZAHEDversusK. RAGHAVAN
1998 INSC 4511 December 1998Disposed off
The landlord M.S. Zayed sued tenant K. Raghavan for possession of a portion of a house under Section 21(1)(h) of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, claiming a reasonable and bona‑fide need for the premises. The trial court found the landlord's need genuine and granted possession, but the Karnataka High Court, on revision …
SHYAMALI DASversusILLA CHOWDHRY AND ORS.
2006 INSC 7811 November 2006Dismissed
The appellant, Shyamali Das, claimed ownership of land acquired by the West Bengal Housing Board and filed a suit for injunction and declaration of title. She also sought to be impleaded in the reference proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, but the Land Acquisition Judge dismissed her application on the ground t…
BALDEV SINGHversusSURINDER MOHAN SHARMA AND ORS
2002 INSC 4581 November 2002Disposed off
The case arose from a property dispute in which the appellant, Baldev Singh, admitted to having two wives. The first wife, Sarbjit Kaur, sued him for dissolution of marriage and obtained a decree declaring the marriage dissolved. The first respondent, S.M. Sharma, who had complained to the appellant's employers about b…
SYED ISRAR MASOOD, FOREST CONTRACTOR. RET GHAT, BHOPALversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
1981 INSC 1771 October 1981Appeal(s) allowed
Syed Israr Masood, a forest contractor, won an auction for two forest coupes in August 1960, paying an earnest money and the first instalment. Upon inspecting the coupes he discovered that the quantity and quality of timber were far less than advertised, and a substantial portion of the marked trees had been later decl…
LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIAversusINDIA AUTOMOBILES AND CO. AND ORS.
1990 INSC 2161 August 1990Dismissed
The Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) acquired two properties on Mount Road, Madras, which had been leased to India Automobiles. LIC applied to the Rent Controller for fixation of fair rent, but the tenants argued that the lease covered only vacant land and that the superstructures they built belonged to them, …
RAM BALAK SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.
2024 INSC 3601 May 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Ram Balak Singh, claimed possession of 0.32 decimal of land that had been settled in favour of his adoptive father Makhan Singh by an ex‑landlord and later recorded in his name by the Consolidation Officer under the Bihar Consolidation Act. After the consolidation proceedings closed, the State of Bihar a…
ARM GROUP ENTERPRISES LTD.versusWALDORF RESTAURANT AND ORS.
2003 INSC 2011 April 2003Appeal(s) allowed
The landlord, ARM Group Enterprises Ltd., owned premises that were leased to Allenberry & Co., who gave notice of surrender on 31‑Aug‑1953 but failed to hand over vacant possession. The tenant vacated under a compromise decree that reserved the landlord's right to evict any sub‑tenants. The restaurant Waldorf, initiall…