R. RUDRAIAH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.
1998 INSC 594 February 1998
The appellants, B. Rudraiah and his son, sought occupancy rights over lands attached to a former village office by filing an application under Section 45 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 on 7 March 1984. The High Court dismissed the application as time‑barred, holding that the six‑month limitation prescribed in …
SODAN SINGHversusN.D.M.C. AND ORS.
1998 INSC 644 February 1998Disposed off
The Supreme Court dealt with a public‑interest litigation concerning the allocation of hawker and squatter sites within the New Delhi Municipal Committee (NDMC) area. The Court examined the objections raised by NDMC to the inclusion of 33 sites in the Thareja Committee’s report and whether the Committee’s recommendatio…
HIRAversusKASTURIBAI AND ORS.
1996 INSC 9903 September 1996Dismissed
The respondents, children of a deceased pakka tenant, sued to declare a 1960 sale deed executed by their mother invalid, alleging that her remarriage in 1958 forfeited her tenancy rights under the Madhya Bharat Land Revenue and Tenancy Act. The trial court, appellate court and High Court held that the mother lost her r…
ABID HATIM MERCHANTversusJANAB SALEBHAI SAHEB SHAIFUDDIN
2000 INSC 493 February 2000Disposed off
The Sir Adamji Peerbhoy Sanatorium Trust, created in the 19th century for charitable purposes, held land on a 99‑year lease and later housed the Saifee Hospital Trust, which served the Dawoodi Bohra community. The trustees sought a cy‑pres amendment to remove the community‑specific restriction on the hospital, arguing …
INDU KAKKARversusHARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. AND ANR.
1998 INSC 4562 December 1998Dismissed
The Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation (HSIDC) allotted an industrial plot to York Printers under an agreement that required the allottee to commence construction within six months, complete it within two years, and start production within three years, failing which the plot could be resumed. York Printer…
L. CHANDRA KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
1994 INSC 5722 December 1994Directions issued
The Supreme Court examined the validity of Section 5(6) of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, and broader questions concerning the powers of administrative tribunals under Articles 323‑A and 323‑B of the Constitution. Relying on the earlier decision in S. P. Sampath Kumar v. Union of India, the Court observed that…
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusSHRI GIAN CHAND AND ORS.
1997 INSC 6352 September 1997Appeal(s) allowed
The United India Insurance Company had issued a third‑party motor insurance policy for a car owned by R‑9. The car was driven by R‑1, who was unlicensed, and collided with a scooter, killing its rider. The claimants (dependents of the deceased) sought compensation, and the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal held that R‑9 h…
RAJENDRA KUMARversusKALYAN (DEAD) BY LRS.
2000 INSC 3702 August 2000Dismissed
The appellant Rajendra Kumar claimed possession of property left by Mohanlal, asserting that he had been adopted by Radhabai, the widow of Mahadeo, who was allegedly an adopted son of Mohanlal. The lower courts held that the adoption of a child by a widow to her deceased husband under Section 8 of the Hindu Adoptions a…
M/S. RAJA RADIO CO., BOMBAYversusCOLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, BOMBAY
1995 INSC 3232 May 1995Dismissed
Raja Radio Co imported Class‑E high‑temperature resisting material consisting of presspahn paper laminated with polyester film and paid customs duty under heading 39.01/06 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, together with counter‑vailing duty under tariff item 17(2). The company later claimed a refund, arguing that the go…
HARYANA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARDversusNARESH TANWAR AND ANR. ETC. ETC.
1996 INSC 1712 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined two appeals challenging High Court orders that directed the Haryana State Electricity Board to appoint the heirs of deceased employees on compassionate grounds. The petitioners argued that compassionate appointments are meant to provide immediate financial relief to dependents of a deceased e…
NATIONAL ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES LTD.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.
1999 INSC 5381 December 1999Appeal(s) allowed
National Engineering Industries Ltd. (employer) had three unions: a recognised majority Labour Union, a Staff Union and a minority Workers' Union. A tripartite settlement was reached in conciliation proceedings with the Labour and Staff unions covering most demands, and the Workers' Union also received the benefits. Th…
M.S. ZAHEDversusK. RAGHAVAN
1998 INSC 4511 December 1998Disposed off
The landlord M.S. Zayed sued tenant K. Raghavan for possession of a portion of a house under Section 21(1)(h) of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, claiming a reasonable and bona‑fide need for the premises. The trial court found the landlord's need genuine and granted possession, but the Karnataka High Court, on revision …
PARBODH SAGARversusPUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ORS.
2000 INSC 2721 May 2000Dismissed
Parbodh Sagar, a Senior Accounts Officer of the Punjab State Electricity Board, saw his service record decline from "good" to "poor" and repeatedly filed unsuccessful litigations against the Board. The Board retired him prematurely under Regulation 3(i)(e) of the Punjab State Electricity Board Services (Premature Retir…
GAINDA RAM AND ORS. ETC.versusM.C.D. AND ORS.
1997 INSC 4641 May 1997Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the implementation of the Delhi hawkers rehabilitation scheme by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) in light of the R.C. Chopra report. It directed the MCD to give all applicants previously held ineligible an opportunity to make representations, to re‑examine eligibility, to prepare zon…
COMMON CAUSE"REGISTERED SOCIETY THROUGH ITS DIRECTORversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
1996 INSC 6051 May 1996Disposed off
The Supreme Court entertained a public‑interest writ under Article 32 filed by the registered society "Common Cause" seeking relief for under‑trial prisoners and accused persons in pending criminal matters. The Court observed that prolonged pendency of criminal cases infringes the right to life and liberty guaranteed b…