Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

RANJAN GOGOI

224 judgments delivered by benches including this judge — showing 201–224.

DAMODAR VALLEY CORPORATIONversusCENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & OTHERS

2018 INSC 11273 December 2018Dismissed

The Damodar Valley Corporation (DVC), a statutory body under the Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948, sought a tariff order from the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) and claimed that, under Section 38 of the DVC Act, it was entitled to interest on its entire capital in addition to the return on equity

FORBES FORBES CAMPBELL & CO. LTD.versusBOARD OF TRUSTEES, PORT OF BOMBAY

2014 INSC 8263 December 2014Dismissed

The case concerned goods that arrived at the Port of Bombay, were warehoused by the Port Trust, and remained unclaimed by the consignee who neither cleared the bill of lading nor responded to notices. The Port Trust auctioned the goods after four years, but the proceeds were insufficient to cover demurrage and other po

PROMOTERS AND BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF PUNEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2014 INSC 8303 December 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The Promoters and Builders Association of Pune and the Nuclear Power Corporation excavated ordinary earth – the former for building foundations and the latter for widening a sea‑water intake channel – and were penalised under Section 48(7) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 for allegedly extracting a minor mine

PRAFULLA C. DAVE & ORS.versusMUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER & ORS.

2014 INSC 8273 December 2014Dismissed

The appellants owned land that had been reserved for a public garden under a development plan notified in 1966 and continued under a revised plan in 1987. They served a notice under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act in 1989, seeking acquisition, but the notice was issued only two years after

B.A. UMESHversusREGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

2016 INSC 12043 October 2016Disposed off

B.A. Umesh, an ex‑police constable, was convicted of murder, rape and robbery and sentenced to death by the Sessions Court, a decision affirmed by the Karnataka High Court and the Supreme Court. He filed review petitions contending that the trial court had not fixed a separate date for hearing on sentencing, alleging a

RAJENDRA KUMAR MESHRAMversusVANSHMANI PRASAD VERMA AND ANR.

2016 INSC 9423 October 2016Appeal(s) allowed

Rajendra Kumar Meshram was elected to the Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly from the Deosar constituency. A petition was filed by the opposing candidate alleging that Meshram's nomination was improperly accepted because he failed to furnish the electoral roll of the constituency where he was a registered voter (Singr

AMEET LALCHAND SHAH AND OTHERSversusRISHABH ENTERPRISES AND ANOTHER

2018 INSC 4503 May 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The appeal concerned four contracts entered into for the commissioning of a 2 MWp photovoltaic solar plant, three of which contained arbitration clauses while the Sale and Purchase Agreement dated 05.02.2012 did not. The Delhi High Court had dismissed an application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation A

POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.versusPUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. AND OTHERS

2016 INSC 11733 March 2016

Power Grid Corporation, a transmission licencee, constructed the 400 kV Barh‑Balia double‑circuit line but the switchgear and protection system at the Barh end, which were to be installed by NTPC, were not completed. Power Grid sought a tariff from CERC effective 1 July 2010, which CERC granted despite the line not bei

MGR INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION AND ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

2017 INSC 1053 February 2017Dismissed

The MGR Industries Association, whose members operate in an area declared as an industrial development area under the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Area Development Act, 1976, challenged a tax demand by the Zila Panchayat under the Uttar Pradesh Kshetra Panchayat and Zila Panchayat Adhiniyam, 1961, claiming exemption under

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusFATEHKARAN MEHDU

2017 INSC 1043 February 2017Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Rajasthan appealed against the High Court’s order quashing charges framed by a Special Judge against mining engineer Fatehkaran Mehdu and Kishan Singh Rawat under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The charges alleged that Mehdu, while granting a quarry licence, sanctioned an area of 80,000 sq. ft. on

M/S. ROHINI TRADERSversusM/S. J.K. LAKSHMI CEMENT LTD.

2015 INSC 9593 February 2015Dismissed

M/s Rohini Traders sued J.K. Lakshmi Cement Ltd. for unpaid dues and served a notice under Order XII Rule 8 of the CPC seeking production of specific documents. The defendant produced some of the documents in court and its representative was cross‑examined, but the plaintiff failed to have those documents marked and en

BACHU DASversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS

2014 INSC 9193 February 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The complainant filed a criminal complaint under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 448 of the IPC and Section 3 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The Sessions Judge held that a prima facie case was made out against the accused. The High Court, however, granted anticipatory ba

SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIAversusBURREN ENERGY INDIA LTD. & ORS.

2016 INSC 10892 December 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) appealed against the Securities Appellate Tribunal’s order that had set aside the Adjudicating Officer’s finding of a violation of Regulation 22(7) of the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997. Burren Energy India Ltd acquired 100% of

VIRESHWAR SINGH & ORS.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS.

2014 INSC 5862 September 2014

The case concerned General Duty Medical Officers (GDMOs) appointed on an ad‑hoc basis in two phases (Phase‑I: 1982‑86; Phase‑II: 1986‑89) by a specially constituted selection committee, contrary to the Delhi Municipal Corporation Health Service Recruitment Regulations, 1982 which required UPSC selection. Phase‑I GDMOs

RITESH SINHAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.

2019 INSC 8552 August 2019Disposed off

The appellant Ritesh Sinha was implicated in a fraud case and the police sought a voice sample to match a recorded phone conversation. The Chief Judicial Magistrate ordered him to appear and give his voice sample, which the appellant challenged under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. The High Court upheld the magistrate's ord

C.B.I. BANK SECURITIES & FRAUD CELLversusRAMESH GELLI & ORS.

2016 INSC 11802 May 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The CBI Bank Securities & Fraud Cell appealed against the Mumbai High Court’s judgment in criminal revision applications involving Ramesh Gelli and others. The appeal contested the accuracy of statutory citations in paragraph 25 of the High Court’s order, which incorrectly referred to Section 46 of the Banking Regulati

PATEL RAVJIBHAI BHULABHAJ (D) THR. LRS.versusRAHEMANBHAI M .. SHAIKH (D) THR. LRS. & ORS.

2016 INSC 11812 May 2016Dismissed

The parties executed a deed on 30‑December‑1960 titled a conditional sale for Rs 10,000, containing a clause that if the plaintiffs repaid the amount within five years the defendants would return possession of the land, and after five years the plaintiffs would have no right to claim it back. The plaintiffs later sued

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.versusSUNIL KUMAR & ANR.

2017 INSC 11431 December 2017Heard

The appellant United India Insurance Co. Ltd. had earlier ordered that 50% of the compensation deposited in the Registry be released to the claimants upon identification. In the judgment dated 24 November 2017, paragraph II contained that direction. Upon clarification sought by the respondents, the Court read the parag

SATISH UKEYversusDEVENDRA GANGADHARRAO FADNAVIS AND ANR.

2019 INSC 11031 October 2019Appeal(s) allowed

Satish Ukey filed a criminal complaint under Section 125-A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 alleging that MLA Devendra Fadnavis concealed two criminal cases in his Form‑26 affidavit, where cognizance had been taken by the courts. The trial court dismissed the complaint, a Sessions Court remanded it for fre

STATE BANK OF HYDERABADversusRABO BANK

2015 INSC 7241 October 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, RABO Bank, sued State Bank of Hyderabad (SBH) in a summary suit under Order 37 of the CPC, claiming payment on several Bills of Exchange that SBH had allegedly accepted via telex/fax messages. SBH denied liability, asserting that the co‑acceptances were unauthorized, that the Bills lacked proper signatur

IQBAL ABDUL SAMIYA MALEKversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2012 INSC 4401 October 2012Disposed off

The appellants, convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment, appealed to the Gujarat High Court. The High Court affirmed the conviction without examining the complete record, including oral and documentary evidence, merely narrating the prosecution and defence cases. The Supreme Court h

RAJKISHORE PUROHITversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS

2017 INSC 6911 August 2017Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a politically motivated attack on a Congress Sewa Dal president who was campaigning against the removal of a mayoral candidate. Four accused, including the nephew of one accused, arrived together in a car; one accused (A‑2) fired a revolver at the deceased while the others provided cover and later f

OIL & NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITEDversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX &ANR.

2015 INSC 4461 July 2015Dismissed

The Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd (ONGC) challenged the assessment of surtax on its agreements with foreign companies, contending that the exemption notification GSR 307(E) dated 31‑03‑1983 under Section 24AA of the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, covered both categories of foreign companies – those with dire

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search