Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

N D OJHA

15 judgments delivered by benches including this judge.

DR. P.P.C. RAWANI AND ORS. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1991 INSC 27529 October 1991Disposed off

The petitioners, doctors appointed ad hoc to the Central Health Service between 1968 and 1977, sought regularisation in Group A with seniority based on their original appointment dates. The Union of India opposed this, fearing that regularising the ad‑hoc doctors would displace regularly recruited Group A doctors. The

R. NARAYANANversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1989 INSC 32425 October 1989Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a freedom fighter, sought a pension under the Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme on the ground that he had permanently lost vision in his left eye due to a police lathi charge during the freedom struggle. Although medical certificates and recommendations from the District Collector and State Govern

SMT. LATA DEVI (MALI)versusHARU RAJWAR

1989 INSC 25122 August 1989Appeal(s) allowed

In the 1985 Bihar Legislative Assembly election, Lata Devi (Mali) was declared elected from Chandan Kyari (SC) constituency. The defeated candidate, Haru Rajwar, filed an election petition alleging that the Returning Officer changed his allotted symbol from "bow and arrow" to "ladder" less than twenty days before polli

DHONDU UNDRU CHOUDHARYversusGANPAT LAL SHANKAR LAL AGARWAL.

1991 INSC 1018 January 1991Dismissed

The suit land was taken under Government management and leased by the Mamlatdar to the appellant for ten years (7 Dec 1951 – 6 Dec 1961). After the lease expired, the management was terminated on 27 July 1963 and the land was restored to the landlord. The appellant claimed that his continued payment of rent to the Maml

UNION CARBIDE CORPORATIONversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS, ETC.

1989 INSC 6015 February 1989Directions issued

The Supreme Court heard a civil appeal concerning the Bhopal gas leak disaster, where Union Carbide Corporation (UCC) sought to resolve all claims arising from the tragedy. After reviewing extensive evidence, including data from U.S. courts and settlement negotiations, the Court deemed a comprehensive settlement approp

CHARITY COMMISSIONER, MAHARASHTRA.versusNIRANJAN & ORS.

1988 INSC 4111 February 1988Disposed off

The Bombay High Court Division Bench criticised the Deputy Charity Commissioner’s conduct and competence while discharging quasi‑judicial functions under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, prompting the Charity Commissioner to seek special leave before the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court held that the High Court’s observat

SHIVA GLASS WORKS CO. LTD.versusASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND OTHERS.

1991 INSC 511 January 1991Dismissed

Shiva Glass Works Co. Ltd., a licensee under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, paid excise duty on glassware based on price lists submitted for provisional assessment. A search revealed two sets of bills, indicating that duty had been paid at lower rates than the actual sale prices. The Assistant Collector issued

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA & ANR.versusGANGADHAR VISHWANATH RANADE (DEAD) BY LRS.

1989 INSC 2748 September 1989Dismissed

The case concerned four life‑insurance policies taken by G.V. Ranade and assigned in 1969 to his wife, Kamalabai Ranade. The Income‑Tax Officer issued a notice under Section 226(3) of the Income Tax Act directing the LIC to pay the policy proceeds to satisfy Ranade’s tax arrears. The LIC delayed making the statutory st

MAGANLAL ETC.versusJAISWAL INDUSTRIES NEEMACH & ORS.

1989 INSC 2287 August 1989Appeal(s) allowed

Maganlal mortgaged his property to M.P. State Financial Corporation. When the loan defaulted, the corporation invoked Sections 31 and 32 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 to attach and sell the property. The first purchaser (Jaiswal Industries) obtained the sale, which was set aside, re‑sold to a second pur

ARJUN KHIAMAL MAKHIJANI ETC.versusJAMNADAS C. TULIANI & ORS. ETC.

1989 INSC 3035 October 1989Dismissed

Jamunadas C. Tuliani, the landlord, sued five tenants and Arjun Khiamal Makhijani (defendant No.6) for eviction under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, alleging six months' rent arrears and illegal sub‑letting of a garage. The trial court decreed eviction on the grounds of rent default

DEVI CINE PROJECTOR MANUFACTURING CO., ETC. ETC.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1990 INSC 275 February 1990Appeal(s) allowed

Devi Cinema and other firms challenged the disallowance of interest paid to their partners under Section 40(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had held that the entire interest paid by the firm to a partner was disallowable, ignoring any interest the partner paid back to the firm on borro

JOHRI SINGHversusSUKH PAL SINGH & ORS.

1989 INSC 2654 September 1989Appeal(s) allowed

The Senior Subordinate Judge decreed a pre-emption suit in favour of Johri Singh, directing payment of Rs 41,082 less Zare‑Panjum (i.e., 4/5 of the amount) by 31‑Dec‑1975. The decree‑holder deposited the calculated sum but later discovered a shortfall of Rs 100 due to an arithmetic error. He applied for condonation of

UNION CARBIDE CORPORATIONversusUNION OF INDIA ETC.

1989 INSC 1794 May 1989Directions issued

The Bhopal gas leak of December 2, 1984 killed about 2,660 people and injured tens of thousands. The Union of India and Union Carbide Corporation appealed against an interim compensation order of Rs.250 crores. The Supreme Court, considering the urgent need for relief, the range of offers (US$426‑500 million) and the g

UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION ETC. ETCversusUNION OF INDIA ETC. ETC.

1991 INSC 2513 October 1991Dismissed

The Union of India sued Union Carbide Corporation (UCC) in the US District Court, which ordered a $5 million interim relief to be paid to the Indian Red Cross Society for Bhopal gas victims, stating the amount was an advance payment and would be set‑off against any final judgment. After the US case was dismissed on for

HINDUSTAN ZINC LTD. ETC. ETCversusANDHRA PRADESH STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS

1991 INSC 1272 May 1991Dismissed

The appellants, industrial electricity consumers, challenged the Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board’s upward revision of high‑tension tariffs and the imposition of a fuel‑cost adjustment charge. The Supreme Court held that the Board’s power to fix tariffs under s.49 of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, remains va

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search