Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

ASHOK BHAN

205 judgments delivered by benches including this judge — showing 201–205.

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNEversusM/S. CADBURY INDIA LTD.

2006 INSC 4821 August 2006Dismissed

Cadbury India Ltd. manufactured several intermediate milk products that were captively consumed in its own factories for making chocolate and were never sold. The assessee sought valuation under Rule 6(b)(ii) of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 1975, presenting a cost statement prepared by a chartered accountant.

M/S. SONEBHADRA FUELSversusCOMMISSIONER, TRADE TAX, U.P. LUCKNOW

2006 INSC 4831 August 2006

M/S Sonebhadra Fuels, which manufactures coal briquettes (coal tikli), sought exemption/rebate of sales tax on the basis that the briquettes were the same commodity as coal, which had already been taxed. The Assessing Authority, Appellate Authority and the Sales Tax Tribunal rejected the claim, holding the briquettes t

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHIversusINDIA THERMIT CORPORATION LTD. & ORS.

2008 INSC 5711 May 2008Dismissed

The Commissioner of Central Excise issued a show‑cause notice on 18 January 1999 demanding differential excise duty and penalties from India Thermit Corporation Ltd. (ITCL) and its subsidiary Asiatic Thermics Ltd. (ATL) for alleged mis‑classification, suppression of facts and undervaluation of thermit portions and dry

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA & ANOTHERversusBIECCO LAWRIE LTD.

2008 INSC 1271 February 2008Dismissed

The respondent, Biecco Lawrie Ltd., imported 5,273.156 MT of Superior Kerosene Oil in May 1998, paid full duty and obtained clearance for home consumption under Section 46. Because the oil was highly combustible, it was stored in a private warehouse under Section 49 of the Customs Act. After the 1998‑99 budget raised t

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search