THE COMMISSIONER, RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS, BANGALORE AND ORS.versusKASLIYAPPA GURUKULA SRI VIDYA SHALA
- Citation
- 1995 INSC 527
- Decided
- 1 September 1995
- Disposal
- Appeal(s) allowed
Holding
No notice under Section 80 CPC was required; the Government had deemed notice on 15 February 1984 and the application filed within three days was timely, so there was no delay.
Summary
The Government was set ex‑parte in a suit and an ex‑parte decree was passed against it. The State filed an application on 17 February 1984 to set aside that decree, claiming it had knowledge of the decree on 15 February 1984 when its office was informed. The Karnataka High Court dismissed the application on the ground that the State had not properly explained any delay in filing within the prescribed 30‑day period. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined whether the State had given a satisfactory explanation for the delay and whether a notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure was required. The Court held that no notice under Section 80 was necessary, that the Government’s office being informed on 15 February amounted to deemed notice, and that the application filed within three days was timely, so there was no delay. Accordingly, the appeal was allowed and no costs were awarded.
Issues considered
- Whether the State properly explained the delay in filing the application to set aside the ex‑parte decree within 30 days of knowledge.
- Whether a notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is required before filing such an application.
Legislation cited
Subjects
Judgment
A THE COMMJSSIONER, RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE
ENDOWMENTS, BANGALORE AND ORS.
v.
KASLIYAPPA GURUKULA SRI VIDYA SHALA
SEPTEMBER 1, 1995
B
(K. RAMASWAMY AND B.L. HANSARIA, JJ.)
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 : Order IX-R.ule 13. Ex-Parte
decree-Setting aside of-Application filed within 3 days of knowledge-Held
C no delay.
On the question whether the State has properly given explanation
for not filing the application to set aside the ex- parte decree within 30 ......
days from the date of the knowledge :
D AlloWing the appeal, this Court
HELD : No notice required under section 80 CPC was issued. In view
of the fact that the office of the Government was informed on February 15,
1984, the Government must be deemed to have had notice of ex parte
decree from the date and within three days thereafter the application was
E filed. Therefore, there was no delay. [247-B-C)
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 8077 of
1995.
From the Judgment and Order dated 19.6.89 of the Karnataka High
F Court in M.F.A. 1046 of 1989.
M. Veer~ppa for the Appellants.
The following Order of the Court was delivered :
G Though the respondent has been served, he does not appear either
in person or through counsel.
Leave granted.
Admittedly, the suit was filed in which the Government was set
H ex-parte and an ex-parte decree was granted. Then the state filed an
246
COMMNR., RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS v. KG. SRI VIDYA SHALA 247
application to set aside the ex-parte decree on February 17, 1984 and that A
petition was dismissed on the ground that the delay was not properly
explained. The appeal was also dismissed by the High Court.
The question is whether the State has properly given explanation for
not filing the application to set aside the ex-parte decree within 30 days
from the date of the knowledge. No notice required under s.80 CPC was B
issued. In view of the fact that the office of the Government was informed
on February 15, 1984, the Government must be deemed to have had notice
of a parte decree from that date and within three days thereafter the
application was filed. Therefore, there was no delay.
The appeal is accordingly allowed. No costs. c
.... T.N.A. Appeal allowed.
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.