STATE OF KERALAversusJAY ENGINEERING WORKS LTD., ERNAKULAM
- Citation
- 1983 INSC 12
- Decided
- 18 February 1983
- Disposal
- Appeal(s) allowed
- Bench
- P N BHAGWATI
Holding
A claim for deduction in respect of goods returned must be made in the assessment proceedings relating to the year in which the goods were sold, not the year in which they were returned.
Summary
The State of Kerala appealed against the High Court's decision in a dispute with Jay Engineering Works Ltd. concerning the timing of a claim for deduction under Rule 9(b)(i) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Rules, 1963 for goods returned by purchasers. The Supreme Court examined whether such a deduction should be claimed in the assessment year in which the goods were sold or the year in which they were returned. Relying on the earlier decision in Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax (Law) Board of Revenue v. Motor Industries Co., the Court held that the claim must be made in the assessment proceedings of the year of sale. Consequently, the assessment order for 1972‑73 was modified, and the order for 1971‑72 was directed to allow the deduction and refund any excess tax paid. The appeal was allowed with no costs awarded.
Issues considered
- Whether a claim for deduction under Rule 9(b)(i) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Rules, 1963 for goods returned must be made in the assessment year of sale or the assessment year of return.
Legislation cited
- Kerala General Sales Tax Rules, 1963s. Rule 9(b)(i)
Subjects
Judgment
361
. STATE OF KERALA
A
v.
JAY ENGINEERING WORKS LTD., ERNAKULAM
8
February 18, 1983
[P.N. BHAGWATI AND E.S. VENKATAR,\MIAH, JJ.)
Kera/a General Tax Rule>, 1963, Rule 9(b) (I) Scope of-Claim for deduction,
in respect ofgoods returned by the purcharers, should be made in the same assesJ- C
ment year in which they were sold.
Allowing the appeal, the Court
HELD : Any claim for deduction in respect of goods returned by the
purchasers under Rule 9(b) (i) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Rules, 1963
should be made in the assessment proceedings relating to the year in which the
said goods were sold and not in the assessing proceedings relating to the
D
assessment year in which they were returned. [362 A·B]
Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax (Law) Board of Revenue (Taxe1),
Ernakulam v. Messrs Motor lndustrie1 Co., ErlfDkulam, [1983] 2 S.C.R. 384
followed.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 2291 of 1980. E
Appeal by Special Leave from the Judgment and Order dated
' the 21st November, 1978 of the Kerala High Court in TRC No. 31
j
of 1978.
P.K. Pillai for the Appellant.
r'
E.C. Agarwala for the Respondent.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by •
VENKATARAMIAH, J. This appeal is filed against the judgment
' dated November 21, !978 of the High Court of Kerala in The Jay G
Engineering Works Ltd. v. State of Kerala(1).
In Deputy Commissiner of Sales Tax (Law), Board of Revenue
(Taxes), Ernakulam v. M/s. Motor lndu3tries Co., Ernakulam('), wo
H
(I) 43 s.c.c. 492.
(2) (1983) 2 S.C.R. 384.
J62 SUPREME COURT RBPORTS (1983] 2 s.c.~.
A have held that any claim for deduction in respect of goods returned
by the purchasers under Rule 9 (b) (i) of the Kerala General Sales
Tax Rules, 1963 should be made in the assessment proceedings
relating to the year in which the said goods were sold and not in the
assessment proceedings relating to the assessment year in which they
were actually returned. Following the above decision we set aside the
B
. judgment of the High Court in this case and direct that the
assessment order for the year 1972-73 shall be accordingly modified .
As a consequence of this order, the Department is directed to
modify the assessment order for the assessment year 1971 -72 by
allowing deduction under Rule 9 (b) (i) of the Kerala General Sales
Tax Rules, 1963 and to ·make refund of any excess tax paid during
c. that year.
The appeal is accordingly allowed. No costs.
S.R. Appeal allowed.·
D
•
,
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.