SMT. CHANDRAKALA TRIVEDIversusDR. S.P. TRIVEDI

A                      SMT. CHANDRAKALA TRIVEDI
                                         v.
                                DR. S.P. TRIVEDI

                                AUGUST 24, 1993

B             [S. RATNAVEL PANDIAN AND R.M. SAHA!, JJ.]

          Hindu Maniage Act, 1955:                                                    ,
          Section 13(I)(a)-Divorce-Allegation of cruelty-Bitterness continuing
C despite becoming grandparent,-Inte1ference by Supreme Court in appeal
    against grant of divorce-Whether called for.

          The respondent-husband had filed a petition for divorce on the
    ground of cruelty against the appellant wife under Section 13(1) (a) of the
    Hindu Marriage Act. It was dismissed by the Matrimonial Court. The
D   Division Bench of the High Court, in the appeal filed by the respondent,
    granted the decree. This appeal is against the grant of decree of divorce
    by the High Court.

          Dismissing the appeal, this Court

E         HELD: 1. Without examining the correctness of the findings of the
    Court below it is certain that in view of the allegations made against each
    other the marriage of the appellant and respondent, in any circumstances,
    cannot be continued further. The marriage appears to be practically dead
    as from cruelty alleged by a husband it has turned out to be atleast
    intimacy of the husband with a lady doctor and unbecoming conduct of a
F   Hindu wife. (788-E-F]

           2. Therefore, the respondent-husband is directed to purchase a flat
    for the appellant between Rs. 3 to 4 lakhs and hand over the vacant
    possession Within six months and deposit a further sum of Rs. 2 lakhs in
                                                                                  {
    the name of the appellant at the Family Court, Bombay. In the alternative,
G   if the appellant is not agreeable for the flat the respondent shall deposit
    a sum of Rs.5 lakhs which the appellant shall be entitled to withdraw.
                                                                     (799-C-D]
           3. The question whether the Division.Bench was in error in observing
    that the matrimonial proceedings are quasi-criminal in nature and there-·
H   fore it was for the wife to prove beyond donbt that the husband was leading
                                          796
                       CHANDRAKALA v. S.P. TRIVEDI [SAHA], J.J                  797

        an adultrous life has some merit but it need not be examined as it would       A
        entail remand which shall be continuation of further agony. [798-G]

                Narayan Ganesh Datane v. Sucheta Nmyana Dastane, [1975] 3 S.C.R.
        967, referred to.

              4. The findings of unbecoming conduct of the appellant is shaky. It      B
        is directed that such findings in the judgment of all courts below shall
        'land deleted. [799-A]

                CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civi1 Appeal No. 1838 of
        1990.
                                                                                       c
             From the .Judgment and Order dated 17.10.89 of the Bombay High
        Court in LPA No. 105/89.

               S.M. Jain, A.N. Pareekh, Sushi! Kumar Jain and A.P. Dhamija for
        I he appellant.
                                                                                       D
              K.K. Singhvi, Mrs. Pushpa Singhvi, B.N. Singhvi and A.K. Gupta for
        the respondent.

                The Judgment of the Court was delivered by

              R.M. SAHA!, J. This is wife's appeal against grant or decree by          E
        divorce by the High Court on ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(a) of
        the Hindu Marriage Act. When leave was granted this Court observed,

                  "Special leave is granted as p1ima facie it appears that there are
                  some points of law arising in the matter which may deserve con-      F
                  sideration. We must, however, express that it is with some regret



-
                  that we arc granting leave in this matter because it appears to us
                  that the marriage between the parties is, for practical purposes,
    ,             dead. The only child of the marriage is a daughter who is also
                  married and settled. The enforced continuity of the marriage will
                  only mean that the parties will spend more years in bitterness       G
                  against each other. The husband is in a position to provide
                  reasonable maintenance or permanent alimony. We can only hope
                  by the time the appeal reaches - hearing the parties will be in a
                  more reasonable frame of mind and arrive at some resolution of
                  thei.r problems which will be mutually acceptable to them."          H
    798                   SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1993] SUPP. 1 S.C.R.

A But when the special leave petition \\as taken up for hearing the parties         (
    adopted very tough and rigid attitude. And that too when they are
    grandparent by now. Prime of life is lost but the fire of dislike for each
    other was still burning hot. We do share feelings of wife expressed by the
    learned counsel that a conservative Hindu lady would no prefer to be know
B   a.s divorcee in the society. At the same time we cannot be oblivious of
    impossible situation in which the parties have landed themselves which
    indeed is unfortunate.

        Both the appellant (wife) and the respondent (husband) come of
  middle class families. Their father were vaid by profession. The husband
C while he was "doing internship at the LI. Hospital, Bombay, was married to
  the appellant and from their wedlock a daughter was born who admittedly
    is now married. Differences appear to have arisen sometime in late seven-
    ties nine years after marriage due lo alleged intimacy of the husband with
    another lady doctor, which ultimately led to filing the petition for divorce
D by the husband on ground of cruelty. When written statement was filed and
    allegations of adultery were made against the husband he set up a case of
    undesirable association of his wife with young boys. Unfortunately for the
    appellant even the Matrimonial Court which dismissed the petition found
    that her behaviour was not of a Hindu married woman. Whether the
    allegation of the husband that she was in the habit of associating with young
E boys and the finding recorded by the three courts are correct or not but
    what is certain is that once such allegations are made by the husband and
    wife as have been made in this case then it is obvious that the marriage of
    the two cannot in any circumstances be continued any further. The mar-
    riage appears to be practically dead as from cruelty alleged by the husband
F · it has turned out to be at least intimacy of the husband with a lady doctor
    and unbecoming conduct of a Hindu Wife.

          The submission of the learned counsel for the appellant that the
    Division Bench committed error in observing that matrimonial proceedings
    are quasi criminal in nature therefore it was for the \vife to prove beyond
G all reasonable doubt that the husband was leading an adulterous life
    appears to have some merit in view of a decision of this Court in Narayan
    Ganesh Dastane v. Sucheta Narayan Dastane, [1975] 3 SCR 967. But we do
    not propose to examine it as we are satisfied that the marriage is dead and
  · the findings of fact cannot be set aside by this Court except that the appeal
H can be sent back to Division Bench to decide it again which would mean
              CHANDRAKi\LA v. S.P. TRIVEDI [SAHA!, J.]                 799

another exercise in futility leading to tortuous litigation and continued     A
agony of the parties. We may also mention that the findings of unbecoming
behaviour or the appellant appear to be shaky. We, therefore, direct that
such findings in the judgment of all the courts shall stand deleted. Yet we
have decided not to interfere with the order passed by the Division Bench.
One uf the reasons for this is that the husband on our persuasion agreed
to provide for a one bed-room flat to the appellant in a locality where it
                                                                              B
can be available between Rs. 3 to 4 lacs. He also agreed to deposit a sum
of Rs. 2,00,000 for the welfare of the appellant.

       4. Therefore, while dismissing this appeal we direct the husband
(respondent) to purchase a flat for the appellant in Thane between Rs. 3      C
to 4 lacs. He shall further deposit a sum of Rs. 2,00,000 by a demand bank
draft in name of the appellant with the Family Court, Bombay which shall
be withdrawn by her. The house shall be purchased within six months from
today and vacant possession shall be handed over to the appellant.

      S. ln case the appellant is not agreeable for one room flat at Thane    D
she shall intimate in writing within one month from today. On being
informed of it the husband shall deposit a sum of Rupees Five Lakhs by a
demand draft payable to the appellant with the Family Court within three
months thereafter. The appellant shall be entitled to withdraw it.

      6. The decree for divorce shall remain suspended for the aforesaid      E
period depending on the appellant if she accepts Rupees Five Lakhs or a
one room flat in Thane and Rupees Two Lakhs.

     Subject to these the appeal is dismissed.

     Parties shall bear their own costs.                                      F
N.P.V.                                                  Appeal dismissed.