SESHAN AND ORS.versusTHE SPECIAL TEHSILDAR AND LAND ACOUISITION OFFICER, SIPCOT, PUDUKKOTTAJ
- Citation
- 1996 INSC 149
- Decided
- 30 January 1996
- Disposal
- Appeal(s) allowed
Holding
The Amendment Act 68 of 1984 applies to the award, entitling claimants to interest at 9 % per annum from possession, 15 % after one year, and a solatium of 30 % on the market value of the enhanced compensation.
Summary
The dispute arose from land acquired under a notification dated 17 October 1981, with possession taken in January 1982. The Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation of Rs 2,000 per acre on 31 July 1982, which was later enhanced by the civil court to Rs 4,000 per acre (7 November 1983) and by the Madras High Court to Rs 6,000 per acre (9 August 1989) with interest under the unamended Act. The appellants argued that, because the award was made after the 1984 Amendment Act 68, they were entitled to interest at 9 % per annum from the date of possession, 15 % after one year, and a solatium of 30 % on the market value of the enhanced compensation as mandated by Sections 34 and 23(2) of the amended Act. The Court examined the retrospective effect of the amendment and the applicability of interest and solatium to both the original and enhanced compensation. It held that the amendment applied, directing payment of interest at the specified rates and solatium on the enhanced compensation. Accordingly, the appeal was allowed and the respondents were ordered to pay the additional amounts, with no costs awarded.
Issues considered
- Whether Amendment Act 68 of 1984 applies to compensation awards made after its enactment
- Whether interest under Section 34 should be calculated at 9 % per annum from the date of possession and 15 % after one year
- Whether a solatium of 30 % under Section 23(2) is payable on the enhanced compensation
- Whether interest is payable on compensation enhanced by lower courts
Legislation cited
- Amendment Act 68 of 1984
- Land Acquisition Act, 1894s. 23(2), s. 34
Subjects
Judgment
A SESHAN AND ORS.
v.
THE SPECIAL TEHSILDAR AND LAND ACOUISITION
OFFICER, SIPCOT, PUDUKKOTTAI
JANUARY 30, 1996
B
[K. RAMASWAMY, S.S. SAGHIR AHMAD
AND G.B. PATTANAIK, JJ.]
La11d Acquisition Act, 1894 :
c
Sections 23(2), 34-Award made after the introduction cf Ame11dment
Act 68 of 1984~Hence claimants entitled to i11£eresl @ 9% p.a. from the dale
of taking possessio11 till date of awan}-A/so elllirled lo interest @I 5% p.a.
on enhanced con1pensation after expily of one yea1; and on the enhanced
con1pensation-Clain1ants are also entitled to Solatiunt @ 3Do/o on the
D additional amo1111£.
•
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 2938 of
1996.
E From the Judgment and Order dated 9.8.89 of the Madras High ·
Court in A.S. No. 572 of 1985.
V. Balachandran for the Appellants.
A. Mariarputham and Mrs. Aruna Mathur for the Respondent.
F The following Order of the Court was delivered : r
Leave granted.
We have heard the learned counsel on both sides.
G Notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894
was published on 17th October, 1981. The possession of the land was taken
in January 1982. The land Acquisition Officer in his award dated July 31,
1982 determined compensation @ Rs. 2,000 per acre. On reference, the
civil Court by award and decree dated November 7, 1983 enhanced the
H compensation to Rs. 4,000 per acre. On appeal, the High Court by judg-
1058
SESHAN v. SPL. TEHSILDAR & LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER 1059
ment and decree dated August, 9, 1989 enhanced the compensation to A
·-...f Rs.6,000 per acre and awarded interest under the unamended Act as per
the State amendment, thus this appeal by special leave.
In view of the fact that the Land Acquisition officer has made the
award on July 31, 1982, i.e., after the introduction of the Amendment Act
68 of 1984 on the floor of the Parliament, the claimants arc entitled to B
interest under Section 34@ 9% per annum from the date of taking posses-
sion till date of payment or deposit in the Court. They are entitled to
-~ interest @ 15% on compensation not paid or deposited after the expiry of
(' one year. Equally so on the enhanced compensation from the respective
dates till the date of deposit in the Court. Equally, solatium @ 30% under C
Section 23(2) is required to be deposited on the market value.
The appeal is accordingly allowed to the above extent. No costs.
G.N. Appeal allowed.
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.