Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

NAVEEN KAUSHIKversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Citation
2018 INSC 418
Decided
26 April 2018
Disposal
Disposed off

Holding

The impugned order in Criminal Appeal No. 1394/2013 is set aside and the matter remanded to the High Court for fresh consideration in accordance with the Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency P. Ltd. judgment.

Summary

The Supreme Court heard a series of criminal appeals and special leave petitions filed by Naveen Kaushik against the Central Bureau of Investigation under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The principal issue concerned the interpretation of Section 19(3)(c) of the Act, which the Court revisited in light of its recent judgment in Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency P. Ltd. v. CBI (28 March 2018). Accordingly, the Court set aside the impugned order in Criminal Appeal No. 1394/2013 and remanded the matter to the Delhi High Court for a fresh decision consistent with the earlier precedent. All other listed appeals and SLPs were either allowed to be withdrawn without prejudice, dismissed as infructuous, or directed for further proceedings before the trial court. The Court also ordered the detagging of one SLP and directed that the records be sent to the trial court for continuation of pending matters.

Issues considered

  • The correct scope and application of Section 19(3)(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
  • Whether the earlier judgment in Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency P. Ltd. v. CBI governs the present appeals.
  • Procedural propriety of withdrawing criminal appeals and special leave petitions without prejudice.

Legislation cited

Subjects

Prevention of Corruption ActSection 19Criminal appealWithdrawal of appealRemandSupreme Court precedentSpecial Leave PetitionTagging and detagging of petitions

Judgment

1108                      [2018]REPORTS
                SUPREME COURT    2 S.C.R. 1108              [2018] 2 S.C.R.


 A                              NAVEEN KAUSHIK
                                          v.
                   CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
                         (Criminal Appeal No(s). 1393/2013)
                                   APRIL 26, 2018
 B         [ADARSH KUMAR GOEL AND R. F. NARIMAN, JJ.]
             Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 – s.19(3)(c) – Held: In
       view of three judge Bench judgment dtd. 28th March, 2018 passed
       by Supreme Court in Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency P. Ltd. and
       Anr. v. Central Bureau of Investigation reported in [2018] 2 SCR 1045,
       impugned order in Criminal Appeal No.1394/2013 is set aside and
       the matter is remanded to High Court – Connected appeal Nos.
 C     1384, 1386-1387, 1395 and 10050-10051, dismissed – SLP Crl.
       No. 5678/14 detagged – SLP Crl. No.9363/17 tagged with SLP Crl.
       No. 6165/2016 – All other connected appeals/special leave petitions
       allowed to be withdrawn without prejudice to any contention to be
       raised before the trial court.
             CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal Appeal
 D     No. 1393 of 2013.
             From the Judgment and Order dated 30.03.2011 of the High Court
       of Delhi at New Delhi in LPA No. 810 of 2010.
                                        WITH
             Crl. A. Nos. 1377, 1394, 1382, 1383, 1384, 1386-1387, 1385, 1406,
 E     1396, 1395, 1391, 1389, 1388, 1398, 1397, 1390, 1399, 1402, 1400, 1401,
       1404, 1403, 1405 of 2013
             Crl.A. Nos. 388, 234 of 2014
             SLP(Crl) Nos. 5678, 1451, 1399, 2508, 2970, 2507, 2939, 2977,
       4709, 6372, 6391, 6691-6692 of 2014
             SLP(Crl) No. 9363 of 2017
 F           SLP(Crl) Nos.2610, 6835, 6834, 6837, 10050-10051, 9652-9653
       of 2013
             Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv., Md. Shahid Anwar, Zulfiquar Ali Khan,
       Aamir Naseem, M.C. Dhingra, Anuj Chauhan, Sibo Sankar Mishra, M.K.
       Pandey, Ms. Sutapa Sarangi, Anupam Lal Das, Anirudh Singh, Krishanu
       Barua, Rishi Malhotra, Dr. Sushil Kumar Gupta, Ajit Kumar Gupta, Ms.
 G     Radhey Shyam Ahuja, Arvind Kumar Shukla, Mohit D. Ram, Alok Shukla,
       Nihal Ahmad, Kunal Yadav, Ms. Nena Shukla, Ms. Mridula Ray
       Bharadwaj, Yoginder Handoo, Nishant Kumar, Harvinder Singh Bhullar,
       Ms. Monalisha Chowdhury, Ashwani Kumar, Yogesh Verma, Bhavtosh
       Sharma, Snehil Sonam, Anuj Chauhan, Gopal Jha, Sarvesh Singh Baghel,
       Rajesh Tyagi, Harsh Khanna, Harish Pandey, Amit Tanwar, Nikhil Jain,
       R.P. Shukla, Vijay K. Jain, Kamal Mohan Gupta, Abhinav Sharma,
 H     Ms. Sneha Baul, Santosh Kumar - I, S. S. Shamshery, Ms. Rukhmini
                                         1108
         NAVEEN KAUSHIK v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF                                   1109
                   INVESTIGATION

Bobde, Ms. Kiran Bhardwaj, Ms. Binu Tamta, V.V. Pattabi Ram, Sumit             A
Teterwal, Mukesh Kumar Maroria, Ms. Kiran Bhardwaj, B. V. Balaram
Das, Ashok K. Mahajan, Senthil Jagadeesan, Amarjit Singh Bedi, Sarvesh
Singh Baghel, Advs. for the appearing parties.
       The following Order of the Court was delivered:
                               ORDER
       We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the           B
record.
       Criminal Appeal No(s).1393 of 2013,
       Criminal Appeal No(s).1377/2013, 1383/2013, 1399/2013, 1405/
2013;
       and SLP(Crl.) NO.6837/2013,
                                                                               C
       Criminal Appeal No.1382 of 2013,
       Criminal Appeal No. 1396 of 2013,
       Criminal Appeal No(s).1389/2013, 1388/2013, 1390/2013
       SLP(Crl.) No.2610/2013,
       Crl.Appeal No(s).1398/2013;
                                                                               D
       SLP (Crl.) No(s). 6835/2013, 6834/2013,
       Criminal Appeal No(s). 1397/2013, 1402/2013, 1401/2013, 1404/
2013, 1403/2013,
       SLP(Crl.) No(s). 9652-53/2013, 1451/2014, 1399/2014, 2508/2014,
2970/2014, 2507/2014, 6372/2014, 6391/2014,
       Criminal Appeal No(s). 1400/2013                                        E
       Criminal Appeal No(s). 388/2014,
       SLP (Crl.) No(s).2939/2014, 2977/2014, 4709/2014, 6691-6692/
2014,
       The appeals and the special leave petition are allowed to be
withdrawn without prejudice to any contention to be raised before the
trial court in accordance with law.                                            F
       The parties are directed to appear before the trial court for further
proceedings on 21st May, 2018 or as per the scheduled date.
Criminal Appeal No. 1394/2013 :
       In view of judgment of this Court dated 28th March, 2018 in Asian
Resurfacing of Road Agency P. Ltd. And Anr. v. Central Bureau of               G
Investigation, Criminal Appeal NO(s).1375-1376 of 2013, the impugned
order is set aside and the matter is remanded to the High Court for fresh
decision in accordance with law.
       The appeal is accordingly disposed of.
       The parties are directed to appear before the High Court on
Monday, the 28th May, 2018.                                                    H
1110             SUPREME COURT REPORTS                           [2018] 2 S.C.R.


 A     Criminal Appeal No. 1384 of 2013:
               The appeal is dismissed as infructuous on the statement of learned
       counsel for the appellant(s).
               The parties are directed to appear before the trial court for further
       proceedings on 21st May, 2018 or as per the scheduled date.
       Criminal Appeal No. 1385 of 2013:
 B             The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn without prejudice to any
       contention to be raised before the trial court in accordance with law.
               The parties are directed to appear before the trial court for further
       proceedings on 15th May, 2018.
       Criminal Appeal No. 1406 of 2013,
 C     Criminal Appeal No. 1391 of 2013:
               The appeals are allowed to be withdrawn without prejudice to
       any contention to be raised before the trial court in accordance with law.
               The parties are directed to appear before the trial court for further
       proceedings on 10th July, 2018.
       Criminal Appeal No(s). 234/2014:
 D             The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn without prejudice to any
       contention to be raised before the trial court in accordance with law.
               The parties are directed to appear before the trial court for further
       proceedings on 19th May, 2018.
       Criminal Appeal No. 1386-1387 of 2013,
 E     Criminal Appeal No. 1395 of 2013,
       SLP (Crl.) No(s). 10050-10051/2013:
               We do not find any merit in these appeals and the special leave
       petitions which are hereby dismissed.
               The parties are directed to appear before the trial court for further
       proceedings on 21st May, 2018 or as per the scheduled date.
 F             We further direct that in all the matters, mentioned above, record
       be sent to the trial court so that the trial court may proceed with the
       matters pending before it.
       SLP(Crl.) No(s). 5678/2014:
               The special leave petition is wrongly tagged with
       Crl.A.NO(s).1386-1387/2013.
 G
               Accordingly, the special leave petition is detagged and may be
       listed independently.
       SLP(Crl.) No. 9363/2017:
               Tag to SLP(Crl.)NO.6165 of 2016.

 H     Divya Pandey                                               Matters disposed of.


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "Prevention of Corruption Act"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.