Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

MRINALINI PADHversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

Citation
2019 INSC 1202
Decided
4 November 2019
Disposal
Directions issued

Holding

The Supreme Court held that, under Article 32, it may issue comprehensive directions to the State and temple authorities to ensure proper administration, preservation, and management of the Shri Jagannath Temple, including appointment of a full‑time Chief Administrator and necessary statutory amendments.

Summary

The petition under Article 32 sought a court‑ordered investigation into the disappearance of the keys to the Ratna Bhandar of Shri Jagannath Temple, Puri, and directions for the preservation, management and inventory of the temple’s valuables, as well as provision of express darshan for devotees. The Supreme Court, having previously directed the District Judge to submit reports and appointed an amicus curiae, examined extensive material including the District Judge’s report, audit findings, committee recommendations and suggestions of the Jagadguru Shankaracharya. It observed chronic mis‑administration, lack of disciplinary control and inadequate facilities for pilgrims, sevaks and the temple premises. The Court therefore directed the State to appoint a full‑time Chief Administrator, to prepare inventories of immovable and movable property, to implement hygiene, security, accommodation, waste‑management and queue‑system measures, and to amend the relevant temple Acts to empower disciplinary action against errant sevaks. It also ordered the establishment of schools for sevak children, a foundation fund, and regular progress reports to be filed within eight weeks. The petition was disposed with these comprehensive directions, without ordering a separate criminal investigation.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Supreme Court can, under Article 32, direct an investigation into the disappearance of the keys to the Ratna Bhandar of Shri Jagannath Temple.
  • Whether the Court can order the preparation of an inventory of the temple’s immovable and movable property and valuables.
  • Whether the Court can direct reforms in the administration of the temple, including appointment of a full‑time Chief Administrator and amendment of the Puri Shri Jagannath Temple (Administration) Act, 1952 and Shri Jagannath Temple Acts, 1954/1955.
  • Whether the Court can prescribe measures for pilgrim safety, hygiene, accommodation, waste management and a queue‑system for darshan.
  • Whether the Court can direct the State to provide educational and welfare facilities for sevaks and their families.
  • Whether the Court can require the State to submit periodic progress reports and inventories within a specified timeframe.

Legislation cited

Subjects

Article 32public interest litigationtemple administrationheritage conservationpilgrimage managementhereditary rightsreligious freedomhygiene and sanitationland acquisitioncourt‑ordered directions

Judgment

                          [2019] 16 S.C.R. 811                           811


                       MRINALINI PADHI                                   A
                                  v.
                  UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
                (Writ Petition (Civil) No.649 of 2018)
                       NOVEMBER 04, 2019                                 B
              [ARUN MISHRA, M. R. SHAH AND
                  S. RAVINDRA BHAT, JJ.]
      Constitution of India:
      Art.32 – Petition under – Seeking direction for investigation/     C
inquiry into the disappearance of keys to the ‘Ratna Bhandar’ of
‘Shri Jagannath Temple, Puri’ – Also sought direction for
appointment of expert committee to prepare report for preservation
and management of property and valuables of the Temple – Prayer
also made to provide express darshan to the devotees visiting the
                                                                         D
temple – Supreme Court by order dated 8.6.2018 directed District
Judge to submit a report before the Court – By order dated
5.7.2008 report of District Judge was accepted and more directions
were issued by the Court – Further Amicus Curie submitted his
reports pursuant to the orders passed by the Court from time to
time – During the pendency of the petition, State Government             E
decided to make land acquisitions so as to provide various facilities
to the pilgrims – Suggestions were also made by ‘Jagadguru
Shankaracharya’ – Held: There is total mal-administration and
chaos – No disciplinary control available – The Chief Administrator
is authorised for the time being, to take appropriate steps against
                                                                         F
such servitors/incumbents who create obstruction in seva/puja/niti
and are involved in misbehaviour and misconduct against the
employees of the Temple Administration or with devotees – The
Temple Management Committee is directed to invite shrimad
Jagadguru Shankaracharya and other stakeholders and ensure
that nitis, puja and rituals are performed as prescribed, regularly,     G
punctually without any remiss and obstruction – There is necessity
for qualified servitors in traditional nitis and rituals – Economic
welfare of the survitors needs to be taken care of – A lot is required
to be done for providing proper darshan – Safety of pilgrims also
needs to be ensured – Temple Administration and Temple police
                                                                         H
                                 811
812            SUPREME COURT REPORTS                      [2019] 16 S.C.R.


A     are directed to ensure that – Identity cards should be issued to the
      survitors and the staff – There is also need for setting up of schools
      for children, accommodation for pilgrims, effluent treatment plant
      and waste management system, separate toilets for male and female,
      cloak room, motorcycle stand – Temple Managing Committee and
      Temple Administration are also directed to ensure hygiene in
B
      Rosaghar where Bhog for Diety is prepared and hygienic sale of
      prasad – Sub-letting of seva/puja also needs to be prohibited –
      Inventory is directed to be prepared as regards the immovable
      property of the Temple – Temple management is directed to place
      before Supreme Court as to what kind of inventory it has prepared
C     with respect to valuables of the Temple – State Government is
      directed to depute full time Chief Administrator – Archaeological
      Survey of India is also directed to co-operate and to permit the
      activities of improvement – Progress report and the decisions taken
      need to be submitted in Supreme Court.
D           Sarika v. Administrator, Shri Mahakaleshwar Mandir
            Committee, Ujjain, M.P. & ors., (2018) 6 SCALE 651
            – referred to.
                             Case Law Reference
      (2018) 6 SCALE 65                referred to            Para 1
E           CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION : Writ Petition (Civil) No.
      649 of 2018.
            [Under Article 32 of The Constitution of India]
            With
            M.A. No. 2053 and 2131 of 2019 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1094
F     of 2019.
            Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv. (A.C.).
            Tushar Mehta, SG., Ashok Parija, AG, R. Balasubramaniam,
      Mohan Parasaran, P. C. Mishra, Ms. Priya Hingorani, S. K. Padhi, Sr.
      Advs., Nalin Kohli, Shibashish Misra, Ms. Janmeja Katikia, Anshul
G     Gupta, Sachin Sharma, A. K. Sharma, Raj Bahadur, Gaurav Khanna,
      S. Debabrata Reddy, Suvidutt M. S., Ms. Anu B., J. Sai Deepak,
      Avinash Sharma, Arnav Behera, Ms. Shayree Chakravarty, B. K. Dash,
      R. M. Patnaik, Himansu Yadav, Kush Chaturvedi, Prabhu Prasanna
      Behara, Ms. Nirmalya Mohanty, Ms. Kalpataru Khuntia, Kaliyug
      Harekrushna, Suvendu Suvashis Dash, Ashok Panigrahi, Anmol Tayal,
H
      MRINALINI PADHI v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS                             813


S. Vinay Ratnakar, Nawab Singh, Surender Deswal, Brijinder Singh             A
Loomba, Jasmeet Singh, Amritpal Singh Khalsa, A. K. Mehta, Ms.
Neena Singh, Sahil A. Garg, Manish Tanwar, Tushar Chhabra,
Swetaketu Mishra, Sanjay K. Das, V. K. Monga, Debasis Misra,
Vishaal S. Jogdand, Suhas Kadam, Sreyas Gacche, Paul Kanakraj,
Jagdev, Ms. Pareena Swarup, Ms. Nanita Sharma, Dr. Sanatan Ray
                                                                             B
Choudhari, Ms. Alpana Sharma, R. Sharath, Manav, Rajnish Kumar,
Choudhary Samsuddin Khan, Ms. Meera Bhatia, Jay Prakash Somani,
R. S. Jena, Pramod Rath, Venkatesh, Partha Sil, Tavish B. Prasad, Amit
Das, Ravi Prakash Mehrotra, Ankit Agarwal, Amartya Singh, Ravi
Prakash Mehrotra, Ramendra Mohan Patnaik, Amrendra Kumar
Mehta, Radha Shyam Jena, Lakshmi Raman Singh, Advs. for the                  C
appearing parties.

      The Order of the Court was passed by

      ARUN MISHRA, J.
                                                                             D
       1. The petition has been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution
of India to direct an investigation/enquiry into the disappearance of the
keys to the Ratna Bhandar of the Shri Jagannath Temple, Puri. It
has also been prayed that an inventory of the valuables stored at the
Ratna Bhandar of Shri Jagannath Temple, Puri be taken and to direct          E
appointment of an expert committee to submit a report to this Court
for preservation and management of property and valuables of Shri
Jagannath Temple. Prayer has also been made to provide express
darshan to all the devotees visiting Shri Jagannath Temple, Puri.
Reliance has been placed on the decision of this Court in Sarika v.          F
Administrator, Shri Mahakaleshwar Mandir Committee, Ujjain,
M.P. & ors., 2018 (6) SCALE 651 (Civil Appeal No.4676 of 2018).

      2. While entertaining the petition, this Court has passed an order
on 8.6.2018, directing District Judge, Puri a submit a report. Later on,
                                                                             G
vide order dated 5.7.2018, in addition to order dated 8.6.2018, some
more directions were issued and were summed up as follows:

      “19. We may sum-up our directions in today’s orders, in addition
      to the orders dated 8.6.2018, as follows:
                                                                             H
814   SUPREME COURT REPORTS                         [2019] 16 S.C.R.


A       i) Report of the District Judge dated 26.6.2018 is accepted
           in principle and action to be taken by the temple
           administration.
        ii) District Judge, Puri may send further report, if any by
            31.8.2018, preferably by e-mail.
B      iii) The State Government may submit report of the
            Committee constituted by it on or before 31.8.2018.
       iv) The Central Government may constitute its Committee,
           as already directed, within two weeks from today and
           place its interim report on record of this Court on or
C          before 31.8.2018.
        v) Copy of the Report of the District Judge may be placed
           on the websites of the temple management, Ministry of
           Culture and website of the Supreme Court for two
           weeks.
D
       vi) The directions in the order dated 8.6.2018 may be
           complied with by all concerned and non-compliance
           thereof may be reported to this Court for appropriate
           action if necessary.
       vii) The temple management may consider, subject to
E
            regulatory measures, with regard to dress code, giving
            of an appropriate declaration or compliance with other
            directions, permitting every visitor irrespective of his
            faith, to offer respects and to make offerings to the deity.
      viii) We have noted that Hinduism does not eliminate any
F
            other belief and is eternal faith and wisdom and
            inspiration of centuries, as noted in earlier judgments of
            this Court.
       ix) Difficulties faced by the visitors, deficiencies in
           management, maintenance of hygiene, appropriate
G          utilization of offerings and protections of assets with
           regard to shrines, irrespective of religion is a matter for
           consideration not only for the State Government, Central
           Government but also for Courts. Every District Judge
           throughout India may examine such matters himself or
H          through any court under his jurisdiction and send a report
      MRINALINI PADHI v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS                             815
                   [ARUN MISHRA, J.]

                to the concerned High Court so that such report can be       A
                treated as PIL on the judicial side and such direction
                may be issued as may be considered necessary having
                regard to individual fact situation.
            x) Learned amicus is at liberty to engage with all
               stakeholders and to give suggestions for bringing about       B
               improvements and also to give a report to this Court.
               However, this will not stand in the way of the Committee
               of the State Government, Committee of the Central
               Government or any District Judge considering matters
               in terms of above directions.”
                                                                             C
        3. This Court vide order dated 9.1.2019, has appointed Shri Ranjit
Kumar, learned Senior Counsel as Amicus Curiae and Ms. Priya
Hingorani, learned Senior Counsel was requested to assist him in the
matter. Learned Amicus Curiae has submitted interim reports pursuant
to the orders which have been passed by this Court from time to time.
                                                                             D
During the pendency of the writ petition, the State Government has
decided to make certain land acquisitions so as to provide various
facilities to the pilgrims such as building of watch tower, an evacuation
plan, widening of roads, etc. A Cabinet of the State Government of
Orissa has taken a decision, which has been gazetted on 27.8.2019.
Thereafter, as the instructions had been issued by the State Government,     E
there was some unrest for the time being which has been settled. We
had requested the Amicus Curiae to make a site visit and submit a
report. They have submitted their report.
       4. We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties and have
considered various reports. We are happy to place it on record that          F
the learned Counsel appearing at the Bar expressed satisfaction that
the action is being taken by the State Government as per the Resolution
dated 27.8.2019.
      IN RE: REPORT OF DISTRICT JUDGE, PURI
                                                                             G
      5. The District Judge, Puri has submitted the report along with
various documents pursuant to order dated 8.6.2018. Following
Annexures have been filed:
       “Annexures
           A-I Sketch Map of Shri Jagannath Temple, Puri.                    H
816   SUPREME COURT REPORTS                       [2019] 16 S.C.R.


A     A-II Sketch Map of different locations in Shri Jagannath
           Temple, Puri.
      A-III Sketch Map of Shri Jagannath Temple with indication
            of five rows of queue of Darshan of the Jews in Shri
            Jagannath Temple.
B
        B. Proposed and Existing C.C.T.V. Cameras.
        C. List of cases against Sevaks.
        D. Statement of Sanctioned Post, present strength and
           vacancy position in Shri Jagannath Temple, Puri as on
C          March 2018.
        E. Fund Management of Shri Jagannath Temple, Puri.
         F. Audit Report of the Accountant General, Odisha of the
            accounts of Shri Jagannath Temple, Puri for period April
            2009 to September, 2015.
D
         G. Relevant Extracts of the Record-of-Rights prepared
            under the Puri Shri Jagannath Temple (Administration)
            Act, 1952 Part-I and Part-II.
        H. List of Sevaks and Palia Awards.
E        J. Number of Hundi installed in Shri Jagannath Temple
            premises, Puri.
        K. Relevant extracts of report of Shri Jagannath Temple
           Administration Improvement Committee.
F       L. Relevant extracts of report of the Commission of Inquiry
           by Justice B.K. Patra, Former Judge, Orissa High Court.
        M. Recommendations of the Hon’ble Shri Justice P.K.
           Mohanty, Commission of Inquiry.
        N. Recommendations in the interim report dated 20-04-2017
G          of the Commission of Inquiry into the affairs of the Shri
           Jagannath Temple, Puri.
         P. The Puri Shri Jagannath Temple (Administration) Act,
            1952.

H       Q. Shri Jagannath Temple Act, 1954.”
     MRINALINI PADHI v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS                           817
                  [ARUN MISHRA, J.]

      6. The audit report of the Accountant General, Odisha has also      A
been filed as Annexure-F on following various aspects:
            1. Fund Management;
            2. Estate Management;
            3. Project Management;                                        B
            4. Financial Management;
            5. Utilisation of Grants-in-Aid;
            6. Unrealistic Budget;
                                                                          C
            7. Submission of Inflated Utilization Certificate (UC) in
               excess of actual expenditure;
            8. Contract Management;
            9. Human Resource Management;
                                                                          D
           10. Miscellaneous observations as to jewellery and
               ornament, non-maintenance of Asset register, non-
               maintenance of subsidiary Registers, non-preparation of
               Report on administration of the affairs of Shri
               Jagannath Temple etc.; and
                                                                          E
           11. Limitation to Audit
       7. Annexure-K is the report of the Committee headed by Shri
B.D. Sharma, Ex-Governor for the State of Orissa for improvement of
the temple in which certain recommendations have been made including
accommodation and other facilities to the pilgrims. It was recommended    F
that accommodation for 60,000 pilgrims should be provided by the
Temple Administration. To start with, accommodation for 10,000 pilgrims
should be provided as early as possible. With respect to the management
of the existing properties and augmentation of income of the Temple,
certain recommendations were made in Chapter III. Recommendations
have also been made with respect to Sevapuja, Nitis, appointment of       G
Sevaks and their conditions of service and subsidiary shrines. In Part
III, recommendations were made as to accommodation and other
facilities to the pilgrims and devotees. It was recommended that
accommodation for 60,000 pilgrims should be provided by the Temple
Administration and to start with, accommodation for 10,000 pilgrims,      H
818            SUPREME COURT REPORTS                          [2019] 16 S.C.R.


A     should be provided as early as possible. With respect to import of the
      record of rights and daily nitis, recommendations were made in
      Chapters XXIII and XXIV respectively. Main cause for delay in
      performance of Nitis and the remedy therefor had been dealt with in
      Chapter XXV. Certain irregularities in the preparation of Kotha Bhog
      were dealt with in Chapter XXVI. In Chapter XXVII, it was
B
      recommended that Temple should take possession of Rosaghar Ovens.
      Certain nature of disputes, which hold back Nitis were mentioned in
      Chapter XXVIII. Economic condition of servitors and their numbers
      to be reduced were mentioned in Chapter XXIX. The aspect with
      respect to reforms in the system of puja and performance of nitis,
C     was dealt with in Chapter XXXI of the report. With respect to the
      constitution of Managing Committee, certain recommendations were
      made in Chapter XXXII. Appointment of Administrator was dealt with
      in Chapter XXXIII. Sarbasadharan Darsan and the queue system
      were dealt with in Chapter XXXV. Paramanik Darsan and special
      sevas were dealt with in Chapter XXXVII. Suggestions for augmenting
D
      the income of the Temple was dealt with in Chapter XXXVIII. In the
      report, reference was also made to transport, dairy farm, lease of other
      rights and properties, land and buildings of Lord Jagannath situated
      outside the district of Puri and outside the State of Orissa. Certain other
      suggestions were made in Chapter XXXIX regarding training of Sevaks,
E     sanitation, publicity, etc. In Chapter XL, a summary of recommendations
      was made, which is as under:
             “CHAPTER XL
                    SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
F           257. The practice of the Charcha staff going to call the Sevaks
            on their Pali day should be stopped. It should be sufficient if the
            intimation to the concerned Palia Sevaks is given on the day
            preceding (Chapter XXIV).
            258. Suars should be prevented from offering any Baradi or Bikri
G
            Bhog at the time of the four main Dhups. To ensure this, the
            Merda Roso should be commissioned and utilised for preparation
            of Kotha Bhog. A collapsible gate should be fixed at a convenient
            place in the Bhog Bata and that should remain closed throughout,
            and be opened just before the prescribed time for Bhog Mandap
H           Puja. (Chapter XXV).
MRINALINI PADHI v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS                            819
             [ARUN MISHRA, J.]

259. As many extra Bhog Mandaps as are absolutely necessary           A
should be arranged on payment of extra fee for the purpose
(Chapter XXV).
260. A temple Official should physically distribute Khei amongst
Palia Sevaks. The system of the Pasarathias taking the Khei of
the various Palia Sevaks directly from inside the Bhittar Pokharia    B
should be stopped. (Chapter XXVI).
261. By arrangement with the various Palia Sevaks, the Temple
Administration should purchase the Khei of the Sevaks and pay
them the price thereof in cash (Chapter XXVI).
                                                                      C
262. The Temple Administration should resume possession of the
Chulis and lease them out every year by public auction to such
Sadhibandha Suars as would be willing to take them on annual
lease. (XXVII).
263. After proper discussion with the representative of the Suar
                                                                      D
Nijog and taking into consideration the current prices of foodstuff
and other relevant factors, the Temple Administration should fix
the maximum selling prices of Abhada and other commodities
exposed for sale in the Ananda Bazar. There should be periodical
revision of such rates. (Chapter XXVII)
                                                                      E
264. A responsible Officer of the Administration not below the
rank of Assistant Administrator should be present inside the
Gambhira at the time of Sahan Mela to exercise effective control
over Pindika collections and prevent exploitation of the pilgrims
either by the Sevaks or by Jatri Pandas or by Dhulia Gumastas
(Chapter XXVIII).                                                     F
265. Disputes that arise between the Administration and Sevak
or Sevaks or between the Sevaks inter se should be disposed of
quickly by the Administration. The Managing Committee should
immediately constitute an Appeal Sub-Committee and that Sub-
Committee should ensure that appeals filed before the Managing        G
Committee against the orders of the Administrator are quickly
disposed of. (Chapter XXVIII).
266. A Sevak who fails to turn up to do his duty on any particular
day without sufficient reasons should be liable for removal. The
number of Sadhibandha Sevaks in each category should be               H
820      SUPREME COURT REPORTS                          [2019] 16 S.C.R.


A     reduced by removing those who do not actually do Seva.
      (Chapter XXVIII).
      267. If the above recommendations are implemented, it is likely
      to result in the elimination of a number of recorded Savaks in
      each category leaving in the field only those who actually do the
B     Seva. Consequently, the turn of worship of the remaining Sevaks
      would be more frequent and the remuneration that they would
      get per month would be more than what it is at present. If in
      spite of this, it is found that the Nitis are not performed punctually
      and regularly, the hereditary rights of the Sevaks should be
      abolished by Legislation and thereafter the required number of
C
      Sevaks should be appointed afresh on the basis of monthly salary
      (Chapter XXIX).
      268. A reserve body of Sevaks should be maintained on salary
      basis consisting of three Srotriya brahmins well-versed in Puja
      Padhhati who can act both as Puja Pandas and Pasupalaks; two
D
      Supakars to prepare Kotha Bhog; a pratihari or a Brahmin who
      can be entrusted with the security type of work; a Mekap or a
      Khuntia type of Sevak or in the alternative a Brahmin; a Bodo
      Sevak or in the alternative a Brahmin; and two non-Brahmin
      Sevaks. The expenditure incurred on the reserve Sevaks would
E     not be a waste, because so long as their services are not required
      in time of emergency, they can be utilized for other purpose as
      indicated in the report. (Chapter XXX)
      269. There is no necessity either to curtail the Nitis or to interfere
      with the system of Puja prevalent at present. (Chapter XXXI)
F
      270. At present neither the Administrator nor the Assistant
      Administrators and in fact no other official excepting a few
      sevaks are entitled to go into the Roso. There appears to be no
      reason why the Administrator and the Assistant Administrators,
      provided they are Brahmins, should not have the privilege to go
G     into the Roso to check malpractices if any prevalent there. This
      should be enforced if necessary after consultation with the
      Sankaracharya of Gobardhan Pitha and Mukti Mandap Pandit
      Sabha. (Chapter XXXI).
      271. Similarly there appears to be no religious prohibition against
H     having three permanent chariots for the Ratha Jatra. There are
MRINALINI PADHI v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS                         821
             [ARUN MISHRA, J.]

great many advantages in having such permanent Chariots. This      A
should be done after necessary consultation with Jagatguru
Sankaracharya and the members of the Mukti Mandap Pandit
Sabha after taking due note of public opinion in the matter.
(Chapter XXXI).
272. The Managing Committee should consist of 10 members,          B
namely –
     1. The Raja of Puri, who should be the Chairman.
     2. The Collector of Puri, who should be the Vice-Chairman.
     3. Administrator.                                             C
     4. Commissioner of Endowment.
     5. Jagatguru Sankaracharya of Gobardhan Pitha or if he
        is not available any other Sanyasi of Sampradaya.
     6. Patajosi Mahapatra or in his absence the person            D
        functioning as such.
     7. Three persons of learning devoted.
     8. to the cult of Lord Jagannath.
     9. nominated by the State Government.                         E
    10. A nominee of the Advisory Body consisting of persons
        who donate Rs.5 lakhs or more for the Foundation Fund
        of the Temple.
The tenure of appointment of non-official Members should be
three years. Power should be given to the Managing Committee       F
to co-opt for any particular meeting, any Sevak or Sevaks whose
presence is considered necessary or desirable by the Committee.
(Chapter XXXII).
273. The present provision regarding selection of Administrator
requires no modification. What however is important is proper      G
selection of the Officer. Not only should he be administratively
strong but he should also have a religious bent of mind, and one
who can involve himself completely in the administration of the
Temple affairs. The minimum period of deputation of an Officer
to work as Administrator should be five years. (Chapter XXXIII).   H
822      SUPREME COURT REPORTS                         [2019] 16 S.C.R.


A     274. Similar procedure should be adopted in the appointment of
      Assistant Administrators. There should be three Assistant
      Administrators one – to remain in charge of revenue
      administration, the office and establishment; the second to remain
      exclusively in charge of the Nitis and the third in charge of the
B     developmental works and discipline inside the Temple. The period
      of appointment of Assistant Administrators should also be five
      years (Chapter XXXIII).
      275. As the Administrator is proposed to be drawn from the
      Orissa Administrative Service, Class (1) controlled by the Political
C     & Services Department and the Assistant Administrators are
      proposed to be drawn from the Orissa Administrative Service
      controlled by the Revenue Department, a convention should grow
      that in matters of posting and withdrawal of these Officers, the
      concerned Department would do so in consultation with the Law
D     Department, which is in administrative charge of the affairs of
      the Sree Jagannath Temple. (Chapter XXXIII).
      276. Disciplinary power vested in the Administrator under the
      Act are quite adequate. But in spite of there being innumerable
      occasions to warrant the exercise of such powers, no
E     Administrator so far has done so because of the fear that such
      action may precipitate a strike in which case the public as also
      the Government, without trying to enter into details, would
      immediately hold the Administrator responsible for precipitating
      such crisis. The general attitude of all Administrators is to
F     somehow or other manage affairs peacefully during their limited
      tenure of office. To enable the Administrator to become effective
      in the Administration of the Temple affairs, he should not only
      be given a free hand for such management but he should also
      be assured by Government that so long as he acts on correct
G     lines, his action would be supported irrespective of any unpleasant
      consequences, that may ensue. (Chapter XXXIV)
      277. Section 21-A of the Puri Sree Jagannath Temple Act should
      be amended to provide for suspension of a Sevak pending
      initiation and disposal of proceedings against him. (Chapter
H     XXXIV)
MRINALINI PADHI v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS                              823
             [ARUN MISHRA, J.]

278. Order passed by the Administrator under clauses (h) and            A
(i) of Sub-Section 2 of Section 21 should be brought within the
purview of Sub-Section 1 of section 24. (Chapter XXXIV).
279. The queue system should be introduced to regulate the entry
of pilgrims inside the Temple for Darshan of the deities. Sahan
Mela which at present means the pilgrims going into the Bhittar         B
Pokharia to have Darshan of the deities, should continue. But
the time allowed for such Sahan Mela should be restricted to
one hour in the morning and half an hour during night. At all other
times, excluding however such occasions when entry of the
pilgrims to Natyamandir (the area between Chandan argali and
                                                                        C
Jaya Bijoya Dwar) is prohibited, pilgrims should be allowed to
go in queue up to Chandan argali to have Darsan of the deities
free of charge. If at times other than Sahan Mela a pilgrim wants
to enter into the Bhittar Pokharia for Darsan of the deities he
should avail himself of the provision for Paramanik Darsan which
is at present in vogue. The existing fee for Paramanik Darsan           D
should be slightly increased. (Chapter XXXV)
280. The practice of placing three Jharis in front of the three
deities for Pindika collection should be discontinued. Instead of
that a strong sealed box with a slit on the top of it should be
placed just below the Ratna Sighasan, at the time pilgrims are          E
allowed into the Bhittar Pokharia either at the time of Sahan Mela
or at the time of Paramanik Darsan. Such of the Jatris who are
inclined to make any offering to the deities may put their offerings
in such boxes. A similar box should also be placed near the
Chandan argali to enable the Jatris who have Darsan of the              F
deities from that point to place their offerings. Excepting the Palia
Pasupalaks who sit on the Ratna Singhasan at the time of Sahan
Mela, there should be no other Palia Sevak on duty inside the
Bhittar Pokharia at the time of Sahan Mela. It shall be the duty
of the Palia Pasupalak on duty who sit on the Ratna Singhasan
to distribute Tulasi to the pilgrims. They shall not, on pain of        G
disciplinary action, solicit for any offering from the pilgrims.
Similarly, at the time of Darsan by the pilgrims from near the
Chandanargali a Sevak should be posted there only to distribute
Tulasi to the pilgrims and he should be prohibited from soliciting
any offerings from pilgrims. (Chapter XXXV)                             H
824      SUPREME COURT REPORTS                       [2019] 16 S.C.R.


A     281. The adoption of the queue system would not prevent the
      pilgrims from gathering in the Jaganmohan and to have Darsan
      of the deities from that place as they are doing at present. It is
      not necessary to regulate them on ordinary days. But regulation
      even of such pilgrims would become necessary on festive
B     occasions when there is expected to be rush of pilgrims. (Chapter
      XXXV)
      282. The existing system of collection of Attika money by Jatri
      Pandas may be allowed to continue only on the specific condition
      that out of the Attika amount they should pay 25% to the funds
C     of the Temple. Simultaneously Legislation should be undertaken
      to give power to the Temple Administration to exercise sufficient
      control over the Jatri business. No person shall be allowed to
      continue doing business of Jatri Panda without obtaining a licence
      from the Administrator and no such licence should be given to
D     anyone who does not actually perform Seva in the Temple.
      Conditions should be embodied in the licence indicating the
      amount that a Jatri Panda is entitled to take from a pilgrim for
      services rendered, and the accounts he is to maintain, etc. No
      Jatri Panda can engage as his Gumasta a person who himself
      has not obtained a licence from the Administrator. If Jatri Pandas
E
      do not agree to contribute 25% of the Attika money to the Temple
      fund, collection of Attika by Jatri Pandas should be banned by
      Legislature, and due publicity should be given that if the Jatris
      wish to make any offerings to the Deities for any purpose
      whatsoever, the offerings should be put only in the Hundis placed
F     in the Temple and that no offerings made elsewhere will be
      utilized for the purposes of the Deities. (Chapter XXXVI)
      283. There should be complete ban on the activities of Dhulia
      Gumastas. The Temple should set up an organization of pilgrim
      guides and in enlisting such guides preference should be given
G     to Dhulia Gumastas who, having regard to their character and
      antecedents, are found fit for the job. Preference should also be
      given to the Sevaks who by reason of any reforms brought about
      by Legislation or otherwise would be displaced from their Seva.
      Each pilgrim guide should obtain a license from the Administrator.
H     (Chapter XXXVI).
MRINALINI PADHI v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS                            825
             [ARUN MISHRA, J.]

284. Provisions contained in Clauses 18B, 18C, 18D and clauses        A
18F to 18H in the Sree Jagannath Temple (Amendment) Bill,
1976 are commended for acceptance. (Chapter XXXVI).
285. Even if the present system of Attika is allowed to continue
under conditions and restrictions mentioned above, still a Hundi
should be placed in a prominent place in the Jagamohan inside a       B
screened enclosure where Jatris may put their offerings. Similarly,
in some of the important subsidiary shrines inside the Temple
sealed boxes may be placed where pilgrims may put their
offerings. (Chapter XXXVI).
286. Existing facilities for Paramanik Darsan should continue, but    C
the fees may be raised slightly. Besides Paramanik Darsan,
provision should be made for Ekanta Seva by pilgrims. (Chapter
XXXVII).
287. The Temple Administration should undertake construction
of a Dharmasala of its own. If possible, at a place as near the       D
Temple as possible. If there is any difficulty to secure such a
vacant site it should put up a Dharamsala in Talabania near the
Railway Station. It should initiate the ‘own your cottage’ scheme
and put up cottages either in Talabania or in Ballapanda.
Simultaneously it should enter into negotiations with the owners
                                                                      E
of Dharamsala to secure management of the Dharamsalas
situated in the Town of Puri. If that is not feasible the Temple
Administration should at least enter into some arrangements with
the owners of Dharamsala to ensure that the pilgrims conducted
to the Dharamsalas in the Temple buses are accommodated
there. (Chapter XXXVIII).                                             F
288. The Temple should keep some of its buses at the Railway
Station and bus stand to conduct the pilgrims from there to the
Dharamsalas. (Chapter XXXVIII)
289. A Foundation Fund of an amount of Rs.10 crores should be
                                                                      G
constituted. The Governor may be requested, if he has no
objection, to issue an appeal on behalf of the people of Orissa
inviting donations to the fund. The Fund should be administered
by a Board of Trustees consisting of those donors who pay Rs.5
lakhs or more to the Foundation Fund. The fund when collected
should be invested in long term deposits. Only the interest           H
826      SUPREME COURT REPORTS                       [2019] 16 S.C.R.


A     accruing from such deposits should be spent for the purpose of
      the Temple. The Board of Trustees should meet once a year at
      Puri to review the financial position of the Temple and inter alia
      to consider proposals to augment the income thereof. The Board
      of Trustees should elect a person to be the Member of the
      Managing Committee. (Chapter XXXVIII).
B
      290. The Temple should publish an almanac of its own. It is only
      this almanac which should receive the approval of the Raja of
      Puri and of the Mukti Mandap. Such Almanac is likely to be very
      popular and the sale thereof may yield a sizeable profit to the
C     Temple. (Chapter XXXVIII)
      291. The Temple should obtain monopoly for the manufacture
      and sale of photo pictures of the Deities in several Besas. This
      is likely to yield a substantial recurring income to the Temple.
      (Chapter XXXVIII).
D
      292. The Mahalaxmi Bhandar should be run departmentally
      instead of being leased out as is being done at present. If worked
      departmentally it is likely to yield annually a net profit of Rs.2
      lakhs as against Rs.70,000 which the Management is at present
      getting by leasing it out. (Chapter XXXVIII).
E
      293. The Management should introduce a scheme whereby
      pilgrims may at their cost conduct some of the festivals of the
      deities for which expenditure is at present being incurred from
      the Temple Funds. Apart from satisfying the devotional urge of
      the pilgrims, this system is likely to yield a good deal of income
F
      to the Temple. (Chapter XXXVIII).
      294. By means of due publicity the pilgrims may be encouraged
      to offer special Bhogs to the Deity. As a portion of such Bhog
      would be distributed amongst certain categories of Palia Sevaks,
G     their earnings would increase thereby. Sale of the Temple’s share
      of such Bhog would also yield an income to the Temple. (Chapter
      XXXVIII).
      295. As the Transport Service of the Temple is yielding a net
      profit of about Rs.2 lakhs per year at present, its scope should
H     be widened as far as it is practicable. (Chapter XXXVIIII).
MRINALINI PADHI v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS                            827
             [ARUN MISHRA, J.]

296. A dairy farm should be started. If properly run there is every   A
likelihood of philanthropic people donating cows to the dairy farm.
(Chapter XXXVIII)
297. Niladribihar should be worked departmentally, and Dolabedi
Kunja should be revived. (Chapter XXXVIII)
                                                                      B
298. Besides taking possession of and leasing out Chulis in the
Temple Roso, the Administration should also take possession of
all the Saraghars inside the Temple premises and utilise them
properly. If possible some of the Sargharas situated in the Bahar
Bedha can be leased out. (Chapter XXXVIII).
                                                                      C
299. As far as it is practicable, lands of Lord Jagannath and Jagir
lands held by Sevaks under Lord Jagannath should be kept out
of the purview of land Legislations. This principle should also
apply to all Debottar lands. If it is not possible to exempt the
Estates of Lord Jagannath from the purview of the Estates
Abolition Act, the annuity that is going to be fixed, should be on    D
as liberal a scale as possible, making a further provision for
periodic upward revision of the annuity amount with the rise in
prices. (Chapter XXXVIII).
300. Sincere and urgent efforts should be made by the Temple
Administration to obtain a full list of all properties of Lord        E
Jagannath situated inside and outside the State. Excepting
properties situated in the district of Puri, which the Temple can
directly manage, efforts should be made to dispose of the
properties situated outside Puri and the sale proceeds should be
invested in long term deposits. The effort to obtain information
                                                                      F
regarding properties situated outside the State of Orissa should
be made at the level of Government. (Chapter XXXVIII).
301. Transfer of Seva rights should be prohibited by Legislation.
(Chapter XXXIX)
302. An institution to train Puja Pandas and such other Sevaks        G
for whom training is necessary should be established inside the
Temple. (Chapter XXXIX).
303. A concerted drive to keep the Temple premises absolutely
clean should be undertaken by the Temple Administration.
(Chapter XXXIX).                                                      H
828            SUPREME COURT REPORTS                         [2019] 16 S.C.R.


A           304. It must be ensured that food-stuff sold in Ananda Bazar
            are kept in fly-proof receptacles. Food-stuff must be sold at places
            earmarked for the purpose. Ananda Bazar should be cleaned
            twice a day. (Chapter XXXIX).
            305. Asking for alms within the Temple precincts should be strictly
B           prohibited. (Chapter XXXIX).
            306. A religious atmosphere should be created inside the Temple
            premises by periodically holding religious discourses and by
            arranging for Vedaparayana and reading of Puranas, inside the
            Temple precincts. (Chapter XXXIX).
C           307. Practically no publicity arrangements exists in the Temple
            at present. The Publicity arrangements should be considerably
            improved for the convenience of the pilgrims. (Chapter XXXIX).
            308. Soliciting Dakhina in any form by any person, be he a Sevak
            or otherwise, inside the Temple premises should be prohibited.
D           (Chapter XXXIX).
            309. Mahaprasad Seva Sadan which had been started some time
            back and which has fallen into disuse now should be revived.
            (Chapter XXXIX).
            310. A Code of Conduct for observance by all Sevaks inside the
E           Temple should be framed and their observance should be strictly
            enforced. (Chapter XXXIX).”
            The CCTV Cameras having night vision was also recommended.
            IN RE: REPORT OF LEARNED AMICUS CURIAE
F            8. Shri Ranjit Kumar, learned Amicus Curiae has made inspection
      of the premises on 22-23.2.2019. He has made reference to the Puri
      Shri Jagannath Temple (Administration) Act, 1952 (for short, ‘the 1952
      Act’) and Shri Jagannath Temple Act, 1954 (for short, ‘the 1954 Act’).
      He has drawn our attention to the definition of Sevaks as defined under
      Section 4(d-1) of the 1954 Act, thus:
G
            “4(d-1) “Sevak” means any person who is recorded as such in
            the Record of Rights or is recognized by a competent authority
            as a Sevak or his substitute or has acquired the rights of a Sevak
            by means of any recognized mode of transfer and includes a
            person appointed to perform any niti or Seva under clause (i) of
H           sub-section (2) of Section 21.”
     MRINALINI PADHI v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS                              829
                  [ARUN MISHRA, J.]

       9. Learned Amicus Curiae has pointed out in his report that 1954      A
Act has been made to reorganize the scheme of the management of
the affairs of the Temple and to provide better administration and
governance having regard to the ancient customs and unique and
traditional nitis and ritual contained in the Record of Rights prepared
under the 1952 Act. The Managing Committee has been constituted
under the Act, inter alia, to ensure proper performance of Seva, Puja        B
and periodicals Niti of temple, arrange for proper collections of
offerings, audit of accounts and installation of Hundi.
       10. Learned Amicus Curiae has pointed out following aspects
in his report of inspection:
                                                                             C
           (a) There is scope of improvement on various aspects with
               respect to visits of devotees inside the Temple complex.
               Suggestion has been made to have darshan in a
               systematic line, which facility is available in Tirupati,
               Golden Temple and Mata Vaishno Devi or such other
               similar places. Learned Amicus Curiae was informed            D
               that the entire complex is about 10 acres and a very
               large number of smaller temples were there,
               approximately 97.
           (b) With respect of hygiene more specifically in Rosaghar,
               where all the cooking for the Mahaprasad is done, it          E
               was found that there was a lot of activities being done
               on small chabutra open to the air and without proper
               manner of disposal of waste. Wood fired chullas are used
               in the main kitchen. Out of 240 chullas, 8 are specifically
               used for preparation of Kotha Bhog of the Lord
                                                                             F
               Jagannath and the rest are under the possession of
               other licensees who pay nominal rent to Temple
               administration and are cooking the Mahaprasad. The
               hygiene in the main kitchen is not known. There is no
               disposal mechanism for waste nor an effluent treatment
               plant.                                                        G
           (c) With respect to hygiene requirement to Anand Bazar
               where the sale of Mahaprasad takes place, the steps
               require large scale improvement in terms of hygiene, but
               Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) seems to be
               having some issue, if improvement is made.                    H
830            SUPREME COURT REPORTS                        [2019] 16 S.C.R.


A                (d) Donation boxes should be placed at strategic point both
                     within, outside and at all other smaller Temples within
                     the complex.
             11. Learned Amicus Curiae was informed that 119 types of Seva/
      Nitis/Rituals are performed by the Sevaks who are hereditary and the
B     daily requirement is about 85 to 90 Sevas from 45 categories of Sevaks
      and the requirement increases in festivals and occasions. The Managing
      Committee meeting was held to consider the 12 recommendations made
      by the District Judge. Learned Amicus Curiae has reported regarding
      12 suggestions thus:
C               “(i) Abolition of Hereditary Sevaks / Appointment of
                     Sevaks: Firstly, in terms of the 1952 Act the hereditary
                     right granted to the Sevaks is recognized and is statutory
                     in nature. Therefore the same cannot be abolished
                     because each of the Sevaks who belonged to different
                     Nijog have been recognized with reference to their right
D                    to perform Rituals/Nitis of the Deity, since it is a
                     practice which has been going on for time immemorial.
                     The same cannot be taken away and those rites stand
                     recognized. However, there are presently about 2300
                     Sevaks belonging to different Nijogs and what was
E                    suggested was that the number was required to be
                     reduced so that each of the Sevaks gets some turn for
                     Seva and thereafter some Puraskar for the maintenance
                     and upkeep of the family and their livelihood. The others
                     be given a golden handshake which was being worked
                     out between the administration and the Nijogs without
F                    losing any of the hereditary practice and requirement
                     qua with Deity while having a reserve list also so that
                     in the absence of any Sevak, the Nitis and Rituals are
                     not in any way affected.
                 (ii) Prohibition to collection of money by Sevaks: The
G                     Administrator along with some others in the Managing
                      Committee suggested, as is also are the requirement
                      under the Act, that additional Hundis/Donation Boxes
                      are placed and from out of the money received a certain
                      percentage be disbursed to the Sevaks. Over and above,
H                     those devotees/visitors who have a specific Yatri Puja
MRINALINI PADHI v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS                             831
             [ARUN MISHRA, J.]

        may do so at a price to be deposited through the office        A
        where receipts would be granted and a percentage of
        the same would be paid to the Sevak for performing
        that Puja. In this manner the Darshan of the Pilgrim
        will not be effected and at the same time the Sevaks
        would also be getting certain percentage of the
                                                                       B
        collection. It was my understanding that the percentage
        being given on some things or the percentage that is
        being thought of may be on the lower side.
   (iii) The Temple Management to take control of
         Rosaghar and Chullas: I have already dealt with this
         above and I was informed by the Managing Committee            C
         that they will make sure that hygiene is brought to the
         standards and all efforts are being made in that direction.
   (iv) Provision of separate toilets for male/female,
        Sevaks: I was informed that just now there was only
        two places in the West and the South but 10 more urinals       D
        and two toilet complexes were being set up with private
        maintenance so that hygiene and cleanliness is
        maintained and cloak rooms will be made in four months
        time and that a motorcycle stand would also be made
        for the Sevaks.                                                E
   (v) Queue in Darshan: I have already outlined this above
       and have suggested already to the Managing Committee
       that how it could be done and will also explain in the
       Court is well.
   (vi) Surveillance of collection from Hundis and                     F
        Donation boxes: This has also been dealt with above.
   (vii) Audit of Temple fund by Accountant General: I was
         informed that Audit was already being done by the
         Internal Audit Committee of the Temple Administration,
         by the Chartered Accountant and that the grants which         G
         were made by the State Government were being audited
         by the CAG. Further the Chartered Accountant, member
         of the Managing Committee, informed me that the
         accounts are going to be put online on the website:
         www.jagannath.nic.in and that more and more activities
                                                                       H
832   SUPREME COURT REPORTS                       [2019] 16 S.C.R.


A          will now be put therein. He also informed me that the
           interest earning of the Temple on the corpus fund of the
           Temple was approximately Rs.30 to Rs.35 crores per
           year while the expenses are Rs.60 to Rs.70 crores per
           year. Thereafter the shortfall is met by the State grants
           and the capital investment requirements are met by the
B
           Government. He was also of the suggestion that digital
           marketing could be done for the Temple for the purpose
           of donations to be received. I was also informed that
           the Temple and endowments have a total of 60418.353
           acres of land and the Record of Rights have been
C          prepared only with reference to 34200.976 acres and
           the rest was under preparation.
           It must be understood that there are two kind of
           Records of Rights vis-à-vis the Temple, one is the
           Record of Rights as is normally understood with
D          reference to property and the revenue entries and
           the second is Record of Rights (RITES) which is
           with reference to the Rites, Rituals and Nitis to be
           performed by Sevaks who have hereditary rights
           and recognized under the 1952 Act.
E     (viii) Identity Cards for the Sevaks and Staff: It has been
             agreed upon that Identity Cards for Sevaks would be
             made with a colour code for Sevaks, for employees and
             for labour so that unwanted element do not come in.
             This would be implemented in three months time.

F      (ix) Guides to be Registered: It was informed that a
            Yatri Panda Sangh was being made who would act
            as guide and who will have to be registered with the
            Administration and this would also be done in three
            months time and they would be verified by the office
            of the S.P., Puri so that any criminal element is not
G           recruited.
       (x) Reduction of Administrative Staff: I was informed
           that rationalization of the administrative staff was being
           done and 127 persons had already been retrenched. The
           main requirement of the administrative staff was with
H          reference to cleaning and sweeping, the internal temple
      MRINALINI PADHI v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS                            833
                   [ARUN MISHRA, J.]

               police, the management of the lands belonging to the         A
               temple as also the management of the Quarries and
               Mines of the temple. This rationalization would be
               completed soon.
           (xi) Single Authority for Security of the Temple: I was
                informed that the internal police performing the job of     B
                security inside the temple was without any police power
                but now an additional S.P. Rank officer has been
                assigned to the temple administration with full powers
                under the control of the Home Deptt.
          (xii) Proposed Amendments in the 1954 Act: The                    C
                emphasis on the amendments was with reference to the
                meaning of the Records of Rights because of the
                confusion that is created to the hereditary rights of the
                Sevaks for the performance of the Nitis and Pujas.”
     12. Learned Amicus Curiae has pointed out that no
accommodation is made available for any pilgrim by the Temple               D
Administration. The Administrator informed that Yatri Niwas and Bhakt
Niwas were proposed and one was under construction and another,
which was available, required lot of repair.
      13. References have been made to the demand of Sevaks
regarding Temple management to provide school, education,                   E
Government jobs, etc., for the families of Sevaks. There is no proper
accommodation for them and for the education of their children. They
hardly get one turn in a month for performing Seva/Puja, for which
they get Puraskar, which is not sufficient for their livelihood.
      14. Learned Amicus Curiae has also pointed out that proper            F
coordination is required. Certain suggestions have been made for
revenue generation of the Temple.
       15. The opinion of the Chairman of the Managing Committee
Shri Gajapati Maharaj has also been noted by learned Amicus Curiae
that the situation was very difficult as the heart and soul was not         G
dedicated to the Lord. The three grey areas have been pointed, namely,
(1) Management with three authorities – the Government, the Managing
Committee and the Administrator; (2) Qualified Sevaks are not available
despite the requirement of having traditional Nitis and Sevas and Rituals
to be performed. Seva should be made attractive; and (3) religious
monitoring was not proper.                                                  H
834             SUPREME COURT REPORTS                         [2019] 16 S.C.R.


A            16. Learned Amicus Curiae has also pointed out that proper
      coordination is required between the Administration and the Sevaks.
      The criminal elements were required to be identified and removed and
      discipline was required to be brought in both for the Sevaks and for
      the pilgrims with regard to the movement inside and outside the
      complex. The system of sub-letting is required to be done away with.
B
      There was a requirement of four tier of security within the Temple in
      such a manner that only one type of police is available so that the pilgrims
      are not harassed.
             17. Learned Amicus Curiae has also pointed out with respect
      to the meeting he had with the stakeholders. Sevaks were of the point
C
      of view that their rites cannot be taken away, which were hereditary
      in nature. Certain restrictions have been imposed on offering during Rath
      Yatra and on the entry of pilgrims inside the Garbh Griha (Sanctum
      Sanctorum). There is no health welfare scheme nor hospitals are
      provided. The accounts are not being managed properly. The quarries
D     and mines were allotted in the names of minor. Reference has also been
      made to the report of 1805 of Charles Grome. It has also been pointed
      out that there was no internal mechanism for complaint to be lodged
      by women. It has been pointed out that 8-9 suggestions of District Judge
      are being implemented. There was scope for improvement and the
      hygiene is required to be improved without affecting the hereditary
E
      rights of Sevaks, which in turn improve the conditions of Sevaks and
      hassle free Darshan.
             18. This Court has directed the learned Amicus Curiae and Shri
      Tushar Mehta, learned Solicitor General of India, to make inspection
      and submit a report as to suggestions after the Cabinet decision, which
F
      has been gazetted on 27.8.2019. Learned Amicus Curiae has submitted
      his report on 27.9.2019, wherein it has been observed that redevelopment
      plan around the Temple is mainly to decongest the area for the benefit
      of pilgrims and to make the city of Puri a world heritage city. Some
      demolition on the entrance of the Temple has already taken place. The
G     Chairman of the Managing Committee informed that nobody was
      opposing the reforms for the betterment of the place so that it becomes
      world heritage city. However, the rehabilitation package should be liberal
      and proper and should provide fair deal.
            19. It has also been pointed out that during annual Rath Yatra,
H     lakhs of people visit the Temple town, the congregation is such that it
      MRINALINI PADHI v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS                            835
                   [ARUN MISHRA, J.]

is difficult to manage the crowd. It becomes difficult to manage the        A
crowd especially to protect the elderly or the children or if somebody
becomes sick. It was informed that Nagarjuna Besha to be held in
2020-21 and the plan has been prepared to rotate the crowd along the
dedicated corridors around the Temple and control the same in a
peaceful manner. The rehabilitation package has been prepared for the
                                                                            B
people who are going to be uprooted from their homes, business places,
etc. The acquisition is being done on the basis of negotiation. Learned
Amicus Curiae also met Srimad Jagadguru Shankaracharya and
Swami Nishchalanand Saraswati, who expressed concern of the daily
Rajbhog and Puja, which are called “NEETIS” to be performed inside
the Temple for Deity on daily basis and if the Deities were not             C
worshipped according to the Neetis, then it amounted to desecration
of the Idol. He has handed over a written note to learned Amicus
Curiae. The note given would be helpful for deciding the main writ
petition about the Neetis and daily ritual to be followed in the worship
of Deities.
                                                                            D
       20. It has also been pointed by learned Amicus Curiae that there
is a necessity to have a better infrastructure outside the Temple than
the existing one, that is sought to be achieved by the proposed plan.
       21. Ms. Priya Hingorani, learned Senior Counsel has also
submitted a separate report. She visited the Temple on 11.10.2019. She      E
has also pointed out certain demolition has taken place. Those structures
were in dilapidated state and unsafe for human habitation. However,
Temples inside the Mathas, their Gaadis, Samadhis and other artefacts
have been preserved. Certain establishments have been relocated and
thus, are yet to be resettled.
                                                                            F
      IN RE: SUGGESTIONS MADE                         BY     SRIMAD
      JAGADGURU SHANKARACHARYA
      22. Suggestions made by Srimad Jagadguru Shankaracharya
have also been placed on record, wherein the importance of the place
has been pointed out thus:                                                  G
      “By faithfully darshan of Neelchakra, Shikha Dhwaj,
      Devalaya, Garuda Stambha, Shri Patit Pavan, bowing down
      in front of Shri Jagannath placed on ratha from the ratha
      premises and outer circumambulation of temple a person will get
      same fruit as one who is directly involved in service and worship.    H
836            SUPREME COURT REPORTS                          [2019] 16 S.C.R.


A           The use of Mantrik, Tantrik and Yantrik process for expressing
            all encompassing Sacchidananda Swaroop Sarveshwar in the
            form of traditionally made Archa Vigraha is same as the process
            of expression of electricity present in water, earth and sky through
            machines.
B           Like we need to respect this fact that “Electricity shouldn’t
            disappear and it’s existence should be beneficial not fatal”. In
            the same manner the fact that “Five deities namely Surya-
            Vishnu-Shiv-Shakti-Ganapati and their avatars as defined by
            Sanatana Shastra (scripture) which are consecrated and
            embedded in the Archa Vigraha their refulgence should not
C           diminish and their presence should be beneficial not fatal”.
            Reverence to this fact within the limits of propriety is the ultimate
            responsibility of cultural, social, administrative and constitutional
            institutes.
            The brilliant people who understand Devata Tatva (god element)
D           through the effect of their extraordinary infallible power consider
            the splendid effect-cause-composed universal all-deity either at
            Aditya (sun) according to ‘,dSo ok egkukRek nsork l lw;Z bR;kp{krs’or
            as Agni (Fire) according to ‘vfXu lokZ nsork%’ (Aitareya Brahmana
            2.3). He is also known as Indra having extraordinary grandeur,
E           Mitra who assures safety from fear of death, Varun who purifies
            all sins. Agni which is omnipresent, Garuda the divine bird, Yama
            who in form of fire governs and Vayu who flows freely
            everywhere in space.
            Therefore worship and consecration of Surya, Vishnu, Shiv,
F           Shakti, Ganpati and their vedas based avatar (incarnations)
            who perform five task namely creation-preservation-destruction-
            punishment-reward in the form of Archa Vigraha is possible.
            Therefore it is the sacred obligation of learned eminent person
            that they allow this Sanatana tradition which is in harmonious
            compliance with philosophy, science and behaviour to be
G           implemented in the Sanatana method.”
            With respect to servitors appointed in Sanatana Temple, they
      are permitted to carry out their living. Concern has been expressed
      about their financial condition. To make temple free from exploitation
      and healthy environment, mutual understanding has to be developed
H     under the aim to free the sacred institution from economic exploitation.
      MRINALINI PADHI v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS                            837
                   [ARUN MISHRA, J.]

Care should be taken that does not result in more economic exploitation     A
by Government in comparison to before. There should not be neglect
and disrespect of any element involved in the proper operation of this
sacred institution, but neither more or less participation of everyone is
required. A High-Level Committee should be formed for which
suggestions have been given to have a harmonious dialogue that can
                                                                            B
remove all discrepancies in Shri Mandir. Following suggestions have
been made:
      “1. Implementation of the endeavour to promote and systemize
      Shri Mandir as an institution of education, defence, culture,
      prosperity, service, dharma & moksha.                                 C
      2. Implementation of proper system for selection, training and
      enrolling servitors according to family tradition.
      3. Absence of dharmic and spiritual leadership should be rectified
      as per tradition.
                                                                            D
      4. The books namely Rigveda, Skanda Purana, Brahma
      Purana, Vamdev Samhita, Neeladrimahoday, Pancharatra-
      Ishwar Samhita and Vimarsha which mention consecration,
      worship and different festivals related to Shri Jagannath; based
      upon these a book named ‘Shrimandir-Seva—Samarcha-
                                                                            E
      Prakalpa-Paddhati’- ‘Shri Jagannath Samhita’ should be
      created by wise pundits under the guidance of Shrimad
      Jagadguru Shankaracharya, Shri Govardhan Math, Puri
      Peeth so that blind traditions are negated appropriately and a
      healthy tradition that is in accordance to Shastra (scriptures) is
      fixed and implemented.                                                F
      5. ‘Mukti Mandapa’ should be restored to its original form and
      the natural right of establishment, upkeep and management
      accorded to Shrimad Jagadguru Shankaracharya, Shri
      Govardhan Math, Puri Peeth by tradition should be restored.
                                                                            G
      6. King Gajapati Ji should be recognised as Yajamana in a
      position of King Indradyumna.
      7. The rights and liabilities of Shankaracharya, Gajapati,
      ‘Mukti Mandapa’, servitors and administration should be
      decided such that they are neither more or less; then the             H
838      SUPREME COURT REPORTS                          [2019] 16 S.C.R.


A     determination and execution of service roles of Kumbhakar etc.
      according to old settled traditions.
      8. Determination of tradition of servitors in accordance to
      Shastra (scriptures). The endeavour to make them well educated,
      cultured, trained, deserving and self-sufficient should be identified
B     and undertaken. A residential school must be established and run
      accordingly for children of servitors and brahmin family belonging
      to solahshasan. They should receive knowledge and skills
      training according to their family tradition.
      In systemizing Shri Mandir it is expected that due consideration
C     must paid to proper following of traditions, establishing eligibility
      of servitors according to daily schedule, appointment of servitors
      within the limits of service required, their training and
      determination of source of livelihood for extra servitors.
      In independent Bharat through directionless government this
D     sacred institution has been removed faraway from spiritual
      guidance and turned just into a hub of money and fame. The
      implementation of divide and rule policy is heights of short
      sightedness. Therefore rectification of this discrepancy is highly
      desired.
E     With the aim to keep the divine powers of Shri Jagannath Ji in
      Archa Vigraha intact so that worshippers and devotees get
      benefiter by it not harmed, we need to follow injunctions and
      prohibitions prescribed in Sanatan Shastra (scriptures) just like
      we follow injunctions and prohibitions regarding electricity. By
F     declaring Shri Mandir as equivalent to samadhi and museum of
      Gandhi Ji, its sacredness and safety is bound to get extinct.
      9. There should be adeptness in securing the sacredness and
      beauty of temple, protection of decency and ornaments of
      devotees and management of temple. The service projects run
G     by temple should be determined and implemented.
      It is essential to make this sacred institution a center of devotion
      and of participation of hindus all over world who are devotees
      of Shri Jagannath and belong to Sanatan, Vedic, Arya tradition.
      The first consecration of Shri Jagannath Ji was done by Shri
H     Brahma Ji on Vaisakh Shukl Ashtami and second consecration
MRINALINI PADHI v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS                               839
             [ARUN MISHRA, J.]

was done by Shri Shankaracharya on Vaisakh Shukl Dashmi                  A
so annual festival should be held on that day.
10. During the reign of idol destroyers for 144 years Shri
Jagannath Ji was not visible; according to Bhasmajabala
Upanishad on Vaishakha Shukl Dashmi 483 BC, Shri
Bhagwatpad Adi Shankaracharya re-consecrated Mukti                       B
Mandap. This fact should be illustrated in history of Shri Mandir
as a token of gratitude.

11. Through the method specified by Shri Bhagwatpad Adi
Shankaracharya and his disciple Emperor Sudhanwa the way of
                                                                         C
managing Shri Govardhan Math, Puri Peeth should be cleared;
then Shri Jagannath Mahaprabhu should be re-established as
the worship deity of this peeth and Puri situated in Purushottam
region should be popularized as a dharmic and spiritual capital
and the Acharya of peeth should be mentioned as it’s overlord.
                                                                         D
Reckon this fact that without Devguru Brihaspati Ji, Indra and
other devatas had to suffer a lot. In modern perspective the
infallible cause behind the preeminence of christians worldwide
is the concurrence between both parts of christianty namely
alternative governance system and Pope. By keeping this fact
in mind a path must be cleared for in principle concurrence              E
between traditional Vyaspeeth and government.

12. Most of servitors are financially vulnerable due to less quantity
of service in Shri Mandir, a way for their economic welfare must
be found out and some adequate arrangements for their medical
                                                                         F
and other expenses must be made.

13. Government of Odisha should appoint a chief manager adept
in complying and making others comply with dharmic and
spiritual activities in Shri Mandir; but he shouldn’t be administrator
of dharmic and spiritual area.                                           G
14. The competent person to be appointed as Chief of Shri
Mandir Management Committee must first undergo dharmic and
spiritual training for a month then he should be appointed to this
post so that he is able to keep this sacred institution away from
the grips of directionless business class.                               H
840     SUPREME COURT REPORTS                      [2019] 16 S.C.R.


A     15. The determination and execution of standards of sacredness,
      beauty, grandeur and orderliness in Shri Mandir must be done
      as soon as possible.
      16. The details of property and budget of Shri Mandir must be
      decided and presented in proper manner.
B     17. Travellers must receive warm and pleasant behaviour.
      18. The service and worship of Devi-Devata consecrated in Shri
      Mandir must be done according to Shastra (scriptures) at
      appropriate timing.

C     19. The selection of members of management committee must
      be done in dharmic and spiritual way with the participation of
      Shankaracharya, Gajapati, ‘Mukti Mandapa’, Mukti Mandapa
      Pandit Sabha’, Servitors and Government administration.
      20. The selection of office bearers of ‘Mukti Mandapa’ and
D     ‘Mukti Mandapa Pandit Sabha’ must be done under the divine
      aegis and guidance of Shrimad Jagadguru Shankaracharya,
      Shri Govardhan Math, Puri Peeth who is the chief of
      institution.
      21. The publication of annual Panchang from Shri Mandir must
      be done in an authentic and optimal method.
E
      22. The endeavour to organize monasteries, temples of ‘Sanatana
      dharma’ in Odisha as dharmic and spiritual fortress and divine
      temples must be determined and implemented.
      23. The office bearers of management committees of Shri
F     Jagannath temples built all over nation and world must be
      contacted in good faith and every year a convention must be
      organized for them in ‘Acharya Peeth’, Puri.
      24. An authorised scholar should recite ‘Shrimad Bhagwat’ and
      stories of greatness of Purushottam region from Skanda
G     Purana in Shri Mandir regularly in morning and evening.
      25. Proper arrangements for the security of Purushottam area
      and Shri Mandir situated there must be done.
      26. The required reformation between Garbhagriha (sanctum
      sanctorum) of Shri mandir and the attached Mandapa must be
H     determined and implemented based upon Shastra (scripture).
     MRINALINI PADHI v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS                                841
                  [ARUN MISHRA, J.]

      27. The inordinate secrecy and misconduct in service and worship         A
      of Shri Mandir is due to addition of different dimensions by
      many eminent persons from time to time; while elaboration leads
      to increase in tribulation but brevity leads to assuagement - foLrkjk%
      Dys’kla;qDrk% la{ksikLrq lq[kkogk%A(Mahabharata Shanti Parva, 297.20,
      37)
                                                                               B
      Therefore, it is necessary to determine and implement practices
      which are unopposed and in accordance to Sanatana tradition
      and which will not lead this sacred institute to become
      directionless.
      28. While any person and organization related to this institution        C
      should be taken care of appropriately, nobody must exploit this
      dharmic and Spiritual institution.
      31.…..Therefore it’s an established principle that Shri
      Govardhan Math and the sacred institution of it’s Aradhya Devi
      Shri Jagannath Ji must be managed as per the code of conduct             D
      given by Shri Bhagwatpad Adi Shankaracharya.”
      IN RE: RESPONSE                 OF     STATE       OF     ORISSA,
      RESPONDENT NO.2
      23. The State of Orissa, respondent no.2 has filed an affidavit
on 29.6.2018, wherein it has been stated that State of Orissa as per           E
the order dated 8.6.2018 passed by this Court, has constituted a
Committee to study the management schemes of other important Shrines
such as Vaishno Devi, Somnath Temple, Golden Temple, Amritsar,
Tirupati Temple and Dharmsthala (Karnataka) Temple. The
Committee was directed to submit an interim report. Notification has           F
been issued on 12.6.2018.
      24. An additional affidavit has been filed on behalf of State of
Orissa on 30.9.2019, in which it has been pointed that a Commission
headed by Shri Justice B.P. Das, retired Judge of the High Court of
Orissa, was constituted, which has recommended for widening of road
                                                                               G
outside the Temple for crowd management, movement of emergency
vehicles such as fire tenders, ambulances, etc. and the Works
Department has submitted a proposal to the Collector for acquisition
of land within 75 meters from Meghanad Pacheri of Shree Jagannath
Temple under the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and
Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act,         H
842            SUPREME COURT REPORTS                        [2019] 16 S.C.R.


A     2013 (‘the Act of 2013’). A Resolution has been passed by the Cabinet,
      which has been gazetted on 27.8.2019. It is stated that steps are being
      taken in accordance with the provisions contained in the Act of 2013,
      to acquire and rehabilitate. Three highly unsafe structures have been
      removed, details of which have been given. It is further stated that 26
      commercial establishments have been relocated temporarily till final
B
      rehabilitation takes place. The Deities and the Gaadis of affected
      Maths have been preserved. The Redevelopment Plan will focus on
      heritage architecture, complementary affiliation between Shri
      Jagannath Temple and the Maths concerned. Adequate parking shall
      be provided for the use of Maths in the redevelopment plan. Shopping
C     units will be constructed as per the Rehabilitation and Resettlement
      Scheme and provided at common market complexes. The Rehabilitation
      and Resettlement Package has been filed as Annexure-C along with
      Heritage City Project of Puri as Annexure-D. Due process of law is
      being followed and the District Administration has no intention to remove
      the temples and gaadies, etc.
D
            25. Additional Status Report has been filed on 21.10.2019 by the
      State of Orissa. The State Government has taken a policy decision in
      consultation with the Mahant and the Administrators of the Matha.
      Following five steps have been taken by the State Government:
E           “7.That the above referred steps would ensure that –
                  (i) The long felt need of clearing the nearby area of Shree
                      Jagannath Temple is achieved so as to avoid any
                      stampede, incident of fire, taking care of emergency
                      situation by providing ingress/egress to fire brigade and
F                     ambulance and taking the security concerns of the
                      temple and the safety of the devotees into consideration.
                 (ii) While doing so, the deities, sanctum santorum, gaadi,
                      samadhi of the Matha, relics of the Matha will not be
                      disturbed and remain at their current place with better
G                     beautification in line with Kalinga style architecture.
                 (iii) The properties of the Matha which are used for shops/
                       commercial activities/ lodges etc will be acquired and
                       cleared and the compensation would be paid at the rate
                       mutually agreed in consonance with the Rehabilitation
H                      and Resettlement Policy. Every shopping unit will be
      MRINALINI PADHI v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS                           843
                   [ARUN MISHRA, J.]

               eligible for allotment of a shop unit in the market         A
               complexes to be developed.
          (iv) In view of redevelopment of Matha with
               accommodation of Mahanta, and other relevant structure
               as applicable, an alternate site would be made available
               at the nearest available vicinity of the place where it     B
               existed earlier. Structure cost as per law would be paid
               to the Mahanta of the respective Mathas with
               construction assistance as prescribed in the
               Rehabilitation & Resettlement Policy.
           (v) Till the time such alternate site is made available, the    C
               State Government would pay compensation/ rent on a
               monthly basis at a rate as per the Rehabilitation &
               Resettlement policy and based upon the request of the
               Mahants which is calculated based upon their actual
               requirement.”
                                                                           D
     The Minutes of Consultation Meeting with various Mahants of
Maths have also been placed on record as Annexures A to H.
      IN RE: SUBMISSION OF INTERVENOR
       26. One of the intervenors – Daitapati Nijog has pointed that
the Daitapatis have a hereditary right to perform secret sevapuja of       E
Lord Jagannath and same is mentioned in Record of Rights under the
Act of 1954. Any reduction in number of Daitapatis would lead to
difficulties in performing the nitis/rituals.
      IN RE: RESPONSE OF TEMPLE MANAGING
      COMMITTEE                                                            F
       27. The Temple Managing Committee has filed its first response
on 24.4.2019, as to the suggestions made by learned Amicus Curiae.
It has been pointed that the Temple Administration is neither averse to
the implementation of the recommendations/suggestions of learned
Amicus Curiae on the issue after holding discussions with all the          G
stakeholders on 23.2.2019.
       28. It is further submitted that Temple Administration is open to
carry out improvements in the Temple as may be directed by this Court
in the larger interest of the public, however, improvement should be
carried out without hurting the religious sentiments of the people of      H
844            SUPREME COURT REPORTS                        [2019] 16 S.C.R.


A     Orissa, the devotees, religious traditions, the rights of Sevaks and the
      Jagannath Sanskruti. Since, it does not wish to have chaotic
      surroundings around the Shrine or to hurt the religious faith of its
      devotees, which are spread all over the world. The queue system has
      been introduced by installing steel railings with covers for all the
      devotees. Queue is controlled by the police personnel of the Temple
B
      Police. Police Officials are monitoring the CCTV footage round the
      clock. Railings at the Singhadwar i.e., main entry, have been installed
      from 1st week of October, 2019, which was strongly opposed by some
      groups claiming to be Jagannath Sena and called for Puri Bandh on
      3.10.2019. During which the members of the group vandalized and
C     ransacked the Temple Administration, which is causing huge loss to the
      property of the Temple Administration. Thus, Temple Administration was
      forced to abandon the execution at the main entrance to the Shrine.
             29. It is further pointed out that large scale improvement for
      managing the crowd inside the Shrine is not possible considering the
D     fact that the Shrine being protected religious monument is under the
      control of Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) and without its express
      permission, no further construction or renovation is possible.
             30. As to the abolition of hereditary rights of Sevaks, the Temple
      Administration is in respectful agreement, however, it is submitted by
E     the Temple Administration that Record of Rights has been conferred
      on such Sevaks/Sebayats recognizing their rights under the 1952 Act.
      The abolition of the system would require amendment of the Act. It
      has also been pointed out that in the event of such amendment to the
      existing provisions abolishing the age-old rights of the Sevaks, the same
F     would have serious ramifications on the daily rituals/nitis/pujas of Shri
      Lord Jagannath as all Pujaries cannot perform seva/puja of the
      Deities, which requires special skills and expertise and the present
      Sevaks are well versed with the traditional style of seva/puja of the
      Deities. The abolition of the system may evoke widespread protest. The
      Temple Administration is contemplating to reduce the number of Sevaks,
G
      who are large in number and have been enjoying such rights as against
      the actual number of Sevaks for performing the daily ritual and
      additional Sevaks are required on festive occasions only. There are
      about 2500 Sevaks at present and number can be cut down to sizeable
      level as per actual requirements. Shri B.D. Sharma, Ex-Governor of
H     State of Orissa as also suggested improvement in his report in this
      MRINALINI PADHI v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS                            845
                   [ARUN MISHRA, J.]

regard. He has also suggested employment of sevayats for nitis shall        A
be rationalized and kept within the limits of actual requirement. The
Temple Administration is not in favour of total abolition of ROR of
Sevaks. Sevaks may create serious problems by stopping daily rituals
in the event of such steps being taken for reduction of their numbers.
Thus, matter has been left at that and they will abide by the directions    B
and the orders which may be issued by this Court.
       31. An incident dated 28.12.2018 which took place in the Shrine
has also been highlighted by the Temple Administration in which one
Bhitar-Chhu Sevak, who was entrusted with the daily duty of opening
the door to the Sanctum-Santorum at 4.30 a.m. for daily puja/nitis, did
                                                                            C
not open the door on the ground of his personal issues with Police
Administration of Puri Town, leading to delay in performance of seva
and puja, the door was opened at 4.30 p.m. in the evening with the
intervention of Chief Administrator. The Chief Administrator may be
directed to take disciplinary action in accordance with law against those
Sevaks, who are found indulged in anti-temple activities including          D
stopping of nitis/pujas/seva and misbehavior/misconduct against the
employees of the Temple Administration and also the devotees. In case
of misconduct with devotees and pilgrims, to debar such Sevaks
permanently from their ROR and benefits/facilities enjoyed by them
under the law. The Committee has also agreed with the collection of
                                                                            E
donations by Sevaks as suggested by learned Amicus Curiae in Para
9 of his report. The Temple Administration has passed a resolution on
18.8.2018 and has formed a Sub-Committee. It has drafted a regulation
in this regard and the same was awaiting approval of the Managing
Committee in accordance with the procedure provided under Section
31 of the Shri Jagannath Temple Act, 1955.                                  F
      32. It is pointed out that suggestions have been made by the Chief
Administrator to the Managing Committee to develop the Mathas
located in the periphery of the Shrine for providing low cost
accommodation to the poor and needy devotees/pilgrims.
                                                                            G
      33. The Temple Administration has taken initiative for launching
E-Services of the Shrine. The website would cover all relevant
information with regard to Shrine like details of seva/puja,
accommodations for the devotees, the price-chart for sale of Prasad/
Bhog. The website was likely to be launched on 7.5.2019, on the
auspicious day of Akshya Tritiya.                                           H
846            SUPREME COURT REPORTS                        [2019] 16 S.C.R.


A            34. With respect to hassle free darshan to the devotees, the
      Temple Administration has initiated steps for providing facility of
      Parikarma around the Shrine with covered roof, safe drinking water
      facility at suitable points, sitting arrangements for old, aged and
      differently-abled persons.
B           35. For providing safe drinking water to devotees and pilgrims,
      water purifiers have been installed at several places including Anand
      Bazar for pilgrims/Servitors.
            36.With respect to improvement in the hygiene conditions around
      Rosaghar, the matter has been taken up with ASI to take steps
C     including providing cover for pandal where all initial preparations for
      cooking takes place.
             37. With respect to waste disposal, treatment plant is in place at
      southern gate. Other wastes are being collected by the employees of
      the Puri Municipality on day to day basis. The Temple is exploring
D     further possibility in view of the report of learned Amicus Curiae for
      installing effective waste management system.
           38. With respect to the welfare measures, the Temple
      Administration has pointed out that they are giving following benefits:
            “14. That so far as the grievances of the sevaks as highlighted
E           in the Report of the Ld. Amicus are concerned, the following
            welfare measures have already been provided by the Temple
            Administration for their benefits;
                  a. Monthly pension for old, senior sevaks, differently abled
                     and widows of the sevaks;
F                 b. Medi-claim policy to all the sevaks.
                  c. Scholarship to the children of the sevaks to promote
                     education.
                  d. Dispensary providing free medical facilities to the sevaks
                     and their family members.
G
                  e. First-Aid centre inside the Shrine for all.
                  f. Financial helps to sevaks in case of marriage, thread
                     ceremony and to meet the funeral expenses.
                  g. Accidental Death Insurance coverage to all sevaks and
H                    devotees in case of death inside the shrine;”
      MRINALINI PADHI v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS                                 847
                   [ARUN MISHRA, J.]

       39. It is further submitted that the Temple Administration is             A
concerning about setting up of school for the children of servitors where
priority is to be given to equip the children with the Jagannath
Sanskruti and the rites and rituals attached to seva/puja.
      40. Another affidavit has been filed on behalf of Temple
Managing Committee, wherein it is stated that Managing Committee                 B
has passed a resolution on 27.9.2018, which is to the following effect:
      ‘(i) Abolition of Hereditary Sevaks/ appointment of Sevaks.
      The Managing Committee considered the recommendations
      submitted by the Sub-Committee constituted under the
                                                                                 C
      Chairmanship of the Chairman of the Managing Committee to
      examine this issue; and after thorough discussions unanimously
      approved the recommendations of the said Sub-Committee after
      some amendments. A copy of the proceedings of the said Sub-
      Committee dated 18.09.2018 incorporating the said amendments
      is annexed hereto as Annexure: R3/ —— and may be treated                   D
      as part of this affidavit. I wish to respectfully add here that the
      daily and periodical rituals of the Deities are performed according
      to religious practices, customs and traditions well established since
      more than 800 years as per the dictates of scared scriptures.
      The sevaks are performing their respective sevas hereditarily
                                                                                 E
      since time immemorial. As the seva is hereditary, the Temple
      Administration has liberally permitted the descendants of the
      hereditary right-holders-sevaks to perform seva as a result of
      which the number of sevaks has increased considerably over the
      centuries. It is necessary now to streamline and rationalise the
      hereditary rights system by re-defined it and implementing it              F
      correctly. With regard to Puri Shri Jagannath Temple, the
      hereditary right of a Sevak is not an absolute right to appointment.
      Rather it is a preferential right to be considered for appointment
      subject to availability of post, eligibility and fitness. On this basis,
      it is proposed to select and appoint the number of sevaks actually
                                                                                 G
      required from each category of hereditary right holder sevaks
      for the smooth performance of the daily rituals, periodical nitis
      and festivals. The number of sevaks actually required and the
      procedure for selection will be determined after thorough
      discussion and deliberation with Sevak Nijogs and the State
      Government. Hereditary right holder sevaks not selected/                   H
848      SUPREME COURT REPORTS                          [2019] 16 S.C.R.


A     appointed through this process will be generously compensated.
      The State Government will be requested to constitute a committee
      under the Chairmanship of a senior Judicial Officer for
      determination of compensation to be paid to each sevak who has
      not been selected/appointed. However, those who will not be
      selected will not lose their status as sevak and they or their
B
      successors may be considered for selection/appointment in case
      of vacancy arising in future in their category of seva. If a selected
      sevak, fails to report in time or neglects in performing his duty,
      he is liable to be dismissed from seva through appropriate
      disciplinary proceeding under Sec. 21-A of the said Act and a
C     new sevak engaged to perform the seva from among the same
      category of sevaks in accordance with the R.0.R.. Except handful
      of sevaks most of the sevaks are performing their seva with
      sincerity and dedication. Many sevaks are not financially sound
      which is apparent from the socio-economic survey conducted by
      the Temple Administration. Handsome remuneration will be paid
D
      to those who will be selected for performing seva puja of the
      Deities so that they will not face any difficulty in maintaining
      themselves and their family in a reasonable decent manner.
      That, learned Amicus Curiae in his report has suggested to reduce
      the number of sevaks as per requirement so that each of the
E     sevaks gets some turn for seva and thereafter some Purshakar
      for the maintenance and upkeep of the family and their livelihood.
      The others be given a golden handshake to be worked out
      between Administration and Nijog. The learned Amicus Curiae
      has also suggested for having a reserve list of sevaks so that in
F     absence of any sevak, the rituals and nities are not in any way
      affected.
      That, it may be considered to exclude those Sevaks who are
      involved in criminal activity and in forcible possession of Temple
      land while selecting required number of sevaks. Besides that the
G     retirement age of the sevaks may be fixed.
      (ii) Prohibition to collect money from Annadan Atika by
      Sevak. Ban on placing Thali and pitchers by Sevaks to
      receive offering :
      As regards the prohibition to collect money from Annadan Atika
H     by Sevaks, the Managing Committee has resolved to close
MRINALINI PADHI v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS                               849
             [ARUN MISHRA, J.]

Annadan Atika offices run by various sevak nijogs inside the             A
Temple premises. It has been decided that the Temple
Administration shall take over the possession of these offices and
collect Annandan Atika money directly from the devotees. The
Annadan Atika system will however be regulated by appropriate
Regulation framed by the Managing Committee under the said
                                                                         B
Act to ensure fair and proper operation of this practice to the
complete satisfaction of the devotee/pilgrims. This regulation will
also appropriately regulate the smooth functioning of traditional
Jatri Panda seva carried by the Sevaks and ensure that no
devotee-pilgrim is put to any harassment or inconvenience
whatsoever. The Yatri Pandas serving the pilgrims as guide in            C
the Temple premises will be granted license, under specific terms
and conditions by the Temple Administration to work as guides.
That, the Temple Managing Committee in its meeting held on
18.08.18 has constituted a sub-committee under the Chairmanship
of Chief Administrator to draft a regulation for the purpose of          D
collection of Atika Money by Temple Administration and for its
proper utilization with a view to save the pilgrims from exploitation.
A draft regulation has been prepared and it is in active
consideration.
As regards Ban on placing Thali and pitchers by Sevaks to                E
receive offerings, it has been contemplated, to replace the Thali
and pitchers with well designed donation boxes to be kept in
suitable places accessible to the devotees for placing of offerings.
(III) Temple Management to take control of Rosaghar and
Chuli (Hearth):                                                          F
In this connection, it is submitted that there are 240 chulis
(traditional hearths for cooking bhoga) within the Rosa-ghara
(Temple kitchen). 8 chulis are dedicated for preparation of
‘Kotha-bhoga’ (which is distributed among the Sevaks as per
ROR); the cost of which is borne by the Temple Administration.           G
The balance 232 chulis are used by the Supakars (traditional
Temple cooks) for preparing “Baradi-bhoga” (bhoga for sale to
devotees) and the respective Supakars bear the expenses in this
regard. The Managing Committee has decided that the said 232
chulis will be let-out to the Supakars on annual license basis on
specific terms and conditions. An appropriate Regulation under           H
850      SUPREME COURT REPORTS                        [2019] 16 S.C.R.


A     the said Act is being framed for comprehensively regulating all
      activities in the Rosa-ghara as well as in the Ananda-bazar
      (where Mahaprasad is sold to the devotees) to ensure hygienic
      and proper preparation of the bhoga and its sale to devotees at
      reasonable rates in a systematic, organised and hygienic manner.
B     That, Mahaprasad is being sold in Ananda-bazar of the Temple.
      Dry Mahaprasad and mementos of Lord Jagannath are being sold
      in shop rooms constructed within the Ananda-bazar. For sale of
      Anna Mahaprasad by Supakars sheds have been set up within
      Ananda-bazar. Steps has been taken to fix the rate of Mahaprasad
      in consultation with the Suar Mahasuar Nijog and the rate chart
C     will be displayed within Ananda Bazar. A control room will be
      opened within Ananda Bazar to address the grievances of the
      purchasers of Mahaprasad. A separate place will be identified
      and selected for storing and dispatching of “Baradi Bhog” (Bhoga
      prepared on orders of devotee).
D     The learned Amicus Curiae, has suggested to make the courtyard
      near Roshaghar where vegetables are chopped and spices are
      grinded for preparation of Bhog more hygienic. In this regard
      Temple Administration has decided to reconstruct the dilapidated
      structures standing on said courtyard and to repair the floor of
E     the courtyard by replacing stones in consultation of the A.S.I.
      (IV) Provision of separate toilets for male and female
      members of the public and for Sevaks:
      That, a Toilet has been constructed outside West Gate of the
      Temple for use by the Sevaks and another toilet has been
F     constructed outside south gate of the Temple for use by the
      pilgrims. A committee was constituted consisting of the Collector,
      Puri, S.P., Puri and Administrator (Development), Shree
      Jagannath Temple, Puri to identify other suitable places at the
      outer periphery of “Meghanada” Pracheri for construction of
G     separate toilets for male and female pilgrims. After identification
      of the land, steps have been taken to construct toilet blocks for
      male, female and differently abled person at one of the location
      near West Gate of the Temple.
      (V) Queue system for hassle-free darshan :
H     As regards the queue system for hassle free Darshan, it is
MRINALINI PADHI v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS                            851
             [ARUN MISHRA, J.]

submitted that queue system has been introduce experimentally         A
from 1st Oct, 2018. Arrangement have been made for entry of
devotees through Lion’s Gate exit through other three gates. The
devotees are being allowed to main temple batch by batch through
‘Sata Pahacha’ (on the northern side) and exit through ‘Beheran
Dwar’. Since it is a very old temple and limited space and has
                                                                      B
several rituals which requires to be performed without any
obstacles, no permanent barricades from Sata Pahacha to
Beheran Dwar can be set up to allow the devotees to go through
in a queue. However, steps will be taken to deploy additional
Temple Police and District Police Staff to manage the Crowd.
                                                                      C
It is pertinent to mention here that for hassle free Darshan of
Deity by differently abled persons, special arrangements are being
made. The differently abled persons will enter the Temple
through North Gate, and will have Darshan of Deity from ‘Bahara
katha’ (Inside Nata Mandap near Jay Bijay Dwar). For this
purpose a ramp is under construction.                                 D
(VI) Surveillance of collection from Hundis and
receptacles:
As regards the surveillance of collection from Hundis and
receptacles, it is submitted that the collection from Hundi and
                                                                      E
donation boxes are being counted by designated Temple Officers
& Staff in the presence of representative of Sevaks in the Branch
Office of the Temple located within the Temple precincts. For
effective surveillance of the counting process, five closed-circuit
cameras have been installed at the counting place monitored by
senior Temple officials and the counting process is also displayed    F
through a large L.E.D. monitor installed outside the said Branch
Office.
(VII) Audit of Temple Funds by Accountant General :
As regards the Audit of Temple Funds by Accountant General,
                                                                      G
it is submitted that as per section 27(1) the said Act read with
Shri Jagannath Temple Audit Rules, 1968, the audit of Shri
Jagannath Temple Accounts is being conducted by Local Fund
Auditors as appointed by the Government of Odisha from time
to time. The Managing Committee moreover appoints a reputed
Chartered Accountant for internal audit and special audit of          H
852      SUPREME COURT REPORTS                          [2019] 16 S.C.R.


A     income and expenditure of the Temple funds. All expenditure of
      Government grants (which are required to be placed before the
      State Legislature) are audited by the Account General Auditors
      appointed by the State Government. It has been proposed to
      introduce online account system from the current financial year.
B     (VIII) & (IX) Identity Cards for Sevaks and Staff & Guides
      to be registered in Temple Office:
      As regards issue of identity cards for Sevaks and staff and
      registration of Guides, it is submitted that multi-coloured identity
      cards with smart chips will be issued by the Temple
C     Administration to all officers and employees of the Temple.
      Besides, all Sevaks, agents of hereditary Yatri-pandas, employees
      of Sevak-nijogs including those engaged in the Rosa-ghara and
      Ananda-bazar (such as, porters and kitchen assistants, namely,
      tunia, jogania etc.) will also be provided identity cards. With the
      introduction the new identify cards all identity cards issued earlier
D     will be cancelled.
      (X) Reduction of over-staff :
      In this regard, it is submitted that a professional agency will be
      hired to design the staff structure of various categories of Temple
E     staff. It may be stated here that the staff strength of Temple
      Administration at present is 547 which is substantially less than
      the staff strength in other important shrines of India. On the other
      hand, the number of devotees visiting Puri Temple on any normal
      day is much more than other shrines of India. On festive
      occasions, there is a manifold increase in the number of visitors
F     to the Temple.
      (XI) Single authority for security management in Temple
      premises:
      As regards appointment of a single authority for security
      management in the Temple premises, it is submitted that the State
G
      Government was requested to appoint an officer of the rank of
      Additional Superintendent of Police who will be the Administrator
      (Security) of the Temple and will also hold charge of Singhadwara
      Police Station located near the main entrance gate of the Temple.
      Accordingly the State Govt. has appointed Addl. S.P. Puri as
H     incharge Administrator (Security) Shree Jagannath Temple, Puri.
     MRINALINI PADHI v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS                             853
                  [ARUN MISHRA, J.]

      The copy of Notification dtd.5.02.19 is annexed hereto and            A
      marked as ANNEXURE:R3/——- of the Paper Book)
      (XII) Proposed amendments to Shri Jagannath Temple Act,
      1955:
      As regards suggestions for amendments to Shri Jagannath
                                                                            B
      Temple Act, 1955, A draft amendment is under preparation which
      will be placed before the Temple Managing Committee and State
      Govt. for necessary orders.”
       41. The District Judge along with his report has also filed the
relevant extracts of the report of the Commission of Inquiry headed
                                                                            C
by Shri B.D. Sharma, Ex-Governor, Orissa as Annexure-K and that of
Mr. Justice B.K. Patra, former Judge, High Court of Orissa as
Annexure-L. The recommendations in the interim report dated 20.4.2017
of the Commission of Inquiry into the affairs of Shri Jagannath Temple
has also filed as Annexure-N. We have carefully perused the various
reports submitted including the one by Shri Ranjit Kumar, Amicus            D
Curiae and Ms. Priya Hingorani, learned Senior Counsel as well as
the Audit Report of Accountant General, Orissa; suggestions given by
Srimad Jagadguru Shankaracharya and Swami Nishchalanand
Saraswati; and the response filed by the Temple Managing Committee.
      42. It is apparent that various aspects have to be gone into and      E
considered by the Temple Managing Committee and wherever the
Government role comes in, the Government has to do the needful after
taking all the stakeholders into confidence. Let following aspects be
considered:
           (i) We are very concerned and worried as to the incident         F
               dated 28.12.2018, pointed out by the Temple Managing
               Committee in which one Bhitar-Chhu Sevak, who was
               entrusted with the duty of opening the door of Sanctum-
               Santorum at 4.30 a.m. for daily puja/nitis, did not open
               the door on the ground of his personal issues with the
               Police Administration of Puri Town and the door was          G
               opened at 4.30 p.m. This is unpardonable. No one has
               right to obstruct the nitis and rituals of the Deity to be
               performed and there are approximately 60,000 people
               visiting the Temple every day. There is absolutely no
               right with anyone to delay the opening of the Temple         H
854   SUPREME COURT REPORTS                        [2019] 16 S.C.R.


A          for even a minute. There was total mal-administration
           and chaos writ large from the aforesaid incident. There
           is no disciplinary control available. In the circumstances,
           we have to authorize the Chief Administrator of the
           Temple, for the time being, to take appropriate steps
           against such servitors/incumbents, who create
B
           obstruction in seva/puja/niti and are involved in
           misbehavior and misconduct against the employees of
           the Temple Administration or with devotees and he may
           pass appropriate orders considering the nature of
           indiscipline.
C      (ii) Srimad Jagadguru Shankaracharya has expressed
            grave concern about the nitis/rituals which are required
            to be performed daily, otherwise it would amount to
            desecration of the Deities. What rituals are to be
            performed is not for the Court to decide, but when
D           Temple exists due to the Deities, the Deities cannot be
            permitted to be disregarded by non-performance of the
            nitis, puja and ritual in the traditional form as observed
            by Srimad Jagadguru Shankaracharya of Govardhan
            Math, Puri in his suggestions, nitis are to be performed
            as per the traditional rituals laid down in Brahma
E           Purana, Vamdev Samhita, Pancharatra - Ishwar
            Samhita and Vimarsha, which mention consecration,
            worship and different festivals related to Shri
            Jagannath Temple. Let the Temple Management
            Committee invite Srimad Jagadguru Shankaracharya
F           and other stakeholders including the erstwhile ruler
            Gajapathi and ensure that nitis, puja and ritual are
            performed as prescribed. They are performed regularly
            punctually every day without any remiss and obstruction.
            At the same time, we request the Temple Managing
            Committee to ensure that as suggested by Srimad
G           Jagadguru Shankaracharya and also as per Record
            of Rights, nitis and puja are performed each and every
            day. The Temple Managing Committee is the best
            master to ensure the same. Let the Temple Management
            Committee ensure and supervise that nitis and rituals
H           are performed regularly.
MRINALINI PADHI v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS                             855
             [ARUN MISHRA, J.]

   (iii) There is a need for setting up of schools for the children    A
         of servitors. We direct the Temple Managing Committee
         to allot suitable place for the school for children of
         servitors for their proper education as may be considered
         necessary. The school should also cater to other
         members of the public, and not exclusively for children
                                                                       B
         of such servitors. The cost of Rs.5 crores imposed on
         Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS) in C.A.
         No. 4914 of 2016, lying in deposit in this Court along
         with interest, to be utilized for the purpose of setting up
         the school and its infrastructure. The Chief Architect
         of the State to ensure that proper plan is produced with      C
         the help of the Temple Managing Committee and
         progress of steps taken in this regard be informed to
         this Court.
   (iv) There are vast immovable properties within and outside
        the State belonging to the Shri Jagannath Temple. It           D
        is stated by learned Amicus Curiae in his report that
        60,418 acres of land belong to the Temple and Record
        of Rights have been prepared for 34200.976 acres so
        far. Let the remaining Record of Rights be prepared,
        as far as possible, within 6 months and the same be
        placed before this Court. With respect to other                E
        immovable properties within and outside the State, let
        inventory be prepared and details be submitted and how
        they are being utilized also how much income is
        generated from them.
   (v) It is stated by learned Amicus Curiae in the report that        F
       there are several quarries and mines of the Temple,
       which are in operation without payment. A list of
       quarries and mines be prepared as to how they are being
       managed, who is operating them, on what basis and what
       is the income of the Temple from them and the                   G
       outstanding dues. Let the list of quarries and mines be
       produced and the income generated/outstanding dues
       with names with other details.
   (vi) There is no proper accommodation at present for
        pilgrims provided by the Temple Managing Committee.            H
856   SUPREME COURT REPORTS                         [2019] 16 S.C.R.


A          Report of Shri B.D. Sharma, former Governor of Orissa,
           indicated that there was need of providing
           accommodation to 60,000 pilgrims. With respect to the
           accommodation not only the Temple Administration, but
           the Government can also do the needful as that is for
           providing shelter to humanity, which is necessary. When
B
           there is a vast congregation of people, it becomes the
           Government’s duty to ensure welfare, law and order,
           hygiene and provide proper amenities and sanitation
           facilities. The State Government is, therefore, directed
           to work out and prepare a plan in this regard. The
C          Temple Administration is directed to coordinate with the
           Government in this regard for providing shelter place and
           facilities to the pilgrims.
      (vii) It appears that there is necessity for qualified servitors
            in traditional nitis and rituals. It is for the Temple
D           Management Committee to ensure that proper training
            is imparted to the servitors as they are in very large
            number and to ensure that only qualified servitors in
            traditional nitis and ritual, perform seva, puja and nitis.
      (viii) Concern has been expressed in various reports with
E            respect to economic welfare of the servitors. It is for
             the Temple Administration and for the Government as
             it provides grants to temple to ensure that servitors are
             looked after properly. At the same time, it is also
             necessary to ensure that pilgrims are not harassed for
             obtaining donations and donations are properly
F
             accounted. It can only be ensured when servitors are
             properly looked after including remuneration and health
             welfare. Likewise, to stop harassment strict control and
             discipline with suitable and swift mechanism to punish
             the erring, should be put in place.
G
       (ix) Concern has also been expressed in the report with
            respect to the sub-letting of seva/puja. Contracting the
            seva/puja is improper and the Temple Management
            Committee is directed to take steps in this regard and
            ensure that seva/puja is performed by a person to whom
H           it is assigned by it.
MRINALINI PADHI v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS                          857
             [ARUN MISHRA, J.]

    (x) Concern has been expressed in various reports with          A
        respect to hygiene in the Rosaghar. We direct the
        Temple Administration to maintain hygiene in Rosaghar
        at all costs. The hygiene of Rosaghar is indispensable
        as Bhog for Deity is also prepared. The place has to
        be clean and hygienic. All effective steps to ensure this
                                                                    B
        shall be taken including using proper means for cooking
        etc.
   (xi) It was also pointed out by the learned Amicus Curiae
        that certain preliminary preparations take place in the
        open area. This state of affairs is not proper. In case
                                                                    C
        preparation of food take place in an open area, obviously
        it is bound to be contaminated. The preparation of food
        should be done in permanently covered area in an
        absolutely hygienic condition. The ASI shall forthwith
        clear the plan for construction of sheds/permanent
        structures which is absolutely necessary.                   D
   (xii) Reports have pointed out that prasad, which is sold in
         Ananda Bazar, is also not sold in hygienic manner. Let
         such places be improved and made hygienic, prasadam
         should be kept in fly proof receptacles and it should be
         sold at proper rates, to be fixed by the Temple            E
         Management. The purity of the prasadam also shall be
         ensured by the Temple Managing Committee.
  (xiii) In the report, necessity has been indicated for I-Cards
         for servitors and staff, which is in the interest of the
         Temple Administration. The servitors and staff should      F
         be provided with I-Cards so that unscrupulous persons
         are not able to present themselves as servitors or staff
         members and the people are not misled on the basis of
         wrong identity.
  (xiv) In the report of Shri B.D. Sharma, Ex-Governor, Orissa,     G
        necessity of a dairy farm has also been pointed out. It
        would be ideal for the Temple to have the dairy farm.
        Let the Temple Management Committee consider the
        same in coordination with other stakeholders with
        respect to opening dairy farm.                              H
858   SUPREME COURT REPORTS                         [2019] 16 S.C.R.


A     (xv) It appears from the Managing Committee response that
           lot needs to be done with respect to having proper
           darshan by people at large. As a matter of fact, there
           should not be any commotion and chaos as large number
           of pilgrims are visiting the Temple every day. It is a pious
           duty to provide proper darshan in systematic manner
B          and to take care of the aged, the infirm and children. It
           is for the experts to suggest what system can be devised
           without disturbances to the rituals to be performed in
           Temple and passage required for it and thereafter
           Temple Management Committee and Administration
C          have to consider it. We direct the Temple Administration
           and the Chief Administrator including the State
           Government to prepare a roadmap with the help of
           experts for having proper darshan by the devotees/
           pilgrims and to implement it effectively and to ensure
           that there is no commotion so that everybody is able to
D          have darshan peacefully without any obstruction by
           anybody.
      (xvi) There are certain incidents which have been pointed out
            in the report relating to the misbehavior with the women,
            snatching of ornaments, etc. There should not be any
E           room for any such incident in the Sanctum-Santorum and
            other Temples situated around. If such incidents are
            taking place, it has to be dealt with all seriousness with
            firm hand and there should not be any room for such
            incidents. Unlawful elements are responsible for doing
            such acts have to be removed out of the premises at all
F           costs. We direct the Temple Administration and also the
            Temple Police to ensure that let there be a dedicated
            section of personnel to tighten security inside the temple
            and only to ensure that no such incident takes place in
            the Temples and no misbehavior is meted out to women.
G           Those found involved in such acts cannot be said to be
            believer in the God also. When such an act is performed
            in the Temple, it is very disrespectful to Shri Jagannath
            and the Sanskruti. There is no place for such unlawful
            activities in Temples. The temple authorities and the
            police are directed to take strict action to avoid such
H           incidents.
MRINALINI PADHI v. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS                           859
             [ARUN MISHRA, J.]

  (xvii) With respect to valuables of the Temple, let the Temple     A
         Management place before this Court, what kind of
         inventory it has prepared? How it proposes to secure
         the valuables of the Temple and ornaments offered by
         the devotees?
 (xviii) Learned Amicus Curiae has also pointed out that there       B
         is need for an effluent treatment plant and waste
         management system which is one of the requirements
         for keeping the area clean and hygienic for devotees.
         The State Government can also spend money in this
         regard, as it is a secular activity. Let proper effluent
                                                                     C
         treatment plant and waste management system be set
         up with the help of experts by the Temple
         Administration and the State Government as may be
         considered appropriate.
  (xix) Learned Amicus Curiae has also pointed out that there
                                                                     D
        is a necessity for separate toilets for male and female.
        We direct that let the toilets be provided with modern
        amenities and should be kept absolutely clean. The
        number of toilets shall be adequate having regard to the
        average footfall in the temple, which is large in number.
                                                                     E
   (xx) There is a necessity pointed out about the cloak rooms.
        Let steps be taken by the Temple Administration in this
        regard.
  (xxi) As pointed out in the report, there is necessity for
        motorcycle stand. Let steps be taken to provide
                                                                     F
        motorcycle stand within a period of 4 months, not only
        for servitors, but also for those who are visiting the
        Temple on their own vehicle and it is for the local
        Administration to work out the proper place for such
        purpose.
  (xxii) As there are various reports which have been submitted      G
         from time to time containing various suggestions. What
         steps have been taken with respect to the suggestions
         pointed out in these reports, shall also be considered by
         the Temple Management at the first instance and
         whatever is done by the other stakeholders like State       H
860             SUPREME COURT REPORTS                         [2019] 16 S.C.R.


A                      Government and others, should also be considered by
                       respective stakeholders. In case they have taken any
                       action, be also report to this Court.
               (xxiii) Considering the overall situation and the facts, we direct
                       the State Government to depute full time Chief
B                      Administrator, not by way of additional charge forthwith.
              One of the positive developments is that of introduction of E-
      Portal. Constant endeavor has to be made to improve upon the
      information made available. It appears from the reports that there are
      various temples of importance and different systems of having darshan.
C     It is for the Temple Committee to place such information on website.
      We place on record our appreciation that all the stakeholders are happy
      with the development which is taking place at the instance of State
      Government and they are cooperating with each other in restoration of
      glory of Lord Shri Jagannath Temple. We direct ASI also to cooperate
      and to permit the activities of improvement which are not prima facie
D     objectionable and are necessary for public hygiene, sanitation and public
      health and upgradation of the facilities and at the same time it has to
      ensure that the form of the new structure is maintained in the same
      manner as the ancient one.
             Let the Temple Management Committee consider various other
E     positive aspects for improvement and invite all the stakeholders including
      the State Government, whose cooperation is necessary in permissible
      matters, to take care of finance in the various development activities.
      The Temple Management Committee has to take steps as it is the sole
      repository of faith. The progress report and the decisions taken shall
F     be submitted in this Court within eight weeks, in the form of an action
      taken report.
             List the matter on 8th January, 2020.


      Kalpana K. Tripathy                                         Directions issued.
G




H


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "Article 32"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.