Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

M.C. MEHTAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Citation
1991 INSC 305
Decided
22 November 1991
Disposal
Disposed off

Holding

The Court held that, under Article 32, it may issue directions to the government to disseminate environmental information and make environmental education compulsory as a means to enforce the constitutional duty to protect the environment.

Summary

M.C. Mehta filed a public‑interest writ under Article 32 seeking directions for the government to promote environmental awareness. The Court examined whether it could order cinema halls, television, radio and educational institutions to disseminate environmental messages free of cost and make environmental studies compulsory. Relying on the fundamental duty under Article 51A(g) and the Environment Protection Act, 1986, the Court held that such directions are within its jurisdiction to enforce the right to a clean environment. It directed the Central and State governments to require cinema licences to include at least two environmental slides per show, to produce short informational films, to broadcast environmental programmes on All India Radio and Doordarshan, and to have the University Grants Commission prescribe a compulsory environmental course in colleges. The petition was disposed of after issuing these directions, with liberty to approach the Court for further orders if needed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Supreme Court can, under Article 32, issue directions to the executive to promote environmental awareness through cinema, broadcast and education.
  • Whether such directions are justified by the fundamental duty to protect the environment under Article 51A(g) and the Environment Protection Act, 1986.
  • Whether the government can be directed to make environmental education a compulsory subject at all levels of schooling and higher education.

Legislation cited

Subjects

environmentpublic interest litigationArticle 32fundamental dutiesenvironmental educationcinema slidesbroadcastpollutionSupreme Court

Judgment

A                                M.C. MEHTA
                                        v.
                        UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

                            NOVEMBER 22, 1991

B    [RANGANATH MISRA, CJ., G.N. RAY AND A.S. ANAND JJ.]

           Environment Pollution Act : Public Interest Litigation-Protection
    of environment and keeping it free from pollution--lndispensable neces-
    sity for life on earth--Directions given to exhibit Cinema slides, films on
    various aspecis of environment and pol/ution--Awareness of environment
c   to be taught as compulsory subject.

         This application is in public interest seeking relief for issuing
    appropriate directions of this Court to Cinema, exhibition halls to
    exhibit slides containing information and messages on environment
D · free of cost. Further directions for spread of information relating to
    environment in national and regional languages vide broadcast thereof
    on the All India Radio, exposure thereof on television in regular
    and short term programmes with a view to educating the people of
    India about their social obligation in the matter of the upkeep of the
    environment in proper shape and making them alive to their obliga-
    tion not to act as polluting agencies or factors. It is further prayed
E that environment should be made a compulsory subject in schools
    and colleges in a graded system so that there would be a general
    growth of awareness.

          Till 1972 general awareness of mankind to the environment for
    the well being of mankind bad not been appropriately appreciated.
F
    In 1975 the Constitution underwent an.amendment by incorporating
    an Article 51A with the beading "Fundamental Duties" Clause (g)
    thereof requires every citizen to protect and improve the natural
    environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life and to
    have compassion for every living creature. In 1974 Water Pollution
G   Central Act came on the statues book. In 1981 Air Pollution (Cen-
    tral Act) and finally in 1986 the Environment Protection Act were
    enacted.                              ·

          Law is a regulator of huma.n· conduct but no law can indeed
    effectively work unless there ·i& an element of acceptance by the
H   people in society.


                                       378
                            MEJITA v. U.0.1.                      379

      There bas been an explosion of human population, over the          A
last SO years. Life bas become competitive so the age old norms of
good living are no longer followed. It bas therefore, become neces-
sary that people be made aware of vice of pollution and its level of
consequences. Keeping the citizen informed is an obligation of the
Government as well as the responsibility of society to adequately
educate every component of it so that social level is kept up.           B
       Disposing of the matter, the Court,

     HELD : The principle on which the prayer is made is accepted
and the following directions are issued.

      1. That the Central Government, the State Government and           c
Union Territories should invariably enforce as a condition of license
of all cinema balls, touring cinemas and video parlours to exhibit
free of cost at least two slides/messages on environment in each
show undertaken by them. The Ministry of Environment should
within two months from now come out with appropriate slide mate-
rial on various aspects of environment and pollution. This material      D
should be circulated to the collectors who are the licensing authori-
ties for compliance without any further directions and failure to
comply with the Court order should be treated as a ground for
cancellation of the licence by the appropriate authorities. (382 A-C)

      2. The Ministry of Information and Broadcasting of the Gov-        E
ernment of India should without delay start pronouncing informa-
tion films of short duration on various aspects of environment and
pollution bringing out the benefits for society on the environment
protection and hazardous involved in environment pollution. [382
DJ
                                                                         F
     3. The national network, the State Door Darshan Centres, All
India Radio, Television sMuld take proper steps to exhibit such
films and interesting programmes on the subject. There should be
regular compliance of these directions be followed from February 1,
1992. (382 G-HJ
                                                                         G
      4. The principle that through the medium of educational aware-
ness of the environment and its pollution problems should be taught
as a compulsory subject at every level of education. University Grants
Commission should prescribe a course on environment in a grade4
manner as a compulsory subject in college education. The compl~­
ance of this requirement be done in the next academic year. [383         H
A-CJ
     380                SUPREME COURT REPORTS                [1991) SUPP. 2 S.C.R.

A          Since there is a general acceptance throughout the world as
     also in our country that protection of environment keeping free of
     pollution is an indispensable necessity of life to survive on earth so
     everyone must turn his immediate attention to the proper care to
     sustain environment in a decent way.

B          ORIGINAL WRISDICTION: Writ Petition (Civil) No. 860 of 1991.

           (Under Article 32 of the Constitution oflndia).

           Petitioner in person

C         G. Ramaswamy, Altaf Ahmad, Anil Katiyar, A.M. Khanwilkar and
     M.P. Sarawala for the Respondents.

           The following Order of the Court was delivered:

           This. application is in public interest and has been filed by a
D    practising advocate of this Court who has consistently been taking interest
     in matters relating to environment and pollution. The reliefs claimed in
    this application under Article 32 of the Constitution are for issuing appro-
    priate directions to cinema exhibition halls to exhibit slides containing
    infonnation .and messages on environment free of cost: directions for
    spread of infonnation relating to environment in national and regional
E   languages and for broadcast ther:eof on the All India Radio and exposure
    thereof on the television in regular and short term programmes with a
    view to educating the people of India about their social obligation in the
    matter of the upkeep of up the environment in proper shape and making
    them alive to their obligation not to act as polluting agencies or factors.
    There is also a prayer that environment should be made a compulsory
F   subject in schools and colleges in a graded system so that there would be a
    general growth of awareness. We had issued notice to the Union of India
    on the petition and the Central Government has immediately responded.

            Until 1972, general awareness of mankind to the importance of envi-
    'ronment for the well-being of mankind had not been appropriately appre-
G    ciated though over the years for more than a century there was a growing
     realisation that mankind had to live in tune with nature if life was to be
    peaceful, happy and satisfied. In the name of scientific development, man
    started distancing himself from Nature and even developed an urge to
    c9nquer nature: Our ancestors had known that nature was not subduable
    and, therefore, had lllade it an obligation for man to surrender to nature
H   and live in tune with it. Our Constitution underwent an amendment in
                             MEHTA v. U.0.1.                            381

1976 by incorporating an article (SIA) with the heading "Fundamental           A
Duties". Clause (g) thereof requires every citizen to protect and improve
the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life, and
to have compassion for living creatures. Soon after the international con-
ference on environment the Water Pollution Control Act of 1974 came on
the statute book; the Air Pollution Control Act came in 1981 and finally
came the Environment Protection Act of 1986.                                   B

      Law is a regulator of human conduct as the professors of jurispru-
dence say, but no law can indeed effectively work unless there is an
element of acceptance by the people in so~iety. No law works out smoothly
unless the interaction is voluntary. In order that human conduct may be in
accordance with the prescription of law it is necessary that there should be   c
appropriat~ awareness about what' the law requires and there is an element
of acceptance that the requirement of law is grounded upon a philosophy
which should be followed. This would be possible only when steps are
taken in an adequate measure to make people aware of·the indispensable
necessity of their conduct being oriented in accordance with the require-
ments of law.                                                                  D

      There has been an explosion of human population over the last 50
years. Life has become competitive. Sense of idealism in the living proc-
ess has systematically eroded. As a consequence of this the age old norms
of good living are no longer followed. The anxiety to do good to the
needy or for the society in general has died out, today oblivious of the       E
repercussions of one's actions on society, everyone is prepared to do
whatever is easy and convenient for his own purpose. In this backdrop if
the laws are to be enforced and the malaise of pollution has to be kept
under control and the environment has to be protected in an unpolluted
state it is necessary that people are aware of the vice of pollution and its
evil consequences.                                                             F

      We are in a democratic polity where dissemination of information is
the foundation of the system. Keeping the citizens informed is an obliga-
tion of the Government. It is equally the responsibility of society to ad-
equately educate every component of it so that the social level is kept up.
We therefore, accept on principle the prayers made by the petitioner. We       G
are happy to find that the learned Attorney General who appeare for the
Union of India has also appreciated the stand of the petitioner and has
even cooperated to .work out the procedure by which some of the prayers
could be granted.
                                                                               H
     We dispose of this writ petition with the following directions:
     382                SUPREME COURT REPORTS              [1991] SUPP. 2 S.C.R.

 A          (1) Respondents 1, 2, & 3 shall issue appropriate directions to the
     State Governments and Union Territories to invariably enforce as a condi-
     tion of license of all cinema halls, touring cinemas and video parlours to
     exhibit free of cost atleast two slides/messages on environment in each
     show undertaken by them. The Ministry of Environment should within
     two months from now come out with appropriate slide material which
 B   would be brief out efficiently carry the message home on various aspects
     of environment and pollution. This material should be circulated directly
     to the Collectors who are the licensing authorities for the cinema exhibi-
     tion halls Under the respective state laws for compliance without any
     further direction and helping the cinema halls and video parlours to com-
     ply with the requirements of our ofder. Failure to comply with our order
 C   should be treated as a ground for cancellation of the licence by the appro-
     priate authorities. The material for the slides should be such that it would
     at once be impressive, striking and leave as impact on every one who sees
     the slide.

           (2) The Ministry. of Information and Broadcasting of the Govern-
o· ment of India should without delay start producing information films of
     short duration as is being done now on various aspects of environment
     and pollution bringing out the benefits for .society on the environment
     being protected and the hazards involved in the environment being pol-
     luted. Mind catching aspects should be made the central theme of such
     short films. One such film should be shown, as far as practicable, in one
E    show every day by the cinema halls and the Central Government and the
     State Government are directed to ensure compliance of this condition
     from February 1, 1992.

        (3) Realising the importance of the matter of environment and the
   necessity of protecting it in an unpolluted for as we had suggested to
F learned Attorney General to have a dialogue with the Ministry of Informa-
  tion and Broadcasting as to the manner the All India Radio and Doordarshan
  can assist this process of education. We are happy to indicate that learned
  Attorney General has told us that five to seven minutes can be devoted
  every day and there could be, once a week, a longer programme. We do
  not want to project an impression that we are authorities on the subject,
G but we would suggest to the programme controlling authorities of the
  Doordarshan and the All India Radio to take proper steps to make interest-        I
  ing programmes and broadcast the same on the radio and exhibit the same
  on the television. The national network as also the State Doordarshan
  Centres should immediately take steps to implement this direction so that
  from February I, 1992, regular compliance can be made.
H
                                 MEHTA v. U.0.1.                            383

          (4) We accept on principle that through the medium of educatiqn          A
    awareness of the environment and its problems related to pollution should


-   be taught as a compulsory subject. Learned Attorney General pointed out
    to us that the Central Government is associated with education at the
    higher levels and the University Grants Commission can monitor only the
    under graduate and post graduate studies. The rest of it, according to him,
    is a State subject. He has agreed that the University Grants Commission        B
    will take appropriate steps immediately to give effect to what we have
    said, i.e., requiring the Universities to prescribe a course on environment.
    They would consider the feasibility of making · this a compulsory subject
    at every level in· college education. So for as education up to the college
    level is concerned, we would require every State Government and every
    Education Board connected with education up to the matriculation ·Or           C
    stage even intermediate colleges to immediately take steps to .enforce.
    compulsory education on environment in a graded way. This should be so
    done that in the next academic year there would be compliance of this
    requirement.

         We have not considered it necessary to hear the State Governments         D
    and the other interested groups as by now there is a general acceptance
    through out the world as also in our country that protection of environ-
    ment and keeping it free of pollution is an indispensable necessity for life
    to survive on earth. If that be the situation, every one must tum his
    immediate attention to the proper care to sustain environment in a decent
    way.                                                                           E
          We dispose of the matter with the aforesaid direction but give lib-
    erty to Mr. Mehta to apply to the Court from time to time for further
    directions, if necessary.

    S.B.                                                  Petition disposed of.


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "environment"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.