Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

KISHANSING TOMARversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF AHMEDABAD AND ORS.

Citation
2006 INSC 713
Decided
19 October 2006
Disposal
Disposed off

Holding

Article 243‑U mandates that a municipality’s five‑year term is compulsory and elections must be completed before its expiry, and the State Election Commission must not defer elections except in truly exceptional circumstances.

Summary

The Chairman of the Standing Committee of Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC) feared a delay in elections to the new municipal body whose term was due to expire on 15 October 2005, and filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State Election Commission and the State Government to hold elections before the expiry of the five‑year term prescribed by Article 243‑U of the Constitution. The State Election Commission argued that delimitation of newly increased wards and preparation of revised electoral rolls would require about six months, and therefore the elections could not be completed by the constitutional deadline. The High Court accepted the Commission’s timeline and dismissed the petition; the Supreme Court, however, held that Article 243‑U imposes a mandatory five‑year tenure and elections must be completed before its expiry, with only exceptional circumstances justifying any delay. It reiterated that the State Election Commission enjoys powers akin to the Election Commission of India and must receive full cooperation from the State Government. Since the elections were eventually held and a new municipal body constituted, the Supreme Court disposed of the appeal without further order.

Issues considered

  • The period of five years fixed under Article 243‑U for a municipality is mandatory or directory.
  • Whether a delay caused by ward delimitation and electoral roll revision can justify non‑compliance with the constitutional deadline.
  • Whether the State Election Commission has the same powers as the Election Commission of India under Articles 243K, 243ZA and 324.
  • Whether the State Government must provide assistance to the State Election Commission to ensure timely elections.

Legislation cited

Subjects

Article 243-Umunicipal corporation electionsmandatory tenureState Election Commissiondelimitation of wardselectoral rollsmandamusconstitutional mandatemunicipal body

Judgment

A                               KISHANSING TOMAR

       MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF AHMEDABAD AND
                              ORS.

                                 OCTOBER 19, 2006
B
      [Y.K. SABHARWAL, CJ., K.G. BALAKRISHNAN, S.H. KAPADIA, C.K.
               THAKKER AND P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN, JJ.]

                                                                                        #",,.
          Constitution of India, 1950:
c
          Article 243-U-Election to Municipal Corporation-Constituting new
    elected Municipal body-Held, the period offive years fixed under the Article
    to constitute the Municipality is mandatory in nature and has to be followed
    in all respects-Any revision of electoral rolls shall be carried out in time
D   and if it cannot be so carried out the elections have to be conducted on the
    basis of the then existing rolls-Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation
    Act, 1949-ss. 6 and 6-8.

            Articles 243-K, 243-ZA(l) and 324-Powers of State Election
     Commission-Held, in terms a/Article 243-K and 243-ZA(J), the same powers
E   are vested in State Election Commission as in the Election Commission of
     India under Article 324-State Government concerned shall have to render
    fit!/ assistance and co-operation to the State Election Commission and respect
     the latter's assessment of the needs in order to ensure free and fair elections.

           The term of the elected body of the respondent-Ahmedabad Municipal
F   Corporation (AMC) was due to expire on October 15, 2005. The appellant,
    who was the Chairman of the Standing Committee of the AMC, apprehended
    that the authoritie~• might delay the process of election to constitute the new
    Municipal body and, therefore, filed a writ petition before t'1e High Court on
    23.8.2005 for a writ or direction to the respondents to take all steps necessary
    for the purpose of holding elections to the Municipal Corporation of the City
G
    before expiry of th1~ duration of the existing body as envisaged by Article 243-
    U of the Constitution of India. Respondent no. 3, the State Election Commission
    in its reply stated that in view of the increase in the number of wards, the
    Commission was required to proceed with the exercise of delimitation of the
    wards of the city and as the political parties were required to be consulted it
                                          454                                           .,
H
               KISHANS!NG TOMAR "· MUNI. CORPN. OF THE CITY OF AHMEDABAD    45 5

would take at least six months time to complete the process of eledion, and         A
that the Commission could act only after the State Government issued the
notification. The Single Judge, accepting the time frame suggested by the
State Election Commission, directed that the process of election must be
completed by 31.12.2005 and no further extension for holding the elections
would be permissible. Appellant's Letters Patent Appeal was dismissed.              B
Aggrieved, he filed the present appeal. Meanwhile the elections to the
Municipal Corporation were held and the new Municipal body has been
constituted.

     On the question: whether Article 243-U of the Constitution of India, by
which the duration of the Municipality is fixed, is mandatory in nature and         C
any violation thereof could be justified in the circumstances stated by the
respondents,

      Disposing of the appeal, the Court

       HELD: 1.1. The provisions contained in Article 243-U of the Constitution     D
make it clear that the period of live years fixed thereunder to constitute the
Municipality is mandatory in nature and has to be followed in all respects.
The constitutional mandate is that election to a Municipality shall be
completed before the expiry of the live years period stipulated in Clause (1) of
Article 243-U and in case of dissolution, the new body shall be constituted
before the expiration of a period of six months and elections have to be            E
conducted in such a manner. The duration of the Municipality is fixed as live
years from the date of its first meeting and no longer. It is incumbent upon
the Election Commission and other authorities to carry out the mandate of
the Constitution and to see that a new Municipality is coostituted in time and
elections to the Municipality are conducted before the expiry of its duration.      F
Taking into account the factors enumerated in the judgment and applying the
principles of golden rule of interpretation, the object and purpose of Article
243-U is to be carried out. (463-A-B-D; 466-C; 467-H)

      Re: Special Reference No. 1 of2002 Gujarat Assembly Elections matter,
120021 s sec 237, referred to.                                                      G
       1.2. The election has to be held on the basis of the electoral rolls which
are in force on the last date for making nomination. Any revision of electoral
rolls shall be carried out in time and if it cannot be carried out within a
reasonable time, the elections have to be conducted on the basis of the then
existing electoral rolls. The Election Commission shall complete the election       H
    456                     SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2006] SUPP. 7 S.C.R.

A before the expiration of the duration of five years period as stipulated in Clause
    (3) of Article 243-U and not yield to situations that may be created by vested
    interests to postpone elections from being held within the stipulated time.
                                                                        (465-E-G(
          Lakshmi Charan Sen & Ors. v. A.K.M Hassan Uzzaman & Ors., (1985)
B 4 sec 689, relied on.
           2.1. In the domain of elections to the Panchayats and the Municipal
    bodies under Part IX and Part IX A of the Constitution, for the conduct of the
    elections to these bodies the State Election Commission enjoys the same status
    as the Election Commission of India. In terms of Article 243K and Article
C   243ZA(l) the same powers are vested in the State Election Commission as
    the Election Commission of India under Article 324. The words in the former
    provisions are in pari materia with the latter provision. The words,
    'superintendence, direction and control' as well as 'conduct of elections' have
    been held in the "broadest of terms" by this Court. It is necessary for all the
D   State Governments to recognize the significance of the State Election
    Commission, which is a constitutional body and they shall abide by the
    directions of the Commission in the same manner in which they follow the
    directions of the Election Commission of India during the elections for the
    Parliament and State Legislatures. [466-E-H)

E          Re : Special Reference No. I of 2002 Gujarat Assembly Elections
    matter, [2002) 8 SCC 237 and Mohinder Singh Gill and Anr. v. Chief Election
    Commissioner, New Delhi, [1978) I SCC 405, relied on.
           2.2. Article 243K(3) also recognizes the independent status of the State
    Election Commission. It states that upon a request made in that behalf the
F   Governor shall make available to the State Election Commission "such staff
    as may be necessary for the discharge of the functions conferred on the State
    Election Commission by clause (I)". It is accordingly to be noted that in the
    matter of the conduct of elections, the concerned Government shall have to
    render full assistance and co-operation to the State Election Commission and
    respect the latter's assessment of the needs in order to ensure that free and
G   fair elections are conducted. [467-D-E)

          2.3. Also, for the independent and effective functioning of the State
    Election Commission, where it feels that it is not receiving the cooperation of
    the concerned State Government in discharging its constitutional obligation
H
      KISHANSING TOMAR •·. MUNI. CORPN. OF THE CITY OF AHMEDABAD [BALASUBRAMANYAN, J)   457

 of holding the elections to the Panchayats or Municipalities within the time A
 mandated in the Constitution, it will be open to the State Election Commission
 to approach the High Courts, in the first instance, and thereafter the Supreme
 Court for a writ of mandamus or such other appropriate writ directing the
 State Government concerned to provide all necessary cooperation and
 assistance to the State Election Commission to enable the latter to fulfil the
 constitutional mandate. (467-F-G(                                              B
       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 5756 of2005.

      From the final Judgment and Order dated 8.8.2005 of the High Court of
 Gujarat at Ahmedabad in L.P.A. No. 83012005 in S.C.A. No. 984712005.
                                                                                              c
      Nidhesh Gupta, S.U.K. Sagar, Bina Madhavan and Rahul Pratap, Lawyer's
 Knit & Co., for the Appellant.

      S. Muralidhar and Rutwik Panda for the Respondent No. 3.

     Soli J. Sorabjee, Preetesh Kapur, Hemantika Wahi, Abhishek Mishra and                    D
Shivangi for the Respondent No. 2.

      Sumita Hazarika for the Respondent No. I.

      Mis. J.S. Wad & Co. (NIP) for the impleading party.
                                                                                              E
      The Judgment of the Court was delivered by

        K.G. BALAKRISHNAN, J. This appeal is directed against the judgment
 of the Division Bench of the High Court of Gujarat. The appellant filed a
 Special Civil Application No. 9847 of 2005 praying for a writ of mandamus or
 any other appropriate writ or direction to the respondents in the writ petition, F
 namely, the Municipal Corporation of the City of Ahmedabad, the State of
 Gujarat and the Gujarat State Election Commission, to take all steps necessary
 for the purpose of holding elections for constituting the Municipal Corporation
 of the city of Ahmedabad before the expiry of the duration of the Municipal
 Corporation constituted pursuant to the elections held in October, 2000. The G
.appellant, who was the writ petitioner before the High Court, was the Chairman
 of the Standing Committee of the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation
 (hereinafter referred to as "AMC"). The elected body of the AMC was
 constituted for the relevant period pursuant to an election held in October,
2000 and its term was due to expire on October 15, 2005. The appellant
                                                                                              H
    458                     SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2006] SUPP. 7 S.C.R.

A apprehended that the authorities may delay the process of election to
  constitute the new Municipal body and therefore filed the aforesaid writ
  petition on 23rd August, 2005. The AMC filed an affidavit before the High
  Court stating that it was the responsibility of the third respondent, namely,
  the .State Election Commission, to conduct the elections in time. The State
B Election Commission, in a separate affidavit in reply, submitted that under the
  provisions of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949, the
  State Govt. had issued a Notification on 8th June, 2005 determining the wards
  for the city of Ahmedabad by which the total number of wards had been
  increased from 43 to 45 and in view of the increase in the number of wards,
  the Commission was required to proceed with the exercise of delimitation of
C the wards of the city of Ahmedabad in accordance with the provisions of the
  Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation (Delimitation of Wards in the City
  & Allocation of Reserved Seats) Rules, 1994 and that the Commission had
  issued a circular requiring the Collectors and the Designated Officers to
  furnish the details and to make proposals for delimitation of the wards. The
  Commission contended that it would take two months' time to complete the
D process of delimitation as the preparation of voters' list in each ward had to
  be revised in accordance with the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation
  (Registration of Voters) Rules, 1994. It was alleged by the Commission that
   it was required to consult the political parties to carry out the delimitation of
  the wards and that it would take at least six months' time for completing the
E process of election and the Commission could act only after the State Govt.
   issued the notification. The State Govt. produced a chart showing the detailed
  steps taken by the State Govt. at various stages culminating in the issue of
  Notification dated 8th June, 2005.

          The appellant contend~.:! before the Single Judge that in view of Article
F 243-U of the Constitution, the authorities were bound to complete the process
  at the earliest and the elections should have been held before the expiry of
  the term of the existing Municipal Corporation. The learned Single Judge
  accepted the timeframe suggested by the State Election Commission and
  directed that it should be strictly followed and the process of elections must
G be completed by 31st December, 2005, and that no further extension for
  holding the elections would be permissible.

        Aggrieved by the decision of the Single Judge, the appellant filed a
  Letters Patent Appeal before the High Court and the Division Bench of the
  High Court by the impugned judgment held that the timeframe given by the
H State Election Commission was perfectly justified and the Election Commission
      KISHANSING TOMAR •·. MUNI CORPN OF THE CITY OF AHMEDABAD [BALASUBRAMANYAN, J)   459

was directed to begin and complete process as per t'1e dates given in its A
affidavit and the LP.A. was dismissed. Aggrieved thereby, the present appeal
is preferred before us by the appellant.

        We heard appellant's counsel as also the counsel for the respondents.
The main thrust of the arguments of the appellant's counsel was that in view
of the various provisions contained in Part IX of the Constitution of India,                B
 it was incumbent on the part of the authorities to complete the process of
election before the expiry of the period of five years from the date appointed
for first meeting of the Municipality. The counsel for the respondents, especially
the counsel for the State Election Commission contended that every effort
was made by the Election Commission to conduct the elections before the                     C
stipulated time, but due to unavoidable reasons, the elections could not be
held and the preparation of the electoral rolls and the increase in the number
of wards had caused delay in the process of election and under such
circumstances the delay was justified in conducting the elections.

      The question that arises for consideration is whether Article 243-U of                D
the Constitution, by which the duration of the Municipality is fixed is mandatory
in nature and any violation could be justified in the circumstances stated by
the respondents. Article 243-U of the Constitution reads as follows :

        "243-U. Duration of Municipalities, etc. - (I) Every Municipality,
        unless sooner dissolved under any law for the time being in force,                  E
        shall continue for five years from the date appointed for its first
        meeting and no longer:

        Provided that a Municipality shall be given a reasonable opportunity
        of being heard before its dissolution.
                                                                                            F
       (2) No amendment of any law for the time being in force shall have
       the effect of causing dissolution of a Municipality at any level, which
       is functioning immediately before such amendment, till the expiration
       of its duration specified in clause (I).

       (3) An election to constitute a Municipality shall be completed,-                    G
       (a) before the expiry of its duration specified in clause (I);

       (b) before the expiration of a period of six months from the date of
       dissolution:

       Provided that where the remainder of the period for which the dissolved H
    460                     SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2006] SUPP. 7 S.C.R.

A           Municipality would have continued is less than six months, it shall
            not be necessary to hold any election under this clause for constituting
            the Municipality for such period.

            (4) A Municipality constituted upon the dissolution of a Municipality
            before the expiration of its duration shall continue only for the remainder
B           of the period for which the dissolved Municipality would have
            continued under clause ( l) had it not been so dissolved."

        Article 243-ZA provides that the superintendence, direction and control
  of the preparation of electoral rolls for, and the conduct of, all elections to
  the Municipalities shall be vested in a State Election Commission referred to
C in Article 243-K.

          Article 243-S states that there shall be constituted Wards' Committees
    consisting of one or more wards, within the territorial area of a Municipality
    having a population of three lakhs or more and that the State Legislature may
D   by law make provision with respect to (a) the composition and the territorial
    area ofa Wards Committee; and (b) the manner in which the seats in a Wards
    Committee shall be filled.

         Under Article 243-T, it is provided that the seats shall be reserved for
  the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in every Municipality and the
E number of seats so reserved shall bear, as nearly as may be the same proportion
  to the total number of seats to be filled by direct election in that Municipality
  as the population of the Scheduled Castes in the Municipal area or of the
  Scheduled Tribes in the Municipal area bears to the total population of that
  area and such seats may be allotted by rotation to different constituencies
  in a Municipality. Further clause (2) of Article 243-T says that not less than
F one third of the total number of seats reserved under clause (I) shall be
  reserved for women belonging to the Scheduled Castes or, as the case may
  be, the Scheduled Tribes. Clause (3) of this Article further provides that not
  less than one third (including the number of seats reserved for women
  belonging to the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes) of the total
G number of seats to be filled by direct election in every Municipality shall be
  reserved for women and such seats may be allotted by rotation to different
  constituencies in a Municipality. Clause (6) empowers the State Legislature
  to make any provision for reservation of seats in any Municipality or offices
  of Chairpersons in the Municipalities in favour of backward class of citizens.

H         The provisions contained in the Bombay Provincial Municipal
          KISHANSING TOMAR ''· MUNL CORPN. OF THE CITY OF AMEDABAD [BALASUBRAMANYAN. J.]   461
-   Corporations Act, 1949 also are relevant to be noted herP.. Section 6 of this                A
    Act deals with the duration of a corporation. It reads as under :

            "6. Duration of Corporation :

            (1) Every Corporation unless sooner dissolved, shall continue for five
            years from the date appointed for its first meeting and no longer.                   B
            (2) A Corporation constituted upon the dissolution before the expiration
            of its duration shall continue only for the remainder of the period for
            which it would have continued under Sub-Section ( 1) had it not been
            so dissolved."

            Section 6A reads as under :                                                          c
            "6A. Terms office of Councillors :

            The term of the office of the Councillors shall be co-extensive with the
            duration of the corporation."
                                                                                                 D
            Section 68 is to the following effect :

            "Election to Constitute the Corporation :

            An election to constitute a corporation shall be completed-

            (a) before the expiration of its duration specified in sub-section (1) of E
            the section 6.

            (b) before the expiration of six months from the date of its dissolution:

           Provided that where the remainder of the period for which the dissolved
           Corporation would have continued is less than six months, it shall not                F
           be necessary to hold any election under this section for constituting
           the Corporation for such period."

          It may be noted that Part IX-A was inserted in the Constitution by
    virtue of the Seventy Fourth Amendment Ac~, 1992. The object of introducing
    these provisions was that in many States the local bodies were not working                   G
    properly and the timely elections were not being held and the nominated
    bodies were continuing for long periods. Elections had been irregular and
    many times unnecessarily delayed or postponed and the elected bodies had
    been superseded or suspended without adequate justification at the whims
    and fancies of the State authorities. These views were expressed by the then
                                                                                                 H
    462                    SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2006] SUPP. 7 S.C.R.

A Minister of State for Urban Development while introducing the Constitution
    Amendment Bill before the Parliament and thus the new provisions were
    added in the Constitution with a view to restore the rightful place in political
    governance for local bodies. It was considered necessary to provide a
    Constitutional status to such bodies and to ensure regular and fair conduct
    of elections. In the statement of objects and reasons in the Constitution
B   Amendment Bill relating to urban local bodies, it was stated :

            "In many States, local bodies have become weak and ineffective on
            account of variety of reasons, including the failure to hold regular
            elections, prolonged supersessions and inadequate devolution of
            powers and functions. As a result, urban local bodies are not able to
c           perfo1m effectively as vibrant democratic units of self-Government.

            Having regard to these inadequacies, it is considered necessary that
            provisions relating to urban local bodies are incorporated in the
            Constitution, particularly for-

D           (i) putting on a firmer footing the relationship between the State
            Government and the Urban Local Bodies with respect to :

            (a) the functions and taxation powers, and

            (b) arrangements for revenue sharing.
E
            (ii) ensuring regular conduct of elections.

            (iii) ensuring timely elections in the case of supersession; and

            (iv) providing adequate representation for the weaker sections like
            Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and women.
F
            Accordingly, it has been proposed to add a new Part relating to the
            Urban Local Bodies in the Constitution to provide for -



            (f) fixed tenure of 5 years for the Municipality and re-election within
G           a period of six months of its dissolution."

         The effect of Article 243-U of the Constitution is to be appreciated in
  the above background. Under this Article, the duration of the Municipality
  is fixed for a term of five years and it is stated that every Municipality shall
H continue for five years from the date appointed for its first meeting and no
          KISHANSING TOMAR ,, MUNI. CORPN OF THE CITY OF AMEOABAD [BALASUBRAMANYAN, J.]   463

    longer. Clause (3) of Article 243-U states that election to constitute a                    A
    Municipality shall be completed· (a) before the expiry of its duration specified
    in clause (I) or (b) before the expiration of a period of six months from the
    date or its dissolution. Therefore, the constitutional mandate is that election
    to a Municipality shall be completed before the expiry of the five years' period
    stipulated in Clause (I) of Article 243-U and in case of dissolution, the new               B
    body shall be constituted before the expiration of a period of six months and
    elections have to be conducted in such a manner. A Proviso is added to Sub-
    clause (3) Article 243-U that in case of dissolution, the remainder of the period
    for which the dissolved Municipality would have continued is less than six
    months, it shall not be .1ecessary to hold any election under this clause for
    constituting the Municipality for such period. It is also specified in Clause               C
    (4) of Article 243-U that a Municipality constituted upon the dissolution of
    a Municipality before the expiration of its duration shall continue only for the
    remainder of the period for which the dissolved Municipality would have
    continued under Clause (I) had it not been so dissolved.

           So, in any case, the duration of the Municipality is fixed as five years             D
    from the date of its first meeting and no longer. It is incumbent upon the
    Election Commission and other authorities to carry out the mandate of the
    Constitution and to see that a new Municipality is constituted in time and
    elections to the Municipality are conducted before the expiry of its duration
    of five years as specified in Clause (I) of Article 243-U.
                                                                                                E
          The counsel for the respondents contended that due to multifarious
    reasons, the St~.te Election Commission may not be in a position to conduct
    the elections in time and under such circumstances th~ provisions of Article
    243-U could not be complied with stricto sensu.
                                                                                                F
           A similar question came up before the Constitution Bench of this Court
    in Special Reference No. I of 2002 with reference to the Gujarat Assembly
    Elections matter. The Legislative Assembly of the State of Gujarat was dissolved
    before the expiration of its normal duration. Article 174( 1) of the Constitution
    provides that six months shall not intervene between the last sitting of the



-
    Legislative Assembly in one session and the <late appointed for its first G
    sitting in the next session and the Election Commission had also noted that
    the mandate of Article 174 would require that the Assembly should meet
    every six months even after dissolution of the House and that the Election
    Commission had all along been consistent that normally a Legislative Assembly
    should meet at least every six months as contemplated by Article 174 even H
    464                    SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2006] SUPP. 7 S.C.R.

A where it has been dissolved. As the last sitting of the Legislative Assembly
    of the State of Gujarat was held on 3.4.2002, the Election Commission, by its
    order dated 16.8.2002, had not recommended any date for holding general
    election for constituting a new Legislative Assembly for the State of Gujarat
    and observed that the Commission will consider framing a suitable schedule
B   for the general election to the State Assembly in November-December, 2002
    and therefore the mandate of Article 174(1) of the Constitution of India to
    constitute a new Legislative Assembly cannot be carried out. The Reference,
    thus, came up before this Court.

          Speaking for the Bench, Justice Khare, as he then was, in paragraph 79
C   of the Answer to the Reference, held :

           "However, we are of the view that the employment of the words "on
           an expiration" occurring in Sections 14 and 15 of the Representation
           of the People Act, 1951 respectively show thatthe Election Commission
           is required to take steps for holding election immediately on expiration
D          of the term of the Assembly or its dissolution, although no period has
           been provided for. Yet, there is another indication in Sections I4 and
           15 of the Representation of People Act that the election process can
           be set in motion by issuing of notification prior to expiry of six months
           of the normal term of the House of the People or Legislative Assembly.
           Clause (I) of Article I72 provides that while promulgation of emergency
E          is in operation, Parliament by law can extend the duration of the
           Legislative Assembly not exceeding one year at a time and this period
           shall not, in any case, extend beyond a period of six months after
           promulgation has ceased to operate.

F
           The aforesaid provisions do indicate that on the premature dissolution
           of the Legislative Assembly, the Election Commission is required to
           initiate immediate steps for holding election for constituting Legislative
           Assembly on the first occasion and in any case within six months
           from the date of premature dissolution of the Legislative Assembly."
G
          Concurring with the foregoing opinion, Pasayat, J. in paragraph 151,
    stated as follows :

           "The impossibility of holding the election is not a factor against the
           Election Commission. The maxim of law impotentia excusat legem is
H          intimately connected with another maxim of law lex no cogit ad
      KISHANSING TOMAR •'· MUNI. CORPN. OF THE CITY OF AMEDABAD [BALASUBRAMANYAN, J.]   465

        impossibilia. lmpotentia excusat legem is that when there is a A
        necessary or invincible disability to perfonn the mandatory part of the
        law that impotentia excuses. The law does not compel one to do that
        which one cannot possibly perform. "Where the law creates a duty
        or charge, and the party is disabled to perform it, without any defau It
        in him." Therefore, when it appears that the performance of the B
        fonnalities prescribed by a statute has been rendered impossible by
        circumstances over which the persons interested had no control, like
        an act of God, the circumstances will be taken as a valid excuse.
        Where the act of God prevents the compliance with the words of a
        statute, the statutory provision is not denuded of its mandatory
        character because of supervening impossibility caused by the act of C
        God. (See Broom's Legal Maxims, 10th Ed., at pp 1962-63 and
        Craies on Statue Law, 6th Edn., p. 268.) These aspects were
        highlighted by this Court in Special Reference No. I of 1974. Situations
        may be created by interested persons to see that elections do not take
        place and the caretaker Government continues in office. This certainly
        would be against the scheme of the Constitution and the basic structure D
        to that extent shall be corroded."

       From the opinion thus expressed by this Court, it is clear that the State
Election Commission shall not put forward any excuse based on unreasonable
grounds that the election could not be completed in time. The Election E
Commission shall try to complete the election before the expiration of the
duration of five years' period as stipulated in Clause (5). Any revision of
electoral rolls shall be carried out in time and if it cannot be carried out within
a reasonable time, the election has to be conducted on the basis of the then
existing electoral rolls. In other words, the Election Commission shall complete
the election before the expiration of the duration of five years' period as F
stipulated in Clause (5) and not yield to situations that may be created by
vested interests to postpone elections from being held within the stipulated
time.

      The majority opinion in Lakshmi Charan Sen & Ors. v. A.KM Hassan
Uzzaman & Ors., [ 1985] 4 sec 689 held that the fact that certain claims and                  G
objections are not finally disposed of while preparing the electoral rolls or
even assuming that they are not filed in accordance with law cannot arrest
the process of election to the Legislature. The election has to be held on the
basis of the electoral rolls which are in force on the last date for making
nomination. It is true that Election Commission shall take steps to prepare the               H
    466                     SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2006] SUPP. 7 S.C.R.

A electoral rolls by following due process of law, but that too, should be done
    timely and in no circumstances, it shall be delayed so as to cause gross
    violation of the mandatory provisions contained in Article 243-U of the
    Constitution.

          It is true that there may be certain man-made calamities, such as rioting
B or breakdown of law and order, or natural calamities which could distract the
    authorities from holding elections to the Municipality, but they are exceptional
    circumstances and under no circumstance the Election Commission would be
    justified in delaying the process of election after consulting the State Govt.
    and other authorities. But that should be an exceptional circumstance and
C   shall not be a regular feature to extend the duration of the Municipality. Going
    by the provisions contained in Article 243-U, it is clear that the period of five
    years fixed thereunder to constitute the Municipality is mandatory in nature
    and has to be followed in all respects. It is only when the Municipality is
    dissolved for any other reason and the remainder of the period for which the
    dissolv1:d Municipality would have continued is less than six months, it shall
D   not be necessary to hold any elections for constituting the Municipality for
    such period.

           In our opinion, the entire provision in the Constitution was inserted to
    see that there should not be any delay in the constitution of the new
    Municipality every five years and in order to avoid the mischief of delaying
E   the process of election and allowing the nominated bodies to continue, the
    provisions have been suitably added to the Constitution. In this direction, it
    is necessary for all the State governments to recognize the significance of the
    State Election Commission, which is a constitutional body and it shall abide
    by the directions of the Commission in the same manner in which it follows
F   the directions of the Election Commission of India during the elections for the
    Parliament and State Legislatures. In fact, in the domain of elections to the
    Panchayats and the Municipal bodies under the Part IX and Part IXA for the
    conduct of the elections to these bodies they enjoy the same status as the
    Election Commission of India.

G         In terms of Article 243 K and Article 243ZA (I) the same powers are
    vested in the State Election Commission as the Election Commission of India
    under Article 324. The words in the former provisions are in pari materia with      '
    the latter provision.

          The words, 'superintendence, direction and control' as well as 'conduct
H of elections' have been held in the "broadest of terms" by this Court in
      KISHANSING TOMAR '" MUNI. CORPN. OF THE CITY OF AMEDABAD [BALASUBRAMANYAN, J.]   467

several decisions including in Re: Special Reference No. I of2002 [2002] 8                   A
SCC 237 and Mohinder Singh Gill's case [ 1978] I SCC 405 and the question
is whether this is equally relevant in respect of the powers of the State
Election Commission as well.

      From the reading of the said provisions it is clear that the powers of
the State Election Commission in respect of conduct of elections is no less                  B
than that of the Election Commission of India in their respective domains.
These powers are, of course, subject to the law made by Parliament or by
State Legislatures provided the same do not encroach upon the plenary
powers of the said Election Commissions.

       The State Election Commissions are to function independent of the                     C
concerned State Governments in the matter of their powers of superintendence,
direction and control of all elections and preparation of electoral rolls for, and
the conduct of, all elections to the Panchayats and Municipalities.

       Article 243K(3) also recognizes the independent status of the State                   D
Election Commission. It states that upon a request made in that behalf the
Governor shall make available to the State Election Commission "such staff
as may be necessary for the discharge of the functions conferred on the State
Election Commission by clause (I). It is accordingly to be noted that in the
matter of the conduct of elections, the concerned government shall have to
render full assistance and co-operation to the State Election Commission and                 E
respect the latter's assessment of the needs in order to ensure that free and
fair elections are conducted.

      Also, for the independent and effective functioning of the State Election
Commission, where it feels that it is not receiving the cooperation of the
concerned State Government in discharging its constitutional obligation of                   F
holding the elections to the Panchayats or Municipalities within the time
mandated in the Constitution, it will be open to the State Election Commission
to approach the High Courts, in the first instance, and thereafter the Supreme
Court for a writ of mandamus or such other appropriate writ directing the
concerned State Government to provide all necessary cooperation and                          G
as~istance to the State Election Commission to enable the latter to fulfil the
constitutional mandate.

      Taking into account these factors and applying the principles of golden
rule of interpretation, the object and purpose of Article 243-U is to be carried
                                                                                             H
    468                    SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2006] SUPP. 7 S.C.R.

A out.
          As the elections to the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation have already
    been held and the new Municipal body constituted, no further direction is
    required in the matter. With these observations, we dispose of the appeal with
    no order as to costs.
B
    RP.                                                     Appeal disposed of.


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "Article 243-U"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.