GURMESH PRAKASH BISHNOIversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
- Citation
- 1998 INSC 218
- Decided
- 5 May 1998
- Disposal
- Case Allowed
Holding
A person who has served as both member and Chairman of the HPSC is entitled to a pension for his service as member, subject to the member ceiling, in addition to a pension for his service as Chairman, subject to the chairman ceiling.
Summary
Gurmush Prakash Bishnoj was appointed a member of the Haryana Public Service Commission (HPSC) on 4 March 1980 and served until 28 August 1984, after which he became Chairman of the HPSC until 27 August 1990. He received a pension of Rs.1,800 per month for his service as Chairman and claimed an additional pension for his earlier service as a member. The dispute centered on Regulation 9A(l) of the Haryana Public Service Commission (Conditions of Service) Regulations, 1972, which provides separate pension rates and ceilings for members and chairmen, and on a proviso that bars pension payment for a member while he holds the office of Chairman. The Supreme Court examined whether the appellant could receive two distinct pensions, one for each post, or only a single pension based on his tenure as Chairman. Relying on the wording of the regulation and the proviso, the Court held that the appellant is entitled to a pension for his service as a member (subject to the member ceiling) in addition to the pension for his service as Chairman (subject to the chairman ceiling). Consequently, the appeal was allowed and the High Court’s order was set aside.
Issues considered
- Whether a person who has served both as a member and subsequently as Chairman of the Haryana Public Service Commission is entitled to separate pensions for each period of service or only a pension based on his service as Chairman.
Legislation cited
Subjects
Judgment
A GURMESH PRAKASH BISHNOJ
v.
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
MAY 5, 1998
B [MRS. SUJATA V. MANOHAR AND G.B. PATTANAIK, JJ.]
Haryana Public Service Commission (Condition a/Service) Regulations,
1972: Regulation (A(l)-Proviso.
C Haryana Public Service Commission-Appointment of appellant as
Member-Appointment of appellant-member as Chairman subsequently-
Entitlement to pension-whether on the basis of service as Chairman or also
on the basis of service as member-Held the appellant is entitled to pension
as a member for the sen•ice he rendered as a member prior to his appointment
as Chairman subject to the maximum, as also pension as Chairman of the
D Haryana Public Service Commission calculated on the basis of the period
during which he held ojficP of the Chairman, subject to maximum as laid
down in Regulation 9A.
CIVIL APP ELLA TE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 2723
of 1998.
E
From the Judgment and Order dated 29.8.97 of the Punjab & Haryana
High Court in C.W.P. No. 12291of1997.
B.S. Malik and K.S. Chauhan for the Appellant.
Ms. Nandini Gore and Prem Malhotra for the Respondents.
F The following Order of the Court was delivered :
Special leave granted.
Heard both sides. The appellant was appointed as member of the Haryana
Public Service Commission with effect from 4.3.80. He continued as a member
G of the Haryana Public Service Commission till 28.8.84 when he was appointed
as Chairman of the Haryana Public Service Commission. He continued as a
Chairman of the Haryana Public Service Commission for a period of six years
up to 27.8.90. The appellant was granted pension at the rate of Rs. 1,800 per
month for his services as Chairman of the Haryana Public Service Commission.
H The appellant contends that in addition, he is also entitled to pension
194
G.P. BISHNOlv. STATE 195
for his services as a member of the Haryana Public Service Commission· for A
a period of 4 years, 5 months and 24 days.The relevant Regulation of the
Haryana Government known as the Haryana Public Service Commission
(Conditions of Service) Regulations, 1972 is Regulations 9A(l ). The relevant
portion of Regulations 9A is as follows :
B
9A(l) : "Subject to the provisions of these regulations, every person,
who, on or after the 1st day of November, 1966. Ceases to hold the
office of the Chariman or the Member, shall, with effect from the !st
December, 1973 or the date of his ceasing to hold the office, whichever
is later, be entitled to pension for his life at the rate of two hundred
rupees per month for ea::h completed year of service as the Chariman C
or the Member, as the case may be, rendered after the 31st day of
October, 1966. Subject to a maximum of eight hundred and fifty rupees
and seven hundred and fifty rupees per month respectively;
D
Provided further that no pension shall be payable during the period
for which ................. the Member may, after his retirement as such, hold
office as .................the Chariman ofH.P.S.C. or of any other State Public
Service Commission." E
The quantum of pension has since been revised to Rs. 250 per month
for a member and Rs. 300 per month for the Chairman. The maximum quantum
of pension has also been revised to Rs. 1,800 per month in the case of the
Chairman and Rs. 1,500 per month in the case of a member. The appellant is
entitled to the benefit of the revised amount. F
Under Rule 9A(l) two separate ceilings are provided; one for the pension
of a Chairman and the other for the pension of a member. The question is
whether a person who has acted both as a member and subsequently as a
Chairman, will be entitled to a pension only on the basis of his services as G
a Chairman or whether he will also be entitled to a separate pension 6n the
basis of his services as a member of the Haryana Public Service Commission.
Under the Union Public Service Commission (Members) Regulations 1969,
there is an express provision contained in Explanation (II) to Regulation 9
which provides that when the total service for pension is rendered by a
person, partly as a member and, partly as a Chairman, the pension, partly as H
196 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (1998] 3 S.C.R.
A a member and, partly as a Chairman, the pension admissible to such person
shall be the aggregate of the pension calculated separately for each such term
as a member and as a Chairman. In the Haryana Public Service Commission
(Regulations) 1972 there is no such expres provision. However, the proviso
to Rule 9A throws some light on the manner in which the pension is to be
B calculated. Under the proviso, when a member of the Haryana Public Service
Commission retires as a member, he would be entitled to pension as a
member.However, if he thereafter holds office (inter alia) as the Chairman of
the Haryana Public Service Commission, he will not get any pension during
the period for which he holds office as Chairman. There is an embargo on his
receiving pension as a memt>e .. ,:11ring the period he functions as a Chairman.
C Once he ceases to function as a Chairman the embargo is lifted and he would
be entitled to get pension as a member for the period during which he served
as a member of the Haryana Public Service Commission. This, of course, will
be subject to the ceiling prescribed under Regulation 9A. At the same time
as the Chairman of the Haryana Public Service Commission, for the period of
service rendered by him as Chaimian, he would also get pension at the rate
D prescribed under Regulation 9A subject to the maximum. The appellant is,
therefore, entitled to pension as a member for the service he rendered as a
member prior to his appointment as Chairman subject to the maximum as also
pension as Chairman of the Haryana Public Service Commission calculated on
the basis of the period during which he held office of the Chairman, subject
E to a maximum as laid down in Regulation 9A. The appeal is allowed accordingly.
The impugned order of the High Court is set aside.
T.N.A. Appeal allowed.
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.