Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

BUDHADEV KARMASKARversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

Citation
2011 INSC 536
Decided
2 August 2011
Disposal
Hearing Adjourned

Holding

Sex workers are entitled to life with dignity under Article 21, and the State must enact and fund rehabilitation schemes, including technical and vocational training, to enable their voluntary exit from prostitution.

Summary

The Supreme Court dismissed the criminal appeal of Budhadev Karmaskar, who was convicted of murdering a sex worker, and suo motu converted the matter into a public interest litigation to address the plight of sex workers nationwide. The Court held that sex workers are human beings entitled to life with dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution and that poverty, not choice, drives women into prostitution. It directed the Central and State Governments, through their Social Welfare Departments, to devise and implement rehabilitation schemes providing technical and vocational training, market linkages, and accommodation for sex workers. A panel comprising senior advocates and NGOs was constituted to monitor the implementation and to submit periodic progress reports. The Court further ordered the governments to provide necessary funds and infrastructure to the panel and to ensure voluntary, non‑coercive rehabilitation of willing sex workers.

Issues considered

  • Whether sex workers are entitled to protection under Article 21 of the Constitution.
  • Whether the State is obligated to formulate rehabilitation schemes for sex workers.
  • Whether technical and vocational training can enable sex workers to lead a life of dignity.

Legislation cited

Subjects

Sex workersRight to lifeArticle 21RehabilitationPublic Interest LitigationTechnical vocational trainingHuman dignitySocial welfare

Judgment

                         [2011] 9 S.C.R. 680
                                                                       ...
A                    BUDHADEV KARMASKAR
                                 v.
                     STATE OF WEST BENGAL
                 (Criminal Appeal No. 135 of 2010)
                                                                                   •
                         AUGUST 02, 2011                               ~
B
    [MARKANDEY KATJU AND GYAN SUDHA MISRA, JJ.]

        Public Interest Litigation - Issue as regards the problems
  of sex workers in the country - Held: Sex workers are also
c human beings and thus, are entitled to a life of dignity - Sex
  workers can lead a life of dignity if they earn their livelihood
  through their technical skills instead of selling their bodies -
  Thus, panel consisting of senior advocates and NGO                           •
  constituted by Supreme Court, to monitor rehabilitation of sex
                                                                           ~
D workers - The Secretaries, Social Welfare Departments of the
  State Governments and the Central Government to meet the
  panel constituted to discuss how proper schemes in the spirit
  of the order by this Court can be prepared - Thereafter, the
  State and the Centre to come out with the schemes/
E suggestions    indicating rehabilitation of sex workers, effective
  feedback as regards rehabilitation with a list of sex workers
  willing for rehabilitation - Panel constituted to submit another
  report of the progress made by the next date of hearing -            ,•
  Social welfare - Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 21.
F       CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal
    No. 135 of 2010.

        From the Judgment & Order dated 25.07.2007 of the High
    Court of Calcutta in Criminal Appeal No. 487 of 2004.
G
        P.P. Malhotra, ASG Pradip Ghosh, Jayant Bhushan, T.S.
                                                                       ••
    Doabia, Ashok Bhan, Ratnakar Dash, I. Venkatanarayana, R.
    Sundravaradan, A. Maria;putham, AG, Dr. Manish Singhvi,
    Shail Kr. Dwivedi, Manjit Singh, AAG, Pijush K. Roy, Reena
H                                680
                   BUDHADEV KARMASKAR v. STATE OF WEST                     681
    i ...                       BENGAL
                George, Gautam Talukdar, Lajja Ram, Gaurav Sharma, D.S. A
                Mahra, Sushma Suri, Sadhana Sandhu, Mohd. Khairati, lrshad
                Ahmad, Vijay Verma, Anitha Shenoy, Ashutosh Sharma, Alka
                Sinha, Anuvrat Sharma, D. Mahesh Babu, Ramesk Allanki, V.
~               Pattabhi Ram, Savita Dhanda, Ranjan Mozumbar (for Corporate
          ~
                Law Group) Anil Srivastava, Rituraj Biswas, Gopal Singh, B
                Manish Kumar, Anjani Aiyag·ari, S. wasim A. Quadiri, Anil
                Katiyar, Hemantika vyahi, Suveni Banerjee, Ashwini Kumar,
                Tarjit Singh, Kamal Mohan Gupta, Abhishek Sood, Rohit Kr.
                Singh, Sunil Fernandes, Astha Sharma, P.V. Dinesh, Jogy
                Scaria, Sanjay Kharde (for Asha G. Nair), Kh. No~in Singh, c
                Balaji Srinivasan, Radha Shyam Jena, Kuldip Singh, R.K.
                Pandey, H.S. Sandhu, K.K. Pandey, Mohit Mudgil, Aruna
                Mathur, Avneesh Arputham, Yusuf Khan, Megha Gaur,
    ·~
                Arputham Aruna & Co., Aniruddha P. Mayee, Abhijit Sengupta,
          ":    B.P. Yadav, Anima Kujur, Anil K. Jha, Dharmendra Kr. Sinha, D
                Chhaya Kumari, V.G. Pragasam, S.J. Aristotle, Prabu
                 Ramasubramanian, Savita Singh, Anand Grover, Tripti Tandon,
                Shivangi Rai, Amritananda Chakraborty, Shefali Malhotra,
                 Prakash Kumar Singh, Ravi Kant, A. Subhashini, Aishwarya
                Bhati, C.D. Singh, K.N. Madhusoodhanan, M.T. George,
                                                                              E
                Subramonium Prasad, Sunil Kumar, Singh, Mukti Singh,
                Jatinder Kr. Bhatia, Manpreet Sing Doabia, Kiran Bhardwaj,
          ,~,
                 Edward Belho, A. Athuimei R. Naga, K. lnatoli Serna, Nimshim
     :r         Voshum, Ranjan Mukherjee for the appearing parties.
                     The following order of the Court was delivered                F
                                            ORDER
                     "Pinha tha daam-e-sakht qareeb aashiyaan ke
         \           Udhne hi na paaye the ki giraftaar hum hue"
                                                                                   G
                                                                 Mirza Ghalib

                    1. This exercise was initiated by us by our order dated 14th
                February 2011. By that order we dismissed the appeal of the
                appellant, who was convicted for murdering a sex worker in a
                                                                                   H
    682       SUPREME COURT REPORTS               [20111 9 S.C.R.
                                                                      .... '
A red light area in Kolkata by battering her head repeatedly
  against the wall and the floor of a room. Having dismissed the
  appeal we suo motu converted the case into a PIL by the same
  order in order to address the problems of sex workers in the
  country.                                                                     •
B                                                                     •
          2. In our order dated 14th February, 2011 we observed:

              "This is a case of brutal murder of a sex worker. Sex
       workers are also human beings and no one has a right to
       assault or murder them. A person becomes a prostitute
c      not because she enjoys it but because of poverty. Society
       must have sympathy towards the sex workers and must not
       look down upon them. They are also entitled to a life of
       dignity in view of Article 21 of the Constitution.                  •
D            In the novels and stories of the great Bengali writer
       Sharat Chandra Chattopadhyaya, many prostitutes have
       been sh.own to be women of very high character, e.g.,
       Rajyalakshmi in '.Shrikant', Chandramukhi in 'Devdas', etc.

             The plight of prostitutes has been depicted by the
E      great Urdu poet Sahil Ludhianvi in his poem 'Chakle' which
       has been sung in the Hindi film Pyasa "Jineh Naaz Hai Hind
       Par wo kahan hain" (simplified version of the verse 'Sana       ,
       Khwan-e-taqdees-e-Mashrik Kahan Hain').

F            We may also refer to the character Sonya
       Marmelodova in Dostoyevsky's famous novel 'Crime and
       Punishment'. Sonya is depicted as a girl who sacrifices
       her body to earn some bread for her impoverished family.
            Reference may also be made to Amrapali, who was
G      a contemporary of Lord Buddha".
                                                                      •>
       3. We further observed :
             "Although we have dismissed this Appeal, we
H      strongly feel that the Central and the State Governments
                                                                         ,.
                BUDHADEV KARMASKAR v. STATE OF WEST                           683
~     :..                    BENGAL

                 through Social Welfare Boards should prepare schemes               A
                 for rehabilitation all over the country for physically and
                 sexually abused women commonly known as prostitutes
                 as we are of the view that the prostitutes also have a right
                 to live with dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution of
      ;
                 India since they are also human beings and their problems          B
                 also need to be addressed.

                         As already observed by us, a woman is compelled
                 to indulge in prostitution not for pleasure but because of
                 abject poverty. If such a woman is granted opportunity to
                 avail some technical or vocational training, she would be          c
                 able to earn her livelihood by such vocational training and
                 skill instead of by selling her body.
•
                        Hence, we direct the Central and the State
    "            Governments to prepare schemes for giving technical/               D
                 vocational training to sex workers and sexually abused
                 women in all cities in India. The schemes should mention
                 in detail who will give the technical/vocational training and
                 in what manner they can be rehabilitated and settled by
                 offering them employment. For instance, if a technical             E
                 training is for some craft like sewing garments, etc. then
                 some arrangements should also be made for providing a
,,,. ....        market for such garments, otherwise they will remain
                 unsold and unused, and consequently the woman will not
                 be able to feed herself.                                           F
                  4. Subsequently by another order we constituted a panel
            headed by Mr. Pradip Ghosh, Senior Advocate as the
            Chairman and including Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Senior Advocate,
            Durbar Mahila Samanwaya Committee (DMSC), Usha
    .....                                                                           G
            Multipurpose Cooperative Society (UMCS) and Roshni through
            its founder Ms. S~ima Hasan. We also directed the Central
            Government to provide some accommodation as well as
            infrastructure, staff etc. to the panel, and grant it adequate funds.

                 5. Today, an interim report has been submitted to us by            H
     684       SUPREME COURT REPORTS                   [2011] 9 S.C.R.
                                                                           ....
 A the panel stating that the panel held its first meeting on 25th
   July, 2011 at 04.30 P.M. and discussed various aspects of the
   problems relating to sex workers. The report shall be taken on
   record.

          6. We have perused the report. It shows that the panel has
 B
     set about the task assigned to it in right earnest.

           7. The report has prayed for directions to the Central
      Government to make necessary funds available for holding
     workshops/meetings to be attended by experts, resource
 c persons, organizations etc. who may be invited by the panel
   . for this purpose and to arrange their travel by air/rail to and fro
      Delhi, and also to make suitable arrangements for their
     accommodation etc. Funds may also be made available to the                      ~



     panel so that the members can educate the concerned people
·D and also to visit other three metropolitan cities i.e. Kolkata,
                                                                            .
     Mumbai and Chennai and also oth3r cities/towns. Funds are
     also required for advertisements in newspapers and T.V.
     inviting responses from social organizations and interested
     individuals who may send their suggestions/comments and also
 E   for  the purpose of printing and publications, as may be
     necessary.

        8. We direct the Central and the State Governments to
   provide funds as prayed for by the panel in its report after                 'I

   discussions with the Chairman of the panel Mr. Pradip Ghosh,
 F Senior Advocate and other members.

       9. In paragraph 1Oof the report it has been stated that the
  Central Government has assured that they will arrange a place
  for the meetings of the Panel with necessary infrastructure,
G computer, staff etc. The Central Government should also look             •'
  around for a permanent office accommodation for the panel as
  that will be necessary sooner or later for the proper functioning
  of the Panel.

H        10. We have noted that some of the members of the panel
                                                                                     ...
                         BUDHADEV KARMASKAR v. STATE OF WEST                           685
       ,.        )>
                                      BENGAL
                      are from Kolkata and Delhi, but there is no representation from A
                      Mumbai and Chennai. Since we had directed that we shall first
4"                    take up the problems of sex workers in the four metropolitan
:\                    cities, i.e. Delhi, Kolkata, Mumbai and Chennai, we suggest to
                      the Chairman of the panel to co-opt some suitable NGOs/social
                 1
                      activists from Mumbai and Chennai also in this connection.      8
                            11. We again reiterate that this exercise is because we
                      are of the opinion that sex workers are also human beings and
                      hence they are entitled to a life of dignity. It has been well-settled
                      by a series of decisions of this Court that the word 'life' in
                      Article 21 of the Constitution means a life of dignity and not just      c
                      an animal life: We are of the opinion that sex workers obviously
      ,.              cannot lead a life of dignity as long as they remain sex workers.

                           12. Sex among human beings is different from sex among
               "      animals. Sex in humans has a cultural aspect to it also, and is D
                      not just a physical act. A sex worker who has to surrender her
                      body to a man for money obviously is not leading a life of dignity.
                      Ordinarily; no woman will willingly surrender her body to a man
                      unless she loves and respects him. A sex worker is obviously
                      not surrendering her body to a man because she loves and E
                      respect him, but just for sheer survival. As Nancy says in
                      Charles Dicken's novel 'Oliver Twist', "you adapt or you die" .
                                                                   \
      .¥""
                           13. Apart from that, sex workers are always in danger of
                      getting sexually transmitted diseases (STD), and they are often
                      abused and beaten by the proprietors of the brothel and others F
                      who give them a pittance out of her earnings. A woman
                      becomes a sex worker not because she enjoys it but due to
                      abject poverty. One estimate suggests that there are 3 million
           i
               '..4
                      sex workers in India, many even from Nepal, Bangaldesh, and
                      even the former Soviet Union. This is due to massive poverty G
                      in the country, and abroad.
                           14. Our effort in this exercise is to educate the public and
                      inform them that sex workers are not bad persons, but they are
                      unfortunate girls who have been forced to go into this flesh trade H
...
    686      SUPREME COURT REPORTS                 [2011] 9 S.C.R.
                                                                       ~       .
A due to terrible poverty. Hence society should not look down upon
  the sex workers but should have sympathy with them. In fact, in
  the novels of the great Bengali writer Sharat Chandra
  Chattopadhayay it has been shown that many of the sex
  workers were women of very high character, e.g. Rajyalakshmi,
B Chandramukhi, etc. and the same has been shown in the novels
  of many European writers. The Russian writer Dostoyevsky's
  novel 'Crime & Punishment' has shown Sonia Marmeladova as
  a woman of high character who became a sex worker to feed
  her starving family. Similarly, in Charles Dicken's novel 'Oliver
c Twist', the sex worker Nancy is shown to be a girl of high
  character who sacrifices her life to save Oliver. In Victor Hugo's
  famous novel 'Les Miserables', Fantine sacrifices her hair and
  teeth to provide for her daughter Cosette. Martha in 'David
  Copperfield' is also depicted as a woman of noble heart.
                                                                               •
                                                                        •·
D         15. We are of the opinion that if sex workers are given
    proper technical training they will be able to come out of sex
    work and instead earn their livelihood through their technical
    skills instead of by selling their bodies. That will enable them
    to live a life of dignity.
E
          16. An impleadment application praying for impleadment
    in this case has been filed. We are of the opinion that instead
    of applying for impleadment in this case, the applicant should     . '\
    approach the Panel constituted by us and give whatever
F   assistance the applicant wishes to give to the Panel. With these
    observations, the impleadment application is disposed of.

       17. Learned counsel appearing for the State of
  Uttarakhand has stated that he will file a comprehensive
  affidavit on behalf of the State within two weeks. He may do             ~

G so.                                                                  •

       18. We may mention here that we are not satisfied with
  the affidavits already filed by the State Governments before us.
  Their contents are vague and too general. We had expected
H the State Governments to come forward with specific schemes
                    BUDHADEV KARMASKAR v. STATE OF WEST                         687
                                 BENGAL

       ~ ).
                 for giving technical training to sex workers but that has not been A
                 done. Hence, we direct that the Secretaries, Social Welfare·
                 Departments of the State Governments and the Central
                 Government to meet the Panel constituted by us whenever the
                 Chairman of the Panel so desires so as to discuss how proper
:i.              schemes in the spirit of our orders can be prepared.               B
             1        19. We are of the opinion that the States should not only
                 come out with schemes indicating therein rehabilitation of the
                 sex workers but they should also demonstrate their commitment
                 to the cause by coming out with some concrete results, at least
                 in phases. So by the next date we expect the State counsels            c
                 to come out with some effective feedback whether at least a
                 few sex workers have been offered any alternative employment,
                 in case they were willing for rehabilitation. We also leave it to
                 the Chairman of the Panel constituted by us to come out with
      '!'        some suggestions in what way the sex workers through the               D
            ..   State Governments and the metro cities can come out with
                 effective results in this regard and by w~y of illustration at least
                 they must come out with report of rehabilitation of at least some
                 of the sex workers in each of the States. We make it clear that
                 any rehabilitation of the sex workers will not be coercive in any      E
                 manner and it shall be voluntary on the part of the sex workers.

                       20. The Chairman of the Panel with the assistance of the
                 NGOs can provide a list by the next date at least of those sex
        ,.....   workers who are living under dire circumstances and are willing        F
                 for rehabilitation. We are informed that some of the NGOs have
                 a list of figures and localities of such sex workers who are
                 immediately willing for rehabilitation and want to get out of the
                 flesh trade.
                      21. We are fully conscious of the fact that simply by our         G
                 orders the sex workers in our country will not be rehabilitated
            \1   immediately. It will take .a long time, but we have to work
                 patiently in this direction. What we have done in this case is
                 to present the situation of sex workers in the country in the
                                                                                        H
   688      SUPREME COURT REPORTS                 [2011] 9 S.C.R.


A correct light, so as to educate the public. It is ultimately the
  people of the country, particularly the young people, who by
  their idealism and patriotism can solve the massive problems
  of sex workers. We, therefore, particularly appeal to the youth
  of the country to contact the members of the panel and to
B offer their services in a manner which the panel may require
  so that the sex workers can be uplifted from their present
  degraded condition. They may contact the panel at the email
  address: panelonsexworkers@gmail.com.

       22. List the case again before this Bench on 24.08.2011
C at 10.30 a.m. by which date the Panel appointed by us should
  submit another report of the progress made.

   N.J.                                         Matter adjourned.
                                                                         ..




                                                                     .
                                                                     . '


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "Sex workers"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.